1
|
Bahl A, Halappanavar S, Wohlleben W, Nymark P, Kohonen P, Wallin H, Vogel U, Haase A. Bioinformatics and machine learning to support nanomaterial grouping. Nanotoxicology 2024; 18:373-400. [PMID: 38949108 DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2024.2368005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Nanomaterials (NMs) offer plenty of novel functionalities. Moreover, their physicochemical properties can be fine-tuned to meet the needs of specific applications, leading to virtually unlimited numbers of NM variants. Hence, efficient hazard and risk assessment strategies building on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) become indispensable. Indeed, the design, the development and implementation of NAMs has been a major topic in a substantial number of research projects. One of the promising strategies that can help to deal with the high number of NMs variants is grouping and read-across. Based on demonstrated structural and physicochemical similarity, NMs can be grouped and assessed together. Within an established NM group, read-across may be performed to fill in data gaps for data-poor variants using existing data for NMs within the group. Establishing a group requires a sound justification, usually based on a grouping hypothesis that links specific physicochemical properties to well-defined hazard endpoints. However, for NMs these interrelationships are only beginning to be understood. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the power of bioinformatics with a specific focus on Machine Learning (ML) approaches to unravel the NM Modes-of-Action (MoA) and identify the properties that are relevant to specific hazards, in support of grouping strategies. This review emphasizes the following messages: 1) ML supports identification of the most relevant properties contributing to specific hazards; 2) ML supports analysis of large omics datasets and identification of MoA patterns in support of hypothesis formulation in grouping approaches; 3) omics approaches are useful for shifting away from consideration of single endpoints towards a more mechanistic understanding across multiple endpoints gained from one experiment; and 4) approaches from other fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) like Natural Language Processing or image analysis may support automated extraction and interlinkage of information related to NM toxicity. Here, existing ML models for predicting NM toxicity and for analyzing omics data in support of NM grouping are reviewed. Various challenges related to building robust models in the field of nanotoxicology exist and are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Bahl
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabina Halappanavar
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Wendel Wohlleben
- BASF SE, Department Analytical and Material Science and Department Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Penny Nymark
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Håkan Wallin
- Department of Chemical and Biological Risk Factors, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Public Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulla Vogel
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrea Haase
- Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
del Giudice G, Migliaccio G, D’Alessandro N, Saarimäki LA, Torres Maia M, Annala ME, Leppänen J, Mӧbus L, Pavel A, Vaani M, Vallius A, Ylä‐Outinen L, Greco D, Serra A. Advancing chemical safety assessment through an omics-based characterization of the test system-chemical interaction. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY 2023; 5:1294780. [PMID: 38026842 PMCID: PMC10673692 DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1294780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Assessing chemical safety is essential to evaluate the potential risks of chemical exposure to human health and the environment. Traditional methods relying on animal testing are being replaced by 3R (reduction, refinement, and replacement) principle-based alternatives, mainly depending on in vitro test methods and the Adverse Outcome Pathway framework. However, these approaches often focus on the properties of the compound, missing the broader chemical-biological interaction perspective. Currently, the lack of comprehensive molecular characterization of the in vitro test system results in limited real-world representation and contextualization of the toxicological effect under study. Leveraging omics data strengthens the understanding of the responses of different biological systems, emphasizing holistic chemical-biological interactions when developing in vitro methods. Here, we discuss the relevance of meticulous test system characterization on two safety assessment relevant scenarios and how omics-based, data-driven approaches can improve the future generation of alternative methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giusy del Giudice
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Giorgia Migliaccio
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Nicoletta D’Alessandro
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marcella Torres Maia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maria Emilia Annala
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jenni Leppänen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Lena Mӧbus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maaret Vaani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anna Vallius
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura Ylä‐Outinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Unit, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Tampere Institute for Advanced Study, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saarimäki LA, Fratello M, Pavel A, Korpilähde S, Leppänen J, Serra A, Greco D. A curated gene and biological system annotation of adverse outcome pathways related to human health. Sci Data 2023; 10:409. [PMID: 37355733 PMCID: PMC10290716 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02321-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are emerging as a central framework in modern toxicology and other fields in biomedicine. They serve as an extension of pathway-based concepts by depicting biological mechanisms as causally linked sequences of key events (KEs) from a molecular initiating event (MIE) to an adverse outcome. AOPs guide the use and development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) aimed at reducing animal experimentation. While AOPs model the systemic mechanisms at various levels of biological organisation, toxicogenomics provides the means to study the molecular mechanisms of chemical exposures. Systematic integration of these two concepts would improve the application of AOP-based knowledge while also supporting the interpretation of complex omics data. Hence, we established this link through rigorous curation of molecular annotations for the KEs of human relevant AOPs. We further expanded and consolidated the annotations of the biological context of KEs. These curated annotations pave the way to embed AOPs in molecular data interpretation, facilitating the emergence of new knowledge in biomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Seela Korpilähde
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jenni Leppänen
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Institute for Advanced Study, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Q, Zhao Q, Guo J, Li X, Song J. Transcriptomic Analysis of Diethylstilbestrol in Daphnia Magna: Energy Metabolism and Growth Inhibition. TOXICS 2023; 11:197. [PMID: 36851071 PMCID: PMC9962875 DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
With the widespread use of diethylstilbestrol (DES), it has become a common contaminant in the aquatic environment. It is toxic to a wide range of aquatic organisms, disrupting the water flea growth and further interfering with several ecosystem services. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism of DES in water fleas is still unexplicit. In this study, the 21-day chronic test showed that a negative effect of growth and reproduction can be observed with DES exposure. Subsequently applied transcriptomic analysis illustrated the molecular mechanism in mode freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna (D. magna) exposed to 2, 200, and 1000 μg·L-1 of DES for 9 days. Meanwhile, exposure to DES at 200 and 1000 μg·L-1 significantly restrains the growth (body length) and reproduction (first spawning time) of D. magna. Identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are majorly enriched relative to energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, the digestive system, transport and catabolism pathways which were remarkably changed. These repressed and up-regulated pathways, in relation to energy synthesis and metabolism, may be the reasons for the reduced body length and delayed first spawning time. Taken together, this study revealed that DES is a threat to D. magna in the aquatic environment and clarifies the molecular mechanism of the toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Li
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-135-7200-0931
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saarimäki LA, Morikka J, Pavel A, Korpilähde S, del Giudice G, Federico A, Fratello M, Serra A, Greco D. Toxicogenomics Data for Chemical Safety Assessment and Development of New Approach Methodologies: An Adverse Outcome Pathway-Based Approach. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 10:e2203984. [PMID: 36479815 PMCID: PMC9839874 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202203984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Mechanistic toxicology provides a powerful approach to inform on the safety of chemicals and the development of safe-by-design compounds. Although toxicogenomics supports mechanistic evaluation of chemical exposures, its implementation into the regulatory framework is hindered by uncertainties in the analysis and interpretation of such data. The use of mechanistic evidence through the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept is promoted for the development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) that can reduce animal experimentation. However, to unleash the full potential of AOPs and build confidence into toxicogenomics, robust associations between AOPs and patterns of molecular alteration need to be established. Systematic curation of molecular events to AOPs will create the much-needed link between toxicogenomics and systemic mechanisms depicted by the AOPs. This, in turn, will introduce novel ways of benefitting from the AOPs, including predictive models and targeted assays, while also reducing the need for multiple testing strategies. Hence, a multi-step strategy to annotate AOPs is developed, and the resulting associations are applied to successfully highlight relevant adverse outcomes for chemical exposures with strong in vitro and in vivo convergence, supporting chemical grouping and other data-driven approaches. Finally, a panel of AOP-derived in vitro biomarkers for pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is identified and experimentally validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Jack Morikka
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Seela Korpilähde
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Giusy del Giudice
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
- Tampere Institute for Advanced StudyTampere UniversityKalevantie 4Tampere33100Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE)Faculty of Medicine and Health TechnologyTampere UniversityArvo Ylpön katu 34Tampere33520Finland
- Institute of BiotechnologyUniversity of HelsinkiP.O.Box 56HelsinkiUusimaa00014Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Data-driven analysis and druggability assessment methods to accelerate the identification of novel cancer targets. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 21:46-57. [PMID: 36514341 PMCID: PMC9732000 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past few decades, drug discovery has greatly improved the outcomes for patients, but several challenges continue to hinder the rapid development of novel drugs. Addressing unmet clinical needs requires the pursuit of drug targets that have a higher likelihood to lead to the development of successful drugs. Here we describe a bioinformatic approach for identifying novel cancer drug targets by performing statistical analysis to ascertain quantitative changes in expression levels between protein-coding genes, as well as co-expression networks to classify these genes into groups. Subsequently, we provide an overview of druggability assessment methodologies to prioritize and select the best targets to pursue.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nguyen N, Jennen D, Kleinjans J. Omics technologies to understand drug toxicity mechanisms. Drug Discov Today 2022; 27:103348. [PMID: 36089240 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Drug side effects are an important study subject in pharmacology. Recent omics technologies provide a range of omics data and help to understand the biological mechanisms involved in drug effects. These modern technologies provide significant support to all biological disciplines, including drug toxicology. In this review, we provide an overview the use of omics applications to understand drug side effects at the molecular level. We discuss by available omics technologies, their possible uses, as well as their advantages and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhan Nguyen
- Department of Toxicogenomics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229ER, the Netherlands
| | - Danyel Jennen
- Department of Toxicogenomics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229ER, the Netherlands.
| | - Jos Kleinjans
- Department of Toxicogenomics, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229ER, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pavel A, Saarimäki LA, Möbus L, Federico A, Serra A, Greco D. The potential of a data centred approach & knowledge graph data representation in chemical safety and drug design. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:4837-4849. [PMID: 36147662 PMCID: PMC9464643 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Big Data pervades nearly all areas of life sciences, yet the analysis of large integrated data sets remains a major challenge. Moreover, the field of life sciences is highly fragmented and, consequently, so is its data, knowledge, and standards. This, in turn, makes integrated data analysis and knowledge gathering across sub-fields a demanding task. At the same time, the integration of various research angles and data types is crucial for modelling the complexity of organisms and biological processes in a holistic manner. This is especially valid in the context of drug development and chemical safety assessment where computational methods can provide solutions for the urgent need of fast, effective, and sustainable approaches. At the same time, such computational methods require the development of methodologies suitable for an integrated and data centred Big Data view. Here we discuss Knowledge Graphs (KG) as a solution to a data centred analysis approach for drug and chemical development and safety assessment. KGs are knowledge bases, data analysis engines, and knowledge discovery systems all in one, allowing them to be used from simple data retrieval, over meta-analysis to complex predictive and knowledge discovery systems. Therefore, KGs have immense potential to advance the data centred approach, the re-usability, and informativity of data. Furthermore, they can improve the power of analysis, and the complexity of modelled processes, all while providing knowledge in a natively human understandable network data model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura A Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Lena Möbus
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland.,Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Serra A, del Giudice G, Kinaret PAS, Saarimäki LA, Poulsen SS, Fortino V, Halappanavar S, Vogel U, Greco D. Characterization of ENM Dynamic Dose-Dependent MOA in Lung with Respect to Immune Cells Infiltration. NANOMATERIALS 2022; 12:nano12122031. [PMID: 35745370 PMCID: PMC9228743 DOI: 10.3390/nano12122031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The molecular effects of exposures to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are still largely unknown. In classical inhalation toxicology, cell composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a toxicity indicator at the lung tissue level that can aid in interpreting pulmonary histological changes. Toxicogenomic approaches help characterize the mechanism of action (MOA) of ENMs by investigating the differentially expressed genes (DEG). However, dissecting which molecular mechanisms and events are directly induced by the exposure is not straightforward. It is now generally accepted that direct effects follow a monotonic dose-dependent pattern. Here, we applied an integrated modeling approach to study the MOA of four ENMs by retrieving the DEGs that also show a dynamic dose-dependent profile (dddtMOA). We further combined the information of the dddtMOA with the dose dependency of four immune cell populations derived from BAL counts. The dddtMOA analysis highlighted the specific adaptation pattern to each ENM. Furthermore, it revealed the distinct effect of the ENM physicochemical properties on the induced immune response. Finally, we report three genes dose-dependent in all the exposures and correlated with immune deregulation in the lung. The characterization of dddtMOA for ENM exposures, both for apical endpoints and molecular responses, can further promote toxicogenomic approaches in a regulatory context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (G.d.G.); (L.A.S.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Giusy del Giudice
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (G.d.G.); (L.A.S.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (G.d.G.); (L.A.S.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah Søs Poulsen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (S.S.P.); (U.V.)
| | - Vittorio Fortino
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland;
| | - Sabina Halappanavar
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada;
| | - Ulla Vogel
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (S.S.P.); (U.V.)
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (G.d.G.); (L.A.S.)
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haimbaugh A, Meyer D, Akemann C, Gurdziel K, Baker TR. Comparative Toxicotranscriptomics of Single Cell RNA-Seq and Conventional RNA-Seq in TCDD-Exposed Testicular Tissue. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY 2022; 4:821116. [PMID: 35615540 PMCID: PMC9126299 DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2022.821116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In this report, we compare the outcomes and limitations of two methods of transcriptomic inquiry on adult zebrafish testes exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) during sexual differentiation: conventional or bulk RNA-seq (bulk-seq) and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. scRNA-seq has emerged as a valuable tool for uncovering cell type-specific transcriptome dynamics which exist in heterogeneous tissue. Our lab previously showed the toxicological value of the scRNA-seq pipeline to characterize the sequelae of TCDD exposure in testes, demonstrating that loss of spermatids and spermatozoa, but not other cell types, contributed to the pathology of infertility in adult male zebrafish exposed during sexual differentiation. To investigate the potential for technical artifacts in scRNA-seq such as cell dissociation effects and reduced transcriptome coverage, we compared bulk-sequenced and scRNA-seq-paired samples from control and TCDD-exposed samples to understand what is gained and lost in scRNA-seq vs bulk-seq, both transcriptomically and toxicologically. We hypothesized that the testes may be sensitive to tissue disruption as they contain multiple cell types under constant division and/or maturation, and that TCDD exposure may mediate the extent of sensitivity. Thus, we sought to understand the extent to which this dissociation impacts the toxicological value of data returned from scRNA-seq. We confirm that the required dissociation of individual cells from intact tissue has a significant impact on gene expression, affecting gene pathways with the potential to confound toxicogenomics studies on exposures if findings are not well-controlled and well-situated in context. Additionally, a common scRNA-seq method using cDNA amplified from the 3' end of mRNA under-detects low-expressing transcripts including transcription factors. We confirm this, and show TCDD-related genes may be overlooked by scRNA-seq, however, this under-detection effect is not mediated by TCDD exposure. Even so, scRNA-seq generally extracted toxicologically relevant information better than the bulk-seq method in the present study. This report aims to inform future experimental design for transcriptomic investigation in the growing field of toxicogenomics by demonstrating the differential information extracted from sequencing cells-despite being from the same tissue and exposure scheme-is influenced by the specific protocol used, with implications for the interpretation of exposure-induced risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Haimbaugh
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Danielle Meyer
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Camille Akemann
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Katherine Gurdziel
- Genome Sciences Core, Office of the Vice President for Research, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Tracie R. Baker
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Serra A, Saarimäki LA, Pavel A, del Giudice G, Fratello M, Cattelani L, Federico A, Laurino O, Marwah VS, Fortino V, Scala G, Sofia Kinaret PA, Greco D. Nextcast: A software suite to analyse and model toxicogenomics data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:1413-1426. [PMID: 35386103 PMCID: PMC8956870 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent advancements in toxicogenomics have led to the availability of large omics data sets, representing the starting point for studying the exposure mechanism of action and identifying candidate biomarkers for toxicity prediction. The current lack of standard methods in data generation and analysis hampers the full exploitation of toxicogenomics-based evidence in regulatory risk assessment. Moreover, the pipelines for the preprocessing and downstream analyses of toxicogenomic data sets can be quite challenging to implement. During the years, we have developed a number of software packages to address specific questions related to multiple steps of toxicogenomics data analysis and modelling. In this review we present the Nextcast software collection and discuss how its individual tools can be combined into efficient pipelines to answer specific biological questions. Nextcast components are of great support to the scientific community for analysing and interpreting large data sets for the toxicity evaluation of compounds in an unbiased, straightforward, and reliable manner. The Nextcast software suite is available at: ( https://github.com/fhaive/nextcast).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Giusy del Giudice
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Veer Singh Marwah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vittorio Fortino
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Giovanni Scala
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jin Y, Qi G, Shou Y, Li D, Liu Y, Guan H, Zhang Q, Chen S, Luo J, Xu L, Li C, Ma W, Chen N, Zheng Y, Yu D. High throughput data-based, toxicity pathway-oriented development of a quantitative adverse outcome pathway network linking AHR activation to lung damages. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2022; 425:128041. [PMID: 34906874 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) is proposed to inform dose-responses at multiple biological levels for the purpose of toxicity prediction. So far, qAOP models concerning human health are scarce. Previously, we proposed 5 key molecular pathways that led aryl hydrogen receptor (AHR) activation to lung damages. The present study assembled an AOP network based on the gene expression signatures of these toxicity pathways, and validated the network using publicly available high throughput data combined with machine learning models. In addition, the AOP network was quantitatively evaluated with omics approaches and bioassays, using 16HBE-CYP1A1 cells exposed to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), a prototypical AHR activator. Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis of transcriptomics revealed that AHR gene held the lowest BMD value, whereas AHR pathway held the lowest point of departure (PoD) compared to the other 4 pathways. Targeted bioassays were further performed to quantitatively understand the cellular responses, including ROS generation, DNA damage, interleukin-6 production, and extracellular matrix increase marked by collagen expression. Eventually, response-response relationships were plotted using nonlinear model fitting. The present study developed a highly reliable AOP model concerning human health, and validated as well as quantitatively evaluated it, and such a method is likely to be adoptable for risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Jin
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Guangshuai Qi
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yingqing Shou
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Daochuan Li
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuzhen Liu
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Heyuan Guan
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Qianqian Zhang
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Shen Chen
- School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiao Luo
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Lin Xu
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Chuanhai Li
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Wanli Ma
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Ningning Chen
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yuxin Zheng
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Dianke Yu
- School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qi Q, Li Q, Li J, Mo J, Tian Y, Guo J. Transcriptomic analysis and transgenerational effects of ZnO nanoparticles on Daphnia magna: Endocrine-disrupting potential and energy metabolism. CHEMOSPHERE 2022; 290:133362. [PMID: 34933032 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The widespread application of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) has raised concerns over the adverse effects on aquatic species. In this study, transcriptomic analysis was applied to evaluate the chronic toxicity of ZnO NPs on the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna and the intergenerational effects were then further investigated. Parent daphnia (F0) were exposed to ZnO NPs at 3, 60, and 300 μg L-1 for 21 days. ZnO NPs significantly inhibited the reproduction (first pregnancy and spawning time, total number of offspring) and growth (molting frequency and body length) of F0. Here, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in lysosomal and phagosome, energy metabolism and endocrine disruption pathways were significantly downregulated. Furthermore, disruption on the transport and catabolic processes probably resulted in the particle accumulation. The inhibited pathways related to energy metabolism may partially account for the body length, molting and reproductive restriction. The suppression of growth and reproduction may attribute to the down-regulation of insulin secretion and ovarian steroidogenesis pathways, respectively. Partial recovery of growth and reproductive inhibition in F1 - F3 descended from the F0 generation exposure did not support constant transgenerational effects. This study unravels the molecular mechanisms and transgenerational consequences of the toxicity of nanoparticles on Daphnia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianju Qi
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China
| | - Qi Li
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China
| | - Jing Li
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China
| | - Jiezhang Mo
- State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution and Department of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yulu Tian
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China
| | - Jiahua Guo
- Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
DNA microarrays are widely used to investigate gene expression. Even though the classical analysis of microarray data is based on the study of differentially expressed genes, it is well known that genes do not act individually. Network analysis can be applied to study association patterns of the genes in a biological system. Moreover, it finds wide application in differential coexpression analysis between different systems. Network based coexpression studies have for example been used in (complex) disease gene prioritization, disease subtyping, and patient stratification.In this chapter we provide an overview of the methods and tools used to create networks from microarray data and describe multiple methods on how to analyze a single network or a group of networks. The described methods range from topological metrics, functional group identification to data integration strategies, topological pathway analysis as well as graphical models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology , University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Federico A, Saarimäki LA, Serra A, Del Giudice G, Kinaret PAS, Scala G, Greco D. Microarray Data Preprocessing: From Experimental Design to Differential Analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2401:79-100. [PMID: 34902124 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1839-4_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
DNA microarray data preprocessing is of utmost importance in the analytical path starting from the experimental design and leading to a reliable biological interpretation. In fact, when all relevant aspects regarding the experimental plan have been considered, the following steps from data quality check to differential analysis will lead to robust, trustworthy results. In this chapter, all the relevant aspects and considerations about microarray preprocessing will be discussed. Preprocessing steps are organized in an orderly manner, from experimental design to quality check and batch effect removal, including the most common visualization methods. Furthermore, we will discuss data representation and differential testing methods with a focus on the most common microarray technologies, such as gene expression and DNA methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Giusy Del Giudice
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology,, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Giovanni Scala
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology,, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saarimäki LA, Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Lynch I, Greco D. Prospects and challenges for FAIR toxicogenomics data. NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY 2022; 17:17-18. [PMID: 34949777 DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-01049-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Saarimäki
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | | | | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dario Greco
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fratello M, Cattelani L, Federico A, Pavel A, Scala G, Serra A, Greco D. Unsupervised Algorithms for Microarray Sample Stratification. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2401:121-146. [PMID: 34902126 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1839-4_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The amount of data made available by microarrays gives researchers the opportunity to delve into the complexity of biological systems. However, the noisy and extremely high-dimensional nature of this kind of data poses significant challenges. Microarrays allow for the parallel measurement of thousands of molecular objects spanning different layers of interactions. In order to be able to discover hidden patterns, the most disparate analytical techniques have been proposed. Here, we describe the basic methodologies to approach the analysis of microarray datasets that focus on the task of (sub)group discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Alisa Pavel
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Giovanni Scala
- Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ventura C, Torres V, Vieira L, Gomes B, Rodrigues AS, Rueff J, Penque D, Silva MJ. New “Omics” Approaches as Tools to Explore Mechanistic Nanotoxicology. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1357:179-194. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88071-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
19
|
Serra A, Cattelani L, Fratello M, Fortino V, Kinaret PAS, Greco D. Supervised Methods for Biomarker Detection from Microarray Experiments. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2401:101-120. [PMID: 34902125 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1839-4_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Biomarkers are valuable indicators of the state of a biological system. Microarray technology has been extensively used to identify biomarkers and build computational predictive models for disease prognosis, drug sensitivity and toxicity evaluations. Activation biomarkers can be used to understand the underlying signaling cascades, mechanisms of action and biological cross talk. Biomarker detection from microarray data requires several considerations both from the biological and computational points of view. In this chapter, we describe the main methodology used in biomarkers discovery and predictive modeling and we address some of the related challenges. Moreover, we discuss biomarker validation and give some insights into multiomics strategies for biomarker detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Luca Cattelani
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vittorio Fortino
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Finnish Hub for Development and Validation of Integrated Approaches (FHAIVE), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grafström R, Haase A, Kohonen P, Jeliazkova N, Nymark P. Reply to: Prospects and challenges for FAIR toxicogenomics data. NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY 2022; 17:19-20. [PMID: 34949776 DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-01050-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Grafström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Turku, Finland
| | - Andrea Haase
- German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pekka Kohonen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Toxicology, Misvik Biology, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Penny Nymark
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Analysis of Nanotoxicity with Integrated Omics and Mechanobiology. NANOMATERIALS 2021; 11:nano11092385. [PMID: 34578701 PMCID: PMC8470953 DOI: 10.3390/nano11092385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) in biomedical applications have benefits owing to their small size. However, their intricate and sensitive nature makes an evaluation of the adverse effects of NPs on health necessary and challenging. Since there are limitations to conventional toxicological methods and omics analyses provide a more comprehensive molecular profiling of multifactorial biological systems, omics approaches are necessary to evaluate nanotoxicity. Compared to a single omics layer, integrated omics across multiple omics layers provides more sensitive and comprehensive details on NP-induced toxicity based on network integration analysis. As multi-omics data are heterogeneous and massive, computational methods such as machine learning (ML) have been applied for investigating correlation among each omics. This integration of omics and ML approaches will be helpful for analyzing nanotoxicity. To that end, mechanobiology has been applied for evaluating the biophysical changes in NPs by measuring the traction force and rigidity sensing in NP-treated cells using a sub-elastomeric pillar. Therefore, integrated omics approaches are suitable for elucidating mechanobiological effects exerted by NPs. These technologies will be valuable for expanding the safety evaluations of NPs. Here, we review the integration of omics, ML, and mechanobiology for evaluating nanotoxicity.
Collapse
|
22
|
Saarimäki LA, Federico A, Lynch I, Papadiamantis AG, Tsoumanis A, Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Serra A, Greco D. Manually curated transcriptomics data collection for toxicogenomic assessment of engineered nanomaterials. Sci Data 2021; 8:49. [PMID: 33558569 PMCID: PMC7870661 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00808-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Toxicogenomics (TGx) approaches are increasingly applied to gain insight into the possible toxicity mechanisms of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Omics data can be valuable to elucidate the mechanism of action of chemicals and to develop predictive models in toxicology. While vast amounts of transcriptomics data from ENM exposures have already been accumulated, a unified, easily accessible and reusable collection of transcriptomics data for ENMs is currently lacking. In an attempt to improve the FAIRness of already existing transcriptomics data for ENMs, we curated a collection of homogenized transcriptomics data from human, mouse and rat ENM exposures in vitro and in vivo including the physicochemical characteristics of the ENMs used in each study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Aliisa Saarimäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antonio Federico
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasios G Papadiamantis
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- NovaMechanics Ltd, P.O Box 26014 1666, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | | | | | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- BioMediTech Institute, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Finnish Centre for Alternative Methods (FICAM), Faculty of Medicine and Heath Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mouchlis VD, Afantitis A, Serra A, Fratello M, Papadiamantis AG, Aidinis V, Lynch I, Greco D, Melagraki G. Advances in de Novo Drug Design: From Conventional to Machine Learning Methods. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:1676. [PMID: 33562347 PMCID: PMC7915729 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
. De novo drug design is a computational approach that generates novel molecular structures from atomic building blocks with no a priori relationships. Conventional methods include structure-based and ligand-based design, which depend on the properties of the active site of a biological target or its known active binders, respectively. Artificial intelligence, including machine learning, is an emerging field that has positively impacted the drug discovery process. Deep reinforcement learning is a subdivision of machine learning that combines artificial neural networks with reinforcement-learning architectures. This method has successfully been employed to develop novel de novo drug design approaches using a variety of artificial networks including recurrent neural networks, convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, and autoencoders. This review article summarizes advances in de novo drug design, from conventional growth algorithms to advanced machine-learning methodologies and highlights hot topics for further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antreas Afantitis
- Department of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus;
| | - Angela Serra
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (D.G.)
- BioMEdiTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Michele Fratello
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (D.G.)
- BioMEdiTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Anastasios G. Papadiamantis
- Department of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1046, Cyprus;
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;
| | - Vassilis Aidinis
- Institute for Bioinnovation, Biomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Fleming 34, 16672 Athens, Greece;
| | - Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (A.S.); (M.F.); (D.G.)
- BioMEdiTech Institute, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Center for Alternative Methods (FICAM), Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Georgia Melagraki
- Division of Physical Sciences & Applications, Hellenic Military Academy, 16672 Vari, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lynch I, Afantitis A, Greco D, Dusinska M, Banares MA, Melagraki G. Editorial for the Special Issue From Nanoinformatics to Nanomaterials Risk Assessment and Governance. NANOMATERIALS 2021; 11:nano11010121. [PMID: 33430326 PMCID: PMC7825746 DOI: 10.3390/nano11010121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Iseult Lynch
- School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Antreas Afantitis
- Department of Cheminformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1065, Cyprus; (A.A.); (G.M.)
| | - Dario Greco
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland;
| | - Maria Dusinska
- Environmental Chemistry Department, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2027 Kjeller, Norway;
| | - Miguel A. Banares
- Institute for Catalysis, ICP-CSIC, Marie Curie 2, E-28049 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Georgia Melagraki
- Department of Cheminformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1065, Cyprus; (A.A.); (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|