Effect Comparison of E-Cigarette and Traditional Smoking and Association with Stroke-A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES

Assessing the association between e-cigarette use and cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis of exclusive and dual use with combustible cigarettes

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence highlights the impact of e-cigarette use on cardiovascular health, prompting a crucial examination of its association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in both exclusive e-cigarette and dual use scenarios with combustible cigarettes. This meta-analysis assessed the association between e-cigarette use and CVD by synthesizing the existing literature.

METHODS

Pertinent observational studies were identified using multiple electronic databases, from August 22nd, 2006, to April 10th, 2024. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effect models. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Study Quality Assessment Tools.

FINDINGS

A total of 20 observational studies involving 8,499,444 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Dual use (e-cigarettes and combustible cigarette) increased the odds of CVD by 2.56 times (95 % CI: 2.11, 3.11) compared to never use of both. Current e-cigarette use combined with former combustible cigarette increased the odds of CVD by 2.02 times (95 % CI: 1.58, 2.58) compared to never use of either. Exclusive current e-cigarette use did not show a statistically significant association with CVD odds compared to never use of either (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI: 0.93, 1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes was significantly associated with CVD, but results failed to show a significant association between exclusive e-cigarette use and CVD. Robust and longitudinal studies are needed to understand the long-term implications of e-cigarette use and CVD. Public health efforts should focus on awareness, smoking cessation, and regulating both e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes.

Prevalence, demographic, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors associated with cigarette, e-cigarette, and dual use: evidence from the 2017-2021 Scottish Health Survey

Understanding the correlation between demographic, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors with e-cigarette use, cigarette smoking, and dual use is essential for targeted public health interventions. This study examines the prevalence of these behaviors in Scotland and identifies the associated factors. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish Health Survey data from 2017 to 2021, leveraging data from 12,644 participants aged 16 and older: 2271 cigarette smokers, 687 e-cigarette users, 428 dual users, and 9258 never users. Weighted prevalences were calculated by age group, sex, and survey year, followed by weighted multinomial logistic regression to explore associated factors. The overall prevalences were 72.0% (95% CI 70.9-73.1) for never users, 18.9% (95% CI 17.9-19.9) for cigarette smokers, 5.5% (95% CI 5.0-6.1) for e-cigarette users, and 3.6% (95% CI 3.2-4.0) for dual users. From 2017 to 2021, cigarette smoking declined from 21.7% (95% CI 19.6-23.9) to 13.1% (95% CI 11.5-15.0), e-cigarette use from 6.5% (95% CI 5.4-7.8) to 4.8% (95% CI 3.6-6.4), and dual use from 3.7% (95% CI 2.9-4.6) to 2.7% (95% CI 1.9-3.7). Age was a critical factor, with the 25-34 age group more likely to use e-cigarettes (p = 0.007) and the 35-44 age group more likely to engage in dual use (p = 0.006) compared to the 16-24 age group. Males had higher odds of e-cigarette use than females (p = 0.031). White individuals had higher odds of using e-cigarettes (p = 0.023) and being dual users (p = 0.017) compared to non-whites. Previously married individuals had higher odds of dual use than singles (p = 0.031). Larger household sizes were linked to reduced odds of all three behaviors (p = 0.001). Rural residents were less likely to use e-cigarettes compared to urban residents (p = 0.025). Higher education correlated with lower odds of all three behaviors (p = 0.001). Manual occupation increased the likelihood of dual use (p = 0.042). Lower income and higher deprivation significantly increased the odds of all three behaviors (p < 0.001). Excessive alcohol consumption was associated with increased odds of the three behaviors (p < 0.001). Poor sleep quality correlated with increased odds of dual use (p = 0.002) and cigarette smoking (p < 0.001). Adherence to physical activity guidelines was associated with reduced odds of all three behaviors (cigarette smoking p < 0.001, e-cigarette use p = 0.031, dual use p = 0.016). In conclusion, this study showed a decline in the prevalence of cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and dual usage from 2017 to 2021 in Scotland. Significant associations with demographic, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors highlight the need for targeted public health interventions.

Association of Serum Homocysteine With Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients Without Diabetes: A Study Based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Database

This study aimed to investigate the association of serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients without diabetes on the basis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study used data from 3 survey cycles (1999 to 2004) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database as the research dataset. Serum Hcy levels were considered an independent variable, whereas PAD was a dependent variable. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline methods were used to explore the relation between Hcy level and PAD risk in patients without diabetes. A total of 4,819 samples were included. In the weighted logistics regression model, a significant positive association was observed between Hcy levels and the risk of PAD (odds ratio >1, p <0.05). Subgroup analysis results indicated a particularly significant association between Hcy levels and PAD risk in the older population (age ≥60 years), those with a history of smoking, and those without a history of myocardial infarction (all odds ratio >1, p <0.05) (p <0.05). Exploring the nonlinear association between Hcy levels and PAD risk through restricted cubic spline curves revealed an overall significant trend (p allover <0.05). In conclusion, elevated Hcy levels increased the risk of PAD, with a more pronounced effect observed in populations of patients without diabetes, especially in older patients (age ≥60 years), those with smoking history, and those without a history of myocardial infarction.

E-cigarette Use and Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

E-cigarettes have been known to cause varied poor health outcomes prior to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but after the impact of COVID-19, evidence came out that was, in some instances, not as expected regarding the severity of COVID-19 among e-cigarette users (vapers). A meta-analysis was performed on the available evidence to comprehensively find the effect of COVID-19 on existing or past e-cigarette users (vapers). The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were used to perform this meta-analysis. PubMed was searched for observational studies that described outcomes after COVID-19 positivity from December 1, 2019, to December 2023. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords were used for searching the relevant studies highlighting the relationship between COVID-19 and e-cigarette users. Calculations for pooled prevalence, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), weights for current e-cigarette users and vapers, and outcomes (events) were made. To analyze the data, Review Manager V.5.4 was used. The I² statistic was used to assess statistical heterogeneity. The I² statistic of >50% was considered significant heterogeneity. The "leave-one-out" method was used for sensitivity analysis. Out of 3231 studies, four studies reported data on vaping and non-vaping status and composite outcomes, resulting in a sample size of 653 COVID-19-positive cases. The pooled prevalence of being COVID-19 positive, having symptoms, or visiting an emergency room was 7.78% (653/8392). COVID-19 patients with current vaping status had decreased odds of poor outcomes compared to non-smokers, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.09 (95% CI 0.00-2.42; p>0.05) with heterogeneity between studies (I²=99%, p=0.15). Because of difficulties related to data collection and other factors, this meta-analysis was unable to conclusively establish the correlation between e-cigarette usage and severe COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, and fatality. Additional research using more detailed data is necessary to fully understand this correlation.

Population-Based Disease Odds for E-Cigarettes and Dual Use versus Cigarettes

BACKGROUND: E-cigarettes are promoted as less harmful than cigarettes. There has not been a direct comparison of health effects of e-cigarettes or dual use (concurrently using e-cigarettes and cigarettes) with those of cigarettes in the general population. METHODS: Studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsychINFO published through October 1, 2023, were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis if five or more studies were identified with a disease outcome. We assessed risk of bias with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposure and certainty with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. Outcomes with fewer studies were summarized but not pooled. RESULTS: We identified 124 odds ratios (94 cross-sectional and 30 longitudinal) from 107 studies. Pooled odds ratios for current e-cigarette versus cigarette use were not different for cardiovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.14), stroke (0.73; 0.47 to 1.13), or metabolic dysfunction (0.99; 0.91 to 1.09) but were lower for asthma (0.84; 0.74 to 0.95), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.53; 0.38 to 0.74), and oral disease (0.87; 0.76 to 1.00). Pooled odds ratios for dual use versus cigarettes were increased for all outcomes (range, 1.20 to 1.41). Pooled odds ratios for e-cigarettes and dual use compared with nonuse of either product were increased (e-cigarette range, 1.24 to 1.47; dual use, 1.49 to 3.29). All included studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. Results were generally not sensitive to study characteristics. Limited studies of other outcomes suggest that e-cigarette use is associated with additional diseases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to reassess the assumption that e-cigarette use provides substantial harm reduction across all cigarette-caused diseases, particularly accounting for dual use.

Association Between Myocardial Infarction and Triglyceride-Glucose Index: A Study Based on NHANES Database

Objective

To investigate differences in levels of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index between individuals with myocardial infarction (MI) and those without MI, as well as the association between TyG index and risk of MI.

Methods

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for US adults from 2013 to 2018 were included in this study. Using MI as an outcome variable and TyG index as an exposure variable, logistic regression models were employed to analyze relationship between MI and TyG index.

Results

The study included 6,695 participants. Compared to the non-MI group, patients with MI had significantly higher TyG index (8.89 vs. 8.63, P = 0.003). Higher TyG index was significantly associated with an increased risk of MI in US adults (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.26-2.26, P < 0.001). Race, smoking status, and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) had significant impacts on the association between TyG index and risk of MI (P for interaction < 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between TyG index and MI risk in non-Hispanic Black individuals, non-smokers, and individuals without COPD across multiple models (OR > 1.0, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

US adults with higher TyG index were more susceptible to MI, and TyG index may be used to identify individuals at high risk of MI in the US population.

The cardiovascular consequences of electronic cigarette smoking: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

E-cigarettes have emerged as a popular alternative to traditional tobacco smoking in recent years. Despite their growing popularity, concerns have arisen regarding the cardiovascular implications of e-cigarette use.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to highlight the latest evidence on the impact of e-cigarettes on cardiovascular health.

EXPERT OPINION

Numerous studies have demonstrated that e-cigarette use can lead to acute adverse cardiovascular effects. Inhalation of e-cigarette aerosols exposes users to a wide range of potentially harmful substances that have been implicated in critical pathophysiologic pathways of cardiovascular disease, namely endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, sympathetic overdrive, and arterial stiffness. While long-term epidemiological studies specifically focusing on the cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes are still relatively scarce, early evidence suggests a potential association between e-cigarette use and an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. However, it is essential to recognize that e-cigarettes are relatively new products, and the full extent of their long-term cardiovascular impact has not been fully elucidated. In the meantime, promoting tobacco cessation strategies that are evidence-based and regulated, along with rigorous monitoring of e-cigarette use patterns and associated health outcomes, are essential steps in safeguarding cardiovascular health in the face of this emerging public health challenge.

Intracranial Hemorrhage Secondary to Vaping: A Case Report and Literature Review

Vaping and marijuana use are becoming more common and accessible in young adults. However, questions remain regarding their long-term health implications. Current literature does not suggest that vaping causes intracranial hemorrhages. Here, we present a case of a 32-year-old male with no medical history other than vaping and marijuana use, who was found to have an acute intraventricular hemorrhage presenting as syncope. This paper explores the relationships between vaping, marijuana use, and strokes in the general population, and further elaborates on the effects of vaping in young adults. We hope to raise awareness of the negative health implications vaping has on otherwise healthy patients and encourage clinicians to take thorough histories and identify those who vape so that comprehensive education can be provided.

The association between combustible/electronic cigarette use and stroke based on national health and nutrition examination survey

AIMS

This study aims to analyze the association between combustible/electronic cigarettes and the risk of stroke.

METHODS

We obtained data from the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The stroke history and combustible/electronic cigarette use were acquired by questionnaires. Considering the sole or dual use of combustible cigarettes and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), we divided all the individuals into four subgroups, including nonsmokers (reference group), sole combustible cigarette, sole e-cigarette, and dual use of both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between cigarette use with the prevalence of stroke. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to show the effect size. Finally, we developed a prediction model to evaluate the risk of stroke for individuals with combustible or electronic cigarette use based on a random forest model.

RESULTS

We included a total of 4022 participants in the study. The median age was 55, and 48.3% of the participants were males. When we adjusted for age, gender, education attainment, race, total-to-HDL cholesterol (< 5.9 or ≥ 5.9), diabetes, hypertension, and alcohol consumption, the groups of sole e-cigarette use, sole combustible cigarette use, and dual use of combustible and electronic cigarettes were significantly associated with the prevalence of stroke with ORs (with 95%CI) of 2.07 (1.04-3.81), 2.36 (1.52-3.59), 2.34 (1.44-3.68), respectively. In the testing set, the AUC was 0.74 (95%CI = 0.65-0.84), sensitivity was 0.68, and specificity was 0.75.

CONCLUSION

Sole e-cigarettes and dual use of e-cigarettes with combustible cigarettes might increase the risk of stroke.

Chronic E-Cigarette Use Impairs Endothelial Function on the Physiological and Cellular Levels

BACKGROUND

The harmful vascular effects of smoking are well established, but the effects of chronic use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) on endothelial function are less understood. We hypothesized that e-cigarette use causes changes in blood milieu that impair endothelial function.

METHODS

Endothelial function was measured in chronic e-cigarette users, chronic cigarette smokers, and nonusers. We measured effects of participants' sera, or e-cigarette aerosol condensate, on NO and H2O2 release and cell permeability in cultured endothelial cells (ECs).

RESULTS

E-cigarette users and smokers had lower flow-mediated dilation (FMD) than nonusers. Sera from e-cigarette users and smokers reduced VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-induced NO secretion by ECs relative to nonuser sera, without significant reduction in endothelial NO synthase mRNA or protein levels. E-cigarette user sera caused increased endothelial release of H2O2, and more permeability than nonuser sera. E-cigarette users and smokers exhibited changes in circulating biomarkers of inflammation, thrombosis, and cell adhesion relative to nonusers, but with distinct profiles. E-cigarette user sera had higher concentrations of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) ligands S100A8 and HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1) than smoker and nonuser sera, and receptor for advanced glycation end product inhibition reduced permeability induced by e-cigarette user sera but did not affect NO production.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic vaping and smoking both impair FMD and cause changes in the blood that inhibit endothelial NO release. Vaping, but not smoking, causes changes in the blood that increase microvascular endothelial permeability and may have a vaping-specific effect on intracellular oxidative state. Our results suggest a role for RAGE in e-cigarette-induced changes in endothelial function.

The Health Effects of Real-World Dual Use of Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes versus the Health Effects of Exclusive Smoking of Conventional Cigarettes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of dual use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes has been reported across the world.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out. We included original articles on any topic relevant to health, excluding mental health, in all languages. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Both reviewers independently screened and read all publications. We compared dual use with exclusive smoking of conventional cigarettes (ESCC).

RESULTS

Fifty-two publications (49 studies) were included. Thirteen papers/10 studies were prospective. There was great heterogeneity across studies. Many methodological weaknesses, such as inaccurate exposure measurement, lack of adjustment for former tobacco consumption, and lack of significance testing were identified. Most prospective studies found dual use to be at least as harmful as ESCC. The longest follow-up was six years. Most of the best available cross-sectional studies found dual use associated with the same and, in several studies, significantly higher risk of self-reported symptoms/disease than in ESCC. The intensity of cigarette smoking seems associated with worse health.

CONCLUSION

Existing studies indicate that dual use is at least as, or probably even more, harmful than ESCC. Due to the predominance of cross-sectional studies and the methodological weaknesses we judged the overall certainty of the evidence as "low certainty".