THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERGLYCEMIA IN NONCRITICALLY ILL HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS TREATED WITH CONTINUOUS ENTERAL OR PARENTERAL NUTRITION

Stress hyperglycemia in acute pancreatitis: From mechanisms to prognostic implications

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory reaction of the pancreas. When the disease is severe, it is often accompanied by destruction of the pancreatic islets, resulting in dysfunction of the endocrine system of the pancreas. Stress hyperglycemia is a transient increase in glucose during a critical illness, and its possible mechanism is related to abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance due to the increased release of counterregulatory hormones and cytokines, such as glucagon, cortisol, and catecholamines. Numerous studies have shown that stress hyperglycemia is strongly associated with morbidity, mortality, and increased risk of post-acute pancreatitis diabetes in AP patients. Therefore, stress hyperglycemia may be a significant independent risk factor for poor clinical outcomes and prognosis in patients with AP. This article reviews the clinical features, risk factors, and mechanisms of action of stress hyperglycemia in AP and its influence on adverse clinical outcomes and the prognosis of inpatients with AP. For AP patients with stress hyperglycemia, it is necessary to comprehensively consider their blood glucose levels, daily habits, and complications to develop an appropriate treatment plan for hyperglycemia. Limited evidence indicates that in the case of acute hyperglycemia in critically ill patients, especially during the first 3 days of hospitalization, insulin therapy should not be undertaken if the blood glucose level does not exceed 10 mmol/L. However, some important questions related to clinical practice remain to be answered. More clinical trials and studies are needed in the future to provide a sufficient basis for clinical practice.

Intraoperative hypoglycemia among adults with intraoperative glucose measurements: a cross-sectional multicentre retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hypoglycemia is presumed to be rare, but generalizable multicentre incidence and risk factor data for adult patients are lacking. We used a multicentre registry to characterize adults with intraoperative hypoglycemia and hypothesized that intraoperative insulin administration would be associated with hypoglycemia.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective multicentre cohort study. We searched the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group registry to identify adult patients with intraoperative hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.3 mmol·L-1 [< 60 mg·dL-1]) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. We evaluated characteristics of patients with intraoperative glucose measurements and with intraoperative hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Of 516,045 patients with intraoperative glucose measurements, 3,900 (0.76%) had intraoperative hypoglycemia. Diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were more common in the cohort with intraoperative hypoglycemia. The odds of intraoperative hypoglycemia were higher for the youngest age category (18-30 yr) compared with the odds for every age category above 40 yr (odds ratio [OR], 1.57-3.18; P < 0.001), and were higher for underweight or normal weight patients compared with patients with obesity (OR, 1.48-2.53; P < 0.001). Parenteral nutrition was associated with lower odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.47; P < 0.001). Intraoperative insulin use was not associated with hypoglycemia (OR, 0.996; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09; P = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

In this large cross-sectional retrospective multicentre cohort study, intraoperative hypoglycemia was a rare event. Intraoperative insulin use was not associated with hypoglycemia.

Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients

People with diabetes account for 25% of hospitalizations, or 8 million admissions annually. Poor glycemic control in the hospital is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and readmissions. Key considerations of inpatient diabetes management include initiation of appropriate insulin or medication regimens and frequent dose adjustments based on patient-specific factors. Inpatient diabetes management teams and new technologies are increasingly prevalent and can assist in achieving glycemic targets in the hospital. At discharge, standardized checklists should be used to ensure successful transitions of care.

Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients Receiving a Diabetes-Specific Nutritional Enteral Formula: A Case Series in Home Care Settings

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Enteral Nutrition (EN) is associated with less hyperglycemia and lower insulin requirements compared to Parenteral Nutrition (PN). The primary aim of this study was to assess changes in glycemic control (GC) in DM patients on EN therapy. The secondary objectives included evaluating the impact of the specialized formula on various clinical parameters and the tolerability of the nutritional formula by monitoring potential gastrointestinal side effects.

METHODS

We report a case series on the effects of a Diabetes-Specific Formula (DSF) on GC, lipid profile (LP), and renal and hepatic function in a DM cohort receiving EN support.

RESULTS

Twenty-two DM subjects with total dysphagia (thirteen men, nine women) on continuous EN were observed. The use of a DSF in EN was associated with an improvement in glycemic indices across all patients studied, leading to a reduction in average insulin demand. No hospitalizations were reported during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the use of DSFs in a multi-dimensional home care management setting can improve glycemic control, reduce glycemic variability and insulin need, and positively impact the lipid profile of the DM cohort. The metabolic improvements were supported by the clinical outcomes observed.

Astragaloside IV (ASIV) Mediates Endothelial Progenitor Cell (EPC) Exosomal LINC01963 to Inhibit Pyroptosis and Oxidative Stress in High Glucose-impaired Endothelial Cells

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia is widespread in the world's population, increasing the risk of many diseases. This study aimed to explore the regulatory effect and mechanism of astragaloside IV (ASIV)-mediated endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) exosomal LINC01963 in endothelial cells (HUVECs) impaired by high glucose.

METHODS

Morphologies of exosomes were observed by light microscope and electron microscope. Immunofluorescence was used to identify EPCs and detect the expressions of caspase-1. LINC01963 was detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-3 were detected by Western Blot. Nanoparticle tracking analysis was carried out to analyze the exosome diameter. High-throughput sequencing was applied to screen target lncRNAs. The proliferation of endothelial cells was measured by cell counting kit-8 assay. The apoptosis level of HUVECs was detected by flow cytometry and TdT-mediated dUTP Nick-End labeling. The levels of IL- 1β, IL-18, ROS, SOD, MDA, and LDH were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

ASIV could promote the secretion of the EPC exosome. LINC01963 was obtained by high-throughput sequencing. It was observed that high glucose could inhibit the proliferation, reduce the level of SOD, the expression of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase- 1, increase the levels of IL-1β, IL-18, ROS, MDA, and LDH, and promote apoptosis of HUVECs. Whereas LINC01963 could inhibit the apoptosis of HUVECs, the increase the expression of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1, and decrease the levels of IL-1β, IL-18, ROS, MDA, and LDH.

CONCLUSION

EPCs exosomal LINC01963 play an inhibitory role in high glucoseinduced pyroptosis and oxidative stress of HUVECs. This study provides new ideas and directions for treating hyperglycemia and researching exosomal lncRNAs.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Behavior of Regular Insulin in a Parenteral Nutrition Admixture: Validation of an LC/MS-MS Assay and the In Vitro Evaluation of Insulin Glycation

Parenteral-nutrition (PN)-induced hyperglycemia increases morbidity and mortality and must be treated with insulin. Unfortunately, the addition of insulin to a ternary PN admixture leads to a rapid decrease in insulin content. Our study's objective was to determine the mechanistic basis of insulin's disappearance. The literature data suggested the presence of a glycation reaction; we therefore validated an LC-MS/MS assay for insulin and glycated insulin. In a 24-h stability study, 20 IU/L of insulin was added to a binary PN admixture at pH 3.6 or 6.3. When the samples were diluted before analysis with a near-neutral diluent, insulin was fully stable at pH 3.6, while a loss of around 50% was observed at pH 6.3. Its disappearance was shown to be inversely correlated with the appearance of monoglycated insulin (probably a Schiff base adduct). Monoglycated insulin might also undergo a back-reaction to form insulin after acidic dilution. Furthermore, a second monoglycated insulin species appeared in the PN admixture after more than 24 h at high temperature (40 °C) and a high insulin concentration (1000 IU/L). It was stable at acidic pH and might be an Amadori product. The impact of insulin glycation under non-forced conditions on insulin's bioactivity requires further investigation.

Stationäre Patienten mit der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus: klinische Relevanz

In deutschen Krankenhäusern werden jährlich etwa 3 Mio. Patienten mit Diabetes stationär behandelt, davon 93 % nicht wegen, sondern mit dieser Erkrankung. In einzelnen Fachabteilungen liegt bei bis zu 40 % der Patienten die Nebendiagnose Diabetes vor. Sie haben oft eine relevante Komorbidität und im Vergleich zu Krankenhauspatienten ohne Diabetes eine längere stationäre Verweildauer, entwickeln deutlich häufiger Komplikationen und müssen öfter kurzfristig wieder aufgenommen werden. In dieser Übersicht wird die klinische Relevanz der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus für Krankenhauspatienten besprochen.

Metabolic and nutritional triggers associated with increased risk of liver complications in SARS-CoV-2

Obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, cancer and smoking are risk factors for negative outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which can quickly induce severe respiratory failure in 5% of cases. Coronavirus disease-associated liver injury may occur during progression of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with or without pre-existing liver disease, and damage to the liver parenchyma can be caused by infection of hepatocytes. Cirrhosis patients may be particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 if suffering with cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction. Furthermore, pharmacotherapies including macrolide or quinolone antibiotics and steroids can also induce liver damage. In this review we addressed nutritional status and nutritional interventions in severe SARS-CoV-2 liver patients. As guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 in intensive care (IC) specifically are not yet available, strategies for management of sepsis and SARS are suggested in SARS-CoV-2. Early enteral nutrition (EN) should be started soon after IC admission, preferably employing iso-osmolar polymeric formula with initial protein content at 0.8 g/kg per day progressively increasing up to 1.3 g/kg per day and enriched with fish oil at 0.1 g/kg per day to 0.2 g/kg per day. Monitoring is necessary to identify signs of intolerance, hemodynamic instability and metabolic disorders, and transition to parenteral nutrition should not be delayed when energy and protein targets cannot be met via EN. Nutrients including vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, folic acid, zinc, selenium and ω-3 fatty acids have in isolation or in combination shown beneficial effects upon immune function and inflammation modulation. Cautious and monitored supplementation up to upper limits may be beneficial in management strategies for SARS-CoV-2 liver patients.

Weight-Based Insulin During and After Intravenous Insulin Infusion Reduces Rates of Rebound Hyperglycemia When Transitioning to Subcutaneous Insulin in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Hyperglycemia often occurs after the transition from intravenous insulin infusion (IVII) to subcutaneous insulin. Weight-based basal insulin initiated earlier in the course of IVII in the medical intensive care unit (MICU), and a weight-based basal-bolus regimen after IVII, can potentially improve post-IVII glycemic control by 48 hours.

METHODS

This prospective study included 69 patients in MICU who were on IVII for ≥24 hours. Exclusions were end-stage renal disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and the active use of vasopressors. The intervention group received weight-based basal insulin (0.2-0.25 units/kg) with IVII and weight-based bolus insulin after IVII. The control group received current care. The primary end points were glucose levels at specific time intervals up to 48 hours after IVII.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients in the intervention group and 44 in the control group. The mean age of the patients was 59 ± 15 years, 32 (47%) were men, and 52 (78%) had prior diabetes mellitus. The 2 groups were not different (acute kidney injury/chronic kidney disease, pre-existing diabetes mellitus, illness severity, or nothing by mouth status after IVII), except for the steroid use, which was higher in the control group than in the intervention group (34% vs 12%, respectively). Glucose levels were not lower until 36 to 48 hours after IVII (166.8 ± 39.1 mg/dL vs 220.0 ± 82.9 mg/dL, P < .001). When controlling for body mass index, nutritional status, hemoglobin A1C, and steroid use, glucose level was lower starting at 12 to 24 hours out (166.87 mg/dL vs 207.50 mg/dL, P = .015). The frequency of hypoglycemia was similar between the 2 groups (5.0% vs 7.1%). The study did not reach target enrollment.

CONCLUSION

The addition of weight-based basal insulin during, and basal-bolus insulin immediately after, IVII in MICU results in better glycemic control at 24 hours after IVII with no increased hypoglycemia.

Addition of Regular Insulin to Ternary Parenteral Nutrition: A Stability Study

Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a complex medium in which added insulin can become unstable. The aim of this study is, therefore, to evaluate the stability of insulin in PN and to identify influencing factors. Methods: A total of 20 IU/L of regular insulin was added to PN in either glass or Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) containers. A 24 h stability study was performed via an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in different media: A ternary PN admixture, separate compartments of the PN bag and a binary admixture. This study was repeated in the absence of zinc, with the addition of serum albumin or tween and with pH adjustment (3.6 or 6.3). Insulin concentration at t time was expressed as a percentage of the initial insulin concentration. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied to determine the factors that influence insulin stability. Results: In all PN admixtures, the insulin concentration ratio decreased, stabilising at a 60% and then plateauing after 6 h. At pH 3.6, the ratio was above 90%, while at pH 6.3 it decreased, except in the amino acid solution. ANCOVA (r² = 0.68, p = 0.01) identified dextrose and pH as significant factors influencing insulin stability. Conclusion: A low pH level seems to stabilise insulin in PN admixtures. The influence of dextrose content suggests that insulin glycation may influence stability.

[Measurement of insulin in multilayer bags for parenteral nutrition]

Introduction

Introduction: it is common to add rapid-acting insulin to parenteral nutrition (NP) bags for the management of hyperglycemia. However, insulin can be adsorbed in NP bags due to electrostatic interactions. Objective: to determine the influence of the presence of lipids and of insulin concentration in NP bags on the adsorption of insulin in these bags, as well as its stability for 5 days. Method: seven NP bags were prepared with the same volume and with a similar composition except for the presence of lipids and micronutrients, and insulin concentration. Insulin was determined by electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. Samples of 2 mL were taken after preparation and on day 5. Results: on day 1, the mean loss of insulin was 15.26 % (± 7.08) in the bags with lipids and 18.45 % (± 5.67) (p = 0.60) in the bags without lipids. The percentage of insulin lost by day 5 in the PN bags with lipids was 30.13 % (± 4.14), and in the PN bags without lipids it was 44.71 % (± 12.94) (p = 0,052). No correlation was observed between the amount of insulin added to the PN bags and the percentage of insulin lost between day 1 (ρ = -0.407, p = 0.365) or day 5 (ρ = -0.295, p = 0.521). Conclusions: there is an increase in insulin adsorption in NP EVA bags over time. The presence of lipids in the bags decreases adsorption. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the factors associated with insulin adsorption in EVA bags.

Hospitalization as an Opportunity to Optimize Glycemic Control in Oncology Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many patients experience hyperglycemia during cancer treatment, either as a new-onset condition or as an exacerbation of existing diabetes. This can impact treatment and outcomes, increasing the risk of complications and worsening health-related quality of life (HRQoL). These issues may be particularly significant when patients are hospitalized and/or acutely ill. The purpose of this review is to identify common barriers and strategies specific to the inpatient setting to improve glycemic control and minimize complications both while patients are hospitalized and after discharge.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hyperglycemia in patients who are hospitalized during cancer treatment is common, but there is a lack of consensus on goals and approaches to glycemic management in this setting. Hyperglycemia related to oncology treatment can have unusual causes and challenges in management. Organizational guidelines can help standardize treatment and guide providers in managing hyperglycemia in oncology patients during hospitalization and upon discharge. Hospitalization is a critical period that provides an opportunity to reassess and modify management plans, coordinate follow-up care, and, crucially, educate and empower patients to successfully manage their blood glucose levels once they are discharged. Emerging technology such as patient portals can facilitate hyperglycemia management after discharge. This review discusses evidences and strategies to utilize the period of hospitalization to develop and implement an individualized plan of care for patients with concurrent hyperglycemia and cancer.