Endoscopic diagnosis and management of type I neuroendocrine tumors

Last decade of advances in gastric neuroendocrine tumors: Innovations, challenges, and future directions

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) are rare tumors originating from enterochromaffin-like cells, with an incidence of 0.4 per 100000 annually. There are three main types: (1) Type I, linked to chronic atrophic gastritis and hypergastrinemia, makes up 75%–80% of G-NETs; (2) Type II, associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) and multiple endocrine neoplasia, comprises 5%; and (3) Type III, sporadic tumors with a higher metastatic potential, accounting for 15%–25%. Diagnosis involves endoscopy, biopsy, and histological examination. Additional methods include serum gastrin testing, immunohistochemistry, and imaging techniques such as computer tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for detecting metastasis. Type I treatment usually involves endoscopic resection (ER), with surgical resection for recurrence. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) can reduce tumor size, and the prognosis is generally excellent. Type II treatment centers on surgical removal of the gastrinoma, with ER for smaller lesions and SSAs for symptom management. Type III requires surgical resection (partial or total gastrectomy) with lymph node dissection, and possibly chemotherapy. This type has a worse prognosis due to its aggressive nature. Emerging treatments like Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy are promising for advanced cases, and ongoing research into immunotherapies is expanding future treatment options. Regular endoscopic follow-up is crucial to monitor for recurrence or metastasis across all types. Our literature review explores the current perspectives on G-NETs and highlights the importance of further research to improve diagnostic precision and treatment, particularly for those associated with less favorable cases.

AIM

To improve diagnostic precision and treatment, particularly for those associated with less favorable cases.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 2024. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility based on G-NET treatment in adults. Eligible studies included cohort studies, clinical trials, case series, and case reports, while in vitro, pediatric, and non-English studies were excluded. Relevant data were extracted independently, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools.

RESULTS

G-NETs are rare, classified into three types: (1) Type I; (2) Type II; and (3) Type III. Type I G-NETs, often associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, are typically slow-growing and low-grade, with favorable outcomes following surgical resection. Type II G-NETs arise in hypergastrinemia conditions like multiple endocrine neoplasia and ZES, showing moderate malignancy risk. Type III G-NETs, the most aggressive and least common, present with distant metastases and poor prognosis. Diagnosis relies on endoscopy, imaging, and biomarkers like chromogranin A. Treatment varies by type, ranging from ER to aggressive surgery and chemotherapy for advanced cases. Regular follow-up is essential to monitor recurrence, particularly for type III G-NETs.

CONCLUSION

G-NETs require tailored diagnosis and treatment based on type and stage. Types I and II generally have better prognosis, while types III and IV are linked to poorer outcomes due to invasion and metastasis. Treatment strategies vary from ER for type I to extensive surgery for type III. Emerging therapies, like somatostatin analogs and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapies, show promise in advanced cases. Further research is essential to improve early diagnosis and treatment, particularly for high-risk lesions.

Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

The endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) remain unclarified. The present study investigated the endoscopic features of G-NETs in relation to the clinicopathological findings.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with G-NETs who received endoscopic or surgical treatment between January 2005 and December 2023. The endoscopic and clinicopathological findings of the lesions were analyzed to provide diagnostic information.

RESULTS

Among 29 patients, the characteristic endoscopic findings of G-NETs on white-light images were reddish color (66%), dilated vessels (83%), submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation (59%), and central depression (48%). The gross appearance of G-NETs was classified into two macroscopic subtypes: reddish polypoid lesions (n = 17) and submucosal tumor-like lesions (n = 9). Magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy revealed an absent microsurface pattern plus an irregular microvascular pattern in all cases of reddish polypoid lesions with central depressions (100%, 9/9). The findings of a reddish polypoid lesion and an absent microsurface pattern plus an irregular microvascular pattern corresponded to the subepithelial NET component close to the non-neoplastic surface epithelium. Additionally, reddish polypoid lesions were significantly more frequent in type 1 G-NETs than in type 3 G-NETs (80% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), while submucosal tumor-like lesions were significantly more frequent in type 3 G-NETs than in type 1 G-NETs (78% vs. 10%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These endoscopic features should increase the index of suspicion and help clinicians to correctly diagnose G-NETs through the pathological examination of biopsy specimens.

Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors and Pernicious Anemia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are rare neoplasms, with the gastric (stomach) subtype (G-NETs) representing a significant clinical focus. Type 1 G-NETs are particularly noteworthy due to their relationship with autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) and pernicious anemia (PA), conditions that impact vitamin B12 absorption. This report presents the case of a patient with a type 1 G-NET identified at the initial diagnosis of PA, demonstrating the connection between these conditions. In the literature review, we discuss the general mechanisms underlying PA, including its etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentations, and diagnostic approaches. Emphasis is placed on the importance of recognizing and diagnosing this condition early, given the treatable nature of the associated gastric neuroendocrine dysregulation. Additionally, the report examines the broad spectrum of G-NETs, with a special emphasis on the characteristics of type 1 tumors. By considering recent developments in the field, we provide an overview of the current understanding of G-NET epidemiology, classification, clinical features, diagnosis, and management strategies.

Autoimmune gastritis studies and gastric cancer: True renaissance or bibliometric illusion

A bibliometric analysis of studies dedicated to autoimmune gastritis (AIG) recently published demonstrated a noteworthy surge in publications over the last three years. This can be explained by numerous publications from different regions of the world reporting the results of several studies that stimulated reassessment of our view of AIG as a precancerous condition. Follow-up studies and retrospective analyses showed that the risk of gastric cancer (GC) in AIG patients is much lower than expected if the patients ever being infected with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) were excluded. The low prevalence of precancerous lesions, such as the incomplete type of intestinal metaplasia, may explain the low risk of GC in AIG patients because the spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia commonly observed in AIG does not involve clonal reprogramming of the gastric gland and can be considered as an adaptive change rather than a true precancerous lesion. However, changes in gastric secretion due to the progression of gastric atrophy during the course of AIG cause changes in the gastric mic-robiome, stimulating the growth of bacterial species such as streptococci, which may promote the development of precancerous lesions and GC. Thus, Streptococcus anginosus exhibited a robust proinflammatory response and induced the gastritis-atrophy-metaplasia-dysplasia sequence in mice, reproducing the well-established process for carcinogenesis associated with H. pylori. Prospective studies in H. pylori-naïve patients evaluating gastric microbiome changes during the long-term course of AIG might provide an explanation for the enigmatic increase in GC incidence in the last decades in younger cohorts, which has been reported in economically developed countries.

Improvements and future perspective in diagnostic tools for neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a complex group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, characterized by heterogeneous behavior and challenging diagnostics. Despite advancements in medical technology, NENs present a major challenge in early detection, often leading to delayed diagnosis and variable outcomes. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of current diagnostic methods as well as the evolving and future directions of diagnostic strategies for NENs.

AREA COVERED

The review extensively covers the evolution of diagnostic tools for NENs, from traditional imaging and biochemical tests to advanced genomic profiling and next-generation sequencing. The emerging role of technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and liquid biopsies could improve diagnostic precision, as could the integration of imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hybrids and innovative radiotracers.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite progress, there is still a significant gap in the early diagnosis of NENs. Bridging this diagnostic gap and integrating advanced technologies and precision medicine are crucial to improving patient outcomes. However, challenges such as low clinical awareness, limited possibility of noninvasive diagnostic tools and funding limitations for rare diseases like NENs are acknowledged.

Surgical indication of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) account for less than 2% of gastric neoplasms and type 1 GNETs (GNETs-1), which are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, account for 70-80% of all GNETs. Treatment of GNETs-1 is usually endoscopic, but surgery also has its indications. The aim of this study is to present five case reports of GNETs-1 treated with surgery and to analyze the surgical indications for this type of tumors.

Clinical experience sharing on gastric microneuroendocrine tumors: A case report

BACKGROUND

The majority of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NENs) are present in various lesions under endoscopy, and they can be polypoid uplifts, submucosal tumors or papules, erosions, and ulcers. The lesions are mostly confined to the mucosal or submucosal layer, usually less than 2 cm, and exclusively localized to the gastric body or fundus. In type 1 G-NENs, about 22% of cases have no visible lesions under an endoscope, and such lesions can only be detected via biopsies (microcarcinoids).

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old female patient with appetite loss for more than half a year and personal history of hyperthyroidism was admitted to our hospital. After admission, a random multi-point biopsy was performed on the gastric body, fundus, angle, and antrum through gastroscopy. Pathological examination showed chronic severe atrophic gastritis in the fundus and body of the stomach. The small curvature of the gastric body, the anterior wall of the gastric body, and the posterior wall of the gastric body displayed proliferation of intestinal chromaffin cells. The curvature of the gastric body showed neuroendocrine tumor G1 (carcinoid), while the antrum and angle of the stomach showed mild atrophic gastritis with mild intestinal metaplasia. Immunohistochemical examination showed that the greater curvature of the gastric body was Syn (+), CgA (+), and Ki-67 (+, approximately 1%), which is consistent with neuroendocrine tumors (grade 1). Regular gastroscopy and biopsy should be performed every one to two years to monitor G-NENs.

CONCLUSION

In the case under study, the patient did not have any visible raised lesions under a gastroscope, and the lesions were found only after a random biopsy. This article combines the endoscopic manifestations and clinical features of the lesions in this case to improve the diagnosis of G-NENs.

Investigation of Clinical, Laboratory, Imaging Findings and Histopathological Features of Patients wıth Gastric Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia is a non-neoplastic proliferation of enterochromaffin-like cells and is considered a premalignant lesion because of their potential to progress to neuroendocrine tumor. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the demographic and clinical features, laboratory, radiological and endoscopic findings, gastric biopsy histopathological features, follow-up frequency, and histopathological findings of patients diagnosed with gastric neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia as well as to investigate the factors that play a role in the development of neuroendocrine tumors on the basis of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study has been conducted in 2 centers with 282 patients that were grouped as those with and without neuroendocrine tumor. Individuals with control endoscopy were separated as those with regression of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia and those without regression, and the determined parameters were evaluated between the groups.

RESULTS

The most common histological subtype of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia was linear+micronodular (50.4%). Neuroendocrine tumor developed in 4.3% (12/282) of the patients with neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia after a mean of 36 months. The presence of polyps as confirmed via endoscopy and dysplasia as confirmed via histopathological examination was significantly higher in favor of the group with neuroendocrine tumor (P = .01). In patients with neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia regressed and patients in whom it did not regress were examined, the rate of asymptomatic patients and increased sedimentation rate were found in favor of the group that did not regress (P = .02 and P = .02), but no difference was found in other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Neuroendocrine tumor development rate was found to be 4.3% in the background of neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Two factors predicting progression from neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia to neuroendocrine tumor can be elaborated as the presence of polypoid appearance due to neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia as confirmed via endoscopy and dysplasia as confirmed via histopathological examination.

Endoscopic Management of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: An Overview of Proposed Resection and Ablation Techniques

A literature search of MEDLINE/PUBMED was conducted with the aim to highlight current endoscopic management of localised gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. Relevant articles were identified through a manual search, and reference lists were reviewed for additional articles. The results of the research have been displayed in a narrative fashion to illustrate the actual state-of-the-art of endoscopic techniques in the treatment of NETs. Localised NETs of the stomach, duodenum and rectum can benefit from advanced endoscopic resection techniques (e.g., modified endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full thickness resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection) according to centre expertise. Radiofrequency thermal ablation can be proposed as an alternative to surgery in selected patients with localised pancreatic NETs.

Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), also called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), are relatively uncommon, heterogenous tumors primarily originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the improvement in technology and increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopy, they are being discovered with increasing frequency. Although traditionally considered indolent tumors with good prognoses, some NENs exhibit aggressive behavior. Timely diagnosis, risk stratification, and management can often be a challenge. In general, small NENs without local invasion or lymphovascular involvement can often be managed using minimally invasive advanced endoscopic techniques, while larger lesions and those with evidence of lymphovascular invasion require surgery, systemic therapy, or a combination thereof. Ideal management requires a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the stage and grade of the tumor. With the recent advancements, a therapeutic advanced endoscopist can play a pivotal role in diagnosing, staging, and managing this rare condition. High-definition white light imaging and digital image enhancing technologies like narrow band imaging (NBI) in the newer endoscopes have improved the diagnostic accuracy of traditional endoscopy. The refinement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) over the past decade has revolutionized the role of endoscopy in diagnosing and managing various pathologies, including NENs. In addition to EUS-directed diagnostic biopsies, it also offers the ability to precisely assess the depth of invasion and lymphovascular involvement and thus stage NENs accurately. EUS-directed locoregional ablative therapies are increasingly recognized as highly effective, minimally invasive treatment modalities for NENs, particularly pancreatic NENs. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques like endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) have been increasingly used over the past decade with excellent results in achieving curative resection of various early-stage gastrointestinal luminal lesions including NENs. In this article, we aim to delineate NENs of the different segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, gastric, pancreatic, and small and large intestine) and their management with emphasis on the endoscopic management of these tumors.

Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare subepithelial tumors that arise from the neuroendocrine cells beneath the epithelial layer. However, an accurate histopathological diagnosis is difficult when tissue samples are obtained using conventional endoscopic forceps biopsy alone. This study aimed to evaluate the magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) findings of duodenal NETs. We retrospectively analyzed a database of 22 duodenal NETs from 21 patients who underwent ME-NBI between January 2011 and June 2022. The ME-NBI, endosonographic, and histopathologic findings of duodenal NETs were analyzed. Nineteen lesions were located in the bulb, two were located in the superior duodenal angle, and one was located in the second portion of the duodenum. Eighteen lesions (82%) had IIa morphology, and nine (41%) had central depression on the surface. On endoscopic ultrasonography, almost all lesions (20/22, 91%) were located in the second and/or third layers, and the median tumor size was 6 mm. During ME-NBI, the microsurface pattern was regular in 18 lesions (82%) and absent in 4 (18%). The microvascular pattern was regular in 17 lesions (77%), irregular in 4 (18%), and absent in 1 (5%). Thickened subepithelial vessels were observed in 15 (68%) lesions. There was no difference in tumor size according to the presence or absence of thickened subepithelial vessels (6.1 ± 1.8 mm vs. 5.9 ± 3.8 mm, p = 0.860). In conclusion, the characteristic ME-NBI findings of duodenal NETs were regular microsurface and microvascular patterns and the presence of thickened subepithelial vessels. These ME-NBI features may be useful for differentiating duodenal NETs from other duodenal subepithelial lesions.

[Difficulties in diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract]

We present diagnosis and complex minimally invasive surgical treatment of a patient with long-standing neuroendocrine tumor of the upper gastrointestinal tract. We followed-up a 50-year-old female patient after endoscopic resection of polypoid neoplasm of the stomach for 2 non-organ retroperitoneal neoplasms in the area of hepatogastric ligament. After a comprehensive examination and minimally invasive surgery including laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal neoplasms, immunohistochemical examination, PET-CT and targeted endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach, we diagnosed a highly differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumor with metastases into lymph nodes of hepatogastric ligament. Combination of endoscopic and morphological diagnosis with rigorous histological examination of specimen provided correct diagnosis and reasonable strategy of aggressive minimally invasive surgical treatment.

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most common type of neuroendocrine tumors and are being increasingly identified in clinical practice. The diagnosis, staging, management, and surveillance of GEP-NETs rely heavily on endoscopy, and consequently, it is important for gastroenterologists to have a solid understanding of these tumors. This article reviews the presentation, diagnosis, and management of both localized and advanced GEP-NETs, with increased emphasis on the role of endoscopy, to enable gastroenterologists and other practitioners to have the necessary tools for the care of patients with these tumors.

Parietal Cell Dysfunction: A Rare Cause of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Achlorhydria and Extreme Hypergastrinemia

A 69-year-old woman with multiple neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) was referred to our hospital. Although she had extreme hypergastrinemia (11,675 pg/mL), no findings that indicated types I to III gastric NENs were found. Although gastric corpus atrophy was suspected on conventional white-light imaging, findings on magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging indicated no severe atrophy. A biopsy from the background fundic gland mucosa revealed no atrophic changes, parietal cells with vacuolated cytoplasm and negative findings for H+K+-ATPase. Thus, this case was diagnosed as multiple NENs with parietal cell dysfunction. Neither progression nor metastasis has been confirmed during two-year follow-up.

Gastric and Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Incidentally Found on Endoscopy During the Evaluation of Iron-Deficiency Anemia

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are a small fraction of overall gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Recently the incidence of NETs has increased due to advancements in diagnostic modality. While solid tumors are easily visible on routine endoscopy, identifying endocrine tumors can be difficult, and low incidence and non-specific presentation can be easily missed on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE). The management differs based on the type of tumor and location, but the overall prognosis is good. We present a 59-year-old male with multiple NETs throughout the GI tract, diagnosed on repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showing multiple gastric folds. A biopsy of multiple nodules was taken to diagnose type I NET with grade 2 differentiation finally. The mucosal nodules were resected with a band ligator, and surveillance endoscopy was recommended.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and precursor lesions: Case reports and literature review

RATIONALE

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) represent a distinctive group of gastric tumors, stratified into different prognostic categories according to different histological characteristics, put forth in the 2018 World Health Organization classification system. The clinical presentations, as well as pathological features, represent important data in establishing the type of the tumor, in estimating the tumor behavior, and in selecting the best therapeutic strategy. In our case series we presented different clinical scenarios that may be encountered in practice regarding gastric NENs. We performed a literature review and discussed diagnostic strategy, current classification system, precursor lesions, and therapeutic options in g-NENs.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The first patient was a 41-year-old female with weight loss, persistent dyspeptic complaints and a history of pernicious anemia. In the second clinical case a 61-year-old man was admitted with heartburn, abdominal pain, diarrhea and mild iron deficiency anemia. The third patient was a 56-year-old male with a history of neoplasia, admitted for weight loss, dyspeptic complaints, and liver metastases.

DIAGNOSIS

All the 3 patients underwent upper endoscopy with targeted biopsies. Histopathological and laboratory evaluation, together with imagistic evaluation (abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging) allowed the distinction between 3 different types of gastric tumors: type 1 enterochromaffin-like-cell G1 NET, type 2 enterochromaffin-like-cell G2 NET, and type 3 G2 NET with liver metastases.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic polypectomy of the largest lesion was performed in patient with type 1 g-NET and autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis, followed by regular endoscopic surveillance with biopsies. In type 2 g-NET associated with pancreatic gastrinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy with total gastrectomy were performed. In type 3 g-NET, detected in metastatic stage, oncologic therapy was performed.

OUTCOMES

The patients follow-up was selected according to tumor behavior, from regular endoscopic surveillance to oncology follow-up. The prognosis was good in case 1, whilst poorer outcomes were associated with more aggressive tumors in case 2 and case 3.

LESSONS

g-NENs are rare tumors with distinct clinical and histological features. Our case series emphasized the role of close collaboration between clinician and pathologist, as well as the importance of a detailed pathology report.

Time to give up traditional methods for the management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease group and constitute 0.5% of all malignancies. The annual incidence of NETs is increasing worldwide. The reason for the increase in the incidence of NETs is the detection of benign lesions, incidental detection due to the highest use of endoscopic and imaging procedures, and higher recognition rates of pathologists. There have been exciting developments regarding NET biology in recent years. Among these, first of all, somatostatin receptors and downstream pathways in neuroendocrine cells have been found to be important regulatory mechanisms for protein synthesis, hormone secretion, and proliferation. Subsequently, activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway was found to be an important mechanism in angiogenesis and tumor survival and cell metabolism. Finally, the importance of proangiogenic factors (platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblastic growth factor, angiopoietin, and semaphorins) in the progression of NET has been determined. Using the combination of biomarkers and imaging methods allows early evaluation of the appropriateness of treatment and response to treatment.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Focused Review and Practical Approach for Gastroenterologists

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors derived from the neuroendocrine cell system, and more commonly found in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Over the last decades, the incidence of GI-NETs has been steadily increasing, partly due to the expanding indications for endoscopy. Most patients with NETs are asymptomatic, and their NETs are noticed during screening examinations; thus, endoscopists are on the frontline of the diagnosis of GI-NETs. Since GI-NETs are less frequent than other malignancies, the natural history, diagnosis, and management of these tumors may not be fully understood. In this review, we aim to update the endoscopist on key clinical features and management of patients with gastric, duodenal, and rectal NETs.

Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor Presenting as Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) are rare and subdivided into type I, type II, and type III. Types I and II are gastrin-dependent and are usually benign, whereas type III is gastrin-independent and more aggressive. Type I accounts for 70-80% of all GNETs. Most of them are asymptomatic and incidentally detected on endoscopy. It can sometimes present with iron and B12 deficiency, dyspepsia, and less commonly with an upper GI bleed. We present a case of type I GNET who came to the hospital with melena and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showing a 3-cm bleeding polyp and histopathology revealing a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with angioinvasion.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors

Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.

Adenocarcinoma and Neuroendocrine Collision Tumor in a Giant Gastric Hyperplastic Polyp

Screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy of a 65-year-old man revealed a 4.7-cm polypoid in the gastric high body. Clinical and laboratory findings, including serum gastrin level (460 pg/mL) and biopsy findings, were consistent with a diagnosis of type I neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Histologically, the mass consisted of dilated tortuous glands at the surface and grade 1 NET in deeper tissue. Some hyperplastic glands exhibited a transition to adenocarcinoma, which invaded the NET, simulating a "tumor in tumor" appearance. Next-generation sequencing revealed that the adenocarcinoma component harbored a TP53 mutation, whereas the NET component showed no pathogenic mutation. To our knowledge, this unusual collision of adenocarcinoma and NET within a single gastric hyperplastic polyp has not been previously described. This case suggests that large gastric hyperplastic polyps should be carefully examined because of the possibility of underlying NET and malignant transformation of surface epithelium.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in 2020

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare slow-growing tumors with distinct histological, biological, and clinical characteristics that have increased in incidence and prevalence within the last few decades. They contain chromogranin A, synaptophysin and neuron-specific enolase which are necessary for making a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Ki-67 index and mitotic index correlate with cellular proliferation. Serum chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker to assess the bulk of disease and monitor treatment and is raised in both functioning and non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors. Most of the gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are non-functional. World Health Organization updated the classification of neuroendocrine tumors in 2017 and renamed mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma into mixed neuroendocrine neoplasm. Gastric neuroendocrine tumors arise from enterochromaffin like cells. They are classified into 4 types. Only type I and type II are gastrin dependent. Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor is the most common small bowel malignancy. More than two-third of them occur in the terminal ileum within 60 cm of ileocecal valve. Patients with small intestinal neuroendrocrine tumors frequently show clinical symptoms and develop distant metastases more often than those with neuroendocrine tumors of other organs. Duodenal and jejuno-ileal neuroendocrine tumors are distinct biologically and clinically. Carcinoid syndrome generally occurs when jejuno-ileal neuroendocrine tumors metastasize to the liver. Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors are generally detected after appendectomy. Colonic neuroendocrine tumors generally present as a large tumor with local or distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Rectal neuroendocrine tumors are increasingly being diagnosed since the implementation of screening colonoscopy in 2000. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed and staged by endoscopy with biopsy, endoscopic ultrasound, serology of biomarkers, imaging studies and functional somatostatin scans. Various treatment options are available for curative and palliative treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors]

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms. Currently, incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) is being significantly increased. There are 3 groups of gNETs: types I, II and III. Each type has important features regarding clinical picture, prognosis and treatment strategy. Type I is the most common (70-80%) and associated with chronic atrophic gastritis including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter associated atrophic gastritis. Type II (5-6%) is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN I - ZES). Both types are characterized by hypergastrinemia and small tumor dimension. These neoplasms are multiple and mostly benign. On the contrary, NETs type III (10-15%) is not associated with hypergastrinemia and represented by single large neoplasms. Tumors are malignant as a rule. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are preferred for these tumors. Endoscopic surgery followed by observation is acceptable for almost all NETS type I and II. At the same time, this approach is advisable only for small and highly differentiated neoplasms type III.

Clinical characteristics of early neuroendocrine carcinoma in stomach: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is rare. It is considered to be aggressive and has a poor prognosis since the diagnosis is usually made at its advanced stage. However, the survival rate is increased in some early gastric NECs. This study showed a case and reviewed the clinical characteristics of early NECs in stomach.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 38-year-old man displayed no symptoms and underwent the gastric endoscopy test for his health examination, which showed a red slightly depressed lesion 1.0 cm in size on the lesser curvature of gastric cardia. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) revealed a clear demarcation and an irregular mesh in vessels within the depressed area. The background mucosa was negative for atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter Pylori infection. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan disclosed no obvious thickening of stomach and lymphadenopathy. Blood tests and physical examination were unremarkable. He had not received any surgical treatment and denied a family history of cancer and any genetic disorders. The pathologic result of biopsy from the lesion was suspicious of superficial carcinoma. Then endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed.

DIAGNOSIS

Gastric NEC G3 in the early stage (T1aN0M0).

INTERVENTIONS

Concerning this patient's situation, we considered the ESD as a curable treatment. And no radical surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy was arranged.

OUTCOMES

The patient is doing well and displays no recurrence for 11 months, who is still in follow-up.

LESSONS SUBSECTIONS AS PER STYLE

The early diagnosis and effective treatment by endoscopy would contribute to improve the prognosis of gastric NECs.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a 10-year data analysis of Northern China

Objective: Endoscopy is the main method to treat gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs), but the specific indications are still controversial. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of GI-NETs patients who experienced endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features and prognosis of 65 GI-NETs patients who underwent ESD between 2008 and 2018. Results: A total of 65 patients diagnosed with GI-NETs pathologically, bearing 75 lesions, were found by endoscopy incidentally for other symptoms. The locations of these lesions were stomach (n = 24), duodenal bulb (n = 4) and rectum (n = 47). The diameter of 75 tumors were as follows: size ≤ 1 cm (78.7%), 1 cm < size ≤ 2 cm (17.3%), 2 cm < size ≤ 3.5 cm (4.0%). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) suggested that 72 lesions were confined to submucosa and 3 lesions invaded into muscularis propria. The rates of en bloc resection and complete resection were all 100% and the rates of intraoperative bleeding and perforation were 2.7% and 1.3%, respectively. None of the 65 patients had lymph nodes and distant metastasis during the period of study. Conclusion: For GI-NETs without lymph nodes and distant metastases, the lesion confined to submucosa with the diameter ≤1 cm is absolute indication of ESD. For rectal neuroendocrine tumors limited in submucosa with the diameter between 1 and 2 cm, and Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors predicted to be T2, ESD should be prioritized to preserve gastrointestinal volume and function at initial treatment.

Insights into gastric neuroendocrine tumors burden

Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) are usually small lesions, restricted to mucosal and sub-mucosal layers of corpus and fundus, with low aggressive behavior, for the majority of cases. Nevertheless, some cases present aggressive behavior. The increasing incidence of gNETs brings together a new relevant problem: how to identify potentially aggressive type 1 gNETs. The challenging problem seems to be finding out signs or features able to predict potentially aggressive cases, allowing a tailored approach, since the involved societies dedicated to provide guidelines for management of these neoplasms apparently failed in producing staging systems able to accurately predict prognosis of these tumors. Additionally, it is also important to try to find out explanations for increasing incidence, as well as to identify potential targets aiming to reach better control of this neoplasia. Here, we discuss potential pathways implicated in aggressive behavior, as well as new strategies to improve clinical management of these tumors.

Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) are rare neoplasms, like all NETs. However, the incidence of GI-NETS has been increasing in recent years. Gastric NETs (G-NETs) and duodenal NETs (D-NETs) are the common types of upper GI-NETs based on tumor location. G-NETs are classified into three distinct subgroups: type I, II, and III. Type I G-NETs, which are the most common subtype (70%-80% of all G-NETs), are associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, including autoimmune gastritis and Helicobacter pylori associated atrophic gastritis. Type II G-NETs (5%-6%) are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (MEN1-ZES). Both type I and II G-NETs are related to hypergastrinemia, are small in size, occur in multiple numbers, and are generally benign. In contrast, type III G-NETs (10%-15%) are not associated with hypergastrinemia, are large-sized single tumors, and are usually malignant. Therefore, surgical resection and chemotherapy are generally necessary for type III G-NETs, while endoscopic resection and follow-up, which are acceptable for the treatment of most type I and II G-NETs, are only acceptable for small and well differentiated type III G-NETs. D-NETs include gastrinomas (50%-60%), somatostatin-producing tumors (15%), nonfunctional serotonin-containing tumors (20%), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (< 3%), and gangliocytic paragangliomas (< 2%). Most D-NETs are located in the first or second part of the duodenum, with 20% occurring in the periampullary region. Therapy for D-NETs is based on tumor size, location, histological grade, stage, and tumor type. While endoscopic resection may be considered for small nonfunctional D-NETs (G1) located in the higher papilla region, surgical resection is necessary for most other D-NETs. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment of D-NETs.

Rare Neoplasia of the Stomach

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenocarcinoma accounts for more than 90% of malignant lesions of the stomach. Besides this entity, numerous neoplastic lesions with malignant or benign characteristics as well as lesions with uncertain malignant potential occur. This review gives an overview on rare neoplasia of the stomach, focusing on gastric polyps, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, gastric lymphoma and neuroendocrine neoplasia.

SUMMARY

A broad spectrum of rare neoplastic lesions of the stomach with significant differences in malignant potential and with specific demands of interventional therapy is known. In addition to the use of high-definition endoscopy techniques, the histopathological assessment of lesions and of the surrounding mucosa is mandatory to characterize and differentiate malignant and benign tumors.

KEY MESSAGE

Rare neoplasia of the stomach is detected in approximately 6% of patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Diligent examination of the gastric mucosa remains essential to detect mucosal and submucosal lesions.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Presenting with a broad spectrum of symptoms, ranging from unspecific abdominal discomfort to gastrointestinal bleeding or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, different rare neoplastic lesions of the stomach with demand of specific diagnostic and therapeutic work-up occur. Diligent endoscopic evaluation of the entire gastric mucosa, preferably by high-definition endoscopy techniques, is essential in addition to histopathological examination of lesional and surrounding tissue.