Prevalence and Description of the Skin Reactions Associated with Adhesives in Diabetes Technology Devices in an Adult Population: Results of the CUTADIAB Study

Objective: The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) devices adhering to the skin can lead to skin reactions. The objective was to determine the prevalence and consequences of skin reactions at CGM or CSII sites in a large unbiased population. Research Design and Methods: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study. All adult patients with diabetes seen in consultation over a period of 7 months and using or having used a system with skin adhesives (in the last 10 years) were included and filled out a self-assessment questionnaire. Results: Among 851 patients, skin reaction was reported in 28% with CGM and 29% with CSII. Patients reporting reactions were more frequently women using CGM and CSII, and CGM users had type 1 more often than type 2 diabetes (P < 0.001). Manifestations were similar for reactions to CGM and CSII: redness and pruritus in 70%-75% of patients with reactions, pain in 20%-25%, and vesicles and desquamation in 12%-15%. Manifestations occurred within the first 24 h of first use in 22%-24% of patients with reactions to CGM and CSII, but after more than 6 months in 38% and 47% of patients with reactions to CGM and CSII, respectively. Device use was definitively stopped in 12% of patients with reactions to CGM (3.2% of all users) and 7% with reactions to CSII (2.1% of all users). Conclusions: Skin reactions were common, with similar presentations in CGM and CSII users. Manifestations suggested skin irritation rather than allergies. These reactions rarely led to the definitive discontinuation of the use of the device.

Insulin allergy: a diagnostic and therapeutic strategy based on a retrospective cohort and a case-control study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Insulin allergy is a rare but significant clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a management workflow by (1) validating clinical criteria to guide diagnosis, based on a retrospective cohort, and (2) assessing the diagnostic performance of confirmatory tests, based on a case-control study.

METHODS

In the retrospective cohort, patients with suspected insulin allergy were classified into three likelihood categories according to the presence of all (likely insulin allergy; 26/52, 50%), some (possible insulin allergy; 9/52, 17%) or none (unlikely insulin allergy; 17/52, 33%) of four clinical criteria: (1) recurrent local or systemic immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions; (2) reactions elicited by each injection; (3) reactions centred on the injection sites; and (4) reactions observed by the investigator (i.e. in response to an insulin challenge test). All underwent intradermal reaction (IDR) tests. A subsequent case-control study assessed the diagnostic performance of IDR, skin prick and serum anti-insulin IgE tests in ten clinically diagnosed insulin allergy patients, 24 insulin-treated non-allergic patients and 21 insulin-naive patients.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort, an IDR test validated the clinical diagnosis in 24/26 (92%), 3/9 (33%) and 0/14 (0%) likely, possible and unlikely insulin allergy patients, respectively. In the case-control study, an IDR test was 80% sensitive and 100% specific and identified the index insulin(s). The skin prick and IgE tests had a marginal diagnostic value. Patients with IDR-confirmed insulin allergy were treated using a stepwise strategy.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Subject to validation, clinical likelihood criteria can effectively guide diabetologists towards an insulin allergy diagnosis before undertaking allergology tests. An IDR test shows the best diagnostic performance. A progressive management strategy can subsequently be implemented. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is ultimately required in most patients.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT01407640.

Design of a prospective, longitudinal cohort of people living with type 1 diabetes exploring factors associated with the residual cardiovascular risk and other diabetes-related complications: The SFDT1 study

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, even after controlling for traditional CV risk factors. Therefore, determinants of the residual increased CV morbidity and mortality remain to be discovered. This prospective cohort of people living with T1DM in France (SFDT1) will include adults and children aged over six years living with T1DM, recruited throughout metropolitan France and overseas French departments and territories. The primary objective is to better understand the parameters associated with CV complications in T1DM. Clinical data and biobank samples will be collected during routine visits every three years. Data from connected tools, including continuous glucose monitoring, will be available during the 10-year active follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes, psychological and socioeconomic information will also be collected either at visits or through web questionnaires accessible via the internet. Additionally, access to the national health data system (Health Data Hub) will provide information on healthcare and a passive 20-year medico-administrative follow-up. Using Health Data Hub, SFDT1 participants will be compared to non-diabetic individuals matched on age, gender, and residency area. The cohort is sponsored by the French-speaking Foundation for Diabetes Research (FFRD) and aims to include 15,000 participants.

Practical implementation of automated closed-loop insulin delivery: A French position statement

Automated closed-loop (CL) insulin therapy has come of age. This major technological advance is expected to significantly improve the quality of care for adults, adolescents and children with type 1 diabetes. To improve access to this innovation for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to promote adherence to its requirements in terms of safety, regulations, ethics and practice, the French Diabetes Society (SFD) brought together a French Working Group of experts to discuss the current practical consensus. The result is the present statement describing the indications for CL therapy with emphasis on the idea that treatment expectations must be clearly defined in advance. Specifications for expert care centres in charge of initiating the treatment were also proposed. Great importance was also attached to the crucial place of high-quality training for patients and healthcare professionals. Long-term follow-up should collect not only metabolic and clinical results, but also indicators related to psychosocial and human factors. Overall, this national consensus statement aims to promote the introduction of marketed CL devices into standard clinical practice.

Impact of a sports project centered on scuba diving for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: New guidelines for adolescent recreational diving, a modification of the French regulations

BACKGROUND

Recreational scuba diving has been authorized for type 1 diabetics over 18 years old - the age of majority in France - since 2004, but it remained forbidden for younger diabetics by the French underwater federation (FFESSM). Here, we present a study to evaluate: - the conditions under which diving could be authorized for 14- to 18 year olds with type 1 diabetes; - the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) while diving. A secondary objective was to monitor the impact of diving on the teenagers' quality of life.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

Sixteen adolescents (14-17.5 years old) were included. Diabetes was known for 6 years (range, 1-14) and Hb1Ac was 9.0% (range, 7.7-11.9). The study was conducted in Mayotte with both capillary glycemia (CG) and CGM measurements taken during five dives.

RESULTS

The average CG prior to diving was 283mg/dL and decreased by 75±76mg/dL during the dive. No hypoglycemia occurred during the dives and four episodes occurred after. Glycemia variations during dives and for the overall duration of the study were greater than for adults, most likely due to the general adolescent behavior, notably regarding diet and diabetes management. CGM was greatly appreciated by the adolescents. They had an overall satisfactory quality of life. No significant variations were observed during the entire course of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in need of further studies, these preliminary results show that CGM can be used while diving. CGM records show a continuous decrease of glycemia during dives. Based on these results, the French underwater federation has now authorized diving for adolescent type 1 diabetics following a specific diving protocol that includes HbA1c<8.5%, autonomous management of diabetes by the adolescent, reduction of insulin doses, and target glycemia prior to the dive>250mg/dL.

[Diagnostic circumstances and clinical forms of type 1 diabetes]

Diagnostic circumstances and clinical forms of type 1 diabetes. In its classic form, type 1 diabetes is the prototype of insulindependent diabetes. But ketoacidosis can occur outside of type 1 diabetes, so ketoacdosis does not necessarily mean definitive insulin therapy. Conversely, type 1 diabetes may initially be mistaken for type 2 diabetes. This is often associated with insulin delay after months of wandering and poor blood glucose control. New forms of diabetes have appeared, such as fulminant diabetes, specific to individuals from South Asia and the Far East, but also iatrogenic forms associated with new immunomodulatory treatments that revolutionize the management of certain cancers. This review presents the clinic and differential diagnosis of type 1 diabetes including these new forms of diabetes.

Delay discounting of gains and losses, glycemic control and therapeutic adherence in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Delay discounting is the tendency to prefer smaller, sooner rewards to larger, later ones. Poor adherence in type 2 diabetes could be partially explained by a discounted value of health, as a function of delay. Delay discounting can be described with a hyperbolic model characterized by a coefficient, k. The higher k, the less future consequences are taken into account when making decisions. This study aimed to determine whether k would be correlated with glycated hemoglobin and adherence in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients were recruited in two diabetology departments. Delay discounting coefficients were measured with a computerized task. HbA1c was recorded and adherence was assessed by questionnaires. Potential socio-demographic and clinical confounding factors were collected.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between delay discounting of gains and HbA1c (r=0.242, P=0.023). This association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounding factors (F=4.807, P=0.031, η²=0.058). This association was partially mediated by adherence to medication (β=0.048, 95% CI [0.004-0.131]).

CONCLUSIONS

Glycemic control is associated with delay discounting in patients suffering from type 2 diabetes. Should these findings be replicated with a prospective design, they could lead to new strategies to improve glycemic control among these patients.

Assessment of a new insulin preparation for implanted pumps used in the treatment of type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Implanted insulin pumps using the peritoneal route provide long-term improvement of glucose control compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. The stability of insulin preparation is critical for a safe use in implanted pumps. Insuman implantable(®) (400 IU/mL) (Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), a recombinant human insulin, has been developed as a replacement for Insuplant(®) (Aventis Pharma, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), a semisynthetic insulin, the only one used so far. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the noninferiority of Insuman versus Insuplant, in terms of safety and effectiveness when used in implanted pumps.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The patients enrolled, currently treated for T1D by the Medtronic MiniMed (Northridge, CA) implantable pump model 2007 with Insuplant, were randomized into two study arms and received either Insuman or Insuplant for four pump refill cycles. Each pump refill cycle was 40±5 days. The co-primary end points included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline and pump infusion accuracy.

RESULTS

In total, 169 patients were randomized. Noninferiority of Insuman versus Insuplant was demonstrated both for the HbA1c change from baseline (as a percentage) with intergroup difference of 95% confidence interval (-0.36;+0.11) and for the infusion accuracy assessed by the measured percentage of error at pump refill, as shown by intergroup difference of 95% confidence interval (-5.81; -0.50), in per-protocol populations, although the insulin daily dose was similar. Severe hypoglycemia occurred at least once in 12 versus 11 patients, respectively, and metabolic or technical adverse events were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that Insuman can safely and effectively replace Insuplant in implanted pumps.

Effect of dietary protein on post-prandial glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In flexible insulin therapy, determination of the prandial insulin dose only takes into account the carbohydrate content of the evening meal, and not the protein content. Protein can, however, contribute to gluconeogenesis. We compared the glycaemic effect of a standard evening meal with that of a test evening meal enriched in protein.

METHODS

The present study was conducted in 28 C-peptide negative patients with type 1 diabetes. Two evening meals that were similar in content, except that one was enriched by the addition of 300 g of 0%-fat fromage frais, were taken on two consecutive days. Insulin doses were maintained exactly the same before both evening meals. Patients were monitored with a continuous glucose-monitoring device.

RESULTS

Patients ate similar quantities at both evening meals, except for protein (21.5 g more at the test evening meal). The preprandial insulin dose was 0.96 (0.4) U per 10 g carbohydrates. After correction for differences of interstitial glucose at the start of the evening meals, both interstitial and capillary glucose levels were similar after both evening meals, except for the late-post-prandial interstitial glucose level.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no effect of dietary protein on post-prandial-, overnight- or late-night glucose levels in patients with type 1 diabetes. This confirms that dietary proteins need not be included in the calculation of prandial insulin dose.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion allows tolerance induction and diabetes treatment in a type 1 diabetic child with insulin allergy

AIM

Insulin allergy is a rare but serious and challenging condition in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This is a case report of an 8-year-old boy with T1D and an allergy to insulin.

CASE REPORT

Three months after being diagnosed with T1D, the patient developed progressive skin reactions to insulin, characterized by small 1.5-cm pruritic wheals at injection sites that persisted for several days. Seven months after diagnosis, he experienced two episodes of generalized urticaria with systemic symptoms that were seen within a few seconds of insulin injection. Examination revealed lipoatrophy of the thighs. Intradermal skin tests were positive for protamine, glargine and lispro. The patient was started on a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) tolerance induction protocol, consisting of a very low basal rate that was progressively increased, with the first bolus given under medical supervision, and was well tolerated for 4 months. After this period of time, the skin wheals reappeared, localized to the infusion sites, but without urticaria or any other generalized reactions. Intradermal skin tests were repeated and were again positive. Serum insulin-specific IgE measured 30 months after the first allergic reactions were positive. After 3 years, pump therapy is ongoing and blood glucose control has remained relatively good (HbA1c 7.6%).

CONCLUSION

In T1D children with insulin allergy, CSII can successfully be used to both induce insulin tolerance and allow diabetes insulin therapy, although insulin desensitization cannot always be fully achieved. The induction protocol was easily manageable partly due to the "honeymoon" period that the patient was still in, but it should nonetheless be used even when the patient has higher insulin requirements.

Emergent technologies applied to diabetes: what do we need to integrate continuous glucose monitoring into daily practice? Where the long-term use of continuous glucose monitoring stands in 2011

The earliest continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices did not permit real-time readouts of glucose measurements. Instead, they were used to determine the glucose profile of patients in "real life" and as educational tools. In contrast, the latest real-time devices, whether linked or not to an insulin pump, give the patient access to glucose measurements and incorporate alarms that can be set. Thus, they are the newest self-management tools for patients with type 1 diabetes requiring an intensive insulin regimen. Some long-term studies in a selected population of patients with type 1 diabetes have shown improvement of glycaemic control as measured by HbA(1c). Although the characteristics of "responsive" patients have yet to be identified, the ability of the patient to use the system on a near-daily basis (about 80% of the time) is a key point. Initial training of the patient by a professional team with expertise in CGM is also of the utmost importance. To date, CGM is not reimbursed by Social Security in France.

Assessment of patient-led or physician-driven continuous glucose monitoring in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes using basal-bolus insulin regimens: a 1-year multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The benefits of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to compare the effect of two modes of use of CGM, patient led or physician driven, for 1 year in subjects with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with type 1 diabetes aged 8-60 years with HbA(1c) ≥ 8% were randomly assigned to three groups (1:1:1). Outcomes for glucose control were assessed at 1 year for two modes of CGM (group 1: patient led; group 2: physician driven) versus conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (group 3: control).

RESULTS

A total of 257 subjects with type 1 diabetes underwent screening. Of these, 197 were randomized, with 178 patients completing the study (age: 36 ± 14 years; HbA(1c): 8.9 ± 0.9%). HbA(1c) improved similarly in both CGM groups and was reduced compared with the control group (group 1 vs. group 3: -0.52%, P = 0.0006; group 2 vs. group 3: -0.47%, P = 0.0008; groups 1 + 2 vs. group 3: -0.50%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in the three groups. Patient SF-36 questionnaire physical health score improved in both experimental CGM groups (P = 0.004). Sensor consumption was 34% lower in group 2 than in group 1 (median [Q1-Q3] consumption: group 1: 3.42/month [2.20-3.91] vs. group 2: 2.25/month [1.27-2.99], P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both patient-led and physician-driven CGM provide similar long-term improvement in glucose control in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes, but the physician-driven CGM mode used fewer sensors.

Ambulatory 24-hour fast using flexible insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIM

Prolonged fasting may be necessary in life for religious, medical and other reasons. For this reason, our study investigated the feasibility and safety of a 24-h fast conducted at home for patients with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with type 1 diabetes performed a 24-h complete fast at home. Thirteen patients were treated with multiple insulin injections using either glargine (n=12) or NPH (n=1) as basal insulin. The remaining patients were treated with an insulin pump. All patients received their basal insulin only, which was adjusted to 40% of their total daily dose, and were monitored by either a Gold(®) or Guardian(®) continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS) device. Capillary glucose (SMBG) was targeted at 3.9-7.8 mmol/L, with a standardized protocol for correction of hyper- and hypoglycaemia. Interstitial glucose (IG) profiles were compared with the SMBG values; the IG profiles of patients using glargine or a pump and either of the two CGMS devices were also compared.

RESULTS

All of the patients completed the 24-h fast with no major incident. At the end of the fast, 80% of the IG values were on target. The route by which insulin was delivered made no difference, but there were more IG values on target in patients monitored by the Guardian(®) device. IG was below target in 104 occurrences and above-target in 34. After a mean intake of 10 g of sucrose, below-target IG was corrected within 30 min [range: 15-40]. The mean insulin dose to correct above-target episodes was 1 U.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged fasting is possible at home in patients with type 1 diabetes, provided the basal dose is adjusted. The use of CGMS is not necessary, but offers useful information on the patient's IG profile during the fast.

Peak-time determination of post-meal glucose excursions in insulin-treated diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the optimal time to measure peak blood glucose values to find the best approach for self-monitoring blood glucose after a meal.

DESIGN AND METHODS

For this retrospective analysis, 69 ambulatory continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS) profiles were obtained from 75 consecutive insulin-treated patients with diabetes. The parameters measured were the peak post-meal blood glucose values, peak time, and rates of increase and decrease to and from the zenith of the resulting curves.

RESULTS

The mean peak time after breakfast was 72+/-23 min, which was reached in less than 90 min in 80% of the patients. The apparent glucose rate of increase from pre-meal to the maximum postprandial value was 1.23+/-0.76 mg/dL/min, while the glucose rate of decrease was 0.82+/-0.70 mg/dL/min. Peak time correlated with the amplitude of postprandial excursions, but not with the peak glucose value. Also, peak times were similar after breakfast, lunch and dinner, and in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.

CONCLUSION

To best assess peak postprandial glucose levels, the optimal time for blood glucose monitoring is about 1h and 15 min after the start of the meal, albeit with wide interpatient variability. Nevertheless, 80% of post-meal blood glucose peaks were observed at less than 90 min after the start of the meal.

The clinical variability of maternally inherited diabetes and deafness is associated with the degree of heteroplasmy in blood leukocytes

CONTEXT

Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD) is a rare form of diabetes with a matrilineal transmission, sensorineural hearing loss, and macular pattern dystrophy due to an A to G transition at position 3243 of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (m.3243A>G). The phenotypic heterogeneity of MIDD may be the consequence of different levels of mutated mtDNA among mitochondria in a given tissue.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was thus to ascertain the correlation between the severity of the phenotype in patients with MIDD and the level of heteroplasmy in the blood leukocytes.

PARTICIPANTS

The GEDIAM prospective multicenter register was initiated in 1995. Eighty-nine Europid patients from this register, with MIDD and the mtDNA 3243A>G mutation, were included. Patients with MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) or with mitochondrial diabetes related to other mutations or to deletions of mtDNA were excluded.

RESULTS

A significant negative correlation was found between levels of heteroplasmy and age of the patients at the time of sampling for molecular analysis, age at the diagnosis of diabetes, and body mass index. After adjustment for age at sampling for molecular study and gender, the correlation between heteroplasmy levels and age at the diagnosis of diabetes was no more significant. The two other correlations remained significant. A significant positive correlation between levels of heteroplasmy and HbA(1c) was also found and remained significant after adjustment for age at molecular sampling and gender.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that heteroplasmy levels are at least one of the determinants of the severity of the phenotype in MIDD.

Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) and multiple daily injections (MDIs) with insulin glargine as basal insulin and mealtime insulin lispro have not been prospectively compared in people naïve to either regimen in a multicenter study. We aimed to help close that deficiency.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

People with type 1 diabetes on NPH-based insulin therapy were randomized to CSII or glargine-based MDI (both otherwise using lispro) and followed for 24 weeks in an equivalence design. Fifty people were correctly randomized, and 43 completed the study.

RESULTS

Total insulin requirement (mean +/- SD) at end point was 36.2 +/- 11.5 units/day on CSII and 42.6 +/- 15.5 units/day on MDI. Mean A1C fell similarly in the two groups (CSII -0.7 +/- 0.7%; MDI -0.6 +/- 0.8%) with a baseline-adjusted difference of -0.1% (95% CI -0.5 to 0.3). Similarly, fasting blood glucose and other preprandial, postprandial, and nighttime self-monitored plasma glucose levels did not differ between the regimens, nor did measures of plasma glucose variability. On CSII, 1,152 hypoglycemia events were recorded by 23 of 28 participants (82%) and 1,022 in the MDI group by 27 of 29 patients (93%) (all hypoglycemia differences were nonsignificant). Treatment satisfaction score increased more with CSII; however, the change in score was similar for the groups. Costs were approximately 3.9 times higher for CSII.

CONCLUSIONS

In unselected people with type 1 diabetes naïve to CSII or insulin glargine, glycemic control is no better with the more expensive CSII therapy compared with glargine-based MDI therapy.