ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Challenges in oncology career: are we closing the gender gap? Results of the new ESMO Women for Oncology Committee survey

BACKGROUND

Following a European Society for Medical Oncology Women for Oncology (ESMO W4O) survey in 2016 showing severe under-representation of female oncologists in leadership roles, ESMO launched a series of initiatives to address obstacles to gender equity. A follow-up survey in October 2021 investigated progress achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The W4O questionnaire 2021 expanded on the 2016 survey, with additional questions on the impact of ethnicity, sexual orientation and religion on career development. Results were analysed according to respondent gender and age.

RESULTS

The survey sample was larger than in 2016 (n = 1473 versus 482), especially among men. Significantly fewer respondents had managerial or leadership roles than in 2016 (31.8% versus 51.7%). Lack of leadership development for women and unconscious bias were considered more important in 2021 than in 2016. In 2021, more people reported harassment in the workplace than in 2016 (50.3% versus 41.0%). In 2021, ethnicity, sexual orientation and religion were considered to have little or no impact on professional career opportunities, salary setting or related potential pay gap. However, gender had a significant or major impact on career development (25.5% of respondents), especially in respondents ≤40 years of age and women. As in 2016, highest ranked initiatives to foster workplace equity were promotion of work-life balance, development and leadership training and flexible working. Significantly more 2021 respondents (mainly women) supported the need for culture and gender equity education at work than in 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender remains a major barrier to career progression in oncology and, although some obstacles may have been reduced since 2016, we are a long way from closing the gender gap. Increased reporting of discrimination and inappropriate behaviour in the workplace is a major, priority concern. The W4O 2021 survey findings provide new evidence and highlight the areas for future ESMO interventions to support equity and diversity in oncology career development.

Capability of Far-Infrared for the selective identification of red and black pigments in paint layers

Artworks are complex objects that merit study and preservation. Far-infrared spectroscopy in ATR mode appears to be a suitable technique for this purpose because it enables information to be obtained regarding the material's composition in a non-destructive way. The use of Far-infrared is especially interesting because most organic compounds do not absorb in this energy range, suggesting the possibility of identifying inorganic pigments. Based on works performed by two research groups from the University of Bologna and the University of Tartu, this study attempts to obtain additional information regarding the capabilities and limitations of Far-infrared spectroscopy when it is applied to objects as complex as artworks. This article first studies the capability of the technique for identifying pigments by following the stability of the position of their absorption bands when mixed with linseed oil, the minimum amount of pigment necessary to be detected and how this amount changes when it is part of a paint layer. The consequences of the pigment: linseed oil interaction and the ageing process are also studied through changes in the linseed oil signal absorptions related to the acid carboxylic and carboxylate bands. The entire study leads to the conclusion that Far-Infrared in ATR mode is an interesting option for the selective identification of some inorganic pigments, but their potential application depends on each case considered.

The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care and oncology clinical research: an experts' perspective

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic promises to have lasting impacts on cancer clinical trials that could lead to faster patient access to new treatments. In this article, an international panel of oncology experts discusses the lasting impacts of the pandemic on oncology clinical trials and proposes solutions for clinical trial stakeholders, with the support of recent data on worldwide clinical trials collected by IQVIA. These lasting impacts and proposed solutions encompass three topic areas. Firstly, acceleration and implementation of new operational approaches to oncology trials with patient-centric, fully decentralized virtual approaches that include remote assessments via telemedicine and remote devices. Geographical differences in the uptake of remote technology, including telemedicine, are discussed in the article, focusing on the impact of the local adoption of new operational approaches. Secondly, innovative clinical trials. The pandemic has highlighted the need for new trial designs that accelerate research and limit risks and burden for patients while driving optimization of clinical trial objectives and endpoints, while testing is being minimized. Areas of considerations for clinical trial stakeholders are discussed in detail. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials; the approach for oncology clinical trials to improve generalizability of efficacy and outcomes data is discussed. Thirdly, a new problem-focused collaborative framework between oncology trial stakeholders, including decision makers, to leverage and further accelerate the innovative approaches in clinical research developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This could shorten timelines for patient access to new treatments by addressing the cultural and technological barriers to adopting new operational approaches and innovative clinical trials. The role of the different stakeholders is described, with the aim of making COVID-19 a catalyst for positive change in oncology clinical research and eventually in cancer care.

Clinical benefit of systemic therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer-ESMO-MCBS scores

BACKGROUND

Licensed systemic treatment options for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer are platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance treatment with bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. For platinum-resistant disease, several non-platinum options are available. We aimed to assess the clinical benefit of these treatments according to the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out including all studies evaluating systemic treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, from 1990 onwards. Randomised trials with an adequate comparator and design showing a statistically significant benefit of the study arm were independently scored by two blinded observers using the ESMO-MCBS.

RESULTS

A total of 1127 papers were identified, out of which 61 reported results of randomised trials of sufficient quality. Nineteen trials showed statistically significant results and the studied treatments were graded according to ESMO-MCBS. Only three treatments showed substantial benefit (score of 4 on a scale of 1-5) according to the ESMO-MCBS: platinum-based chemotherapy with paclitaxel in the platinum-sensitive setting and the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in the platinum-resistant setting. The WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib (not licensed) also scores a 4, based on a recent small phase II study. Assessment of quality-of-life data and toxicity using the ESMO-MCBS showed to be complex, which should be taken into account in using this score for clinical decision making.

CONCLUSION

Only a few licensed systemic therapies for recurrent ovarian cancer show substantial clinical benefit based on ESMO-MCBS scores. Trials demonstrating overall survival benefit are sparse.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Surgery

METHODS

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology council nominated an international multidisciplinary development group made of practicing clinicians who have demonstrated leadership and interest in the care of ovarian cancer (20 experts across Europe). To ensure that the statements are evidence based, the current literature identified from a systematic search has been reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group (expert agreement). The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 66 international reviewers independent from the development group including patients representatives.

RESULTS

The guidelines cover preoperative workup, specialized multidisciplinary decision making, and surgical management of diagnosed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers. The guidelines are also illustrated by algorithms.

ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease

The development of guidelines is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on April 12-14, 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†

The development of guidelines recommendations is one of the core activities of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Society of Gynaecologial Oncology (ESGO), as part of the mission of both societies to improve the quality of care for patients with cancer across Europe. ESMO and ESGO jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations in several selected areas in order to improve the quality of care for women with ovarian cancer. The ESMO-ESGO consensus conference on ovarian cancer was held on 12-14 April 2018 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of ovarian cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel worked on five clinically relevant questions regarding ovarian cancer relating to each of the following four areas: pathology and molecular biology, early-stage and borderline tumours, advanced stage disease and recurrent disease. Relevant scientific literature, as identified using a systematic search, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. The recommendations presented here are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. This article presents the recommendations of this ESMO-ESGO consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Abstract CT014: A large phase I study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: Deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) is the key gatekeeper enzyme that inhibits 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) misincorporation into DNA in tumor cells, and its overexpression is associated with resistance to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.1 TAS-114 is an oral dUTPase inhibitor and has shown favorable safety and preliminary efficacy in combination with S-1 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.2 This Phase I study further evaluated TAS-114/S-1 combination therapy in advanced solid tumors (NCT02454062).

Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and who failed all standard therapies were enrolled. Primary objectives were safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TAS-114 combined with S-1. Secondary objectives were pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity. In the dose-escalation phase, pts received an increasing dose of twice-daily (BID) TAS-114 (5 mg/m2 [dose level 1] to 240 mg/m2 [level 12]) + BID S-1 25 mg/m2 (levels 1-4), 30 mg/m2 (levels 5-11), or 36 mg/m2 (level 12) for 14 days with 7 days' rest in a 21-day cycle; the expansion cohort received the MTD. PK analyses were performed on day 1 (cycle 1) in both phases and following a single dose of S-1, 7-10 days before day 1 of treatment with TAS-114/S-1, in the expansion phase.

Results: 99 pts were enrolled: 53.5% were male, median age was 59.4 years (36-78), and 81.8% were Caucasian. Most common cancer types were colorectal (n=43; 43.4%) and pancreatic (n=16; 16.2%), and 45 pts (45.5%) had ≥4 prior lines of anticancer therapy. In the dose-escalation phase (n=37), 3 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (1 in dose level 7 and 2 in level 12) and the MTD was determined to be TAS-114 240 mg/m2 + S-1 30 mg/m2 BID (dose level 11). PK analysis did not show any significant correlation between the plasma concentrations of TAS-114 and S-1 or its metabolites. In the expansion phase (n=62), grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 47 pts (75.8%) and treatment related in 38 (61.3%). Overall, the most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia (17.2%), rash (10.1%), asthenia (8.1%), neutropenia, and increased blood bilirubin (each 5.1%). Ten pts died during the study (none treatment related). PK interaction analysis in the expansion phase indicated similar exposure of 5-FU with S-1 alone and with TAS-114. Five pts had a partial response (1 each with breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer; 2 with non-small-cell lung cancer), 51 (51.5%) had stable disease (30 [68.4%] in the expansion cohort), and the objective response rate was 5.1% (8.1% in the expansion cohort).

Conclusions: TAS-114 combined with S-1 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and preliminary efficacy in heavily pretreated pts with advanced solid tumors. 1. Ladner RD et al. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3493-3503. 2. Aoyama T et al. Eur J Cancer 2016; 69: S117-S118.

Citation Format: Angelica Fasolo, Takekazu Aoyama, Anastasios Stathis, Christiana Sessa, Antoine Hollebecque, Jean Charles Soria, Alberto Sobrero, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Kunihiro Yoshisue, Lucca Gianni. A large phase I study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT014.

Enzymuria in Carboplatin Nephrotoxicity

Urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase (NAG) is an early marker of nephrotoxicity. NAG activity was assayed by the fluorimetric method of Leaback and Walker in 17 patients treated (22 courses) with carboplatin (CBDCA, 220–550 mg/m2) before infusion and 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after. Increased excretion of NAG, a sensitive index of renal tubular damage, was observed following 10 of the 22 courses. A transient increase in plasma creatinine and/or abnormal proteinuria was observed in 6 cases. Impaired renal function prior to therapv seems to be a predisposing factor to the nephrotoxicity.

Genetic susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma in southern Switzerland: role of CDKN2A, MC1R and MITF

BACKGROUND

Nearly 10% of all cases of cutaneous melanoma (CM) occur in patients with a personal or family history of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain information about genetic predisposition to CM in Ticino, the southern region of Switzerland, a zone with moderate-to-high CM incidence.

METHODS

We identified germline mutations in highly CM-associated genes (CDKN2A and CDK4) and low/medium-penetrance variants (MC1R and MITF) in patients with multiple primary CMs or individuals with one or more CM and a positive family history for CM or pancreatic cancer among first- or second-degree relatives. Healthy blood donors (n = 146) were included as a control group.

RESULTS

From July 2010 to July 2012, 57 patients (41 pedigrees) were included. Twenty-six were melanoma-prone families (with at least two cases) and 15 had multiple CMs. Pancreatic cancer was found in six families. The CDKN2A mutation p.V126D was identified in seven patients (four families) with a founder effect, whereas CDKN2A A148T was detected in seven cases (five families) and seven healthy donors (odds ratio 2·76, 95% confidence interval 0·83-9·20). At least one MC1R melanoma-associated polymorphism was detected in 32 patients (78%) and 97 healthy donors (66%), with more than one polymorphism in 12 patients (29%) and 25 healthy donors (17%). The MITF variant p.E318K was identified in four patients from three additional pedigrees (7%) and one healthy control (0·7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion criteria for the Ticino population for genetic assessment should follow the rule of two (two affected individuals in a family or a patient with multiple CMs), as we detected a CDKN2A mutation in almost 10% of our pedigrees (four of 41), MITF p.E318K in 7% (three of 41) and a higher number of MC1R variants than in the control population.

A phase I study of PankoMab-GEX, a humanised glyco-optimised monoclonal antibody to a novel tumour-specific MUC1 glycopeptide epitope in patients with advanced carcinomas

BACKGROUND

A phase I open-label dose-escalation study was conducted to define the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of PankoMab-GEX, a glyco-optimised humanised IgG1, with high affinity to a novel tumour-specific glycopeptide epitope of MUC1 (TA-MUC1) with excellent preclinical anti-tumour activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients with advanced TA-MUC1-positive carcinomas received PankoMab-GEX intravenously every 3 (Q3W), 2 (Q2W), or 1 (QW) week in doses of 1-2200 mg in a three-plus-three dose-escalation design until disease progression (NCT01222624).

RESULTS

No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Adverse events were mainly mild-to-moderate infusion-related reactions (IRRs) by the first infusion in 45% of patients. Only one dose-limiting toxicity, a grade III IRR, was observed. PankoMab-GEX exhibited linear PK over all doses. Mean terminal half-life was 189 ± 66 h (Q3W), without dose dependency. A target trough level ≥50 μg/mL was reached after one infusion with doses ≥1700 mg Q3W in 80% of patients. Clinical benefit in 60 evaluable patients included one complete response in a patient with ovarian cancer treated 483 d and confirmed disease stabilisation in 19 patients lasting a median (range) of 23 (10-109) weeks. All but two of the patients with clinical benefit had received a compounded total dose ≥700 mg over a 3-week period, including 8 of 12 (67%) patients with ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

PankoMab-GEX is safe, well tolerated, and showed promising anti-tumour activity in advanced disease. A phase IIb study is ongoing evaluating the efficacy of PankoMab-GEX as a maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Treatment with the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir triggers the unfolded protein response and may overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance of multiple myeloma in combination with bortezomib: a phase I trial (SAKK 65/08)

Downregulation of the unfolded protein response mediates proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma. The Human Immunodeficieny Virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir activates the unfolded protein response in vitro. We determined dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose for phase II of nelfinavir in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Twelve patients with advanced hematologic malignancies were treated with nelfinavir (2500-5000 mg/day p.o., days 1-14, 3+3 dose escalation) and bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, 11; 21-day cycles). A run in phase with nelfinavir monotherapy allowed pharmakokinetic/pharmakodynamic assessment of nelfinavir in the presence or absence of concomittant bortezomib. End points included dose-limiting toxicity, activation of the unfolded protein response, proteasome activity, toxicity and response to trial treatment. Nelfinavir 2×2500 mg was the recommended phase II dose identified. Nelfinavir alone significantly up-regulated expression of proteins related to the unfolded protein response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and inhibited proteasome activity. Of 10 evaluable patients in the dose escalation cohort, 3 achieved a partial response, 4 stable disease for 2 cycles or more, while 3 had progressive disease as best response. In an exploratory extension cohort with 6 relapsed, bortezomib-refractory, lenalidomide-resistant myeloma patients treated at the recommended phase II dose, 3 reached a partial response, 2 a minor response, and one progressive disease. The combination of nelfinavir with bortezomib is safe and shows promising activity in advanced, bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma. Induction of the unfolded protein response by nelfinavir may overcome the biological features of proteasome inhibitor resistance. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01164709).

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

The ESMO guideline strategy: an identity statement and reflections on improvement

Guidelines should provide recommendations on the optimal management of a patient in specific clinical circumstances based on the scientific evidence. ESMO, as Europe's leading society in medical oncology produces a range of guideline products in order to assist the cancer specialist towards implementation of quality cancer care, as well as in order to provide information to patients establishing standards for up-to-date optimal management. The ESMO 'guideline products' include the Clinical Practice Guidelines, the complementing Consensus Conferences on focused clinical scenarios, as well as memory tools such as print and e-Pocket Guidelines and Patient Guides. In this manuscript, methodology, design and characteristics of the ESMO guideline products are explained and discussed by their strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats in order to stimulate reflections on room for improvement and future strategy.

Integrative population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose finding approach of the new camptothecin compound namitecan (ST1968)

AIMS

Namitecan is a new camptothecan compound undergoing early clinical development. This study was initiated to build an integrated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) population model of namitecan to guide future clinical development.

METHODS

Plasma concentration-time data, neutrophils and thrombocytes were pooled from two phase 1 studies in 90 patients with advanced solid tumours, receiving namitecan as a 2 h infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (D1,8) (n = 34), once every 3 weeks (D1) (n = 29) and on 3 consecutive days (D1-3) (n = 27). A linear three compartment PK model was coupled to a semiphysiological PD-model for neutrophils and thrombocytes. Data simulations were used to interrogate various dosing regimens and give dosing recommendations.

RESULTS

Clearance was estimated to be 0.15 l h(-1), with a long terminal half-life of 48 h. Body surface area was not associated with clearance, supporting flat-dosing of namitecan. A significant and clinically relevant association was found between namitecan area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the percentage drop of neutrophils (r(2) = 0.51, P < 10(-4)) or thrombocytes (r(2) = 0.49, P < 10(-4)). With a target for haematological dose-limiting toxicity of <20%, the recommended dose was defined as 12.5 mg for the D1,8 regimen, 23 mg for the once every 3 week regimen and 7 mg for the D1-3 regimen.

CONCLUSION

This is the first integrated population PK-PD analysis of the new hydrophilic topoisomerase I inhibitor namitecan, that is currently undergoing early clinical development. A distinct relationship was found between drug exposure and haematological toxicity, supporting flat-dosing once every 3 weeks as the most adequate dosing regimen.

Five-year results from the prospective European multicentre cohort study on radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins

Background

This was a prospective study of radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation (RFA) for the treatment of incompetent varicose great saphenous veins (GSVs). The present report describes long-term follow-up at 5 years.

Methods

The 5-year follow-up of this multicentre European study included assessment of the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and GSV occlusion and reflux on duplex imaging.

Results

A total of 225 patients had 295 GSVs treated by RFA, achieving an initial vein occlusion rate of 100 per cent. With 80·0 per cent compliance, Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a GSV occlusion rate of 91·9 per cent and a reflux-free rate of 94·9 per cent at 5 years. Among the 15 GSVs noted with reflux during follow-up, only three showed full recanalization of the GSV at 1 week, 6 months and 3 years. Of the 12 legs with partial recanalization, reflux originated at the saphenofemoral junction in ten, with a mean length of the patent segment of 5·8 (range 3·2–10) cm; only six patients were symptomatic. Mean(s.d.) VCSS scores improved from 3·9(2·1) at baseline to 0·6(1·2), 0·9(1·3) and 1·3(1·7) at 1, 3 and 5 years.

Conclusion

At 5 years RFA proved to be an efficient endovenous treatment for incompetent GSVs in terms of sustained clinical and anatomical success for the vast majority of treated patients.

Editor's choice--hybrid treatment of thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the results of hybrid techniques for the treatment of thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal aortic aneurysms based on multicenter results and the various series regarding hybrid procedures reported in the literature.

METHODS

The results of 76 hybrid procedures performed in 19 French university hospital centers between November 2001 and October 2011 were collected. There were 50 men and 26 women, mean age 68.2 (35-86) years. All patients were considered at high risk (ASA≥3) for conventional surgery. Aneurysms involved the thoracic, abdominal, and thoracoabdominal aorta in five, 14, and 57 cases respectively. There were 11 emergent repairs. The revascularization of four visceral arteries was performed in 38 cases. Between one and three visceral arteries were revascularized in the other cases. Visceral artery debranching and stent graft deployment were performed in a one-stage procedure in 53 cases and in a two-stage procedure in 23 cases.

RESULTS

There were 26 (34.2%) postoperative deaths. Nine of the survivors developed paraplegia, of which one resolved completely. Bowel ischemia occurred in 13 cases (17.1%), and one patient was treated by a superior mesenteric artery bypass. Four patients required long-term hemodialysis. Postoperative computed tomography scan showed a type II endoleak in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality in this study were greater than previously reported. Candidates for hybrid aortic repair should be carefully selected.

[Nephrological paradox]

Patients that are followed by nephrologists from the beginning of the illness, they show a deceleration in the progression of the Chronic Kidney Disease towards dialysis and a better quality of life (less osteodystrophy, anaemia and fluids overload, better pressure management). However, in 2013 it still exists a great lack of knowledge about the professional figure of nephrologist. Residents of Nephrological School of Catania decided to conduct a survey to evaluate common knowledge of renal diseases and their treatments. The survey was conducted in two cities of Sicily. The results show that people are generally uninformed and disoriented about renal illness and their risks.

Phase I study of humanized monoclonal antibody AVE1642 directed against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R), administered in combination with anticancer therapies to patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) mediates resistance to chemotherapy and targeted agents. This study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and tolerability of humanized IGF-1R antibody AVE1642 with other cancer treatments.

PATIENTS

Patients with advanced solid tumors received three weekly AVE1642 dosed at 6 mg/kg, chosen following previous study, with 75 (cohort A) or 100 mg/m(2) (B) docetaxel, 1250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine/100 mg erlotinib (C1), or 60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin (D1). Blood samples were assayed for PK, IGFs, and IGF-BP3.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients received 317 AVE1642 infusions. The commonest adverse events were diarrhea (37/58 patients), asthenia (34/58), nausea (30/58), and stomatitis (21/58). Dose-limiting toxic effects in cohorts C1 (diarrhea) and D1 (neutropenia) prompted addition of cohorts C2 (1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine/75 mg erlotinib) and D2 (50 mg/m(2) doxorubicin). Grade 3-4 hyperglycemia (three cases) accompanied steroid premedication for docetaxel administration. No PK interactions were detected. There were three partial responses in cohorts B (melanoma) and C (leiomyosarcoma, two cases) and 22 stabilizations ≥12 weeks, giving a control rate of 25/57 (44%). On treatment IGF-II rose by 68 ± 25 ng/ml in patients discontinuing treatment <12 weeks, and fell by 55.5 ± 21 ng/ml with disease control (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

AVE1642 was tolerable with 75-100 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine/75 mg erlotinib, achieving durable disease control in 44%, with an association between IGF-II and response.

Seminars in clinical pharmacology: an introduction to MET inhibitors for the medical oncologist

MET is a tyrosine kinase receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), primarily expressed on epithelial cells; the activation of MET induces several biological responses relevant for the development and growth of many human cancers. Several human malignancies present altered expression of MET and this is usually associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. The majority of MET inhibitors in clinical development target directly the receptor through the use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or through small molecule inhibitors of MET kinase activity; small molecule inhibitors are very potent but less specific than MAbs. MET inhibitors are of great clinical interest because of the extensive crosstalk of the HGF/MET axis with many other signaling pathways, including growth factor-dependent pathways (like PI3K/AKT/mTOR,RAS/RAF/ERK) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) axis. In preclinical studies, the treatment with MET inhibitors could prevent or reverse resistance to inhibitors of growth factor-dependent signaling; this hypothesis is currently tested in phase III trials with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on preclinical and preliminary clinical results, a rational strategy for the clinical development of MET antagonists should include a selection of the tumors with MET overexpression, the identification of prognostic/predictive biomarkers, the evaluation of combinations with anti-VEGF compounds.

Update on PARP1 inhibitors in ovarian cancer

The clinical development of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of tumors deficient in BRCA1 or BRCA2 is based on the concept of synthetic lethality. From the initial proof of concept study with the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib (AZD2281) in BRCA mutation carriers, in which 28% of ovarian cancer patients achieved an objective response, the target population of ovarian patients potentially sensitive to treatment with PARP inhibitors has greatly increased. Objective responses have been observed in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant BRCA mutation carriers but, more recently, also in BRCA negative 'BRCAness' patients, those with no BRCA mutations but with a dysfunction of the homologous recombination (HR) system, which makes them more sensitive to the antitumor agents which cause double strand breaks of DNA. The recent results achieved with olaparib, given as maintenance in platinum sensitive recurrent high grade serous ovarian cancer, in response after reinduction with platinum, confirm the antitumor effect of single agent olaparib in BRCAness patients. Main topics of investigations in this field are the identification of BRCAness phenotype and the definition of tests to identify BRCAness patients. More in general, additional preclinical studies are needed to further improve clinical results in order to define the optimal regimen of combination with PARP1 inhibitor and cytotoxics or molecular targeted agents (sequence of administration, interval between dosing of the agents, duration of treatment).