1
|
Galdi P, Cabez MB, Farrugia C, Vaher K, Williams LZJ, Sullivan G, Stoye DQ, Quigley AJ, Makropoulos A, Thrippleton MJ, Bastin ME, Richardson H, Whalley H, Edwards AD, Bajada CJ, Robinson EC, Boardman JP. Feature similarity gradients detect alterations in the neonatal cortex associated with preterm birth. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26660. [PMID: 38488444 PMCID: PMC10941526 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The early life environment programmes cortical architecture and cognition across the life course. A measure of cortical organisation that integrates information from multimodal MRI and is unbound by arbitrary parcellations has proven elusive, which hampers efforts to uncover the perinatal origins of cortical health. Here, we use the Vogt-Bailey index to provide a fine-grained description of regional homogeneities and sharp variations in cortical microstructure based on feature gradients, and we investigate the impact of being born preterm on cortical development at term-equivalent age. Compared with term-born controls, preterm infants have a homogeneous microstructure in temporal and occipital lobes, and the medial parietal, cingulate, and frontal cortices, compared with term infants. These observations replicated across two independent datasets and were robust to differences that remain in the data after matching samples and alignment of processing and quality control strategies. We conclude that cortical microstructural architecture is altered in preterm infants in a spatially distributed rather than localised fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Galdi
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Christine Farrugia
- Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MaltaVallettaMalta
- University of Malta Magnetic Resonance Imaging Platform (UMRI)VallettaMalta
| | - Kadi Vaher
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Logan Z. J. Williams
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging ScienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gemma Sullivan
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - David Q. Stoye
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | | | | | - Mark E. Bastin
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Hilary Richardson
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Heather Whalley
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental MedicineUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - A. David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental DisordersKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Claude J. Bajada
- University of Malta Magnetic Resonance Imaging Platform (UMRI)VallettaMalta
- Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaVallettaMalta
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging ScienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - James P. Boardman
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ball G, Oldham S, Kyriakopoulou V, Williams LZJ, Karolis V, Price A, Hutter J, Seal ML, Alexander-Bloch A, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Robinson EC, Seidlitz J. Molecular signatures of cortical expansion in the human fetal brain. bioRxiv 2024:2024.02.13.580198. [PMID: 38405710 PMCID: PMC10888819 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.13.580198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
The third trimester of human gestation is characterised by rapid increases in brain volume and cortical surface area. A growing catalogue of cells in the prenatal brain has revealed remarkable molecular diversity across cortical areas.1,2 Despite this, little is known about how this translates into the patterns of differential cortical expansion observed in humans during the latter stages of gestation. Here we present a new resource, μBrain, to facilitate knowledge translation between molecular and anatomical descriptions of the prenatal developing brain. Built using generative artificial intelligence, μBrain is a three-dimensional cellular-resolution digital atlas combining publicly-available serial sections of the postmortem human brain at 21 weeks gestation3 with bulk tissue microarray data, sampled across 29 cortical regions and 5 transient tissue zones.4 Using μBrain, we evaluate the molecular signatures of preferentially-expanded cortical regions during human gestation, quantified in utero using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We find that differences in the rates of expansion across cortical areas during gestation respect anatomical and evolutionary boundaries between cortical types5 and are founded upon extended periods of upper-layer cortical neuron migration that continue beyond mid-gestation. We identify a set of genes that are upregulated from mid-gestation and highly expressed in rapidly expanding neocortex, which are implicated in genetic disorders with cognitive sequelae. Our findings demonstrate a spatial coupling between areal differences in the timing of neurogenesis and rates of expansion across the neocortical sheet during the prenatal epoch. The μBrain atlas is available from: https://garedaba.github.io/micro-brain/ and provides a new tool to comprehensively map early brain development across domains, model systems and resolution scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Ball
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Oldham
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - V Kyriakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - L Z J Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - V Karolis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M L Seal
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A D Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - E C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Seidlitz
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Snyder WE, Vértes PE, Kyriakopoulou V, Wagstyl K, Williams LZJ, Moraczewski D, Thomas AG, Karolis VR, Seidlitz J, Rivière D, Robinson EC, Mangin JF, Raznahan A, Bullmore ET. A bipolar taxonomy of adult human brain sulcal morphology related to timing of fetal sulcation and trans-sulcal gene expression gradients. bioRxiv 2023:2023.12.19.572454. [PMID: 38168226 PMCID: PMC10760196 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.19.572454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
We developed a computational pipeline (now provided as a resource) for measuring morphological similarity between cortical surface sulci to construct a sulcal phenotype network (SPN) from each magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in an adult cohort (N=34,725; 45-82 years). Networks estimated from pairwise similarities of 40 sulci on 5 morphological metrics comprised two clusters of sulci, represented also by the bipolar distribution of sulci on a linear-to-complex dimension. Linear sulci were more heritable and typically located in unimodal cortex; complex sulci were less heritable and typically located in heteromodal cortex. Aligning these results with an independent fetal brain MRI cohort (N=228; 21-36 gestational weeks), we found that linear sulci formed earlier, and the earliest and latest-forming sulci had the least between-adult variation. Using high-resolution maps of cortical gene expression, we found that linear sulcation is mechanistically underpinned by trans-sulcal gene expression gradients enriched for developmental processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Snyder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Section on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Petra E Vértes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vanessa Kyriakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Konrad Wagstyl
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Logan Z J Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Dustin Moraczewski
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adam G Thomas
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Vyacheslav R Karolis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Jakob Seidlitz
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Denis Rivière
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Neurospin, Baobab, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jean-Francois Mangin
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Neurospin, Baobab, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France
| | - Armin Raznahan
- Section on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Edward T Bullmore
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams LZJ, Fitzgibbon SP, Bozek J, Winkler AM, Dimitrova R, Poppe T, Schuh A, Makropoulos A, Cupitt J, O'Muircheartaigh J, Duff EP, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D, Smith SM, Edwards AD, Robinson EC. Structural and functional asymmetry of the neonatal cerebral cortex. Nat Hum Behav 2023; 7:942-955. [PMID: 36928781 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01542-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Features of brain asymmetry have been implicated in a broad range of cognitive processes; however, their origins are still poorly understood. Here we investigated cortical asymmetries in 442 healthy term-born neonates using structural and functional magnetic resonance images from the Developing Human Connectome Project. Our results demonstrate that the neonatal cortex is markedly asymmetric in both structure and function. Cortical asymmetries observed in the term cohort were contextualized in two ways: by comparing them against cortical asymmetries observed in 103 preterm neonates scanned at term-equivalent age, and by comparing structural asymmetries against those observed in 1,110 healthy young adults from the Human Connectome Project. While associations with preterm birth and biological sex were minimal, significant differences exist between birth and adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Z J Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Sean P Fitzgibbon
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Anderson M Winkler
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tanya Poppe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Cupitt
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department for Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eugene P Duff
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uus AU, Kyriakopoulou V, Makropoulos A, Fukami-Gartner A, Cromb D, Davidson A, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Grigorescu I, Williams LZJ, Robinson EC, Lloyd D, Pushparajah K, Story L, Hutter J, Counsell SJ, Edwards AD, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Deprez M. BOUNTI: Brain vOlumetry and aUtomated parcellatioN for 3D feTal MRI. bioRxiv 2023:2023.04.18.537347. [PMID: 37131820 PMCID: PMC10153133 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.18.537347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Fetal MRI is widely used for quantitative brain volumetry studies. However, currently, there is a lack of universally accepted protocols for fetal brain parcellation and segmentation. Published clinical studies tend to use different segmentation approaches that also reportedly require significant amounts of time-consuming manual refinement. In this work, we propose to address this challenge by developing a new robust deep learning-based fetal brain segmentation pipeline for 3D T2w motion corrected brain images. At first, we defined a new refined brain tissue parcellation protocol with 19 regions-of-interest using the new fetal brain MRI atlas from the Developing Human Connectome Project. This protocol design was based on evidence from histological brain atlases, clear visibility of the structures in individual subject 3D T2w images and the clinical relevance to quantitative studies. It was then used as a basis for developing an automated deep learning brain tissue parcellation pipeline trained on 360 fetal MRI datasets with different acquisition parameters using semi-supervised approach with manually refined labels propagated from the atlas. The pipeline demonstrated robust performance for different acquisition protocols and GA ranges. Analysis of tissue volumetry for 390 normal participants (21-38 weeks gestational age range), scanned with three different acquisition protocols, did not reveal significant differences for major structures in the growth charts. Only minor errors were present in < 15% of cases thus significantly reducing the need for manual refinement. In addition, quantitative comparison between 65 fetuses with ventriculomegaly and 60 normal control cases were in agreement with the findings reported in our earlier work based on manual segmentations. These preliminary results support the feasibility of the proposed atlas-based deep learning approach for large-scale volumetric analysis. The created fetal brain volumetry centiles and a docker with the proposed pipeline are publicly available online at https://hub.docker.com/r/fetalsvrtk/segmentation (tag brain_bounti_tissue).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alena U Uus
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Cromb
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alice Davidson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
- Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicacion, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, ISCII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irina Grigorescu
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Logan Z J Williams
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Lloyd
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kuberan Pushparajah
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lisa Story
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Joseph V Hajnal
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Deprez
- School of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bass C, Silva MD, Sudre C, Williams LZJ, Sousa HS, Tudosiu PD, Alfaro-Almagro F, Fitzgibbon SP, Glasser MF, Smith SM, Robinson EC. ICAM-Reg: Interpretable Classification and Regression With Feature Attribution for Mapping Neurological Phenotypes in Individual Scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42:959-970. [PMID: 36374873 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2022.3221890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
An important goal of medical imaging is to be able to precisely detect patterns of disease specific to individual scans; however, this is challenged in brain imaging by the degree of heterogeneity of shape and appearance. Traditional methods, based on image registration, historically fail to detect variable features of disease, as they utilise population-based analyses, suited primarily to studying group-average effects. In this paper we therefore take advantage of recent developments in generative deep learning to develop a method for simultaneous classification, or regression, and feature attribution (FA). Specifically, we explore the use of a VAE-GAN (variational autoencoder - general adversarial network) for translation called ICAM, to explicitly disentangle class relevant features, from background confounds, for improved interpretability and regression of neurological phenotypes. We validate our method on the tasks of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) cognitive test score prediction for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort, as well as brain age prediction, for both neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration, using the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) and UK Biobank datasets. We show that the generated FA maps can be used to explain outlier predictions and demonstrate that the inclusion of a regression module improves the disentanglement of the latent space. Our code is freely available on GitHub https://github.com/CherBass/ICAM.
Collapse
|
7
|
Topiwala A, Nichols TE, Williams LZJ, Robinson EC, Alfaro-Almagro F, Taschler B, Wang C, Nelson CP, Miller KL, Codd V, Samani NJ, Smith SM. Telomere length and brain imaging phenotypes in UK Biobank. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282363. [PMID: 36947528 PMCID: PMC10032499 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Telomeres form protective caps at the ends of chromosomes, and their attrition is a marker of biological aging. Short telomeres are associated with an increased risk of neurological and psychiatric disorders including dementia. The mechanism underlying this risk is unclear, and may involve brain structure and function. However, the relationship between telomere length and neuroimaging markers is poorly characterized. Here we show that leucocyte telomere length (LTL) is associated with multi-modal MRI phenotypes in 31,661 UK Biobank participants. Longer LTL is associated with: i) larger global and subcortical grey matter volumes including the hippocampus, ii) lower T1-weighted grey-white tissue contrast in sensory cortices, iii) white-matter microstructure measures in corpus callosum and association fibres, iv) lower volume of white matter hyperintensities, and v) lower basal ganglia iron. Longer LTL was protective against certain related clinical manifestations, namely all-cause dementia (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.96), but not stroke or Parkinson's disease. LTL is associated with multiple MRI endophenotypes of neurodegenerative disease, suggesting a pathway by which longer LTL may confer protective against dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anya Topiwala
- Nuffield Department Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas E. Nichols
- Nuffield Department Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Logan Z. J. Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fidel Alfaro-Almagro
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Bernd Taschler
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Chaoyue Wang
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher P. Nelson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Karla L. Miller
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Veryan Codd
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Nilesh J. Samani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M. Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dahan S, Fawaz A, Suliman MA, da Silva M, Williams LZJ, Rueckert D, Robinson EC. The Multiscale Surface Vision Transformer. ArXiv 2023:arXiv:2303.11909v1. [PMID: 36994163 PMCID: PMC10055498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Surface meshes are a favoured domain for representing structural and functional information on the human cortex, but their complex topology and geometry pose significant challenges for deep learning analysis. While Transformers have excelled as domain-agnostic architectures for sequence-to-sequence learning, notably for structures where the translation of the convolution operation is non-trivial, the quadratic cost of the self-attention operation remains an obstacle for many dense prediction tasks. Inspired by some of the latest advances in hierarchical modelling with vision transformers, we introduce the Multiscale Surface Vision Transformer (MS-SiT) as a backbone architecture for surface deep learning. The self-attention mechanism is applied within local-mesh-windows to allow for high-resolution sampling of the underlying data, while a shifted-window strategy improves the sharing of information between windows. Neighbouring patches are successively merged, allowing the MS-SiT to learn hierarchical representations suitable for any prediction task. Results demonstrate that the MS-SiT outperforms existing surface deep learning methods for neonatal phenotyping prediction tasks using the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) dataset. Furthermore, building the MS-SiT backbone into a U-shaped architecture for surface segmentation demonstrates competitive results on cortical parcellation using the UK Biobank (UKB) and manually-annotated MindBoggle datasets. Code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/metrics-lab/surface-vision-transformers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Dahan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abdulah Fawaz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London
| | | | | | - Logan Z J Williams
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London
| | | | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London
- Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ma Q, Li L, Robinson EC, Kainz B, Rueckert D, Alansary A. CortexODE: Learning Cortical Surface Reconstruction by Neural ODEs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 42:430-443. [PMID: 36094986 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2022.3206221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
We present CortexODE, a deep learning framework for cortical surface reconstruction. CortexODE leverages neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to deform an input surface into a target shape by learning a diffeomorphic flow. The trajectories of the points on the surface are modeled as ODEs, where the derivatives of their coordinates are parameterized via a learnable Lipschitz-continuous deformation network. This provides theoretical guarantees for the prevention of self-intersections. CortexODE can be integrated to an automatic learning-based pipeline, which reconstructs cortical surfaces efficiently in less than 5 seconds. The pipeline utilizes a 3D U-Net to predict a white matter segmentation from brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, and further generates a signed distance function that represents an initial surface. Fast topology correction is introduced to guarantee homeomorphism to a sphere. Following the isosurface extraction step, two CortexODE models are trained to deform the initial surface to white matter and pial surfaces respectively. The proposed pipeline is evaluated on large-scale neuroimage datasets in various age groups including neonates (25-45 weeks), young adults (22-36 years) and elderly subjects (55-90 years). Our experiments demonstrate that the CortexODE-based pipeline can achieve less than 0.2mm average geometric error while being orders of magnitude faster compared to conventional processing pipelines.
Collapse
|
10
|
Edwards AD, Rueckert D, Smith SM, Abo Seada S, Alansary A, Almalbis J, Allsop J, Andersson J, Arichi T, Arulkumaran S, Bastiani M, Batalle D, Baxter L, Bozek J, Braithwaite E, Brandon J, Carney O, Chew A, Christiaens D, Chung R, Colford K, Cordero-Grande L, Counsell SJ, Cullen H, Cupitt J, Curtis C, Davidson A, Deprez M, Dillon L, Dimitrakopoulou K, Dimitrova R, Duff E, Falconer S, Farahibozorg SR, Fitzgibbon SP, Gao J, Gaspar A, Harper N, Harrison SJ, Hughes EJ, Hutter J, Jenkinson M, Jbabdi S, Jones E, Karolis V, Kyriakopoulou V, Lenz G, Makropoulos A, Malik S, Mason L, Mortari F, Nosarti C, Nunes RG, O’Keeffe C, O’Muircheartaigh J, Patel H, Passerat-Palmbach J, Pietsch M, Price AN, Robinson EC, Rutherford MA, Schuh A, Sotiropoulos S, Steinweg J, Teixeira RPAG, Tenev T, Tournier JD, Tusor N, Uus A, Vecchiato K, Williams LZJ, Wright R, Wurie J, Hajnal JV. The Developing Human Connectome Project Neonatal Data Release. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:886772. [PMID: 35677357 PMCID: PMC9169090 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.886772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The Developing Human Connectome Project has created a large open science resource which provides researchers with data for investigating typical and atypical brain development across the perinatal period. It has collected 1228 multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain datasets from 1173 fetal and/or neonatal participants, together with collateral demographic, clinical, family, neurocognitive and genomic data from 1173 participants, together with collateral demographic, clinical, family, neurocognitive and genomic data. All subjects were studied in utero and/or soon after birth on a single MRI scanner using specially developed scanning sequences which included novel motion-tolerant imaging methods. Imaging data are complemented by rich demographic, clinical, neurodevelopmental, and genomic information. The project is now releasing a large set of neonatal data; fetal data will be described and released separately. This release includes scans from 783 infants of whom: 583 were healthy infants born at term; as well as preterm infants; and infants at high risk of atypical neurocognitive development. Many infants were imaged more than once to provide longitudinal data, and the total number of datasets being released is 887. We now describe the dHCP image acquisition and processing protocols, summarize the available imaging and collateral data, and provide information on how the data can be accessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephen M. Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Samy Abo Seada
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amir Alansary
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Almalbis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Allsop
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jesper Andersson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tomoki Arichi
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Arulkumaran
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Baxter
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eleanor Braithwaite
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Brandon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Carney
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raymond Chung
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kathleen Colford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Serena J. Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harriet Cullen
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Cupitt
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Curtis
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Davidson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Deprez
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Dillon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantina Dimitrakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Translational Bioinformatics Platform, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sean P. Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jianliang Gao
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreia Gaspar
- Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR-Lisboa)/LaRSyS, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicholas Harper
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam J. Harrison
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Emer J. Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Saad Jbabdi
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Jones
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vyacheslav Karolis
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vanessa Kyriakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Lenz
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shaihan Malik
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Mason
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Mortari
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Nosarti
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rita G. Nunes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute for Systems and Robotics (ISR-Lisboa)/LaRSyS, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Camilla O’Keeffe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hamel Patel
- BioResource Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximillian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N. Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A. Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stamatios Sotiropoulos
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pedro Azeredo Gomes Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tencho Tenev
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alena Uus
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Logan Z. J. Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Wright
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Wurie
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V. Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fenchel D, Dimitrova R, Robinson EC, Batalle D, Chew A, Falconer S, Kyriakopoulou V, Nosarti C, Hutter J, Christiaens D, Pietsch M, Brandon J, Hughes EJ, Allsop J, O'Keeffe C, Price AN, Cordero-Grande L, Schuh A, Makropoulos A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Bozek J, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, McAlonan G, Edwards AD, O'Muircheartaigh J. Neonatal multi-modal cortical profiles predict 18-month developmental outcomes. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2022; 54:101103. [PMID: 35364447 PMCID: PMC8971851 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Developmental delays in infanthood often persist, turning into life-long difficulties, and coming at great cost for the individual and community. By examining the developing brain and its relation to developmental outcomes we can start to elucidate how the emergence of brain circuits is manifested in variability of infant motor, cognitive and behavioural capacities. In this study, we examined if cortical structural covariance at birth, indexing coordinated development, is related to later infant behaviour. We included 193 healthy term-born infants from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP). An individual cortical connectivity matrix derived from morphological and microstructural features was computed for each subject (morphometric similarity networks, MSNs) and was used as input for the prediction of behavioural scores at 18 months using Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling (CPM). Neonatal MSNs successfully predicted social-emotional performance. Predictive edges were distributed between and within known functional cortical divisions with a specific important role for primary and posterior cortical regions. These results reveal that multi-modal neonatal cortical profiles showing coordinated maturation are related to developmental outcomes and that network organization at birth provides an early infrastructure for future functional skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna Fenchel
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK; Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EU, UK
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Vanessa Kyriakopoulou
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Chiara Nosarti
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Jakki Brandon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Emer J Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Joanna Allsop
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Camilla O'Keeffe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK; Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Institute für Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Grainne McAlonan
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK; Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK; Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dimitrova R, Pietsch M, Ciarrusta J, Fitzgibbon SP, Williams LZJ, Christiaens D, Cordero-Grande L, Batalle D, Makropoulos A, Schuh A, Price AN, Hutter J, Teixeira RP, Hughes E, Chew A, Falconer S, Carney O, Egloff A, Tournier JD, McAlonan G, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ, Robinson EC, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D, Edwards AD, O'Muircheartaigh J. Preterm birth alters the development of cortical microstructure and morphology at term-equivalent age. Neuroimage 2021; 243:118488. [PMID: 34419595 PMCID: PMC8526870 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The dynamic nature and complexity of the cellular events that take place during the last trimester of pregnancy make the developing cortex particularly vulnerable to perturbations. Abrupt interruption to normal gestation can lead to significant deviations to many of these processes, resulting in atypical trajectory of cortical maturation in preterm birth survivors. METHODS We sought to first map typical cortical micro- and macrostructure development using invivo MRI in a large sample of healthy term-born infants scanned after birth (n = 259). Then we offer a comprehensive characterization of the cortical consequences of preterm birth in 76 preterm infants scanned at term-equivalent age (37-44 weeks postmenstrual age). We describe the group-average atypicality, the heterogeneity across individual preterm infants, and relate individual deviations from normative development to age at birth and neurodevelopment at 18 months. RESULTS In the term-born neonatal brain, we observed heterogeneous and regionally specific associations between age at scan and measures of cortical morphology and microstructure, including rapid surface expansion, greater cortical thickness, lower cortical anisotropy and higher neurite orientation dispersion. By term-equivalent age, preterm infants had on average increased cortical tissue water content and reduced neurite density index in the posterior parts of the cortex, and greater cortical thickness anteriorly compared to term-born infants. While individual preterm infants were more likely to show extreme deviations (over 3.1 standard deviations) from normative cortical maturation compared to term-born infants, these extreme deviations were highly variable and showed very little spatial overlap between individuals. Measures of regional cortical development were associated with age at birth, but not with neurodevelopment at 18 months. CONCLUSION We showed that preterm birth alters cortical micro- and macrostructural maturation near the time of full-term birth. Deviations from normative development were highly variable between individual preterm infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judit Ciarrusta
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sean P Fitzgibbon
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Welcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Logan Z J Williams
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pag Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Carney
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexia Egloff
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Grainne McAlonan
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Informatics and Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dimitrova R, Arulkumaran S, Carney O, Chew A, Falconer S, Ciarrusta J, Wolfers T, Batalle D, Cordero-Grande L, Price AN, Teixeira RPAG, Hughes E, Egloff A, Hutter J, Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Schuh A, Vecchiato K, Steinweg JK, Macleod R, Marquand AF, McAlonan G, Rutherford MA, Counsell SJ, Smith SM, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, O’Muircheartaigh J, Edwards AD. Phenotyping the Preterm Brain: Characterizing Individual Deviations From Normative Volumetric Development in Two Large Infant Cohorts. Cereb Cortex 2021; 31:3665-3677. [PMID: 33822913 PMCID: PMC8258435 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The diverse cerebral consequences of preterm birth create significant challenges for understanding pathogenesis or predicting later outcome. Instead of focusing on describing effects common to the group, comparing individual infants against robust normative data offers a powerful alternative to study brain maturation. Here we used Gaussian process regression to create normative curves characterizing brain volumetric development in 274 term-born infants, modeling for age at scan and sex. We then compared 89 preterm infants scanned at term-equivalent age with these normative charts, relating individual deviations from typical volumetric development to perinatal risk factors and later neurocognitive scores. To test generalizability, we used a second independent dataset comprising of 253 preterm infants scanned using different acquisition parameters and scanner. We describe rapid, nonuniform brain growth during the neonatal period. In both preterm cohorts, cerebral atypicalities were widespread, often multiple, and varied highly between individuals. Deviations from normative development were associated with respiratory support, nutrition, birth weight, and later neurocognition, demonstrating their clinical relevance. Group-level understanding of the preterm brain disguises a large degree of individual differences. We provide a method and normative dataset that offer a more precise characterization of the cerebral consequences of preterm birth by profiling the individual neonatal brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Sophie Arulkumaran
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Olivia Carney
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andrew Chew
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Shona Falconer
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Judit Ciarrusta
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Thomas Wolfers
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525EN, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525EN, the Netherlands
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicacion, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Rui P A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Alexia Egloff
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Johannes K Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Russell Macleod
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andre F Marquand
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525EN, the Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6525EN, the Netherlands
| | - Grainne McAlonan
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Budd S, Robinson EC, Kainz B. A survey on active learning and human-in-the-loop deep learning for medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2021; 71:102062. [PMID: 33901992 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Fully automatic deep learning has become the state-of-the-art technique for many tasks including image acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and for the extraction of clinically useful information for computer-aided detection, diagnosis, treatment planning, intervention and therapy. However, the unique challenges posed by medical image analysis suggest that retaining a human end-user in any deep learning enabled system will be beneficial. In this review we investigate the role that humans might play in the development and deployment of deep learning enabled diagnostic applications and focus on techniques that will retain a significant input from a human end user. Human-in-the-Loop computing is an area that we see as increasingly important in future research due to the safety-critical nature of working in the medical domain. We evaluate four key areas that we consider vital for deep learning in the clinical practice: (1) Active Learning to choose the best data to annotate for optimal model performance; (2) Interaction with model outputs - using iterative feedback to steer models to optima for a given prediction and offering meaningful ways to interpret and respond to predictions; (3) Practical considerations - developing full scale applications and the key considerations that need to be made before deployment; (4) Future Prospective and Unanswered Questions - knowledge gaps and related research fields that will benefit human-in-the-loop computing as they evolve. We offer our opinions on the most promising directions of research and how various aspects of each area might be unified towards common goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Budd
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ball G, Seidlitz J, O’Muircheartaigh J, Dimitrova R, Fenchel D, Makropoulos A, Christiaens D, Schuh A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Hutter J, Cordero-Grande L, Hughes E, Price A, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D, Robinson EC, Edwards AD. Cortical morphology at birth reflects spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression in the fetal human brain. PLoS Biol 2020; 18:e3000976. [PMID: 33226978 PMCID: PMC7721147 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Interruption to gestation through preterm birth can significantly impact cortical development and have long-lasting adverse effects on neurodevelopmental outcome. We compared cortical morphology captured by high-resolution, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in n = 292 healthy newborn infants (mean age at birth = 39.9 weeks) with regional patterns of gene expression in the fetal cortex across gestation (n = 156 samples from 16 brains, aged 12 to 37 postconceptional weeks [pcw]). We tested the hypothesis that noninvasive measures of cortical structure at birth mirror areal differences in cortical gene expression across gestation, and in a cohort of n = 64 preterm infants (mean age at birth = 32.0 weeks), we tested whether cortical alterations observed after preterm birth were associated with altered gene expression in specific developmental cell populations. Neonatal cortical structure was aligned to differential patterns of cell-specific gene expression in the fetal cortex. Principal component analysis (PCA) of 6 measures of cortical morphology and microstructure showed that cortical regions were ordered along a principal axis, with primary cortex clearly separated from heteromodal cortex. This axis was correlated with estimated tissue maturity, indexed by differential expression of genes expressed by progenitor cells and neurons, and engaged in stem cell differentiation, neuron migration, and forebrain development. Preterm birth was associated with altered regional MRI metrics and patterns of differential gene expression in glial cell populations. The spatial patterning of gene expression in the developing cortex was thus mirrored by regional variation in cortical morphology and microstructure at term, and this was disrupted by preterm birth. This work provides a framework to link molecular mechanisms to noninvasive measures of cortical development in early life and highlights novel pathways to injury in neonatal populations at increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorder. Interruption to gestation through preterm birth can significantly impact cortical development and have long-lasting adverse effects on neurodevelopmental outcome. A large neuroimaging study of newborn infants reveals how their cortical structure at birth is associated with patterns of gene expression in the fetal cortex and how this relationship is affected by preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Ball
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Jakob Seidlitz
- Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Daphna Fenchel
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Jo V. Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King’s College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fitzgibbon SP, Harrison SJ, Jenkinson M, Baxter L, Robinson EC, Bastiani M, Bozek J, Karolis V, Cordero Grande L, Price AN, Hughes E, Makropoulos A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Schuh A, Gao J, Farahibozorg SR, O'Muircheartaigh J, Ciarrusta J, O'Keeffe C, Brandon J, Arichi T, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD, Smith SM, Duff E, Andersson J. The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) automated resting-state functional processing framework for newborn infants. Neuroimage 2020; 223:117303. [PMID: 32866666 PMCID: PMC7762845 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
An automated and robust pipeline to minimally pre-process highly confounded neonatal fMRI data. Includes integrated dynamic distortion and slice-to-volume motion correction. A robust multimodal registration approach which includes custom neonatal templates. Incorporates an automated and self-reporting QC framework to quantify data quality and identify issues for further inspection. Data analysis of 538 infants imaged at 26–45 weeks post-menstrual age.
The developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) aims to create a detailed 4-dimensional connectome of early life spanning 20–45 weeks post-menstrual age. This is being achieved through the acquisition of multi-modal MRI data from over 1000 in- and ex-utero subjects combined with the development of optimised pre-processing pipelines. In this paper we present an automated and robust pipeline to minimally pre-process highly confounded neonatal resting-state fMRI data, robustly, with low failure rates and high quality-assurance. The pipeline has been designed to specifically address the challenges that neonatal data presents including low and variable contrast and high levels of head motion. We provide a detailed description and evaluation of the pipeline which includes integrated slice-to-volume motion correction and dynamic susceptibility distortion correction, a robust multimodal registration approach, bespoke ICA-based denoising, and an automated QC framework. We assess these components on a large cohort of dHCP subjects and demonstrate that processing refinements integrated into the pipeline provide substantial reduction in movement related distortions, resulting in significant improvements in SNR, and detection of high quality RSNs from neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Samuel J Harrison
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Translational Neuromodeling Unit, University of Zurich & ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Luke Baxter
- Paediatric Neuroimaging Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Vyacheslav Karolis
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jianliang Gao
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Judit Ciarrusta
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Camilla O'Keeffe
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jakki Brandon
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tomoki Arichi
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK; Children's Neurosciences, Evelina London Children's Hospital, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Eugene Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Jesper Andersson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fenchel D, Dimitrova R, Seidlitz J, Robinson EC, Batalle D, Hutter J, Christiaens D, Pietsch M, Brandon J, Hughes EJ, Allsop J, O'Keeffe C, Price AN, Cordero-Grande L, Schuh A, Makropoulos A, Passerat-Palmbach J, Bozek J, Rueckert D, Hajnal JV, Raznahan A, McAlonan G, Edwards AD, O'Muircheartaigh J. Development of Microstructural and Morphological Cortical Profiles in the Neonatal Brain. Cereb Cortex 2020; 30:5767-5779. [PMID: 32537627 PMCID: PMC7673474 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Interruptions to neurodevelopment during the perinatal period may have long-lasting consequences. However, to be able to investigate deviations in the foundation of proper connectivity and functional circuits, we need a measure of how this architecture evolves in the typically developing brain. To this end, in a cohort of 241 term-born infants, we used magnetic resonance imaging to estimate cortical profiles based on morphometry and microstructure over the perinatal period (37–44 weeks postmenstrual age, PMA). Using the covariance of these profiles as a measure of inter-areal network similarity (morphometric similarity networks; MSN), we clustered these networks into distinct modules. The resulting modules were consistent and symmetric, and corresponded to known functional distinctions, including sensory–motor, limbic, and association regions, and were spatially mapped onto known cytoarchitectonic tissue classes. Posterior regions became more morphometrically similar with increasing age, while peri-cingulate and medial temporal regions became more dissimilar. Network strength was associated with age: Within-network similarity increased over age suggesting emerging network distinction. These changes in cortical network architecture over an 8-week period are consistent with, and likely underpin, the highly dynamic processes occurring during this critical period. The resulting cortical profiles might provide normative reference to investigate atypical early brain development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna Fenchel
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Ralica Dimitrova
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jakob Seidlitz
- Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EU, UK
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jakki Brandon
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Emer J Hughes
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Joanna Allsop
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Camilla O'Keeffe
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Armin Raznahan
- Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Grainne McAlonan
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.,Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eichert N, Robinson EC, Bryant KL, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Li L, Krug K, Watkins KE, Mars RB. Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe. eLife 2020; 9:e53232. [PMID: 32202497 PMCID: PMC7180052 DOI: 10.7554/elife.53232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Evolutionary adaptations of temporo-parietal cortex are considered to be a critical specialization of the human brain. Cortical adaptations, however, can affect different aspects of brain architecture, including local expansion of the cortical sheet or changes in connectivity between cortical areas. We distinguish different types of changes in brain architecture using a computational neuroanatomy approach. We investigate the extent to which between-species alignment, based on cortical myelin, can predict changes in connectivity patterns across macaque, chimpanzee, and human. We show that expansion and relocation of brain areas can predict terminations of several white matter tracts in temporo-parietal cortex, including the middle and superior longitudinal fasciculus, but not the arcuate fasciculus. This demonstrates that the arcuate fasciculus underwent additional evolutionary modifications affecting the temporal lobe connectivity pattern. This approach can flexibly be extended to include other features of cortical organization and other species, allowing direct tests of comparative hypotheses of brain organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Eichert
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Biomedical Engineering Department, King’s College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Katherine L Bryant
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Saad Jbabdi
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Longchuan Li
- Marcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory UniversityAtlantaUnited States
| | - Kristine Krug
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Institute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
- Leibniz-Insitute for NeurobiologyMagdeburgGermany
| | - Kate E Watkins
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Rogier B Mars
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O'Muircheartaigh J, Robinson EC, Pietsch M, Wolfers T, Aljabar P, Grande LC, Teixeira RPAG, Bozek J, Schuh A, Makropoulos A, Batalle D, Hutter J, Vecchiato K, Steinweg JK, Fitzgibbon S, Hughes E, Price AN, Marquand A, Reuckert D, Rutherford M, Hajnal JV, Counsell SJ, Edwards AD. Modelling brain development to detect white matter injury in term and preterm born neonates. Brain 2020; 143:467-479. [PMID: 31942938 PMCID: PMC7009541 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Premature birth occurs during a period of rapid brain growth. In this context, interpreting clinical neuroimaging can be complicated by the typical changes in brain contrast, size and gyrification occurring in the background to any pathology. To model and describe this evolving background in brain shape and contrast, we used a Bayesian regression technique, Gaussian process regression, adapted to multiple correlated outputs. Using MRI, we simultaneously estimated brain tissue intensity on T1- and T2-weighted scans as well as local tissue shape in a large cohort of 408 neonates scanned cross-sectionally across the perinatal period. The resulting model provided a continuous estimate of brain shape and intensity, appropriate to age at scan, degree of prematurity and sex. Next, we investigated the clinical utility of this model to detect focal white matter injury. In individual neonates, we calculated deviations of a neonate's observed MRI from that predicted by the model to detect punctate white matter lesions with very good accuracy (area under the curve > 0.95). To investigate longitudinal consistency of the model, we calculated model deviations in 46 neonates who were scanned on a second occasion. These infants' voxelwise deviations from the model could be used to identify them from the other 408 images in 83% (T2-weighted) and 76% (T1-weighted) of cases, indicating an anatomical fingerprint. Our approach provides accurate estimates of non-linear changes in brain tissue intensity and shape with clear potential for radiological use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maximillian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thomas Wolfers
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Aljabar
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rui P A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Dafnis Batalle
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Johannes K Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sean Fitzgibbon
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andre Marquand
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Reuckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mary Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Harms MP, Somerville LH, Ances BM, Andersson J, Barch DM, Bastiani M, Bookheimer SY, Brown TB, Buckner RL, Burgess GC, Coalson TS, Chappell MA, Dapretto M, Douaud G, Fischl B, Glasser MF, Greve DN, Hodge C, Jamison KW, Jbabdi S, Kandala S, Li X, Mair RW, Mangia S, Marcus D, Mascali D, Moeller S, Nichols TE, Robinson EC, Salat DH, Smith SM, Sotiropoulos SN, Terpstra M, Thomas KM, Tisdall MD, Ugurbil K, van der Kouwe A, Woods RP, Zöllei L, Van Essen DC, Yacoub E. Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects. Neuroimage 2018; 183:972-984. [PMID: 30261308 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The Human Connectome Projects in Development (HCP-D) and Aging (HCP-A) are two large-scale brain imaging studies that will extend the recently completed HCP Young-Adult (HCP-YA) project to nearly the full lifespan, collecting structural, resting-state fMRI, task-fMRI, diffusion, and perfusion MRI in participants from 5 to 100+ years of age. HCP-D is enrolling 1300+ healthy children, adolescents, and young adults (ages 5-21), and HCP-A is enrolling 1200+ healthy adults (ages 36-100+), with each study collecting longitudinal data in a subset of individuals at particular age ranges. The imaging protocols of the HCP-D and HCP-A studies are very similar, differing primarily in the selection of different task-fMRI paradigms. We strove to harmonize the imaging protocol to the greatest extent feasible with the completed HCP-YA (1200+ participants, aged 22-35), but some imaging-related changes were motivated or necessitated by hardware changes, the need to reduce the total amount of scanning per participant, and/or the additional challenges of working with young and elderly populations. Here, we provide an overview of the common HCP-D/A imaging protocol including data and rationales for protocol decisions and changes relative to HCP-YA. The result will be a large, rich, multi-modal, and freely available set of consistently acquired data for use by the scientific community to investigate and define normative developmental and aging related changes in the healthy human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Harms
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Leah H Somerville
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Beau M Ances
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesper Andersson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Deanna M Barch
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan Y Bookheimer
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy B Brown
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Randy L Buckner
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gregory C Burgess
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael A Chappell
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mirella Dapretto
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gwenaëlle Douaud
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; St. Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cynthia Hodge
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Keith W Jamison
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saad Jbabdi
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sridhar Kandala
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Xiufeng Li
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ross W Mair
- Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Silvia Mangia
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Daniel Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniele Mascali
- Centro Fermi - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "Enrico Fermi", Rome, Italy
| | - Steen Moeller
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David H Salat
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Melissa Terpstra
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kathleen M Thomas
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - M Dylan Tisdall
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kamil Ugurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Andre van der Kouwe
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roger P Woods
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bozek J, Makropoulos A, Schuh A, Fitzgibbon S, Wright R, Glasser MF, Coalson TS, O'Muircheartaigh J, Hutter J, Price AN, Cordero-Grande L, Teixeira RPAG, Hughes E, Tusor N, Baruteau KP, Rutherford MA, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Smith SM, Rueckert D, Jenkinson M, Robinson EC. Construction of a neonatal cortical surface atlas using Multimodal Surface Matching in the Developing Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 2018; 179:11-29. [PMID: 29890325 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We propose a method for constructing a spatio-temporal cortical surface atlas of neonatal brains aged between 36 and 44 weeks of post-menstrual age (PMA) at the time of scan. The data were acquired as part of the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP), and the constructed surface atlases are publicly available. The method is based on a spherical registration approach: Multimodal Surface Matching (MSM), using cortical folding for driving the alignment. Templates have been generated for the anatomical cortical surface and for the cortical feature maps: sulcal depth, curvature, thickness, T1w/T2w myelin maps and cortical regions. To achieve this, cortical surfaces from 270 infants were first projected onto the sphere. Templates were then generated in two stages: first, a reference space was initialised via affine alignment to a group average adult template. Following this, templates were iteratively refined through repeated alignment of individuals to the template space until the variability of the average feature sets converged. Finally, bias towards the adult reference was removed by applying the inverse of the average affine transformations on the template and de-drifting the template. We used temporal adaptive kernel regression to produce age-dependant atlases for 9 weeks (36-44 weeks PMA). The generated templates capture expected patterns of cortical development including an increase in gyrification as well as an increase in thickness and T1w/T2w myelination with increasing age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sean Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Wright
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; St. Lukes Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rui Pedro A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garcia KE, Robinson EC, Alexopoulos D, Dierker DL, Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Ortinau CM, Rueckert D, Taber LA, Van Essen DC, Rogers CE, Smyser CD, Bayly PV. Dynamic patterns of cortical expansion during folding of the preterm human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:3156-3161. [PMID: 29507201 PMCID: PMC5866555 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715451115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
During the third trimester of human brain development, the cerebral cortex undergoes dramatic surface expansion and folding. Physical models suggest that relatively rapid growth of the cortical gray matter helps drive this folding, and structural data suggest that growth may vary in both space (by region on the cortical surface) and time. In this study, we propose a unique method to estimate local growth from sequential cortical reconstructions. Using anatomically constrained multimodal surface matching (aMSM), we obtain accurate, physically guided point correspondence between younger and older cortical reconstructions of the same individual. From each pair of surfaces, we calculate continuous, smooth maps of cortical expansion with unprecedented precision. By considering 30 preterm infants scanned two to four times during the period of rapid cortical expansion (28-38 wk postmenstrual age), we observe significant regional differences in growth across the cortical surface that are consistent with the emergence of new folds. Furthermore, these growth patterns shift over the course of development, with noninjured subjects following a highly consistent trajectory. This information provides a detailed picture of dynamic changes in cortical growth, connecting what is known about patterns of development at the microscopic (cellular) and macroscopic (folding) scales. Since our method provides specific growth maps for individual brains, we are also able to detect alterations due to injury. This fully automated surface analysis, based on tools freely available to the brain-mapping community, may also serve as a useful approach for future studies of abnormal growth due to genetic disorders, injury, or other environmental variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara E Garcia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Computer Science, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
- Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, Division of Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitrios Alexopoulos
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Donna L Dierker
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63017
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Cynthia M Ortinau
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computer Science, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Larry A Taber
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Cynthia E Rogers
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Christopher D Smyser
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Philip V Bayly
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bijsterbosch JD, Woolrich MW, Glasser MF, Robinson EC, Beckmann CF, Van Essen DC, Harrison SJ, Smith SM. The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions. eLife 2018; 7:32992. [PMID: 29451491 PMCID: PMC5860869 DOI: 10.7554/elife.32992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain connectivity is often considered in terms of the communication between functionally distinct brain regions. Many studies have investigated the extent to which patterns of coupling strength between multiple neural populations relates to behaviour. For example, studies have used ‘functional connectivity fingerprints’ to characterise individuals' brain activity. Here, we investigate the extent to which the exact spatial arrangement of cortical regions interacts with measures of brain connectivity. We find that the shape and exact location of brain regions interact strongly with the modelling of brain connectivity, and present evidence that the spatial arrangement of functional regions is strongly predictive of non-imaging measures of behaviour and lifestyle. We believe that, in many cases, cross-subject variations in the spatial configuration of functional brain regions are being interpreted as changes in functional connectivity. Therefore, a better understanding of these effects is important when interpreting the relationship between functional imaging data and cognitive traits. People differ a lot from one another in terms of their personality, behaviour and lifestyle. This individuality is attributed to the different regions in the brain, and the strength of communication between them. The connectivity pattern between these areas is thought to be as unique as a fingerprint. If the connections are weak or disrupted it can play a role in conditions such as schizophrenia, depression or Alzheimer’s disease. It is thought that the strength of the connection depends on how strongly the nerve cells in these regions communicate. But are these individual differences solely caused by different strengths of connection, or could other factors contribute to them? Now, Bijsterbosch et al. found that the size, shape and exact position of the brain regions was also strongly linked to the different behaviours of individuals. The study used brain scans, behavioural tests and questionnaires from a large database about lifestyle choices and demographics, to analyse the relationship between the different brain features of healthy individuals. The results showed that the variations in the brain regions were linked to many behavioural factors including intelligence, life satisfaction, drug use and aggression problems. Moreover, Bijsterbosch et al. showed that the existing methods for estimating the strength of connection between brain regions could reveal more about the spatial layout of these regions than the actual connection strength between them. This suggests that new approaches are needed to properly evaluate the strength of the connections. Some psychiatric and neurological diseases may be associated with changes in size and position of the different regions in the brain. In future, the findings of this study could be applied to individuals affected by such conditions, to see if the location of a region could be used as a diagnostic indicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Diane Bijsterbosch
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark W Woolrich
- Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Missouri, United States.,St. Luke's Hospital, Missouri, United States
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christian F Beckmann
- Donders Institute, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Cognitive Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegan, Netherlands
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Missouri, United States
| | - Samuel J Harrison
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Schuh A, Wright R, Fitzgibbon S, Bozek J, Counsell SJ, Steinweg J, Vecchiato K, Passerat-Palmbach J, Lenz G, Mortari F, Tenev T, Duff EP, Bastiani M, Cordero-Grande L, Hughes E, Tusor N, Tournier JD, Hutter J, Price AN, Teixeira RPAG, Murgasova M, Victor S, Kelly C, Rutherford MA, Smith SM, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D. The developing human connectome project: A minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 2018. [PMID: 29409960 DOI: 10.1101/125526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) seeks to create the first 4-dimensional connectome of early life. Understanding this connectome in detail may provide insights into normal as well as abnormal patterns of brain development. Following established best practices adopted by the WU-MINN Human Connectome Project (HCP), and pioneered by FreeSurfer, the project utilises cortical surface-based processing pipelines. In this paper, we propose a fully automated processing pipeline for the structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the developing neonatal brain. This proposed pipeline consists of a refined framework for cortical and sub-cortical volume segmentation, cortical surface extraction, and cortical surface inflation, which has been specifically designed to address considerable differences between adult and neonatal brains, as imaged using MRI. Using the proposed pipeline our results demonstrate that images collected from 465 subjects ranging from 28 to 45 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) can be processed fully automatically; generating cortical surface models that are topologically correct, and correspond well with manual evaluations of tissue boundaries in 85% of cases. Results improve on state-of-the-art neonatal tissue segmentation models and significant errors were found in only 2% of cases, where these corresponded to subjects with high motion. Downstream, these surfaces will enhance comparisons of functional and diffusion MRI datasets, supporting the modelling of emerging patterns of brain connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Wright
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Lenz
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Mortari
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tencho Tenev
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene P Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pedro A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Murgasova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suresh Victor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Kelly
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Schuh A, Wright R, Fitzgibbon S, Bozek J, Counsell SJ, Steinweg J, Vecchiato K, Passerat-Palmbach J, Lenz G, Mortari F, Tenev T, Duff EP, Bastiani M, Cordero-Grande L, Hughes E, Tusor N, Tournier JD, Hutter J, Price AN, Teixeira RPAG, Murgasova M, Victor S, Kelly C, Rutherford MA, Smith SM, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D. The developing human connectome project: A minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 2018; 173:88-112. [PMID: 29409960 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) seeks to create the first 4-dimensional connectome of early life. Understanding this connectome in detail may provide insights into normal as well as abnormal patterns of brain development. Following established best practices adopted by the WU-MINN Human Connectome Project (HCP), and pioneered by FreeSurfer, the project utilises cortical surface-based processing pipelines. In this paper, we propose a fully automated processing pipeline for the structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the developing neonatal brain. This proposed pipeline consists of a refined framework for cortical and sub-cortical volume segmentation, cortical surface extraction, and cortical surface inflation, which has been specifically designed to address considerable differences between adult and neonatal brains, as imaged using MRI. Using the proposed pipeline our results demonstrate that images collected from 465 subjects ranging from 28 to 45 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) can be processed fully automatically; generating cortical surface models that are topologically correct, and correspond well with manual evaluations of tissue boundaries in 85% of cases. Results improve on state-of-the-art neonatal tissue segmentation models and significant errors were found in only 2% of cases, where these corresponded to subjects with high motion. Downstream, these surfaces will enhance comparisons of functional and diffusion MRI datasets, supporting the modelling of emerging patterns of brain connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Wright
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Lenz
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Mortari
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tencho Tenev
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene P Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pedro A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Murgasova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suresh Victor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Kelly
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Robinson EC, Garcia K, Glasser MF, Chen Z, Coalson TS, Makropoulos A, Bozek J, Wright R, Schuh A, Webster M, Hutter J, Price A, Cordero Grande L, Hughes E, Tusor N, Bayly PV, Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Edwards AD, Hajnal J, Jenkinson M, Glocker B, Rueckert D. Multimodal surface matching with higher-order smoothness constraints. Neuroimage 2017; 167:453-465. [PMID: 29100940 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In brain imaging, accurate alignment of cortical surfaces is fundamental to the statistical sensitivity and spatial localisation of group studies, and cortical surface-based alignment has generally been accepted to be superior to volume-based approaches at aligning cortical areas. However, human subjects have considerable variation in cortical folding, and in the location of functional areas relative to these folds. This makes alignment of cortical areas a challenging problem. The Multimodal Surface Matching (MSM) tool is a flexible, spherical registration approach that enables accurate registration of surfaces based on a variety of different features. Using MSM, we have previously shown that driving cross-subject surface alignment, using areal features, such as resting state-networks and myelin maps, improves group task fMRI statistics and map sharpness. However, the initial implementation of MSM's regularisation function did not penalize all forms of surface distortion evenly. In some cases, this allowed peak distortions to exceed neurobiologically plausible limits, unless regularisation strength was increased to a level which prevented the algorithm from fully maximizing surface alignment. Here we propose and implement a new regularisation penalty, derived from physically relevant equations of strain (deformation) energy, and demonstrate that its use leads to improved and more robust alignment of multimodal imaging data. In addition, since spherical warps incorporate projection distortions that are unavoidable when mapping from a convoluted cortical surface to the sphere, we also propose constraints that enforce smooth deformation of cortical anatomies. We test the impact of this approach for longitudinal modelling of cortical development for neonates (born between 31 and 43 weeks of post-menstrual age) and demonstrate that the proposed method increases the biological interpretability of the distortion fields and improves the statistical significance of population-based analysis relative to other spherical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Robinson
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Kara Garcia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; St. Luke's Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Zhengdao Chen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Robert Wright
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Webster
- Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip V Bayly
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Glocker
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Passerat-Palmbach J, Reuillon R, Leclaire M, Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Parisot S, Rueckert D. Reproducible Large-Scale Neuroimaging Studies with the OpenMOLE Workflow Management System. Front Neuroinform 2017; 11:21. [PMID: 28381997 PMCID: PMC5361107 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OpenMOLE is a scientific workflow engine with a strong emphasis on workload distribution. Workflows are designed using a high level Domain Specific Language (DSL) built on top of Scala. It exposes natural parallelism constructs to easily delegate the workload resulting from a workflow to a wide range of distributed computing environments. OpenMOLE hides the complexity of designing complex experiments thanks to its DSL. Users can embed their own applications and scale their pipelines from a small prototype running on their desktop computer to a large-scale study harnessing distributed computing infrastructures, simply by changing a single line in the pipeline definition. The construction of the pipeline itself is decoupled from the execution context. The high-level DSL abstracts the underlying execution environment, contrary to classic shell-script based pipelines. These two aspects allow pipelines to be shared and studies to be replicated across different computing environments. Workflows can be run as traditional batch pipelines or coupled with OpenMOLE's advanced exploration methods in order to study the behavior of an application, or perform automatic parameter tuning. In this work, we briefly present the strong assets of OpenMOLE and detail recent improvements targeting re-executability of workflows across various Linux platforms. We have tightly coupled OpenMOLE with CARE, a standalone containerization solution that allows re-executing on a Linux host any application that has been packaged on another Linux host previously. The solution is evaluated against a Python-based pipeline involving packages such as scikit-learn as well as binary dependencies. All were packaged and re-executed successfully on various HPC environments, with identical numerical results (here prediction scores) obtained on each environment. Our results show that the pair formed by OpenMOLE and CARE is a reliable solution to generate reproducible results and re-executable pipelines. A demonstration of the flexibility of our solution showcases three neuroimaging pipelines harnessing distributed computing environments as heterogeneous as local clusters or the European Grid Infrastructure (EGI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Romain Reuillon
- Institut des Systemes Complexes Paris Ile de FranceParis, France
| | - Mathieu Leclaire
- Institut des Systemes Complexes Paris Ile de FranceParis, France
| | | | - Emma C. Robinson
- BioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College LondonLondon, UK
| | - Sarah Parisot
- BioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College LondonLondon, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- BioMedIA Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College LondonLondon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Glasser MF, Smith SM, Marcus DS, Andersson J, Auerbach EJ, Behrens TEJ, Coalson TS, Harms MP, Jenkinson M, Moeller S, Robinson EC, Sotiropoulos SN, Xu J, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Van Essen DC. The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach. Nat Neurosci 2016; 19:1175-87. [PMID: 27571196 PMCID: PMC6172654 DOI: 10.1038/nn.4361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 589] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Noninvasive human neuroimaging has yielded many discoveries about the brain. Numerous methodological advances have also occurred, though inertia has slowed their adoption. This paper presents an integrated approach to data acquisition, analysis and sharing that builds upon recent advances, particularly from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). The 'HCP-style' paradigm has seven core tenets: (i) collect multimodal imaging data from many subjects; (ii) acquire data at high spatial and temporal resolution; (iii) preprocess data to minimize distortions, blurring and temporal artifacts; (iv) represent data using the natural geometry of cortical and subcortical structures; (v) accurately align corresponding brain areas across subjects and studies; (vi) analyze data using neurobiologically accurate brain parcellations; and (vii) share published data via user-friendly databases. We illustrate the HCP-style paradigm using existing HCP data sets and provide guidance for future research. Widespread adoption of this paradigm should accelerate progress in understanding the brain in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F. Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stephen M. Smith
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel S. Marcus
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesper Andersson
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edward J. Auerbach
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy E. J. Behrens
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy S. Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael P. Harms
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Steen Moeller
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos
- FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Junqian Xu
- Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kamil Ugurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - David C. Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, Hacker CD, Harwell J, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Andersson J, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM, Van Essen DC. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 2016; 536:171-178. [PMID: 27437579 PMCID: PMC4990127 DOI: 10.1038/nature18933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2406] [Impact Index Per Article: 300.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the amazingly complex human cerebral cortex requires a map (or parcellation) of its major subdivisions, known as cortical areas. Making an accurate areal map has been a century-old objective in neuroscience. Using multi-modal magnetic resonance images from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and an objective semi-automated neuroanatomical approach, we delineated 180 areas per hemisphere bounded by sharp changes in cortical architecture, function, connectivity, and/or topography in a precisely aligned group average of 210 healthy young adults. We characterized 97 new areas and 83 areas previously reported using post-mortem microscopy or other specialized study-specific approaches. To enable automated delineation and identification of these areas in new HCP subjects and in future studies, we trained a machine-learning classifier to recognize the multi-modal ‘fingerprint’ of each cortical area. This classifier detected the presence of 96.6% of the cortical areas in new subjects, replicated the group parcellation, and could correctly locate areas in individuals with atypical parcellations. The freely available parcellation and classifier will enable substantially improved neuroanatomical precision for studies of the structural and functional organization of human cerebral cortex and its variation across individuals and in development, aging, and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Emma C Robinson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.,Department of Computing, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Carl D Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - John Harwell
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Essa Yacoub
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Kamil Ugurbil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Jesper Andersson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Christian F Beckmann
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6525 EN, The Netherlands.,Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Postbus 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Harrison SJ, Woolrich MW, Robinson EC, Glasser MF, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM. Large-scale probabilistic functional modes from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2015; 109:217-31. [PMID: 25598050 PMCID: PMC4349633 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well established that it is possible to observe spontaneous, highly structured, fluctuations in human brain activity from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) when the subject is ‘at rest’. However, characterising this activity in an interpretable manner is still a very open problem. In this paper, we introduce a method for identifying modes of coherent activity from resting state fMRI (rfMRI) data. Our model characterises a mode as the outer product of a spatial map and a time course, constrained by the nature of both the between-subject variation and the effect of the haemodynamic response function. This is presented as a probabilistic generative model within a variational framework that allows Bayesian inference, even on voxelwise rfMRI data. Furthermore, using this approach it becomes possible to infer distinct extended modes that are correlated with each other in space and time, a property which we believe is neuroscientifically desirable. We assess the performance of our model on both simulated data and high quality rfMRI data from the Human Connectome Project, and contrast its properties with those of both spatial and temporal independent component analysis (ICA). We show that our method is able to stably infer sets of modes with complex spatio-temporal interactions and spatial differences between subjects. We introduce a probabilistic model for modes in resting state fMRI. Our hierarchical model captures subject variability and haemodynamic effects. We illustrate its performance on simulated data and rfMRI data from 200 subjects. We demonstrate the ability of our method to infer spatio-temporally interacting modes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Harrison
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Oxford, UK; Life Sciences Interface Doctoral Training Centre (LSI-DTC), Oxford, UK.
| | - Mark W Woolrich
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Oxford, UK
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University, Medical School, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christian F Beckmann
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abdollahi RO, Kolster H, Glasser MF, Robinson EC, Coalson TS, Dierker D, Jenkinson M, Van Essen DC, Orban GA. Correspondences between retinotopic areas and myelin maps in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 2014; 99:509-24. [PMID: 24971513 PMCID: PMC4121090 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 05/30/2014] [Accepted: 06/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We generated probabilistic area maps and maximum probability maps (MPMs) for a set of 18 retinotopic areas previously mapped in individual subjects (Georgieva et al., 2009 and Kolster et al., 2010) using four different inter-subject registration methods. The best results were obtained using a recently developed multimodal surface matching method. The best set of MPMs had relatively smooth borders between visual areas and group average area sizes that matched the typical size in individual subjects. Comparisons between retinotopic areas and maps of estimated cortical myelin content revealed the following correspondences: (i) areas V1, V2, and V3 are heavily myelinated; (ii) the MT cluster is heavily myelinated, with a peak near the MT/pMSTv border; (iii) a dorsal myelin density peak corresponds to area V3D; (iv) the phPIT cluster is lightly myelinated; and (v) myelin density differs across the four areas of the V3A complex. Comparison of the retinotopic MPM with cytoarchitectonic areas, including those previously mapped to the fs_LR cortical surface atlas, revealed a correspondence between areas V1–3 and hOc1–3, respectively, but little correspondence beyond V3. These results indicate that architectonic and retinotopic areal boundaries are in agreement in some regions, and that retinotopy provides a finer-grained parcellation in other regions. The atlas datasets from this analysis are freely available as a resource for other studies that will benefit from retinotopic and myelin density map landmarks in human visual cortex. Maximum probability maps for 18 retinotopic areas were generated. Multimodal surface matching was used to compare with myelin and cytoarchitectonic maps. Early areas V1–3 areas are heavily myelinated, as are V3D and most of areas MT/pMSTv. The phPIT cluster is lightly myelinated compared to other retinotopic areas. Early areas V1–3 correspond to areas hOc1–3, with little correspondence beyond V3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hauke Kolster
- Laboratorium voor Neuro-en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy S Coalson
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Donna Dierker
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Guy A Orban
- Laboratorium voor Neuro-en Psychofysiologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Robinson EC, Jbabdi S, Glasser MF, Andersson J, Burgess GC, Harms MP, Smith SM, Van Essen DC, Jenkinson M. MSM: a new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching. Neuroimage 2014; 100:414-26. [PMID: 24939340 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 357] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2013] [Revised: 05/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Surface-based cortical registration methods that are driven by geometrical features, such as folding, provide sub-optimal alignment of many functional areas due to variable correlation between cortical folding patterns and function. This has led to the proposal of new registration methods using features derived from functional and diffusion imaging. However, as yet there is no consensus over the best set of features for optimal alignment of brain function. In this paper we demonstrate the utility of a new Multimodal Surface Matching (MSM) algorithm capable of driving alignment using a wide variety of descriptors of brain architecture, function and connectivity. The versatility of the framework originates from adapting the discrete Markov Random Field (MRF) registration method to surface alignment. This has the benefit of being very flexible in the choice of a similarity measure and relatively insensitive to local minima. The method offers significant flexibility in the choice of feature set, and we demonstrate the advantages of this by performing registrations using univariate descriptors of surface curvature and myelination, multivariate feature sets derived from resting fMRI, and multimodal descriptors of surface curvature and myelination. We compare the results with two state of the art surface registration methods that use geometric features: FreeSurfer and Spherical Demons. In the future, the MSM technique will allow explorations into the best combinations of features and alignment strategies for inter-subject alignment of cortical functional areas for a wide range of neuroimaging data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Robinson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Saad Jbabdi
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesper Andersson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Gregory C Burgess
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael P Harms
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stephen M Smith
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- FMRIB centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Smith SM, Vidaurre D, Beckmann CF, Glasser MF, Jenkinson M, Miller KL, Nichols TE, Robinson EC, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Woolrich MW, Barch DM, Uğurbil K, Van Essen DC. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn Sci 2013; 17:666-82. [PMID: 24238796 PMCID: PMC4004765 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 601] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2013] [Revised: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 09/30/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Spontaneous fluctuations in activity in different parts of the brain can be used to study functional brain networks. We review the use of resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) for the purpose of mapping the macroscopic functional connectome. After describing MRI acquisition and image-processing methods commonly used to generate data in a form amenable to connectomics network analysis, we discuss different approaches for estimating network structure from that data. Finally, we describe new possibilities resulting from the high-quality rfMRI data being generated by the Human Connectome Project and highlight some upcoming challenges in functional connectomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Smith
- Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Optical properties of nanostructures depend on size, shape, material, and local environment. These characteristics can be probed interferometrically, given a broadband source. However, broadband supercontinuum sources are intrinsically noisy, limiting the measurement sensitivity. In this article we describe the application of an auto-balancing technique to reduce the noise in a broadband supercontinuum source, thus increasing the signal to noise ratio. We show a noise reduction of 41 dB allowing optical powers as small as 0.01 pW to be interferometrically detected with a 5 ms integration time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Robinson
- H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Robinson EC, Hammers A, Ericsson A, Edwards AD, Rueckert D. Identifying population differences in whole-brain structural networks: A machine learning approach. Neuroimage 2010; 50:910-9. [PMID: 20079440 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2009] [Revised: 01/06/2010] [Accepted: 01/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Robinson
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Alkylate 215, a mixture of linear decyl- to tridecylbenzenes, is an intermediate in the manufacture of detergent sulfonates. A two-generation reproduction study and a developmental toxicity study were conducted using single daily doses given by gastric intubation in a corn oil vehicle. In the reproduction study, groups of 30 rats/sex/group were given doses of 0, 5, 50, or 500 mg/kg/day. F0 animals received a 10-week premating treatment period and were then mated to produce a single litter; F1 adults were selected from the F1 litters. F1 animals were dosed for 11 weeks before mating to produce a single litter. Adults and weaned pups received a gross postmortem examination. Histopathology studies were conducted on reproductive tissues, tissues with gross lesions, and the pituitary gland taken from each adult in the control and high dose groups. In the developmental toxicity study, groups of 24 mated female rats were given 0, 125, 500, or 2000 mg/kg/day on Days 6 through 15 of gestation. Dams were terminated on gestation Day 20 and fetuses were examined for external, soft tissue, and skeletal defects. Results of the reproduction study were as follows. At 50 mg/kg/day, pup weights were decreased at Day 7 in the F1 litter. At 500 mg/kg/day, decreases were found in the F0 females in premating and early lactation weight gains; in both generations in premating weight gains in males and in weight gains during gestation in females; and in litter size, pup viability at birth, Day 0-4 survival, and pup weights on Days 14 and 21. The NOAEL for reproductive effects was 5 mg/kg/day. The developmental toxicity study found effects on several parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Robinson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri 63167
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Alkylate 215 (A-215), Alkylate 225 (A-225), and Alkylate 230 (A-230) are mixtures of C10-C14 linear alkylbenzenes used as intermediates for the manufacture of detergents. These products were evaluated for genotoxic activity in the Ames bacterial mutagenesis assay (strains TA98, 100, 1535, and 1537), the CHO/HGPRT mammalian cell forward gene mutation assay, and the in vivo rat bone marrow chromosome assay. The Ames and CHO/HGPRT assays were conducted both with and without the addition of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. The maximum concentrations evaluated were 10 mg/plate (A-215) and 3 mg/plate (A-225 and A-230) for the Ames test, and 1.5 mg/ml (A-215 and A-225) and 2.0 mg/ml (A-230) for the CHO/HGPRT assay. In each case, the highest concentrations produced evidence of either toxicity or insolubility. The highest dose in the bone marrow cytogenetics assay was 12,700 mg/kg, a level which produced significant weight loss. The results of all tests were negative, indicating a lack of genotoxic activity as measured by the battery of tests used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Robinson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri 63167
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP; Santicizer 160 Plasticizer) was fed to 3 groups of 10 male and 10 female Charles River CD rats for 6 wk at target doses of 500, 1500, and 3000 mg/kg/d. Control groups of 6 males and 6 females received untreated diets for the same period. Body weight gains were decreased at the 1500 and 3000 mg/kg/d levels. Hindlimb stiffness was noted at the 3000 mg/kg/d level and was more prevalent in males. Stiffness was apparently reversed after withdrawal from BBP exposure for 2 d. Microscopic examination of central and peripheral nervous system tissues did not reveal any compound-related pathological changes. Thus, there were no morphological changes in the nervous system that could be related to the apparently reversible hindlimb stiffness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Robinson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri 63167
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bosher J, Robinson EC, Hay RT. Interactions between the adenovirus type 2 DNA polymerase and the DNA binding domain of nuclear factor I. New Biol 1990; 2:1083-90. [PMID: 2088500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The adenovirus origin of DNA replication is located within the terminal 51 bp of the viral genome and contains three recognizable domains: the minimal origin or "core" and binding sites for the cellular transcription factors NFI (CTF) and NFIII (oct-1, OTF-I). In vivo assays with a series of plasmids containing insertions between the "core" and NFI binding site revealed that a strict spatial arrangement of the NFI binding site relative to the "core" was required for efficient DNA replication. To determine if this strict positional constraint was a result of interactions between genome-bound proteins, we used the DNA-binding domain of NFI immobilized on Sepharose as an affinity matrix to examine binding of the adenovirus DNA polymerase and preterminal protein. Extracts from insect cells infected with baculoviruses expressing the polymerase or preterminal protein were passed over the NFI affinity matrix and bound proteins were eluted. Whereas preterminal protein passed through the column, the DNA polymerase was specifically retained. When extracts containing both preterminal protein and polymerase were passed over the NFI column, both proteins were retained because of the formation of DNA polymerase-preterminal protein heterodimers. Thus, interactions between the DNA binding domain of NFI and the DNA polymerase may serve to direct the DNA polymerase-preterminal protein heterodimer into a preinitiation complex that assembles at the adenovirus origin of DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bosher
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
This review compares the subchronic toxicity of butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) across several species. Data from the published literature as well as previously unpublished studies sponsored by Monsanto are presented. BBP-induced toxicity occurs only at relatively high levels of exposure and is dependent on the species, age and strain of test animals used. These factors should be considered in extrapolating findings from animal toxicology studies to humans when assessing the safety of BBP.
Collapse
|
41
|
Short RD, Robinson EC, Lington AW, Chin AE. Metabolic and peroxisome proliferation studies with di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in rats and monkeys. Toxicol Ind Health 1987; 3:185-95. [PMID: 3617067 DOI: 10.1177/074823378700300213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Male Fischer 344 rats and cynomolgus monkeys were treated with various doses of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) for at least 21 days. There was metabolic, biochemical, and morphological evidence for peroxisomal proliferation in rats that consumed diets containing 1000 ppm DEHP and above. These diets were estimated to provide average daily doses of about 100 mg/kg of DEHP. In contrast, peroxisomal proliferation was not observed in monkeys that received up to 500 mg/kg/day of DEHP by gavage. The results of this study suggest that rats do not provide a good model for predicting the results of DEHP exposure on peroxisomal proliferation in higher primates.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The REP sequence is a highly conserved inverted repeat that is present in about 25% of all E. coli transcription units. We show that the REP sequence can stabilize upstream RNA, independently of any other sequences, by protection from 3'-5' exonuclease attack. The REP sequence is frequently responsible for the differential stability of different segments of mRNA within an operon. We demonstrate that REP-stabilized mRNA can be translated in vivo and that cloning the REP sequence downstream of a gene can increase protein synthesis. This provides direct evidence that alterations in mRNA stability can play a role in determining bacterial gene expression. The implications of these findings for the mechanisms of mRNA degradation and for the role of RNA stability in the regulation of gene expression are discussed.
Collapse
|
43
|
Robinson EC, Hammond BG, Johannsen FR, Levinskas GJ, Rodwell DE. Teratogenicity studies of alkylaryl phosphate ester plasticizers in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1986; 7:138-43. [PMID: 3732665 DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(86)90207-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Santicizer 141 plasticizer (2-ethylhexyldiphenyl phosphate) and Santicizer 148 plasticizer (isodecyldiphenyl phosphate) were tested for teratogenic activity in Charles River COBS CD rats. Groups of 25 mated females were given 0, 300, 1000, or 3000 mg/kg/day by gavage on Days 6 through 15 (Santicizer 141) or 6 through 19 (Santicizer 148) of gestation. Mean maternal body weight gains were slightly and severely reduced at the mid- and high-dose levels of Santicizer 141, respectively. Body weights were not affected by treatment with Santicizer 148. Most malformations found in groups treated with either plasticizer occurred as single incidences and have been observed in historical controls. Thus, no teratogenic response was observed in rats after treatment with either of these two alkylaryl phosphates during the period of organogenesis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
We describe a remarkably conserved nucleotide sequence, the many copies of which may occupy up to 1% of the genomes of E. coli and S. typhimurium. This sequence, the REP (repetitive extragenic palindromic) sequence, is about 35 nucleotides long, includes an inverted repeat, and can occur singly or in multiple adjacent copies. A possible role for the REP sequences in regulation of gene expression has been thoroughly investigated. While the REP sequences do not appear to modulate differential gene expression within an operon, they can affect the expression of both upstream and downstream genes to a small extent, probably by affecting the rate of mRNA degradation. Possible roles for the REP sequence in mRNA degradation, chromosome structure, and recombination are discussed.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Oral leiomyosarcomata have been reported on only 15 occasions in the world literature. An additional case of leiomyosarcoma of the cheek in an 88-year-old male is reported. The relevant features of leiomyosarcomata are reviewed and discussed.
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Cocolas GH, Robinson EC, Dewey WL. A comparison of some stereochemical requirements of the acetylcholinesterase and muscarinic receptor areas. J Med Chem 1970; 13:299-301. [PMID: 5418506 DOI: 10.1021/jm00296a034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
48
|
Wazenski TJ, Rhodes KJ, Robinson EC. Note on the Simultaneous Use of Polyvalent H and Spicer-Edwards H Antisera as a Preliminary Step in the Identification of Salmonellae. J AOAC Int 1968. [DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/51.3.718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T J Wazenski
- Food and Drug Administration, 2nd and Chestnut Sis., Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
| | - K J Rhodes
- Food and Drug Administration, 2nd and Chestnut Sis., Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
| | - E C Robinson
- Food and Drug Administration, 2nd and Chestnut Sis., Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Robinson EC. 100 years of service. Can Hosp 1966; 43:55-6. [PMID: 5321598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|