Efficacy and Safety of Calcifediol in Young Adults with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Phase I, Multicentre, Clinical Trial-POSCAL Study

Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent, and recent evidence suggests a possible association between vitamin D deficiency and various health conditions. The aim of this study was to assess monthly calcifediol treatments for vitamin D deficiency (or biweekly, if the deficiency was severe) in a young adult population with no associated comorbidities. This multicentre phase I trial started with a four month open-label treatment phase (TP) that included 101 participants (65% women with mean age 29.8 years). Eighty-two percent of the subjects (79/96) achieved 25(OH)D levels within the target range (20-60 ng/mL) by the end of the TP, and they were subsequently randomised and subjected to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, five month follow-up phase (FP). At the end of the FP, 89% of participants maintained vitamin D levels of >20 ng/mL with calcifediol, versus 49% with placebo (p < 0.001). Subjects receiving monthly calcifediol during both phases (n = 32) maintained 25(OH)D levels >20 ng/mL, whereas those on the placebo during the FP (n = 38) exhibited deficiency levels of 25(OH)D by the end of the study. No clinically relevant changes in bone metabolism parameters or toxic 25(OH)D levels were observed, and no serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. Calcifediol is a safe and effective treatment for vitamin D deficiency in the young adult population, but long-term use may be required to sustain optimal 25(OH)D levels.

Weekly Icodec versus Daily Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin

BACKGROUND

Insulin icodec is an investigational once-weekly basal insulin analogue for diabetes management.

METHODS

We conducted a 78-week randomized, open-label, treat-to-target phase 3a trial (including a 52-week main phase and a 26-week extension phase, plus a 5-week follow-up period) involving adults with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin level, 7 to 11%) who had not previously received insulin. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly insulin icodec or once-daily insulin glargine U100. The primary end point was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to week 52; the confirmatory secondary end point was the percentage of time spent in the glycemic range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter) in weeks 48 to 52. Hypoglycemic episodes (from baseline to weeks 52 and 83) were recorded.

RESULTS

Each group included 492 participants. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The mean reduction in the glycated hemoglobin level at 52 weeks was greater with icodec than with glargine U100 (from 8.50% to 6.93% with icodec [mean change, -1.55 percentage points] and from 8.44% to 7.12% with glargine U100 [mean change, -1.35 percentage points]); the estimated between-group difference (-0.19 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.36 to -0.03) confirmed the noninferiority (P<0.001) and superiority (P = 0.02) of icodec. The percentage of time spent in the glycemic range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter was significantly higher with icodec than with glargine U100 (71.9% vs. 66.9%; estimated between-group difference, 4.27 percentage points [95% CI, 1.92 to 6.62]; P<0.001), which confirmed superiority. Rates of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were 0.30 events per person-year of exposure with icodec and 0.16 events per person-year of exposure with glargine U100 at week 52 (estimated rate ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.75) and 0.30 and 0.16 events per person-year of exposure, respectively, at week 83 (estimated rate ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.61). No new safety signals were identified, and incidences of adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycemic control was significantly better with once-weekly insulin icodec than with once-daily insulin glargine U100. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; ONWARDS 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04460885.).

Two-year effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on control of eating in adults with overweight/obesity: STEP 5

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effect of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg on 2-year control of eating.

METHODS

In STEP 5, adults with overweight/obesity were randomized 1:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, plus lifestyle modification, for 104 weeks. A 19-item Control of Eating Questionnaire was administered at weeks 0, 20, 52, and 104 in a subgroup of participants. P values were not controlled for multiplicity.

RESULTS

In participants completing the Control of Eating Questionnaire (semaglutide, n = 88; placebo, n = 86), mean body weight changes were -14.8% (semaglutide) and -2.4% (placebo). Scores significantly improved with semaglutide versus placebo for Craving Control and Craving for Savory domains at weeks 20, 52, and 104 (p < 0.01); for Positive Mood and Craving for Sweet domains at weeks 20 and 52 (p < 0.05); and for hunger and fullness at week 20 (p < 0.001). Improvements in craving domain scores were positively correlated with reductions in body weight from baseline to week 104 with semaglutide. At 104 weeks, scores for desire to eat salty and spicy food, cravings for dairy and starchy foods, difficulty in resisting cravings, and control of eating were significantly reduced with semaglutide versus placebo (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with overweight/obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg improved short- and longer-term control of eating associated with substantial weight loss.

Long-Term Treatment and Effect of Discontinuation of Calcifediol in Postmenopausal Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Trial

Vitamin D plays a major role in bone health and probably also in multiple extraskeletal acute and chronic diseases. Although supplementation with calcifediol, a vitamin D metabolite, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in short-term clinical trials, its effects after long-term monthly administration have been studied less extensively. This report describes the results of a 1-year, phase III-IV, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter superiority clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of monthly calcifediol 0.266 mg versus cholecalciferol 25,000 IU (0.625 mg) in postmenopausal women with vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL). A total of 303 women were randomized and 298 evaluated. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 12 months (Group A1), calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 4 months followed by placebo for 8 months (Group A2), and cholecalciferol 25,000 IU/month (0.625 mg/month) for 12 months (Group B). By month 4, stable 25(OH)D levels were documented with both calcifediol and cholecalciferol (intention-to-treat population): 26.8 ± 8.5 ng/mL (Group A1) and 23.1 ± 5.4 ng/mL (Group B). By month 12, 25(OH)D levels were 23.9 ± 8.0 ng/mL (Group A1) and 22.4 ± 5.5 ng/mL (Group B). When calcifediol treatment was withdrawn in Group A2, 25(OH)D levels decreased to baseline levels (28.5 ± 8.7 ng/mL at month 4 versus 14.4 ± 6.0 ng/mL at month 12). No relevant treatment-related safety issues were reported in any of the groups. The results confirm that long-term treatment with monthly calcifediol in vitamin D-deficient patients is effective and safe. The withdrawal of treatment leads to a pronounced decrease of 25(OH)D levels. Calcifediol presented a faster onset of action compared to monthly cholecalciferol. Long-term treatment produces stable and sustained 25(OH)D concentrations with no associated safety concerns. © 2023 Faes Farma SA. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Two-year effects of semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 5 trial

The STEP 5 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo (both plus behavioral intervention) for long-term treatment of adults with obesity, or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity, without diabetes. The co-primary endpoints were the percentage change in body weight and achievement of weight loss of ≥5% at week 104. Efficacy was assessed among all randomized participants regardless of treatment discontinuation or rescue intervention. From 5 October 2018 to 1 February 2019, 304 participants were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2.4 mg (n = 152) or placebo (n = 152), 92.8% of whom completed the trial (attended the end-of-trial safety visit). Most participants were female (236 (77.6%)) and white (283 (93.1%)), with a mean (s.d.) age of 47.3 (11.0) years, body mass index of 38.5 (6.9) kg m-2 and weight of 106.0 (22.0) kg. The mean change in body weight from baseline to week 104 was -15.2% in the semaglutide group (n = 152) versus -2.6% with placebo (n = 152), for an estimated treatment difference of -12.6 %-points (95% confidence interval, -15.3 to -9.8; P < 0.0001). More participants in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group achieved weight loss ≥5% from baseline at week 104 (77.1% versus 34.4%; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal adverse events, mostly mild-to-moderate, were reported more often with semaglutide than with placebo (82.2% versus 53.9%). In summary, in adults with overweight (with at least one weight-related comorbidity) or obesity, semaglutide treatment led to substantial, sustained weight loss over 104 weeks versus placebo. NCT03693430.

Benefits of SGLT2i for the Treatment of Heart Failure Irrespective of Diabetes Diagnosis: A State-of-the-Art Review

Morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure (HF) has remained high despite advances in therapy. Furthermore, HF-associated risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is even higher than in patients without T2D owing to the strong reciprocal relationship between conditions. However, until recently, no therapy to treat patients with diabetes also reduced cardiovascular risks related to HF. Recent clinical studies (DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved, SOLOIST-WHF trial) and meta-analysis have demonstrated that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are among the first antidiabetic drugs capable of reducing cardiovascular risks related to HF and improving the prognosis of patients with and without diabetes. Their pleiotropic mechanisms of action place them at the intersection of hemodynamic, metabolic, and neurohumoral pathways, with clear advantages for treating these patients independent of its glucose-lowering effect. Moreover, the benefits of SGLT2i were consistent across the cardiorenal continuum in different populations and clinical settings, which has led to different guidelines introducing SGLT2i as a first-line treatment for HF.

Effective Overall Glycaemic Control with Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Across Patients with Different Baseline Characteristics: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Onset 9 Trial

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) compared with insulin aspart (IAsp) in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across different subgroups.

METHODS

We report on a post hoc analysis of onset 9, a 16-week trial of participants with T2D randomised to faster aspart (n = 546) or IAsp (n = 545). Participants were grouped by baseline HbA1c (< 7.0%, ≥ 7.0%), meal test bolus insulin dose (≤ 10 units [U], > 10 U to ≤ 20 U, > 20 U), body mass index (< 30 kg/m², ≥ 30 to < 35 kg/m², ≥ 35 kg/m²), and age (< 65 years, ≥ 65 years). Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in HbA1c and in 1-h postprandial glucose (PPG) increment, and severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Faster aspart provided reductions in HbA1c comparable to IAsp across all subgroups, with improved 1-h PPG control compared with IAsp in several subgroups. Faster aspart had comparable or improved rates of severe or BG-confirmed hypoglycaemia versus IAsp, particularly in participants with good glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7.0%), the elderly (≥ 65 years old), and those with insulin resistance (> 20 U meal test bolus insulin dose).

CONCLUSIONS

Faster aspart provides effective overall glycaemic control, with improved early PPG control compared with IAsp across a range of patient characteristics.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03268005.

Glycaemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with dulaglutide, with and without concomitant insulin: Post hoc analyses of randomized clinical trials

AIM

To investigate the association between treatment with dulaglutide and glycaemic variability (GV) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Post hoc analyses of six randomized, phase 3 studies were conducted to investigate the association between treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly and GV in adult patients with T2D. Using data from seven- and eight-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles over up to 28 weeks of treatment, GV in within- and between-day SMPG, and between-day fasting glucose from SMPG (FSMPG) was assessed according to standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

RESULTS

Pooled data from five studies with dulaglutide as monotherapy or added to oral glucose-lowering medication, without concomitant insulin treatment, revealed clinically meaningful reductions in within- and between-day SMPG, and between-day FSMPG variability from baseline in the dulaglutide group. Comparisons between treatment groups in two studies demonstrated that reductions from baseline in within-day and between-day SMPG, and between-day FSMPG variability were greater for treatment with dulaglutide compared with insulin glargine, as well as for treatment with dulaglutide when added to insulin glargine compared with insulin glargine alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2D, treatment with dulaglutide as monotherapy or added to oral glucose-lowering medication, without concomitant insulin treatment, was potentially associated with a reduction in GV. Treatment with dulaglutide was associated with a reduction in GV to a greater degree than insulin glargine. When added to insulin glargine, treatment with dulaglutide was associated with greater decreases in GV compared with insulin glargine alone. As reduced GV may be associated with better outcomes, these findings may have clinical relevance.

Calcifediol is superior to cholecalciferol in improving vitamin D status in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial

Vitamin D has shown to play a role in multiple diseases due to its skeletal and extraskeletal actions. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency has become a worldwide health issue. Few supplementation guidelines mention calcifediol treatment, despite being the direct precursor of calcitriol and the biomarker of vitamin D status. This 1-year, phase III-IV, double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of calcifediol 0.266 mg soft capsules in vitamin D-deficient postmenopausal women, compared to cholecalciferol. Results reported here are from a prespecified interim analysis, for the evaluation of the study's primary endpoint: the percentage of patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels above 30 ng/ml after 4 months. A total of 303 patients were enrolled, of whom 298 were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Patients with baseline levels of serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml were randomized 1:1:1 to calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 12 months, calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 4 months followed by placebo for 8 months, and cholecalciferol 25,000 IU/month for 12 months. At month 4, 35.0% of postmenopausal women treated with calcifediol and 8.2% of those treated with cholecalciferol reached serum 25(OH)D levels above 30 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). The most remarkable difference between both drugs in terms of mean change in serum 25(OH)D levels was observed after the first month of treatment (mean ± standard deviation change = 9.7 ± 6.7 and 5.1 ± 3.5 ng/ml in patients treated with calcifediol and cholecalciferol, respectively). No relevant treatment-related safety issues were reported in any of the groups studied. These results thus confirm that calcifediol is effective, faster, and more potent than cholecalciferol in raising serum 25(OH)D levels and is a valuable option for the treatment of vitamin D deficiency. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec as add-on to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus titrated insulin degludec in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

In this open-label, parallel-group, multicentre (122 sites), multinational (13 countries), phase 3 study, eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had a baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) of 7·0-10·5%, body-mass index of at least 25 kg/m², stable weight, and were insulin-naive and treated with metformin alone or in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor for at least 3 months before screening. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using an interactive web-response system, to once-weekly subcutaneous injection of tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or once-daily subcutaneous injection of titrated insulin degludec, and were stratified by country, HbA_1c, and concomitant use of oral antihyperglycaemic medications. Tirzepatide was initially given at 2·5 mg and the dose was escalated by 2·5 mg every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was reached. Insulin degludec was initially given at 10 U per day and was titrated once weekly to a fasting self-monitored blood glucose of less than 5·0 mmol/L (<90 mg/dL), following a treat-to-target algorithm, for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was non-inferiority of tirzepatide 10 mg or 15 mg, or both, versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA_1c at week 52. Key secondary efficacy endpoints were non-inferiority of tirzepatide 5 mg versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA_1c at week 52, superiority of all doses of tirzepatide versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA_1c and bodyweight, and the proportion of participants achieving HbA_1c of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) at week 52. We used a boundary of 0·3% to establish non-inferiority in HbA_1c difference between treatments. Efficacy and safety analyses were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all participants who received at least one dose of study drug). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03882970, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between April 1 and Nov 15, 2019, we assessed 1947 participants for eligibility, 1444 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment. The modified intention-to-treat population was 1437 participants from the tirzepatide 5 mg (n=358), tirzepatide 10 mg (n=360), tirzepatide 15 mg (n=359), and insulin degludec (n=360) groups. From a mean baseline HbA_1c of 8·17% (SD 0·91), the reductions in HbA_1c at week 52 were 1·93% (SE 0·05) for tirzepatide 5 mg, 2·20% (0·05) for tirzepatide 10 mg, and 2·37% (0·05) for tirzepatide 15 mg, and 1·34% (0·05) for insulin degludec. The non-inferiority margin of 0·3% was met. The estimated treatment difference (ETD) versus insulin degludec ranged from -0·59% to -1·04% for tirzepatide (p<0·0001 for all tirzepatide doses). The proportion of participants achieving a HbA_1c of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) at week 52 was greater (p<0·0001) in all three tirzepatide groups (82%-93%) versus insulin degludec (61%). At week 52, from a baseline of 94·3 kg (SD 20·1), all three tirzepatide doses decreased bodyweight (-7·5 kg to -12·9 kg), whereas insulin degludec increased bodyweight by 2·3 kg. The ETD versus insulin degludec ranged from -9·8 kg to -15·2 kg for tirzepatide (p<0·0001 for all tirzepatide doses). The most common adverse events in tirzepatide-treated participants were mild to moderate gastrointestinal events that decreased over time. A higher incidence of nausea (12-24%), diarrhoea (15-17%), decreased appetite (6-12%), and vomiting (6-10%) was reported in participants treated with tirzepatide than in those treated with insulin degludec (2%, 4%, 1%, and 1%, respectively). Hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL or severe) was reported in five (1%), four (1%), and eight (2%) participants on tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg, respectively, versus 26 (7%) on insulin degludec. Treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common in the tirzepatide groups than in the insulin degludec group. Five participants died during the study; none of the deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) was superior to titrated insulin degludec, with greater reductions in HbA_1c and bodyweight at week 52 and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia. Tirzepatide showed a similar safety profile to that of GLP-1 receptor agonists.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

The Benefit of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Compared With Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy is Consistent Across Participant Subgroups With Type 2 Diabetes in the DUAL VII Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) results in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels comparable with basal-bolus (BB) therapy. Here, we assessed the effect of once-daily IDegLira compared with BB (once-daily insulin glargine 100 U/mL and insulin aspart ≤4 times/day) across subgroups with varying characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DUAL VII trial participants (type 2 diabetes [T2D], HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol [7.0%-10.0%]) were subgrouped post hoc based on the following baseline characteristics: HbA1c (≤58.5, >58.5 to ≤69.4, and >69.4 mmol/mol; ≤7.5%, >7.5 to ≤8.5%, and >8.5%), body mass index (<30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m²), age (18 to <65 and ≥65 years), duration of diabetes (≥0 to 10 and ≥10 years), total pretrial daily basal insulin dose (20 to <30, ≥30 to <40, and ≥40 to ≤50 U), and fasting plasma glucose (<7.2 mmol/L/<130 mg/dL and ≥7.2 mmol/L/≥130 mg/dL).

RESULTS

Compared with BB, and in all subgroups, IDegLira treatment consistently gave similar HbA1c reductions, less severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemia, lower end-of-trial (EOT) total daily insulin dose, and weight loss. In all subgroups, mean EOT HbA1c was ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%). The greatest HbA1c reduction occurred in the highest baseline HbA1c subgroup. Overall, mean EOT daily insulin dose was 0.43 to 0.52 U/kg with IDegLira and 0.74 to 1.07 U/kg with BB. More participants achieved the triple composite endpoint (HbA1c <53 mmol/mol [<7.0%] without weight gain or hypoglycemia) with IDegLira vs BB across the baseline HbA1c subgroups (≤58.5 mmol/mol [44.6% vs 7.0%], >58.5 to ≤69.4 mmol/mol [41.1% vs 8.3%], and >69.4 mmol/mol [23.8% vs 3.4%]).

CONCLUSION

These results support initiating IDegLira in patients with varying baseline characteristics and uncontrolled T2D on basal insulin.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02420262.

Semaglutide improves health-related quality of life versus placebo when added to standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk (SUSTAIN 6)

AIM

To assess what drives change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in type 2 diabetes in the SUSTAIN 6 trial and identify potential mediators of the treatment effect of semaglutide on HRQoL scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Short Form (SF)-36v2® questionnaire [comprising physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)] was used to assess changes in HRQoL from baseline to week 104, by treatment, in a prespecified analysis. This post-hoc analysis assessed change in PCS and MCS using the following factors as parameter/covariate, using descriptive statistics and linear regressions: major adverse cardiac events, hypoglycaemia, gastrointestinal adverse events, at least one episode of nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea, and change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, blood pressure, heart rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

Mean change in overall PCS score was +1.0 with semaglutide versus +0.4 with placebo, and +0.5 versus -0.2 for MCS. The treatment effect of semaglutide versus placebo (unadjusted estimate) was 0.7 [(95% confidence interval 0.1, 1.2); P = 0.018] on PCS and this was reduced when adjusted for change in HbA1c [0.4 (-0.2, 1.0), P = .167] and body weight [0.3 (-0.3, 0.9), P = .314]. The unadjusted treatment effect on MCS [0.7 (-0.0, 1.5), P = .054] was only reduced when adjusted for change in HbA1c [0.3 (-0.4, 1.1), P = .397]. When adjusting for all other parameters separately, the estimated effect of semaglutide on PCS and MCS qualitatively did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Semaglutide improved HRQoL versus placebo; greater improvements with semaglutide versus placebo were possibly mediated, in part, by change in HbA1c and body weight. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01720446 (SUSTAIN 6).

Once-weekly dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in the early control of fasting serum glucose and HbA1c

AIMS

To determine the early benefit:risk balance of dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used data from a randomized, open-label study (AWARD-2; modified intention-to-treat group) in which suboptimally controlled metformin + glimepiride-treated patients received dulaglutide 1.5 mg (n = 273) or insulin glargine (n = 262). Two composite endpoints were used: for weeks 2-20, fasting serum glucose (FSG) <130 mg/dL (<7.2 mmol/L) without hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L] or severe hypoglycemia); at week 26, patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol) or reduction from baseline ≥1.0% (≥10.9 mmol/mol), no hypoglycemia (as defined above) and no weight gain. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The probability of reaching the FSG target without hypoglycemia was higher with dulaglutide than with insulin glargine at weeks 4 (OR 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.60) and 8 (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.15-2.48). The proportion of patients achieving the 26-week endpoint was higher with dulaglutide (37.4% vs. 10.3%; OR 5.28; 95% CI 3.28-8.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Dulaglutide's balanced efficacy-to-safety profile compares favorably with that of insulin glargine and is apparent soon after treatment initiation and after 6 months of therapy.

Once-Weekly Semaglutide Reduces HbA1c and Body Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Regardless of Background Common OAD: a Subgroup Analysis from SUSTAIN 2-4 and 10

INTRODUCTION

Despite treatment with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), achieving effective glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a challenge. The objective of this post hoc analysis of data from the SUSTAIN 2, 3, 4 and 10 active-controlled trials was to assess the efficacy and safety of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) semaglutide in patients on background treatment with metformin (MET), with or without a sulphonylurea (SU).

METHODS

Data from the randomised phase 3 trials SUSTAIN 2, 3, 4 and 10 for subjects who received background MET alone or MET + SU were analysed. Change from baseline in HbA_1c and body weight at the end of treatment visit (week 30 in SUSTAIN 4 and 10, week 56 in SUSTAIN 2 and 3), and rates of hypoglycaemia and adverse events leading to premature treatment discontinuation were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 3411 subjects were included in the full analysis set (3410 in the safety analysis set). Across the four trials, semaglutide significantly reduced HbA_1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] - 0.32 to - 0.79%-points for semaglutide 0.5 mg, and - 0.38 to - 1.07%-points for semaglutide 1.0 mg vs comparators; p < 0.01) in subjects receiving both MET and MET + SU. Regardless of background OAD, semaglutide significantly reduced body weight (ETD - 2.35 to - 4.72 kg for semaglutide 0.5 mg, and - 2.96 to - 6.76 kg for semaglutide 1.0 mg vs comparators; p < 0.0001). Across the trials, hypoglycaemic events were more common with background MET + SU than MET alone, in subjects receiving either semaglutide or a comparator. The rate of adverse events (AEs) leading to premature treatment discontinuations in subjects treated with semaglutide were generally consistent regardless of background therapy.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg significantly improve glycaemic control (HbA_1c) and body weight in subjects with T2D, with a similar tolerability profile, regardless of whether they receive background MET or MET + SU.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01930188 (SUSTAIN 2), NCT01885208 (SUSTAIN 3), NCT02128932 (SUSTAIN 4) and NCT03191396 (SUSTAIN 10).

IDegLira improves patient-reported outcomes while using a simple regimen with fewer injections and dose adjustments compared with basal-bolus therapy

AIMS

Basal-bolus therapy is associated with greater treatment burden and lower adherence compared with more simplified regimens. This post hoc analysis studied the difference between insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and basal-bolus therapy on number of injections, dose adjustments and patient outcomes in the DUAL VII trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DUAL VII was a 26-week, open-label trial in which patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were using metformin and insulin glargine 100 units/mL (20-50 U) were randomized 1:1 to IDegLira (N = 252) or basal-bolus (insulin glargine U100 + insulin aspart ≤4 times/day) (N = 254). This post hoc analysis reports the observed mean number of injections and cumulative dose adjustments during 26 weeks of treatment. Patient-reported outcomes (Treatment-Related Impact Measure - Diabetes [TRIM-D] and Short Form-36 Health Survey version 2 [SF-36v2]) were collected at scheduled visits and change from baseline scores calculated.

RESULTS

The clinical benefits (non-inferior HbA1c reductions, weight benefit, less hypoglycaemia) of IDegLira vs basal-bolus therapy were achieved with fewer cumulative dose adjustments (16.6 vs 217.2, respectively) and fewer injections (1 vs ≥3 per day, respectively). Patients treated with IDegLira experienced significant improvements across all TRIM-D domains compared with those undergoing basal-bolus therapy. The SF-36v2 showed improvements in both treatment arms with no significant difference between arms in the physical component summary, but there was a significant improvement in patients treated with IDegLira in the mental component summary (P = .0228).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings, combined with the DUAL VII results, suggest that IDegLira, through a more simplified regimen versus basal-bolus therapy, may help improve patient adherence and improve patient outcomes related to diabetes management, treatment burden and mental health, which in turn may assist in the timely achievement of glycaemic control in clinical practice.

Cardiovascular risk reduction with once-weekly semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of gender, age, and baseline CV risk profile in the SUSTAIN 6 trial

Background

The SUSTAIN 6 trial demonstrated that once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 and 1.0 mg) significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) vs placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high CV risk. The effects of gender, age and baseline CV risk on outcomes are important considerations for further study.

Methods

Subjects were grouped according to gender, age (50–65 years and > 65 years), and CV risk profile at baseline (prior myocardial infarction [MI] or stroke vs no prior MI or stroke, and established CV disease [CVD] vs CV risk factors alone, including subjects with chronic kidney disease). Time to MACE and its individual components (CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke), hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and revascularization (coronary and peripheral) were analyzed for all subgroups. Additional analyses were performed for gender and age to investigate change from baseline in HbA_1c and body weight, as well as tolerability.

Results

A total of 3297 subjects were included. The majority of subjects (60.7%) were male; 43% were > 65 years of age; 41.5% had a history of MI or stroke; and 76.8% had established CVD. Compared with placebo, semaglutide reduced the risk of the first occurrence of MACE and each MACE component consistently across all subgroups (gender, age, and baseline CV risk profile). Revascularizations, HbA_1c and body weight were also reduced consistently across all subgroups compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal adverse events in all treatment groups were more common among women than men, but rates of premature treatment discontinuation were similar for both genders.

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6, once-weekly semaglutide vs placebo reduced the risk of MACE in all subjects included in the trial, regardless of gender, age, or baseline CV risk profile.

Trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifying number: NCT01720446, Date of registration: October 29, 2012

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12933-019-0871-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Spanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosis

To reach a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis, a Delphi Consensus Study has been developed. Most of the experts (59.8%) were rheumatologist with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items. Therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been defined.

INTRODUCTION

The paper aims to achieve a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in osteoporosis.

METHODS

A scientific committee led the project and was involved in expert panel identification and Delphi questionnaire development. Two Delphi rounds were completed. The first-round questionnaire included 24 items and assessed, using a seven-point Likert scale, the experts' wish (W) and prognosis (P) in 5 years for each topic (applicability, therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up, and possible treatment to be prescribed). Items for which there was no consensus in the first round were included in the second round. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely agree) or disagreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely disagree) responses.

RESULTS

Of the experts, 112 and 106 completed the first and second rounds, respectively. 59.8% were rheumatologists with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items, and was established regarding the utility of a T2T strategy to define therapeutic objectives, optimal follow-up, and therapeutic algorithm. Participants agreed on the utility of the bone mineral density (BMD) value (T-score >-2.5 SD for spine and >-2.5/-2.0 SD for femoral neck), lack of fractures, and fracture risk (FRAX) as therapeutic objectives. For measuring BMD changes, consensus was achieved on the suitability of hip and femoral neck locations. Experts agreed to consider treatment failure as when a significant BMD gain could not be achieved, or when a new fracture occurs within 2-3 years. There was consensus that all proposed therapies should achieve a therapeutic target through T2T strategy (treatments with the highest consensus scores were denosumab and teriparatide).

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been established by a panel of experts. Some aspects nevertheless still require further analysis.

Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was effective across a range of dysglycaemia and body mass index categories in the DUAL V randomized trial

This study assessed the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) vs insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) across categories of baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; ≤7.5%, >7.5% to ≤8.5% and >8.5%), body mass index (BMI; <30, ≥30 to <35 and ≥35 kg/m² ) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG; <7.2 and ≥7.2 mmol/L) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on basal insulin, using post hoc analyses of the DUAL V 26-week trial. With IDegLira, mean HbA1c was reduced across all baseline HbA1c (1.0%-2.5%), FPG (1.5%-1.9%) and BMI categories (1.8%-1.9%), with significantly greater reductions compared with IGlar U100. For all HbA1c, FPG and BMI categories, IDegLira resulted in weight loss and IGlar U100 in weight gain; hypoglycaemia rates were lower for IDegLira vs IGlar U100. More patients achieved HbA1c <7% with IDegLira than IGlar U100 across all HbA1c (59%-87% vs 31%-66%), FPG (71%-74% vs 40%-51%) and BMI categories (71%-73% vs 40%-54%). IDegLira improved glycaemic control and induced weight loss in patients with T2D previously uncontrolled on basal insulin, across the categories of baseline HbA1c, FPG or BMI that were tested.

Placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-9)

AIM

To compare the addition of weekly dulaglutide vs the addition of placebo to titrated glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with sub-optimum glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (N = 300) from this phase III, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study were randomized to weekly subcutaneous injections of dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo with titrated daily glargine (mean ± standard deviation baseline dose: 39 ± 22 U), with or without metformin (≥1500 mg/d). The primary endpoint was superiority of dulaglutide/glargine to placebo/glargine with regard to change from baseline in HbA1c level at 28 weeks.

RESULTS

Least squares (LS) mean ± standard error (s.e.) HbA1c changes from baseline were -1.44 ± 0.09% (-15.74 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with dulaglutide/glargine and -0.67 ± 0.09% (-7.32 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with placebo/glargine at 28 weeks (LS mean difference [95% confidence interval] -0.77% [-0.97, -0.56]; P < .001). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide/glargine and increased with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -2.41 ± 0.39 kg; P < .001). Increases from baseline in mean glargine dose were significantly smaller with dulaglutide/glargine vs placebo/glargine (13 ± 2 U [0.1 ± 0.02 U/kg] vs 26 ± 2 U [0.3 ± 0.02 U/kg], respectively; P < .001; LS mean ± s.e. final dose: dulaglutide/glargine, 51 ± 2 U; placebo/glargine, 65 ± 2 U). The hypoglycaemia rate (≤3.9 mmol/L threshold) was 7.69 ± 15.15 and 8.56 ± 16.13 events/patient/year, respectively (P = .488). One episode of severe hypoglycaemia occurred in the dulaglutide/glargine group. Common gastrointestinal adverse events with dulaglutide were nausea (12.0%), diarrhoea (11.3%) and vomiting (6.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg added to basal insulin is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option for patients with T2D.

Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Regulatory guidance specifies the need to establish cardiovascular safety of new diabetes therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes in order to rule out excess cardiovascular risk. The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week, in type 2 diabetes are unknown.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 3297 patients with type 2 diabetes who were on a standard-care regimen to receive once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) or placebo for 104 weeks. The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. We hypothesized that semaglutide would be noninferior to placebo for the primary outcome. The noninferiority margin was 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio.

RESULTS

At baseline, 2735 of the patients (83.0%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both. The primary outcome occurred in 108 of 1648 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group and in 146 of 1649 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 2.9% of the patients receiving semaglutide and in 3.9% of those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P=0.12); nonfatal stroke occurred in 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.99; P=0.04). Rates of death from cardiovascular causes were similar in the two groups. Rates of new or worsening nephropathy were lower in the semaglutide group, but rates of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or conditions requiring treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) were significantly higher (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.78; P=0.02). Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the semaglutide group, although more patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high cardiovascular risk, the rate of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke was significantly lower among patients receiving semaglutide than among those receiving placebo, an outcome that confirmed the noninferiority of semaglutide. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; SUSTAIN-6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01720446 .).

Validation of PHPQoL, a Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism

CONTEXT

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) but instruments to specifically assess this are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

Validate the new disease-specific Primary Hyperparathyroidism Quality of Life (PHPQoL) questionnaire in usual clinical practice.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective, and multicenter.

SETTING

Public hospital ambulatory care.

PATIENTS

Patients with PHPT of both sexes, aged more than or equal to 18 years either initiated treatment for PHPT (group A) or had stable PHPT, not requiring therapy (group B). Patients in group A had at least one surgical criterion according to the 2009 Third International Workshop on Management of Asymptomatic PHPT.

INTERVENTION

Sociodemographic, clinical, and HRQoL data (PHPQol, Short Form-36, Psychological Well-Being Index, and patients' self-perceived health status) were collected. Group A underwent 4 evaluations (baseline, 3 ± 1, 6 ± 1, and 12 ± 2 months after a therapeutic intervention) and group B 2, at baseline and 1 month later to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were included (104 group A, 78 group B) with a mean age (SD) of 61.4 (12.1) years; 79.7% were women. Group A increased PHPQoL score (SD) (better HRQoL) (52 ± 23 at baseline; 62 ± 24 at 12 months; P < .001). At baseline, symptomatic patients had a lower PHPQoL score (worse) than asymptomatic ones (51 ± 21 vs 68 ± 21; P < .001). Correlations were seen between PHPQoL and Short Form-36, Psychological Well-Being Index, and self-perceived health status (P < .001). PHPQoL had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.80), test-retest reliability (group B, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80), and sensitivity to detect HQRoL changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

PHPQoL is a valid HRQoL measure to assess the impact of PHPT on health perception in clinical practice.

High prevalence of undiagnosed vertebral fractures in patients suffering from hip fracture at their hospital admission: weak concordance among observers

BACKGROUND

Vertebral fracture is often underdiagnosed. Patients with hip fracture may suffer from vertebral fracture without knowing it. The diagnosis of vertebral fracture is sometimes difficult because there is no consensus regarding the definition of osteoporotic vertebral fracture, and several indexes may be used to diagnose it and the concordance between several observers may not be optimal.

OBJECTIVE

To study the concordance in the diagnosis of vertebral fracture done by three different doctors: an orthopedic surgeon, a radiologist, and a bone mineral metabolism expert.

METHODS

A lateral thoracic-lumbar spine X-Ray was performed in 177 patients suffering from hip fracture to assess the presence or absence of vertebral fractures. Three different observers applied Genant's criteria for it. Concordance between observers was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Patients suffering from hip fractures have undiagnosed vertebral fractures in a range that varies from 41.8 to 47.5% depending on the observer. The concordance in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures is quite low, ranging a Cohen's kappa coefficient from 0.43 to 0.55 and a percentage of concordance varying from 64 to 72%. The best concordance was found between observers 1 and 3.

DISCUSSION

Depending on the observer who made the diagnosis, the prevalence of previously undiagnosed vertebral fractures in patients with HF varied widely. We selected three different observers to assess the possible differences in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures among these patients and using the same method (Genant's semi-quantitative assessment), surprisingly, there was little concordance among the three of them.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hip fracture have high prevalence of undiagnosed vertebral fractures. The diagnosis of these fractures varies widely depending on the observers and the Cohen's kappa coefficient and percentage of concordance is rather low.

[Characteristics and types of GLP-1 receptor agonists. An opportunity for individualized therapy]

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is secreted from enteroendocrine L-cells in response to oral nutrient intake and elicits glucose-stimulated insulin secretion while suppressing glucagon secretion. Moreover slows gastric emptying -reducing postprandial glycemic excursions-, reduces body weight, systolic blood pressure and has beneficial effects in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. Since the 1990s, the efficacy of GLP-1 in reducing blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetes (DM2) was well known. However, GLP-1 should be administered by chronic subcutaneous infusion because of the rapid cleavage by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4). Hence, DPP-4 inhibitors -which increase pseudo-physiologically endogenous GLP-1 levels- were developed. In addition, several GLP-1 receptor agonists have been designed to avoid DPP-4-breakdown and/or rapid renal elimination and, therefore, induce a pharmacologic effect in the GLP-1 receptor: short-acting, long-acting, and prolonged-acting GLP-1 analogs. Each class has different structural, pharmacodynamic and clinical properties and could be administered in different therapeutical regimens giving us the opportunity to individualize the therapy of DM2.

Osteoporosis and metabolic syndrome according to socio-economic status, contribution of PTH, vitamin D and body weight: The Canarian Osteoporosis Poverty Study (COPS)

BACKGROUND

Poverty is associated with a great number of diseases, but the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism and the potential association of osteoporosis, osteoporotic fractures and metabolic syndrome in this situation are less well known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations between poverty, bone density, fragility fractures and metabolic syndrome in a population of southern European postmenopausal women. Also, to assess the potential role of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in these associations.

METHOD

Cross-sectional study was carried out in 1 250 postmenopausal Caucasian Spanish women. The socio-economic status of the participants was determined after a personal interview, according to the criteria of the Spanish Institute of Statistics. Participants were divided into two socio-economic levels: low (poverty) and medium or high socioeconomic level. The study protocol included a health questionnaire, a complete physical examination, lateral radiograph of the dorsal and lumbar spine and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur. Fasting blood was obtained to measure 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OHD), intact PTH and selected biochemical variables.

RESULTS

Low socio-economic status was associated with 25-OHD insufficiency, higher values of PTH, higher body weight and body mass index (BMI), lower values of BMD at the lumbar spine and a higher prevalence of fragility fractures, both vertebral and nonvertebral. Poverty was also associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome, but this association was driven mainly by the higher BMI and not by poverty itself. Both vitamin D insufficiency and elevated PTH were consistently related to poverty and osteoporotic fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor postmenopausal women in southern Europe have a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome and osteoporotic fractures. Poverty was associated with higher BMI and metabolic syndrome on the one hand and, on the other, with 25OHD insufficiency, higher PTH levels and osteoporosis. 25OHD insufficiency and/or secondary hyperparathyroidism do not have a significant influence on the presence of metabolic syndrome in this population.

Effect of alendronate in elderly patients after low trauma hip fracture repair

SUMMARY

One year of once weekly alendronate, when given shortly after the surgical repair of a hip fracture, produces reductions in bone markers and increases proximal femoral bone density. The therapy was well tolerated.

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture is the most devastating type of osteoporotic fracture and increases notably the risk of subsequent fractures. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effects of 1 year therapy with a weekly dose of alendronate in the bone mineral density and bone markers in elderly patients after low trauma hip fracture repair.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-nine patients (81 +/- 7 years; 79.8% women) were randomized to be treated either with calcium (500 mg/daily) and vitamin D(3) (400 IU/daily; Ca-Vit D group) or with alendronate (ALN, 70 mg/week) plus calcium and vitamin D(3) (500 mg/daily and 400 IU/daily, respectively; ALN + Ca-Vit D group).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven (61.5%) patients completed the trial. Alendronate increased proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean difference (95% confidence interval); total hip 2.57% (0.67; 4.47); trochanteric 2.96% (0.71; 5.20), intertrochanteric 2.32% (0.36; 4.29)), but the differences were not significant in the BMD of the femoral neck (0.47%; (-2.03; 2.96) and the lumbar spine (0.69%; (-0.86; 2.23)). Bone turnover markers decreased during alendronate treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates for the first time the anti-resorptive efficacy of alendronate given immediately after surgical repair in an elderly population with recent hip fracture. This effect should positively affect the rate of subsequent fractures.

Bone mineral density and risk of fractures in aging, obese post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes. The GIUMO Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has a high prevalence in aging obese postmenopausal women. It is not clear whether or not diabetes produces an increase in bone mineral density or an increase in fracture rates.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to investigate whether type 2 DM produces a higher prevalence of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures in obese postmenopausal Caucasian women. A secondary objective was to study the influence of DM in quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel (QUS) and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in both lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur.

METHOD

This study was a prospective cohort of 111 patients with type 2 DM and 91 control individuals (CTR) over age 65 and obese, recruited from 16 centers in Spain.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lateral dorsal and lumbar X-rays were performed to assess vertebral fractures. Hip and non-vertebral fractures were noted from medical records, written reports or Xray studies. QUS measurements were made of the calcaneus and BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur.

RESULTS

Patients had higher BMD in the lumbar spine (L2-L4) than controls (0.979 g/cm2 vs 0.927 g/cm2, p=0.035), but we found no statistically significant differences in the proximal femur. QUS measurements showed similar values in both groups: BUA (69.3 dB/Mhz vs 66.7 dB/Mhz, p=0.291), SOS (1537 m/sg vs 1532 m/sg, p=0.249) and QUI (87.5 vs 83.7, p=0.153). No statistically significant differences were found in any case. There was no association between vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures and DM. The crude odds ratio, without adjusting was 1.045 (CI 95% 0.531 ; 2.059), and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.927 (CI 95% 0.461 ; 1.863).

CONCLUSIONS

In obese postmenopausal Caucasian women, type 2 DM produces an increase in BMD of the lumbar spine without changes in BMD of the proximal femur or in QUS measurements of the heel. The prevalence of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures did not increase in type 2 DM.

Postmenopausal Canarian women receiving oral glucocorticoids have an increased prevalence of vertebral fractures and low values of bone mineral density measured by quantitative computer tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry, without significant changes in parathyroid hormone

BACKGROUND

Daily doses higher than 7.5 mg/daily of prednisone or equivalents confer a great risk of vertebral and hip fractures with a clear dose dependence of fracture risk. Information regarding the utility in assessing trabecular bone mineral density by quantitative computer tomography (QCT) in these patients, either in the Canaries or in Spain, is lacking. Moreover, in this setting, the importance of secondary hyperparathyroidism is still controversial.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study performed on 1177 consecutive Canary postmenopausal women who attended our Bone Metabolic Unit. The Patient Group was composed of 88 postmenopausal women who were taking oral corticosteroids in dose higher than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent for more than 6 months (OG group). The Control Group included 838 postmenopausal women who did not take steroids. A complete validated questionnaire for osteoporosis risk assessment and a complete physical examination were performed. A lateral X-ray of the spine was performed on every woman. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (LS) by dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and QCT and at the femoral neck by DXA. Fasting serum and 24 hour urine was collected and biochemical markers of bone remodelling were studied.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in general characteristics and calcium intake. The OG group showed lower values of BMD estimated both by DXA and QCT (p<0.05). LS BMD was closely correlated by using both methods (r=0.636, p<0.001). The OG group showed lower values of osteocalcin (p=0.023) and TRAP (p=0.026) without significant differences in PTH. Patients in OG group had a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures than controls (13.3% vs 8.6%; crude values: p=0.049, OR: 1.63 (0.99-2.67); age adjusted: p=0.003, OR 2.29 (1.33-9.93)).

CONCLUSIONS

In postmenopausal Canarian women, chronic glucocorticoid therapy is associated with low bone mineral density, measured either by DXA or QCT, with evidence of low turnover and high prevalence of fractures without significant changes in PTH. DXA and QCT provide similar information in the assessment of this high risk population.

Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in long-term liver or cardiac transplantation patients

Bone loss is one of the most common complications after solid-organ transplantation, but it is frequently under-diagnosed. Our purpose was to evaluate quantitative ultrasound of calcaneus (QUS) in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to identify transplant recipients with osteoporosis. We have cross-sectionally evaluated 140 transplant recipients (85 liver and 55 cardiac transplantations; mean age: 53.6 years, time since transplantation: 67.9 months). Devices used were Hologic 4500 QDR for DXA measurements and Sahara Clinical Sonometer (Hologic Inc, Bedford, MA) for calcaneal QUS. Quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) was calculated from speed of sound (m/s) and broadband ultrasonic attenuation (dB/MHz). QUI T-score and bone mineral density (BMD) T-score (spine and hip) were obtained from Spanish normative data. According to World Health Organization criteria, defined either at lumbar spine or femoral neck, 61% of the females had osteopenia and 32% had osteoporosis, whereas 52% of the males had osteopenia and 11% had osteoporosis. Calcaneal QUS parameters (speed of sound, broadband ultrasonic attenuation, and QUI) were positively correlated with lumbar and femoral BMD (p<0.001). In receiver operator characteristic analysis, a T-score QUI<or=-1.4 standard deviation (SD) had 68% sensitivity and 72% specificity for osteoporosis diagnosis by DXA criteria. However, to obtain maximal sensitivity (5% of false-negative), QUI T-score cutoff should be -0.6 SD, but specificity drops to 42%. In conclusion, a positive correlation exists between lumbar and femoral BMD and QUS parameters in long-term liver or cardiac transplant recipients. QUS could be recommended for screening of osteoporosis in long-term transplanted patients.

Inhaled steroids do not decrease bone mineral density but increase risk of fractures: data from the GIUMO Study Group

Although the negative effect of systemic steroids on bone is well documented, there is not clear evidence about possible adverse effects of inhaled steroids on bone metabolism and fractures. A cross-sectional study was performed on 105 women suffering from bronchial asthma treated with inhaled steroids and 133 controls. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) at the calcaneus and by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), at both the lumbar spine and proximal femur. Patients suffering from bronchial asthma showed no statistically significant changes in BMD as measured by DXA or QUS, compared with controls. A higher prevalence of fractures was found in the group of women with bronchial asthma, with an age-adjusted odds ratio of 2.79 (95% CI: 1.19-6.54). Inhaled steroids do not appear to decrease BMD, but are associated with an increased risk of fracture in women.

Serum lipids and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms in male-to-female transsexuals: effects of estrogen treatment

The effects of chronic administration of estrogens on the lipid profile in males are not fully understood. We have studied the effect of chronic administration of estrogens on the lipid profile in a group of transsexual (TS) Canarian men who were taking estrogens and anti-androgens for a minimum of 3 years. In this cross-sectional study of cases (n=27) and controls (n=26), plasma lipid profile and selected biochemical and hormonal features were studied. TS subjects had shorter stature than controls, and, after adjusting for height and weight, we found that they had lower values of serum free testosterone (FT) and higher estradiol (E2) levels than controls. The TS group had lower total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lower apoprotein B (Apo B) levels than the control group. Biochemistry was similar in both groups. The distribution of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms (ER-Pvu and ER-Xba) was also similar in both groups. Serum Apo B concentration was related to ER-Xba polymorphism. No other association between lipid profile and the distribution of ER-Pvu and ER-Xba was found. We conclude that the chronic administration of estrogens in men could produce an increase in serum estradiol, a decrease in free testosterone levels, and a reduction in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and Apo B levels. The ER-Xba polymorphism may influence the Apo B response to exogenous estrogen in males.

[Development of a questionnaire for the assessment and quantification of overweight and obesity related lifestyles]

INTRODUCTION

Lifestyle intervention is mandatory for obesity treatment. The aim of this study is to design a questionnaire to describe and quantify those behaviours more closely related to obesity in the Spanish obese population.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

An expert panel designed a preliminary 57 Liker-type item questionnaire, which was self-administered to 335 overweight patients (110 male, 225 female; age, 42 +/- 14 years; BMI, 32.6 +/- 3.7 kg/m2). After a subjacent dimensionality searching and item reducing first phase, a shrunk questionnaire of 24 items was then self-administered to 156 overweight patients (52 male, 104 female; age 42 +/- 12 years; BMI, 33.1 +/- 3.5 kg/m2); 56 of those patients were re-administered the questionnaire in order to provide test-retest information.

RESULTS

Final questionnaire includes 22 items clustered in five dimensions: diet caloric intake, searching for psychological well-being eating, physical activity, healthy eating and alcohol intake. Proposed factorial structure is mostly reproduced in different samples and using different extraction methods: all dimensions but alcohol intake score alpha values > 0.75 for liability; test-retest stability is greater than 0.90 in all dimensions but alcohol intake; results for all validity tests performed (of construct, of content and discriminative) are highly satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Metrics study results (liability and validity) demonstrate that the proposed questionnaire provides an excellent tool to assess those lifestyles related to obesity control.

Long-term follow-up of bone mineral density in Addison's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term effects of long-term glucocorticoid replacement therapy (GRT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with chronic adrenal insufficiency. Our aim was to evaluate bone turnover and changes in BMD in patients on GRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We have studied 25 subjects (six men, 19 women; aged 62.4 +/- 11.3 years, duration of disease 21.7 +/- 11.7 years, fasting cortisol 63 +/- 36 nmol/l) on GRT (hydrocortisone 30 mg/day or prednisone 7.5 mg/day). BMD was assessed at the lumbar spine (LS; L2-L4), proximal femur (PF) and ultra distal radius (UR) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The rates of bone loss were calculated using previous DXA measurements at the LS (48 and 60 months earlier). Serum calcium, phosphate alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone ALP, serum osteocalcin (BGP), intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 25(OH) vitamin D were also measured.

RESULTS

BMD [Z-score; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)] was normal at the LS: (-1.15-+0.07); PF: (-0.90-+0.22) and UDR (-0.77-+0.36). No significant differences were found according to the type of replacement therapy or sex. No significant bone loss (g/cm2; 95% CI) was detected at the LS: (-0.021-+0.023). Fifty-six per cent of patients met osteoporotic criteria; a greater proportion of patients treated with prednisone had osteoporosis compared with those an hydrocortisone. All bone markers were in their normal ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on long-term therapy do not show accelerated bone loss at the lumbar spine. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of patients, mainly those treated with prednisone, showed densitometric osteoporosis.

Bone mineral density in hypoparathyroid women on LT4 suppressive therapy. Effect of calcium and 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 treatment

Our aim was to study the bone mineral density (BMD) of patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism (hypoPTH) after longterm calcium and vitamin D treatment. Twenty hypoPTH women (mean-/+SD, aged 50-/+15 years, IPTH 4-/+6 pg/ml) and 20 matched euparathyroid women (euPTH) after near total thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer, completed with I-131 ablation and on suppressive therapy with L-Thyroxine (LT(4)), were studied. In addition eight hypoPTH patients who were receiving LT(4) replacement therapy after surgery for compressive goiter were simultaneously studied. The hypoPTH patients were on calcium and 1,25(OH)(2) vitamin D(3) therapy to normalize serum calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) (DXA, at the lumbar spine [L(2)- L(4), LS], femoral neck [FN] and Ward triangle [WT]), serum and urine calcium, serum phosphorus, TOTALALP and osteocalcin were measured. Patients with hypoPTH showed greater lumbar BMD than euPTH patients on suppressive therapy (Z-score; 1.01-/+1.34 vs. -0.52-/+0.70, p<0.05). Serum osteocalcin levels were higher in hypoPTH patients on suppressive therapy compared to hypoPTH patients on replacement therapy. The LS BMD from hypoPTH patients correlated with calcium supplements (r=0.439; p=0.02), 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) dose (r=0.382; p=0.04) and LT(4) dose (r=0.374; p=0.05). Our data suggest that long-term treatment with calcium and 1,25(OH)(2) vitamin D3 supplements in hypoPTH patients on suppressive LT4 therapy results in increased BMD when compared with patients with normal PTH levels.

Bone mass, bone turnover, vitamin D, and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms in male to female transsexuals: effects of estrogenic treatment on bone metabolism of the male

The effect of chronic administration of estrogens on bone and mineral metabolism in men is not known. We have studied the effect of chronic administration of estrogens on bone mineral metabolism in a group of transsexual (TS) Canarian men, who were taking estrogens for a minimum of 3 years. This is a cross-sectional study of cases and controls and we studied biochemical markers of bone remodeling, bone mineral density (BMD), and selected biochemical and hormonal features. TS subjects had shorter stature than controls, and after adjusting for height and weight, we found that they had lower values for serum-free testosterone and higher values for BMD, both in the lumbar spine and in femoral neck. Biochemistry, bone remodeling markers, and calcitropic hormone values were similar in both groups. Finally, the distributions of vitamin D receptor (BsmI) and estrogen receptor (ER-Pvu and ER-Xba) polymorphisms were also similar in both groups. We conclude that the chronic administration of estrogens in men may produce an increase in serum estradiol, a decrease in free testosterone levels, and an increase in BMD-both in lumbar spine and in femoral neck. We found no association between the transsexual phenotype and the distribution of vitamin D receptor (BsmI) and estrogen receptor (ER-Pvu and ER-Xba).

Long-term follow-up of bone mass after orthotopic liver transplantation: effect of steroid withdrawal from the immunosuppressive regimen

Glucocorticoids have been suggested to play a major role in transplantation-related osteopenia. In this study we assess the long-term changes and the effect of steroid withdrawal from the standard immunosuppressive regimen on bone mineral density (BMD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Sixty-nine non-osteoporotic patients (20 women, 49 men), aged 48 +/- 9.5 years (mean +/- SD), and with a follow-up of 58.3 +/- 23.2 months (range 24-121 months) were studied. Immunosuppressive treatment consisted of prednisone, cyclosporin A and azathioprine. In 41 patients (group A), prednisone was tapered and withdrawn after 36.2 +/- 19.3 months (range 13-79 months), whereas in 28 patients (group B) prednisone was maintained. BMD in the spine (L1-L4) was serially measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 1,000w) at baseline, before steroid withdrawal and at the end of study. Age- and sex-matched Z-scores of BMD were calculated. No differences were found in age, body mass index, time since OLT, or baseline BMD between the two groups. BMD had significantly increased in both groups at the end of follow-up period (group A, +8.1 +/- 8.7%; group B, +3.2 +/- 8.0%, p < 0.05). However, the Z-score was significantly higher in group A than in group B at the end of study (-0.44 +/- 1.05 vs -0.99 +/- 0.77; p<0.05). BMD recovery was lower in pre-OLT biliary cirrhosis patients. Bone mass improvement was independent of the time since OLT in both groups, and of the time of steroid withdrawal in group A. Our data confirm that steroid withdrawal accelerates the recovery of bone mass in patients who have undergone a successful liver transplantation.

Bone mineral density in male patients with L-thyroxine suppressive therapy and Graves disease

Little is known about the effects of thyroid hormone excess in male patients. Our aim was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and thyroid function in male patients with treated thyroid cancer on long-term suppressive L-T4 therapy (TC) and in male patients with Graves' disease (GD). We studied 49 male patients (aged 45+/-12 years), 17 with TC (29-288 months on L-T4 suppressive therapy; free T4: 1.9+/-0.6 ng/dl [normal< or =2.0]; TSH: 0.2+/-0.3 microU/ml [Normal 0.5-5.0]) and 32 with recent onset GD (<12 weeks, free T4: 2.0+/-1.4 ng/dl; TSH: 1.07+/-1.8 microU/ml; TSHRAb 53+/-45% [normal < 15]). BMD was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic QDR1000w) at the lumbar spine (L2-L4, LS), femoral neck (FN), and Ward's triangle (WT). Results were expressed as Z-score (SD compared to national controls). Total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin (BGP), iPTH, serum phosphorus, serum, and 24 h urine calcium were measured as bone markers. Age, weight, and body mass index were comparable in both groups. Patients with TC and with GD showed reduced axial BMD (95% confidence interval: LS: TC (-1.27-0.01)(P = 0.046), GD (-1.06 to-0.38)(P < 0.001); FN: TC (-0.82 to-0.16)(P = 0.007), GD (-0.95 to-0.15)(P = 0.008); WT: TC (-0.82 to -0.18)(P = 0.004), GD (-0.97 to -0.08)(P = 0.024). No significant differences in BMD were found between the groups. Among bone markers, total ALP and osteocalcin levels showed higher levels in Graves' disease (ALP: 139+/-76 vs. 88+/-34, P < 0.01; BGP: 7.5+/-3.7 vs. 4.6+/-1.6; P < 0.001). Our data suggest a mild deleterious effect of thyroid hormone excess in the axial bone mass from male subjects. A skeletal status assessed by BMD in male patients with chronic TSH suppression by L-T4 or history of hyperthyroidism is recommended.

Bone mass after long-term euthyroidism in former hyperthyroid women treated with (131)I influence of menopausal status

The objective of this study was to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers in former hyperthyroid females after long-term euthyroidism (>4 yr) following (131)I therapy, as well as the potential influence of the timing of menopause. Twenty-six females ages 57 +/- 8 yr previously diagnosed with hyperthyroidism and treated with (131)I who were euthyroid for a minimum of the last 4 yr (10 +/- 5 yr) were studied. Eighteen patients (69%) were on levothyroxine (LT(4)) replacement therapy for 9 +/- 4 yr. BMD (g/cm(2) and Z-score) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and Ward's triangle. BMD (Z-score) was lower than the normal reference values for the Spanish population in all sites (lumbar spine: -0.65 +/- 1.13; femoral neck: -0.47 +/- 0.95; Ward's triangle: -0.37 +/- 0.88). No differences were found between BMD values according to the etiology of the hyperthyroidism or current LT(4) therapy. Current postmenopausal patients (n = 21) showed lower BMD than current premenopausal patients in the lumbar spine and femoral neck (p < 0.05). Those women who were postmenopausal at the time of the (131)I therapy (n = 15) also had lower lumbar spine BMD than premenopausal patients (p = 0.01), while no significant difference in BMD was seen according to the menopausal status when hyperthyroidism was diagnosed. Former hyperthyroid patients after long-term euthyroidism following (131)I therapy showed reduced BMD at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. Menopausal women showed a greater reduction in bone density. The menopausal status at the time of diagnosis did not seem to have long-term effects in bone density; nevertheless, an early therapeutic intervention in premenopause is suggested to reduce bone loss.

Bone changes in pre- and postmenopausal women with thyroid cancer on levothyroxine therapy: evolution of axial and appendicular bone mass

The effects of suppressive doses of levothyroxine (LT4) on bone mass are controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the effects on axial and appendicular bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism of long-term LT4 suppressive therapy in women by means of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, and also to assess the potential influence of menopausal status and LT4 dose. Seventy-six women (aged 47 +/- 13 years, 37 pre- and 39 postmenopausal) on suppressive therapy (67 +/- 34 months duration, mean LT4 dose 168 +/- 41 micrograms/day) from our Thyroid Cancer Unit without previous hyperthyroidism or concomitant hypoparathyroidism were studied. Serum TSH, T3 free T4, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, BGP, iPTH and urinary calcium (uCA) were measured. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at lumbar spine, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, ultradistal and distal third radius and expressed as a Z-score. In a subset of 27 women aged 46 +/- 15 years (14 pre- and 13 postmenopausal) a second densitometry scan was performed 27 +/- 5 months later. Patients on suppressive therapy showed a small reduction in BMD at the distal third radius (Z-score: -0.77 +/- 0.98; 95% confidence interval: -1.11, -0.44) without differences between pre- and postmenopausal women. Significant relations with the regimen of suppressive therapy and bone turnover markers were detected except at the lumbar spine. In the longitudinal study a significant although mild reduction in femoral neck BMD was found that correlated with prior T3 and iPTH. In conclusion, our data show a small detrimental effect of cautious LT4 suppressive therapy on bone mass assessed by DXA; it remains to be established whether this increases the prevalence of fractures.

Bone loss in hyperthyroid patients and in former hyperthyroid patients controlled on medical therapy: influence of aetiology and menopause

OBJECTIVE

The effect of hyperthyroidism on osteoporosis risk and its reversal after control of hyperthyroidism remains somewhat controversial. We assessed the values of bone mineral density in hyperthyroid patients and in former hyperthyroid patients euthyroid on medical therapy, as well as the influence of aetiology and menopause upon bone mass.

DESIGN

The values of bone mineral density in hyperthyroid patients (active) and former hyperthyroid patients euthyroid on medical therapy (controlled), were compared, together with data from our control group and from the Spanish reference population. We also compared the values of bone mineral density in patients with Graves' disease with those in patients with toxic nodular goitre and assessed the influence of the menopause.

PATIENTS

We studied 127 consecutive hyperthyroid patients (age 41 +/- 16 years; 110 females, 17 males; 102 Graves' disease and 25 toxic nodular goitre); 78 were active (group A) and 49 controlled on medical therapy (carbimazole, mean time of euthyroidism 7.5 +/- 9.1 months; group B). We also studied 43 healthy subjects (age 40 +/- 14 years; 41 females, two males; group C).

MEASUREMENTS

Bone mineral density was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck and Ward's triangle. Data were expressed as g/cm2 and as a Z score (SD vs Spanish reference population adjusted by age and sex). Blood was obtained to measure the levels of free T4, TSH and TSH receptor antibody.

RESULTS

Patients with active hyperthyroidism showed a generalized reduction in axial bone mineral density in comparison with both the control group and the reference population, whereas former hyperthyroid patients showed partial recovery of bone mass in lumbar spine and Ward's triangle. Mean Z scores at lumbar spine, femoral neck and Ward's triangle were: -0.92, -0.79 and -0.89 in group A; -0.74, -0.23 and -0.44 in group B and 0.18, 0.09 and 0.36 in group C, respectively. No differences were found between bone mineral density values from patients with Graves' disease and those with toxic nodular goitre, nor between pre and postmenopausal hyperthyroid women once adjusted by age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that hyperthyroid patients show a generalized reduction of bone mass in the axial skeleton and that only partial recovery is present in former hyperthyroid patients after a mean of 7.5 months of biochemical euthyroidism. This recovery is insufficient to normalize the bone density in lumbar spine and Ward's triangle, although femoral bone mass was not different from that of the control group. The extent and degree of hyperthyroid bone disease surpass the effects of the menopause on the bone mass. The aetiology of hyperthyroidism does not seem to play any role in the severity of hyperthyroid bone disease.

Antiresorptive therapy in hyperthyroid patients: longitudinal changes in bone and mineral metabolism

The effect of antiresorptive therapy with nasal calcitonin (CT) in recently diagnosed hyperthyroid patients on conventional medical therapy as well as the evolution of bone metabolism were assessed. Forty-five patients with recent-onset hyperthyroidism (<12 weeks) were sex and menopause stratified and randomly allocated to treatment with carbimazole (Neotomizol), carbimazole plus low dose CT (Calsynar; 100 IU/day, 2 days/week), or carbimazole plus high dose CT (Calsynar; 100 IU/day, 14 days/month). Bone mineral density was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and Ward's triangle at 0, 9, and 18 months of treatment. We also determined free T4, free T3, TSH, osteocalcin, total and bone alkaline phosphatases, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, type I collagen C telopeptide, and urinary hydroxyproline every 3 months of follow-up. No significant difference was observed among treatments. A euthyroid state was attained at 3 months. Bone mass increased significantly at the 9 month evaluation (P < 0.05), with a 5-10% net gain during follow-up. Nevertheless, final bone mass was 4-8% smaller than expected. Bone formation markers were increased at 0 and 3 months, with reductions at 6-9 months; resorption bone markers showed a significant reduction at the 3 month evaluation. These results indicate that the euthyroid state partially reduces hyperthyroidism-associated osteopenia, with a bone mass recovery period during the 6-9 early months of effective treatment. This recovery phase is characterized by raised bone formation markers and reduced bone resorption markers. The treatment with nasal CT at the doses assayed has no additional effect over that of attainment of the euthyroid state.