Improving the management of medical emergency team calls due to suspected infections: A before-after study

Objective

To introduce a management guideline for sepsis-related MET calls to increase lactate and blood culture acquisition, as well as prescription of appropriate antibiotics.

Design

Prospective before (Jun-Aug 2018) and after (Oct-Dec 2018) study was designed.

Setting

A public university linked hospital in Melbourne, Australia.

Participants

Adult patients with MET calls related to sepsis/infection were included.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was the proportion of MET calls during which both a blood culture and lactate level were ordered. Secondary outcomes included the frequency with which new antimicrobials were commenced by the MET, and the presence and class of administered antimicrobials.

Results

There were 985 and 955 MET calls in the baseline and after periods, respectively. Patient features, MET triggers, limitations of treatment and disposition after the MET call were similar in both groups. Compliance with the acquisition of lactates (p = 0.101), respectively. There was a slight reduction in compliance with lactate acquisition in the after period (97% vs 99%; p = 0.06). In contrast, there was a significant increase in acquisition of blood cultures in the after period (69% vs 78%; p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Introducing a sepsis management guideline and enhanced linkage with an AMS program increased blood culture acquisition and decreased broad spectrum antimicrobial use but didn't change in-hospital mortality.

Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Self-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting.

METHODS

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event).

DISCUSSION

We will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12621000051842 Date registered: 20/01/2021 https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true.

Clinical standards for the management of adverse effects during treatment for TB

BACKGROUND: Adverse effects (AE) to TB treatment cause morbidity, mortality and treatment interruption. The aim of these clinical standards is to encourage best practise for the diagnosis and management of AE.METHODS: 65/81 invited experts participated in a Delphi process using a 5-point Likert scale to score draft standards.RESULTS: We identified eight clinical standards. Each person commencing treatment for TB should: Standard 1, be counselled regarding AE before and during treatment; Standard 2, be evaluated for factors that might increase AE risk with regular review to actively identify and manage these; Standard 3, when AE occur, carefully assessed and possible allergic or hypersensitivity reactions considered; Standard 4, receive appropriate care to minimise morbidity and mortality associated with AE; Standard 5, be restarted on TB drugs after a serious AE according to a standardised protocol that includes active drug safety monitoring. In addition: Standard 6, healthcare workers should be trained on AE including how to counsel people undertaking TB treatment, as well as active AE monitoring and management; Standard 7, there should be active AE monitoring and reporting for all new TB drugs and regimens; and Standard 8, knowledge gaps identified from active AE monitoring should be systematically addressed through clinical research.CONCLUSION: These standards provide a person-centred, consensus-based approach to minimise the impact of AE during TB treatment.

Assessing the safety profile of voriconazole use in suspected COVID-19-Associated pulmonary aspergillosis - A two-centre observational study

The decision to use voriconazole for suspected COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is based on clinical judgement weighed against concerns about its potential toxicity. We assessed the safety profile of voriconazole for patients with suspected CAPA by conducting a retrospective study of patients across two intensive care units. We compared changes in any liver enzymes or bilirubin and any new or increasing QTc prolongation following voriconazole use to patient baseline to indicate possible drug effect. In total, 48 patients with presumed CAPA treated with voriconazole were identified. Voriconazole therapy was administered for a median of 8 days (IQR 5-22) and the median level was 1.86 mg/L (IQR 1.22-2.94). At baseline, 2% of patients had a hepatocellular injury profile, 54% cholestatic injury profile and 21% mixed injury profile. There were no statistically significant changes in liver function tests over the first seven days after voriconazole initiation. At day 28, there was a significant increase in ALP only (81U/L to 122U/L, p = 0.006), driven by changes in patients with baseline cholestatic injury. In contrast, patients with baseline hepatocellular or mixed injury had a significant decrease in ALT and AST. Baseline QTc was 437 msecs and remained unchanged after seven days of voriconazole therapy even after sensitivity analysis for concomitantly administered QT prolonging agents. Therefore, at the doses used in this study, we did not detect evidence of significant liver or cardiac toxicity related to voriconazole use. Such information can be used to assist clinicians in the decision to initiate such treatment.

Study protocol for PREPARE: a phase II feasibility/safety randomised controlled trial on PeRiopErative Penicillin AlleRgy TEsting

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) are common. These labels have been demonstrated to have a negative impact on use of appropriate antibiotics and patient-related health outcomes. These patients are more likely to receive suboptimal antibiotics, have increased rates of surgical site infections and are more likely to be colonised with multidrug-resistant organisms. Increasing recognition that antibiotic allergy forms a key part of good antimicrobial stewardship has led to calls for greater access to antibiotic allergy assessment.PREPARE is a pilot randomised controlled trial of beta-lactam allergy assessment and point of care delabelling in perioperative patients utilising a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool that has been repurposed into a smartphone application. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and safety of this approach in the perioperative outpatient setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adult participants requiring elective surgery and are likely to require prophylactic intravenous antibiotics will be recruited. During the intervention phase, participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arm, with control patients receiving usual standard of care. Those randomised to intervention undertake a risk assessment via the smartphone application, with those deemed low risk proceeding to direct oral provocation with either a penicillin or cephalosporin. Study outcomes will be evaluated in the postintervention phase, 30 and 90 days after surgery.Feasibility of intervention delivery and recruitment will be reported as proportions with respective 95% CIs. Participants who experience an antibiotic adverse event will be reported by group with respective 95% CIs and compared using modified Poisson regression model with robust SE estimation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol has received approval from the Austin Health human research and ethics committee, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (HREC/17/Austin/575). Results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals as well as presentation at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12620001295932.

Study protocol: Australasian Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR)

INTRODUCTION

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of T cell-mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity, mortality and hospital costs. Clinical phenotypes include Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). In this Australasian, multicentre, prospective registry, we plan to examine the clinical presentation, drug causality, genomic predictors, potential diagnostic approaches, treatments and long-term outcomes of SCAR in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adult and adolescent patients with SCAR including SJS, TEN, DRESS, AGEP and another T cell-mediated hypersensitivity, generalised bullous fixed drug eruption, will be prospectively recruited. A waiver of consent has been granted for some sites to retrospectively include cases which result in early mortality. DNA will be collected for all prospective cases. Blood, blister fluid and skin biopsy sampling is optional and subject to patient consent and site capacity. To develop culprit drug identification and prevention, genomic testing will be performed to confirm human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type and ex vivo testing will be performed via interferon-γ release enzyme linked immunospot assay using collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The long-term outcomes of SCAR will be investigated with a 12-month quality of life survey and examination of prescribing and mortality data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/50791/Austin-19). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000241134).

Use of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule to enable direct oral penicillin provocation: an international multicentre randomised control trial in an adult population (PALACE): study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in the healthcare setting and associated with the prescription of second-line inferior antibiotics. More than 85% of all penicillin allergy labels can be removed by skin testing and 96%-99% of low-risk penicillin allergy labels can be removed by direct oral challenge. An internally and externally validated clinical assessment tool for penicillin allergy, PEN-FAST, can identify a low-risk penicillin allergy without the need for skin testing; a score of less than 3 has a negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 94.1 to 97.8) for the presence of a penicillin allergy. It is hypothesised that PEN-FAST is a safe and effective tool for assessing penicillin allergy in an outpatient clinic setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an international, multicentre randomised control trial using the PEN-FAST tool to risk-stratify penicillin allergy labels in adult outpatients. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of using PEN-FAST score-guided management with direct oral challenge compared with standard care (defined as prick and intradermal skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention arm (direct oral penicillin challenge) or standard of care arm (skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge, if skin testing is negative). The sample size of 380 randomised patients (190 per treatment arm) is required to demonstrate non-inferiority.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be performed according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/62425/Austin-2020) in Melbourne Australia, Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB #202174) in Tennessee, USA, Duke University Institutional Review Board (IRB #Pro00108461) in North Carolina, USA and McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board in Canada (PALACE/2022-7605). The results of this study will be published and presented in various scientific forums.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04454229.

Immune responses in COVID-19 respiratory tract and blood reveal mechanisms of disease severity

Although the respiratory tract is the primary site of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the ensuing immunopathology, respiratory immune responses are understudied and urgently needed to understand mechanisms underlying COVID-19 disease pathogenesis. We collected paired longitudinal blood and respiratory tract samples (endotracheal aspirate, sputum or pleural fluid) from hospitalized COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls. Cellular, humoral and cytokine responses were analysed and correlated with clinical data. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies were detected using ELISA and multiplex assay in both the respiratory tract and blood of COVID-19 patients, although a higher receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgM and IgG seroconversion level was found in respiratory specimens. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity in respiratory samples was detected only when high levels of RBD-specific antibodies were present. Strikingly, cytokine/chemokine levels and profiles greatly differed between respiratory samples and plasma, indicating that inflammation needs to be assessed in respiratory specimens for the accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immunopathology. Diverse immune cell subsets were detected in respiratory samples, albeit dominated by neutrophils. Importantly, we also showed that dexamethasone and/or remdesivir treatment did not affect humoral responses in blood of COVID-19 patients. Overall, our study unveils stark differences in innate and adaptive immune responses between respiratory samples and blood and provides important insights into effect of drug therapy on immune responses in COVID-19 patients.

A pilot double-blind safety and feasibility randomized controlled trial of high-dose intravenous zinc in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Zinc inhibits replication of the SARS-CoV virus. We aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and biological effect of administering high-dose intravenous zinc (HDIVZn) to patients with COVID-19. We performed a Phase IIa double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare HDIVZn to placebo in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We administered trial treatment per day for a maximum of 7 days until either death or hospital discharge. We measured zinc concentration at baseline and during treatment and observed patients for any significant side effects. For eligible patients, we randomized and administered treatment to 33 adult participants to either HDIVZn (n = 15) or placebo (n = 18). We observed no serious adverse events throughout the study for a total of 94 HDIVZn administrations. However, three participants in the HDIVZn group reported infusion site irritation. Mean serum zinc on Day 1 in the placebo, and the HDIVZn group was 6.9 ± 1.1 and 7.7 ± 1.6 µmol/l, respectively, consistent with zinc deficiency. HDIVZn, but not placebo, increased serum zinc levels above the deficiency cutoff of 10.7 µmol/l (p < .001) on Day 6. Our study did not reach its target enrollment because stringent public health measures markedly reduced patient hospitalizations. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients demonstrated zinc deficiency. This can be corrected with HDIVZn. Such treatment appears safe, feasible, and only associated with minimal peripheral infusion site irritation. This pilot study justifies further investigation of this treatment in COVID-19 patients.

Randomised controlled trial for high-dose intravenous zinc as adjunctive therapy in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) positive critically ill patients: trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has caused an international pandemic of respiratory illness, resulting in significant healthcare and economic turmoil. To date, no robust vaccine or treatment has been identified. Elemental zinc has previously been demonstrated to have beneficial effects on coronaviruses and other viral respiratory infections due to its effect on RNA polymerase. Additionally, zinc has well-demonstrated protective effects against hypoxic injury-a clear mechanism of end-organ injury in respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to assess the effect of high-dose intravenous zinc (HDIVZn) on SARS-CoV-2 infection. The end of study analyses will evaluate the reduction of impact of oxygen saturations or requirement of oxygen supplementation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a double-blind randomised controlled trial of daily HDIVZn (0.5 mg/kg) versus placebo. Primary outcome measures are lowest oxygen saturation (or greatest level of supplemental oxygenation) for non-ventilated patients and worst PaO2/FiO2 for ventilated patients. Following power calculations, 60 hospitalised patients and 100 ventilated patients will be recruited to demonstrate a 20% difference. The duration of follow-up is up to the point of discharge.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained through the independent Human Research Ethics Committee. Participant recruitment will commence in May 2020. Results will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN126200000454976.

An adaptive randomised placebo controlled phase II trial of antivirals for COVID-19 infection (VIRCO): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Objectives

Primary objective: To determine the efficacy of a candidate antiviral on time to virological cure compared to standard of care within 14 days of randomisation

Secondary objectives:

• To determine the safety of the antiviral

• To determine the clinical benefit of the antiviral over placebo according to the WHO 7-point ordinal scale

• To determine the clinical benefit of the antiviral over placebo on time to resolution of clinical symptoms

• To determine the effect of the antiviral over placebo on biomarkers of inflammation and immune activation

Trial design

This is a multi-centre, triple-blind, randomised placebo controlled phase II, 2-arm trial with parallel-group design with allocation ratio 1:1.

Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

• Provision of informed consent by the participant

• Age ≥18 years

• Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by nucleic acid testing in the past 5 days

• COVID-19 related symptom initiation within 5 days

• Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening. Female patients of childbearing potential and fertile male patients who are sexually active with a female of childbearing potential must use highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study and for 1 week following the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion criteria:

• Known allergy to the study medication

• Is on another clinical trial investigating an antiviral treatment for COVID-19

• Pregnancy

• Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction equivalent to Grade C in the Child-Pugh classification

• Patients with renal impairment requiring dialysis

• Is deemed by the Investigator to be ineligible for any reason

Participants will be recruited from, and the study visits will take place at Alfred Hospital, Monash Health, Austin Health in Victoria, Australia for hospitalised participants as well as recruitment in the community in participants homes for eligible people not requiring hospitalisation.

Intervention and comparator

The first candidate antiviral is favipiravir

Arm 1: Favipiravir 1800 mg favipiravir BD on Day 1 followed by 800 mg BD favipiravir for the next 13 days.

Arm 2: Placebo

Main outcomes

Primary outcome: Time to virological cure as defined by 2 successive throat (or combined nose/throat) swabs negative for SARS-CoV-2 by nucleic acid testing during the 14 days after enrolment.

Randomisation

Randomisation performed at the Alfred Hospital Clinical Trials Pharmacy using computer generated block-randomisation lists with 6 participants per block. Within each block half of the participants will be randomised to the candidate antiviral and the other half to placebo. Randomisation is stratified by study site, with participants enrolled in the community considered as a study site.

Blinding (masking)

Study participants, study investigators and the study statistician will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Numbers to be randomised (sample size)

The study aims to recruit 190 people (95/arm) with the first candidate antiviral favipiravir

Trial Status

Protocol version 2.0 Dated 31-Jul-2020. Recruitment will take place between July 2020 and December 2020.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov NCT04445467

First posted 24-Jun-2020

Full protocol

The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

The democratization of de-labeling: a review of direct oral challenge in adults with low-risk penicillin allergy

INTRODUCTION

Penicillin antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) are common and lead to significant negative health and health system outcomes. Direct oral challenge offers a rapid and cost-effective way of removing inaccurate AALs and improving outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative review (Medline, May 2020) of direct oral challenge in low-risk penicillin allergy in adults is described, and the evidence for the safety and efficacy of this approach in inpatients, outpatients, and special patient groups is presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Whilst the current literature demonstrates the safety and efficacy of direct oral challenge in de-labeling low-risk penicillin allergy in adults, novel approaches are needed to improve access to antibiotic allergy assessment and address the growing global need.

Children with reported penicillin allergy: Public health impact and safety of delabeling

OBJECTIVE

To review the relevant literature related to children with reported penicillin allergy and highlight the different ways in which children could be delabeled and to evaluate the public health impact that a penicillin allergy has for children.

DATA SOURCES

Data for this review were obtained via PubMed searches and then retrieval of articles from their respective journals for further review.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Studies regarding the safety of different ways to evaluate penicillin allergy in children were identified via PubMed searches. Any study that reported different ways of testing (3-tier, direct oral challenge, 5-day oral challenges) were included. This same format was used when selecting relevant articg:les related to the costs, prescription patterns, and stewardship trends associated with a penicillin allergy label.

RESULTS

This review found that penicillin allergy testing is a safe and effective way to delabel those with reported allergy. In children with low-risk allergy symptoms, a direct oral challenge approach may be optimal. In those children with a history of high-risk allergy symptoms, a 3-tiered approach is ideal. The review also found that there is a significant cost associated with reported penicillin allergy and that there are increased negative health benefits to those children with reported allergy.

CONCLUSION

Penicillin allergy is overdiagnosed, often incorrectly, and the label is frequently first applied during childhood. Targeting children for the removal of the incorrect penicillin allergy label provides a mechanism to reduce the use of broader-spectrum and less effective antibiotics.

The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND

Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus.

METHODS

We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events," "testing," "evaluation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship".

RESULTS

Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.

Bartonella Quintana prosthetic aortitis successfully treated with doxycycline

Bartonella quintana is a rare cause of culture-negative endovascular infection, characterised by intracellular persistence. We describe a case of ascending aortic prosthetic graft infection due to B. quintana, in a patient with past unrecognised necrotising aortitis, which was successfully treated with doxycycline monotherapy.

Controversies in drug allergy: Testing for delayed reactions

Controversies exist with regard to in vivo approaches to delayed immunologically mediated adverse drug reactions, such as exanthem (maculopapular eruption), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and fixed drug eruptions. In particular, widespread differences exist between regions and practice on the availability and use of intradermal and patch testing, the standard drug concentrations used, the use of additional drugs in intradermal and patch testing to help determine cross-reactivity, the timing of testing in relation to the occurrence of the adverse drug reaction, the use of testing in specific phenotypes, and the use of oral challenge in conjunction with delayed intradermal and patch testing to ascertain drug tolerance. It was noted that there have been advances in the science of delayed T cell-mediated reactions that have shed light on immunopathogenesis and provided a mechanism of preprescription screening in the case of HLA-B*57:01 and abacavir hypersensitivity and HLA-B*15:02 and carbamazepine Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in Southeast Asian subjects. Future directions should include the collaboration of large international networks to develop and standardize in vivo diagnostic approaches, such as skin testing and patch testing, combined with ex vivo and in vitro laboratory approaches.

1787. The Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Rechallenge Program in Cancer Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Study

Background

Patient-reported antibiotic allergies (so-called antibiotic allergy labels [AALs]) are found in one in four cancer patients and significantly impact patient outcomes. Whilst 85% of AALs can be removed by skin testing, the role of simple point-of-care oral penicillin rechallenge in this cohort remains unknown. We report on a novel penicillin rechallenge program in cancer patients.

Methods

An oral penicillin rechallenge program was implemented at Austin Health (Melb, Aus) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melb, Aus) on May 31, 2017. Patients were prospectively identified by Infectious Diseases and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) services at both sites and reviewed by the conjoint Antibiotic Allergy Service for suitability as per the criteria outlined in Figure 1. Patients underwent supervised challenge with oral penicillin VK 250 mg or amoxicillin 250 mg, dependent on reported index allergy, and observed for 2-hours post. Patients were followed for up to 12 months post for adverse events and antibiotic usage.

Figure 1. Selection algorithm for oral penicillin rechallenge program.

Results

Twenty-nine patients underwent penicillin oral challenge between May 31, 2017 to April 30, 2018, 15 with cancer. Of those with cancer, 8 (53%) were male, median age 56 years (IQR 44, 67), 15 (100%) avoiding penicillin, and 7 (47%) penicillins and cephalosporins. The penicillin–amoxicillin AAL phenotypes were “rash” in 73% (11/15) and “unknown” in 27% (4/15). Patients were challenged with penicillin VK or amoxicillin, based on their reported penicillin allergy with no positive challenges or adverse events noted in those with (n = 15) and without (n = 14) cancer. In the follow-up period, 88% (14/16) patients that were prescribed antibiotics received a narrow-spectrum β-lactam.

Conclusion

A pilot penicillin oral rechallenge program was safe in cancer patients. This program serves as a future model for active “de-labelling” in carefully selected cancer patients, without formal allergy services, aiding AMS programs.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

1578. Back to Bactrim–Utilizing Preferred Prophylaxis Strategies in Immunocompromised Hosts Via a Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Rechallenge Program

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Disclosures

Review of epiglottitis in the post Haemophilus influenzae type-b vaccine era

BACKGROUND

This study reviewed the demographics, presentation, management, complications and outcomes of acute epiglottitis post Haemophilus influenzae type-b vaccine introduction in Australia.

METHODS

Retrospective review of acute epiglottitis at four Victorian tertiary centres from 2011 to 2016 was conducted. Patient characteristics, presentation, investigations, management, complications and outcomes were recorded. Subgroup analysis aiming to identify risk factors for patients requiring acute airway management was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven adult and six paediatric cases were identified. The most frequent clinical findings in adults were sore throat (88.5%), dysphagia (71.3%), odynophagia (57.5%), dysphonia (56.3%) and fever (55.2%); 75.9% required intensive care unit admission. Airway compromise requiring intubation occurred in 27.6%, with 12.5% of these patients undergoing emergency surgical airways. Stridor, hypoxia, shortness of breath, odynophagia and lymphadenopathy were statistically more frequent amongst cases requiring airway intervention (P < 0.05). Cultures revealed mixed results with no aetiological pattern. H. influenzae type-b was never cultured. Amongst paediatric cases, fever, tachycardia and stridor were frequently observed and all were admitted to intensive care unit. Two of six required intubation and one underwent surgical intervention. There were no deaths, but one patient suffered a hypoxic brain injury.

CONCLUSION

Modern epiglottitis is not the disease previously encountered by clinicians. With changing demographics and varying organisms, management is adapting to reflect this. Complications are rare, and symptomatology at presentation aids earlier recognition of patients who may require airway protection.

Recent advances in the understanding of severe cutaneous adverse reactions

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) encompass a heterogeneous group of delayed hypersensitivity reactions, which are most frequently caused by drugs. Our understanding of several aspects of SCAR syndromes has evolved considerably over the last decade. This review explores evolving knowledge of the immunopathogenic mechanisms, pharmacogenomic associations, in vivo and ex vivo diagnostics for causality assessment, and medication cross-reactivity data related to SCAR syndromes. Given the rarity and severity of these diseases, multidisciplinary collaboration through large international, national and/or multicentre networks to collect prospective data on patients with SCAR syndromes should be prioritized. This will further enhance a systematized framework for translating epidemiological, clinical and immunopathogenetic advances into preventive efforts and improved outcomes for patients.

The revolving door: antibiotic allergy labelling in a tertiary care centre

BACKGROUND

Patients frequently report antibiotic allergies; however, only 10% of labelled patients have a true allergy.

AIM

We investigated the documentation of antibiotic 'allergy' labels (AAL) and the effect of labelling on clinical outcomes, in a West Australian adult tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients captured in the 2013 and 2014 National Antimicrobial Prescribing Surveys was carried out. Data were collected on documented antibiotic adverse drug reactions, antibiotic cost, prescribing appropriateness, prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms, length of stay, intensive care admission and readmissions.

RESULTS

Of the 687 patients surveyed, 278 (40%) were aged 70 or above, 365 (53%) were male and 279 (41%) were prescribed antibiotics. AAL were recorded in 122 (18%) patients and the majority were penicillin labels (n = 87; 71%). Details of AAL were documented for 80 of 141 (57%) individual allergy labels, with 61 describing allergic symptoms. Patients with beta-lactam allergy labels received fewer penicillins (P = 0.0002) and more aminoglycosides (P = 0.043) and metronidazole (P = 0.021) than patients without beta-lactam labels. Five patients received an antibiotic that was contraindicated according to their allergy status. Patients with AAL had significantly more hospital readmissions within 4 weeks (P = 0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.025) of discharge, compared with unlabelled patients. The majority (81%) of readmitted labelled patients had major infections.

CONCLUSIONS

AAL are common, but poorly documented in hospital records. Patients with AAL are significantly more likely to require alternative antibiotics and hospital readmissions. There may be a role for antibiotic allergy delabelling to mitigate the clinical and economic burdens for patients with invalid allergy labels.

7th drug hypersensitivity meeting: part one

Oral Abstracts

O1 Functionally distinct HMGB1 isoforms correlate with physiological processes in drug-induced SJS/TEN

Daniel F. Carr, Wen-Hung Chung, Rosalind E. Jenkiins, Mas Chaponda, Gospel Nwikue, Elena M. Cornejo Castro, Daniel J. Antoine, Munir Pirmohamed

O2 Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams, does the t cell recognition pattern influence the clinical picture?

Natascha Wuillemin, Dolores Dina, Klara K. Eriksson, Daniel Yerly

O3 Specific binding characteristics of HLA alleles associated with nevirapine hypersensitivity

Rebecca Pavlos, Elizabeth Mckinnin, David Ostrov, Bjoern Peters, Soren Buus, David Koelle, Abha Chopra, Craig Rive, Alec Redwood, Susana Restrepo, Austin Bracey, Jing Yuan, Silvana Gaudieri, Mary Carrington, David Haas, Simon Mallal, Elizabeth Phillips

O4 Do we need to measure total ige for the interpretation of analytical results of ImmunoCAP dnd 3gAllergy specific IgE?

Douwe De Boer, Paul Menheere, Chris Nieuwhof, Judith Bons

O5 Neutrophil activation in systemic anaphylaxis: results from the multicentric NASA study

Friederike Jonsson, Luc De Chaisemartin, Vanessa Granger, Caitlin Gillis, Aurelie Gouel, Catherine Neukirch, Fadia Dib, Pascale Roland Nicaise, Dan Longrois, Florence Tubach, Sylvie Martin, Pierre Bruhns, NASA Study Group

O6 Purpuric drug eruptions due to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a clinic-pathological study of 32 cases

Kai-Lung Chen, Shu-Ling Liao, Yi-Shuan Sheen, Yung-Tsu Cho, Che-Wen Yang, Jau-Yu Liau, Chia-Yu Chu

Poster presentations: Poster Walk 1—Anaphylaxis (P01–P09)

P1 Anaphylactic reactions during anaesthesia and the perioperative period

Rita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Natália Fernandes, Leonor Viegas, M. A. Pereira-Barbosa

P2 Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: is there a cross-reactivity to alexidine?

Antonia Bünter, Nisha Gupta, Tatjana Pecaric Petkovic, Nicole Wirth, Werner J. Pichler, Oliver Hausmann

P3 Cefotaxime-induced severe anaphylaxis in a neonate

Mehtap Yazicioglu, Pinar G. Ozdemir, Gokce Ciplak, Ozkan Kaya

P4 Clinical features and diagnosis of anaphylaxis resulting from exposure to chlorhexidine

Peter John Cooke

P5 Drug-induced anaphylaxis: five-year single-center survey

Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Filipe Benito-Garcia, Marta Chambel, Mário Morais-Almeida

P6 Intraoperative severe anaphylactic reaction due to patent blue v dye

Luis Marques, Eva Alcoceba, Silvia Lara

P7 Kounis syndrome in the setting of anaphylaxis to diclofenac

Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Carmen Botelho, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P8 Perioperative anaphylaxis audit: Royal Melbourne Hospital

Katherine Nicholls, William Lay, Olivia Smith, Christine Collins, Gary Unglik, Kymble Spriggs, Priscilla Auyeung, Jeremy McComish, Jo A. Douglass

P9 Recurrent peri-operative anaphylaxis: a perfect storm

Jonny G. Peter, Paul Potter

Poster Walk 2: DH regions and patient groups (P10–P19)

P10 A rare presentation of amoxicillin allergy in a young child

Fabrícia Carolino, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas

P11 Adverse drug reactions in children: antibiotics or virus?

Ana Sofia Moreira, Carmo Abreu, Eva Gomes

P12 Allergic reactions in invasive medical procedures

Bárbara Kong Cardoso, Elza Tomaz, Sara Correia, Filipe Inácio

P13 Antibiotic allergy in children: room for improvement

Annabelle Arnold, Natasha Bear, Kristina Rueter, Grace Gong, Michael O’Sullivan, Saravanan Muthusamy, Valerie Noble, Michaela Lucas

P14 Drug hypersensitivity reactions in children and results of diagnostic evaluation

Neringa Buterleviciute, Odilija Rudzeviciene

P15 Nonimmediate cutaneous drug reactions in children: are skin tests required?

Ana Sofia Moreira, Carmo Abreu, Eva Gomes

P16 Pediatric patients with a history of penicillin allergy and a positive penicillin skin test may not be at an increased risk for multiple drug allergies

Sara May, Thanai Pongdee, Miguel Park

P17 Proved hypersensitivity to drugs according data of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos

Linas Griguola, Arturas Vinikovas, Simona Kašinskaite, Violeta Kvedariene

P18 Self-reported prevalence of drug hypersensitivity reactions among students in Celal Bayar University, Turkey

Ayse Aktas, Suheyla Rahman, Huseyin Elbi, Beyhan Cengiz Ozyurt

P19 Severe drug hypersensitivity reactions in pediatric age

Ozlem Cavkaytar, Betul Karaatmaca, Pinar Gur Cetinkaya, Saliha Esenboga, Umit M. Sahiner, Bulent E. Sekerel, Ozge Soyer

Poster Walk 3: Desensitisation (P20–P28)

P20 A protocol for desensitisation to valaciclovir

Celia Zubrinich, Bianca Tong, Mittal Patel, Michelle Giles, Robyn O’Hehir, Robert Puy

P21 A rare case of desensitization to modafinil

Josefina Cernadas, Luís Amaral, Fabrícia Carolino

P22 A sixteen-day desensitization protocol in delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to oral drugs

Semra Demir, Asli Gelincik, Muge Olgac, Raif Caskun, Derya Unal, Bahauddin Colakoglu, Suna Buyukozturk

P23 Desensitization to intravenous etoposide using a 12 and a 13-step protocol. Two cases report

Olga Vega Matute, Amalia Bernad, Gabriel Gastaminza, Roselle Madamba, Carlos Lacasa, M. J. Goikoetxea, Carmen D’Amelio, Jose Rifón, Nicolas Martínez, Marta Ferrer

P24 Drug desensitisation in oncology: the experience of an immunoallergology department for 5 years

Carmelita Ribeiro, Emília Faria, Cristina Frutuoso, Anabela Barros, Rosário Lebre, Alice Pego, Ana Todo Bom

P25 Filgrastim anaphylaxis: a successful desensitization protocol

Luis Amaral, Josefina Cernadas

P26 Galsulfase hypersensitivity and desensitization of a mucopolysaccharidosis VI patient

Luis Felipe Ensina, Carolina Aranda, Ines Camelo Nunes, Ana Maria Martins, Dirceu Solé

P27 Rapid drug desensitization with biologicals: one-center experience with four biologicals

Sevim Bavbek, Resat Kendirlinan, Pamir Çerçi, Seda Tutluer, Sadan Soyyigit, Zeynep Çelebi Sözener, Ömür Aydin, Reyhan Gümüsburun

P28 Successful desensitization to a high dose of methotrexate in a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction

Josefina Cernadas, Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Fabrícia Carolino, Marta Almeida

Poster Walk 4: SJS (P29–P38)

P29 Assessment of impact of infection on drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions and rhabdomyolysis using the Japanese adverse drug event report database

Kimie Sai, Takuya Imatoh, Ryosuke Nakamura, Chisato Fukazawa, Yasushi Hinomura, Yoshiro Saito

P30 Characterization of erythema multiforme and severe cutaneous adverse reactions hospitalizations

Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Cláudia Correia, Lídia Gomes, Sara Gil-Mata, Luís Araújo, Luís Delgado

P31 Effects of infection on incidence/severity of SJS/TEN and myopathy in Japanese cases analyzed by voluntary case reports

Ryosuke Nakamura, Kimie Sai, Takuya Imatoh, Yoshimi Okamoto-Uchida, Koji Kajinami, Kayoko Matsunaga, Michiko Aihara, Yoshiro Saito

P32 Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor—a antagonists in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a randomized controlled trial and immunosuppressive effects evaluation

Chuang-Wei Wang, Shih-Chi Su, Shuen-Iu Hung, Hsin-Chun Ho, Chih-Hsun Yang, Wen-Hung Chung

P33 Evolution of drug causality in Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Europe: analysis of 10 years RegiSCAR-Study

Maren Paulmann, Ariane Dunant, Maja Mockenhaupt, Peggy Sekula, Martin Schumacher, Sylvia Kardaun, Luigi Naldi, Teresa Bellón, Daniel Creamer, Cynthia Haddad, Bruno Sassolas, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore, Jean-Claude Roujeau

P34 Long-term sequelae in patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a 5-year analysis

Maren Paulmann, Carmen Kremmler, Peggy Sekula, Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore, Luigi Naldi, Sylvia Kardaun, Maja Mockenhaupt

P35 Major emotional complications and decreased health related quality of life among survivors of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Anthony Feinstein, Rena Hashimoto, Raed Alhusayen, Sonia Whyte-Croasdaile, Yaron Finkelstein, Marjorie Burnett, Shachar Sade, Robert Cartotto, Marc Jeschke, Neil H. Shear

P36 Retrospective analysis of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japanese patients: treatment and outcome

Naoko Takamura, Yumiko Yamane, Setsuko Matsukura, Kazuko Nakamura, Yuko Watanabe, Yukie Yamaguchi, Takeshi Kambara, Zenro Ikezawa, Michiko Aihara

P37 Severe physical complications among survivors of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Rena Hashimoto, Hall Chew, Raed Alhusayen, Sonia Whyte-Croasdaile, Yaron Finkelstein, Marjorie Burnett, Shachar Sade, Robert Cartotto, Marc Jeschke, Neil H. Shear

P38 Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis combined with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a case report

Brittany Knezevic, Una Nic Ionmhain, Allison Barraclough, Michaela Lucas, Matthew Anstey

Poster Walk 5: Other organs/unexpected immune reactions (P39–P47)

P39 A case report of patient with anti-tuberculosis drug-related severe liver failure

Toru Usui, Xiaoli Meng, John Farrell, Paul Whitaker, John Watson, Neil French, Kevin Park, Dean Naisbitt

P40 Acute interstitial nephritis induced by ibuprofen

Ana Castro Neves, Susana Cadinha, Ana Moreira, J. P. Moreira Da Silva

P41 Cetuximab induced acneiform rash—two case reports

Daniela Ledic Drvar, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Suzana Ljubojevic Hadzavdic, Romana Ceovic

P42 Enteropathy associated with losartan

Ana Montoro De Francisco, Talía De Vicente Jiménez, Amelia García Luque, Natalia Rosado David, José Mª Mateos Galván

P43 Granuloma annulare after therapy with canakinumab

Razvigor Darlenski

P44 Hypersensitivity eosinophilic myocarditis or acute coronary syndrome? Case report

Dario Gulin, Jozica Sikic, Jasna Cerkez Habek, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Edvard Galic

P45 Piperacillin-induced immune haemolytic anaemia: a severe and frequent complication of antibiotic treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis

Philip Specht, Doris Staab, Beate Mayer, Jobst Roehmel

P46 Progesterone triggered pemphigus foliaceus: case report

Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Caius Solovan, Anca Chiriac

P47 Ramipril: triggered generalized pustular psoriasis

Paola Djurinec, Kresimir Kostovic, Mirna Bradamante, Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Romana Ceovic

Poster Walk 6: NSAIDs (P48–P56)

P48 Aspirin desensitization in cardiovascular disease—Portuguese experience

Jose Pedro Almeida, Joana Caiado, Elisa Pedro, Pedro Canas Da Silva, Manuel Pereira Barbosa

P49 Asthma and/or rhinitis to NSAIDs with good tolerance to ASA

Gador Bogas, Natalia Blanca-López, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Inmaculada Doña, José Augusto Agúndez, Elena García-Martín, José Antonio Cornejo-García, Cristobalina Mayorga, María José Torres, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P50 Clinical characteristics of 196 patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) hypersensitivity

Sengül Aksakal, Aytül Zerrin Sin, Zeynep Peker Koç, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Ömür Ardeniz, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Okan Gülbahar, Ali Kokuludag

P51 Development of immediate hypersensitivity to several NSAIDs maintaining good tolerance to ASA

Natalia Pérez-Sánchez, Natalia Blanca-López, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Gador Bogas, Inmaculada Doña, María Salas, María José Torres, Miguel Blanca, Gabriela Canto

P52 Diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol in a large series of cases

Inmaculada Doña, Maria Salas, Francisca Gomez, Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Perez-Alzate, Gador Bogas, Esther Barrionuevo, Maria Jose Torres, Inmaculada Andreu, Miguel Ángel Miranda, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P53 Hypersensitivity to paracetamol according to the new classification of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs

Gabija Didžiokaite, Olesia Gaidej, Simona Kašinskaite, Violeta Kvedariene

P54 Ibuprofen and other aryl propionic derivates can induce immediate selective hypersensitivity responses

Diana Perez-Alzate, Natalia Blanca-López, Maria Isabel Garcimartin, Inmaculada Doña, Maria Luisa Somoza, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Gador Bojas, Jose Antonio Cornejo-Garcia, Maria Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca

P55 Subjects developing immediate responses to several NSAIDs can be selective with good tolerance to ASA

Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Francisco Javier Ruano Perez, Inmaculada Doña, Maria Luisa Somoza, Inmaculada Andreu, Miguel Angel Miranda, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria Jose Torres, Jose Antonio Cornejo-Garcia, Miguel Blanca, Maria Gabriela Canto

P56 Utility of low-dose oral aspirin challenges for diagnosis of aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Elina Jerschow, Teresa Pelletier, Zhen Ren, Golda Hudes, Marek Sanak, Esperanza Morales, Victor Schuster, Simon D. Spivack, David Rosenstreich

Poster Walk 7: NSAID 2 (P57–P65)

P57 Alternate regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) MRNA expression may predispose patients to aspirin-induced exacerbations

Renato Erzen, Mira Silar, Nissera Bajrovic, Matija Rijavec, Mihaela Zidarn, Peter Korosec

P58 Anaphylaxis to diclofenac: what about the underlying mechanism?

Leonor Carneiro-Leão, Fabrícia Carolino, Luís Amaral, Carmen Botelho, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P59 COX-2 inhibitors: are they always a safe alternative in hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

Luis Amaral, Fabricia Carolino, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P60 Management of patients with history of NSAIDs reactions prior to coronary angioplasty

Mona Al-Ahmad, Tito Rodriguez

P61 Oral drug challenge with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug under spirometric control: clinical series of 110 patients

João Pedro Azevedo, Emília Faria, Beatriz Tavares, Frederico Regateiro, Ana Todo-Bom

P62 Prevalence and incidence of analgesic hypersensitivity reactions in Colombia

Pablo Andrés Miranda, Bautista De La Cruz Hoyos

P63 Recent endoscopic sinus surgery lessens reactions during aspirin challenge in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Teresa Pelletier, Waleed Abuzeid, Nadeem Akbar, Marc Gibber, Marvin Fried, Weiguo Han, Taha Keskin, Robert Tamayev, Golda Hudes, Simon D. Spivack, David Rosenstreich, Elina Jerschow

P64 Safe use of imidazole salycilate in a case of multiple NSAIDs induced urticaria-angioedema

Elisa Boni, Marina Russello, Marina Mauro

P65 Selective hypersensitivity reactions to ibuprofen—seven years experience

Marta Ferreira Neto

Poster Walk 8: Epidemiological methods (P66–P72)

P66 Allopurinol hypersensitivity: a 7-year review

Lise Brosseron, Daniela Malheiro, Susana Cadinha, Patrícia Barreira, J. P. Moreira Da Silva

P67 Antibiotic allergy labelling is associated with increased hospital readmission rates in Australia

Brittany Knezevic, Dustin Sprigg, Michelle Trevenen, Jason Seet, Jason Trubiano, William Smith, Yogesh Jeelall, Sandra Vale, Richard Loh, Andrew Mclean-Tooke, Michaela Lucas

P68 Experts’ opinions on severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions-report of a survey from the 9th international congress on cutaneous adverse drug reactions 2015

Roni P. Dodiuk-Gad, Cristina Olteanu, Wen-Hung Chung, Neil H. Shear

P69 HLA-A*31-positive AGEP with carbamazepine use and other severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) detected by electronic medical records screening

Sabine Müller, Ursula Amstutz, Lukas Jörg, Nikhil Yawalkar, Stephan Krähenbühl

P70 Patients with suspected drug allergy: a specific psychological profile?

Eunice Dias-Castro, Ana Leblanc, Laura Ribeiro, Josefina R. Cernadas

P71 Use of an electronic device and a computerized mathematic algorithm to detect the allergic drug reactions through the analysis of heart rate variability

Arantza Vega, Raquel Gutierrez Rivas, Ana Alonso, Juan Maria Beitia, Belén Mateo, Remedios Cárdenas, Juan Jesus Garcia-Dominguez

P72 Variation in ERAP influences risk for HLA-B*57:01 positive abacavir hypersensitivity

Rebecca Pavlos, Kaija Strautins, Ian James, Simon Mallal, Alec Redwood, Elizabeth Phillips

Poster Walk 9: DRESS/AGEP (P73–P81)

P73 A clinical case of DRESS syndrome in a child after administration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid

Rita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Ana Neves, Maria Do Céu Machado, M. A. Pereira-Barbosa

P74 Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) induced by mesalazine, reliable and oftenly used drug to treat inflammatory bowel disease

Ceyda Tunakan Dalgiç, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Gökten Bulut, Fatma Ömür Ardeniz, Okan Gülbahar, Ali Kokuludag, Aytül Zerrin Sin

P75 Changes of blood plasmacytoid dendritic cells, myeloid dendritic cells, and basophils during the acute stage of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and other drug eruptions

Shao-Hsuan Hsu, Yung-Tsu Cho, Che-Wen Yang, Kai-Lung Chen, Chia-Yu Chu

P76 Characterization of isoniazid/rifampicin-specific t-cell responses in patients with DRESS syndrome

Young-Min Ye, Gyu-Young Hur, Hae-Sim Park, Seung-Hyun Kim

P77 DRESS syndrome secondary to sulfasalazine with delayed TEN: a case presentation

Syed Ali, Michaela Lucas, Peter N. Hollingsworth, Andrew P. C. Mclean-Tooke

P78 Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) features according to the culprit drug

Zohra Chadly, Nadia Ben Fredj, Karim Aouam, Haifa Ben Romdhane, Naceur A. Boughattas, Amel Chaabane

P79 Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms induced by allopurinol: not always easy to diagnose

Marina Lluncor Salazar, Beatriz Pola, Ana Fiandor, Teresa Bellón, Elena Ramírez, Javier Domínguez Ortega, Santiago Quirce, Rosario Cabañas

P80 Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome induced by two drugs simultaneously: a case report

Krasimira Baynova, Marina Labella, Manuel Prados

P81 The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by the second-line antituberculosis drugs and Epstein–Barr virus infection

Agne Ramonaite, Ieva Bajoriuniene, Brigita Sitkauskiene, Raimundas Sakalauskas

Poster Walk 10: Miscellaneous drug hypersensitivity (P82–P91)

P82 A case of cycloserine-induced lichenoid drug eruption confirmed with a lymphocatye transformation test

Jae-Woo Kwon, Shinyoung Park

P83 Allergic reaction to topical eye drops: 5 years’ retrospective study in a drug allergy unit

Diana Silva, Leonor Carneiro Leão, Fabricia Carolino, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas

P84 Allergy to heparins

Diana Perez-Alzate, Natalia Blanca-López, Maria Luisa Somoza Alvarez, Maria Garcimartin, Maria Vazquez De La Torre, Francisco Javier Ruano Pérez, Elisa Haroun, Gabriela Canto Diez

P85 Allopurinol-induced adverse drug reactions

Katinka Ónodi-Nagy, Ágnes Kinyó, Lajos Kemény, Zsuzsanna Bata-Csörgo

P86 Analysis of a population with immediate hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: an 11 year review

Joana Sofia Pita, Emília Faria, Rosa Anita Fernandes, Ana Moura, Nuno Sousa, Carmelita Ribeiro, Carlos Loureiro, Ana Todo Bom

P87 Anaphylaxis against mivacurium in a 12-months old boy at first-time exposure

Wolfgang Pfützner

P88 Antihistamine-exacerbated chronic spontaneous urticaria: a paradox?

Nadine Marrouche, Clive Grattan

P89 Anti-osteoporotic agents-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Asians

Yu-En Chen, Chun-Bing Chen, Wen-Hung Chung, Yu-Ping Hsiao, Chia-Yu Chu

P90 Diagnosis of allergic reactions to eye drops

Maria Vazquez De La Torre, Natalia Blanca-Lopez, Diana Perez-Alzate, Maria Isabel Garcimartin, Francisco Javier Ruano, Maria Luisa Somoza, Elisa Haroun, Gabriela Canto

P91 Diagnostic approach in suspected hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids

Fabrícia Carolino, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas

More than skin deep. Ten year follow-up of delayed cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR)

AIMS

To determine the gaps in practice regarding appropriate ADR documentation and risk communication for patients diagnosed with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study conducted using hospital coding and databases to identify inpatients diagnosed with CADR from January 2004 to August 2014. Hospital discharge summaries, ADR reports and pharmacy dispensing records were reviewed for ADR documentation. Patients still living in Australia and who did not opt out of being contacted were invited to be surveyed by telephone to determine their understanding of recommendations, re-exposure rates and long-term effects.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients identified, median age was 59 (IQR 44-72) years and 47.1% were male. The most common diagnosis was TENS (49.4%). Ten patients (11.8%) died as inpatients. Of the 81 patients with a drug-related causality, 47 (58%) had appropriate documentation in all three required medical record platforms. Of the 56 eligible patients, 38 (67.9%) were surveyed; 13% had no information provided upon discharge and 26.3% patients had a mismatch in knowledge of implicated medications. No surveyed patient had a relapse of CADR, but 23.7% had a subsequent unrelated allergic reaction. Thirteen patients (34.2%) reported long-term effects.

CONCLUSIONS

We found gaps in the accuracy of ADR documentation and communication of risk at discharge, which indicated risks to patient safety. Electronic systems are being developed to improve documentation. Written information about CADR is being provided at discharge to improve patient understanding and knowledge.

Characterizing immune responses in severe T-cell mediated adverse drug reaction

Severe immune-mediated adverse drug reactions (IM-ADRs) significantly impact patient outcome and inflict substantial cost on healthcare and drug development. Many of these T-cell mediated reactions are now known to be class I and/or class II HLA restricted, however, the minority of patients carrying an HLA risk allele will develop an IM-ADR. To help define the specific immunopathogenesis of these T-cell mediated drug reactions, a biobank of cryopreserved PBMCs and blister fluid/skin biopsies has been developed from HLA class I and II genotyped patients with IM-ADRs (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), abacavir hypersensitivity, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)) at various time points from their acute reaction. Causative drugs included antibiotics, antiretrovirals, anticonvulsants and allopurinol. Overnight gamma interferon ELISpot assay proved sensitive to identify dose-dependent drug responses at different time points during and following the acute IM-ADR. We used intracellular cytokine staining and cell sorting to identify drug specific CD137+/CD69+ activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Single cell and bulk TCR sequencing was performed to compare activated and non-activated populations of T cells in the presence and absence of drug. Immune responses differed according to the drug, clinical phenotype/tissue specificity, time from drug reaction, CD4+ and/or CD8+ dependency, and the oligoclonality of drug specific T-cell populations.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia following everolimus treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Everolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin with anti-tumour activity. While everolimus is known to cause drug-induced pneumonitis, it is rarely associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). We report a patient on everolimus therapy for metastatic breast cancer that developed PJP. Diagnosis was based on clinical features and a quantitative polymerase chain reaction for P. jirovecii DNA. Clinicians should consider PJP as a potential cause of pulmonary infiltrates in patients treated with everolimus.

Antimicrobial stewardship's new weapon? A review of antibiotic allergy and pathways to 'de-labeling'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The continued emergence of multiresistant pathogens and widespread antimicrobial use has led to a greater emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship programs. Concurrently, an increased awareness of the rising number of antibiotic allergy labels and impact on antimicrobial use has surfaced. The integration of antibiotic allergy de-labeling and antimicrobial stewardship programs may be a pathway worthy of further focus and investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature has evaluated the efficacy of antibiotic allergy management (historical de-labeling, in-vitro testing, skin prick testing, intradermal testing, and oral challenges) and impact of antibiotic allergy labels on patient outcome. The importance of true and perceived antibiotic allergy cross-reactivity in the setting of β-lactam allergies has been highlighted. The impact of dedicated antibiotic allergy de-labeling clinics, inpatient antibiotic allergy testing, and integrated antimicrobial stewardship programs has been recently appraised.

SUMMARY

More recent literature supports that appropriate antibiotic allergy in-vitro and in-vivo testing and subsequent antibiotic allergy de-labeling, particularly in regard to β-lactams, can decrease broad-spectrum antibiotic use, costs, patient length of stay, and mortality. Integration of antibiotic allergy management into the decision support systems of inpatient and outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs represents an important opportunity to further improve measured outcomes from antibiotic utilization.