1
|
van Heerwaarden J, Ronner E, Baijukya F, Adjei-Nsiah S, Ebanyat P, Kamai N, Wolde-meskel E, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE. Consistency, variability, and predictability of on-farm nutrient responses in four grain legumes across East and West Africa. Field Crops Res 2023; 299:108975. [PMID: 37529086 PMCID: PMC10300239 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Grain legumes are key components of sustainable production systems in sub-Saharan Africa, but wide-spread nutrient deficiencies severely restrict yields. Whereas legumes can meet a large part of their nitrogen (N) requirement through symbiosis with N2-fixing bacteria, elements such as phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and secondary and micronutrients may still be limiting and require supplementation. Responses to P are generally strong but variable, while evidence for other nutrients tends to show weak or highly localised effects. Here we present the results of a joint statistical analysis of a series of on-farm nutrient addition trials, implemented across four legumes in four countries over two years. Linear mixed models were used to quantify both mean nutrient responses and their variability, followed by a random forest analysis to determine the extent to which such variability can be explained or predicted by geographic, environmental or farm survey data. Legume response to P was indeed variable, but consistently positive and we predicted application to be profitable for 67% of farms in any given year, based on prevailing input costs and grain prices. Other nutrients did not show significant mean effects, but considerable response variation was found. This response heterogeneity was mostly associated with local or temporary factors and could not be explained or predicted by spatial, biophysical or management factors. An exception was K response, which displayed appreciable spatial variation that could be partly accounted for by spatial and environmental covariables. While of apparent relevance for targeted recommendations, the minor amplitude of expected response, the large proportion of unexplained variation and the unreliability of the predicted spatial patterns suggests that such data-driven targeting is unlikely to be effective with current data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost van Heerwaarden
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O.Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Ronner
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O.Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederick Baijukya
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), P.O. Box 3444, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Samuel Adjei-Nsiah
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, CSIR Campus, Accra, Ghana
| | - Peter Ebanyat
- Department of Agricultural Production, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Nkeki Kamai
- Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria
| | - Endalkachew Wolde-meskel
- World Agroforestry (ICRAF), C/o International Livestock Research Institute, Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O.Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moinet GYK, Hijbeek R, van Vuuren DP, Giller KE. Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon. Glob Chang Biol 2023; 29:2384-2398. [PMID: 36644803 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The role of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration as a 'win-win' solution to both climate change and food insecurity receives an increasing promotion. The opportunity may be too good to be missed! Yet the tremendous complexity of the two issues at stake calls for a detailed and nuanced examination of any potential solution, no matter how appealing. Here, we critically re-examine the benefits of global SOC sequestration strategies on both climate change mitigation and food production. While estimated contributions of SOC sequestration to climate change vary, almost none take SOC saturation into account. Here, we show that including saturation in estimations decreases any potential contribution of SOC sequestration to climate change mitigation by 53%-81% towards 2100. In addition, reviewing more than 21 meta-analyses, we found that observed yield effects of increasing SOC are inconsistent, ranging from negative to neutral to positive. We find that the promise of a win-win outcome is confirmed only when specific land management practices are applied under specific conditions. Therefore, we argue that the existing knowledge base does not justify the current trend to set global agendas focusing first and foremost on SOC sequestration. Away from climate-smart soils, we need a shift towards soil-smart agriculture, adaptative and adapted to each local context, and where multiple soil functions are quantified concurrently. Only such comprehensive assessments will allow synergies for land sustainability to be maximised and agronomic requirements for food security to be fulfilled. This implies moving away from global targets for SOC in agricultural soils. SOC sequestration may occur along this pathway and contribute to climate change mitigation and should be regarded as a co-benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Renske Hijbeek
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Detlef P van Vuuren
- PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson WC, Slingerland M, Baijukya FP, Giller KE, Oosting S. Feed gap analysis of dual-purpose chicken production in Tanzania: feed quantity and quality limited production. Poult Sci 2023; 102:102574. [PMID: 36881957 PMCID: PMC10009198 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The demand for chicken meat and eggs exceeds what can be produced in Tanzania, largely due to low productivity of the sector. Feed quantity and quality are the major factors determining the potential production and productivity of chickens. The present study explored the yield gap in chicken production in Tanzania and analyses the potential of increased chicken production as a result of closing the feed gaps. The study focused on feed aspects limiting dual-purpose chicken production in semi-intensive and intensive systems. A total of 101 farmers were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire and the amount of feed provided to chickens per day was quantified. Feed was sampled for laboratory analysis and physical assessments were made of weights of chicken bodies and eggs. The results were compared with the recommendations for improved dual-purpose crossbred chickens, exotic layers, and broilers. The results show that the feeds were offered in insufficient quantity compared with the recommendations for laying hens (125 g/chicken unit/d). Indigenous chickens were fed 111 and 67 while the improved crossbred chickens were fed 118 and 119 g/chicken unit/d under semi-intensive and intensive systems, respectively. Most feeds fed to dual-purpose chickens were of low nutritional quality, particularly lacking in crude protein and essential amino acids in both rearing systems and breeds. Maize bran, sunflower seedcake, and fishmeal were the main sources of energy and protein in the study area. The study findings show that the important feed ingredients: protein sources, essential amino acids, and premixes were expensive, and were not included in formulating compound feeds by most chicken farmers. Of all 101 respondents interviewed, only one was aware of aflatoxin contamination and its effects on animal and human health. All feed samples contained a detectable concentration of aflatoxins and 16% of them exceeded the allowed toxicity thresholds (>20 µg/kg). We highlight the need for a stronger focus on feeding strategies and ensuring the availability of suitable and safe feed formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson C Wilson
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Tanzania Livestock Research Institute (TALIRI), Uyole Centre, Mbeya, Tanzania.
| | - Maja Slingerland
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Oosting
- Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marinus W, Descheemaeker K, van de Ven GWJ, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE. Narrowing yield gaps does not guarantee a living income from smallholder farming-an empirical study from western Kenya. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283499. [PMID: 37079542 PMCID: PMC10118150 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Crop yields in sub-Saharan Africa need to increase to keep pace with food demands from the burgeoning population. Smallholder farmers play an important role in national food self-sufficiency, yet many live in poverty. Investing in inputs to increase yields is therefore often not viable for them. To investigate how to unlock this paradox, whole-farm experiments can reveal which incentives could increase farm production while also increasing household income. In this study we investigated the impact of providing farmers with a US$ 100 input voucher each season, for five seasons in a row, on maize yields and overall farm-level production in two contrasting locations in terms of population density, Vihiga and Busia, in western Kenya. We compared the value of farmers' produce with the poverty line and the living income threshold. Crop yields were mainly limited by cash constraints and not by technological constraints as maize yield immediately increased from 16% to 40-50% of the water-limited yield with the provision of the voucher. In Vihiga, at best, one-third of the participating households reached the poverty line. In Busia half of the households reached the poverty line and one-third obtained a living income. This difference between locations was caused by larger farm areas in Busia. Although one third of the households increased the area farmed, mostly by renting land, this was not enough for them to obtain a living income. Our results provide empirical evidence of how a current smallholder farming system could improve its productivity and value of produce upon the introduction of an input voucher. We conclude that increasing yields of the currently most common crops cannot provide a living income for all households and additional institutional changes, such as alternative employment, are required to provide smallholder farmers a way out of poverty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wytze Marinus
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien Descheemaeker
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrie W J van de Ven
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gould F, Amasino RM, Brossard D, Buell CR, Dixon RA, Falck-Zepeda JB, Gallo MA, Giller KE, Glenna LL, Griffin T, Magraw D, Mallory-Smith C, Pixley KV, Ransom EP, Stelly DM, Stewart CN. Toward product-based regulation of crops. Science 2022; 377:1051-1053. [PMID: 36048940 DOI: 10.1126/science.abo3034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Current process-based approaches to regulation are no longer fit for purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Gould
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Richard M Amasino
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Dominique Brossard
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - C Robin Buell
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Richard A Dixon
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | | | - Michael A Gallo
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Ken E Giller
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Leland L Glenna
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Timothy Griffin
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Daniel Magraw
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | | | - Kevin V Pixley
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Elizabeth P Ransom
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - David M Stelly
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - C Neal Stewart
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alemayehu T, Assogba GM, Gabbert S, Giller KE, Hammond J, Arouna A, Dossou-Yovo ER, Ven GWJVD. Farming Systems, Food Security and Farmers' Awareness of Ecosystem Services in Inland Valleys: A Study From Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana. Front Sustain Food Syst 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.892818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Inland valleys (IVs) in West African countries have increasingly been used for crop production, including rice cultivation. Though it is widely assumed that IVs have a high potential to contribute to food security of West African countries, a comprehensive assessment of farming systems addressing agricultural, institutional, food security, poverty, and ecosystem indicators is still lacking. This study characterizes IVs' smallholder farm households at the regional and farm type level using Rural Household Multiple Indicator Survey (RHoMIS) data collected from 733 randomly selected farm households in four agro-ecological regions, i.e., Bouaké and Gagnoa in Cote d'Ivoire, and Ahafo Ano North and Ahafo Ano South in Ghana. A farm typology is developed, and farm households are characterized with regard to demographic, agricultural, economic, and institutional indicators. Furthermore, farm households' food security and poverty status, and the importance of rice in the portfolio of crops, is assessed. Finally, farmers' awareness of different ecosystem services (ES) for their food security is examined. Four farm types are identified, i.e., farmers who rent all the land cultivated, farmers who own some land and rent extra land, farmers who own and cultivate all their land, and farmers cultivating only a part of the land they own. We find that the variation in farm households' demographic, economic, and institutional characteristics is greater between regions than within regions. Crop production, either for direct consumption or marketing, especially rice production, is the main contributor to daily energy intake, followed by wild food consumed. Still, a substantial percentage of the farm households (16–38%) in all regions cannot meet minimum daily energy requirements. Farmers of all farm types, and in all regions, attach high relevance to IVs' provisioning ES, particularly the ability to provide food. A majority of farmers in all regions highlighted the relevance of regulating ES, including climate regulation, water storage, and groundwater values for their wellbeing. In contrast, farmers attached relatively lower relevance to cultural ES. Interventions to improve national rice production need to acknowledge and preserve the diversity ES that IVs provide to smallholder farm households.
Collapse
|
7
|
Matema S, Eilers CHAM, van der Zijpp AJ, Giller KE. Wetlands in drylands: Use and conflict dynamics at the human–wildlife interface in Mbire District, Zimbabwe. Afr J Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/aje.13043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Matema
- Animal Production Systems Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands
- Plant Production Systems Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands
- Applied Ecology Unit, African Conservation Trust South Africa
- Human Environment Applied Research Trust Chipinge Zimbabwe
| | | | | | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Ochola D, Boekelo B, van de Ven GWJ, Taulya G, Kubiriba J, van Asten PJA, Giller KE. Mapping spatial distribution and geographic shifts of East African highland banana (Musa spp.) in Uganda. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0263439. [PMID: 35176065 PMCID: PMC8853547 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
East African highland banana (Musa acuminata genome group AAA-EA; hereafter referred to as banana) is critical for Uganda's food supply, hence our aim to map current distribution and to understand changes in banana production areas over the past five decades. We collected banana presence/absence data through an online survey based on high-resolution satellite images and coupled this data with independent covariates as inputs for ensemble machine learning prediction of current banana distribution. We assessed geographic shifts of production areas using spatially explicit differences between the 1958 and 2016 banana distribution maps. The biophysical factors associated with banana spatial distribution and geographic shift were determined using a logistic regression model and classification and regression tree, respectively. Ensemble models were superior (AUC = 0.895; 0.907) compared to their constituent algorithms trained with 12 and 17 covariates, respectively: random forests (AUC = 0.883; 0.901), gradient boosting machines (AUC = 0.878; 0.903), and neural networks (AUC = 0.870; 0.890). The logistic regression model (AUC = 0.879) performance was similar to that for the ensemble model and its constituent algorithms. In 2016, banana cultivation was concentrated in the western (44%) and central (36%) regions, while only a small proportion was in the eastern (18%) and northern (2%) regions. About 60% of increased cultivation since 1958 was in the western region; 50% of decreased cultivation in the eastern region; and 44% of continued cultivation in the central region. Soil organic carbon, soil pH, annual precipitation, slope gradient, bulk density and blue reflectance were associated with increased banana cultivation while precipitation seasonality and mean annual temperature were associated with decreased banana cultivation over the past 50 years. The maps of spatial distribution and geographic shift of banana can support targeting of context-specific intensification options and policy advocacy to avert agriculture driven environmental degradation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Ochola
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kampala, Uganda
- Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaen Boekelo
- Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Godfrey Taulya
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jerome Kubiriba
- National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kawanda, Uganda
| | | | - Ken E. Giller
- Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marinus W, Thuijsman ES, van Wijk MT, Descheemaeker K, van de Ven GWJ, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE. What Farm Size Sustains a Living? Exploring Future Options to Attain a Living Income From Smallholder Farming in the East African Highlands. Front Sustain Food Syst 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.759105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Smallholder farming in sub-Saharan Africa keeps many rural households trapped in a cycle of poor productivity and low incomes. Two options to reach a decent income include intensification of production and expansion of farm areas per household. In this study, we explore what is a “viable farm size,” i.e., the farm area that is required to attain a “living income,” which sustains a nutritious diet, housing, education and health care. We used survey data from three contrasting sites in the East African highlands—Nyando (Kenya), Rakai (Uganda), and Lushoto (Tanzania) to explore viable farm sizes in six scenarios. Starting from the baseline cropping system, we built scenarios by incrementally including intensified and re-configured cropping systems, income from livestock and off-farm sources. In the most conservative scenario (baseline cropping patterns and yields, minus basic input costs), viable farm areas were 3.6, 2.4, and 2.1 ha, for Nyando, Rakai, and Lushoto, respectively—whereas current median farm areas were just 0.8, 1.8, and 0.8 ha. Given the skewed distribution of current farm areas, only few of the households in the study sites (0, 27, and 4% for Nyando, Rakai, and Lushoto, respectively) were able to attain a living income. Raising baseline yields to 50% of the water-limited yields strongly reduced the land area needed to achieve a viable farm size, and thereby enabled 92% of the households in Rakai and 70% of the households in Lushoto to attain a living income on their existing farm areas. By contrast, intensification of crop production alone was insufficient in Nyando, although including income from livestock enabled the majority of households (73%) to attain a living income with current farm areas. These scenarios show that increasing farm area and/or intensifying production is required for smallholder farmers to attain a living income from farming. Obviously such changes would require considerable capital and labor investment, as well as land reform and alternative off-farm employment options for those who exit farming.
Collapse
|
11
|
Baijukya FP, Van Heerwaarden J, Franke AC, Van den Brand GJ, Foli S, Keino L, Seitz T, Servan L, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE. Nutrient Deficiencies Are Key Constraints to Grain Legume Productivity on “Non-responsive” Soils in Sub-Saharan Africa. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.678955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Leguminous plants are known to require phosphorus fertilizers and inoculation with nitrogen fixing rhizobia for optimum yield but other nutrients may also be lacking. In this study, the most limiting nutrients for legume growth were determined in soils where the crops had not responded to P and rhizobial inoculation in field trials, using the double pot technique. Soils were collected from 17 farmers' fields in West Kenya, Northern Nigeria, Eastern and Southern Rwanda, South-west and North-west Sierra Leone. Plant growth and mean biomass were measured on soils to which a full nutrient solution, containing phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S) and micronutrients (MN) were added, and which were compared to a control (no nutrient added), and individual omissions of each nutrient. The relationship between soil properties and nutrient deficiencies was explored. Nutrient limitations were found to differ between soils, both within and across countries. Generally, each soil was potentially deficient in at least one nutrient, with K, P, Mg, MN and S emerging as most limiting in 88, 65, 59, 18, and 12% of tested soils, respectively. While K was the most limiting nutrient in soils from Kenya and Rwanda, P was most limiting in soils from Nigeria. P and K were equally limiting in soils from Sierra Leone. Mg was found limiting in two soils from Kenya and three soils from Rwanda and one soil each in Nigeria and Sierra Leone. Micronutrients were found to be limiting in one soil from Nigeria and one soil from Rwanda. Estimates of nutrient deficiency using growth and mean biomass were found to be correlated with each other although the latter proved to be a more sensitive measure of deficiency. With few exceptions, the relation between soil parameters and nutrient deficiencies was weak and there were no significant relations between deficiency of specific nutrients and the soil content of these elements. Although our results cannot be translated directly to the field, they confirm that individual and multiple nutrient deficiencies were common in these “non-responsive” soils and may have contributed to reported low yields. This highlights the need for balanced nutrition in legume production in SSA.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
It is often claimed that cocoa producers are poor, but the extent of their poverty is rarely defined. We analyzed six data sets derived from household questionnaires of 385–88,896 cocoa producers in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana. Across all data sets, many households (30–58%) earn a gross income below the World Bank extreme poverty line and the majority (73–90%) do not earn a Living Income. Households with less income per person per day generally achieve lower cocoa yields, consist of more household members, have a smaller land size available, and rely more on cocoa income than households with higher incomes. When comparing the effects of increasing prices and yields on gross income, yield increases lead to larger benefits especially for the poorest households. Doubling the cocoa price would leave 15–25% of households with a gross income below the extreme poverty line and 53–65% below the Living Income benchmark. At yields of 600 kg/ha, against current yields around 300 kg/ha, these percentages are reduced to 7–11 and 48–62%, respectively, while at yields of 1,500 kg/ha only 1–2% of households remain below the extreme poverty line and 13–20% below the Living Income benchmark. If we assume that the production costs of achieving a yield of 1,500 kg/ha are 30% of revenue, still only 2–4% of households earn a net income below the extreme poverty line and 25–32% below the Living Income benchmark. Whilst sustainable intensification of cocoa production is undoubtedly a strong approach to increase cocoa yields and farmer incomes, achieving this does not come without pitfalls. The poorer households face multiple barriers to invest in cocoa production. A better understanding of cocoa producing households and the resources available to them, as well as the opportunity for alternative income generation, is required to tailor options to increase their income. The utility and interpretability of future household surveys would be drastically improved if definitions and variables addressed were approached in a standardized way.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ebanyat P, de Ridder N, Bekunda M, Delve RJ, Giller KE. Efficacy of Nutrient Management Options for Finger Millet Production on Degraded Smallholder Farms in Eastern Uganda. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.674926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Poor soil fertility is a major problem constraining crop productivity in smallholder farms of sub-Saharan Africa due to inadequate nutrient replenishment. Differential management of nutrients creates areas of accumulation and depletion of nutrients within farms with the latter increasing in spatial coverage. Nutrient additions are required to increase crop production in such degraded areas. We used experimental data to evaluate the potential of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures to offset finger millet yield differences or gap between degraded fields and former kraals, which are recognized as niches for obtaining the best yields within the Teso farming system in eastern Uganda. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers were sole applied at 0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha−1 and in combination (N+P) at equal rates of sole application, and manure (3 t ha−1) supplemented with N (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha−1) to degraded fields located in upper and middle landscape positions in Chelekura and Onamudian villages. A second control treatment of finger millet grown on soils of former kraal sites (high fertility niches) was included as a benchmark to evaluate the efficacy of nutrient management options on degraded field. Average grain yield ranged from 404 to 2,026 kg ha−1 and differed significantly (p < 0.001) between villages and seasons. Significant effects (p < 0.05) of landscape position on grain yield were observed only in Onamudian village. Although the treatments significantly increased millet yields on degraded fields above the control, they could not eliminate the yield differences between degraded fields and former kraals. The largest average grain yields on degraded fields were obtained from combined application of N+P resulting in average grain yields of 800 and 1,171 kg ha−1 in Chelekura village and Onamudian village, respectively. These yield responses resulted in only 24 and 43% of yields obtained on former kraal fields in Chelekura and Onamudian, respectively. The physiological efficiencies, agronomic efficiencies, and apparent recoveries of N and P were low; often <25%. Pot experiments conducted in a greenhouse showed that Sulphur (S) and potassium (K) were additional limiting nutrients to N and P for finger millet production in Chelekura and Onamudian and may partly explain the large yield differences of finger millet between fertilized fields and former kraals in the smallholder farming systems. Nutrient management strategies for sustainable millet production in these farming systems need consideration of site-specific nutrient limitations.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wilson WC, Slingerland M, Baijukya FP, van Zanten H, Oosting S, Giller KE. Integrating the soybean-maize-chicken value chains to attain nutritious diets in Tanzania. Food Secur 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01213-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIn Tanzania, diets are dominated by starchy staple crops such as maize, levels of malnutrition are high and largely attributed to lack of dietary diversity. We employed fuzzy cognitive mapping to understand the current soybean, maize and chicken value chains, to highlight stakeholder relationships and to identify entry points for value chain integration to support nutritious diets in Tanzania. The fuzzy cognitive maps were constructed based on information gathered during household interviews with 569 farming households, followed by a participatory workshop with 54 stakeholders involved in the three value chains. We found that the soybean, maize and chicken value chains were interconnected, particularly at the level of the smallholder farming systems and at processing facilities. Smallholder farming households were part of one or more value chains. Chicken feed is an important entry point for integrating the three value chains, as maize and soybean meal are the main sources of energy and protein for chicken. Unlike maize, the utilization of soybean in chicken feed is limited, mainly due to inadequate quality of processing of soybean grain into meal. As a result, the soybean grain produced by smallholders is mainly exported to neighbouring countries for further processing, and soybean meal is imported at relatively high prices. Enhancing local sourcing and adequate processing of soybean, coupled with strengthening the integration of smallholder farmers with other soybean, maize and chicken value chain actors offers an important opportunity to improve access to nutritious diets for local people. Our method revealed the importance of interlinkages that integrate the value chains into a network within domestic markets.
Collapse
|
15
|
Silva JV, Reidsma P, Baudron F, Laborte AG, Giller KE, van Ittersum MK. How sustainable is sustainable intensification? Assessing yield gaps at field and farm level across the globe. Global Food Security 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
16
|
Ronner E, Sumberg J, Glover D, Descheemaeker KKE, Almekinders CJM, Haussmann BIG, Kuyper TW, Posthumus H, Ebanyat P, Giller KE. Basket of options: Unpacking the concept. Outlook Agric 2021; 50:116-124. [PMID: 34366487 PMCID: PMC8299778 DOI: 10.1177/00307270211019427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
How to stimulate technological change to enhance agricultural productivity and reduce poverty remains an area of vigorous debate. In the face of heterogeneity among farm households and rural areas, one proposition is to offer potential users a 'basket of options' - a range of agricultural technologies from which potential users may select the ones that are best suited to their specific circumstances. While the idea of a basket of options is now generally accepted, it has attracted little critical attention. In this paper, we reflect on outstanding questions: the appropriate dimensions of a basket, its contents and how they are identified, and how a basket might be presented. We conceive a basket of options in terms of its depth (number of options related to a problem or opportunity) and breadth (the number of different problems or opportunities addressed). The dimensions of a basket should reflect the framing of the problem or opportunity at hand and the objective in offering the basket. We recognise that increasing the number of options leads to a trade-off by decreasing the fraction of those options that are relevant to an individual user. Farmers might try out, adapt or use one or more of the options in a basket, possibly leading to a process of technological change. We emphasise that the selection (or not) of specific options from the basket, and potential adaptation of the options, provide important opportunities for learning. Baskets of options can therefore be understood as important boundary concepts that invite critical engagement, comparison and discussion. Significant knowledge gaps remain, however, about the best ways to present the basket and to guide potential users to select the options that are most relevant to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ronner
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Sumberg
- Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK
| | - D Glover
- Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK
| | - KKE Descheemaeker
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - CJM Almekinders
- Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - BIG Haussmann
- Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - TW Kuyper
- Soil Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - H Posthumus
- KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Ebanyat
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - KE Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Udvardi M, Below FE, Castellano MJ, Eagle AJ, Giller KE, Ladha JK, Liu X, Maaz TM, Nova-Franco B, Raghuram N, Robertson GP, Roy S, Saha M, Schmidt S, Tegeder M, York LM, Peters JW. A Research Road Map for Responsible Use of Agricultural Nitrogen. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.660155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) is an essential but generally limiting nutrient for biological systems. Development of the Haber-Bosch industrial process for ammonia synthesis helped to relieve N limitation of agricultural production, fueling the Green Revolution and reducing hunger. However, the massive use of industrial N fertilizer has doubled the N moving through the global N cycle with dramatic environmental consequences that threaten planetary health. Thus, there is an urgent need to reduce losses of reactive N from agriculture, while ensuring sufficient N inputs for food security. Here we review current knowledge related to N use efficiency (NUE) in agriculture and identify research opportunities in the areas of agronomy, plant breeding, biological N fixation (BNF), soil N cycling, and modeling to achieve responsible, sustainable use of N in agriculture. Amongst these opportunities, improved agricultural practices that synchronize crop N demand with soil N availability are low-hanging fruit. Crop breeding that targets root and shoot physiological processes will likely increase N uptake and utilization of soil N, while breeding for BNF effectiveness in legumes will enhance overall system NUE. Likewise, engineering of novel N-fixing symbioses in non-legumes could reduce the need for chemical fertilizers in agroecosystems but is a much longer-term goal. The use of simulation modeling to conceptualize the complex, interwoven processes that affect agroecosystem NUE, along with multi-objective optimization, will also accelerate NUE gains.
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Gunnabo AH, van Heerwaarden J, Geurts R, Wolde-Meskel E, Degefu T, Giller KE. Phylogeography and Symbiotic Effectiveness of Rhizobia Nodulating Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Ethiopia. Microb Ecol 2021; 81:703-716. [PMID: 33098438 PMCID: PMC7982387 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01620-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) used to be considered a restrictive host that nodulated and fixed nitrogen only with Mesorhizobium ciceri and M. mediterraneum. Recent analysis revealed that chickpea can also establish effective symbioses with strains of several other Mesorhizobium species such as M. loti, M. haukuii, M. amorphae, M. muleiense, etc. These strains vary in their nitrogen fixation potential inviting further exploration. We characterized newly collected mesorhizobial strains isolated from various locations in Ethiopia to evaluate genetic diversity, biogeographic structure and symbiotic effectiveness. Symbiotic effectiveness was evaluated in Leonard Jars using a locally released chickpea cultivar "Nattoli". Most of the new isolates belonged to a clade related to M. plurifarium, with very few sequence differences, while the total collection of strains contained three additional mesorhizobial genospecies associated with M. ciceri, M. abyssinicae and an unidentified Mesorhizobium species isolated from a wild host in Eritrea. The four genospecies identified represented a subset of the eight major Mesorhizobium clades recently reported for Ethiopia based on metagenomic data. All Ethiopian strains had nearly identical symbiotic genes that grouped them in a single cluster with M. ciceri, M. mediterraneum and M. muleiense, but not with M. plurifarium. Some phylogeographic structure was observed, with elevation and geography explaining some of the genetic differences among strains, but the relation between genetic identity and symbiotic effectiveness was observed to be weak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Gunnabo
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J van Heerwaarden
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - R Geurts
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Wolde-Meskel
- World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - T Degefu
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - K E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Agriculture is in crisis. Soil health is collapsing. Biodiversity faces the sixth mass extinction. Crop yields are plateauing. Against this crisis narrative swells a clarion call for Regenerative Agriculture. But what is Regenerative Agriculture, and why is it gaining such prominence? Which problems does it solve, and how? Here we address these questions from an agronomic perspective. The term Regenerative Agriculture has actually been in use for some time, but there has been a resurgence of interest over the past 5 years. It is supported from what are often considered opposite poles of the debate on agriculture and food. Regenerative Agriculture has been promoted strongly by civil society and NGOs as well as by many of the major multi-national food companies. Many practices promoted as regenerative, including crop residue retention, cover cropping and reduced tillage are central to the canon of 'good agricultural practices', while others are contested and at best niche (e.g. permaculture, holistic grazing). Worryingly, these practices are generally promoted with little regard to context. Practices most often encouraged (such as no tillage, no pesticides or no external nutrient inputs) are unlikely to lead to the benefits claimed in all places. We argue that the resurgence of interest in Regenerative Agriculture represents a re-framing of what have been considered to be two contrasting approaches to agricultural futures, namely agroecology and sustainable intensification, under the same banner. This is more likely to confuse than to clarify the public debate. More importantly, it draws attention away from more fundamental challenges. We conclude by providing guidance for research agronomists who want to engage with Regenerative Agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Hijbeek
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens A Andersson
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - James Sumberg
- Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rahman N, Giller KE, de Neergaard A, Magid J, van de Ven G, Bruun TB. The effects of management practices on soil organic carbon stocks of oil palm plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. J Environ Manage 2021; 278:111446. [PMID: 33212354 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The rapid increase in global production of and demand for palm oil has resulted in large-scale expansion of oil palm monoculture in the world's tropical regions, particularly in Indonesia. This expansion has led to the conversion of carbon-rich land-use types to oil palm plantations with a range of negative environmental impacts, including loss of carbon from aboveground biomass and soil. Sequestration of soil organic carbon (SOC) in existing oil palm plantations is an important strategy to limit carbon losses. The aim of this study was to investigate SOC stocks of oil palm plantations under different management systems. Soil samples were collected from three different management systems (best management practices (BMP), current management practices typical of large plantations (CMP) and smallholder management practices (SHMP)) in north Sumatra, Indonesia. Plantations were divided into four management zones that were sampled separately with four replicate profiles in the weeded circle, frond stack, harvesting path and interrow zones. All the soil samples were collected from five (0-5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-50 and 50-70 cm) soil depths. Soil samples were analysed for concentration of SOC, soil texture, soil bulk density and pH. Calculations of SOC stocks in the soils were undertaken according to the fixed-depth and equivalent soil mass approaches. Results showed that SOC stocks of plantations under BMP (68 t ha-1) were 31% and 18% higher than under CMP (57 t ha-1) and SHMP (46 t ha-1) respectively. In the BMP system, soils under the interrow zone that received enriched mulch and frond stack positions stored significantly more SOC than the harvesting path of the BMP system (77, 73 and 57 t ha-1 respectively). BMP also had a 33% higher fresh fruit bunch yield compared to the SHMP system. This study shows that residue incorporation or retention as a part of BMP could be an effective strategy for increasing SOC stocks of oil palm plantations and confirms that these management practices could improve yields from SHMP systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niharika Rahman
- Plant Production Systems, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700, AK Wageningen, the Netherlands; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700, AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas de Neergaard
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Jakob Magid
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Gerrie van de Ven
- Plant Production Systems, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700, AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Thilde Bech Bruun
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Veldhuizen LJL, Slingerland M, Barredo L, Giller KE. Carbon-free conferencing in the age of COVID-19. Outlook Agric 2020; 49:321-329. [PMID: 33281231 PMCID: PMC7684527 DOI: 10.1177/0030727020960492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a crash course for many in working from home using various online tools, many of which can be used to organize e-conferences. An e-conference is a fully online event with multiple sessions and virtual discussion in one platform. In this paper, we aim to provide insights in and present key steps to organize a successful e-conference, increase our understanding of the impact of e-conferences, and identify key strengths, weaknesses, and success factors. Based on a participant survey and our own experience, we found that e-conferences are relatively easy to organize with readily-available and free tools, that they are more accessible and thus inclusive than physical meetings, and that they are virtually carbon-free which can contribute to large emission savings. Three important success factors are attracting a good set of speakers, building an interested audience, and reaching your objectives and desired impact. A successful e-conference can enable joint learning among speakers and participants, and allows novel ways of disseminating scientific knowledge while also enabling networking for the many participants who might not be able to attend an in-person event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda JL Veldhuizen
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maja Slingerland
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lauren Barredo
- Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), New York, USA
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van de Ven GWJ, de Valença A, Marinus W, de Jager I, Descheemaeker KKE, Hekman W, Mellisse BT, Baijukya F, Omari M, Giller KE. Living income benchmarking of rural households in low-income countries. Food Secur 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01099-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe extreme poverty line is the most commonly used benchmark for poverty, set at US$ 1.90 by the World Bank. Another benchmark, based on the Anker living wage methodology, is the remuneration received for a standard work week necessary for a worker to meet his/her family’s basic needs in a particular place. The living wage concept has been used extensively to address incomes of plantation workers producing agricultural commodities for international markets. More recently intense discussion has emerged concerning the ‘living income’ of smallholder farmers who produce commodities for international supply chains on their own land. In this article we propose a simple method that can be used in all types of development projects to benchmark a rural ‘living income’. We launch the Living Income Methodology, as adapted from the Living Wage Methodology, to estimate the living income for rural households. In any given location this requires about one week of fieldwork. We express it per adult equivalent per day (AE/day) and data collection is focused on rural households and their immediate surroundings. Our three case studies showed that in 2017 in Lushoto District, rural Tanzania, the living income was US$ PPP 4.04/AE/day, in Isingiro District, rural Uganda, 3.82 and in Sidama Zone, rural Ethiopia, 3.60. In all cases, the extreme poverty line of US$ PPP 1.90 per capita per day is insufficient to meet the basic human rights for a decent living in low-income countries. The Living Income Methodology provides a transparent local benchmark that can be used to assess development opportunities of rural households, by employers in rural areas, including farmers hiring in labour, while respecting basic human rights on a decent living. It can be used to reflect on progress of rural households in low-income countries on their aspired path out of poverty. It further provides a meaningful benchmark to measure progress on Sustainable Development Goal 1, eliminating poverty, and 2, zero hunger and sustainable food systems, allowing for consideration of the local context.
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Akakpo DB, de Boer IJM, Adjei-Nsiah S, Duncan AJ, Giller KE, Oosting SJ. Evaluating the effects of storage conditions on dry matter loss and nutritional quality of grain legume fodders in West Africa. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020; 262:114419. [PMID: 32255896 PMCID: PMC7104892 DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Nutritional quality and dry matter quantity of grain legume fodders (GLFs) declined with increasing duration of storage. GLFs stored in sacks had better nutritional quality and less dry matter loss than stored GLFs tied with rope. Decline in nutritional quality is drastic in leaf fractions than in stem fractions of GLFs during storage. Aflatoxin was not detected in groundnut fodder during storage in the dry season.
Feed scarcity is a major challenge for livestock production in West Africa, especially during the dry season when grass quality and quantity on grazing lands are inadequate. In the dry season, crop residues are a key source of livestock feed. The residues of grain legumes, also known as grain legume fodders (GLFs), are stored and traded for feeding in the dry season. The objectives of our experiment were to evaluate the effects of storage conditions and duration on dry matter (DM) and nutritional quality of GLFs, and to assess the risk of aflatoxin in stored groundnut fodder. The experiment was designed as a factorial trial with 18 treatment combinations with four replicates (4 farms). The treatments included: 3 types of GLFs (cowpea, groundnut and soybean fodder), 3 types of storage locations (rooftop, room and tree-fork) and 2 types of packaging (packed in polythene sacks and unpacked but tied with rope). Over a 120 day storage period, DM quantity reduced by an average of 24 % across all storage conditions, showing a range from 14 % in the best condition (sacks and rooms) to 35 % in the worst condition (bundles tied with rope and stored on rooftops or tree-forks). Soybean fodder had no leaves, the lowest crude protein content (CP) and organic matter digestibility (OMD), and the highest content of cell wall components compared to cowpea and groundnut fodder. These nutritional quality parameters in soybean fodder hardly changed during storage. Cowpea and groundnut fodder showed a decrease in leaf-to-stem ratio (LSR), CP and OMD, and an increase in the content of cell wall components during storage, but their nutritional value remained better than that of soybean fodder. Storage in sacks resulted in less DM loss, in less reduction of LSR and in a smaller increase of the content of cell wall components than storage of bundles tied with rope. Our study shows that the DM loss, the decrease in LSR, and the increase in the content of cell wall components can be prevented partly by storing GLFs in sacks instead of tying bundles with rope, and to a minor extent by storing in rooms instead of in the open air. Aflatoxin was not detectable in the groundnut fodder samples. Our results highlight that attention to storage conditions can improve the feeding value of GLFs which are key for livestock nutrition during the dry season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D B Akakpo
- Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338,6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.,Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - I J M de Boer
- Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338,6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - S Adjei-Nsiah
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box TL 06, Tamale, Ghana.,Forest and Horticultural Crops Research Centre, Kade, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
| | - A J Duncan
- International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - K E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - S J Oosting
- Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338,6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Veldhuizen LJL, Giller KE, Oosterveer P, Brouwer ID, Janssen S, van Zanten HHE, Slingerland M. The Missing Middle: Connected action on agriculture and nutrition across global, national and local levels to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 2. Global Food Security 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
27
|
Gunnabo AH, Geurts R, Wolde-Meskel E, Degefu T, Giller KE, van Heerwaarden J. Genetic Interaction Studies Reveal Superior Performance of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 on a Range of Diverse East African Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85:e01763-19. [PMID: 31562174 PMCID: PMC6881787 DOI: 10.1128/aem.01763-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We studied symbiotic performance of factorial combinations of diverse rhizobial genotypes (GR) and East African common bean varieties (GL) that comprise Andean and Mesoamerican genetic groups. An initial wide screening in modified Leonard jars (LJ) was followed by evaluation of a subset of strains and genotypes in pots (contained the same, sterile medium) in which fixed nitrogen was also quantified. An additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to identify the contribution of individual strains and plant genotypes to the GL × GR interaction. Strong and highly significant GL × GR interaction was found in the LJ experiment but with little evidence of a relation to genetic background or growth habits. The interaction was much weaker in the pot experiment, with all bean genotypes and Rhizobium strains having relatively stable performance. We found that R. etli strain CFN42 and R. tropici strains CIAT899 and NAK91 were effective across bean genotypes but with the latter showing evidence of positive interaction with two specific bean genotypes. This suggests that selection of bean varieties based on their response to inoculation is possible. On the other hand, we show that symbiotic performance is not predicted by any a priori grouping, limiting the scope for more general recommendations. The fact that the strength and pattern of GL × GR depended on growing conditions provides an important cautionary message for future studies.IMPORTANCE The existence of genotype-by-strain (GL × GR) interaction has implications for the expected stability of performance of legume inoculants and could represent both challenges and opportunities for improvement of nitrogen fixation. We find that significant genotype-by-strain interaction exists in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) but that the strength and direction of this interaction depends on the growing environment used to evaluate biomass. Strong genotype and strain main effects, combined with a lack of predictable patterns in GL × GR, suggests that at best individual bean genotypes and strains can be selected for superior additive performance. The observation that the screening environment may affect experimental outcome of GL × GR means that identified patterns should be corroborated under more realistic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Gunnabo
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Geurts
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Wolde-Meskel
- World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - T Degefu
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - K E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - J van Heerwaarden
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Klapwijk CJ, Schut M, van Asten PJA, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE, Descheemaeker K. Micro-livestock in smallholder farming systems: the role, challenges and opportunities for cavies in South Kivu, eastern DR Congo. Trop Anim Health Prod 2019; 52:1167-1177. [PMID: 31758384 PMCID: PMC7190603 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-02112-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Livestock play multiple roles for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Mixed crop-livestock systems are common in South Kivu, eastern DR Congo, but herd sizes are small and numbers of large livestock (i.e. cattle) have declined, due to high population density, recent conflicts and extreme poverty. Over half of the farmers keep cavies, a type of micro-livestock fitting the circumstances of smallholders and a valuable asset especially for the poorest households. To characterize cavy husbandry practices, detailed monthly on-farm data on cavy numbers, weights, herd dynamics and feeding practices were collected over 15 months and from households in two contrasting sites in South Kivu. Cavy herds contained on average 10 animals and strongly varied in size over time and between households. The main reasons for keeping cavies were meat consumption, especially for children, and the opportunity to generate petty cash. A large difference was observed in adult cavy live weights between the sites (an average of 0.6 and 1.0 kg per animal in Kabamba and Lurhala, respectively) and attributed to differences in cavy husbandry and genetics. In both sites, quantities of fresh fodder on offer were larger than fodder demand by 50–100%, but no correlation was found between amount of fodder on offer and cavy weight. Farmers faced several constraints to cavy production, including substantial declines in cavy herd size due to predation or theft and a lack of knowledge regarding breeding and feeding. Hence, the introduction of cages to limit mortality and fodder cultivation to improve feed quality were opportunities for improving cavy production. Overall, micro-livestock present a promising entry-point for development initiatives, also outside DR Congo, because of their potential to decrease poverty and improve human nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J Klapwijk
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.,Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), P.O. Box 430, 6700, AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Schut
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kigali, Rwanda.,Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), P.O. Box 8130, 6700, EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Piet J A van Asten
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Kampala, Uganda.,Olam International Ltd., Kampala, Uganda
| | - Bernard Vanlauwe
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), P.O. Box 430, 6700, AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien Descheemaeker
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), P.O. Box 430, 6700, AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pixley KV, Falck-Zepeda JB, Giller KE, Glenna LL, Gould F, Mallory-Smith CA, Stelly DM, Stewart CN. Genome Editing, Gene Drives, and Synthetic Biology: Will They Contribute to Disease-Resistant Crops, and Who Will Benefit? Annu Rev Phytopathol 2019; 57:165-188. [PMID: 31150590 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Genetically engineered crops have been grown for more than 20 years, resulting in widespread albeit variable benefits for farmers and consumers. We review current, likely, and potential genetic engineering (GE) applications for the development of disease-resistant crop cultivars. Gene editing, gene drives, and synthetic biology offer novel opportunities to control viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens, parasitic weeds, and insect vectors of plant pathogens. We conclude that there will be no shortage of GE applications totackle disease resistance and other farmer and consumer priorities for agricultural crops. Beyond reviewing scientific prospects for genetically engineered crops, we address the social institutional forces that are commonly overlooked by biological scientists. Intellectual property regimes, technology regulatory frameworks, the balance of funding between public- and private-sector research, and advocacy by concerned civil society groups interact to define who uses which GE technologies, on which crops, and for the benefit of whom. Ensuring equitable access to the benefits of genetically engineered crops requires affirmative policies, targeted investments, and excellent science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin V Pixley
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), 56237 Texcoco, Mexico;
| | - Jose B Falck-Zepeda
- International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC 20005-3915, USA
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leland L Glenna
- Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Fred Gould
- Genetic Engineering and Society Center and Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - Carol A Mallory-Smith
- Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
| | - David M Stelly
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA
| | - C Neal Stewart
- Department of Plant Sciences and Center for Agricultural Synthetic Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Veen GF, Wubs ERJ, Bardgett RD, Barrios E, Bradford MA, Carvalho S, De Deyn GB, de Vries FT, Giller KE, Kleijn D, Landis DA, Rossing WAH, Schrama M, Six J, Struik PC, van Gils S, Wiskerke JSC, van der Putten WH, Vet LEM. Applying the Aboveground-Belowground Interaction Concept in Agriculture: Spatio-Temporal Scales Matter. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
31
|
de Jager I, Borgonjen-van den Berg KJ, Giller KE, Brouwer ID. Current and potential role of grain legumes on protein and micronutrient adequacy of the diet of rural Ghanaian infants and young children: using linear programming. Nutr J 2019; 18:12. [PMID: 30791898 PMCID: PMC6385461 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-019-0435-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grain legumes are appreciated for their contribution to dietary protein and micronutrient intake in addition to their benefits in providing income and replenishing soil fertility. They offer potential benefits in developing countries where future food demand is increasing and both undernutrition and overweight co-exist. We studied the current and potential role of grain legumes on protein, both quantity and quality, and micronutrient adequacy in the diet of rural Ghanaian infants and young children. METHODS Energy and nutrient (including amino acids) intakes of breastfed children of 6-8 months (n=97), 9-11 months (n=97), 12-23 months (n=114), and non-breastfed children of 12-23 months (n=29) from Karaga district in Northern Ghana were assessed using a repeated quantitative multi-pass 24-hour recall method. Food-based dietary guidelines that cover nutrient adequacy within the constraints of local current dietary patterns were designed using the linear programming software Optifood (version 4.0.9, Optifood©). Optifood was also used to evaluate whether additional legumes would further improve nutrient adequacy. RESULTS We found that 60% of the children currently consumed legumes with an average portion size of 20 g per day (cooked) contributing more than 10% of their total protein, folate, iron and niacin intake. The final sets of food-based recommendations included legumes and provided adequate protein and essential amino acids but insufficient calcium, iron, niacin and/or zinc among breastfed children and insufficient calcium, vitamin C, vitamin B12 and vitamin A among non-breastfed children. The sets of food-based recommendations combined with extra legumes on top of the current dietary pattern improved adequacy of calcium, iron, niacin and zinc but only reached sufficient amounts for calcium among breastfed children of 6-8 months old. CONCLUSIONS Although legumes are often said to be the 'meat of the poor' and current grain legume consumption among rural children contribute to protein intake, the main nutritional benefit of increased legume consumption is improvement of micronutrient adequacy. Besides food-based recommendations, other interventions are needed such as food-based approaches and/or fortification or supplementation strategies to improve micronutrient adequacy of infants and young children in rural Ghana. TRIAL REGISTRATION Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research Institutional Review Board (NMIMR-IRB CPN 087/13-14).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse de Jager
- Division of Human Nutrition and Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge D. Brouwer
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Verkaart S, Mausch K, Claessens L, Giller KE. A recipe for success? Learning from the rapid adoption of improved chickpea varieties in Ethiopia. Int J Agric Sustain 2018; 17:34-48. [PMID: 30828358 PMCID: PMC6382285 DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2018.1559007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Many studies detail constraints deemed responsible for the limited adoption of new technologies among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. By contrast, here we study the conditions that led to the remarkably fast spread of improved chickpea varieties in Ethiopia. Within just seven years, the adoption rate rose from 30 to 80% of the farmers. A combination of factors explains the rapid uptake. Their attraction lay in superior returns and disease resistance. Chickpea was already an important crop for rural households in the studied districts, for both cash income and consumption. Good market access and an easy accessibility of extension services advanced the adoption process. Thus, an attractive technology suitable for rural households in a conducive environment enabled adoption. Our findings prompt us to stress the importance of tailoring agricultural innovations to the realities and demands of rural households, and the need to design and deploy interventions on the basis of ex-ante knowledge on factors potentially determining their success or failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Verkaart
- Eastern and Southern Africa Program, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
- Development Economics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Kai Mausch
- Eastern and Southern Africa Program, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
- Impact Acceleration Unit, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Lieven Claessens
- Soil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
- Natural Resource Management Program, International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wichern J, van Heerwaarden J, de Bruin S, Descheemaeker K, van Asten PJA, Giller KE, van Wijk MT. Using household survey data to identify large-scale food security patterns across Uganda. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208714. [PMID: 30543661 PMCID: PMC6292625 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To target food security interventions for smallholder households, decision makers need large-scale information, such as maps on poverty, food security and key livelihood activities. Such information is often based on expert knowledge or aggregated data, despite the fact that food security and poverty are driven largely by processes at the household level. At present, it is unclear if and how household level information can contribute to the spatial prediction of such welfare indicators or to what extent local variability is ignored by current mapping efforts. A combination of geo-referenced household level information with spatially continuous information is an underused approach to quantify local and large-scale variation, while it can provide a direct estimate of the variability of welfare indicators at the most relevant scale. We applied a stepwise regression kriging procedure to translate point information to spatially explicit patterns and create country-wide predictions with associated uncertainty estimates for indicators on food availability and related livelihood activities using household survey data from Uganda. With few exceptions, predictions of the indicators were weak, highlighting the difficulty in capturing variability at larger scale. Household explanatory variables identified little additional variation compared to environmental explanatory variables alone. Spatial predictability was strongest for indicators whose distribution was determined by environmental gradients. In contrast, indicators of crops that were more ubiquitously present across agroecological zones showed large local variation, which often overruled large-scale patterns. Our procedure adds to existing approaches that often only show large-scale patterns by revealing that local variation in welfare is large. Interventions that aim to target the poor must recognise that diversity in livelihood activities for income generation within any given area often overrides the variability of livelihood activities between distant regions in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannike Wichern
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Joost van Heerwaarden
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sytze de Bruin
- Laboratory of Geo-information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katrien Descheemaeker
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark T. van Wijk
- International Livestock Research Institute, Sustainable Livestock Systems, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Jager I, Giller KE, Brouwer ID. Food and nutrient gaps in rural Northern Ghana: Does production of smallholder farming households support adoption of food-based dietary guidelines? PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204014. [PMID: 30212549 PMCID: PMC6136797 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) provide guidance to policy makers, the private sector and consumers to redesign food systems and to improve diets of vulnerable populations. As appropriate FBDGs are based on the actual dietary patterns and their costs, it is assumed that the recommended foods are available, affordable and acceptable for the population under study. Using quantitative dietary intake data of young children in rural Northern Ghana, we developed local FBDGs and studied whether these are supported by the diversity and quantity of the production of a household among 329 households. We found that 40% of rural Northern Ghanaian infants and young children were stunted and their nutrient intakes were far below the recommendations: the probability of adequacy for most nutrient intakes was less than 50%. At household level, the developed FBDGs were, on average, unable to sufficiently cover the household requirements for fat (60.4% of recommended nutrient intake (RNI)), calcium (34.3% RNI), iron (60.3% RNI), vitamin A (39.1% RNI), vitamin B12 (2.3% RNI) and vitamin C (54.6% RNI). This implies that even when these FBDGs are fully adopted the requirements for these nutrients will not be met. In addition, the nutrient needs and food needs (according to the developed FBDGs) of a household were only marginally covered by their own food production. The food production of over half the households supplied insufficient calcium (75.7%), vitamin A (100%), vitamin B12 (100%) and vitamin C (77.5%) to cover their needs. The food production of about 60% of the households did not cover their required quantities of grains and legumes and none covered their required quantities of vegetables. Further analysis of the food gaps at district and national level showed that sufficient grains were available at both levels (267% and 148%, respectively) to meet requirements; availability of legumes was sufficient at district level (268%) but not at national level (52%); and vegetables were insufficient at both levels (2% and 49%, respectively). Diversifying household food production is often proposed as a means to increase the diversity of foods available and thereby increasing dietary diversity of rural populations. We found that the diversity of the production of a household was indeed positively related with their food and nutrient coverage. However, the diversity of the production of a household and their food and nutrient coverage were not related with children's dietary diversity and nutrient adequacy. Our results show that the production of a households does not support the adoption of FBDGs in rural Northern Ghana, especially for vegetables. This suggests that the promotion of FBDGs through nutrition education or behaviour change communications activities alone is insufficient to lead to improvements in diets. Additional strategies are needed to increase the food availability and accessibility of the households, especially that of fruits and vegetables, such as diversification of the crops grown, increased production of specific crops and market-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse de Jager
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge D. Brouwer
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wolde-meskel E, van Heerwaarden J, Abdulkadir B, Kassa S, Aliyi I, Degefu T, Wakweya K, Kanampiu F, Giller KE. Additive yield response of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) to rhizobium inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer across smallholder farms in Ethiopia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2018; 261:144-152. [PMID: 29970943 PMCID: PMC5946702 DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2017] [Revised: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The impacts of rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of chickpea have mainly been tested in experiments conducted in greenhouses or on research stations. We report the response of the crop to inoculation (I) and phosphorus fertilizer (P) application across a large number of smallholder's farms over four regions of Ethiopia, covering diverse soil fertility and agro-ecological conditions. Increased grain yields due to the soil fertility treatments was evident for 99% target farmers. On average, I and P increased grain yield by 21% and 25% respectively, while the combined application of I and P resulted in a 38% increase. However, observed grain yields on control plots and responses to the treatments on individual farms varied greatly, and relative yield responses (%; yield of P and/I minus control yield, divided by control yield) ranged from 3% to 138%. With the exception of a few extremely poorly yielding locations, average responses to P and I were high across a wide range of control yields, indicating the possibility of boosting chickpea productivity for smallholders with P fertilizer and inoculant technology. Variation in response to rhizobium inoculation was mostly independent of agro-ecology and soil type although it was found to be low on a number of farms with extremely high N contents (%). Assuming that a relative yield increase of 10% due to treatment effects is required to be visible, 71%, 73% and 92% of the farmers observed a yield benefit by applying P, I, and P + I, respectively. The results are discussed with respect to the additive benefits of P fertilizers and rhizobial inoculation and their implications for wide scale promotion of inoculant technology to smallholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joost van Heerwaarden
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Birhan Abdulkadir
- International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Sofia Kassa
- Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debre-Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Bishoftu, Ethiopia
| | - Ibsa Aliyi
- School of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
| | - Tulu Degefu
- International Crop Research Institute for SemiArid Tropics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Kissi Wakweya
- Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Robe, Ethiopia
| | - Fred Kanampiu
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rurangwa E, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE. Benefits of inoculation, P fertilizer and manure on yields of common bean and soybean also increase yield of subsequent maize. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2018; 261:219-229. [PMID: 29970950 PMCID: PMC5946694 DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Common bean and soybean yield poorly on smallholder farms in Rwanda. We evaluated the benefits of inoculation combined with P fertilizer and manure on yields of common bean and soybean in three agro-ecological zones (AEZs), and their residual effects on a subsequent maize crop. In the first season, the treatments included inoculum, three rates of manure, and two rates of P fertilizer, with nine replications (three per AEZ). Both legumes responded well to inoculation if applied together with manure and P fertilizer. Grain yields varied from 1.0 t ha-1 to 1.7 t ha-1 in unamended control plots to 4.8 t ha-1 for common bean and 3.8 t ha-1 for soybean in inoculated plots with both P and manure addition. The response of common bean and soybean to inputs varied greatly between AEZs. In the AEZ with low and erratic rainfall (Bugesera), yields of both legumes and maize were low and maize after soybean failed to yield any grain due to drought. In this regard, early maturing legume varieties are advised in regions of low rainfall. Responses of maize to an input applied to the legumes strongly increased when other inputs were applied together to the legume. This allowed greater maize yields which ranged from 0.8 t ha-1 in control plots to 6.5 t ha-1 in treatments previously inoculated with P and manure added for maize grown after common bean and from 1.9 t ha-1 in control plots to 5.3 t ha-1 for maize grown after soybean. The amount of N2-fixed measured using the 15N-natural abundance method differed between the two legumes and varied between 15 and 198 kg N2 ha-1 for common bean and between 15 and 186 kg N2 ha-1 for soybean and differed enormously among treatments and AEZs. Application of inputs to the legumes also resulted in enhanced N and P uptake of the subsequent maize. The use of inoculum combined with manure and P fertilizer is a good option for smallholder farmers growing common bean and soybean in rotation with maize. We observed strong effects of environment and call for care when targeting crops and technologies for sustainable crop production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edouard Rurangwa
- Rwanda Agriculture Board, P.O. Box 5016, Kigali, Rwanda
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard Vanlauwe
- Natural Resource Management Research Area, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gould F, Amasino RM, Brossard D, Buell CR, Dixon RA, Falck-Zepeda JB, Gallo MA, Giller KE, Glenna LL, Griffin T, Hamaker BR, Kareiva PM, Magraw D, Mallory-Smith C, Pixley KV, Ransom EP, Rodemeyer M, Stelly DM, Stewart CN, Whitaker RJ. Elevating the conversation about GE crops. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 35:302-304. [PMID: 28398318 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Gould
- North Carolina State, Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Genetic Engineering and Society Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard M Amasino
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Biochemistry, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Dominique Brossard
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Life Sciences Communication, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - C Robin Buell
- Michigan State University, Dept. of Plant Biology, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard A Dixon
- University of North Texas, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Denton, Texas, USA
| | - Jose B Falck-Zepeda
- International Food Policy Research Institute, Environment and Production Technology Division, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael A Gallo
- Rutgers University, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and CounterACT Research Center of Excellence, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ken E Giller
- Wageningen University, Plant Production Systems, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leland L Glenna
- Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Griffin
- Tufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Jaharis Family Center for Biomedical and Nutrition Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bruce R Hamaker
- Purdue University, Dept. of Food Science, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter M Kareiva
- University of California, Los Angeles, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel Magraw
- Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Carol Mallory-Smith
- Oregon State University, Dept. of Crop and Soil Science, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Kevin V Pixley
- CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo), Texcoco CP, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | - Elizabeth P Ransom
- University of Richmond, Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael Rodemeyer
- University of Virginia, Dept. of Engineering and Society, Charlottesville, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - David M Stelly
- Texas A&M University, Dept. of Soil and Crop Sciences, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - C Neal Stewart
- University of Tennessee, Dept. of Plant Sciences, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kermah M, Franke AC, Adjei-Nsiah S, Ahiabor BD, Abaidoo RC, Giller KE. Maize-grain legume intercropping for enhanced resource use efficiency and crop productivity in the Guinea savanna of northern Ghana. Field Crops Res 2017; 213:38-50. [PMID: 29104356 PMCID: PMC5614088 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Smallholder farmers in the Guinea savanna practise cereal-legume intercropping to mitigate risks of crop failure in mono-cropping. The productivity of cereal-legume intercrops could be influenced by the spatial arrangement of the intercrops and the soil fertility status. Knowledge on the effect of soil fertility status on intercrop productivity is generally lacking in the Guinea savanna despite the wide variability in soil fertility status in farmers' fields, and the productivity of within-row spatial arrangement of intercrops relative to the distinct-row systems under on-farm conditions has not been studied in the region. We studied effects of maize-legume spatial intercropping patterns and soil fertility status on resource use efficiency, crop productivity and economic profitability under on-farm conditions in the Guinea savanna. Treatments consisted of maize-legume intercropped within-row, 1 row of maize alternated with one row of legume, 2 rows of maize alternated with 2 rows of legume, a sole maize crop and a sole legume crop. These were assessed in the southern Guinea savanna (SGS) and the northern Guinea savanna (NGS) of northern Ghana for two seasons using three fields differing in soil fertility in each agro-ecological zone. Each treatment received 25 kg P and 30 kg K ha-1 at sowing, while maize received 25 kg (intercrop) or 50 kg (sole) N ha-1 at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing. The experiment was conducted in a randomised complete block design with each block of treatments replicated four times per fertility level at each site. Better soil conditions and rainfall in the SGS resulted in 48, 38 and 9% more maize, soybean and groundnut grain yield, respectively produced than in the NGS, while 11% more cowpea grain yield was produced in the NGS. Sole crops of maize and legumes produced significantly more grain yield per unit area than the respective intercrops of maize and legumes. Land equivalent ratios (LERs) of all intercrop patterns were greater than unity indicating more efficient and productive use of environmental resources by intercrops. Sole legumes intercepted more radiation than sole maize, while the interception by intercrops was in between that of sole legumes and sole maize. The intercrop however converted the intercepted radiation more efficiently into grain yield than the sole crops. Economic returns were greater for intercrops than for either sole crop. The within-row intercrop pattern was the most productive and lucrative system. Larger grain yields in the SGS and in fertile fields led to greater economic returns. However, intercropping systems in poorly fertile fields and in the NGS recorded greater LERs (1.16-1.81) compared with fertile fields (1.07-1.54) and with the SGS. This suggests that intercropping is more beneficial in less fertile fields and in more marginal environments such as the NGS. Cowpea and groundnut performed better than soybean when intercropped with maize, though the larger absolute grain yields of soybean resulted in larger net benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kermah
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author.
| | - Angelinus C. Franke
- Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
| | - Samuel Adjei-Nsiah
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box TL 06, Tamale, Ghana
| | | | - Robert C. Abaidoo
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.O. Box TL 06, Tamale, Ghana
- Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Arruda MRDE, Giller KE, Slingerland M. Where is sugarcane cropping expanding in the brazilian cerrado, and why? A case study. AN ACAD BRAS CIENC 2017; 89:2485-2493. [PMID: 28813093 DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201720150260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Sugarcane growing area in Brazil sharply expanded between 2000 and 2010 due to the increasing world demand for sugar and ethanol. Since this expansion of sugarcane is said to occur in areas covered by degraded pastures, it is likely not threatening the environment or food production. In order to verify this assumption, we investigate at farm and field levels which types of land use sugarcane cropping replaced between 2005 and 2010 and the reasons for farmers shifting or not shifting to sugarcane, as a case study in two counties in the state of Goiás. Within the studied period, sugarcane cropping expansion was related to large farms, lower risk perceived by farmers, and higher profitability compared with soybean and beef cattle-raising. For smallholders, particularly dairy farmers, the need to comply with the set-aside rules under Brazilian Forest Code (Código Florestal Brasileiro) made a shift to sugarcane less attractive, as it would have forced them to reduce farm cultivable area, with loss of incomes. From 30,408 ha under sugarcane surveyed, 45.7% had used to be pastures, 31% had previously been pastures rotated with soybean and maize, and 23.3% had been cropped exclusively with soybean or maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murilo R DE Arruda
- Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Rodovia AM-010, Km 29, (Estrada Manaus/Itacoatiara), Caixa Postal 319, 69010-970 Manaus, AM, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia Tropical, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Av. Rodrigo Octavio J. Ramos, 6200,69080-900 Manaus, AM, Brazil
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maja Slingerland
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rurinda J, van Wijk MT, Mapfumo P, Descheemaeker K, Supit I, Giller KE. Climate change and maize yield in southern Africa: what can farm management do? Glob Chang Biol 2015; 21:4588-4601. [PMID: 26251975 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
There is concern that food insecurity will increase in southern Africa due to climate change. We quantified the response of maize yield to projected climate change and to three key management options - planting date, fertilizer use and cultivar choice - using the crop simulation model, agricultural production systems simulator (APSIM), at two contrasting sites in Zimbabwe. Three climate periods up to 2100 were selected to cover both near- and long-term climates. Future climate data under two radiative forcing scenarios were generated from five global circulation models. The temperature is projected to increase significantly in Zimbabwe by 2100 with no significant change in mean annual total rainfall. When planting before mid-December with a high fertilizer rate, the simulated average grain yield for all three maize cultivars declined by 13% for the periods 2010-2039 and 2040-2069 and by 20% for 2070-2099 compared with the baseline climate, under low radiative forcing. Larger declines in yield of up to 32% were predicted for 2070-2099 with high radiative forcing. Despite differences in annual rainfall, similar trends in yield changes were observed for the two sites studied, Hwedza and Makoni. The yield response to delay in planting was nonlinear. Fertilizer increased yield significantly under both baseline and future climates. The response of maize to mineral nitrogen decreased with progressing climate change, implying a decrease in the optimal fertilizer rate in the future. Our results suggest that in the near future, improved crop and soil fertility management will remain important for enhanced maize yield. Towards the end of the 21st century, however, none of the farm management options tested in the study can avoid large yield losses in southern Africa due to climate change. There is a need to transform the current cropping systems of southern Africa to offset the negative impacts of climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jairos Rurinda
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
- Soil Fertility Consortium for Southern Africa (SOFECSA), University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Mark T van Wijk
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Paul Mapfumo
- Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
- Soil Fertility Consortium for Southern Africa (SOFECSA), University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Katrien Descheemaeker
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan Supit
- Earth System Science & Climate Adaptive Land Management, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ken E Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Giller KE, Andersson JA, Corbeels M, Kirkegaard J, Mortensen D, Erenstein O, Vanlauwe B. Beyond conservation agriculture. Front Plant Sci 2015; 6:870. [PMID: 26579139 PMCID: PMC4623198 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings, and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals, and biotechnology. Over the past 10 years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems, Wageningen UniversityWageningen, Netherlands
| | - Jens A. Andersson
- Sustainable Intensification Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Marc Corbeels
- Agro-ecology and Sustainable Intensification of Annual Crops, French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), c/o Embrapa-CerradosPlanaltina, Brazil
| | - John Kirkegaard
- CSIRO Agriculture, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation AgricultureCanberra, ACT, Australia
| | - David Mortensen
- Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, PA, USA
| | - Olaf Erenstein
- Socio-economics Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Bernard Vanlauwe
- Natural Resource Management Research Area, International Institute of Tropical AgricultureNairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
Leonardo WJ, van de Ven GWJ, Udo H, Kanellopoulos A, Sitoe A, Giller KE. Labour not land constrains agricultural production and food self-sufficiency in maize-based smallholder farming systems in Mozambique. Food Secur 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s12571-015-0480-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
44
|
Bucagu C, Vanlauwe B, Van Wijk MT, Giller KE. Resource use and food self-sufficiency at farm scale within two agro-ecological zones of Rwanda. Food Secur 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s12571-014-0382-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
45
|
Ebanyat P, de Ridder N, de Jager A, Delve RJ, Bekunda MA, Giller KE. Drivers of land use change and household determinants of sustainability in smallholder farming systems of Eastern Uganda. Popul Environ 2010; 31:474-506. [PMID: 20628448 PMCID: PMC2889287 DOI: 10.1007/s11111-010-0104-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa have undergone changes in land use, productivity and sustainability. Understanding of the drivers that have led to changes in land use in these systems and factors that influence the systems' sustainability is useful to guide appropriate targeting of intervention strategies for improvement. We studied low input Teso farming systems in eastern Uganda from 1960 to 2001 in a place-based analysis combined with a comparative analysis of similar low input systems in southern Mali. This study showed that policy-institutional factors next to population growth have driven land use changes in the Teso systems, and that nutrient balances of farm households are useful indicators to identify their sustainability. During the period of analysis, the fraction of land under cultivation increased from 46 to 78%, and communal grazing lands nearly completely disappeared. Cropping diversified over time; cassava overtook cotton and millet in importance, and rice emerged as an alternative cash crop. Impacts of political instability, such as the collapse of cotton marketing and land management institutions, of communal labour arrangements and aggravation of cattle rustling were linked to the changes. Crop productivity in the farming systems is poor and nutrient balances differed between farm types. Balances of N, P and K were all positive for larger farms (LF) that had more cattle and derived a larger proportion of their income from off-farm activities, whereas on the medium farms (MF), small farms with cattle (SF1) and without cattle (SF2) balances were mostly negative. Sustainability of the farming system is driven by livestock, crop production, labour and access to off-farm income. Building private public partnerships around market-oriented crops can be an entry point for encouraging investment in use of external nutrient inputs to boost productivity in such African farming systems. However, intervention strategies should recognise the diversity and heterogeneity between farms to ensure efficient use of these external inputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ebanyat
- Department of Soil Science, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Nico de Ridder
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Andre de Jager
- Wageningen University and Research Centre-Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), P.O. Box 29703, 2502 LS Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Delve
- Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (TSBF-CIAT), P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mateete A. Bekunda
- Department of Soil Science, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ken E. Giller
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Anyango B, Wilson KJ, Beynon JL, Giller KE. Diversity of Rhizobia Nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Two Kenyan Soils with Contrasting pHs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 61:4016-21. [PMID: 16535165 PMCID: PMC1388601 DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.11.4016-4021.1995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhizobia were isolated from two Kenyan soils with pHs of 4.5 and 6.8 and characterized on the basis of their host ranges for nodulation and nitrogen fixation, colony morphologies, restriction fragment fingerprints, and hybridization with a nifH probe. The populations of rhizobia nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris in the two soils were similar in numbers and in effectiveness of N(inf2) fixation but were markedly different in composition. The population in the Naivasha soil (pH 6.8) was dominated by isolates specific in host range for nodulation to P. vulgaris; these all had multiple copies, in most cases four, of the structural nitrogenase gene nifH. Only one of the isolates from this soil formed effective nodules on Leucaena leucocephala, and this isolate had only a single copy of nifH. By contrast, the population in the acid Daka-ini soil (pH 4.5) was composed largely of broad-host-range isolates which had single copies of nifH. The isolates from the Daka-ini soil which were specific to P. vulgaris generally had three copies of nifH, although one isolate had only two copies. These rhizobial isolates are indigenous to Kenyan soils and yet have marked similarities to previously described Rhizobium species from other continents.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kaschuk G, Hungria M, Leffelaar PA, Giller KE, Kuyper TW. Differences in photosynthetic behaviour and leaf senescence of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) dependent on N2 fixation or nitrate supply. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2010; 12:60-9. [PMID: 20653888 DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Biological N(2) fixation can fulfil the N demand of legumes but may cost as much as 14% of current photosynthate. This photosynthate (C) sink strength would result in loss of productivity if rates of photosynthesis did not increase to compensate for the costs. We measured rates of leaf photosynthesis, concentrations of N, ureides and protein in leaves of two soybean cultivars (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) differing in potential shoot biomass production, either associated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains, or amended with nitrate. Our results show that the C costs of biological N(2) fixation can be compensated by increased photosynthesis. Nodulated plants shifted N metabolism towards ureide accumulation at the start of the reproductive stage, at which time leaf N concentration of nodulated plants was greater than that of N-fertilized plants. The C sink strength of N(2) fixation increased photosynthetic N use efficiency at the beginning of plant development. At later stages, although average protein concentrations were similar between the groups of plants, maximum leaf protein of nodulated plants occurred a few days later than in N-fertilized plants. The chlorophyll content of nodulated plants remained high until the pod-filling stage, whereas the chlorophyll content of N-fertilized plants started to decrease as early as the flowering stage. These results suggest that, due to higher C sink strength and efficient N(2) fixation, nodulated plants achieve higher rates of photosynthesis and have delayed leaf senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kaschuk
- Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nyamangara J, Piha MI, Giller KE. Effect of combined cattle manure and mineral nitrogen on maize N uptake and grain yield. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004. [DOI: 10.4314/acsj.v11i4.27579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
49
|
Abstract
The natural rhizobial populations of Calliandra calothyrsus, Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala and Sesbania sesban were assessed in soils from nine sites across tropical areas of three continents. The rhizobial population size varied from undetectable numbers to 1.8 x 104 cells/g of soil depending on the trap host and the soil. Calliandra calothyrsus was the most promiscuous legume, nodulating in eight soils, while S. sesban nodulated in only one of the soils. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analyses of the 16S rRNA gene and the internally transcribed spacer (ITS) region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes were used to assess the diversity and relative abundance of rhizobia trapped from seven of the soils by C. calothyrsus, G. sepium and L. leucocephala. Representatives of the 16S rRNA RFLP groups were also subjected to sequence analysis of the first 950 base pairs of the 16S rRNA gene. Eighty ITS groups were obtained, with none of the ITS types being sampled in more than one soil. RFLP analysis of the 16S rRNA yielded 23 'species' groups distributed among the Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Sinorhizobium and Agrobacterium branches of the rhizobial phylogenetic tree. The phylogeny of the isolates was independent of the site or host of isolation, with different rhizobial groups associated with each host across the soils from widely separated geographical regions. Although rhizobial populations in soils sampled from the centre of diversity of the host legumes were the most genetically diverse, soil acidity was highly correlated with the diversity of ITS types. Our results support the hypothesis that the success of these tree legumes in soils throughout the tropics is the result of their relative promiscuity (permissiveness) allowing nodulation with diverse indigenous rhizobial types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Bala
- Imperial College at Wye, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) production in the smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe is based on both organic and mineral nutrient sources. A study was conducted to determine the effect of composted cattle manure, mineral N fertilizer, and their combinations on NO3 concentrations in leachate leaving the root zone and to establish N fertilization rates that minimize leaching. Maize was grown for three seasons (1996-1997, 1997-1998, and 1998-1999) in field lysimeters repacked with a coarse-grained sandy soil (Typic Kandiustalf). Leachate volumes ranged from 480 to 509 mm yr(-1) (1395 mm rainfall) in 1996-1997, 296 to 335 mm yr(-1) (840 mm rainfall) in 1997-1998, and 606 to 635 mm yr(-1) (1387 mm rainfall) in 1998-1999. Mineral N fertilizer, especially the high rate (120 kg N ha(-1)), and manure plus mineral N fertilizer combinations resulted in high NO3 leachate concentrations (up to 34 mg N L(-1)) and NO3 losses (up to 56 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)) in 1996-1997, which represent both environmental and economic concerns. Although the leaching losses were relatively small in the other seasons, they are still of great significance in African smallholder farming where fertilizer is unaffordable for most farmers. Nitrate leaching from sole manure treatments was relatively low (average of less than 20 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)), whereas the crop uptake efficiency of mineral N fertilizer was enhanced by up to 26% when manure and mineral N fertilizer were applied in combination. The low manure (12.5 Mg ha(-1)) plus 60 kg N ha(-1) fertilizer treatment was best in terms of maintaining dry matter yield and minimizing N leaching losses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nyamangara
- Dep. of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|