1
|
Polden M, Jones A, Essman M, Adams J, Bishop T, Burgoine T, Donohue A, Sharp S, White M, Smith R, Robinson E. Point-of-choice kilocalorie labelling practices in large, out-of-home food businesses: a preobservational versus post observational study of labelling practices following implementation of The Calorie Labelling (Out of Home Sector) (England) Regulations 2021. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080405. [PMID: 38604637 PMCID: PMC11015320 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES On 6 April 2022, the UK government implemented mandatory kilocalorie (kcal) labelling regulations for food and drink products sold in the out-of-home food sector (OHFS) in England. Previous assessments of kcal labelling practices in the UK OHFS found a low prevalence of voluntary implementation and poor compliance with labelling recommendations. This study aimed to examine changes in labelling practices preimplementation versus post implementation of mandatory labelling regulations in 2022. METHODS In August-December 2021 (preimplementation) and August-November 2022 (post implementation), large OHFS businesses (250 or more employees) subject to labelling regulations were visited. At two time points, a researcher visited the same 117 food outlets (belonging to 90 unique businesses) across four local authorities in England. Outlets were rated for compliance with government regulations for whether kcal labelling was provided at any or all point of choice, provided for all eligible food and drink items, provided per portion for sharing items, if labelling was clear and legible and if kcal reference information was displayed. RESULTS There was a significant increase (21% preimplementation vs 80% post implementation, OR=40.98 (95% CI 8.08 to 207.74), p<0.001) in the proportion of outlets providing any kcal labelling at point-of-choice post implementation. Only 15% of outlets met all labelling compliance criteria post implementation, with a minority of outlets not presenting labelling in a clear (33%) or legible (29%) way. CONCLUSION The number of large businesses in the OHFS providing kcal labelling increased following the implementation of mandatory labelling regulations. However, around one-fifth of eligible outlets sampled were not providing kcal labelling 4-8 months after the regulations came into force, and the majority of businesses only partially complied with government guidance. More effective enforcement may be required to further improve kcal labelling practices in the OHFS in England. PREREGISTRATION Study protocol and analysis strategy preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pfnm6/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Polden
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Michael Essman
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jean Adams
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tom Bishop
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Stephen Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martin White
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Smith
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Eric Robinson
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Essman M, Burgoine T, Cameron A, Jones A, Potvin Kent M, Polden M, Robinson E, Sacks G, Smith RD, Vanderlee L, White C, White M, Hammond D, Adams J. A multi-country comparison of jurisdictions with and without mandatory nutrition labelling policies in restaurants: analysis of behaviours associated with menu labelling in the 2019 International Food Policy Study. Public Health Nutr 2023; 26:2595-2606. [PMID: 37661595 PMCID: PMC10641604 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980023001775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine differences in noticing and use of nutrition information comparing jurisdictions with and without mandatory menu labelling policies and examine differences among sociodemographic groups. DESIGN Cross-sectional data from the International Food Policy Study (IFPS) online survey. SETTING IFPS participants from Australia, Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom and USA in 2019. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 18-99; n 19 393. RESULTS Participants in jurisdictions with mandatory policies were significantly more likely to notice and use nutrition information, order something different, eat less of their order and change restaurants compared to jurisdictions without policies. For noticed nutrition information, the differences between policy groups were greatest comparing older to younger age groups and comparing high education (difference of 10·7 %, 95 % CI 8·9, 12·6) to low education (difference of 4·1 %, 95 % CI 1·8, 6·3). For used nutrition information, differences were greatest comparing high education (difference of 4·9 %, 95 % CI 3·5, 6·4) to low education (difference of 1·8 %, 95 % CI 0·2, 3·5). Mandatory labelling was associated with an increase in ordering something different among the majority ethnicity group and a decrease among the minority ethnicity group. For changed restaurant visited, differences were greater for medium and high education compared to low education, and differences were greater for higher compared to lower income adequacy. CONCLUSIONS Participants living in jurisdictions with mandatory nutrition information in restaurants were more likely to report noticing and using nutrition information, as well as greater efforts to modify their consumption. However, the magnitudes of these differences were relatively small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Essman
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adrian Cameron
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Andrew Jones
- School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Monique Potvin Kent
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Megan Polden
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eric Robinson
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gary Sacks
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | | | - Lana Vanderlee
- School of Nutrition, Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), INAF, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Christine White
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Martin White
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Hammond
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Jean Adams
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Polden M, Jones A, Adams J, Bishop T, Burgoine T, Essman M, Sharp SJ, Smith R, White M, Robinson E. Kilocalorie labelling in the out-of-home sector: an observational study of business practices and consumer behaviour prior to implementation of the mandatory calorie labelling policy in England, 2022. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1088. [PMID: 37280640 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16033-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regulations mandating kilocalorie (kcal) labelling for large businesses in the out-of-home food sector (OHFS) came into force on 6th April 2022 as a policy to reduce obesity in England. To provide indicators of potential reach and impact, kcal labelling practices were studied in the OHFS, and customer purchasing and consumption behaviours prior to implementation of the mandatory kcal labelling policy in England. METHODS From August-December 2021, large OHFS businesses subject to the kcal labelling regulations were visited prior to regulations coming into force on 6th April 2022. 3308 customers were recruited from 330 outlets and collected survey information on the number of kcal purchased and consumed by customers, customers' knowledge of the kcal content of their purchases, and customers noticing and use of kcal labelling. In a subset of 117 outlets, data was collected on nine recommended kcal labelling practices. RESULTS The average number of kcals purchased (1013 kcal, SD = 632 kcal) was high with 69% of purchases exceeding the recommendation of a maximum of 600 kcal per meal. Participants underestimated the energy content of their purchased meals by on average 253 kcal (SD = 644 kcals). In outlets providing kcal labelling in which customer survey data was collected, a minority of customers reported noticing (21%) or using (20%) kcal labelling. Out of the 117 outlets assessed for kcal labelling practices, 24 (21%) provided any in-store kcal labelling. None of the outlets met all nine aspects of recommended labelling practices. CONCLUSIONS Prior to implementation of 2022 kcal labelling policy, the majority of sampled OHFS large business outlets in England did not provide kcal labelling. Few customers noticed or used the labels and on average customers purchased and consumed substantially more energy than recommended in public health guidelines. The findings suggest that reliance on voluntary action for kcal labelling implementation failed to produce widespread, consistent, and adequate kcal labelling practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Polden
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | - Jean Adams
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tom Bishop
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Essman
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen J Sharp
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Smith
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin White
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eric Robinson
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang Y, Burgoine T, Essman M, Theis DRZ, Bishop TRP, Adams J. Monitoring the Nutrient Composition of Food Prepared Out-of-Home in the United Kingdom: Database Development and Case Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022; 8:e39033. [PMID: 36074559 PMCID: PMC9501650 DOI: 10.2196/39033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hand transcribing nutrient composition data from websites requires extensive human resources and is prone to error. As a result, there are limited nutrient composition data on food prepared out of the home in the United Kingdom. Such data are crucial for understanding and monitoring the out-of-home food environment, which aids policy making. Automated data collection from publicly available sources offers a potential low-resource solution to address this gap. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we describe the first UK longitudinal nutritional database of food prepared out of the home, MenuTracker. As large chains will be required to display calorie information on their UK menus from April 2022, we also aimed to identify which chains reported their nutritional information online in November 2021. In a case study to demonstrate the utility of MenuTracker, we estimated the proportions of menu items exceeding recommended energy and nutrient intake (eg, >600 kcal per meal). METHODS We have collated nutrient composition data of menu items sold by large chain restaurants quarterly since March 2021. Large chains were defined as those with 250 employees or more (those covered by the new calorie labeling policy) or belonging to the top 100 restaurants based on sales volume. We developed scripts in Python to automate the data collection process from business websites. Various techniques were used to harvest web data and extract data from nutritional tables in PDF format. RESULTS Automated Python programs reduced approximately 85% of manual work, totaling 500 hours saved for each wave of data collection. As of January 2022, MenuTracker has 76,405 records from 88 large out-of-home food chains at 4 different time points (ie, March, June, September, and December) in 2021. In constructing the database, we found that one-quarter (24.5%, 256/1043) of large chains, which are likely to be subject to the United Kingdom's calorie menu labeling regulations, provided their nutritional information online in November 2021. Across these chains, 24.7% (16,391/66,295) of menu items exceeded the UK government's recommendation of a maximum of 600 kcal for a single meal. Comparable figures were 46.4% (29,411/63,416) for saturated fat, 34.7% (21,964/63,388) for total fat, 17.6% (11,260/64,051) for carbohydrates, 17.8% (11,434/64,059) for sugar, and 35.2% (22,588/64,086) for salt. Furthermore, 0.7% to 7.1% of the menu items exceeded the maximum daily recommended intake for these nutrients. CONCLUSIONS MenuTracker is a valuable resource that harnesses the power of data science techniques to use publicly available data online. Researchers, policy makers, and consumers can use MenuTracker to understand and assess foods available from out-of-home food outlets. The methods used in development are available online and can be used to establish similar databases elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuru Huang
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Essman
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Dolly R Z Theis
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tom R P Bishop
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Adams
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Essman M, Stoltze FM, Carpentier FD, Swart EC, Taillie LS. Examining the news media reaction to a national sugary beverage tax in South Africa: a quantitative content analysis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:454. [PMID: 33676468 PMCID: PMC7937301 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10460-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background South Africa was the first sub-Saharan African country to implement a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax called the Health Promotion Levy (HPL) in April 2018. Given news media can increase public awareness and sway opinions, this study analyzed how the media represented the HPL, including expressions of support or challenge, topics associated with the levy, and stakeholder views of the HPL. Methods We performed a quantitative content analysis of online South African news articles related to the HPL published between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. We coded the presence or absence of mentions related to health and economic effects of the HPL and HPL support or opposition. Prevalence of these mentions, overall and by source (industry, government, academics, other), were analyzed with Pearson χ2 and post-hoc Fisher exact tests. Results Across all articles, 81% mentioned health, and 65% mentioned economics topics. 54% of articles expressed support, 26% opposition, and 20% a balanced view of the HPL. All sources except industry expressed majority support for the HPL. Health reasons were the most common justifications for support, and economic harms were the most common justifications for opposition. Statements that sugar intake is not related to obesity, the HPL will not reduce SSB intake, and the HPL will cause industry or economic harm were all disproportionately high in industry sources (92, 80, and 81% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (p < 0.001). Statements that sugar intake is related to obesity and non-communicable diseases were disproportionately high in both government (46 and 54% vs 31% prevalence in total sample) (p < 0.001) and academics (33 and 38% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (p < 0.05). Statements that the HPL will improve health and the HPL will reduce health care costs were disproportionately high in government (47% vs 31% prevalence in total sample) (p < 0.001) and academics (44% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusions Industry expressed no support for the HPL, whereas academics, government, and other sources mainly expressed support. Future studies would be improved by linking news media exposure to SSB intake data to better understand the effects news media may have on individual behavior change. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10460-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Essman
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Fernanda Mediano Stoltze
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth C Swart
- Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Rd, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lindsey Smith Taillie
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Essman M, Stoltze FM, Carpentier FD, Swart R, Taillie LS. Examining the News Media Reaction to a National Sugary Beverage Tax in South Africa: A Quantitative Content Analysis. Curr Dev Nutr 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa064_003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
South Africa was the first sub-Saharan African country to implement a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax called the Health Promotion Levy (HPL) in April 2018. Given news media can increase public awareness and sway opinions, this study analyzed how the media represented the HPL, including expressions of support or challenge, topics associated with the levy, and stakeholder views of the HPL.
Methods
We performed a quantitative content analysis of online South African news articles related to the HPL published between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. We coded the presence or absence of mentions related to health and economic effects of the HPL and HPL support or opposition. Prevalence of these mentions, overall and by source (industry, government, academics, other), were analyzed with Pearson χ2 and post-hoc Fisher exact tests.
Results
Across all articles, 81% mentioned health, and 65% mentioned economics topics. 54% of articles expressed support, 26% opposition, and 20% a balanced view of the HPL. All sources except industry expressed majority support for the HPL. Health reasons were the most common justifications for support, and economic harms were the most common justifications for opposition. Statements that sugar intake is not related to obesity, the HPL will not reduce SSB intake, and the HPL will cause industry or economic harm were all disproportionately high in industry sources (92%, 80%, and 81% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (P < 0.001). Statements that sugar intake is related to obesity and non-communicable diseases were disproportionately high in both government (46% and 54% vs 31% prevalence in total sample) (P < 0.001) and academics (33% and 38% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (P < 0.05). Statements that the HPL will improve health and the HPL will reduce health care costs were disproportionately high in government (47% vs 31% prevalence in total sample) (P < 0.001) and academics (44% vs 25% prevalence in total sample) (P < 0.05), respectively.
Conclusions
Industry expressed no support for the HPL, whereas academics, government, and other sources mainly expressed support. Future studies would be improved by linking news media exposure to SSB intake data to better understand the effects news media may have on individual behavior change.
Funding Sources
This research was supported by Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Carolina Population Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lindsey Smith Taillie
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Population obesity and associated morbidities pose significant public health and economic burdens in the United Kingdom, United States, and globally. As a response, public health initiatives often seek to change individuals' unhealthy behavior, with the dual aims of improving their health and conserving health care resources. One such initiative-taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages-has sparked considerable ethical debate. Prominent in the debate are arguments seeking to demonstrate the supposed impermissibility of SSB taxes and similar policies on the grounds that they interfere with individuals' freedom and autonomy. Commentators have often assumed that a policy intended to restrict or change private individuals' consumption behavior will necessarily curtail freedom and, as a corollary, will undermine individuals' autonomy with respect to their consumption choices. Yet this assumption involves a conceptual mistake. To address the misunderstanding, it's necessary to attend to the differences between negative liberty, freedom of options, and autonomy. Ultimately, concerns about negative liberty, freedom, and autonomy do not provide strong grounds for opposing SSB taxes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Essman M, Popkin BM, Corvalán C, Reyes M, Taillie LS. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake among Chilean Preschoolers and Adolescents in 2016: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Nutrients 2018; 10:nu10111767. [PMID: 30445671 PMCID: PMC6265687 DOI: 10.3390/nu10111767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chile has the highest sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sales of any country and a growing burden of childhood obesity. This study examines SSB intake in Chilean children after a 5% SSB tax increase in 2014 but prior to marketing, labeling, and school policies implemented in 2016. METHODS 24-h recalls were collected in 2016 from two cohorts comprised of preschoolers 3⁻5 years of age (n = 961) and adolescents 12⁻14 years of age (n = 770) from low⁻moderate income neighborhoods. Beverages were categorized as regulated or unregulated according to whether they exceeded nutrient thresholds established by the 2016 policies. RESULTS Preschoolers consumed mainly beverage calories from regulated dairy beverages and substitutes (109 kcal, SD 30), unregulated dairy beverages (102 kcal, SD 24), and regulated fruit and vegetables drinks (44 kcal, SD 20). For adolescents, the greatest contributions came from regulated sodas (77 kcal, SD 47), regulated dairy beverages and substitutes (41 kcal, SD 16), and unregulated coffee and tea (41 kcal, SD 11). Overall, regulated beverages provided a greater proportion of calories than unregulated for preschoolers (15.0% vs. 11.8%) and for adolescents (9.1% vs. 5.0%). CONCLUSIONS Before major policy implementation, regulated beverages accounted for a higher percentage of energy intake than unregulated beverages among both age groups. Future research will be needed to evaluate the impact of Chile's new policies on sugary beverage intake in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Essman
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA.
| | - Barry M Popkin
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA.
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524, USA.
| | - Camila Corvalán
- Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago 7830490, Chile.
| | - Marcela Reyes
- Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago 7830490, Chile.
| | - Lindsey Smith Taillie
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400, USA.
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rayfield S, Mohamed-Ahmed O, Chilundika N, Essman M. PP19 Successful promotion of fruit consumption in the workplace: posters versus price – a comparison of two interventions. Br J Soc Med 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204726.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|