Perioperative dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (VESPER): survival endpoints at 5 years in an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The optimal perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is not defined. The VESPER (French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group and French Association of Urology V05) trial reported improved 3-year progression-free survival with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, but not in the overall perioperative setting. In this Article, we report on the secondary endpoints of overall survival and time to death due to bladder cancer at 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

VESPER was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 28 university hospitals or comprehensive cancer centres in France, in which adults (age ≤18 years and ≤80 years) with primary bladder cancer and histologically confirmed muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma were randomly allocated (1:1; block size four) to treatment with dd-MVAC (every 2 weeks for a total of six cycles) or GC (every 3 weeks for a total of four cycles). Overall survival and time to death due to bladder cancer (presented as 5-year cumulative incidence of death due to bladder cancer) was analysed by intention to treat (ITT) in all randomly assigned patients. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the treatment groups compared with log-rank test stratified for mode of administration of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and lymph node involvement. Time to death due to bladder cancer was analysed with an Aalen model for competing risks and a Fine and Gray regression model stratified for the same two covariates. Results were presented for the total perioperative population and for the neoadjuvant and adjuvant subgroups. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01812369, and is complete.

FINDINGS

From Feb 25, 2013, to March 1, 2018, 500 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 493 were included in the final ITT population (245 [50%] in the GC group and 248 [50%] in the dd-MVAC group; 408 [83%] male and 85 [17%] female). 437 (89%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 5·3 years (IQR 5·1-5·4); 190 deaths at the 5-year cutoff were reported. In the perioperative setting (total ITT population), we found no evidence of association of overall survival at 5 years with dd-MVAC treatment versus GC treatment (64% [95% CI 58-70] vs 56% [50-63], stratified hazard ratio [HRstrat] 0·79 [95% CI 0·59-1·05]). Time to death due to bladder cancer was increased in the dd-MVAC group compared with in the GC group (5-year cumulative incidence of death: 27% [95% CI 21-32] vs 40% [34-46], HRstrat 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·84]). In the neoadjuvant subgroup, overall survival at 5 years was improved in the dd-MVAC group versus the GC group (66% [95% CI 60-73] vs 57% [50-64], HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·52-0·97]), as was time to death due to bladder cancer (5-year cumulative incidence: 24% [18-30] vs 38% [32-45], HR 0·55 [0·39-0·78]). In the adjuvant subgroup, the results were not conclusive due to the small sample size. Bladder cancer progression was the cause of death for 157 (83%) of the 190 deaths; other causes of death included cardiovascular events (eight [4%] deaths), deaths related to chemotherapy toxicity (four [2%]), and secondary cancers (four [2%]).

INTERPRETATION

Our results on overall survival at 5 years were in accordance with the primary endpoint analysis (3-year progression-free survival). We found no evidence of improved overall survival with dd-MVAC over GC in the perioperative setting, but the data support the use of six cycles of dd-MVAC over four cycles of GC in the neoadjuvant setting. These results should impact practice and future trials of immunotherapy in bladder cancer.

FUNDING

French National Cancer Institute.

Rationale for Prostate-Specific-Membrane-Antigen-Targeted Radionuclide Theranostic Applied to Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma, is also highly expressed in the neovessels of various solid tumors, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In the VISION phase III clinical trial, PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) with lutetium 177 demonstrated a 4-month overall survival OS benefit compared to the best standard of care in heavily pretreated metastatic prostate cancer. Despite the improvement in the management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immunotherapy, there is still a need for new treatments for patients who progress despite these drugs. In this study, we discuss the rationale of PRLT applied to the treavtment of mccRCC.

Extracranial germ cell tumours in children and adolescents: Results from the French TGM13 protocol

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) exposes to dose-dependent toxicities. The TGM13-NS protocol (EudraCT 2013-004039-60) aimed to decrease the chemotherapy burden compared to the previous TGM95 protocol while maintaining the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) at 80% or more.

PROCEDURE

Patients less than 19 years of age with disseminated NSGCT were enrolled (May 2014 to May 2019) and stratified into four groups: two intermediate-risk (IR: localised tumour with low tumour markers [TM]) groups treated with VBP (vinblastine-bleomycin-cisplatin): three courses for IR1 (ovarian tumour any age/testis tumour less than or equal to 10 years) and four courses for IR2 (extragonadal tumour 10 years or less) groups, and two high-risk (HR: metastatic and/or high TM) groups treated with etoposide-cisplatin and either ifosfamide (VIP) or bleomycin (BEP): three courses for HR1 (ovarian tumour any age/testis tumour less than or equal to 10 years and low TM/testis tumour more than 10 years and very low TM) groups and four courses for HR2 (remainder) groups.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were included: median age of 12.8 years (0.4-18.9); tumour sites: 44 ovaries, 37 testes and 34 extragonadal. The 5-year EFS and overall survival (OS) were 87% (95% CI: 80-92) and 95% (89-98), respectively (median follow-up: 3.5 years, range: 0.2-5.9), similar to those of the TGM95 protocol (5-year EFS 89% (84-93), 5-year OS 93% (89-95), p = .561). The 5-year EFS were 93% (95% CI: 80-98), 88% (71-95) and 79% (62-90) for ovarian, testicular and extragonadal tumours, respectively. The 5-year EFS varied (p = .02) according to the risk groups: 90% (66-97), 64% (30-85), 95% (72-99) and 87% (74-94) for IR1, IR2, HR1 and HR2, respectively. TM decline adjusted to tumour site, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level revealed a prognostic impact of time to normalisation on EFS: HR = 1.03 (1.003-1.007).

CONCLUSION

Risk-adapted and globally decreased chemotherapy burden maintains excellent outcomes, exclusive of the IR2 group, which warrants more intensive chemotherapy.

Natural history of patients with muscle metastases from renal cell carcinoma: Results of the French national ARTEMIS study

618

Background: Muscle metastases (MM) are among rare secondary locations in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Current guidelines do not provide specific advice on the management of these patients. There is a lack of scientific literature on the subject, mainly based on case reports or small retrospective monocentric cohorts. To date, therefore, there remains uncertainty about the clinical history, prognosis, and appropriate management of patients with MM. Methods: ARTEMIS is an ambispective national French multicenter, non-interventional study. It was opened to patients with metastatic RCC who had MM. The study was designed to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), describe diagnostic and treatment modalities, and treatment-related serious adverse events in case of local treatments (TR-SAEs). Results: Median follow-up was 74.4 months IC95% [38.7-84.1]. The 146 enrolled patients were 73.6% male, with a median age of 57.6 years at diagnosis. They were initially diagnosed with stage IV RCC for 40.4% of them and had a favorable (36.2%), intermediate (45.7%), or poor (18.1%) IMDC risk score at the onset of metastases. Initially, metastases were mainly located in the lungs (55.5%), lymph nodes (26.7%), and bones (24.0%). Patients had a history of partial or total nephrectomy in 78.8% of cases. There were 30.0% of patients with synchronous MM. The median times from initial diagnosis or metastatic status to MM discovery were 25.5 [16.8-35.7] months and 8.4 [5.0-13.5] months, respectively. The majority (69.0%) of MM were discovered on conventional injected CT scans, whereas 8.3% were diagnosed clinically. Survival data are displayed on the table. Thirty-seven (25.3%) patients received local treatment of their MM which consisted of: external radiotherapy (48.6%), surgery (27.0%), cryotherapy (27.0%), stereotactic radiotherapy (5.4%), embolization (2.7%). Among them, local treatments prevented local relapse of MM in 28 patients (75.7%). Local TR-SAEs were seen in two patients (5.4%). Conclusions: ARTEMIS is the largest published cohort describing the disease history of patients with RCC suffering from MM. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the diagnostic and treatment modalities, also survival data. Despite its low incidence, the issue of these patients is not so rare in physicians’ practice. This work thus allows a greater understanding of clinical features and treatment of this pathology. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and androgen deprivation therapy +/- docetaxel in older patients (≥70 years), with de novo metastatic-castration sensitive prostate cancer, compared to younger patients (<70 years): The PEACE-1 trial

20

Background: Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) primarily affects older men (OM). In this post-hoc analysis we investigated the safety and efficacy of abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AAP) in older (≥ 70 years) and younger (< 70 years) patients in PEACE-1. Methods: Men with de novo mCSPC were allocated to standard of care (SOC), SOC + AAP, SOC + radiotherapy (RXT), or SOC + AAP + RXT in this 2x2 design phase 3 trial. SOC was initially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, then from Oct 2015 onwards, the use of docetaxel (D) was authorized as part of SOC (at the investigator’s discretion until 2017, then, following the publication of LATITUDE and STAMPEDE trials, accrual was restricted to men receiving ADT+ D). Efficacy and safety in OM included in PEACE-1 were analyzed with the same methods used in the overall trial (Lancet 2022; 399: 1695-1707). Results: A total of 741 younger men (YM) (63%) and 431 OM (37%) were randomized. OM presented with more altered PS (ECOG 1-2) (36% vs 26% p=0.0003) and less frequent use of docetaxel (D) as part of SOC (66% vs 51% p<0.0001) than YM. Hypertension (56,5% vs 38,2%, p<0,001) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (15,5% vs 11%, p=0,029) were significantly more frequent in OM. Median time to AAP discontinuation was shorter (30.0 months [95%CI= 22.1; 35.4] vs 41.4 [95%CI= 31.5; 54.0] independently of D use and more frequently due to adverse events or death in the older than younger population. The benefit of AAP on radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) tended to decrease with age in the overall population: (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.42-1.01) in OM vs (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.35-0.69) for YM. The same trend was observed on overall survival (OS): (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.72-1.25) for OM vs (HR: 0.73, 95%CI 0.58-0.92) for YM. On the other hand, in men fit to receive the SOC composed of ADT+D, the rPFS benefit of AAP was comparable in OM (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.29-1.04) and in YM (HR 0.5, 95%CI 0.33-0.78). The OS benefit of AAP was: (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.53-1.2) and (HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.52-0.95) in OM and YM, respectively. Safety data show that severe adverse events (grade 3-5) were more frequent in OM receiving AAP in comparison with YM (69% vs 61%) while there was no difference between older and YM not receiving AAP (48% vs 47%). Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis of PEACE-1 suggests that, in the overall population, OM derive a lower benefit, both in terms of rPFS and OS, from adding AAP to SOC versus YM. This decreased benefit is likely due to more toxicity leading to more frequent and earlier drug discontinuation. Importantly, in OM fit enough to receive ADT+D, the benefit of adding AAP to SOC was comparable to YM. Clinical trial information: NCT01957436 .

Updated outcomes in TROPHY-U-01 cohort 1, a phase 2 study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) that progressed after platinum (PT)-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)

526

Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38, a topoisomerase-I inhibitor, via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated FDA approval in April 2021 in pts with mUC who previously received PT-based therapy and a CPI based on the primary analysis of the pivotal TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 1 study. With 9.1 mo median (med) follow-up, SG monotherapy demonstrated a 27% objective response rate (ORR) and med overall survival (OS) of 10.9 mo in 113 pts with locally advanced or mUC progressing after receiving at least a PT-based therapy and a CPI (Tagawa, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). Here we report updated Cohort 1 outcomes. Methods: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 study. Cohort 1 pts (≥18 y) had progression of mUC following PT (as first-line metastatic therapy or as (neo)adjuvant therapy with recurrence/progression ≤12 mo) and CPI, had ECOG PS 0-1, and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min. Pts received 10 mg/kg of SG intravenously on D1 and D8 of 21-D cycles. The primary endpoint was ORR per central review by RECIST 1.1. Key secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), OS, and safety. Results: As of July 26, 2022, med follow-up was 10.5 mo (range, 0.3-40.9) for treated pts (N=113). As previously reported, pts (78% men; med age, 66 y; 66% with visceral metastases, 34% liver), were heavily pretreated with a med of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-8). Med time since last prior therapy was 1.5 mo (range, 0-60.0). At data cutoff, per central review, ORR was 28% (95% CI, 20.2-37.6); CBR was 38% (95% CI, 29.1-47.7), med DOR was 6.1 mo (95% CI, 4.7-9.7, n=32) and med PFS was 5.4 mo (95% CI, 3.5-6.9). Med time to response was 1.6 mo (range, 1.2-5.6) and med OS was 10.9 mo (95% CI, 8.9-13.8). DOR, PFS, and OS rates (95% CI) at 12 mo were 30% (13.6-48.8), 14% (7.2-23.3), and 45% (35.4-53.8), respectively, with 7 (6%) pts still receiving SG at 12 mo. In pts who received prior enfortumab vedotin (n=10) and prior PT in the (neo)adjuvant setting (n=39), results were consistent with the overall population. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 65% of pts and were similar to prior reports; the most common Grade ≥3 TRAEs were neutropenia (35%), leukopenia (18%), anemia (14%), diarrhea (10%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). One treatment-related death occurred due to febrile neutropenia-related sepsis. Conclusions: At 10.5-mo med follow-up, the response rate remains high in pts with heavily pretreated mUC, including pts with visceral metastases, prior EV therapy and prior (neo)adjuvant PT therapy. No new safety signals were observed. These data support the use of SG in pts with mUC who received PT and a CPI and further evaluation of SG in earlier lines of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973 .

Full analysis from AVENANCE: A real-world study of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC)

471

Background: In the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, avelumab 1L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) vs BSC alone in pts with aUC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx). The JAVELIN Bladder regimen is now standard of care with level 1 evidence in international treatment guidelines. The AVENANCE study (NCT04822350), is investigating the efficacy and safety of avelumab 1L maintenance in a real-world population of pts with aUC in France. Data from the full analysis set are reported for the first time. Methods: In this ongoing, noninterventional, ambispective study, eligible pts have locally advanced or metastatic UC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-based CTx and previous, ongoing, or planned avelumab 1L maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint is OS from start of avelumab; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), duration of treatment (DOT), and safety. Results: 591 pts received avelumab. At data cutoff (July 31, 2022), median follow-up was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 10.9-12.9). Median age was 73.1 y (IQR, 67.0-78.1). At start of 1L CTx (excluding pts with missing data), disease stage was metastatic in 524 pts (90.5%; visceral metastases in 426 [81.5%]) and locally advanced in 54 (9.3%). ECOG PS was 0-1 in 407 pts (85.3%) and 2-3 in 69 (14.5%). Tumor histology was pure UC in 528 pts (91.8%) and UC with variant or pure variant in 47 (8.2%). 1L CTx was gemcitabine + carboplatin (GemCarbo), gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis), dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + adriamycin + cisplatin (DD-MVAC), and other in 353 (61.0%), 170 (29.4%), 28 (4.8%), and 28 (4.8%) pts, respectively. Median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1-10). Median DOT with avelumab was 5.8 mo (95% CI, 5.2-7.0); 241 pts (40.8%) remained on treatment at data cutoff. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (74.1% [n=258]), death (11.5% [n=40]), and adverse events ([AEs] 10.3% [n=36]). Median OS from start of avelumab was 18.4 mo (95% CI, 15.4-not estimable [NE]), the 12-month OS rate was 64.8% (95% CI, 60.0%-69.1%), and median PFS was 5.7 mo (95% CI, 5.3-7.0). In pts who had received GemCarbo, GemCis, or DD-MVAC, median OS (95% CI) was 16.2 mo (13.4-NE), not reached (NR; 18.1-NE), and NR (15.2-NE), respectively. Subgroups analyses will be presented. 218 pts received subsequent 2L, including CTx, antibody-drug conjugates, immunotherapy, and other in 186 (85.3%), 22 (10.1%), 6 (2.8%), and 4 (1.8%) pts, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 217 pts (36.7%), including serious TRAEs in 29 (4.9%). Conclusions: Real-world data for avelumab 1L maintenance in pts with aUC from AVENANCE support the findings of JAVELIN Bladder 100 and confirm the clinical activity and acceptable safety profile of avelumab in a heterogeneous population. Clinical trial information: NCT04822350 .

EDEN (Etude Désescalade sEmiNome): Prospective therapeutic de-escalation and miRNA-M371 biomarker evaluation phase II study for stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm seminomas

TPS434

Background: At diagnosis, 10 to 15% of testicular pure seminomas have a stage II defined by the presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. The optimal choice of treatment modalities are associated with excellent efficacy but also acute and late toxicities. De-escalating treatment for seminoma patients with stage IIb, IIc and III and good prognosis according to IGCCCG (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group) based on negative FDG-PET (Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography) after 2 cycles of EP (etoposide, cisplatine) chemotherapy seems feasible and safe according to SEMITEP cohort 2 results (Loriot Y, and al GETUG SEMITEP Trial: Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):172-179). Serum levels of microRNA (miR)-371a-3p (miRNA-M371) have been significantly associated with clinical stage and response to treatment in testicular germ cell tumors, with sensitivity and specificity higher than those of classic markers. The aim of the study NCT05529251 is to propose a new therapeutic approach for the stages IIa/IIb. Methods: This phase II, multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative, de-escalation study will include patient with primary testicular seminomatous germ cell tumor with stage IIa/IIb < 3 cm in largest diameter seminoma, histologically proved after orchiectomy and good prognosis according to IGCCCG and LDH (Lactate DesHydogenase) < 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN). They must have progressive disease and no prior treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. In case of negative week-3 (after 1 EP cycle) PET-scan, patients will be randomized according to 2 arms ARM A: Boost of radiotherapy 20 to 30 Gray (Gy); ARM B Carboplatin AUC7 chemotherapy. In case of positive week-3 PET-scan: 3 courses of EP chemotherapy (ARM C). Primary outcome will include progression-free rate at 36 months. Secondary Outcome Measures will be serum level of miRNA M371, correlation with response to treatments and PET scan results, overall survival (OS), quality of life and tolerance to treatment. Blood samples (miRNA-M371) will be collected at screening, at the time of randomization before second cycle of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, at the end of treatment and at relapse. Enrollment has started in October 2022. A total of 90 patients will be included in the interventional study, leading to approximately 60 patients with negative FDG-PET randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT05529251 .

Activity of lutetium-177 PSMA (Lu-PSMA) and determinants of outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with cabazitaxel: The PACAP study

180

Background: Cabazitaxel and Lu-PSMA both improved survival in patients with mCRPC after docetaxel and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), but there is limited data regarding Lu-PSMA activity after cabazitaxel. We aimed at assessing activity of Lu-PSMA and determinants of outcomes in this setting. Methods: Consecutive mCRPC patients from 6 European centers treated with Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel were included in this retrospective study. Endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to PSA progression (PSA-TTP), PSA decline, objective response, overall survival, and safety. Results: Of 101 patients included (median age 67y), 64% had ISUP grade 4-5 disease; 71% had bone +/- nodal (LN) metastases, 22% visceral metastases, 7% LN only. All patients and 92% had received previous docetaxel and a prior ARPI (≥ 2 in 47%) before cabazitaxel respectively. Patients had received a median number of 6 cabazitaxel cycles (range 1-26). DNA damage repair alterations (DDR) were found in 11/48 (23%) patients with available testing. Patients received a median number of 3 Lu-PSMA cycles (range 1-14). With a median follow-up of 5.7 months, the median rPFS from Lu-PSMA initiation was 4.3 months (m, 95%CI 3.2-5.7) and median PSA-TTP was 3.5 m (95%CI 3.0-4.5). Overall, 44 patients (44%) experienced a PSA decline ≥ 50% (PSA50), 54 (53%) ≥ 30% (PSA30), and 67 (66%) any PSA decline. Objective response rate was 34%. Baseline characteristics associated with shorter rPFS on Lu-PSMA included ISUP grade 4-5 disease (median rPFS of 3.5 vs. 7.2m, p=0.02) and a time to castration resistance < 12 months (3.1m vs. 4.5m, p=0.04). Patients with LN only had longer rPFS compared to those with bone and visceral metastases (median NR vs. 3.6 and 3.7m, respectively, p=0.02). There was no association between activity of Lu-PSMA and DNA damage repair alterations, duration of previous cabazitaxel therapy, and number of previous ARPI. During Lu-PSMA, a profound PSA decline was associated with longer rPFS: patients achieving PSA50, PSA30 or any PSA decline had respective median rPFS rates of 9.0, 8.3 and 6.2 months, while those who did not experience any PSA decline had a median rPFS of only 2.6 months. Conclusions: Lu-PSMA demonstrated substantial PSA decline but limited duration of response after cabazitaxel in a real-life setting. Adverse baseline characteristics and absence of PSA decline may help early identification of poor responders.

Primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3, a phase 2 study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in combination with pembrolizumab (Pembro) in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) that progressed after platinum (PT)-based therapy

518

Background: Pembro is standard of care for pts with mUC who progress after 1L PT therapy but only ~21% of pts respond, highlighting an unmet need (Bellmunt, et al. NEJM. 2017). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a hydrolyzable linker. In Cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study, SG demonstrated a 27% objective response rate (ORR) with manageable safety in 113 pts with locally advanced or mUC who previously received PT and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI; Tagawa, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021), leading to accelerated FDA approval in this pt population. Preliminary results of the phase 2 TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3 study showed that SG plus Pembro demonstrated a high ORR (34%) as a 2L therapy in 41 CPI-naive pts with mUC who progressed after PT (Grivas et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). Here we present the primary analysis of Cohort 3. Methods: Cohort 3 pts (≥18 y) had progression of mUC following PT in the metastatic setting or following ≤12 mo of PT in the (neo)adjuvant setting and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts received 10 mg/kg of SG on D1 and D8 and 200 mg of Pembro on D1 of a 21-D cycle for ≤2 y. The primary endpoint was ORR [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] per central review by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate [CBR; CR + PR + stable disease for at least 6 mo], duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review; and safety. Target enrollment was approximately 41 pts based on a Simon two-stage design for 90% power at one-sided α of 0.05 to demonstrate 21% improvement in ORR, with a null hypothesis of historical ORR ≤20% and an alternate hypothesis of ORR ≥41%. Results: As of July 26, 2022, median follow-up was 12.5 mo (range, 0.9-24.6) for treated pts (N=41); median age, 67 y (range, 46-86), 83% male, 61% ECOG PS 1, 76% ≥1 Bellmunt risk factors, and 78% visceral metastases (29% liver). Median duration of last prior anti-cancer therapy was 2.7 mo (range, 0-13). Per central review, ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3-57.9; 20% CR); CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7-62.6); median DOR was 11.1 mo (95% CI, 4.8-NE [not estimable]; n=17); and median PFS was 5.3 mo (95% CI, 3.4-10.2). Median time to response was 1.4 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.7) and median OS was 12.7 mo (95% CI, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 61% of pts; most common Grade ≥3 TRAEs were neutropenia (37%; 10% febrile neutropenia), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%). TRAEs led to a 15% discontinuation rate. Systemic steroid and G-CSF use were both 34%. No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: SG plus Pembro demonstrated a high ORR and CBR with a manageable safety profile in 2L mUC in CPI-naive pts who progressed after PT-based therapy. No new safety signals were observed with the combination. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973 .

Urachal carcinoma: a large retrospective multicentric study from the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group

Introduction

Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare, non-urothelial malignancy. Its natural history and management are poorly understood. Although localized to the bladder dome, the most common histological subtype of UrC is adenocarcinoma. UrC develops from an embryonic remnant, and is frequently diagnosed in advanced stage with poor prognosis. The treatment is not standardized, and based only on case reports and small series. This large retrospective multicentric study was conducted by the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group to gain a better understanding of UrC.

Material and Methods

data has been collected retrospectively on 97 patients treated at 22 French Cancer Centers between 1996 and 2020.

Results

The median follow-up was 59 months (range 44-96). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 20-86), 45% were females and 23% had tobacco exposure. For patients with localized disease (Mayo I-II, n=46) and with lymph-node invasion (Mayo III, n=13) median progression-free-survival (mPFS) was 31 months (95% CI: 20-67) and 7 months (95% CI: 6-not reached (NR)), and median overall survival (mOS) was 73 months (95% CI: 57-NR) and 22 months (95% CI: 21-NR) respectively. For 45 patients with Mayo I-III had secondary metastatic progression, and 20 patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Metastatic localization was peritoneal for 54% of patients. Most patients with localized tumor were treated with partial cystectomy, with mPFS of 20 months (95% CI: 14-49), and only 12 patients received adjuvant therapy. Metastatic patients (Mayo IV) had a mOS of 23 months (95% CI: 19-33) and 69% received a platin-fluorouracil combination treatment.

Conclusion

UrC is a rare tumor of the bladder where patients are younger with a higher number of females, and a lower tobacco exposure than in standard urothelial carcinoma. For localized tumor, partial cystectomy is recommended. The mOS and mPFS were low, notably for patients with lymph node invasion. For metastatic patients the prognosis is poor and standard therapy is not well-defined. Further clinical and biological knowledge are needed.

Olaparib Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM Alterations Identified by Testing Circulating Tumor DNA

PURPOSE

The phase III PROfound study (NCT02987543) evaluated olaparib versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (control) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with tumor homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. We present exploratory analyses on the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing as an additional method to identify patients with mCRPC with HRR gene alterations who may be eligible for olaparib treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plasma samples collected during screening in PROfound were retrospectively sequenced using the FoundationOne®Liquid CDx test for BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA), and ATM alterations in ctDNA. Only patients from Cohort A (BRCA/ATM alteration positive by tissue testing) were evaluated. We compared clinical outcomes, including radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) between the ctDNA subgroup and Cohort A.

RESULTS

Of the 181 (73.9%) Cohort A patients who gave consent for plasma sample ctDNA testing, 139 (76.8%) yielded a result and BRCA/ATM alterations were identified in 111 (79.9%). Of these, 73 patients received olaparib and 38 received control. Patients' baseline demographics and characteristics, and the prevalence of HRR alterations were comparable with the Cohort A intention-to-treat (ITT) population. rPFS was longer in the olaparib group versus control [median 7.4 vs. 3.5 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.53; nominal P < 0.0001], which is consistent with Cohort A ITT population (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

When tumor tissue testing is not feasible or has failed, ctDNA testing may be a suitable alternative to identify patients with mCRPC carrying BRCA/ATM alterations who may benefit from olaparib treatment.

PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon

Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair-proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response rate to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. This study illustrates how specific DNA repair defects sensitize to immunotherapy. POLE proofreading deficiency represents a novel agnostic biomarker for response to PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

POLE proofreading deficiency leads to high tumor mutational burden with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and predicts anti-PD-1 efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient tumors. Conversely, tumors harboring POLE mutations not affecting proofreading derived no benefit from PD-1 blockade. POLE proofreading deficiency is a new tissue-agnostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397.

Bone mineral density in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with or without abiraterone plus prednisone in the PEACE-1 phase 3 trial

19

Background: Addition of abiraterone plus prednisone (AAP) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) improved overall survival in men with de novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer in PEACE-1 trial. An analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) was planned by an amendment in the last randomized patients to assess whether addition of AAP increases bone loss. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized to receive either ADT + D + AAP or ADT + D (and also randomized for radiotherapy given to the prostate). BMD (g/cm2) of the lumbar spine (L), femoral neck (F) and total hip (H) were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline, M6, M12 and M24 in both arms. Mean percent change in BMD values from baseline to the different time points were calculated. T-Scores were also assessed. Results: Among the 210 pts with BMD data, 182 (87%) had available data at baseline, 109 (52%) at M6, 94 (45%) at M12, and 109 (52%) at M24: 97 pts were treated with AAP and 98 without. In both arms, the median age was 65 years and 69 pts (71%) were ECOG PS 0. Median body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 and 26.5 kg/m2 in pts treated with or without AAP, respectively. BMD, T score and mean percent change in BMD values are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: This is the first prospective assessment of BMD in a randomized trial, according to an experimental treatment with AAP. Despite a bone loss increase in both arms over time, addition of AAP to ADT+D was associated with no or modest difference in bone loss during the first 2 years, compared to ADT+D. Data including fractures will be presented. Main limitations include the difficulty to reliably assess BMD in men with bone metastases, the limited sample size and the short follow-up (i.e. 2 years). Clinical trial information: NCT01957436. [Table: see text]

TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in combination with pembrolizumab (Pembro) in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progressed after platinum (PLT)-based regimens

434

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard therapy for pts with mUC after PLT-based regimens, with limited long-term disease control. SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) antibody coupled to SN-38 (a topoisomerase-I inhibitor) via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. In the TROPHY-U-01 registrational phase 2 trial, SG monotherapy demonstrated significant activity and manageable safety in pts with mUC who progressed after prior PLT-based chemotherapy and CPI, with 27% objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival of 11 months (Tagawa, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021). Here, we present interim efficacy and safety results of combining SG with Pembro as 2nd-line therapy in CPI-naive pts with mUC who progressed after PLT-based chemotherapy (cohort 3). Methods: TROPHY-U-01 is a multicohort, open-label, global phase 2 trial. Eligible pts had measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–1, and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined during a 10-pt safety lead-in, and additional pts were enrolled at the RP2D in a Simon 2-stage design. Primary endpoint: ORR by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Key secondary endpoints: investigator-assessed ORR, clinical benefit rate [CBR; complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease], progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: At the time of data cutoff, 41 pts received at least a dose of SG at the RP2D (10 mg/kg). Of these 41 pts, median (range) age was 67y (46–86), 83% men, 61% ECOG PS 1, 76% had ≥1 Bellmunt risk factor, and median (range) number of prior anticancer regimens was 1 (1–3). At a median follow-up of 5.8 mo, the investigator-assessed ORR was 34% (95% CI, 20.1–50.6; 1 CR; 13 PR); CBR was 44% (95% CI, 28.5–60.3); 6-mo PFS rate was 47%. Median time to response was 2.0 mo (95% CI, 1.3–2.8). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (76%), nausea (59%), anemia (56%), neutropenia (44%), and asthenia (41%). Treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 59% of pts. Key grade ≥3 TEAEs of any cause included diarrhea (24%), anemia (20%), febrile neutropenia (10%), fatigue (7%), and asthenia (5%). Two pts discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs. No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: SG in combination with Pembro demonstrated encouraging ORR and CBR, with an overall manageable safety profile with no new safety signal in CPI-naive pts who progressed after prior PLT-based chemotherapy. The data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC. Limitations: small sample size, short follow-up, and lack of randomization. Biomarker evaluation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

Association of TMB and PD-L1 with efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab (pembro) or pembro + chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) from KEYNOTE-361

540

Background: The 3-arm, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 study (NCT02853305) evaluated first-line pembro ± chemo vs chemo in advanced UC regardless of PD-L1 status. The trial did not meet its primary end points of superior PFS and OS with pembro + chemo vs chemo and thus analysis of pembro monotherapy (mono) vs chemo was exploratory. We explored the association of TMB status and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) with clinical outcomes in KEYNOTE-361. Methods: In pts with TMB and/or PD-L1 data, the association between TMB (via whole exome sequencing) and PD-L1 (via PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx) and clinical outcomes (ORR, PFS, and OS) was evaluated. In each treatment arm, the hypotheses regarding the associations were evaluated using logistic regression (ORR) and Cox proportional hazards regression (PFS; OS), and 1-sided (pembro; pembro + chemo) and 2-sided (chemo) P values were calculated; significance was prespecified at α = 0.05 without multiplicity adjustment. Clinical utility was assessed using prespecified cutoffs of 175 mut/exome (TMB) and CPS 10 (PD-L1). Clinical data cutoff was April 29, 2020. Results: 820/993 pts (82.6%) had evaluable TMB data (pembro, 252; pembro + chemo, 282; chemo, 286). TMB (log10) was significantly positively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembro ( P < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.007, respectively) and PFS and OS for pembro + chemo ( P= 0.007 and 0.010, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve (95% CI) for discriminating response was 0.64 (0.56-0.71) for pembro, 0.53 (0.46-0.60) for pembro + chemo, and 0.52 (0.45-0.59) for chemo. Efficacy by TMB cutoff is reported in the Table. All 993 pts had PD-L1 data (pembro, 302; pembro + chemo, 349; chemo, 342). PD-L1 was significantly positively associated with PFS for pembro ( P= 0.006) and ORR for pembro + chemo ( P= 0.042) but not chemo. Efficacy by PD-L1 CPS is reported in the Table. Conclusions: Strong associations were observed between TMB and all 3 clinical outcomes (ORR, PFS, and OS) with pembro mono in the first-line setting and a reduced association was observed between TMB and clinical outcomes with pembro + chemo. No consistent associations were observed between PD-L1 and clinical outcomes with pembro mono or pembro + chemo. Clinical trial information: NCT02853305. [Table: see text]

CIMUC: Chemotherapy following Immune checkpoints inhibitors in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC)

492

Background: Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have recently changed therapeutic landscape of la/mUC. Recent studies suggested an improvement of response to salvage chemotherapy (CT) after ICIs in several cancer types including urothelial carcinoma. We assumed that efficacy of CT rechallenge after ICIs may be improved compared to second-line CT without previous ICIs in patients (pts) with la/mUC. Methods: CIMUC is a French multicentric retrospective study including all pts with la/mUC initiating second or third-line CT from January 1st 2015 to June 30th 2020. Two groups of pts were defined: pts in group 1 (G1) were treated with a second-line CT without previous ICIs; pts in group 2 (G2) were treated with third line CT after ICIs. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR: proportion of patients with complete or partial response, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria) in G2 versus G1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from initiation of second or third-line CT to disease progression or death from any cause, and toxicities. This study is supported by the French Genito Urinary Group (GETUG). Results: 553 pts were included. Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups are summarized in the Table. ORRs were 31% (95%CI [26.5-35.5]) and 29.2% (95%CI [21.9-36.6]) respectively in G1 and G2, without statistically significant difference (p=0.617), even after adjustment for Bellmunt risk factors (p=0.3214). In subgroups analysis, no difference in ORR was observed by type of CT (platinum or taxanes), duration of response (DOR) to first-platinum-based CT (< 12 months or ≥ 12 months) and FGFR-status. We did not identify any predictive factor of OR in G2 in multivariate analysis. Median PFS were 4.6 months (95%CI [3.88; 5.06]) and 4.86 months (95%CI [4.11; 5.45]), respectively in G1 and G2. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 35% and 22.4%, respectively in G1 and G2. Conclusions: While ORR was not superior in G2 versus G1, pts derive comparable benefit in a further line of treatment (G2) in terms of ORR and PFS. Despite limits inherent to any retrospective study, CIMUC represents one of the largest retrospective studies in this setting.[Table: see text]

First-line pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma: Clinical parameters associated with efficacy in the phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 and phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 trials

521

Background: First-line treatment with pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy has shown durable clinical activity in selected patients (pts) with advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). In a pooled population of pts with advanced UC from the single-arm phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424) and the randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305) studies, this exploratory analysis evaluated the relationship between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of first-line pembro monotherapy. Methods: Cisplatin-ineligible pts with advanced UC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-052 and chemotherapy-naive pts with advanced UC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-361. For analysis of predictive factors for ORR and OS in pembro-treated pts, the purposeful selection method was used to build the multivariable logistic regression model (ORR) and multivariable Cox model (OS), beginning with a univariable analysis of each independent variable. Any variable in the univariate model with P < 0.10 was a candidate for the multivariate model. The stepwise selection method was used to select the variables in the final model. Significance of the final model was set at P < 0.05. Data cutoff dates were September 26, 2020 (KEYNOTE-052) and April 29, 2020 (KEYNOTE-361). Results: This pooled analysis included 681 pts treated with pembro monotherapy (KEYNOTE-052, N = 374; KEYNOTE-361, N = 307 [170 were cisplatin ineligible]). Median follow-up was 51.9 mo (range, 22.0-65.3). ORR was 29.4% (95% CI, 26.0-32.9; 69 CRs, 131 PRs), and median DOR was 33.2 mo (range, 1.4+ to 60.7+). Median OS was 12.5 mo (95% CI, 11.0-14.6). By multivariate analysis, independent factors significantly associated with higher ORR were PD-L1 status (combined positive score [CPS] ≥10 vs CPS < 10; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.33-2.71]; P = 0.0004), site of metastasis (lymph node only vs visceral disease; OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.06-2.59]; P = 0.0265), liver involvement (absent vs present; OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.06-2.89]; P = 0.0294), and baseline hemoglobin level ≥10 vs < 10 g/dL; OR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.09-4.31]; P = 0.0276). Multivariate analysis of OS is displayed in the Table. Conclusions: This exploratory multivariate analysis identified numerous factors, including PD-L1–positive status (CPS ≥10), lymph node only metastasis, and lower ECOG PS score, associated with improved clinical outcomes in pts with advanced UC treated with first-line pembro monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02335424 and NCT02853305. [Table: see text]

Primary urethral cancer: A GETUG French nationwide cohort study

430

Background: Primary urethral cancer (PUC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy. Due to its scarcity, little data are available on the optimal treatment sequence and survival, especially in metastatic patients. Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with a PUC between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2018 were retrospectively collected from nine French referral centers. Survival rate were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model and the log-rank test. In order to increase the statistical power of survival analysis in the metastatic stage, patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic disease were pooled. Results: We identified 44 (62%) males and 27 (38%) females with a PUC. The most frequent histological types were urothelial carcinomas (40.0%), squamous cell carcinomas (34.3%) and adenocarcinomas (14.3%). Twenty-five (35.2%) patients were diagnosed at a localized stage (≤ T2, N0, M0); 35 (49.3%) at a locally advanced stage (≥ T3 or ≥ N1, M0) and 11 (15.5%) at a distant stage (M1). Twenty-seven patients had a metachronous metastatic cancer. Multimodality therapy was used in 24.0% and 57.1% of the patients with a localized and locally advanced disease, respectively. In the entire cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 52.5 months (IC95% 32.2 – 64.1) and stage at diagnosis was a predictor of OS (p < 0.0001). For the 60 patients with a non-metastatic disease, 39 (65%) had a recurrence or were dead and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 21.2 months (IC95% 16.8 – 34.5). Nodal involvement was the only factor associated with DFS (HR: 2.03, p = 0.0390). Multimodal treatment compared with unimodal treatment was not significantly associated with DFS (HR: 1.22, p = 0.5419). Regarding survival of the 38 metastatic patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (IC95% 8.2 – 23.5) and the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (IC95% 4.4 – 9.8). Conclusions: This retrospective study showed an important heterogeneity in terms of histology, stage at diagnosis, and treatment of PUC. In this cohort, the multimodal approach did not show any improvement in survival of non-metastatic patients. This study is one of the few to describe the survival in metastatic patients.

Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was shown to be clinically active and tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations in the primary analysis of the BLC2001 study at median 11 months of follow-up. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the selected regimen of erdafitinib determined in the initial part of the study.

METHODS

The open-label, non-comparator, phase 2, BLC2001 study was done at 126 medical centres in 14 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, at least one prespecified FGFR alteration, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and progressive disease after receiving at least one systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy or were ineligible for cisplatin. The selected regimen determined in the initial part of the study was continuous once daily 8 mg/day oral erdafitinib in 28-day cycles, with provision for pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg/day (8 mg/day UpT). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of erdafitinib. This is the final analysis of this study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02365597.

FINDINGS

Between May 25, 2015, and Aug 9, 2018, 2328 patients were screened, of whom 212 were enrolled and 101 were treated with the selected erdafitinib 8 mg/day UpT regimen. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Aug 9, 2019. Median efficacy follow-up was 24·0 months (IQR 22·7-26·6). The investigator-assessed objective response rate for patients treated with the selected erdafitinib regimen was 40 (40%; 95% CI 30-49) of 101 patients. The safety profile remained similar to that in the primary analysis, with no new safety signals reported with longer follow-up. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any causality occurred in 72 (71%) of 101 patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any cause were stomatitis (in 14 [14%] of 101 patients) and hyponatraemia (in 11 [11%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

With longer follow-up, treatment with the selected regimen of erdafitinib showed consistent activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations.

FUNDING

Janssen Research & Development.

Patient Preference Between Cabazitaxel and Docetaxel for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The CABADOC Trial

BACKGROUND

The taxanes docetaxel and cabazitaxel prolong overall survival for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with cabazitaxel approved in the postdocetaxel setting only. Recent data suggest they have similar efficacy but a different safety profile in the first-line mCRPC setting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient preference between docetaxel and cabazitaxel among men who received one or more doses of each taxane and did not experience progression after the first taxane.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel (75 mg/m² every 3 wk × 4 cycles) followed by cabazitaxel (25 mg/m² every 3 wk × 4 cycles) or the reverse sequence. Randomization was stratified by prior abiraterone or enzalutamide use.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed via a dedicated questionnaire after the second taxane. Secondary endpoints included reasons for patient preference, prostate-specific antigen response, radiological progression-free survival, and overall survival. This clinical trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02044354.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of 195 men randomized, 152 met the prespecified modified intent-to-treat criteria for analysis. Overall, 66 patients (43%) preferred cabazitaxel, 40 (27%) preferred docetaxel, and 46 (30%) had no preference (p = 0.004, adjusted for treatment period effect). More patients preferred treatment period 1 (43%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 36-52%) versus period 2 (27%, 95% CI 20-34%). Patient preference for cabazitaxel was mainly related to less fatigue (72%), better quality of life (64%), and other adverse events (hair loss, pain, nail disorders, edema). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of each drug.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher proportion of chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC who received both taxanes preferred cabazitaxel over docetaxel. Less fatigue and better quality of life were the two main reasons driving patient choice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer preferred cabazitaxel over docetaxel for chemotherapy, mainly because of less fatigue and better quality of life.

PSMA targeting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: where are we and where are we going?

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on the membrane of most prostate cancer cells and to a lesser extent in normal tissues. Many vectors targeting this protein have been created over the past decade and numerous clinical studies have positively demonstrated the tolerance and efficacy of radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands for PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT). Preliminary results are encouraging that PRLT will become an important addition to the current therapeutic options in a number of settings. Improvement in radiopharmaceutical targeting and combination with other oncological agents are under investigation to further improve its therapeutic efficacy. These encouraging results have led to the development of other therapies using PSMA as a target, such as PSMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, PSMA-targeted antibody drug conjugates, and PSMA-targeted bi-specific T-cell-directed therapy. This narrative review details the current state and advancements in prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting in prostate cancer treatment.

A phase 3 trial with a 2x2 factorial design of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and/or local radiotherapy in men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): First results of PEACE-1

5000

Background: Historically, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was the standard of care (SOC) for men with mCSPC. Since 2015, combining ADT with either docetaxel, novel hormonal therapies, or radiotherapy to the primary tumor (RXT) (for those with low burden metastases) was shown to improve overall survival (OS) and thus has become the new SOC. It is unknown whether combining these new treatments on top of ADT further increments outcomes. Methods: Men with de novo mCSPC were randomized to SOC, SOC + abiraterone acetate-prednisone (abiraterone), SOC + RXT, or SOC + abiraterone + RXT. SOC was initially ADT alone, then from Oct 2015 onwards the use of docetaxel was authorized as part of SOC (at the investigator’s discretion until 2017, then, following the publication of the LATITUDE and STAMPEDE trials, accrual was restricted to men receiving ADT+docetaxel). The trial has two co-primary endpoints of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS with type I error of 0.1% and 4.9%, respectively. The required number of rPFS events to achieve 80% power has been reached for the abiraterone question (not yet for the RXT question). The interaction between abiraterone and RXT was first tested using a Cox model adjusted for stratification factors (performance status, type of castration, metastatic burden, and when applicable, docetaxel). A hierarchical testing was used to test the effect of abiraterone: overall population, then ADT+docetaxel population. Results: From Nov 2013 to Dec 2018, 1173 men were enrolled (SOC was ADT+docetaxel in 710 pts and ADT alone in 463 pts), median age 67y (IQR: 60-72), high volume 57%, low volume 43%. The median follow-up is 3.5y. No interaction was detected between the effect of abiraterone and that of RXT (p = 0.64), allowing to pool abiraterone arms for comparisons. rPFS was significantly improved in the abiraterone arm in the overall population (HR: 0.54 (0.46-0.64), p < 0.0001; medians: 2.2 vs 4.5 years) and in the ADT+docetaxel population: (HR: 0.50 (0.40-0.62), p < 0.0001; medians: 2.0 vs 4.5 years). bPFS (PFS including PSA progression as an event) also significantly favored abiraterone in the overall population (HR: 0.40 (0.35-0.47), p < 0.0001; medians: 1.5 vs 3.8 years) and in the ADT+docetaxel population (HR: 0.38 (0.31-0.47), p < 0.0001; medians: 1.5 vs 3.2 years). OS is maturing. Grade 3-4 adverse events reported in > 5% of pts within the first 6 months in the ADT+docetaxel population included neutropenic fever (4.5% vs 5.4%), liver toxicity (19.7% vs 13%), and hypertension (12.2% vs 8.6%) in the abiraterone and control arms, respectively. Conclusion: Adding abiraterone to ADT + docetaxel significantly improves rPFS in men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer, with about 2.5 years of absolute benefit in medians, and no meaningful additional short-term toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT01957436.

CheckMate 9KD cohort A1 final analysis: Nivolumab (NIVO) + rucaparib for post-chemotherapy (CT) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

5044

Background: CheckMate 9KD is a phase 2 trial of NIVO (anti-PD-1) combined with either rucaparib, docetaxel, or enzalutamide for mCRPC. PARP inhibitors, like rucaparib, increase cellular DNA damage, particularly in tumors with DNA repair defects, leading to genomic instability and cell death. This DNA damage promotes immune priming and adaptive PD-L1 upregulation. Consequently, dual PD-(L)1 and PARP inhibition is a plausible therapeutic strategy for mCRPC. We report final results for cohort A1 (NIVO + rucaparib for post-CT mCRPC) of CheckMate 9KD. Methods: Cohort A1 enrolled patients (pts) with post-CT mCRPC (1–2 prior taxane regimens), ongoing ADT, ≤ 2 prior novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc) for mCRPC, and no prior PARP inhibitor treatment. Pts received NIVO 480 mg Q4W + rucaparib 600 mg BID until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (NIVO dosing limited to 2 yrs). Coprimary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) per PCWG3 criteria and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR; ≥ 50% PSA reduction) in all treated pts and pts with homologous recombination deficiency positive (HRD+) tumors, determined before enrollment. Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 88 treated pts, median age 66 yrs (range, 46–85), 34.1% had visceral metastases and 65.9% had measurable disease. Median follow-up was 11.9 mo. Pts had a median of 4.5 NIVO doses and 3.8 mo of rucaparib. The table summarizes primary and key secondary efficacy results, and shows better outcomes for HRD+ vs HRD–/not evaluable (NE) tumors. In pts with BRCA2 mutations, confirmed ORR was 37.5% (3/8 pts) and confirmed PSA-RR was 45.5% (5/11 pts). Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 93.2% of pts, most commonly nausea (40.9%) and fatigue (33.0%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 54.5% of pts, most commonly anemia (20.5%) and neutropenia (10.2%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 27.3% of pts. One pt had a stroke, considered related to rucaparib by the investigator, after 28 days on rucaparib and 2 NIVO doses and died 2 months later due to post-thrombolysis hematoma. Conclusions: NIVO + rucaparib is active in pts with HRD+ post-CT mCRPC, although the trial design and short follow-up limit assessment of benefits of the combination vs individual components. Pts with HRD– tumors did not appear to benefit from either drug. No new safety signals were observed with NIVO + rucaparib. Additional biomarker analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03338790. [Table: see text]

CYCLONE 1: A phase 2 study of abemaciclib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a novel hormonal agent and taxane-based chemotherapy

TPS5086

Background: In cancer cells, the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 & 6)/retinoblastoma protein (Rb) pathway is commonly altered, resulting in uncontrolled cell cycle entry and proliferation. CDK4 & 6 inhibitors represent a major advance in the management of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC or MBC, respectively). Abemaciclib is an oral selective inhibitor of CDK4 & 6 administered on a continuous dosing schedule, approved in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC or MBC. In addition, abemaciclib is also approved by the FDA as monotherapy for HR+, HER2- ABC or MBC following endocrine therapy and prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Similar to the estrogen receptor signaling pathway in breast cancer cells, there is evidence that the androgen receptor axis activates CDK4 & 6 to sustain prostate cancer cell proliferation and survival. Preclinical studies in prostate cancer cell lines and xenograft models showed that abemaciclib exhibits single agent activity by inducing cell cycle arrest and tumor growth inhibition. Clinical activity of abemaciclib in combination with abiraterone and prednisone is investigated in a randomized phase 2 study in the first-line mCRPC setting (CYCLONE 2, NCT03706365). Despite recent advances, management of heavily pretreated mCRPC remains a major clinical challenge. Herein, we hypothesize that mCRPC patients whose disease progressed after novel hormonal agents (NHA) and taxane therapies may derive therapeutic benefit from single agent abemaciclib. Methods: CYCLONE 1 is a phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib monotherapy in 40 patients with mCRPC progressing after ≥1 NHA and 2 taxane regimens. Patients will be enrolled at time of prostate specific antigen (PSA) or radiographic progression per PCWG3 criteria and have at least 1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. Metastatic tumor tissue (fresh biopsy or archival material <12 weeks) is required at baseline for biomarker analysis. Patients will receive abemaciclib 200 mg twice daily until unacceptable adverse events or disease progression. The primary objective is investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary objectives include safety, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, PSA response rate, time to PSA progression, time to symptomatic progression, Ki-67 expression, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. Assuming an ORR of 15%, the study has over 73% power to observe a response rate of at least 12.5%. Accrual began in January 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04408924.

Multicentric phase II trial of TI-CE high-dose chemotherapy with therapeutic drug monitoring of carboplatin in patients with relapsed advanced germ cell tumors

Background

High‐dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with TI‐CE regimen is a valid option for the treatment of relapsed advanced germ cell tumors (GCT). We report a phase II trial with therapeutic drug monitoring of carboplatin for optimizing area under the curve (AUC) of this drug.

Methods

Patients with unfavorable relapsed GCT were treated according to TI‐CE regimen: two cycles combining paclitaxel and ifosfamide followed by three cycles of HD carboplatin plus etoposide administered on 3 days. Carboplatin dose was adapted on day 3 based on carboplatin clearance (CL) at day 1 in order to reach a target AUC of 24 mg.min/mL per cycle. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate.

Results

Eighty‐nine patients who received HDCT were included in the modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT) analysis. Measured mean AUC was 24.4 mg.min/mL per cycle (22.4 and 26.8 mg.min/mL for 10th and 90th percentiles). Thirty‐five (44.3%) patients achieved a CR with or without surgery of residual masses and 20 patients achieved a partial response with negative tumor markers. With a median follow‐up of 44 months (m), median PFS was 12.3 m (95% CI: 7.5–25.9) and OS was 46.3 m (95% CI: 18.6–not reached). For high‐ and very high‐risk patients, according to the International Prognostic Score at first relapse or treated after at least one salvage treatment (n = 51), 2‐year PFS rate was 41.1%.

Conclusion

The rates of complete and favorable responses were clinically relevant in this very poor risk population. Individual monitoring of carboplatin plasma concentration permitted to control more accurately the target AUC and avoided both underexposure and overexposure to the drug.

Impact of subsequent therapy on survival in KEYNOTE-361: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) or pembro alone versus chemo as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC)

439

Background: The phase III KEYNOTE-361 study examined the efficacy and safety of 1L pembro + chemo or pembro alone vs chemo for pts with advanced UC. The PFS and OS benefit of pembro + chemo vs chemo did not reach statistical significance; no further formal tesing was done. We present an exploratory analysis of OS by subsequent therapy in KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305) to assess how 1L and 2L therapy selection affected survival outcomes; no formal comparisons were conducted. Methods: OS was estimated for pts by whether they received subsequent therapy, and by whether subsequent therapy included an anti–PD-(L)1 agent. Results: 351 pts were randomized to pembro + chemo, 307 pts to pembro, and 352 pts to chemo. As of Apr 29, 2020, the median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff was 31.7 (22.0-42.3) mo. 124/351 pts (35%) in the pembro + chemo arm, 126/307 pts (41%) in the pembro arm, and 215/352 pts (61%) in the chemo arm received any subsequent therapy. Similar rates of subsequent therapy (pembro + chemo: 32%; pembro: 43%; chemo: 59%) were observed for pts who experienced progressive disease (PD) by blinded independent central review (BICR). A higher rate of pts (169/352 [48%]) in the chemo arm received subsequent anti–PD-(L)1 therapy than in either the pembro + chemo arm (23/351 [7%]) or pembro arm (14/307 [5%]). Due to the small pt numbers, pts in the pembro + chemo or pembro arms who received subsequent anti−PD-(L)1 were not considered further. This analysis included all pts who received 2L therapy (465/1010 pts [46%]); the rate of 2L therapy was similar in pts with PD by BICR (274/615 [45%]). Chemo agents alone or in combination, specifically carboplatin, cisplatin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel, were the most commonly received subsequent therapies for pts who did not receive anti–PD-(L)1 in 2L. Pts who received 1L chemo followed by subsequent anti–PD-(L)1 had longer mOS (19.1 mo [95% CI 16.2-22.2]) than pts with 1L pembro followed by 2L therapy not including an anti−PD-(L)1 agent (16.0 mo [95% CI 11.8-19.2]) (Table). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, favorable survival outcomes were observed for pts who received 1L chemo followed by anti–PD-(L)1 compared with pts who received 1L pembro followed by 2L therapy not including an anti–PD-(L)1 agent. These data underline the continued importance of immunotherapy as 2L therapy for advanced UC. Clinical trial information: NCT02853305 . Research Sponsor: Merck & Co., Inc[Table: see text]

Olaparib efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) carrying circulating tumor (ct) DNA alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM: Results from the PROfound study

27

Background: ctDNA testing offers additional opportunities for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alteration determination in patients who are not able to access tumor tissue testing. Alteration testing in ctDNA, for BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM alterations was performed retrospectively in the PROfound study (phase 3 trial of olaparib versus physician’s choice of abiraterone or enzalutamide in men with HRR gene-mutated mCRPC [NCT02987543]). Methods: ctDNA samples were sequenced at FMI, using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay for alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 (BRCA) and ATM, using plasma samples collected during screening in PROfound. Only patients who consented and provided plasma samples from Cohort A (BRCA/ ATM alteration positive by tissue testing) were tested for ctDNA alterations. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients positive for alterations in ctDNA was analysed via stratified log-rank test. Additional efficacy endpoints (Objective Response Rate [ORR], Overall Survival[OS]) were also assessed. Results: In total, 181/245 (73.9%) Cohort A patients consented and provided a plasma sample for ctDNA testing, of which 139/181 (76.8%) had a ctDNA result reported (either mutation positive or mutation negative) and 42 patient samples failed testing due to insufficient DNA yield or a technical failure of the test.BRCA/ ATM alterations were identified in111/139 (79.9%) patients and 28/139 patients did not report a BRCA/ATM mutation either due to lack of ctDNA shedding from the tumour or ctDNA levels below the sensitivity of the assay. Patients who carried BRCA/ ATM ctDNA alterations had comparable demography, baseline characteristics and proportions of BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM mutated patients to the overall Cohort A patients. rPFS by BICR results, in patients with BRCA/ ATM alterations in ctDNA, are presented in the Table. Key secondary efficacy endpoints (ORR, OS) will also be reported for ctDNA alteration positive patients. Conclusions: ctDNA testing in patients with mCRPC is feasible and most, but not all patients have concordant results. Patients who were positive for alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM showed a consistent rPFS improvement (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [0.21, 0.53]) when compared with the ITT population identified by tumor tissue testing (HR 0.34 [0.25, 0.47]). This suggests that using ctDNA to identify patients carrying BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM alterations who will benefit from olaparib may be beneficial. Clinical trial information: NCT02987543. [Table: see text]

Analysis of PFS2 by subsequent therapy in KEYNOTE-361: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) or pembro alone versus chemo as 1L therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC)

448

Background: 1L pembro + chemo did not show statistically superior PFS and OS vs chemo for pts with advanced UC in the phase III KEYNOTE-361 study; OS for pembro vs chemo was not formally tested. We analyzed PFS2 (time from randomization to progressive disease [PD] on first subsequent therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first) by study treatment and subsequent therapy in KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305) to determine the effects, if any, of therapy sequence on PFS2. Methods: PFS2 was estimated for pts in each treatment arm, who received any subsequent therapy including any anti–PD-(L)1, any therapy other than anti–PD-(L)1, or no therapy. These were exploratory analyses; no formal comparisons were done. Results: 1010 pts were randomized: 351 pts to receive pembro + chemo, 307 to pembro, and 352 to chemo. As of Apr 29, 2020, the median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff was 31.7 (22.0-42.3) mo. Subsequent therapy was received by 124/351 (35%), 126/307 (41%), and 215/352 (61%) pts in the pembro + chemo, pembro, and chemo arms, respectively. Subsequent anti–PD-(L)1 therapy was received by 169/352 (48%) pts in the chemo arm vs 23/351 (7%) in the pembro + chemo arm and 14/307 (5%) in the pembro arm. Of pts in the pembro arm who received subsequent therapy, >90% received 2L cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based treatment. Median (m) PFS2 (95% CI) for all pts by treatment arm was 14.1 mo (12.6-16.2) with pembro + chemo, 10.9 mo (9.5-12.9) with pembro, and 10.4 mo (9.8-11.2) with chemo. Across treatment arms, pts in the pembro + chemo arm had the longest mPFS2 with any subsequent therapy (14.5 mo [95% CI 13.1-16.6]) (Table). Pts in the pembro arm who received no subsequent therapy had a longer mPFS2 (12.9 mo [95% CI 8.1-17.9]) vs pts in the chemo arm who received no subsequent therapy (9.4 mo [95% CI 7.6-10.6]). Finally, pts treated with 1L pembro in the trial followed by 2L therapy other than anti−PD-(L)1 had comparable mPFS2 (10.2 mo [95% CI 8.6-12.1]) to pts treated with 1L chemo in the trial followed by 2L anti−PD-(L)1 (11.1 mo [95% CI 10.2-12.9]). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, treatment sequence of chemo followed by anti−PD-(L)1 upon PD vs anti–PD-(L)1 followed by chemo upon PD did not appear to impact mPFS2. Among pts who did not receive 2L therapy, 1L pembro appeared to be associated with longer mPFS2 than chemo, potentially driven by long-term responders to pembro. Clinical trial information: NCT02853305 . [Table: see text]

Rechallenge of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, an ambispective multicenter study (RENIVO)

330

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with another ICI or an antiangiogenic targeted therapy have been approved for frontline therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, progression disease (PD) often occurs and subsequent therapies are needed. Rechallenge of ICI may then be an option, but there is a lack of data regarding this strategy. Methods: This ambispective multicenter study included patients who received a rechallenge of Nivolumab (ICI-2) between January 2014 and September 2020, after a first-ICI therapy (ICI-1), regardless of the reason of the discontinuation. Patients could have either a non-ICI therapy or have a prolonged free-interval (≥ 12 weeks) between ICI regimens. Those with ongoing rechallenge at inclusion were followed prospectively. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best ORR. Results: 45 rechallenges were included from 16 centers. Median age was 60 years (range, 42-90), 64% were male. Most of them had clear cell histology (91%) and a Fuhrman or ISUP grade ≥ 3 (80%). Single-agent Nivolumab and Nivolumab-Ipilimumab association were used in 78% and 11% during ICI-1 and in 93% and 7% during ICI-2, respectively. Discontinuation for PD, toxicity or clinical decision occurred in 49%, 27% and 24% for ICI-1 and in 94%, 3% and 3% for ICI-2, respectively. The ORR were 51% (n = 23) at ICI-1 and 16% (n = 7) at ICI-2. One patient had a complete response during both ICI-1 and ICI-2 and two had a partial response at ICI-2 although they had PD as best ICI-1 response. After a median follow-up of 14.9 months (mo), median duration of response for ICI-2 was 5.1 mo (95% CI, 2.7-not reached [NR]). For ICI-1 and ICI-2: median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4 mo (95% CI, 9.8-23.5) and 3.5 mo (95% CI, 2.8-9.7); median overall survival was NR (95% CI, 37.8-NR) and 24 mo (95% CI, 9.9-NR). Poor prognostic factors for PFS at ICI-2 were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, presence of liver metastases, inflammatory syndrome and PFS under ICI-1 > 6 months. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 24% (n = 11) during ICI-1 but only in 4% (n = 2) during ICI-2. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: Our study suggests that resumption of ICI with Nivolumab has a moderate efficacy in mRCC and acceptable tolerance. Predictive factors of response are needed to propose this strategy to selected mRCC patients. Larger prospective cohorts are needed to confirm these results. [Table: see text]

Adaptation of chemotherapy to the decline tumor markers in patients with poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumors:Real-world French experience

385

Background: Personalized chemotherapy based on tumor marker decline is the new standard in poor prognosis germ-cell tumor in Europe since 2014 (GETUG 13, Lancet, Fizazi et al). The purpose of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of the princeps study in patients not selected in clinical routine between 2014 and 2018. Methods: Patients (pts) were eligible if they had at least one criteria of IGCCCG classification for poor prognosis group. They had to be treated according the study terms of GETUG 13 study and did not received prior treatment. They had to received 1 BEP (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin). Tumor markers (HCG and AFP) were dosed between day 18 and 21. Then, they received 3 additional BEP if they had favorable tumor marker decline or intensive chemotherapy if they had unfavorable decline. Results: This retrospective study included 104 patients in 14 french centers treated between 2013 and 2018: 22,1 % (n = 23) in the favorable group (Fav), 77,9 % (n = 81) in the unfavorable group (Unfav). Thirty-two pts had PS ≥ 2. In Unfav, there were more pts with HCG > 50 000 UI/L (44,2 % vs 13 %, p = 0,0067), neutrophil-to-lymphocyt ratio was also higher (median 6,4 vs 4,5, p = 0,0199). At cycle 1, all pts received BEP in Fav and 87,5 % (n = 70) in Unfav. After chemotherapy and surgery, 65,2 % in Fav and 41,3 % in Unfav obtained complete response. At 30 months (median follow-up), Fav-OS was 80,5 % (IC95% 55,8 – 92,2) and Unfav-OS was 64,4 % (IC95% 52 – 74,4). At 30 months, rates were 69,6 % (IC95% 46,6 -84,2) and 63.5 % (IC95% 51,9 – 73) respectively. In GETUG 13 study, 3-years OS was 84 % in Fav and 73 % on Unfav; 3-years PFS was 70 % and 59 % respectively. Seven pts died because of toxicity in Unfav (No one in Fav). Neuropathy, anemia and thrombopenia were more frequent in Unfav. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell transplant was required in 4 (66,7 %) pts in Fav and 8 (36,4 %) pts in Unfav. Conclusions: This study showed a reproducibility of the princeps study in terms of PFS and OS. Toxicity seemed more important in real world. For the congress, results will be reported with 50 additional pts.

Localized testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) surveillance: A Delphi consensus study

384

Background: Stage I testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) has excellent cure rates and surveillance is fully included in patient’s management, particularly during the first years of follow-up. Surveillance guidelines differ between the academic societies, with different recommendations concerning clinical and imaging frequency de-escalation and long term follow-up. We evaluated surveillance practice and schedules followed by French specialists and set up a DELPHI method to obtain a consensual surveillance program with an optimal schedule for patients with localized TGCT. Methods: An online survey on surveillance practice of stage I TGCT based on clinical-cases was conducted among urologists, radiotherapists and oncologists. Results were compared to AFU, ESMO and EAU guidelines. Then a panel of experts assessed surveillance proposals following a formal consensus method (DELPHI method). Statements were drafted after analysis of the previous survey and systematic literature review, with 2 successive rounds to reach a consensus. Results: Survey and DELPHI were conducted between July 2018 and May 2019. Sixty-one (12.2%) participated to the survey (69% oncologists, 15% urologists, 16% radiotherapists). For the first 5 years of follow-up we observed 30 to 50% of adherence to AFU’s guidelines, 20 to 36% of adherence to ESMO’s guidelines and 6 to 45% of practices not corresponding to any of the guidelines depending on clinical situations. Only 25% of practitioners stopped surveillance after the 5th year, as recommended. No physician followed the ESMO guidelines of de-escalation chest imaging. For the Delphi study, a panel of 32 experts (78% oncologists, 16% urologists, 6% radiotherapists) was asked about 38 statements. Consensus was reached for 26 statements concerning clinico-biological surveillance modalities and end of surveillance after the 5th year of follow-up. For seminoma, abdominal ultrasound was proposed as an option to the abdominopelvic (AP) scan for the 4th year of follow-up. No consensus was reached regarding de-escalation of chest imaging. Conclusions: The survey proved that French TGCT specialists do not follow current guidelines. With DELPHI method, a consensus was obtained for frequency of clinico-biological surveillance, discontinuation of surveillance after the 5th year and stop of AP scan on the 4th year of follow-up for seminoma. Questions remains concerning type and frequency of chest imaging.

1L pembrolizumab (pembro) versus chemotherapy (chemo) for choice-of-carboplatin patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in KEYNOTE-361

450

Background: 1L pembro is approved in advanced UC for cisplatin-ineligible pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 and any platinum-ineligible pts regardless of CPS in the United States based on single-arm trial data. In the phase III KEYNOTE-361 study, 1L pembro + chemo did not statistically significantly improve PFS or OS vs chemo for pts with advanced UC; formal testing of 1L pembro vs chemo was not performed. We present an exploratory analysis of outcomes with pembro vs chemo for choice-of-carboplatin (carbo) pts in KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305). Methods: At randomization, choice of platinum agent (cisplatin or carbo) plus gemcitabine for each pt was selected based on investigator’s assessment of cisplatin ineligibility. ORR/DOR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS were determined for all pts selected for carbo (“choice-of-carbo”) and also choice-of-carbo pts with CPS ≥10. Risk difference assessment for select AEs for pembro vs chemo was conducted in choice-of-carbo pts who received ≥1 dose study treatment. Results: As of Apr 29, 2020, the median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff in the full study cohort was 31.7 (22.0-42.3) mo. At randomization, renal impairment was the most common reason for choice of carbo by investigators (36% of all pts). 170 choice-of-carbo pts were randomized to the pembro arm, and 196 choice-of-carbo pts to the chemo arm. Median OS in this subgroup was 14.6 mo with pembro vs 12.3 mo with chemo (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.65-1.06]). 18-mo OS rate was 42% with pembro vs 40% with chemo. ORR to pembro vs chemo was 27.6% vs 41.8%. Median (range) DOR with pembro vs chemo was not reached (NR) (3.2+-36.1+ mo) vs 6.3 (1.8+-33.8+) mo. 84/170 (49%) and 89/196 (45%) choice-of-carbo pts in the pembro and chemo arms, respectively, had CPS ≥10. In this subgroup, median OS was 15.6 mo with pembro vs 13.5 mo with chemo (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.57-1.17]). 18-mo OS rate was 44% with pembro vs 43% with chemo. ORR to pembro vs chemo was 29.8% vs 46.1%. Median (range) DOR with pembro vs chemo was NR (4.2-36.1+ mo) vs 8.3 (2.1+-33.8+) mo. Among treated pts (N=166 for pembro, N=190 for chemo), 112 pts (68%) in the pembro arm and 163 pts (86%) in the chemo arm had grade 3-5 AEs of any cause. Pembro was associated with a higher risk of pruritus, while chemo was associated with a higher risk of decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and platelet counts, nausea, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. Conclusions: Due to the trial design, this subset was not statistically tested and is exploratory. Median OS and 18-mo OS rates did not appear markedly different in the two arms; some parameters such as DOR favored pembro, although longer follow-up is needed to determine median DOR for pembro. The PD-L1 CPS ≥10 did not clearly enrich for responders to pembro in choice-of-carbo pts. Pembro was associated with a lower rate of grade 3-5 AEs of any cause than chemo. Clinical trial information: NCT02853305.

An open-label, multicenter, phase IIIb study of patients with urinary tract carcinoma (UTC) (STRONG): Final analysis for fixed-dose durvalumab monotherapy (module A)

429

Background: Patients (pts) with advanced UTC who fail first-line therapy have poor prognoses. Durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks is approved for treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Further understanding of long-term safety and efficacy of D in platinum and non-platinum pretreated pts, using a fixed dose every 4 weeks (Q4W), is of value. Methods: Module A of the phase IIIb STRONG study (NCT03084471) investigated the safety of fixed-dose D (1500 mg, Q4W) in pts with urothelial and nonurothelial UTC who progressed on or after platinum/non-platinum CT. The primary endpoint was the number of pts with adverse events of special interest (AESIs) – events with an inflammatory or immune-mediated mechanism that may require interventions (eg, steroids/immunosuppressants), including immune-mediated adverse events (imAE). AEs with onset date on or after the date of first dose and up to 90 days after study discontinuation were included. Secondary endpoints included serious AEs and overall survival (OS). Exploratory endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) (investigator assessed per RECIST 1.1). Results: A total of 867 pts received D monotherapy. Median age was 68.1 yr and 80.0% were male; 87.1% had an ECOG PS 0-1 and 12.7% had ECOG PS 2. Most (96.3%) had urothelial UTC, including urothelial variants. Tumor PD-L1 expression was high (≥25%) in 239/577 (41.4%) pts with available data. Median treatment and follow-up duration were 12.1 wk (range 1-128) and 13.8 mo (range 0.0-28.8), respectively. Safety data are reported in the table. Deaths related to study treatment occurred in 9 pts (1.0%). At data cutoff (March 31, 2020), 30.8% of pts were in survival follow-up. Median OS was 7.0 mo (95% CI: 6.4-8.2); OS rate at 1 and 2 yr was 35.8% (95% CI: 32.5-39.2) and 20.2% (95% CI: 16.5-24.1), respectively. ORR was 17.7% with complete responses in 5.1% of pts. DCR at 6 mo was 33.0%. Median OS of subgroups: PD-L1 high or low: 9.3 mo (95% CI: 6.7-12.7) and 6.5 mo (95% CI: 5.8-8.1); ECOG PS 0-1 or 2: 8.4 mo (95% CI: 7.2–9.8) and 3 mo (95% CI: 2.0-4.1); urothelial and nonurothelial UTC: 7.0 mo (95% CI: 6.4-8.2) and 7.0 mo (95% CI: 2.7-10.2), respectively. Conclusions: Fixed-dose D monotherapy Q4W is convenient with an acceptable safety profile in previously treated pts for UTC. Long-term safety and efficacy data reported are consistent with published studies of D and other IO agents in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03084471 . [Table: see text]

Post-hoc analysis of long-term outcomes in patients with CR, PR, or SD to pembrolizumab (pembro) or platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) as 1L therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in KEYNOTE-361

435

Background: The phase III KEYNOTE-361 study compared efficacy and safety of 1L pembro + chemo or pembro vs chemo in pts with advanced UC. The trial did not meet its primary endpoints of PFS or OS superiority for pembro + chemo vs chemo; formal testing for OS for pembro vs chemo was not performed. We present a post hoc landmark analysis to examine the durability of CR/PR/SD and long-term survival in pts with CR, PR, or SD to pembro vs chemo at week 9 in KEYNOTE-361 (NCT02853305). Methods: Landmark analyses of OS by CR/PR/SD at 9 weeks after randomization in the ITT population were performed. Pts were included if they had a best response of CR/PR/SD per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review at the landmark date of week 9 (first imaging assessment per study protocol). Duration of CR/PR/SD and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. No formal comparisons were performed. Results: 307 pts were randomized to receive pembro and 352 pts to receive chemo in the KEYNOTE-361 study. As of Apr 29, 2020, the median (range) time from randomization to data cutoff was 32.5 (22.0-42.4) mo for the pembo arm and 31.4 (22.1-41.6) mo for the chemo arm. In the landmark analysis, fewer pts had CR/PR/SD at week 9 with pembro (n=137 [45%]) than with chemo (n=253 [72%]). Median (range) duration of response for pembro vs chemo was 18.7 (4.4+-35.4+) vs 12.3 (0.0+-29.7+) mo for pts with CR, and 35.0 (1.1-36.1+) vs 6.1 (0.0+-36.3+) mo for pts with PR. Median (range) duration of SD was 4.8 mo (0.0-38.2+) with pembro and 4.6 mo (0.0-16.1+) with chemo. Median OS (95% CI) for pembro vs chemo was not reached (NR) (25.5-NR) vs NR (19.1-NR) for pts with CR; NR (NR-NR) vs 14.8 mo (12.1-21.0) for pts with PR; and 18.5 mo (13.8-28.8) vs 11.1 mo (8.1-14.6) for pts with SD, respectively. Long-term OS rates were higher with pembro vs chemo across all groups (CR/PR/SD) at week 9 (Table). Conclusions: In this post hoc landmark analysis, chemo was associated with more initial responses than pembro, whereas pembro was associated with longer median duration of CR and PR, and generally longer median OS than chemo. Among pts who achieved CR/PR/SD at week 9, the relative OS benefit for pembro vs chemo increased over time. Clinical trial information: NCT02853305. [Table: see text]

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of a first cancer is associated with a decreased incidence of second primary cancer

Background

Second primary cancers (SPCs) are diagnosed in over 5% of patients after a first primary cancer (FPC). We explore here the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) given for an FPC on the risk of SPC in different age groups, cancer types and treatments.

Patients and methods

The files of the 46 829 patients diagnosed with an FPC in the Centre Léon Bérard from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed. Structured data were extracted and electronic patient records were screened using a natural language processing tool, with validation using manual screening of 2818 files of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the incidence of SPC according to patient characteristics and treatment were conducted.

Results

Among the 46 829 patients, 1830 (3.9%) had a diagnosis of SPC with a median interval of 11.1 months (range 0-78 months); 18 128 (38.7%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) and 1163 (2.5%) received ICIs for the treatment of the FPC in this period. SPCs were observed in 7/1163 (0.6%) patients who had received ICIs for their FPC versus 437/16 997 (2.6%) patients receiving CC and no ICIs for the FPC versus 1386/28 669 (4.8%) for patients receiving neither CC nor ICIs for the FPC. This reduction was observed at all ages and for all histotypes analyzed. Treatment with ICIs and/or CC for the FPC are associated with a reduced risk of SPC in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy with ICIs alone and in combination with CC was found to be associated with a reduced incidence of SPC for all ages and cancer types.

•

From 2013 to 2018, 3.9% of the 46 829 patients diagnosed with a first cancer presented with an SPC.

•

Treatment of the first cancer with ICIs was associated with a major reduction of SPC.

•

CC given for an FPC was also associated with a lower magnitude of reduction of SPC.

•

There were no SPC in cancer patients treated with ICIs in the localized phase of their first cancer.

Localized testicular germ cell tumor surveillance: A Delphi consensus study

e17060

Background: Stage I testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) has excellent cure rates and surveillance is fully included in patient’s management, particularly during the first years of follow-up. Surveillance guidelines differ between the scientific societies, with different recommendations concerning clinical and imaging frequency de-escalation and long term follow-up. We evaluated surveillance practice and schedules followed by French specialists and set up a DELPHI method to obtain a consensual surveillance program with an optimal schedule for patients with localized TGCT. Methods: An online survey on surveillance practice of stage I TGCT based on clinical-cases was conducted among urologists, radiotherapists and oncologists. Results were compared to AFU, ESMO and EAU guidelines. Then a panel of experts assessed surveillance proposals following a formal consensus method (DELPHI method). Statements were drafted after analysis of the previous survey and systematic literature review, with 2 successive rounds to reach a consensus. Results: Survey and DELPHI method were conducted between July 2018 and May 2019. 61 participated to the survey (69% oncologists, 15% urologists, 16% radiotherapists). About 65% of practitioners followed clinico-biological guidelines concerning 1 to 5 years of follow-up, only 25% discontinued surveillance after the 5th year, as recommended. No physician followed the ESMO guidelines of de-escalation chest imaging. A panel of 32 experts (78% oncologists, 16% urologists, 6% radiotherapists) was asked about 38 statements. Consensus was reached for 26 statements concerning clinico-biological surveillance modalities and end of surveillance after the 5th year of follow-up. For seminoma, abdominal ultrasound was proposed as an option to the abdominopelvic (AP) scan for the 4th year of follow-up. No consensus was reached regarding de-escalation of chest imaging. Conclusions: The survey proved that French TGCT specialists do not follow current guidelines. With DELPHI method, a consensus was obtained for frequency of clinico-biological surveillance, discontinuation of surveillance after the 5th year and discontinuation of AP scan on the 4th year of follow-up for seminoma. Questions remains concerning type and frequency of chest imaging.

The SEMITEP trial: De-escalating chemotherapy in low-volume metastatic seminoma based on early FDG-PET

387

Background: A negative FDG-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET) predicts the absence of viable seminoma cells after chemotherapy in men with metastatic seminoma. In this study, we assessed whether patients (pts) with low-volume metastatic seminoma can be treated with 2 cycles of etoposide-cisplatin (EP) followed by only one cycle of carboplatin (CARBO) on the basis of a negative interim PET, thereby limiting the burden of toxicity. Methods: In this non-randomised, multiple-center, phase 2 trial (NCT01887340), we enrolled pts with low-volume metastatic seminoma (with good prognosis according to IGCCCG and the Medical Research Council classifications). All pts with baseline PET-positive received EP for two cycles. After completion of first two cycles, pts underwent a second PET to assess response. Patients with a persistent positive PET (based on local review) proceeded directly to two additional EP cycles (for a total of 4); those who achieved a PET-negative received only one cycle of CARBO (AUC=7). The primary outcome was the proportion of pts who were PET-negative on interim PET and received de-escalating chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between June 2013 and July 2017, 102 pts were enrolled in the study. Three pts were deemed ineligible or not evaluable and thus 99 patients received treatment. After 2 first EP cycles, PET was available in 94 pts. Interim PET was negative in 68 pts (72%) and positive in 26 pts (28%). Overall, 63 pts (67.0%; 95% CI 57.5-76.5) were PET-negative and proceeded to one single cycle of CARBO. Overall, 24 (25.5%, 95% CI 17.1-34.9) patients had a PET positive after 2 EP and received 2 additional cycles of EP. After a median follow-up of 34.4 months, only 8 patients relapsed (2 in EP group and 6 in CARBO group). 2-year PFS rates were respectively 93.7% (95% CI 84.9-97.5) in the CARBO group and 92.9% (95% CI 77.4-98.0) in the EP group. Only one patient died during the 2 first cycles. Conclusions: De-escalating treatment based on a negative PET after 2 cycles of chemotherapy appears to be safe and feasible in the majority of patients with low-volume metastatic seminoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01887340.

Utility of a general molecular screening program in patients with GU malignancies: The ProfiLER trial experience

528

Background: Advances in comprehensive tumor molecular pathology in genito-urinary (GU) tumors have driven development of targeted agents since ten years and changed the landscape of GU tumors treatment. We describe our experience with the institutional molecular trial ProfiLER. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies included in the prospective molecular profiling trial ProfiLER (NCT01774409) Tumor samples were analyzed by sequencing a 69 gene panel by next generation sequencing (NGS, Ion torrent PGM system) and whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization (Agilent platform). Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Cases were presented in a molecular board to drive prescription of molecular targeted therapy (MTT) according to the molecular abnormalities observed. Results: Between February 2013 and December 2018 156 adult patients were included, 42 had kidney cancer (including 32 clear cell carcinoma, 5 papillary type 2); 38 prostate cancer, 52 urothelial carcinoma including (16 upper tract), 12 cisplatin-refractory testicular germ cell tumor, 4 penile cancer, 3 adenocarcinoma of the urachus, 2 urethral carcinoma and 3 Leydig cell tumor. Median age at inclusion was 62 years (range 19, 80). Overall NGS and CGH failed in 11.5% of cases, and in 24% of prostate cancer cases.28.8% patients had at least one actionable target (n=45) with a recommended MTT. Only 17.8 % (n=8) patients actually received MTT corresponding to 5.1% of the total screened population. Only one patient had a clinical benefit from MTT. The most frequently initiated MTT were PIK3/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors (44,4%), FGRF/EGFR pathway inhibitors (13.3%) PARP inhibitors (8.7%) or cyclin kinase inhibitors (8.7%). The most frequent reasons for lack of MTT initiation were early death, ineligibility for clinical trials due to general condition. Conclusions: Non tumor-specific molecular profiling is feasible in GU cancers. However the use of targeted sequencing with a tumor type specific panel and at an earlier clinical stage may improve the proportion of MTT recommendations.

Randomized phase III trial of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIUBC): Preliminary results of the GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER trial on toxicity and pathological responses

437

Background: The optimal perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients (pts) with MIUBC is not defined. Methods: Between February 2013 and February 2018, 494 pts were randomized in 28 French centres and received either 4 cycles of GC every 3 weeks or 6 cycles of dd-MVAC every 2 weeks before surgery (neoadjuvant group) or after surgery (adjuvant group). The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival at 3 years. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, pathological responses and overall survival. Results: In the neoadjuvant group, 218 pts received dd-MVAC and 219 pts GC. The median number of cycles was 6 (0-6) and 4 (1-4), respectively. 60% of pts received 6 cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, 84% received 4 cycles in the GC arm. 199 pts (91%) and 198 (90%) pts underwent surgery, respectively. Complete pathologic responses (ypT0pN0) were observed in 84 (42%) and 71 (36%) pts, respectively (p=0.02). An organ-confined status (<ypT3pN0) was obtained in 154 (77%) and 124 (63%) pts, respectively (p=0.002). In the adjuvant group (57 pts), the median number of cycles was 5 (1-6) and 4 (1-4), respectively. 40% of pts received 6 cycles in the dd-MVAC arm, 60% received 4 cycles in the GC arm. Most of CTCAE grade ≥ 3 toxicities concerned hematological toxicities. At least one of these where reported for 125 (50%) pts in the dd-MVAC group and 134 (54%) pts in the GC group (p=NS). Gastrointestinal (GI) grade ≥ 3 disorders were more frequently observed in the dd-MVAC arm (p<0.0001) as well as grade ≥ 3 asthenia (p<0.00001). Four deaths (3 in the dd-MVAC) occurred during chemotherapy. Conclusions: Complete pathological responses and organ-confined status were more frequently observed in the dd-MVAC arm. Toxicity was manageable with more severe asthenia and GI side effects in the dd-MVAC arm. Clinical trial information: 2012-000563-25.

Real-world data of cabozantinib in patients with VEGF-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the French Early Access Program (CABOREAL)

683

Background: Cabozantinib (Cabo) is approved in Europe for the treatment of mRCC in first line and after failure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). We report the results from real-world use of Cabo in the French Early Access Program (EAP) (CABOREAL [NCT03744585]). Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 26 centers. Patients (pts) were treated with Cabo during the Temporary Authorization for Use (ATU) period from Sep 12, 2016 to licensing in Feb 19, 2018. Pts were eligible after 2 prior VEGFR TKI unless clinical decision for 2nd line (L). The aim was to evaluate the use and activity of Cabo in real-life conditions. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from initiation of Cabo. Results: Overall, 410 pts were included. Median age was 63 years, 85% had clear-cell histology, 41% and 32% were intermediate/poor IMDC risk, respectively. Pts were mostly ECOG 1 (42%) or 2 (30%); 229 (56%) pts had bone metastasis (mets). Median follow-up was 14.4 months (m). Cabo was used as 2L, 3L and 4L or beyond for 101 (25%), 137 (33%) and 172 (41%) pts respectively; 204 pts (50%) were pretreated with nivolumab (Nivo). Activity results and dose reduction are summarized in the table. Starting dose was 60 mg (290 pts, 71%), 40 mg (109 pts, 27%) and 20 mg (8 pts, 2%). Treatment interruption occurred for 267 pts (65%), dose modification for 240 pts (59%) and schedule change for 64 pts (16%). Median daily dose was 40 mg/day. Treatment discontinuation occurred for 348 (85%) pts, with 86 (25%) due to adverse events. Notably, 184 (54%) pts received a subsequent systemic therapy. Conclusions: We report the largest real-world study of Cabo in mRCC to date. CABOREAL demonstrates that using dose modification, median Cabo duration was 7.6 m in a heavily pretreated population, with the longest treatment duration in patients with prior Nivo exposure. Clinical trial information: NCT03744585. [Table: see text]

Is body mass index (BMI) associated with favorable outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab? An ancillary study of the NIVOREN-GETUG AFU-26 trial

630

Background: Adipose tissue might affect response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in cancer patients (pts). Higher BMI is associated with improved outcomes in mRCC under VEGFR TKI but BMI impact under CPI remains unclear. Methods: We analysed BMI in the NIVOREN GETUG AFU 26 study, a prospective study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in mRCC after failure of prior VEGFR inhibitors. We investigated the association between BMI, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). BMI (weight/height 2) was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) categories: underweight as BMI < 18.5; normal weight as 18.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9; overweight as 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29.9 and obesity as BMI ≥ 30. Survival distributions were compared using a Log-Rank test, supported by uni- and multivariate Cox regressions to estimate the Hazard Ratio (HR) and its 95% CIs. Median follow-up (FU) and the 95% CI were calculated using the reverse Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Overall, 708 pts were included in the BMI analysis: 20 pts (2.8%) were underweight, 322(45.5%) had normal weight, 255(36.0%) were overweight and 111(15.7%) obese. Median age was 64 years, 77.3% were male, performance status was ≥ 80% in 81.2%, and IMDC risk group was good, intermediate and poor in respectively 18.2%, 56.4%, 25.4%. Outcomes according to BMI is detailed in table, median FU was 23.9 months (95%CI 23.0-24.5). BMI adjusted to known prognostic factors was not significant in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Higher BMI patients seems to have better outcomes with nivolumab in mRCC. Further characterisation is on-going to explore the relation of BMI with established risk factor in pts under CPI in mRCC.[Table: see text]