Adenosine increases LPS-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation in smooth muscle cells via an intracellular mechanism and modulates it via actions on adenosine receptors

AIM

In inflamed and damaged cardiovascular tissues, local extracellular adenosine concentrations increase coincidentally with activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB). To investigate whether adenosine influences NFκB activation in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and, if so, to examine the role of its receptors.

METHODS

VSMCs were isolated from NFκB-luciferase reporter mice, cultured and then treated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to activate NFκB signalling. Adenosine, adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, adenosine deaminase and uptake inhibitors were used together with LPS to evaluate the role of adenosine and its receptors on NFκB activation, which was assessed by luciferase activity and NFκB target gene expression.

RESULTS

Adenosine potentiated LPS-induced NFκB activation. This was dependent on adenosine uptake and enhanced by an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, suggesting that intracellular adenosine plays an important role. Non-selective adenosine receptor agonists (2Cl-Ado and NECA) inhibited NFκB activation induced by LPS. Selective A1 or A2A antagonist given alone could not completely antagonize the NECA effect, indicating that the inhibitory effect was due to multiple adenosine receptors. The activation of the A3 receptor further increased LPS-induced NFκB activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine increases LPS-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation in smooth muscle cells via an intracellular mechanism and decreases it via actions on A1 and A2A receptors. These results provide novel insights into the role of adenosine as a regulator of inflammation-induced NFκB activation.

Inhibition of sodium-linked glucose reabsorption normalizes diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration in conscious adenosine A₁-receptor deficient mice

AIM

Glomerular hyperfiltration is commonly observed in diabetics early after the onset of the disease and predicts the progression of nephropathy. Sustained hyperglycaemia is also closely associated with kidney hypertrophy and increased electrolyte and glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule. In this study, we investigated the role of the increased tubular sodium/glucose cotransport for diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration. To eliminate any potential confounding effect of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism, we used adenosine A₁-receptor deficient (A1AR(-/-)) mice known to lack a functional TGF mechanism and compared the results to corresponding wild-type animals (A1AR(+/+)).

METHODS

Diabetes was induced by an intravenous bolus injection of alloxan. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined in conscious mice by a single bolus injection of inulin. The sodium/glucose cotransporters were inhibited by phlorizin 30 min prior to GFR measurements.

RESULTS

Normoglycaemic animals had a similar GFR independent of genotype (A₁AR(+/+) 233 ± 11 vs. A₁AR(-/-) 241 ± 25 μL min(-1)), and induction of diabetes resulted in glomerular hyperfiltration in both groups (A₁AR(+/+) 380 ± 25 vs. A₁AR(-/-) 336 ± 35 μL min(-1); both P < 0.05). Phlorizin had no effect on GFR in normoglycaemic mice, whereas it reduced GFR in both genotypes during diabetes (A₁AR(+/+) 365 ± 18 to 295 ± 19, A₁AR(-/-) 354 ± 38 to 199 ± 15 μL min(-1); both P < 0.05). Notably, the reduction was more pronounced in the A₁AR(-/-) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that increased tubular sodium/glucose reabsorption is important for diabetes-induced hyperfiltration, and that the TGF mechanism is not involved in these alterations, but rather functions to reduce any deviations from a new set-point.

Peripheral adenosine A2A receptors are involved in carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in mice

Here we studied the role of peripheral adenosine A(2A) receptors in mechanical hyperalgesia during inflammation using mice lacking the A(2A) receptors. Unilateral s.c. administration of the local inflammatory agent λ-carrageenan induced profound mechanical hyperalgesia 24 h after administration in the ipsilateral hind paw in wild-type mice. In homozygous mice lacking the A(2A) receptors, carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia was significantly reduced compared to wild type controls. The reduction in inflammatory hyperalgesia seen in A(2A) receptor knock-out mice was not associated with changes in paw edema. CGS 21680, a selective A(2A) receptor agonist, produced significantly more mechanical hyperalgesia in wild type females than in wild type males upon direct s.c. injection into the hindpaw whereas it had no effect upon systemic administration. The hyperalgesic effect of CGS 21680 was markedly reduced in the A(2A) knock-out mice of both sexes. Subcutaneous ZM-241,385, a selective A(2A) receptor antagonist, injected into the hindpaw reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia following carrageenan in female mice, but not in males. The results indicate that activation of peripheral adenosine A(2A) receptors during inflammation is associated with mechanical hyperalgesia, and that this effect is more prominent in females than in males.

CX3CL1-induced modulation at CA1 synapses reveals multiple mechanisms of EPSC modulation involving adenosine receptor subtypes

We characterized the role of adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes in the modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by the chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1) in mouse hippocampal CA1 neurons. CX(3)CL1 causes a reversible depression of excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC), which is abolished by the A(3)R antagonist MRS1523, but not by A(1)R (DPCPX) or A(2A)R (SCH58261) antagonists. Consistently, CX3CL1-induced EPSC depression is absent in slices from A(3)R(-/-) but not A(1)R(-/-) or A(2A)R(-/-) mice. Further, A(3)R stimulation causes similar EPSC depression. In cultured neurons, CX3CL1-induced depression of AMPA current shows A(1)R-A(3)R pharmacology. We conclude that glutamatergic depression induced by released adenosine requires the stimulation of different ARs.

The birth and postnatal development of purinergic signalling

The purinergic signalling system is one of the most ancient and arguably the most widespread intercellular signalling system in living tissues. In this review we present a detailed account of the early developments and current status of purinergic signalling. We summarize the current knowledge on purinoceptors, their distribution and role in signal transduction in various tissues in physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Adenosine A(3) receptors regulate heart rate, motor activity and body temperature

AIM

To examine the phenotype of mice that lack the adenosine A(3) receptor (A(3)R).

METHODS

We examined the heart rate, body temperature and locomotion continuously by telemetry over several days. In addition, the effect of the adenosine analogue R-N(6)-phenylisopropyl-adenosine (R-PIA) was examined. We also examined heat production and food intake.

RESULTS

We found that the marked diurnal variation in activity, heart rate and body temperature, with markedly higher values at night than during day time, was reduced in the A(3)R knock-out mice. Surprisingly, the reduction in heart rate, activity and body temperature seen after injection of R-PIA in wild type mice was virtually eliminated in the A(3)R knock-out mice. The marked reduction in activity was associated with a decreased heat production, as expected. However, the A(3)R knock-out mice, surprisingly, had a higher food intake but no difference in body weight compared to wild type mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The mice lacking adenosine A(3) receptors exhibit a surprisingly clear phenotype with changes in diurnal rhythm and temperature regulation. Whether these effects are due to a physiological role of A(3) receptors in these processes or whether they represent a role in development remains to be elucidated.

Adenosine A(1) receptors and vascular reactivity

AIM

Blood pressure is higher in A(1) receptor knock-out (A(1)R-/-) mice than in wild type litter mates (A(1)R+/+) and we have examined if this could be related to altered vascular functions.

METHODS

Contraction of aortic rings and mesenteric arteries were examined. To examine if the adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated contraction of aortic muscle was functionally important we examined pulse pressure (PP) and augmentation index (AIX) using a sensor that allows measurements of rapid pressure transients.

RESULTS

Contraction of aortic rings to phenylephrine and relaxation to acetylcholine were similar between genotypes. The non-selective adenosine receptor agonist N-ethyl carboxamido adenosine (NECA) enhanced the contractile response, and this was eliminated in aortas from A(1)R-/- mice. However, in mesenteric arteries no contractile response was seen and adenosine-mediated relaxation was identical between studied genotypes. A(2B) adenosine receptors, rather than A(2A) receptors, may be mainly responsible for the vasorelaxation induced by adenosine analogues in the examined mouse vessels. PP was higher in A(1)R-/- mice, but variability was unaltered. AIX was not different between genotypes, but the NECA-induced fall was larger in A(1)R-/- mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of adenosine A(1) receptors in regulating vessel tone differs between blood vessels. Furthermore, contractile effects on isolated vessels cannot explain the blood pressure in A(1) knock-out mice. The A(1) receptor modulation of blood pressure is therefore mainly related to extravascular factors.

On the mechanism of action of theophylline and caffeine

Important developments in our understanding of the mechanism of action of methylxanthines have taken place in the last 10 years. A brief overview of these developments is provided below and the author concludes that the common view that theophylline (and caffeine) acts by raising the levels of cyclic AMP is generally untenable. Instead, many of the actions of the methylxanthines can be explained on the basis of their being antagonists of endogenous adenosine. However, the mechanism behind the antiasthmatic effects of xanthines still remains unknown and further research is necessary.

Diabetes-induced hyperfiltration in adenosine A(1)-receptor deficient mice lacking the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism

AIMS

Glomerular hyperfiltration is commonly found in diabetic patients early after the onset of disease. This is one of the first indications of the development of progressive diabetic nephropathy. It has been proposed that glomerular hyperfiltration is caused by decreased delivery of electrolytes to the macula densa due to the increased sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule, which would increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) via the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism. In this study, we investigated the role of TGF in diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration by inducing diabetes in adenosine A(1)-receptor knockout (A1AR(-/-)) mice known to lack a functional TGF mechanism.

METHODS

Diabetes was induced by alloxan (75 mg kg(-1) bw) injected into the tail vein. The 24-hour urinary electrolyte excretion was measured in metabolic cages, the GFR determined by inulin clearance under isoflurane-anaesthesia, and histological changes evaluated.

RESULTS

All alloxan-treated animals developed hyperglycaemia (> or =20 mm). Normoglycaemic animals had a similar GFR independent of genotype (A1AR(+/+) 9.3 +/- 0.5 vs. A1AR(-/-) 10.1 +/- 0.8 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw) and diabetes resulted in similar glomerular hyperfiltration in both groups (A1AR(+/+) 14.0 +/- 1.7, n = 9 vs. A1AR(-/-) 15.3 +/- 1.9 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw). Diabetic animals had a similar tendency to develop interstitial fibrosis, whereas the glomerular volume was similar in both genotypes, and unaltered by diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the A1AR(-/-) mice develop diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration, demonstrating that the TGF mechanism is not the major cause of the development of hyperfiltration. Furthermore, the hyperfiltration in the present study was not related to alterations in the glomerular filtration area.

Eliminating the antilipolytic adenosine A1 receptor does not lead to compensatory changes in the antilipolytic actions of PGE2 and nicotinic acid

AIM

We examined whether compensatory changes after adenosine A(1) receptor knockout [A(1)R (-/-)] eliminate the antilipolytic actions mediated by this receptor.

METHODS

Lipolysis experiments were performed on adipocytes prepared from the wild type A(1)R (+/+), A(1)R (-/-) and heterozygous mice. Gene expression was assayed with cDNA microarray technique and real-time PCR; protein expression with immunoblotting.

RESULTS

The A(1)R was the only adenosine receptor involved in lipolysis. The effects of adenosine deaminase and 2-chloroadenosine were abolished in A(1)R (-/-) mice. The IC(50) value of 2-chloroadenosine doubled from 16.6 to 33.6 nm when half of the A(1)Rs were eliminated. Adrenergic alpha(2) agonists had no effects on lipolysis. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 5.8 nm (4.7-7.2 nm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 10.6 nm (9.0-12.6 nm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. Nicotinic acid inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 0.30 microm (0.19-0.46 microm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 0.24 microm (0.16-0.37 microm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. G(i)alpha(1) mRNA was significantly up-regulated in adipose tissue from A(1)R (-/-) mice. However, immunoblotting showed that G(ialpha1) was not up-regulated at the protein level.

CONCLUSION

The A(1)R mediates the antilipolytic actions of adenosine. Deletion of the A(1)R in mice does not result in compensatory increases in G-protein-mediated antilipolytic actions of PGE(2) or nicotinic acid.

G-protein-coupled receptors: an update

The receptors that couple to G proteins (GPCR) and which span the cell membranes seven times (7-TM receptors) were the focus of a symposium in Stockholm 2006. The ensemble of GPCR has now been mapped in several animal species. They remain a major focus of interest in drug development, and their diverse physiological and pathophysiological roles are being clarified, i.a. by genetic targeting. Recent developments hint at novel levels of complexity. First, many, if not all, GPCRs are part of multimeric ensembles, and physiology and pharmacology of a given GPCR may be at least partly guided by the partners it was formed together with. Secondly, at least some GPCRs may be constitutively active. Therefore, drugs that are inverse agonists may prove useful. Furthermore, the level of activity may vary in such a profound way between cells and tissues that this could offer new ways of achieving specificity of drug action. Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear that some of these receptors can signal via novel types of pathways, and hence that 'GPCRs' may not always be G-protein-coupled. Thus there are many challenges for the basic scientist and the drug industry.

Sex differences in mouse heart rate and body temperature and in their regulation by adenosine A1 receptors

AIM

To examine cardiac function, body temperature and locomotor behaviour in the awake adenosine A(1) receptor knock out mouse of both sexes.

METHODS

Male and female A(1)R (+/+) and (-/-) mice, instrumented with telemetric devices, were recorded during basal conditions and after drug administration.

RESULTS

Female mice had higher heart rate, body temperature and locomotion, both during daytime and during the night. Awake A(1)R (-/-) mice had a slightly elevated heart rate, and this was more clear-cut in males. Heart rate was also higher in Langendorff-perfused denervated A(1)R (-/-) hearts. Body temperature was higher in A(1)R (-/-) males and females; locomotor activity was higher in A(1)R (-/-) females, but not in males. The adenosine receptor agonist R-PIA (0.2 mg kg(-1)) decreased heart rate and body temperature, but less in A(1)R (-/-) animals than in A(1)R (+/+) mice (P < 0.001 in both parameters). The unselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine had a minor stimulatory effect on heart rate in lower doses, but depressed it at a dose of 75 mg kg(-1). Body temperature was increased after a low dose (7.5 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine in both sexes and genotypes, and markedly reduced after a high dose (75 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine. An intermediary dose of caffeine 30 mg kg(-1) increased or decreased body temperature depending on genotype and sex. Locomotor responses to caffeine were variable depending both on genotype and sex.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the adenosine A(1) receptor is involved in the regulation of heart rate, body temperature and locomotor activity, but the magnitude of the involvement is different in males and females.

Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair

Adenosine is formed inside cells or on their surface, mostly by breakdown of adenine nucleotides. The formation of adenosine increases in different conditions of stress and distress. Adenosine acts on four G-protein coupled receptors: two of them, A(1) and A(3), are primarily coupled to G(i) family G proteins; and two of them, A(2A) and A(2B), are mostly coupled to G(s) like G proteins. These receptors are antagonized by xanthines including caffeine. Via these receptors it affects many cells and organs, usually having a cytoprotective function. Joel Linden recently grouped these protective effects into four general modes of action: increased oxygen supply/demand ratio, preconditioning, anti-inflammatory effects and stimulation of angiogenesis. This review will briefly summarize what is known and what is not in this regard. It is argued that drugs targeting adenosine receptors might be useful adjuncts in many therapeutic approaches.

Contribution of adenosine receptors in the control of arteriolar tone and adenosine–angiotensin II interaction

Adenosine (Ado) mediates vasoconstriction via A(1)-Ado receptors and vasodilation via A(2)-Ado receptors in the kidney. It interacts with angiotensin II (Ang II), which is important for renal hemodynamics and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). The aim was to investigate the function of Ado receptors in the Ado-Ang II interaction in mouse microperfused, afferent arterioles. Ado (10(-11)-10(-4) mol/l) caused a biphasic response: arteriolar diameters were reduced (-7%) at Ado 10(-11)-10(-9) mol/l and returned to control values at higher concentrations. Treatment with Ang II (10(-10) mol/l) transformed the response into a concentration-dependent constriction. N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (A(1)-Ado receptor agonist) reduced diameters (12% at 10(-6) mol/l). Application of CGS21680 (10(-12)-10(-4) mol/l, A(2A) receptor agonist) increased the diameter by 13%. Pretreatment with ZM241385 (A(2A)-Ado receptor antagonist) alone or in combination with MRS1706 (A(2B)-Ado receptor antagonist) resulted in a pure constriction upon Ado, whereas 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) (A(1)-Ado receptor antagonist) inhibited the constrictor response. Afferent arterioles of mice lacking A(1)-Ado receptor did not show constriction upon Ado. Treatment with Ado (10(-8) mol/l) increased the response upon Ang II, which was blocked by CPT. Ado (10(-5) mol/l) did not influence the Ang II response, but an additional blockade of A(2)-Ado receptors enhanced it. The action of Ado on constrictor A(1)-Ado receptors and dilatory A(2)-Ado receptors modulates the interaction with Ang II. Both directions of Ado-Ang II interaction, which predominantly leads to an amplification of the contractile response, are important for the operation of the TGF.

Differences between A 68930 and SKF 82958 could suggest synergistic roles of D1 and D5 receptors

The isochroman A 68930 and the benzazepine SKF 82958 are two full dopamine D1 receptor agonists. Responses to these compounds are different in several important aspects. When given to rats in a novel environment, A 68930 caused a dose-dependent (0.019-4.9 mg/kg) suppression of locomotion. SKF 82958 had no such effect at any dose studied (0.051-3.3 mg/kg). In animals habituated to the environment, A 68930 had no effect but SKF 82958 increased locomotor activity. Both A 68930 and SKF 82958 caused a decrease in core temperature at early time points. Both agonists increased c-fos and NGFI-A expression in caudate putamen but only SKF 82958 did so in the accumbens nucleus (at 1.6 mg/kg). Quantitative receptor autoradiography showed that A 68930 is 9-13 times more potent than SKF 82958 at displacing the selective dopamine D1 antagonist [3H]SCH 23390. This difference agrees with the difference observed when the agonists were used to stimulate cAMP formation in cells transfected with the D1 receptor. In contrast, SKF 82958 was 5 times more potent than A 68930 in cells transfected with the D5 receptor. We suggest that the balance between signaling via dopamine D1 and D5 receptors determines the functional effects of agonists at D1/D5 receptors.

Intake inhibition by NPY and CCK-8: A challenge of the notion of NPY as an “Orexigen”

We tested the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) interacts with cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) in inhibition of intake of an intraorally infused solution of sucrose, a test of consummatory ingestive behavior. Both intracerebroventricular infusion of NPY (10 microg) and intraperitoneal injection of CCK-8 (0.5 micro/kg) reduced the intake of a 1M solution of sucrose infused intraorally at a rate of 0.5 ml/min in ovariectomized female rats, but the two peptides did not interact in inhibiting intraoral intake. By contrast, NPY increased intake if the sucrose solution was ingested from a bottle, a test demanding both appetitive and consummatory ingestive responses. CCK-8 inhibited intake in this test and its inhibitory effect was increased by simultaneous treatment with NPY. The activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), a brainstem relay mediating inhibition of intake, judged by the expression of c-fos-like immunoreactivity, was significantly increased after treatment with CCK-8 or NPY to approximately the same extent. Combined treatment with NPY and CCK-8 did not increase the c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the NTS above treatment with NPY or CCK-8 alone. These results strengthen the hypothesis that NPY, like CCK-8, is an inhibitor of consummatory ingestive behavior and suggest that this inhibition is mediated via the NTS.

Adenosine A1 receptors are necessary for protection of the murine heart by remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia

AIMS

Adenosine is involved in classic pre-conditioning (PC) in most species, acting through especially adenosine A1 and A3 receptors. We studied whether the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was important for remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia using a mouse with targeted deletion of the A1R gene.

METHODS

Remote, delayed adaptation was evoked by brain ischaemia (BIPC) through bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries. Through microdialysis probes placed in the brain and the abdominal aorta, we found that plasma adenosine increased following carotid artery ligation. Twenty-four hours after ligation, hearts were isolated, Langendorff perfused and subjected to 40 min global ischaemia and 60 min reperfusion. Hearts from sham operated and BIPC animals either with (A1R+/+) or without (A1R-/-) the gene for the adenosine A(1)R were compared with each other.

RESULTS

In wild types, BIPC reduced infarct size and improved functional recovery during reperfusion, but BIPC did not protect hearts of A1R-/- mice. There were no significant differences between sham-operated A1R+/+ and A1R-/- in recovery of function or infarct size. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were phosphorylated during reperfusion of sham treated hearts. The increase in ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation detected was attenuated in hearts of BIPC or A1R-/- animals.

CONCLUSION

During BIPC adenosine acting on the A1R appears necessary for myocardial protection. MAPK signalling may possibly be involved in organ protection during the delayed phase of remote, delayed adaptation.

Distribution of antinociceptive adenosine A1 receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and relationship to primary afferents and neuronal subpopulations

Adenosine can reduce pain and allodynia in animals and man, probably via spinal adenosine A1 receptors. In the present study, we investigate the distribution of the adenosine A1 receptor in the rat spinal cord dorsal horn using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radioligand binding, and confocal microscopy. In the lumbar cord dorsal horn, dense immunoreactivity was seen in the inner part of lamina II. This was unaltered by dorsal root section or thoracic cord hemisection. Confocal microscopy of the dorsal horn revealed close anatomical relationships but no or only minor overlap between A1 receptors and immunoreactivity for markers associated with primary afferent central endings: calcitonin gene-related peptide, or isolectin B4, or with neuronal subpopulations: mu-opioid receptor, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, met-enkephalin, parvalbumin, or protein kinase Cgamma, or with glial cells: glial fibrillary acidic protein. A few adenosine A1 receptor positive structures were double-labeled with alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoaxolepropionic acid glutamate receptor subunits 1 and 2/3. The results indicate that most of the adenosine A1 receptors in the dorsal horn are located in inner lamina II postsynaptic neuronal cell bodies and processes whose functional and neurochemical identity is so far unknown. Many adenosine A1 receptor positive structures are in close contact with isolectin B4 positive C-fiber primary afferents and/or postsynaptic structures containing components of importance for the modulation of nociceptive information.

Decreased inflammatory pain due to reduced carrageenan-induced inflammation in mice lacking adenosine A3 receptors

Mice with a targeted disruption of adenosine A(3) receptor (A(3)AR) gene were assessed for their nociceptive threshold and for their localized inflammatory response following carrageenan injected into the hindpaw. Under basal conditions no difference was seen between A(3)AR knock-out (A(3)AR(-/-)) and wild-type (A(3)AR(+/+)) mice in nociceptive response to mechanical or heat stimuli. The antinociceptive response to the intrathecal adenosine analogue R-phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA) was also unchanged in the A(3)AR(-/-) mice. In contrast, heat hyperalgesia, plasma extravasation and edema following carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind paw were significantly reduced in A(3)AR(-/-) mice compared to the A(3)AR(+/+) controls. Thus, mice lacking A(3)AR had deficits in generating the localized inflammatory response to carrageenan, supporting a pro-inflammatory role of A(3)AR in peripheral tissues. However, no evidence for a role of A(3)AR in nociception and the antinociceptive effect of R-PIA was found.

Adenosine A(2A) receptor facilitation of hippocampal synaptic transmission is dependent on tonic A(1) receptor inhibition

Adenosine tonically inhibits synaptic transmission through actions at A(1) receptors. It also facilitates synaptic transmission, but it is unclear if this facilitation results from pre- and/or postsynaptic A(2A) receptor activation or from indirect control of inhibitory GABAergic transmission. The A(2A) receptor agonist, CGS 21680 (10 nM), facilitated synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices (by 14%), independent of whether or not GABAergic transmission was blocked by the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor antagonists, picrotoxin (50 microM) and CGP 55845 (1 microM), respectively. CGS 21680 (10 nM) also inhibited paired-pulse facilitation by 12%, an effect prevented by the A(2A) receptor antagonist, ZM 241385 (20 nM). These effects of CGS 21680 (10 nM) were occluded by adenosine deaminase (2 U/ml) and were made to reappear upon direct activation of A(1) receptors with N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 6 nM). CGS 21680 (10 nM) only facilitated (by 17%) the K(+)-evoked release of glutamate from superfused hippocampal synaptosomes in the presence of 100 nM CPA. This effect of CGS 21680 (10 nM), in contrast to the isoproterenol (30 microM) facilitation of glutamate release, was prevented by the protein kinase C inhibitors, chelerythrine (6 microM) and bisindolylmaleimide (1 microM), but not by the protein kinase A inhibitor, H-89 (1 microM). Isoproterenol (30 microM), but not CGS 21680 (10-300 nM), enhanced synaptosomal cAMP levels, indicating that the CGS 21680-induced facilitation of glutamate release involves a cAMP-independent protein kinase C activation. To discard any direct effect of CGS 21680 on adenosine A(1) receptor, we also show that in autoradiography experiments CGS 21680 only displaced the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyladenosine ([(3)H]DPCPX, 0.5 nM) with an EC(50) of 1 microM in all brain areas studied and CGS 21680 (30 nM) failed to change the ability of CPA to displace DPCPX (1 nM) binding to CHO cells stably transfected with A(1) receptors. Our results suggest that A(2A) receptor agonists facilitate hippocampal synaptic transmission by attenuating the tonic effect of inhibitory presynaptic A(1) receptors located in glutamatergic nerve terminals. This might be a fine-tuning role for adenosine A(2A) receptors to allow frequency-dependent plasticity phenomena without compromising the A(1) receptor-mediated neuroprotective role of adenosine.

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

Adenosine A(1) receptor agonism in the immature rat brain and heart

We examined if the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist adenosine amine congener (ADAC, 100 microg/kg i.p.) is neuroprotective in 7-day-old rats subjected to hypoxic ischemia. Brain damage, evaluated as weight deficit and gross morphology, was not affected by ADAC treatment. Nonetheless, ADAC (100 microg/kg i.p.) reduced heart rate by 44% (p<0.0001), indicating that the dose given was pharmacologically active. Adenosine A(1) receptors were determined by [(3)H] 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX)-binding and levels were 23% of the adult levels. GTP did not affect [(3)H] DPCPX-binding in the cerebral cortex at postnatal day 7 whereas there was strong enhancement of [(3)H] DPCPX-binding in the heart. This suggested a poor G-protein coupling at postnatal day 7 in the brain, which also was confirmed using GTP [gamma-(35)S]-binding in the presence of an adenosine A(1) receptor agonist. Thus, the lack of a neuroprotective effect of ADAC may be explained by the fact that adenosine A(1) receptors are not part of a functional unit in the 7-day-old rat brain.

Hyperalgesia, anxiety, and decreased hypoxic neuroprotection in mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor

Caffeine is believed to act by blocking adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors (A(1)R, A(2A)R), indicating that some A(1) receptors are tonically activated. We generated mice with a targeted disruption of the second coding exon of the A(1)R (A(1)R(-/-)). These animals bred and gained weight normally and had a normal heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature. In most behavioral tests they were similar to A(1)R(+/+) mice, but A(1)R(-/-) mice showed signs of increased anxiety. Electrophysiological recordings from hippocampal slices revealed that both adenosine-mediated inhibition and theophylline-mediated augmentation of excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission were abolished in A(1)R(-/-) mice. In A(1)R(+/-) mice the potency of adenosine was halved, as was the number of A(1)R. In A(1)R(-/-) mice, the analgesic effect of intrathecal adenosine was lost, and thermal hyperalgesia was observed, but the analgesic effect of morphine was intact. The decrease in neuronal activity upon hypoxia was reduced both in hippocampal slices and in brainstem, and functional recovery after hypoxia was attenuated. Thus A(1)Rs do not play an essential role during development, and although they significantly influence synaptic activity, they play a nonessential role in normal physiology. However, under pathophysiological conditions, including noxious stimulation and oxygen deficiency, they are important.

Opposite changes in adenosine A1 and A2A receptor mRNA in the rat following sleep deprivation

Extracellular levels of adenosine increase in basal forebrain following prolonged wakefulness. Moreover, perfusion of adenosine into basal forebrain increases sleep. In this study we have examined the adenosine receptor subtypes, A1 and A2A, for changes in the levels of mRNA using RT-PCR and in situ hybridization and the receptor ligand binding efficiency using autoradiography following 3 and 6 h of sleep deprivation. We observed that A1 receptor mRNA levels increased in basal forebrain with no changes in other forebrain areas examined. A1 receptor binding was not affected. A2A receptor mRNA and ligand binding were undetectable in basal forebrain. However, in the olfactory tubercle, A2A mRNA and receptor binding decreased significantly. Based on the significant increase in the A1 but not in A2A receptor, we hypothesize that the effects of sleep deprivation-induced increased adenosine are mediated by A1 receptor in basal forebrain of rats.

Comparison of the potency of adenosine as an agonist at human adenosine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The potency of adenosine and inosine as agonists at human adenosine receptors was examined in a functional assay using changes in cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation in intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the human A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors. Adenosine increased cAMP formation in cells expressing the A2A (EC(50): 0.7 microM) and A2B (EC(50): 24 microM) receptors and inhibited forskolin (0.3-3 microM)-stimulated cAMP formation in cells expressing the A1 (EC(50): 0.31 microM) and A3 receptors (EC(50): 0.29 microM). The potency of adenosine at the A2A and A2B receptors was not altered by the presence of the uptake inhibitor nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR), whereas it was increased about 6-fold by NBMPR at the A1 and A3 receptors. In the presence of NBMPR, inosine was a potent agonist (EC(50): 7 and 0.08 microM at the A1 and A3 receptors, respectively), but with low efficacy especially at the A3 receptors. No effect of inosine was seen at the A(2) receptors. Caffeine, theophylline, and paraxanthine shifted the dose-response curve for adenosine at the A1, A2A, and A2B receptors. These results indicate that adenosine is the endogenous agonist at all human adenosine receptors and that physiological levels of this nucleoside can activate A1, A2A, and A3 receptors on cells where they are abundantly expressed, whereas pathophysiological conditions are required to stimulate A2B receptors to produce cyclic AMP.

Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned from many mammalian and some non-mammalian species. In each case the translated part of the receptor is encoded by two separate exons. Two separate promoters regulate the A1 receptor expression, and a similar situation may pertain also for the other receptors. The receptors are expressed in a cell and tissue specific manner, even though A1 and A2B receptors are found in many different cell types. Emerging data indicate that the receptor protein is targeted to specific parts of the cell. A1 and A3 receptors activate the Gi family of G proteins, whereas A2A and A2B receptors activate the Gs family. However, other G proteins can also be activated even though the physiological significance of this is unknown. Following the activation of G proteins several cellular effector pathways can be affected. Signaling via adenosine receptors is also known to interact in functionally important ways with signaling initiated via other receptors.

Lack of tolerance to motor stimulant effects of a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist

It is well known that tolerance develops to the actions of caffeine, which acts as an antagonist on adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Since selective adenosine A(2A) antagonists have been proposed as adjuncts to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) therapy in Parkinson's disease we wanted to examine if tolerance also develops to the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261). SCH 58261 (0.1 and 7.5 mg/kg) increased basal locomotion and the motor stimulation afforded by apomorphine. Neither effect was subject to tolerance following long-term treatment with the same doses given intraperitoneally twice daily. There were no adaptive changes in A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors or their corresponding messenger RNA or in dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptors. These results demonstrate that the tolerance that develops to caffeine is not secondary to its inhibition of adenosine A(2A) receptors. The results also offer hope that long-term treatment with an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist may be possible in man.

Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of adenosine A(2A) receptors on nerve growth factor-induced phosphorylation of extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 in PC12 cells

Effects of nerve growth factor (NGF), adenosine and an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS 21680) on the phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) were examined in PC12 cells. Adenosine and CGS 21680stimulated ERK1/2, but inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 induced by a 10 min incubation with NGF. Longer treatment with CGS 21680 and NGF (1-2h) resulted in an additive effect on the activation of ERK1/2. Forskolin exerted the same effects, suggesting that they are mediated by cyclic AMP. These results indicate that adenosine A(2A) receptor induced increases in cyclic AMP can stimulate ERK1/2 phosphorylation per se, inhibit the initial and enhance the late NGF-induced activation of ERK1/2. These results may be explained by the fact that NGF action is mediated via different pathways at early and late time points.

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are colocalized with and activate g(olf) in rat striatum

In situ hybridization with cRNA probes showed A(2A) receptor and G(olf) mRNAs to be abundantly expressed in caudate putamen, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle, whereas G(s) mRNA shows a comparatively low expression in regions expressing A(2A) receptors. In caudate putamen, 49% of the medium-sized neuron-like cells exhibited a strong signal for adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA, and 98% showed a strong signal for G(olf) mRNA. In contrast, G(s) mRNA was found in only 12% of the medium-sized neuron-like cells in caudate putamen. The coexpression of adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA with that of G(olf) or G(s) mRNAs was studied with double in situ hybridization. A large majority (91-95%) of the neurons in caudate-putamen that contained adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA also expressed G(olf) mRNA, whereas only 3 to 5% of the neurons with adenosine A(2A) receptor mRNA coexpressed G(s) mRNA. The A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 [2-[p-(2-carbonylethyl)phenylethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxa midoadenosin e] dose dependently activated G(olf) subunits in striatal membranes as shown by photolabeling with [alpha-(32)P]m-acetylanilido-GTP followed by immunoprecipitation with a specific antibody against G(olf). Transfection of G(olf) cDNA into Chinese hamster ovary cells, which stably express human adenosine A(2A) receptors, led to an increased efficacy of CGS 21680, as evidenced by a stronger cAMP response, indicating that activation of G(olf) by A(2A) receptors leads to a biological signal. In conclusion, these results provide anatomical and biochemical evidence that adenosine A(2A) receptors stimulate G(olf) rather than G(s) in striatum.

Co-stimulation of D(1)/D(5) and D(2) dopamine receptors leads to an increase in c-fos messenger RNA in cholinergic interneurons and a redistribution of c-fos messenger RNA in striatal projection neurons

The anatomical subdivision of striatum in patch and matrix compartments plays an important role for the processing of neurotransmission through the basal ganglia in primates and rodents. Here we report that co-administration of D(1)/D(5) and D(2) receptor agonists, which induces a heterogenous and patchy pattern of c-fos messenger RNA expression in striatum, stimulates c-fos messenger RNA expression in cholinergic interneurons. Moreover, this treatment induces c-fos messenger RNA in projection neurons containing D(1)-, rather than D(2)-receptor messenger RNA. The preferential induction of c-fos messenger RNA in patches does not depend upon a higher degree of co-localization between D(1) and D(2) receptors in this area, since double in situ hybridization experiments showed a large segregation of D(1) and D(2) receptor messenger RNAs in the patch as well as the matrix compartments. By contrast, treatment with a full D(1)/D(5) receptor agonist up-regulates striatal c-fos messenger RNA homogenously and in similar proportions of D(1) and D(2) receptor messenger RNA-containing projection neurons in both medial and lateral striatum, but has only minor effects on c-fos messenger RNA expression in cholinergic interneurons. These results provide a neuroanatomical/neurochemical correlate to the well-known behavioral interaction between dopamine D(1)/D(5) agonists and dopamine D(2) agonists. They also suggest that there may be a relation between a heterogenous, patch-enriched c-fos messenger RNA expression and an increased expression of this immediate early gene in cholinergic interneurons.

Human adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells all mediate the phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2

The known diverse effects of adenosine on mitogenesis may be related to changes in mitogen-activated protein kinases. In this study we therefore compared the phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) via the four known human adenosine receptors A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3), stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The adenosine analog 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), known to act on all subtypes, had no effect on untransfected CHO cells, but did cause a substantial time- and dose-dependent phosphorylation in CHO cells transfected with each of the receptors. The maximal phosphorylation was highest in A(1) and A(3) receptor-transfected cells, intermediate in A(2A) and low in A(2B) receptor-expressing CHO cells. For all receptors the half-maximal ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed at 19-115 nM NECA. NECA acting on adenosine A(2B) receptors was much more potent in stimulating ERK1/2 phosphorylation (EC(50) = 19 nM) than cAMP formation (EC(50) = 1.4 microM). Stimulation with the endogenous ligand adenosine resulted in the same pattern of ERK1/2 phosphorylation as NECA. Concentrations of adenosine that occur physiologically caused an increased phosphorylation after 5 min in CHO cells transfected with any one of the four adenosine receptors. Adenosine at levels reached during ischemia (3 microM) induced a more pronounced, but still transient, activation of ERK1/2. In conclusion, this study shows that all the human adenosine receptors transfected into CHO cells are able to activate ERK1/2 at physiologically relevant concentrations of the endogenous agonist.

GTP differentially affects antagonist radioligand binding to adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in human brain

The effect of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) on the interaction of antagonists with human adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors was studied using whole-hemisphere sections from human brain and membranes from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Adenosine A(1) receptors, studied using [3H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) as radioligand, showed the expected regional distribution in human brain. Addition of 500 microM GTP significantly increased (23-55%) [3H]DPCPX binding in all regions measured. In CHO cells transfected with human adenosine A(1) receptor cDNA, the number of receptors, B(max), increased from 401 (359-442) to 667 (592-743) fmol/mg protein upon addition of GTP. [3H]5-Amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo-[1,5-c]-pyrimidine ([3H]SCH 58261), a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor ligand, showed saturable binding to membranes from CHO cells transfected with adenosine A(2A) receptor cDNA and was localized to striatum and globus pallidus in human brain sections. Addition of GTP did not significantly change [3H]SCH 58261 binding to brain sections or CHO cell membranes. These results indicate that human A(1) and A(2A) receptors are not substantially different from those of the rat as regards regulation by GTP and interactions with endogenous adenosine in binding experiments. However, the relative abundance of the receptors differs between species, and this may be related to the differences observed in the potency of the endogenous agonist.

Functional uncoupling of adenosine A(2A) receptors and reduced responseto caffeine in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors

Dopamine D(2) receptors (Rs) and adenosine A(2A)Rs are coexpressed on striatopallidal neurons, where they mediate opposing actions. In agreement with the idea that D(2)Rs tonically inhibit GABA release from these neurons, stimulation-evoked GABA release was significantly greater from striatal/pallidal slices from D(2)R null mutant (D(2)R(-/-)) than from wild-type (D(2)R(+/+)) mice. Release from heterozygous (D(2)R(+/-)) slices was intermediate. However, contrary to predictions that A(2A)R effects would be enhanced in D(2)R-deficient mice, the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 significantly increased GABA release only from D(2)R(+/+) slices. CGS 21680 modulation was observed when D(2)Rs were antagonized by raclopride, suggesting that an acute absence of D(2)Rs cannot explain the results. The lack of CGS 21680 modulation in the D(2)R-deficient mice was also not caused by a compensatory downregulation of A(2A)Rs in the striatum or globus pallidus. However, CGS 21680 significantly stimulated cAMP production only in D(2)R(+/+) striatal/pallidal slices. This functional uncoupling of A(2A)Rs in the D(2)R-deficient mice was not explained by reduced expression of G(s), G(olf), or type VI adenylyl cyclase. Locomotor activity induced by the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine was significantly less pronounced in D(2)R(-/-) mice than in D(2)R(+/+) and D(2)R(+/-) mice, further supporting the idea that D(2)Rs are required for caffeine activation. Caffeine increased c-fos only in D(2)R(-/-) globus pallidus. The present results show that a targeted disruption of the D(2)R reduces coupling of A(2A)Rs on striatopallidal neurons and thereby responses to drugs that act on adenosine receptors. They also reinforce the ideas that D(2)Rs and A(2A)Rs are functionally opposed and that D(2)R-mediated effects normally predominate.

Differences in the effect of chronic and acute caffeine on self-administration of cocaine in mice

We have compared the ability of an acute injection of caffeine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) and long-term peroral caffeine consumption for 10 days ( approximately 150 mg/kg/day in tap water) to affect cocaine self-administration in mice. The peak plasma and brain levels of caffeine and its metabolites were similar in the two experimental set-ups. Moreover, the levels reached are close to those obtained in humans upon coffee ingestion. Neither type of caffeine administration affected the reinforcing effect of cocaine, defined as a selective increase in nose-poke responses in mice self-administering cocaine compared to their yoked controls. However, caffeine injection increased the amount of cocaine self-administered whereas caffeine drinking reduced it. A low dose of cocaine, by itself essentially ineffective, produced an increase in c-fos and NGFI-A mRNA in the cerebral cortex in mice that had been drinking caffeine. An acute caffeine injection also enhanced the immediate early gene response to cocaine, but to a lesser degree. Cocaine and caffeine also synergistically increased NGFI-A expression in caudate-putamen. Thus, regular caffeine drinking decreased the cocaine intake without significantly affecting its reinforcing properties, perhaps because it enhanced the activation of the predominantly inhibitory frontal cortical areas produced by low doses of cocaine.

Maternal caffeine intake has minor effects on adenosine receptor ontogeny in the rat brain

Maternal caffeine intake has been suggested to influence the offspring. We have studied the effects of maternal caffeine intake on adenosine and GABA receptors, targets for caffeine, during development of the rat brain. Caffeine (0.3 g/L) was added to the drinking water of rat dams during pregnancy and early postnatal life. Adenosine A1 and A2A and GABAA receptor development was studied using receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization. Pups were examined on embryonic d 14 (E14), E18, E21, 2 h after birth (P2h), P24h, postnatal d 3 (P3), P7, P14, and P21. Adenosine A, receptor mRNA was detected at E14 and receptors at E18. A1 mRNA levels increased from the level reached at E18 between P3 and P14 (maximally a doubling), whereas A, receptors, studied by [3H]-1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl xanthine binding, increased later and to a much larger extent (about 10-fold) postnatally. Caffeine treatment had no significant effect on adenosine A1 receptors or on A1 receptor mRNA. A2A mRNA had reached adult levels by E18, whereas receptor levels were low or undetectable before birth and increased dramatically until P14. Caffeine did not influence A2A receptors or A2A receptor mRNA at any stage during development. [3H]-flunitrazepam binding, representing GABAA receptors, showed large regional variations during ontogeny, but there were no clear differences between the caffeine-exposed and the nonexposed pups. Thus, exposure to a low dose of caffeine during gestation and postnatal life had only minor effects on development of adenosine A, and A2A receptors and GABAA receptors in the rat brain.

Evidence for increased dorsal hippocampal adenosine release and metabolism during pharmacologically induced seizures in rats

There is growing pharmacological evidence from several animal models of seizure disorder that adenosine possesses endogenous anticonvulsant activity. In order to further evaluate the role of adenosine in seizure activity, we monitored adenosine and its major biochemical metabolites inosine, xanthine, and hypoxanthine in the dorsal hippocampus by in vivo microdialysis before and during the induction of generalized seizures. Seizures were induced pharmacologically in groups of urethane-anesthetized rats by the administration of bicuculline (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.), kainic acid (12.0 mg/kg, i.v.) or pentylenetetrazol (100-250 mg/kg, i.p). Seizure activity was monitored electrophysiologically from the dorsal hippocampus. Dialysate hippocampal purine levels increased during all three seizure types. The largest increases were for the adenosine metabolites hypoxanthine and inosine, with smaller increases observed for adenosine and xanthine. Intra-hippocampal perfusion with the adenosine deaminase inhibitor erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl-adenine, (EHNA, 300 microM), only slightly increased basal hippocampal adenosine. Guanosine levels in the hippocampus, a purine not directly related to adenosine metabolism, were unaffected by all treatments. These findings demonstrate that an increase in hippocampal adenosine release and metabolism is associated with seizure activity and support the hypothesis that the increased adenosine levels may attenuate hippocampal seizure activity, possibly by terminating ongoing seizures and altering the pattern of subsequent seizures.

Nitric oxide interacts with oxygen free radicals to evoke the release of adenosine and adenine nucleotides from rat hippocampal slices

The present study examined some possible mechanisms underlying the previously demonstrated release of adenosine by nitric oxide (NO) donors. Perfusion with the NO-donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl penicillamine (SNAP; 300 microM) led to a significant increase in the release of [3H]purines from both unstimulated and electrically stimulated hippocampal slices prelabeled with [3H]adenine. The NO-donor also evoked the release of endogenous ATP and ADP from unstimulated slices and, when combined with electrical stimulation, the release of ATP, AMP and adenosine. The SNAP-induced [3H]purine release was calcium-dependent, but not affected by the glutamate receptor antagonists MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a, d]-cyclohepten-5,10-imine;100 nM) and CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; 10 microM). Zaprinast (5 microM), an inhibitor of the cyclic GMP-dependent phosphodiesterase and 8-Br-cyclic GMP (0.01-1 mM) failed to evoke the release of purines, whereas generation of oxygen free radicals by xanthine plus xanthine oxidase did evoke purine release. Coperfusion of SNAP with the free radical scavengers superoxide dismutase (SOD; 60 microg/ml) and catalase (50 microg/ml) reduced or eliminated the ability of the NO-donor to enhance [3H]purine release, but the poly (ADP-ribosyl) synthetase (PARS) inhibitor benzamide (500 microM) did not affect it. These data indicate that NO interacts with superoxide, likely forming peroxynitrite, which subsequently acts to release adenosine and adenine nucleotides from hippocampal tissue.

Dopamine D(1) receptor-induced gene transcription is modulated by DARPP-32

The role of the dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein of M(r) 32,000 (DARPP-32) in dopaminergic regulation of gene transcription in striatum and globus pallidus was examined. Mice with targeted disruption of the gene encoding DARPP-32, its homologue, inhibitor-1, or both, were used. Pharmacological characterization showed that mutant mice had normal basal levels of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors and adenosine A(2A) receptors. Basal expression levels of the striatonigral-specific neuropeptides substance P and prodynorphin and the immediate early genes c-fos and NGFI-A were also unaltered in mutant mice. A full D(1) receptor agonist, SKF 82958, up-regulated the expression of these neuropeptides and immediate early genes significantly more in wild-type mice than in mice lacking DARPP-32. Moreover, the additive stimulation of SKF 82958 and quinelorane, a D(2) receptor agonist, on c-fos mRNA in globus pallidus was significantly decreased in DARPP-32 and DARPP-32/I-1 knockout mice. No changes in dopamine receptor-induced gene expression were found in I-1 knockout mice. These results demonstrate an important involvement of DARPP-32 in dopamine receptor-mediated regulation of gene expression both in striatal neurons, which are enriched in DARPP-32, and in pallidal neurons, which do not contain DARPP-32.

Regulation of the phosphorylation of the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa in vivo by dopamine D1, dopamine D2, and adenosine A2A receptors

Dopamine D(1), dopamine D(2), and adenosine A(2A) receptors are highly expressed in striatal medium-sized spiny neurons. We have examined, in vivo, the influence of these receptors on the state of phosphorylation of the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa (DARPP-32). DARPP-32 is a potent endogenous inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1, which plays an obligatory role in dopaminergic transmission. A dose-dependent increase in the state of phosphorylation of DARPP-32 occurred in mouse striatum after systemic administration of the D(2) receptor antagonist eticlopride (0.1-2.0 mg/kg). This effect was abolished in mice in which the gene coding for the adenosine A(2A) receptor was disrupted by homologous recombination. A reduction was also observed in mice that had been pretreated with the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist SCH 58261 (10 mg/kg). The eticlopride-induced increase in DARPP-32 phosphorylation was also decreased by pretreatment with the D(1) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.125 and 0.25 mg/kg) and completely reversed by combined pretreatment with SCH 23390 (0.25 mg/kg) plus SCH 58261 (10 mg/kg). SCH 23390, but not SCH 58261, abolished the increase in DARPP-32 caused by cocaine (15 mg/kg). The results indicate that, in vivo, the state of phosphorylation of DARPP-32 and, by implication, the activity of protein phosphatase-1 are regulated by tonic activation of D(1), D(2), and A(2A) receptors. The results also underscore the fact that the adenosine system plays a role in the generation of responses to dopamine D(2) antagonists in vivo.

P2Y receptors contribute to ATP-induced increases in intracellular calcium in differentiated but not undifferentiated PC12 cells

ATP-induced Ca2+ transients were examined in individual PC12 cells of a well defined clone, before and after treatment with nerve growth factor (NGF) to induce a neurone-like phenotype. Using reverse transcriptase PCR these cells were found to express mRNA for several P2 receptors. In undifferentiated cells the ATP-induced Ca2+ response was entirely dependent on Ca2+ influx, could not be mimicked by UTP, alpha,beta-methylene ATP or dibenzoyl ATP or be blocked by pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS). ATP had no significant effect on levels of cyclic AMP or inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3). These results suggest that in undifferentiated PC12 cells ATP mainly acts on a P2X receptor, possibly the P2X4 subtype. After treatment with NGF for 7 days the ATP response was increased and partially sensitive to PPADS. A component of the ATP-induced Ca2+ increase was due to mobilisation of intracellular Ca2+ stores and another to capacitative Ca2+ entry. UTP caused an increase in intracellular Ca2+, and InsP3 formation could be stimulated by ATP and UTP. ATP also caused a small increase in cyclic AMP, but this was abolished in the presence of indomethacin. Thus, after NGF treatment ATP acts partially via a P2Y receptor, possibly the P2Y2 subtype.

Genetic evidence that cocaine and caffeine stimulate locomotion in mice via different mechanisms

The effects of cocaine and caffeine on motor activity in two mouse strains 129/OlaHsd (129) and C57BL/6J (C57) were compared. The former mice exhibited lower basal motor activity than the latter. Cocaine (3, 10, 30 mg/kg) injected i.p. in habituated C57 mice produced a dose-dependent increase in rearing, motility and locomotion. In 129 mice, little or no stimulation was seen and only with the highest dose of cocaine. In both strains caffeine (3, 15, 30 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent increase in rearing, motility and locomotion. The effect of caffeine on rearing was greater in C57 than in 129 mice, but motility and locomotion were stimulated approximately to the same degree in both strains. Thus, differences in the sensitivity to caffeine and cocaine between mouse strains provide genetic evidence that these two stimulants probably produce locomotor stimulation via somewhat different mechanisms.

Distribution, biochemistry and function of striatal adenosine A2A receptors

It is well known that the nucleoside adenosine exerts a modulatory influence in the central nervous system by activating G protein coupled receptors. Adenosine A2A receptors, the subject of the present review, are predominantly expressed in striatum, the major area of the basal ganglia. Activation of A2A receptors interferes with effects mediated by most of the principal neurotransmitters in striatum. In particular, the inhibitory interactions between adenosine acting on A2A receptors and dopamine acting on D2 receptors have been well examined and there is much evidence that A2A receptors may be a possible target for future development of drugs for treatment of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and affective disorders. Our understanding of the role of striatal A2A receptors has increased dramatically over the last few years. New selective antibodies, antagonist radioligands and optimized in situ hybridization protocols have provided detailed information on the distribution of A2A receptors in rodent as well as primate striatum. Studies on the involvement of A2A receptors in the regulation of DARPP-32 and the expression of immediate early genes, such as nerve growth factor-induced clone A and c-fos, have pointed out an important role for these receptors in regulating striatopallidal neurotransmission. Moreover, by using novel selective antagonists for A2A receptors and transgenic mice lacking functional A2A receptors, crucial information on the behavioral role of striatal A2A receptors has been provided, especially concerning their involvement in the stimulatory action of caffeine and the anti-Parkinsonian properties of A2A receptor antagonists. In the present review, current knowledge on the distribution, biochemistry and function of striatal A2A receptors is summarized.