1
|
Haan NL, Benucci GNM, Fiser CM, Bonito G, Landis DA. Contrasting effects of bioenergy crops on biodiversity. Sci Adv 2023; 9:eadh7960. [PMID: 37738354 PMCID: PMC10516493 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh7960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Agriculture is driving biodiversity loss, and future bioenergy cropping systems have the potential to ameliorate or exacerbate these effects. Using a long-term experimental array of 10 bioenergy cropping systems, we quantified diversity of plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and microbes in each crop. For many taxonomic groups, alternative annual cropping systems provided no biodiversity benefits when compared to corn (the business-as-usual bioenergy crop in the United States), and simple perennial grass-based systems provided only modest gains. In contrast, for most animal groups, richness in plant-diverse perennial systems was much higher than in annual crops or simple perennial systems. Microbial richness patterns were more eclectic, although some groups responded positively to plant diversity. Future agricultural landscapes incorporating plant-diverse perennial bioenergy cropping systems could be of high conservation value. However, increased use of annual crops will continue to have negative effects, and simple perennial grass systems may provide little improvement over annual crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan L. Haan
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Gian N. M. Benucci
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Cynthia M. Fiser
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Gregory Bonito
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ali MP, Clemente-Orta G, Kabir MMM, Haque SS, Biswas M, Landis DA. Landscape structure influences natural pest suppression in a rice agroecosystem. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15726. [PMID: 37735534 PMCID: PMC10514064 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41786-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Agricultural landscapes are constantly changing as farmers adopt new production practices and respond to changing environmental conditions. Some of these changes alter landscape structure with impacts on natural pest control, pesticide use, and conservation of biodiversity. In rice agroecosystems the effect of landscape structure on natural enemies and pest suppression is often poorly understood. Here we investigate the effect of landscape composition and configuration on a key pest of rice, the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Using N. lugens as sentinel prey coupled with predator exclusions, we investigated landscape effects on herbivore suppression and rice grain yield at multiple spatial scales in two regions of Bangladesh. Ladybird beetles and spiders were the most abundant natural enemies of N. lugens with landscape effects observed at all scales on ladybird beetles. Specifically, ladybird beetles were positively influenced by road edges, and fallow land, while spiders were strongly influenced only by rice phenology. Predator exclusion cages showed that N. lugens abundance significantly increased in caged plots, reducing rice gain yield. We also used an estimated biocontrol service index that showed a significant positive relationship with landscape diversity and a significant negative impact on pest density and yield loss. These results suggest that promoting fallow lands and fragmented patches between rice fields could lead to more sustainable insect pest management in rice agroecosystems, potentially reducing the practice of prophylactic insecticide use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Ali
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
| | - Gemma Clemente-Orta
- Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, AGROTECNIO Center, University of Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
| | - M M M Kabir
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - S S Haque
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - M Biswas
- Department of Geography, Presidency University, 86/1, College Street, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700073, India
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnold MB, Back M, Crowell MD, Farooq N, Ghimire P, Obarein OA, Smart KE, Taucher T, VanderJeugdt E, Perry KI, Landis DA, Bahlai CA. Coexistence between similar invaders: The case of two cosmopolitan exotic insects. Ecology 2023; 104:e3979. [PMID: 36691998 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Biological invasions are usually examined in the context of their impacts on native species. However, few studies have examined the dynamics between invaders when multiple exotic species successfully coexist in a novel environment. Yet, long-term coexistence of now established exotic species has been observed in North American lady beetle communities. Exotic lady beetles Harmonia axyridis and Coccinella septempunctata were introduced for biological control in agricultural systems and have since become dominant species within these communities. In this study, we investigated coexistence via spatial and temporal niche partitioning among H. axyridis and C. septempunctata using a 31-year data set from southwestern Michigan, USA. We found evidence of long-term coexistence through a combination of small-scale environmental, habitat, and seasonal mechanisms. Across years, H. axyridis and C. septempunctata experienced patterns of cyclical dominance likely related to yearly variation in temperature and precipitation. Within years, populations of C. septempunctata peaked early in the growing season at 550 degree days, while H. axyridis populations grew in the season until 1250 degree days and continued to have high activity after this point. C. septempunctata was generally most abundant in herbaceous crops, whereas H. axyridis did not display strong habitat preferences. These findings suggest that within this region H. axyridis has broader habitat and abiotic environmental preferences, whereas C. septempunctata thrives under more specific ecological conditions. These ecological differences have contributed to the continued coexistence of these two invaders. Understanding the mechanisms that allow for the coexistence of dominant exotic species contributes to native biodiversity conservation management of invaded ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Arnold
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Nageen Farooq
- Department of Earth Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Prashant Ghimire
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Omon A Obarein
- Department of Geography, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Kyle E Smart
- Department of Earth Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Trixie Taucher
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Erin VanderJeugdt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Kayla I Perry
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Christie A Bahlai
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.,Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alred B, Haan N, Landis DA, Szűcs M. Does the Presence of the Biological Control Agent, Hypena opulenta (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) on Swallow-Worts Deter Monarch Oviposition? Environ Entomol 2022; 51:77-82. [PMID: 34751381 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvab121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Invasive black and pale swallow-worts (Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench, and Vincetoxicum rossicum Kelopow), which are related to milkweeds, can act as ecological traps for monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)) as they lay eggs on them that fail to develop. A recently approved biological control agent against swallow-worts, Hypena opulenta Christoph, occupies the same feeding guild on swallow-worts as monarch larvae and could be perceived as a competitor to monarchs. We tested how the presence of this defoliating moth on swallow-worts may influence monarch host selection. In a two-year field experiment, we placed pale swallow-wort plants that were either infested with H. opulenta or noninfested as well as common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.), into monarch habitats to assess oviposition rates. In the laboratory, monarchs were either given a choice or not between milkweeds and black swallow-worts with or without H. opulenta. While monarchs strongly preferred common milkweed in the field, up to 25% of the eggs we observed were laid on pale swallow-wort, without preference for swallow-wort with (10.7%) or without (14.3%) H. opulenta. In laboratory choice and no-choice tests, monarchs did not lay any eggs on black swallow-wort, likely because of the long-term laboratory rearing on common milkweeds. Our results confirm that pale swallow-wort may act as an oviposition sink to monarchs in Michigan as well. Since the biological control program is still in its infancy, the nature of interactions between monarchs and H. opulenta may change as the biocontrol agent becomes more widespread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Alred
- Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Nathan Haan
- Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Marianna Szűcs
- Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rowe L, Gibson D, Landis DA, Isaacs R. Wild bees and natural enemies prefer similar flower species and respond to similar plant traits. Basic Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Ali MP, Rahman MS, Nowrin F, Haque SS, Qin X, Haque MA, Uddin MM, Landis DA, Howlader MTH. Salinity Influences Plant-Pest-Predator Tritrophic Interactions. J Econ Entomol 2021; 114:1470-1479. [PMID: 34231849 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Climate change-induced salinity intrusion into agricultural soils is known to negatively impact crop production and food security. However, the effects of salinity increase on plant-herbivore-natural enemy systems and repercussions for pest suppression services are largely unknown. Here, we examine the effects of increased salinity on communities of rice (Oryza sativa), brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens, and green mirid bug (GMB), Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, under greenhouse conditions. We found that elevated salinity significantly suppressed the growth of two rice cultivars. Meanwhile, BPH population size also generally decreased due to poor host plant quality induced by elevated salinity. The highest BPH density occurred at 2.0 dS/m salinity and declined thereafter with increasing salinity, irrespective of rice cultivar. The highest population density of GMB also occurred under control conditions and decreased significantly with increasing salinity. Higher salinity directly affected the rice crop by reducing plant quality measured with reference to biomass production and plant height, whereas inducing population developmental asynchrony between BPH and GMB observed at 2 dS/m salinity and potentially uncoupling prey-predator dynamics. Our results suggest that increased salinity has harmful effects on plants, herbivores, natural enemies, as well as plant-pest-predator interactions. The effects measured here suggest that the bottom-up effects of predatory insects on rice pests will likely decline in rice produced in coastal areas where salinity intrusion is common. Our findings indicate that elevated salinity influences tritrophic interactions in rice production landscapes, and further research should address resilient rice insect pest management combining multipests and predators in a changing environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Ali
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
| | - M S Rahman
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
| | - Farzana Nowrin
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
| | - S S Haque
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh
| | - Xinghu Qin
- School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - M A Haque
- Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
| | - M M Uddin
- Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - M T H Howlader
- Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sultaire SM, Kroll AJ, Verschuyl J, Landis DA, Roloff GJ. Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M. Sultaire
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| | | | - Jake Verschuyl
- National Council for Air and Stream Improvement P.O. Box 1259 Anacortes Washington 98221 USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University 578 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| | - Gary J. Roloff
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cates AM, Wills BD, Kim TN, Landis DA, Gratton C, Read HW, Jackson RD. No evidence of top‐down effects by ants on litter decomposition in a temperate grassland. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Cates
- Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota 55108 USA
- DOE‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
| | - Bill D. Wills
- Department of Biological Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama 36849 USA
| | - Tania N. Kim
- Department of Entomology Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas 66506 USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- DOE‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| | - Claudio Gratton
- DOE‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA
| | - Harry W. Read
- Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA
| | - Randall D. Jackson
- DOE‐Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
- Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bahlai CA, Hart C, Kavanaugh MT, White JD, Ruess RW, Brinkman TJ, Ducklow HW, Foster DR, Fraser WR, Genet H, Groffman PM, Hamilton SK, Johnstone JF, Kielland K, Landis DA, Mack MC, Sarnelle O, Thompson JR. Cascading effects: insights from the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christie A. Bahlai
- Department of Biological Sciences Kent State University Kent Ohio44242USA
- Kellogg Biological Station Michigan State University Hickory Corners Michigan49060USA
| | - Clarisse Hart
- Harvard Forest Harvard University Petersham Massachusetts01366USA
| | - Maria T. Kavanaugh
- College of Earth Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon97331USA
| | - Jeffrey D. White
- Department of Biology Framingham State University 100 State Street Framingham Massachusetts01702USA
| | - Roger W. Ruess
- Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska99775USA
| | - Todd J. Brinkman
- Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska99775USA
| | | | - David R. Foster
- Harvard Forest Harvard University Petersham Massachusetts01366USA
| | | | - Hélène Genet
- Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska99775USA
| | - Peter M. Groffman
- City University of New York Advanced Science Research Center at the Graduate Center New York New York10031USA
- Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Millbrook New York12545USA
| | - Stephen K. Hamilton
- Kellogg Biological Station Michigan State University Hickory Corners Michigan49060USA
- Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Millbrook New York12545USA
| | - Jill F. Johnstone
- Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska99775USA
| | - Knut Kielland
- Institute of Arctic Biology University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska99775USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan48824USA
| | - Michelle C. Mack
- Center for Ecosystem Science and Society and Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona86011USA
| | - Orlando Sarnelle
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan48824USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blossey B, Nuzzo V, Dávalos A, Mayer M, Dunbar R, Landis DA, Evans JA, Minter B. Residence time determines invasiveness and performance of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in North America. Ecol Lett 2021; 24:327-336. [PMID: 33295700 PMCID: PMC7839695 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
While biological invasions have the potential for large negative impacts on local communities and ecological interactions, increasing evidence suggests that species once considered major problems can decline over time. Declines often appear driven by natural enemies, diseases or evolutionary adaptations that selectively reduce populations of naturalised species and their impacts. Using permanent long-term monitoring locations, we document declines of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in eastern North America with distinct local and regional dynamics as a function of patch residence time. Projected site-specific population growth rates initially indicated expanding populations, but projected population growth rates significantly decreased over time and at the majority of sites fell below 1, indicating declining populations. Negative soil feedback provides a potential mechanism for the reported disappearance of ecological dominance of A. petiolata in eastern North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Blossey
- Department of Natural ResourcesFernow HallCornell UniversityIthacaNY14853USA
| | - Victoria Nuzzo
- Natural Area Consultants1 West Hill School RoadRichfordNY13835USA
| | - Andrea Dávalos
- Biological Sciences DepartmentSUNY CortlandCortlandNY13045USA
| | - Mark Mayer
- New Jersey Department of AgricultureDivision of Plant IndustryPO Box 330TrentonNJ08625USA
| | - Richard Dunbar
- Division of Nature PreservesIndiana Department of Natural Resources1040 E 700 N Columbia CityIN46725‐8948USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMI48824USA
| | - Jeffrey A. Evans
- Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMI48824USA
- Farmscape Analytics16 Merrimack StConcordNH03301USA
| | - Bill Minter
- Institute for Ecological RegenerationGoshen College1700 South Main StreetGoshenIN46526USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Perović DJ, Gámez-Virués S, Landis DA, Tscharntke T, Zalucki MP, Saura S, Furlong MJ, Desneux N, Sciarretta A, Balkenhol N, Schmidt JM, Trematerra P, Westphal C. Broadening the scope of empirical studies to answer persistent questions in landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. ADV ECOL RES 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
13
|
González E, Landis DA, Knapp M, Valladares G. Forest cover and proximity decrease herbivory and increase crop yield via enhanced natural enemies in soybean fields. J Appl Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ezequiel González
- Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic
- Centro de Investigaciones Entomológicas de Córdoba Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología VegetalUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaCONICET Córdoba Argentina
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA
| | - Michal Knapp
- Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic
| | - Graciela Valladares
- Centro de Investigaciones Entomológicas de Córdoba Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología VegetalUniversidad Nacional de CórdobaCONICET Córdoba Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Albrecht M, Kleijn D, Williams NM, Tschumi M, Blaauw BR, Bommarco R, Campbell AJ, Dainese M, Drummond FA, Entling MH, Ganser D, Arjen de Groot G, Goulson D, Grab H, Hamilton H, Herzog F, Isaacs R, Jacot K, Jeanneret P, Jonsson M, Knop E, Kremen C, Landis DA, Loeb GM, Marini L, McKerchar M, Morandin L, Pfister SC, Potts SG, Rundlöf M, Sardiñas H, Sciligo A, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Venturini E, Veromann E, Vollhardt IMG, Wäckers F, Ward K, Westbury DB, Wilby A, Woltz M, Wratten S, Sutter L. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis. Ecol Lett 2020; 23:1488-1498. [PMID: 32808477 PMCID: PMC7540530 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological intensification of agriculture through provisioning of ecosystem services. However, a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences for crop yield is lacking. Here we quantified the impacts of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control (18 studies) and pollination services (17 studies) in adjacent crops in North America, Europe and New Zealand. Flower strips, but not hedgerows, enhanced pest control services in adjacent fields by 16% on average. However, effects on crop pollination and yield were more variable. Our synthesis identifies several important drivers of variability in effectiveness of plantings: pollination services declined exponentially with distance from plantings, and perennial and older flower strips with higher flowering plant diversity enhanced pollination more effectively. These findings provide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosystem service delivery and ecological intensification of agriculture in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708PB, The Netherlands
| | - Neal M Williams
- Department of Entomology and Nematology and Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Matthias Tschumi
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| | - Brett R Blaauw
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden
| | - Alistair J Campbell
- Laboratório de Entomologia, Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Pará, CEP 66095-903, Brazil
| | - Matteo Dainese
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, Bozen/Bolzano, 39100, Italy
| | - Francis A Drummond
- School of Biology And Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469, USA
| | - Martin H Entling
- iES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstr. 7, Landau, D-76829, Germany
| | - Dominik Ganser
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Baltzerstrasse 6, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| | - G Arjen de Groot
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Dave Goulson
- School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK
| | - Heather Grab
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA
| | - Hannah Hamilton
- School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK
| | - Felix Herzog
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| | - Rufus Isaacs
- Department of Entomology and EEBB Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Katja Jacot
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Jeanneret
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden
| | - Eva Knop
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Baltzerstrasse 6, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| | - Claire Kremen
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, & Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Gregory M Loeb
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA
| | - Lorenzo Marini
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, viale dell'Università 16, Padova, 35020, Italy
| | - Megan McKerchar
- Institute of Science & the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Lora Morandin
- Pollinator Partnership, 475 Sansome Street, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94111, USA
| | - Sonja C Pfister
- iES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstr. 7, Landau, D-76829, Germany
| | - Simon G Potts
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, 223 62, Sweden
| | - Hillary Sardiñas
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Amber Sciligo
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - Carsten Thies
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eric Venturini
- Wild Blueberry Commission of Maine, 5784 York Complex, Suite 52, Orono, Maine, 04469, USA
| | - Eve Veromann
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu, 51006, Estonia
| | - Ines M G Vollhardt
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Felix Wäckers
- Lancaster Environnent Centre, Lancaster University, LA1 4YQ, UK
| | - Kimiora Ward
- Department of Entomology and Nematology and Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Duncan B Westbury
- Institute of Science & the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Andrew Wilby
- Lancaster Environnent Centre, Lancaster University, LA1 4YQ, UK
| | - Megan Woltz
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Steve Wratten
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Louis Sutter
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich, CH-8046, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wills BD, Kim TN, Fox AF, Gratton C, Landis DA. Reducing Native Ant Abundance Decreases Predation Rates in Midwestern Grasslands. Environ Entomol 2019; 48:1360-1368. [PMID: 31713603 PMCID: PMC6894410 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Diverse and robust predator communities are important for effective prey suppression in natural and managed communities. Ants are ubiquitous components of terrestrial systems but their contributions to natural prey suppression is relatively understudied in temperate regions. Growing evidence suggests that ants can play a significant role in the removal of insect prey within grasslands, but their impact is difficult to separate from that of nonant predators. To test how ants may contribute to prey suppression in grasslands, we used poison baits (with physical exclosures) to selectively reduce the ant population in common garden settings, then tracked ant and nonant ground predator abundance and diversity, and removal of sentinel egg prey for 7 wk. We found that poison baits reduced ant abundance without a significant negative impact on abundance of nonant ground predators, and that a reduction in ant abundance decreased the proportion of sentinel prey eggs removed. Even a modest decrease (~20%) in abundance of several ant species, including the numerically dominant Lasius neoniger Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), significantly reduced sentinel prey removal rates. Our results suggest that ants disproportionately contribute to ground-based predation of arthropod prey in grasslands. Changes in the amount of grasslands on the landscape and its management may have important implications for ant prevalence and natural prey suppression services in agricultural landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B D Wills
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - T N Kim
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - A F Fox
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - C Gratton
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - D A Landis
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gibson DR, Rowe L, Isaacs R, Landis DA. Screening Drought-Tolerant Native Plants for Attractiveness to Arthropod Natural Enemies in the U.S. Great Lakes Region. Environ Entomol 2019; 48:1469-1480. [PMID: 31701140 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Arthropods provide a variety of critical ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes; however, agricultural intensification can reduce insect abundance and diversity. Designing and managing habitats to enhance beneficial insects requires the identification of effective insectary plants that attract natural enemies and provide floral resources. We tested the attractiveness of 54 plant species with tolerance to dry soils, contrasting perennial forbs and shrubs native to the Great Lakes region to selected non-native species in three common garden experiments in Michigan during 2015-2016. Overall, we found 32 species that attracted significantly more natural enemies than associated controls. Among these, Achillea millefolium and Solidago juncea were consistently among the most attractive plants at all three sites, followed by Solidago speciosa, Coreopsis tripteris, Solidago nemoralis, Pycnanthemum pilosum, and Symphyotrichum oolantangiense. Species which attracted significantly more natural enemies at two sites included: Asclepias syriaca, Asclepias tuberosa, Monarda fistulosa, Oligoneuron rigidum, Pycnanthemum virginianum, Dasiphora fruticosa, Ratibida pinnata, Asclepias verticillata, Monarda punctata, Echinacea purpurea, Helianthus occidentalis, Silphium integrifolium, Silphium terebinthinaceum, Helianthus strumosus, and Symphyotrichum sericeum. Two non-native species, Lotus corniculatus, and Centaurea stoebe, were also attractive at multiple sites but less so than co-blooming native species. Parasitic Hymenoptera were the most abundant natural enemies, followed by predatory Coleoptera and Hemiptera, while Hemiptera (Aphidae, Miridae, and Tingidae) were the most abundant herbivores. Collectively, these plant species can provide floral resources over the entire growing season and should be considered as potential insectary plants in future habitat management efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gibson
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, East Lansing, MI
- Jensen Ecology, Madison, WI
| | - Logan Rowe
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, East Lansing, MI
- Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Michigan State University Extension, Lansing, MI
| | - Rufus Isaacs
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, East Lansing, MI
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, East Lansing, MI
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haan NL, Zhang Y, Landis DA. Predicting Landscape Configuration Effects on Agricultural Pest Suppression. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 35:175-186. [PMID: 31699410 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Arthropod predators and parasitoids attack crop pests, providing a valuable ecosystem service. The amount of noncrop habitat surrounding crop fields influences pest suppression, but synthesis of new studies suggests that the spatial configuration of crops and other habitats is similarly important. Natural enemies are often more abundant in fine-grained agricultural landscapes comprising smaller patches and can increase or decrease with the connectivity of crop fields to other habitats. Partitioning organisms by traits has emerged as a promising way to predict the strength and direction of these effects. Furthermore, our ability to predict configurational effects will depend on understanding the potential for indirect effects among trophic levels and the relationship between arthropod dispersal capability and the spatial scale of underlying landscape structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan L Haan
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, 578 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
| | - Yajun Zhang
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, 578 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, Center for Integrated Plant Systems, 578 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hermann SL, Blackledge C, Haan NL, Myers AT, Landis DA. Predators of monarch butterfly eggs and neonate larvae are more diverse than previously recognised. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14304. [PMID: 31586127 PMCID: PMC6778129 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50737-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Conserving threatened organisms requires knowledge of the factors impacting their populations. The Eastern monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) has declined by as much as 80% in the past two decades and conservation biologists are actively seeking to understand and reverse this decline. While it is well known that most monarchs die as eggs and young larvae, few studies have focused on identifying what arthropod taxa contribute to these losses. The aim of our study was to identify previously undocumented predators of immature monarchs in their summer breeding range in the United States. Using no-choice feeding assays augmented with field observations, we evaluated 75 arthropod taxa commonly found on the primary host plant for their propensity to consume immature monarchs. Here we report 36 previously unreported monarch predators, including representatives from 4 new orders (Orthoptera, Dermaptera, Lepidoptera and Opiliones) and 11 taxa (Acrididae, Gryllidae, Tettigoniidae, Forficulidae, Anthocoridae, Geocoridae, Lygaeidae, Miridae, Nabidae, Erebidae and Opilliones). Surprisingly, several putative herbivores were found to readily consume immature monarchs, both in a targeted fashion or incidentally as a result of herbivory. This work expands our understanding of the monarch predator community and highlights the importance of unrecognized predation on insects of conservation concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Hermann
- Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
| | | | - Nathan L Haan
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| | - Andrew T Myers
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.,Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.,Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, Carvalheiro LG, Chaplin-Kramer R, Gagic V, Garibaldi LA, Ghazoul J, Grab H, Jonsson M, Karp DS, Kennedy CM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Letourneau DK, Marini L, Poveda K, Rader R, Smith HG, Tscharntke T, Andersson GKS, Badenhausser I, Baensch S, Bezerra ADM, Bianchi FJJA, Boreux V, Bretagnolle V, Caballero-Lopez B, Cavigliasso P, Ćetković A, Chacoff NP, Classen A, Cusser S, da Silva e Silva FD, de Groot GA, Dudenhöffer JH, Ekroos J, Fijen T, Franck P, Freitas BM, Garratt MPD, Gratton C, Hipólito J, Holzschuh A, Hunt L, Iverson AL, Jha S, Keasar T, Kim TN, Kishinevsky M, Klatt BK, Klein AM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Larsen AE, Lavigne C, Liere H, Maas B, Mallinger RE, Martinez Pachon E, Martínez-Salinas A, Meehan TD, Mitchell MGE, Molina GAR, Nesper M, Nilsson L, O'Rourke ME, Peters MK, Plećaš M, Potts SG, Ramos DDL, Rosenheim JA, Rundlöf M, Rusch A, Sáez A, Scheper J, Schleuning M, Schmack JM, Sciligo AR, Seymour C, Stanley DA, Stewart R, Stout JC, Sutter L, Takada MB, Taki H, Tamburini G, Tschumi M, Viana BF, Westphal C, Willcox BK, Wratten SD, Yoshioka A, Zaragoza-Trello C, Zhang W, Zou Y, Steffan-Dewenter I. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci Adv 2019; 5:eaax0121. [PMID: 31663019 PMCID: PMC6795509 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Dainese
- Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Emily A. Martin
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo A. Aizen
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CONICET, 8400 Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ignasi Bartomeus
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Integrative Ecology, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Luisa G. Carvalheiro
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goias (UFG), Goiânia, Brazil
- Faculdade de Ciencias, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Vesna Gagic
- CSIRO, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
| | - Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) y CONICET, Mitre 630, CP 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - Jaboury Ghazoul
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heather Grab
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel S. Karp
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Christina M. Kennedy
- Global Lands Program, The Nature Conservancy, 117 E. Mountain Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - David Kleijn
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
| | - Claire Kremen
- IRES and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology and Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, 204 CIPS, 578 Wilson Ave, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Deborah K. Letourneau
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Lorenzo Marini
- DAFNAE, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
| | - Katja Poveda
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Romina Rader
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Henrik G. Smith
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Georg K. S. Andersson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Isabelle Badenhausser
- USC1339 INRA-CNRS, CEBC UMR 7372, CNRS and Université de La Rochelle, Beauvoir sur Niort 79360, France
- INRA, Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies et Plantes Fourragères (URP3F), Lusignan 86600, France
| | - Svenja Baensch
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
- Functional Agrobiodiversity, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Felix J. J. A. Bianchi
- Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Virginie Boreux
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vincent Bretagnolle
- LTSER Zone Atelier Plaine and Val de Sevre, CEBC UMR 7372, CNRS and Université de La Rochelle, Beauvoir sur Niort 79360, France
| | | | - Pablo Cavigliasso
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Concordia, Estacion Yuqueri y vias del Ferrocarril s/n, 3200 Entre Rios, Argentina
| | - Aleksandar Ćetković
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Natacha P. Chacoff
- Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, CONICET, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - Alice Classen
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Cusser
- W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA
| | - Felipe D. da Silva e Silva
- Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso, Campus of Barra do Garças/MT, 78600-000, Brazil
- Center of Sustainable Development, University of Brasília (UnB)—Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil
| | - G. Arjen de Groot
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan H. Dudenhöffer
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME44TB, UK
| | - Johan Ekroos
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Thijs Fijen
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
| | - Pierre Franck
- INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - Breno M. Freitas
- Departamento de Zootecnia–CCA, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60.356-000 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Michael P. D. Garratt
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading University, Reading RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Claudio Gratton
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Juliana Hipólito
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) y CONICET, Mitre 630, CP 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), CEP 69.067-375 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| | - Andrea Holzschuh
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lauren Hunt
- Human-Environment Systems, Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Aaron L. Iverson
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Shalene Jha
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 205 W 24th Street, 401 Biological Laboratories, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Tamar Keasar
- Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa, Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
| | - Tania N. Kim
- Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, 125 Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS 66503, USA
| | - Miriam Kishinevsky
- Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, 3498838 Haifa, Israel
| | - Björn K. Klatt
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
- Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alexandra-Maria Klein
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kristin M. Krewenka
- Institute for Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Smitha Krishnan
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
- Bioversity International, Bangalore 560 065, India
- Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bangalore, India
| | - Ashley E. Larsen
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131, USA
| | - Claire Lavigne
- INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - Heidi Liere
- Department of Environmental Studies, Seattle University, 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 9812, USA
| | - Bea Maas
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Rachel E. Mallinger
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA
| | | | - Alejandra Martínez-Salinas
- Agriculture, Livestock and Agroforestry Program, Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE), Cartago, Turrialba 30501, Costa Rica
| | | | - Matthew G. E. Mitchell
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gonzalo A. R. Molina
- Cátedra de Avicultura, Cunicultura y Apicultura, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CABA C1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Maike Nesper
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lovisa Nilsson
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Megan E. O'Rourke
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Marcell K. Peters
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Milan Plećaš
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Simon G. Potts
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Davi de L. Ramos
- Department of Ecology, UnB—Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília-DF 70910-900, Brazil
| | - Jay A. Rosenheim
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Adrien Rusch
- INRA, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, ISVV, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, F-33883 Villenave d’Ornon Cedex, France
| | - Agustín Sáez
- INIBIOMA, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, CONICET, Quintral 1250, 8400 Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Jeroen Scheper
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen 6708 PB, Netherlands
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Matthias Schleuning
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julia M. Schmack
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Amber R. Sciligo
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Colleen Seymour
- South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, South Africa
| | - Dara A. Stanley
- School of Agriculture and Food Science and Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rebecca Stewart
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
| | - Jane C. Stout
- School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Louis Sutter
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mayura B. Takada
- Institute for Sustainable Agro-ecosystem Services, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 188-0002 Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisatomo Taki
- Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan
| | - Giovanni Tamburini
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Tschumi
- Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Blandina F. Viana
- Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-210 Salvador, Brazil
| | - Catrin Westphal
- Functional Agrobiodiversity, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bryony K. Willcox
- School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Stephen D. Wratten
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Akira Yoshioka
- Fukushima Branch, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 963-770 Fukushima, Japan
| | | | - Wei Zhang
- Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, USA
| | - Yi Zou
- Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong–Liverpool University, 215123, Suzhou, China
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Veen GF, Wubs ERJ, Bardgett RD, Barrios E, Bradford MA, Carvalho S, De Deyn GB, de Vries FT, Giller KE, Kleijn D, Landis DA, Rossing WAH, Schrama M, Six J, Struik PC, van Gils S, Wiskerke JSC, van der Putten WH, Vet LEM. Applying the Aboveground-Belowground Interaction Concept in Agriculture: Spatio-Temporal Scales Matter. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
21
|
Ali MP, Bari MN, Haque SS, Kabir MMM, Afrin S, Nowrin F, Islam MS, Landis DA. Establishing next-generation pest control services in rice fields: eco-agriculture. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10180. [PMID: 31308440 PMCID: PMC6629669 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pesticides are commonly used in food crop production systems to control crop pests and diseases and ensure maximum yield with high market value. However, the accumulation of these chemical inputs in crop fields increases risks to biodiversity and human health. In addition, people are increasingly seeking foods in which pesticide residues are low or absent and that have been produced in a sustainable fashion. More than half of the world’s human population is dependent on rice as a staple food and chemical pesticides to control pests is the dominant paradigm in rice production. In contrast, the use of natural enemies to suppress crop pests has the potential to reduce chemical pesticide inputs in rice production systems. Currently, predators and parasitoids often do not persist in rice production landscapes due to the absence of shelter or nutritional sources. In this study, we modified the existing rice landscape through an eco-engineering technique that aims to increase natural biocontrol agents for crop protection. In this system, planting nectar-rich flowering plants on rice bunds provides food and shelter to enhance biocontrol agent activity and reduce pest numbers, while maintaining grain yield. The abundance of predators and parasitoids and parasitism rates increased significantly in the eco-engineering plots compared to the insecticide-treated and control plots. Moreover, a significantly lower number of principal insect pests and damage symptoms were found in treatments where flowering plants were grown on bunds than in plots where such plants were not grown. This study indicates that manipulating habitat for natural enemies in rice landscapes enhances pest suppression and maintains equal yields while reducing the need for insecticide use in crop fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Ali
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh.
| | - M N Bari
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - S S Haque
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - M M M Kabir
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - S Afrin
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - F Nowrin
- Entomology Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - M S Islam
- Farm Management Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 1701, Bangladesh
| | - D A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Myers A, Bahlai CA, Landis DA. Habitat Type Influences Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Oviposition and Egg Survival on Asclepias syriaca (Gentianales: Apocynaceae). Environ Entomol 2019; 48:675-684. [PMID: 31074487 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
As agricultural practices intensify, species once common in agricultural landscapes are declining in abundance. One such species is the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.), whose eastern North American population has decreased approximately 80% during the past 20 yr. One hypothesis explaining the monarch's decline is reduced breeding habitat via loss of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) from agricultural landscapes in the north central United States due to the adoption of herbicide-tolerant row crops. Current efforts to enhance monarch breeding habitat primarily involve restoring milkweed in perennial grasslands. However, prior surveys found fewer monarch eggs on common milkweed in grassland versus crop habitats, indicating potential preference for oviposition in row crop habitats, or alternatively, greater egg loss to predation in grasslands. We tested these alternative mechanisms by measuring oviposition and egg predation on potted A. syriaca host plants. Our study revealed that habitat context influences both monarch oviposition preference and egg predation rates and that these patterns vary by year. We found higher monarch egg predation rates during the first 24 h after exposure and that much of the predation occurs at night. Overall, we documented up to 90% egg mortality over 72 h in perennial grasslands, while predation rates in corn were lower (10-30% mortality) and more consistent between years. These findings demonstrate that weekly monarch egg surveys are too infrequent to distinguish oviposition habitat preferences from losses due to egg predation and suggest that monarch restoration efforts need to provide both attractive and safe habitats for monarch reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Myers
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
- Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | | | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
- Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Schuh MK, Bahlai CA, Malmstrom CM, Landis DA. Effect of Switchgrass Ecotype and Cultivar on Establishment, Feeding, and Development of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 2019; 112:440-449. [PMID: 30346580 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
As interest in production of second-generation biofuels increases, dedicated biomass crops are likely to be called upon to help meet feedstock demands. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a North American native perennial grass that as a candidate biomass crop, combines high biomass yields with other desirable ecosystem services. At present, switchgrass is produced on limited acres in the United States and experiences relatively minor insect pest problems. However, as switchgrass undergoes breeding to increase biomass yield and quality, and is grown on more acres, insect pest pressure will probably increase. To investigate how currently available switchgrass ecotypes and cultivars may influence herbivory by generalist insect herbivores, we performed feeding trials using neonate and late-instar fall armyworm [Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)]. No-choice feeding experiments were used to explore how switchgrass varieties influence larval establishment, consumption levels, and life-history traits in contrast to a preferred host, corn (Zea mays L.). Neonate S. frugiperda consumed greater amounts of corn than switchgrass and increased amounts of upland versus lowland ecotypes. Late-instar larvae, which do the majority of the larval feeding, exhibited lower consumption of lowland ecotypes, which led to increased development time and reduced pupal weights. The exception to these trends was the upland cultivar 'Trailblazer', which unexpectedly performed similarly to lowland cultivars. These results suggest that both switchgrass ecotype and cultivar can influence feeding damage by a common generalist herbivore. These findings can be used to help inform current switchgrass planting decisions as well as future breeding efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa K Schuh
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Christie A Bahlai
- Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
| | - Carolyn M Malmstrom
- Department of Plant Biology and Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim TN, Bartel S, Wills BD, Landis DA, Gratton C. Disturbance differentially affects alpha and beta diversity of ants in tallgrass prairies. Ecosphere 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tania N. Kim
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
| | - Savannah Bartel
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
| | - Bill D. Wills
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan 48824 USA
| | - Claudio Gratton
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin 53726 USA
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin 53706 USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Historic and current land-use changes have altered the landscape for grassland biota, with over 90% of grasslands and savannas converted to agriculture or some other use in north temperate regions. Reintegrating grasslands into agricultural landscapes can increase biodiversity while also providing valuable ecosystem services. In contrast to their well-known importance in tropical and subtropical ecosystems, the role of ants in temperate grasslands is often underappreciated. As consumers and ecosystem engineers, ants in temperate grasslands influence invertebrate, plant, and soil microbial diversity and potentially alter grassland productivity. As common and numerically dominant invertebrates in grasslands, ants can also serve as important indicator species to monitor conservation and management practices. Drawing on examples largely from mesic, north temperate studies, and from other temperate regions where necessary, we review the roles of ants as consumers and ecosystem engineers in grasslands. We also identify five avenues for future research to improve our understanding of the roles of ants in grasslands. This includes identifying how grassland fragmentation may influence ant community assembly, quantifying how ant communities impact ecosystem functions and soil processes, and understanding how ant communities and their associated interactions are impacted by climate change. In synthesizing the role of ants in temperate grasslands and identifying knowledge gaps, we hope this and future work will help inform how land managers maximize grassland conservation value while increasing multiple ecosystem services and minimizing disservices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B D Wills
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - D A Landis
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Robertson GP, Hamilton SK, Barham BL, Dale BE, Izaurralde RC, Jackson RD, Landis DA, Swinton SM, Thelen KD, Tiedje JM. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes. Science 2018; 356:356/6345/eaal2324. [PMID: 28663443 DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 243] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Cellulosic crops are projected to provide a large fraction of transportation energy needs by mid-century. However, the anticipated land requirements are substantial, which creates a potential for environmental harm if trade-offs are not sufficiently well understood to create appropriately prescriptive policy. Recent empirical findings show that cellulosic bioenergy concerns related to climate mitigation, biodiversity, reactive nitrogen loss, and crop water use can be addressed with appropriate crop, placement, and management choices. In particular, growing native perennial species on marginal lands not currently farmed provides substantial potential for climate mitigation and other benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Philip Robertson
- W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA. .,Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Stephen K Hamilton
- W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Bradford L Barham
- Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Bruce E Dale
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - R Cesar Izaurralde
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.,Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX 76502, USA
| | - Randall D Jackson
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.,Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Scott M Swinton
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Kurt D Thelen
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - James M Tiedje
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.,Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lettow MC, Brudvig LA, Bahlai CA, Gibbs J, Jean RP, Landis DA. Bee community responses to a gradient of oak savanna restoration practices. Restor Ecol 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.12655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell C. Lettow
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University, 578 Wilson Road East Lansing MI 48824 U.S.A
| | - Lars A. Brudvig
- Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University, 612 Wilson Road East Lansing MI 48824 U.S.A
| | - Christie A. Bahlai
- Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University, 288 Farm Lane East Lansing MI 48824 U.S.A
| | - Jason Gibbs
- Department of Entomology University of Manitoba, 12 Dafoe Road Winnipeg Manitoba R3T 2N2 Canada
| | - Robert P. Jean
- Environmental Solutions & Innovations, Inc., 1811 Executive Dr., Suites C‐D Indianapolis IN 46241 U.S.A
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology Michigan State University, 578 Wilson Road East Lansing MI 48824 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Perović DJ, Gámez-Virués S, Landis DA, Wäckers F, Gurr GM, Wratten SD, You MS, Desneux N. Managing biological control services through multi-trophic trait interactions: review and guidelines for implementation at local and landscape scales. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2017; 93:306-321. [PMID: 28598568 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Ecological studies are increasingly moving towards trait-based approaches, as the evidence mounts that functions, as opposed to taxonomy, drive ecosystem service delivery. Among ecosystem services, biological control has been somewhat overlooked in functional ecological studies. This is surprising given that, over recent decades, much of biological control research has been focused on identifying the multiple characteristics (traits) of species that influence trophic interactions. These traits are especially well developed for interactions between arthropods and flowers - important for biological control, as floral resources can provide natural enemies with nutritional supplements, which can dramatically increase biological control efficiency. Traits that underpin the biological control potential of a community and that drive the response of arthropods to environmental filters, from local to landscape-level conditions, are also emerging from recent empirical studies. We present an overview of the traits that have been identified to (i) drive trophic interactions, especially between plants and biological control agents through determining access to floral resources and enhancing longevity and fecundity of natural enemies, (ii) affect the biological control services provided by arthropods, and (iii) limit the response of arthropods to environmental filters, ranging from local management practices to landscape-level simplification. We use this review as a platform to outline opportunities and guidelines for future trait-based studies focused on the enhancement of biological control services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Perović
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian & Taiwan Crops and Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, Fuzhou, 350002, China
| | - Sagrario Gámez-Virués
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian & Taiwan Crops and Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, Fuzhou, 350002, China
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, 204 Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, U.S.A
| | - Felix Wäckers
- BioBest Sustainable Crop Management, Ilse Velden 18, 2260, Westerlo, Belgium.,Lancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, U.K
| | - Geoff M Gurr
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian & Taiwan Crops and Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, Fuzhou, 350002, China.,School of Agriculture & Wine Science, Graham Centre, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 883, Orange, 2800, Australia
| | - Stephen D Wratten
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, 7647, New Zealand
| | - Min-Sheng You
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian & Taiwan Crops and Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 15 Shangxiadian Road, Fuzhou, 350002, China
| | - Nicolas Desneux
- INRA (French National Institute for Agricultural Research), Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, UMR 1355-7254, 06903, Sophia Antipolis, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim TN, Fox AF, Wills BD, Meehan TD, Landis DA, Gratton C. Harvesting biofuel grasslands has mixed effects on natural enemy communities and no effects on biocontrol services. J Appl Ecol 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tania N. Kim
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison WI 53726 USA
| | - Aaron F. Fox
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab Michigan State University East Lansing MI 48824 USA
- Department of Plant Science California State Polytechnic University Pomona CA 91768 USA
| | - Bill D. Wills
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab Michigan State University East Lansing MI 48824 USA
| | - Timothy D. Meehan
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison WI 53726 USA
- National Ecological Observatory Network Boulder CO 80301 USA
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab Michigan State University East Lansing MI 48824 USA
| | - Claudio Gratton
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center University of Wisconsin Madison Madison WI 53726 USA
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison WI 53706 USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hermann SL, Landis DA. Scaling up our understanding of non-consumptive effects in insect systems. Curr Opin Insect Sci 2017; 20:54-60. [PMID: 28602236 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-consumptive effects (NCEs) of predators on prey is an important topic in insect ecology with potential applications for pest management. NCEs are changes in prey behavior and physiology that aid in predation avoidance. While NCEs can have positive outcomes for prey survival there may also be negative consequences including increased stress and reduced growth. These effects can cascade through trophic systems influencing ecosystem function. Most NCEs have been studied at small spatial and temporal scales. However, recent studies show promise for the potential to manipulate NCEs for pest management. We suggest the next frontier for NCE studies includes manipulating the landscape of fear to improve pest control, which requires scaling-up to field and landscape levels, over ecologically relevant time frames.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Hermann
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, United States; Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, United States.
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, United States; Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Habitat management involving manipulation of farmland vegetation can exert direct suppressive effects on pests and promote natural enemies. Advances in theory and practical techniques have allowed habitat management to become an important subdiscipline of pest management. Improved understanding of biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships means that researchers now have a firmer theoretical foundation on which to design habitat management strategies for pest suppression in agricultural systems, including landscape-scale effects. Supporting natural enemies with shelter, nectar, alternative prey/hosts, and pollen (SNAP) has emerged as a major research topic and applied tactic with field tests and adoption often preceded by rigorous laboratory experimentation. As a result, the promise of habitat management is increasingly being realized in the form of practical worldwide implementation. Uptake is facilitated by farmer participation in research and is made more likely by the simultaneous delivery of ecosystem services other than pest suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoff M Gurr
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
- Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales 2800, Australia
| | - Steve D Wratten
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, 7647 Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
| | - Minsheng You
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Evans JA, Lankau RA, Davis AS, Raghu S, Landis DA. Soil-mediated eco-evolutionary feedbacks in the invasive plant Alliaria petiolata. Funct Ecol 2016; 30:1053-1061. [PMID: 31423041 PMCID: PMC6686332 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Ecological and evolutionary processes historically have been assumed to operate on significantly different time-scales. We know now from theory and work in experimental and model systems that these processes can feed back on each other on mutually relevant time-scales.Here, we present evidence of a soil-mediated eco-evolutionary feedback on the population dynamics of an invasive biennial plant, Alliaria petiolata.As populations age, natural selection drives down production of A. petiolata's important antimycorrhizal allelochemical, sinigrin. This occurs due to density-dependent selection on sinigrin, which is favoured under interspecific, but disfavoured under intraspecific, competition.We show that population stochastic growth rates (λS) and plant densities are positively related to sinigrin concentration measured in seedling roots. This interaction is mediated by sinigrin's positive effect on seedling and summer survival, which are important drivers of λS.Together, these illustrate how the evolution of a trait shaped by natural selection can influence the ecology of a species over a period of just years to decades, altering its trajectory of population growth and interactions with the species in the soil and plant communities it invades.Our findings confirm the predictions that eco-evolutionary feedbacks occur in natural populations. Furthermore, they improve our conceptual framework for projecting future population growth by linking the variation in plant demography to a critical competitive trait (sinigrin) whose selective advantages decrease as populations age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Evans
- USDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit University of Illinois Turner Hall 1102 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana-Champaign IL 61801 USA
| | - Richard A Lankau
- Department of Plant Biology 2502 Miller Plant Sciences The University of Georgia Athens GA 30602 USA
- Present address: Department of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin-Madison Russell Labs Building 1630 Linden Drive Madison WI 53706 USA
| | - Adam S Davis
- USDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit University of Illinois Turner Hall 1102 S. Goodwin Ave. Urbana-Champaign IL 61801 USA
| | - S Raghu
- CSIRO & USDA-ARS Australian Biological Control Laboratory GPO Box 2583 Brisbane Qld 4001 Australia
| | - Douglas A Landis
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems Lab 578 Wilson Road, Room 204 East Lansing MI 48824 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bahlai CA, Landis DA. Predicting plant attractiveness to pollinators with passive crowdsourcing. R Soc Open Sci 2016; 3:150677. [PMID: 27429762 PMCID: PMC4929897 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Global concern regarding pollinator decline has intensified interest in enhancing pollinator resources in managed landscapes. These efforts frequently emphasize restoration or planting of flowering plants to provide pollen and nectar resources that are highly attractive to the desired pollinators. However, determining exactly which plant species should be used to enhance a landscape is difficult. Empirical screening of plants for such purposes is logistically daunting, but could be streamlined by crowdsourcing data to create lists of plants most probable to attract the desired pollinator taxa. People frequently photograph plants in bloom and the Internet has become a vast repository of such images. A proportion of these images also capture floral visitation by arthropods. Here, we test the hypothesis that the abundance of floral images containing identifiable pollinator and other beneficial insects is positively associated with the observed attractiveness of the same species in controlled field trials from previously published studies. We used Google Image searches to determine the correlation of pollinator visitation captured by photographs on the Internet relative to the attractiveness of the same species in common-garden field trials for 43 plant species. From the first 30 photographs, which successfully identified the plant, we recorded the number of Apis (managed honeybees), non-Apis (exclusively wild bees) and the number of bee-mimicking syrphid flies. We used these observations from search hits as well as bloom period (BP) as predictor variables in Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for field-observed abundances of each of these groups. We found that non-Apis bees observed in controlled field trials were positively associated with observations of these taxa in Google Image searches (pseudo-R (2) of 0.668). Syrphid fly observations in the field were also associated with the frequency they were observed in images, but this relationship was weak. Apis bee observations were not associated with Internet images, but were slightly associated with BP. Our results suggest that passively crowdsourced image data can potentially be a useful screening tool to identify candidate plants for pollinator habitat restoration efforts directed at wild bee conservation. Increasing our understanding of the attractiveness of a greater diversity of plants increases the potential for more rapid and efficient research in creating pollinator-supportive landscapes.
Collapse
|
35
|
Landis DA, Saidov N, Jaliov A, El Bouhssini M, Kennelly M, Bahlai C, Landis JN, Maredia K. Demonstration of an Integrated Pest Management Program for Wheat in Tajikistan. J Integr Pest Manag 2016; 7:11. [PMID: 28446990 PMCID: PMC5394565 DOI: 10.1093/jipm/pmw010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Wheat is an important food security crop in central Asia but frequently suffers severe damage and yield losses from insect pests, pathogens, and weeds. With funding from the United States Agency for International Development, a team of scientists from three U.S. land-grant universities in collaboration with the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas and local institutions implemented an integrated pest management (IPM) demonstration program in three regions of Tajikistan from 2011 to 2014. An IPM package was developed and demonstrated in farmer fields using a combination of crop and pest management techniques including cultural practices, host plant resistance, biological control, and chemical approaches. The results from four years of demonstration/research indicated that the IPM package plots almost universally had lower pest abundance and damage and higher yields and were more profitable than the farmer practice plots. Wheat stripe rust infestation ranged from 30% to over 80% in farmer practice plots, while generally remaining below 10% in the IPM package plots. Overall yield varied among sites and years but was always at least 30% to as much as 69% greater in IPM package plots. More than 1,500 local farmers-40% women-were trained through farmer field schools and field days held at the IPM demonstration sites. In addition, students from local agricultural universities participated in on-site data collection. The IPM information generated by the project was widely disseminated to stakeholders through peer-reviewed scientific publications, bulletins and pamphlets in local languages, and via Tajik national television.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 (; ; )
| | - Nurali Saidov
- Regional Office for Central Asia and the Caucasus (CAC), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), 100000 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
| | - Anvar Jaliov
- Institute of Plant Production "Ziroatparvar" of Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
| | - Mustapha El Bouhssini
- International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat, Morocco
| | - Megan Kennelly
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506
| | - Christie Bahlai
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 (; ; )
| | - Joy N Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 (; ; )
- MSU IPM Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824
| | - Karim Maredia
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 (; ; )
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bahlai CA, van der Werf W, O'Neal M, Hemerik L, Landis DA. Shifts in dynamic regime of an invasive lady beetle are linked to the invasion and insecticidal management of its prey. Ecol Appl 2015; 25:1807-1818. [PMID: 26591447 DOI: 10.1890/14-2022.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The spread and impact of invasive species may vary over time in relation to changes in the species itself, the biological community of which it is part, or external controls on the system. We investigate whether there have been changes in dynamic regimes over the last 20 years of two invasive species in the midwestern United States, the multicolored Asian lady beetle Harmonia axyridis and the soybean aphid Aphis glycines. We show by model selection that after its 1993 invasion into the American Midwest, the year-to-year population dynamics of H. axyridis were initially governed by a logistic rule supporting gradual rise to a stable carrying capacity. After invasion of the soybean aphid in 2000, food resources at the landscape level became abundant, supporting a higher year-to-year growth rate and a higher but unstable carrying capacity, with two-year cycles in both aphid and lady beetle abundance as a consequence. During 2005-2007, farmers in the Midwest progressively increased their use of insecticides for managing A. glycines, combining prophylactic seed treatment with curative spraying based on thresholds. This human intervention dramatically reduced the soybean aphid as a major food resource for H. axyridis at landscape level and corresponded to a reverse shift towards the original logistic rule for year-to-year dynamics. Thus, we document a short episode of major predator-prey fluctuations in an important agricultural system resulting from two biological invasions that were apparently damped by widespread insecticide use. Recent advances in development of plant resistance to A. glycines in soybeans may mitigate the need for pesticidal control and achieve the same stabilization of pest and predator populations at lower cost and environmental burden.
Collapse
|
37
|
Liere H, Kim TN, Werling BP, Meehan TD, Landis DA, Gratton C. Trophic cascades in agricultural landscapes: indirect effects of landscape composition on crop yield. Ecol Appl 2015. [PMID: 26214911 DOI: 10.1890/14-0570.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The strength and prevalence of trophic cascades, defined as positive, indirect effects of natural enemies (predatory and parasitic arthropods) on plants, is highly variable in agroecosystems. This variation may in part be due to the spatial or landscape context in which hese trophic cascades occur. In 2011 and 2012, we conducted a natural enemy exclusion experiment in soybean fields along a gradient of landscape composition across southern Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. We used structural equation modeling to ask (1) whether natural enemies influence biocontrol of soybean aphids (SBA) and soybean yield and (2) whether landscape effects on natural enemies influence the strength of the trophic cascades. We found that natural enemies (NE) suppressed aphid populations in both years of our study, and, in 2011, the yield of soybean plants exposed to natural enemies was 37% higher than the yield of plants with aphid populations protected from natural enemies. The strength of the :rophic cascade was also influenced by landscape context. We found that landscapes with a higher proportion of soybean and higher diversity habitats resulted in more NE, fewer aphids, and, in some cases, a trend toward greater soybean yield. These results indicate that landscape context is important for understanding spatial variability in biocontrol and yield, but other factors, such as environmental variability and compensatory growth, might overwhelm the beneficial effects of biocontrol on crop yield.
Collapse
|
38
|
Safarzoda S, Bahlai CA, Fox AF, Landis DA. The role of natural enemy foraging guilds in controlling cereal aphids in Michigan wheat. PLoS One 2014; 9:e114230. [PMID: 25473951 PMCID: PMC4256412 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Insect natural enemies (predators and parasitoids) provide important ecosystem services by suppressing populations of insect pests in many agricultural crops. However, the role of natural enemies against cereal aphids in Michigan winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is largely unknown. The objectives of this research were to characterize the natural enemy community in wheat fields and evaluate the role of different natural enemy foraging guilds (foliar-foraging versus ground-dwelling predators) in regulating cereal aphid population growth. We investigated these objectives during the spring and summer of 2012 and 2013 in four winter wheat fields on the Michigan State University campus farm in East Lansing, Michigan. We monitored and measured the impact of natural enemies by experimentally excluding or allowing their access to wheat plants infested with Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) and Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphidae). Our results indicate that the natural enemy community in the wheat fields consisted mostly of foliar-foraging and ground-dwelling predators with relatively few parasitoids. In combination, these natural enemy groups were very effective at reducing cereal aphid populations. We also investigated the role of each natural enemy foraging guild (foliar-foraging versus ground-dwelling predators) independently. Overall, our results suggest that, in combination, natural enemies can almost completely halt early-season aphid population increase. Independently, ground-dwelling predators were more effective at suppressing cereal aphid populations than foliar-foraging predators under the conditions we studied. Our results differ from studies in Europe and the US Great Plains where foliar foraging predators and parasitoids are frequently more important cereal aphid natural enemies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahlo Safarzoda
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Christine A. Bahlai
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Aaron F. Fox
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Philip Robertson G, Gross KL, Hamilton SK, Landis DA, Schmidt TM, Snapp SS, Swinton SM. Farming for Ecosystem Services: An Ecological Approach to Production Agriculture. Bioscience 2014; 64:404-415. [PMID: 26955069 PMCID: PMC4776676 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A balanced assessment of ecosystem services provided by agriculture requires a systems-level socioecological understanding of related management practices at local to landscape scales. The results from 25 years of observation and experimentation at the Kellogg Biological Station long-term ecological research site reveal services that could be provided by intensive row-crop ecosystems. In addition to high yields, farms could be readily managed to contribute clean water, biocontrol and other biodiversity benefits, climate stabilization, and long-term soil fertility, thereby helping meet society's need for agriculture that is economically and environmentally sustainable. Midwest farmers—especially those with large farms—appear willing to adopt practices that deliver these services in exchange for payments scaled to management complexity and farmstead benefit. Surveyed citizens appear willing to pay farmers for the delivery of specific services, such as cleaner lakes. A new farming for services paradigm in US agriculture seems feasible and could be environmentally significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Philip Robertson
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Katherine L Gross
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Stephen K Hamilton
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Douglas A Landis
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Thomas M Schmidt
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Sieglinde S Snapp
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| | - Scott M Swinton
- G. Philip Robertson ( ) is a professor at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU), in East Lansing. Katherine L. Gross is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant Biology at MSU. Stephen K. Hamilton is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Zoology at MSU. Douglas A. Landis is a professor in the Department of Entomology at MSU. Thomas M. Schmidt is a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Sieglinde S. Snapp is a professor at KBS and in the Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences at MSU. Scott M. Swinton is a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics at MSU. All of the authors are lead investigators with the KBS Long-Term Ecological Research Program
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Werling BP, Dickson TL, Isaacs R, Gaines H, Gratton C, Gross KL, Liere H, Malmstrom CM, Meehan TD, Ruan L, Robertson BA, Robertson GP, Schmidt TM, Schrotenboer AC, Teal TK, Wilson JK, Landis DA. Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:1652-7. [PMID: 24474791 PMCID: PMC3910622 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309492111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Agriculture is being challenged to provide food, and increasingly fuel, for an expanding global population. Producing bioenergy crops on marginal lands--farmland suboptimal for food crops--could help meet energy goals while minimizing competition with food production. However, the ecological costs and benefits of growing bioenergy feedstocks--primarily annual grain crops--on marginal lands have been questioned. Here we show that perennial bioenergy crops provide an alternative to annual grains that increases biodiversity of multiple taxa and sustain a variety of ecosystem functions, promoting the creation of multifunctional agricultural landscapes. We found that switchgrass and prairie plantings harbored significantly greater plant, methanotrophic bacteria, arthropod, and bird diversity than maize. Although biomass production was greater in maize, all other ecosystem services, including methane consumption, pest suppression, pollination, and conservation of grassland birds, were higher in perennial grasslands. Moreover, we found that the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem services is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to other habitats, with local landscape context as important as crop choice in determining provision of some services. Our study suggests that bioenergy policy that supports coordinated land use can diversify agricultural landscapes and sustain multiple critical ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben P. Werling
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Timothy L. Dickson
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182
| | - Rufus Isaacs
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Hannah Gaines
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
| | - Claudio Gratton
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
| | - Katherine L. Gross
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Heidi Liere
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
| | - Carolyn M. Malmstrom
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Timothy D. Meehan
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
- Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
| | - Leilei Ruan
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Bruce A. Robertson
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Division of Science, Mathematics and Computing, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504
| | - G. Philip Robertson
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Thomas M. Schmidt
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Abbie C. Schrotenboer
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Biology, Trinity Christian College, Palos Heights, IL 60463; and
| | - Tracy K. Teal
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Microbiology and Microbial Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Julianna K. Wilson
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, US Department of Energy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bahlai CA, Colunga-Garcia M, Gage SH, Landis DA. Long-term functional dynamics of an aphidophagous coccinellid community remain unchanged despite repeated invasions. PLoS One 2013; 8:e83407. [PMID: 24349505 PMCID: PMC3862681 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aphidophagous coccinellids (ladybeetles) are important providers of herbivore suppression ecosystem services. In the last 30 years, the invasion of exotic coccinellid species, coupled with observed declines in native species, has led to considerable interest in the community dynamics and ecosystem function of this guild. Here we examined a 24-year dataset of coccinellid communities in nine habitats in southwestern Michigan for changes in community function in response to invasion. Specifically we analyzed their temporal population dynamics and species diversity, and we modeled the community’s potential to suppress pests. Abundance of coccinellids varied widely between 1989 and 2012 and became increasingly exotic-dominated. More than 71% of 57,813 adult coccinellids captured over the 24-year study were exotic species. Shannon diversity increased slightly over time, but herbivore suppression potential of the community remained roughly constant over the course of the study. However, both Shannon diversity and herbivore suppression potential due to native species declined over time in all habitats. The relationship between Shannon diversity and herbivore suppression potential varied with habitat type: a positive relationship in forest and perennial habitats, but was uncorrelated in annual habitats. This trend may have been because annual habitats were dominated by a few, highly voracious exotic species. Our results indicated that although the composition of the coccinellid community in southwestern Michigan has changed dramatically in the past several decades, its function has remained relatively unchanged in both agricultural and natural habitats. While this is encouraging from the perspective of pest management, it should be noted that losses of one of the dominant exotic coccinellids could result in a rapid decline in pest suppression services if the remaining community is unable to respond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine A. Bahlai
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Manuel Colunga-Garcia
- Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Stuart H. Gage
- Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Douglas A. Landis
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hamm CA, Rademacher V, Landis DA, Williams BL. Conservation genetics and the implication for recovery of the endangered Mitchell's satyr Butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii. J Hered 2013; 105:19-27. [PMID: 24158752 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/est073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The modern delineation of taxonomic groups is often aided by analyses of molecular data, which can also help inform conservation biology. Two subspecies of the butterfly Neonympha mitchellii are classified as federally endangered in the United States: Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii, the Mitchell's satyr, and Neonympha mitchellii francisi, the Saint Francis's satyr. The recent discovery of additional disjunct populations of N. mitchellii in the southeastern US could have important implications for both legal protection and management decisions. We elucidated the relationships among 48 individuals representing 5 N. mitchellii populations using 6 molecular markers (5 nuclear and 1 mitochondrial) under a variety of analytical frameworks. Phylogenetic analysis resulted in moderately supported clades that corresponded with the geographic region where samples originated. Clustering analyses identified 3 groups, wherein the 2 named subspecies formed separate clusters. Coalescent analyses indicated evolutionary divergence between N. m. mitchellii and all other populations but weakly supported divergence among N. m. francisi and the recently discovered populations. Hence, the 2 currently accepted subspecies were clearly different from one another, but the recently discovered populations could not be completely distinguished from N. m. francisi or each other. We propose that N. m. mitchellii and N. m. francisi continue to be managed as separate endangered species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Hamm
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, Center for Integrative Plant Systems-Room 204, 578 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Meehan TD, Werling BP, Landis DA, Gratton C. Pest-suppression potential of midwestern landscapes under contrasting bioenergy scenarios. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41728. [PMID: 22848582 PMCID: PMC3405014 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomass crops grown on marginal soils are expected to fuel an emerging bioenergy industry in the United States. Bioenergy crop choice and position in the landscape could have important impacts on a range of ecosystem services, including natural pest-suppression (biocontrol services) provided by predatory arthropods. In this study we use predation rates of three sentinel crop pests to develop a biocontrol index (BCI) summarizing pest-suppression potential in corn and perennial grass-based bioenergy crops in southern Wisconsin, lower Michigan, and northern Illinois. We show that BCI is higher in perennial grasslands than in corn, and increases with the amount of perennial grassland in the surrounding landscape. We develop an empirical model for predicting BCI from information on energy crop and landscape characteristics, and use the model in a qualitative assessment of changes in biocontrol services for annual croplands on prime agricultural soils under two contrasting bioenergy scenarios. Our analysis suggests that the expansion of annual energy crops onto 1.2 million ha of existing perennial grasslands on marginal soils could reduce BCI between -10 and -64% for nearly half of the annual cropland in the region. In contrast, replacement of the 1.1 million ha of existing annual crops on marginal land with perennial energy crops could increase BCI by 13 to 205% on over half of the annual cropland in the region. Through comparisons with other independent studies, we find that our biocontrol index is negatively related to insecticide use across the Midwest, suggesting that strategically positioned, perennial bioenergy crops could reduce insect damage and insecticide use on neighboring food and forage crops. We suggest that properly validated environmental indices can be used in decision support systems to facilitate integrated assessments of the environmental and economic impacts of different bioenergy policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Meehan
- Department of Entomology and DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Evans JA, Davis AS, Raghu S, Ragavendran A, Landis DA, Schemske DW. The importance of space, time, and stochasticity to the demography and management of Alliaria petiolata. Ecol Appl 2012; 22:1497-1511. [PMID: 22908709 DOI: 10.1890/11-1291.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
As population modeling is increasingly called upon to guide policy and management, it is important that we understand not only the central tendencies of our study systems, but the consequences of their variation in space and time as well. The invasive plant Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) is actively managed in the United States and is the focus of a developing biological control program. Two weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Ceutorhynchus) that reduce fecundity (C. alliariae) and rosette survival plus fecundity (C. scrobicollis) are under consideration for release pending host specificity testing. We used a demographic modeling approach to (1) quantify variability in A. petiolata growth and vital rates and (2) assess the potential for single- or multiple-agent biocontrol to suppress growth of 12 A. petiolata populations in Illinois and Michigan studied over three plant generations. We used perturbation analyses and simulation models with stochastic environments to estimate stochastic growth rates (lambda(S)) and predict the probability of successful management using either a single biocontrol agent or two agent species together. Not all populations exhibited invasive dynamics. Estimates of lambda(S) ranged from 0.78 to 2.21 across sites, while annual, deterministic growth (lambda) varied up to sevenfold within individual sites. Given our knowledge of the biocontrol agents, this analysis suggests that C. scrobicollis alone may control A. petiolata at up to 63% of our study sites where lambda >1, with the combination of both agents predicted to succeed at 88% of sites. Across sites and years, the elasticity rankings were dependent on lambda. Reductions of rosette survival, fecundity, or germination of new seeds are predicted to cause the greatest reduction of lambda in growing populations. In declining populations, transitions affecting seed bank survival have the greatest effect on lambda. This contrasts with past analyses that varied parameters individually in an otherwise constant matrix, which may yield unrealistic predictions by decoupling natural parameter covariances. Overall, comparisons of stochastic and deterministic growth rates illustrate how analyses of individual populations or years could misguide management or fail to characterize complex traits such as invasiveness that emerge as attributes of populations rather than species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Evans
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Knapp AK, Smith MD, Hobbie SE, Collins SL, Fahey TJ, Hansen GJA, Landis DA, La Pierre KJ, Melillo JM, Seastedt TR, Shaver GR, Webster JR. Past, Present, and Future Roles of Long-Term Experiments in the LTER Network. Bioscience 2012. [DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.4.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
46
|
Abstract
Coccinellid communities across North America have experienced significant changes in recent decades, with declines in several native species reported. One potential mechanism for these declines is interference competition via intraguild predation; specifically, increased predation of native coccinellid eggs and larvae following the introduction of exotic coccinellids. Our previous studies have shown that agricultural fields in Michigan support a higher diversity and abundance of exotic coccinellids than similar fields in Iowa, and that the landscape surrounding agricultural fields across the north central U.S. influences the abundance and activity of coccinellid species. The goal of this study was to quantify the amount of egg predation experienced by a native coccinellid within Michigan and Iowa soybean fields and explore the influence of local and large-scale landscape structure. Using the native lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata as a model, we found that sentinel egg masses were subject to intense predation within both Michigan and Iowa soybean fields, with 60.7% of egg masses attacked and 43.0% of available eggs consumed within 48 h. In Michigan, the exotic coccinellids Coccinella septempunctata and Harmonia axyridis were the most abundant predators found in soybean fields whereas in Iowa, native species including C. maculata, Hippodamia parenthesis and the soft-winged flower beetle Collops nigriceps dominated the predator community. Predator abundance was greater in soybean fields within diverse landscapes, yet variation in predator numbers did not influence the intensity of egg predation observed. In contrast, the strongest predictor of native coccinellid egg predation was the composition of edge habitats bordering specific fields. Field sites surrounded by semi-natural habitats including forests, restored prairies, old fields, and pasturelands experienced greater egg predation than fields surrounded by other croplands. This study shows that intraguild predation by both native and exotic predators may contribute to native coccinellid decline, and that landscape structure interacts with local predator communities to shape the specific outcomes of predator-predator interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Gardiner
- Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Abstract
The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, has become the single most important arthropod pest of soybeans in North America. Native to Asia, this invasive species was first discovered in North America in July 2000 and has rapidly spread throughout the northcentral United States, much of southeastern Canada, and the northeastern United States. In response, important elements of the ecology of the soybean aphid in North America have been elucidated, with economic thresholds, sampling plans, and chemical control recommendations widely adopted. Aphid-resistant soybean varieties were available to growers in 2010. The preexisting community of aphid natural enemies has been highly effective in suppressing aphid populations in many situations, and classical biological control efforts have focused on the addition of parasitoids of Asian origin. The keys to sustainable management of this pest include understanding linkages between the soybean aphid and other introduced and native species in a landscape context along with continued development of aphid-resistant varieties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Ragsdale
- Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Costamagna AC, McCornack BP, Ragsdale DW, Landis DA. Development and validation of node-based sample units for estimating soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) densities in field cage experiments. J Econ Entomol 2010; 103:1483-92. [PMID: 20857764 DOI: 10.1603/ec10012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is currently the most important insect threat to soybean, Clycine max (L.) Merr., production in the North Central United States. Field cage studies are a key tool in investigating the potential of natural enemies and host plant resistance to control this pest. However, a major constraint in the use of cage studies is the limited number of treatments and replicates that can be used as aphid densities frequently become so large as to limit the number of experimental units that can be quantified. One way to overcome this limitation is to develop methods that estimate whole-plant aphid densities based on a reduced sampling plan. Here, we extend an existing method, node-sampling, used for estimating aphid populations in open field conditions and apply it to caged populations. We show that parameters calculated under open field conditions are inappropriate to estimate caged populations. In contrast, using four independent data sets of caged populations and a cross-validation technique, we demonstrate that a three-node sampling unit and a weighted formula provide accurate and robust estimates of whole-plant aphid density. This method reduced the number of aphids counted per plant by and average of 60%, with greater reductions at higher aphid densities. We further demonstrate that nearly identical statistical results were obtained when whole-plant or node-sampling estimates were used in the analysis of two case studies. The reduced sample unit method developed here saves time without sacrificing efficiency so that more plants, replications, or studies can be conducted that will lead to improved soybean aphid management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro C Costamagna
- Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave., University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Heimpel GE, Frelich LE, Landis DA, Hopper KR, Hoelmer KA, Sezen Z, Asplen MK, Wu K. European buckthorn and Asian soybean aphid as components of an extensive invasional meltdown in North America. Biol Invasions 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9736-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|