Antidepressants recruit new neurons to improve stress response regulation

Recent research suggests an involvement of hippocampal neurogenesis in behavioral effects of antidepressants. However, the precise mechanisms through which newborn granule neurons might influence the antidepressant response remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice not only reduces hippocampal neurogenesis, but also dampens the relationship between hippocampus and the main stress hormone system, the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Moreover, this relationship is restored by treatment with the antidepressant fluoxetine, in a neurogenesis-dependent manner. Specifically, chronic stress severely impairs HPA axis activity, the ability of hippocampus to modulate downstream brain areas involved in the stress response, the sensitivity of the hippocampal granule cell network to novelty/glucocorticoid effects and the hippocampus-dependent negative feedback of the HPA axis. Remarkably, we revealed that, although ablation of hippocampal neurogenesis alone does not impair HPA axis activity, the ability of fluoxetine to restore hippocampal regulation of the HPA axis under chronic stress conditions, occurs only in the presence of an intact neurogenic niche. These findings provide a mechanistic framework for understanding how adult-generated new neurons influence the response to antidepressants. We suggest that newly generated neurons may facilitate stress integration and that, during chronic stress or depression, enhancing neurogenesis enables a dysfunctional hippocampus to restore the central control on stress response systems, then allowing recovery.

Acute inescapable stress exposure induces long-term sleep disturbances and avoidance behavior: a mouse model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

The experience of traumatic stress often leads to long-lasting alteration in sleep quality and behavior. The objective of the present experiment was to investigate the short- and long-term effects of acute inescapable stress (i.e. two electric foot-shocks of 1.5 mA; 2s) on sleep/wakefulness parameters and behavior in Swiss mice using electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis. Baseline EEG recording was performed in the home cage for 6h prior to the application of the foot-shocks in the presence of an object (i.e. a plastic prism). One, 7, 14 or 21 days later, a second 6h EEG recording session was performed after mice had been exposed or not to the same object for 5 min in their home cage. Results showed that at day 1, 7, 14 and 21 post-stress, shocked mice displayed sleep fragmentation as shown by an increase in the number of sleep episodes, regardless the presence of the object or not. In animals exposed to the object, the total duration of wakefulness over 6h was significantly increased at days 7, 14 and 21 post-stress, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was significantly decreased at day 14 post-shock. Moreover, in the behavioral experiment, conditioned avoidance to a shock-paired object, which appeared as soon as 24h after shock application, turned into generalized avoidance towards an unknown object 21 days after stress. These findings demonstrate that an acute inescapable stress exposure may cause long-lasting alterations in sleep patterns and behavior. Such modifications may be reminiscent of the profound changes observed in patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Cortico-limbic circuitry for conditioned nicotine-seeking behavior in rats involves endocannabinoid signaling

RATIONALE

The endocannabinoid system plays an important role in conditioned drug seeking, but the neuronal mechanisms involved in this behavior are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we evaluate the role of endogenous cannabinoids in the cortico-limbic circuitry in cue-induced nicotine-seeking behavior in rats.

METHODS

Animals were first trained to self-administer nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/injection, IV) under conditions in which responding was reinforced jointly by response-contingent nicotine injections and audiovisual stimuli. During subsequent sessions, nicotine was withdrawn and responding was reinforced by contingent presentation of the stimuli only. One month after nicotine removal, the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, rimonabant, was injected bilaterally into the shell of the nucleus accumbens (ShNAcc, 0.3, 3, or 30 ng/0.5 microl), the basolateral amygdala (BLA, 30 ng/0.5 microl), or the prelimbic cortex (PLCx, 30 ng/0.5 microl).

RESULTS

Rimonabant injected into the ShNAcc dose-dependently reduced nicotine-seeking behavior without modifying spontaneous locomotor activity. Similar results were obtained when the drug (30 ng) was injected into the BLA or the PLCx. The anatomical specificity was confirmed in a control experiment using [(3)H]rimonabant. Fifteen minutes after drug injection, when the behavioral effects of rimonabant were already achieved, radioactivity was detected at the site of injection and had not diffused to adjacent regions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that increased endocannabinoid transmission critically triggers conditioned nicotine-seeking behavior in key cortico-limbic regions.

Differential roles of amygdaloid nuclei in the anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of the V1b receptor antagonist, SSR149415, in rats

RATIONALE

SSR149415 ((2S, 4R)-1-[5-chloro-1-[(2,4-dimethoxyphenyl)sulfonyl]-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-3-yl]-4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidinecarboxamide), the first selective nonpeptide vasopressin V1b receptor antagonist has been shown to induce antidepressant-and anxiolytic-like effects following systemic administration, whereas intraseptal infusion of the drug engender antidepressant-but not anxiolytic-like effects.

OBJECTIVES

Based on recent evidence that V1b receptors are located within the amygdaloid complex, a structure which is well known for its modulatory role of emotional processes, the possible involvement of the different amygdaloid nuclei in the anxiolytic- and/or antidepressant-like effects of SSR149415 was examined.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley or Wistar rats were infused with SSR149415 into the central (CeA), the basolateral (BlA), or the medial (MeA) nucleus of the amygdala and tested 10 min after microinjection in the elevated plus-maze or the forced-swimming test, two models typically used for assessing the anxiolytic and antidepressant effects of drugs, respectively.

RESULTS

Microinjection of SSR149415 into the BlA (1-10 ng), but not into the CeA or the MeA, increased the percentage of time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus-maze, indicating anxiolytic-like effects. Furthermore, in the forced-swimming test, microinjection of the drug into the CeA (1, 10, and 100 ng), BlA (1-10 ng), or MeA (100 ng) decreased immobility, an effect which is indicative of an antidepressant-like action. Together, these findings indicate that while the antidepressant-like effects of SSR149415 are mediated by different amygdaloid nuclei, its anxiolytic-like effects appear to involve only the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala. Moreover, these results add further evidence to the role of extrahypothalamic vasopressinergic systems in the control of emotional responses.

Neuropeptides in psychiatric diseases: an overview with a particular focus on depression and anxiety disorders

This paper aimed at reviewing the involvement of neuropeptides in various psychiatric diseases, particularly in depression, and anxiety disorders. General features of neuropeptides are first described, including the history of their discovery, their definition, classification, biosynthesis, transport, release, inactivation, as well as their interaction with specific neuronal receptors. The differences with classical neurotransmitters are mentioned, as well as the different patterns of co-transmission. Finally, different mechanisms, both at the cellular and at the systemic level, are proposed that may explain the involvement of these molecules in various psychiatric diseases. Indeed, at the cellular level, a neuropeptide can be involved in a psychiatric disease, either because it is co-localized with a classical neurotransmitter involved in a disease, or because the neuropeptide-containing neuron projects on a target neuron involved in the disease. At the systemic level, a neuropeptide can play a direct role in the expression of a symptom of the disease. This is illustrated by different examples.

Selective blockade of NK2 or NK3 receptors produces anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in gerbils

There is a growing interest in the potential anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of compounds that target neurokinin receptors. Since the structure and the pharmacology of the human neurokinin receptor resembles that of gerbils, rather than that of mice or rats, we decided to investigate the anxiolytic- and /or antidepressant-like effects of NK1 (SSR240600), NK2 (saredutant) and NK3 (osanetant) receptor antagonists in gerbils. It was found that saredutant (3-10 mg/kg, p.o.) and osanetant (3-10 mg/kg, p.o.) produced anxiolytic-like effects in the gerbil social interaction test. These effects were similar to those obtained with the V1b receptor antagonist SSR149415 (3-10 mg/kg, p.o.), diazepam (1 mg/kg, p.o.) and buspirone (10 mg/kg, p.o.). Fluoxetine and SSR240600 were devoid of effects in this test. In the tonic immobility test in gerbils, saredutant (5-10 mg/kg, i.p.) and osanetant (5-10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced similar effects to those observed with fluoxetine (7.5-15 mg/kg, i.p.), SSR149415 (10-30 mg/kg, p.o.) and buspirone (3 mg/kg, i.p.). Diazepam and SSR240600 were inactive in this paradigm. In conclusion, the present study indicates further that NK2 and NK3 receptor antagonists may have therapeutic potential in the clinical management of anxiety and depression.

SSR181507, a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist and 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, alleviates disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, a putative model of selective attention deficit

RATIONALE

Selective attention deficit, characterised by the inability to differentiate relevant from irrelevant information, is considered to underlie many cognitive deficits of schizophrenia, and appears to be only marginally responsive to treatment with current antipsychotics.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the activity of the putative atypical antipsychotic SSR181507 (a dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist and 5HT(1A) receptor agonist) with reference compounds, on disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, a behavioural paradigm that putatively models selective attention deficit.

METHODS

A first (familiar) juvenile rat was presented to an adult rat for a period (P1) of 30 min. A second (novel) juvenile was then introduced at the end of P1 for a period (P2) of 5 min. The ability of the adult rat to discriminate between the two juveniles, presented at the same time, was evaluated by measuring the ratio of the time spent in interaction with the novel vs the familiar juvenile during P2.

RESULTS

Adult rats spent more time exploring the novel than the familiar juvenile. This novelty discrimination capacity was disrupted by: (1) parametric modification of the procedure (reduction of time spent in contact with the familiar juvenile during P1); (2) acute injection of psychotomimetics that are known to induce schizophrenia-like symptoms in humans, such as phencyclidine (PCP; 3 mg/kg, i.p.) and d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and (3) neonatal treatment with PCP (three injections of 10 mg/kg, s.c.), a model based on the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. The potential atypical antipsychotic SSR181507 (0.03-3 mg/kg, i.p.) and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.) and amisulpride (1-3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated deficits in novelty discrimination produced by parametric manipulation and by acute or neonatal treatment with PCP. The typical antipsychotic haloperidol (up to 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated only deficits in novelty discrimination produced by parametric modification.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these results suggest that SSR181507 can alleviate disturbances of novelty discrimination in a social context in rats, and that this paradigm may represent a suitable animal model of selective attention deficits observed in schizophrenia.

SSR181507, a putative atypical antipsychotic with dopamine D2 antagonist and 5-HT1A agonist activities: improvement of social interaction deficits induced by phencyclidine in rats

Social behaviour is frequently impaired in schizophrenic patients, and current antipsychotics appear poorly effective in alleviating this deficit. SSR181507 is a selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist and 5-HT1A receptor agonist [Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (2003) 2064] with an atypical antipsychotic profile and additional antidepressant/anxiolytic activities [Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (2003) 1889]. Here, we sought to assess the efficacy of SSR181507, and of reference antipsychotics and antidepressant/anxiolytics, to counteract phencyclidine (PCP)-induced social interaction deficit in rats. Pairs of unfamiliar rats were placed for 10 min each day into a dimly lit arena, during four consecutive days. On the test day (5th day), each pair was placed into the arena 30 min after i.p. treatment with PCP (or vehicle) and a challenge compound or vehicle (same for both rats, i.p. or s.c.). The time spent in social interaction was scored during 10 min. PCP (1 mg/kg) decreased social interaction time by about 35%. This effect was fully antagonized by pre-treatment with SSR181507 (1 mg/kg). In contrast, neither haloperidol (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) nor clozapine (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) antagonized this PCP-induced deficit. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg s.c.), but not the anxiolytic diazepam (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg), also improved social interaction impairment in PCP-treated rats: this would indicate that the 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of SSR181507 are responsible for the reversal of PCP-induced social deficit. These data suggest that, in addition to its atypical antipsychotic profile and antidepressant/anxiolytic activities, SSR181507 has a potential therapeutic activity in another key feature of schizophrenia poorly controlled by current antipsychotics, namely deterioration in social functioning.

Blockade of CRF(1) or V(1b) receptors reverses stress-induced suppression of neurogenesis in a mouse model of depression

Repeated exposure to stress is known to induce structural remodelling and reduction of neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) and vasopressin (AVP) are key regulators of the stress response via activation of CRF(1) and V(1b) receptors, respectively. The blockade of these receptors has been proposed as an innovative approach for the treatment of affective disorders. The present study aimed at determining whether the CRF(1) receptor antagonist SSR125543A, the V(1b) receptor antagonist SSR149415, and the clinically effective antidepressant fluoxetine may influence newborn cell proliferation and differentiation in the dentate gyrus of mice subjected to the chronic mild stress (CMS) procedure, a model of depression with predictive validity. Repeated administration of SSR125543A (30 mg/kg i.p.), SSR149415 (30 mg/kg i.p.), and fluoxetine (10 mg/kg i.p.) for 28 days, starting 3 weeks after the beginning of the stress procedure, significantly reversed the reduction of cell proliferation produced by CMS, an effect which was paralleled by a marked improvement of the physical state of the coat of stressed mice. Moreover, mice subjected to stress exhibited a 53% reduction of granule cell neurogenesis 30 days after the end of the 7-week stress period, an effect which was prevented by all drug treatments. Collectively, these results point to an important role of CRF and AVP in the regulation of dentate neurogenesis, and suggest that CRF(1) and V(1b) receptor antagonists may affect plasticity changes in the hippocampal formation, as do clinically effective antidepressants.

Characterization of the profile of neurokinin-2 and neurotensin receptor antagonists in the mouse defense test battery

Defensive behaviors of lower mammals confronted with a predatory stimulus provide an appropriate laboratory model for investigating behavior relevant to human emotional disorders. The mouse defense test battery (MDTB) has been developed because it combines many of the aspects of defense. Briefly, it consists of five tests either associated with potential threat (contextual defense) or the actual presence of an approaching threat (a rat). These latter focus on changes in flight, risk assessment and defensive threat and attack behaviors. Investigations with anxiolytic compounds have shown that these defense reactions may be used to differentiate between several classes of anxiolytic drugs. Here we used the MDTB to compare the behavioral profile of the benzodiazepine diazepam with that of neuropeptide receptor antagonists which have been shown to be involved in the modulation of stress response, namely the NK(2) receptor antagonists, SR48968 (0.01-1mg/kg) and SR144190 (1-10mg/kg), and the NT(1) receptor antagonist, SR48692 (1-30mg/kg). Results showed that all compounds decreased defensive threat/attack, but only diazepam and, to a lesser extent, SR48692 significantly modified risk assessment or flight. Further, none of the neuropeptide receptor antagonists modified contextual defense. Overall, the behavioral profile displayed by diazepam and these latter compounds in the MDTB are consistent with an anxiolytic-like action. However, our results suggest that, while NK(2) and NT(1) receptor antagonists may have limited efficacy on anxiety-related responses including cognitive aspects (i.e. risk assessment), they may have a potential against some forms of anxiety disorders which involve adaptative responses to extreme stress stimuli (e.g. direct confrontation with the threat stimulus).

Selective blockade of neurokinin-2 receptors produces antidepressant-like effects associated with reduced corticotropin-releasing factor function

The present study investigated the effects of the selective neurokinin-2 (NK2) receptor antagonist SR48968 in behavioral, electrophysiological, and biochemical tests sensitive to the action of prototypical antidepressants (fluoxetine, imipramine) or to corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonists, which have been proposed recently as potential antidepressants. Results showed that SR48968 (0.3-10 mg/kg i.p.) produced antidepressant-like activity because it reduced immobility in the forced swimming test in both mice and rats, and decreased the amount of maternal separation-induced vocalizations in guinea pig pups. This latter effect appears to involve a reduction of stress-induced substance P release because SR48968 reduced the separation-induced increase in the number of neurons displaying neurokinin-1 receptor internalization in the amygdala. Furthermore, SR48968 increased the expression of the cAMP response-element binding protein mRNA in the rat hippocampus after repeated (1 mg/kg i.p., 21 days), but not acute administration. Finally, neuronal firing of the locus coeruleus (LC) and noradrenergic (NE) release in the prefrontal cortex both elicited by an uncontrollable stressor or an intraventricular administration of CRF were reduced by SR48968 (0.3-1 mg/kg i.p.). The finding that SR48968 (1 mg/kg i.p.) blocked the cortical release of NE induced by an intra-LC infusion of the preferential NK2 receptor agonist neurokinin A suggested the presence of NK2 receptors in this latter region. Importantly, SR48965 (1-10 mg/kg i.p.), the optical antipode of SR48968, which is devoid of affinity for the NK2 receptor, was inactive in all the models used. These data suggest that NK2 receptor blockade may constitute a novel mechanism in the treatment of depression and CRF-related disorders.

Measuring normal and pathological anxiety-like behaviour in mice: a review

Measuring anxiety-like behaviour in mice has been mostly undertaken using a few classical animal models of anxiety such as the elevated plus-maze, the light/dark choice or the open-field tests. All these procedures are based upon the exposure of subjects to unfamiliar aversive places. Anxiety can also be elicited by a range of threats such as predator exposure. Furthermore, the concepts of "state" and "trait" anxiety have been proposed to differentiate anxiety that the subject experiences at a particular moment of time and that is increased by the presence of an anxiogenic stimulus, and anxiety that does not vary from moment to moment and is considered to be an "enduring feature of an individual". Thus, when assessing the behaviour of mice, it is necessary to increase the range of behavioural paradigms used, including animal models of "state" and "trait" anxiety. In the last few years, many mice with targeted mutations have been generated. Among them some have been proposed as animal models of pathological anxiety, since they display high level of anxiety-related behaviours in classical tests. However, it is important to emphasise that such mice are animal models of a single gene dysfunction, rather than models of anxiety, per se. Inbred strains of mice, such as the BALB/c line, which exhibits spontaneously elevated anxiety appear to be a more suitable model of pathological anxiety.

Effects of SR48968, a selective non-peptide NK2 receptor antagonist on emotional processes in rodents

RATIONALE

It has been suggested that tachykinin NK(2) receptor antagonists may have therapeutic utility in anxiety and/or depressive disorders.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the modulatory action of the NK(2) receptor antagonist SR48968 on emotional processes in rodents.

METHODS

The tests used include classical models of anxiety (punished lever pressing and punished drinking conflict tests, elevated plus-maze in rats), a model based on defensive behaviors of mice confronted with a natural threat (a rat), and two tests based on exposure of rats or mice to a natural predator (a cat) followed by subsequent exposure to a cat odor cue. The prototypical anxiolytic diazepam was used throughout as a positive control, the antidepressant imipramine was tested in the mouse defense test battery and in both models of predatory exposure, and the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin was used in the cat-exposure test in rats.

RESULTS

Unlike diazepam, SR48968 failed to increase rates of responding suppressed by punishment in both conflict procedures. By contrast, in the elevated plus-maze test, the NK(2) receptor antagonist (3 mg/kg, IP) elicited positive effects on traditional and ethologically derived measures of anxiety. In the mouse defense test battery, SR48968 (0.03-1 mg/kg, IP) decreased flight reactions, risk assessment behavior, defensive biting and escape attempts. While the magnitude of the effects on flight, risk assessment and escape attempts of the NK(2) receptor antagonist was less than that of diazepam, SR48968 appeared to be as effective as the BZ on defensive biting. In rats previously exposed to a cat, SR48968 (3 mg/kg, IP), antalarmin (1 mg/kg, IP), imipramine (30 mg/kg, IP), but not diazepam, reduced subsequent high levels of avoidance responses when subjects are exposed to a cat odor-saturated cue 1 h later. Similar effects of SR48968 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, IP) were observed in mice following repeated administration (twice a day/5 days/IP). Importantly, the positive effects of the NK(2) receptor antagonist were evident at doses that did not impair general activity, unlike imipramine which displayed mainly sedative action. Moreover, the (R)-enantiomer of SR48968, SR48965, which was tested in the elevated plus-maze, the mouse defense test battery and the cat exposure tests, was much less active than its racemate, indicating a stereoselective action of SR48968.

CONCLUSION

These data show that while SR48968 has limited or no efficacy in models or behavioral measures mainly sensitive to BZs, it shows good activity in reducing anxiety-like behaviors following traumatic stress or upon forced and unavoidable contact with a threatening stimulus. This suggests that NK(2) receptor antagonists may have a potential in the treatment of some forms of anxiety disorders.

Behavioral and neurochemical changes following predatory stress in mice

This article had several objectives. First it aimed at investigating the anxiogenic-like behaviors elicited by unavoidable cat exposure and/or cat odor across nine strains of mice (BALB/c, C57BL/6, C3H, CBA, DBA/2, NMRI, NZB, SJL, Swiss) in a modified version of the free-exploration test. The second objective was to investigate possible neurochemical changes following cat exposure in Swiss mice by measuring the turnover of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) in several brain regions known to be involved in the modulation of emotional processes (hippocampus, hypothalamus and striatum). Finally, the third objective was to examine the effects of anxiolytic drug treatments on the anxiogenic responses elicited by a cat odor (i.e. a feces) in Swiss mice previously exposed to a cat using the free-exploration test. Results from the strain comparison showed that mice could be divided into three distinct groups: two non-reactive strains (NZB and SJL) which were relatively insensitive to predatory exposure and/or odor; five intermediate-reactive strains (Swiss, NMRI, CBA, C3H and BALB/c) which displayed clear anxiogenic-like responses only when exposed to both cat and, subsequently, to feces; and two high reactive strains (C57BL/6 and DBA/2) which showed anxiogenic-like reactions following cat exposure, regardless of the stimulus (clay or feces) present in the free-exploration cage. Neurochemical data revealed that, while brain levels of NA, DA, 5-HT in cat exposed Swiss mice were not significantly different from those of control animals, turnover rates of these monoamines were increased in the hippocampus (NA and 5-HT), hypothalamus and striatum (DA) after cat exposure. Results from pharmacological experiments indicated that repeated administration of the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5-20 mg/kg, twice a day, for 5 days) completely abolished avoidance of the cat feces in Swiss mice previously exposed to the predator. Neither acute nor repeated administration of the classical anxiolytic diazepam was able to reduce avoidance behavior of the anxiogenic stimulus in the free-exploration test. Taken together, these findings indicate that the exposure of mice to unavoidable predatory stimuli is associated with behavioral and neurochemical changes consistent with increased anxiety.

SL651498: an anxioselective compound with functional selectivity for alpha2- and alpha3-containing gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors

SL651498 [6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-one] is a novel pyridoindole derivative that displays high affinity for rat native GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(1) (K(i) = 6.8 nM) and alpha2 (K(i) = 12.3 nM) subunits, and weaker affinity for alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors (K(i) = 117 nM). Studies on recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors confirm these data (K(i), alpha1beta2gamma2 = 17, alpha2beta2gamma2 = 73, alpha5beta3gamma2 = 215 nM) and indicate intermediate affinity for the alpha3beta2gamma2 subtype (K(i) = 80 nM). SL651498 behaves as a full agonist at recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors containing alpha2 and alpha3 subunits and as a partial agonist at recombinant GABA(A) receptors expressing alpha1 and alpha5 subunits. SL651498 elicited anxiolytic-like activity similar to that of diazepam [minimal effective dose (MED): 1-10 mg/kg, i.p.] in three conflict models, in the elevated plus-maze, the light/dark test, and the defense test battery in rats and mice. Results from activity tests and electroencephalogram analysis indicated that SL651498 induced muscle weakness, ataxia, or sedation at doses much higher than those producing anxiolytic-like activity (MED > or = 30 mg/kg, i.p.). Repeated treatment for 10 days with SL651498 (30 mg/kg, i.p., b.i.d.) in mice was not associated with the development of tolerance to its anticonvulsant effects or physical dependence. Furthermore, SL651498 was much less active than diazepam in potentiating the depressant effects of ethanol in mice. The "anxioselective" profile of SL651498 points to a major role for GABA(A) alpha2 subtype in regulating anxiety and suggests that selectively targeting GABA(A) receptor subtypes can lead to drugs with increased clinical specificity.

Mouse defensive behaviors: pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic

The natural defensive behaviors of laboratory mice have been evaluated in both seminatural and highly structured situations; and characterized in terms of eliciting stimuli, response to pharmacological agents, behavior patterns, and outcome or effect on the social and physical environment. The defense patterns of laboratory mice and rats are generally similar, but mice show risk assessment on initial exposure to highly threatening stimuli while rats do not, while rats display alarm vocalizations, missing in mice. Quantitative differences in freezing and flight for laboratory mice and rats appear to largely reflect domestication effects, with wild mice and rats more similar to each other. This nexus of detailed within-species and comparative data on defense patterns makes it possible to reliably elicit specific defenses in mice or rats in an experimental context, providing well-validated assays of the natural defensive behaviors themselves, as opposed to 'models' of defense. The mouse--rat comparisons indicate considerable cross-species generality for these defense patterns, as does a scattered but considerable literature on other mammalian species, generally involving field studies and typically focusing on those aspects of defensive behavior that are visible at a distance, such as vigilance, or flight. Although potential homologies between normal mouse and human defense systems should ideally involve all four pattern components (stimulus, organismic factors, response characteristics, outcome), predictive validity in terms of response to drugs active against specific defensive psychopathology is the most extensively investigated of these. Flight, as measured in the Mouse Defense Test Battery shows a consistently appropriate response to panicolytic, panicogenic, and panic-neutral drugs, while some other predictive 'panic models' (dPAG-stimulation; DMH-inhibition; possibly conditioned suppression of drinking paradigms) also elicit and (indirectly) measure behaviors potentially related to flight. Models unrelated to flight (e.g. ultrasonic vocalization to conditioned stimuli); or for which flight elements may a relatively minor contributor to the behavior measured (Elevated T-maze) are less predictive of panicolytic or panicogenic action. These findings indicate that natural defensive behaviors provide a well-characterized pattern for analysis of effects of genetic or other physiological manipulations in the mouse, and may also serve as a model for analysis of defense-related human psychopathology.

The brain decade in debate: II. Panic or anxiety? From animal models to a neurobiological basis

This article is a transcription of an electronic symposium sponsored by the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC). Invited researchers from the European Union, North America and Brazil discussed two issues on anxiety, namely whether panic is a very intense anxiety or something else, and what aspects of clinical anxiety are reproduced by animal models. Concerning the first issue, most participants agreed that generalized anxiety and panic disorder are different on the basis of clinical manifestations, drug response and animal models. Also, underlying brain structures, neurotransmitter modulation and hormonal changes seem to involve important differences. It is also common knowledge that existing animal models generate different types of fear/anxiety. A challenge for future research is to establish a good correlation between animal models and nosological classification.

The effects of compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three rat models of anxiety

Compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have recently been reported to produce benzodiazepine-like antianxiety effects in mice. To assess the cross-species generality of these findings, the present experiments compared the effects of diazepam (0.625-5 mg/kg) with those of several non-selective (MM-77, 0.03-1 mg/kg and pindobind-5-HT(1A), 0.1-5 mg/kg) and selective (WAY100635, 0.01-10 mg/kg, p-MPPI, 0.01-3 mg/kg and SL88.0338, 0.3-10 mg/kg) 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists in three well-validated anxiolytic screening tests in rats: punished lever-pressing, punished drinking, and the elevated plus-maze. In the punished lever-pressing conflict test, none of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists modified rates of punished responding, whereas in the punished drinking test, WAY100635 (0.3-1 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (3-10 mg/kg), p-MPPI (1 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), but not pindobind-5-HT(1A), produced clear anticonflict activity. However, the increase in punished responding with the 5-HT(1A) compounds was smaller than that produced by diazepam, indicating weaker anxiolytic-like activity. In the elevated plus-maze test, WAY100635 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg), SL88.0338 (0.3-10 mg/kg), MM-77 (0.01-3 mg/kg), pindobind-5-HT(1A) (0.1-3 mg/kg), but not p-MPPI, showed anxiolytic-like activity on traditional behavioral indices, increasing the percentage of time spent in open arms and the percentage of open arm entries. As was the case in the punished drinking test, the magnitude of the positive effects of the 5-HT(1A) compounds was generally smaller than that of diazepam. Of the ethological measures recorded in the plus-maze, all compounds markedly decreased risk assessment (i.e. attempts) over the entire dose-range, but only diazepam clearly increased directed exploration (i.e. head-dipping). Although the present results demonstrate that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists elicit anxiolytic-like effects in rats, this action appears to be test-specific and, unlike previous findings in mice, smaller than that observed with benzodiazepines. The data are discussed in relation to the possible relevance of species differences in 5-HT(1A) receptor function and the nature of the anxiety response studied.

Beta-CCT, a selective BZ-omega1 receptor antagonist, blocks the anti-anxiety but not the amnesic action of chlordiazepoxide in mice

The aim of this study was to test further the hypothesis that different benzodiazepine (BZ-omega) receptor subtypes may mediate anxiolytic and amnesic effects of BZ agonists, using the selective BZ-omega1 receptor antagonist beta-CCT (beta-carboline-3-carboxylate t-butyl-ester). Experiments were performed in Swiss mice using the elevated plus-maze anxiety test and two learning tasks - passive avoidance and the radial arm maze. In the elevated plus-maze test, beta-CCT (30 mg/kg, i.p.) completely abolished the increase in open-arm entries induced by the BZ chlordiazepoxide (5mg/kg, i.p.). Chlordiazepoxide decreased retention latency in the passive avoidance step-through procedure, and increased the number of errors in the radial arm maze. These effects were not modified by beta-CCT. Except for a slight, albeit significant, amnesic effect in the passive avoidance test, beta-CCT was devoid of intrinsic activity when administered alone. These results are in agreement with previous studies using selective BZ-omega1 agonists, and thus provide further evidence that BZ-omega1 receptors may be involved in the anxiolytic but not in the amnesic effects of BZ agonists.

Differences in anxiety-related behaviours and in sensitivity to diazepam in inbred and outbred strains of mice

RATIONALE

Natural strain differences exist in mice for behavioural traits such as emotional reactivity.

OBJECTIVE

The present experiments compared the behavioural profiles of nine strains of mice (BALB/c, C57BL/6, C3H, CBA, DBA/2, NMRI, NZB, SJL, Swiss) in two models of anxiety after the administration of the benzodiazepine diazepam.

METHODS

The tests used were the light/dark choice task and the elevated plus-maze, two well-validated anxiolytic screening tests.

RESULTS

In vehicle-treated animals, differences on variables designed to measure anxiety-related behaviours were observed in both tests. In the light/dark test, the strains could be divided into three distinct groups: two non-reactive strains (NZB and SJL), an intermediate-reactive group (C3H, CBA, DBA/2, NMRI, C57BL/6 and Swiss), and one highly reactive strain (BALB/c). In the elevated plus-maze, SJL, NMRI, CBA and, to a lesser extent, C3H strains of mice, consistently showed low levels of anxiety-related behaviours. Intermediate levels were seen in the Swiss and BALB/c strains, and high levels of emotional reactivity were seen in C57BL/6, DBA/2 and NZB. The strain distribution between the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests shows similarities and differences, suggesting that each of these experimental procedures represents a different set of behaviours. Marked differences between a number of strains of mice in their sensitivity to the anxiolytic-like action of diazepam were observed in both the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests. Mice of the BALB/c, Swiss and, to a lesser extent, CBA and C3H strains were responsive to diazepam in both tests, although in the case of CBA mice, effects may have been contaminated by behavioural suppression. SJL mice were largely unresponsive to the action of the benzodiazepine in both tests, whereas in C57, DBA/2, NMRI and NZB mice, diazepam produced positive effects only in the elevated plus-maze.

CONCLUSION

The finding of differential strain distributions both with and without diazepam treatment in the light/dark and the elevated plus-maze tests, indicates that not all strains of mice are suitable for investigating the effects of GABA/BZ receptor ligands. This study may thus provide a useful guide for choosing the best strain of mice for studying the pharmacology of fear-related behaviours.

Discriminative stimulus effects of drugs acting at GABA(A) receptors: differential profiles and receptor selectivity

The GABA(A) receptor complex contains a number of binding sites at which a variety of psychotropic drugs, including benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and some neurosteroids, act to potentiate or inhibit the effect of the transmitter. Many studies have reported that these drugs can produce discriminative stimulus actions, but the cueing effects of compounds acting at different sites to enhance the effects of GABA are not identical. The discriminative stimulus effects of benzodiazepines have been analyzed in detail, and there is also a great deal of information available on the effects of nonbenzodiazepine compounds acting at BZ(omega) recognition sites, which form part of the GABA(A) receptor complex. Of particular interest are compounds with selectivity for the BZ1(omega1) receptor subtype including zolpidem, zaleplon, and CI 218,872. BZ1(omega1)-selective drugs substitute for the discriminative stimulus produced by chlordiazepoxide only partially and at sedative doses. This is consistent with the view that sedative effects of BZ(omega) receptor agonists are mediated by the BZ1(omega1) receptor subtype, whereas the discriminative stimulus produced by chlordiazepoxide may be produced by activity at the BZ2(omega2) subtype. Analysis of this hypothesis is complicated by the variety of levels of intrinsic activity shown by different drugs.

New evidence that the pharmacological effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands can be associated with activities at different BZ (omega) receptor subtypes

RATIONALE

It has been suggested that different BZ (omega) receptor subtypes may mediate distinct behavioural effects of BZ receptor ligands.

OBJECTIVE

The present study examined this hypothesis further.

METHODS

The antagonism exerted by the selective BZ(1) (omega(1)) receptor antagonist beta-CCT on the pharmacological effects of the selective BZ(1) (omega(1)) receptor agonist zolpidem and the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor agonist diazepam in behavioural, biochemical and electrophysiological experiments was assessed.

RESULTS

beta-CCT which was devoid of activity per se, antagonized the effects of the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor full agonist diazepam and the selective BZ(1) (omega(1)) receptor full agonist zolpidem against seizures produced by isoniazid, but beta-CCT failed to affect their action on seizures produced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), suggesting that BZ(2) (omega(2)) receptors may be primarily involved in the convulsant action of PTZ. In the light/dark test, beta-CCT abolished the anxiolytic-like action of diazepam. In tests designed to investigate the central depressant activity of drugs, beta-CCT antagonized the sedative effects of diazepam and zolpidem, but failed to modify clearly the myorelaxant effects of diazepam. These differences may be related to the selectivity of beta-CCT for BZ(1) (omega(1)) sites as indicated by the preferential displacement of [(3)H]flumazenil in BZ(1) (omega(1))-enriched structures as compared to BZ(2) (omega(2))-enriched structures in the mouse. In in vitro experiments, beta-CCT antagonized the potentiation of the GABA-induced Cl(-) current produced by zolpidem in HEK cells expressing the alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2) receptor or in cerebellar Purkinje neurones, while it failed to modify the diazepam potentiation at either alpha(3)beta(2)gamma(2) or alpha(5)beta(3)gamma(2) receptor subtypes.

CONCLUSION

These results are consistent with the hypothesis that BZ(1) (omega(1)) receptors play an important role in the anxiolytic and sedative/hypnotic effects of BZ (omega) receptor ligands, whereas activity at BZ(2) (omega(2)) sites might be associated primarily with muscle relaxation.

Comparison of the pharmacological properties of classical and novel BZ-omega receptor ligands

The experiments in this study compared the pharmacological properties of several BZ-omega receptor ligands, including the imidazobenzodiazepine imidazenil, the beta-carboline abecarnil, the pyridazinone Y-23684, the pyrido [1,2-a]benzimidazole RWJ 46771 and the 1,6-naphthyridin-2(1H)-one derivative SX-3228, with the prototypical BZs diazepam, clobazam and bretazenil. In in vitro experiments diazepam, bretazenil, imidazenil and Y-23684 displaced [3H]flumazenil binding non-selectively in membranes from rat cerebellum and spinal cord, two brain areas enriched in the BZ-omega 1 and BZ-omega 2 receptor subtypes, respectively. In contrast, abecarnil, RWJ 46771 and SX-3228 were more potent in displacing [3H]flumazenil binding to membranes from rat cerebellum than from spinal cord or hippocampus, indicating selectivity for the BZ-omega 1 receptor subtype. The in vivo experiments showed that all compounds increased the latency to clonic seizures produced by isoniazid. However, the maximal increase in latency induced by diazepam, clobazam, abecarnil, RWJ 46771 and SX-3228 was greater than that of bretazenil, imidazenil and Y-23684, thereby indicating that these latter compounds have low intrinsic efficacy. In the punished drinking, the punished lever pressing and the elevated plus-maze tests in rats, three models of anxiety, diazepam, clobazam and imidazenil elicited clear anxiolytic-like effects but at doses which were close to those producing hypolocomotion, ataxia and myorelaxation as measured in activity cages, the rotarod and the loaded grid tests, respectively. In contrast, bretazenil and Y-23684 induced anxiolytic-like activity at much lower doses than those which impaired motor performances. The magnitude of the positive effects of Y-23684 was similar to that of the reference BZs, suggesting that it may become a valuable alternative to currently used agents for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Abecarnil, RWJ 46771 and SX-3228 produced weaker or non-specific anxiolytic-like effects as they decreased anxiety-related behaviours at doses similar or close to those impairing motor performance. However, unlike the other compounds they induced myorelaxation at doses which were 3-10 times higher than those needed to produce decrease in exploratory activity. It is suggested that the behavioural profiles of abecarnil, RWJ 46771 and SX-3228 may be attributed to their selectivity for the BZ-omega 1 receptor subtype which may account for their sedative activity, thereby masking other effects including anxiolytic-like activity. This suggests that BZ receptor modulation of anxiety may involve BZ receptor subtypes other than BZ-omega 1.

Behavioral effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine in Wistar-Kyoto rats

It has been previously reported that Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats may be useful in the study of the biological mechanisms involved in stress-related disorders. In the present study, WKY were treated acutely or chronically (one daily i.p. injection for 22-24 days) with the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor and clinically effective antidepressant and anxiolytic fluoxetine (5 and 20 mg/kg) and exposed to the forced swimming test (FST) and to the elevated plus-maze (EPM) at different times postinjection (30, 60, min or 24 h). In the FST, WKY failed to respond to fluoxetine, regardless of treatment. In the EPM, acute fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) produced anxiolytic-like effects when animals were tested 24 h, but not 30 min after drug administration. Positive effects in the EPM were evident on both conventional (open-arm activity) and ethological (risk assessment) measures in the absence of effect on activity measures (total and closed-arm entries). No evidence for anxiolytic-like activity was observed following chronic fluoxetine. These results indicate that WKY rats are resistant to fluoxetine treatment in the FST, while their behavior may be modified in the EPM when animals received a single fluoxetine challenge 24 h before testing. Overall, these findings provided little evidence that WKY rats may represent a valid model of stress-related disorders.

Orphanin FQ, a novel neuropeptide with anti-stress-like activity

Potential anxiolytic-like properties of intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) infusion of orphanin FQ (OFQ), a recently discovered neuropeptide, were investigated in the mouse defense test battery, a well-validated anxiolytic screening test. In this model, Swiss mice are directly confronted with a natural threat (a rat) as well as situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken during and after rat confrontation were flight, risk assessment, defensive attack and escape attempts. Unlike the anxiolytic drug diazepam (3-10 microgram/5 microliter, i.c.v.), which affected all defensive responses, OFQ (0.3-3 nM/5 microliter) only clearly reduced defensive upright postures and biting reactions. Subjects displayed these latter defensive behaviors upon forced contact with the threat stimulus, a situation which is considered to be highly stressful. These results suggest that the OFQ system may not be primarily involved in anxiety-related responses including cognitive aspects (i. e., risk assessment), while it may play a role in the adaptative responses to unavoidable or extreme stress stimuli.

Pharmacological studies on synthetic flavonoids: comparison with diazepam

The present experiments compared the central BZ-omega binding characteristics and pharmacological profiles of two synthetic flavonoids (6-bromoflavone and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone) with those of the benzodiazepine (BZ) diazepam. In vitro experiments showed that while diazepam displaced [3H]flumazenil binding to the GABA(A) receptor in membranes from rat cerebellum and spinal cord, two brain areas enriched in the BZ-omega1 and BZ-omega2 receptor subtypes, with nearly equivalent half maximally effective concentrations, 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone was somewhat more potent in displacing [3H]flumazenil binding to membranes from rat cerebellum (IC50 = 31 nM) than from spinal cord (IC50 = 120 nM), indicating selectivity for the BZ-omega1 receptor subtype. 6-Bromoflavone displayed weak (IC50 = 970 nM) affinity for the BZ-omega1 and no affinity for the BZ-omega2 (IC50 > 1000 nM) receptor subtypes. Diazepam, but not the synthetic flavonoids increased the latency to clonic seizures produced by isoniazid, thereby indicating that neither 6-bromoflavone nor 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone display detectable intrinsic activity at GABA(A) receptors in vivo. Results from two conflict tests in rats showed that 6-bromoflavone (3-10 mg/kg) and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone (0.3-1 mg/kg) elicited anxiolytic-like activity in the punished drinking test, while both drugs were inactive in the punished lever pressing test. The positive effects displayed by the synthetic flavonoids in the punished drinking procedure were smaller than that of diazepam and were not antagonized by the BZ receptor antagonist flumazenil. In two models of exploratory activity, 6-bromoflavone (3-30 mg/kg) and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone (0.3-1 mg/kg) produced anxiolytic-like effects in the rat elevated plus-maze test, whereas both compounds failed to modify the behavior of mice in the light/dark test over a wide dose-range. The effects in the elevated plus-maze were antagonized by flumazenil. In the mouse defense test battery, where mice were confronted with a natural threat (a rat), 6-bromoflavone and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone failed to decrease flight reactions after the rat was introduced into the test area and risk assessment behavior displayed when subjects were constrained in a straight alley, and only weakly affected risk assessment of mice chased by the rat and defensive biting upon forced contact with the threat stimulus. In a drug discrimination experiment 6-bromoflavone and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone up to 30 and 3 mg/kg, respectively, did not substitute for the BZ chlordiazepoxide. Taken together, these results failed to demonstrate that the synthetic flavonoids 6-bromoflavone and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone possess anxiolytic-like properties similar or superior to that of diazepam, as was suggested previously. Furthermore, they question the contribution of BZ-omega receptors to the behavioral effects of 6-bromoflavone and 6-bromo-3'-nitroflavone.

Behavioural profiles in the mouse defence test battery suggest anxiolytic potential of 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists

RATIONALE

Compounds varying in selectivity as 5-HT1A receptor antagonists have recently been reported to produce anxiolytic-like effects comparable to those of benzodiazepines in the mouse elevated plus-maze procedure.

OBJECTIVE

In view of the potential clinical significance of these findings, the present experiments compared the behavioural effects of diazepam (0.5-3.0 mg/kg) with those of several non-selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists [NAN-190, 0.1-3.0 mg/kg, MM-77, 0.03-1.0 mg/kg, (S)-UH-301, 0.3-3.0 mg/kg and pindobind-5-HT1A, 0.03-1.0 mg/kg], and three selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists (WAY100635, 0.01-3.0 mg/kg, p-MPPI, 0.1-3.0 mg/kg and SL88.0338, 0.3-3.0 mg/kg) in the mouse defence test battery (MDTB).

METHODS

In this well-validated anxiolytic screening test, Swiss mice are directly confronted with a natural threat (a rat) as well as situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken during and after rat confrontation were flight, risk assessment (RA), defensive threat/attack and escape attempts.

RESULTS

Diazepam significantly decreased flight reactions after the rat was introduced into the runway, reduced RA activities of mice chased by the rat, increased RA responses displayed when subjects were constrained in a straight alley and reduced defensive upright postures and biting upon forced contact. All the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists and NAN-190 also reduced flight, RA in the chase test, and defensive threat and attack behaviours. (S)-UH-301 and pindobind-5-HT1A reduced RA in the chase test, but only partially modified defensive threat and attack. Unlike the other drugs tested, MM-77 produced significant effects only at doses which also markedly reduced spontaneous locomotor activity, suggesting a behaviourally non-specific action. In contrast to diazepam, the 5-HT1A receptor ligands failed to affect RA in the straight alley test. Following removal of the rat from the test area, only diazepam and (S)-UH-301 reduced escape behaviour (contextual defence) at doses which did not decrease locomotion. Overall, the present findings indicate that except for one RA behaviour and escape responses, the 5-HT1A receptor ligands studied modified the same defensive behaviours as diazepam, suggesting potential therapeutic efficacy in the management of anxiety disorders. However, the magnitude of the effects of the 5-HT1A compounds on defence was generally smaller than that of the benzodiazepine.

CONCLUSION

As all of the 5-HT1A compounds tested in this series share antagonistic activity in models of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor function, it is proposed that this action accounts for their effects on defence.

Is there a future for neuropeptide receptor ligands in the treatment of anxiety disorders?

This review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical evidence of a role for the neuroactive peptides cholecystokinin (CCK), corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), neuropeptide Y (NPY), tachykinins (i.e., substance P, neurokinin [NK] A and B), and natriuretic peptides in anxiety and/or stress-related disorders. Results obtained with CCK receptor antagonists in animal studies have been highly variable, and clinical trials with several of these compounds in anxiety disorders have been unsuccessful so far. However, future investigations using CCK receptor antagonists with better pharmacokinetic characteristics and animal models other than those validated with the classical anxiolytics benzodiazepines may permit a more precise evaluation of the potential of these compounds as anti-anxiety agents. Results obtained with peptide CRF receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety convincingly demonstrated that the blockade of central CRF receptors may yield anxiolytic-like activity. However, the discovery of nonpeptide and more lipophilic CRF receptor antagonists is essential for the development of these agents as anxiolytics. Similarly, there is clear preclinical evidence that the central infusion of NPY and NPY fragments selective for the Y1 receptor display anxiolytic-like effects in a variety of tests. However, synthetic nonpeptide NPY receptor agonists are still lacking, thereby hampering the development of NPY anxiolytics. Unlike selective NK1 receptor antagonists, which have variable effects in anxiety models, peripheral administration of selective NK2 receptor antagonists and central infusion of natriuretic peptides produce clear anxiolytic-like activity. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that compounds targeting specific neuropeptide receptors may become an alternative to benzodiazepines for the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Differences in anxiolytic-like profile of two novel nonbenzodiazepine BZ (omega) receptor agonists on defensive behaviors of mice

The present experiments compared the behavioral effects of two novel BZ (omega) receptor agonists, the pyridazinone Y-23684 (1-30 mg/kg) and the pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole RWJ-46771 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) with the BZs diazepam (0.5-3 mg/kg) and clobazam (1-30 mg/kg) in the mouse defense test battery (MDTB), a model for the screening of anxiolytic drugs. In the MDTB, Swiss mice were confronted with a natural threat (a rat) and situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken during and after rat confrontation were flight, risk assessment, defensive threat/attack, and escape attempts. Results showed that clobazam and Y-23684 significantly modified all defense responses in the presence of the rat at doses that did not decrease spontaneous locomotor activity. These drugs decreased avoidance reactions after the rat was introduced into the runway, reduced flight speed and risk assessment activities of mice chased by the rat, increased risk assessment displayed when subjects were constrained in a straight alley, and reduced defensive threat and attack behaviors upon forced contact. Diazepam significantly decreased all but one (number of avoidances when the rat was first introduced into the runway) defensive behaviors. RWJ-46771 reduced risk assessment in the chase test, avoidance responses, flight speed, and defensive threat and attack reactions, but these effects occurred in the great part at motor-impairing doses, suggesting that the decrease in defensiveness may have been contaminated by behavioral suppression. Finally, following the removal of the rat from the runway, only Y-23684 reduced escape behavior at doses that did not decrease spontaneous behavior. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Y-23684 displayed anxiolytic-like activity comparable to that of BZs in the MDTB. Although RWJ-46771 significantly modified most defensive behaviors, the effects may have been confounded by decreases in locomotor activity.

Limited anxiolytic-like effects of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics in rodents

The present experiments compared the anxiolytic-like effects of the benzodiazepine (BZD) hypnotic triazolam with those of four non-BZD hypnotics including one non-selective (zopiclone) and three omega1-BZD selective (zolpidem, zaleplon and SX-3228) receptor ligands, in classical animal models including conflict tests (punished lever pressing and punished drinking tests in rats) and exploratory models (elevated plus-maze test in rats and light/dark choice test in mice), and a recently developed mouse defence test battery (MDTB) which has been validated for the screening of anxiolytic drugs. Results from both conflict procedures showed that zopiclone (0.3-10 mg/kg) produced anxiolytic-like effects comparable to those of triazolam (0.1-3 mg/kg), whereas the selective omega1-BZD receptor hypnotics zolpidem (0.3-3 mg/kg), zaleplon (0.1-3 mg/kg) and SX-3228 (0.1-1 mg/kg) displayed weaker and/or non-specific anxiolytic-like effects. Similarly, in the light/dark test in mice, zolpidem (0.1-1 mg/kg), zaleplon (0.3-10 mg/kg) and SX-3228 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) showed a reduced potential to produce anxiolytic-like effects as compared to the non-selective omega-BZD receptor hypnotics triazolam (0.03-1 mg/kg) and zopiclone (1-30 mg/kg). In the elevated plus-maze test, zopiclone (1-10 mg/kg), zolpidem (0.1-1 mg/kg), zaleplon (0.3-3 mg/kg) and SX-3228 (0.1-1 mg/kg) displayed anxiolytic-like activity at doses close to those producing behavioural impairment, whereas triazolam (0.03-1 mg/kg) exhibited anxiolytic-like effects over a wide dose range in the absence of decreases in general activity. In the MDTB, zaleplon (0.3-10 mg/kg) decreased all defensive responses, a profile which was similar to that of triazolam (0.03-1 mg/kg), while zopiclone (1-30 mg/kg), zolpidem (0.3-10 mg/kg) and SX-3228 (0.03-1 mg/kg) had fewer effects on defensive behaviours with several effects occurring only at motor-impairing doses. Taken together, these results demonstrate that, although selective omega1-BZD receptor hypnotics display anxiolytic-like activity, the effects are generally weaker than those observed with non-selective omega-BZD receptor selective hypnotics such as triazolam or zopiclone. In particular, the anxiety-reducing potential of the omega1-BZD receptor selective compounds is limited to certain anxiety measures and may be confounded and/or masked by behavioural suppression.

Study of the modulatory activity of BZ (omega) receptor ligands on defensive behaviors in mice: evaluation of the importance of intrinsic efficacy and receptor subtype selectivity

1. This study examined the hypothesis that the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepine (BZ (omega)) receptor ligands may be associated with actions at a defined receptor subtype and/or their level of intrinsic activity using the mouse defense test battery. 2. This test has been designed to assess defensive reactions of Swiss mice confronted with a natural threat (a rat) and situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken before, during and after rat confrontation were escape attempts, flight, risk assessment and defensive threat and attack. 3. The drugs used were the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor full agonist diazepam, the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor partial agonist bretazenil and the beta-carboline abecarnil which acts as a full agonist on GABAA receptors containing the alpha 1- and the alpha 3-subunits and as a partial agonist at receptors containing the alpha 2- and the alpha 5-subunits. The drugs were given alone and diazepam was co-administered with either bretazenil or abecarnil. 4. When administered alone, diazepam attenuated several defensive responses including risk assessment activities, defensive threat/attack reactions upon forced contact with the rat and escape attempts following the removal of the rat from the apparatus. Unlike diazepam, bretazenil was devoid of significant activity on defense and abecarnil displayed depressant activity. 5. Bretazenil blocked all behavioral effects of diazepam on defense behaviors. The co-administration of diazepam and abecarnil produced a behavioral profile similar to that observed when diazepam was administered alone, indicating that abecarnil did not influence the effects of diazepam on defense. By contrast, diazepam completely antagonized the sedative effects of abecarnil. 6. These findings indicate that only BZ (omega) ligands with high intrinsic efficacy at all BZ (omega) receptor subtypes display clear and specific effects on defensive behaviors in mice, and suggest that GABAA receptors containing the alpha 3 subunit might represent the primary target involved in the modulatory action of diazepam on defensive behaviors.

Benzodiazepine and serotonergic modulation of antipredator and conspecific defense

The mammalian defense repertory comprises an array of individual behaviors that are extraordinarily sensitive to relevant features of the threat stimulus and the situation in which it occurs. In parallel with increasing awareness of the specificity and complexity of defensive behaviors and of their potential relevance to psychopathologies (e.g. anxiety, panic, and depression) is an escalating use of natural threat stimuli such as attacking conspecifics or predators in paradigms aimed at evaluating drug effects on defense. A review of the literature on benzodiazepine (BZ) and serotonin (5-HT) effects on conspecific and antipredator defense, including defensive analgesia, indicates that both types of stimuli elicit a wide array of relevant defensive behaviors. These studies suggest specificity of drug effects on particular behaviors, rather than a general alteration of all aspects of defense. However, stimulus variability and possible confounding of effects are a considerable problem with conspecific defense paradigms, while antipredator paradigms utilizing human experimenters as the predator may be difficult to use with the domesticated laboratory animal subjects. In addition, sensitivity to the organization of defensive behaviors and to differences between species in defense patterns is necessary to adequate interpretation of results. Nonetheless, these paradigms have permitted major advancements in analysis of the behavioral defense systems and their sensitive use in drug studies will greatly facilitate an understanding of the physiology of defense.

Characterization of the behavioral profile of the non-peptide CRF receptor antagonist CP-154,526 in anxiety models in rodents. Comparison with diazepam and buspirone

The present series of experiments compared the behavioral effects of the novel non-peptide CRF antagonist CP-154,526 with those of diazepam and the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist buspirone in classical animal models of anxiety including conflict tests (punished lever pressing and punished drinking tests in rats) and exploratory models (elevated plus-maze test in rats, light/dark choice and free-exploration tests in mice), and a recently developed mouse defense test battery (MDTB) which has been validated for the screening of anxiolytic drugs. Results from both conflict procedures showed that diazepam (2.5-10 mg/kg, i.p.) produced clear anxiolytic-like effects, whereas buspirone (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) displayed anticonflict activity in the punished drinking test only. CP-154,526 (0.6-20 mg/kg) was devoid of significant activity in both procedures. In the elevated plus-maze, diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.) produced significant effects on traditional (i.e. spatio-temporal) and ethologically derived (i.e. risk assessment and directed exploration) indices of anxiety. Buspirone (1-4 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced risk assessment activities only, and CP-154,526 (0.6-20 mg/kg, i.p.) did not modify the indices of anxiety in the elevated plus-maze. In the light/dark test, diazepam (2.5-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and CP-154,526 (10-40 mg/kg, i.p.) affected all behavioral indices of anxiety, while buspirone reduced risk assessment activities at the highest doses only (10 and 15 mg/kg, i.p.). In the free-exploration test, diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced avoidance responses towards novelty, as indicated by the increase in exploratory activity in a novel compartment and the decrease in risk assessment. CP-154,526 failed to affect the former behavior and weakly reduced the latter (5 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.). Buspirone (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.) was inactive in this test. Finally, in the MDTB, diazepam (0.5-3 mg/kg, i.p.) attenuated all defensive reactions of mice confronted with a rat stimulus (i.e. flight, risk assessment and defensive attack) or with a situation associated with this threat (i.e. contextual defense). Buspirone (1.25-5 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced defensive attack and contextual defense, while CP-154,526 (5-20 mg/kg, i.p.) affected all defensive behaviors, with the exception of one risk assessment measure. The finding that CP-154,526 displayed positive effects in mice but not in rats may be due to increased sensitivity to environmental stress of the strains used (i.e. BALB/c, Swiss) and/or to the fact that animals were exposed to unavoidable stress stimuli which may lead to a significant activation of the CRF system. Although in mice the anxiety-reducing potential of CP-154,526 is superior to that of the atypical anxiolytic buspirone, it is smaller in terms of the magnitude of the effects and the number of indices of anxiety affected than that of diazepam.

Behavioral effects of phenelzine in an experimental model for screening anxiolytic and anti-panic drugs: correlation with changes in monoamine-oxidase activity and monoamine levels

This study investigated the effects of acute and chronic (one daily i.p. injection for 14 days) treatments with the non-selective irreversible monoamine-oxidase (MAO) inhibitor phenelzine (10 and 30 mg/kg) on defensive behaviors of Swiss mice in the mouse defense test battery (MDTB) which has been designed for screening anxiolytic and anti-panic drugs. In the MDTB, subjects were confronted with a natural threat (a rat) and situations associated with this threat. MAO-A and MAO-B activities and levels of brain monoamines (serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE)) and their deaminated metabolites were subsequently measured. Behavioral results showed that acute administration of phenelzine did not specifically modify defensive behaviors. By contrast, after chronic treatment, phenelzine produced a significant reduction in avoidance distance when the rat was approaching, an effect which is consistent with an anti-panic-like action. In addition, phenelzine displayed weak anxiolytic-like effects as it increased risk assessment responses when mice were constrained in one part of the apparatus facing the rat which remained at a constant distance. No other specific drug effect was observed. These behavioral changes were associated with a dramatic increase in 5-HT levels, in particular after chronic treatment, while levels of DA and NE increased only slightly. Importantly, no significant differences in DA and NE levels between acute and chronic regimens were observed. Levels of deaminated metabolites of monoamines were markedly decreased. Measurements of MAO activity revealed substantial reductions in both type A and B forms with a full inhibition of both forms being observed only after chronic treatment with phenelzine. These results suggest that the effects of phenelzine may be due mainly to its effects on the 5-HT system and presumably related to the full inhibition of MAO-A and/or MAO-B.

Differentiation of anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs by effects on rat and mouse defense test batteries

The use of ethoexperimental techniques to elicit and maximize the full range of defensive behaviors of rats and mice enables a very precise analysis of the effects of drugs on these behavior patterns. Two rat defense test batteries (the fear/defense test battery or F/DTB and the anxiety/defense test battery or A/DTB) have provided evidence that anxiolytic drugs, even from different classes, produce a common pattern of changes in specific behaviors. A recently developed mouse defense test battery (MDTB) has enabled description of mouse defensive behaviors to a predator, for comparison to those of rats, and a series of studies of drug effects on the behaviors measured in the MDTB provides evidence of cross-species generality of anxiolytic drug effects, or lack of effect, on specific defensive behaviors. In addition, tests with panicogenic and panicolytic drugs in the MDTB indicate that these enhance and reduce, respectively, flight reactions, which generally are not altered by anxiolytic compounds. Thus, results from the MDTB, taken in conjunction with those of the two rat test batteries and other defense analyses in rats and mice, provide evidence that many defensive behaviors are similar across rodent species, while the differences obtained provide a consistent pattern across situations. Moreover, the defense test batteries may be used to differentiate the effects of drugs effective against generalized anxiety as opposed to panic, through effects on specific defensive behaviors.

CCK receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety: comparison between exploration tests, conflict procedures and a model based on defensive behaviours

The present experiments compared the behavioural effects of one cholecystokininA (CCKA; lorglumide) and two CCKB (PD 135,158 and LY 288513) receptor antagonists in classical animal models of anxiety, including conflict tests (punished lever pressing and Vogel drinking tests in rats) and exploratory models (elevated plus-maze test in rats and light/dark choice test in mice), and a recently developed mouse defence test battery (MDTB) which has been validated for the screening of both anti-panic and classical anxiolytic (i.e. benzodiazepines) drugs. Diazepam was used as a positive control. Results showed that all three CCK receptor antagonists were inactive in both conflict tests. Furthermore, despite the incorporation of more ethologically-derived measures (i.e. risk assessment activities or directed exploration, or both) no effects were observed in the elevated plus-maze and in the light/dark tests. These profiles contrast with that of diazepam which displayed clear anxiolytic-like effects in these models. In the MDTB, the CCK receptor antagonists failed to modify parameters (i.e. risk assessment, defensive threat/attack and escape attempts), which have been shown to be particularly sensitive to drugs effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety. By contrast, the CCKB receptor antagnoists PD 135,158 (0.001-0.01, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and LY 288513 (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased avoidance distance when the rat was first placed in the test apparatus, an effect which is consistent with an anti-panic-like action. Overall, these findings support the idea that classical animal models of anxiety may not be suitable for evaluation of the behavioural effects of CCK receptor antagonists, whereas tests which may model certain aspects of human panic such as the MDTB appear to be more reliable tools when screening such compounds.

An ethopharmacological analysis of selective activation of 5-HT1A receptors: the mouse 5-HT1A syndrome

The behavioral effects of 8-OH-DPAT [0.5-10 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)] and (+) S-20499 (1-20 mg/kg IP), a recently synthesized 5-HT1A receptor full agonist, were examined over a 2-h period in mice in a neutral cage and, during the peak period of effect, in a runway, 8-OH-DPAT (1 and 10 mg/kg) and (+) S-20499 (10 and 20 mg/kg) blocked vertical activity (i.e., rearing and hanging on the wire mesh) during the period postinjection when levels of activity of the control mice were high. In this initial period (0-30 min), mice treated with 8-OH-DPAT, but not those treated with (+) S-20499, displayed flat back rather than curve back locomotion (0.5-10 mg/kg). However, after about 50 min., marked hyperactivity emerged for 8-OH-DPAT at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg and for (+) S-20499 at all doses, including increases in rearing, hanging, grooming, and for (+) S-20499, curve back locomotion. Both 8-OH-DPAT (10 mg/kg) and (+) S-20499 (> 20 mg/kg) significantly enhanced eating responses. Both drugs rapidly induced straub tail responses at all doses, and this effect remained significant until the end of the experiment at the highest doses. Subjects treated with 0.5 mg/kg of 8-OH-DPAT and 10 mg/kg of (+) S-20499 displayed in the initial time period "ballistic-type" rapid forelimb movements targeted toward the side of the head. During peak drug effect periods, higher doses of both drugs produced significant increases in movement with a change of direction, including rotation around the hindlimbs, suggesting, as do the ballistic-type movements, particular involvement of the forelimbs. These findings provide evidence consonant with the view that selective activation of 5-HT1A receptors in mice produces distinct behavioral changes in part associated with the 5-HT syndrome. Moreover, these changes differ, in the specific movements induced and in the drug parameters and time course of changes, from those reported in the laboratory rat.

Risk assessment behaviour: evaluation of utility in the study of 5-HT-related drugs in the rat elevated plus-maze test

The present study compared the effects of a wide range of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-modulating and potential anxiolytic agents in the rat elevated plus-maze using spatiotemporal (i.e., open arm time and entries) and ethologically derived measures (i.e., risk assessment activities and directed exploration). The drugs used were 5-HT1A receptor partial (buspirone and ipsapirone) and full (8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan) agonists, mixed 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonists (ritanserin, ketanserin, mianserin, and pirenperone), selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (ICS 205-930, MDL 72222, ondansetron, and (RS)-zacopride), and selective (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and zimelidine) and nonselective (imipramine) 5-HT reuptake inhibitors. Only buspirone and mianserin produced effects indicative of an anxiolytic-like action on the spatiotemporal measures. However, all 5-HT1A receptor ligands, as well as mianserin, ketanserin, ondansetron, and zacopride, decreased the number of aborted attempts at entry into open arms (risk assessment). In addition, buspirone, mianserin, and zacopride increased head-dipping (directed exploration). Among the 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, zimelidine reduced head-dipping and total entries. The present findings demonstrate that risk assessment responses are sensitive to the action of 5-HT1A receptor ligands, but their modulation by drugs targetting 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT3 receptors was not convincingly established.

A comparative study of the effects of selective and non-selective 5-HT2 receptor subtype antagonists in rat and mouse models of anxiety

Although there is some evidence that compounds acting at 5-HT2 receptors show anxiolytic activity, little is known about the specific involvement of the different 5-HT2 receptor subtypes in the modulation of anxiety-related responses. In the present study, the behavioural effects of mianserin, a non-selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, MDL 100,907, a selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, and SB 206553, a selective 5-HT2B/2C receptor antagonist, were investigated in two rat (the Vogel drinking conflict and the elevated plus-maze tests) and two mouse (i.e. the mouse defense test battery (MDTB) and the light/dark choice test) models of anxiety. Diazepam was used as a positive control. In the Vogel drinking test, mianserin (10 mg/kg) and SB 206553 (3-30 mg/kg), but not MDL 100,907, increased punished responding. Similarly, mianserin (1 mg/kg) and SB 206553 (3-10 mg/kg), but not MDL 100,907, increased entries into the open arms of the elevated plus-maze. These effects are consistent with anxiolytic-like actions of mianserin and SB 206553, although the magnitude of the effects of these two compounds was less than those of diazepam. In addition, in the MDTB, the 5-HT2 antagonists did not clearly affect the defensive reactions of mice exposed to a rat stimulus and they failed to reverse the avoidance of the illuminated box in the light/dark choice test. These results indicate a lack of anxiolytic-like action of the compounds in mice. These behavioural profiles suggest that blockade of the 5-HT2A receptor may not reduce anxiety and demonstrate that 5-HT2B and/or 5-HT2C receptor subtypes may be primarily involved in the anxiolytic-like effects of mianserin and SB 206553 in rats.

Behavioural profiles of the reversible monoamine-oxidase-A inhibitors befloxatone and moclobemide in an experimental model for screening anxiolytic and anti-panic drugs

The present study compared the behavioural effects of acute and chronic (one daily i.p. injection for 14 days) treatments with the reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors (RIMAs) moclobemide (3 and 10 mg/kg) and befloxatone (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) in the Mouse Defence Test Battery (MDTB) which has been designed for screening anxiolytic and anti-panic drugs. In the MDTB, Swiss mice were confronted with a natural threat (a rat) and situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken before, during and after rat confrontation were escape attempts, flight, risk assessment (RA) and defensive threat and attack. After acute administration of both compounds, no modification of defensive behaviours were observed. This was in contrast to chronic treatments, where moclobemide (3 and 10 mg/kg) and befloxatone (1 mg/kg) produced a significant reduction in one flight measure (avoidance distance when the rat was approaching). In addition, befloxatone (0.3 and 1 mg/kg), but not moclobemide, increased RA responses when mice were constrained in one part of the apparatus facing the rat, which remained at a constant distance. No other drug effects were observed with either compound. Although these behavioural profiles are consistent with an anxiolytic-like effect, the finding of an action upon a limited number of defence responses suggests a weaker anxiolytic-like potential compared to that of classical anxiolytics. However, in view of previous data with panic-modulating compounds on flight behaviours in the MDTB, the present results are in line with clinical results showing that moclobemide is effective in panic disorders and suggest that befloxatone may have some efficacy in the clinical management of panic.

The mouse defense test battery: evaluation of the effects of non-selective and BZ-1 (omega1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands

The behavioral effects of several benzodiazepine (BZ) (omega) receptor ligands were compared using the Mouse Defense Test Battery which has been designed to assess defensive reactions of Swiss mice confronted with a natural threat (a rat) and situations associated with this threat. Primary measures taken before, during and after rat confrontation were escape attempts, flight, risk assessment and defensive threat and attack. The drugs used included non-selective BZ (omega) full (clonazepam, clorazepate, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam) and partial (bretazenil and imidazenil) agonists, and BZ-1 (omega1) selective (abecarnil, CL 218,872 and zolpidem) receptor ligands. With the exception of clonazepam, non-selective BZ (omega) receptor compounds only partially affected flight behaviors. The drugs reduced some but not all flight measures in response to the approaching rat, whereas clonazepam attenuated all flight reactions. In contrast to their mild and inconsistent actions on flight, the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor agonists displayed clear effects on risk assessment when subjects were chased by the rat. When contact was forced between the subject and the rat, the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor full agonists reduced defensive threat and attack reactions, while the partial agonists imidazenil and bretazenil only weakly attenuated defensive attack behavior. Similarly, after the rat had been removed from the test area, the non-selective BZ (omega) receptor full agonists displayed greater efficacy than the partial agonists in reducing escape attempts. Overall, results obtained with the selective BZ-1 (omega1) receptor ligands demonstrated either no clear effects or no specific action on defensive reactions. Taken together, these data demonstrate that: (1) non-selective BZ (omega) agonists displaying high intrinsic activity affect a wider range of defensive behaviors than non-selective BZ (omega) receptor partial agonists; (2) the defense system does not involve primarily BZ (omega) receptors containing the alpha1-subunit.

Evidence that the behaviors in the Mouse Defense Test Battery relate to different emotional states: a factor analytic study

The Mouse Defense Test Battery (MDTB) has been designed to investigate defensive responses of Swiss-Webster mice confronted with a natural threat, a rat. These behaviors include flight, avoidance, defensive threat/attack reactions, and risk assessment activities. In the present study, a factor analysis was used to examine potential relationships between these behavioral responses. Five independent Factors were extracted from the 17 parameters obtained in the MDTB. Both Factor 1 and Factor 2 include cognitive aspects of defensive behaviors that appear to be related to the process of acquiring and analyzing information in the presence of threatful stimuli (i.e., risk assessment). Flight/avoidance responses heavily loaded on Factor 3 and to a lesser extent on Factor 4. Several defensive threat/attack reactions (i.e., upright postures and biting) highly loaded on Factor 4 and biting also loaded on Factor 3. Finally, the variables that loaded highly on Factor 5 were the number of wall rearings and climbings following the removal of the rat and the immobility time when the subject was trapped in a straight alley. Although the meaning of this latter Factor is not clear at present. Factors 1 to 4 seemingly relate to anxiety. Taken together with recent drug findings from the MDTB, the present analysis further supports the idea that this model provides measures that reflect different aspects of anxiety.

Preclinical profile of the mixed 5-HT1A/5-HT2A receptor antagonist S 21,357

This study evaluated the pharmacological and behavioral effects of S 21,357, a drug with high affinity for both 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. The drug behaved as antagonist at both 5-HT1A autoreceptors and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, as it prevented the inhibitory effect of lesopitron on the electrical discharge of the dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN) 5-HT neurons and the activity of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase in hippocampal homogenates. In addition, S 21,357 (4 and 128 mg/kg, PO) inhibited 5-HTP-induced head-twitch responses in mice, indicating that it possesses 5-HT2A antagonistic properties. In a test battery designed to assess defensive behaviors of Swiss-Webster mice to the presence of, or situations associated with, a natural threat stimulus (i.e., rat), S 21,357 (0.12-2 mg/kg, IP) reduced contextual defense reactions after the rat was removed, risk assessment activities when the subject was chased, and finally, defensive attack behavior. These behavioral changes are consistent with fear/anxiety reduction. Furthermore, the drug strongly reduced flight reactions in response to the approaching rat. This last finding, taken together with recent results with panic-modulating drugs, suggest that S 21,357 may have potential efficacy against panic attack. Finally, our results suggest that compounds sharing high affinities for both 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors may directly or synergistically increase the range of defensive behaviors affected.

The use of the rat elevated plus-maze to discriminate between non-selective and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands

The behavioral effects of a wide range of BZ (omega) receptor ligands, including non-selective full (alprazolam, clorazepate, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam) and partial (bretazenil, imidazenil and Ro 19-8022) agonists, and selective BZ-1 (omega 1) (abecarnil, CL 218,872, CL 284,846 and zolpidem) receptor ligands, were compared in the rat elevated plus-maze test. Behaviors recorded comprised the traditional indices of anxiety as well as a number of ethologically derived measures. In addition, the specificity of drug effects was evaluated by measuring spontaneous locomotor activity in activity cages in separate groups of animals. Results showed that all compounds tested not only increased the proportion of time spent and proportion of entries into the open arms of the maze (considered as traditional indices of anxiety) but also affected head-dippings and attempts at entry into open arms, which can be considered as indices of risk assessment responses. However, the magnitude of these effects was generally smaller with the BZ-1 (omega 1) selective agents. Moreover, additional differences were apparent on the total number of arm entries measure, which was significantly increased by most full and all partial agonists, but was unaffected by the selective BZ-1 (omega 1) compounds. If it is assumed that total arm entries are contaminated by anxiety, the latter finding indicates a weaker anxiety-reducing potential of selective BZ-1 (omega 1) ligands. Importantly, the increase in total arm entries induced by the non-selective agents was not associated with a similar effect on locomotion as revealed in the actimeter. Finally, anxiolysis produced by the BZ-1 (omega 1) ligands was invariably observed at doses which reduced locomotor activity, suggesting that the anxiolytic-like effects of these compounds are confounded by decreases in locomotor activity.

Variability in the effects of 5-HT-related compounds in experimental models of anxiety: evidence for multiple mechanisms of 5-HT in anxiety or never ending story?

To date, more than two thousand experiments have investigated the behavioral effect of 5-HT-interacting drugs in animal models of anxiety disorders. Most of them have focused on the involvement of drugs interacting with 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A/2C and 5-HT3 receptors. Although numerous results are in line with the classic 5-HT hypothesis of anxiety, suggesting that decreased anxiety is related to decreased activity in central 5-HT neurons and vice versa, paradoxical drug effects have often been found. To explain this variability, several authors point to a determining role of the experimental paradigms used. In fact, an overview of the behavioral data arising from the vast literature indicates that conditioned procedures as well as more ethological-based tests are equal in revealing anxiolytic-like effects of drugs targetting 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptor subtypes. Furthermore, results obtained in ethologically-based animal models of anxiety with drugs stimulating 5-HT transmission are most consistent with the classic 5-HT hypothesis of anxiety in that they showed an increase in animals' emotional reactivity. Finally, anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are in great part revealed by models based on spontaneous behaviors. Taken together, these observations lead to the conclusion that different 5-HT mechanisms, mediated by different receptor subtypes, are involved in the genesis of anxiety.

Predator-elicited flight responses in Swiss-Webster mice: an experimental model of panic attacks

1. The nosological status of panic disorder is still a matter of debate. Nevertheless, evidence is emerging that panic attacks have a different pattern of drug responsiveness from other forms of anxiety. 2. Several experimental animal models of panic attacks have been developed. These vary in the extent to which they meet criteria for face validity, predictive validity and construct validity, normally applied to such models. 3. In the present review, the authors examine the possibility that predator-elicited flight responses in Swiss-Webster mice might serve as an experimental model for the screening of panic-modulating drugs. 4. Drug effects on flight responses clearly indicate that this model has good predictive validity as panic-promoting agents increase flight reactions, while panicolytic drug challenge induces opposite effects. In addition, drugs devoid of any effect on panic attack, also do not alter flight behavior. 5. These findings strongly suggest that the model of predator-elicited flight responses in Swiss-Webster mice is useful for the investigation of panic-modulating drugs.

Further evidence for differences between non-selective and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands in murine models of "state" and "trait" anxiety

The behavioural effects of several BZ (omega) receptor ligands were compared in mice using the light/dark choice task, an animal model of "state" anxiety, and the free-exploration test, which has been proposed as an experimental model of "trait" anxiety. The drugs used included non-selective full (alprazolam, clorazepate, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam), partial agonists (bretazenil, imidazenil and Ro 19-8022) and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective receptor ligands (abecarnil, CL 218,872 and zolpidem). In the light/dark choice task, non-selective full agonists elicited clear anxiolytic-like effects increasing time spent in the lit box and simultaneously reducing attempts at entry into the illuminated cage followed by withdrawal responses, a measure of risk assessment. With the exception of abecarnil, both non-selective partial agonists and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective receptor ligands displayed reduced efficacy compared to the full agonists as they decreased risk assessment responses without altering time in the lit box. In addition, the weak anxiolytic-like actions displayed by selective BZ-1 (omega 1) agents were evident only at doses which reduced locomotor activity, indicating that this effect may be non-specific. In the free-exploration test, non-selective BZ (omega) receptor agonists markedly increased the percentage of time spent in the novel compartment and reduced the number of attempts to enter whereas selective BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor ligands displayed a weaker neophobia-reducing effect as they reduced risk assessment responses only. As was the case in the light/dark choice task, this latter effect was observed at locomotor depressant doses. These findings indicate that while both full and partial BZ (omega) receptor agonists are equally effective against "trait" anxiety, full agonists may be superior in reducing "state" anxiety. In addition, the lack of specific effects of selective BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor ligands in reducing both types of anxiety suggests that the BZ-1 (omega 1) receptor subtype cannot be considered as the primary target mediating the anxiolytic action of drugs interacting with the GABAA benzodiazepine receptor complex.

Further evidence that the mouse defense test battery is useful for screening anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs: effects of acute and chronic treatment with alprazolam

The Mouse Defense Test Battery (MDTB) has been designed to investigate defensive responses of Swiss-Webster mice confronted with a natural predator, a rat. These behaviors include flight, avoidance, defensive threat/attack responses, and risk assessment activities. Previous studies with the MDTB have suggested that this model may have some utility for the investigation of panicogenic and antipanic compounds. In the present study the MDTB was used to investigate the effects of acute (0.05-1 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min) or chronic (0.5-2 mg/kg, one daily i.p. injection during 10 days) treatment with the benzodiazepine receptor (BZPR) full agonist and panicolytic agent alprazolam. At non motor-impairing doses (0.05-0.5 mg/kg), acute alprazolam failed to alter the avoidance distance between the subject and the predator, the number of avoidances when the rat is approaching, predator assessment activities, defensive threat/attack responses when contact is forced between the subject and the predator or contextual escape attempts after the predator was removed. This was in contrast to chronic treatment which decreased both avoidance variables at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, defensive threat/attack responses at all doses, and predator assessment responses at 0.5 mg/kg. In addition, the latter treatment reduced post-predator potentiation of escape attempts at 2 mg/kg. These results (1) confirm previous findings with the BZPR full agonist chlordiazepoxide, indicating that these compounds generally attenuate antipredator defensive responses in Swiss-Webster mice; (2) support recent data indicating that panic-altering drugs modulate flight/escape reactions, and suggest that the primary mechanism of action of drugs with efficacy against panic disorder may involve neural systems controlling flight; (3) confirm that the MDTB may be useful for the investigation of panicolytic as well as anxiolytic agents.