1
|
Bloomfield GS, Hill CL, Chiswell K, Cooper L, Gray S, Longenecker CT, Louzao D, Marsolo K, Meissner EG, Morse CG, Muiruri C, Thomas KL, Velazquez EJ, Vicini J, Pettit AC, Sanders G, Okeke NL. Cardiology Encounters for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Borderline Cardiovascular Disease Risk. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024; 11:1509-1519. [PMID: 37160576 PMCID: PMC10632543 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01627-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs) with HIV have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with the general population. Referral to a cardiovascular specialist improves CVD risk factor management in high-risk individuals. However, patient and provider factors impacting the likelihood of UREGs with HIV to have an encounter with a cardiologist are unknown. METHODS We evaluated a cohort of UREGs with HIV and borderline CVD risk (10-year risk ≥ 5% by the pooled cohort equations or ≥ 7.5% by Framingham risk score). Participants received HIV-related care from 2014-2020 at four academic medical centers in the United States (U.S.). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of patient and provider characteristics with time to first ambulatory cardiology encounter. RESULTS A total of 2,039 people with HIV (PWH) and borderline CVD risk were identified. The median age was 45 years (IQR: 36-50); 52% were female; and 94% were Black. Of these participants, 283 (14%) had an ambulatory visit with a cardiologist (17% of women vs. 11% of men, p < .001). In fully adjusted models, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), atrial fibrillation, multimorbidity, urban residence, and no recent insurance were associated with a greater likelihood of an encounter with a cardiologist. CONCLUSION In UREGs with HIV and borderline CVD risk, the strongest determinants of a cardiology encounter were diagnosed CVD, insurance type, and urban residence. Future research is needed to determine the extent to which these encounters impact CVD care practices and outcomes in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04025125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald S Bloomfield
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| | - C Larry Hill
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Karen Chiswell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Linda Cooper
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shamea Gray
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chris T Longenecker
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Darcy Louzao
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric G Meissner
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Caryn G Morse
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Charles Muiruri
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Eric J Velazquez
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph Vicini
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - April C Pettit
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gretchen Sanders
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 W. Morgan Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Nwora Lance Okeke
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karatela MF, Dowell RS, Friedman DJ, Jackson KP, Thomas KL, Piccini JP. Peak frequency mapping of atypical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:950-964. [PMID: 38477184 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peak frequency (PF) mapping is a novel method that may identify critical portions of myocardial substrate supporting reentry. The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate PF mapping combined with omnipolar voltage mapping in the identification of critical isthmuses of left atrial (LA) atypical flutters. METHODS AND RESULTS LA omnipolar voltage and PF maps were generated in flutter using the Advisor HD-Grid catheter (Abbott) and EnSite Precision Mapping System (Abbott) in 12 patients. Normal voltage was defined as ≥0.5 mV, low-voltage as 0.1-0.5 mV, and scar as <0.1 mV. PF distributions were compared with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses. The 1 cm radius from arrhythmia termination was compared to global myocardium with unpaired t-testing. The mean age was 65.8 ± 9.7 years and 50% of patients were female. Overall, 34 312 points were analyzed. Atypical flutters most frequently involved the mitral isthmus (58%) or anterior wall (25%). Mean PF varied significantly by myocardial voltage: normal (335.5 ± 115.0 Hz), low (274.6 ± 144.0 Hz), and scar (71.6 ± 140.5 Hz) (p < .0001 for all pairwise comparisons). All termination sites resided in low-voltage regions containing intermediate or high PF. Overall, mean voltage in the 1 cm radius from termination was significantly lower than the remaining myocardium (0.58 vs. 0.95 mV, p < .0001) and PF was significantly higher (326.4 vs. 245.1 Hz, p < .0001). CONCLUSION Low-voltage, high-PF areas may be critical targets during catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham F Karatela
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert S Dowell
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Abbott, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Daniel J Friedman
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024:10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5. [PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory F Michaud
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)00261-3. [PMID: 38597857 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France and Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine & Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, and Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio and Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez», Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024; 26:euae043. [PMID: 38587017 PMCID: PMC11000153 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, Deswal A, Eckhardt LL, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorenek B, Hess PL, Hlatky M, Hogan G, Ibeh C, Indik JH, Kido K, Kusumoto F, Link MS, Linta KT, Marcus GM, McCarthy PM, Patel N, Patton KK, Perez MV, Piccini JP, Russo AM, Sanders P, Streur MM, Thomas KL, Times S, Tisdale JE, Valente AM, Van Wagoner DR. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024; 149:e1-e156. [PMID: 38033089 PMCID: PMC11095842 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anita Deswal
- ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines liaison
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul L Hess
- ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Performance Measures liaison
| | | | | | | | | | - Kazuhiko Kido
- American College of Clinical Pharmacy representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, Deswal A, Eckhardt LL, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorenek B, Hess PL, Hlatky M, Hogan G, Ibeh C, Indik JH, Kido K, Kusumoto F, Link MS, Linta KT, Marcus GM, McCarthy PM, Patel N, Patton KK, Perez MV, Piccini JP, Russo AM, Sanders P, Streur MM, Thomas KL, Times S, Tisdale JE, Valente AM, Van Wagoner DR. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:109-279. [PMID: 38043043 PMCID: PMC11104284 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Arps K, Li B, Allen JC, Alenezi F, Frazier-Mills C, Al-Khatib SM, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Thomas KL, Piccini JP. Association of leadless pacing with ventricular and valvular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:2233-2242. [PMID: 37702140 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional transvenous pacemakers are associated with worsening tricuspid valve function due to lead-related leaflet impingement, as well as ventricular dysfunction related to electromechanical dyssynchrony from chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing. The association of leadless pacing with ventricular and valvular function has not been well established. We aimed to assess the association of leadless pacemaker placement with changes in valvular regurgitation and ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS Echocardiographic features before and after leadless pacemaker implant were analyzed in consecutive patients who received a leadless pacemaker with pre- and postprocedure echocardiography at Duke University Hospital between November 2014 and November 2019. Valvular regurgitation was graded ordinally from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Among 54 patients, the mean age was mean age was 70.1 ± 14.3 years, 24 (44%) were women, and the most frequent primary pacing indication was complete heart block in 24 (44%). The median RV pacing burden was 45.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5-97.0). On echocardiogram performed 8.9 months (IQR 4.5-14.5) after implant, there was no change in the average severity of tricuspid regurgitation (mean change 0.07 ± 1.15, p = .64) from pre-procedure echocardiogram. We observed a decrease in the average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (52.3 ± 9.3 to 47.9 ± 12.1, p = .0019) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (1.8 ± 0.6 to 1.6 ± 0.4, p = .0437). Thirteen patients (24%) had absolute drop in LVEF of ≥10%. CONCLUSION We did not observe short term worsening valvular function in patients with leadless pacemakers. However, consistent with the pathophysiologic impact of RV pacing, leadless pacing was associated with a reduction in biventricular function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Arps
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bicong Li
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John Carson Allen
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fawaz Alenezi
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Camille Frazier-Mills
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Campbell KB, Eickman SD, Truong T, Black-Maier E, Barnett AS, Wang A, Green CL, Daubert JP, Lewis RK, Atwater BD, Al-Khatib SM, Bahnson TD, Thomas KL, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Pokorney S, Frazier-Mills C, Piccini JP. Colchicine for the Prevention of Recurrent Arrhythmia After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2023; 23:709-719. [PMID: 37801260 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence to suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation; however, the tolerability and safety of colchicine in routine practice is unknown. METHODS Patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF who received colchicine after ablation were matched 1:1 to patients who did not by age, sex, and renal function. Recurrent AF was compared between groups categorically at 12 months and via propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards models with and without a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS Overall, 180 patients (n = 90 colchicine and n = 90 matched controls) were followed for a median (Q1, Q3) of 10.3 (7.0, 12.0) months. Mean age was 65.3 ± 9.1 years, 33.9% were women, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.5, and 51.1% had persistent AF. Most patients (70%) received colchicine 0.6 mg daily for a median of 30 days. In the colchicine group, 55 patients (61.1%) were receiving at least one known interacting medication with colchicine. After ablation, one patient required colchicine dose reduction and four patients required discontinuation. After adjusting for covariate imbalance using propensity weighting, no significant association between colchicine use and AF recurrence was identified (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.85; p = 0.853). No significant association was found between colchicine use and all-cause hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28-1.96; p = 0.548). CONCLUSION Despite the frequent presence of drug-drug interactions, a 30-day course of colchicine is well-tolerated after AF ablation; however, we did not observe any association between colchicine and lower rates of AF recurrence or hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Bova Campbell
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | | | - Tracy Truong
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Methods Core, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric Black-Maier
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Adam S Barnett
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Allen Wang
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Cynthia L Green
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James P Daubert
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Robert K Lewis
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | | | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tristram D Bahnson
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Sean Pokorney
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Camille Frazier-Mills
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Duke University Medical Center (Electrophysiology), 2301 Erwin Road, 3174, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Al-Khatib SM, Thomas KL. Advancing Equity in Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention: Beware of Making Assumptions About the Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Black Patients. Circulation 2023; 148:253-255. [PMID: 37459416 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.065723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sana M Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tamirisa KP, Dye CA, Patel K, Chrispin J, Parham TA, Fradley MG, McLemore-McGregor R, Hsu JC, Frazier-Mills CG, Sogade FO, Ajijola OA, Fontaine JM, Volgman AS, Thomas KL. From the Heart Rhythm Society's Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Council. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:1098-1100. [PMID: 37393098 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cicely A Dye
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kavisha Patel
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Tara A Parham
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael G Fradley
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jonathan C Hsu
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sullivan AE, Barbery CE, Holder T, Green CL, Patel MR, Thomas KL, Jones WS. Association of race and in-hospital outcomes following acute pulmonary embolism: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Cardiol 2023. [PMID: 37255216 DOI: 10.1002/clc.24055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities in health care are well established, with Black patients frequently experiencing the most significant consequences of this inequality. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing in incidence and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, but little is known about racial disparities in the inpatient setting. HYPOTHESIS Black and White patients admitted with acute PE will have different in-hospital outcomes. METHODS All PE patients from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 were retrospectively identified using ICD-10 codes. Data were abstracted by manual chart review for all image-confirmed PEs. RESULTS A total of 782 patients with acute PE were identified, of which 319 (40.8%) were Black and 463 (59.2%) were White. Black patients had higher BMI (median [Q1-Q3]: 30.3 [25.4-36.6] vs. 29.3 [24.5-33.8] kg/m2 , p = .017), were younger (61 [48-74] vs. 67 [54-75] years, p = .001), and were more likely to have a history of heart failure (16.0 vs. 7.1%, p < .001), while White patients had higher rates of malignancy (46.9 vs. 34.5%, p = .001) and recent surgery (29.6 vs. 18.2%, p < .001). Black patients were more likely to receive systemic thrombolysis (3.1% vs. 1.1%, p = .040), while White patients had numerically higher rates of surgical embolectomy (0.3% vs. 1.1%, p = .41). No difference in inpatient mortality was observed; however, Black patients had longer hospital length of stay (5.0 [3-9] vs. 4.0 [2-9] days, p = .007) and were more likely to receive warfarin (23.5 vs. 12.1%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Similar in-hospital mortality rates were observed in Black and White patients following acute PE. However, Black patients had longer hospital stays, higher warfarin prescription, and fewer traditional PE-related risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carlos E Barbery
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tara Holder
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cynthia L Green
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manesh R Patel
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - W Schuyler Jones
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomas KL, Al-Khatib SM, Kosinski AS, Sears SF, Allen LaPointe NM, Jackson LR, Matlock DD, Haithcock D, Colley BJ, Hirsh DS, Peterson ED. Facilitating Shared Decision Making Among Black Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Arrest : A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:615-623. [PMID: 37011387 PMCID: PMC10354526 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation are multifactorial and are partly explained by higher refusal rates. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of a video decision support tool for Black patients eligible for an ICD. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted between September 2016 and April 2020. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02819973). SETTING Fourteen academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Black adults with heart failure who were eligible for a primary prevention ICD. INTERVENTION An encounter-based video decision support tool or usual care. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was the decision regarding ICD implantation. Additional outcomes included patient knowledge, decisional conflict, ICD implantation within 90 days, the effect of racial concordance on outcomes, and the time patients spent with clinicians. RESULTS Of the 330 randomly assigned patients, 311 contributed data for the primary outcome. Among those randomly assigned to the video group, assent to ICD implantation was 58.6% compared with 59.4% in the usual care group (difference, -0.8 percentage point [95% CI, -13.2 to 11.1 percentage points]). Compared with usual care, participants in the video group had a higher mean knowledge score (difference, 0.7 [CI, 0.2 to 1.1]) and a similar decisional conflict score (difference, -2.6 [CI, -5.7 to 0.4]). The ICD implantation rate within 90 days was 65.7%, with no differences by intervention. Participants randomly assigned to the video group spent less time with their clinician than those in the usual care group (mean, 22.1 vs. 27.0 minutes; difference, -4.9 minutes [CI, -9.4 to -0.3 minutes]). Racial concordance between video and study participants did not affect study outcomes. LIMITATION The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented a requirement for shared decision making for ICD implantation during the study. CONCLUSION A video-based decision support tool increased patient knowledge but did not increase assent to ICD implantation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Thomas
- Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (K.L.T., S.M.A.)
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (K.L.T., S.M.A.)
| | | | - Samuel F Sears
- Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina (S.F.S.)
| | - Nancy M Allen LaPointe
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (N.M.A.L.)
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (L.R.J.)
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (D.D.M.)
| | | | | | - David S Hirsh
- Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (D.S.H.)
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas (E.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Go AS, Al-Khatib SM, Desvigne-Nickens P, Bansal N, Bushnell CD, Fang MC, Freeman JV, Gage BF, Hanke T, Hylek EM, Lopes RD, Noseworthy PA, Reddy VY, Singer DE, Thomas KL, Hills MT, Turakhia MP, Zieman SJ, Cooper LS, Benjamin EJ. Research Opportunities in Stroke Prevention for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Virtual Workshop. Stroke 2023; 54:e75-e85. [PMID: 36848427 PMCID: PMC9995163 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.038273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the strongest risk factors for ischemic stroke, which is a leading cause of disability and death. Given the aging population, increasing prevalence of AF risk factors, and improved survival in those with cardiovascular disease, the number of individuals affected by AF will continue increasing over time. While multiple proven stroke prevention therapies exist, important questions remain about the optimal approach to stroke prevention at the population and individual patient levels. Our report summarizes the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute virtual workshop focused on identifying key research opportunities related to stroke prevention in AF. The workshop reviewed major knowledge gaps and identified targeted research opportunities to advance stroke prevention in AF in the following areas: (1) improving risk stratification tools for stroke and intracranial hemorrhage; (2) addressing challenges with oral anticoagulants; and (3) delineating the optimal roles of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and surgical left atrial appendage closure/excision. This report aims to promote innovative, impactful research that will lead to more personalized, effective use of stroke prevention strategies in people with AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan S. Go
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA
- Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Patrice Desvigne-Nickens
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nisha Bansal
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Margaret C. Fang
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - James V. Freeman
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation, New Haven, CT
| | - Brian F. Gage
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Thorsten Hanke
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg-Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Renato D. Lopes
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Vivek Y. Reddy
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Daniel E. Singer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mintu P. Turakhia
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto CA
- Center for Digital Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Susan J. Zieman
- Division of Geriatrics and Clinical Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lawton S. Cooper
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Emelia J. Benjamin
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lunyera J, Clare RM, Chiswell K, Scialla JJ, Pun PH, Thomas KL, Starks MA, Mohottige D, Boulware LE, Diamantidis CJ. Association of Acute Kidney Injury and Cardiovascular Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Assessment of Interactions by Race, Diabetes, and Kidney Function. Am J Kidney Dis 2023; 81:707-716. [PMID: 36822398 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Black patients and those with diabetes or reduced kidney function experience a disproportionate burden of acute kidney injury (AKI) and cardiovascular events. However, whether these factors modify the association between AKI and cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown and was the focus of this study. STUDY DESIGN Observational cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent PCI at Duke between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2013, with data available in the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease. EXPOSURES AKI, defined as ≥1.5-fold relative elevation in serum creatinine within seven days from a reference value ascertained 30 days before PCI, or a 0.3 mg/dl increase from the reference value within 48 hours. OUTCOMES A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization during the first year following PCI. ANALYTIC APPROACH Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders, and with interaction terms between AKI and race, diabetes, or baseline eGFR. RESULTS Among 9422 patients, 9% (n=865) developed AKI and the primary composite outcome occurred in 21% (n=2017). AKI was associated with a nearly 2-fold higher risk of the primary outcome (adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.71 to 2.20). The association between AKI and cardiovascular risk did not significantly differ by race (P-interaction, 0.4), diabetes, (P-interaction, 0.06) or eGFR (P-interaction, 0.2). However, Black race and severely reduced eGFR, but not diabetes, each had a cumulative impact with AKI on risk for the primary outcome. Compared with White patients with no AKI as the reference, the risk for the outcome was highest in Black patients with AKI (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.83 to 2.82), followed by White patients with AKI (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.21), and least in patients of other races with AKI (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.88 to 2.48). LIMITATIONS Residual confounding, including the impact of clinical care following PCI on cardiovascular outcomes of AKI. CONCLUSIONS Neither race, diabetes, nor reduced eGFR potentiated the association of AKI with cardiovascular risk, but Black patients with AKI had a qualitatively greater risk than White patients with AKI or patients of other races with AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lunyera
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
| | - Robert M Clare
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Karen Chiswell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Julia J Scialla
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Patrick H Pun
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Monique A Starks
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Dinushika Mohottige
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - L Ebony Boulware
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Clarissa J Diamantidis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Benjamin EJ, Thomas KL, Go AS, Desvigne-Nickens P, Albert CM, Alonso A, Chamberlain AM, Essien UR, Hernandez I, Hills MT, Kershaw KN, Levy PD, Magnani JW, Matlock DD, O'Brien EC, Rodriguez CJ, Russo AM, Soliman EZ, Cooper LS, Al-Khatib SM. Transforming Atrial Fibrillation Research to Integrate Social Determinants of Health: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Report. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:182-191. [PMID: 36478155 PMCID: PMC10993288 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Only modest attention has been paid to the contributions of social determinants of health to atrial fibrillation (AF) risk factors, diagnosis, symptoms, management, and outcomes. The diagnosis of AF provides unique challenges exacerbated by the arrhythmia's often paroxysmal nature and individuals' disparate access to health care and technologies that facilitate detection. Social determinants of health affect access to care and management decisions for AF, increasing the likelihood of adverse outcomes among individuals who experience systemic disadvantages. Developing effective approaches to address modifiable social determinants of health requires research to eliminate the substantive inequities in health care delivery and outcomes in AF. Observations The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened an expert panel to identify major knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the field of social determinants of AF. The workshop addressed the following social determinants: (1) socioeconomic status and access to care; (2) health literacy; (3) race, ethnicity, and racism; (4) sex and gender; (5) shared decision-making in systemically disadvantaged populations; and (6) place, including rurality, neighborhood, and community. Many individuals with AF have multiple adverse social determinants, which may cluster in the individual and in systemically disadvantaged places (eg, rural locations, urban neighborhoods). Cumulative disadvantages may accumulate over the life course and contribute to inequities in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes in AF. Conclusions and Relevance Workshop participants identified multiple critical research questions and approaches to catalyze social determinants of health research that address the distinctive aspects of AF. The long-term aspiration of this work is to eradicate the substantive inequities in AF diagnosis, management, and outcomes across populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emelia J Benjamin
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alan S Go
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Patrice Desvigne-Nickens
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christine M Albert
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alvaro Alonso
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alanna M Chamberlain
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Utibe R Essien
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Inmaculada Hernandez
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego
| | | | - Kiarri N Kershaw
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Phillip D Levy
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Integrated Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jared W Magnani
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Division of Geriatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver
| | - Emily C O'Brien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carlos J Rodriguez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Andrea M Russo
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Elsayed Z Soliman
- Section on Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Lawton S Cooper
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pokorney SD, Chertow GM, Al-Khalidi HR, Gallup D, Dignacco P, Mussina K, Bansal N, Gadegbeku CA, Garcia DA, Garonzik S, Lopes RD, Mahaffey KW, Matsuda K, Middleton JP, Rymer JA, Sands GH, Thadhani R, Thomas KL, Washam JB, Winkelmayer WC, Granger CB. Apixaban for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation 2022; 146:1735-1745. [PMID: 36335914 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.054990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no randomized data evaluating the safety or efficacy of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis and with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS The RENAL-AF trial (Renal Hemodialysis Patients Allocated Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome evaluation (PROBE) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients receiving hemodialysis with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 5 mg of apixaban twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily for patients ≥80 years of age, weight ≤60 kg, or both) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The primary outcome was time to major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke, mortality, and apixaban pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic sampling was day 1, day 3, and month 1. RESULTS From January 2017 through January 2019, 154 patients were randomly assigned to apixaban (n=82) or warfarin (n=72). The trial stopped prematurely because of enrollment challenges. Time in therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) for warfarin-treated patients was 44% (interquartile range, 23%-59%). The 1-year rates for major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 32% and 26% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.30]), whereas 1-year rates for stroke or systemic embolism were 3.0% and 3.3% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Death was the most common major event in the apixaban (21 patients [26%]) and warfarin (13 patients [18%]) arms. The pharmacokinetic substudy enrolled the target 50 patients. Median steady-state 12-hour area under the curve was 2475 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 1342-3285) for 5 mg of apixaban twice daily and 1269 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 615-1946) for 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily. There was substantial overlap between minimum apixaban blood concentration, 12-hour area under the curve, and maximum apixaban blood concentration for patients with and without a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. CONCLUSIONS There was inadequate power to draw any conclusion regarding rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Clinically relevant bleeding events were ≈10-fold more frequent than stroke or systemic embolism among this population on anticoagulation, highlighting the need for future randomized studies evaluating the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation among patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT02942407.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean D Pokorney
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | | | - Hussein R Al-Khalidi
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | - Dianne Gallup
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | - Pat Dignacco
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | - Kurt Mussina
- Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (G.M.C., K.W.M., K.M.)
| | - Nisha Bansal
- University of Washington, Seattle (N.B., D.A.G.)
| | | | | | | | - Renato D Lopes
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | | | - Kelly Matsuda
- Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (G.M.C., K.W.M., K.M.)
- Frenova Renal Research, Waltham, MA (K.M.)
| | - John P Middleton
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | - Jennifer A Rymer
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | | | - Ravi Thadhani
- Massachussetts General and Brigham and Women's Hospitals, Boston (R.T.)
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | - Jeffrey B Washam
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| | | | - Christopher B Granger
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.D.P., H.R.A.-K., D.G., P.D., R.D.L., J.P.M., J.A.R., K.L.T., J.B.W., C.B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Essien UR, Chiswell K, Kaltenbach LA, Wang TY, Fonarow GC, Thomas KL, Turakhia MP, Benjamin EJ, Rodriguez F, Fang MC, Magnani JW, Yancy CW, Piccini JP. Association of Race and Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulation and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation Registry. JAMA Cardiol 2022; 7:1207-1217. [PMID: 36287545 PMCID: PMC9608025 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is underprescribed in underrepresented racial and ethnic group individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). Little is known of how differential OAC prescribing relates to inequities in AF outcomes. Objective To compare OAC use at discharge and AF-related outcomes by race and ethnicity in the Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation (GWTG-AFIB) registry. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the GWTG-AFIB registry, a national quality improvement initiative for hospitalized patients with AF. All registry patients hospitalized with AF from 2014 to 2020 were included in the study. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to July 2022. Exposures Self-reported race and ethnicity assessed in GWTG-AFIB registry. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was prescription of direct-acting OAC (DOAC) or warfarin at discharge. Secondary outcomes included cumulative 1-year incidence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality postdischarge. Outcomes adjusted for patient demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics as well as hospital factors. Results Among 69 553 patients hospitalized with AF from 159 sites between 2014 and 2020, 863 (1.2%) were Asian, 5062 (7.3%) were Black, 4058 (5.8%) were Hispanic, and 59 570 (85.6%) were White. Overall, 34 113 (49.1%) were women; the median (IQR) age was 72 (63-80) years, and the median (IQR) CHA2DS2-VASc score (calculated as congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years and older, diabetes, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category) was 4 (2-5). At discharge, 56 385 patients (81.1%) were prescribed OAC therapy, including 41 760 (74.1%) receiving DOAC. OAC prescription at discharge was lowest in Hispanic patients (3010 [74.2%]), followed by Black patients (3935 [77.7%]) Asian patients (691 [80.1%]), and White patients (48 749 [81.8%]). Black patients were less likely than White patients to be discharged while taking any anticoagulant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84) and DOACs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.82). In 16 307 individuals with 1-year follow up data, bleeding risks (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.08; 95% CI, 1.53-2.83), stroke risks (aHR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.34-3.20), and mortality risks (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47) were higher in Black patients than White patients. Hispanic patients had higher stroke risk (aHR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.38-2.95) than White patients. Conclusions and Relevance In a national registry of hospitalized patients with AF, compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to be discharged while taking anticoagulant therapy and DOACs in particular. Black and Hispanic patients had higher risk of stroke compared with White patients; Black patients had a higher risk of bleeding and mortality. There is an urgent need for interventions to achieve pharmacoequity in guideline-directed AF management to improve overall outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utibe R. Essien
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen Chiswell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lisa A. Kaltenbach
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tracy Y. Wang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gregg C. Fonarow
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Associate Editor for Health Care Quality and Guidelines, JAMA Cardiology
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mintu P. Turakhia
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
- Center for Digital Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Emelia J. Benjamin
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fatima Rodriguez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Margaret C. Fang
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jared W. Magnani
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Clyde W. Yancy
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Deputy Editor, JAMA Cardiology
| | - Jonathan P. Piccini
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Farmer HR, Xu H, Granger BB, Thomas KL, Dupre ME. Factors associated with racial differences in all-cause 30-day readmission in adults with cardiovascular disease: an observational study of a large healthcare system. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051661. [PMID: 36424114 PMCID: PMC9693888 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine factors contributing to racial differences in 30-day readmission in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). DESIGN Patients were enrolled from 1 January 2015 to 31 August 2017 and data were collected from electronic health records and a standardised interview administered prior to discharge. SETTING Duke Heart Center in the Duke University Health System. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 and older admitted for the treatment of cardiovascular-related conditions (n=734). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES All-cause readmission within 30 days was the main outcome. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine whether and to what extent socioeconomic, psychosocial, behavioural and healthcare-related factors contributed to 30-day readmissions in Black and White CVD patients. RESULTS The median age of patients was 66 years and 18.1% (n=133) were readmitted within 30 days after discharge. Black patients were more likely than White patients to be readmitted (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.23) and the racial difference in readmissions was largely reduced after taking into account differences in a wide range of clinical and non-clinical factors (OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.91). In Black patients, readmission risks were especially high in those who were retired (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.71 to 8.07), never married (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.21 to 4.05), had difficulty accessing their routine care (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.70 to 4.88) or had been hospitalised in the prior year (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.37). In White patients, being widowed (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.41 to 4.07) and reporting a higher number of depressive symptoms (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13) were the key factors associated with higher risks of readmission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Black patients were more likely than White patients to be readmitted within 30 days after hospitalisation for CVD. The factors contributing to readmission differed by race and offer important clues for identifying patients at high risk of readmission and tailoring interventions to reduce these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather R Farmer
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Hanzhang Xu
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bradi B Granger
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew E Dupre
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nguyen DT, Bilchick KC, Narayan SM, Chung MK, Thomas KL, Laurita KR, Vaseghi M, Sandhu R, Chelu MG, Kannankeril PJ, Packer DL, McManus DD, Verma A, Singleton M, Tarakji K, Al-Khatib SM, Kaltman JR, Balijepalli RC, Van Hare GF, Hurwitz JL, Russo AM, Kusumoto FM, Albert CM. Opportunities and challenges in heart rhythm research: Rationale and development of an electrophysiology collaboratory. Heart Rhythm 2022; 19:1927-1945. [PMID: 37850602 PMCID: PMC10824490 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
There are many challenges in the current landscape of electrophysiology (EP) clinical and translational research, including increasing costs and complexity, competing demands, regulatory requirements, and challenges with study implementation. This review seeks to broadly discuss the state of EP research, including challenges and opportunities. Included here are results from a Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Research Committee member survey detailing HRS members' perspectives regarding both barriers to clinical and translational research and opportunities to address these challenges. We also provide stakeholder perspectives on barriers and opportunities for future EP research, including input from representatives of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, industry, and research funding institutions that participated in a Research Collaboratory Summit convened by HRS. This review further summarizes the experiences of the heart failure and heart valve communities and how they have approached similar challenges in their own fields. We then explore potential solutions, including various models of research ecosystems designed to identify research challenges and to coordinate ways to address them in a collaborative fashion in order to optimize innovation, increase efficiency of evidence generation, and advance the development of new therapeutic products. The objectives of the proposed collaborative cardiac EP research community are to encourage and support scientific discourse, research efficiency, and evidence generation by exploring collaborative and equitable solutions in which stakeholders within the EP community can interact to address knowledge gaps, innovate, and advance new therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mina K Chung
- Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Marmar Vaseghi
- University of California, Los Angeles Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Roopinder Sandhu
- Department of Cardiology and Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | - David D McManus
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Atul Verma
- Southlake Regional Health Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Ravi C Balijepalli
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - George F Van Hare
- Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Christine M Albert
- Department of Cardiology and Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dunbar TK, Olsen MK, Yang H, Kennedy D, Jackson LR, Thomas KL, Alkon A, Prose NS, Pollak KI. Characteristics Associated with Burnout among Cardiologists in an Academic Medical Setting: Baseline Survey Results from a Communication Coaching RCT. Behav Sci (Basel) 2022; 12:362. [PMID: 36285931 PMCID: PMC9598081 DOI: 10.3390/bs12100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinician burnout poses risks not just to clinicians but also to patients and the health system. Cardiologists might be especially prone to burnout due to performing high-risk procedures, having to discuss serious news, and treating diseases that incur significant morbidity and mortality. Few have attempted to examine which cardiologists might be at higher risk of burnout. Knowing at-risk cardiologists can help frame resilience interventions. METHODS We enrolled 41 cardiologists across five ambulatory cardiology clinics into a randomized controlled trial where we assessed the Maslach Burnout Inventory at baseline. We used bivariate analyses to assess associations between cardiologist demographics and burnout. RESULTS Cardiologists reported low burnout for depersonalization and personal accomplishment and moderate levels for emotional exhaustion. Female cardiologists reported emotional exhaustion scores in the "low" range (M = 12.3; SD = 10.06), compared to male cardiologists whose score was in the "moderate" range 19.6 (SD = 9.59; p = 0.113). Cardiologists who had greater than 15 years in practice reported higher mean scores of emotional exhaustion, indicating moderate burnout (M = 20.0, SD = 10.63), compared to those with less than 15 years in practice (M = 16.6, SD = 9.10; p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS In this sample, unlike prior studies, male cardiologists reported more burnout. Consistent with prior work, mid-level cardiologists might be at highest risk of emotional exhaustion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travia Kayla Dunbar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Maren K. Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Larry R. Jackson
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Aviel Alkon
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Neil S. Prose
- Department of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kathryn I. Pollak
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Research Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thomas KL, Garg J, Velagapudi P, Gopinathannair R, Chung MK, Kusumoto F, Ajijola O, Jackson LR, Turagam MK, Joglar JA, Sogade FO, Fontaine JM, Krahn AD, Russo AM, Albert C, Lakkireddy DR. Racial and ethnic disparities in arrhythmia care: A call for action. Heart Rhythm 2022; 19:1577-1593. [PMID: 35842408 PMCID: PMC10124949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jalaj Garg
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Loma Linda University Hospital, Loma Linda, California
| | - Poonam Velagapudi
- Division of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Mina K Chung
- Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Fred Kusumoto
- Heart Rhythm Services, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Olujimi Ajijola
- Ronald Reagan University of California Los Angeles Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mohit K Turagam
- Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jose A Joglar
- Division of Cardiology, Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Felix O Sogade
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants, Macon, Georgia
| | - John M Fontaine
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Service, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Williamsport, Williamsport, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew D Krahn
- Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea M Russo
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Christine Albert
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bicong L, Allen JC, Arps K, Al-Khatib SM, Bahnson TD, Daubert JP, Frazier-Mills C, Hegland DD, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Sun AY, Thomas KL, Piccini JP. Leadless Pacemaker Implantation after Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implanted Electronic Device Infection. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:464-470. [PMID: 35029307 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) pocket and systemic infection remain common complications with traditional CIEDs and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Leadless pacemakers may be an attractive pacing alternative for many patients following complete hardware removal for a CIED infection by eliminating surgical pocket-related complications as well as lower risk of recurrent complications. OBJECTIVE To describe use and outcomes associated with leadless pacemaker implantation following extraction of a prior CIED system due to infection. METHODS Patient characteristics and post-procedural outcomes were described in patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation at Duke University Hospital between November 11, 2014 and November 18, 2019, following CIED infection and device extraction. Outcomes of interest included procedural complications, pacemaker syndrome, need for system revision, and recurrent infection. RESULTS Among 39 patients, the mean age was 71 ±17 years, 31% were women, and the most frequent primary pacing indication was complete heart block (64.1%) with 9 (23.1%) patients being pacemaker dependent at the time of Micra implantation. The primary organism implicated in the CIED infection was Staphylococcus aureus (43.6%). Nine of the 39 patients had a leadless pacemaker implanted before or on the same day as their extraction procedure, and the remaining 30 patients had a leadless pacemaker implanted after their extraction procedure. During the mean follow-up time (mean 24.8 ± 14.7 months) following the leadless pacemaker implantation, there were a total of 3 major complications: 1 groin hematoma, 1 femoral arteriovenous fistula, and 1 case of pacemaker syndrome. No patients had evidence of recurrent CIED infection after leadless pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS Despite a prior CIED infection and an elevated risk of recurrent infection, there was no evidence of CIED infection with a mean follow up of over 2 years following leadless pacemaker implantation at or after CIED system removal. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to determine if there is a long-term advantage to implanting a leadless pacemaker versus a traditional pacemaker following temporary pacing when needed during the peri-extraction period in patients with a prior CIED infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Bicong
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John Carson Allen
- Duke University School of Medicine, Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kelly Arps
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tristram D Bahnson
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James P Daubert
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Camille Frazier-Mills
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donald D Hegland
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert K Lewis
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sean D Pokorney
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Albert Y Sun
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tamirisa KP, Al-Khatib SM, Mohanty S, Han JK, Natale A, Gupta D, Russo AM, Al-Ahmad A, Gillis AM, Thomas KL. Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. CJC Open 2021; 3:S137-S148. [PMID: 34993443 PMCID: PMC8712595 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia, and it results in adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Racial and ethnic differences in AF management, although recognized, are poorly understood. This review summarizes racial differences in AF epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and management. In addition, it highlights the underrepresentation of racial and ethnic populations in AF clinical trials, especially trials focused on stroke prevention. Specific strategies are proposed for future research and initiatives that have potential to eliminate racial and ethnic differences in the care of patients with AF. Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access, enrollment in clinical trials, resource allocation, prevention, and management will likely narrow the gaps in the care and outcomes of racial and ethnic minorities suffering from AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Janet K. Han
- Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin/Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dhiraj Gupta
- Department of Cardiology, University of Liverpool, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea M. Russo
- Division of Cardiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Amin Al-Ahmad
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin/Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anne M. Gillis
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Thomas KL, Mehta LS, Rzeszut AK, Lewis SJ, Duvernoy CS, Douglas PS. Perspectives of Racially and Ethnically Diverse U.S. Cardiologists: Insights From the ACC Professional Life Survey. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:1746-1750. [PMID: 34674820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sandra J Lewis
- Northwest Cardiovascular Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Claire S Duvernoy
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Arps K, Piccini JP, Yapejian R, Leguire R, Smith B, Al-Khatib SM, Bahnson TD, Daubert JP, Hegland DD, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Sun AY, Thomas KL, Frazier-Mills C. Optimizing mechanically sensed atrial tracking in patients with atrioventricular-synchronous leadless pacemakers: A single-center experience. Heart Rhythm O2 2021; 2:455-462. [PMID: 34667960 PMCID: PMC8505205 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Atrioventricular (AV)-synchronous single-chamber leadless pacing using a mechanical atrial sensing algorithm produced high AV synchrony in clinical trials, but clinical practice experience with these devices has not yet been described. Objective To describe pacing outcomes and programming changes with AV-synchronous leadless pacemakers in clinical practice. Methods Consecutive patients without persistent atrial fibrillation who received an AV-synchronous leadless pacemaker and completed follow-up between February 2020 and April 2021 were included. We evaluated tracking index (atrial mechanical sense followed by ventricular pace [AM-VP] divided by total VP), total AV synchrony (sum of AM-ventricular sense [AM-VS], AM-VP, and AV conduction mode switch), use of programming optimization, and improvement in AV synchrony after optimization. Results Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 69 ± 16.8 years, 24 (48%) were women, 24 (48%) had complete heart block, and 17 (34%) required ≥50% pacing. Mean tracking index was 41% ± 34%. Thirty-five patients (70%) received ≥1 programming change. In 36 patients with 2 follow-up visits, tracking improved by +9% ± 28% (P value for improvement = .09) and +18% ± 19% (P = .02) among 15 patients with complete heart block. Average total AV synchrony increased from 89% [67%, 99%] to 93% [78%, 100%] in all patients (P = .22), from 86% [52%, 98%] to 97% [82%, 99%] in those with complete heart block (P = .04), and from 73% [52%, 80%] to 78% [70%, 85%] in those with ≥50% pacing (P = .09). Conclusion In patients with AV-synchronous leadless pacemakers, programming changes are frequent and are associated with increased atrial tracking and increased AV synchrony in patients with complete heart block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Arps
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rebecca Yapejian
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rhonda Leguire
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brenda Smith
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tristram D Bahnson
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James P Daubert
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donald D Hegland
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert K Lewis
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sean D Pokorney
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Albert Y Sun
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Camille Frazier-Mills
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Moeller S, Hansen CM, Kragholm K, Dupre ME, Sasson C, Pearson DA, Tyson C, Jollis JG, Monk L, Starks MA, McNally B, Thomas KL, Becker L, Torp-Pedersen C, Granger CB. Race Differences in Interventions and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in North Carolina, 2010 to 2014. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e019082. [PMID: 34431375 PMCID: PMC8649293 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Following the implementation of the HeartRescue project, with interventions in the community, emergency medical services, and hospitals to improve care and outcomes for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in North Carolina, improved bystander and first responder treatments as well as survival were observed. This study aimed to determine whether these improvements were consistent across Black versus White individuals. Methods and Results Using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), we identified OHCA from 16 counties in North Carolina (population 3 million) from 2010 to 2014. Temporal changes in interventions and outcomes were assessed using multilevel multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient and socioeconomic neighborhood‐level factors. Of 7091 patients with OHCA, 36.5% were Black and 63.5% were White. Black patients were younger, more females, had more unwitnessed arrests and non‐shockable rhythm (Black: 81.0%; White: 75.4%). From 2010 to 2014, the adjusted probabilities of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) went from 38.5% to 51.2% in White, P<0.001; and 36.9% to 45.6% in Black, P=0.002, and first‐responder defibrillation went from 13.2% to 17.2% in White, P=0.002; and 14.7% to 17.3% in Black, P=0.16. From 2010 to 2014, survival to discharge only increased in White (8.0% to 11.4%, P=0.004; Black 8.9% to 9.5%, P=0.60), though, in shockable patients the probability of survival to discharge went from 24.8% to 34.6% in White, P=0.02; and 21.7% to 29.0% in Black, P=0. 10. Conclusions After the HeartRescue program, bystander CPR and first‐responder defibrillation increased in both patient groups; however, survival only increased significantly for White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidsel Moeller
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.,Department of Cardiology Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte Hellerup Denmark
| | - Carolina M Hansen
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.,Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen University of Copenhagen Denmark.,Department of Cardiology Nordsjaellands Hospital Hillerød Denmark
| | - Kristian Kragholm
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.,Department of Cardiology North Denmark Regional Hospital &Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
| | - Matt E Dupre
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC.,Department of Sociology Durham NC.,Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University Durham NC
| | - Comilla Sasson
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Monk
- Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC
| | | | - Bryan McNally
- Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Atlanta GA.,Rollins School of Public Health Atlanta Atlanta GA
| | | | - Lance Becker
- Department of Emergency Medicine Northwell HealthHofstra Northwell School of Medicine at Hofstra University Manhasset NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jawitz OK, Lawton JS, Thibault D, O'Brien S, Higgins RSD, Schena S, Vemulapalli S, Thomas KL, Zwischenberger BA. Sex Differences in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Techniques: A STS Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 113:1979-1988. [PMID: 34280377 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Females with coronary artery disease (CAD) have inferior outcomes compared with males, including higher mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to evaluate the association of female sex with the use of guideline-concordant CABG revascularization techniques. METHODS The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried for adult patients who underwent first-time isolated CABG in the US from 2011-2019. The association between female sex and the odds of (1) receiving a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, (2) undergoing complete revascularization, and (3) undergoing multi-arterial grafting was assessed, adjusting for procedural anatomy. RESULTS Among 1,212,487 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 75% were male (n=911,178) and 25% were female (n=301,309). Female sex was associated with lower unadjusted rates of revascularization with an IMA (93.9% vs 95.9%, P<.001), bilateral IMA (2.9% vs 5.6%, P<.001) or radial artery (3.2% vs 5.6%, P<.001) graft. After adjustment, females had a lower odds than males of receiving a LIMA graft to the LAD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.83, P<.001), undergoing complete revascularization (AOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83-0.90, P<.001), and undergoing multi-arterial grafting (AOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Female sex was associated with a 14-22% lower odds of undergoing guideline concordant revascularization including LIMA to LAD grafting, multi-arterial grafting, and complete revascularization. Further investigation is necessary to determine why revascularization approaches differ by sex and to what degree sex disparities in CAD outcomes are due to surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver K Jawitz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Jennifer S Lawton
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dylan Thibault
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sean O'Brien
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert S D Higgins
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stefano Schena
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sreekanth Vemulapalli
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brittany A Zwischenberger
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thomas KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, Mark DB, Packer DL. Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:126-138. [PMID: 34238436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), including catheter ablation, are substantially underused in racial/ethnic minorities in North America. OBJECTIVES This study sought to describe outcomes in the CABANA trial as a function of race/ethnicity. METHODS CABANA randomized 2,204 symptomatic participants with AF to ablation or drug therapy including rate and/or rhythm control drugs. Only participants in North America were included in the present analysis, and participants were subgrouped as racial/ethnic minority or nonminority with the use of National Institutes of Health definitions. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. RESULTS Of 1,280 participants enrolled in CABANA in North America, 127 (9.9%) were racial and ethnic minorities. Compared with nonminorities, racial and ethnic minorities were younger with median age 65.6 versus 68.5 years, respectively, and had more symptomatic heart failure (37.0% vs 22.0%), hypertension (92.1% vs 76.8%, respectively), and ejection fraction <40% (20.8% vs 7.1%). Racial/ethnic minorities treated with ablation had a 68% relative reduction in the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.78) and a 72% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.79). Primary event rates in racial/ethnic minority and nonminority participants were similar in the ablation arm (4-year Kaplan-Meier event rates 12.3% vs 9.9%); however, racial and ethnic minorities randomized to drug therapy had a much higher event rate than nonminority participants (27.4% vs. 9.4%). CONCLUSION Among racial or ethnic minorities enrolled in the North American CABANA cohort, catheter ablation significantly improved major clinical outcomes compared with drug therapy. These benefits, which were not seen in nonminority participants, appear to be due to worse outcomes with drug therapy. (Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial [CABANA]; NCT00911508).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | | | - Adam P Silverstein
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Tristram D Bahnson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeanne E Poole
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Daniel B Mark
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jackson LR, Jackson KP, Thomas KL. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: A review of current devices, clinical evidence, patient selection, and post procedural antithrombotic management. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 66:92-100. [PMID: 34332665 PMCID: PMC9899495 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Stroke is a major driver of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). While systemic oral anticoagulation (OAC) continues to be the mainstay for stroke reduction therapy in patients with NVAF, several barriers prevent the sustained long-term use of OAC, including increased risk of bleeding, non-compliance, cost, drug-drug interactions, and the need for ongoing laboratory testing. Given the need for continued stroke reduction therapies in patients who are intolerant of or non-compliant with OAC, percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a nonpharmacologic alternative to OAC. The development of percutaneous LAAO techniques is based on data suggesting that more than 90% of thrombi in patients with NVAF originate in the LAA. Two percutaneous LAAO devices are currently in widespread clinical use: Watchman (United States and Europe) and the Amplatzer type of devices (Europe); randomized trial data exist only for the Watchman device. Multiple randomized and nonrandomized trials and registries have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of LAAO in patients who are suitable for short-term anticoagulation using a variety of post-procedural antithrombotic strategies. Ongoing randomized clinical trials on LAAO are focused on OAC-ineligible patients to compare efficacy of LAAO devices against a multitude of antithrombotic options. This review aims to discuss the rationale and evidence for LAAO and post procedural antithrombotic strategies and opportunities for research examination. In addition, we discuss the need for continued investigation of LAAO in populations not well represented in clinical trials or registries, including women, older patients, and underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry R Jackson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America; Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yankey GS, Jackson LR, Marts C, Chiswell K, Wu A, Ugowe F, Wilson J, Vemulapalli S, Samad Z, Thomas KL. African American-Caucasian American differences in aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 2021; 234:111-121. [PMID: 33453161 PMCID: PMC9899489 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), there are limited data on aortic valve replacement (AVR), reasons for nonreceipt and mortality by race. METHODS Utilizing the Duke Echocardiography Laboratory Database, we analyzed data from 110,711 patients who underwent echocardiography at Duke University Medical Center between 1999 and 2013. We identified 1,111 patients with severe AS who met ≥1 of 3 criteria for AVR: ejection fraction ≤50%, diagnosis of heart failure, or need for coronary artery bypass surgery. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between race, AVR and 1-year mortality. χ2 testing was used to assess potential racial differences in reasons for AVR nonreceipt. RESULTS Among the 1,111 patients (143 AA and 968 CA) eligible for AVR, AA were more often women, had more diabetes, renal insufficiency, aortic regurgitation and left ventricular hypertrophy. CA were more often smokers, had more ischemic heart disease, hyperlipidemia and higher median income levels. There were no racial differences in surgical risk utilizing logistic euroSCORES. Relative to CA, AA had lower rates of AVR (adjusted odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.71, P < .001) yet similar 1-year mortality (aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57-1.17, P = .262). There were no significant differences in reasons for AVR nonreceipt. CONCLUSIONS We identified 143 African Americans (AA) and 968 Caucasian Americans(CA) with severe AS who met prespecified criteria for AVR.. AA relative to CA were more often women, had more diabetes, renal insufficiency, and left ventricular hypertrophy, however had less tobacco use, ischemic heart disease, hyperlipidemia and lower median income levels. Among patients with severe AS, AA relative to CA had lower rates of AVR (adjusted odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.3-0.71, P < .001) without significant differences in reasons for AVR nonreceipt and similar 1-year mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Colin Marts
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Angie Wu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Sreekanth Vemulapalli
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lunyera J, Clare RM, Chiswell K, Scialla JJ, Pun PH, Thomas KL, Starks MA, Diamantidis CJ. Racial Differences in AKI Incidence Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:654-662. [PMID: 33443096 PMCID: PMC7920184 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020040502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a risk factor for AKI development, but few studies have quantified racial differences in AKI incidence after this procedure. METHODS We examined the association of self-reported race (Black, White, or other) and baseline eGFR with AKI incidence among patients who underwent PCI at Duke University Medical Center between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2013. We defined AKI as a 0.3 mg/dl absolute increase in serum creatinine within 48 hours, or ≥1.5-fold relative elevation within 7 days post-PCI from the reference value ascertained within 30 days before PCI. RESULTS Of 9422 patients in the analytic cohort (median age 63 years; 33% female; 75% White, 20% Black, 5% other race), 9% developed AKI overall (14% of Black, 8% of White, 10% of others). After adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, predisposing medications, PCI indication, periprocedural AKI prophylaxis, and PCI procedural characteristics, Black race was associated with increased odds for incident AKI compared with White race (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.48 to 2.15). Compared with Whites, odds for incident AKI were not significantly higher in other patients (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.83). Low baseline eGFR was associated with graded, higher odds of AKI incidence (P value for trend <0.001); however, there was no interaction between race and baseline eGFR on odds for incident AKI (P value for interaction = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS Black patients had greater odds of developing AKI after PCI compared with White patients. Future investigations should identify factors, including multiple domains of social determinants, that predispose Black individuals to disparate AKI risk after PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lunyera
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert M. Clare
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Karen Chiswell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julia J. Scialla
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Patrick H. Pun
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monique A. Starks
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Clarissa J. Diamantidis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Xu H, Farmer HR, Granger BB, Thomas KL, Peterson ED, Dupre ME. Perceived Versus Actual Risks of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2021; 14:e006586. [PMID: 33430612 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States, and patients with CVD are at a high risk of readmission after discharge. We examined whether patients' perceived risk of readmission at discharge was associated with actual 30-day readmissions in patients hospitalized with CVD. METHODS We recruited 730 patients from the Duke Heart Center who were admitted for treatment of CVD between January 1, 2015, and August 31, 2017. A standardized survey was linked with electronic health records to ascertain patients' perceived risk of readmission, and other sociodemographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and clinical data before discharge. All-cause readmission within 30 days after discharge was examined. RESULTS Nearly 1-in-3 patients perceived a high risk of readmission at index admission and those who perceived a high risk had significantly more readmissions within 30 days than patients who perceived low risks of readmission (23.6% versus 15.8%, P=0.016). Among those who perceived a high risk of readmission, non-White patients (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.28-3.36]), those with poor self-rated health (OR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.38-3.85]), difficulty accessing care (OR, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.24-6.00]), and prior hospitalizations in the past year (OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.21-3.74]) were more likely to be readmitted. Among those who perceived a low risk of readmission, patients who were widowed (OR, 2.69 [95% CI, 1.60-4.51]) and reported difficulty accessing care (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.07-3.33]) were more likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSIONS Patients who perceived a high risk of readmission had a higher rate of 30-day readmission than patients who perceived a low risk. These findings have important implications for identifying CVD patients at a high risk of 30-day readmission and targeting the factors associated with perceived and actual risks of readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanzhang Xu
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (H.X.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Duke University School of Nursing (H.X., B.B.G.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development (H.X., M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Heather R Farmer
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (H.R.F.)
| | - Bradi B Granger
- Duke University School of Nursing (H.X., B.B.G.), Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (K.L.T., E.D.P., M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (K.L.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (K.L.T., E.D.P., M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (E.D.P)
| | - Matthew E Dupre
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development (H.X., M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Duke Clinical Research Institute (K.L.T., E.D.P., M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Population Health Sciences (M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC.,Department of Sociology (M.E.D.), Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rymer JA, Frazier-Mills CG, Jackson LR, Thomas KL, Douglas PS, Wang A, Patel MR, Crowley AL. Evaluation of Women and Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Group Representation in a General Cardiology Fellowship After a Systematic Recruitment Initiative. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2030832. [PMID: 33427883 PMCID: PMC7801933 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The proportion of women and underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs) matriculating into general cardiology fellowships remains low. OBJECTIVE To assess a systematic recruitment initiative aimed at ensuring adequate matriculation of women and UREGs in a general cardiology fellowship. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This quality improvement study took place at a large, tertiary academic medical center and associated Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Cardiovascular Disease fellowship. Participants included cardiology fellowship and divisional leadership and general cardiology fellow applicants to the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Program from 2017 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from December 2019 to May 2020. EXPOSURE Multipronged initiative that created an environment committed to ensuring equity of opportunity. This included the creation of a fellowship diversity and inclusivity task force that drafted recommendations, which included reorganization of the fellowship recruitment committee, and changes to the applicant screening process, the interview day, applicant ranking process, and postmatch interventions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The percentage of matriculating and overall women and UREGs before and after the interventions were recorded. RESULTS The fellowship received a mean (SD) of 462 (55) applications annually before the interventions (2006-2016) and 611 (27) applications annually after the interventions (2017-2019). Between the 10-year period before the interventions and the 3-year period during the interventions, there was a significant increase in the annual mean (SD) percentage of women (22.4% [2.9%] vs 26.4% [0.07%]; P < .001) and UREG applicants (10.5% [1.1%] vs 12.5% [1.9%]; P = .01) to the program. Among applicants interviewed, the percentage of women increased from 20.0% to 33.5% (P = .01) and that of and UREGs increased from 14.0% to 20.0% (P = .01). Before the interventions, a mean (SD) of 23.2% (16.2%) women and 9.7% (7.8%) UREGs matriculated as first-year fellows, whereas after the interventions, a mean (SD) of 54.2% (7.2%) women and 33.3% (19.0%) UREGs matriculated as first-year fellows. The proportion of the entire fellowship who were women increased from a 5-year mean (SD) of 27.0% (8.8%) to 54.2% (7.2%) after 3 years of interventions, and that of UREGs increased from 5.6% (4.6%) to 33.3% (19.0%). Overall, the proportion of applicants in the entire population who were either women or from UREGs increased from 27.8% to 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE After implementing interventions to promote equity of opportunity in the cardiovascular disease fellowship, the percentage of women and UREGs significantly increased in the fellowship over a 3-year time period. These interventions may be applicable to other cardiovascular disease fellowships seeking to diversify training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A. Rymer
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Camille G. Frazier-Mills
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pamela S. Douglas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manesh R. Patel
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Anna Lisa Crowley
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chery G, Jackson L, Thomas KL. Letter to the Editor: Inappropriate subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge related to myopotential oversensing. J Arrhythm 2020; 36:948-949. [PMID: 33024477 PMCID: PMC7532264 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Godefroy Chery
- Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham NC USA
| | - Larry Jackson
- Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham NC USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Department of Medicine Duke University Medical Center Durham NC USA.,Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Black-Maier E, Rehorn M, Loungani R, Friedman DJ, Alenezi F, Geurink K, Pokorney SD, Daubert JP, Sun AY, Atwater BD, Jackson KP, Hegland DD, Thomas KL, Bahnson TD, Khouri MG, Piccini JP. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 43:913-921. [PMID: 32573789 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac amyloidosis is a progressive infiltrative disease involving deposition of amyloid fibrils in the myocardium and cardiac conduction system that frequently manifests with heart failure (HF) and arrhythmias, most frequently atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and atrial tachycardia (AT). METHODS We performed an observational retrospective study of patients with a diagnosis of cardiac amyloid who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between January 1, 2011 and December 1, 2018. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were determined by manual chart review. RESULTS A total of 13 catheter ablations were performed over the study period in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, including 10 AT/AF/AFL ablations and three atrioventricular nodal ablations. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower at the time of AV node ablation than catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL (23% vs 40%, P = .003). Cardiac amyloid was diagnosed based on the results of preablation cardiac MRI results in the majority of patients (n = 7, 70%). The HV interval was prolonged at 60 ± 15 ms and did not differ significantly between AV nodal ablation patients and AT/AF/AFL ablation patients (69 ± 18 ms vs 57 ± 14 ms, P = .36). The majority of patients undergoing AT/AF/AFL ablation had persistent AF (n = 7, 70%) and NYHA class II (n = 5, 50%) or III (n = 5, 50%) HF symptoms, whereas patients undergoing AV node ablation were more likely to have class IV HF (n = 2, 66%, P = .014). Arrhythmia-free survival in CA patients after catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL was 40% at 1 year and 20% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation of AT/AF/AFL may be a feasible strategy for appropriately selected patients with early to mid-stage CA, whereas AV node ablation may be more appropriate in patients with advanced-stage CA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Black-Maier
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael Rehorn
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rahul Loungani
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel J Friedman
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fawaz Alenezi
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kyle Geurink
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sean D Pokorney
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James P Daubert
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Albert Y Sun
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brett D Atwater
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin P Jackson
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donald D Hegland
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tristram D Bahnson
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michel G Khouri
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Division of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang A, Truong T, Black-Maier E, Green C, Campbell KB, Barnett AS, Febre J, Loring Z, Al-Khatib SM, Atwater BD, Daubert JP, Frazier-Mills C, Hegland DD, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Koontz JI, Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Sun AY, Thomas KL, Bahnson TD, Piccini JP. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Heart Rhythm O2 2020; 1:180-188. [PMID: 34113872 PMCID: PMC8183889 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies have compared clinical outcomes after catheter ablation between patients with and those without DM. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare AF ablation outcomes in patients with and those without DM. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 351 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation. Clinical outcomes included freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia, symptom burden (Mayo AF Symptom Inventory score), cardiovascular and all-cause hospitalizations, and periprocedural complications. RESULTS Patients with DM (n = 65) were older, had a higher body mass index, more persistent AF, more hypertension, and larger left atrial diameter (P <.05 for all). Median (Q1, Q3) total radiofrequency duration [64.0 (43.6, 81.4) minutes vs 54.3 (39.2, 76.4) minutes; P = .132] and periprocedural complications (P = .868) did not differ between patients with and those without DM. After a median follow-up of 29.5 months, arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in the DM group compared to the no-DM group after adjustment for baseline differences (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.24; 95% confidence [CI] 1.42-3.55; P = .001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher AF recurrence with worse glycemic levels (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.99-1.69; P = .064). CONCLUSION Although safety outcomes associated with AF ablation were similar between patients with and those without DM, arrhythmia-free survival was significantly lower among patients with DM. Poor glycemic control seems to an important risk factor for AF recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen Wang
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tracy Truong
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric Black-Maier
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Cynthia Green
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kristen B. Campbell
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adam S. Barnett
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Janice Febre
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zak Loring
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brett D. Atwater
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James P. Daubert
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Camille Frazier-Mills
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donald D. Hegland
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin P. Jackson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jason I. Koontz
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert K. Lewis
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sean D. Pokorney
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Albert Y. Sun
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tristam D. Bahnson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan P. Piccini
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Breathett K, Sims M, Gross M, Jackson EA, Jones EJ, Navas-Acien A, Taylor H, Thomas KL, Howard BV. Cardiovascular Health in American Indians and Alaska Natives: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020; 141:e948-e959. [PMID: 32460555 PMCID: PMC7351358 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Over the past 50 years, the prevalence of CVD has been rising among American Indians and Alaska Natives. The objective of this statement is to summarize population-level risk factors and management techniques tailored for the American Indian and Alaska Native populations. METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the annual Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics report from the American Heart Association were used to identify risk factors and interventions specific to American Indians and Alaska Natives. RESULTS Diabetes mellitus is a major contributor to disproportionately higher rates of coronary heart disease among American Indians and Alaska Natives compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Additional risk factors for CVD include low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, hypertension, renal disease, age, and sex. Smoking and exposure to toxic metals are risk factors for some subpopulations. A quarter of American Indians live below the federal poverty line, and thus, low socioeconomic status is an important social determinant of cardiovascular health. Community-based interventions have reduced CVD risk in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Underreporting of American Indian and Alaska Native race could underestimate the extent of CVD in this population. CONCLUSIONS Prevention and treatment of CVD in American Indians and Alaska Natives should focus on control of risk factors and community-based interventions that address social determinants of health, particularly among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Accurate reporting of race/ethnicity is encouraged to address race-specific risk factors.
Collapse
|
39
|
Sutter JS, Lokhnygina Y, Daubert JP, Bahnson T, Jackson K, Koontz JI, Sun AY, Hegland DD, Thomas KL, Jackson L, Lewis R, Granger C, Piccini JP, Atwater BD. Safety and efficacy outcomes of left atrial posterior wall isolation compared to pulmonary vein isolation and pulmonary vein isolation with linear ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2020; 220:89-96. [PMID: 31805423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly used as an adjunctive lesion set to compliment pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI with and without adjunctive PWI. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 558 patients who underwent de novo and repeat ablation for persistent AF. Subjects were matched using propensity score adjustments. Outcomes were freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia and adverse events. RESULTS Among 558 patients who underwent ablation for persistent AF, 78 (14%) underwent PVI + PWI, 255 (46%) underwent PVI, and 225 (40%) underwent PVI + linear ablation. Stratified logistic regression analysis with propensity matching revealed higher odds of recurrent arrhythmia with PVI + PWI when compared to PVI (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.08-4.69, P = .030) and when compared to PVI + linear (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.28, P = .048). Within the PVI + PWI group, 57.7% of subjects were in normal sinus rhythm at 6 months compared to 73.9% and 72.2% in PVI and PVI + linear groups, respectively. Adverse events were rare, with 19 events total identified across all groups. CONCLUSIONS PVI + PWI does not appear to be as effective as PVI or PVI + linear ablation in reducing the recurrence of arrhythmia within 6 months of the index procedure in patients with persistent AF. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing these ablation techniques is needed to clarify the role of extensive substrate modification for treatment of persistent AF. CONDENSED ABSTRACT PWI is increasingly used as an adjunctive lesion set to compliment PVI in patients with persistent AF. We performed a retrospective study of 558 patients who underwent de novo and repeat ablation for persistent AF to compare the outcomes between PVI with and without adjunctive PWI. We found an increased incidence in recurrence of AF and other atrial arrhythmias at 6 months in the PVI + PWI cohort compared to PVI with or without additional linear ablation. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing these ablation techniques is needed to clarify the role of extensive substrate modification for treatment of persistent AF.
Collapse
|
40
|
Black‐Maier E, Steinberg BA, Trulock KM, Wang F, Lokhnygina Y, O'Neal W, Al‐Khatib S, Atwater BD, Daubert JP, Frazier‐Mills C, Hegland DD, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Koontz JI, Lewis RK, Sun AY, Thomas KL, Bahnson TD, Piccini JP. Effectiveness of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation according to heart failure etiology. J Arrhythm 2020; 36:84-92. [PMID: 32071625 PMCID: PMC7011840 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation is an important rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with concomitant heart failure (HF). The objective of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy of AF ablation patients with ischemic vs nonischemic heart failure. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with HF who underwent AF ablation. Outcomes were compared based on HF etiology and included in-hospital events, symptoms (Mayo AF Symptom Inventory [MAFSI]), and functional status (New York Heart Association class) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. RESULTS Among 242 patients (n = 70 [29%] ischemic, n = 172 [71%] nonischemic), patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were younger (mean age 64 ± 11.5 vs 69 ± 9.1, P = .002), more often female (36% vs 17%, P = .004), and had higher mean left-ventricular ejection fraction (47% vs 42%, P = .0007). There were no significant differences in periprocedural characteristics, including mean procedure time (243 ± 74.2 vs 259 ± 81.8 minutes, P = .1) and nonleft atrial ablation (17% vs 20%, P = .6). All-cause adverse events were similar in each group (15% vs 17%, P = .7). NYHA and MAFSI scores improved significantly at follow-up and did not differ according to HF etiology (P = .5; P = .10-1.00 after Bonferroni correction). There were no significant differences in freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 12-months between ischemic (74%) and nonischemic patients (78%): adjusted RR 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.19. CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation in patients with AF and concomitant heart failure leads to significant improvements in functional and symptom status without significant differences between patients with ischemic vs nonischemic HF etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Black‐Maier
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | | | - Kevin M. Trulock
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Frances Wang
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | | | - Wanda O'Neal
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Sana Al‐Khatib
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | - Brett D. Atwater
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - James P. Daubert
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Camille Frazier‐Mills
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Donald D. Hegland
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Kevin P. Jackson
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jason I. Koontz
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Robert K. Lewis
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Albert Y. Sun
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | - Tristram D. Bahnson
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jonathan P. Piccini
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionDuke Center for Atrial FibrillationDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomas KL, Sullivan LT, Al-Khatib SM, LaPointe NA, Sears S, Kosinski AS, Jackson LR, Kutyifa V, Peterson ED. Videos to reduce racial disparities in ICD therapy Via Innovative Designs (VIVID) trial: Rational, design and methodology. Am Heart J 2020; 220:59-67. [PMID: 31785550 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a higher prevalence of sudden cardiac death (SCD), black individuals are less likely than whites to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted. Racial differences in ICD utilization is in part explained by higher refusal rates in black individuals. Decision support can assist with treatment-related uncertainty and prepare patients to make well-informed decisions. METHODS The Videos to reduce racial disparities in ICD therapy Via Innovative Designs (VIVID) study will randomize 350 black individuals with a primary prevention indication for an ICD to a racially concordant/discordant video-based decision support tool or usual care. The composite primary outcome is (1) the decision for ICD placement in the combined video groups compared with usual care and (2) the decision for ICD placement in the racially concordant relative to discordant video group. Additional outcomes include knowledge of ICD therapy and SCD risk; decisional conflict; ICD receipt at 90 days; and a qualitative assessment of ICD decision making in acceptors, decliners, and those undecided. CONCLUSIONS In addition to assessing the efficacy of decision support on ICD acceptance among black individuals, VIVID will provide insight into the role of racial concordance in medical decision making. Given the similarities in the root causes of racial/ethnic disparities in care across health disciplines, our approach and findings may be generalizable to decision making in other health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sam Sears
- East Carolina University, Department of Psychology, Greenville, NC
| | | | | | - Valentina Kutyifa
- University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Affiliation(s)
- Francis E Ugowe
- Duke University Medical Center (F.E.U., L.R.J., K.L.T.), Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke University Medical Center (F.E.U., L.R.J., K.L.T.), Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, (L.R.J., K.L.T.), Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University Medical Center (F.E.U., L.R.J., K.L.T.), Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, (L.R.J., K.L.T.), Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wilson JB, Jackson LR, Ugowe FE, Jones T, Yankey GS, Marts C, Thomas KL. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Outcomes of Severe Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:149-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
44
|
Black-Maier E, Parish A, Steinberg BA, Green CL, Loring Z, Barnett AS, Al-Khatib SM, Atwater BD, Daubert JP, Frazier-Mills C, Hegland DD, Jackson KP, Jackson LR, Koontz J, Lewis RK, Pokorney SD, Sun AY, Thomas KL, Bahnson TD, Piccini JP. Predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in patients with heart failure: Validity of the APPLE and CAAP-AF risk scoring systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2019; 42:1440-1447. [PMID: 31544956 PMCID: PMC7534412 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) improves cardiovascular outcomes. Risk scores (CAAP-AF and APPLE) have been developed to predict the likelihood of AF recurrence after ablation, have not been validated specifically in patients with AF and HF. METHODS We analyzed baseline characteristics, risk scores, and rates of AF recurrence 12 months postablation in a cohort of 230 consecutive patients with AF and HF undergoing PVI in the Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation registry from 2009-2013. RESULTS During a follow-up period of 12 months, 76 of 230 (33%) patients with HF experienced recurrent AF after ablation. The median APPLE and CAAP-AF scores were 1.5 ([Q1, Q3]: [1.0, 2.0]) and 4.0 ([Q1, Q3]: [3.0, 5.0]), respectively and were not different from those patients with and without recurrent AF. Freedom from AF was not different according to APPLE and CAAP-AF scores. Discrimination for recurrent AF with the CAAP-AF score was modest with a C-statistic of 0.60 (95% CI 0.52-0.67). Discrimination with the APPLE score was similarly modest, with a C-statistic of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.47-0.62). CONCLUSIONS Validated predictive risk scores for recurrent AF after catheter ablation exhibit limited predictive ability in cohorts of AF and HF. Additional tools are needed to facilitate risk stratification and patient selection for AF ablation in patients with concomitant HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Black-Maier
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Benjamin A. Steinberg
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Cynthia L. Green
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Zak Loring
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Adam S. Barnett
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Brett D. Atwater
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - James P. Daubert
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Donald D. Hegland
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin P. Jackson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jason Koontz
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Robert K. Lewis
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Sean D. Pokorney
- Electrophysiology Section, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, UK
| | - Albert Y. Sun
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Tristam D. Bahnson
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Jonathan P. Piccini
- Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Greene SJ, DeVore AD, Sheng S, Fonarow GC, Butler J, Califf RM, Hernandez AF, Matsouaka RA, Samman Tahhan A, Thomas KL, Vaduganathan M, Yancy CW, Peterson ED, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ. Representativeness of a Heart Failure Trial by Race and Sex: Results From ASCEND-HF and GWTG-HF. JACC Heart Fail 2019; 7:980-992. [PMID: 31606362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the degree to which U.S. patients enrolled in a heart failure (HF) trial represent patients in routine U.S. clinical practice according to race and sex. BACKGROUND Black patients and women are frequently under-represented in HF clinical trials. However, the degree to which black patients and women enrolled in trials represent such patients in routine practice is unclear. METHODS The ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) trial randomized patients hospitalized for HF to receive nesiritide or placebo from May 2007 to August 2010 and was neutral for clinical endpoints. This analysis compared non-Hispanic white (n = 1,494) and black (n = 1,012) patients enrolled in ASCEND-HF from the U.S. versus non-Hispanic white and black patients included in a U.S. hospitalized HF registry (i.e., Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure [GWTG-HF]) during the ASCEND-HF enrollment period and meeting trial eligibility criteria. RESULTS Among 79,291 white and black registry patients, 49,063 (62%) met trial eligibility criteria (white, n = 37,883 [77.2%]; black, n = 11,180 [22.8%]). Women represented 35% and 49% of the ASCEND-HF and trial-eligible GWTG-HF cohorts, respectively. Compared with trial-enrolled patients, trial-eligible GWTG-HF patients tended to be older with higher blood pressure and higher ejection fraction. Trial-eligible patients had higher in-hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 1.3%), 30-day readmission (20.2% vs. 16.8%), and 180-day mortality (21.2% vs. 18.6%) than those enrolled in the trial (all p < 0.02), with consistent mortality findings by race and sex. After propensity score matching, mortality rates were similar; however, trial-eligible patients continued to have higher rates of 30-day readmission (23.1% vs. 17.3%; p < 0.01), driven by differences among black patients and women (all p for interaction ≤0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with HF seen in U.S. practice and eligible for the ASCEND-HF trial had worse clinical outcomes than those enrolled in the trial. After accounting for clinical characteristics, trial-eligible real-world patients continued to have higher rates of 30-day readmission, driven by differences among black patients and women. Social, behavioral, and other unmeasured factors may impair representativeness of patients enrolled in HF trials, particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and women. (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure [ASCEND-HF]; NCT00475852).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J Greene
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shubin Sheng
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gregg C Fonarow
- Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Javed Butler
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Robert M Califf
- Duke Forge, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Verily Life Sciences (Alphabet), South San Francisco, California
| | - Adrian F Hernandez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Roland A Matsouaka
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ayman Samman Tahhan
- Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Muthiah Vaduganathan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clyde W Yancy
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Robert J Mentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ali-Ahmed F, Matlock D, Zeitler EP, Thomas KL, Haines DE, Al-Khatib SM. Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results of a physician survey. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30:2420-2426. [PMID: 31515880 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has mandated the use of shared decision-making (SDM) for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. SDM tools help facilitate quality SDM by presenting patients with balanced evidence-based facts related to risk and benefits. Perceptions of ICD implantation may differ based on patients' sex and race. OBJECTIVE To determine if and how physicians are incorporating SDM in counseling patients about ICD and if they are aware of sex- and race-based differences in patients' perception of ICDs. METHODS This was a pilot study involving an online survey targeting attending physicians who implant ICDs. Physicians were randomly selected by a computer-based program; 350 surveys were sent. RESULTS Of the 124 (35%) respondents to the survey, 102 (84%) met the inclusion criteria, and of those, 99 (97%) were adult electrophysiologists. Most physicians (90, 88%) stated they engaged in SDM during the general consent process. Sixty-three (62%) physicians discuss end of life issues while obtaining general consent. Forty-four (43%) physicians said they use an existing SDM tool with the Colorado SDM tool being the most common (39, 89%). The majority of physicians were unaware of sex- and race-based differences in perceptions related to ICD implantation (sex 64, 63% and race 63, 62%). CONCLUSION A vast majority of physicians are engaging in SDM; however less than half are using a formal SDM tool, and a minority of physicians were aware of sex- and race-based differences in patients' perception of ICD implantation. Sex- and race-based tools might help address this gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Ali-Ahmed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.,Division of Cardiology, Beaumont Health, Michigan
| | - Daniel Matlock
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Emily P Zeitler
- Division of Cardiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.,Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.,Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Starks MA, Sanders GD, Coeytaux RR, Riley IL, Jackson LR, Brooks AM, Thomas KL, Choudhury KR, Califf RM, Hernandez AF. Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219894. [PMID: 31404063 PMCID: PMC6690528 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are being increasingly used to test a range of interventions, including medical interventions commonly used in clinical practice. Policies created by the NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require the reporting of demographics and the examination of demographic heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) for individually randomized trials. Little is known about how frequent demographics are reported and HTE analyses are conducted in CRTs. Objectives We sought to understand the prevalence of HTE analyses and the statistical methods used to conduct them in CRTs focused on treating cardiovascular disease, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases. Additionally, we also report on the proportion of CRTs that reported on baseline demographics of its populations and conducted demographic HTE analyses. Data sources We searched PubMed and Embase for CRTs published between 1/1/2010 and 3/29/2016 that focused on treating the top 3 Center for Disease Control causes of death (cardiovascular disease, chronic lower respiratory disease, and cancer). Evidence Screening And Review: Of 1,682 unique titles, 117 abstracts were screened. After excluding 53 articles, we included 64 CRT publications and abstracted information on study characteristics and demographic information, statistical analysis, HTE analysis, and study quality. Results Age and sex were reported in greater than 95.3% of CRTs, while race and ethnicity were reported in only 20.3% of CRTs. HTE analyses were conducted in 28.1% (n = 18) of included CRTs and 77.8% (n = 12) were prespecified analyses. Four CRTs conducted a demographic subgroup analysis. Only 6/18 CRTs used interaction testing to determine whether HTE existed. Conclusions Baseline demographic reporting was high for age and sex in CRTs, but was uncommon for race and ethnicity. HTE analyses were uncommon and was rare for demographic subgroups, which limits the ability to examine the extent of benefits or risks for treatments tested with CRT designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Anderson Starks
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Gillian D. Sanders
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Remy Rene Coeytaux
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine; Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Isaretta L. Riley
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Larry R. Jackson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Amanda McBroom Brooks
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kevin L. Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kingshuk Roy Choudhury
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Robert M. Califf
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Adrian F. Hernandez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sullivan LT, Mulder H, Chiswell K, Shaw LK, Wang TY, Jackson LR, Thomas KL. Racial differences in long-term outcomes among black and white patients with drug-eluting stents. Am Heart J 2019; 214:46-53. [PMID: 31154196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some studies suggest that black patients may have worse outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. There are limited data characterizing long-term outcomes by race. The objective was to compare long-term outcomes between black and white patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES implantation. METHODS We analyzed 915 black and 3,559 white (n = 4,474) consecutive patients who underwent DES placement at Duke University Medical Center from 2005 through 2013. Over 6-year follow up, we compared rates of myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, revascularization, and major bleeding between black and white patients. A multivariable Cox regression model was fit to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Dual-antiplatelet therapy use over time was determined by patient follow-up surveys and compared by race. RESULTS Black patients were younger; were more often female; had higher body mass indexes; had more diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal disease; and had lower median household incomes than white patients (P < .001). At 6 years after DES placement, black relative to white patients had higher unadjusted rates of MI (12.1% vs 10.1%, hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.57, P = .05) and major bleeding (17.8% vs 14.3%, hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, P = .01), but there were no significant differences in other outcomes. After multivariable adjustment, there were no statistically significant racial differences in any of these outcomes at 6 years. Similarly, dual-antiplatelet therapy use was comparable between racial groups. CONCLUSIONS Unadjusted rates of MI and major bleeding over long-term follow up were higher among black patients compared to white patients, but these differences may be explained by racial differences in comorbid disease.
Collapse
|
49
|
Pokorney SD, Bloom D, Granger CB, Thomas KL, Al-Khatib SM, Roettig ML, Anderson J, Heflin MT, Granger BB. Exploring patient–provider decision-making for use of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Results of the INFORM-AF study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2018; 18:280-288. [DOI: 10.1177/1474515118812252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation is associated with stroke, yet approximately 50% of patients are not treated with guideline-directed oral anticoagulants (OACs). Aims: Given that the etiology of this gap in care is not well understood, we explored decision-making by patients and physicians regarding OAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Methods and results: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study among providers ( N=28) and their patients with atrial fibrillation for whom OACs were indicated ( N=25). We used purposive sampling across three outpatient settings in which atrial fibrillation patients are commonly managed: primary care ( n=14), geriatrics ( n=10), and cardiology ( n=4). Eligible patients were stratified by those prescribed OAC ( n=13) and not prescribed OAC ( n=12). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews assessed decision-making regarding risk and OAC use. Classical content analysis was used to code narratives and identify themes. Results among patients consisted of the overarching theme of trust in provider recommendations. Sub-themes included: awareness of increased risk of stroke with atrial fibrillation; willingness to accept medications recommended by their physician; and low demand for explanatory decision aids. Among physicians, the overarching theme was decisional conflict regarding the balance between stroke and bleeding risk, and the optimal medication to prescribe. Subthemes included: absence of decision aids for communication; and misperceptions around the assessment and management of stroke risk with atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: Patient involvement in decision-making around OAC use did not occur in this study of patients with atrial fibrillation. Improved access to decision aids may increase patient engagement in the decision-making process of OAC use for stroke prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean D Pokorney
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Diane Bloom
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher B Granger
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - John Anderson
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Primary Care, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mitchell T Heflin
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Egwim CC, Rucker AJ, Madut DC, Chery GS, Sullivan LT, Jackson LR, Batchelor WB, Thomas KL. Research Participation of a Professional Organization in Clinical Trials: The Association of Black cardiologists Clinical Trial Investigator Identification Project. J Natl Med Assoc 2018; 111:122-133. [PMID: 30100090 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Black individuals continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials despite efforts by the National Institutes of Health and the Federal Drug Administration to increase their enrollment. Health care providers play a critical role in the recruitment of patients into clinical trials, as they have established relationships and are uniquely positioned to make referrals for participation. While prior initiatives have focused on training black physicians to conduct clinical research, we sought to determine the potential of utilizing a professional organization as a resource to identify established investigators to champion recruitment of underrepresented racial and ethnic populations. The Association of Black Cardiologists (ABC) is a non-profit organization with a mission to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease and may provide a conduit for recruiting investigators. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using the ABC membership to identify investigators with an established track record in clinical trials. METHODS/RESULTS Utilizing a roster of ABC members, we searched Scopus to quantify ABC member publications from 1999 to 2015 and identify members who have been active in clinical trials. Within the membership of 2037 individuals, we identified 794 with peer-reviewed publications, and 109 who co-authored manuscripts involving randomized clinical trials. The manuscripts largely focused on hypertension and heart failure, conditions that have a disproportionately greater affect on black individuals. CONCLUSION Members of the ABC have varied amounts of research productivity. We identified a group of experienced investigators to engage in efforts aimed at recruiting/enrolling underrepresented racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials of cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidiebube C Egwim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street Durham, NC 27705, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Alvin J Rucker
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27703, USA
| | - Deng C Madut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Goderfroy S Chery
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Lonnie T Sullivan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street Durham, NC 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27703, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street Durham, NC 27705, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Wayne B Batchelor
- Florida State University College of Medicine and Southern Medical Group, P.A., 1300 Medical Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA
| | - Kevin L Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street Durham, NC 27705, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road Durham, NC 27705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|