1
|
Anmella G, Meehan A, Ashton M, Mohebbi M, Fico G, Ng CH, Maes M, Berk L, Prisco MD, Singh AB, Malhi GS, Berk M, Dodd S, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Grande I, Pacchiarotti I, Murru A, Vieta E, Dean OM. Exploring Clinical Subgroups of Participants with Major Depressive Disorder that may Benefit from Adjunctive Minocycline Treatment. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2024; 22:33-44. [PMID: 38247410 PMCID: PMC10811397 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.23.1098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective : To explore illness-related factors in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) recipients of adjunctive minocycline (200 mg/day) treatment. The analysis included participants experiencing MDD from a 12-week, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT). Methods : This is a sub-analysis of a RCT of all 71 participants who took part in the trial. The impact of illness chronicity (illness duration and number of depressive episodes), systemic illness (endocrine, cardiovascular and obesity), adverse effects and minocycline were evaluated as change from baseline to endpoint (12-week) using ANCOVA. Results : There was a consistent but statistically non-significant trend on all outcomes in favour of the use of adjunctive minocycline for participants without systemic illness, less illness chronicity, and fewer adverse effects. Conclusion : Understanding the relationship between MDD and illness chronicity, comorbid systemic illness, and adverse effects, can potentially better characterise those individuals who are more likely to respond to adjunctive anti-inflammatory medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard Anmella
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alcy Meehan
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Melanie Ashton
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Faculty of Health, Biostatistics Unit, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Giovanna Fico
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chee H. Ng
- The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Michele De Prisco
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ajeet B. Singh
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Gin S. Malhi
- Department of Psychiatry, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iria Grande
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabella Pacchiarotti
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Murru
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Digital Innovation Group, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivia M. Dean
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jayasinghe A, Wrobel A, Filia K, Byrne LK, Melvin G, Murrihy S, Moller C, Berk L, Berk M, Cotton S. Distress, burden, and wellbeing in siblings of people with mental illness: a mixed studies systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2023; 53:6945-6964. [PMID: 37489510 PMCID: PMC10951414 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723001733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family members of people with mental illness (MI) may experience a host of psychological adversities such as increased stress, burden, and reduced wellbeing. However, relatively little is known about siblings. This study aimed to characterise the experience of distress (viz. depressive and anxiety symptoms), burden, and wellbeing in siblings of people with MI. METHODS Studies reporting on quantitative measures of depression, anxiety, burden, or wellbeing in siblings; and/or qualitative findings on siblings' experience were eligible. The literature search was conducted up until 20th October 2022. RESULTS Sixty-two studies comprising data from 3744 siblings were included. The pooled mean percentage of depressive symptoms fell in the mild range at 15.71 (k = 28, N = 2187, 95% CI 12.99-18.43) and anxiety symptoms fell in the minimal range at 22.45 (k = 16, N = 1122, 95% CI 17.09-27.80). Moderator analyses indicate that siblings of people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder experience greater depressive symptoms than siblings of people with other types of MI (β = -16.38, p < 0.001). Qualitative findings suggest that individuals may be particularly vulnerable during their siblings' illness onset and times of relapse. Limited communication, confusion about MI, and the need to compensate may contribute to siblings' distress and/or burden. Siblings' experience of wellbeing and caregiving were closely related. CONCLUSION This review highlights the complex psychological experience of siblings and the need for greater research and clinical support for this important yet often overlooked cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradhi Jayasinghe
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Wrobel
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Filia
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda K. Byrne
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glenn Melvin
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sean Murrihy
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carl Moller
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berk M, Köhler-Forsberg O, Turner M, Penninx BWJH, Wrobel A, Firth J, Loughman A, Reavley NJ, McGrath JJ, Momen NC, Plana-Ripoll O, O'Neil A, Siskind D, Williams LJ, Carvalho AF, Schmaal L, Walker AJ, Dean O, Walder K, Berk L, Dodd S, Yung AR, Marx W. Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management. World Psychiatry 2023; 22:366-387. [PMID: 37713568 PMCID: PMC10503929 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Populations with common physical diseases - such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and neurodegenerative disorders - experience substantially higher rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) than the general population. On the other hand, people living with MDD have a greater risk for many physical diseases. This high level of comorbidity is associated with worse outcomes, reduced adherence to treatment, increased mortality, and greater health care utilization and costs. Comorbidity can also result in a range of clinical challenges, such as a more complicated therapeutic alliance, issues pertaining to adaptive health behaviors, drug-drug interactions and adverse events induced by medications used for physical and mental disorders. Potential explanations for the high prevalence of the above comorbidity involve shared genetic and biological pathways. These latter include inflammation, the gut microbiome, mitochondrial function and energy metabolism, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, and brain structure and function. Furthermore, MDD and physical diseases have in common several antecedents related to social factors (e.g., socioeconomic status), lifestyle variables (e.g., physical activity, diet, sleep), and stressful live events (e.g., childhood trauma). Pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies are effective treatments for comorbid MDD, and the introduction of lifestyle interventions as well as collaborative care models and digital technologies provide promising strategies for improving management. This paper aims to provide a detailed overview of the epidemiology of the comorbidity of MDD and specific physical diseases, including prevalence and bidirectional risk; of shared biological pathways potentially implicated in the pathogenesis of MDD and common physical diseases; of socio-environmental factors that serve as both shared risk and protective factors; and of management of MDD and physical diseases, including prevention and treatment. We conclude with future directions and emerging research related to optimal care of people with comorbid MDD and physical diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Ole Köhler-Forsberg
- Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Megan Turner
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Brenda W J H Penninx
- Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Wrobel
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Amy Loughman
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola J Reavley
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John J McGrath
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Park Centre for Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Natalie C Momen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oleguer Plana-Ripoll
- National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adrienne O'Neil
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Dan Siskind
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Park Centre for Mental Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lana J Williams
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Lianne Schmaal
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam J Walker
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia Dean
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Ken Walder
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Alison R Yung
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Wolfgang Marx
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berk L. Response to Mistry: Radiosensitivity Index is Not Fit to be Used for Dose Adjustments: A Pan-Cancer Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:482. [PMID: 37088571 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Berk
- Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Panizzutti B, Skvarc D, Lin S, Croce S, Meehan A, Bortolasci CC, Marx W, Walker AJ, Hasebe K, Kavanagh BE, Morris MJ, Mohebbi M, Turner A, Gray L, Berk L, Walder K, Berk M, Dean OM. Minocycline as Treatment for Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065250. [PMID: 36982324 PMCID: PMC10049047 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Minocycline has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic properties that explain the renewed interest in its use as an adjunctive treatment for psychiatric and neurological conditions. Following the completion of several new clinical trials using minocycline, we proposed an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the data available. The PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) framework was used to search 5 databases aiming to identify randomized controlled trials that used minocycline as an adjunctive treatment for psychiatric and neurological conditions. Search results, data extraction, and risk of bias were performed by two independent authors for each publication. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software. Literature search and review resulted in 32 studies being included in this review: 10 in schizophrenia, 3 studies in depression, and 7 in stroke, with the benefit of minocycline being used in some of the core symptoms evaluated; 2 in bipolar disorder and 2 in substance use, without demonstrating a benefit for using minocycline; 1 in obsessive-compulsive disorder, 2 in brain and spinal injuries, 2 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 1 in Alzheimer’s disease, 1 in multiple systems atrophy, and 1 in pain, with mixes results. For most of the conditions included in this review the data is still limited and difficult to interpret, warranting more well-designed and powered studies. On the other hand, the studies available for schizophrenia seem to suggest an overall benefit favoring the use of minocycline as an adjunctive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Panizzutti
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - David Skvarc
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Sylvia Lin
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - Sarah Croce
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Alcy Meehan
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Chiara Cristina Bortolasci
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Wolfgang Marx
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Adam J. Walker
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Kyoko Hasebe
- School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Bianca E. Kavanagh
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Margaret J. Morris
- School of Biomedical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Laura Gray
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Ken Walder
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Olivia M. Dean
- IMPACT, Institute for Innovation in Physical and Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-03-4215-3300
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratheesh A, Hett D, Ramain J, Wong E, Berk L, Conus P, Fristad MA, Goldstein T, Hillegers M, Jauhar S, Kessing LV, Miklowitz DJ, Murray G, Scott J, Tohen M, Yatham LN, Young AH, Berk M, Marwaha S. A systematic review of interventions in the early course of bipolar disorder I or II: a report of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Taskforce on early intervention. Int J Bipolar Disord 2023; 11:1. [PMID: 36595095 PMCID: PMC9810772 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-022-00275-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the likelihood of progressive illness in bipolar disorder (BD), it is important to understand the benefits and risks of interventions administered early in illness course. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the early course of BD I or II. METHODS We completed a systematic search on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar from 1/1/1979 till 14/9/2022. We included controlled trials examining intervention effects on symptomatic, course, functional and tolerability outcomes of patients in the 'early course' of BD I or II. We classified patients to be in early course if they (a) were seeking help for the first time for a manic episode, (b) had a lifetime history of up to 3 manic episodes, or (c) had up to 6 lifetime mood episodes. Evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS From 4135 unique publications we included 25 reports representing 2212 participants in 16 randomized studies, and 17,714 participants from nine non-randomized studies. Available evidence suggested that in early illness course, lithium use was associated with lower recurrence risk compared with other mood stabilizers. Mood stabilizers were also associated with better global functioning, compared with the use of antipsychotics in the medium term. While summative findings regarding psychological therapies were limited by heterogeneity, family-focused and cognitive-behavioral interventions were associated with reduced recurrence risk or improved symptomatic outcomes. There was some evidence that the same pharmacological interventions were more efficacious in preventing recurrences when utilized in earlier rather than later illness course. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS While there are promising initial findings, there is a need for more adequately powered trials to examine the efficacy and tolerability of interventions in youth and adults in early illness course. Specifically, there is a compelling need to compare the relative benefits of lithium with other pharmacological agents in preventing recurrences. In addition to symptomatic outcomes, there should be a greater focus on functional impact and tolerability. Effective pharmacological and psychological interventions should be offered to those in early course of BD, balancing potential risks using shared decision-making approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Ratheesh
- grid.488501.00000 0004 8032 6923Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D. Hett
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK ,Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J. Ramain
- grid.8515.90000 0001 0423 4662TIPP Program, Service of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E. Wong
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L. Berk
- grid.414257.10000 0004 0540 0062IMPACT-The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - P. Conus
- grid.8515.90000 0001 0423 4662TIPP Program, Service of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M. A. Fristad
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943Nationwide Children’s Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - T. Goldstein
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M. Hillegers
- grid.5645.2000000040459992XDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. Jauhar
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK ,grid.415717.10000 0001 2324 5535South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 3BX UK
| | - L. V. Kessing
- grid.475435.4Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ,grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D. J. Miklowitz
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - G. Murray
- grid.1027.40000 0004 0409 2862Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J. Scott
- grid.1006.70000 0001 0462 7212Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - M. Tohen
- grid.266832.b0000 0001 2188 8502Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - L. N. Yatham
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A. H. Young
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK ,grid.415717.10000 0001 2324 5535South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent, BR3 3BX UK
| | - M. Berk
- grid.414257.10000 0004 0540 0062IMPACT-The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - S. Marwaha
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK ,Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walker AJ, Mohebbi M, Maes M, Berk M, Walder K, Bortolasci CC, Liu ZSJ, Ng CH, Ashton MM, Berk L, Singh AB, Malhi GS, Dean OM. Adjunctive minocycline for major depressive disorder: A sub-study exploring peripheral immune-inflammatory markers and associated treatment response. Brain Behav Immun Health 2022; 27:100581. [PMID: 36632339 PMCID: PMC9826878 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adjunctive minocycline shows promise in treating affective and psychotic disorders; however, the therapeutic mechanism remains unclear. Identifying relevant biomarkers may enhance the efficacy of novel adjunctive treatment candidates. We thus investigated the peripheral immune-inflammatory profile in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of minocycline in major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods This sub-study investigated serum samples from a RCT evaluating minocycline (200 mg/day, 12 weeks) in addition to treatment as usual for MDD (ACTRN12612000283875). Of the original sample (N = 71), serum assays were conducted in 47 participants (placebo n = 24; minocycline n = 23) targeting an array of 46 immune-inflammatory analytes including cytokines, chemokines, and acute-phase reactants. General estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess whether analyte concentration at baseline (effect modification) and change in analytes (change association) influenced change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score over time. The Benjamini-Hochberg approach was applied when adjusting for false discovery rates (FDR). Results GEE models revealed several interaction effects. After adjusting for FDR several change association-models survived correction. However, no such models remained significant for effect modification. Three-way group × time × marker interactions were significant for complement C3 (B = -10.46, 95%CI [-16.832, -4.095], q = 0.019) and IL-1Ra (B = -9.008, 95%CI [-15.26, -2.751], q = 0.036). Two-way group × biomarker interactions were significant for ICAM-1/CD54 (B = -0.387, 95%CI [-0.513, -0.26], q < 0.001) and IL-8/CXCL8 (B = -4.586, 95%CI [-7.698, -1.475], q = 0.036) indicating that increases in the serum concentration of these analytes were associated with an improvement in MADRS scores in the minocycline group (compared with placebo). Conclusions Change in complement C3, IL-1Ra, IL-8/CXCL8, and ICAM-1 may be associated with greater change in depressive scores following adjunctive minocycline treatment in MDD. Further investigations are needed to assess the utility of these biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Walker
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia,Corresponding author. Deakin University, IMPACT, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, HERB B Level 3, P.O. Box 281, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia,Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand,Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Plodiv, Plodiv, Bulgaria
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,Orygen, National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
| | - Ken Walder
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Chiara C. Bortolasci
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Zoe SJ. Liu
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Chee H. Ng
- The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Australia
| | - Melanie M. Ashton
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Ajeet B. Singh
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Gin S. Malhi
- CADE Clinic and Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Olivia M. Dean
- Deakin University, IMPACT, The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ciuba D, Curtis A, Dunlap N, Siegel R, Biswas T, Wisbeck W, Berk L, Miller D, Holmlund J, Allen B. AESOP: Phase 2 Open-Label Trial of Avasopasem Manganese (GC4419) for Reduction of Esophagitis in Patients Receiving Chemoradiotherapy for Nonmetastatic Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Chatterton ML, Lee YY, Berk L, Mohebbi M, Berk M, Suppes T, Lauder S, Mihalopoulos C. Cost-Utility and Cost-effectiveness of MoodSwings 2.0, an Internet-Based Self-management Program for Bipolar Disorder: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health 2022; 9:e36496. [PMID: 36318243 PMCID: PMC9667380 DOI: 10.2196/36496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-delivered psychosocial interventions can overcome barriers to face-to-face psychosocial care, but limited evidence supports their cost-effectiveness for people with bipolar disorders (BDs). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to conduct within-trial cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of an internet-based intervention for people with BD, MoodSwings 2.0, from an Australian health sector perspective. METHODS MoodSwings 2.0 included an economic evaluation alongside an international, parallel, and individually stratified randomized controlled trial comparing an internet-based discussion forum (control; group 1), a discussion forum plus internet-based psychoeducation (group 2), and a discussion forum plus psychoeducation and cognitive behavioral tools (group 3). The trial enrolled adults (aged 21 to 65 years) with a diagnosis of BD assessed by telephone using a structured clinical interview. Health sector costs included intervention delivery and additional health care resources used by participants over the 12-month trial follow-up. Outcomes included depression symptoms measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; the trial primary outcome) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) calculated using the short-form 6-dimension instrument derived from the 12-item version of the short-form health survey. Average incremental cost-effectiveness (cost per MADRS score) and cost-utility (cost per QALY) ratios were calculated using estimated mean differences between intervention and control groups from linear mixed effects models in the base case. RESULTS In total, 304 participants were randomized. Average health sector cost was lowest for group 2 (Aus $9431, SD Aus $8540; Aus $1=US $0.7058) compared with the control group (Aus $15,175, SD Aus $17,206) and group 3 (Aus $15,518, SD Aus $30,523), but none was statistically significantly different. The average QALYs were not significantly different among the groups (group 1: 0.627, SD 0.062; group 2: 0.618, SD 0.094; and group 3: 0.622, SD 0.087). The MADRS scores were previously shown to differ significantly between group 2 and the control group at all follow-up time points (P<.05). Group 2 was dominant (lower costs and greater effects) compared with the control group for average incremental cost per point decrease in MADRS score over 12 months (95% CI dominated to Aus $331). Average cost per point change in MADRS score for group 3 versus the control group was dominant (95% CI dominant to Aus $22,585). Group 2 was dominant (95% CI Aus $43,000 to dominant) over the control group based on lower average health sector cost and average QALY benefit of 0.012 (95% CI -0.009 to 0.033). Group 3, compared with the control group, had an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of dominant (95% CI dominated to Aus $19,978). CONCLUSIONS Web-based psychoeducation through MoodSwings 2.0 has the potential to be a cost-effective intervention for people with BD. Additional research is needed to understand the lack of effectiveness for the addition of cognitive behavioral tools with the group 3 intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Lou Chatterton
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yong Yi Lee
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Michael Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Trisha Suppes
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sue Lauder
- Cairnmillar Institute, Hawthorn East, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jayasinghe A, Wrobel A, Filia K, Byrne LK, Melvin G, Berk L, Berk M, Cotton S. Psychological distress in siblings of people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2022; 57:642-660. [PMID: 36113083 DOI: 10.1177/00048674221123481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to characterise the prevalence and/or severity of psychological distress (namely, depression and anxiety symptoms) in siblings of people with mental illness (MI) and to examine correlates of distress in siblings of people with MI. METHOD Studies comparing distress in individuals with and without a sibling with MI were eligible. Studies reporting on correlates of distress in siblings were also eligible. A search of MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO and Embase was conducted up until 17 March 2022. RESULTS Fifteen studies comprising 2304 siblings and 2263 comparison individuals were included. Meta-analyses indicated individuals with a sibling with MI experience significantly greater depressive symptoms (Hedges's g = 0.53, 95% CI = [0.32, 0.73], siblings n = 1962, comparison individuals n = 2248) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges's g = 0.40, 95% CI = [0.19, 0.61], siblings n = 653, comparison individuals n = 533) than those without. The sibling relationship, siblings' locus of control, interpersonal functioning and their appraisal of the impacts of MI were identified as important and potentially modifiable correlates. CONCLUSION Individuals with a sibling with MI experience greater depressive and anxiety symptoms than those without and would likely benefit from support. Future studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying distress in siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradhi Jayasinghe
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Wrobel
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Kate Filia
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda K Byrne
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Glenn Melvin
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Lesley Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kavanagh BE, O'Donohue JS, Ashton MM, Lotfaliany M, McCallum M, Wrobel AL, Croce S, Berk M, Saunders L, Lai J, Berk L. Coping with COVID-19: Exploring coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:1025767. [PMID: 36339873 PMCID: PMC9630636 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1025767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth among Australians with and without a history of a mental health diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS Australians (N = 381) completed an online survey between 4-August 2020 and 25-October-2020. Coping strategies, distress, and post-traumatic growth were ascertained via the Brief COPE, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), respectively. Linear regression was conducted to examine the relationship between the Brief COPE, DASS-21, and PTGI, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Models were conducted separately for those with/without a history of a mental health diagnosis. RESULTS Higher distress was found among those with a history of a mental health diagnosis. Significant differences in the types of coping strategies associated with distress and post-traumatic growth were identified between the groups, however, behavioral disengagement and self-blame consistently predicted depression, anxiety, and stress. For those with a history of a mental health diagnosis, positive reframing decreased anxiety. Self-distraction was associated with post-traumatic growth across both groups. CONCLUSION There are important differences in the way people with and without a history of a mental health diagnosis cope with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca E Kavanagh
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Josephine S O'Donohue
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Melanie M Ashton
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mojtaba Lotfaliany
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Maddy McCallum
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna L Wrobel
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Croce
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucy Saunders
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Jerry Lai
- Deakin University, eResearch, Deakin eSolutions, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Intersect Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- School of Medicine, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murray G, Thomas N, Michalak EE, Jones SH, Lapsley S, Bowe SJ, Foley F, Fletcher K, Perich T, Johnson SL, Cotton S, Berk L, Mihalopoulos C, Kyrios M, Berk M. Mindfulness-based online intervention to improve quality of life in late-stage bipolar disorder: A randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2021; 89:830-844. [PMID: 34807658 DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Adjunctive psychological interventions improve outcomes in bipolar disorder (BD), but people in latter stages likely have different clinical needs. The objective here was to test the hypothesis that for people with ≥10 episodes of BD, a brief online mindfulness-based intervention (ORBIT 2.0) improves quality of life (QoL) relative to a Psychoeducation control. Method: A rater-masked, pragmatic superiority randomized clinical trial compared ORBIT 2.0 with active control. Both interventions were 5-week coach-supported programs with treatment as usual continued. Inclusion criteria included age 18-65 years, confirmed diagnosis of BD, and history of ≥10 episodes. Measures were collected at baseline, postintervention, and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The main outcome was QoL, measured on the Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (Brief QoL.BD) at 5 weeks, using intention-to-treat analyses. Results: Among N = 302 randomized participants, the primary hypothesis was not supported (Treatment × Time β = -0.69, 95% CI [-2.69, 1.31], p = .50). The main effect of Time was not significant in either condition, indicating no improvement in either group. Recruitment was feasible, the platform was safe, both interventions were highly acceptable, but usage was suboptimal. Post hoc analyses found both interventions effective for participants not in remission from depression at baseline. Conclusions: In people with late-stage BD, an online mindfulness-based intervention was not superior to psychoeducational control in improving QoL. Online delivery was found to be safe and acceptable. Future interventions may need to be higher intensity, address engagement challenges, and target more symptomatic individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology
| | - Neil Thomas
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology
| | | | - Steven H Jones
- Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University
| | - Sara Lapsley
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia
| | - Steven J Bowe
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology
| | - Fiona Foley
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology
| | | | | | | | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT-The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University
| | | | - Michael Kyrios
- Órama Institute for Mental Health & Wellbeing, Flinders University
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bowe S, Foley F, Fletcher K, Thomas N, Michalak E, Berk L, Berk M, Cotton S, Engel L, Johnson SL, Jones S, Kyrios M, Lapsley S, Mihalopoulos C, Perich T, Murray G. 796Is Mindfulness a more effective intervention than Psychoeducation for reducing Bipolar Disorder-related symptoms of depression? Int J Epidemiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab168.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The primary objective is to test the effectiveness of a novel online quality of life (QoL) intervention tailored for people with late stage (≥ 10 episodes) bipolar disorder (BD) compared with psychoeducation. Relative to early stage individuals, this late stage group may not benefit as much from existing psychosocial treatments.
Methods
An NH&MRC funded international RCT to compare the effectiveness of two 5-week adjunctive online self-management interventions: Mindfulness for Bipolar 2.0 and an active control (Psychoeducation for Bipolar). A total of 300 participants were recruited primarily via social media channels. Evaluations occurred at pre- and post- treatment, and at 3- and 6- months follow-up. A secondary outcome measure was BD-related symptoms (depression). A longitudinal analysis was conducted using random effects mixed models.
Results
Preliminary results suggest no change in mean QIDS_total over time (p = 0.891). Nor does there appear to be a difference in groups (B coeff= 0.47, 95%CI (-0.60, 1.55), p = 0.613) and no difference in intervention groups over time (p = 0.828).
Conclusions
The effectiveness of a novel QoL focused, mindfulness based, online guided self-help intervention for late stage BD does not appear to have been any more effective than a psychoeducation intervention for reducing depression.
Key messages
There may be no significant benefit from using a mindfulness based, online guided self-help intervention over a psychoeducation intervention to reduce the BD symptoms of depression in late stage Bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Bowe
- Deakin Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University., Geelong, Australia
| | - Fiona Foley
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn Fletcher
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil Thomas
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine,Deakin University Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine,Deakin University Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health,, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health,, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Steven Jones
- Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Sara Lapsley
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Tania Perich
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zazula R, Husain MI, Mohebbi M, Walker AJ, Chaudhry IB, Khoso AB, Ashton MM, Agustini B, Husain N, Deakin J, Young AH, Berk M, Kanchanatawan B, Ng CH, Maes M, Berk L, Singh AB, Malhi GS, Dean OM. Minocycline as adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder: Pooled data from two randomized controlled trials. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021; 55:784-798. [PMID: 33092404 DOI: 10.1177/0004867420965697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled clinical trials that have investigated minocycline as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder have proved promising. Data from two studies were pooled to evaluate more definitively whether the addition of minocycline to standard treatment for major depressive disorder leads to an improvement of depressive symptoms when compared with placebo. METHODS Both studies were multi-site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of minocycline 200 mg/day added to treatment as usual during a 12-week period. The primary outcome measure was change in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in Dean et al. and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in Husain et al.). Secondary outcomes were change in depression severity (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale for Dean et al. and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire in Husain et al.), anxiety severity (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in Dean et al. and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in Husain et al.) and functional status, which were also evaluated as potential mediators on the primary outcome. RESULTS A total of 112 participants were included in the pooled data (Dean et al., n = 71; Husain et al., n = 41). A significant change from baseline to week 12 was noted in depressive symptoms - differential change (Placebo vs Minocycline): 9.0, 95% confidence interval = [4.2, 13.9], Cohen's D (95% confidence interval): 0.71 [0.29, 1.14], p < 0.001 - anxiety severity - differential change (Placebo vs Minocycline): 0.38, confidence interval = [0.00, 0.75], Cohen's D (95% confidence interval): 0.41 [0.00, 0.82], p = 0.050) and functional status - differential change (Placebo vs Minocycline): 1.0, 95% confidence interval = [0.4, 1.5], Cohen's D (95% confidence interval): 0.76 [0.34, 1.19], p = 0.001). Duration of illness, current use of benzodiazepine and pain medication were identified as moderators, whereas functional status as a mediator/predictor. CONCLUSION The improvement of depressive symptoms, anxiety severity and functional status is promising and suggests that minocycline has potential as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. However, further studies are warranted to confirm therapeutic effects of minocycline in major depressive disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS NCT02263872, registered October 2014, and ACTRN12612000283875, registered March 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robson Zazula
- Latin American Institute for the Science of Life and Nature, Federal University of Latin American Integration, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.,Health Sciences Graduate Program, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.,Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Muhammad Ishrat Husain
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Deakin University, Faculty of Health, Biostatistics Unit, Geelong, Australia
| | - Adam J Walker
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Imran B Chaudhry
- Department of Psychiatry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.,Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan.,University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ameer B Khoso
- Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Melanie M Ashton
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Bruno Agustini
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Jfw Deakin
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent, UK
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.,The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia.,Orygen the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Chee H Ng
- The Melbourne Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ajeet B Singh
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Gin S Malhi
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Department of Psychiatry, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Olivia M Dean
- Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bortolasci CC, Marx W, Walker AJ, Hasebe K, Kavanagh BE, Morris MJ, Mohebbi M, Turner A, Gray L, Berk L, Walder K, Berk M, Dean OM. Minocycline for the treatment of mental health and neurological conditions: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035080. [PMID: 32198305 PMCID: PMC7103827 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic properties of minocycline, clinical trials have evaluated the potential of this drug to treat several psychiatric and neurological disorders, including major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This protocol proposes a systematic review (and potential meta-analysis) that aims to identify and critically evaluate randomised controlled trials of minocycline for treating psychiatric and neurological disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) will be used to identify randomised controlled trials that used minocycline to treat psychiatric and neurological disorders. Double-blind, randomised, controlled, clinical trials of participants aged 18 years or older and written in English will be included in the review. Data will be extracted by two independent reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed and the Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of Bias' tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in all studies included in the systematic review. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be used to access the overall quality of the level of evidence of the studies. If sufficient evidence is identified, a meta-analysis will be conducted using the standardised mean difference approach and reported with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity of evidence will be evaluated using the I2 model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review will evaluate only published data; therefore, ethical approval is not required. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant research conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020153292.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara C Bortolasci
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wolfgang Marx
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam J Walker
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kyoko Hasebe
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bianca E Kavanagh
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret J Morris
- School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Gray
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ken Walder
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Olivia M Dean
- The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kavanagh BE, Williams LJ, Berk M, Turner A, Jackson HJ, Mohebbi M, Kanchanatawan B, Ashton MM, Ng CH, Maes M, Berk L, Malhi GS, Dowling N, Singh AB, Dean OM. Personality disorder and functioning in major depressive disorder: a nested study within a randomized controlled trial. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 42:14-21. [PMID: 31116261 PMCID: PMC6986492 DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine if personality disorder (PD) predicted functional outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Data (n=71) from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week trial assessing the efficacy of 200 mg/day adjunctive minocycline for MDD were examined. PD was measured using the Standardized Assessment of Personality Abbreviated Scale. Outcome measures included Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS), and Range of Impaired Functioning (RIFT). Analysis of covariance was used to examine the impact of PD (dichotomized factor [≥ 3] or continuous measure) on the outcome measures-treatment group correlation. Results: PD was identified in 69% of the sample. After adjusting for age, sex, and baseline scores for each of the outcome measures, there was no significant difference between participants with and without PD on week 12 scores for any of the outcome measures (all p > 0.14). Conclusion: In this secondary analysis of a primary efficacy study, PD was a common comorbidity among those with MDD, but was not a significant predictor of functional outcomes. This study adds to the limited literature on PD in randomized controlled trials for MDD. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12612000283875.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca E Kavanagh
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lana J Williams
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.,Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Henry J Jackson
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Buranee Kanchanatawan
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Melanie M Ashton
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Australia
| | - Chee H Ng
- Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Gin S Malhi
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Department of Psychiatry, Sydney, Australia.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Nathan Dowling
- Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Australia
| | - Ajeet B Singh
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - Olivia M Dean
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alfonso JCL, Berk L. Modeling the effect of intratumoral heterogeneity of radiosensitivity on tumor response over the course of fractionated radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:88. [PMID: 31146751 PMCID: PMC6543639 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1288-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Standard radiobiology theory of radiation response assumes a uniform innate radiosensitivity of tumors. However, experimental data show that there is significant intratumoral heterogeneity of radiosensitivity. Therefore, a model with heterogeneity was developed and tested using existing experimental data to show the potential effects from the presence of an intratumoral distribution of radiosensitivity on radiation therapy response over a protracted radiation therapy treatment course. Methods The standard radiation response curve was modified to account for a distribution of radiosensitivity, and for variations in the repopulation rates of the tumor cell subpopulations. Experimental data from the literature were incorporated to determine the boundaries of the model. The proposed model was then used to show the changes in radiosensitivity of the tumor during treatment, and the effects of fraction size, α/β ratio and variation of the repopulation rates of tumor cells. Results In the presence of an intratumoral distribution of radiosensitivity, there is rapid selection of radiation-resistant cells over a course of fractionated radiation therapy. Standard treatment fractionation regimes result in the near-complete replacement of the initial population of sensitive cells with a population of more resistant cells. Further, as treatment progresses, the tumor becomes more resistant to further radiation treatment, making each fractional dose less efficacious. A wider initial distribution induces increased radiation resistance. Hypofractionation is more efficient in a heterogeneous tumor, with increased cell kill for biologically equivalent doses, while inducing less resistance. The model also shows that a higher growth rate in resistant cells can account for the accelerated repopulation that is seen during the clinical treatment of patients. Conclusions Modeling of tumor cell survival with radiosensitivity heterogeneity alters the predicted tumor response, and explains the induction of radiation resistance by radiation treatment, the development of accelerated repopulation, and the potential beneficial effects of hypofractionation. Tumor response to treatment may be better predicted by assaying for the distribution of radiosensitivity, or the extreme of the radiosensitivity, rather than measuring the initial, general radiation sensitivity of the untreated tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C L Alfonso
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | - L Berk
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Morsani School of Medicine at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gliddon E, Cosgrove V, Berk L, Lauder S, Mohebbi M, Grimm D, Dodd S, Coulson C, Raju K, Suppes T, Berk M. A randomized controlled trial of MoodSwings 2.0: An internet-based self-management program for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2019; 21:28-39. [PMID: 29931798 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES MoodSwings 2.0 is an online self-guided intervention for bipolar disorder that includes educational modules, interactive tools, and discussion forums. The primary aim of the study was to determine if participation in MoodSwings 2.0 would result in decreased symptoms of depression and mania compared to the control condition. Secondary aims were to identify improvements in core depression symptoms, quality of life, medication adherence, functioning, and time to relapse. METHODS This was a three-arm randomized controlled trial that compared two intervention arms against a peer support control group (forum). A total of 304 adults aged 21 to 65 years with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder were assigned to a forum-only control group (Group 1; n = 102), a forum plus modules treatment group (Group 2; n = 102), or a forum, modules, and tools treatment group (Group 3; n = 100), in addition to usual care. RESULTS There was a significant intervention impact showing improvement on the primary outcome of depression for Group 2 compared to Group 1 (P = .05) with effect sizes (Cohen's d) ranging from 0.17 to 0.43. There was also a significant intervention impact showing improvement on the secondary outcome of core depression for Group 2 (P = .02) and Group 3 (P = .05), but worse physical functioning for Group 3 (P = .01), compared to Group 1. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence of the efficacy of internet-based psychoeducation interventions for bipolar disorder in reducing depressive symptoms. Further investigation is needed to assess effectiveness in a public program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Gliddon
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Victoria Cosgrove
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sue Lauder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Faculty of Health, School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Deakin Biostatistics Unit, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - David Grimm
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Systems Psychology Lab, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carolyn Coulson
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Karishma Raju
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Trisha Suppes
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martini T, Czepielewski LS, Baldez DP, Gliddon E, Kieling C, Berk L, Berk M, Kauer-Sant’Anna M. Mental health information online: what we have learned from social media metrics in BuzzFeed’s Mental Health Week. Trends Psychiatry Psychother 2018; 40:326-336. [DOI: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The Internet has seen rapid growth in the number of websites focusing on mental health content. Considering the increased need for access to accurate information about mental health treatment, it is important to understand the promotion of this information online. Objective To analyze BuzzFeed’s Mental Health Week (BFMHW) interactions on its own website and in related social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter and YouTube) using metrics of information delivery in mental health topics. Methods We extracted social media metrics from the 20 posts with the highest number of BuzzFeed interactions on the BFMHW website and from 41 videos available on the BFMHW playlist created by the BuzzFeed Video profile on YouTube. We analyzed the format and content used in BuzzFeed’s publishing methods as well as the following social media metrics: exposure (presence online, views and time online), influence (likes) and engagement (comments, shares, replies and BuzzFeed interactions). Results Analysis of the variables revealed that audience engagement is associated with the number of medias in which the content is published: views on YouTube and shares on Facebook (0.71, p<0.001), total interactions on Facebook (0.66, p<0.001) and BuzzFeed number of total interactions (0.56, p<0.001). Conclusions Our results suggest that videos on YouTube may be an important information channel, including activity and engagement on other medias such as Facebook. Information may be more effective in reaching the audience if it is delivered in more than one media and includes personal experiences, some humor in content and detailed information about treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emma Gliddon
- Deakin University, Australia; University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Australia
| | | | - Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, Australia; University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Australia; University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, Australia; University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Australia; University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fletcher K, Foley F, Thomas N, Michalak E, Berk L, Berk M, Bowe S, Cotton S, Engel L, Johnson SL, Jones S, Kyrios M, Lapsley S, Mihalopoulos C, Perich T, Murray G. Web-based intervention to improve quality of life in late stage bipolar disorder (ORBIT): randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18:221. [PMID: 30001704 PMCID: PMC6044003 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1805-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to establish the effectiveness of a novel online quality of life (QoL) intervention tailored for people with late stage (≥ 10 episodes) bipolar disorder (BD) compared with psychoeducation. Relative to early stage individuals, this late stage group may not benefit as much from existing psychosocial treatments. The intervention is a guided self-help, mindfulness based intervention (MBI) developed in consultation with consumers, designed specifically for web-based delivery, with email coaching support. METHODS/DESIGN This international RCT will involve a comparison of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two 5-week adjunctive online self-management interventions: Mindfulness for Bipolar 2.0 and an active control (Psychoeducation for Bipolar). A total of 300 participants will be recruited primarily via social media channels. Main inclusion criteria are: a diagnosis of BD (confirmed via a phone-administered structured diagnostic interview), no current mood episode, history of 10 or more mood episodes, no current psychotic features or active suicidality, under the care of a medical practitioner. Block randomisation will be used for allocation to the interventions, and participants will retain access to the program for 6 months. Evaluations will be conducted at pre- and post- treatment, and at 3- and 6- months follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be the Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder Scale (Brief QoL.BD), collected immediately post-intervention at 5 weeks (T1). Secondary measures include BD-related symptoms (mania, depression, anxiety, stress), time to first relapse, functioning, sleep quality, social rhythm stability and resource use. Measurements will be collected online and via telephone assessments at baseline (T0), 5 weeks (T1), three months (T2) and six months (T3). Candidate moderators (diagnosis, anxiety or substance comorbidities, demographics and current treatments) will be investigated as will putative therapeutic mechanisms including mindfulness, emotion regulation and self-compassion. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted. Acceptability and any unwanted events (including adverse treatment reactions) will be documented and explored. DISCUSSION This definitive trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a novel QoL focused, mindfulness based, online guided self-help intervention for late stage BD, and investigate its putative mechanisms of therapeutic action. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03197974 . Registered 23 June 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Fletcher
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Foley
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil Thomas
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Sue Cotton
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Steven Jones
- Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Sara Lapsley
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Tania Perich
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cavalcanti Ferreira P, Berk L, Daher N, Petrofsky J, Lohman E, John A, Campus T. 0657 Circadian and Homeostatic Control of The Sleep-wake Cycle In Type 2 Diabetes Correlated with salivary Melatonin. Sleep 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsy061.656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Berk
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - N Daher
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | | | - E Lohman
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - A John
- Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, BRAZIL
| | - T Campus
- Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, BRAZIL
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Berk M, Post R, Ratheesh A, Gliddon E, Singh A, Vieta E, Carvalho AF, Ashton MM, Berk L, Cotton SM, McGorry PD, Fernandes BS, Yatham LN, Dodd S. Staging in bipolar disorder: from theoretical framework to clinical utility. World Psychiatry 2017; 16:236-244. [PMID: 28941093 PMCID: PMC5608827 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Illness staging is widely utilized in several medical disciplines to help predict course or prognosis, and optimize treatment. Staging models in psychiatry in general, and bipolar disorder in particular, depend on the premise that psychopathology moves along a predictable path: an at-risk or latency stage, a prodrome progressing to a first clinical threshold episode, and one or more recurrences with the potential to revert or progress to late or end-stage manifestations. The utility and validity of a staging model for bipolar disorder depend on its linking to clinical outcome, treatment response and neurobiological measures. These include progressive biochemical, neuroimaging and cognitive changes, and potentially stage-specific differences in response to pharmacological and psychosocial treatments. Mechanistically, staging models imply the presence of an active disease process that, if not remediated, can lead to neuroprogression, a more malignant disease course and functional deterioration. Biological elements thought to be operative in bipolar disorder include a genetic diathesis, physical and psychic trauma, epigenetic changes, altered neurogenesis and apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Many available agents, such as lithium, have effects on these targets. Staging models also suggest the utility of stage-specific treatment approaches that may not only target symptom reduction, but also impede illness neuroprogression. These treatment approaches range from prevention for at-risk individuals, to early intervention strategies for prodromal and newly diagnosed individuals, complex combination therapy for rapidly recurrent illness, and palliative-type approaches for those at chronic, late stages of illness. There is hope that prompt initiation of potentially disease modifying therapies may preclude or attenuate the cognitive and structural changes seen in the later stages of bipolar disorder. The aims of this paper are to: a) explore the current level of evidence supporting the descriptive staging of the syndromal pattern of bipolar disorder; b) describe preliminary attempts at validation; c) make recommendations for the direction of further studies; and d) provide a distillation of the potential clinical implications of staging in bipolar disorder within a broader transdiagnostic framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Robert Post
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health SciencesWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Aswin Ratheesh
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Emma Gliddon
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | - Ajeet Singh
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyInstitute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAMBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Andre F. Carvalho
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group and Department of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of CearáFortalezaBrazil,Institute for Clinical Research and Education in MedicinePaduaItaly
| | - Melanie M. Ashton
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Susan M. Cotton
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Patrick D. McGorry
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Brisa S. Fernandes
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
| | - Lakshmi N. Yatham
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthParkvilleAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cosgrove V, Gliddon E, Berk L, Grimm D, Lauder S, Dodd S, Berk M, Suppes T. Online ethics: where will the interface of mental health and the internet lead us? Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5:26. [PMID: 28480484 PMCID: PMC5545079 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-017-0095-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
While e-health initiatives are poised to revolutionize delivery and access to mental health care, conducting clinical research online involves specific contextual and ethical considerations. Face-to-face psychosocial interventions can at times entail risk and have adverse psychoactive effects, something true for online mental health programs too. Risks associated with and specific to internet psychosocial interventions include potential breaches of confidentiality related to online communications (such as unencrypted email), data privacy and security, risks of self-selection and self-diagnosis as well as the shortcomings of receiving psychoeducation and treatment at distance from an impersonal website. Such ethical issues need to be recognized and proactively managed in website and study design as well as treatment implementation. In order for online interventions to succeed, risks and expectations of all involved need to be carefully considered with a focus on ethical integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Cosgrove
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. .,Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA.
| | - Emma Gliddon
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - David Grimm
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA
| | - Sue Lauder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Faculty of Health, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.,Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Trisha Suppes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.,Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dean OM, Kanchanatawan B, Ashton M, Mohebbi M, Ng CH, Maes M, Berk L, Sughondhabirom A, Tangwongchai S, Singh AB, McKenzie H, Smith DJ, Malhi GS, Dowling N, Berk M. Adjunctive minocycline treatment for major depressive disorder: A proof of concept trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017; 51:829-840. [PMID: 28578592 DOI: 10.1177/0004867417709357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conventional antidepressant treatments result in symptom remission in 30% of those treated for major depressive disorder, raising the need for effective adjunctive therapies. Inflammation has an established role in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder, and minocycline has been shown to modify the immune-inflammatory processes and also reduce oxidative stress and promote neuronal growth. This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial examined adjunctive minocycline (200 mg/day, in addition to treatment as usual) for major depressive disorder. This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial investigated 200 mg/day adjunctive minocycline (in addition to treatment as usual) for major depressive disorder. METHODS A total of 71 adults with major depressive disorder ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition) were randomised to this 12-week trial. Outcome measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (primary outcome), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement and Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Social and Occupational Functioning Scale and the Range of Impaired Functioning Tool. The study was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: www.anzctr.org.au , #ACTRN12612000283875. RESULTS Based on mixed-methods repeated measures analysis of variance at week 12, there was no significant difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores between groups. However, there were significant differences, favouring the minocycline group at week 12 for Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score - effect size (95% confidence interval) = -0.62 [-1.8, -0.3], p = 0.02; Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire score - effect size (confidence interval) = -0.12 [0.0, 0.2], p < 0.001; and Social and Occupational Functioning Scale and the Range of Impaired Functioning Tool score - 0.79 [-4.5, -1.4], p < 0.001. These effects remained at follow-up (week 16), and Patient Global Impression also became significant, effect size (confidence interval) = 0.57 [-1.7, -0.4], p = 0.017. CONCLUSION While the primary outcome was not significant, the improvements in other comprehensive clinical measures suggest that minocycline may be a useful adjunct to improve global experience, functioning and quality of life in people with major depressive disorder. Further studies are warranted to confirm the potential of this accessible agent to optimise treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia M Dean
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,2 The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,3 Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Buranee Kanchanatawan
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Melanie Ashton
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,2 The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,5 Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Mohammadreza Mohebbi
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Chee Hong Ng
- 5 Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Lesley Berk
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,6 School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Atapol Sughondhabirom
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sookjaroen Tangwongchai
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ajeet B Singh
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen McKenzie
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Deidre J Smith
- 5 Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Gin S Malhi
- 7 Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,8 CADE Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Nathan Dowling
- 5 Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,2 The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,3 Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,9 Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,10 Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Berk L, Hallam KT, Venugopal K, Lewis AJ, Austin DW, Kulkarni J, Dodd S, de Castella A, Fitzgerald PB, Berk M. Impact of irritability: a 2-year observational study of outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. Bipolar Disord 2017; 19:184-197. [PMID: 28470892 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 03/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many people experience irritability when manic, hypomanic, or depressed, yet its impact on illness severity and quality of life in bipolar and schizoaffective disorders is poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the relationship between irritability and symptom burden, functioning, quality of life, social support, suicidality, and overall illness severity in a naturalistic cohort of people with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS We used data from 239 adult outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder in the Bipolar Comprehensive Outcomes Study (BCOS) - a non-interventional observational study with a 2-year follow-up period. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants with and without irritability were compared. A mixed-model repeated measures analysis was conducted to examine the longitudinal effect of irritability on clinical and quality-of-life variables over follow-up using significant baseline variables. RESULTS At baseline, 54% of participants were irritable. Baseline irritability was associated with illness severity, mania, depression, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, poor functioning, and quality of life, but not diagnosis (schizoaffective/bipolar disorder). Participants with irritability were less likely to have a partner and perceived less adequate social support. On average, over follow-up, those with irritability reported more symptoms, functional impairment, and suicidality. Furthermore, the effects of irritability could not be fully explained by illness severity. CONCLUSIONS Irritability was associated with more negative symptomatic, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes and suicidality. The identification, monitoring, and targeted treatment of irritability may be worth considering, to enhance health and wellbeing outcomes for adults with bipolar and schizoaffective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Karen T Hallam
- Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychology, Victoria University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Kamalesh Venugopal
- South Australian Department for Health and Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew James Lewis
- School of Psychology & Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.,Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - David W Austin
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Anthony de Castella
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPrc), Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lauder S, Cosgrove VE, Gliddon E, Grimm D, Dodd S, Berk L, Castle D, Suppes TS, Berk M. Progressing MoodSwings. The upgrade and evaluation of MoodSwings 2.0: An online intervention for bipolar disorder. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 56:18-24. [PMID: 28257919 PMCID: PMC5612827 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
MoodSwings 2.0 is a self-guided online intervention for bipolar disorder. The intervention incorporates technological improvements on an earlier validated version of the intervention (MoodSwings 1.0). The previous MoodSwings trial provides this study with a unique opportunity to progress previous work, whilst being able to take into consideration lesson learnt, and technological enhancements. The structure and technology of MoodSwings 2.0 are described and the relevance to other online health interventions is highlighted. An international team from Australia and the US updated and improved the programs content pursuant to changes in DSM-5, added multimedia components and included larger numbers of participants in the group discussion boards. Greater methodological rigour in this trial includes an attention control condition, quarterly telephone assessments, and red flag alerts for significant clinical change. This paper outlines these improvements, including additional security and safety measures. A 3 arm RCT is currently evaluating the enhanced program to assess the efficacy of MS 2.0; the primary outcome is change in depressive and manic symptoms. To our knowledge this is the first randomized controlled online bipolar study with a discussion board attention control and meets the key methodological criteria for online interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lauder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia.
| | - V E Cosgrove
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States; Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, United States
| | - E Gliddon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - D Grimm
- Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, United States
| | - S Dodd
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | - L Berk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia; School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - D Castle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - T S Suppes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States; Bipolar and Depression Research Program, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, United States
| | - M Berk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, the Department of Psychiatry and the Florey Institute for Neuroscience Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
| | - Lesley Berk
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health and the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gin S Malhi
- 1 Academic Department of Psychiatry, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,2 Sydney Medical School Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,3 CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Yulisha Byrow
- 1 Academic Department of Psychiatry, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,2 Sydney Medical School Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,3 CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristina Fritz
- 1 Academic Department of Psychiatry, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,2 Sydney Medical School Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,3 CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- 4 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,5 Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,6 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- 4 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,5 Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,7 The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,8 Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Murray G, Leitan ND, Thomas N, Michalak EE, Johnson SL, Jones S, Perich T, Berk L, Berk M. Towards recovery-oriented psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder: Quality of life outcomes, stage-sensitive treatments, and mindfulness mechanisms. Clin Psychol Rev 2017; 52:148-163. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
30
|
Michalak EE, Suto MJ, Barnes SJ, Hou S, Lapsley S, Scott MW, Murray G, Austin J, Elliott NB, Berk L, Crest Bd. Effective self-management strategies for bipolar disorder: A community-engaged Delphi Consensus Consultation study. J Affect Disord 2016; 206:77-86. [PMID: 27466745 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management represents an important complement to psychosocial treatments for bipolar disorder (BD), but research is limited. Specifically, little is known about self-management approaches for elevated mood states; this study investigated self-management strategies for: (1) maintaining balance in mood, and (2) stopping progression into hypomania/mania. METHODS To identify the common components of BD self-management, Delphi Consensus Consultation methods were combined with a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach across five study phases: (1) Qualitative dataset content analysis; (2) Academic/grey literature reviews; (3) Content analysis; (4) Two Delphi rounds (rating strategies on a 5-point Likert scale, Very Unhelpful-Very Helpful), and; (5) Quantitative analysis and interpretation. Participants were people with BD and healthcare providers. RESULTS Phases 1 and 2 identified 262 and 3940 candidate strategies, respectively; 3709 were discarded as duplicates/unintelligible. The remaining 493 were assessed via Delphi methods in Phase 4: 101 people with BD and 52 healthcare providers participated in Round 1; 83 of the BD panel (82%) and 43 of the healthcare provider panel (83%) participated in Round 2-exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on Round 2 results. LIMITATIONS EFA was underpowered and sample was not ethnically diverse, limiting generalizability. DISCUSSION High concordance was observed in ratings of strategy effectiveness between the two panels. Future research could usefully investigate the provisional discovery here of underlying factors which link individual strategies. For example, 'maintaining hope' underpinned strategies for maintaining balance, and 'decreasing use of stimulants' underpinned strategies to interrupt hypo/manic ascent. There is merit in combining CBPR and Delphi methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Michalak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Melinda J Suto
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steven J Barnes
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sharon Hou
- Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Canada
| | - Sara Lapsley
- CREST.BD, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mike W Scott
- CREST.BD, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Greg Murray
- Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Lesley Berk
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crest Bd
- CREST.BD, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Oedegaard CH, Berk L, Berk M, Youngstrom EA, Dilsaver SC, Belmaker RH, Oedegaard KJ, Fasmer OB, Engebretsen IM. An ISBD perspective on the sociocultural challenges of managing bipolar disorder: A content analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2016; 50:1096-1103. [PMID: 27742913 DOI: 10.1177/0004867416668790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical management of bipolar disorder patients might be affected by culture and is further dependent on the context of healthcare delivery. There is a need to understand how healthcare best can be delivered in various systems and cultures. The objective of this qualitative study was to gain knowledge about culture-specific values, beliefs and practices in the medical care provided to patients with bipolar disorders from a provider perspective in various areas of the world. SAMPLING AND METHODS The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) network provided the framework for this qualitative study. An electronic interview with open-ended questions was administered to 19 international experts on bipolar spectrum disorder representing the International Society for Bipolar Disorders chapter network in 16 countries and six continents. In addition, there were two in-depth interviews with bipolar spectrum disorder experts done prior to the survey. The data were analysed using content analysis, and the information was structured using the software NVivo by QSR International Pty Ltd. FINDINGS All participants described sociocultural factors as important in healthcare delivery to bipolar patients in their part of the world, both in accessing healthcare and in providing culturally appropriate care. Factors that affected the provider's ability to supply good clinical management of patients were access to treatment options and long-term follow-up, as well as general strategies to combat stigma. In some societies, the patients' use of alternative treatments, gender issues and religion were also important factors. Understanding the impact of such culturally specific factors was overall regarded as essential for proper treatment interventions. CONCLUSION Sociocultural factors clearly affect the nature and quality of medical services delivered to bipolar patients. Financial, social and cultural factors affect patients' health-seeking behaviour, and this highlights the need for knowledge about such factors in order to adequately identify and treat bipolar patients globally. Culturally adapted training and psychoeducation programmes are particularly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine H Oedegaard
- Global Mental Health Research Group (GMHRG), Centre for International Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Eric A Youngstrom
- Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert H Belmaker
- Beersheva Mental Health Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ketil J Oedegaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway .,Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ole B Fasmer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.,Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingunn M Engebretsen
- Global Mental Health Research Group (GMHRG), Centre for International Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Devenish B, Berk L, Lewis AJ. The treatment of suicidality in adolescents by psychosocial interventions for depression: A systematic literature review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2016; 50:726-40. [PMID: 26896044 DOI: 10.1177/0004867415627374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given depression is a significant risk factor for suicidal behaviour, it is possible that interventions for depression may also reduce the risk of suicide in adolescents. The purpose of this literature review is to determine whether psychological interventions aimed to prevent and/or treat depression in adolescents can also reduce suicidality. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of psychological interventions aimed to prevent and/or treat depression in adolescents in which outcomes for suicidality were reported, using five databases: PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. RESULTS A total of 35 articles pertaining to 12 treatment trials, two selective prevention trials and two universal prevention trials met inclusion criteria. No studies were identified that used a no-treatment control. In both intervention and active control groups, suicidality decreased over time; however, most structured psychological depression treatment interventions did not outperform pharmaceutical or treatment as usual control groups. Depression prevention studies demonstrated small but statistically significant reductions in suicidality. LIMITATIONS Analysis of study quality suggested that at least 10 of the 16 studies have a high risk of bias. Conclusive comparisons across studies are problematic due to differences in measures, interventions, population differences and control groups used. CONCLUSIONS It is unclear whether psychological treatments are more effective than no treatment since no study has used a no-treatment control group. There is evidence to suggest that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy interventions produce pre-post reductions in suicidality with moderate effect sizes and are at least as efficacious as pharmacotherapy in reducing suicidality; however, it is unclear whether these effects are sustained. There are several trials showing promising evidence for family-based and interpersonal therapies, with large pre-post effect sizes, and further evaluation with improved methodology is required. Depression prevention interventions show promising short-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Devenish
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Andrew J Lewis
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Backes Y, Moons LMG, van Bergeijk JD, Berk L, Ter Borg F, Ter Borg PCJ, Elias SG, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, Hadithi M, Hardwick JCH, Kerkhof M, Mangen MJJ, Straathof JWA, Schröder R, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Wolfhagen FHJ, Koch AD. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:56. [PMID: 27229709 PMCID: PMC4882830 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0468-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is currently the most used technique for resection of large distal colorectal polyps. However, in large lesions EMR can often only be performed in a piecemeal fashion resulting in relatively low radical (R0)-resection rates and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a newer procedure that is more difficult resulting in a longer procedural time, but is promising due to the high en-bloc resection rates and the very low recurrence rates. We aim to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of ESD against EMR on both short (i.e. 6 months) and long-term (i.e. 36 months). We hypothesize that in the short-run ESD is more time consuming resulting in higher healthcare costs, but is (cost-) effective on the long-term due to lower patients burden, a higher number of R0-resections and lower recurrence rates with less need for repeated procedures. Methods This is a multicenter randomized clinical trial in patients with a non-pedunculated polyp larger than 20 mm in the rectum, sigmoid, or descending colon suspected to be an adenoma by means of endoscopic assessment. Primary endpoint is recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are R0-resection rate, perceived burden and quality of life, healthcare resources utilization and costs, surgical referral rate, complication rate and recurrence rate at 36 months. Quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) will be estimated taking an area under the curve approach and using EQ-5D-indexes. Healthcare costs will be calculated by multiplying used healthcare services with unit prices. The cost-effectiveness of ESD against EMR will be expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) showing additional costs per recurrence free patient and as ICER showing additional costs per QALY. Discussion If this trial confirms ESD to be favorable on the long-term, the burden of extra colonoscopies and repeated procedures can be prevented for future patients. Trial registration NCT02657044 (Clinicaltrials.gov), registered January 8, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - J D van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, Netherlands
| | - L Berk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Franciscus, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - P C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ikazia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, Netherlands
| | - M Hadithi
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Maasstad hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J C H Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands
| | - M J J Mangen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J W A Straathof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - R Schröder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
| | - M P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | | | - F H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - A D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Perlick DA, Berk L, Kaczynski R, Gonzalez J, Link B, Dixon L, Grier S, Miklowitz DJ. Caregiver burden as a predictor of depression among family and friends who provide care for persons with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2016; 18:183-91. [PMID: 27004622 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Over one-third of caregivers of people with bipolar disorder report clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms. This study examined the causal relationship between depression and caregiver burden in a large sample of caregivers of adult patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS Participants were 500 primary caregivers of persons with bipolar disorder enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).This study evaluates the strength and direction of the associations between caregiver burden and depressive symptoms at baseline and at six- and 12-month follow-up using cross-lagged panel analyses, controlling for the clinical status of patients and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Higher levels of overall caregiver burden at baseline were associated with increased levels of depressive symptoms among caregivers at follow-up (F = 8.70, df = 1,290, p < 0.001), after controlling for baseline caregiver depression, gender, race, age, social support, and patients' clinical status. By contrast, caregiver depression at baseline was not significantly associated with caregiver burden at follow-up (F = 1.65, p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS Caregiver burden is a stronger predictor of caregiver depressive symptoms over time than the reverse. Interventions that help alleviate caregiver burden may decrease depressive symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Perlick
- James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and VISN 3 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Bronx, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lesley Berk
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Kaczynski
- Veterans Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, West Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jodi Gonzalez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Bruce Link
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Dixon
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Practice Innovations, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Savannah Grier
- James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and VISN 3 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Bronx, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David J Miklowitz
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gliddon E, Lauder S, Berk L, Cosgrove V, Grimm D, Dodd S, Suppes T, Berk M. Evaluating discussion board engagement in the MoodSwings online self-help program for bipolar disorder: protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15:243. [PMID: 26462799 PMCID: PMC4604761 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0630-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 10/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online, self-guided programs exist for a wide range of mental health conditions, including bipolar disorder, and discussion boards are often part of these interventions. The impact engagement with these discussion boards has on the psychosocial well-being of users is largely unknown. More specifically we need to clarify the influence of the type and level of engagement on outcomes. The primary aim of this exploratory study is to determine if there is a relationship between different types (active, passive or none) and levels (high, mid and low) of discussion board engagement and improvement in outcome measures from baseline to follow up, with a focus on self-reported social support, stigma, quality of life and levels of depression and mania. The secondary aim of this study is to identify any differences in demographic variables among discussion users. METHODS/DESIGN The present study is a sub-study of the MoodSwings 2.0 3-arm randomised controlled trial (discussion board only (arm 1), discussion board plus psychoeducation (arm 2), discussion board, psychoeducation plus cognitive behavioural therapy-based tools (arm 3)). Discussion engagement will be measured via online participant activity monitoring. Assessments include online self-report as well as blinded phone interviews at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow up. DISCUSSION The results of this study will help to inform future programs about whether or not discussion boards are a beneficial inclusion in online self-help interventions. It will also help to determine if motivating users to actively engage in online discussion is necessary, and if so, what level of engagement is optimal to produce the most benefit. Future programs may benefit through being able to identify those most likely to poorly engage, based on demographic variables, so motivational strategies can be targeted accordingly. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02118623 registered April 15 2014 and NCT02106078 registered May 16 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Gliddon
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. .,The Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Sue Lauder
- The Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,The Collaborative Research Network, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.
| | - Lesley Berk
- The Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,Orygen - The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia. .,School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
| | - Victoria Cosgrove
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. .,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| | - David Grimm
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. .,The Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Trisha Suppes
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. .,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. .,The Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,Orygen - The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia. .,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Berk
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia Melbourne School of Population and Global Health and Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia Department of Psychiatry, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim SW, Dodd S, Berk L, Kulkarni J, de Castella A, Fitzgerald PB, Kim JM, Yoon JS, Berk M. Impact of Cannabis Use on Long-Term Remission in Bipolar I and Schizoaffective Disorder. Psychiatry Investig 2015; 12. [PMID: 26207128 PMCID: PMC4504917 DOI: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of regular cannabis use on long-term remission of mood symptoms in bipolar spectrum disorders. METHODS The 24-month prospective observational study included patients (n=239) with bipolar I disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Participants were classified as regular cannabis users (three times or more per week) or non-users. The primary outcome measure was the achievement of remission on the evaluations during the 24 months. RESULTS Of the 234 participants for whom data was available, 25 (10.7%) were regular cannabis users, and the group comprised significantly more males than females. In the total population, cannabis use was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of remission during the 24-month follow-up period. Subgroup analyses showed that cannabis use was significantly associated with lower remission rates on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in females (n=139) and patients prescribed mood stabilizers alone (n=151), whereas in males (n=95) and patients prescribed olanzapine and/or a mood stabilizer (n=83), cannabis use was significantly associated with lower remission rates on the Young Mania Rating Scale. Remission rates were lowest in the concurrent cannabis and tobacco smoking group (n=22) followed by the tobacco smoking only group (n=97), and the non-smoker group (n=116). The post-hoc analysis revealed that all remission rates were significantly lower in the concurrent cannabis and the tobacco smoking group compared to the non-smoker group. CONCLUSION Cannabis use negatively affects the long-term clinical outcome in patients with bipolar spectrum disorders. A comprehensive assessment and integrated management of cannabis use are required to achieve better treatment outcomes for bipolar spectrum disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Wan Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anthony de Castella
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B. Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jae-Min Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Sang Yoon
- Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Murray G, Leitan ND, Berk M, Thomas N, Michalak E, Berk L, Johnson SL, Jones S, Perich T, Allen NB, Kyrios M. Online mindfulness-based intervention for late-stage bipolar disorder: pilot evidence for feasibility and effectiveness. J Affect Disord 2015; 178:46-51. [PMID: 25795535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People in the late stage of bipolar disorder (BD) experience elevated relapse rates and poorer quality of life (QoL) compared with those in the early stages. Existing psychological interventions also appear less effective in this group. To address this need, we developed a new online mindfulness-based intervention targeting quality of life (QoL) in late stage BD. Here, we report on an open pilot trial of ORBIT (online, recovery-focused, bipolar individual therapy). METHODS Inclusion criteria were: self-reported primary diagnosis of BD, six or more episodes of BD, under the care of a medical practitioner, access to the internet, proficient in English, 18-65 years of age. Primary outcome was change (baseline - post-treatment) on the Brief QoL.BD (Michalak and Murray, 2010). Secondary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and stress measured on the DASS scales (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1993). RESULTS Twenty-six people consented to participate (Age M=46.6 years, SD=12.9, and 75% female). Ten participants were lost to follow-up (38.5% attrition). Statistically significant improvement in QoL was found for the completers, t(15)=2.88, 95% CI:.89-5.98, p=.011, (Cohen׳s dz=.72, partial η(2)=.36), and the intent-to-treat sample t(25)=2.65, 95% CI:.47-3.76, (Cohen׳s dz=.52; partial η(2)=.22). A non-significant trend towards improvement was found on the DASS anxiety scale (p=.06) in both completer and intent-to-treat samples, but change on depression and stress did not approach significance. LIMITATIONS This was an open trial with no comparison group, so measured improvements may not be due to specific elements of the intervention. Structured diagnostic assessments were not conducted, and interpretation of effectiveness was limited by substantial attrition. CONCLUSION Online delivery of mindfulness-based psychological therapy for late stage BD appears feasible and effective, and ORBIT warrants full development. Modifications suggested by the pilot study include increasing the 3 weeks duration of the intervention, adding cautions about the impact of extended meditations, and addition of coaching support/monitoring to optimise engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Murray
- Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - N D Leitan
- Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Berk
- Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Thomas
- Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - E Michalak
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - L Berk
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S L Johnson
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| | - S Jones
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - T Perich
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Michalak EE, Lane K, Hole R, Barnes SJ, Khatri N, Lapsley S, Maxwell V, Milev R, Parikh SV, Berk L, Berk M, Tse S, Murray G, Algorta GP, Lobban F, Jones S, Johnson SL. Towards a Better Future for Canadians with Bipolar Disorder: Principles and Implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research Model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.15402/esj.2015.1.a08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
40
|
Michalak EE, Lane K, Hole R, Barnes SJ, Khatri N, Lapsley S, Maxwell V, Milev R, Parikh SV, Berk L, Berk M, Tse S, Murray G, Algorta GP, Lobban F, Jones S, Johnson SL. Towards a Better Future for Canadians with Bipolar Disorder: Principles and Implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research Model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.15402/esj.v1i1.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The Collaborative RESearch Team to study psychosocial factors in bipolar disorder (CREST.BD) is a multidisciplinary network dedicated to advancing science and practice around psychosocial issues associated with bipolar disorder (BD), improving the care and wellness of people living with bipolar disorder, and strengthening services and supports for these individuals. CREST.BD specializes in community-based participatory research, in which research is conducted as a partnership between researchers and community members. This article describes the evolution of the CREST.BD network and CREST.BD’s commitment to community-based participatory research in bipolar disorder research. Examples of CREST.BD projects using community-based participatory research to study stigma, quality of life, psychosocial interventions, and creativity in bipolar disorder are highlighted, and opportunities and challenges of engaging in community-based participatory research in bipolar disorder specifically and the mental health field more broadly are discussed. This article demonstrates how CBPR can be used to enhance the relevance of research practices and products through community engagement, and how community-based participatory research can enrich knowledge exchange and mobilization.Â
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomson D, Berk M, Dodd S, Rapado-Castro M, Quirk SE, Ellegaard PK, Berk L, Dean OM. Tobacco use in bipolar disorder. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2015; 13:1-11. [PMID: 25912533 PMCID: PMC4423166 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2015.13.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco use in mental health in general and bipolar disorder in particular remains disproportionally common, despite declining smoking rates in the community. Furthermore, interactions between tobacco use and mental health have been shown, indicating the outcomes for those with mental health disorders are impacted by tobacco use. Factors need to be explored and addressed to improve outcomes for those with these disorders and target specific interventions for people with psychiatric illness to cease tobacco smoking. In the context of bipolar disorder, this review explores; the effects of tobacco smoking on symptoms, quality of life, suicidal behavior, the biological interactions between tobacco use and bipolar disorder, the interactions between tobacco smoking and psychiatric medications, rates and factors surrounding tobacco smoking cessation in bipolar disorder and suggests potential directions for research and clinical translation. The importance of this review is to bring together the current understanding of tobacco use in bipolar disorder to highlight the need for specific intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Marta Rapado-Castro
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, CIBERSAM, IiSGM, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Shae E Quirk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong
| | - Pernille K Ellegaard
- Research Unit, Mental Health Services, Region of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Lesley Berk
- Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Olivia M Dean
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Thomson D, Turner A, Lauder S, Gigler ME, Berk L, Singh AB, Pasco JA, Berk M, Sylvia L. A brief review of exercise, bipolar disorder, and mechanistic pathways. Front Psychol 2015; 6:147. [PMID: 25788889 PMCID: PMC4349127 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite evidence that exercise has been found to be effective in the treatment of depression, it is unclear whether these data can be extrapolated to bipolar disorder. Available evidence for bipolar disorder is scant, with no existing randomized controlled trials having tested the impact of exercise on depressive, manic or hypomanic symptomatology. Although exercise is often recommended in bipolar disorder, this is based on extrapolation from the unipolar literature, theory and clinical expertise and not empirical evidence. In addition, there are currently no available empirical data on program variables, with practical implications on frequency, intensity and type of exercise derived from unipolar depression studies. The aim of the current paper is to explore the relationship between exercise and bipolar disorder and potential mechanistic pathways. Given the high rate of medical co-morbidities experienced by people with bipolar disorder, it is possible that exercise is a potentially useful and important intervention with regard to general health benefits; however, further research is required to elucidate the impact of exercise on mood symptomology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Thomson
- Department of Applied Sciences, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University , Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia ; Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Sue Lauder
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia ; Federation University Australia , Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret E Gigler
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lesley Berk
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia ; Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Ajeet B Singh
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie A Pasco
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia ; Department of Medicine, NorthWest Academic Centre, University of Melbourne , St Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia ; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health , Parkville, VIC, Australia ; Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health , Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Louisa Sylvia
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, MA, USA ; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University , Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Leitan ND, Michalak EE, Berk L, Berk M, Murray G. Optimizing delivery of recovery-oriented online self-management strategies for bipolar disorder: a review. Bipolar Disord 2015; 17:115-27. [PMID: 25238632 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2013] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Self-management is emerging as a viable alternative to difficult-to-access psychosocial treatments for bipolar disorder (BD), and has particular relevance to recovery-related goals around empowerment and personal meaning. This review examines data and theory on BD self-management from a recovery-oriented perspective, with a particular focus on optimizing low-intensity delivery of self-management tools via the web. METHODS A critical evaluation of various literatures was undertaken. Literatures on recovery, online platforms, and self-management in mental health and BD are reviewed. RESULTS The literature suggests that the self-management approach aligns with the recovery framework. However, studies have identified a number of potential barriers to the utilization of self-management programs for BD and it has been suggested that utilizing an online environment may be an effective way to surmount many of these barriers. CONCLUSIONS Online self-management programs for BD are rapidly developing, and in parallel the recovery perspective is becoming the dominant paradigm for mental health services worldwide, so research is urgently required to assess the efficacy and safety of optimization methods such as professional and/or peer support, tailoring and the development of 'online communities'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuwan D Leitan
- Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lauder S, Chester A, Castle D, Dodd S, Gliddon E, Berk L, Chamberlain J, Klein B, Gilbert M, Austin DW, Berk M. A randomized head to head trial of MoodSwings.net.au: an Internet based self-help program for bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2015; 171:13-21. [PMID: 25282145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Revised: 07/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjunctive psychosocial interventions are efficacious in bipolar disorder, but their incorporation into routine management plans are often confounded by cost and access constraints. We report here a comparative evaluation of two online programs hosted on a single website (www.moodswings.net.au). A basic version, called MoodSwings (MS), contains psychoeducation material and asynchronous discussion boards; and a more interactive program, MoodSwings Plus (MS-Plus), combined the basic psychoeducation material and discussion boards with elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. These programs were evaluated in a head-to-head study design. METHOD Participants with Bipolar I or II disorder (n=156) were randomized to receive either MoodSwings or MoodSwings-Plus. Outcomes included mood symptoms, the occurrence of relapse, functionality, Locus of Control, social support, quality of life and medication adherence. RESULTS Participants in both groups showed baseline to endpoint reductions in mood symptoms and improvements in functionality, quality of life and medication adherence. The MoodSwings-Plus group showed a greater number of within-group changes on symptoms and functioning in depression and mania, quality of life and social support, across both poles of the illness. MoodSwings-Plus was superior to MoodSwings in improvement on symptoms of mania scores at 12 months (p=0.02) but not on the incidence of recurrence. LIMITATIONS The study did not have an attention control group and therefore could not demonstrate efficacy of the two active arms. There was notable (81%) attrition by 12 months from baseline. CONCLUSION This study suggests that both CBT and psychoeducation delivered online may have utility in the management of bipolar disorder. They are feasible, readily accepted, and associated with improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Lauder
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North, Main Block, Victoria 3050, Australia; DVC-Research and Innovation Portfolio & School of Health Sciences, and the Collaborative Research Network Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Andrea Chester
- RMIT University, Building 6, Level 5 Bowen Street, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - David Castle
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent׳s Hospital, P.O. Box, 2900, Fitzroy 3065, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North, Main Block, Victoria 3050, Australia; IMPACT Strategic Research Center, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, P.O. Box 291, Geelong 3220, Australia
| | - Emma Gliddon
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North, Main Block, Victoria 3050, Australia; IMPACT Strategic Research Center, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, P.O. Box 291, Geelong 3220, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North, Main Block, Victoria 3050, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Center, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville 3052, Australia
| | | | - Britt Klein
- DVC-Research and Innovation Portfolio & School of Health Sciences, and the Collaborative Research Network Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia; National Institute for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Building 63, Canberra 2000, Australia; National eTherapy Center, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Monica Gilbert
- Healthmaps Pty Ltd, PO Box 2501, Fitzroy, 3065 Melbourne, Australia
| | - David W Austin
- Deakin University, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125, Victoria Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 1 North, Main Block, Victoria 3050, Australia; IMPACT Strategic Research Center, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, P.O. Box 291, Geelong 3220, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Center, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville 3052, Australia; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Kenneth Myer Building, 30 Royal Parade, 3052 Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dean OM, Maes M, Ashton M, Berk L, Kanchanatawan B, Sughondhabirom A, Tangwongchai S, Ng C, Dowling N, Malhi GS, Berk MI. Protocol and rationale-the efficacy of minocycline as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder: a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2014; 12:180-8. [PMID: 25598820 PMCID: PMC4293162 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2014.12.3.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
While current pharmacotherapies are efficacious, there remain a clear shortfall between symptom remission and functional recovery. With the explosion in our understanding of the biology of these disorders, the time is ripe for the investigation of novel therapies. Recently depression is conceptualized as an immune-inflammatory and nitro-oxidative stress related disorder. Minocycline is a tetracycline antibiotic that has anti-inflammatory, pro-oxidant, glutamatergic, neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties that make it a viable target to explore as a new therapy. This double blind, randomised, placebo controlled adjunctive trial will investigate the benefits of 200 mg/day of minocycline treatment, in addition to any usual treatment, as an adjunctive treatment for moderate-severe major depressive disorder. Sixty adults are being randomised to 12 weeks of treatment (with a 4 week follow-up post-discontinuation). The primary outcome measure for the study is mean change on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), with secondary outcomes including the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), Patient Global Impression (PGI), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) and Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT). Biomarker analyses will also be conducted at baseline and week 12. The study has the potential to provide new treatment targets, both by showing efficacy with a new class of 'antidepressant' but also through the analysis of biomarkers that may further inform our understanding of the pathophysiology of unipolar depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia May Dean
- Innovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatments Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia. ; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Michael Maes
- Department of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Melanie Ashton
- Innovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatments Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Department of Psychiatry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Buranee Kanchanatawan
- Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, Deakin University, School of Psychology, Burwood, Australia
| | - Atapol Sughondhabirom
- Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, Deakin University, School of Psychology, Burwood, Australia
| | - Sookjareon Tangwongchai
- Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, Deakin University, School of Psychology, Burwood, Australia
| | - Chee Ng
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, The Melbourne Clinic, Richmond, Australia
| | - Nathan Dowling
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, The Melbourne Clinic, Richmond, Australia
| | - Gin S Malhi
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. ; Department of Psychiatry, CADE Clinic, St. Leonards, Australia
| | - MIchael Berk
- Innovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatments Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia. ; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. ; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Parkville, Australia. ; Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim SW, Berk L, Kulkarni J, Dodd S, de Castella A, Fitzgerald PB, Amminger GP, Berk M. Impact of comorbid anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder on 24-month clinical outcomes of bipolar I disorder. J Affect Disord 2014; 166:243-8. [PMID: 25012437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2014] [Revised: 05/12/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the impact of comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and four anxiety disorders [panic disorder (PD), agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder (SAD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)] on the clinical outcomes of bipolar disorder. METHODS This study analysed data of 174 patients with bipolar I disorder who participated in the prospective observational study. Participants were assessed every 3 months for 24 months. The primary outcome measure was the achievement of symptomatic remission, defined by a total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) of ≤12 and a total score on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) of ≤8. RESULTS Comorbidity was associated with decreased likelihood of remission. However, the impact of individual disorders on outcome differed according to clinical and treatment situations. Most comorbid anxiety disorders and OCD had a negative effect on remission during the first year of evaluation, as measured by the HAMD-21, and in patients taking a conventional mood stabilizer alone. However, the association with poorer outcome was observed only for a few specific comorbid disorders in the second year (GAD and OCD), as measured by YMRS-defined remission (OCD), and in patients with olanzapine therapy (GAD and OCD). LIMITATIONS Follow-up evaluation of comorbid disorders was lacking. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid anxiety disorders and OCD negatively influenced the clinical course of bipolar disorder. Specifically, OCD had a consistently negative impact on the outcome of bipolar I disorder regardless of clinical situation. Effective strategies for the control of these comorbidities are required to achieve better treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Wan Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Lesley Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia
| | - Seetal Dodd
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Anthony de Castella
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, VIC, Australia
| | - G Paul Amminger
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Berk M, Berk L, Dodd S, Cotton S, Macneil C, Daglas R, Conus P, Bechdolf A, Moylan S, Malhi GS. Stage managing bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2014; 16:471-7. [PMID: 23782499 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2012] [Accepted: 01/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical staging is widespread in medicine - it informs prognosis, clinical course, and treatment, and assists individualized care. Staging places an individual on a probabilistic continuum of increasing potential disease severity, ranging from clinically at-risk or latency stage through first threshold episode of illness or recurrence, and, finally, to late or end-stage disease. The aim of the present paper was to examine and update the evidence regarding staging in bipolar disorder, and how this might inform targeted and individualized intervention approaches. METHODS We provide a narrative review of the relevant information. RESULTS In bipolar disorder, the validity of staging is informed by a range of findings that accompany illness progression, including neuroimaging data suggesting incremental volume loss, cognitive changes, and a declining likelihood of response to pharmacological and psychosocial treatments. Staging informs the adoption of a number of approaches, including the active promotion of both indicated prevention for at-risk individuals and early intervention strategies for newly diagnosed individuals, and the tailored implementation of treatments according to the stage of illness. CONCLUSIONS The nature of bipolar disorder implies the presence of an active process of neuroprogression that is considered to be at least partly mediated by inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and changes in neurogenesis. It further supports the concept of neuroprotection, in that a diversity of agents have putative effects against these molecular targets. Clinically, staging suggests that the at-risk state or first episode is a period that requires particularly active and broad-based treatment, consistent with the hope that the temporal trajectory of the illness can be altered. Prompt treatment may be potentially neuroprotective and attenuate the neurostructural and neurocognitive changes that emerge with chronicity. Staging highlights the need for interventions at a service delivery level and implementing treatments at the earliest stage of illness possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; Orygen Youth Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychiatry, Orygen Research Centre, and the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lesley Berk
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tim Denton
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia Barwon Medicare Local, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Berk M, Berk L, Davey CG, Moylan S, Giorlando F, Singh AB, Kalra H, Dodd S, Malhi GS. Treatment of bipolar depression. Med J Aust 2013; 199:S32-5. [DOI: 10.5694/mja12.10611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 08/16/2012] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Berk
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Lesley Berk
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Christopher G Davey
- Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | | | | | - Harish Kalra
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
| | - Seetal Dodd
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Gin S Malhi
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wong R, Deshmukh S, Wyatt G, Sagar S, Singh A, Sultanem K, Nguyen-Tan P, Yom S, Pugh S, Berk L. RTOG 0537 Phase 2/3 Study Comparing Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (ALTENS) Versus Pilocarpine (PC) in Treating Early Radiation-Induced Xerostomia (RIX): Phase 3 Preliminary Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|