099 High relapse rate with steroid monotherapy in non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy

Introduction

Historically, single tissue vasculitis has been managed with steroid monotherapy. Recent data from large longitudinal databases on systemic vasculitis suggest Non-Systemic Vasculitic Neuropathy (NSVN) has higher rates of relapse, recommending that more aggressive immunotherapy is employed.

Aim

To investigate the relapse rate in NSVN in response to steroid monotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective case note review of clinically and/or pathologically defined cases of (Systemic Vasculitic Neuropathy) SVN and NSVN in two London specialist peripheral nerve centres, between 2005

- 2012 and 2015 - 2019.

Results

32 cases of SVN and 34 cases of NSVN were identified. In each group 14 individuals were treated first-line with steroid monotherapy, and 8 with cyclophosphamide. 8 SVN and 9 NSVN cases received steroids plus azathioprine. 15/32 SVN and 13/34 NSVN relapsed after first-line therapy (10/14 and 9/14 on steroid monotherapy, 3/8 and 3/9 on steroids and azathioprine, 2/8 and 1/8 on cyclophosphamide). 10 individuals stabilised with the addition of azathioprine, 13 with cyclophosphamide and 4 with Rituximab.

Conclusion

This representative case series suggests that steroid monotherapy is inadequate in the treatment of NSVN and supports an approach akin to that recommended in SVN, even if nerve is the only tissue clinically involved.

e.bunting@nhs.net

Intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous methylprednisolone as optimal induction treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: protocol of an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OPTIC)

Background

International guidelines recommend either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids as first-line treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). IVIg treatment usually leads to rapid improvement and is generally safe, but does not seem to lead to long-term remissions. Corticosteroids act more slowly and are associated with more side effects, but may induce long-term remissions. The hypothesis of this study is that combined IVIg and corticosteroid induction treatment will lead to more frequent long-term remissions than IVIg treatment alone.

Methods

An international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in adults with ‘probable’ or ‘definite’ CIDP according to the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria. Three groups of patients are included: (1) treatment naïve, (2) known CIDP patients with a relapse after > 1 year without treatment, and (3) patients with CIDP who improved within 3 months after a single course of IVIg, who subsequently deteriorate at any interval without having received additional treatment. Patients are randomised to receive 7 courses of IVIg and 1000 mg intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) (in sodium chloride 0.9%) or IVIg and placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), every 3 weeks for 18 weeks. IVIg treatment consists of a loading dose of 2 g/kg (over 3–5 days) followed by 6 courses of IVIg 1/g/kg (over 1–2 days). The primary outcome is remission at 1 year, defined as improvement in disability from baseline, sustained between week 18 and week 52 without further treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in disability, impairment, pain, fatigue, quality of life, care use and costs and (long-term) safety.

Discussion

In case of superiority of the combined treatment, patients will experience the advantages of two proven efficacious treatments, namely rapid improvement due to IVIg and long-term remission due to corticosteroids. Long-term remission would reduce the need for maintenance IVIg treatment and may decrease health care costs. Additionally, we expect that the combined treatment leads to a higher proportion of patients with improvement as some patients who do not respond to IVIg will respond to corticosteroids. Risks of short and long-term additional adverse events of the combined treatment need to be assessed.

Trial registration

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN15893334. Prospectively registered on 12 February 2018.

Laboratory biomarkers associated with COVID-19 severity and management

The heterogeneous disease course of COVID-19 is unpredictable, ranging from mild self-limiting symptoms to cytokine storms, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure and death. Identification of high-risk cases will enable appropriate intervention and escalation. This study investigates the routine laboratory tests and cytokines implicated in COVID-19 for their potential application as biomarkers of disease severity, respiratory failure and need of higher-level care.

From analysis of 203 samples, CRP, IL-6, IL-10 and LDH were most strongly correlated with the WHO ordinal scale of illness severity, the fraction of inspired oxygen delivery, radiological evidence of ARDS and level of respiratory support (p ≤ 0.001). IL-6 levels of ≥3.27 pg/ml provide a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.64 for a requirement of ventilation, and a CRP of ≥37 mg/l of 0.91 and 0.66.

Reliable stratification of high-risk cases has significant implications on patient triage, resource management and potentially the initiation of novel therapies in severe patients.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis: audit of the NHS experience

Objectives

The treatments of limbic and other autoimmune encephalitis include immunosuppression, symptomatic treatment, and in the case of paraneoplastic syndromes, appropriate therapy for underlying neoplasms. When immunotherapy is considered, intravenous immunoglobulin is one option for treatment, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids. To date, however, evidence for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in this context comes from case series/expert reviews as no controlled trials have been performed. We aimed to analyse the NHS England Database of intravenous immunoglobulin usage, which was designed to log use and guide procurement, to explore usage and therapeutic effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune encephalitis in England.

Design

We conducted a retrospective audit and review of the NHS England Database on intravenous immunoglobulin use.

Setting

NHS England Database of intravenous immunoglobulin use which covers secondary and tertiary care prescribing and use of intravenous immunoglobulin for all patients in hospitals in England.

Participants

Hospital in-patients with confirmed or suspected autoimmune/limbic encephalitis between September 2010 and January 2017.

Results

A total of 625 patients who were 18 years of age or older were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin for autoimmune encephalitis, of whom 398 were determined as having 'highly likely' or 'definite' autoimmune/limbic encephalitis. Ninety-six percent were treated with a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin. The availability and accuracy of reporting of outcomes was very poor, with complete data only available in 27% of all cases.

Conclusions

This is the first review of data from this unique national database. Whilst there was evidence for clinical improvement in many cases of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, the quality of outcome data was generally inadequate. Methods to improve quality, accuracy and completeness of reporting are crucial to maximise the potential value of this resource as an auditing tool.

Therapeutic immunoglobulin should be dosed by clinical outcome rather than by body weight in obese patients

There are currently no data to support the suggestion that the dose of therapeutic immunoglobulin (Ig) should be capped in obese patients for pharmacokinetic (PK), safety and economic reasons. We compared IgG trough levels, increment and efficiency in matched pairs of obese and lean patients receiving either replacement or immunomodulatory immunoglobulin therapy. Thirty-one obese patients were matched with a clinically equivalent lean patient across a range of indications, including primary antibody deficiency or autoimmune peripheral neuropathy. Comprehensive matching was carried out using ongoing research databases at two centres in which the dose of Ig was based on clinical outcome, whether infection prevention or documented clinical neurological stability. The IgG trough or steady state levels, IgG increments and Ig efficiencies at times of clinical stability were compared between the obese and lean cohorts and within the matched pairs. This study shows that, at a population level, obese patients achieved a higher trough and increment (but not efficiency) for a given weight-adjusted dose compared with the lean patients. However at an individual patient level there were significant exceptions to this correlation, and upon sub-group analysis no significant difference was found between obese and lean patients receiving replacement therapy. Across all dose regimens a high body mass index (BMI) cannot be used to predict reliably the patients in whom dose restriction is clinically appropriate.

Clinical, neuropathological and radiological evidence for a rare complication of rituximab therapy

We report a rare case of myofasciitis and meningitis with deafness caused by systemic enterovirus infection in the setting of hypogammaglobulinaemia induced by rituximab. Whilst effective and generally safe, anti- CD 20 antibody therapy is increasingly recognised to result in unusual infectious complications to be considered in a treated patient presenting with neurological symptoms. These cases may pose diagnostic difficulties and can have atypical presentations. We present this rare complication of rituximab therapy, with histopathological confirmation of myofasciitis. In the older literature, enterovirus associated myofasciitis may have erroneously been termed dermatomyositis and we review the literature to demonstrate this important nosological point.

Immunotherapy for IgM anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated peripheral neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Serum monoclonal anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibodies may be pathogenic in some patients with IgM paraprotein and demyelinating neuropathy. Immunotherapies aimed at reducing the level of these antibodies might be expected to be of benefit in the treatment of the neuropathy. Many potential therapies have been described in small trials, uncontrolled studies and case reports.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of any form of immunotherapy in reducing disability and impairment resulting from IgM anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraprotein-associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group register (August 2002) and MEDLINE (January 1966 - August 2002) and EMBASE (January 1980 - August 2002) for controlled trials, checked the bibliographies to identify other controlled trials and contacted authors and other experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

patients of any age with anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody associated demyelinating peripheral neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of any severity. Types of interventions: any type of immunotherapy. Types of outcome measures: Primary: improvement in the Neuropathy Disability Score or Modified Rankin Scale six months after randomisation Secondary: Neuropathy Disability Score and/or the Modified Rankin Score 12 months after randomisation. Ten metre walk time, subjective clinical scores and electrophysiological parameters at six and 12 months after randomisation. IgM paraprotein levels and anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein antibody titres six months after randomisation. Adverse effects of treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified six randomised controlled trials of which five were included after discussion between the authors. One author extracted the data and the other checked them. No missing data could be obtained from authors.

MAIN RESULTS

The five eligible trials used four of the many available immunotherapy treatments. Only two had comparable interventions and outcomes but these were only short-term studies. There were no significant benefits of the treatments used in the predefined outcomes. However intravenous immunoglobulin showed benefits in terms of improved Modified Rankin Scale at two weeks and 10 metre walk time at four weeks. Serious adverse effects of intravenous immunoglobulin are known to occur from observational studies but none were encountered in these trials.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate reliable evidence from trials of immunotherapies in anti-Myelin Associated Glycoprotein paraproteinaemic neuropathy to recommend any particular immunotherapy treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin is relatively safe and may produce some short-term benefit. Large well designed randomised trials are required to assess the efficacy of promising new therapies.

High-affinity anti-ganglioside IgG antibodies raised in complex ganglioside knockout mice: reexamination of GD1a immunolocalization

Gangliosides, sialic acid-bearing glycosphingolipids, are highly enriched in the vertebrate nervous system. Anti-ganglioside antibodies are associated with various human neuropathies, although the pathogenicity of these antibodies remains unproven. Testing the pathogenic role of anti-ganglioside antibodies will be facilitated by developing high-affinity IgG-class complement-fixing monoclonal anti-bodies against major brain gangliosides, a goal that has been difficult to achieve. In this study, mice lacking complex gangliosides were used as immune-naive hosts to raise anti-ganglioside antibodies. Wild-type mice and knockout mice with a disrupted gene for GM2/GD2 synthase (UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine : GM3/GD3 N-acetyl-D-glactosaminyltransferase) were immunized with GD1a conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. The knockout mice produced a vigorous anti-GD1a IgG response, whereas wildtype littermates failed to do so. Fusion of spleen cells from an immunized knockout mouse with myeloma cells yielded numerous IgG anti-GD1a antibody-producing colonies. Ganglioside binding studies revealed two specificity classes; one colony representing each class was cloned and characterized. High-affinity monoclonal antibody was produced by each hybridoma : an IgG1 that bound nearly exclusively to GD1a and an IgG2b that bound GD1a, GT1b, and GT1aalpha. Both antibodies readily readily detected gangliosides via ELISA, TLC immune overlay, immunohistochemistry, and immunocytochemistry. In contrast to prior reports using anti-GD1a and anti-GT1b IgM class monoclonal antibodies, the new antibodies bound avidly to granule neurons in brain tissue sections and cell cultures. Mice lacking complex gangliosides are improved hosts for raising high-affinity, high-titer anti-ganglioside IgG antibodies for probing for the distribution and physiology of gangliosides and the pathophysiology of anti-ganglioside antibodies.

Cytomegalovirus is not associated with IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein/sulphate-3-glucuronyl paragloboside antibody-associated neuropathy

Monoclonal antibodies reactive with the HNK-1 epitope of myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and the sulphate-3-glucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG)-like glycolipids are often found in the serum of patients with IgM paraprotein-associated demyelinating neuropathy. The presence of such antibodies in patients with chronic polyneuropathy has recently been associated with evidence of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection by the polymerase chain reaction. We wished to test these findings and examined sera from patients with MAG-reactive or MAG-nonreactive paraproteinemic neuropathy and patients with paraproteinemia only for the presence of CMV DNA and anti-CMV antibodies. CMV DNA was not detected in sera from any patient group. Furthermore, anti-CMV antibody prevalence was normal and similar in all 3 groups. We therefore report no evidence of an association between CMV infection and anti-MAG/SGPG antibodies associated with paraproteinemic peripheral neuropathy.

Successful treatment of IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with fludarabine

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response of four patients with IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy to a novel therapy-pulsed intravenous fludarabine.

BACKGROUND

The peripheral neuropathy associated with IgM paraproteinaemia usually runs a chronic, slowly progressive course which may eventually cause severe disability. Treatment with conventional immunosuppressive regimens has been unsatisfactory. Fludarabine is a novel purine analogue which has recently been shown to be effective in low grade lymphoid malignancies.

METHODS

Four patients were treated with IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy with intravenous pulses of fludarabine. Two of the four patients had antibodies to MAG and characteristic widely spaced myelin on nerve biopsy and a third had characteristic widely spaced myelin only. The fourth had an endoneurial lymphocytic infiltrate on nerve biopsy and a diagnosis of Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia.

RESULTS

In all cases subjective and objective clinical improvement occurred associated with a significant fall in the IgM paraprotein concentration in three cases. Neurophysiological parameters improved in the three patients examined. The treatment was well tolerated. All patients developed mild, reversible lymphopenia and 50% mild generalised myelosuppression, but there were no febrile episodes.

CONCLUSION

Fludarabine should be considered as a possible treatment for patients with IgM MGUS paraproteinaemic neuropathy.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a prevalence study in south east England

Although there are now widely accepted diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) there are few epidemiological data. A prevalence study was performed in the four Thames health regions, population 14 049 850. The prevalence date was 1 January 1995. Data were from a national consultant neurologist surveillance programme and the personal case series of two investigators. A diagnosis of CIDP was made according to definite, probable, possible, or suggestive diagnostic criteria. A wide difference in prevalence rates between the four health regions was noted, probably due to reporting bias. In the South East Thames Region, from which the data were most comprehensive the prevalence for definite and probable cases was 1.00/100 000; the highest total prevalence (if possible and suggestive cases were included) would have been 1.24/100 000. On the prevalence date 13% of patients required aid to walk and 54% were still receiving treatment.