FGFR inhibitors in urothelial cancer: Contextualizing THOR within the new treatment landscape

As frontline treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (UC) evolves, optimal sequencing of subsequent therapies remains unclear. The phase 3 THOR trial compared the efficacy of erdafitinib to chemotherapy or immunotherapy in FGFR3/2-altered advanced UC. THOR offers valuable data informing sequencing strategies, reinforcing the need for molecular testing in UC.

Relationship Between Availability of Urologists and Primary Care Providers and Stage of Diagnosis for Invasive Urinary Bladder Cancer

INTRODUCTION

With no recommended screening approach, urinary bladder cancer patients rely on referral to urologists to ensure timely diagnosis of bladder cancer. This requires coordination between primary and specialty care. We provide estimates of the relative association between primary care physician and urologist density on stage of urinary bladder cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

We used 2010 to 2016 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data to identify all adult patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. Our primary outcome was locoregional stage of diagnosis, since treatment modality changes and prognosis worsens beyond this stage. Based on patient's residential location at the time of diagnosis we defined both density of urologists and number of primary care providers (defined as providers per population) within the patient's county. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between provider density and likelihood of locoregional stage of diagnosis. We also controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, and year.

RESULTS

Our sample included 11,771 urinary bladder cancer patients with 10,607 diagnosed at locoregional stage and 1164 at distant stage. Multivariate regression results show primary care density was associated with significantly higher odds of locoregional stage of diagnosis (odds ratio of 1.05 [95% CI: 1.02-1.08]) while urologist density was associated with significantly lower odds of locoregional stage (odds ratio of 0.65 [95% CI: 0.48-0.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

We found primary care density but not urologist density was associated with earlier stage of diagnosis, highlighting the importance of access to primary care and need for timely referral to urologic care.

The impact of cancer metastases on COVID-19 outcomes: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium registry-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 can have a particularly detrimental effect on patients with cancer, but no studies to date have examined if the presence, or site, of metastatic cancer is related to COVID-19 outcomes.

METHODS

Using the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry, the authors identified 10,065 patients with COVID-19 and cancer (2325 with and 7740 without metastasis at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis). The primary ordinal outcome was COVID-19 severity: not hospitalized, hospitalized but did not receive supplemental O2 , hospitalized and received supplemental O2 , admitted to an intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, or died from any cause. The authors used ordinal logistic regression models to compare COVID-19 severity by presence and specific site of metastatic cancer. They used logistic regression models to assess 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to patients without metastasis, patients with metastases have increased hospitalization rates (59% vs. 49%) and higher 30 day mortality (18% vs. 9%). Patients with metastasis to bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and brain have significantly higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.38, 1.59, 1.38, 1.00, and 2.21) compared to patients without metastases at those sites. Patients with metastasis to the lung have significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.00) when adjusting for COVID-19 severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic cancer, especially with metastasis to the brain, are more likely to have severe outcomes after COVID-19 whereas patients with metastasis to the lung, compared to patients with cancer metastasis to other sites, have the highest 30-day mortality after COVID-19.

Durvalumab and guadecitabine in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase Ib/II study BTCRC-GU16-043

Epigenetic modulation is well established in hematologic malignancies but to a lesser degree in solid tumors. Here we report the results of a phase Ib/II study of guadecitabine and durvalumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC; NCT03308396). Patients received guadecitabine (starting at 60 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1-5 with de-escalation to 45 mg/m2 in case of dose limiting toxicity) with durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously on day 8). The study enrolled 57 patients, 6 in phase Ib with safety being the primary objective and 51in phase II, comprising 2 cohorts: 36 patients in Cohort 1 were treatment naive to checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) with 0-1 prior therapies and 15 patients in Cohort 2 were treated with up to two prior systemic therapies including one CPI. The combination of guadecitabine 45 mg/m2 with durvalumab 1500 mg was deemed safe. The primary objective of overall response rate (ORR) in cohort 1 was 22%. Sixteen patients (44%) experienced stable disease (SD). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate, and safety as well as ORR for Cohort 2. Median PFS for cohort 1 and cohort 2 were 14.26 and 3.91 months respectively. Median OS was not reached. In cohort 2, one patient achieved a partial response and 60% achieved SD. Asymptomatic neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Even though the trial did not meet the primary objective in cohort 1, the tolerability and PFS signal in CPI naive patients are worth further investigation.

Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study

Background

Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations.

Methods

This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity.

Results

1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32-1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70-6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83-12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63-3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20-2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66-3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89-22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status.

Conclusions

Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients.

Funding

This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication.

Clinical trial number

CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.

Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Thromboembolic Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer and COVID-19

Importance

Systematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.

Objective

To assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.

Exposure

Treatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.

Results

Of 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19-related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Development of a V5-tag-directed nanobody and its implementation as an intracellular biosensor of GPCR signaling

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) form the foundation of any cell signaling network. Considering that PPIs are highly dynamic processes, cellular assays are often essential for their study because they closely mimic the biological complexities of cellular environments. However, incongruity may be observed across different PPI assays when investigating a protein partner of interest; these discrepancies can be partially attributed to the fusion of different large functional moieties, such as fluorescent proteins or enzymes, which can yield disparate perturbations to the protein's stability, subcellular localization, and interaction partners depending on the given cellular assay. Owing to their smaller size, epitope tags may exhibit a diminished susceptibility to instigate such perturbations. However, while they have been widely used for detecting or manipulating proteins in vitro, epitope tags lack the in vivo traceability and functionality needed for intracellular biosensors. Herein, we develop NbV5, an intracellular nanobody binding the V5-tag, which is suitable for use in cellular assays commonly used to study PPIs such as BRET, NanoBiT, and Tango. The NbV5:V5 tag system has been applied to interrogate G protein-coupled receptor signaling, specifically by replacing larger functional moieties attached to the protein interactors, such as fluorescent or luminescent proteins (∼30 kDa), by the significantly smaller V5-tag peptide (1.4 kDa), and for microscopy imaging which is successfully detected by NbV5-based biosensors. Therefore, the NbV5:V5 tag system presents itself as a versatile tool for live-cell imaging and a befitting adaptation to existing cellular assays dedicated to probing PPIs.

Management of Fibroblast Growth Factor Inhibitor Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Interest in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Background

Erdafitinib is indicated for the treatment of adults with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma and susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations progressing on/after one or more lines of prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Objective

To better understand the frequency and management of select treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) to enable optimal fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor (FGFRi) treatment.

Design setting and participants

Longer-term efficacy and safety results of the BLC2001 (NCT02365597) trial in patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were studied.

Intervention

Erdafitinib schedule of 8 mg/d continuous in 28-d cycles, with uptitration to 9 mg/d if serum phosphate level was <5.5 mg/dl and no significant TEAEs occurred.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Adverse events were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used for the cumulative incidence of the first onset of TEAEs by grade. Time to resolution of TEAEs was summarized descriptively.

Results and limitations

At data cutoff, the median treatment duration was 5.4 mo among 101 patients receiving erdafitinib. Select TEAEs (total; grade 3) were hyperphosphatemia (78%; 2.0%), stomatitis (59%; 14%), nail events (59%; 15%), non-central serous retinopathy (non-CSR) eye disorders (56%; 5.0%), skin events (55%; 7.9%), diarrhea (55%; 4.0%), and CSR (27%; 4.0%). Select TEAEs were mostly of grade 1 or 2, and were managed effectively with dose modifications, including dose reductions or interruptions, and/or supportive concomitant therapies, resulting in few events leading to treatment discontinuation. Further work is needed to determine whether management is generalizable to the nonprotocol/general population.

Conclusions

Identification of select TEAEs and appropriate management with dose modification and/or concomitant therapies resulted in improvement or resolution of most TEAEs in patients, allowing for continuation of FGFRi treatment to ensure maximum benefit.

Patient summary

Early identification and proactive management are warranted to mitigate or possibly prevent erdafitinib side effects to allow for maximum drug benefit in patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.

Clinical Characteristics, Racial Inequities, and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study

Background

Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations.

Methods

This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity.

Results

1,383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32 - 1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70 - 6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83 - 12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63 - 3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20 - 2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66 - 3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89 - 22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status.

Conclusions

Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to Non-Hispanic White patients.

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections among patients with cancer following two and three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a retrospective observational study from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium

Background

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections following vaccination against COVID-19 are of international concern. Patients with cancer have been observed to have worse outcomes associated with COVID-19 during the pandemic. We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after 2 or 3 doses of mRNA vaccines.

Methods

We evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with cancer who developed breakthrough infections using data from the multi-institutional COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19; NCT04354701). Analysis was restricted to patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed in 2021 or 2022, to allow for a contemporary unvaccinated control population; potential differences were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model after inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for potential baseline confounding variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, with key secondary endpoints of hospitalization and ICU and/or mechanical ventilation (ICU/MV).

Findings

The analysis included 2486 patients, of which 564 and 385 had received 2 or 3 doses of an mRNA vaccine prior to infection, respectively. Hematologic malignancies and recent receipt of systemic anti-neoplastic therapy were more frequent among vaccinated patients. Vaccination was associated with improved outcomes: in the primary analysis, 2 doses (aOR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.88) and 3 doses (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.36) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality. There were similar findings for the key secondary endpoints of ICU/MV (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.82 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.58) and hospitalization (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75 and 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46) for 2 and 3 doses, respectively. Importantly, Black patients had higher rates of hospitalization (aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.92), and Hispanic patients presented with higher rates of ICU/MV (aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44).

Interpretation

Vaccination against COVID-19, especially with additional doses, is a fundamental strategy in the prevention of adverse outcomes including death, among patients with cancer.

Funding

This study was partly supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to C-YH, YS, SM, JLW; T32-CA236621 and P30-CA046592 to C.R.F; CTSA 2UL1TR001425-05A1 to TMW-D; ACS/FHI Real-World Data Impact Award, P50 MD017341-01, R21 CA242044-01A1, Susan G. Komen Leadership Grant Hunt to MKA. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH).

Metabolomic response of microalgae towards diclofenac sodium during its removal from water and concomitant recovery of pigments and lipids

The aim of this work was to assess the efficiency of freshwater green microalga, Chlorella sorokiniana for diclofenac sodium (DFS) removal, and metabolic response of alga to comprehend the metabolic pathways involved/affected during DFS decontamination. Results showed 91.51 % removal of DFS could be achieved within 9 days of algal treatment along with recovery of enhanced value-added bioresources i.e. chlorophyll, carotenoids, and lipids from the spent biomass. DFS also had an effect on enzyme activity including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and lipid peroxidation (MDA). Furthermore, metabolomics profiling provided an in-depth insight into changes in the metabolic response of C. sorokiniana wherein DFS induced 32 metabolites in microalgae compared to unexposed-control. This study offers microalgae as a green option for DFS removal, and the metabolomics study complemented with DFS could be an approach to understand the stress-induced strategies of C. sorokiniana for concomitant value-added products recovery in presence of DFS.

Angelica herbal supplement AGN-CognI.Q acute dose safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) dose-response in patients with prostate cancer (PK Dose Trial)

TPS404

Background: There are currently no FDA approved modalities for intercepting biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after standard of care surgery and radiation therapies to delay or prevent the need of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized disease. Preclinical modeling has suggested herbal alcoholic extracts of Angelica gigas Nakai (AGN) root, their signature pyranocoumarins and metabolite decursinol, as potential novel modalities to address this unmet clinical need. We hypothesize that CognI.Q at the higher doses has an acceptable safety profile in prostate cancer patients and pharmacokinetics (PK) exposure metrics will be increased proportional to dose increment. Methods: This is a single institution, phase 1 PK study, N=12. Primary objective- PK, pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers with a single ascending dose (SAD)-PK response design. After a subject is enrolled, a 14-day gap must occur before the next subject can be enrolled. If one subject develops a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at any dose level, that subject will stop participation; If a 2nd subject develops DLT at the same dose level, the trial will be stopped, and the dose level below will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Any subject at a higher dose level at the time of occurrence of 2nd DLT will also stop participation. All subjects will initially start at the 800 mg x 1dose, with further single dose escalation to 1200mg, 1600mg, 2000mg doses of AGN-CognI.Q; each dose will be 1-2 weeks apart. Inclusion criteria: Treated PCa, not on ADT; no active cancer. Subjects will be assessed for safety- clinical, labs (CBC, CMP, baseline and after 24hrs) and EKGs. PK blood will be taken at hourly intervals from 2-7hrs and 24hrs. Plasma pyranocoumarin content will be measured by LC-MS. Immunophenotyping of NK and T cell subtypes will be assessed at baseline and 24 h. Primary Endpoint: MTD. Secondary Endpoint: PK metrics; genotype CYP 2C19 and 3A4 metabolizer status and explore relationship to PK metrics and safety metrics; NK and inflammatory and immune cytokines as PD biomarkers. Trial is now open to accrual (Clinical trial registration NCT05375539). We anticipate that the acute dose safety and PK/PD information will inform the optimal design and execution of the longer-term safety and efficacy (phase I/II) trials. Research Support: MPI 1R01CA260901-01A. Clinical trial information: Clinical trial registration NCT05375539 .

COVID-19 vaccination behavior and outcomes in patients with genitourinary cancer in comparison with other cancer types

134

Background: Cancer(ca) and old age are risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 (C19+) disease, related morbidity and mortality. These patients (pts) were excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of 3 FDA approved C19 vaccines (vax). Genitourinary (GU) ca-prostate, bladder and kidney ca contribute to the majority of non-skin ca and median age of these pts range from 65-75 yrs. We aimed to study these highly vulnerable pts behavior and outcomes regarding C19 vax in comparison to non-GU ca pts (18-89 years). Methods: A prospective and observational single center study. Adult ca pts seen in clinics from Nov 2021-Sept 2022 were randomly interviewed using telephone surveys after a verbal consent. Type of ca and therapy data were collected from pts’ medical records. The survey included C19 disease status, vax status positive (+) or negative (-), reason for vax status, side effects (s.e), impact on ca Rx or ca progression. Data was entered on REDCap. The primary end point was rate of vaccination in adult ca pts. Secondary end points were to quantify C19 vax acceptance vs. hesitance, identify s.e of C19 vax and effect of C19 vax on outcomes in GU and non-GU Ca pts. Results: N=172; GU ca 21 (12.2%) and non-GU ca 151 (87.8%). Among GU ca pts- 9 had prostate ca, 7 had bladder ca and 5 had renal ca. C19+ in 4 (19%) GU and 45 (30.2%) non-GU pts. GU pts: 90.5% received C19 vax (Pfizer 47.6%; Moderna 42.9%, J & J 0%); 9.5% were not vaxed. Non-GU pts: 85.2% received C19 vax (Pfizer 39.1%; Moderna 43%, J & J 2.6%); 14.8% were not vaxed. The top 3 risk factors for serious C19+ were age >65yr (76.2%), heart disease (61.9%) and BMI>30 (42.9%) in GU ca pts and age >65yr (46.4%), BMI>30 (35.1%) and smoking (19.9%) in non-GU ca pts. The top 3 reasons for C19 vax (+) in GU ca pts: protection against C19+ for self (81%), for others (47.6%) and provider recommendation (38.1%). The main reasons for vax hesitancy in C19 vax (-) GU ca pts: concern for allergy to the vax (4.8%) and prior C19 infection (4.8%). The common s.e of C19 vax reported in GU ca pts were injection site inflammation (19%), headache (4.8%), muscle/body aches (4.8%) but no lymphadenopathy. None of GU ca pts reported delay in Rx or progression of the disease due to C-19 vax. Conclusions: C19 vax were overall well tolerated and did not impact ca outcomes in pts with GU malignancies. Oncologists should discuss the importance of C19 vax in the context of ca. Clinical trial information: NCT04953065 . [Table: see text]

Final results of phase Ib/II study of durvalumab and guadecitabine in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and biomarker analysis

696

Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMA) can augment the anti-tumor immune response. Guadecitabine (G) is a novel HMA shown to induce a dose-dependent decrease of global DNA and gene-specific methylation in pre-clinical models. Methods: This is phase Ib/II clinical trial of Guadecitabine (G) and Durvalumab (D) in advanced ccRCC. Phase Ib tested two doses of G, de-escalated from 60 mg/m2 to 45 mg/m2 in combination with standard dose of D. Followed by two cohorts in phase II. Cohort 1 (C1, CPI naïve) allowed up to one prior line of treatment and Cohort 2 (C2, CPI refractory) enrolled patients with up to two prior systemic therapies including at least one CPI. Primary endpoint in phase 1b was safety, primary endpoint in phase II was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoint of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and biomarkers evaluation. Results: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, 42 were in C1 and 15 in C2. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 neutropenia was noted with G 60 mg/m2. The combination of G 45 mg/m2 on days 1-5 along with D at 1500 mg on day 8, was deemed safe and the recommended phase II dose. Asymptomatic neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE). Other AEs included thyroid dysfunction, diarrhea, pneumonitis, myalgia, and hepatotoxicity. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The ORR for C1 and C2 were 26% and 7% respectively. The median PFS for C1 and C2 were 18.4 and 3.9 months respectively. Median OS was not reached. Flow cytometry on peripheral blood (PB) collected before treatment demonstrated myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) to be inversely associated with response, showing the highest levels in progressive disease (PD) and the lowest in partial response (PR). Responders to treatment had the highest expression of IFN γ, IL-17 and RORyt in CD8+ T cells and lower Foxp3 expression in CD4+ T cells compared to non-responders. We observed a significant increase in serum CXCL9/CXCL10 with the study combination (p 0.00003 and p 0.000005 respectively) and this increase correlated with better clinical outcome. Conclusions: The combination of D and G has an acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy mainly PFS in CPI naïve ccRCC patients, that is worth further investigation in larger randomized clinical trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03308396 .

Concurrent durvalumab and radiation therapy (DUART) followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with localized urothelial cancer of bladder: results from phase II study, BTCRC-GU15-023

BACKGROUND

Patients with bladder cancer (BC) who are cisplatin ineligible or have unresectable disease have limited treatment options. Previously, we showed targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with durvalumab (durva) and radiation therapy (RT) combination was safe in BC. We now report results from a phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of durva and RT in localized BC.

METHODS

This is a single-arm, multi-institutional phase II study; N=26. Enrolled patients had pure or mixed urothelial BC (T2-4 N0-2 M0) with unresectable tumors and were unfit for surgery or cisplatin ineligible. Patients received durva concurrently with RT ×7 weeks, followed by adjuvant durva × 1 year.

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS

(A) progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year and (B) disease control rate (DCR) post adjuvant durva. Key secondary endpoints: (A) complete response (CR) post durvaRT (8 weeks), (B) overall survival (OS), (C) PFS and (D) toxicity. Correlative studies included evaluation of baseline tumor and blood (baseline, post durvaRT) for biomarkers.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 27 months. Evaluable patients: 24/26 post durvaRT, 22/26 for DCR post adjuvant durva, all patients for PFS and OS. Post adjuvant durva, DCR was seen in 72.7%, CR of 54.5%. 1-year PFS was 71.5%, median PFS was 21.8 months. 1-year OS was 83.8%, median OS was 30.8 months. CR at 8 weeks post durvaRT was 62.5%. Node positive (N+) patients had similar median PFS and OS. DurvaRT was well tolerated. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events: anemia, high lipase/amylase, immune-nephritis, transaminitis, dyspnea (grade 4-COPD/immune), fatigue, rash, diarrhea and scleritis. No difference in outcome was observed with PD-L1 status of baseline tumor. Patients with CR/PR or SD had an increase in naïve CD4 T cells, a decrease in PD-1+CD4 T cells at baseline and an increase in cytokine-producing CD8 T cells, including interferon gamma (IFNγ) producing cells, in the peripheral blood.

CONCLUSION

Durva with RT followed by adjuvant durva was safe with promising efficacy in localized BC patients with comorbidities, including N+ patients. Larger randomized studies, like S1806 and EA8185, are needed to evaluate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy and RT in BC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02891161.

Interplay of Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Among Patients With Cancer and COVID-19

Importance

Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.

Objective

To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.

Exposures

Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.

Results

The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701.

Pharmaceutical residues: One of the significant problems in achieving 'clean water for all' and its solution

With the rapid emergence of various metabolic and multiple-drug-resistant infectious diseases, new pharmaceuticals are continuously being introduced in the market. The excess production and use of pharmaceuticals and their untreated/unmetabolized release in the environment cause the contamination of aquatic ecosystem, and thus, compromise the environment and human-health. The present review provides insights into the classification, sources, occurrence, harmful impacts, and existing technologies to curb these problems. A comprehensive detail of various biological and nanotechnological strategies for the removal of pharmaceutical residues from water is critically discussed focusing on their efficiencies, and current limitations to design improved-technologies for their lab-to-field applications. Furthermore, the review highlights and suggests the scope of integrated bionanotechnological methods for enhanced removal of pharmaceutical residues from water to fulfill the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UN-SDG) for providing clean potable water for all.

Association of the Time to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Initiation and Outcomes With Second Line ICI in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early progression on first-line (1L) platinum-based therapy or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but its prognostic role regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and survival is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of second-line (2L) ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study in patients with aUC treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, who received 2L ICI. Patients receiving switch maintenance ICI were excluded. We defined time to 2L ICI therapy as the time between the start of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy to the start of 2L ICI and categorized patients a priori into 1 of 3 groups: less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months. We calculated overall response rate (ORR) with 2L ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of 2L ICI. ORR was compared among the 3 groups using multivariable logistic regression, and PFS, OS using cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We included 215, 215, and 219 patients in the ORR, PFS, and OS analyses, respectively, after exclusions. ORR difference did not reach statistical significance between patients with less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months to 2L ICI. However, PFS (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and OS (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.84) was shorter among those with time to 2L ICI less than 3 months compared to those who initiated 2L ICI more than 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with aUC treated with 2L ICI, time to 2L ICI less than 3 months was associated with lower, but not significantly different ORR, but shorter PFS and OS compared to 2L ICI more than 6 months. This highlights potential cross resistance mechanisms between ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy.

FOXA1 repression drives lineage plasticity and immune heterogeneity in bladder cancers with squamous differentiation

Cancers arising from the bladder urothelium often exhibit lineage plasticity with regions of urothelial carcinoma adjacent to or admixed with regions of divergent histomorphology, most commonly squamous differentiation. To define the biologic basis for and clinical significance of this morphologic heterogeneity, here we perform integrated genomic analyses of mixed histology bladder cancers with separable regions of urothelial and squamous differentiation. We find that squamous differentiation is a marker of intratumoral genomic and immunologic heterogeneity in patients with bladder cancer and a biomarker of intrinsic immunotherapy resistance. Phylogenetic analysis confirms that in all cases the urothelial and squamous regions are derived from a common shared precursor. Despite the presence of marked genomic heterogeneity between co-existent urothelial and squamous differentiated regions, no recurrent genomic alteration exclusive to the urothelial or squamous morphologies is identified. Rather, lineage plasticity in bladder cancers with squamous differentiation is associated with loss of expression of FOXA1, GATA3, and PPARG, transcription factors critical for maintenance of urothelial cell identity. Of clinical significance, lineage plasticity and PD-L1 expression is coordinately dysregulated via FOXA1, with patients exhibiting morphologic heterogeneity pre-treatment significantly less likely to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Association of prior local therapy and outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 inhibitors in advanced urothelial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have vs have not undergone radical surgery (RS) or radiation therapy (RT) prior to developing metastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs across 25 institutions. We compared outcomes (observed response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) between patients with vs without prior RS, and by type of prior locoregional treatment (RS vs RT vs no locoregional treatment). Patients with de novo advanced disease were excluded. Analysis was stratified by treatment line (first-line and second-line or greater [second-plus line]). Logistic regression was used to compare ORR, while Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used for PFS and OS. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We included 562 patients (first-line: 342 and second-plus line: 220). There was no difference in outcomes based on prior locoregional treatment among those treated with first-line ICIs. In the second-plus-line setting, prior RS was associated with higher ORR (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.19-5.74]), longer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88) and PFS (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89) vs no prior RS. This association remained significant when type of prior locoregional treatment (RS and RT) was modelled separately.

CONCLUSION

Prior RS before developing advanced disease was associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in the second-plus-line but not in the first-line setting. While further validation is needed, our findings could have implications for prognostic estimates in clinical discussions and benchmarking for clinical trials. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, lack of randomization, and possible selection and confounding biases.

End-of-Life Costs of Cancer Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the U.S

CONTEXT

End-of-Life (EOL) care consumes a substantial amount of healthcare resources, especially among older persons with cancer. Having Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) brings additional complexities to these patients' EOL care.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the Medicare expenditures at the EOL (last 12 months of life) among beneficiaries having cancer and ADRD vs. those without ADRD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study used 2004-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Patient populations were deceased Medicare beneficiaries with cancer (breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate) and continuously enrolled for 12 months before death. Beneficiaries with ADRD were propensity score matched with non-ADRD counterparts. Generalized Estimating Equation Model was deployed to estimate monthly Medicare expenditures. Generalized Linear Models were constructed to assess total EOL expenditures.

RESULTS

Eighty six thousand three hundred ninety-six beneficiaries were included (43,198 beneficiaries with ADRD and 43,198 beneficiaries without ADRD). Beneficiaries with ADRD utilized $64,901 at the EOL, which was roughly $407 more than those without ADRD ($64,901 vs. $64,494, P = 0.31). Compared to beneficiaries without ADRD, those with ADRD had 11% higher monthly expenditure and 7% higher in total expenditures. Greater expenditure was incurred on inpatient (5%), skilled nursing facility (SNF) (119%), home health (42%), and hospice (44%) care.

CONCLUSION

Medicare spending at the EOL per beneficiary was not statistically different between cohorts. However, specific types of service (i.e., inpatient, SNF, home health, and hospice) were significantly higher in the ADRD group compared to their non-ADRD counterparts. This study underscored the potential financial burden and informed Medicare about allocation of resources at the EOL.

Disparities in access to novel systemic therapies in patients with urinary tract cancer: Propagating access, policies and resources uniformly

After several decades of therapeutic stagnation, the treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma has met a revolutionary wave, anticipated by the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and followed by newer therapeutic options in the post-ICI setting. These achievements were made in a very short time-frame, thus making the treatment of this disease particularly susceptible to geographical health disparity due to the differences in healthcare systems and approval processes of the regulatory authorities. Furthermore, additional barriers to access innovative care are represented by a limited coverage of clinical trials availability, that is consistent in focusing on selected geographical areas, across trials and clinical settings. Here, we present the current picture of new drug approvals in urothelial carcinoma worldwide, and we also focus our considerations onto the spectrum of ongoing trial inclusion possibilities, trying to understand what are the current gaps in clinical research and routine practice, identifying a way to move forward.

Association Between Sites of Metastasis and Outcomes With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sites of metastasis have prognostic significance in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but more information is needed regarding outcomes based on metastatic sites in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesized that presence of liver/bone metastases would be associated with worse outcomes with ICI.

METHODS

We identified a retrospective cohort of patients with aUC across 26 institutions, collecting demographics, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcomes information. Outcomes were compared with logistic (observed response rate; ORR) and Cox (progression-free survival; PFS, overall survival; OS) regression between patients with/without metastasis beyond lymph nodes (LN) and those with/without bone/liver/lung metastasis. Analysis was stratified by 1st or 2nd+ line.

RESULTS

We identified 917 ICI-treated patients: in the 1st line, bone/liver metastases were associated with shorter PFS (Hazard ratio; HR: 1.65 and 2.54), OS (HR: 1.60 and 2.35, respectively) and lower ORR (OR: 0.48 and 0.31). In the 2nd+ line, bone/liver metastases were associated with shorter PFS (HR: 1.71 and 1.62), OS (HR: 1.76 and 1.56) and, for bone-only metastases, lower ORR (OR: 0.29). In the 1st line, LN-confined metastasis was associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.53), OS (HR:0.49) and higher ORR (OR: 2.97). In the 2nd+ line, LN-confined metastasis was associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.47), OS (HR: 0.54), and higher ORR (OR: 2.79); all associations were significant.

CONCLUSION

Bone and/or liver metastases were associated with worse, while LN-confined metastases were associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC receiving ICI. These findings in a large population treated outside clinical trials corroborate data from trial subset analyses.

Environmental friendly Polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats encapsulated and coated with green algae mediated Titanium oxide nanoparticles for efficient oil spill adsorption

Oil spill causes extreme environmental damage, from aquatic life to seabirds, disrupting the entire ecosystem. Herein, we have synthesized high scale, economical and bio-compatible, green algae mediated Titanium oxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles and Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber mats. We have studied the effect of encapsulation and coating of TiO₂ nanoparticles over nanofiber mats for highly efficient oil spill adsorption. TiO₂ encapsulated and coated PAN (TECP) nanofibers showed a maximum of 62.34 g g^-1 adsorption capacity of petroleum oil from the water surface. Moreover, the composite mats show maximum adsorption within 45 s for up to 5 repeated cycles. Further, it has been observed that the adsorption capacity has increased by increasing the weight of the composite nanofiber mats, which confirms its commercial applicability. Thus, this work provides rapid, large-scale, economical, bio-compatible, and highly effective adsorbents for oil spill cleaning and extraction over natural waterbodies.

Angelica gigas: Signature Compounds, In Vivo Anticancer, Analgesic, Neuroprotective and Other Activities, and the Clinical Translation Challenges

Angelica gigas Nakai (AGN) root is a medicinal herbal widely used in traditional medicine in Korea. AGN root ethanolic extract dietary supplements are marketed in the United States for memory health and pain management. We comprehensively reviewed the anticancer, analgesic, pro-memory and other bio-activities of AGN extract and its signature phytochemicals decursin, decursinol angelate, and decursinol a decade ago in 2012 and updated their anticancer activities in 2015. In the last decade, significant progress has been made for understanding the pharmacokinetics (PK) and metabolism of these compounds in animal models and single dose human PK studies have been published by us and others. In addition to increased knowledge of the known bioactivities, new bioactivities with potential novel health benefits have been reported in animal models of cerebral ischemia/stroke, anxiety, sleep disorder, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease, sepsis, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and even male infertility. Herein, we will update PK and metabolism of pyranocoumarins, review in vivo bioactivities from animal models and human studies, and critically appraise the relevant active compounds, the cellular and molecular pharmacodynamic targets, and pertinent mechanisms of action. Knowledge gaps include whether human pyranocoumarin PK metrics are AGN dose dependent and subjected to metabolic ceiling, or metabolic adaptation after repeated use. Critical clinical translation challenges include sourcing of AGN extracts, product consistency and quality control, and AGN dose optimization for different health conditions and disease indications. Future research directions are articulated to fill knowledge gaps and address these challenges.

Effect of bone metastasis on outcomes in the CCTG BR.34 phase II randomized trial of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment with or without chemotherapy in high-risk, stage IVA/B NSCLC

9067

Background: Bone metastasis (BM) occurs in about 40% of patients with metastatic lung cancer. Recently, BM was associated with decreased OS to nivolumab in previously-treated NSCLC (Landi L et al, P1.01.53, 19th WCLC, 2018). CCTG BR.34 (NCT03057106) was an open-label, randomized phase II clinical trial that randomized 301 patients with treatment-naïve, high-risk, stage IVA/B NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations (1:1) to durvalumab plus tremelimumab with or without platinum doublet chemotherapy. First, 109 patients accrued with stage IVB, or selected IVA disease. Then 192 patients accrued with any stage IVA/B disease. In CCTG BR.34, median OS was not significantly different: 16.6 mo in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (C+IO) arm, vs 14.1 mo in the IO alone arm (HR 0.88, p = 0.46) (Leighl NB et al, J Thor Oncol, 2021). However, in BR.34 PFS was significantly longer in the C+IO arm (7.7 mo) compared to the IO alone arm (3.2 mo) (HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.52 – 0.88). Here we analyzed the effect of BM on outcomes in BR.34. Methods: The 301 patients in the trial were characterized by the presence of BM at study entry (129-yes, 172-no). BM effect was evaluated on trial outcomes (OS, PFS, and ORR) using Cox/logistic regression analysis. Multivariable analysis was performed adjusting for the clinical and molecular covariates available. Results: In univariate analysis of the entire study population, median OS was significantly shorter for patients with BM vs those without BM (10. 9 vs 18.7 mos, HR 1.68, p = 0.001), as was median PFS (3.4 vs 7.2 mos, HR 1.82, p < 0.0001), and lower ORR (29.5% vs 45.9%, OR 0.52, p = 0.003), respectively. There was no evidence of differential association of BM with treatment arms for OS (p = 0.23), PFS (p = 0.84), and ORR (p = 0.25, Breslow-Day test). In multivariate analysis (MVA), BM remained significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.44, p = 0.026), PFS (HR 1.69, p < 0.0001), and ORR (OR 0.52, p = 0.01). In MVA for OS: TMB, histology type, race, and ECOG were also significant; but age, smoking history, and PD-L1 IHC status were not significant. Conclusions: In CCTG BR.34 the presence of BM at trial entry was associated with significantly shorter OS, PFS, and lower ORR. BM is therefore a significant adverse prognostic factor in high-risk, stage IVA/B NSCLC treated with durvalumab and tremilimumab (with or without platinum doublet chemotherapy). If confirmed in a larger phase III trial, BM should be considered as an important new stratification factor in all clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We and others have reported that molecules arising in the bone microenvironment (e.g: IL-8, PTHrP, TGF-b, sclerostin, and activin A) cause immunosuppression in cancer, and future trials should evaluate the addition of targeted therapies against these factors in combination with the ICIs in patients with BM.

Genomic and immunologic profiles of concurrent RB1 and CDKN1A/p21(WAF1) truncating mutations (RW+) in bladder cancer

4571

Background: p53 target and cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A/p21(WAF1) was initially not found to be mutated in cancer. TCGA analysis identified CDKN1A mutations are present but rare with frequencies of < 1%, but enrich in bladder cancer (̃8%). Truncating WAF1 mutations are associated with sensitivity to cisplatin and are associated with truncating Rb mutations in bladder cancer (RW+). We hypothesized RW+ bladder cancers may represent a unique subgroup with sensitivity to therapeutics. Methods: A total of 1104 urothelial tumors underwent molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) utilizing NGS of DNA (592 Gene Panel, NextSeq, or WES, NovaSeq) and RNA (NovaSeq, WTS). Wilcoxon, Fisher’s exact were used for statistical significance (p value without and q value with multi comparison correction). Immune cell fraction (QuanTIseq) and pathway analysis (ssGSEA) were assessed by mRNA analysis. Immune epitope prediction was performed using the NetMHCpan v4.0 method in the Immune Epitope Database. Results: Concurrent truncating mutation (frameshift, nonsense) for RB1 and WAF1 were detected in 47 tumors (RW+, 4.25%) and tumors with wild-type status for both RB1 and WAF1 genes were classified as RW- group (54.08%). Tumors harboring only one RB1 or WAF1 mutation were excluded for further analysis. When compared to RW- group, RW+ tumors showed lower mutation rate of TP53 (54.5% vs 80.9%, q < 0.05), ARID1A (23.5% vs 38.3%, p < 0.05), and PIK3CA (18.4% vs 31.9%, p < 0.05). Interestingly, RW+ was mutually exclusive with FGFR3 mutation (18.0% vs 0%, p < 0.05). We further evaluated RNA expression of DNA repair and checkpoint arrest pathways. Notably, E2F pathway (Normalized Enrichment Scores, NES: 0.89 vs 0.86, q < 0.01) and DNA G2M checkpoint (NES: 0.89 vs 0.86, q < 0.01) were found to be the most enriched in RW+ with respect to RW- group. In addition, mRNA levels of FANCC/A, CHEK1, WEE1, CDC25A/C, PALB2 and BRCA1/2 were found to be overexpressed in RW+ group (q < 0.05). RW+ tumors also displayed a distinct immunological profile: They were associated with higher PD-L1 status (63.8% vs 37.3%, q < 0.01), higher median TMB (11 mut/Mb vs 8 mut/Mb, q < 0.01) and with less frequent loss of heterozygosity for HLA-DPA1 (51.1% vs 66.7%, p < 0.05), with more high-binding-affinity neoantigen load (4.78 vs 3.89, p < 0.05) to MHC proteins, consistent with the significantly more myeloid dendritic cells in in RW+ group (0.3 vs 0.04, q < 0.001). Conclusions: Concurrent truncating mutation in RB1 and WAF1 (RW+) bladder carcinomas have fewer p53, ARID1A, and PIK3CA mutations but are enriched for E2F targets, G2/M checkpoint genes, FANCC/A, CHEK1, WEE1, CDC25A/C, PALB2 and BRCA1/2 and have a distinct immunological profile. The findings suggest therapeutic strategies for RW+ bladder cancers including Chk1/Wee1, PARP inhibitors, -/+ immunotherapy that may impact on clinical outcomes.

Landscape analysis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) by telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) alterations

4524

Background: TERT is a catalytic subunit of telomerase, the unique enzyme that confers immortality to cells and is expressed in >90% of cancer cells. Mutations in the TERT promoter region (pTERTmut) are the most prevalent noncoding mutations in cancer. Recent data suggest pTERTmut are associated with improved outcomes in patients with UC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated the molecular and immune landscape of UC with and without pTERTmut. Methods: UC tissue samples were analyzed for DNA alterations (NextSeq, 592 Genes; NovaSeq, WES) and mRNA expression (NovaSeq, WTS). Immune cell fraction was calculated by QuantiSeq (Finotello 2019, Genome Medicine). PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). MSI/MMR was tested by fragment analysis, IHC and NGS. TMB-H was based on a cut-off of > 10 mut/MB. We compared alterations between samples with and without detected pathogenic pTERTmut. Significance was determined by Mann–Whitney U, X2, and Fischer-Exact and p adjusted for multiple comparisons (q) was < 0.05 using Benjamini-Hochberg. Results: Overall, 1686 UC samples were analyzed, 1166 from primary lesions and 499 from a lymph node or metastatic site. pTERTmut was present in 68% of primary and 61% of metastatic tumors, and correlated with modest increase of TERT expression (1.18 fold, p=0.015). pTERTmut was associated with less frequent alterations in TP53, KMT2D, CCND1, MYC, KEAP1 and less MSI/dMMR. By contrast, pTERTmut was associated with more frequent alterations in ARID1A, TSC1, PIK3CA and TMB-H (all q<0.05). Over 41% of pTERTmut were TMB-H. TERTp mutations were not associated with FGFR alterations. The frequency of co-occurring mutations was similar by specimen site. In evaluating the immune landscape (Table), pTERTmut was associated with higher expression of PD-L1 (IHC, mRNA), PD-L2 (mRNA) and TIM3 (mRNA) in tumors from primary sites (all p and q<0.05), but not in metastatic sites. Investigation of tumor-associated immune cells demonstrated that pTERTmut correlated with higher percentage of M1-macrophages and CD8+ T cells in primary tumors, and was inversely-correlated with NK cells in metastatic sites (all q<0.05). Conclusions: This is the largest analysis looking at the molecular and immune landscape of pTERTmut UC tumors. We observed differential patterns of DNA alterations and tumor immune microenvironment based on pTERTmut status. Further work is needed to understand differences in these molecular cohorts and the association of these data with clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

POS1565-PARE ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS FOR PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN EDUCATION ON INFLAMMATORY MYOSITIS

Background

Nowadays 80% of internet users access health information online, with YouTube being the second most popular search website worldwide. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability and quality of videos pertaining to myositis on YouTube and identify lacunae in information material on the platform.

Objectives

This study aims to assess the quality and profile of myositis information videos on YouTube, and to compare and delineate attributes of useful and not useful videos using standard metrics.

Methods

A thorough search was carried out on YouTube using 9 search terms related to myositis. The inclusion criteria were primary English content related to myositis, acceptable audio-video quality, and multi-part videos to be considered as one, while duplicates and advertisements were excluded. The videos were classified as useful, not useful or misleading, and patient experiences (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of selection of YouTube videos for the study

Reliability of the videos was determined using the 5-point modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria and quality by the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) and 4-point JAMA scoring system. Score-based usefulness was defined as mDISCERN >4 or GQS >4 or JAMA >3. All values are in median and IQR.

Results

Of 453 analyzed videos 74% and 2% provided useful and not useful information respectively. 24% were patient experiences, and 324 (71%) were intended specifically for patients while 313 (69%) were for healthcare providers and students. Nearly one-thirds (n=143) reported information related to treatment of myositis.

Noteworthily, useful and not useful videos had similar views count. However, number of likes and daily viewership were higher for useful videos (p=0.024, p=0.046). Nearly half (47%) of useful videos were by professional medical societies/patient support groups while not useful ones were often by nonmedical media (38%).

Useful videos had higher mDISCERN reliability scores [4(3-4) vs 2(1-3), p<0.001] and better quality on GQS [4.5 (3.5-5) vs 1 (1-2.8), p<0.001] and JAMA [3 (3-4) vs 2.25 (2-3), p=0.004]. Physician predicted usefulness was discordant with score-based usefulness(κ=0.129). However, GQS score emerged significant (p=0.008) for predicting video usefulness in multivariate analysis (Table 1).

Table 1.

Factors predicting usefulness of video in binary logistic regression.

VariableB coefficientS.E.Exp (B) and 95% CIp valueIntended audience Anyone/General public-5.452.5860.004 (0.0-0.68)0.035Average GQS-2.861.0760.05 (0.007-0.47)0.008

GQS Global Quality Scale

. Exp (B) is odd’s ratio, p<0.05 is significant

Conclusion

Majority of English YouTube videos on myositis provide useful information for patients, largely related to treatment of myositis. However, the dynamic nature of YouTube could potentially change this equation in the future and physicians should correct any misinformation identified in face-to-face meetings or teleconsultations. High quality useful videos, often predicted by validated scores and produced by professional medical societies should be promoted as the first line of content consumed.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

EA8185: Phase 2 study of bladder-sparing chemoradiation (chemoRT) with durvalumab in clinical stage III, node-positive urothelial carcinoma (INSPIRE), an ECOG-ACRIN/NRG collaboration

TPS4617

Background: Patients [pts] withlymph node positive (LN+), non-metastatic bladder cancer (BC) have a better prognosis than those with metastatic (M1) disease. However, this population is under-represented in advanced bladder trials and ineligible for bladder-sparing trials. Therefore, there have been no larger prospective trials establishing the standard of care in LN+ BC. Given the promise of immunotherapy in advanced BC and potential synergy between immunotherapy and radiation, INSPIRE was designed to determine the role of concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab (durva) in this patient population when treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoRT. Methods: This is a randomized phase II study that is enrolling BC pts with stage III [N1-3 M0], pure or mixed urothelial cancer. Pts must have received ≥3 cycles of IC [either before or after registration, prior to randomization] without progression. LN+ is defined as radiologically LN ≥1.0 cm in short axis, with or without biopsy prior to IC. As long as pts do not progress on induction chemotherapy, they will be randomized to chemoRT+/- durva using 5 stratification factors (Simon Pocock minimization method) a) IC prior vs. post registration b) cisplatin vs non-cisplatin regimen during RT c) LN size d) response to IC e) extent of TURBT. Pts on the chemoRT+durva arm will get chemotherapy per physician choice + IMRT + 3 x doses of Q3wk durva for 6.5-8 wks, whereas those on the control arm will get chemoRT alone. The primary end point is clinical complete response [CR], defined as no radiologically measurable disease in the LNs and negative cystoscopy and bladder biopsy 8-10 weeks post-chemoRT +/- durva. Pts on the chemoRT + durva arm who have a CR or clinical benefit ( > T0 and ≤T2 in bladder per cystoscopy, biopsy + CR/PR/SD in LN by imaging) will get adjuvant Q4wk durva for 9 doses, while those on the chemoRT arm will undergo observation. Secondary end points include OS, PFS, bladder-intact event-free survival, rate of toxicity and salvage cystectomy. This study is designed to detect an improvement of 25% in clinical CR between both arms (37.5% to 62.5%). A total accrual of 114 pts (in order to enroll 92 evaluable pts) will provide 81% power to detect this difference using a Fisher’s exact test (assuming 10% drop out + anticipating that 20% chemotherapy-naïve pts will progress post IC). We are banking blood and primary tumor tissue pre- and post-chemoRT in both groups. The study was activated in August 2020 and accrual is ongoing. We expanded eligibility to include N3 in 9/2021. INSPIRE is the first prospective study designed for only LN+ BC and will define both short-term and long-term outcomes for bladder sparing in this patient population and has the potential to define a new treatment strategy for stage III BC. Clinical trial information: NCT04216290.

Geography Should Not Be an "Oncologic Destiny" for Urothelial Cancer: Improving Access to Care by Removing Local, Regional, and International Barriers

Urothelial cancer care is particularly susceptible to geographical health disparity given its complex nature, requiring access to several specialists such as a urologist, a medical oncologist, a radiation oncologist, a surgical oncologist, and multidisciplinary care teams. Furthermore, other barriers to care access in underserved areas include travel burden, longer wait times, late-stage disease at the time of diagnosis, cost, type of treatment, less enrollment in clinical trials, lack of follow-up among cancer survivors, and less research funding in this area. Here, we discuss the impact of geographical location on access to urothelial cancer care, management decisions, and outcomes and we reflect on how to address geographical disparities in care delivery.

Response and Outcomes to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Cancer Based on Prior Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but response rates can be modest. We compared outcomes between patients with and without prior intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), who received ICI for aUC, hypothesizing that prior intravesical BCG would be associated with worse outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study across 25 institutions in US and Europe. We compared observed response rate (ORR) using logistic regression; progression-free survival (PFS) and OS using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Analyses were stratified by treatment line (first line/salvage) and included multivariable models adjusting for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1026 patients with aUC were identified; 614, 617, and 638 were included in ORR, OS, PFS analyses, respectively. Overall, 150 pts had history of prior intravesical BCG treatment. ORR to ICI was similar between those with and without prior intravesical BCG exposure in both first line and salvage settings (adjusted odds radios 0.55 [P= .08] and 1.65 [P= .12]). OS (adjusted hazard ratios 1.05 [P= .79] and 1.13 [P= .49]) and PFS (adjusted hazard ratios 1.12 [P= .55] and 0.87 [P= .39]) were similar between those with and without intravesical BCG exposure in first line and salvage settings.

CONCLUSION

Prior intravesical BCG was not associated with differences in response and survival in patients with aUC treated with ICI. Limitations include retrospective nature, lack of randomization, presence of selection and confounding biases. This study provides important preliminary data that prior intravesical BCG exposure may not impact ICI efficacy in aUC.

Patients recently treated for B-lymphoid malignancies show increased risk of severe COVID-19: a CCC19 registry analysis

Patients with B-lymphoid malignancies have been consistently identified as a population at high risk of severe COVID-19. Whether this is exclusively due to cancer-related deficits in humoral and cellular immunity, or whether risk of severe COVID-19 is increased by anti-cancer therapy, is uncertain. Using data derived from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19), we show that patients treated for B-lymphoid malignancies have an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared to control populations of patients with non-B-lymphoid hematologic malignancies. Among patients with B-lymphoid malignancies, those who received anti-cancer therapy within 12 months of COVID-19 diagnosis experienced increased COVID-19 severity compared to patients with B-lymphoid malignancies off therapy, after adjustment for cancer status and several other prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that patients recently treated for a B-lymphoid malignancy are at uniquely high risk for severe COVID-19.

Computerized Decision Support for Bladder Cancer Treatment Response Assessment in CT Urography: Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy in Multi-Institution Multi-Specialty Study

This observer study investigates the effect of computerized artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support system (CDSS-T) on physicians’ diagnostic accuracy in assessing bladder cancer treatment response. The performance of 17 observers was evaluated when assessing bladder cancer treatment response without and with CDSS-T using pre- and post-chemotherapy CTU scans in 123 patients having 157 pre- and post-treatment cancer pairs. The impact of cancer case difficulty, observers’ clinical experience, institution affiliation, specialty, and the assessment times on the observers’ diagnostic performance with and without using CDSS-T were analyzed. It was found that the average performance of the 17 observers was significantly improved (p = 0.002) when aided by the CDSS-T. The cancer case difficulty, institution affiliation, specialty, and the assessment times influenced the observers’ performance without CDSS-T. The AI-based decision support system has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy in assessing bladder cancer treatment response and result in more consistent performance among all physicians.

EA8185: Phase 2 study of bladder-sparing chemoradiation (chemoRT) with durvalumab in clinical stage III, node positive urothelial carcinoma (INSPIRE), an ECOG-ACRIN/NRG collaboration

TPS594

Background: Patients [pts] withlymph node positive (LN+), non-metastatic bladder cancer (BC) have a better prognosis than those with metastatic (M1) disease. However, this population is under-represented in advanced bladder trials and ineligible for bladder-sparing trials. Therefore, there have been no larger prospective trials establishing the standard of care in LN+ BC. Given the promise of immunotherapy in advanced BC and potential synergy between immunotherapy and radiation, INSPIRE was designed to determine the role of concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab (durva) in this patient population when treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoRT. Methods: This is a randomized phase II study that is enrolling BC pts with stage III [N1-3 M0], pure or mixed urothelial cancer. Pts must have received ≥3 cycles of IC [either before or after registration, prior to randomization] without progression. LN+ is defined as radiologically LN ≥1.0 cm in short axis, with or without biopsy prior to IC. As long as pts do not progress on induction chemotherapy, they will be randomized to chemoRT+/- durva using 5 stratification factors (Simon Pocock minimization method) a) IC prior vs. post registration b) cisplatin vs non-cisplatin regimen during RT c) LN size d) response to IC e) extent of TURBT. Pts on the chemoRT+durva arm will get chemotherapy per physician choice + IMRT + 3 x doses of Q3wk durva for 6.5-8 wks, whereas those on the control arm will get chemoRT alone. The primary end point is clinical complete response [CR], defined as no radiologically measurable disease in the LNs and negative cystoscopy and bladder biopsy 8-10 weeks post-chemoRT +/- durva. Pts on the chemoRT + durva arm who have a CR or clinical benefit (>T0 and ≤T2 in bladder per cystoscopy, biopsy + CR/PR/SD in LN by imaging) will get adjuvant Q4wk durva for 9 doses, while those on the chemoRT arm will undergo observation. Secondary end points include OS, PFS, bladder-intact event-free survival, rate of toxicity and salvage cystectomy. This study is designed to detect an absolute improvement of 25% in clinical CR between both arms (37.5% to 62.5%). The accrual goal is 114, assuming 10% drop out + anticipating that 20% chemotherapy-naïve pts will progress post IC, and 92 evaluable pts that will provide 81% power to detect this difference using a Fisher’s exact test. We are banking blood and primary tumor tissue pre- and post-chemoRT in both groups. The study was activated in August 2020 and accrual is ongoing. We expanded eligibility to include N3 in 9/2021. INSPIRE is the first prospective study designed for only LN+ BC and will define both short-term and long-term outcomes for bladder sparing in this patient population and has the potential to define a new treatment strategy for stage III BC. Clinical trial information: NCT04216290.

Abstract P5-13-10: Elevated plasma IL-8 predicts for reduced outcomes in CCTG MA.38, a phase 2 randomized trial of palbociclib in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients

Background: CCTG MA38 (NCT02630693) was a randomized phase II clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy of 2 dose schedules of palbociclib [100mg PO on continuous daily dose (CDD)] compared to 125mg PO daily for 3 weeks on/1 week off (STD) along with physician-choice of endocrine therapy in patients with ER+, HER- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the second-line setting. The final analysis indicated that palbociclib had comparable efficacy, safety and QOL for both treatment arms (SABCS 2018, abstr PD1-10). Our lab has reported that IL-8 was highly expressed by primary human breast cancers, and that higher pretreatment plasma IL-8 was significantly correlated with elevated bone resorption in HR+MBC patients (Kamalakar A et al. Bone 61:176-85, 2014). Most recently, our lab has reported that elevated serum IL-8 predicts for significantly reduced OS in 3 large metastatic cohorts of pancreatic (ASCO 2019, abstr 4131), prostate (ASCO 2020, abstr e17565) and breast cancer patients (ASCO 2020, abstr 1067). In this retrospective study, we investigated the prognostic value of pretreatment plasma IL-8 in CCTG MA38. Methods: 123 patients enrolled in MA38 were analyzed in this retrospective biomarker study. Serum IL-8 levels were measured using the ELLA immunoassay platform (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to correlate plasma IL-8 levels with OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In the total study cohort, pretreatment plasma IL-8 concentration had a median of 11.10 pg/ml, and 25% and 75% interquartiles of 7.36 and 15.00 pg/ml, respectively. In univariate analysis higher plasma IL-8 was a significant adverse biomarker for reduced PFS as a continuous variable (p = 0.01), at the median cutpoint (HR= 1.55, p=0.042), and in quartile cutpoints (HR=2.28, p=0.03, Q4 vs Q1). For OS, higher plasma IL-8 also trended significant for reduced OS at the median cutpoint (HR= 1.66, p=0.10). In multivariate analysis, higher plasma IL-8 also trended significant for reduced PFS (HR= 1.47, p=0.094). Conclusions: In the CCTG MA.38 trial, higher pre-treatment plasma IL-8 level was associated with reduced PFS, and is therefore an adverse prognostic biomarker for reduced outcome to the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Anti-IL-8 therapy combined with CDK 4/6 inhibitors should be evaluated in future trials to improve outcome in patients with higher circulating IL-8.

Citation Format: Hyma V Polimera, Dhirisha Bhatt, Lois E Shepherd, Karen Gelmon, Anil A Joy, Wendy R Parulekar, Monika Joshi, Suhail M Ali, Kim Leitzel, Cristina Truica, Monali Vasekar, Joseph J Drabick, Harry Menon, Neal Shah, Ashok Maddukuri, Prashanth Moku, E. Scott Halstead, Daniel McKeone, Todd M Umstead, BE Chen, Allan Lipton. Elevated plasma IL-8 predicts for reduced outcomes in CCTG MA.38, a phase 2 randomized trial of palbociclib in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-10.

Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was shown to be clinically active and tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations in the primary analysis of the BLC2001 study at median 11 months of follow-up. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the selected regimen of erdafitinib determined in the initial part of the study.

METHODS

The open-label, non-comparator, phase 2, BLC2001 study was done at 126 medical centres in 14 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, at least one prespecified FGFR alteration, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and progressive disease after receiving at least one systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy or were ineligible for cisplatin. The selected regimen determined in the initial part of the study was continuous once daily 8 mg/day oral erdafitinib in 28-day cycles, with provision for pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg/day (8 mg/day UpT). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of erdafitinib. This is the final analysis of this study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02365597.

FINDINGS

Between May 25, 2015, and Aug 9, 2018, 2328 patients were screened, of whom 212 were enrolled and 101 were treated with the selected erdafitinib 8 mg/day UpT regimen. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Aug 9, 2019. Median efficacy follow-up was 24·0 months (IQR 22·7-26·6). The investigator-assessed objective response rate for patients treated with the selected erdafitinib regimen was 40 (40%; 95% CI 30-49) of 101 patients. The safety profile remained similar to that in the primary analysis, with no new safety signals reported with longer follow-up. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any causality occurred in 72 (71%) of 101 patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any cause were stomatitis (in 14 [14%] of 101 patients) and hyponatraemia (in 11 [11%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

With longer follow-up, treatment with the selected regimen of erdafitinib showed consistent activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations.

FUNDING

Janssen Research & Development.

Stepwise interventions for improving hand hygiene compliance in a level 3 academic neonatal intensive care unit in north India

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated effect of sequentially introducing four WHO-recommended interventions to promote hand-hygiene compliance in tertiary-care NICU.

STUDY DESIGN

Four dedicated research nurses directly observed doctors and nurses to record success in hand-hygiene opportunities at randomly selected NICU beds and randomly sampled time-slots in four phases (of 4-weeks each): I-Baseline, II-Self-directed learning; III-Participatory learning; IV-Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV); and V-CCTV-plus (with feedback).

FINDINGS

Hand-hygiene compliance changed from 61.8% (baseline) to 77% (end) with overall relative change: 24.6% (95% CI 18, 32; p value= 0.003); compared with preceding phase, relative changes of 21% (15, 28; <0.001), 4% (0, 8; 0.008), -10% (-13, -6; <0.001), and 10% (5, 15; <0.001) during phases II, III, IV, and V, respectively were observed. Rise in hand-hygiene compliance was higher for after-WHO-moments (12.7%; upto 2.5-folds for moment 5, <0.001) compared to before-WHO-moments (5.2%). Educational interventions, feedback and monitoring WHO moments can improve hand-hygiene compliance significantly among health-care providers in NICU.

Association Between Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Mortality Among Patients With Prostate Cancer and COVID-19

IMPORTANCE

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been theorized to decrease the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with prostate cancer owing to a potential decrease in the tissue-based expression of the SARS-CoV-2 coreceptor transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2).

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether ADT is associated with a decreased rate of 30-day mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with prostate cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study analyzed patient data recorded in the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium registry between March 17, 2020, and February 11, 2021. The consortium maintains a centralized multi-institution registry of patients with a current or past diagnosis of cancer who developed COVID-19. Data were collected and managed using REDCap software hosted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee. Initially, 1228 patients aged 18 years or older with prostate cancer listed as their primary malignant neoplasm were included; 122 patients with a second malignant neoplasm, insufficient follow-up, or low-quality data were excluded. Propensity matching was performed using the nearest-neighbor method with a 1:3 ratio of treated units to control units, adjusted for age, body mass index, race and ethnicity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, smoking status, comorbidities (cardiovascular, pulmonary, kidney disease, and diabetes), cancer status, baseline steroid use, COVID-19 treatment, and presence of metastatic disease.

EXPOSURES

Androgen deprivation therapy use was defined as prior bilateral orchiectomy or pharmacologic ADT administered within the prior 3 months of presentation with COVID-19.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of all-cause 30-day mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis for patients receiving ADT compared with patients not receiving ADT after propensity matching.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 1106 patients with prostate cancer (before propensity score matching: median age, 73 years [IQR, 65-79 years]; 561 (51%) self-identified as non-Hispanic White) were included for analysis. Of these patients, 477 were included for propensity score matching (169 who received ADT and 308 who did not receive ADT). After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in the primary end point of the rate of all-cause 30-day mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.42-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Findings from this cohort study suggest that ADT use was not associated with decreased mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, large ongoing clinical trials will provide further evidence on the role of ADT or other androgen-targeted therapies in reducing COVID-19 infection severity.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma: a comparison of outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73-1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06-2.59), respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.

Carbamazepine-associated Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome is a severe type IV (delayed T-cell-dependent reaction) hypersensitivity reaction, characterized by fever, mucocutaneous eruptions, eosinophilia, and systemic inflammatory involvement. It usually begins a few weeks after the exposure to offending drug. Commonly implicated drugs are aromatic anticonvulsants (phenytoin, phenobarbitone, and carbamazepine) and sulfa drugs (sulfonamides, sulfasalazine, and dapsone). It is a potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction. Here we report a case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome associated with carbamazepine, which was successfully treated with intravenous methylprednisolone.

Strength of Association between Infarct Volume and Clinical Outcome Depends on the Magnitude of Infarct Size: Results from the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Infarct volume is an important predictor of clinical outcome in acute stroke. We hypothesized that the association of infarct volume and clinical outcome changes with the magnitude of infarct size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were derived from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial, in which patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion were randomized to endovascular treatment plus either nerinetide or a placebo. Infarct volume was manually segmented on 24-hour noncontrast CT or DWI. The relationship between infarct volume and good outcome, defined as mRS 0-2 at 90 days, was plotted. Patients were categorized on the basis of visual grouping at the curve shoulders of the infarct volume/outcome plot. The relationship between infarct volume and adjusted probability of good outcome was fitted with linear or polynomial functions as appropriate in each group.

RESULTS

We included 1099 individuals in the study. Median infarct volume at 24 hours was 24.9 mL (interquartile range [IQR] = 6.6-92.2 mL). On the basis of the infarct volume/outcome plot, 4 infarct volume groups were defined (IQR = 0-15 mL, 15.1-70 mL, 70.1-200 mL, >200 mL). Proportions of good outcome in the 4 groups were 359/431 (83.3%), 219/337 (65.0%), 71/201 (35.3%), and 16/130 (12.3%), respectively. In small infarcts (IQR = 0-15 mL), no relationship with outcome was appreciated. In patients with intermediate infarct volume (IQR = 15-200 mL), there was progressive importance of volume as an outcome predictor. In infarcts of > 200 mL, outcomes were overall poor.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between infarct volume and clinical outcome varies nonlinearly with the magnitude of infarct size. Infarct volume was linearly associated with decreased chances of achieving good outcome in patients with moderate-to-large infarcts, but not in those with small infarcts. In very large infarcts, a near-deterministic association with poor outcome was seen.

A New Prognostic Model in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in the first-line (1L) setting for cisplatin-unfit patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-high tumors or for platinum (cisplatin/carboplatin)-unfit patients, response rates remain modest and outcomes vary with no clinically useful biomarkers (except for PD-L1).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in patients receiving 1L ICIs for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) in a multicenter cohort study.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients treated with 1L ICIs for aUC across 24 institutions and five countries (in the USA and Europe) outside clinical trials were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We used a stepwise, hypothesis-driven approach using clinician-selected covariates to develop a new risk score for patients receiving ICIs in the 1L setting. Demographics, clinicopathologic data, treatment patterns, and OS were collected uniformly. Univariate Cox regression was performed on 18 covariates hypothesized to be associated with OS based on published data. Variables were retained for multivariate analysis (MVA) if they correlated with OS (p < 0.2) and were included in the final model if p < 0.05 on MVA. Retained covariates were assigned points based on the beta coefficient to create a risk score. Stratified median OS and C-statistic were calculated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 984 patients, 357 with a mean age of 71 yr were included in the analysis, 27% were female, 68% had pure UC, and 13% had upper tract UC. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, albumin <3.5 g/dl, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio >5, and liver metastases were significant prognostic factors on MVA and were included in the risk score. C index for new 1L risk score was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.71). Limitations include retrospective nature and lack of external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a new 1L ICI risk score for OS based on data from patients with aUC treated with ICIs in the USA and Europe outside of clinical trials. The score components highlight readily available factors related to tumor biology and treatment response. External validation is being pursued.

PATIENT SUMMARY

With multiple new treatments under development and approved for advanced urothelial carcinoma, it can be difficult to identify the best treatment sequence for each patient. The risk score may help inform treatment discussions and estimate outcomes in patients treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, while it can also impact clinical trial design and endpoints. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: A new risk score was developed for advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. The score assigned Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, albumin <3.5 g/dl, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio >5, and liver metastases each one point, with a higher score being associated with worse overall survival.