A human liver cell-based system modeling a clinical prognostic liver signature for therapeutic discovery

Chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are life-threatening diseases with limited treatment options. The lack of clinically relevant/tractable experimental models hampers therapeutic discovery. Here, we develop a simple and robust human liver cell-based system modeling a clinical prognostic liver signature (PLS) predicting long-term liver disease progression toward HCC. Using the PLS as a readout, followed by validation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/fibrosis/HCC animal models and patient-derived liver spheroids, we identify nizatidine, a histamine receptor H2 (HRH2) blocker, for treatment of advanced liver disease and HCC chemoprevention. Moreover, perturbation studies combined with single cell RNA-Seq analyses of patient liver tissues uncover hepatocytes and HRH2+, CLEC5Ahigh, MARCOlow liver macrophages as potential nizatidine targets. The PLS model combined with single cell RNA-Seq of patient tissues enables discovery of urgently needed targets and therapeutics for treatment of advanced liver disease and cancer prevention.

Nizatidine and gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia

In clinical practice, H2-receptor antagonists, including nizatidine, in addition to their use in the treatment of peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux, are also useful in alleviating dyspeptic symptoms. Patients with functional dyspepsia show a tendency to delayed gastric emptying. Results of preliminary studies have demonstrated that nizatidine has a prokinetic effect due to its cholinergic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nizatidine on gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixteen patients with dyspeptic symptoms referred for gastroscopy by primary care physicians were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study. They received nizatidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo for 2 months. After a 1-month washout period, the 2-month treatment was repeated, with these patients acting as their own controls. Gastric emptying was measured by scintigraphy, and dyspeptic symptoms and quality of life were evaluated at the end of both treatment periods. Gastric emptying of solids during nizatidine therapy was prolonged (T1/2 110.1 +/- 76.7 vs. 65.6 +/- 23.2 min, P = 0.03), but nizatidine had no effect on gastric emptying of liquids. Nizatidine improved the symptom scores and seven of eight aspects of quality of life - but not significantly. In conclusion, nizatidine decreases the gastric emptying rate of solids without having a significant effect on symptoms or quality of life in functional dyspepsia.

Clinical study on the effects of nizatidine on gastric motility and cardiac autonomic function. Investigations using electrogastrography and spectral analysis of heart rate variability

Nizatidine (CAS 76963-41-2, Acinon), an H2 receptor antagonist, not only inhibits acid secretion but also improves gastrointestinal motility. However, autonomic nervous function has not been studied in detail using electrogastrography (EGG). In the present study, two protocols were adopted to study nizatidine's effects on cardiac autonomic function and gastric motility. Protocol I--Acute: "Group C-I": 10 healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of nizatidine 150 mg. Protocol II--Chronic: "Group DM without N": 15 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were observed prior to administration of nizatidine. "Group DM with N": The same 15 patients with DM received nizatidine 300 mg/day for more than 30 days. "Group C-II": This control group was composed of 15 healthy volunteers not receiving nizatidine. In all groups, EGGs were recorded before and after a meal, and autonomic nervous function and QT interval of ECG dispersions were simultaneously evaluated. In Group C-I, nizatidine significantly increased the peak power amplitude of 3 cycles/min (cpm) frequency, but did not significantly change the dominant frequency of the 3-cpm waves. In Group DM with N, nizatidine administration significantly increased the peak power amplitude from 2.4 cpm or a lower frequency (bradygastria) to 3 cpm. Prior to nizatidine administration but after eating a meal, the peak power amplitude on EGG was not increased in Group DM without N. In Group DM with N, however, the EGG peak power amplitude increased to levels similar to those of the healthy subjects (Group C-II). Neither the single nor the chronic administration of nizatidine significantly prolonged the QT interval or increased the QT dispersion. A spectral analysis of heart rate variability showed that nizatidine administration, whether acute or chronic, did not significantly change the indices of autonomic nervous activity. Nizatidine may promote gastric emptying by inhibiting acetylcholine esterase, thus increasing cholinergic activity, and by acting directly on gastric smooth muscle. The results indicate that because nizatidine increases gastric motility without exerting a negative influence on the autonomic nerves, it may be a useful drug in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Teprenone, but not H2-receptor blocker or sucralfate, suppresses corpus Helicobacter pylori colonization and gastritis in humans: teprenone inhibition of H. pylori-induced interleukin-8 in MKN28 gastric epithelial cell lines

BACKGROUND

The role of teprenone in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis has yet to be determined. To investigate the effect of teprenone on inflammatory cell infiltration, and on H. pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa in H. pylori-infected patients, we first compared the effect of teprenone with that of both histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2-RA) and sucralfate on the histological scores of H. pylori gastritis. We then examined its in vitro effect on H. pylori-induced interleukin (IL)-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 68 patients were divided into three groups, each group undergoing a 3-month treatment with either teprenone (150 mg/day), H2-RA (nizatidine, 300 mg/day), or sucralfate (3 g/day). All subjects underwent endoscopic examination of the stomach before and after treatment. IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Following treatment, the teprenone group showed a significant decrease in both neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density of the corpus (before vs. after: 2.49 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.23, p =.009; 2.36 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.00 +/- 0.24, p =.035, respectively), with no significant differences seen in either the sucralfate or H2-RA groups. Teprenone inhibited H. pylori-enhanced IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Teprenone may modify corpus H. pylori-associated gastritis through its effect on neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density, in part by its inhibition of IL-8 production in the gastric mucosa.

Developmental pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nizatidine

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the impact of development on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nizatidine.

METHODS

Children (age range, 5 days-18 years) and adults (age range, 18-50 years) were enrolled in four open-label trials. Nizatidine formulation and dose were determined by age: infants received 2 or 4 mg/kg i.v., children 2.5 or 5 mg/kg in one of three oral liquid formulations, and adolescents and adults received a fixed 150-mg capsule. Nizatidine and N-desmethylnizatidine concentrations were measured in serial post-dose plasma samples by a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. Intragastric pH was recorded during a 24-hour post-dose interval.

RESULTS

Data on 93 subjects were combined with previous values from 36 individuals to cover an age group not adequately captured and to control for formulation effects. Dose-normalized exposure estimates revealed no apparent age dependence; however, maximum plasma concentration (298.5 +/- 100.7 v 552.8 +/- 152.4 ng/mL per mg/kg dose) and AUC0-infinity (954.4 +/- 379.8 v 1,573.0 +/- 347.4 ng*hour/mL per mg/kg dose) were reduced in extemporaneous formulations in apple juice. The apparent modest age dependence observed for total body clearance (Cl/F) (r = 0.365) and Vss/F (r = 0.221) reflected a formulation-dependent decrease in bioavailability rather than a true age effect. The age-associated changes in lambda z observed for nizatidine and its metabolite were predictable and consistent with developmental acquisition of renal function. Mean and median pH, as well as fraction of time that the dosing interval remained above target pH values, were significantly greater with administration of the drug than without.

CONCLUSIONS

The biodisposition of nizatidine in children and adults is similar; however, response after a comparable weight-based dose is equal and potentially greater in children.

Nizatidine and cisapride increase salivary secretion in rats

Saliva is a neurally induced solution with buffering capacity against acidic solutions. Salivation therefore plays an important role in defending the esophageal mucosa against refluxed gastric acid and is evoked by cholinergic stimulation. Both nizatidine and cisapride are reported to increase acetylcholine concentrations in the postganglionic cholinergic synapses. We performed this study to clarify the effect of administration of nizatidine and cisapride on salivary secretion. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for the experiments. Histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion was measured after intraduodenal administration of nizatidine or famotidine to determine the equipotent acid-suppressing doses. Salivary secretion was then measured for 3 hr after intraduodenal administration of nizatidine (30 mg/kg), famotidine (3 mg/kg), or cisapride (1 mg/kg). Both nizatidine and famotidine dose-dependently inhibited histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Total salivary secretion was significantly increased by nizatidine (P = 0.02) and cisapride (P = 0.02) but not by famotidine (P = 0.50) compared with controls.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel nizatidine controlled-release formulation in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH effects of a novel nizatidine controlled-release (CR) formulation were compared to a currently marketed immediate-release (IR) nizatidine formulation (Axid). The bimodal pulsatile release characteristics of nizatidine CR decreased its Cmax by approximately 42% compared to nizatidine IR while maintaining 90% relative bioavailability; tmax was approximately 1.6 times longer with the CR formulation. These characteristics enabled controlled-release nizatidine to sustain effective plasma drug concentrations for a greater duration than immediate-release nizatidine over the dosing intervals. In multiple doses, the 24-hour AUC ratio for all comparisons of nizatidine CR 150 mg bid, nizatidine CR 300 mg daily, and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid was between 97% and 99%. Mean pH AUC values for nizatidine CR 150 mg bid and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid were similar overall during the 0- to 14-hour and 14- to 24-hour dosing intervals. For the 14- to 24-hour dosing interval, nizatidine CR 150 mg maintained gastric pH over 3.0 and 4.0 for 42% and 27% of the time compared to 39% and 23% for nizatidine IR, respectively. Nizatidine CR 300 mg, compared to the 150-mg CR and IR regimens, had a greater effect on increasing evening intragastric pH, thus providing support for the potential utility of nizatidine CR 300 mg dosed at night in alleviating nocturnal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Effects of histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists on human plasma levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide

The effects of the histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists (H(2)-antagonists), ranitidine, nizatidine, cimetidine and famotidine, on plasma levels of gastrointestinal peptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was investigated with respect to regulation of gastric mucosal blood flow, in healthy volunteers. H(2)-Antagonists or placebo was orally administered to five healthy male volunteers. Venous blood samples were taken before and after drug administration. The levels of plasma gastrointestinal peptides were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The administration of ranitidine and nizatidine caused significant increases in plasma CGRP and SP levels at 30 to 120 min compared with the placebo group. Peak plasma CGRP levels (39.8+/-3.1 and 40.6+/-3.6 pg mL(-1)) were achieved 60 min after administration of ranitidine and nizatidine, respectively. Maximum plasma SP levels (21.3+/-5.2 and 22.8+/-4.2 pg mL(-1)) were reached 60 min after administration of ranitidine and nizatidine, respectively. However, all H(2)-antagonists did not alter the levels of VIP. The released CGRP and SP by ranitidine and nizatidine administration may produce a gastroprotective effect, increase mucosal blood flow, and inhibit acid secretion in the gastrointestinal tract.

Lack of effect of nizatidine-induced elevation of gastric pH on the oral bioavailability of dapsone in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of histamine2 (H2)-receptor antagonist-induced elevation of gastric pH on oral bioavailability of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover, open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixteen men were enrolled in the study; data from 11 subjects were evaluable.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants received two treatments separated by at least 14 days. Treatment A consisted of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg. Treatment B consisted of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg plus two doses of oral nizatidine 300 mg administered 3-4 hours apart to maintain gastric pH above 6.0. Plasma samples collected before and up to 120 hours after dapsone administration were analyzed for dapsone and monoacetyldapsone (MADDS) by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Gastric pH in the first 6 hours after dapsone administration was above 6.0 for a mean +/- SD of 1.1% +/- 2.9% of the time in the absence of nizatidine and 69.5% +/- 18.0% of the time during nizatidine therapy. The geometric mean dapsone maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) declined by 13% (p<0.01), and median time to Cmax occurred 2 hours later (p<0.01) with nizatidine coadministration compared with dapsone alone. Inclusion of the 90% confidence interval for the mean Cmax ratio within the equivalence interval of 0.8-1.25 demonstrated the lack of clinical significance for this modest decrease in Cmax. Neither the area under the dapsone plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity nor the elimination half-life of dapsone were significantly altered by nizatidine. No clinically significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of MADDS with regard to coadministration of nizatidine.

CONCLUSION

Elevation of gastric pH by H2-receptor antagonists, such as nizatidine, does not result in clinically important changes in the rate or extent of oral dapsone absorption.

Effect of nizatidine on paracetamol and its metabolites in human plasma

The effect of the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, nizatidine, on plasma concentrations of paracetamol has been investigated with respectto hepatic metabolism. Paracetamol (1000 mg) together with 300 or 150 mg nizatidine or placebo was orally administered to five healthy male volunteers. Venous blood samples were taken before and after administration. Plasma paracetamol and paracetamol conjugates (glucuronide and sulfate) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curves of each volunteer. The plasma nizatidine concentration was highest (2420.0+/-192.4 and 996.0+/-54.6 ng mL(-1)) in the sample taken 1 h after administration of 300 mg nizatidine (high dose) and 150mg nizatidine (low dose), respectively. Plasma paracetamol concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were increased significantly at 45-120 min and 45-60 min, respectively, compared with placebo. The total area under the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curve from 0 to 180 min (2361.5+/-146.4 and 2085.75+/-73.5 microg min mL(-1)) significantly increased after coadministration of nizatidine (high and low doses), respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Paracetamol glucuronide concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were decreased significantly at 30-45 min and 30 min, respectively, compared with placebo. However, plasma paracetamol sulfate concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were not significantly altered. The coadministration of nizatidine (150 and 300 mg) dose-dependently reduces plasma paracetamol glucuronide concentrations and increases plasma paracetamol concentrations. The effects of nizatidine could result from the inhibition of glucuronyltransferase. Thus, care is necessary when paracetamol and nizatidine are coadministered.

Nizatidine and omeprazole enhance the effect of metronidazole on Helicobacter pylori in vitro

Treatment failures are common in patients infected with metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori in the gastric mucosa when triple therapy including metronidazole is used. In patients with treatment failure and metronidazole-resistant H. pylori, a higher eradication rate for H. pylori was found after secondary treatment with bismuth/ranitidine in combination with antibiotics including metronidazole, compared with the same antibiotics combined with a standard dose of omeprazole. This agrees with our previous finding that bismuth was able to reduce the susceptibility of H. pylori to metronidazole. In this study, we have found that nizatidine, an H(2)-receptor antagonist, is also able to reduce the susceptibility of H. pylori to metronidazole in vitro, despite having no direct inhibitory effect on the growth of H. pylori. This agrees with earlier findings that compounds having the ability to reverse antibiotic resistance do not necessarily have an antibiotic or chemotherapeutic effect in the sense of growth inhibition. Therefore, it was decided to investigate the effect of nizatidine and omeprazole on the oxidative respiratory chain, as it is known that metronidazole is able to inhibit the activity of fumarate reductase of H. pylori. This enzyme is a key enzyme in the alternative respiratory chain under anaerobic conditions. Nizatidine was, in these preliminary experiments, found to inhibit fumarate reductase in a dose-dependent way, like metronidazole, whereas omeprazole had almost no effect on fumarate reductase. No other significant effects on the enzymes of the respiratory chain were found. The synergistic effect of nizatidine on metronidazole resistant H. pylori strains could be explained by the effect on fumarate reductase, whereas the effect of omeprazole is different and could be an inhibition of a proton pump in H. pylori. Reversal of antimicrobial resistance with the help of different non-antibiotics seems to be possible by using quite different compounds, and is therefore to be explained by different molecular mechanisms.

Nizatidine and cisapride enhance salivary secretion in humans

BACKGROUND

Salivation plays an important role in the defence of the oesophageal mucosa against gastric acidic reflux and can be evoked by cholinergic stimulation. Both nizatidine and cisapride have been reported to increase acetylcholine concentrations in the cholinergic system.

AIM

To investigate the effect of nizatidine and cisapride on salivary secretion, salivary epidermal growth factor and bicarbonate output.

METHODS

The salivary volume and concentration of salivary epidermal growth factor and bicarbonate were measured after the administration of nizatidine (150 mg), famotidine (20 mg) and cisapride (5 mg) in 30 male healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Basal and stimulated salivary secretions were found to be increased after the administration of nizatidine and cisapride. In contrast, salivary secretion was not increased by famotidine. Although epidermal growth factor content was not augmented, nizatidine and cisapride administration also increased the bicarbonate output in mastication-stimulated saliva.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased salivary secretion and bicarbonate output induced by nizatidine may be useful for the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Nizatidine enhances the gastrocolonic response and the colonic peristaltic reflex in humans

Animal studies demonstrate that nizatidine, an H2-receptor inhibitor, may enhance colonic activity independent of its effect on acid secretion. The effect of nizatidine on human colonic motility is unknown. We evaluated the potential prokinetic property of nizatidine in 12 healthy subjects (10 men and 2 women, age 21-46 years). Each subject received either nizatidine (600 mg), famotidine (80 mg, a H2-receptor inhibitor used as a control), or a placebo, on separate days in randomized order at least 3 days apart. Following an overnight fast, a three-lumen catheter fitted with a stimulus balloon and two barostat bags was placed in the descending colon. The gastrocolonic response was tested by antral balloon inflation and the colonic peristaltic reflex was evaluated by colonic distension. Changes in colonic motility were assessed by volume changes in the barostat bags. Antral distension evoked volume-dependent increases in colonic motility, maximal at a 300-ml inflation, as demonstrated by a reduced bag volume. Nizatidine enhanced colonic motility in response to antral distension at 200 and 300 ml, compared with famotidine and placebo. Colonic distension evoked volume-dependent increases in colonic motility proximal to the stimulus balloon. Compared with famotidine and placebo, nizatidine enhanced the ascending and descending contractile limbs of the peristaltic reflex but did not affect relaxation distal to the balloon. In conclusion, nizatidine enhanced the gastrocolonic response and the colonic peristaltic reflex in healthy subjects. Further research on the prokinetic action of nizatidine in the colon may lead to novel treatments for idiopathic constipation.

Bicarbonate stimulatory action of nizatidine, a histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist, in rat duodenums

Nizatidine, a histamine H(2)-antagonist, is known to inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and is used clinically as a gastroprokinetic agent as well as the anti-ulcer agent. We examined whether or not nizatidine stimulates duodenal HCO(3)(-) secretion in rats through vagal-cholinergic mechanisms by inhibiting AChE activity. Under pentobarbital anesthesia, a proximal duodenal loop was perfused with saline, and the HCO(3)(-) secretion was measured at pH 7.0 using a pH-stat method and by adding 10 mM HCl. Nizatidine, neostigmine, carbachol, famotidine or ranitidine was administered i.v. as a single injection. Intravenous administration of nizatidine (3-30 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased the HCO(3)(-) secretion, and the effect at 10 mg/kg was equivalent to that obtained by carbachol at 0.01 mg/kg. The HCO(3)(-) stimulatory action of nizatidine was observed at the doses that inhibited the histamine-induced acid secretion and enhanced gastric motility. This effect was mimicked by neostigmine (0.03 mg/kg) and significantly attenuated by bilateral vagotomy and pretreatment with atropine but not indomethacin. The IC(50) of nizatidine for AChE of rat erythrocytes was 1.4 x 10(-6) M, about 12 times higher than that of neostigmine. Ranitidine showed the anti-AchE activity and increased duodenal HCO(3)(-) secretion, similar to nizatidine, whereas famotidine had any influence on neither AChE activity nor the HCO(3)(-) secretion. On the other hand, duodenal damage induced by acid perfusion (100 mM HCl for 4 h) in the presence of indomethacin was significantly prevented by nizatidine and neostigmine, at the doses that increased the HCO(3)(-) secretion. These results suggest that nizatidine increases HCO(3)(-) secretion in the rat duodenum, mediated by vagal-cholinergic mechanism, the action being associated with the anti-AChE activity of this agent.

Inhibition of drug metabolism in human liver microsomes by nizatidine, cimetidine and omeprazole

1. The inhibitory effects of cimetidine, nizatidine and omeprazole on the metabolic activity of CYP2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A were investigated in human liver microsomes. Both cimetidine and omeprazole inhibited each of the CYP subfamily enzymes; in particular, omeprazole extensively inhibited the hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin (CYP2C19, Ki = 7.1 microM). Nizatidine exhibited no inhibition of any of the CYP isoforms examined. 2. Cimetidine inhibited the hydroxylation of tolbutamide but not of diclofenac, whereas omeprazole inhibited the hydroxylation of diclofenac but not that of tolbutamide. The ability to inhibit CYP2C9 varied with incubation time, as measured by the metabolic rate constant for the substrates. Therefore, suitable substrates and incubation times must be selected in inhibition studies examining metabolic clearance and the mechanism of inhibition of these drugs. 3. Nizatidine did not inhibit the metabolism of cisapride, glibenclamide, benidipine and simvastatin. Omeprazole inhibited the metabolism of cisapride (Ki = 0.4 microM), glibenclamide (11.7 microM) and benidipine (6.5 microM), whereas cimetidine inhibited the metabolism of glibenclamide (11.6 microM). To avoid drug-drug interactions, care needs to be taken to select suitable medicines for co-administration with anti-ulcer drugs.

H(2) antagonist nizatidine may control olanzapine-associated weight gain in schizophrenic patients

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine is temporally associated, in a number of patients with schizophrenia, with weight gain. H(2) antagonists, like nizatidine, have been shown to control appetite in overweight patients.

METHODS

A patient with olanzapine temporally associated weight gain was treated with nizatidine as "add-on" therapy.

RESULTS

Nizatidine treatment was associated with good control and subsequent reduction of weight after 4 to 5 weeks of therapy in a patient with repetitive episodes of weight gain during olanzapine treatment. Olanzapine was otherwise well tolerated and effective in controlling psychopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

H(2) antagonist treatment with olanzapine may be a valid medical strategy in preventing and/or reducing weight gain in patients with schizophrenia. Controlled studies are recommended to confirm this observation.

The effect of previous administration of nizatidine on the neuromuscular effects of vecuronium and the effect of nizatidine on gastric secretion

Nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, has been reported to inhibit acetylcholinesterase activity. This could lead to an interaction with neuromuscular blocking drugs. This study examined the effects of nizatidine on the actions of vecuronium. Oral nizatidine has been reported to be an effective protective agent against acid aspiration syndrome, and we reevaluated this effect. The control group (n = 10) received a placebo with water 50 ml and the nizatidine group (n = 10) received nizatidine 300 mg with water 50 ml two hours before arrival in the operating room. Gastric contents were aspirated and the volume and pH measured before induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced in all patients with thiopentone 5 mg/kg and 1.5% isoflurane in 98.5% oxygen followed by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Vecuronium onset time and duration time 25 (time from injection until recovery of 25% of vaseline twitch amplitude) were obtained using electromyography. There were no significant differences between the two groups in vecuronium onset time or duration time 25. Gastric fluid volume was greater and gastric pH was lower in the control group than in the nizatidine group. 70% of the control group and none of the nizatidine group (P < 0.005) had a gastric content pH < 2.5 or volume > 25 ml.

Gastroprokinetic activity of nizatidine during the digestive state in the dog and rat

The present study was undertaken to clarify a prokinetic activity of nizatidine (CAS 76963-41-2) during the digestive state as well as gastric emptying of a solid test meal in comparison with cimetidine (CAS 51481-61-9), famotidine (CAS 76842-35-6) and cisapride (CAS 81098-60-4). Intravenous administration of nizatidine (0.3-3 mg/kg) enhanced the motility of the gastric antrum and duodenum during the digestive state. With cimetidine (1-10 mg/kg) and famotidine (0.1-1 mg/kg) enhancement of gastric motility was observed only with the highest dose of cimetidine, and famotidine had no effect. Marked enhancement of gastric motility was observed with cisapride (0.1-0.5 mg/kg). After intraduodenal administration of nizatidine (10 and 20 mg/kg) and cisapride (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), they also amplified the contractile activity of the gastric antrum. Gastric emptying of a solid test meal was accelerated by intraperitoneal administration of nizatidine (1-10 mg/kg) to the same extent as cisapride (0.1-1 mg/kg). In addition, even in a model of delayed gastric emptying induced by clonidine, nizatidine, like cisapride, improved the rate of gastric emptying. Neither cimetidine (3-30 mg/kg) nor famotidine (0.3-3 mg/kg) affected the gastric emptying of a solid meal or delayed gastric emptying. These results suggest that nizatidine enhanced gastric motility even during the digestive state, and accelerated gastric emptying of a solid meal, similar to cisapride. Furthermore, nizatidine improved clonidine-induced delayed gastric emptying. These prokinetic activities of nizatidine may by useful for the treatment of abdominal symptoms due to dysmotility and delayed gastric emptying in patients with gastritis and non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). In comparison with famotidine and cimetidine, nizatidine may be different from other histamine H2-receptor antagonists and has unique properties other than its gastric antisecretory activity.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastric motility disorders

A disorder of gastric motility should be suspected in patients with chronic vomiting. Imaging studies are used to confirm delayed gastric emptying, the most common form of a gastric motility disorder. Other causes of chronic vomiting, for example, metabolic or endocrine disorders, other abdominal disorders, mechanical causes of gastric obstruction, and lower gastrointestinal tract disease, are then ruled out. If no underlying cause is determined, a functional disorder of gastric emptying is presumptively diagnosed. Treatment consists of dietary management and gastric prokinetic agents. Cisapride is the drug of choice for treating delayed gastric emptying followed by erythromycin and ranitidine or nizatidine.

Effects of different antisecretory drugs on gastric potential difference in the rat: comparison with sucralfate

The proton pump inhibitors omeprazole and lansoprazole and the histamine H2 receptor antagonists ranitidine and nizatidine were investigated for their effects on gastric transmucosal potential difference (PD) in the rat, in comparison with the gastroprotective compound sucralfate. Omeprazole (1-3 mg kg-1, i.v.) and lansoprazole (1-3 mg kg-1, i.v.) did not modify basal PD, but significantly reduced (by approx. 50-60%) the drop in PD caused by intragastric administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 60 mg kg-1). Ranitidine (3-100 mg kg-1, i.v.) and nizatidine (10-30 mg kg-1, i.v.) behaved similarly to proton pump inhibitors, being ineffective on basal PD, while significantly reducing the effect of ASA. The antisecretory compounds did not change basal pH values. Sucralfate (0.5-1.5 g kg-1 intragastrically) caused a slight increase (approx. 20%) of basal PD and a dose-dependent reduction of ASA-induced fall in PD, with a maximum effect (65% reduction) comparable to that caused by the antisecretory agents. These results showed that ASA-induced disruption of the mucosal barrier can be reduced to the same extent by various antiulcer drugs, irrespective of their effects on gastric acid secretion.

An antibody from a patient with ranitidine-induced thrombocytopenia recognizes a site on glycoprotein IX that is a favored target for drug-induced antibodies

Although thrombocytopenia associated with the use of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) antagonists has been described, a drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibody has not previously been identified in such cases. We studied serum from a patient who developed acute, severe thrombocytopenia after exposure to the H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine, and identified an antibody that reacted with normal platelets in the presence of this drug at pharmacologic concentrations. In flow cytometric and immunoprecipitation studies, the antibody was shown to be specific for the glycoprotein Ib/IX complex (GPIb/IX). From the pattern of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) inhibition and the reactions of antibody with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with GPIX and GPIbbeta, we found that the patient's antibody is specific for an epitope on GPIX close to, or identical with a site recognized by the MoAb SZ1 that is a common target for antibodies induced by quinine and quinidine, drugs structurally unrelated to ranitidine. These findings provide evidence that immune thrombocytopenia can be caused by sensitivity to an H2 R antagonist and suggest that the SZ1 binding site on GPIX may be a common target for drug-induced antibodies. Further studies of the epitope for which SZ1 is specific may provide clues to the mechanism(s) by which drugs promote tight binding of antibody to a membrane glycoprotein and cause platelet destruction in patients with drug sensitivity.

Effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on blood alcohol levels: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect, if any, of histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on serum alcohol levels under various conditions including type of H2RA receptor antagonist, alcohol dose, and fed status of the subject.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the published literature.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by MEDLINE (January 1982 through December 1997) using the key words H2 receptor antagonists and alcohol. Other studies were identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and by discussion with colleagues.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they involved the coadministration of H2RAs and alcohol in healthy, human volunteers. Studies that may have addressed this goal but were performed in another context, for instance the measurement of ulcer healing, were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on the design, number of participants, participant characteristics, type and dose of H2RA administered, serum alcohol levels (measured as Cmax) along with standard deviations, dose of alcohol received, and fed or fasted status of participants. Alcohol dose was arbitrarily divided into low dose (< or = 0.5 g/kg body weight) versus high dose (> 0.5 g/kg body weight). In addition, studies involving ranitidine and cimetidine were stratified by sample size into small (n < or = 10) versus not small (n > 10).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials met selection criteria. Small elevations in Cmax were noted when cimetidine (2.71 mg/DL; 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.60, 3.83) or ranitidine (6.95 mg/DL; 95% CI 5.83, 8.08) were coadministered with alcohol. No such differences were noted for famotidine (0.28 mg/DL; 95% CI -1.24, 1.80) or nizatidine (2.33 mg/DL;, 95% CI -0.06, 4.72). The elevation detected with cimetidine and ranitidine was most pronounced in smaller studies (n < 10). Separate analyses investigating the effect of alcohol dose and fed or fasted status of participants revealed no clinically important differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Cimetidine and ranitidine, but not the other H2RAs, can cause small elevations of serum alcohol level when alcohol and drug are administered concurrently. Studies with larger numbers of participants were less likely to demonstrate this effect. Relative to accepted, legal definitions of intoxication, the effect of any H2RA on blood alcohol level is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Quantitative prediction of the interaction of midazolam and histamine H2 receptor antagonists in rats

To quantitatively evaluate drug-drug interactions involving metabolic processes in the liver, we attempted to predict the increasing ratio of the plasma concentration of midazolam (MDZ) in the presence of cimetidine (CIM) or nizatidine (NZD) in rats. Under steady-state conditions for the plasma concentration of CIM or NZD, MDZ was administered through the portal vein. The AUC of MDZ in the presence of CIM was 2.5-fold higher than that in the absence of CIM. There was no effect of NZD on the AUC of MDZ. The liver/plasma concentration ratios for CIM and NZD were 4.0 and 2.7, respectively. The estimated liver unbound concentration (CH,f)/plasma unbound concentration (Cp,f) ratios for CIM and NZD were 1.9 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting concentrative hepatic accumulation of both drugs. The oxidative metabolism of MDZ in rat liver microsomes was competitively inhibited by CIM or NZD, and the Ki values of CIM and NZD were 110 and 2600 microM, respectively. Based on these data obtained in vivo and in vitro, the increasing ratios for MDZ in the presence of CIM or NZD were predicted using the equations Rp = 1 + Cp,f/Ki and RH = 1 + CH,f/Ki. The observed increasing ratios in the presence of CIM were very close to RH, compared with Rp. However, Cp, f and CH,f were much less than Ki and there was no difference between Rp and RH in the presence of NZD. Consequently, Cp,f and CH, f were greater than or equal to Ki and Cp,f was not equal to CH,f, as in the presence of CIM, and it was indicated that CH,f was more suitable for quantitatively predicting the drug-drug interactions than was Cp,f.

Ranitidine and nizatidine stimulate antral smooth muscle contractility via excitatory cholinergic mechanisms

Histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) have been found to alter gastric motility. The aims of this study were to determine if H2RAs affect antral contractility in vitro and the mechanism of this effect. Guinea pig antral muscle strips were pinned in an organ bath after removing the mucosa, and circular muscle tension was measured using an isometric force transducer. Gastric myocytes were isolated from guinea pig stomach using collagenase digestion, and cell lengths were measured using an image analysis system. In muscle strips, ranitidine and nizatidine increased the amplitude of spontaneous phasic antral contractions in a concentration-dependent fashion with threshold concentrations of 5 microM. The order of potency for the H2RAs was ranitidine = nizatidine >> cimetidine > famotidine. The contractile effects of ranitidine and nizatidine were reduced, but not abolished, by tetrodotoxin and omega-conotoxin GVIA and nearly abolished by atropine. In isolated cells, ranitidine and nizatidine, but not famotidine or cimetidine, induced concentration-dependent cell shortening, with maximal shortening at 10 microM. These contractile effects of ranitidine and nizatidine in isolated cells were inhibited by atropine. Ranitidine and nizatidine increase antral contractility; this effect appears to be mediated by an interaction between ranitidine and nizatidine on cholinergic pathways with both direct effects on smooth muscle cholinergic receptors and indirect effects by increasing cholinergic neurotransmission.

Correlation of the end-tidal PCO2 during laparoscopic surgery with the pH of the gastric juice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

During laparoscopy, the increase of the carbon dioxide tension may increase the synthesis of hydrochloric acid in the parietal cells of the stomach; the source of the secreted hydrogen ions is carbonic acid derived from the hydration of carbon dioxide. The present report tests this hypothesis by correlating the changes of end-tidal PCO2 (ETCO2) with the pH of the gastric juice in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

40 adult patients were investigated: 20 controls, and 20 patients receiving 100 mg nizatidine intravenously, prior to surgery. In both groups, the ETCO2 was measured by capnography and the pH of the gastric juice was monitored before carbon dioxide insufflation and at the end of laparoscopy prior to carbon dioxide deflation.

RESULTS

In the control group, the ETCO2 increased following carbon dioxide insufflation from a mean basal value of 30.2 (standard deviation [SD] 4.6) mm Hg to 41.1 (SD 9.5) mm Hg, while the mean pH of the gastric juice decreased significantly from 1.9 (SD 0.4) to 1.27 (SD 0.43). There was a significant negative correlation between the ETCO2 and pH of the gastric juice (r = -0.4). In the Nizatidine group, the ETCO2 also increased following carbon dioxide insufflation from a mean basal value of 30.9 (SD 3.0) mm Hg to 39.4 (SD 5.3) mm Hg. However, in contrast with the control group, the mean pH of the gastric juice did not decrease, but paradoxically increased from 1.68 (SD 0.36) to 3.6 (SD 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

During laparoscopy, the pH of the gastric juice is significantly decreased. This decrease is inversely related to the increase of ETCO2. The preoperative administration of the selective H2-blocker nizatidine can prevent the increase in gastric acidity and can result in a paradoxical increase of pH of the gastric juice.

[H2-receptor antagonists and alcohol: clinical significance]

The aim of the review is to evaluate the putative clinical interactions between alcohol metabolism and the administration of H2-receptor antagonists. Places of the first-pass metabolism of ethanol in the body have been investigated as well. According to the in vitro experimental results the H2-receptor antagonists can inhibit the ethanol metabolism which may have clinical relevance. When low doses of alcohol (below 0.3 g/kg) are given per os, the administration of H2-receptor antagonists results in an increase in the blood ethanol concentrations. Since that challenged increase never exceeds the level of 0.3/1000 blood alcohol concentration, it has hardly any clinical or medico-legal significance.

Nizatidine accelerates gastric emptying of a solid meal in rats

Nizatidine, a new histamine-2-receptor antagonist, stimulates gastrointestinal motility in dogs and gastric emptying of liquids in rats. Effect of nizatidine on gastric emptying of a solid meal was investigated using a novel gastric emptying model in rats. Male Wistar rats (weighing 200-300 g) were supplied with powdered food containing 30 w/w% barium 14 hr before the beginning of the experiment and x-ray photography of rat stomach was taken under light ether anesthesia. Gastric emptying was assessed by percentage of a decrease in area 30 min after drug was injected intraperitoneally. There was a positive correlation between the area of the gastric outline and the weight of the gastric contents (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Ether anesthesia itself did not affect gastric emptying. Nizatidine increased gastric emptying dose-dependently (emptied percentage; vehicle: 4.9 +/- 1.5%, 1 mg/kg: 7.2 +/- 0.4%, 3 mg/kg: 10.4 +/- 2.0%, 10 mg/kg: 16.7 +/- 4.9%, 30 mg/kg: 25.7 +/- 7.4%). N-Desmethyl nizatidine (NDM) also stimulated gastric emptying, but nizatidine S-oxide, cimetidine, an famotidine had no significant effects on gastric emptying. Nizatidine and neostigmine, but not NDM, at a subthreshold dose accelerated gastric emptying treated with a low dose of acetylcholine (0.1 mg/kg). Atropine (2 mg/kg, -30 min) did not modulate the gastroprokinetic action of nizatidine, but blocked that of NDM. These findings suggest that this noninvasive method may allow measurement of gastric emptying of solids accurately and that nizatidine and NDM facilitate gastric emptying probably mediated by a direct and/or an indirect (acetylcholinesterase inhibition) cholinergic mechanism.

Effect of nizatidine and ranitidine on 24 hour intragastric pH, pepsin, prostaglandin E2 and serum gastrin concentrations in healthy volunteers

In order to achieve possible greater therapeutic efficacy, ranitidine 300 mg bid (R2) may be given rather than 300 mg qhs (R1), or nizatidine 300 mg bid (N2) may be given rather than 300 mg qhs (N1). A randomized placebo-controlled crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers (four males, two females) who ranged in age from 23 to 43 years, comparing R1, R2, N1 and N2 versus placebo (P), measuring 24 h intragastric pH by the aspiration technique, gastric juice pepsin and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations, as well as serum gastrin concentrations. In all treatment groups, 24-h intragastric pH was higher than with P; the 24 h and daytime (0800-2200 h) pH was higher with N2 than with N1, but not with R2 versus R1. The percentage pH > or = 3 was greater with N2 than with N1 during the daytime. Night-time (2200-0800 h) and 24 h pepsin concentrations were higher in R2 than in R1, were similar in N1 and N2, and were lower in these treatment groups than in P. The gastric juice PGE2 concentration at night-time, but not at daytime, was increased in the four treatment groups compared with P. Despite the higher pH values at night-time in the treatment groups, the night-time concentrations of serum gastrin were unchanged, and yet during the daytime the higher values of pH were associated with increased gastrin concentrations when R2 or N2 were given, but not with R1 and N1. There was a negative correlation between intragastric juice pH and pepsin concentration during the daytime, and a positive correlation between pH and PGE2 concentration during the night-time. The slopes and y-axis intercepts between pH and pepsin or PGE2 concentrations differed between the placebo and the treatment groups, suggesting that these H2-receptor antagonists may have an effect on lowering pepsin and raising PGE2 concentrations in addition to their effects on pH. As the percentage of time over the 24 h period and night-time periods when the pH was greater than 3 was not different between ranitidine and nizatidine, the two regimens will likely have similar clinical efficacy.

Cimetidine inhibition of human gastric and liver alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes: identification of inhibitor complexes by kinetics and molecular modeling

Cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the world. It has been reported to increase blood alcohol concentrations in drinking individuals. To determine if this increase could be due to inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase activity, the effect of the drug on ethanol oxidation by gastric sigma sigma alcohol dehydrogenase and liver beta 2 beta 2, pi pi, and chi chi alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes was observed. Cimetidine inhibited all isoenzymes studied except chi chi; the chi chi isoenzyme showed no inhibition up to 5 mM cimetidine. Inhibition of the alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes by the H2-receptor antagonists nizatidine, ranitidine, and famotidine was negligible. Docking simulations with the beta 2.NAD+.4-iodopyrazole X-ray structure indicated that cimetidine fit well into the substrate binding site. The substitution on the thiazole ring of nizatidine, however, prevented docking into the binding site. Cimetidine inhibition of ethanol oxidation by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2 was competitive with varied ethanol, exhibiting Ki values of 2.8 +/- 0.4 mM and 0.77 +/- 0.07 mM, respectively. Cimetidine inhibition of ethanol oxidation by pi pi was noncompetitive with varied ethanol (Ki = 0.50 +/- 0.03 mM). Inhibition of ethanol oxidation by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2 with varied NAD+ was competitive. These results, together with the cimetidine inhibition kinetics of acetaldehyde reduction by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2, with either varied NADH or varied acetaldehyde, are consistent with cimetidine binding to two enzyme species. These species are free enzyme and the productive enzyme.NAD+ complex.

Effects of oral nizatidine on preoperative gastric fluid pH and volume in children

We have studied the effect of oral nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 in total on preoperative gastric fluid pH and volume in children. One hundred and four healthy children, aged 4-11 yr, were allocated randomly to four groups (n = 26): placebo administered at 21:00 and 06:30 the night before and on the day of surgery, respectively (placebo-placebo: control); nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 at 21:00 and placebo at 06:30 (nizatidine-placebo); placebo at 21:00 and nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 at 06:30 (placebo-nizatidine); and nizatidine 3 mg kg-1 at 21:00 and 06:30 (nizatidine-nizatidine). Each child ingested a large volume of apple juice 3 h before estimated induction of anaesthesia. After induction of anaesthesia, pH and volume of gastric fluid obtained via an orogastric tube were measured. Mean pH in the placebo-nizatidine and nizatidine-nizatidine groups was significantly higher than that in the placebo-placebo group (5.7 (SEM 0.3), 6.0 (0.3) vs 1.8 (0.2), respectively) (P < 0.05). Mean pH in the nizatidine-placebo group was similar to that in the control group (2.3 (0.3) vs 1.8 (0.2)). The number of children with pH < 2.5 and volume > 0.4 ml kg-1 in the nizatidine-nizatidine (0%) and placebo-nizatidine (4%) groups was reduced compared with the control (46%) or nizatidine-placebo (38%) group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of the H2-antagonists famotidine and nizatidine and the cytoprotectant misoprostol on human colonic and rat peritoneal mast cells

The H2-antagonists famotidine and nizatidine produced a dose-dependent inhibition of histamine release from human colonic mucosal and muscle mast cells stimulated with anti-IgE. The IC30 values were in the range 0.5-10 microM and the maximum inhibition approached 50%. The compounds showed similar efficacy against rat peritoneal mast cells but were more potent. The cytoprotectant misoprostol had a striking effect on the human colonic mast cells, producing more than 50% inhibition at concentrations of 0.1-1 nM, but was much less active against the rat cells.

H2-antagonists and alcohol. Do they interact?

There are conflicting data on the existence of significant first-pass metabolism of alcohol (ethanol) in the human stomach and its inhibition by histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Alcohol is predominantly metabolised in the liver by the microsomal alcohol oxidising system, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and a catalase enzyme. Histochemical and kinetic studies have revealed several ADH isoenzymes in the gastric mucosa with different kinetic properties. After small oral doses of alcohol first-pass metabolism in the stomach occurs, as shown by reduced area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with intravenous or intraduodenal administration. The activity of gastric ADH is reduced in women, the elderly, Asian individuals, the fasting state, chronic alcoholism and after gastrectomy. The effect is only present with small (< or = 0.3 g/kg) alcohol doses and with a high alcohol concentration. In a number of studies, cimetidine in therapeutic doses over 7 days produced a significant increase in the AUC and in the peak plasma concentration after administration of alcohol 0.15 and 0.30 g/kg. This was related to an inhibition of gastric ADH activity, as shown by in vitro studies. Ranitidine inhibited gastric ADH to a similar extent on a molar basis, but its effect on alcohol levels in vivo was less constant in various studies. Nizatidine also reduced gastric alcohol first-pass metabolism, but famotidine and roxatidine did not show this effect. In other studies, H2-receptor antagonists did not change AUC and peak alcohol concentration. The controversy is not easy to resolve, since a number of the positive studies did not use a placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover design, while some of the negative studies did not exclude habitual alcohol consumers and included Oriental volunteers, although both groups have been shown to lack significant gastric ADH activity. In this case, when first-pass metabolism of alcohol does not exist, this by definition cannot be abolished by H2-antagonists. The inclusion of oral and intravenous dosage data of alcohol is mandatory to positively identify first-pass metabolism in any individuals. The significance of the effect of H2-antagonists on blood alcohol concentrations is minor. It only occurs in young, male, nonalcoholic, non-Asian individuals, and alcohol must be given in a small (social) dose, in a high concentration, and after meals. An increase in alcohol levels in predisposed patients during treatment with some H2-antagonists cannot be excluded, although the likelihood is small. Furthermore, carefully designed studies are needed to clarify fully the significance of this interaction.

Effect of nizatidine and ranitidine on the D-tubocurarine neuromuscular blockade in the toad rectus abdominis muscle

The influence of varying concentrations of the H2-receptor antagonists nizatidine and ranitidine on the acetylcholine- and carbachol-induced contractures on the toad rectus abdominis muscle, as well as the possible interaction between the above H2-receptor antagonists and D-tubocurarine were studied. Nizatidine and ranitidine at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-4) mol l-1 augmented, and at 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 inhibited, the acetylcholine-induced contractures on the toad rectus abdominis muscle, while at concentrations from 3.2 x 10(-4) to 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 they inhibited the carbachol-induced contractures, in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, nizatidine and ranitidine at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-4) mol l-1 reversed the D-tubocurarine blocking activity on the acetylcholine-induced contractures, but at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 they augmented it. These findings provide evidence that the above H2-receptor antagonists produce either cholinesterase inhibition or neuromuscular blockade, depending on their concentration. Thus, the D-tubocurarine neuromuscular blocking activity is potentiated at high concentrations of nizatidine and ranitidine, while it is reversed at lower ones.

Acid inhibitory characteristics of nizatidine in man: an overview

The antisecretory activity of nizatidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, has been extensively investigated in man both by quantitative acid secretory tests and by means of 24-h continuous ambulatory pH monitoring. Studies have shown that nizatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal, nocturnal and stimulated acid secretion. Particular modalities of nizatidine administration, such as early evening intake with supper or morning dosing, have been recently defined. Further studies are needed to clarify if rebound nocturnal acid hypersecretion may develop after abrupt withdrawal of nizatidine or if tolerance may develop during prolonged administration.

Drug interactions of H2-receptor antagonists

Three drug interactions of nizatidine and of other antisecretory agents were studied comparatively. First, the effects of nizatidine, cimetidine and ranitidine on the dispositional kinetics of theophylline were evaluated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Second, the effect of magnesium/aluminium hydroxide on the relative bioavailability of nizatidine, famotidine, cimetidine and ranitidine was evaluated in healthy volunteers. Finally, the effects of nizatidine and omeprazole on the dispositional kinetics of phenytoin were evaluated in healthy volunteers. Only cimetidine altered the steady-state kinetics of oral theophylline, slowing theophylline clearance by 25%. Each of the H2-receptor antagonists exhibited a modest decline in relative bioavailability when ingested with antacid. Antacid ingestion decreased the bioavailability of famotidine, ranitidine and cimetidine by 20-25%, and the bioavailability of nizatidine by 12%. Each of these effects was statistically significant. Finally, it was found that neither omeprazole nor nizatidine affected the single dose kinetics of phenytoin.

Absence of an inhibitory effect of omeprazole and nizatidine on phenytoin disposition, a marker of CYP2C activity

The effects of omeprazole (40 mg orally per day) and nizatidine (300 mg orally per day) on the disposition of phenytoin (4.5 mg kg(-1) p.o. single dose) were studied in 18 healthy, young adult males. Total and unbound plasma concentrations of phenytoin were measured for 48 h after each dose of phenytoin. Neither treatment altered the disposition kinetics of phenytoin, the hydroxylation of which is mediated specifically by cytochromes P450 of the 2C subfamily.

[Nizatidine: a meta-analytical study]

The medline database was applied to search all randomized clinical trials published from 1986 to 1992 concerning the use of Nizatidine, a powerful H2-antagonist, versus other treatments, including placebo, in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease. Therapeutic efficacy of nizatidine is comparable to that of other H2-antagonists; with the use of meta-analysis, no significant differences were demonstrated, both in acute and long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer between nizatidine and ranitidine, but untoward side effects were less frequent with nizatidine than with ranitidine.

Changes in the effects of nizatidine and famotidine on cardiac performance after pretreatment with ranitidine

This was an open, randomized study of the cardiovascular effects of the histamine H2 receptor antagonists ranitidine, famotidine, and nizatidine after single oral doses alone or in combination in healthy volunteers. When compared with placebo ranitidine (450 mg) did not have any haemodynamic effects. Nizatidine (300 mg) caused significant falls in heart rate and cardiac output. Famotidine (40 mg) caused significant falls in stroke volume and cardiac output and an increase in pre-ejection period. Pretreatment with ranitidine abolished the haemodynamic effects of nizatidine and caused a time-shift of 2 h in the onset of the cardiovascular effects of famotidine. The difference in the results for nizatidine and famotidine can be explained by the longer half-life of famotidine. Vascular effects are assumed to be responsible for impairment of cardiac performance by famotidine.

[Effects of various histamine H2-receptor antagonists on gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying]

Effects of various histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) on gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying were investigated. Ranitidine, nizatidine and cimetidine dose dependently induced contractions over the entire gastrointestinal tract, and the order of their effects was ranitidine > nizatidine > cimetidine. Roxatidine or famotidine had no effects on motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Ranitidine and nizatidine also induced contractions during the postprandial period and facilitated gastric emptying, while cimetidine, roxatidine or famotidine did not influence gastric emptying. Since acid reduction is thought to be the most important element of the treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux esophagitis, it was inferred that administration of a H2-RA selected with consideration of its property of facilitating gastrointestinal motility is effective in the treatment of patients with abnormal gastrointestinal motility.

Anti-oxidant properties of H2-receptor antagonists. Effects on myeloperoxidase-catalysed reactions and hydroxyl radical generation in a ferrous-hydrogen peroxide system

Ulcerogenesis of the gastroduodenal mucosa is caused by the digestive action of gastric juice and initially involves an inflammatory reaction with infiltration of phagocytes. The anti-inflammatory activity of many drugs have been attributed to the inhibition of the leukocyte enzyme, myeloperoxidase (MPO). In this study, the H2-antagonists in clinical use were found to be potent inhibitors of MPO-catalysed reactions (IC50 < 3 microM) under conditions resembling those in experiments with intact neutrophils. Since peak plasma concentrations of cimetidine, ranitidine and nizatidine are well within the micromolar range, after oral therapeutic dosing, our results may be of clinical relevance. The inhibitory actions of cimetidine and nizatidine were largely due to scavenging of hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a powerful chlorinating oxidant produced in the MPO-H2O2-Cl- system. In contrast to famotidine, ranitidine was also a potent scavenger of HOCl, while both drugs inhibited MPO reversibly by converting it to compound II, which is inactive in the oxidation of Cl-. The HOCl scavenging potencies of ranitidine and nizatidine were about three times higher than that of the anti-rheumatic drug, penicillamine, which had a potency similar to that of cimetidine. The rapid HOCl scavenging ability of penicillamine is thought to contribute to its anti-inflammatory effects. Using riboflavin as a probe, the H2-antagonists were found to be inhibitors of hydroxyl radical (.OH) generated in a Fe(2+)-H2O2 reaction mixture. Spectral analyses of the interaction of iron ions with the drugs and studies with chelators, suggest that the drugs were efficient chelators of Fe2+, in addition to their .OH scavenging abilities. Since the gastrointestinal tract can contain potentially reactive iron, the simultaneous presence of H2-antagonists may help to suppress iron-driven steps in tissue damage.

Dose-dependent heart rate reducing effect of nizatidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist

1. Twelve healthy subjects were treated in a randomised placebo-controlled crossover study with placebo, 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg nizatidine, 100 mg pirenzepine, and 300 mg nizatidine plus 100 mg pirenzepine for 1 week each. 2. On the seventh treatment day, heart rate, blood pressure, systolic time intervals, impedance cardiographic and Doppler ultrasound variables were measured. 3. Stroke volume and blood pressure were not altered by nizatidine and/or pirenzepine. By contrast, heart rate and cardiac output significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in a dose-dependent manner 1.5 and 3 h after administration of 300 and 600 mg nizatidine. Treatment with 150 mg nizatidine led to similar though non-significant trends. 4. While a slightly insignificant rise in heart rate was detected with pirenzepine alone, heart rate and cardiac output remained unchanged upon combined nizatidine and pirenzepine treatment as compared with placebo and baseline values. 5. In conclusion, nizatidine reduced heart rate and cardiac output in a dose-dependent manner, whereas this negative chronotropic effect was counteracted by concurrent administration of the anti-cholinergic drug pirenzepine.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists do not alter serum ethanol levels in fed, nonalcoholic men

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the four histamine-2 receptor antagonists currently available for the treatment of acid-peptic disorders in the United States alter serum ethanol levels after moderate alcohol consumption.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized crossover design comparing the effects of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and no treatment on serum ethanol levels. Each participant served as his own control.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five healthy nonalcoholic men (21 to 35 years old); two participants were withdrawn before starting the study.

SETTING

University medical center.

INTERVENTION

Cimetidine (400 mg twice daily), famotidine (20 mg twice daily), nizatidine (150 mg twice daily), ranitidine (150 mg twice daily), and no treatment for 7 days. After the last dose of medication, participants ate a standard meal; 1 hour later they drank ethanol (0.3 g/kg body weight in 500 mL of orange juice) over 8 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS

Simultaneous measurements of breath and serum (headspace gas chromatography) ethanol were made before and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after ingestion of ethanol.

RESULTS

Peak ethanol levels did not differ (mmol/L; mean +/- SE) after cimetidine (3.0 +/- 0.3), famotidine (2.9 +/- 0.3), nizatidine (2.9 +/- 0.3), ranitidine (3.1 +/- 0.4), and no treatment (2.9 +/- 0.4). Similarly, there was no difference in the area under the curve (mmol/L.h; mean +/- SE) after cimetidine (4.3 +/- 0.5), famotidine (3.8 +/- 0.4), nizatidine (4.2 +/- 0.5), ranitidine (3.9 +/- 0.4), and no treatment (4.0 +/- 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy nonalcoholic men, the histamine-2 receptor antagonists currently available in the United States do not alter serum ethanol levels following moderate alcohol consumption after an evening meal.

Early evening nizatidine intake with a meal optimizes the antisecretory effect

The importance of the temporal relationship between meal and nizatidine intake was studied in a six-armed, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eleven healthy volunteers received early (18.00 hours) or late (21.00 hours) supper, with either placebo, early (18.00 hours) nizatidine, or late (21.00 hours) 300 mg nizatidine. Ambulatory 21-hour gastric pH-metry was performed and plasma nizatidine concentrations were determined by high pressure liquid chromatography. Early-nizatidine/early-supper (median pH 2.50), but not late-nizatidine/late supper (median pH 2.30), produced significantly higher median 21-hour pH values than did early-nizatidine/late-supper (median pH 1.90). Concomitant food delayed the absorption of nizatidine but did not change the drug's bioavailability. Oral nizatidine should be taken with food, preferably early in the evening, to optimize its anti-secretory effect.

Twenty-four-hour control of gastric acidity by twice-daily doses of placebo, nizatidine 150 mg, nizatidine 300 mg, and ranitidine 300 mg

This study was carried out to assess the effects on gastric acidity of placebo twice daily (bid), nizatidine 150 mg bid, nizatidine 300 mg bid, and ranitidine 300 mg bid by means of continuous 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring. Twelve patients with duodenal ulcer in remission were randomized to receive in single-blind fashion the above medications on four separate occasions, at least 1 week apart. The three active regimens produced higher pH values (P < .001) and maintained gastric pH above 3.0 units for a longer period (P < .001) than placebo in all time intervals but evening. Nizatidine 150 mg bid caused a lower rise in pH than nizatidine 300 mg bid (P < .01) and ranitidine 300 mg bid (P < .05) during both the daytime and the whole 24 hours. In these time windows also the time spent above 3.0 pH units was significantly shorter for the former regimen than for 300 mg bid of both nizatidine (P < .01) and ranitidine (P < .05). There was no difference between the latter two dosing schedules in terms of both potency and duration of action in all the time intervals considered. It is concluded that twice daily doses of H2 blockers are more effective than placebo in reducing gastric acidity. Three hundred milligrams twice daily of both nizatidine and ranitidine produce a significantly greater and longer-lasting acid suppression than 150 mg bid of nizatidine. Our study also confirms the greater effectiveness of H2 antagonists during nighttime than during day-time.

Gastroprokinetic activity of nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, and its possible mechanism of action in dogs and rats

We studied the anti-acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of a new H2-antagonist, nizatidine, in in vitro experiments and its gastroprokinetic action in the dog and rat in comparison with other H2-antagonists, neostigmine and cisapride. The IC50 of nizatidine for AChE was 6.7 x 10(-6) M, and this activity was reversible. The relative anti-AChE potency was in the following order: neostigmine > nizatidine > cimetidine >> famotidine. The inhibition of AChE by nizatidine was noncompetitive, with a Ki value of 7.4 x 10(-6) M. Gastrointestinal (GI) motility was examined during the interdigestive state in dogs with chronically implanted force transducers. Nizatidine (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly increased the motor index in a dose-dependent manner. It was of interest that the contractile response of the GI tract to nizatidine was similar to the interdigestive migrating contractions-like activity. At the doses used in this study, neither cimetidine nor famotidine had a significant effect on the motor index. Neostigmine at a higher dose of 0.06 mg/kg and cisapride at 0.3 mg/kg were found to stimulate GI contractions. Gastric emptying was determined in rats given phenol red as a liquid test meal. Nizatidine (3 mg/kg, i.p., or above) significantly increased gastric emptying, whereas the other H2-antagonists had no such effect. The ED50 and ED90 values of nizatidine for inhibition of gastric acid secretion were 0.18 and 3.22 mg/kg in dogs, and 2.94 and 19.6 mg/kg in rats, respectively. These findings suggest that nizatidine stimulates GI contractions and accelerates gastric emptying at gastric antisecretory doses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effect of a single oral morning dose of nizatidine and ranitidine on intragastric pH under basal conditions and after pentagastrin stimulation

A comparison was made of the antisecretory activity of orally administered nizatidine and ranitidine by measuring intragastric pH under basal conditions and during and after pentagastrin stimulation. Intragastric pH values were measured with a bipolar glass electrode in 10 patients with healed duodenal ulcers treated with nizatidine or ranitidine according to a randomized single-blind design. The antisecretory activity of the two drugs was similar during the 4 h of monitoring following drug administration. Nizatidine, however, showed a more rapid inhibitory action than ranitidine, producing a significantly greater increase in pH with respect to basal values during pentagastrin infusion. In the period following infusion the pH values observed with ranitidine were higher than with nizatidine, but not significantly so. Under these experimental conditions, therefore, the antisecretory activity of nizatidine was shown to be more rapid than that of ranitidine and equally effective.

The effect of nizatidine on neuromuscular transmission

The effect of the H2-receptor antagonist, nizatidine, on neuromuscular transmission was investigated using sciatic nerve-gastrocnemius muscle preparations of rat in vivo. Nizatidine, administered by i.v. injection, potentiates the neuromuscular blockade induced by d-tubocurarine, pancuronium and the aminoglycoside antibiotic, kanamycin. Moreover, the drug alone is capable of producing a blockade on preparations stimulated at high frequency. The neuromuscular blockade induced by nizatidine is reversed by 4-aminopyridine but not by dimaprit.