Diphenhydramine-Induced Antimuscarinic Delirium Treated with Physostigmine and Transdermal Rivastigmine

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent physostigmine shortages present a challenge to healthcare providers treating antimuscarinic delirium. Other centrally acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine may represent a therapeutic alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage; however, previous reports of use have not documented serum antimuscarinic toxin concentrations, limiting evaluation of effectiveness. Combination therapy with physostigmine and rivastigmine has not been described. In this report, the authors present a case of diphenhydramine-induced antimuscarinic delirium with elevated diphenhydramine serum concentrations treated with physostigmine and transdermal rivastigmine without observed adverse effect.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old female presented to an emergency department after ingesting 3.75 g (41.2 mg/kg) of diphenhydramine. She had antimuscarinic delirium with a presenting serum diphenhydramine concentration of 1500 ng/mL (therapeutic range, 25-112 ng/mL) and required two doses of physostigmine to avert intubation prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At hospital hour 22, in the ICU, antimuscarinic delirium persisted but no further physostigmine was available due to hospital shortage. Therefore, a 9.5-mg transdermal rivastigmine patch was applied. By hospital hour 24, her delirium had resolved. A serum diphenhydramine concentration at hospital hour 25 was elevated at 760 ng/mL. Transdermal rivastigmine was discontinued at hospital hour 48 without recurrent delirium. Despite persistent normal mental status after rivastigmine discontinuation, the patient had a dry mouth, difficulty urinating, and mydriasis until hospital day 5. She never developed muscarinic toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Transdermal rivastigmine may be a useful treatment alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage for antimuscarinic delirium and has a long duration of action without aspiration risk. Muscarinic toxicity was not observed.

Physostigmine and anaesthesia emergence delirium in preschool children

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of preschool children experiences severe emergence agitation after anaesthesia. The symptoms of disorientation, restlessness, inconsolable crying and thrashing resemble an acute psychosis similar to an agitated central anticholinergic syndrome. The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to assess the efficiency of the cholinesterase-inhibitor physostigmine in these children and to identify adverse effects.

METHODS

We anaesthetized 211 children (1-5 yr) with sevoflurane after midazolam premedication for varying operative procedures. Multimodal intraoperative and prophylactic pain therapy combined alfentanil, piritramide, diclofenac and regional/local bupivacaine. A 5-step score assessed emergence agitation. Severely agitated children were treated immediately with physostigmine (30 mug kg-1) or placebo in a randomized, double-blind fashion. The primary variable was the agitation score after 5 min.

RESULTS

Severe delirium occurred in 19% of all children. Five minutes following injection, severe agitation was still present in 10 out of 20 patients treated with physostigmine and 16/20 with placebo. This difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1). Rescue therapy with intravenous propofol was given after 15 min of severe agitation to four children following physostigmine and nine following placebo (non-significant). An increased rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (45% vs. 15%, P < 0.05) was the only adverse effect observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe emergence agitation might be related to a central anticholinergic syndrome as diagnosed empirically with a successful treatment with physostigmine. However, the results of this study do not support its routine use. The substance may augment the therapeutic options if injected slowly and after suitable prophylaxis to avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Physostigmine: is there a role for this antidote in pediatric poisonings?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ingestion of anticholinergic medications is common in pediatrics. Toxicity may result in symptoms such as severe agitation requiring physical restraint. Physostigmine, an antidote for anticholinergic poisoning, could be useful in this situation. Many physicians are hesitant to use physostigmine after case series suggested its use in tricyclic antidepressant overdose was associated with asystole. This paper reviews the anticholinergic toxidrome and pathophysiology, recent literature on the efficacy and toxicity of physostigmine, and its dosing, indications, and contraindications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent articles suggest that toxicity associated with physostigmine consists mostly of seizures and cardiac arrhythmia, and occurs when used in the absence of anticholinergic symptoms. Despite potential complications, physostigmine has been shown to be useful in cases of confirmed anticholinergic poisoning by controlling agitation and reversing delirium, and appears to be safer and more effective than benzodiazepines in this situation.

SUMMARY

In the proper clinical situation such as pure anticholinergic overdose with severe symptoms, physostigmine can be beneficial. The potential for side effects is not insignificant, and the antidote should be used with caution in any patient with unknown ingestions or those with cardiac conduction defects. More research is needed, especially involving children, before we will fully understand the indications and toxicities associated with physostigmine.

Retracted: Do patients profit from physostigmine in recovery from desflurane anaesthesia?

BACKGROUND

Physostigmine is the drug of choice in the central anticholinergic syndrome, but has also been used in post-operative mental derangement secondary to sedatives and volatile anaesthetics. The aim of this double-blind, randomized, prospective study was to determine whether physostigmine alters recovery after desflurane anaesthesia.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing urologic or surgical procedures were enrolled to receive either NaCl 0.9% (n = 50) or 2 mg of physostigmine (n = 50) at the end of general anaesthesia with propofol, fentanyl, cisatracurium and desflurane. Times to extubation, stating name, birthday and place of residence, and obeying commands such as eye opening and hand squeezing were noted. Haemodynamics, Aldrete and pain scores, the analgesic requirements, and any adverse side-effects were documented until the 1st post-operative day.

RESULTS

Demographic, peri-operative data including duration of anaesthesia, surgery and postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, and consumption of anaesthetics were comparable in both groups. No significant difference between the groups was found for extubation time or other emergence parameters. Patients undergoing anaesthesia >150 min showed after receiving physostigmine significantly (P < 0.05) faster spontaneous breathing (2.6 +/- 3.1 vs. placebo 5.0 +/- 4.2 min) and extubation time (6.2 +/- 3.7 vs. placebo 8.8 +/- 5.0 min). Women showed significantly shorter extubation times (5.5 +/- 3.4 min) and eye opening (5.5 +/- 2.6 min) with physostigmine than placebo (7.7 +/- 4.5 and 7.8 +/- 4.0 min). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher after physostigmine than placebo, whereas shivering occurred more often after placebo.

CONCLUSION

Physostigmine does not alter desflurane-based anaesthesia compared with placebo. An option is to use physostigmine in patients with a duration of anaesthesia >150 min who profit in earlier return to spontaneous breathing and shorter extubation time.

Anticholinesterase and pharmacokinetic profile of phenserine in healthy elderly human subjects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the acetyl-selective anticholinesterase, phenserine tartrate, in healthy elderly subjects.

METHODS

32 healthy elderly volunteers received single oral doses of phenserine tartrate (5-20 mg). Physical and vital signs were monitored over the ensuing 24 hours. Analyses were performed on plasma samples to determine PK, and PD were assessed using an erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition assay.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred; the most common were headache and vomiting. The MTD of phenserine tartrate was 10 mg. The Cmax and AUC(0-24) of phenserine increased with dose, but neither were dose-proportional. Subjects receiving 10 mg of phenserine tartrate had a Cmax of 1.95 ng/mL at 1.5 hours, and the mean peak inhibition (Imax) of AChE was 26% (range: 18-34%) at 1.75 hours (tImax) following dosing. The half-life of AChE inhibition (tI1/2) was 11 hours. Evaluation of PK/PD relationships suggested a linear correlation between plasma phenserine concentration and AChE inhibition in the blood.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenserine tartrate was safe and well tolerated when administered as a single oral dose of either 5 mg or 10 mg. An increase in the severity and frequency of AEs occurred at the 20 mg dose level.

An overview of phenserine tartrate, a novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Existing cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitor therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD), while effective in improving cognitive, behavioral and functional impairments, do not alter disease progression. Novel drug design studies have focused on the classical ChE inhibitor, (-)-physostigmine, producing alterations in chemical composition and three-dimensional structure, which may offer an improved therapeutic index. The phenylcarbamate derivative, (-)-phenserine, is a selective, non-competitive inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE). In vivo, (-)-phenserine produces rapid, potent, and long-lasting AChE inhibition. As a possible result of its preferential brain selectivity, (-)-phenserine is significantly less toxic than (-)-physostigmine. In studies using the Stone maze paradigm, (-)-phenserine has been shown to improve cognitive performance in both young learning-impaired and elderly rats. In addition to reducing inactivation of acetylcholine in the brain, (-)-phenserine appears to have a second mode of action. Reduced secretion of beta-amyloid (Abeta) has been observed in cell lines exposed to (-)-phenserine, occurring through translational regulation of beta-amyloid precursor protein (beta-APP) mRNA via a non-cholinergic mechanism. These in vitro findings appear to translate in vivo into animal models and humans. In a small study of patients with AD, (-)-phenserine treatment tended to reduce beta-APP and Abeta levels in plasma samples. Clinical studies also reveal that (-)-phenserine (5-10 mg b.i.d.) had a favorable safety and pharmacological profile, produced significant improvements in cognitive function and was well tolerated in patients with AD treated for 12 weeks. Further randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies assessing the efficacy, safety/tolerability and potential disease-modifying effects of (-)-phenserine in patients with AD are currently ongoing.

Physostigmine does not effect arousal but produces toxicity in an animal model of severe gamma-hydroxybutyrate intoxication

OBJECTIVES

Physostigmine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and can produce fasciculations, seizures, bradycardia, and asystole. gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) increases acetylcholine levels in the central nervous system and can decrease heart rate. Despite this, physostigmine has been proposed as an arousal agent to treat coma from overdoses of GHB. The authors hypothesized that in the setting of severe GHB intoxication, physostigmine would reverse sedation without producing adverse effects such as a decrease in heart rate, seizures, and fasciculations.

METHODS

GHB intoxication was induced in 20 rats by intraperitoneal injection of 700 mg/kg of the GHB precursor gamma-butyrolactone. One hour later, rats were randomly assigned to receive either physostigmine (0.06 mg/kg) intraperitoneally or an equivalent volume of saline. After administration of physostigmine, rats were continuously monitored by a blinded observer for arousal (return of righting reflex), fasciculations, and seizures. Heart rate and respiratory rate were recorded at 0, 5, 15, and 60 minutes after administration of physostigmine. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and chi-square test. A pretest sample size calculation determined that 10 rats per group would detect a change in arousal from 0% to 50% and a 10% change in heart rate.

RESULTS

No rats in either group had arousal within one hour (p = 1.0); however, ten of ten physostigmine-treated rats developed signs of physostigmine toxicity (fasciculations, 7; seizures, 3), while no controls developed signs of physostigmine toxicity (p = 0.00). The authors were unable to detect a decrease in heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Physostigmine did not produce a 50% change in arousal as measured by a return of righting reflex but did produce physostigmine toxicity (fasciculations and seizures) in this rat model of severe GHB intoxication.

Suspected central anticholinergic syndrome in a 6-week-old infant

A 6-wk-old male infant became unresponsive after an uneventful general anesthetic for hernia repair. His symptoms were consistent with central anticholinergic syndrome. He appeared to awaken after treatment with IV physostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg. Because of the recurrence of sedation, a second physostigmine infusion was administered, which again led to transient arousal. Finally, the patient awoke spontaneously after 24 h and recovered uneventfully.

[Postoperative routine use of physostigmine on vigilance, cardiovascular parameters and need of analgesics]

OBJECTIVE

A central anticholinergic syndrome (CAS) can be related to the majority of anesthetic agents, but is often not recognized as such. Thus, most anesthesiologists seem to miss the occurrence of an anticholinergic syndrome especially when agitation and/or restlessness are the major symptoms. Therefore, the following study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that routine administration of the anticholinergic agent physostigmin is of benefit for patients in regard to vigilance, the cardiovascular system and the need of analgesics easing the time in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

METHODS

After approval by the local ethics committee and written informed consent, 100 patients undergoing a cholecystectomy or a struma resection, were given either physostigmin (n = 51) or saline 0.9 % (n = 49) in a randomized fashion. The study was conceived to block a possible isoflurane-N2O/O2 (opioid-based plus relaxant) induced central anticholinergic syndrome and to evaluate the effects on the cardiovascular system on vigilance and on postoperative analgesic demand. Following parameters were measured: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gases. In addition, vigilance was determined and typical anticholinergic symptoms (disorientation, slurred speech, agitation, nausea, emesis, cardiac arrhythmia and muscle shivering) were determined 10, 20, 40 and 60 minutes following the intravenous injection of physostigmin. Also, the need for the postoperative analgesic pethidine was evaluated among the two groups.

RESULTS

Except for a significant reduction in the need of analgesics, a reduced diastolic pressure and heart rate and a lower incidence of muscle shivering there was no difference among the two groups. One major side effect following the use of physostigmin was the higher incidence of nausea in the im mediate minutes following injection. This effect may be due to the rapid injection of the anticholinergic compound. Otherwise there were no detrimental effects of physostigmin in patients.

CONCLUSION

From the results it can be concluded that routine administration of an anticholinergic agent results in a short term beneficial effect in regard to vigilance, a lesser incidence of muscle shivering and a lesser demand for analgesics. However, because of the low incidence of a classical central anticholinergic syndrome, routine physostigmine is only indicated when agitation is diagnosed.

Complications of diagnostic physostigmine administration to emergency department patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Literature exists describing the complications associated with therapeutic physostigmine administration. No series exists detailing strictly diagnostic use. Our objective was to document the complications associated with diagnostic physostigmine administration in emergency department (ED) patients suspected of having antimuscarinic delirium.

METHODS

Two reviewers blinded to the study purpose performed a retrospective chart review on all adult patients administered physostigmine diagnostically over a 79-month period at a tertiary-care hospital. Twenty percent of charts were reviewed by both abstractors. The data abstracted from the chart included total dose of physostigmine, effect on mental status, any subsequent complications, or any use of atropine. Discharge summaries, toxicology consultations, and urine drug screens were used to determine the cause of the altered mental status.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine adult patients were administered varying doses of physostigmine (range 0.5 to 2 mg). The reviewers were able to determine the cause of the altered mental status in 35 patients. The cause was purely antimuscarinic in 19 patients, purely nonantimuscarinic in 10 patients, mixed antimuscarinic and nonantimuscarinic in 2 patients, psychiatric in 4 patients, and unknown in 4 patients. A total of 22 patients had full reversal of delirium, and this group comprised all 19 patients with a purely antimuscarinic cause and 3 patients in whom a cause was never determined. One (2.6%) in 39 patients had a brief convulsion without adverse sequelae. This patient was poisoned with an antimuscarinic drug. No patient had dysrhythmias, had signs of cholinergic excess, or was administered atropine.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic physostigmine administration was without significant complication when given to ED patients suspected of having antimuscarinic delirium. Although a relatively small series, it contributes to the safety profile of physostigmine.

Effects of cholinergic enhancement on conditioning-related responses in human auditory cortex

It has previously been shown that cholinergic blockade attenuates conditioning-related neuronal responses in human auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of cholinergic enhancement on such experience-dependent cortical responses. The cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine, or a placebo control, were continuously infused into healthy young volunteers, during differential aversive conditioning whilst brain activity was measured using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Volunteers were presented with two tones, one of which (CS+) was conditioned by pairing with an electrical shock whereas the other was always presented without the shock (CS-). Conditioning-related activations, expressed as an enhanced blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response to the salient CS+, were evident in left auditory cortex under placebo but not under physostigmine. This absence of conditioning-related activations under physostigmine was due to enhanced responses to the CS- under physostigmine as compared to placebo. We suggest that an overactive cholinergic system leads to increased processing of behaviourally irrelevant stimuli and thus attenuates differential conditioning-related cortical activations.

Eptastigmine: ten years of pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetic, and clinical studies

Eptastigmine (heptyl-physostigmine tartrate) is a carbamate derivative of physostigmine in which the carbamoylmethyl group in position 5 of the side chain has been substituted with a carbamoylheptyl group. In vitro and ex vivo results suggest that eptastigmine has a long-lasting reversible brain cholinesterase (i.e., acetylcholinesterase and butyryl-cholinesterase) inhibitory effect. When administered in vivo to rodents by various routes, eptastigmine inhibits cerebral acetylcholinesterases (AChE) and increases acetylcholine (Ach) brain levels by 2500-3000%, depending on the dose. This effect leads to an improvement in the cerebral blood flow in the ischemic brain, excitatory and inhibitory effects on the gastrointestinal tract and to a protection from acute soman and diisopropylfluorophosphate intoxication. Eptastigmine, by either acute or chronic administration, has been found to have memory enhancing effects in different species of normal, aged and lesioned animals. It also restored to normal the age-related increase of EEG power without affecting spontaneous motor activity. Clinical investigations on more than 1500 patients with Alzheimer's disease demonstrated that eptastigmine significantly improved cognitive performance (as assessed by the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) as compared with placebo. This improvement was most evident in patients with more severe cognitive impairment at the baseline. The relationship between patient performance and average steady-state AChE inhibition was described by an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. Pharmacokinetic studies have revealed that after oral administration eptastigmine is rapidly distributed to the tissues and readily enters the CNS, where it can be expected to inhibit AChE for a prolonged period. Eptastigmine is generally well tolerated and the majority of adverse events (cholinergic) were mild to moderate in intensity. However, the adverse hematologic (granulocytopenia) effects reported in two studies have resulted in the suspension of further clinical trials.

Muscarinic versus nicotinic modulation of a visual task. a pet study using drug probes

Little is known about acetylcholine (ACh) modulation of central visual processing in humans. Receptor densities in visual brain regions are differentially distributed suggesting that receptor subtypes have different functions. Using PET, we have previously described the brain regions activated by a simple pattern-flash stimulus in healthy elderly subjects. To evaluate muscarinic and nicotinic contributions to ACh modulation of visual processing, we scanned elderly subjects watching the pattern-flash stimulus during no drug, during physostigmine augmentation, and during scopolamine antagonism of physostigmine's action. These manipulations of ACh significantly altered regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in brain regions activated by the task. The pattern of rCBF values across drug conditions suggested that muscarinic and nicotinic effects were dissociated. Muscarinic action predominated in striate cortex (Brodmann Area, BA 17) and lateral visual association areas (BA 18, 19), while nicotinic action predominated in the thalamus and inferior parietal regions (BA 39/40). Both muscarinic and nicotinic actions increased rCBF in some regions while decreasing it in others. A parsimonious reconciliation of these results with functional anatomy suggests that muscarinic action modulates visual attribute processing, while nicotinic action modulates arousal and selective attention to the visual task.

[Etiology of initially unexplained confusion of excitability in deadly nightshade poisoning with suicidal intent. Symptoms, differential diagnosis, toxicology and physostigmine therapy of anticholinergic syndrome]

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS

After a walk in a wood a 55-year-old teacher was admitted to the emergency unit of a university hospital because of somnolence and excitability. Her rectal temperature was 37.8 degrees C, she had sinus tachycardia (rate of 130/min) but no other significant findings.

INVESTIGATIONS

With the exception of C-reactive protein (10 mg/dl), MCV (101 fl), MCH (34 pg) and arterial blood gases (pH 7.483, pCO2 35.5 mmHg, base excess 5.1 mmp/l) laboratory tests were within normal limits. Qualitative screening of serum for benzodiazepines, barbiturates and antidepressives was negative. Neurological examination, including lumbar puncture and cranial computed tomography were noncontributory.

TREATMENT AND COURSE

10 hours after admission the patient developed signs of an anticholinergic syndrome with mydriasis, dry mouth, tachycardia, hot skin and an atonic bladder. Physostigmine 2 mg completely reversed the neurological and mental symptoms. After gas chromatography, mass-spectrometry of a urine sample showed an atropine molecular fragment with a molecular weight of 271. At intervals of 3 to 5 hours the recurrence of confusion and excitability required 4 further i.v. injection of physostigmine. The patient subsequently became accessible to psychiatric examination and reported that during the walk she had swallowed 8-10 berries of deadly nightshade with suicidal intent.

CONCLUSION

In case of excitability and confusion as well as somnolence or coma of uncertain aetiology an anticholinergic syndrome caused by ingestion of atropine-containing plants or psychoactive drugs (phenothiazines, butyrophenones, tri- or tetracyclic antidepressants) should be included in the differential diagnosis. If there are suggestive clinical findings (tachycardia, somnolence, coma or threatened respiratory arrest, physostigmine should be given if there are no contraindications.

Effects of serotoninergic drugs on tremor induced by physostigmine in rats

We investigated the effects of various serotoninergic drugs and serotonin (5-HT) depletion on physostigmine-induced visible tremor in rats. Physostigmine (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) caused dose-dependent tremor, initiated at 3-5 min (latency decreases as dose increases) and lasted for 30-35 min. Serotonin agonists, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (2.5 mg/kg) and buspirone (5 mg/kg) augmented the tremor response caused by physostigmine. The 5-HT(1)/5-HT(2) receptor antagonist, metergoline (1 mg/kg), and 5-HT(2) blocker, cyproheptadine (10 mg/kg) significantly decreased the duration (40%) as well as intensity (45-50%) of physostigmine-tremor. The 5-HT(2a)/5-HT(2c) antagonist ritanserin (5 mg/kg) significantly reduced the duration (60%) without affecting the intensity of the tremor. In 5-HT depleted rats (p-chlorophenylalanine; 300 mg/kg, for 3 days), physostigmine failed to produce tremor. Interestingly, in these animals, administration of a non-specific 5-HT agonist, 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyl tryptamine, caused high intensity tremor. These results suggest that presence of 5-HT at the pre-synaptic terminals is needed for the tremor response by physostigmine and the response is greatly mediated via post-synaptic 5-HT receptors. The overall data indicated a direct involvement of central 5-HT system in the cholinergic tremor induced by physostigmine.

Extended-release physostigmine in Alzheimer disease: a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week study with dose enrichment. Physostigmine Study Group

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of extended-release physostigmine salicylate, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, was evaluated in 850 subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) in a multicenter trial.

METHODS

Subjects initially entered a dose-enrichment phase in which they received 1 week each of physostigmine salicylate, 24 mg/d and 30 mg/d, and daily placebo. Among the subjects who completed this phase, 35.9% responded to physostigmine treatment, whereas 62.4% were considered nonresponders, and 1.6% could not be evaluated because of missing data. After a 4-week placebo-washout phase, 176 responder subjects were randomized to receive their best dose of physostigmine or placebo in a 12-week double-blind phase. Primary efficacy measures included the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change With Caregiver Input (CIBIC+), and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC).

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat analysis of the double-blind phase, physostigmine-treated subjects scored -2.02 points better than placebo-treated subjects on the ADAS-Cog (F1,167 = 6.42 [P = .01]) and 0.33 points higher on the CIBIC+ (F1,150 = 5.68 [P = .02]). No significant improvement was observed on the CGIC or the secondary outcome measures. Nausea and vomiting were experienced by 47.0% of all physostigmine-treated subjects during the double-blind phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Physostigmine demonstrated a statistically significant benefit compared with placebo on a clinical global rating of change and an objective test of cognitive function. Given the frequency of gastrointestinal side effects, the role of this agent in clinical use remains to be determined.

A 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of eptastigmine in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptastigmine as a treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. It was performed in 26 Italian and American geriatric and neurological centers. The study group comprised 349 outpatients with a diagnosis of probable AD according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the AD and Related Disorders Association. Patients were assigned to one of the three study groups: placebo (n = 119), eptastigmine 10 mg t.i.d. (n = 115) or eptastigmine 12 mg t.i.d. (n = 115) for 25 weeks. The AD Assessment Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of the Boxes (CDR-SB) were the primary outcome measures for efficacy.

RESULTS

The two doses of eptastigmine produced similar results and are presented together. Percentages of patients completing double-blind treatment were 82 and 87% in the placebo and eptastigmine groups, respectively. At the end of treatment, the intent to-treat analysis on 342 patients showed a statistically significant effect of eptastigmine compared to placebo on both ADAS-Cog (p = 0.047) and CDR-SB (p = 0.010). Patients on eptastigmine performed significantly better than placebo-treated patients also on the Mini-Mental State Examination (p < 0.001). The drug was well tolerated with 5% of patients withdrawing due to adverse events versus 3% on placebo. Adverse events were recorded in 46% of the patients on placebo compared to 52% of the patients taking eptastigmine. Cholinergic side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain) were reported with similar frequency in the eptastigmine and placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Eptastigmine doses up to 12 mg t.i.d. for 25 weeks are well tolerated. The drug positively affects cognitive performance and global function of patients with mild-to-moderate AD.

Subchronic physostigmine pretreatment in marmosets: absence of side effects and effectiveness against soman poisoning with negligible postintoxication incapacitation

Subchronic pretreatment with physostigmine (PHY) (0.0125 mg/kg/h) leading to a blood acetylcholinesterase inhibition of about 30% caused no side effects when applied to marmoset monkeys. This was evident on behavioral parameters and on EEG and cortical visual evoked response. Furthermore, this treatment regime, followed by atropine as postintoxication therapy, protected the marmosets against lethality after a 2 x LD50 dose of soman with negligible postintoxication incapacitation. These findings suggest that a symptom-free pretreatment with subchronic PHY could protect man sufficiently against severe soman intoxication.

Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal cortical responses to low-dose physostigmine and arginine vasopressin administration: sex differences between major depressives and matched control subjects

Of heuristic value in understanding the neurochemistry of major depression is whether the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis hyperactivity that occurs in this illness can be related to putative neurotransmitter dysfunction(s). Cholinergic neurotransmission stimulates hypothalamic corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion, both of which stimulate pituitary corticotropin (ACTH) secretion, but whether the HPA axis in humans is activated only by doses of cholinergic agonists that produce noxious side effects remains controversial. To test the hypothesis of increased cholinergic sensitivity in major depression, physostigmine (PHYSO), a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, was administered to patients and control subjects at a dose that elevated plasma ACTH, cortisol, and AVP concentrations but produced few or no side effects. Exogenous AVP also was administered to determine if it would augment the effect of low-dose PHYSO on the HPA axis. Twelve premenopausal or estrogen-replaced female major depressives, 12 individually matched female control subjects, eight male major depressives, and eight matched male control subjects underwent four test sessions 5-7 days apart: PHYSO (8 microg/kg IV), AVP (0.08 U/kg IM), PHYSO + AVP, and saline control. Serial blood samples were taken before and after pharmacologic challenge and analyzed for ACTH1-39, cortisol, and AVP. Estradiol and testosterone were also measured at each test session. PHYSO (8 microg/kg) significantly increased plasma ACTH, cortisol, and AVP, while producing no side effects in approximately half the subjects and predominantly mild side effects in the other half. These hormone increases following PHYSO occurred primarily in the female depressives and the male control subjects and were not significantly related to the presence or absence of side effects. The greater the ACTH and AVP responses to PHYSO, the stronger their correlation, suggesting that AVP may have been acting as a secretagogue for ACTH. Administered AVP significantly increased the secretion of ACTH in the patients and control subjects to a similar degree, and AVP given after PHYSO did not augment the HPA axis response to a greater degree in the depressives than in the control subjects. Plasma estradiol and testosterone were within the normal range for all four groups of subjects and were not significantly related to their HPA axis hormone responses. The study results support the hypothesis of heightened cholinergic sensitivity in premenopausal female, but not in male, patients with major depression. The low dose of PHYSO used may represent a useful paradigm for central cholinergic stimulation of the HPA axis.

Undiagnosed central anticholinergic syndrome may lead to dangerous complications

This report describes two cases of central anticholinergic syndrome, the first after general anaesthesia and the other during a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. The symptoms in both patients resolved soon after physostigmine administration. There was a delay in the diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome, which resulted in acute lung injury and unanticipated intensive care unit admission. It is suggested that in cases of abnormal mental recovery after anaesthesia or sedation, the diagnosis of central anticholinergic syndrome should be considered.

[Effect pf anti-dementia drugs on the daily routine and attitude of dementia patients]

The introduction of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors has greatly improved therapeutic opportunities for patients with dementia, in particular with Alzheimer's disease. The most likely outcome of treatment with these compounds is a maintenance of cognitive ability and/or activities of daily living over at least 6 months. Regarding the progressive nature of the underlying neurodegenerative process a temporary stabilization of symptoms is a clear treatment success. Approximately 25 per cent of patients experience a significant improvement in cognitive ability. They show more attentiveness, interest, activity, orientation, communicative ability, as well as better memory. In addition, the new medications can ameliorate non-cognitive symptoms including apathy, agitation, delusions, hallucinations, and disinhibition. Open-label long-term studies have demonstrated that patients receiving treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor cross their baseline cognitive ability at week 40 to 50 and continue to decline thereafter. In spite of this slow deterioration treated patients perform better than untreated individuals. Since ethical reasons do not permit to include placebo control groups in long-term trials it is not known presently how long the benefit from treatment lasts.

Pituitary-adrenal cortical responses to low-dose physostigmine and arginine vasopressin administration in normal women and men

Animal studies indicate that central cholinergic neurotransmission stimulates CRH secretion, but several human studies suggest that the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal cortical (HPA) axis may be activated only by doses of cholinergic agonists that produce noxious side effects and, by inference, a nonspecific stress response. Physostigmine (PHYSO), a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, was administered to normal women and men at a dose that elevated plasma ACTH1-39, cortisol, and arginine vasopressin (AVP) concentrations but produced few or no side effects. Exogenous AVP also was administered alone and following PHYSO, to determine if it would augment the effect of PHYSO on the HPA axis. Fourteen normal women and 14 normal men matched to the women on age and race underwent four test sessions 5 to 7 days apart: PHYSO (8 micrograms/kg i.v.), AVP (0.08 U/kg i.m.), PHYSO plus AVP, and saline control. Serial blood samples taken before and after pharmacologic challenge were analyzed for ACTH1-39, cortisol, and AVP. PHYSO and AVP administration produced no side effects in about half the subjects and mild side effects in the other half, with no significant female-male differences overall. There also were no significant female-male differences in ACTH1-39 or cortisol responses to AVP. In contrast, the men had significantly greater ACTH1-39 responses to PHYSO administration than did the women. The endogenous AVP response to PHYSO also was significantly greater in the men than in the women, and the ACTH1-39 and AVP responses to PHYSO were significantly correlated in the men (both = +0.70) but not in the women. None of the hormone responses was significantly correlated with the presence or absence of side effects in either group of subjects. These results indicate a greater sensitivity of the HPA axis to low-dose PHYSO in normal men than in normal women, which likely is mediated by increased secretion of AVP. The lack of difference in side effects between the two groups of subjects and the lack of significant correlations between presence or absence of side effects and hormone responses in either group suggest that the increased hormone responses in the men were due to increased responsivity of central cholinergic systems and not to a nonspecific stress response.

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of a physostigmine patch in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type

Owing to the pharmacokinetic properties of physostigmine when administered by conventional routes, long-term cholinergic treatment of Alzheimer's disease is difficult to manage. In order to overcome the problems associated with the oral and intravenous application of physostigmine, and to improve patients' compliance, a transdermal therapeutic system was developed. The efficacy and tolerability of this system were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study comparing patches containing 30 mg and 60 mg physostigmine with a placebo patch. The clinical trial followed the basic principles of the various guidelines on the evaluation of anti-dementia drugs, and included patients with mild to moderate probable Alzheimer's disease. A total of 204 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease were included in the study. Of these, 136 patients were eligible for the according-to-protocol analysis of efficacy, 167 subjects for the intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy, and 181 patients were included in the safety analysis. In contrast to the hypothesis to be tested, the efficacy of physostigmine was not superior to that of placebo after a treatment period of 24 weeks. On the contrary, there was even a slight, but not statistically significant, trend toward a better outcome in the placebo group. Median physostigmine plasma concentrations of approximately 100 pg/ml were measured, showing a high degree of interindividual variability and no linear dose relationship between the 30 mg and 60 mg dosages. Plasma cholinesterase activity was not significantly affected by physostigmine. The physostigmine patch application in doses of 30 mg and 60 mg apparently did not lead to physostigmine plasma concentrations that were sufficient to compensate for cholinergic deficiencies in affected brain areas and produce clinical benefits. Both the drug and the transdermal system were generally well tolerated under the study conditions. Modifications of the patch system may perhaps make it possible to achieve higher physostigmine plasma concentrations, which seem to be required to induce the expected beneficial effects during long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Neuroendocrine responses to intravenous infusion of physostigmine in patients with Alzheimer disease

We have reported that physostigmine, a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances verbal memory in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). To elucidate the mechanism of cognition enhancement, plasma hormones were measured during high-dose acute and low-dose chronic steady-state intravenous infusions of physostigmine in nine subjects with AD. High-dose hormone responses were measured during and for 24 h after the infusion of physostigmine 1-1.5 mg over 45-60 min. Chronic responses were measured during continuous intravenous infusions of physostigmine at doses (0.5-25 mg/day) that escalated over 2 weeks, and then during 1 week infusion of the dose that optimized cognition (2-12 mg/day) or placebo administered in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design. A replicable improvement in verbal memory was found in five subjects. High-dose physostigmine infusion that produced noxious side effects resulted in significant elevation above baseline in plasma levels of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) (p = 0.0001), cortisol (p = 0.0001), and beta-endorphin (p = 0.0001). Chronic physostigmine administration, in the absence of adverse effects, produced no significant elevation in ACTH (p = 0.08), cortisol (p = 0.70), or beta-endorphin (p = 0.82). These results indicate that high-dose physostigmine activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, likely representing a "stress response." In contrast, cognition-enhancing doses do not produce a peripheral corticosteroid response. Thus, physostigmine-induced memory improvement is independent of the activation of the HPA axis.

Efficacy and safety of eptastigmine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptastigmine in patients with moderate to moderately severe AD.

BACKGROUND

Eptastigmine is a centrally acting cholinesterase inhibitor.

METHODS

The study was carried out according a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Patients received a 24-week treatment with placebo or eptastigmine 15 mg or 20 mg three times daily after a 4-week, stepwise dose escalation. The effects of treatment on cognition, global function, and activities of daily living were evaluated with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus), and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL), respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-six centers recruited 491 patients: 164 on placebo, 166 on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily, and 161 on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Percentages of patients completing double-blinded treatment were 87% in the placebo group and 86% in both the eptastigmine-treated groups. At the end of treatment, the intent-to-treat analysis on 463 patients showed a dose-dependent effect of eptastigmine on all efficacy variables, with a statistically significant effect of the 20 mg three times daily dose compared with placebo on the ADAS-Cog, CIBIC-Plus, and IADL. Patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily performed significantly better than placebo-treated patients only on the ADAS-Cog. Eleven patients on placebo (7%), 13 patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily (8%), and 12 patients on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily (8%) discontinued study treatment because of adverse events. Adverse events were recorded in 49% of patients on placebo compared with 54% on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily and 48% on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Cholinergic side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain) were reported with similar frequency in the eptastigmine- and placebo-treated patients. There was a dose-dependent transient and mild neutropenic effect associated with eptastigmine treatment, and one patient on 20 mg three times daily had an asymptomatic pancytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Eptastigmine produces significant cognitive, clinical, and functional benefits in patients with probable AD. Although the cholinergic tolerability of eptastigmine was found to be favorable, its potential adverse hematologic effects limit its clinical utility.

Two-year treatment of Alzheimer's disease with eptastigmine. The Eptastigmine Study Group

The effectiveness of long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease with cholinesterase inhibitors is a matter of controversy. We evaluated the effects of prolonged treatment with eptastigmine in 176 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease participating in the open-label extension phase of a 25-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of eptastigmine. The effects of eptastigmine on cognition and daily functioning were evaluated with the cognitive portion of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog) and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, respectively. Safety was monitored by physical examination, laboratory tests, vital functions and electrocardiogram measurements and by the assessment of adverse events. One hundred and fifty-three patients (87%) completed 1 year of treatment, 77 patients (44%) 18 months and 33 patients (19%) 2 years of treatment. Patients treated for 2 years showed an improvement of mean ADAS-Cog scores compared to baseline for 31 weeks and mean IADL scores remained close to baseline for 25 weeks. Cognitive and functional scores then worsened as expected in this progressive disease. After 2 years, patients deteriorated compared to baseline by 13.4 points on the ADAS-Cog and 6.1 points on IADL. Historical untreated controls with identical disease severity are expected to have an annual worsening of approximately 10.9 points on ADAS-Cog and 4.9 points on IADL. Thus patients treated with eptastigmine for 2 years had a benefit of 8.5 points on ADAS-Cog and 3.8 points on IADL. These benefits translate to about 9 months difference between eptastigmine-treated patients and untreated historical patients. The drug was generally well tolerated with 14 patients (7.9%) withdrawing due to adverse events. Adverse events, not necessarily drug-related, were recorded in 66 patients (37.5%) and were transient and generally mild in severity. This study indicates that prolonged treatment with eptastigmine is safe and produced a clinically long-term benefit in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

A 25-week placebo-controlled study of eptastigmine in patients with Alzheimer disease

The efficacy and safety of eptastigmine in patients with probable Alzheimer disease was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Patients with mild to moderate dementia were randomly assigned to placebo, eptastigmine 10 mg three times a day (t.i.d.), or eptastigmine 15 mg t.i.d. over 25 weeks. The Alzheimer Disease Assessment Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus) were the primary outcome measures for efficacy. Twenty-six centers recruited 320 patients: 106 on placebo, 105 on eptastigmine 10 mg t.i.d., and 109 on eptastigmine 15 mg t.i.d. Six patients on placebo (6%), 18 patients on eptastigmine 10 mg t.i.d. (17%), and 10 patients on eptastigmine 15 mg t.i.d. (9%) discontinued study treatment. The intent-to-treat analysis on 315 patients showed a statistically significant (p=0.047) difference of 2.0 points on ADAS-Cog between the placebo and the eptastigmine 15 mg t.i.d. group at the end of treatment. Patients in the 10 mg t.i.d. group performed better than did placebo-treated patients on the Spontaneous Behavior Interview (SBI) total scores (p=0.015) and on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL, p=0.043) and Behavioral Problems (BP, p=0.028) subscales. The differences in favor of the eptastigmine groups on the CIBIC-Plus did not reach statistical significance. In a post hoc subgroup analysis by staging, the effect size of eptastigmine was found to be greater in the most severely impaired patients (Global Deterioration Scale rating of 4 and 5 at screening) reaching statistical significance in both ADAS-Cog (p=0.007) and CIBIC-Plus (p=0.038). In this patient subgroup (n=222), there was also a significant effect of eptastigmine on SBI (p=0.019). The drug was generally well tolerated, with 8% of patients withdrawing due to adverse events versus 5% on placebo. Adverse events were recorded in 35 patients (33%) on placebo compared with 41 (39%) on eptastigmine 10 mg t.i.d. and 38 (35%) on eptastigmine 15 mg t.i.d. This study shows that eptastigmine doses up to 15 mg t.i.d. for 25 weeks are well tolerated. The drug positively affects cognitive performance of Alzheimer patients. This effect appears greater in more severely impaired patients and also impacts on their behavioral performance.

Effects of lead exposure on licking and yawning behaviour in rats

In the present study, effects of lead exposure on licking and yawning behaviour have been studied. The dopaminergic receptor agonist, apomorphine (0.15, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), induced dose-dependent licking in rats. The maximum response was obtained with 0.5 mg/kg of the apomorphine. Lead acetate (0.05%) exposure significantly increased apomorphine-induced licking. Yawning induced by the D2 dopaminergic agonist, bromocriptine (2, 3, 4, 8 mg/kg), and the cholinergic drug, physostigmine (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg), was significantly decreased by lead acetate (0.05%) exposure. It may be concluded that the behaviour induced by dopaminergic or cholinergic agents can be affected by lead subchronic exposure.

Maximum tolerated dose and pharmacodynamics of eptastigmine in elderly healthy volunteers

Eptastigmine is a new acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor currently under development for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer disease. This study was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacodynamics of eptastigmine in nine healthy elderly volunteers. Subjects received single oral doses of 8 mg, 20 mg, 32 mg, and 40 mg eptastigmine and placebo according to a double-blind, randomized, rising-dose, five-way crossover design. Adverse events, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, forced expiratory volume, salivary flow, and pupilar activity were closely monitored during treatment. Pharmacodynamic activity of eptastigmine was evaluated with an assay of AChE activity in red blood cells. Eptastigmine doses of 8 mg, 20 mg, and 32 mg were well tolerated. Two of four subjects receiving the 40-mg dose developed profound AChE inhibition (58-59%) and reported severe adverse events (nausea, vomiting, syncope, and bradycardia), precluding further administration in the remaining subjects. Eptastigmine administration produced a weak effect on supine heart rate, body temperature, and pupil diameter. There were no effects on blood pressure, forced expiratory volume, salivary flow, and near point of focus. Acetylcholinesterase activity was inhibited in a dose-related fashion according to a sigmoidal (logistic) function. The mean (+/- SEM) maximum inhibition of AChE activity (Imax) was 14.5+/-3.3%, 20.4+/-2.3%, 28.7+/-2.9%, 45.2+/-1.3% and 53.6+/-2.9% after placebo, 8 mg, 20 mg, 32 mg, and 40 mg of eptastigmine, respectively. The theoretical maximum response (Emax) was 72.9%, and the dose that produced half of the maximum response (ED50) was 29.5 mg. At 24 hours, residual AChE inhibition ranged from 9% to 15%, with a half-life of recovery of the enzyme of approximately 10 hours. The maximum tolerated dose of eptastigmine after single-dose oral administration in healthy elderly subjects is 32 mg. Single oral doses of eptastigmine produce sustained, dose-related inhibition of AChE activity. Adverse events are related to the degree of AChE inhibition.

Effect of food on the absorption of eptastigmine

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of food on the rate and extent of eptastigmine absorption in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

The study was carried out according to a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over design. On three separate occasions, six young subjects received 30 mg eptastigmine after a 12-h overnight fast (reference treatment), 30 mg eptastigmine 15 min after a standard breakfast (test treatment) and placebo 15 min after a standard breakfast (control treatment). Acetylcholinesterase activity in red blood cells was assayed 24 h after drug administration as a biological marker of eptastigmine plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

Mean maximum acetylcholinesterase inhibition (Imax) was 39.9% after eptastigmine without food and 33.1% after eptastigmine with food. Maximum inhibitions occurred at 4.75 h and 4.88 h after eptastigmine without and with food, respectively. Areas under the curve of acetylcholinesterase per cent inhibition from 0 to 8 h after drug administration (AUC0-8) were 198% h after eptastigmine without food and 124% h after eptastigmine with food. Ninety per cent confidence intervals of test/reference ratios for AUC0-8 and Imax exceeded the 0.80 to 1.20 limits, thus indicating that the two eptastigmine treatments cannot be considered bioequivalent. Mild and transient adverse events were recorded in three subjects receiving eptastigmine without food, one subject receiving eptastigmine with food and one subject receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The ingestion of food significantly reduces the bioavailability of eptastigmine estimated by the assay of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity.

Subchronic physostigmine pretreatment in guinea pigs: effective against soman and without side effects

The behavioral and neurophysiological effects of the subchronically administered cholinesterase-inhibitor physostigmine (PHY) (0.025 mg/kg/h) either with or without the muscarinergic antagonist scopolamine (SCO) (0.018 mg/kg/h) were determined in guinea pigs. In contrast to a single injection of PHY, subchronic application by osmotic minipumps of PHY, even without SCO, caused no behavioral or neurophysiological side effects. Also, the efficacy of such a pretreatment in counteracting soman-induced lethality and apparent symptoms of intoxication were determined. After subchronically administered PHY or PHY + SCO, the treated animals were protected against a 3 x LD50 dose of soman.

Donepezil medicated memory improvement in traumatic brain injury during post acute rehabilitation

Memory dysfunction is a recognized and difficult to treat complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Since medial-temporal lobe injury is a frequent contributor to memory dysfunction in TBI, it is likely that an acetylcholine deficit contributes to memory dysfunction in this population. Recently, Donepezil, an acetylcholine-esterase inhibitor which has demonstrated a high selectivity for neural Ach-esterase (with minimal side effects), was approved for use in dementia in Alzheimer's patients. Due to its promising results in Alzheimer's patients, and reports in the literature describing the use of physostigmine (an anti-cholinesterase with significant cardiovascular and autonomic side effects) to treat memory deficits in closed head injury, we decided to begin a trial of Donepezil in two patients with TBI who were experiencing long term static memory dysfunction refractory to conventional treatment. Both patients were admitted to our facility for physical and cognitive rehabilitation, and were started on a trial of Donepezil. Modified memory tests and subjective observations by both family and staff pointed to an improvement in memory within three weeks of starting Donepezil. Should these initial results be supported in larger trials, Donepezil may prove to be a valuable tool for the treatment of memory dysfunction in TBI.

Physostigmine increases aqueous humor production in human eyes

PURPOSE

To investigate if part of the progressive reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP), seen when physostigmine is applied on alternate hours, is due to a reduced aqueous flow.

METHODS

In a randomized, open study, one drop of physostigmine salicylate, 8 mg/ml, was instilled at 7 AM in one randomly assigned eye in each of twenty healthy volunteers. Instillations were repeated on alternate hours throughout the day. Each subject's untreated eye served as control. Fluorophotometry of the anterior segment was performed hourly between 7 Am and 8 PM and aqueous flow was calculated. Subsequently, the subjects underwent tomography and tonometry. The change in anterior chamber depth and volume induced by physostigmine was assessed separately.

RESULTS

The mean aqueous flow during the day was 25-28% higher in the physostigmine-treated eye than in the control eye. The difference was statistically significant from 9 AM (p < 0.05-p < 0.001). Each dose caused a further increase. The mean outflow facility increased by 0.14 microliters/min/mm Hg with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.18. Although the increase in outflow facility was small, there was a marked reduction of IOP with a mean difference between treated and untreated eye of 3.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3-4.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated administrations of physostigmine increase the aqueous flow and outflow facility. The combined effect is a marked reduction of IOP.

Physostigmine increases the dose of propofol required to induce anaesthesia

PURPOSE

This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to determine the effect of administration of physostigmine on the dose of propofol required to produce loss of consciousness.

METHODS

Forty female unpremedicated patients were assigned in a random blind design to receive either 2 mg physostigmine or equal volume of normal saline i.v. five minutes before induction of anaesthesia with propofol. All patients received general anaesthesia for breast surgery. Propofol was infused at a constant rate of 200 ml.hr-1 while patients were breathing oxygen 100% via a face mask. In each patient the dose of propofol required to produce loss of the ability to grasp a 20 ml syringe was recorded as the end-point of loss of consciousness. At this point the protocol was terminated and, after intubation of the trachea, anaesthesia was maintained with a nitrous oxide-isoflurane or sevoflurane mixture in oxygen, increments of an opioid and a muscle relaxant. Doses of anaesthetic drugs and duration of anaesthesia varied and depended on the type of breast surgery, determined by frozen section.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD dose of propofol required to produce loss of consciousness was 2.4 +/- 0.6 mg.kg-1 and 2.0 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1 in the physostigmine and in the normal saline groups respectively (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Physostigmine pretreatment increases the dose of propofol required to produce loss of consciousness.

Assessment of motor and process skills as a measure of IADL functioning in pharmacologic studies of people with Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) as an outcome measure of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in pharmacologic studies of people with Alzheimer's disease. The AMPS simultaneously measures motor and process skills and their effect on the ability of the person to perform familiar IADL tasks. We administered the AMPS to 11 Alzheimer inpatients in a 3 1/2-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of fluoxetine and selegiline administered as single agents and in combination with physostigmine. Results indicated that there was a significant difference in IADL ability among study conditions for process skills, but not for motor skills, thereby suggesting that the AMPS is useful as a sensitive outcome measure of IADL ability in drug trials with this population.

Clinical applications of commonly used contemporary antidotes. A US perspective

Poisonings are a common problem. In 1995, over 2 million exposures were reported to American poison information centres alone. The majority of poisoning exposures can be treated without major therapeutic intervention. If therapy is indicated, it is usually in the form of gastrointestinal decontamination with activated charcoal, to prevent absorption of the toxin and the subsequent toxicity that may occur. In a limited number of cases, more aggressive life-support measures may be necessary to treat the adverse effects of poisons. Occasionally, that intervention may include the use of pharmacological antagonists, more commonly referred to as antidotes. According to the American Association of Poison Control Centers, the most commonly used antidotes are acetylcysteine, naloxone, atropine, deferoxamine (desferrioxamine) and antivenins. Overall, 17 antidotes account for 99% of all antidote use and those agents are reviewed in this article. With the exception of naloxone, most antidotes have pharmacological effects that are independent of their inherent antidotal properties. Therefore, antidotes should be used judiciously because their pharmacological properties may exacerbate pre-existing toxicity and only in rare circumstances are they used prophylactically. Some antidotes, such as digoxin-specific antigen binding fragments (digoxin immune Fab), are very expensive, and both the risk: benefit ratio and the associated cost should be considered before the antidote is administered. The principle aims are to "treat the patient, not the poison' and to do no harm to the patient. Antidotes should be used only when they are indicated and may help a patient.

A multicenter double-blind study of controlled-release physostigmine for the treatment of symptoms secondary to Alzheimer's disease. Physostigmine Study Group

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of controlled-release physostigmine salicylate, a cholinesterase inhibitor, was conducted in 1,111 mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects.

DESIGN

During dose titration, subjects received 18, 24, or 30 mg of physostigmine or placebo daily. After a 2-week washout period, 366 subjects with putative improvement were randomized to receive either placebo or their best dose of physostigmine in a 6-week double-blind trial. Nonresponding patients (439) were randomized to receive in a separate double-blind trial either placebo or their highest tolerated dose of physostigmine. The primary efficacy measures included the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) and a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Secondary measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination and two activities-of-daily-living scales.

RESULTS

At the end of the 6-week double-blind phase, physostigmine-treated patients scored 1.75 points higher than placebo-treated patients on the ADAS (p = 0.003) and 0.26 points higher on the CGIC (p = 0.012) in the intent-to-treat analysis. There was no significant improvement on the secondary outcome measures. Patients failing to respond to physostigmine during the dose titration phase failed to respond on any of the outcome measures during the double-blind period of re-exposure. Common adverse events included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no significant changes in liver function tests.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated statistically significant differences between physostigmine and placebo on both a performance-based cognitive functioning instrument and a clinician's global evaluation. The magnitude of the effect size was small and occurred only in the subset of patients who responded in the initial dose titration study period. Nevertheless, the results suggest that in a subset of patients, physostigmine can induce a degree of cognitive improvement over 6 weeks of treatment.

Relationship between pharmacodynamic activity and cognitive effects of eptastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Eptastigmine Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of eptastigmine, a new long-acting cholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, unbalanced parallel-group study. One-hundred and three patients (83 in the eptastigmine group and 20 in the placebo group) were recruited by 10 centers. Patients received 20 mg eptastigmine or placebo for 4 weeks with twice-a-day or three-times-a-day regimens, depending on body weight (< or = 65 kg or > 65 kg, respectively). Patient performance on the Logical Memory Test, Semantic Word Fluency Test, Trail Making Test, Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scales (IADL), and the Physician and Caregiver Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Nine patients, all from the eptastigmine group, did not complete treatment because of uncooperativeness (n = 3), adverse events (n = 3), protocol violations (n = 2), and clinical decline (n = 1). Twenty-five patients receiving eptastigmine (34%) reported adverse events mainly of the cholinergic type. Cholinergic side effects were generally associated with peak red blood cell cholinesterase inhibition exceeding 50% after the first dose, or 70% at steady state. At steady state, average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranged from 13% to 54%. Overall, 34% of patients receiving eptastigmine versus 0% receiving placebo (p = 0.006) improved on the Physician CGIC. This percentage increased to 46% in the subgroup of patients with average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition ranging from 30% to 35%. Patient performance on the IADL also improved significantly compared with the placebo group (p = 0.019). In the eptastigmine group, performances on all tests and scales improved with an inverted U-shaped relation to average daily acetylcholinesterase inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that doses of 40 to 60 mg per day of eptastigmine are relatively safe and well tolerated and that moderate acetylcholinesterase inhibition is associated with maximal cognitive efficacy.

[Physostigmine in treatment of cerebellar ataxia]

Cerebellar ataxias are still a challenging problem for neurologists, and to this day there exists no medical, physiotherapeutic, psychot-erapeutic or surgical therapy which constantly leads to a reduction of ataxic symptoms. In the pathophysiology of cerebellar ataxia a cholinergic defect has often been described. In a double-blind, cross-over study with 14 patients with cerebellar ataxia and an open follow-up, long-term study with 21 patients, the clinical effects of physostigmine capsules in doses up to 10 mg per day were studied. Moreover, a transdermal application (physostigmine patch) was developed, achieving constant physostigmine plasma levels for 24 h. Of 14 patients treated with physostigmine during the double-blind, cross-over study, nine could correctly distinguish between verum and placebo. They all showed small but constant improvements, clearly experienced by the patients. With the physostigmine patch, 12 of 14 patients improved. Thirteen of 14 patients decided to take part in open follow-up studies with physostigmine, and most of them preferred the physostigmine patch as long-term medication. To date, 21 patients with cerebellar ataxia have been treated with physostigmine. As far as we can judge at the end of a treatment period of at least 2 years, the progression of the disease could be stopped in 17 of 21 patients. These patients reported small but constant effects, and none wants to live without the physostigmine patch.

L-deprenyl and physostigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

The present study evaluated the safety of and obtained preliminary data on the cognitive effects of L-deprenyl and physostigmine in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Seventeen outpatients with Alzheimer's Disease participated in a double-blind crossover study in which they received 4 weeks of L-deprenyl at a dose of 10 mg p.o., q.d., and 4 weeks of placebo in random order. During both the L-deprenyl and placebo periods, patients received cognitive assessments during physostigmine (0.5 mg) and placebo infusions separated by 2 days. The cognitive effects of these agents alone and in combination were measured with digit span, verbal fluency, list learning, praxis, delayed recall, and delayed recognition tasks. Fifteen patients completed the study. The two drugs, used alone or in combination, were safe and well tolerated. Analyses of variance demonstrated that neither physostigmine nor L-deprenyl, whether given alone or in combination, significantly improved cognition, when compared with the double placebo condition.

Oral physostigmine in Alzheimer's disease: effects on norepinephrine and vasopressin in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma

Physostigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor which enhances central and peripheral cholinergic activity. In this study, we explored in persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) the effects of an acute dose of physostigmine in patients receiving chronic physostigmine treatment on the activity of the cholinergically regulated noradrenergic and arginine vasopressin (AVP) systems. Specifically, we estimated the effects of sustained release oral physostigmine on central and peripheral noradrenergic and AVP systems by measuring norepinephrine (NE) and AVP in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Lumbar punctures were performed in both physostigmine and no drug treatment conditions. In some subjects the effects of physostigmine on the plasma AVP response to the osmolar stimulus of a hypertonic saline infusion also were measured. NE concentrations in both CSF and plasma were significantly lower in the physostigmine than in the no drug condition. AVP concentrations did not differ between conditions in either compartment, nor did physostigmine affect the AVP response to hypertonic saline. Physostigmine appears to decrease both central and peripheral noradrenergic activity in AD.

[Antagonists in anesthesia]

In modern anaesthesia various antagonists are used. They provide efficient tools to facilitate better control of pharmacological effects and side effects of drugs routinely used in anaesthesia. Naloxone is a competitive antagonist of opioids without any intrinsic activity. It counteracts respiratory depression, pruritus, sedation and analgesia caused by opioids. It is fast-acting with a duration of action of 45 to 90 min. Several investigators have reported severe side effects of naloxone including hypertension, tachyarrhythmias, left heart failure and cardiac arrest, and hence the use of naloxone must be carefully considered in every single patient. Flumazenil is a competitive antagonist of benzodiazepines. It is a remarkably safe drug and very effective to terminate all benzodiazepine effects in anaesthesia and intensive-care patients. Serious complications caused by flumazenil have been reported in patients receiving benzodiazepines in the treatment of seizure disorders and in patients with mixed intoxications. Neostigmine is one of several antagonists of neuromuscular blocking agents. Its side effects include bradycardia, increased bronchial secretions and increased peristalsis. Indication depends on the results of neuromuscular monitoring. Physostigmine is an unspecific antagonist of the central anticholinergic syndrome, an acute psychosis that may be caused by numerous drugs used in anaesthesia. Generally, antagonists should be carefully titrated. In emergency medicine the use of these antagonists is not recommended; the primary goal is to restore vital functions.

Scientific and ethical concerns in clinical trials in Alzheimer's patients: the bridging study

This paper reviews the scientific and ethical issues surrounding the conduct of bridging studies in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Bridging studies, so called because they facilitate the transition from phase I to phase II development, are late phase I safety/tolerance studies which determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients before initiating phase II efficacy studies. Determining the MTD in patients is important because we have found that AD patients appear to respond to cholinergic compounds differently from normal volunteers, reaching a different MTD. Preliminary evidence of dose-related efficacy with two cholinergic compounds lends support to our contention that determination of the highest tolerated dose maximizes the potential to detect efficacy. We will review the early clinical development of several cholinergic compounds and make recommendations for the design and conduct of bridging studies based on our experience. A fixed-dose panel design with dosages based on the MTD determined in normal volunteers is recommended. In order to minimize risk to the patients, ensuring that scientific benefits outweigh the risks, a bridging study must be supported by detailed preclinical toxicology, by a clinical research unit that is prepared to handle unexpected contingencies, and by the oversight of a competent, multi-disciplinary review board. Patients should be in good physical health (excluding AD), and a comprehensive informed consent procedure must be instituted. Carefully planned and well run bridging studies represent a scientifically and ethically sound approach to drug development in the Alzheimer's population.

Protracted post-traumatic confusional state treated with physostigmine

A case study is presented of confusion in a head-injured man, lasting for more than 2 years, when intermittent treatment with physostigmine resulted in progressive improvement in both confusion and usable cognitive functions. Aetiological mechanisms and implications for treatment plans are discussed.