Common and divergent structural features of a series of corticotropin releasing factor-related peptides

Members of the corticoliberin family include the corticotropin releasing factors (CRFs), sauvagine, the urotensins, and urocortin 1 (Ucn1), which bind to both the CRF receptors CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, and the urocortins 2 (Ucn2) and 3 (Ucn3), which are selective agonists of CRF-R2. Structure activity relationship studies led to several potent and long-acting analogues with selective binding to either one of the receptors. NMR structures of six ligands of this family (the antagonists astressin B and astressin2-B, the agonists stressin1, and the natural ligands human Ucn1, Ucn2, and Ucn3) were determined in DMSO. These six peptides show differences in binding affinities, receptor-selectivity, and NMR structure. Overall, their backbones are alpha-helical, with a small kink or a turn around residues 25-27, resulting in a helix-loop-helix motif. The C-terminal helices are of amphipathic nature, whereas the N-terminal helices vary in their amphipathicity. The C-terminal helices thereby assume a conformation very similar to that of astressin bound to the ECD1 of CRF-R2 recently reported by our group.1 On the basis of an analysis of the observed 3D structures and relative potencies of [Ala]-substituted analogues, it is proposed that both helices could play a crucial role in receptor binding and selectivity. In conclusion, the C-terminal helices may interact along their hydrophobic faces with the ECD1, whereas the entire N-terminal helical surface may be involved in receptor activation. On the basis of the common and divergent features observed in the 3D structures of these ligands, multiple binding models are proposed that may explain their plurality of actions.

Subtype-Selective Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Agonists Exert Contrasting, but Not Opposite, Effects on Anxiety-Related Behavior in Rats

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system mediates stress responses. Extrahypothalamic CRF1 receptor activation has anxiogenic-like properties, but anxiety-related functions of CRF2 receptors remain unclear. The present study determined the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of a CRF2 agonist, urocortin 3, on behavior of male Wistar rats in the shock-probe, social interaction, and defensive withdrawal tests of anxiety-like behavior. Equimolar doses of stressin1-A, a novel CRF1 agonist, were administered to separate rats. The effects of pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazin-4-amine,8-[4-(bromo)-2-chlorophenyl]-N, N-bis(2-methoxyethyl)-2,7-dimethyl-(9Cl) (MJL-1-109-2), a CRF1 antagonist, on behavior in the shock-probe test also were studied. Stressin1-A increased anxiety-like behavior in the social interaction and shock-probe tests. Stressin1-A elicited behavioral activation and defensive burying at lower doses (0.04 nmol), but it increased freezing, grooming, and mounting at 25-fold higher (1-nmol) doses. Conversely, systemic administration of MJL-1-109-2 (10 mg/kg) had anxiolytic-like effects in the shock-probe test. Unlike stressin1-A or MJL-1-109-2, i.c.v. urocortin 3 infusion did not alter anxiety-like behavior in the shock-probe test across a range of doses that reduced locomotion and rearing and increased grooming. Urocortin 3 also did not decrease social interaction, but it decreased anxiety-like behavior in the defensive withdrawal test at a 2-nmol dose. Thus, i.c.v. administration of CRF1 and CRF2 agonists produced differential, but not opposite, effects on anxiety-like behavior. Urocortin 3 (i.c.v.) did not consistently decrease or increase anxiety-like behavior, the latter unlike effects seen previously after local microinjection of CRF2 agonists into the septum or raphe. With increasing CRF1 activation, however, the behavioral expression of anxiety qualitatively changes from "coping" to "noncoping" and offensive, agonistic behaviors.

Delayed satiety-like actions and altered feeding microstructure by a selective type 2 corticotropin-releasing factor agonist in rats: intra-hypothalamic urocortin 3 administration reduces food intake by prolonging the post-meal interval

Brain corticotropin-releasing factor/urocortin (CRF/Ucn) systems are hypothesized to control feeding, with central administration of 'type 2' urocortins producing delayed anorexia. The present study sought to identify the receptor subtype, brain site, and behavioral mode of action through which Ucn 3 reduces nocturnal food intake in rats. Non-food-deprived male Wistar rats (n=176) were administered Ucn 3 into the lateral (LV) or fourth ventricle, or into the ventromedial or paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus (VMN, PVN) or the medial amygdala (MeA), regions in which Ucn 3 is expressed in proximity to CRF(2) receptors. LV Ucn 3 suppressed ingestion during the third-fourth post-injection hours. LV Ucn 3 anorexia was reversed by cotreatment with astressin(2)-B, a selective CRF(2) antagonist and not observed following equimole subcutaneous or fourth ventricle administration. Bilateral intra-VMN and intra-PVN infusion, more potently than LV infusion, reduced the quantity (57-73%) and duration of ingestion (32-68%) during the third-fourth post-infusion hours. LV, intra-PVN and intra-VMN infusion of Ucn 3 slowed the eating rate and reduced intake by prolonging the post-meal interval. Intra-VMN Ucn 3 reduced feeding bout size, and intra-PVN Ucn 3 reduced the regularity of eating from pellet to pellet. Ucn 3 effects were behaviorally specific, because minimal effective anorectic Ucn 3 doses did not alter drinking rate or promote a conditioned taste aversion, and site-specific, because intra-MeA Ucn 3 produced a nibbling pattern of more, but smaller meals without altering total intake. The results implicate the VMN and PVN of the hypothalamus as sites for Ucn 3-CRF(2) control of food intake.

Structure of the N-terminal domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor in complex with a peptide ligand

The corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) family of ligands and their receptors coordinate endocrine, behavioral, autonomic, and metabolic responses to stress and play additional roles within the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and other systems. The actions of CRF and the related urocortins are mediated by activation of two receptors, CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, belonging to the B1 family of G protein-coupled receptors. The short-consensus-repeat fold (SCR) within the first extracellular domain (ECD1) of the CRF receptor(s) comprises the major ligand binding site and serves to dock a peptide ligand via its C-terminal segment, thus positioning the N-terminal segment to interact with the receptor's juxtamembrane domains to activate the receptor. Here we present the 3D NMR structure of ECD1 of CRF-R2beta in complex with astressin, a peptide antagonist. In the structure of the complex the C-terminal segment of astressin forms an amphipathic helix, whose entire hydrophobic face interacts with the short-consensus-repeat motif, covering a large intermolecular interface. In addition, the complex is characterized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge. These interactions are quantitatively weighted by an analysis of the effects on the full-length receptor affinities using an Ala scan of CRF. These structural studies identify the major determinants for CRF ligand specificity and selectivity and support a two-step model for receptor activation. Furthermore, because of a proposed conservation of the fold for both the ECD1s and ligands, this structure can serve as a model for ligand recognition for the entire B1 receptor family.

The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress

Animals respond to stress by activating a wide array of behavioral and physiological responses that are collectively referred to as the stress response. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays a central role in the stress response by regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In response to stress, CRF initiates a cascade of events that culminate in the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex. As a result of the great number of physiological and behavioral effects exerted by glucocorticoids, several mechanisms have evolved to control HPA axis activation and integrate the stress response. Glucocorticoid feedback inhibition plays a prominent role in regulating the magnitude and duration of glucocorticoid release. In addition to glucocorticoid feedback, the HPA axis is regulated at the level of the hypothalamus by a diverse group of afferent projections from limbic, mid-brain, and brain stem nuclei. The stress response is also mediated in part by brain stem noradrenergic neurons, sympathetic andrenornedullary circuits, and parasympathetic systems. In summary, the aim of this review is to discuss the role of the HPA axis in the integration of adaptive responses to stress. We also identify and briefly describe the major neuronal and endocrine systems that contribute to the regulation of the HPA axis and the maintenance of homeostasis in the face of aversive stimuli.

The three-dimensional structure of the N-terminal domain of corticotropin-releasing factor receptors: sushi domains and the B1 family of G protein-coupled receptors

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors, CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, belong to the B1 subfamily of G protein-coupled Receptors (GPCRs), including receptors for secretin, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), calcitonin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), glucagon, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The peptide ligand family comprises CRF, Ucn 1, 2, and 3. CRF plays the major role in integrating the response to stress. Additionally, the ligands exhibit many effects on muscle, pancreas, heart, and the GI, reproductive, and immune systems. CRF-R1 has higher affinity for CRF than does CRF-R2 while both receptors bind Ucn 1 equally. CRF-R2 shows specificity for Ucns 2 and 3. A major binding domain of the CRFRs is the N terminus/first extracellular domain (ECD1). Soluble proteins corresponding to the ECD1s of each receptor bind CRF ligands with nanomolar affinities. Our three-dimensional (3D) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of a soluble protein corresponding to the ECD1 of CRF-R2beta (1) identified its structural fold as a Sushi domain/short consensus repeat (SCR), stabilized by three disulfide bridges, two tryptophan residues, and an internal salt bridge (Asp65-Arg101). Disruption of the bridge by D65A mutation abrogates ligand recognition and results in loss of the well-defined disulfide pattern and Sushi domain structure. NMR analysis of the ECD1 in complex with astressin identified key amino acids involved in ligand recognition. Mutation of some of these residues in the full-length receptor reduces its affinity for CRF ligands. A structure-based sequence comparison shows conservation of key amino acids in all the B1 subfamily receptors, suggesting a corresponding conservation of a Sushi domain structural fold of their ECD1s.

Cocaine withdrawal enhances long-term potentiation induced by corticotropin-releasing factor at central amygdala glutamatergic synapses via CRF1, NMDA receptors and PKA

Cocaine addiction is an enduring, relapsing, behavioural disorder in which stressors reinstate cocaine-seeking even after prolonged abstinence. Evidence suggests that the 'anxiety-like' behaviour and stress associated with protracted withdrawal may be mediated by increased corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), a part of the limbic circuitry engaged in the coding and transmission of stimulus-reward associations. In the present study we describe a long-lasting potentiation of glutamatergic transmission induced at lateral amygdala (LA)-to-CeA synapses by rat/human CRF. After 2 weeks of withdrawal from repeated intermittent exposure to cocaine, CRF-induced long-term potentiation (LTP) was greatly enhanced compared to the respective saline control group while, after short-term withdrawal (24 h), there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups, indicating alterations in CRF systems during protracted withdrawal from chronic cocaine. After prolonged withdrawal, CRF-induced LTP was dependent on activation of CRF2, CaV2.3 (R-type) calcium channels and intracellular signalling through protein kinase C in both saline- and cocaine-treated groups. The enhanced CRF-induced LTP after 2 weeks of withdrawal was mediated through augmented CRF1 receptor function, associated with an increased signalling through protein kinase A, and required N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Accordingly, single-cell recordings revealed a significantly increased NMDA/AMPA ratio after prolonged withdrawal from the cocaine treatment. These results support a role for CRF1 receptor antagonists as plausible treatment options during withdrawal from chronic cocaine and suggest Ca(V)2.3 blockers as potential candidates for pharmaceutical modulation of CRF systems.

Pituitary actions of ligands of the TGF-β family: activins and inhibins

Activins, as members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, control and orchestrate many physiological processes and are vital for the development, growth and functional integrity of most tissues, including the pituitary. Activins produced by pituitary cells work in conjunction with central, peripheral, and other local factors to influence the function of gonadotropes and maintain a normal reproductive axis. Follistatin, also produced by the pituitary, acts as a local buffer to bind activin and modulate its bioactivity. On the other hand, inhibins of gonadal origin provide an endocrine feedback signal to antagonize activin signaling in cells that express the inhibin co-receptor, betaglycan, such as gonadotropes. This review highlights the pituitary roles of activin and the mechanisms through which these actions are modulated by inhibin and follistatin.

Structure of the ternary signaling complex of a TGF-beta superfamily member

The crystal structure of the complete signaling complex formed between bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and the extracellular domains (ECDs) of its type I receptor [bone morphogenetic protein receptor type Ia (BMPR-Ia)-ECD] and its type II receptor [activin receptor type II (ActRII)-ECD] shows two fundamental structural constraints for receptor assembly. First, the homodimeric BMP-2 ligand assembles two pairs of each receptor symmetrically, where each of the receptor ECDs does not make physical contact. Therefore, conformational communication between receptor ECDs, if any, should be propagated through the central ligand. Second, the type I and II receptor interfaces of the complex, when compared with those of binary complexes such as BMP-2/BMPR Ia-ECD, BMP-7/ActRII-ECD, and activin/ActRIIb-ECD, respectively, show there are common sets of positions repeatedly used by both ligands and receptors. Therefore, specificity-determining amino acid differences at the receptor interfaces should also account for the disparity in affinity of individual receptors for different ligand subunits. We find that a specific mutation to BMP-2 increases its affinity to ActRII-ECD by 5-fold. These results together establish that the specific signaling output is largely determined by two variables, the ligand-receptor pair identity and the mode of cooperative assembly of relevant receptors governed by the ligand flexibility in a membrane-restricted manner.

Identification of distinct inhibin and transforming growth factor beta-binding sites on betaglycan: functional separation of betaglycan co-receptor actions

Betaglycan is a co-receptor that mediates signaling by transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) superfamily members, including the distinct and often opposed actions of TGFbetas and inhibins. Loss of betaglycan expression, or abrogation of betaglycan function, is implicated in several human and animal diseases, although both betaglycan actions and the ligands involved in these disease states remain unclear. Here we identify a domain spanning amino acids 591-700 of the betaglycan extracellular domain as the only inhibin-binding region in betaglycan. This binding site is within the betaglycan ZP domain, but inhibin binding is not integral to the ZP motif of other proteins. We show that the inhibin and TGFbeta-binding residues of this domain overlap and identify individual amino acids essential for binding of each ligand. Mutation of Val614 to Tyr abolishes both inhibin and TGFbeta binding to this domain. Full-length betaglycan V614Y, and other mutations, retain TGFbeta binding activity via a distinct site, but are unable to bind inhibin-A. These betaglycan mutants fail to mediate inhibin antagonism of activin signaling but can present TGFbeta to TbetaRII. Separating the co-receptor actions of betaglycan toward inhibin and TGFbeta will allow the clarification of the role of betaglycan in disease states such as renal cell carcinoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript is localized in pituitary lactotropes and is regulated during lactation

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) is a highly expressed peptide implicated in the regulation of feeding, reward and reinforcement, and stress-related behaviors. CART has been localized to discrete cell populations in the brain, gut, adrenal gland, and pancreas. In contrast, CART-producing cell types in the pituitary gland remain ill defined. In the present study, double-label immunohistochemistry, employing a high-affinity antiserum we generated against CART-(62-102), was used to identify CART-producing cells in the pituitary gland. In the anterior pituitary, the majority of CART immunoreactivity (-ir) was localized in lactotropes; minor populations of CART-ir cells were identified as somatotropes and corticotropes. In the posterior pituitary, CART-ir extensively colocalized with oxytocin-containing fibers; in contrast, only a few vasopressin fibers contained CART-ir. As expected, CART colocalized with oxytocin in magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic nucleus. The effects of bromocriptine, a potent dopamine receptor agonist, were examined to determine whether CART mRNA expression and protein release are regulated in a similar fashion as prolactin. Similar to prolactin, CART mRNA expression and protein release were significantly decreased after bromocriptine treatment of dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells in culture. To explore the putative physiological role of pituitary CART, we compared levels of CART mRNA expression in lactating and nonlactating female rats. CART mRNA levels were significantly increased in the anterior pituitary and supraoptic nucleus of lactating rats. Furthermore, levels of CART in the systemic circulation were significantly elevated at the onset of lactation, peaked on d 10 of lactation and returned to baseline values 10 d after pups were weaned. The current study describes the cellular localization and regulation of CART expression and protein release from the rat pituitary gland. These findings suggest a putative role for CART in lactation.

Vital functions of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) pathways in maintenance and regulation of energy homeostasis

Regulation of energy homeostasis is a vital function of the CNS requiring adaptive responses to maintain and support life after stress perturbations. The mechanisms whereby these processes occur are, however, only partially understood. A major determinate of these responses is corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). Receptors for CRF, CRFR1 and CRFR2, have been hypothesized to play distinct roles in the alterations necessary for homeostatic maintenance. The function of CRFR2, in particular, has remained elusive despite its presence in both the CNS and periphery. In this work, we have used complimentary gene deletion and pharmacological approaches to elucidate the crucial role CRFR2 plays in the regulation of regional tissue thermogenesis and adaptive physiology. Analyses of interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT) thermogenesis by thermal signature analysis and the concordant biochemical changes in key sympathetic components in mice deficient for CRFR2 revealed significantly elevated basal IBAT thermogenesis and prolonged adrenergic responsivity of IBAT in older mice. Measurement of metabolic rates by indirect calorimetry after chronic high-fat diet challenge and treatment with the CRFR1 antagonist NBI-27914 revealed a decreased respiratory exchange ratio of these mice that was normalized with NBI-27914. Further, as a definitive measure for physiological pathology, mice examined in a behavioral model of differential temperature selection showed a predilection for warmer external temperatures, supporting a loss of body heat in these mice. These studies provide physiological, biochemical, and behavioral evidence for the critical participation of CRF pathways in the maintenance and adaptive responses necessary for regulation of energy homeostasis.

The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress

Animals respond to stress by activating a wide array of behavioral and physiological responses that are collectively referred to as the stress response. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) plays a central role in the stress response by regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In response to stress, CRF initiates a cascade of events that culminate in the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex. As a result of the great number of physiological and behavioral effects exerted by glucocorticoids, several mechanisms have evolved to control HPA axis activation and integrate the stress response. Glucocorticoid feedback inhibition plays a prominent role in regulating the magnitude and duration of glucocorticoid release. In addition to glucocorticoid feedback, the HPA axis is regulated at the level of the hypothalamus by a diverse group of afferent projections from limbic, midbrain, and brain stem nuclei. The stress response is also mediated in part by brain stem noradrenergic neurons, sympathetic andrenomedullary circuits, and parasympathetic systems. In summary, the aim of this review is to discuss the role of the HPA axis in the integration of adaptive responses to stress. We also identify and briefly describe the major neuronal and endocrine systems that contribute to the regulation of the HPA axis and the maintenance of homeostasis in the face of aversive stimuli.

The neurobiology of depression: inroads to treatment and new drug discovery

The underlying causes of most mood and anxiety disorders remain unknown. There is a strong heritable component to psychiatric illnesses that, when coupled with environmental influences, results in increased vulnerability. Intensive research efforts have been expended to better characterize the genetic underpinnings of mental illness. However, most psychiatric disorders, including mood and anxiety disorders, are polygenetic in nature rather than determined by traditional autosomal-dominant Mendelian genetics. Recent technological advances, including the completion of the human genome inventory, chromosome mapping, high throughput DNA sequencing, and others, offer the promise of someday identifying the genetic basis of mental illnesses. In parallel, tremendous inroads have been made into understanding the neurobiological basis of mood and anxiety disorders and the influence of life events on risk and resilience. Evidence from preclinical, epidemiologic, and clinical studies has converged to convincingly demonstrate that stressful or traumatic events occurring in early life significantly increase the risk for depression and other psychiatric illnesses in adulthood. Neural circuits containing corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) have been identified as an important mediator of the stress response. Early-life adversity, such as physical or sexual abuse during childhood, results in long-lasting changes in the CRF-mediated stress response and a greatly increased risk of depression in genetically predisposed persons. Identification and cloning of CRF receptors and characterization of their role in the stress response have enabled a better understanding of maladaptive responses to early-life adversity. In addition, studies of the CRF system have suggested molecular targets for new drug development, biological risk factors, and predictors of treatment response.

Chronic cocaine administration switches corticotropin-releasing factor2 receptor-mediated depression to facilitation of glutamatergic transmission in the lateral septum

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and urocortin (Ucn I) are endogenous members among a family of CRF-related peptides that activate two different and synaptically localized G-protein-coupled receptors, CRF1 and CRF2. These peptides and their receptors have been implicated in stress responses and stress with cocaine abuse. In this study, we observed significant alterations in excitatory transmission and CRF-related peptide regulation of excitatory transmission in the lateral septum mediolateral nucleus (LSMLN) after chronic cocaine administration. In brain slice recordings from the LSMLN of control (saline-treated) rats, glutamatergic synaptic transmission was facilitated by activation of CRF1 receptors with CRF but was depressed after activation of CRF2 receptors with Ucn I. After acute withdrawal from a chronic cocaine administration regimen, CRF1 activation remained facilitatory, but CRF2 activation facilitated rather than depressed LSMLN EPSCs. These alterations in CRF2 effects occurred through both presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms. In saline-treated rats, CRF1 and CRF2 coupled predominantly to protein kinase A signaling pathways, whereas after cocaine withdrawal, protein kinase C activity was more prominent and likely contributed to the CRF2-mediated presynaptic facilitation. Neither CRF nor Ucn I altered monosynaptic GABA(A)-mediated IPSCs before or after chronic cocaine administration, suggesting that loss of GABAA-mediated inhibition could not account for the facilitation. This switch in polarity of Ucn I-mediated neuromodulation, from a negative to positive regulation of excitatory glutamatergic transmission after chronic cocaine administration, could generate an imbalance in the brain reward circuitry associated with the LSMLN.

Antagonists of activin signaling: mechanisms and potential biological applications

Activins are members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily that control many physiological processes such as cell proliferation and differentiation, immune responses, wound repair and various endocrine activities. Activins elicit these diverse biological responses by signaling via type I and type II receptor serine kinases. Recent studies have revealed details of the roles of inhibin, betaglycan, follistatin and its related protein follistatin-related gene (FLRG), Cripto and BAMBI in antagonizing activin action, and exogenous antagonists against the activin type I (SB-431542 and SB-505124) and type II (activin-M108A) receptors have been developed. Understanding how activin signaling is controlled extracellularly is the first step in providing treatment for wound healing and for disorders such as cachexia and cancer, which result from a deregulated activin pathway.

A soluble mouse brain splice variant of type 2alpha corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor binds ligands and modulates their activity

Peptides of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family signal through the activation of two receptors, CRF receptor type 1 (CRFR1) and type 2 (CRFR2), both of which exist as multiple splice variants. We have identified a cDNA from mouse brain encoding a splice variant, soluble CRFR2alpha (sCRFR2alpha), in which exon 6 is deleted from the gene encoding CRFR2alpha. Translation of this isoform produces a predicted 143-aa soluble protein. The translated protein includes a majority of the first extracellular domain of the CRFR2alpha followed by a unique 38-aa hydrophilic C terminus resulting from a frame shift produced by deletion of exon 6. By using RT-PCR and Southern hybridization, the relative mRNA expression levels of full-length (seven transmembrane domains) CRFR2alpha and the soluble form (sCRFR2alpha) in the mouse brain were measured with a single reaction. The results demonstrate high levels of expression of sCRFR2alpha in the olfactory bulb, cortex, and midbrain regions. A rabbit antiserum raised against a synthetic peptide fragment encoding the unique C terminus revealed specific sCRFR2alpha immunoreactivity in mouse brain slices by immunohistochemistry and in extracts of brain regions by RIA. Interestingly, the sCRFR2alpha immunoreactivity distribution closely approximated that of CRFR1 expression in rodent brain. A protein corresponding to sCRFR2alpha, expressed and purified from either mammalian or bacterial cell systems, binds several CRF family ligands with low nanomolar affinities. Furthermore, the purified sCRFR2alpha protein inhibits cellular responses to CRF and urocortin 1. These data support a potential role of the sCRFR2alpha protein as a possible biological modulator of CRF family ligands.

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis through a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-dependent mechanism

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) is a highly expressed hypothalamic transcript that is concentrated in areas associated with the stress response. There is evidence for a role of CART in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. However, it is not clear whether CART regulates activity of the HPA axis by directly stimulating ACTH release from pituitary corticotropes or through interaction with hypothalamic factors. To address this issue, the effects of central and peripheral administration of CART on the HPA axis were compared. Central administration of CART(55-102) (1 microg) significantly increased circulating levels of ACTH (481 +/- 122 vs. 93 +/- 14 pg/ml; CART vs. vehicle) and corticosterone (460 +/- 29 vs. 179 +/- 62 ng/ml; CART vs. vehicle). In contrast, iv injection of CART(55-102) (0.09-9.0 nmol/kg) did not significantly affect circulating levels of ACTH or corticosterone. The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist Astressin B was used to determine whether CART(55-102) elicits ACTH secretion via a CRF receptor-dependent mechanism. Injection of Astressin B (50 microg/kg, iv) inhibited CART(55-102)-induced ACTH and corticosterone responses. The effects of CART(55-102) on CRF and arginine vasopressin (AVP) expression were also examined in static hypothalamic explants. RT-PCR analysis revealed a significant up-regulation of CRF and AVP mRNA levels after CART(55-102) (10 nm and 1 microm) treatment. Last, the effects of CART(55-102) on CRF- and AVP-mediated ACTH release was investigated in dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells. Incubation of CART(55-102) (10-100 nm) did not significantly affect ACTH release from anterior pituitary cells. Findings from the present study suggest that CART regulates activity of the HPA axis through a CRF-dependent central mechanism and not by means of direct interaction with pituitary corticotropes.

Autocrine/paracrine regulation of pituitary function by activin, inhibin and follistatin

The precise regulation of the anterior pituitary is achieved by the cell-specific and combined actions of central, peripheral and local factors. Activins, inhibins, and follistatins were first discovered as gonadal factors with actions on FSH production from pituitary gonadotropes. With the realization that these factors are expressed in a wide array of tissues, including the pituitary, it became apparent that the functional importance of activins, inhibins, and follistatins extends beyond the reproductive axis and that they often exert their effects by autocrine/paracrine mechanisms. As members of the TGF-beta superfamily, activins and inhibins control and orchestrate many physiological processes and are vital for the development, the growth, and the functional integrity of most tissues, including the pituitary. Activins exert effects on multiple pituitary cell types but the best-characterized pituitary targets of the autocrine/paracrine function of activins are the gonadotropes. The autocrine/paracrine function of the activin-binding proteins, follistatins, constitutes an important local mechanism to modulate activin bioactivity while the restricted actions of gonadal inhibins to betaglycan-expressing gonadotropes provides a secondary mode of regulation of cell-specific actions of activins. The aim of this review is to highlight and evaluate experimental evidence that supports the roles of activins, inhibins, and follistatins as autocrine, paracrine, and/or endocrine modulators of the pituitary.

NMR structure and peptide hormone binding site of the first extracellular domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) ligand family has diverse effects on the CNS, including the modulation of the stress response. The ligands' effects are mediated by binding to CRF G protein-coupled receptors. We have determined the 3D NMR structure of the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD1) of the mouse CRF receptor 2beta, which is the major ligand recognition domain, and identified its ligand binding site by chemical-shift perturbation experiments. The fold is identified as a short consensus repeat (SCR), a common protein interaction module. Mutagenesis reveals the integrity of the hormone-binding site in the full-length receptor. This study proposes that the ECD1 captures the C-terminal segment of the ligand, whose N terminus then penetrates into the transmembrane region of the receptor to initiate signaling. Key residues of SCR in the ECD1 are conserved in the G protein-coupled receptor subfamily, suggesting the SCR fold in all of the ECD1s of this subfamily.

Corticotropin-releasing factor and Urocortin I modulate excitatory glutamatergic synaptic transmission

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-related peptides serve as hormones and neuromodulators of the stress response and play a role in affective disorders. These peptides are known to alter complex behaviors and neuronal properties, but their receptor-mediated effects at CNS synapses are not well described. Here we show that excitatory glutamatergic transmission is modulated by two endogenous CRF-related peptide ligands, corticotropin-releasing factor [CRF rat/human (r/h)] and Urocortin I (Ucn I), within the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and the lateral septum mediolateral nucleus (LSMLN). These limbic nuclei are reciprocally innervated, are involved in stress and affective disorders, and have high densities of the CRF receptors CRF1 and CRF2. Activation of these receptors exerts diametrically opposed actions on glutamatergic transmission in these nuclei. In the CeA, CRF(r/h) depressed excitatory glutamatergic transmission through a CRF1-mediated postsynaptic action, whereas Ucn I facilitated synaptic responses through presynaptic and postsynaptic CRF2-mediated mechanisms. Conversely, in the LSMLN, CRF caused a CRF1-mediated facilitation of glutamatergic transmission via postsynaptic mechanisms, whereas Ucn I depressed EPSCs by postsynaptic and presynaptic CRF2-mediated actions. Furthermore, antagonists of these receptors also affected glutamatergic neurotransmission, indicating that endogenous ligands tonically modulated synoptic activity at these synapses. These data show that CRF receptors in CeA and LSMLN synapses exert and maintain a significant synaptic tone and thereby regulate excitatory glutamatergic transmission. The results also suggest that CRF receptors may provide novel targets in affective disorders and stress.

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors CRF1 and CRF2 exert both additive and opposing influences on defensive startle behavior

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors (CRF1 and CRF2) are crucial mediators of physiological and behavioral responses to stress. In animals, CRF1 appears to primarily mediate CRF-induced anxiety-like responses, but the role of CRF2 during stress is still unclear. Here we report the effects of CRF1 and CRF2 on the magnitude and plasticity of defensive startle responses in mice. Startle plasticity is measured by inhibition of startle by sensory stimuli, i.e., prepulse inhibition (PPI), and is disrupted in patients with panic or posttraumatic stress disorders in which CRF neurotransmission may be overactive. Pharmacological blockade of CRF1 reversed both CRF-induced increases in startle and CRF-induced deficits in PPI. CRF2 blockade attenuated high-dose but not low-dose CRF-induced increases in startle and reduced PPI. Conversely, activation of CRF2 enhanced PPI. CRF had no effect on startle and increased PPI in CRF1 knock-out mice. These data indicate that CRF receptors act in concert to increase the magnitude of defensive startle yet in opposition to regulate the flexibility of startle. These data support a new model of respective CRF receptor roles in stress-related behavior such that, although both receptors enhance the magnitude of defensive responses, CRF1 receptors contravene, whereas CRF2 receptors enhance, the impact of sensory information on defensive behavior. We hypothesize that excessive CRF1 activation combined with reduced CRF2 signaling may contribute to information processing deficits seen in panic and posttraumatic stress disorder patients and support CRF1-specific pharmacotherapy.

CRF and CRF receptors: role in stress responsivity and other behaviors

Since corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) was first characterized, a growing family of ligands and receptors has evolved. The mammalian family members include CRF, urocortinI (UcnI), UcnII, and UcnIII, along with two receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2, and a CRF binding protein. These family members differ in their tissue distribution and pharmacology. Studies have provided evidence supporting an important role of this family in regulation of the endocrine and behavioral responses to stress. Although CRF appears to play a stimulatory role in stress responsivity through activation of CRFR1, specific actions of UcnII and UcnIII on CRFR2 may be important for dampening stress sensitivity. As the only ligand with high affinity for both receptors, UcnI's role may be promiscuous. Regulation of the relative contribution of the two CRF receptors to brain CRF pathways may be essential in coordinating physiological responses to stress. The development of disorders related to heightened stress sensitivity and dysregulation of stress-coping mechanisms appears to involve regulatory mechanisms of CRF family members.

Human urocortin 2, a corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)2 agonist, and ovine CRF, a CRF1 agonist, differentially alter feeding and motor activity

Two corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor families have been identified (CRF1 and CRF2). Whereas anxiogenic-like roles for the CRF1 receptor have been identified, behavioral functions of the CRF2 receptor remain obscure. Urocortin 2 (Ucn 2), a CRF-related peptide that selectively binds CRF2 receptors, was recently identified and recognized for its central anorectic properties. The present study tested the hypothesis that the anorexigenic mode of action of Ucn 2 differed from that of ovine CRF (oCRF), a preferential CRF1 receptor agonist. The behavioral effects of intracerebroventricular administration of Ucn 2 were compared with those of oCRF in nondeprived male Wistar rats (n=102). Ucn 2 reduced 6-h food and water intake at doses that did not induce visceral illness (0.1, 1, and 10 microg), as indicated by kaolin intake. Ucn 2 retained its potent anorectic activity in rats receiving a highly palatable cafeteria diet, preferentially reducing intake of carbohydrate (CHO)-rich items while sparing intake of mixed-fat/CHO items. In contrast to Ucn 2, oCRF (10 microg) suppressed 6-h intake of cafeteria diet-fed rats without regard to macronutrient composition. Rather, oCRF most potently suppressed intake of preferred food items. Whereas oCRF had short-onset motor-activating effects, Ucn 2 had nondose-dependent, delayed-onset motor-suppressing effects. Thus, central infusion of a CRF2 receptor agonist suppressed intake of both bland and palatable diets without inducing behavioral arousal or malaise, and the profile of anorexigenic effects qualitatively differed from those of a CRF1 receptor agonist. The results suggest the existence of distinct forms of CRF1- and CRF2-mediated anorexia.