1
|
Schaffert D, Bibi I, Blauth M, Lull C, von Ahnen JA, Gross G, Schulze-Hagen T, Knitza J, Kuhn S, Benecke J, Schmieder A, Leipe J, Olsavszky V. Using Automated Machine Learning to Predict Necessary Upcoming Therapy Changes in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris and Psoriatic Arthritis and Uncover New Influences on Disease Progression: Retrospective Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e55855. [PMID: 38738977 PMCID: PMC11240079 DOI: 10.2196/55855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are complex, multifactorial diseases significantly impacting health and quality of life. Predicting treatment response and disease progression is crucial for optimizing therapeutic interventions, yet challenging. Automated machine learning (AutoML) technology shows promise for rapidly creating accurate predictive models based on patient features and treatment data. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop highly accurate machine learning (ML) models using AutoML to address key clinical questions for PsV and PsA patients, including predicting therapy changes, identifying reasons for therapy changes, and factors influencing skin lesion progression or an abnormal Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score. METHODS Clinical study data from 309 PsV and PsA patients were extensively prepared and analyzed using AutoML to build and select the most accurate predictive models for each variable of interest. RESULTS Therapy change at 24 weeks follow-up was modeled using the extreme gradient boosted trees classifier with early stopping (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] of 0.9078 and logarithmic loss [LogLoss] of 0.3955 for the holdout partition). Key influencing factors included the initial systemic therapeutic agent, the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis score at baseline, and changes in quality of life. An average blender incorporating three models (gradient boosted trees classifier, ExtraTrees classifier, and Eureqa generalized additive model classifier) with an AUC of 0.8750 and LogLoss of 0.4603 was used to predict therapy changes for 2 hypothetical patients, highlighting the significance of these factors. Treatments such as methotrexate or specific biologicals showed a lower propensity for change. An average blender of a random forest classifier, an extreme gradient boosted trees classifier, and a Eureqa classifier (AUC of 0.9241 and LogLoss of 0.4498) was used to estimate PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) change after 24 weeks. Primary predictors included the initial PASI score, change in pruritus levels, and change in therapy. A lower initial PASI score and consistently low pruritus were associated with better outcomes. BASDAI classification at onset was analyzed using an average blender of a Eureqa generalized additive model classifier, an extreme gradient boosted trees classifier with early stopping, and a dropout additive regression trees classifier with an AUC of 0.8274 and LogLoss of 0.5037. Influential factors included initial pain, disease activity, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores for depression and anxiety. Increased pain, disease activity, and psychological distress generally led to higher BASDAI scores. CONCLUSIONS The practical implications of these models for clinical decision-making in PsV and PsA can guide early investigation and treatment, contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Schaffert
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Igor Bibi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Mara Blauth
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian Lull
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan Alwin von Ahnen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Gross
- Department of Medicine V, Division of Rheumatology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Theresa Schulze-Hagen
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Johannes Knitza
- Institute of Digital Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kuhn
- Institute of Digital Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Benecke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Astrid Schmieder
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jan Leipe
- Department of Medicine V, Division of Rheumatology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Victor Olsavszky
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, and Center of Excellence in Dermatology, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karnam S, Donthi MR, Jindal AB, Paul AT. Recent innovations in topical delivery for management of rheumatoid arthritis: A focus on combination drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 2024; 29:104071. [PMID: 38942070 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated disease that necessitates a thorough understanding of its intricate pathophysiological mechanism for precise and effective therapeutic targeting. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) has established guidelines for RA treatment, endorsing monotherapy or combination therapy with corticosteroids and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). This review delves into clinical trials and research outcomes related to combination drug delivery, with an emphasis on the role of natural products in combination with synthetic drugs. Given the significant adverse effects associated with systemic administration, topical delivery has emerged as an alternative avenue for effective management of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sriravali Karnam
- Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India
| | - Mahipal Reddy Donthi
- Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India
| | - Anil B Jindal
- Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India
| | - Atish T Paul
- Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Raslan MA, Raslan SA, Shehata EM, Mahmoud AS, Sabri NA, Alzahrani KJ, Alzahrani FM, Halawani IF, Azevedo V, Lundstrom K, Barh D. Different modalities to manage rheumatoid arthritis: an A to Z story. Future Sci OA 2024; 10:FSO968. [PMID: 38827788 PMCID: PMC11140679 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate different approaches to RA treatment that might lead to greater efficacy and better safety profiles. Methods: The Search strategy was based on medical subject headings, and screening and selection were based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results & discussion: Early therapy is critical for disease control and loss of bodily function. The most promising outcomes came from the development of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Different foods have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant qualities that protect against the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Some dietary patterns and supplements have been shown to have potential protective benefits against RA. Conclusion: Improvement in the quality of life of RA patients requires a tailored management approach based on the current patient medical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amr Saad Mahmoud
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, P.O. Box 11591, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nagwa Ali Sabri
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, P.O. Box 11566, Cairo,, Egypt
| | - Khalid J Alzahrani
- Department of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fuad M Alzahrani
- Department of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim F Halawani
- Department of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia
| | - Vasco Azevedo
- Department of Genetics, Ecology & Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil
| | | | - Debmalya Barh
- Department of Genetics, Ecology & Evolution, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil
- Institute of Integrative Omics & Applied Biotechnology (IIOAB), Nonakuri, Purba, Medinipur, 721172, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Branco ABXC, Argolo W, Santos N, Hernandez G, Kakehasi A, Sobrado CW, Melsheimer R. ADHERENCE AND PERSISTENCE TO TREATMENT WITH INFLIXIMAB: ANALYSIS OF A PATIENT SUPPORT PROGRAM COHORT IN BRAZIL. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23149. [PMID: 38775584 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies have proven efficacy in the management of several conditions and infliximab (IFX) is one of the most important drugs of the class. Some recent data have shown low rates of both persistence and adherence to several available biologics. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe adherence and persistence rate to IFX treatment and also persistence in the patient support program (PSP), among patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or rheumatic diseases (RD) enrolled in the program of a large pharmaceutical company in Brazil. METHODS Retrospective observational analysis using the PSP database. IBD or RD patients using IFX enrolled on the PSP database between September 2015 and August 2019 were retrospectively evaluated to identify the persistence rate and adherence and followed up until March 1, 2020. Patients were excluded if treatment start date was prior to program entry; first infusion prior to September 1st, 2015 or after August 31st, 2019; the patients did not started treatment; and patients with "OTHERS" in "Indication" field. Persistence was assessed considering both persistence in the program ("PSP persistence") and persistence on IFX in the PSP ("IFX persistence in the PSP"). PSP persistence was defined as the proportion of patients remaining in the program at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after initiating IFX. To determine IFX persistence in the PSP, censoring was defined at the time the patient left the program, died, or was lost to follow-up. Adherence to treatment was measured by medication possession ratio ((MPR) - All days supply / elapsed days from first prescription to last day of medication possession)). Descriptive statistics were initially used. Kaplan-Meier curve, the median time estimated by the survival function, Cox regression model, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were used to evaluate the treatment persistence time at 24 months and the logistic regression model was performed aiming to identify variables associated with adherence (MPR ≥80%). RESULTS A total of 10,233 patients were analyzed, 5,826 (56.9%) with the diagnosis of RD and 4,407 (43.1%) of IBD. At the end of the follow-up (median 9.1 months from PSP entry to the last infusion), persistence in the PSP was 65.6%, 48.2%, 31.0%, 20.7% and 13.1% at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, respectively. Considering persistence on IFX in the PSP, estimates were 93.7%, 87.8%, 77.0%, 62.4% and 53.0% at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, respectively. Variables associated with the risk of non-persistence were gender, country region and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Median MPR was 94.2%, while the percentage of patients with MPR ≥80% was 91.0%. Variables associated with MPR≥80% were country region and diagnosis of Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION Many patients leave the program without discontinuing IFX, since the 12-month persistence were very different between program and medication estimates, while high adherence rates were observed among patients enrolled in the PSP. Data highlights the benefits of a PSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Adriana Kakehasi
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bergmans B, Jessurun N, van Lint J, Murk JL, van Puijenbroek E, de Vries E. Burden of non-serious infections during biological use for rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296821. [PMID: 38377117 PMCID: PMC10878515 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biologicals have become a cornerstone in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. The increased risk of serious infections associated with their use is well-established. Non-serious infections, however, occur more frequently and are associated with a high socioeconomic burden and impact on quality of life but have not received the same attention in the literature to date. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the various non-serious infections reported in RA patients using biologicals and their experienced burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Dutch Biologic Monitor was a prospective observational study that included adults with rheumatoid arthritis and biological use who answered bimonthly questionnaires on the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) they experienced from their biological and reported the associated impact score (ranging from 1, no impact, to 5, very high impact). ADRs were assigned a MedDRA code by pharmacovigilance experts and labeled as definite, probable, possible or no infection by infectious disease professionals. Descriptive statistics were performed using medians and interquartile ranges. RESULTS A total of 586 patients were included in the final analysis. Eighty-five patients (14.5%) reported a total of 421 ADRs labeled as probable or definite infections by the experts. Patient-assigned burden was ADR-specific. Upper respiratory tract infections were most frequently reported and had a high rate of recurrence or persistence, with a median impact score of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-3.0) which remained stable over time. DISCUSSION Non-serious infections significantly outnumbered serious infections in this real-life cohort of RA patients using biologicals (77.1 non-serious infections and 1.3 serious infections per 100 patient years, respectively). Infections in the upper respiratory tract were rated as having an average burden, which remained constant over a long period of time. Awareness of the impact of recurrent and chronic non-serious infections may enable healthcare professionals to timely treat and maybe even prevent them, which would lessen the associated personal and socioeconomic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Bergmans
- Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi Jessurun
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jette van Lint
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Luc Murk
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Microvida, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Eugène van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, PharmacoTherapy,—Epidemiology & -Economics, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Vries
- Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tornero Molina J, Hernández-Cruz B, Corominas H. Initial Treatment with Biological Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Med 2023; 13:48. [PMID: 38202055 PMCID: PMC10779475 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to analyse the effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of initial treatment with biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Qualitative study. A group of RA experts was selected. A scoping review in Medline was conducted to analyse the evidence of initial RA treatment with biological therapies. Randomised clinical trials were selected. Two reviewers analysed the articles and compiled the data, whose quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. The experts discussed the review's findings and generated a series of general principles: Results: Seventeen studies were included. Most of the included patients were middle-aged women with early RA (1-7 months) and multiple poor prognostic factors. Initial treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors combined with methotrexate (MTX) and an IL6R inhibitor (either in mono or combination therapy) is effective (activity, function, radiographic damage, quality of life), safe, and superior to MTX monotherapy in the short and medium term. In the long term, patients who received initial treatment with biologicals presented better results than those whose initial therapy was with MTX. CONCLUSIONS Initial treatment of RA with biological therapies is effective, efficient, and safe in the short, medium, and long term, particularly for patients with poor prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Tornero Molina
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Guadalajara, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina y Especialidades Médicas, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Hernández-Cruz
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain;
| | - Héctor Corominas
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital Universitari de Sant Pau & Hospital Dos de Maig, 08025 Barcelona, Spain;
- Medicine Faculty, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sapart E, Sokolova T, de Montjoye S, Dierckx S, Nzeusseu A, Avramovska A, Meric de Bellefon L, Durez P. Should We Use bDMARDs as an Induction Therapy in Early and Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis? Results at 5 years from the ERA UCLouvain Brussels Cohort. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:875-886. [PMID: 37183237 PMCID: PMC10326217 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00551-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study sought to analyze the benefit of an early induction therapy with a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) during the first year of treatment with a 5-year follow-up in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA). METHODS We included ERA patients from the UCLouvain Brussels cohort who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria and were naïve to DMARDs. ERA patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received an induction bDMARD therapy or a standard therapy with methotrexate (MTX). Clinical response after the induction treatment at 6 and 12 months followed by a MTX maintenance therapy at 36 and 60 months was evaluated. RESULTS Data from 470 ERA patients were collected, 189 received a bDMARD and 281 initiated MTX alone. In the bDMARD group, disease activity and HAQ were higher at baseline. A total of 391 patients were followed up to 5 years. We then divided each group into two subgroups according to the last treatment they received at 5 years: bDMARD > MTX (n = 95), bDMARD > bDMARD (n = 59); MTX > MTX (n = 134), MTX > bDMARD (n = 103). During the induction, we observed a clinical response with a large number of patients achieving DAS28-CRP remission. According to a treat-to-target (T2T) approach, remission rate was stable on MTX monotherapy or rescued by the addition or prolongation of a bDMARD. Interestingly, bDMARD followed by a MTX maintenance therapy experienced a stable and sustained DAS28-CRP remission rate in 53% of the ERA patients at year 5. CONCLUSIONS Long-term remission is an achievable goal in ERA. Our results suggest that a bDMARD induction therapy followed by MTX maintenance therapy could be an interesting option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Sapart
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tatiana Sokolova
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie de Montjoye
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Adrien Nzeusseu
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aleksandra Avramovska
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent Meric de Bellefon
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Durez
- Department of Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10, Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharma A, Goel A. Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and its treatment with anti-inflammatory natural products. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 50:4687-4706. [PMID: 37022525 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08406-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease across the globe that is chronic and systemic as well. The disease is linked with autoantibodies and is inflammatory, eventually targeting several molecules along with certain modified self-epitopes. The disease majorly affects the joints of an individual. Rheumatoid arthritis is manifested clinically by polyarthritis linked with the dysfunction of the joints. This chiefly affects the synovial joint lining and is linked with progressive dysfunction, premature death, along with socioeconomic implications. The macrophage activation, along with the activation of certain defense cells, results in a response to self-epitopes that helps in providing a better understanding of the disease pathogenesis. Material and methodology For this review article, papers have been retrieved and reviewed from database including PubMed, Scopus and Web of science. Relevant papers were taken fulfilling the criteria for writing this review article. Results This has resulted in the establishment of several new therapeutic techniques that serve as potential inhibitors of such cells. Researchers have gained an interest in understanding this disease to provide strategies for treatment in the last two decades. This also includes recognition followed by the treatment of the disease at its early stages. Various allopathic treatment approaches often have chronic and toxic teratogenic effects. However, to avoid this issue of toxicity followed by side effects, certain medicinal plants have been used in treating RA. Conclusion Medicinal plants possess active phytoconstituents that entail antioxidants as well as anti-inflammatory properties, making them a helpful alternative to allopathic drugs that are often linked with highly toxic effects. This review paper entails a thorough discussion of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of RA. The paper will also focus on the use of herbal plants in the treatment of the disease to avoid the side effects that generally occur in allopathic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayushi Sharma
- Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences & Humanities, GLA University, Uttar Pradesh, 281406, Mathura, India
| | - Anjana Goel
- Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences & Humanities, GLA University, Uttar Pradesh, 281406, Mathura, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Broadwell A, Schechtman J, Conaway D, Kivitz A, Shiff NJ, Black S, Xu S, Langholff W, Schwartzman S, Curtis JR. Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study. BMC Rheumatol 2023; 7:5. [PMID: 36973741 PMCID: PMC10045110 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + MTX vs golimumab without MTX in RA patients. METHODS AWARE, a real-world, prospective and pragmatic, Phase 4 study, compared effectiveness and safety of golimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Effectiveness was evaluated by mean change in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12. Safety was monitored through approximately 1 year. RESULTS Among 685 golimumab-treated patients, 420 (61%) received concomitant MTX during the study and 265 (39%) did not receive MTX after enrollment; 63% and 72%, respectively, discontinued the study. Relative to golimumab without MTX, golimumab + MTX patients had shorter mean disease duration (8.7 vs 10.0 years) and a lower proportion received prior biologics (60% vs 72%); mean ± standard deviation (SD) baseline CDAI scores were similar (30.8 ± 15.1 and 32.6 ± 15.4). Mean ± SD changes from baseline in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12, respectively, were similar with golimumab + MTX (- 10.2 ± 14.2 and - 10.8 ± 13.8) and golimumab without MTX (- 9.6 ± 12.9 and - 9.9 ± 13.1). The incidence of adverse events/100 patient-years (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 155.6 (145.6, 166.1) for golimumab + MTX and 191.2 (176.2, 207.1) for golimumab without MTX; infections were the most common type. The incidence of infusion reactions/100PY (95% CI) was 2.1 (1.1, 3.6) for golimumab + MTX versus 5.1 (2.9, 8.3) for golimumab without MTX; none were considered serious. For golimumab + MTX versus golimumab without MTX, rates/100PY (95% CI) of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were 2.6 (1.5, 4.3) versus 7.0 (4.4, 10.6), 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) versus 2.6 (1.1, 5.0), and 3.0 (1.7, 4.7) versus 1.0 (0.2, 2.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Mean change in CDAI score in the golimumab without MTX group was generally similar to that of the golimumab + MTX group through 1 year, regardless of prior biologic therapy. Adverse events were consistent with the known IV golimumab safety profile. These results provide real world evidential data that may assist healthcare providers and patients with RA in making informed treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 05/04/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Broadwell
- Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, 820 Jordan Street, Suite 201, Shreveport, LA, 71101, USA.
| | | | | | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | - Natalie J Shiff
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
- Adjunct, Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Shawn Black
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Xu
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Wayne Langholff
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leone GM, Mangano K, Petralia MC, Nicoletti F, Fagone P. Past, Present and (Foreseeable) Future of Biological Anti-TNF Alpha Therapy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041630. [PMID: 36836166 PMCID: PMC9963154 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the key role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the pathogenesis of immunoinflammatory diseases, TNF-α inhibitors have been successfully developed and used in the clinical treatment of autoimmune disorders. Currently, five anti-TNF-α drugs have been approved: infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol and etanercept. Anti-TNF-α biosimilars are also available for clinical use. Here, we will review the historical development as well as the present and potential future applications of anti-TNF-α therapies, which have led to major improvements for patients with several autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PS) and chronic endogenous uveitis. Other therapeutic areas are under evaluation, including viral infections, e.g., COVID-19, as well as chronic neuropsychiatric disorders and certain forms of cancer. The search for biomarkers able to predict responsiveness to anti-TNF-α drugs is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Marco Leone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Katia Mangano
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Petralia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Nicoletti
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Paolo Fagone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Gande A, Anusha M, Dar H, Baji DB. The Role of Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e33293. [PMID: 36606106 PMCID: PMC9808655 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease that can cause cartilage and bone damage as well as a disability. Various cytokines play an essential role in disease formation such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-17, and macrophages; osteoclast is also activated by the cytokines, which cause bone degradation. Early diagnosis is key to optimal therapeutic success, particularly in patients with well-characterized risk factors for poor outcomes such as high disease activity, presence of autoantibodies, and early joint damage. Treatment algorithms involve measuring disease activity with composite indices, applying a treatment-to-target strategy, and using conventional, biological, and new non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. After the treatment target of stringent remission (or at least low disease activity) is maintained, dose reduction should be attempted. Although the prospects for most patients are now favorable, many still do not respond to current therapies. The biologics have changed the disease progression over the past few decades, such as TNF-alpha inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab), IL-1 inhibitors (anakinra), IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab), CD20 inhibitors (rituximab), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors (abatacept). In treatment with biologics, only little is known if "biologic-free" remission is possible in patients with sustained remission following intensive biological therapy. Infliximab and etanercept, in the long run, develop the drug antibody. This article has reviewed the action of the cytokine on joints and biological drug's action in blocking the cytokine degradation effect, benefits of biologics, and adverse effects in the long and short term. They are also effective alone or in combination with other drugs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ceban F, Xu J. The Evolution of TNF-α Blockade for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE LIFE SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.33137/juls.v16i1.39048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is a potent trimeric cytokine which plays a fundamental role in the host immuno-inflammatory response, as well as in homeostasis and development. Although critical for canonical immune function, TNF-α has great destructive potential and is implicated in the development of multiple immune-mediated disorders. Within the context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), TNF-α acts as a primary pathogenic driver by precipitating a pro-inflammatory cytokine cascade and coordinating the attraction and activation of immune cells, all of which culminate in damage to the synovium. The discovery of the paramount role of TNF-α in the pathophysiology of RA motivated studies to understand the effects of TNF blockade in vitro and in vivo. Promising preclinical results provided the impetus for clinical trials, spearheaded in the 1980s and 90s by Marc Feldmann, which revealed significant improvements across RA symptom scores and finally led to FDA approval in 1998. As of 2021, five TNF-α blocking agents have been widely applied clinically, including infliximab (IFX), etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GLM) and certolizumab pegol (CZP). All of them successfully ameliorated symptoms of RA and the associated tissue damage, especially in patients not responding to traditional treatment methods. Anti-TNFs are most often administered in combination with methotrexate (MTX) as part of Phase II treatment (i.e., second line). Although the general availability of anti-TNFs has dramatically improved patient outcomes, sustained remission is rare and the mechanism of RA remains incompletely understood. Thus, additional basic and translational research is warranted, towards the aim of developing novel RA treatments.
Collapse
|
13
|
Brouwer R, ten Klooster PM, Masselink JB, Vonkeman HE. Continuous effectiveness and safety after a hospital-wide switch to adalimumab biosimilar: An observational study in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2022; 10:e01025. [PMID: 36479936 PMCID: PMC9731312 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the maintenance of effect and safety after a hospital-wide switch for economic reasons from adalimumab originator Humira® to biosimilar Amgevita® in real-world rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and patient satisfaction with the switch. We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of RA patients on the course of their disease activity (DAS28, ESR, and CRP), health-related quality of life (SF-36), and functional disability (HAQ-DI) before and up to 1 year after the switch, supplemented with a cross-sectional survey on satisfaction and experienced side effects approximately 18 months after the switch. Treatment outcomes were analyzed with linear mixed modeling and generalized estimating equations. Of 52 RA patients sufficient data were available. Disease activity levels, the proportion of patients in remission, and SF-36 and HAQ-DI scores did not significantly change from before the switch. Overall, patients were satisfied with the switch. Three patients (7.9%) stopped the biosimilar due to side effects. In conclusion, switching to the adalimumab biosimilar did not result in increased disease activity or worse patient-reported outcomes. Also, there was no apparent evidence of increased side effects. Patients themselves were mostly satisfied with the switching experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rianne Brouwer
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Peter M. ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Joost B. Masselink
- Department of Clinical PharmacyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| | - Harald E. Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pang M, Sun Z, Zhang H. Biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs and the risk of all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29838. [PMID: 35960132 PMCID: PMC9371573 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the risk of all-cause mortality between biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and non-b/tsDMARDs involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We performed a systematic review of articles published up to August 2021 using electronic databases. We included studies that reported all-cause mortality in RA patients and compared b/tsDMARDs and non-b/tsDMARDs. RESULTS We included a total of 77 studies involving 64,428 patients. These comprised 44,227 patients treated with b/tsDMARDs and 20,201 treated with non-b/tsDMARDs. The occurrence of all-cause mortality was the primary outcome. The risk of all-cause mortality between the 2 treatments was not significantly different (relative risk = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 0.98-1.19). However, subgroup analyses showed significant increase in risks of mortality in anti-TNFs users with RA compared with non-b/tsDMARDs (relative risk = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.12). No significant differences were found after subgroup analyses based on other molecules involved and study duration. CONCLUSION In comparison with non-b/tsDMARDs, our results suggest that antitumor necrosis factor therapy is associated with observed increased risks of mortality and further investigation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengduan Pang
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou District, Dalian, China
| | - Zhe Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou District, Dalian, China
| | - Hongfeng Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Shahekou District, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakano S, Mikami N, Miyawaki M, Yamasaki S, Miyamoto S, Yamada M, Temma T, Nishi Y, Nagaike A, Sakae S, Furusawa T, Kawakami R, Tsuji T, Kohno T, Yoshida Y. Therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis by induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells with high suppressive potential. Biol Pharm Bull 2022; 45:1053-1060. [PMID: 35613869 DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b21-01096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Combination treatment using fingolimod (FTY720), an immunomodulator, and a pathogenic antigen prevents the progression of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI)325-339-induced arthritis. In this study, we focused on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs; CD11b+Gr-1+ cells) and investigated the effects of the combination treatment on these cells. DBA/1J mice with GPI325-339-induced arthritis were treated using FTY720 and/or GPI325-339 for five days. The expanded CD11b+Gr-1+ cell population and its inhibitory potential were examined. The percentage of CD369+CD11b+Gr-1+ cells effectively increased in the combination-treated mice. The inhibitory potential of CD369+CD11b+Gr-1+ cells was higher than that of cells not expressing CD369. Among bone marrow cells, the expression of CD369 in CD11b+Gr-1+ cells increased following stimulation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and the expression of CD11c increased accordingly. The increased CD11c expression indicated a decrease in the potential to suppress T cell proliferation based on the results of the suppression assay. The percentage of CD11c-CD369+ cells in CD11b+Gr-1+ cells that were induced by the combination treatment also increased, and these cells tended to have a higher capacity to inhibit T cell proliferation. In conclusion, the combination treatment using FTY720 and the pathogenic antigen effectively induces MDSC, which demonstrates a high potential for suppressing T cell proliferation in the lymph nodes, thereby establishing an immune-tolerant state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shohei Nakano
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Norihisa Mikami
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University.,Department of Experimental Pathology, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University
| | - Mai Miyawaki
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Saho Yamasaki
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Shoko Miyamoto
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Mayu Yamada
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Tomoya Temma
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Yousuke Nishi
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Arata Nagaike
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Seijun Sakae
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Takuya Furusawa
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Ryoji Kawakami
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University.,Department of Experimental Pathology, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University
| | - Takumi Tsuji
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Takeyuki Kohno
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| | - Yuya Yoshida
- Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Venetsanopoulou AI, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Janus kinase versus TNF inhibitors: where we stand today in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:485-493. [PMID: 35535405 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2064275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent decades, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment landscape has evolved with the induction of new biological and targeted therapies that provide significant therapeutic benefits in patients with sustained disease. AREAS COVERED Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were the first biologics used in the treatment of RA. Although they present a significant efficacy, an insufficient response of some patients led to further research and discovery of targeted therapies, such as Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), which act at a molecular level, regulating many cytokines. Clinical benefits have been seen with both TNFi and JAKi as monotherapy and combined with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Still, some significant side effects have been reported with JAKi, and several questions remain about their safety and selectivity in action. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the mechanism of action, the clinical efficacy, and safety of TNFi vs. JAKi. EXPERT OPINION TNFi and JAKi are particularly useful in treating inflammatory arthropathies. Both drug categories are recommended by ACR and EULAR institutions in RA patients suffering from moderate to severe disease. Safety data in long-term studies are required to determine the optimal benefit to the risk profile of JAKi use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliki I Venetsanopoulou
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Paraskevi V Voulgari
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Alexandros A Drosos
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
He B, Li Y, Luo WW, Cheng X, Xiang HR, Zhang QZ, He J, Peng WX. The Risk of Adverse Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:814429. [PMID: 35250992 PMCID: PMC8888889 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.814429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the safety of each anti-TNF therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and then make the best choice in clinical practice. Methods We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The deadline for retrieval is August 2021. The ORs, Confidence Intervals (CIs), and p values were calculated by STATA.16.0 software for assessment. Result 72 RCTs involving 28332 subjects were included. AEs were more common with adalimumab combined disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) compared with placebo (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.42), DMARDs (1.28, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.52), etanercept combined DMARDs (1.32, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.67); certolizumab combined DMARDs compared with placebo (1.63, 95% CI: 1.07, 2.46), DMARDs (1.30, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.54), etanercept combined DMARDs (1.34, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.70). In SAEs, comparisons between treatments showed adalimumab (0.20, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.59), etanercept combined DMARDs (0.39, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.96), golimumab (0.19, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.77), infliximab (0.15, 95% CI: 0.03,0.71) decreased the risk of SAEs compared with golimumab combined DMARDs. In infections, comparisons between treatments showed adalimumab combined DMARDs (0.59, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.95), etanercept (0.49, 95% CI: 0.28, 0.88), etanercept combined DMARDs (0.56, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.91), golimumab combined DMARDs (0.51, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.83) decreased the risk of infections compared with infliximab combined DMARDs. No evidence indicated that the use of TNF-α inhibitors influenced the risk of serious infections, malignant tumors. Conclusion In conclusion, we regard etanercept monotherapy as the optimal choice for RA patients in clinical practice when the efficacy is similar. Conversely, certolizumab + DMARDs therapy is not recommended. Systematic Review Registration identifier PROSPERO CRD42021276176.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei He
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wen-Wen Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xuan Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huai-Rong Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qi-Zhi Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wen-Xing Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a common chronic inflammatory disease with substantial economic, social, and personal costs. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial and complex. The ultimate goal of rheumatoid arthritis treatment is stopping or slowing down the disease progression. In the past two decades, invention of new medicines, especially biologic agents, revolutionized the management of this disease. These agents have been associated with an improved prognosis and clinical remission, especially in patients who did not respond to traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Improvement in the understanding of the rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis leads to the development of novel biologic therapeutic approaches. In the present paper, we summarized the current therapeutics, especially biologic agents, available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Collapse
|
19
|
Tesser J, Lin I, Shiff NJ, Chakravarty SD, Schmajuk G, Hammam N, Desai S. Improvement in disease activity among patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switched from intravenous infliximab to intravenous golimumab in the ACR RISE registry. Clin Rheumatol 2022; 41:2319-2327. [PMID: 35312895 PMCID: PMC9287251 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06116-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Infliximab and golimumab are intravenously (IV) administered tumor necrosis factor inhibitors approved to treat moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with concomitant methotrexate. Owing to differences in biologic construct, patients with IV-infliximab treatment failure may benefit from switching to IV-golimumab. Utilizing the ACR’s Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE), a large electronic health records registry based in the USA, we assessed RA disease activity in patients switching from IV-infliximab to IV-golimumab. This retrospective, longitudinal, single-arm study included adults (≥ 18 years) with ≥ 1 RA diagnosis code between 2014 and 2018 and ≥ 1 IV-infliximab prescription within 6 months of a new IV-golimumab order (index date). Longitudinal assessments of disease activity using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) were calculated in patients continuing IV-golimumab for 6–9- and 9–12-months post-switch. Paired t-tests evaluated significance of mean improvements during the follow-up periods. Most RA patients with disease activity assessments during the 6-month follow-up (N = 100; mean age: 65.3 years; 81% female; 74% white) demonstrated moderate-to-high disease activity (CDAI: 73% [38/52]) at enrollment. On average, patients showed significant improvement in disease activity within 6–9 months of switching; mean CDAI scores improved from 21.3 to 14.1 (p < 0.0001) and were durable through 9–12 months of treatment. Real-world patients with moderate-to-high disease activity who switched from IV-infliximab to IV-golimumab demonstrated significant and sustained improvements post-switch as measured by the CDAI.
Key Points • This study used real-world data from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry to evaluate the efficacy of directly switching from intravenous (IV)-infliximab to IV-golimumab to control rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. • Most IV-infliximab patients had moderate-to-high disease activity at the time of the switch. • On average, IV-golimumab was effective in improving RA disease activity after switching from IV-infliximab as measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index. • These data suggest that real-world RA patients with persistent symptoms despite treatment with IV-infliximab may realize improved disease control with a switch to IV-golimumab. |
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Tesser
- Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, 4550 E. Bell Road, Suite 172, Phoenix, AZ, 85032, USA.
| | - Iris Lin
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | - Natalie J Shiff
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
- Adjunct, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Soumya D Chakravarty
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Nevin Hammam
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jana M, Mittal D, Bagri N, Yadav R, Parihar V, Bagri NK. Role of Imaging in Childhood Arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 2022; 28:e539-e544. [PMID: 33843776 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Imaging plays a pivotal role in the management of various childhood arthritis. Conventional radiography is the most commonly ordered imaging modality for the evaluation of arthritis. Owing to their higher sensitivity for detecting synovitis, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography are increasingly being used to guide clinical management of various forms of arthritis, especially juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging is a preferred modality for evaluating more complex sites such as the sacroiliac joint. In this review, we have discussed the rational use and the characteristic imaging features of common childhood arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Jana
- From the Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
| | - Disha Mittal
- From the Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
| | - Neha Bagri
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Richa Yadav
- From the Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
| | - Vivek Parihar
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Narendra Kumar Bagri
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nakatsu K, Rahman R, Morita K, Fujita D, Kobashi S. Automatic Carpal Site Detection Method for Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Deep Learning. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS 2022. [DOI: 10.20965/jaciii.2022.p0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 600,000 to 1,000,000 patients are diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. To provide appropriate treatment, it is necessary to accurately measure the progression of RA by diagnosing the disease several times a year. The modified total sharp score (mTSS) calculated from hand X-ray images is a standard diagnostic method for RA progression. However, this diagnostic method is time-consuming as the scores are rated at as many as 16 points per hand. Accordingly, in order to shorten the diagnosis time of RA patients and improve the quality of diagnosis, the development of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems is expected. We have previously proposed a CAD system that can detect finger joint positions using a support vector machine and can estimate the mTSS using ridge regression. In this study, we propose a fully automatic detection method of RA score evaluation points in the carpal site from simple hand X-ray images using deep learning. The proposed method first segments the carpal site using deep learning. Next, the RA evaluation points are automatically determined from each segment based on prior knowledge. Experimental results on X-ray images of the hands of 140 patients with RA showed that the mTSS evaluation point at the carpal site could be detected with an average error of 25 pixels. This study enables the automatic detection of RA score evaluation points in the carpal site. In the diagnosis of RA, the time required for diagnosis can be reduced by automating the determination of diagnostic points by physician.
Collapse
|
22
|
Jones A, Rapisardo S, Zhang L, Mellors T, Withers JB, Gatalica Z, Akmaev VR. Analytical and clinical validation of an RNA sequencing-based assay for quantitative, accurate evaluation of a molecular signature response classifier in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:1235-1243. [PMID: 34727834 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.2000394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study reports analytical and clinical validation of a molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) that identifies rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are non-responders to tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS The MSRC integrates patient-specific data from 19 gene expression features, anti-cyclic citrullinated protein serostatus, sex, body mass index, and patient global assessment into a single score. RESULTS The MSRC results stratified samples (N = 174) according to non-response prediction with a positive predictive value of 87.7% (95% CI: 78-94%), sensitivity of 60.2% (95% CI: 50-69%), and specificity of 77.3% (95% CI: 65-87%). The 25-point scale was subdivided into three thresholds: signal not detected (<10.6), high (≥10.6), and very high (≥18.5). The MSRC relies on sequencing of RNA extracted from blood; this assay displays high gene expression concordance between inter- and intra-assay sample (R2 > 0.977) and minimal variation in cumulative gene assignment diversity, read mapping location, or gene-body coverage. The MSRC accuracy was 95.8% (46/48) for threshold concordance (no signal, high, very high). Intra- and inter-assay precision studies demonstrated high repeatability (92.6%, 25/27) and reproducibility (100%, 35/35). CONCLUSION The MSRC is a robust assay that accurately and reproducibly detects an RA patient's molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Jones
- Data Science, Scipher Medicine Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Rapisardo
- Laboratory Operations, Scipher Medicine Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Lixia Zhang
- Data Science, Scipher Medicine Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Zoran Gatalica
- Laboratory Operations, Scipher Medicine Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Axelrod H, Adams M. Biologic Agents and Secondary Immune Deficiency. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2021; 41:639-652. [PMID: 34602234 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Biologics are protein-based pharmaceuticals derived from living organisms or their proteins. We discuss the mechanism of action for currently approved biologics and a give summary of the studies on immune suppression from biologics. Most of these studies have been conducted with rheumatology patients, and many in adults. Their relevance for children is explored and existing gaps in data for children are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Axelrod
- Department of Pediatrics (PGY3), Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Matthew Adams
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, 3950 Beaubien Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Capelusnik D, Aletaha D. Baseline predictors of different types of treatment success in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:153-158. [PMID: 34607792 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a comprehensive analysis on predictors of achieving disease activity outcomes by change, response and state measures. METHODS We used data from three rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials (one for main analysis, two for validation) to analyse the effect of patient and disease characteristics, core set measure and composite indices on the achievement of different outcomes: response outcomes (% of patients achieving a relative response margin); state outcomes (remission or low disease activity, LDA) and change outcomes (numerical change on metric scales). RESULTS We included patients from the ASPIRE trial (for analysis) and from the ATTRACT and GO-BEFORE trials (for validation). While lower disease activity components at baseline-except acute phase reactants-were associated with achievement of state outcomes (such as LDA by the Simplified Disease Activity Index, SDAI), higher baseline values were associated with change outcomes (such as SDAI absolute change). A multivariate analysis of the identified predictors of state outcomes identified best prediction by a combination of shorter disease duration, male gender and lower disease activity. For prediction of response, no consistently significant predictors were found, again, with exception of C reactive protein, for which higher levels at baseline were associated with better responses. CONCLUSION Prediction of treatment success is limited in RA. Particularly in early RA, prediction of state targets can be achieved by lower baseline levels of diseases activity. Gender and disease duration may improve the predictability of state targets. In clinical trials, included populations and choice of outcomes can be coordinated to maximise efficiency from these studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafne Capelusnik
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.,Department of Rheumatology, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, CABA, Argentina
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lv X, Wang L, Zou X, Huang S. Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Regenerative Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Opportunities and Challenges. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2021; 15:3927-3936. [PMID: 34584402 PMCID: PMC8462093 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s323107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology with a high rate of disability. Traditional treatments for RA remain a challenging issue. For example, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have no therapeutic effects on joint destruction, and the prominent side effects include gastrointestinal symptoms. RA is characterized by recurrence and bone attrition. Therefore, regenerative medicine and the use of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) therapies have recently emerged as potential options. UC-MSCs are multifunctional stem cells that are present in neonatal umbilical cord tissue and can differentiate into many kinds of cells, which have broad clinical application prospects in the tissue engineering of bone, cartilage, muscle, tendon, ligament, nerve, liver, endothelium, and myocardium. Moreover, UC-MSCs have advantages, such as convenient collection of materials and no ethical disputes; thus, these cells have attracted increasing attention from researchers. However, there are few clinical studies regarding UC-MSC therapy for RA. In this paper, we will review traditional drugs for RA treatment and then focus on UC-MSC therapy for RA, including preclinical and clinical UC-MSC applications for RA patients in the context of regenerative medicine. Finally, we will summarize the challenges and perspectives of UC-MSCs as a potential therapeutic strategy for RA. This review will help to design and discover more potent and efficacious treatments for RA patients and aid in advancing this class of cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolan Lv
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liu Zhou, Guang Xi, People's Republic of China
| | - Liming Wang
- Shaanxi Jiuzhou Biomedical Science and Technology Group, Xi'an, Shaan Xi, People's Republic of China
| | - XiaoRong Zou
- Department of Hematology, 986 Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaan Xi, People's Republic of China
| | - Shigao Huang
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Naffaa ME, Hassan F, Golan-Cohen A, Merzon E, Green I, Saab A, Paz Z. Factors associated with drug survival on first biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. Rheumatol Int 2021; 41:1905-1913. [PMID: 34529109 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04989-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Lack of sufficient head-to-head trials comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), makes the choice of the first bDMARD a matter of rheumatologist's preference. Longer drug survival on the first bDMARD usually correlates with early remission. We aimed to identify factors associated with longer drug survival. We conducted a population-based retrospective longitudinal cohort study. We identified RA patients using the relevant International Classification of Disease 9th codes. "True" RA patients were defined as patients fulfilling, additionally, at least one of the following: receiving conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs), being positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, or being diagnosed by a rheumatologist. We compared drug survival times and identified factors associated with longer drug survival. We identified 4268 true RA patients between the years of 2000-2017. 820 patients (19.2%) received at least one bDMARD. The most commonly prescribed bDMARDs were etanercept (352, 42.9%), adalimumab (143, 17.4%), infliximab (142, 17.3%) and tocilizumab (58, 7.1%). Infliximab was associated with the longest drug survival (47.1 months ± 46.3) while golimumab was associated with the shortest drug survival (14.9 months ± 15.1). Male gender [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.86, p = 0.001], concurrent conventional DMARDs use (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 - 0.98, p = .031) and initiating bDMARD therapy in earlier calendric years (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 -1.18, p = 0.0001) were associated with longer drug survival. Male gender, concomitant cDMARDs and initiating biologic therapy at earlier calendric years are associated with longer drug survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad E Naffaa
- Rheumatology Unit, Galilee Medical Center, Road 89, Naharyia, Israel. .,Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.
| | - Fadi Hassan
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.,Internal Medicine "E", Galilee Medical Center, Naharyia, Israel
| | - Avivit Golan-Cohen
- Leumit Health Services, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | | | - Ilan Green
- Leumit Health Services, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Amir Saab
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.,Internal Medicine "E", Galilee Medical Center, Naharyia, Israel
| | - Ziv Paz
- Rheumatology Unit, Galilee Medical Center, Road 89, Naharyia, Israel.,Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Scott DL, Ibrahim F, Hill H, Tom B, Prothero L, Baggott RR, Bosworth A, Galloway JB, Georgopoulou S, Martin N, Neatrour I, Nikiphorou E, Sturt J, Wailoo A, Williams FMK, Williams R, Lempp H. Intensive therapy for moderate established rheumatoid arthritis: the TITRATE research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Rheumatoid arthritis is a major inflammatory disorder and causes substantial disability. Treatment goals span minimising disease activity, achieving remission and decreasing disability. In active rheumatoid arthritis, intensive management achieves these goals. As many patients with established rheumatoid arthritis have moderate disease activity, the TITRATE (Treatment Intensities and Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis ThErapy) programme assessed the benefits of intensive management.
Objectives
To (1) define how to deliver intensive therapy in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis; (2) establish its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in a trial; and (3) evaluate evidence supporting intensive management in observational studies and completed trials.
Design
Observational studies, secondary analyses of completed trials and systematic reviews assessed existing evidence about intensive management. Qualitative research, patient workshops and systematic reviews defined how to deliver it. The trial assessed its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis.
Setting
Observational studies (in three London centres) involved 3167 patients. These were supplemented by secondary analyses of three previously completed trials (in centres across all English regions), involving 668 patients. Qualitative studies assessed expectations (nine patients in four London centres) and experiences of intensive management (15 patients in 10 centres across England). The main clinical trial enrolled 335 patients with diverse socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity (in 39 centres across all English regions).
Participants
Patients with established moderately active rheumatoid arthritis receiving conventional disease-modifying drugs.
Interventions
Intensive management used combinations of conventional disease-modifying drugs, biologics (particularly tumour necrosis factor inhibitors) and depot steroid injections; nurses saw patients monthly, adjusted treatment and provided supportive person-centred psychoeducation. Control patients received standard care.
Main outcome measures
Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)-categorised patients (active to remission). Remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.60) was the treatment target. Other outcomes included fatigue (measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale), disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire), harms and resource use for economic assessments.
Results
Evaluation of existing evidence for intensive rheumatoid arthritis management showed the following. First, in observational studies, DAS28-ESR scores decreased over 10–20 years, whereas remissions and treatment intensities increased. Second, in systematic reviews of published trials, all intensive management strategies increased remissions. Finally, patients with high disability scores had fewer remissions. Qualitative studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients, workshops and systematic reviews helped develop an intensive management pathway. A 2-day training session for rheumatology practitioners explained its use, including motivational interviewing techniques and patient handbooks. The trial screened 459 patients and randomised 335 patients (168 patients received intensive management and 167 patients received standard care). A total of 303 patients provided 12-month outcome data. Intention-to-treat analysis showed intensive management increased DAS28-ESR 12-month remissions, compared with standard care (32% vs. 18%, odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.68; p = 0.004), and reduced fatigue [mean difference –18, 95% confidence interval –24 to –11 (scale 0–100); p < 0.001]. Disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire) decreased when intensive management patients achieved remission (difference –0.40, 95% confidence interval –0.57 to –0.22) and these differences were considered clinically relevant. However, in all intensive management patients reductions in the Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were less marked (difference –0.1, 95% confidence interval –0.2 to 0.0). The numbers of serious adverse events (intensive management n = 15 vs. standard care n = 11) and other adverse events (intensive management n = 114 vs. standard care n = 151) were similar. Economic analysis showed that the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £43,972 from NHS and Personal Social Services cost perspectives. The probability of meeting a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 was 17%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased to £29,363 after including patients’ personal costs and lost working time, corresponding to a 50% probability that intensive management is cost-effective at English willingness-to-pay thresholds. Analysing trial baseline predictors showed that remission predictors comprised baseline DAS28-ESR, disability scores and body mass index. A 6-month extension study (involving 95 intensive management patients) showed fewer remissions by 18 months, although more sustained remissions were more likley to persist. Qualitative research in trial completers showed that intensive management was acceptable and treatment support from specialist nurses was beneficial.
Limitations
The main limitations comprised (1) using single time point remissions rather than sustained responses, (2) uncertainty about benefits of different aspects of intensive management and differences in its delivery across centres, (3) doubts about optimal treatment of patients unresponsive to intensive management and (4) the lack of formal international definitions of ‘intensive management’.
Conclusion
The benefits of intensive management need to be set against its additional costs. These were relatively high. Not all patients benefited. Patients with high pretreatment physical disability or who were substantially overweight usually did not achieve remission.
Future work
Further research should (1) identify the most effective components of the intervention, (2) consider its most cost-effective delivery and (3) identify alternative strategies for patients not responding to intensive management.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70160382.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Scott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Prothero
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon R Baggott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - James B Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Naomi Martin
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Isabel Neatrour
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Department of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Frances MK Williams
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Molecular Signature Response Classifier to Predict Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors: The NETWORK-004 Prospective Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2021; 8:1159-1176. [PMID: 34148193 PMCID: PMC8214458 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00330-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Timely matching of patients to beneficial targeted therapy is an unmet need in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) that predicts which patients with RA are unlikely to respond to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy would have wide clinical utility. Methods The protein–protein interaction map specific to the rheumatoid arthritis pathophysiology and gene expression data in blood patient samples was used to discover a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapy. Inadequate response predictions were validated in blood samples from the CERTAIN cohort and a multicenter blinded prospective observational clinical study (NETWORK-004) among 391 targeted therapy-naïve and 113 TNFi-exposed patient samples. The primary endpoint evaluated the ability of the MSRC to identify patients who inadequately responded to TNFi therapy at 6 months according to ACR50. Additional endpoints evaluated the prediction of inadequate response at 3 and 6 months by ACR70, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI. Results The 23-feature molecular signature considers pathways upstream and downstream of TNFα involvement in RA pathophysiology. Predictive performance was consistent between the CERTAIN cohort and NETWORK-004 study. The NETWORK-004 study met primary and secondary endpoints. A molecular signature of non-response was detected in 45% of targeted therapy-naïve patients. The MSRC had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64 and patients were unlikely to adequately respond to TNFi therapy according to ACR50 at 6 months with an odds ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.0–8.3, p value 0.0001). Odds ratios (3.4–8.8) were significant (p value < 0.01) for additional endpoints at 3 and 6 months, with AUC values up to 0.74. Among TNFi-exposed patients, the MSRC had an AUC of up to 0.83 and was associated with significant odds ratios of 3.3–26.6 by ACR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI metrics. Conclusion The MSRC stratifies patients according to likelihood of inadequate response to TNFi therapy and provides patient-specific data to guide therapy choice in RA for targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi-exposed patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00330-y. A blood-based molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) integrating next-generation RNA sequencing data with clinical features predicts the likelihood that a patient with rheumatoid arthritis will have an inadequate response to TNFi therapy. Treatment selection guided by test results, with likely inadequate responders appropriately redirected to a different therapy, could improve response rates to TNFi therapies, generate healthcare cost savings, and increase rheumatologists’ confidence in prescribing decisions and altered treatment choices. The MSRC described in this study predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to TNFi therapies among targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi-exposed patients in a multicenter, 24-week blinded prospective clinical study: NETWORK-004. Patients with a molecular signature of non-response are less likely to have an adequate response to TNFi therapies than those patients lacking the signature according to ACR50, ACR70, CDAI, and DAS28-CRP with significant odds ratios of 3.4–8.8 for targeted therapy-naïve patients and 3.3–26.6 for TNFi-exposed patients. This MSRC provides a solution to the long-standing need for precision medicine tools to predict drug response in rheumatoid arthritis—a heterogeneous and progressive disease with an abundance of therapeutic options. These data validate the performance of the MSRC in a blinded prospective clinical study of targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi therapy-exposed patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Park YJ, Gherghe AM, van der Heijde D. Radiographic progression in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systemic literature review of trials performed by industry. RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2020-001277. [PMID: 32669455 PMCID: PMC7425197 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To summarise radiographic data in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) as part of the radiographic inhibition claim of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) approved for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A systemic literature review was performed using the Medline database from 1994 to February 2020. The results were grouped based on the scoring methods (Sharp, Genant modification, van der Heijde modification) and RA patient populations. Results One hundred sixty-eight publications were selected. After detailed assessment, 52 RCTs (7 methotrexate (MTX)-naive, 23 MTX inadequate response (IR), 9 DMARDs IR and 3 tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) IR studies) were finally included. Information on patient population, scoring method used, reader reliability, statistical analyses and detailed radiographic data on baseline and change scores over multiple follow-up periods are presented. Conclusion The data gathered in this review serve as a repository for the design of future trials with radiographic damage as an outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yune-Jung Park
- Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).,Rheumatology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Ana Maria Gherghe
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Cantacuzino Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mysler E, Caubet M, Lizarraga A. Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Open Access Rheumatol 2021; 13:139-152. [PMID: 34104009 PMCID: PMC8179789 DOI: 10.2147/oarrr.s282627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most prevalent form of inflammatory arthritis. It is a profoundly serious and severe disease that if it goes untreated could have severe consequences to the joints and health of the patient who carries this diagnosis. The treatment of RA has dramatically changed since the year 2000, with the discovery of the TNFis, then other biologics, and finally the JAKi. All these new medications with or without methotrexate in combination, tight control and treat to target have produced a revolution in the outcome of this disease. We reviewed and summarized the treatment options, and the most significant papers for each one of these new drugs. The reader could have a full picture with all the references of the recent publications. We also updated the biosimilar situation in RA, as well as the new drugs that will be coming to the market in the next 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Mysler
- Organización Medica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariana Caubet
- Organización Medica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana Lizarraga
- Organización Medica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Patel S, Wadhwa M. Therapeutic use of specific tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in inflammatory diseases including COVID-19. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 140:111785. [PMID: 34126316 PMCID: PMC8162906 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused significant devastation globally. Despite the development of several vaccines, with uncertainty around global uptake and vaccine efficacy, the need for effective therapeutic agents remains. Increased levels of cytokines including tumour necrosis factor are significant in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and associated with poor outcomes including ventilator requirement and mortality. Repurposing tumour necrosis factor blocker therapy used in conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease seems promising, with early feasibility data showing a reduction in circulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and encouraging the evaluation of such interventions in preventing disease progression and clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19. Here, we examine the biological activities of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors indicative of their potential in COVID-19 and briefly outline the randomised control trials assessing their benefit-risk profile in COVID-19 therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Patel
- Downing College, Regent Street, Cambridge CB2 1DQ, UK; Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Meenu Wadhwa
- NIBSC, MHRA, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3QG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miller H, Wallman JK, Petersson IF, Saevarsdottir S, Söderling J, Ernestam S, Askling J, van Vollenhoven R, Neovius M. Mortality over 14 years in MTX-refractory patients randomized to a strategy of addition of infliximab or sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:2217-2222. [PMID: 33179071 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare mortality risk over up to 14 years of follow-up in methotrexate-refractory patients with early RA randomized to a strategy starting with addition of infliximab vs addition of SSZ and HCQ. METHODS Data was from the two-arm, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, open-label Swefot trial in which patients with early RA (symptom duration <1 y) were recruited from 15 rheumatology clinics in Sweden (2002-2005). Patients who did not achieve low disease activity after 3-4 months of MTX were randomized to addition of infliximab (n = 128) or SSZ and HCQ (n = 130). Participants were followed until death, emigration, or end of follow-up, whichever came first. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. RESULTS Over an average follow-up of 13 years, there were 13 and 16 deaths, respectively [8.8 vs 10.6 deaths per 1000 person-years; mortality hazard ratio 1.2 (95% CI: 0.6, 2.5); P =0.62]. The 1-year mortality was 0.8% in both treatment arms, the 5-year mortality was 2.3% for the infliximab arm compared with 1.5% for the conventional combination treatment arm, while the 10-year mortality was 7.8% and 7.7%, respectively. After 5 years, ∼50% of patients in the conventional combination therapy arm had switched to biologic treatment, and 50% in the biologic arm had discontinued treatment with a biologic DMARD. CONCLUSION No difference in mortality risk could be observed over up to 14 years of follow-up between treatment strategy groups. At 5 years (3 years after trial cessation), 50% of patients remained on their assigned therapy, reflecting that DMARD combination is an adequate treatment strategy in 50% of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00764725.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Miller
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | | | - Ingemar F Petersson
- Department of Orthopedics, Lund University.,Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Saedis Saevarsdottir
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Jonas Söderling
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Sofia Ernestam
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm Health Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Askling
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Ronald van Vollenhoven
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Neovius
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nozaki Y, Hidaka T, Ri J, Itami T, Tomita D, Okada A, Ashida C, Ikeda F, Yamamoto A, Funahashi K, Kinoshita K, Matsubara T, Funauchi M, Matsumura I. Real-World Methotrexate Dose on Clinical Effectiveness and Structural Damage of Certolizumab Pegol With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:643459. [PMID: 33968956 PMCID: PMC8096982 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments have markedly advanced with the introduction of biological agents, e. g., tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. TNF inhibitors are demonstrated to be quite effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX), and sufficient doses of both agents are important to control RA's disease activity. However, not all RA patients can be treated with high-dose MTX due to contraindications related to the antimetabolite action of MTX or to tolerability concerns. In daily practice, this has resulted in reduced effectiveness of TNF inhibitors. We sought to determine whether the concomitant use of dose of MTX affected the clinical effectiveness, retention rate, and side effects of certolizumab pegol (CZP) for treating RA in a real-world setting. CZP is a pegylated-conjugated Fab' fragment of a humanized anti-TNF antibody that has high affinity to TNF. Patients and Methods: We divided Japanese RA patients treated with CZP (n = 95, 25-83 years old) into groups based on those with (n = 65) and without (n = 30) concomitant MTX and those treated with a high dose (≥8 mg, n = 41) or low dose (1- <8 mg, n = 24) of MTX. We retrospectively analyzed the concomitant MTX doses' effects and side effects and the patient retention rate. Results: There were no significant differences among the CZP groups with and without MTX or the groups receiving the high vs. low MTX doses in the retention rate, the low disease activity rate, or the inhibitory effect in radiographic joint damage. Conclusion: CZP has the potential to be a useful biological agent to control RA's disease activity and the bone destruction in patients who cannot tolerate a sufficient MTX dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Nozaki
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Hidaka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Zenjinkai Shimin-No-Mori Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Jinhai Ri
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Tetsu Itami
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Daisuke Tomita
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Akinori Okada
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Chisato Ashida
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Fusayo Ikeda
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Yamamoto
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Keiko Funahashi
- Institute of Rheumatology, Zenjinkai Shimin-No-Mori Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Koji Kinoshita
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | | | - Masanori Funauchi
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Itaru Matsumura
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Post-Marketing Pooled Safety Analysis for CT-P13 Treatment of Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in Observational Cohort Studies. BioDrugs 2021; 34:513-528. [PMID: 32356239 PMCID: PMC7223987 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00421-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background At EU marketing authorisation, safety data for CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) were limited, particularly in some indications, and uncommon adverse events (AEs) could not be evaluated among relatively small analysis populations. Objectives Our objective was to investigate the overall safety profile and incidence rate of AEs of special interest (AESIs), including serious infections and tuberculosis, in CT-P13-treated patients. Methods Data were pooled from six observational studies representing authorised indications of CT-P13 (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis, adult and paediatric Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis). Patients were analysed by indication and treatment (patients who received CT-P13 or those who switched from reference infliximab to CT-P13 ≤ 6 months prior to enrolment or during the study). Results Overall, 4393 patients were included (n = 3677 CT-P13 group; n = 716 switched group); 64.03% of patients had inflammatory bowel disease and 6.31% of patients were antidrug antibody positive. Overall, 32.94% and 9.58% of patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious AEs, respectively. Across indications, TEAEs were more frequent with CT-P13 than with the switched group. Infections including tuberculosis were the most frequent serious AESI overall (2.48%) and by treatment group or indication. In total, 14 patients (0.32%) reported active tuberculosis. Overall incidence rates per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval) were 3.40 (2.788–4.096) for serious infections including tuberculosis and 0.44 (0.238–0.732) for active tuberculosis. Infusion-related reactions were the second most frequent AESI following infection including tuberculosis. Conclusion The CT-P13 safety profile appears consistent with previous studies for CT-P13 and reference infliximab, supporting the favourable risk/benefit balance for CT-P13 treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-020-00421-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gaujoux-Viala C, Hudry C, Zinovieva E, Herman-Demars H, Flipo RM. MTX optimization or adding bDMARD equally improve disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the prospective study STRATEGE. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:270-280. [PMID: 33774669 PMCID: PMC8742827 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The STRATEGE (Therapeutic Strategy in Patients Treated With Methotrexate for Rheumatoid Arthritis) study aimed to describe treatment strategies in current practice in RA biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve patients with an inadequate response to MTX therapy, and to compare clinical efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies on disease activity after 6 months. Methods The main inclusion criteria of this prospective, observational, multicentre study were confirmed RA diagnosis, treatment by MTX monotherapy and need for therapeutic management modification. Results The 722 patients included had a mean (s.d.) RA duration of 5.3 (6.7) years, a mean DAS28 of 4.0 (1.1); they were all receiving MTX monotherapy, 68% oral, at a mean dose of 15.0 (4.1) mg/week. Two major strategies were identified: (i) MTX monotherapy dose and/or route optimization (72%) and (ii) bDMARD initiation ± MTX (16%). MTX dosing was modified for 70% of patients, maintained (dose and route) for 28% of patients and interrupted for 2%. bDMARDs were started when the MTX mean dose was 17.4 mg/week, 56% parenterally; MTX was maintained concomitantly for 96% of patients. Six-month follow-up results adjusted by propensity score showed that both options were equally successful in improving disease activity and physical function, with 63 and 68% of good-to-moderate EULAR responses, respectively. Conclusion The STRATEGE study shows the importance of initial MTX treatment optimization before initiation of a biological treatment and emphasizes the importance of treat-to-target strategy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02288520.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Gaujoux-Viala
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Nîmes, Univ Montpellier, Nîmes, France.,Research Unit INSERM University of Montpellier, IDESP Institute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, Montpellier, France
| | - Christophe Hudry
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Institut de Rhumatologie, Paris 7, France
| | | | | | - René-Marc Flipo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Roger Salengro, University of Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
MicroRNA-101-3p inhibits fibroblast-like synoviocyte proliferation and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting PTGS2. Biosci Rep 2021; 40:221734. [PMID: 31894846 PMCID: PMC6960065 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20191136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequently occurring inflammatory arthritis. The present study was performed to characterize the role of microRNA-101-3p (miR-101-3p) and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) in inflammation and biological activities of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) in RA. METHODS Initially, miR-101-3p and PTGS2 expression in RA tissues of RA patients and RA rats was detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Rat model of type II collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) was adopted to simulate RA, followed by injection of miR-101-3p mimics or siRNA against PTGS2. Next, the apoptosis in synovial tissue and the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were identified. Subsequently, FLSs in RA (RA-FLSs) were isolated, after which in vitro experiments were conducted to analyze cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion upon treatment of up-regulated miR-101-3p and silenced PTGS2. Furthermore, the relationship of miR-101-3p and PTGS2 was determined by bioinformatics prediction and luciferase activity assay. RESULTS We identified poorly expressed miR-101-3p and highly expressed PTGS2 in synovial tissues of RA patients and RA rats, which showed reduced synoviocyte apoptosis and enhanced inflammation. In response to miR-101-3p mimics and si-PTGS2, the RA-FLSs were observed with attenuated cell proliferation, migration and invasion, corresponding to promoted apoptosis. Down-regulation of PTGS2 could rescue the effect of inhibited miR-101-3p in synovial injury and phenotypic changes of FLS in RA rats. Notably, miR-101-3p was found to negatively regulate PTGS2. CONCLUSION Taken together, miR-101-3p reduces the joint swelling and arthritis index in RA rats by down-regulating PTGS2, as evidenced by inhibited FLS proliferation and inflammation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Verhoeven MMA, Tekstra J, Welsing PMJ, Pethö-Schramm A, Borm MEA, Bruyn GAW, Bos R, Griep EN, Klaasen R, van Laar JM, Lafeber FPJG, Bijlsma JWJ, de Hair MJH, Jacobs JWG. Effectiveness and safety over 3 years after the 2-year U-Act-Early trial of the strategies initiating tocilizumab and/or methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 59:2325-2333. [PMID: 31859346 PMCID: PMC7449801 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives U-Act-Early was a 2-year, randomized placebo controlled, double-blind trial, in which DMARD-naïve early RA patients were treated to the target of sustained remission (SR). Two strategies initiating tocilizumab (TCZ), with and without methotrexate (MTX), were more effective than a strategy initiating MTX. The aim of the current study was to determine longer-term effectiveness in daily clinical practice. Methods At the end of U-Act-Early, patients were included in a 3-year post-trial follow-up (PTFU), in which treatment was according to standard care and data were collected every 3 months during the first year and every 6 months thereafter. Primary end point was disease activity score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) over time. Mixed effects models were used to compare effectiveness between initial strategy groups, correcting for relevant confounders. Between the groups as randomized, proportions of patients were tested for DMARD use, SR and radiographic progression of joint damage. Results Of patients starting U-Act-Early, 226/317 (71%) participated in the PTFU. Over the total 5 years, mean DAS28 was similar between groups (P > 0.20). During U-Act-Early, biologic DMARD use decreased in both TCZ initiation groups and increased in the MTX initiation group, but during follow-up this trend did not continue. SR was achieved at least once in 99% of patients. Of the 226 patients, only 30% had any radiographic progression over 5 years, without significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Although in the short-term the strategies initiating TCZ yielded the most clinical benefit, in the longer-term differences in important clinical outcomes between the strategies disappeared, probably due to continuation of the treat-to-target principle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime M A Verhoeven
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Reinhard Bos
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden
| | - Ed N Griep
- Department of Rheumatology, Antonius Hospital, Sneek
| | - Ruth Klaasen
- Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris P J G Lafeber
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein J H de Hair
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes W G Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chandramohan P, Jain A, Antony G, Krishnan N, Shenoy P. Low-dose rituximab protocol in rheumatoid arthritis-outcome and economic impact. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkaa077. [PMID: 33605940 PMCID: PMC7878847 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A significant proportion of RA patients, particularly those associated with poor prognostic factors, fail on conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). Although rituximab (RTX) has been effective in these patients, the cost of therapy makes it unaffordable, particularly in poor and developing countries. Numerous, albeit small, studies using lower doses have shown contradictory results. We aimed to analyse the effectiveness of a low-dose RTX protocol based on clinical outcomes in RA patients. METHODS Seropositive RA patients with moderate to high disease activity (DAS28-ESR > 3.2) despite combination cDMARDs, treated with RTX, were included in retrospective analysis. All patients were treated according to a predefined protocol, using 500 mg RTX with ongoing cDMARDs at baseline and repeat dosing at 6 weeks or beyond, on lack of moderate to good EULAR response. The B cell count was assessed at baseline, 2 and 24 weeks. RESULTS At 12 weeks, 93% of 166 patients [mean (s.d.) age, 51.5 (11.96) years, 25 men and 141 women, with a disease duration of 10.4 (6.29) years] achieved moderate to good EULAR response. At 24 weeks, 90.8% of patients achieved moderate to good EULAR response, 19.8% achieved low disease activity and 29.5% achieved remission, with a mean change in DAS28-ESR from baseline of 2.9 (1.3). RTX failure and relapse were seen in 5.4% and 3.6%, respectively. The response was maintained for 12.3 (7.2) months with a mean RTX dose 521.1 (100.8) mg. Adverse events were seen in 9.6%. When compared with the standard dosing regimen with the originator molecule, a cost reduction of 90% was achieved. CONCLUSION A low-dose RTX regimen achieved reasonably good clinical outcomes at the end of 6 months, with a significantly lower cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Avinash Jain
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sawai Mansingh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | - Glindow Antony
- Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatism Excellence (CARE), Kochi
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Quantification of Joint Space Width Difference on Radiography Via Phase-Only Correlation (POC) Analysis: a Phantom Study Comparing with Various Tomographical Modalities Using Conventional Margin-Contouring. J Digit Imaging 2020; 34:96-104. [PMID: 33269449 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00406-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Several visual scoring methods are currently used to assess progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on radiography. However, they are limited by its subjectivity and insufficient sensitivity. We have developed an original measurement system which uses a technique called phase-only correlation (POC). The purpose of this study is to validate the system by using a phantom simulating the joint of RA patients.A micrometer measurement apparatus that can adjust arbitrary joint space width (JSW) in a phantom joint was developed to define true JSW. The phantom was scanned with radiography, 320 multi detector CT (MDCT), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT), cone beam CT (CBCT), and tomosynthesis. The width was adjusted to the average size of a women's metacarpophalangeal joint, from 1.2 to 2.2 mm with increments of 0.1 mm and 0.01 mm. Radiographical images were analyzed by the POC-based system and manual method, and images from various tomographical modalities were measured via the automatic margin detection method. Correlation coefficients between true JSW difference and measured JSW difference were all strong at 0.1 mm intervals with radiography (POC-based system and manual method), CBCT, 320MDCT, HR-pQCT, and tomosynthesis. At 0.01 mm intervals, radiography (POC-based system), 320MDCT, and HR-pQCT had strong correlations, while radiography (manual method) and CBCT had low correlations, and tomosynthesis had no statistically significant correlation. The smallest detectable changes for radiography (POC-based system), radiography (manual method), 320MDCT, HR-pQCT, CBCT, and tomosynthesis were 0.020 mm, 0.041 mm, 0.076 mm, 0.077 mm, 0.057 mm, and 0.087 mm, respectively. We conclude that radiography analyzed with the POC-based system might sensitively detect minute joint space changes of the finger joint.
Collapse
|
40
|
Hetland ML, Haavardsholm EA, Rudin A, Nordström D, Nurmohamed M, Gudbjornsson B, Lampa J, Hørslev-Petersen K, Uhlig T, Grondal G, Østergaard M, Heiberg MS, Twisk J, Lend K, Krabbe S, Hyldstrup LH, Lindqvist J, Hultgård Ekwall AK, Grøn KL, Kapetanovic M, Faustini F, Tuompo R, Lorenzen T, Cagnotto G, Baecklund E, Hendricks O, Vedder D, Sokka-Isler T, Husmark T, Ljoså MKA, Brodin E, Ellingsen T, Söderbergh A, Rizk M, Olsson ÅR, Larsson P, Uhrenholt L, Just SA, Stevens DJ, Laurberg TB, Bakland G, Olsen IC, van Vollenhoven R. Active conventional treatment and three different biological treatments in early rheumatoid arthritis: phase IV investigator initiated, randomised, observer blinded clinical trial. BMJ 2020; 371:m4328. [PMID: 33268527 PMCID: PMC7708829 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI≤2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and -0.6% (-10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT2011-004720-35, NCT01491815.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anna Rudin
- Rheumatology Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dan Nordström
- Division of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Michael Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Jon Lampa
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Till Uhlig
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gerdur Grondal
- Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marte S Heiberg
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jos Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kristina Lend
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Simon Krabbe
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lise Hejl Hyldstrup
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joakim Lindqvist
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Hultgård Ekwall
- Rheumatology Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kathrine Lederballe Grøn
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE) and DANBIO, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Meliha Kapetanovic
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden
| | - Francesca Faustini
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Riitta Tuompo
- Division of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tove Lorenzen
- Department of Rheumatology, Silkeborg University Clinic, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Giovanni Cagnotto
- Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Eva Baecklund
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | - Daisy Vedder
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Netherlands
| | - Tuulikki Sokka-Isler
- Department of Medicine and University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Tomas Husmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Falu Hospital, Falun, Sweden
| | | | - Eli Brodin
- Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Torkell Ellingsen
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Southern University of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Annika Söderbergh
- Department of Rheumatology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Milad Rizk
- Rheumatology Clinic, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås, Sweden
| | | | - Per Larsson
- Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Line Uhrenholt
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Søren Andreas Just
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Svendborg Hospital OUH, Denmark
| | - David John Stevens
- Department of Rheumatology, St Olav's Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Gunnstein Bakland
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Inge C Olsen
- Department of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Ronald van Vollenhoven
- Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Center for Molecular Medicine (CMM), Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Weiss PF, Chauvin NA. Imaging in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis in children. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2020; 34:101596. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
42
|
Traditional and modern management strategies for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 512:142-155. [PMID: 33186593 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious disorder of the joints affecting 1 or 2% of the population aged between 20 and 50 years worldwide. RA is the foremost cause of disability in developing and Western populations. It is an autoimmune disease-causing inflammation and pain involving synovial joints. Pro-inflammatory markers, including cytokines, such as interleukin -1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are involved in RA. RA treatment involves TNF-α blockade, B cell therapy, IL-1 and IL-6 blockade, and angiogenesis inhibition. Synthetic drugs available for the treatment of RA include disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), such as cyclophosphamide, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and intramuscular gold. These agents induce adverse hepatorenal effects, hypertension, and gastric ulcers. We found that patients diagnosed with chronic pain, as in RA, and those refractory to contemporary management are most likely to seek traditional medicine. Approximately 60-90% of patients with arthritis use traditional medicines. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of these traditional medicines need to be established. The treatment for RA entails a comprehensive multidisciplinary strategy to reduce pain and inflammation and to restore the activity of joints. The potential medicinal plants exhibiting anti-arthritic and anti-rheumatic pharmacological activity are reviewed here.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cai B, Kasikara C. TAM receptors and their ligand-mediated activation: Role in atherosclerosis. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2020; 357:21-33. [PMID: 33234243 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
TAM family tyrosine kinase receptors including Tyro3, Axl, and MerTK are the key efferocytosis receptors presenting on antigen-presenting cell that mediate the clearance of apoptotic cells. They are thought to regulate inflammatory diseases by modulating inflammatory response and efferocytosis. Recent studies have revealed novel roles of TAM receptors in the biosynthesis of specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) and inflammation resolution. In this chapter, we discuss the central roles of TAM signaling in atherosclerosis focusing on their regulation in efferocytosis and inflammation resolution and highlight the unique therapeutic potential of SPMs in blocking the progression of atherosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bishuang Cai
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Canan Kasikara
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rezk MF, Pieper B. Unlocking the Value of Anti-TNF Biosimilars: Reducing Disease Burden and Improving Outcomes in Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Narrative Review. Adv Ther 2020; 37:3732-3745. [PMID: 32740789 PMCID: PMC7444394 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01437-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are chronic conditions that create a significant disease burden on millions of patients while adding a major financial burden to societies and healthcare systems. The introduction of biologic medicines has contributed majorly to improving the clinical outcomes of IMIDs and as such these modalities have gained first- or second-line positions in a wide range of treatment guidelines from different international clinical societies. However, the high cost of these biologics traditionally limited their accessibility and delayed their initiation, leaving millions of patients with unmet medical needs for a more affordable and sustainable solution. The introduction of cost-efficient biosimilar anti-TNFs within Europe since 2013 has allowed more patients with IMIDs to access biologic therapies earlier and for longer, potentially altering the course of the disease into a milder phenotype and reducing the long-term disease burden. This review provides the latest evidence for the impact of biosimilars on patient outcomes and demonstrates their clinical value beyond a reduction in price.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mourad F Rezk
- Biogen International GmbH, Neuhofstrasse 30, 6340, Baar, Switzerland.
| | - Burkhard Pieper
- Biogen International GmbH, Neuhofstrasse 30, 6340, Baar, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Whilst extremely efficacious, the original TNFi also carried a high acquisition cost that limited their use. 'Biosimilar' TNFi's, developed on expiry of the patents for the biooriginators, have comparable efficacy and safety, are less expensive and provide the potential to improve access to these effective therapies in a more cost-effective manner. AREAS COVERED The background and development of TNFis, their biosimilars and follow on 'copycat' drugs are discussed, together with their use in both developed and developing countries, focusing on the potential to enhance access to effective targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION Bridging the economic gap to facilitate universal access to anti-TNF biosimilars has been largely unsuccessful, driving the development of copycat mimics in developing countries. Meanwhile, the more recent introduction of targeted synthetic disease-modifying drugs has provided cheaper, equally effective treatments for rheumatic diseases that are conveniently delivered by mouth. We review the TNF biosimilars in rheumatic diseases, their role in a rapidly evolving treatment landscape, and speculate about the future for this iconic therapeutic class.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinalini Dey
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Centre, Aintree Hospital , Liverpool, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, UK
| | - Sizheng Steven Zhao
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Centre, Aintree Hospital , Liverpool, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert J Moots
- Department of Rheumatology, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool, UK.,Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University Ormskirk, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kawashiri SY, Shimizu T, Sato S, Morimoto S, Kawazoe Y, Sumiyoshi R, Hosogaya N, Fukushima C, Yamamoto H, Kawakami A. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving clinical remission (the IFX-SIRIUS study I): Study protocol for an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm and noninferiority clinical trial with clinical, ultrasound, and biomarker assessments. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e21151. [PMID: 32791688 PMCID: PMC7387067 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000021151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) into clinical practice has dramatically improve the clinical outcomes of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, bDMARDs are associated with high costs, which has resulted in restricted treatment access and a burden on medical insurance finances. Although biosimilars offer cost-saving, their effectiveness and safety must be established in Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS). Infliximab (IFX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to TNF-alpha, is the first bDMARD; its biosimilar, CT-P13, is the first biosimilar DMARD approved for RA treatment in Japan. We will evaluate whether switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 is not inferior for maintaining non-clinical relapse to continued treatment with originator IFX in RA patients achieving clinical remission. METHODS/DESIGN This study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm against historical control and noninferiority clinical trial with a 24-week follow-up. Eighty RA patients who are treated by originator IFX for ≥24 weeks and are achieving clinical remission will be included. Patients will be switched to CT-P13 with the unchanged dosing regimen. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the ratio of patients who experience a nonclinical relapse during the study period. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from the baseline of the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze the serum levels of many biomarkers such as cytokines and chemokines. DISCUSSION The study results are expected to show the noninferiority of switching to CT-P13 over the continuation of originator IFX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices but also MSUS to accurately and objectively evaluate disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will explore whether parameters at baseline can predict a nonclinical relapse after switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 by integrating multilateral assessments, i.e., clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) on October 11, 2019 as jRCTs071190030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-ya Kawashiri
- Departments of1Community Medicine
- Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
| | - Toshimasa Shimizu
- Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital
| | - Shuntaro Sato
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital
| | - Shimpei Morimoto
- Innovation Platform & Office for Precision Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Remi Sumiyoshi
- Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital
| | | | | | | | - Atsushi Kawakami
- Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
- Innovation Platform & Office for Precision Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mellors T, Withers JB, Ameli A, Jones A, Wang M, Zhang L, Sanchez HN, Santolini M, Do Valle I, Sebek M, Cheng F, Pappas DA, Kremer JM, Curtis JR, Johnson KJ, Saleh A, Ghiassian SD, Akmaev VR. Clinical Validation of a Blood-Based Predictive Test for Stratification of Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. NETWORK AND SYSTEMS MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.1089/nsm.2020.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Asher Ameli
- Scipher Medicine, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alex Jones
- Scipher Medicine, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Lixia Zhang
- Scipher Medicine, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Marc Santolini
- Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Italo Do Valle
- Center for Complex Network Research, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Sebek
- Center for Complex Network Research, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Feixiong Cheng
- Center for Complex Network Research, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dimitrios A. Pappas
- Division of Rheumatology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- CORRONA, LCC, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel M. Kremer
- CORRONA, LCC, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
- Albany Medical College, The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Jeffery R. Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Alif Saleh
- Scipher Medicine, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020; 33:33/3/e00035-19. [PMID: 32522746 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00035-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Ghembaza A, Vautier M, Cacoub P, Pourcher V, Saadoun D. Risk Factors and Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients With Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases. Chest 2020; 158:2323-2332. [PMID: 32502592 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases (AIIDs) are prone to serious infectious complications such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). In non-HIV patients, the prognosis is poorer, and diagnostic tests are of lower sensitivity. Given the low incidence of PJP in AIIDs, with the exception of granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and the non-negligible side effects of chemoprophylaxis, routine prescription of primary prophylaxis is still debated. Absolute peripheral lymphopenia, high doses of corticosteroids, combination with other immunosuppressive agents, and concomitant lung disease are strong predictors for the development of PJP and thus should warrant primary prophylaxis. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is considered first-line therapy and is the most extensively used drug for PJP prophylaxis. Nevertheless, it may expose patients to side effects. Effective alternative drugs such as atovaquone or aerosolized pentamidine could be used when trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is not tolerated or contraindicated. No standard guidelines are available to guide PJP prophylaxis in patients with AIIDs. This review covers the epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of pneumocystis in the context of AIIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amine Ghembaza
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre national de références Maladies Autoimmunes systémiques rares et Centre national de références Maladies Autoinflammatoires et amylose inflammatoire; Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 6, INSERM, UMR S 959, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Vautier
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre national de références Maladies Autoimmunes systémiques rares et Centre national de références Maladies Autoinflammatoires et amylose inflammatoire; Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 6, INSERM, UMR S 959, Paris, France
| | - Patrice Cacoub
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre national de références Maladies Autoimmunes systémiques rares et Centre national de références Maladies Autoinflammatoires et amylose inflammatoire; Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 6, INSERM, UMR S 959, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Pourcher
- Service des maladies infectieuses et tropicales, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; INSERM UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - David Saadoun
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre national de références Maladies Autoimmunes systémiques rares et Centre national de références Maladies Autoinflammatoires et amylose inflammatoire; Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (I3), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 6, INSERM, UMR S 959, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|