1
|
Blackburn AZ, Katakam A, Amakiri I, Mittal A, Bedair HS, Melnic CM. MCID achievement in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: Are both joints created equal? Knee 2024; 50:1-8. [PMID: 39089103 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A notable portion of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients undergo arthroplasty of the contralateral knee. The aims of this study were to describe the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in staged bilateral TKAs (BTKAs) and identify factors associated with these outcomes. METHODS Patients with staged BTKA were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgery details, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF10a) were collected. MCID-I and MCID-W were defined for PROMIS PF10a. Patients were stratified into nine groups based on the MCID achievement of the first and second TKA: (A) MCID-I, MCID- I, (B) MCID-I, Neutral, (C) MCID-I, MCID-W, (D) Neutral, MCID-I, (E) Neutral, Neutral, (F) Neutral, MCID-W, (G) MCID- W, MCID-I, (H) MCID-W, Neutral, (I) MCID-W, MCID-W. Neutral patients did not achieve either MCID-I or MCID-W. RESULTS The final cohort consisted of 59 staged BTKA patients. In patients who achieved MCID-I in the first TKA, 39.1% achieved MCID-I again in the second TKA (A), 39.1% were neutral (B), and 21.7% achieved MCID-W (C) in the second TKA. However, 77.8% of those who achieved MCID-W in the first joint (n = 9) went on to achieve MCID-I (G) in the second TKA. Those who achieved MCID-I after both TKAs (A) had a longer staged interval than those who achieved first MCID-I, then MCID-W (C) (15 months vs 8 months, P = 0.0113). CONCLUSION In staged BTKA, MCID achievement of the first TKA may not be associated with the outcome of the second TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Z Blackburn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| | - Akhil Katakam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| | - Ikechukwu Amakiri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ashish Mittal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| | - Hany S Bedair
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| | - Christopher M Melnic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
You DS, Chong JL, Mackey SC, Poupore-King H. Utilizing a learning health system to capture real-world patient data: Application of the reliable change index to evaluate and improve the outcome of a pain rehabilitation program. Pain Pract 2024; 24:856-865. [PMID: 38465804 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The learning healthcare system (LHS) has been developed to integrate patients' clinical data into clinical decisions and improve treatment outcomes. Having little guidance on this integration process, we aim to explain (a) an applicable analytic tool for clinicians to evaluate the clinical outcomes at a group and an individual level and (b) our quality improvement (QI) project, analyzing the outcomes of a new outpatient pain rehabilitation program ("Back-in-Action": BIA) and applying the analysis results to modify our clinical practice. METHODS Through our LHS (CHOIR; https://choir.stanford.edu), we administered the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMIS)® before and after BIA. After searching for appropriate analytic tools, we decided to use the Reliable Change Index (RCI) to determine if an observed change in the direction of better (improvement) or worse (deterioration) would be beyond or within the measurement error (no change). RESULTS Our RCI calculations revealed that at least a 9-point decrease in the PCS scores and 10-point increase in the CPAQ scores would indicate reliable improvement. RCIs for the PROMIS measures ranged from 5 to 8 T-score points (i.e., 0.5-0.8 SD). When evaluating change scores of the PCS, CPAQ, and PROMIS measures, we found that 94% of patients showed improvement in at least one domain after BIA and 6% showed no reliable improvement. CONCLUSIONS Our QI project revealed RCI as a useful tool to evaluate treatment outcomes at a group and an individual level, and RCI could be incorporated into the LHS to generate a progress report automatically for clinicians. We further explained how clinicians could use RCI results to modify a clinical practice, to improve the outcomes of a pain program, and to develop individualized care plans. Lastly, we suggested future research areas to improve the LHS application in pain practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jeanette L Chong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Steiner Q, Watson AM, Mosiman SJ, Spiker AM. Association Between Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression, Hip Pathology, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:1728-1734. [PMID: 38771945 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241252821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), mental health has been implicated in both symptom severity and postoperative outcomes. However, there are limited data regarding the independent influences of baseline mental health and hip pathology on patient-reported outcomes over time after hip arthroscopy. PURPOSE To evaluate the association between mental health and structural hip pathology with pain, hip function, and quality of life (QOL). STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Patient records from a single surgeon's hip outcomes registry were retrospectively reviewed. Mental health was evaluated using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety and Depression scores. Pain was evaluated with the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score for Activities of Daily Living (SANE-ADL), while hip-related QOL was evaluated with the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Hip function was assessed with the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sport-Specific (SS) and ADL subscales. Separate mixed models were used to predict pain, QOL, and hip function, including hip pathology measures (size of labral tear, grade of chondral damage, preoperative alpha angle), anxiety, depression, and time as fixed effects and individuals as a random effect. RESULTS A total of 312 patients were included in this study. The preoperative alpha angle, degree of intraoperative cartilage damage, and size of the labral tear were not associated with pain or QOL (P > .05 for all). However, higher levels of anxiety and depression were significantly associated with lower SANE-ADL scores (estimate ± SE) (anxiety: -0.59 ± 0.07, P < .0001; depression: -0.64 ± 0.08, P < .0001), iHOT-12 scores (anxiety: -0.72 ± 0.07, P < .0001; depression: -0.72 ± 0.08, P < .0001), HOS-SS scores (anxiety: -0.68 ± 0.09, P < .0001; depression: -0.57 ± 0.10, P < .0001), and HOS-ADL scores (anxiety: -0.43 ± 0.05, P < .0001; depression: -0.43 ± 0.06, P < .0001). CONCLUSION Patients had similar improvements in pain scores, QOL, and hip function after hip arthroscopy for FAI irrespective of their degree of hip pathology. Additionally, preoperative symptoms of anxiety and depression symptoms were associated with greater pain, decreased QOL, and worse hip function both pre- and postoperatively, independent of the degree of hip pathology. This suggests that efforts to directly address symptoms of anxiety and depression may improve outcomes after hip arthroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quinn Steiner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Andrew M Watson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Samuel J Mosiman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Andrea M Spiker
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barr A, Moore K, Flegge LG, Atsaphanthong E, Kirby KE, Craner JR. Predictors of sexual satisfaction among patients with chronic pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 5:1375546. [PMID: 38638533 PMCID: PMC11024270 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1375546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Sexual satisfaction is an important aspect of quality of life. Chronic pain, depression and anxiety, and relational problems correspond with higher risk for sexual difficulties. Less is known about how risk factors for sexual dysfunction and other problems-such as medical conditions, pain severity, and medication side effects-affect the sexual satisfaction of people with chronic pain. Using a biopsychosocial framework, this study explored factors related to sexual satisfaction among patients presenting for evaluation of chronic pain. Methods Researchers used a hierarchical multiple regression analysis to model potential predictors of sexual satisfaction. Variables analyzed were demographic features, medical history, average pain severity, depressed mood, anxiety, and perceived significant other support. Data collection involved administration of retrospective questionnaires and chart review. The sample included male and female participants (N = 134) presenting for evaluation at a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation clinic. Results Medical history (i.e., medical conditions, surgical history, and medications) and clinical self-report variables (i.e., pain severity, depressed mood, anxiety, and perceived significant other support) were associated with sexual satisfaction. In this sample, antidepressant use and higher pain severity were unique predictors of lower sexual satisfaction. Married marital status and higher levels of perceived significant other support were predictive of greater sexual satisfaction. Discussion Findings highlight the importance of understanding the unique impact of biopsychosocial variables on the sexual satisfaction of patients presenting for evaluation at a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation clinic. Further exploration of protective factors that account for sexual satisfaction among individuals with chronic pain may help inform screening, referrals, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aex Barr
- Pain Rehabilitation Program, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Kayla Moore
- Pain Rehabilitation Program, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Lindsay G. Flegge
- Pain Rehabilitation Program, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Emily Atsaphanthong
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Krissa E. Kirby
- Pain Rehabilitation Program, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Julia R. Craner
- Pain Rehabilitation Program, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma NK, Li H, Aoyagi K, Ritchey S, Mohr E, Burton DC, Arnold PM, Colgrove Y. Tailored Yoga Intervention for Postlumbar Spine Surgical Pain Management: A Feasibility Study. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE 2024. [PMID: 38513063 DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Severe pain, anxiety, and high opioid use are common following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). Yoga helps to reduce pain and anxiety, but it has not been considered for postsurgical care. The authors developed and tested the feasibility of a tailored yoga program designed for individuals undergoing LSS and explored clinical feasibility of yoga intervention on measures of pain, function, psychological status, and opioid use. Methods: Individuals scheduled for LSS were randomized into yoga versus control groups presurgery. Participants in the yoga group received tailored yoga sessions plus usual care, whereas participants in the control group received usual care only during the hospital stay post-LSS. In-person daily yoga sessions were individually presented and performed in the participant's hospital room. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, rate of yoga session completion, tolerance to yoga intervention, and ability to carry out planned assessment. Exploratory clinical outcomes included pain, psychological measures, Timed-Up-and-Go test, gait distance, and opioid use, during the hospital stay post-LSS. Results: Forty-one participants were enrolled, of which 30 completed. There were no dropouts. Planned assessments were completed within 45 min, suggesting no excessive burden on participants. Baseline variables were similar across both groups. The majority of participants participated in yoga intervention on the day of surgery or one day after surgery with acceptance rate of 100%. Participants showed good tolerance to yoga intervention on 0-4 tolerance scale and by their reports of exploratory clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This study indicates feasibility for a modified yoga program for postoperative care following LSS due to participant tolerance and retention. The results provide preliminary framework for future confirmatory studies that can assess the potential benefits of yoga in reducing pain, catastrophizing behavior, and opioid use and improving function. A modified yoga program focusing on diaphragmatic breathing, relaxation, and core isometric contraction exercises can be an important adjunct intervention for patients undergoing LSS. CTR Number: This trial was registered in UMIN CTR (https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/) with registration number: UMIN000032595.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neena K Sharma
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Haiyin Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kosaku Aoyagi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Movement Science, College of Health Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Shannon Ritchey
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Elisa Mohr
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yvonne Colgrove
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science and Athletic Training, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cross WW, Tomov MN, Hung MY, Muir JM. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Computed Tomography Review After Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint With Aggressive Joint Decortication and Joint Compression. Orthopedics 2024; 47:101-107. [PMID: 37672779 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230901-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common, underrecognized source of low back pain. We evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) using a novel, minimally invasive SIJF system emphasizing compressive forces across an aggressively debrided SIJ. We retrospectively reviewed data from a continuous set of patients presenting to a large, tertiary care hospital from September 2017 to August 2019. All patients received the novel SIJF device. Outcomes were assessed at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures, plus radiographic evaluation of fusion status. Data from 75 patients were analyzed. At 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months, the ODI score improved by 10.5 points (P=.002), 17.4 points (P<.0001), and 23.6 points (P<.0001), respectively, while the NRS score improved by 4.6 points (P<.0001), 4.4 points (P<.0001), and 4.6 points (P<.0001), respectively. SANE scores indicated high levels of patient satisfaction (81.0%, 92.18%, and 89.2%, respectively). PROMIS physical function scores improved by 2.65 points, 3.30 points, and 3.63 points, respectively, while PROMIS mental health scores showed changes of -1.93 points, 1.57 points, and -0.47 points, respectively. A review of computed tomography scans demonstrated grade 3 fusion (complete) in 81% of cases at a mean of 371 days postoperatively. There was one revision case for a malpositioned implant. The use of a novel SIJF device emphasizing compressive forces provided early, durable improvements in patient-reported outcomes and extremely high patient satisfaction. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):101-107.].
Collapse
|
7
|
Silva MDC, Woodward AP, Fearon AM, Perriman DM, Spencer TJ, Couldrick JM, Scarvell JM. Minimal clinically important change of knee flexion in people with knee osteoarthritis after non-surgical interventions using a meta-analytical approach. Syst Rev 2024; 13:50. [PMID: 38303000 PMCID: PMC10832130 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimal clinically important change (MCIC) represents the minimum patient-perceived improvement in an outcome after treatment, in an individual or within a group over time. This study aimed to determine MCIC of knee flexion in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions using a meta-analytical approach. METHODS Four databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science and CINAHL) were searched for studies of randomised clinical trials of non-surgical interventions with intervention duration of ≤ 3 months that reported change in (Δ) (mean change between baseline and immediately after the intervention) knee flexion with Δ pain or Δ function measured using tools that have established MCIC values. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Bayesian meta-analytic models were used to determine relationships between Δ flexion with Δ pain and Δ function after non-surgical interventions and MCIC of knee flexion. RESULTS Seventy-two studies (k = 72, n = 5174) were eligible. Meta-analyses included 140 intervention arms (k = 61, n = 4516) that reported Δ flexion with Δ pain using the visual analog scale (pain-VAS) and Δ function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale (function-WOMAC). Linear relationships between Δ pain at rest-VAS (0-100 mm) with Δ flexion were - 0.29 (- 0.44; - 0.15) (β: posterior median (CrI: credible interval)). Relationships between Δ pain during activity VAS and Δ flexion were - 0.29 (- 0.41, - 0.18), and Δ pain-general VAS and Δ flexion were - 0.33 (- 0.42, - 0.23). The relationship between Δ function-WOMAC (out of 100) and Δ flexion was - 0.15 (- 0.25, - 0.07). Increased Δ flexion was associated with decreased Δ pain-VAS and increased Δ function-WOMAC. The point estimates for MCIC of knee flexion ranged from 3.8 to 6.4°. CONCLUSIONS The estimated knee flexion MCIC values from this study are the first to be reported using a novel meta-analytical method. The novel meta-analytical method may be useful to estimate MCIC for other measures where anchor questions are problematic. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022323927.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Denika C Silva
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.
- Department of Physiotherapy, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
| | - Andrew P Woodward
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
| | - Angela M Fearon
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Diana M Perriman
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Trevor J Spencer
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Jacqui M Couldrick
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Jennie M Scarvell
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Edlund MJ, Thomas SM, Wagner LK, Thompson JE, Wu LT, Dolor RJ, Chelminski PR, Ives TJ, Archer KR, Dewey CM, Sullivan MD, McCormack LA. Design of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial comparing the effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for voluntary opioid tapering: The INSPIRE study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 137:107410. [PMID: 38092285 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes the design and protocol of a pragmatic, randomized trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain for the voluntary tapering of opioid dose in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Integrated Services for Pain: Interventions to Reduce Pain Effectively (INSPIRE) is a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at three academic health centers in the southeastern United States. Participants are adults receiving long-term opioid therapy of at least 20 morphine milligram equivalents daily for chronic noncancer pain. METHODS Participants were randomized to either the shared decision-making intervention or the motivational interviewing session and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain intervention. All participants also received guideline-concordant care supporting opioid pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome was change from baseline in average daily prescribed opioid dose at 12 months, using prescribing data from electronic health records. Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference and Physical Function at 12 months. CONCLUSION This trial evaluates the comparative effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain for the voluntary tapering of opioid dose in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Results from this study can guide clinicians, researchers, and policymakers as they seek to reduce opioid prescribing and improve management of chronic pain. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03454555 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03454555). Participant enrollment began on June 26, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Edlund
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | - Sonia M Thomas
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | - Laura K Wagner
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | | | - Li-Tzy Wu
- Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | | | - Paul R Chelminski
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| | - Timothy J Ives
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| | - Kristin R Archer
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
| | - Charlene M Dewey
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gill JK, Pucci M, Samudio A, Ahmed T, Siddiqui R, Edwards N, Marticorena RM, Donnelly S, Lok C, Wentlandt K, Wolofsky K, Mucsi I. Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms Response Tool (SUPPORT-dialysis): systematic symptom assessment and management in patients on in-centre haemodialysis - a parallel arm, non-randomised feasibility pilot study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080712. [PMID: 38296283 PMCID: PMC10828879 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with kidney failure experience symptoms that are often under-recognised and undermanaged. These symptoms negatively impact health-related quality of life and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Regular symptom assessment, using electronic patient reported outcomes measure (ePROMs) linked to systematic symptom management, could improve such outcomes. Clinical implementation of ePROMs have been successful in routine oncology care, but not used for patients on dialysis. In this study, we describe a pilot study of ePROM-based systematic symptom monitoring and management intervention in patients treated with in-centre haemodialysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a parallel-arm, controlled pilot of adult patients receiving in-centre maintenance haemodialysis. Participants in the intervention arm will complete ePROMs once a month for 6 months. ePROMs will be scored real time and the results will be shared with participants and with the clinical team. Moderate-severe symptoms will be flagged using established cut-off scores. Referral options for those symptoms will be shared with the clinical team, and additional symptom management resources will also be provided for both participants and clinicians. Participants in the control arm will be recruited at a different dialysis unit, to prevent contamination. They will receive usual care, except that they will complete ePROMs without the presentation of results to participants of the clinical team. The primary objectives of the pilot are to assess (1) the feasibility of a larger, randomised clinical effectiveness trial and (2) the acceptability of the intervention. Interviews conducted with participants and staff will be assessed using a content analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University Health Network (REB#21-5199) and the William Osler Health System (#23-0005). All study procedures will be conducted in accordance with the standards of University Health Network research ethics board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Results of this study will be shared with participants, patients on dialysis and other stakeholders using lay language summaries, oral presentations to patients and nephrology professionals. We will also be publishing the results in a peer-reviewed journal and at scientific meetings. PROTOCOL VERSION 4 (16 November 2022). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05515991.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasleen Kaur Gill
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto-St George Campus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Multi-organ Transplant, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Pucci
- Multi-organ Transplant, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ana Samudio
- Multi-organ Transplant, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tibyan Ahmed
- Multi-organ Transplant, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Rosa M Marticorena
- Nephrology Program, Sir William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra Donnelly
- Nephrology Program, Sir William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charmaine Lok
- Division of Nephrology, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kayla Wolofsky
- Department of Supportive Care, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Medicine, Multiorgan Transplant Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mani R, Adhia DB, Awatere S, Gray AR, Mathew J, Wilson LC, Still A, Jackson D, Hudson B, Zeidan F, Fillingim R, De Ridder D. Self-regulation training for people with knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a feasibility randomised control trial (MiNT trial). FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 4:1271839. [PMID: 38269396 PMCID: PMC10806808 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1271839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain condition resulting in disability, reduced quality of life, and high societal costs. Pain associated with knee OA is linked to increased sensitivity in sensory, cognitive, and emotional areas of the brain. Self-regulation training targeting brain functioning related to pain experience could reduce pain and its associated disability. Self-regulatory treatments such as mindfulness meditation (MM) and electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG-NF) training improve clinical outcomes in people with knee OA. A feasibility clinical trial can address factors that could inform the design of the full trial investigating the effectiveness of self-regulation training programmes in people with knee OA. This clinical trial will evaluate the feasibility, safety, acceptability, experience and perceptions of the self-regulatory training programmes. Methods The proposed feasibility trial is based on a double-blind (outcome assessor and investigators), three-arm (MM usual care, EEG-NF + usual care and usual care control group) randomised controlled parallel clinical trial. Participants with knee OA will be recruited from the community and healthcare practices. A research assistant (RA) will administer both interventions (20-min sessions, four sessions each week, and 12 sessions over three successive weeks). Feasibility measures (participant recruitment rate, adherence to interventions, retention rate), safety, and acceptability of interventions will be recorded. An RA blinded to the group allocation will record secondary outcomes at baseline, immediately post-intervention (4th week), and 3 months post-intervention. The quantitative outcome measures will be descriptively summarised. The qualitative interviews will evaluate the participants' experiences and perceptions regarding various aspects of the trial, which includes identifying the barriers and facilitators in participating in the trial, evaluating their opinions on the research procedures, such as their preferences for the study site, and determining the level of acceptability of the interventions as potential clinical treatments for managing knee OA. Māori participant perceptions of how assessment and training practices could be acceptable to a Māori worldview will be explored. The interviews will be audio-recorded and analysed thematically. Discussion This trial will provide evidence on the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of the MM and EEG-NF training in people with knee OA, thus informing the design of a full randomised clinical control trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramakrishnan Mani
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Divya Bharatkumar Adhia
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sharon Awatere
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- The Health Boutique, Napier, New Zealand
| | | | - Jerin Mathew
- Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Amanda Still
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - David Jackson
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ben Hudson
- Department of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Fadel Zeidan
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Roger Fillingim
- Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goodyear EG, O'Brien AL, West JM, Huayllani MT, Huffman AC, Souza JM, Schulz SA, Moore AM. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:154-163. [PMID: 37199690 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective technique for the prevention and management of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) among amputees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptomatic neuroma recurrence and neuropathic pain outcomes between cohorts undergoing TMR at the time of amputation (ie, acute) versus TMR following symptomatic neuroma formation (ie, delayed). METHODS A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review was conducted using patients undergoing TMR between 2015 and 2020. Symptomatic neuroma recurrence and surgical complications were collected. A subanalysis was conducted for patients who completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, interference, and behavior scales and an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) form. RESULTS A total of 105 limbs from 103 patients were identified, with 73 acute TMR limbs and 32 delayed TMR limbs. Nineteen percent of the delayed TMR group had symptomatic neuromas recur in the distribution of original TMR compared with 1% of the acute TMR group ( P < 0.05). Pain surveys were completed at final follow-up by 85% of patients in the acute TMR group and 69% of patients in the delayed TMR group. Of this subanalysis, acute TMR patients reported significantly lower PLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05), RLP PROMIS pain intensity ( P < 0.05), and RLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05) scores in comparison to the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent acute TMR reported improved pain scores and a decreased rate of neuroma formation compared with TMR performed in a delayed fashion. These results highlight the promising role of TMR in the prevention of neuropathic pain and neuroma formation at the time of amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn G Goodyear
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Andrew L O'Brien
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Julie M West
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Maria T Huayllani
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Allison C Huffman
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Jason M Souza
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | | | - Amy M Moore
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Darnall BD, Burns JW, Hong J, Roy A, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Ziadni MS, You DS, Jung C, Cook KF, Lorig K, Tian L, Mackey SC. Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial. Pain Rep 2024; 9:e1116. [PMID: 38288134 PMCID: PMC10824382 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We previously conducted a 3-arm randomized trial (263 adults with chronic low back pain) which compared group-based (1) single-session pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief; ER); (2) 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic back pain; and (3) single-session health and back pain education class (HE). Results suggested non-inferiority of ER vs. CBT at 3 months post-treatment on an array of outcomes. Methods Here, we tested the durability of treatment effects at 6 months post-treatment. We examined group differences in primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months and the degree to which outcomes eroded or improved from 3-month to 6-month within each treatment group. Results Empowered Relief remained non-inferior to CBT on most outcomes, whereas both ER and CBT remained superior to HE on most outcomes. Outcome improvements within ER did not decrease significantly from 3-month to 6-month, and indeed ER showed additional 3- to 6-month improvements on pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness, and anxiety. Effects of ER at 6 months post-treatment (moderate term outcomes) kept pace with effects reported by participants who underwent 8-session CBT. Conclusions The maintenance of these absolute levels implies strong stability of ER effects. Results extend to 6 months post-treatment previous findings documenting that ER and CBT exhibit similarly potent effects on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John W. Burns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Juliette Hong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Anuradha Roy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Slater
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Dokyoung S. You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Corinne Jung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Kate Lorig
- Department of Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science and (by courtesy) Statistics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sean C. Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Falowski SM, Raso LJ, Mangal V, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Danko MD, Justiz R, Vogel RS, Koga S, Josephson Y, Pope JE, Raji OR. Early Functional Outcomes in Low Back Pain Subjects with a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device: REFINE Study 6-Month Results. J Pain Res 2023; 16:4113-4126. [PMID: 38058981 PMCID: PMC10697144 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s427407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lumbar interlaminar decompression with interspinous fixation is an established safe and effective treatment for spinal stenosis. Early maintenance of improvements in pain intensity and function are critical for durability of symptom relief. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of minimally invasive treatments for low back pain during the early period after treatment and their utility in setting the course for longer term success. Patients and Methods This study utilized patient evaluations at 3- and 6-months following treatment and is part of an actively enrolling, institutional review board (IRB) approved, single-arm, multicenter, prospective, open-label 12-month study. Clinical efficacy was assessed primarily using the change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the back and leg pain during walking and standing, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and secondarily using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1. The safety endpoints were the adverse events and reoperations or revisions at the index level(s). Results At 6-month post-op, 76%, 62%-64%, and 64% of patients demonstrated clinical meaningful, and statistically significant improvement in their pain as defined by ZCQ, VAS (back and leg), and ODI, respectively. In addition, 78% of patients noted improvement in PGIC. Two procedure-related adverse events were noted which fully resolved without surgical intervention. Conclusion This 6-month interim analysis at 42% enrollment of patients was conducted to determine prolonged safety and efficacy of the interspinous fusion device. Our analysis showed a sustained improvement in clinical efficacy, and safety endpoints, when compared to the 3-months evaluations, across both interventional pain and neurosurgery specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Falowski
- Argires-Marotti Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | | | - Vipul Mangal
- National Spine and Pain Centers, Oxon Hill, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rainer S Vogel
- Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management, Henderson, NV, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wasser JG, Hendershot BD, Acasio JC, Dodd LD, Krupenevich RL, Pruziner AL, Miller RH, Goldman SM, Valerio MS, Senchak LT, Murphey MD, Heltzel DA, Fazio MG, Dearth CL, Hager NA. Exploring relationships among multi-disciplinary assessments for knee joint health in service members with traumatic unilateral lower limb loss: a two-year longitudinal investigation. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21177. [PMID: 38040780 PMCID: PMC10692131 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48662-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Motivated by the complex and multifactorial etiologies of osteoarthritis, here we use a comprehensive approach evaluating knee joint health after unilateral lower limb loss. Thirty-eight male Service members with traumatic, unilateral lower limb loss (mean age = 38 yr) participated in a prospective, two-year longitudinal study comprehensively evaluating contralateral knee joint health (i.e., clinical imaging, gait biomechanics, physiological biomarkers, and patient-reported outcomes); seventeen subsequently returned for a two-year follow-up visit. For this subset with baseline and follow-up data, outcomes were compared between timepoints, and associations evaluated between values at baseline with two-year changes in tri-compartmental joint space. Upon follow-up, knee joint health worsened, particularly among seven Service members who presented at baseline with no joint degeneration (KL = 0) but returned with evidence of degeneration (KL ≥ 1). Joint space narrowing was associated with greater patellar tilt (r[12] = 0.71, p = 0.01), external knee adduction moment (r[13] = 0.64, p = 0.02), knee adduction moment impulse (r[13] = 0.61, p = 0.03), and CTX-1 concentration (r[11] = 0.83, p = 0.001), as well as lesser KOOSSport and VR-36General Health (r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01 and r[16] = - 0.69, p = 0.01, respectively). This longitudinal, multi-disciplinary investigation highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to evaluate the fast-progressing onset of knee osteoarthritis, particularly among relatively young Service members with lower limb loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G Wasser
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brad D Hendershot
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Julian C Acasio
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Lauren D Dodd
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L Krupenevich
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alison L Pruziner
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - Ross H Miller
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Stephen M Goldman
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael S Valerio
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lien T Senchak
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark D Murphey
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David A Heltzel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael G Fazio
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Dearth
- Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Research and Surveillance Section, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Research and Engineering Directorate, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nelson A Hager
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nielsen C, Merrell D, Reichenbach R, Mayolo P, Qubain L, Hustedt JW. An Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Usage in Hand Surgery. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5490. [PMID: 38111720 PMCID: PMC10727676 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Background This study was designed to examine the current use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculations in the hand surgery literature in an effort to standardize their use for research purposes. Methods A systematic review of the hand surgery literature was conducted. All nonshoulder upper extremity articles utilizing PROMs were compared between different journals, different surgical indications, and differing usage. MCID values were reported, and calculation methods assessed. Results In total, 4677 articles were reviewed, and 410 met the inclusion criteria of containing at least one PROM. Of the 410 articles reporting PROMs, 148 also mentioned an associated MCID. Of the articles that mentioned MCIDs, 14 calculated MCID values based on their specific clinical populations, whereas the remainder referenced prior studies. An estimated 35 different PROMs were reported in the study period; 95 different MCID values were referenced from 65 unique articles. Conclusions There are many different PROMs currently being used in hand surgery clinical reports. The reported MCIDs from their related PROMs are from multiple different sources and calculated by different methods. The lack of standardization in the hand surgery literature makes interpretation of studies utilizing PROMs difficult. There is a need for a standardized method of calculating MCID values and applying these values to established PROMs for nonshoulder upper extremity conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colby Nielsen
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Dallin Merrell
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Rachel Reichenbach
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Patrick Mayolo
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Leeann Qubain
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| | - Joshua W Hustedt
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Ariz
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Queiroga F, Cross M, Thomas MJ, March L, Epstein J, Guillemin F. A scoping review of patient self-report measures of flare in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA): A report from the OMERACT flares in OA working group. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 63:152281. [PMID: 37948937 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to analyze the content validity/domain match and feasibility of self-report instruments that could measure flare in osteoarthritis (OA), by extending our 2017 literature review on the definition of flare in knee and hip OA. METHOD We searched PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and PsycInfo (Ebsco Host) databases for original articles reporting research about flare (or synonyms) in humans with knee and hip OA, between 2017 and 2023. Four experts worked independently, checking the records, and assessing content validity and feasibility, writing justification for exclusion. RESULTS At literature review phase, 575 papers were filtered. After experts' analysis, 59 studies were included, and 44 instruments associated with flare in OA were identified. Most were studies about pain in knee or hip OA (35 %), cultural adaptation of a measure (33 %) or studies investigating psychometric properties of full (16 %) or short form (4 %) instruments. The assessment of domain match and feasibility revealed that 15 instruments were assigned a label of 'yes' or 'uncertain' as to whether or not there was a good match with the domain concept or whether the instrument was considered feasible to use. DISCUSSION Most identified instruments considered different aspects of pain and the associated discomfort in performing daily activities but did not include the central aspects of flare in OA, i.e. the change of state, nor the additional Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) endorsed domains for OA flare namely stiffness, swelling, psychological aspects, impact of symptoms including fatigue and sleep disturbance. Although it is possible that the period specified to conduct this literature review may have led to some recognized instruments being excluded, this review demonstrates the need for the research community to reach consensus on the best way to measure self-reported flares in future clinical trials and observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martin J Thomas
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Lyn March
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research - Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore, Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nasir M, Scott EJ, Westermann RC. Pain Catastrophizing, Kinesiophobia, Stress, Depression, and Poor Resiliency Are Associated With Pain and Dysfunction in the Hip Preservation Population. THE IOWA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL 2023; 43:125-132. [PMID: 38213857 PMCID: PMC10777701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Psychiatric disorders are known to have a negative impact on outcomes attained from hip-preservation surgery. Psychosocial traits such as resiliency and pain avoidance likely also affect treatment outcomes, however these characteristics are less easily identified, and data is lacking supporting their presence and impact on related outcomes within the hip preservation population. We therefore evaluated hip preservation patients for a variety of maladaptive psychosocial traits and assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in order to ascertain which specific traits were most associated with hip pain and dysfunction. Methods 62 subjects aged 15-49 years presenting for evaluation of a nonarthritic hip condition completed psychosocial questionnaires and patient reported outcome measures via electronic survey as listed in table one. Participants were tested again eight weeks later to evaluate the relationship between changes in physical function, pain, and mental health behaviors. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed association between hip PROs and psychosocial tests and analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons. Results Pain Catastrophizing (PCS), Kinesiophobia (TSK), Stress, and PROMIS-Global Mental Health (GMH) scores correlated with poor physical function and high pain scores at zero and eight weeks. Low resiliency (BRS) and depression were also associated with elevated pain on PRO tests as well as HOOS-Physical Function. There was a moderately strong correlation between improvement in PROMIS-Physical Function (PF) from zero to eight weeks and subjects initial scores for kinesiophobia, anxiety, and stress (r= -0.45, -0.41, -0.44, all p<0.05). Conclusion PCS, TSK, Stress, Depression, and low BRS are associated with pain and disability in hip preservation subjects. Elevated TSK, Anxiety and Stress may be predictors of failure to improve with nonoperative treatment. These psychosocial characteristics should be investigated further as predictors of clinical outcomes in the hip preservation population. Level of Evidence: II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Momin Nasir
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Scott
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert C. Westermann
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cheng AL, Agarwal M, Armbrecht MA, Abraham J, Calfee RP, Goss CW. Behavioral Mechanisms That Mediate Mental and Physical Health Improvements in People With Chronic Pain Who Receive a Digital Health Intervention: Prospective Cohort Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e51422. [PMID: 37976097 PMCID: PMC10692879 DOI: 10.2196/51422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preliminary evidence suggests that digital mental health intervention (Wysa for Chronic Pain) can improve mental and physical health in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and coexisting symptoms of depression or anxiety. However, the behavioral mechanisms through which this intervention acts are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify behavioral mechanisms that may mediate changes in mental and physical health associated with use of Wysa for Chronic Pain during orthopedic management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. We hypothesized that improved behavioral activation, pain acceptance, and sleep quality mediate improvements in self-reported mental and physical health. METHODS In this prospective cohort, pilot mediation analysis, adults with chronic (≥3 months) neck or back pain received the Wysa for Chronic Pain digital intervention, which uses a conversational agent and text-based access to human counselors to deliver cognitive behavioral therapy and related therapeutic content. Patient-reported outcomes and proposed mediators were collected at baseline and 1 month. The exposure of interest was participants' engagement (ie, total interactions) with the digital intervention. Proposed mediators were assessed using the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale-Short Form, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, and Athens Insomnia Scale. Outcomes included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, Pain Interference, and Physical Function scores. A mediation analysis was conducted using the Baron and Kenny method, adjusting for age, sex, and baseline mediators and outcome values. P<.20 was considered significant for this pilot study. RESULTS Among 30 patients (mean age 59, SD 14, years; 21 [70%] female), the mediation effect of behavioral activation on the relationship between increased intervention engagement and improved anxiety symptoms met predefined statistical significance thresholds (indirect effect -0.4, 80% CI -0.7 to -0.1; P=.13, 45% of the total effect). The direction of mediation effect was generally consistent with our hypothesis for all other proposed mediator or outcome relationships, as well. CONCLUSIONS In a full-sized randomized controlled trial of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, behavioral activation, pain acceptance, and sleep quality may play an important role in mediating the relationship between use of a digital mental health intervention (Wysa for Chronic Pain) and improved mental and physical health. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05194722; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05194722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L Cheng
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Mansi Agarwal
- Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Melissa A Armbrecht
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Joanna Abraham
- Department of Anesthesiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ryan P Calfee
- Division of Hand and Wrist, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Charles W Goss
- Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Terkawi AS, Popat RA, Mackey S. Characterization and burden of localized back pain versus back pain with chronic overlapping pain conditions. Pain Pract 2023; 23:904-913. [PMID: 37392043 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is the most common cause of years lived with disability (YLD). Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) is a relatively new taxonomy for widespread pain. Researchers have postulated that patients with COPCs have more pain-related impact than those with isolated pain conditions. We know little about the combination of COPCs with cLBP. This study aims to characterize patients with isolated cLBP compared to those with cLBP and associated COPCs across multiple domains of physical, psychological, and social functioning. METHODS Using Stanford's CHOIR registry-based learning health system, we performed a cross-sectional study on patients with localized cLBP (group L) versus cLBP with COPCs (group W). We used demographic, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), and legacy survey data to characterize the physical, psychological, social, and global health outcomes. We further subdivided the COPCs into intermediate and severe based on the number of body regions involved. We used descriptive statistics and generalized linear regression models to characterize and compare the pain groups. RESULTS Among 8783 patients with cLBP, 485 (5.5%) had localized cLBP (Group L) without widespread pain. Compared to Group L, patients in Group W were more likely to be females, younger, and reported longer duration of pain. Although the mean pain scores were significantly higher in group W, this difference did not appear clinically significant (average pain scores MD -0.73, 95% CI [-0.91 to -0.55]). Group W had significantly worse outcomes in all PROMIS outcomes. However, outcomes with large clinical differences (Cohen's d > 0.5) were fatigue (MD = -7.0, 95% CI [-8.0 to -6.1]); sleep impairment (MD = -6.2, 95% CI [-7.1 to -5.3]); sleep disturbance (MD = -5.3, 95% CI [-6.2 to -4.5]); pain behavior (MD = -2.2, 95% CI [-2.5 to -1.8]); physical function (MD = 4.0, 95% CI [3.2-5.0]); pain interference (MD = -3.4, 95% CI [-4.0 to -2.8]); and anxiety (MD = -4.9, 95% CI [-5.7 to -4.0]). Adjusted analysis controlling for age, gender, BMI category, and duration of pain confirmed worsening of all outcomes with more widespread pain. CONCLUSION COPCs are a common presentation with cLBP. The combination of COPCs with cLBP is associated with significantly worse physical, psychological, social, and global health outcomes. This information may identify patients with COPCs and cLBP to optimally risk and treatment stratify their care and individualize their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Rita A Popat
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gilat R, Mitchnik IY, Patel S, Dubin JA, Agar G, Tamir E, Lindner D, Beer Y. Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:6617-6629. [PMID: 37436494 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as a uniform and generalizable PROM system using item response theory and computer adaptive testing. We aimed to assess the utilization of PROMIS for clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) measurements and provide insights into its use in orthopaedic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed PROMIS CSO reports for orthopaedic procedures via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 2022, excluding abstracts and missing measurements. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and questionnaire compliance. PROMIS domains, CSO measures, and study populations were described. A meta-analysis compared distribution and anchor-based MCIDs in low-bias (NOS ≥ 7) studies. RESULTS Overall, 54 publications from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed. PROMIS CSO studies were observational with increasing publication rates. Evidence-level was II in 10/54, bias low in 51/54, and compliance ≥ 86% in 46/54. Most (28/54) analysed lower extremity procedures. PROMIS domains examined Pain Function (PF) in 44/54, Pain Interference (PI) in 36/54, and Depression (D) in 18/54. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported in 51/54 and calculated based on distribution in 39/51 and anchor in 29/51. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported in ≤ 10/54. MCIDs were not significantly greater than MDCs. Anchor-based MCIDs were greater than distribution based MCIDs (standardized mean difference = 0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS PROMIS CSOs are increasingly utilized, especially for lower extremity procedures assessing the PF, PI, and D domains using distribution-based MCID. Using more conservative anchor-based MCIDs and reporting MDCs may strengthen results. Researchers should consider unique pearls and pitfalls when assessing PROMIS CSOs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gilat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ilan Y Mitchnik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Military Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sumit Patel
- Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy A Dubin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Agar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Tamir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dror Lindner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yiftah Beer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Faurot KR, Park J, Miller V, Honvoh G, Domeniciello A, Mann JD, Gaylord SA, Lynch CE, Palsson O, Ramsden CE, MacIntosh BA, Horowitz M, Zamora D. Dietary fatty acids improve perceived sleep quality, stress, and health in migraine: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1231054. [PMID: 37954068 PMCID: PMC10634433 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1231054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is a prevalent disabling condition often associated with comorbid physical and psychological symptoms that contribute to impaired quality of life and disability. Studies suggest that increasing dietary omega-3 fatty acid is associated with headache reduction, but less is known about the effects on quality of life in migraine. Methods After a 4-week run-in, 182 adults with 5-20 migraine days per month were randomized to one of the 3 arms for sixteen weeks. Dietary arms included: H3L6 (a high omega-3, low omega-6 diet), H3 (a high omega-3, an average omega-6 diet), or a control diet (average intakes of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids). Prespecified secondary endpoints included daily diary measures (stress perception, sleep quality, and perceived health), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Version 1.0 ([PROMIS©) measures and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Analyses used linear mixed effects models to control for repeated measures. Results The H3L6 diet was associated with significant improvements in stress perception [adjusted mean difference (aMD): -1.5 (95% confidence interval: -1.7 to -1.2)], sleep quality [aMD: 0.2 (95% CI:0.1-0.2)], and perceived health [aMD: 0.2 (0.2-0.3)] compared to the control. Similarly, the H3 diet was associated with significant improvements in stress perception [aMD: -0.8 (-1.1 to -0.5)], sleep quality [aMD: 0.2 (0.1, 0.3)], and perceived health [aMD: 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)] compared to the control. MIDAS scores improved substantially in the intervention groups compared with the control (H3L6 aMD: -11.8 [-25.1, 1.5] and H3 aMD: -10.7 [-24.0, 2.7]). Among the PROMIS-29 assessments, the biggest impact was on pain interference [H3L6 MD: -1.8 (-4.4, 0.7) and H3 aMD: -3.2 (-5.9, -0.5)] and pain intensity [H3L6 MD: -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1) and H3 aMD: -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)]. Discussion The diary measures, with their increased power, supported our hypothesis that symptoms associated with migraine attacks could be responsive to specific dietary fatty acid manipulations. Changes in the PROMIS© measures reflected improvements in non-headache pain as well as physical and psychological function, largely in the expected directions. These findings suggest that increasing omega-3 with or without decreasing omega-6 in the diet may represent a reasonable adjunctive approach to reducing symptoms associated with migraine attacks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02012790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keturah R. Faurot
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Jinyoung Park
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Vanessa Miller
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Gilson Honvoh
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Anthony Domeniciello
- Lipid Peroxidation Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - J. Douglas Mann
- Department of Neurology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Susan A. Gaylord
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Chanee E. Lynch
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Olafur Palsson
- Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Christopher E. Ramsden
- Lipid Peroxidation Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Intramural Program of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Beth A. MacIntosh
- Metabolic and Nutrition Research Core, UNC Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Mark Horowitz
- Lipid Peroxidation Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Daisy Zamora
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Lipid Peroxidation Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barreveld AM, Rosén Klement ML, Cheung S, Axelsson U, Basem JI, Reddy AS, Borrebaeck CAK, Mehta N. An artificial intelligence-powered, patient-centric digital tool for self-management of chronic pain: a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:1100-1110. [PMID: 37104747 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate how a behavioral health, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered, digital self-management tool affects the daily functions in adults with chronic back and neck pain. DESIGN Eligible subjects were enrolled in a 12-week prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study and instructed to use the digital coach daily. Primary outcome was a change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores for pain interference. Secondary outcomes were changes in PROMIS physical function, anxiety, depression, pain intensity scores and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) scores. METHODS Subjects logged daily activities, using PainDrainerTM, and data analyzed by the AI engine. Questionnaire and web-based data were collected at 6 and 12 weeks and compared to subjects' baseline. RESULTS Subjects completed the 6- (n = 41) and 12-week (n = 34) questionnaires. A statistically significant Minimal Important Difference (MID) for pain interference was demonstrated in 57.5% of the subjects. Similarly, MID for physical function was demonstrated in 72.5% of the subjects. A pre- to post-intervention improvement in depression score was also statistically significant, observed in 100% of subjects, as was the improvement in anxiety scores, evident in 81.3% of the subjects. PCS mean scores was also significantly decreased at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION Chronic pain self-management, using an AI-powered, digital coach anchored in behavioral health principles significantly improved subjects' pain interference, physical function, depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing over the 12-week study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antje M Barreveld
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA 02462, United States
| | - Maria L Rosén Klement
- Department of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden
- PainDrainer AB, Sheeletorget, Medicon Village, Lund 223 81, Sweden
| | - Sophia Cheung
- Office of Clinical Research, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA 02462, United States
| | - Ulrika Axelsson
- PainDrainer AB, Sheeletorget, Medicon Village, Lund 223 81, Sweden
| | - Jade I Basem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anika S Reddy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carl A K Borrebaeck
- Department of Immunotechnology, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden
- PainDrainer AB, Sheeletorget, Medicon Village, Lund 223 81, Sweden
| | - Neel Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wasan AD, Edwards RR, Kraemer KL, Jeong J, Kenney M, Luong K, Cornelius MC, Mickles C, Dharmaraj B, Sharif E, Stoltenberg A, Emerick T, Karp JF, Bair MJ, George SZ, Hooten WM. Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC): Protocol and Pilot Study Results for a Randomized Comparative-Effectiveness Trial of Antidepressants, Fear Avoidance Rehabilitation, or the Combination for Chronic Low Back Pain and Comorbid High Negative Affect. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:S105-S114. [PMID: 36715655 PMCID: PMC10403304 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and comorbid depression or anxiety disorders are highly prevalent. Negative affect (NA) refers to a combination of negative thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Patients with CLBP with high NA have greater pain, worse treatment outcomes, and greater prescription opioid misuse. We present the protocol for SYNNAPTIC (SYNergizing Negative Affect & Pain Treatment In Chronic pain). DESIGN A randomized comparative-effectiveness study of antidepressants, fear-avoidance rehabilitation, or their combination in 300 patients with CLBP with high NA. In the antidepressant- or rehabilitation-only arms, SYNNAPTIC includes an adaptive design of re-randomization after 4 months for nonresponders. SETTING A multisite trial conducted in routine pain clinical treatment settings: pain clinics and physical and occupational therapy treatment centers. METHODS Inclusion criteria include CLBP with elevated depression and anxiety symptoms. Antidepressant and rehabilitation treatments follow validated and effective protocols for musculoskeletal pain in patients with high NA. Power and sample size are based on superior outcomes of combination therapy with these same treatments in a 71-subject 4-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS SYNNAPTIC addresses the lack of evidence-based protocols for the treatment of the vulnerable subgroup of patients with CLBP and high NA. We hypothesize that combination therapy of antidepressants plus fear-avoidance rehabilitation will be more effective than each treatment alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04747314.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay D Wasan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, United States
| | - Robert R Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02467, United States
| | - Kevin L Kraemer
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
| | - Jong Jeong
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
| | - Megan Kenney
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
| | - Kevin Luong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, United States
| | - Marise C Cornelius
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02467, United States
| | - Caitlin Mickles
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, United States
| | - Bhagya Dharmaraj
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, United States
| | - Essa Sharif
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MA 55905, United States
| | - Anita Stoltenberg
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MA 55905, United States
| | - Trent Emerick
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, United States
| | - Jordan F Karp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85007, United States
| | - Matt J Bair
- Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Health Services Research & Development (HSRD), Richard L Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Steven Z George
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, United States
| | - William M Hooten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MA 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhang W, Singh SP, Clement A, Calfee RP, Bijsterbosch JD, Cheng AL. Improvements in Physical Function and Pain Interference and Changes in Mental Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Care. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2320520. [PMID: 37378984 PMCID: PMC10308248 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health. Objective To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included adult patients treated by an orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center from June 22, 2015, to February 9, 2022. Eligible participants presented between 4 and 6 times during the study period for 1 or more musculoskeletal conditions and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit. Exposure PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores. Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether improvements in PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores were associated with improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the anxiety model) or PROMIS Anxiety (for the depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as 3.0 points or more for PROMIS Anxiety and 3.2 points or more for PROMIS Depression. Results Among 11 236 patients (mean [SD] age, 57 [16] years), 7218 (64.2%) were women; 120 (1.1%) were Asian, 1288 (11.5%) were Black, and 9706 (86.4%) were White. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.13; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.26; P < .001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of 21 PROMIS points or more (95% CI, 20-23 points) on Physical Function or 12 points or more (95% CI, 12-12 points) on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.04; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05; P < .001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Patients seeking musculoskeletal care clinicians providing treatment cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Som P. Singh
- University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City
| | - Amdiel Clement
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan P. Calfee
- Division of Hand and Wrist, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Janine D. Bijsterbosch
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Abby L. Cheng
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cheng AL, Carbonell KV, Prather H, Hong BA, Downs DL, Metzler JP, Hunt DM. Unique characteristics of patients who choose an intensive lifestyle medicine program to address chronic musculoskeletal pain. PM R 2023; 15:761-771. [PMID: 35567523 PMCID: PMC9659670 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Factors that motivate musculoskeletal patients to pursue an intensive, lifestyle medicine-based approach to care are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To determine whether, compared to patients seeking musculoskeletal care through traditional pathways, patients who choose an intensive lifestyle medicine program for musculoskeletal pain endorse greater physical dysfunction, worse psychological health, and/or more biopsychosocial comorbidities. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of existing medical records from 2018 to 2021. SETTING Orthopedic department of one academic medical center. PATIENTS Fifty consecutive patients who enrolled in an intensive lifestyle medicine program to address a musculoskeletal condition. Comparison groups were the following: (1) 100 patients who presented for standard nonoperative musculoskeletal care, and (2) 100 patients who presented for operative evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon and qualified for joint arthroplasty. INTERVENTION Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were age-adjusted, between-group differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical and psychological health measures. Secondary outcomes were between-group differences in sociodemographic and medical history characteristics. RESULTS Patients who enrolled in the intensive lifestyle medicine program were more racially diverse (non-White race: lifestyle cohort 34% vs. comparison cohorts 16%-18%, p ≤ .029) and had a higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes than both comparison groups (mean body mass index: lifestyle cohort 37.6 kg/m2 vs. comparison cohorts 29.3-32.0, p < .001; diabetes prevalence: lifestyle cohort 32% vs. comparison cohorts 12%-16%, p ≤ .024). Compared to standard nonoperative patients, there were no clear between-group differences in PROMIS physical or psychological health scores. Compared to standard operative evaluation patients, patients in the lifestyle program reported worse anxiety but less pain interference (PROMIS Anxiety: B = 3.8 points [95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 7.4], p = .041; Pain interference: B = -3.6 [-6.0 to -1.2], p = .004). CONCLUSIONS Compared to musculoskeletal patients who sought care through traditional pathways, patients who chose an intensive lifestyle medicine pathway had a higher prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, but there was substantial overlap in patients' physical, psychological, and sociodemographic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L Cheng
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Heidi Prather
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Barry A Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Dana L Downs
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - John P Metzler
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Devyani M Hunt
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Silva MDC, Perriman DM, Fearon AM, Couldrick JM, Scarvell JM. Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063026. [PMID: 37202126 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. Design A systematic review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies' methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method. RESULTS Forty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies. CONCLUSION Median MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020215952.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Denika C Silva
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Werahera, Sri Lanka
| | - Diana M Perriman
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Angela M Fearon
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jacqui M Couldrick
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jennie M Scarvell
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hollenberg AM, Yanik EL, Hannon CP, Calfee RP, O’Keefe RJ. Did the Physical and Mental Health of Orthopaedic Patients Change After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:935-944. [PMID: 36696142 PMCID: PMC10097584 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with poor mental health outcomes and widened health disparities in the United States. Given the inter-relationship between psychosocial factors and functional outcomes in orthopaedic surgery, it is important that we understand whether patients presenting for musculoskeletal care during the pandemic were associated with worse physical and mental health than before the pandemic's onset. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Did patients seen for an initial visit by an orthopaedic provider during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate worse physical function, pain interference, depression, and/or anxiety than patients seen before the pandemic, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument? (2) During the COVID-19 pandemic, did patients living in areas with high levels of social deprivation demonstrate worse patterns of physical function, pain interference, depression, or anxiety on initial presentation to an orthopaedic provider than patients living in areas with low levels of social deprivation, compared with prepandemic PROMIS scores? METHODS This was a retrospective, comparative study of new patient evaluations that occurred in the orthopaedic department at a large, urban tertiary care academic medical center. During the study period, PROMIS computer adaptive tests were routinely administered to patients at clinical visits. Between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, we identified 26,989 new patients; we excluded 4% (1038 of 26,989) for being duplicates, 4% (1034 of 26,989) for having incomplete demographic data, 44% (11,925 of 26,989) for not having a nine-digit home ZIP Code recorded, and 5% (1332 of 26,989) for not completing all four PROMIS computer adaptive tests of interest. This left us with 11,660 patients in the "before COVID-19" cohort. Between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021, we identified 30,414 new patients; we excluded 5% (1554 of 30,414) for being duplicates, 4% (1142 of 30,414) for having incomplete demographic data, 41% (12,347 of 30,414) for not having a nine-digit home ZIP Code recorded, and 7% (2219 of 30,414) for not completing all four PROMIS computer adaptive tests of interest. This left us with 13,152 patients in the "during COVID-19" cohort. Nine-digit home ZIP Codes were used to determine patients' Area Deprivation Indexes, a neighborhood-level composite measure of social deprivation. To ensure that patients included in the study represented our overall patient population, we performed univariate analyses on available demographic and PROMIS data between patients included in the study and those excluded from the study, which revealed no differences (results not shown). In the before COVID-19 cohort, the mean age was 57 ± 16 years, 60% (7046 of 11,660) were women, 86% (10,079 of 11,660) were White non-Hispanic, and the mean national Area Deprivation Index percentile was 47 ± 25. In the during COVID-19 cohort, the mean age was 57 ± 16 years, 61% (8051 of 13,152) were women, 86% (11,333 of 13,152) were White non-Hispanic, and the mean national Area Deprivation Index percentile was 46 ± 25. The main outcome measures in this study were the PROMIS Physical Function ([PF], version 2.0), Pain Interference ([PI], version 1.1), Depression (version 1.0), and Anxiety (version 1.0). PROMIS scores follow a normal distribution with a mean t-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher PROMIS PF scores indicate better self-reported physical capability, whereas higher PROMIS PI, Depression, and Anxiety scores indicate more difficulty managing pain, depression, and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Clinically meaningful differences in PROMIS scores between the cohorts were based on a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold of 4 points. Multivariable linear regression models were created to determine whether presentation to an orthopaedic provider during the pandemic was associated with worse PROMIS scores than for patients who presented before the pandemic. Regression coefficients (ß) represent the estimated difference in PROMIS scores that would be expected for patients who presented during the pandemic compared with patients who presented before the pandemic, after adjusting for confounding variables. Regression coefficients were evaluated in the context of clinical importance and statistical significance. Regression coefficients equal to or greater than the MCID of 4 points were considered clinically important, whereas p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS We found no clinically important differences in baseline physical and mental health PROMIS scores between new patients who presented to an orthopaedic provider before the COVID-19 pandemic and those who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic (PROMIS PF: ß -0.2 [95% confidence interval -0.43 to 0.03]; p = 0.09; PROMIS PI: ß 0.06 [95% CI -0.13 to 0.25]; p = 0.57; PROMIS Depression: ß 0.09 [95% CI -0.14 to 0.33]; p = 0.44; PROMIS Anxiety: ß 0.58 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.84]; p < 0.001). Although patients from areas with high levels of social deprivation had worse PROMIS scores than patients from areas with low levels of social deprivation, patients from areas with high levels of social deprivation demonstrated no clinically important differences in PROMIS scores when groups before and during the pandemic were compared (PROMIS PF: ß -0.23 [95% CI -0.80 to 0.33]; p = 0.42; PROMIS PI: ß 0.18 [95% CI -0.31 to 0.67]; p = 0.47; PROMIS Depression: ß 0.42 [95% CI -0.26 to 1.09]; p = 0.23; PROMIS Anxiety: ß 0.84 [95% CI 0.16 to 1.52]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Contrary to studies describing worse physical and mental health since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found no changes in the health status of orthopaedic patients on initial presentation to their provider. Although large-scale action to mitigate the effects of worsening physical or mental health of orthopaedic patients may not be needed at this time, orthopaedic providers should remain aware of the psychosocial needs of their patients and advocate on behalf of those who may benefit from intervention. Our study is limited in part to patients who had the self-agency to access specialty orthopaedic care, and therefore may underestimate the true changes in the physical or mental health status of all patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Future longitudinal studies evaluating the impact of specific COVID-19-related factors (for example, delays in medical care, social isolation, or financial loss) on orthopaedic outcomes may be helpful to prepare for future pandemics or natural disasters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex M. Hollenberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Elizabeth L. Yanik
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Charles P. Hannon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan P. Calfee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Regis J. O’Keefe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
How Soon Do Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Improve after Bariatric Surgery? Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11060862. [PMID: 36981519 PMCID: PMC10048012 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Depression and anxiety are prevalent among bariatric surgery candidates, yet little is known about the course of symptoms after surgery. This study aimed to identify how soon changes in depression and anxiety occur after surgery. A retrospective review of patients treated at a university hospital was conducted. Participants attended a presurgical psychological evaluation, completed surgery, and attended follow-up visits with bariatric medical providers (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively). Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed at all time points by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression and Anxiety. Generalized estimating equations models with repeated measures by person over time were used to examine change in depression and anxiety symptoms across time. Among 27 patients, anxiety (incident rate ratio (IRR) = 0.81, p = 0.04) and depression (IRR = 0.78, p = 0.05) significantly improved both 6 weeks and 3–6 months after bariatric surgery, after controlling for education, marital status, surgery type, age, and baseline body mass index. This is the first known study to show faster improvement in anxiety compared to depression after bariatric surgery. Understanding reductions in anxiety and depression symptoms may be important for postoperative care and timing of weight maintenance interventions.
Collapse
|
29
|
Stephan A, Stadelmann VA, Preiss S, Impellizzeri FM. Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in patients receiving knee arthroplasty. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:18. [PMID: 36854937 PMCID: PMC9975126 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While there are a few studies on measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, nothing is known about the measurement properties in patients with knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this study examined the measurement properties of the German Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms for pain intensity (PAIN), pain interference (PI) and physical function (PF) in knee arthroplasty patients. METHODS Short forms were collected from consecutive patients of our clinic's knee arthroplasty registry before and 12 months post-surgery. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the reference measure. A subsample completed the short forms twice to test reliability. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using scale-specific hypothesis testing. For reliability, Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement using standard error of measurement (SEMagr) were used. Agreement was used to determine standardised effect sizes and smallest detectable changes (SDC90). Individual-level minimal important change (MIC) was calculated using a method of adjusted prediction. RESULTS Of 213 eligible patients, 155 received questionnaires, 143 returned baseline questionnaires and 119, 12-month questionnaires. Correlations of short forms with OKS were large (│r│ ≥ 0.7) with slightly lower values for PAIN, and specifically for men. Cronbach's alpha values were ≥ 0.84 and intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.90. SEMagr were around 3.5 for PAIN and PI and 1.7 for PF. SDC90 were around 8 for PAIN and PI and 4 for PF. Follow-up showed a relevant ceiling effect for PF. Correlations with OKS change scores of around 0.5 to 0.6 were moderate. Adjusted MICs were 7.2 for PAIN, 3.5 for PI and 5.7 for PF. CONCLUSION Our results partly support the use of the investigated short forms for knee arthroplasty patients. The ability of PF to differentiate between patients with high perceived recovery is limited. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages should be strongly considered within the context of the intended use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Stephan
- Department of Teaching, Research and Development - Lower Extremities, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Vincent A. Stadelmann
- grid.415372.60000 0004 0514 8127Department of Teaching, Research and Development – Lower Extremities, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Preiss
- grid.415372.60000 0004 0514 8127Knee Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Franco M. Impellizzeri
- grid.415372.60000 0004 0514 8127Department of Teaching, Research and Development – Lower Extremities, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland ,grid.117476.20000 0004 1936 7611Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang W, Singh SP, Clement A, Calfee RP, Bijsterbosch JD, Cheng AL. Relationships between improvement in physical function, pain interference, and mental health in musculoskeletal patients. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.12.23285824. [PMID: 36824736 PMCID: PMC9949185 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.12.23285824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health. Objective To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care. Design Retrospective cohort study from June 22, 2015 to February 9, 2022. Setting Orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center. Participants Consecutive sample of adult patients who presented to the musculoskeletal clinic 4 to 6 times during the study period and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit. Exposure PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores. Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether: 1) PROMIS Anxiety and 2) PROMIS Depression scores improved as a function of improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores, after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the Anxiety model) and PROMIS Anxiety (for the Depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as ≥3.0 points for PROMIS Anxiety and ≥3.2 points for PROMIS Depression. Results Among 11,236 patients (mean [SD] age 57 [16] years), 9,706 (86%) were White, and 7,218 (64%) were women. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.14 [95% CI -0.15- -0.13], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.26 [0.25-0.26], p<0.001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of ≥21 [20-23] PROMIS points on Physical Function or ≥12 [12-12] points on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.05 [- 0.06- -0.04], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.04 [0.04-0.05], p<0.001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety. Key Points Question: Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, are improvements in physical function and pain interference associated with meaningful changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression?Findings: In this large cohort study, improvement by ≥2.3 population-level standard deviations (SD) on PROMIS Physical Function or ≥1.2 SD on PROMIS Pain Interference were required for any association with meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms. Improvements in physical function and pain interference were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.Meaning: Musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that exclusively addressing the physical aspect of a musculoskeletal condition will improve symptoms of depression or potentially even anxiety.
Collapse
|
31
|
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Woods H, Buchbinder E, Frazier L, LaCasce A, Luskin MR, Phillips CS, Thornton K, Berry DL, Ligibel J. Exploring Influencing Factors of Anxiety Improvement Following Mindfulness-Based Music Therapy in Young Adults with Cancer. J Music Ther 2023:7036622. [PMID: 36787235 DOI: 10.1093/jmt/thac017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this secondary analysis was to explore physiological, psychological, and situational influencing factors that may affect the impact of a mindfulness-music therapy intervention on anxiety severity in young adults receiving cancer treatment. Young adults receiving cancer treatment for ≥ eight weeks were recruited from adult and pediatric oncology outpatient centers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Participants were asked to attend up to four, in-person (offered virtually via Zoom video conference after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic) 45-min mindfulness-based music therapy sessions over twelve weeks with a board-certified music therapist. Participants completed questionnaires about anxiety, stress, and other cancer treatment-related outcomes before and after participating in the intervention. Changes in anxiety (i.e., PROMIS Anxiety 4a) over time were compared among baseline physiological (e.g., age or sex), psychological (e.g., stress), and situational influencing (i.e., intervention delivery format) factors using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests. Thirty-one of the 37 enrolled participants completed the baseline and post-intervention measures and were eligible for inclusion in the secondary analysis. Results revealed that higher baseline physical functioning (median change = -6.65), anxiety (median change=-5.65), fatigue (median change = -5.6), sleep disturbance (median change = -5.6), female sex (median change = -5.15), or virtual intervention delivery (median change = -4.65) were potential physiological, psychological, or situational influencing factors associated with anxiety improvement following mindfulness-based music therapy. Additional investigation into physiological, psychological, or situational influencing factors associated with anxiety response will help to tailor the design of future mindfulness-music therapy interventions to decrease psychological distress and address the unique psychosocial concerns among young adults receiving cancer treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03709225.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Knoerl
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather Woods
- The Leonard P. Zakim Center for Integrative Therapies and Healthy Living, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Lindsay Frazier
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann LaCasce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marlise R Luskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carolyn S Phillips
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Thornton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna L Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ligibel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tang CT, Sookochoff M, Rhea L, Carrier J, Prather H, Guan L. An audit of structure-based medical acupuncture by a single provider in patients with musculoskeletal pain using PROMIS scores as the outcome. Acupunct Med 2023; 41:48-54. [PMID: 36112861 DOI: 10.1177/09645284221118589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess whether structure-based medical acupuncture (SMA) can improve Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS An audit was conducted of all patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain treated by a single provider with SMA in 2017. Inclusion criteria included a pre-treatment and at least one post-treatment PROMIS score. Patient demographics and previous treatments tried were recorded. Documented events other than acupuncture that were thought to interfere with PROMIS scores were recorded, and no further scores were used after these events. A maximum of nine visits after the initial visit were used. The PROMIS domains assessed included anxiety, depression, pain interference and physical function. RESULTS Seventy-two patients who had been treated with SMA met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-five of the patients (90%) had chronic pain. For their presenting complaint, 59 (82%) had previously sought treatment from another non-operative provider, 60 (83%) had tried physical therapy, and 20 (28%) had even had surgery. Despite this, SMA appeared to be able to significantly improve PROMIS anxiety at visits 1-3 and PROMIS depression at visit 3. After just one treatment, minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were reached in 32%-44% of patients for PROMIS anxiety, 17%-36% for PROMIS depression, 28%-29% for PROMIS physical function, and 21%-36% for PROMIS pain interference, based on low and high cut-offs of a range of quoted MCID values. CONCLUSION In a difficult patient population with musculoskeletal pain, SMA is a technique that can likely be used to improve PROMIS anxiety and depression, although no firm conclusions can be drawn from this uncontrolled clinical audit. Of note, MCIDs were sometimes obtained even after just one treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Tsai Tang
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael Sookochoff
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lee Rhea
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Ling Guan
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prather H, Fogarty AE, Cheng AL, Wahl G, Hong B, Hunt D. Feasibility of an intensive interprofessional lifestyle medicine program for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in the setting of lifestyle-related chronic disease. PM R 2023; 15:41-50. [PMID: 34713577 PMCID: PMC9046467 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle factors are associated with musculoskeletal pain and metabolic chronic diseases. To date, intensive lifestyle medicine programs have predominantly targeted metabolic rather than musculoskeletal conditions. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of an intensive interprofessional lifestyle medicine program for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. DESIGN Prospective observational feasibility study. SETTING Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS Adults diagnosed with musculoskeletal condition(s) and lifestyle-related chronic disease(s) who previously completed standard-of-care musculoskeletal treatments, enrolled from 2018 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS Patients enrolled in an intensive interprofessional lifestyle medicine program led by a physiatrist, with options to interface with an acupuncturist, dietician, massage therapist, psychologist, physical therapist, and smoking cessation specialist. The physiatrist engaged in shared decision making with patients to establish program goals related to function, overall health, and required lifestyle changes. Bimonthly interprofessional team conferences facilitated communication between treatment team and patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility was measured by patient participation and goal attainment. Secondary outcomes included changes from program enrollment to discharge in patient anthropometric, metabolic lab, sleep apnea risk, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) function, pain, and behavioral health measures. RESULTS Twenty-six patients enrolled in the program (18 [69%] female, mean age 59 [SD 14.5] years, baseline hemoglobin A1c 6.0% [0.8%], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein 7.7 [12.1] mg/dL, 25-hydroxy vitamin D 32.0 [14.2] ng/mL). Of 21 (81%) patients who completed the program, 13/21 (62%) met their goal. On average, program completers presented for 26.2 (10.6) total visits over 191 (88) days. By discharge, program completers achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS Anxiety (mean difference -3.5 points, 95% confidence interval [-6.5 to 0.5], p = .035), whereas noncompleters did not (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS An intensive interprofessional lifestyle medicine program for patients with musculoskeletal conditions is feasible. With training in lifestyle intervention, physiatrists are well suited to lead interprofessional teams aimed at assisting patients in making lifestyle changes to achieve personalized function- and health-related goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Prather
- Department of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra E Fogarty
- Department of Neurology, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Abby L Cheng
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurology, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Garett Wahl
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Barry Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Devyani Hunt
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurology, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hong Z, Clever DC, Tatman LM, Miller AN. The Effect of Social Deprivation on Fracture-Healing and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1968-1976. [PMID: 36126122 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social deprivation is a state marked by limited access to resources due to poverty, discrimination, or other marginalizing factors. We investigated the links between social deprivation and orthopaedic trauma, including patient-reported outcomes, radiographic healing, and complication rates following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 229 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures at our Level-I trauma center. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated proxy for social deprivation, was used to group patients into the most deprived tercile (MDT), the intermediate deprived tercile (IDT), and the least deprived tercile (LDT) for outcome comparison. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was used to measure the domains of Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Anxiety, and Depression, and radiographic healing was assessed with the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) system. RESULTS On univariate analyses, patients from the MDT reported worse PF, PI, Anxiety, and Depression scores than those from the LDT within the first year of postoperative follow-up. On multivariable regression analysis, PROMIS score outcomes were influenced by age, race, and smoking status, but not by social deprivation tercile. Furthermore, residing in the MDT was associated with a 31% increase in time to radiographic union compared with the LDT (β = 0.27; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures, social deprivation is associated with slower fracture-healing and potentially influences short-term PROMIS scores. These results warrant further investigation in additional patient populations with orthopaedic trauma and highlight the importance of developing interventions to reduce inequities faced by patients from low-resource settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachery Hong
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - David C Clever
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren M Tatman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna N Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carlozzi NE, Choi SW, Wu Z, Troost JP, Lyden AK, Miner JA, Graves CM, Wang J, Yan X, Sen S. An app-based just-in-time-adaptive self-management intervention for care partners: The CareQOL feasibility pilot study. Rehabil Psychol 2022; 67:497-512. [PMID: 36355640 PMCID: PMC10157671 DOI: 10.1037/rep0000472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of an intensive data collection protocol that involves the delivery of a personalized just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) in three distinct groups of care partners (care partners of persons with spinal cord injury [SCI], Huntington's disease [HD], or hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN Seventy care partners were enrolled in this study (n = 19 SCI; n = 21 HD, n = 30 HCT). This three-month (90 day) randomized control trial involved wearing a Fitbit to track sleep and steps, providing daily reports of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and completing end of month HRQOL surveys. Care partners in the JITAI group also received personalized pushes (i.e., text-based phone notifications that include brief tips or suggestions for improving self-care). At the end of three-months, care partners in both groups completed a feasibility and acceptability questionnaire. RESULTS Most (98.6%) care partners completed the study, average compliance was 88% for daily HRQOL surveys, 96% for daily steps, and 85% for daily sleep (from wearing the Fitbit), and all monthly surveys were completed with the exception of one missed 3-month assessment. The acceptability of the protocol was high; ratings exceeded 80% agreement for the different elements of the study. Improvements were seen for the majority of the HRQOL measures. There was no evidence of measurement reactivity. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS Findings provide strong support for the acceptability and feasibility of an intensive data collection protocol that involved the administration of a JITAI. Although this trial was not powered to establish efficacy, findings indicated improvements across a variety of different HRQOL measures (~1/3 of which were statistically significant). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle E. Carlozzi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sung Won Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Zhenke Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jonathan P. Troost
- Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Angela K. Lyden
- Clinical Trials Support Office, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer A. Miner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Christopher M. Graves
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jitao Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Xinghui Yan
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Srijan Sen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Poutanen J, Anttila H, Tallqvist S, Kallinen M, Koskinen E, Hämäläinen H, Kauppila AM, Täckman A, Vainionpää A, Arokoski J, Hiekkala S. Physical health among the Finnish spinal cord injury population according to the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). J Spinal Cord Med 2022; 45:865-873. [PMID: 34726579 PMCID: PMC9662063 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1989184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the physical health in the Finnish Spinal cord injury (SCI) population using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) and make a comparison to the general United States (US) population. Furthermore, the aim is to explore the associations between pain interference, pain intensity, sleep disturbance, and fatigue and physical function. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. This study is part of the Finnish Spinal Cord Injury (FinSCI) community survey study. SETTING Community, Finland. PARTICIPANTS 884 persons with SCI. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES Physical health was measured with custom Patient Reported Outcome Measure System (PROMIS®) short forms. RESULTS Higher age and lesion level indicated more severe physical function impairments. Persons ≥46 years exhibited more pain interference symptoms compared to younger participants. On average, the Finnish SCI population had 1.3 SD lower physical function and 0.9 SD higher pain interference T-scores compared to the US general population (P < 0.001). The most significant association was observed between pain interference and physical function (r = -0.364, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present study provides a description of the state of physical health in the Finnish spinal cord injury population, as well as the associations between the physical health areas. The results highlight the substantiality of pain management in terms of improving physical function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04649814.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonas Poutanen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,Correspondence to: Joonas Poutanen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Heidi Anttila
- Welfare Department, Ageing, Disability and Functioning Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Mauri Kallinen
- Rehabilitation Department, Central Finland Health Care District, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland,Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eerika Koskinen
- Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Harri Hämäläinen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation/Spinal Cord Injury Outpatient Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna-Maija Kauppila
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation/Spinal Cord Injury Outpatient Clinic, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anni Täckman
- The Finnish Association of Spinal Cord Injured Akson, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aki Vainionpää
- Department of Rehabilitation, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland
| | - Jari Arokoski
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation/Spinal Cord Injury Outpatient Clinic, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sinikka Hiekkala
- The Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilities, Helsinki, Finland,Validia Rehabilitation, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Henson GJ, Taylor BV, van der Mei I, Claflin SB, Simpson-Yap S, Palmer AJ, Xia Q, Antony B, Singh A, Campbell JA. Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of minimal important differences for generic multiattribute utility instruments. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062703. [PMID: 36283751 PMCID: PMC9608522 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Generic multiattribute utility instruments (MAUIs) are efficient tools for determining and enumerating health-related quality of life. MAUIs accomplish this by generating health state utilities (HSUs) via algorithms. Minimal important differences (MIDs) assist with the interpretation of HSUs by estimating minimum changes that are clinically significant. The overall goal of the proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is the development of comprehensive guidelines for MID estimation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol defines a systematic review and meta-analysis of MIDs for generic MAUIs. The proposed research will involve a comprehensive investigation of 10 databases (EconLit, IDEAs database, INAHTA database, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Emcare, JBIEBP and CINAHL) from 1 June 2022 to 7 June 2022, and will be performed and reported in accordance with several validated guidelines, principally the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of papers, considered for inclusion in the review, will be appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, inter alia.Narrative analysis will involve identifying the characteristics of MIDs including methods of calculation, sources of heterogeneity, and validation. Meta-analysis will also be conducted. The descriptive element of meta-analysis will involve the generation of I2 statistics and Galbraith plots of MID heterogeneity. Together with narrative analysis, this will allow sources of MID heterogeniety to be identified. A multilevel mixed model, estimated via restricted maximum likelihood estimation, will be constructed for the purposes of meta-regression. Meta-regression will attempt to enumerate the effects of sources of heterogeneity on MID estimates. Meta-analysis will be concluded with pooling of MIDs via a linear random-effects model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for this review, as it will aggregate data from published literature. Methods of dissemination will include publication in a peer-reviewed journal, as well as presentation at conferences and seminars. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021261821.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen James Henson
- Health Economics, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Bruce V Taylor
- Menzies Insitute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ingrid van der Mei
- Menzies Insitute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Suzi B Claflin
- Menzies Insitute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Steve Simpson-Yap
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew J Palmer
- Health Economics, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Qing Xia
- Health Economics, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Benny Antony
- Menzies Insitute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ambrish Singh
- Menzies Insitute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Julie A Campbell
- Health Economics, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
DiRenzo DD, Hunt C, Sibinga EM, Gould NF, Shah AA, Bartlett SJ, Bingham CO. Feasibility and acceptability of using a meditation app in adults with rheumatic disease. Explore (NY) 2022; 18:523-525. [PMID: 34801408 PMCID: PMC9081288 DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Meditation is a stress-reduction and contemplative technique that can improve emotional distress in people with chronic disease and may be especially beneficial for patients with rheumatic diseases. However, patient access to in-person programs is challenging. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility/acceptability associated with physician-directed use of a widely available smartphone application (app), Calm©. METHODS In this single-arm, pre-post intervention study with recruitment over a 10-month period, adults with rheumatic disease were asked to use the app for ≥5 min/day for 30 days. Participants completed sociodemographic surveys and validated health related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires from the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) and NIH Toolbox at baseline and 30-days. RESULTS Thirty-five participants who were mostly well-educated (66% ≥college degree) females (91%) with a mean age of 50 (SD 13) completed baseline questionnaires; 18 participants completed post-study questionnaires ("full completers"). Full completers had higher baseline stress, anxiety, pain, and patient global assessment scores (p's <0.05) compared to partial completers. Full completers who provided data used the app on average for 283 min/30 days (SD 257; n = 16) and showed significant improvements in fatigue (-7.6 T-Score units, p = 0.017), with trends for improvement in perceived stress, anxiety, sleep disturbance, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and pain intensity (p's <0.15). CONCLUSIONS A 30-day meditation, stress-reduction app used by patients with rheumatic disease revealed that this is a feasible non-pharmacologic modality to target HRQL and problematic symptoms like fatigue. More rigorous study on app use and potential effect is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana D DiRenzo
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Carly Hunt
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | | | - Neda F Gould
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Ami A Shah
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Susan J Bartlett
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Evon DM, Dong M, Reeve BB, Peter J, Michael L, Lok AS, Nelson DR, Stewart PW. Sustainable and equivalent improvements in symptoms and functional well-being following viral cure from ledipasvir/sofosbuvir versus elbasvir/grazoprevir for chronic hepatitis C infection: Findings from the randomized PRIORITIZE trial. J Viral Hepat 2022; 29:795-806. [PMID: 35657133 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
The PRIORITIZE trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02786537) was the first comparative effectiveness study to directly compare ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A secondary aim of this study was to compare LDV/SOF and EBR/GZR on sustainable changes in several HCV-associated symptoms and functional well-being in patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). PRIORITIZE, a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2016 and 2020, evaluated change in six PROMIS® symptom scores (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive disturbance, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain) and functional well-being using the disease-specific HCV-PRO instrument. Survey assessments were administered at baseline, early post-treatment (median = 6 months) and late post-treatment (median = 21 months). Constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate within-treatment change and between-treatment differences. Data from 793 participants (average 55 years old, 57% male, 44% black, 17% with cirrhosis) were analysed. From baseline to early post-treatment, 5 out of 6 symptoms and functional well-being significantly improved (all p's < .05). In the LDV/SOF arm, mean changes ranged from -3.73 for nausea to -6.41 for fatigue and in the EBR/GZR, mean changes ranged from -2.19 for cognitive impairment to -4.67 for fatigue. Change of >3 points was consider clinically meaningful. Improvements in most symptoms slightly favoured LDV/SOF, although the magnitude of differences between the regimens were small. Both regimens demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms and functional well-being that were sustained during the late post-treatment phase. EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF regimens had clinically equivalent and durable improvements in HCV symptoms and functional well-being up to two years after SVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Evon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meichen Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joy Peter
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Larry Michael
- Center for Gastroenterology Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna S Lok
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David R Nelson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Paul W Stewart
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Danhauer SC, Miller ME, Divers J, Anderson A, Hargis G, Brenes GA. Long-Term Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Yoga for Worried Older Adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 30:979-990. [PMID: 35260292 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and yoga decrease worry and anxiety. There are no long-term data comparing CBT and yoga for worry, anxiety, and sleep in older adults. The impact of preference and selection on these outcomes is unknown. In this secondary data analysis, we compared long-term effects of CBT by telephone and yoga on worry, anxiety, sleep, depressive symptoms, fatigue, physical function, social participation, and pain; and examined preference and selection effects. DESIGN In this randomized preference trial, participants (N = 500) were randomized to a: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) of CBT or yoga (n = 250); or 2) preference trial (selected CBT or yoga; n = 250). Outcomes were measured at baseline and Week 37. SETTING Community. PARTICIPANTS Community-dwelling older adults (age 60+ years). INTERVENTIONS CBT (by telephone) and yoga (in-person group classes). MEASUREMENTS Penn State Worry Questionnaire - Abbreviated (worry);1,2 Insomnia Severity Index (sleep);3 PROMIS Anxiety Short Form v1.0 (anxiety);4,5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (generalized anxiety);6,7 and PROMIS-29 (depression, fatigue, physical function, social participation, pain).8,9 RESULTS: Six months after intervention completion, CBT and yoga RCT participants reported sustained improvements from baseline in worry, anxiety, sleep, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and social participation (no significant between-group differences). Using data combined from the randomized and preference trials, there were no significant preference or selection effects. Long-term intervention effects were observed at clinically meaningful levels for most of the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS CBT and yoga both demonstrated maintained improvements from baseline on multiple outcomes six months after intervention completion in a large sample of older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier NCT02968238.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy (SCD), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
| | - Michael E Miller
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (MEM), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Jasmin Divers
- Division of Health Services Research (JD), NYU Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Anderson
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (AA), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Gena Hargis
- Department of Internal Medicine (GH), Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| | - Gretchen A Brenes
- Department of Internal Medicine (GAB), Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elsman EBM, Flens G, de Beurs E, Roorda LD, Terwee CB. Towards standardization of measuring anxiety and depression: Differential item functioning for language and Dutch reference values of PROMIS item banks. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273287. [PMID: 35998333 PMCID: PMC9398458 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The outcomes anxiety and depression are measured frequently by healthcare providers to assess the impact of a disease, but with numerous instruments. PROMIS item banks provide an opportunity for standardized measurement. Cross-cultural validity of measures and the availability of reference values are prerequisites for standardized measurement. Methods PROMIS Anxiety and Depression item banks were completed by 1002 representative Dutch persons. To evaluate cross-cultural validity, data from US participants in PROMIS wave 1 were used and differential item functioning (DIF) was investigated, using an iterative hybrid of logistic regression and item response theory. McFadden’s pseudo R2-change of 2% was the critical threshold. The impact of any DIF on full item banks and short forms was investigated. To obtain Dutch reference values, T-scores for anxiety and depression were calculated for the complete Dutch sample, and age-group and gender subpopulations. Thresholds corresponding to normal limits, mild, moderate and severe symptoms were computed. Results In both item banks, two items had DIF but with minimal impact on population level T-scores for full item banks and short forms. The Dutch general population had a T-score of 49.9 for anxiety and 49.6 for depression, similar to the T-scores of 50.0 of the US general population. T-scores for age-group and gender subpopulations were also similar to T-scores of the US general population. Thresholds for mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression were set to 55, 60 and 70, identical to US thresholds. Conclusions The limited number of items with DIF and its minimal impact, enables the use of standard (US) item parameters and comparisons of scores between Dutch and US populations. The Dutch reference values provide an important tool for healthcare professionals and researchers to evaluate and interpret symptoms of anxiety and depression, stimulating the uptake of PROMIS measures, and contributing to standardized outcome measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen B. M. Elsman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Flens
- Alliance for Quality in Mental Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin de Beurs
- Arkin GGZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D. Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schultz MJ, Licciardone JC. The effect of long-term opioid use on back-specific disability and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. J Osteopath Med 2022; 122:469-479. [PMID: 35950241 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2021-0172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Opioids are commonly utilized for the treatment of chronic pain. However, research regarding the long-term (≥12 months) outcomes of opioid therapy remains sparse. OBJECTIVES This study aims to evaluate the effects of long-term opioid therapy on measures of back-specific disability and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients with chronic low back pain who reported consistent opioid use or abstinence for at least 12 months while enrolled in the Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation Pain Research Registry were classified as long-term opioid users or nonusers, respectively. For comparison, intermediate-term and short-term opioid users and nonusers were also identified. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to compare back-specific disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) and health-related quality of life (29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) between opioid users and nonusers while controlling for pain intensity, depression, age, body mass index (BMI), and eight common comorbid conditions (herniated disc, sciatica, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, and asthma). Statistically significant findings were assessed for clinical relevance. RESULTS There were 96 long-term opioid users and 204 long-term opioid nonusers. After controlling for potential confounders, long-term opioid use was a predictor of worse back-specific disability (adjusted mean difference=2.85, p<0.001), physical function (adjusted mean difference=-2.90, p=0.001), fatigue (adjusted mean difference=4.32, p=0.001), participation in social roles (adjusted mean difference=-4.10, p<0.001), and pain interference (adjusted mean difference=3.88, p<0.001) outcomes. Intermediate-term opioid use was a predictor of worse back-specific disability (adjusted mean difference=2.41, p<0.001), physical function (adjusted mean difference=-2.26, p=0.003), fatigue (adjusted mean difference=3.70, p=0.002), and sleep disturbance outcomes (adjusted mean difference=3.03, p=0.004), whereas short-term opioid use was a predictor of worse back-specific disability (adjusted mean difference=2.42, p<0.001) and physical function outcomes (adjusted mean difference=-1.90, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study are largely consistent with existing literature regarding the outcomes of long-term opioid therapy. Taken in conjunction with the well-established risks of opioid medications, these findings draw into question the utility of long-term opioid therapy for chronic low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schultz
- Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - John C Licciardone
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patel KV, Hoffman EV, Phelan EA, Gell NM. Remotely Delivered Exercise to Rural Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022; 4:735-744. [PMID: 35687577 PMCID: PMC9374047 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE EnhanceFitness (EF) is an evidence-based exercise program recommended for management of osteoarthritis (OA). However, access to EF is limited in rural areas. Accordingly, we evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered EF (tele-EF) in rural, community-dwelling older adults with symptomatic knee OA. METHODS A single-arm pilot trial of tele-EF classes was conducted. Videoconferencing was used to livestream the instructor-led, 1-hour EF classes 3 days/week for 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post intervention. RESULTS A total of 15 of 27 potential participants (55%) were screen eligible and enrolled into the trial. Participants had a median age of 70 years (interquartile range: 67-75), and 14 (93%) were women. The median EF class attendance rate was 91% (interquartile range: 85%-94%). Knee pain, as measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), improved significantly from baseline to the 12-week end point (mean difference = -11.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): -20.9 to -2.0]; P = 0.02). In addition, participants' self-reported knee function improved significantly (mean difference in KOOS function score = -11.8 [95% CI: -18.4 to -5.2]; P < 0.01) as well as their physical capacity (mean difference in Timed Up and Go test time = 1.8 seconds [95% CI: 0.2-3.4]; P = 0.03). All participants (100%) were very satisfied with tele-EF classes, and 12 participants (86%) reported that their condition had much improved or very much improved since beginning the EF exercise program. Lastly, there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION Findings from this pilot trial indicate that tele-EF is feasible and acceptable in rural older adults with knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kushang V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elise V Hoffman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washingto, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nancy M Gell
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Xiong GX, Goh BC, Agaronnik N, Crawford AM, Smith JT, Hershman SH, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Impact of insurance type on patient-reported outcome measures in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Spine J 2022; 22:1309-1317. [PMID: 35351668 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniations (LDH) are among the most common spinal conditions. Despite increased appreciation for the importance of social determinants of health, the role that these factors play in patients with lumbar disc herniations is poorly defined. PURPOSE To elucidate the association between insurance status and baseline patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the setting of lumbar disc herniations. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were reviewed from 924 adult patients presenting for treatment of lumbar disc herniation within our institutional healthcare system (2015-2020). OUTCOME MEASURES The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, PROMIS Global-Physical, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were assessed. METHODS PROMIS scores at presentation were defined at the primary outcome and insurance status as the primary predictor. Differences in clinical and sociodemographic characteristics between our cohorts, stratified by insurance status, were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum or chi-squared testing. We used multivariable negative binomial regression modeling to adjust for potential confounders including age, gender, race, language, ethnicity, comorbidity index, and median geospatial household income. RESULTS We included 924 patients, with mean age of 58.4 +/- 15.2 years and 52.6% male prevalence. Patients insured through Medicaid were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, and non-English speaking patients compared with the commercially insured. The Charlson Comorbidity index was significantly higher in the Medicare group. Following adjusted analysis, patients with Medicaid insurance had significantly worse PF10a (IRR, 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96), as well as PROMIS Global-Physical score (IRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94), and VAS low back pain (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.40) when compared to the commercially insured. CONCLUSIONS We encountered worse physical function, mental, and pain-related patient-reported outcomes for those with Medicaid insurance in a population of patients presenting for evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. These findings, including worse depression, anxiety, and higher axial back pain scores, merit further investigation into potential health system asymmetries, and should be accounted for by treating providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian C Goh
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy T Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart H Hershman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Amakiri IC, Xiong GX, Verhofste B, Crawford AM, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Insurance types are correlated with baseline patient-reported outcome measures in patients with adult spinal deformity. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 103:180-187. [PMID: 35908366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognized as a key component of healthcare value, allowing comparison of therapeutic impact across different specialties. Prior literature suggests that insurance type may be associated with differing baseline PROMs among patients with degenerative conditions, including lumbar stenosis and hip arthritis. This association, however, has not been investigated for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Baseline PROMs were reviewed from 207 patients with ASD presenting for treatment between 2015 and 2019. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, PROMIS Global-Physical, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were assessed. Negative binomial regression was used to determine the impact of sociodemographic factors, including insurance type, on severity of symptoms and degree of disability at baseline. RESULTS Mean age of the study population was 62.2 +/- 15 years, with 61.8 % male prevalence. The Medicaid population had a greater proportion of Hispanic and non-English speaking patients, compared to commercially insured patients. Medicaid insured patients had significantly greater VAS low back pain scores compared with commercially insured individuals (IRR 1.535, 95 % CI 1.122-2.101, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Medicaid insured patients demonstrated worse baseline PROMs at presentation with ASD, as compared to commercially insured or Medicare patients. Stakeholders across spine care delivery should elucidate the etiology of baseline disparities in ASD patients, as they may result from health system asymmetries. In an ecosystem moving toward value-driven treatment algorithms, accounting for and addressing these differences will be necessary to provide equitable care for ASD populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikechukwu C Amakiri
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Bram Verhofste
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Alexander M Crawford
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leach W, Doherty C, Olave M, England BR, Wysham K, Kerr G, Quinones M, Ogdie A, White D, Neogi T, Scanzello CR, Baker JF. Protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of exercise incentives and corticosteroid injections in osteoarthritis of the knee (MOVE-OK). Trials 2022; 23:604. [PMID: 35897080 PMCID: PMC9327347 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06529-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a high-priority problem among the aging population. While exercise has been shown to be beneficial in management of the disease, scalable and low-cost interventions to improve exercise in this population are lacking. Recent controversy over the value of corticosteroid injections for palliation has also arisen. Therefore, we designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 2-period crossover design to study (1) behavioral incentives to promote exercise and (2) corticosteroid injections to reduce pain and improve function in patients with KOA when compared to lidocaine only. METHODS The study design is a pragmatic factorial and crossover randomized clinical trial. Patients with KOA who are deemed eligible by their provider to receive knee injections and are able to walk without assistive devices will be recruited from clinical practices at four sites within the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System in the USA. In total, 220 participants will be randomized to receive social incentives with gamification (i.e., incorporation of game elements) to promote exercise and compared to controls that receive a Fitbit but no incentive. Each patient will also be assigned to receive a blinded corticosteroid injection and a lidocaine-only injection in random order. The primary outcomes are the change in average daily step counts from baseline and the change in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from baseline. The study team will continuously collect step count, heart rate, and sleep data using activity monitors and patient-reported outcomes using the Way to Health (WTH) platform at two four-week intervals over eight months of follow-up. Mixed effects regression incorporating all available data points will be used for analysis. DISCUSSION The "Marching on for Veterans with Osteoarthritis of the Knee" (MOVE-OK) trial will take a pragmatic approach to evaluate (1) whether incentives based on behaviorally enhanced gamification can improve physical activity in this patient population and (2) whether corticosteroids injections reduce pain and disability in patients with KOA. Results of this trial will help to direct clinical practice and inform management guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05035810 . Registered on 5 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Leach
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caleigh Doherty
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 5th Floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Marianna Olave
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bryant R England
- Medicine Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Katherine Wysham
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gail Kerr
- Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, D.C, USA
| | | | - Alexis Ogdie
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 5th Floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Dan White
- University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Tuhina Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carla R Scanzello
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 5th Floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Joshua F Baker
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 5th Floor White Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ahmed O, Lee A, Vachharajani N, Chang SH, Park Y, Khan AS, Chapman WC, Doyle MM. Reviewing Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:69-77. [PMID: 35703964 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With improved survivorship in liver transplantation (LT), there is an emerging focus on functional recovery and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after surgery. The present study aimed to assess HRQoL after LT using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective analysis of LT recipients between 2020 and 2021. A total of 238 patients were contacted by phone at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using the PROMIS 29-Profile. Scores were recorded and computed using the HealthMeasures Scoring Service. RESULTS PROMIS was available for 174 patients at 3 (n = 58), 6 (n = 57), and 12 months (n = 59). Overall, mean PROMIS scores were 47.6 ± 3, 47.6 ± 3, and 47.6 ± 3 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Most domains improved postoperatively by 12 months except for anxiety and sleep disturbance measures. The lowest domain in the immediate postoperative period was physical functioning, but this had the closest return to normative population values. Pain interference was above the population reference during the initial postoperative period, improving by 12 months where they were below mean population values. Depression and fatigue scores improved by 6 months and appeared to stabilize by 12 months post-LT. Patients demonstrated increased social participation, and scores were remarkably higher than general population means at each timepoint. CONCLUSION LT can impact physical, mental, and social health which, in this setting, remains largely unexplored using PROMIS instruments. We report that although overall patient well being can improve, some mental health domains require further consideration during the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Ahmed
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Angela Lee
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Neeta Vachharajani
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Su-Hsin Chang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery (Chang, Park), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Yikyung Park
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery (Chang, Park), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Adeel S Khan
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - William C Chapman
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| | - Mb Majella Doyle
- From the Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery (Ahmed, Lee, Vachharajani, Khan, Chapman, Doyle)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jones SM, Unger JM. Feasibility of a patient-centered method to determine meaningful change in pain intensity on a survey of patients with a history of cancer. Pain Rep 2022; 7:e1015. [PMID: 38304398 PMCID: PMC10833635 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Current methods of determining minimally important differences (MIDs) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) do not incorporate individual patient values. Objectives This study tested the feasibility of having cancer patients define a personally meaningful change in pain intensity, a method we have termed Precision PROs. Methods Adults with cancer and pain (n = 231) completed an electronic questionnaire twice over 2 weeks. Participants were then given their pain intensity scores with an explanation of score meaning. Participants then defined their own MIDs for an increase and decrease in pain intensity. Participants also answered 3 questions testing their understanding of the MID concept. Results The majority of participants could define an individually meaningful increase (97% [n = 223]) and individually meaningful decrease (98% [n = 226]) in pain intensity. Seventy-two percent of participants (n = 166) answered all test questions correctly and 26% (n = 60) answered 2 of 3 correctly. Using the individual MID, 32% (95% CI: 25.3, 40.0) of the sample experienced a meaningful change between the 2 surveys, more than other methods (z-test: 14%, 95% CI: 9.4, 20.6; distribution-based method: 24%, 95% CI: 17.7, 31.1). Conclusions This study showed the feasibility of the Precision PRO individual MID, which could be used in clinical care or clinical trials. Further studies are needed to compare the individual MID to current methods.
Collapse
|
49
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Ritchlin CT, Leibowitz E, Kollmeier AP, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Han C. Meaningful Improvement in General Health Outcomes with Guselkumab Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Results from a Phase 3 Study. THE PATIENT - PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 15:657-668. [PMID: 35768650 PMCID: PMC9584870 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective The Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 study of guselkumab is the first randomized controlled trial to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures to assess the effects of treatment on general health outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Patients (N = 381) with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with Week 24 crossover to guselkumab Q4W. The PROMIS-29 Profile contains four items for each of seven domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social participation) and one pain-intensity item. Raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores, with norms based on a US general population mean of 50 (1 standard deviation (SD) = 10). T-score changes of ≥ 5 are considered clinically meaningful. Least-squares mean PROMIS-29 T-score changes from baseline to Week 24 and Week 52 were summarized for the guselkumab and placebo groups; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using a mixed model for repeated measures. The proportions of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS-29 T-scores were also summarized at Week 24 and Week 52; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results In the DISCOVER-1 patient population, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores at baseline were ~ 1 SD worse for physical function and pain interference and were numerically worse for social participation, fatigue, and sleep disturbance compared with the US general population. At Week 24, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores improved in guselkumab-treated patients, approaching US population norms; T-scores continued to improve through Week 52. Significantly higher proportions of patients in both guselkumab treatment arms (31–52% across domains) had clinically meaningful improvements in pain interference, fatigue, physical function, sleep, and social participation at Week 24 versus placebo (all nominal p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion In patients with active PsA, guselkumab treatment provided clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, as measured by the PROMIS-29 Profile. These improvements were maintained through 1 year. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number, NCT03162796; Submission date 19 May 2017. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-022-00588-6.
Collapse
|
50
|
Elsman EBM, Roorda LD, Smidt N, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile in people with and without chronic conditions. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3447-3458. [PMID: 35751760 PMCID: PMC9587921 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03171-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the structural validity, internal consistency, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile, including seven physical (e.g., pain, physical function), mental (e.g., depression, anxiety), and social (e.g., role functioning) domains of health, in a Dutch general population sample including subsamples with and without chronic diseases. METHODS The PROMIS-29 was completed by 63,602 participants from the Lifelines cohort study. Structural validity of the PROMIS-29, including unidimensionality of each domain and the physical and mental health summary scores, was evaluated using factor analyses (criteria: CFI ≥ 0.95, TLI ≥ 0.95, RMSEA ≤ 0.06, SRMR ≤ 0.08). Internal consistency, measurement invariance (no differential item functioning (DIF) for age, gender, administration mode, educational level, ethnicity, chronic diseases), and construct validity (hypotheses on known-groups validity and correlations between domains) were assessed per domain. RESULTS The factor structure of the seven domains was supported (CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.046, SRMR = 0.031) as was unidimensionality of each domain, both in the entire sample and the subsamples. Model fit of the physical and mental health summary scores reached the criteria, and scoring coefficients were obtained. Cronbach's alpha for the seven PROMIS-29 domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.96 in the complete sample. No DIF was detected. Of the predefined hypotheses, 78% could be confirmed. CONCLUSION Sufficient structural validity, internal consistency and measurement invariance were found, both in the entire sample and in subsamples with and without chronic diseases. Requirements for sufficient evidence for construct validity were (almost) met for most subscales. Future studies should investigate test-retest reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness of the PROMIS-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen B M Elsman
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke Smidt
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henrica C W de Vet
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|