1
|
Lin YC, Kuo WY, Kung PT, Tsai WC. Proportion trends, cancer stage, and survival of patients with cancer diagnosed through emergency and nonemergency departments: a nationwide cohort study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1399326. [PMID: 39252940 PMCID: PMC11381288 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction To reduce mortality, the Taiwan government has vigorously promoted free cancer screening and preventive health screening services. Cancers are usually advanced by the time they are discovered in the emergency department. Through this study, we aimed to understand the characteristics of cancer patients diagnosed through the emergency department and thus identify high-risk populations by comparing cancer staging and survival rates in patients diagnosed in the emergency department and those diagnosed in the non-emergency department. Methods The retrospective study enrolled a total of 389,043 patients over the age of 20 who were newly diagnosed with one of the five major cancers (including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and oral cancer) between 2008 and 2017 and analyzed their diagnostic pathway, cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival time. Results Of the study participants, 59,423 patients (about 15.3%) were diagnosed with cancer through the emergency department. We found that a sizable proportion of older people and patients with low education and low incomes were diagnosed through emergency department visits, and those with a health condition comorbidity severity of 3 had the highest proportion diagnosed by the emergency department, advanced stages at diagnosis, and risk of death. These can be classified as high-risk groups. In addition, 76.4% of patients diagnosed in the emergency department had advanced cancer, and the risk of death was 1.46 times higher than that of patients diagnosed in the non-emergency department. Although cancer screening is available, it does not reduce the proportion of patients with advanced cancer who are diagnosed through or at the time of diagnosis in the emergency department. Conclusions The present study found that the government's cancer screening did not affect the proportion or number of cancers diagnosed through emergency department visits. Therefore, the government should focus on more cancer screening, health education in high-risk groups, and strengthening the link between emergency and oncology departments to reduce the risk of death for patients diagnosed through emergency department visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Chao Lin
- Graduate Institute of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
- Department of Neurological Institute, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Yin Kuo
- Department of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Tseng Kung
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chen Tsai
- Department of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rasmussen LA, Vedsted P, Jensen H, Frederiksen H, El-Galaly TC, Kristensen IB, Virgilsen LF. Multiple myeloma: unplanned diagnostic pathways and association with risk factors and survival - a nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:998. [PMID: 39134966 PMCID: PMC11320956 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12706-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma often presents with vague and non-specific symptoms. Many patients are diagnosed in unplanned rather than elective (planned) diagnostic pathways. This study investigates the diagnosis of multiple myeloma in unplanned pathways and the association with patient characteristics, disease profile, and survival. METHODS We conducted a nationwide register-based study, including all patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Denmark in 2014-2018. Patients were categorised as diagnosed in an unplanned pathway if registered with an acute admission within 30 days prior to the multiple myeloma diagnosis and no other previously registered pathway to this diagnosis. Unplanned pathways were compared to all other pathways combined. RESULTS We included 2,213 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, hereof 32% diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. Comorbidity, no prior cancer diagnosis, a history of few visits to the general practitioner (GP), multiple myeloma complications at diagnosis, high-risk cytogenetics, and advanced cancer stage were associated with a higher probability of being diagnosed in an unplanned pathway. For example, 24.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.8-27.0) of patients with low comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 0) were diagnosed in an unplanned pathway as were 50.9% (95% CI: 45.6-56.1) of patients with high comorbidity (CCI score 3+). For patients with dialysis need at the time of diagnosis the probability was 66.0% (95% CI 54.2-77.8) and 30.9% (95% CI: 28.9-32.9) for patients with no dialysis need. Patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival (hazard ratio 1.44 (95% CI: 1.26-1.64)). However, this association was not seen in analyses restricted to patients surviving for more than three years. CONCLUSIONS High comorbidity level, few usual GP visits, advanced disease status at diagnosis, and complications were associated with diagnosis in an unplanned pathway. Further, patients diagnosed in an unplanned pathway had inferior survival. Promoting earlier diagnosis and preventing unplanned pathways may help improve survival in multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henry Jensen
- Danish Clinical Quality Program - National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Frederiksen
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Haematology, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ida Bruun Kristensen
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mitchell RJ, Delaney GP, Arnolda G, Liauw W, Lystad RP, Braithwaite J. Survival of patients who had cancer diagnosed through an emergency hospital admission: A retrospective matched case-comparison study in Australia. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 91:102584. [PMID: 38772062 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals diagnosed with cancer via emergency admission are likely to have poor outcomes. This study aims to identify cancer diagnosed through an emergency hospital admission and examine predictors associated with mortality within 12-months. METHOD A population-based retrospective 1:1 propensity-matched case-comparison study of people who had an emergency versus a planned hospital admission with a principal diagnosis of cancer during 2013-2020 in New South Wales, Australia using linked hospital, cancer registry and mortality records. Conditional logistic regression examined predictors of mortality at 12-months. RESULTS There were 28,502 matched case-comparisons. Individuals who had an emergency admission were four times more likely to die within 12-months (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.93; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.75-4.13) compared to individuals who had a planned admission for cancer. Older individuals, diagnosed with lung (OR 1.89; 95 %CI 1.36-2.63) or digestive organ, excluding colorectal (OR1.78; 95 %CI 1.30-2.43) cancers, where the degree of spread was metastatic (OR 3.61; 95 %CI 2.62-4.50), who had a mental disorder diagnosis (OR 2.08; 95 %CI 1.89-2.30), lived in rural (OR 1.27; 95 %CI 1.17-1.37) or more disadvantaged neighbourhoods had a higher likelihood of death within 12-months following an unplanned admission compared to referent groups. Females (OR 0.87; 95 %CI 0.81-0.93) had an 13 % lower likelihood of mortality within 12-months compared to males. CONCLUSIONS While some emergency cancer admissions are not avoidable, the importance of preventive screening and promotion of help-seeking for early cancer symptoms should not be overlooked as mechanisms to reduce emergency admissions related to cancer and to improve cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Geoffrey P Delaney
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal - Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, South-Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Reidar P Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggarwal A, Simcock R, Price P, Rachet B, Lyratzopoulos G, Walker K, Spencer K, Roques T, Sullivan R. NHS cancer services and systems-ten pressure points a UK cancer control plan needs to address. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e363-e373. [PMID: 38991599 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00345-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
In this Policy Review we discuss ten key pressure points in the NHS in the delivery of cancer care services that need to be urgently addressed by a comprehensive national cancer control plan. These pressure points cover areas such as increasing workforce capacity and its productivity, delivering effective cancer survivorship services, addressing variation in quality, fixing the reimbursement system for cancer care, and balancing of the cancer research agenda. These areas have been selected based on their relative importance to ensuring sustainable cancer services, persistence as key issues in the NHS, and their impact on delivering better and more equitable and affordable patient outcomes. Many of these pressure points are not acknowledged explicitly in any current discourse. The evidence we provide points to their impact on the ability to deliver world class cancer care, but also to their amenability to affordable solutions if given the relevant prioritisation and investment. The current narrative needs to move away from a technocentric approach to improving care, to one focused on understanding the complexity of cancer services and the wider health system to drive improvements in survival, quality of life, and experience for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Richard Simcock
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Pat Price
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katie Spencer
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Tom Roques
- Department of Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kapadia P, Zimolzak AJ, Upadhyay DK, Korukonda S, Murugaesh Rekha R, Mushtaq U, Mir U, Murphy DR, Offner A, Abel GA, Lyratzopoulos G, Mounce LT, Singh H. Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2506-2515. [PMID: 38718321 PMCID: PMC11268555 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Missed and delayed cancer diagnoses are common, harmful, and often preventable. Automated measures of quality of cancer diagnosis are lacking but could identify gaps and guide interventions. We developed and implemented a digital quality measure (dQM) of cancer emergency presentation (EP) using electronic health record databases of two health systems and characterized the measure's association with missed opportunities for diagnosis (MODs) and mortality. METHODS On the basis of literature and expert input, we defined EP as a new cancer diagnosis within 30 days after emergency department or inpatient visit. We identified EPs for lung cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Geisinger from 2016 to 2020. We validated measure accuracy and identified preceding MODs through standardized chart review of 100 records per cancer per health system. Using VA's longitudinal encounter and mortality data, we applied logistic regression to assess EP's association with 1-year mortality, adjusting for cancer stage and demographics. RESULTS Among 38,565 and 2,914 patients with lung cancer and 14,674 and 1,649 patients with CRCs at VA and Geisinger, respectively, our dQM identified EPs in 20.9% and 9.4% of lung cancers, and 22.4% and 7.5% of CRCs. Chart reviews revealed high positive predictive values for EPs across sites and cancer types (72%-90%), and a substantial percent represented MODs (48.8%-84.9%). EP was associated with significantly higher odds of 1-year mortality for lung cancer and CRC (adjusted odds ratio, 1.78 and 1.83, respectively, 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.86 and 1.61 to 2.07). CONCLUSION A dQM for cancer EP was strongly associated with both mortality and MODs. The findings suggest a promising automated approach to measuring quality of cancer diagnosis in US health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paarth Kapadia
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Andrew J. Zimolzak
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Umair Mushtaq
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Usman Mir
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel R. Murphy
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Alexis Offner
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bosch X, Mota Gomes T, Montori-Palacin E, Moreno P, López-Soto A. Time to Diagnosis and Presenting Symptoms of Patients Diagnosed With Cancer Through Emergency and Nonemergency Routes: A Large Retrospective Study From a High-Volume Center. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:932-942. [PMID: 38457754 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The symptoms with which a patient with cancer presents and the route taken to diagnosis (emergency v nonemergency) may affect the speed with which the diagnosis of cancer is made, thereby affecting outcomes. We examined time to diagnosis by symptom for cancers diagnosed through emergency and nonemergency routes (NERs). METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with 10 solid cancers at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona between March 2013 and June 2023. Cancers were diagnosed through emergency presentation and admission (inpatient emergency route [IER]), emergency presentation and outpatient referral (outpatient emergency route [OER]), and primary care presentation and outpatient referral (NER). We assessed the effect of diagnostic routes on intervals to diagnosis for 19 cancer symptoms. RESULTS A total of 5,174 and 1,607 patients were diagnosed with cancer through emergency routes and NERs, respectively. Over 85% of patients presenting with alarm (localizing) symptoms such as hematuria through emergency routes were diagnosed with the expected cancer, whereas those with nonlocalizing symptoms such as abdominal pain had a more heterogeneous cancer-site composition. Median intervals were shorter for alarm than nonlocalizing symptoms and tended to be shorter in IERs than OERs. However, for most symptoms, intervals in both routes were invariably shorter than in the NER. For example, diagnostic intervals for hematuria and abdominal pain were 3 and 5 days shorter in IERs than OERs, but they were 5-8 and 17-22 days shorter than in the NER, respectively. CONCLUSION For patients with alarm symptoms, intervals were shorter than for those with nonlocalizing symptoms and, for most symptoms, intervals were shorter when patients were evaluated by emergency routes rather than NERs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tiago Mota Gomes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabet Montori-Palacin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Moreno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alfonso López-Soto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Clínic Foundation for Biomedical Research (FCRB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rafiq M, Renzi C, White B, Zakkak N, Nicholson B, Lyratzopoulos G, Barclay M. Predictive value of abnormal blood tests for detecting cancer in primary care patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms: A population-based cohort study of 477,870 patients in England. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004426. [PMID: 39078806 PMCID: PMC11288431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying patients presenting with nonspecific abdominal symptoms who have underlying cancer is a challenge. Common blood tests are widely used to investigate these symptoms in primary care, but their predictive value for detecting cancer in this context is unknown. We quantify the predictive value of 19 abnormal blood test results for detecting underlying cancer in patients presenting with 2 nonspecific abdominal symptoms. METHODS AND FINDINGS Using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked to the National Cancer Registry, Hospital Episode Statistics and Index of Multiple Deprivation, we conducted a population-based cohort study of patients aged ≥30 presenting to English general practice with abdominal pain or bloating between January 2007 and October 2016. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), sensitivity, and specificity for cancer diagnosis (overall and by cancer site) were calculated for 19 abnormal blood test results co-occurring in primary care within 3 months of abdominal pain or bloating presentations. A total of 9,427/425,549 (2.2%) patients with abdominal pain and 1,148/52,321 (2.2%) with abdominal bloating were diagnosed with cancer within 12 months post-presentation. For both symptoms, in both males and females aged ≥60, the PPV for cancer exceeded the 3% risk threshold used by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for recommending urgent specialist cancer referral. Concurrent blood tests were performed in two thirds of all patients (64% with abdominal pain and 70% with bloating). In patients aged 30 to 59, several blood abnormalities updated a patient's cancer risk to above the 3% threshold: For example, in females aged 50 to 59 with abdominal bloating, pre-blood test cancer risk of 1.6% increased to: 10% with raised ferritin, 9% with low albumin, 8% with raised platelets, 6% with raised inflammatory markers, and 4% with anaemia. Compared to risk assessment solely based on presenting symptom, age and sex, for every 1,000 patients with abdominal bloating, assessment incorporating information from blood test results would result in 63 additional urgent suspected cancer referrals and would identify 3 extra cancer patients through this route (a 16% relative increase in cancer diagnosis yield). Study limitations include reliance on completeness of coding of symptoms in primary care records and possible variation in PPVs if extrapolated to healthcare settings with higher or lower rates of blood test use. CONCLUSIONS In patients consulting with nonspecific abdominal symptoms, the assessment of cancer risk based on symptoms, age and sex alone can be substantially enhanced by considering additional information from common blood test results. Male and female patients aged ≥60 presenting to primary care with abdominal pain or bloating warrant consideration for urgent cancer referral or investigation. Further cancer assessment should also be considered in patients aged 30 to 59 with concurrent blood test abnormalities. This approach can detect additional patients with underlying cancer through expedited referral routes and can guide decisions on specialist referrals and investigation strategies for different cancer sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meena Rafiq
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cristina Renzi
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Becky White
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nadine Zakkak
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Barclay
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shimer S, Allen OS, Yang C, Canavan M, Westvold S, Kim N, Morillo J, Parker T, Wallace N, Smith CB, Adelson KB. Prognostic Understanding, Goals of Care, and Quality of Life in Hospitalized Patients with Leukemia or Multiple Myeloma. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:879-887. [PMID: 38990245 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Prior studies reveal a lack of illness understanding and prognostic awareness among patients with hematological malignancies. We evaluated prognostic awareness and illness understanding among patients with acute leukemia and multiple myeloma (MM) and measured patient-hematologist discordance. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with acute leukemia and MM at Mount Sinai Hospital or Yale New Haven Hospital between August 2015 and February 2020. Patients were administered a survey assessing prognostic awareness, goals of care (GOC), and quality of life. Hematologists completed a similar survey for each patient. We assessed discordance across the cohort of patients and hematologists using the likelihood-ratio chi-square test and within patient-hematologist pairs using the kappa (κ) statistic. Results: We enrolled 185 patients (137 with leukemia and 48 with MM) and 29 hematologists. Among patients, 137 (74%) self-identified as White, 27 (15%) as Black, and 21 (11%) as Hispanic. Across the entire cohort, patients were significantly more optimistic about treatment goals compared with hematologists (p = 0.027). Within patient-hematologist pairs, hematologists were significantly more optimistic than patients with respect to line of treatment (κ = 0.03). For both leukemia and MM cohorts, patients were significantly more likely to respond "don't know" or deferring to a faith-based response with 88 (64%) and 34 (71%), respectively, compared with only 28 (20%) and 11 (23%) of hematologists, respectively. Conclusions: We observed significant discordance regarding prognosis and GOC among patients with hematological malignancies and their hematologists. These data support future interventions to improve prognostic understanding among this patient population to facilitate informed treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Shimer
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Olivia S Allen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chen Yang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Nina Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jose Morillo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Terri Parker
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Cardinale B Smith
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kerin B Adelson
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stauder SK, Borkar SR, Glasgow AE, Runkle TL, Sherman ME, Spaulding AC, Mohseni MM, DeStephano CC. Emergency Department Visits Before Cancer Diagnosis Among Women at Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2024; 8:213-224. [PMID: 38596167 PMCID: PMC11002794 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine associations of incident cancer diagnoses in women with recent emergency department (ED) care. Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort study analyzing biological females aged 18 years and older, who were diagnosed with an incident primary cancer (12 cancer types studied) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, from electronic health records. The primary outcome was a cancer diagnosis within 6 months of a preceding ED visit. Secondary outcomes included patient factors associated with a preceding ED visit. Results Of 25,736 patients (median age of 62 years, range 18-101) diagnosed with an incident primary cancer, 1938 (7.5%) had an ED visit ≤6 months before a diagnosis. The ED-associated cancer cases were highest in lung cancer (n=514, 14.7%) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=22, 13.3%). Patient factors increasing the likelihood of ED evaluation before diagnosis included 18-50 years of age (OR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.61), Elixhauser score (measure of comorbidities) >4 (OR=17.90; 95% CI, 14.21-22.76), use of Medicaid or other government insurance (OR=2.10; 95% CI, 1.63-2.69), residence within the institutional catchment areas (OR=3.18; 95% CI, 2.78-3.66), non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (OR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.88), and established primary care provider at Mayo Clinic (OR=1.45; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65). The ED visits were more likely in those who died within 6 months of diagnosis (n=327, 37.8%) than those who did not die (n=1611, 6.5%). Conclusion Patient characteristics identified in this study offer opportunities to provide cancer risk assessment and health navigation, particularly among individuals with comorbidities and limited health care access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shalmali R. Borkar
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Amy E. Glasgow
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tage L. Runkle
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Aaron C. Spaulding
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Exarchakou A, Rachet B, Lyratzopoulos G, Maringe C, Rubio FJ. What can hospital emergency admissions prior to cancer diagnosis tell us about socio-economic inequalities in cancer diagnosis? Evidence from population-based data in England. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1960-1968. [PMID: 38671209 PMCID: PMC11182764 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More deprived cancer patients are at higher risk of Emergency Presentation (EP) with most studies pointing to lower symptom awareness and increased comorbidities to explain those patterns. With the example of colon cancer, we examine patterns of hospital emergency admissions (HEAs) history in the most and least deprived patients as a potential precursor of EP. METHODS We analysed the rates of hospital admissions and their admission codes (retrieved from Hospital Episode Statistics) in the two years preceding cancer diagnosis by sex, deprivation and route to diagnosis (EP, non-EP). To select the conditions (grouped admission codes) that best predict emergency admission, we adapted the purposeful variable selection to mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS Colon cancer patients diagnosed through EP had the highest number of HEAs than all the other routes to diagnosis, especially in the last 7 months before diagnosis. Most deprived patients had an overall higher rate and higher probability of HEA but fewer conditions associated with it. CONCLUSIONS Our findings point to higher use of emergency services for non-specific symptoms and conditions in the most deprived patients, preceding colon cancer diagnosis. Health system barriers may be a shared factor of socio-economic inequalities in EP and HEAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimilia Exarchakou
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Camille Maringe
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burton A, Wilburn J, Driver RJ, Wallace D, McPhail S, Cross TJS, Rowe IA, Marshall A. Routes to diagnosis for hepatocellular carcinoma patients: predictors and associations with treatment and mortality. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1697-1708. [PMID: 38499728 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02645-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence has increased rapidly, and prognosis remains poor. We aimed to explore predictors of routes to diagnosis (RtD), and outcomes, in HCC cases. METHODS HCC cases diagnosed 2006-2017 were identified from the National Cancer Registration Dataset and linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the RtD metric. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between RtD, diagnosis year, 365-day mortality and receipt of potentially curative treatment. RESULTS 23,555 HCC cases were identified; 36.1% via emergency presentation (EP), 30.2% GP referral (GP), 17.1% outpatient referral, 11.0% two-week wait and 4.6% other/unknown routes. Odds of 365-day mortality was >70% lower via GP or OP routes than EP, and odds of curative treatment 3-4 times higher. Further adjustment for cancer/cirrhosis stage attenuated the associations with curative treatment. People who were older, female, had alcohol-related liver disease, or were more deprived, were at increased risk of an EP. Over time, diagnoses via EP decreased, and via GP increased. CONCLUSIONS HCC RtD is an important predictor of outcomes. Continuing to reduce EP and increase GP and OP presentations, for example by identifying and regularly monitoring patients at higher risk of HCC, may improve stage at diagnosis and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anya Burton
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE, UK.
- Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Jennifer Wilburn
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE, UK
| | - Robert J Driver
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Sean McPhail
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, LS2 7UE, UK
| | - Tim J S Cross
- Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | - Ian A Rowe
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Aileen Marshall
- Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, The Royal Free Hospital, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scott SE, Thompson MJ. "Notification! You May Have Cancer." Could Smartphones and Wearables Help Detect Cancer Early? JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e52577. [PMID: 38767941 PMCID: PMC11148520 DOI: 10.2196/52577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
This viewpoint paper considers the authors' perspectives on the potential role of smartphones, wearables, and other technologies in the diagnosis of cancer. We believe that these technologies could be valuable additions in the pursuit of early cancer diagnosis, as they offer solutions to the timely detection of signals or symptoms and monitoring of subtle changes in behavior that may otherwise be missed. In addition to signal detection, technologies could assist symptom interpretation and guide and facilitate access to health care. This paper aims to provide an overview of the scientific rationale as to why these technologies could be valuable for early cancer detection, as well as outline the next steps for research and development to drive investigation into the potential for smartphones and wearables in this context and optimize implementation. We draw attention to potential barriers to successful implementation, including the difficulty of the development of signals and sensors with sufficient utility and accuracy through robust research with the target group. There are regulatory challenges; the potential for innovations to exacerbate inequalities; and questions surrounding acceptability, uptake, and correct use by the intended target group and health care practitioners. Finally, there is potential for unintended consequences on individuals and health care services including unnecessary anxiety, increased symptom burden, overinvestigation, and inappropriate use of health care resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne E Scott
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lüchtenborg M, Huynh J, Armes J, Plugge E, Hunter RM, Visser R, Taylor RM, Davies EA. Cancer incidence, treatment, and survival in the prison population compared with the general population in England: a population-based, matched cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:553-562. [PMID: 38697154 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00035-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growing and ageing prison population in England makes accurate cancer data of increasing importance for prison health policies. This study aimed to compare cancer incidence, treatment, and survival between patients diagnosed in prison and the general population. METHODS In this population-based, matched cohort study, we used cancer registration data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England to identify primary invasive cancers and cervical cancers in situ diagnosed in adults (aged ≥18 years) in the prison and general populations between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2017. Ministry of Justice and Office for National Statistics population data for England were used to calculate age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) per year and age-standardised incidence rate ratios (ASIRR) for the 20-year period. Patients diagnosed with primary invasive cancers (ie, excluding cervical cancers in situ) in prison between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2017 were matched to individuals from the general population and linked to hospital and treatment datasets. Matching was done in a 1:5 ratio according to 5-year age group, gender, diagnosis year, cancer site, and disease stage. Our primary objectives were to compare the incidence of cancer (1998-2017); the receipt of treatment with curative intent (2012-17 matched cohort), using logistic regression adjusted for matching variables (excluding cancer site) and route to diagnosis; and overall survival following cancer diagnosis (2012-17 matched cohort), using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for matching variables (excluding cancer site) and route to diagnosis, with stratification for the receipt of any treatment with curative intent. FINDINGS We identified 2015 incident cancers among 1964 adults (1556 [77·2%] men and 459 [22·8%] women) in English prisons in the 20-year period up to Dec 31, 2017. The ASIR for cancer for men in prison was initially lower than for men in the general population (in 1998, ASIR 119·33 per 100 000 person-years [95% CI 48·59-219·16] vs 746·97 per 100 000 person-years [742·31-751·66]), but increased to a similar level towards the end of the study period (in 2017, 856·85 per 100 000 person-years [675·12-1060·44] vs 788·59 per 100 000 person-years [784·62-792·57]). For women, the invasive cancer incidence rate was low and so ASIR was not reported for this group. Over the 20-year period, the incidence of invasive cancer for men in prison increased (incidence rate ratio per year, 1·05 [95% CI 1·04-1·06], during 1999-2017 compared with 1998). ASIRRs showed that over the 20-year period, overall cancer incidence was lower in men in prison than in men in the general population (ASIRR 0·76 [95% CI 0·73-0·80]). The difference was not statistically significant for women (ASIRR 0·83 [0·68-1·00]). Between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2017, patients diagnosed in prison were less likely to undergo curative treatment than matched patients in the general population (274 [32·3%] of 847 patients vs 1728 [41·5%] of 4165; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·85]). Being diagnosed in prison was associated with a significantly increased risk of death on adjustment for matching variables (347 deaths during 2021·9 person-years in the prison cohort vs 1626 deaths during 10 944·2 person-years in the general population; adjusted HR 1·16 [95% CI 1·03-1·30]); this association was partly explained by stratification by curative treatment and further adjustment for diagnosis route (adjusted HR 1·05 [0·93-1·18]). INTERPRETATION Cancer incidence increased in people in prisons in England between 1998 and 2017, with patients in prison less likely to receive curative treatments and having lower overall survival than the general population. The association with survival was partly explained by accounting for differences in receipt of curative treatment and adjustment for diagnosis route. Improved routine cancer surveillance is needed to inform prison cancer policies and decrease inequalities for this under-researched population. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, King's College London, and Strategic Priorities Fund 2019/20 of Research England via the University of Surrey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margreet Lüchtenborg
- Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK; National Disease Registration Service, Data and Analytics, Transformation Directorate, NHS England, UK
| | - Jennie Huynh
- Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK; National Disease Registration Service, Data and Analytics, Transformation Directorate, NHS England, UK
| | - Jo Armes
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Emma Plugge
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rachael M Hunter
- Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Renske Visser
- Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Centre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Professional Research, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Davies
- Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mergen M, Welter N, Furtwängler R, Melchior P, Vokuhl C, Gessler M, Meier C, Kager L, Schenk J, Graf N. The impact of the route to diagnosis in nephroblastoma. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7226. [PMID: 38785181 PMCID: PMC11117195 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common childhood kidney cancer. It is a rapid growing embryonal tumor in young children and can be diagnosed with and without tumor related symptoms. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the route to diagnosis of WT treated prospectively according to the SIOP 93-01/GPOH and 2001/GPOH in Germany between 1993 and 2022. Four routes were defined: diagnosis due to tumor-related symptoms, incidental diagnosis during another disease, diagnosis by preventive examinations, and diagnosis within a surveillance program. For these groups we compared clinical and tumor characteristics and outcome. RESULTS Of 2549 patients with WT 1822 (71.5%) were diagnosed by tumor-related symptoms, 472 (18.5%) incidentally, 213 (8.4%) by preventive medical examinations, and 42 (1.6%) by surveillance. Age, general health status, tumor volume, and local and overall stage varied significantly between these groups. The youngest patients were those diagnosed by preventive medical examination (mean: 1.70 years). These patients also showed the best general health status. Tumor volume at diagnosis (549 mL) and after preoperative chemotherapy (255 mL) was significantly higher for children with tumor-related symptoms. The highest percentage of local stage I (78.6%) and the lowest percentage of metastatic disease (4.8%) was found in the surveillance group. The outcome of patients was not significantly different, with up to 19.0% relapses in the surveillance group and 3.0% deaths in the group with tumor-related symptoms. CONCLUSION The route to diagnosis of WT correlates with age, general health status, tumor volume, and stage distribution, but does not impact the outcome of patients. Nonetheless, diagnosis without tumor related symptoms results in lower treatment burden and thus improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Mergen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and HematologySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
| | - Nils Welter
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and HematologySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
| | - Rhoikos Furtwängler
- Divison of Paediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Paediatrics, InselspitalBern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Patrick Melchior
- Department of Radiation OncologySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
| | - Christian Vokuhl
- Section of Pediatric Pathology, Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital BonnBonnGermany
| | - Manfred Gessler
- Developmental Biochemistry and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Theodor‐Boveri‐Institute/BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Clemens‐Magnus Meier
- Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric SurgerySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
| | - Leo Kager
- Department of PediatricsSt. Anna Children's Hospital, Medical University ViennaViennaAustria
- St. Anna Children's Cancer Research InstituteViennaAustria
| | - Jens‐Peter Schenk
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Division of Pediatric RadiologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Norbert Graf
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and HematologySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thompson CA, Sheridan P, Metwally E, Peacock Hinton S, Mullins MA, Dillon EC, Thompson M, Pettit N, Kurian AW, Pruitt SL, Lyratzopoulos G. Emergency department involvement in the diagnosis of cancer among older adults: a SEER-Medicare study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae039. [PMID: 38796687 PMCID: PMC11193434 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, 20% to 50% of cancer is diagnosed through emergency presentation, which is associated with lower survival, poor patient experience, and socioeconomic disparities, but population-based evidence about emergency diagnosis in the United States is limited. We estimated emergency department (ED) involvement in the diagnosis of cancer in a nationally representative population of older US adults, and its association with sociodemographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. METHODS We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare data for Medicare beneficiaries (≥66 years old) with a diagnosis of female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers (2008-2017), defining their earliest cancer-related claim as their index date, and patients who visited the ED 0 to 30 days before their index date to have "ED involvement" in their diagnosis, with stratification as 0 to 7 or 8 to 30 days. We estimated covariate-adjusted associations of patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, comorbidity score, tumor stage, year of diagnosis, rurality, and census-tract poverty with ED involvement using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 614 748 patients, 23% had ED involvement, with 18% visiting the ED in the 0 to 7 days before their index date. This rate varied greatly by tumor site, with breast cancer at 8%, colorectal cancer at 39%, lung cancer at 40%, and prostate cancer at 7%. In adjusted models, older age, female sex, non-Hispanic Black and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander race, being unmarried, recent year of diagnosis, later-stage disease, comorbidities, and poverty were associated with ED involvement. CONCLUSIONS The ED may be involved in the initial identification of cancer for 1 in 5 patients. Earlier, system-level identification of cancer in non-ED settings should be prioritized, especially among underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Thompson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Eman Metwally
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sharon Peacock Hinton
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Megan A Mullins
- Peter O’Donnell Jr School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Matthew Thompson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nicholas Pettit
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Sandi L Pruitt
- Peter O’Donnell Jr School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Purshouse K, Bulbeck HJ, Rooney AG, Noble KE, Carruthers RD, Thompson G, Hamerlik P, Yap C, Kurian KM, Jefferies SJ, Lopez JS, Jenkinson MD, Hanemann CO, Stead LF. Adult brain tumour research in 2024: Status, challenges and recommendations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2024; 50:e12979. [PMID: 38605644 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
In 2015, a groundswell of brain tumour patient, carer and charity activism compelled the UK Minister for Life Sciences to form a brain tumour research task and finish group. This resulted, in 2018, with the UK government pledging £20m of funding, to be paralleled with £25m from Cancer Research UK, specifically for neuro-oncology research over the subsequent 5 years. Herein, we review if and how the adult brain tumour research landscape in the United Kingdom has changed over that time and what challenges and bottlenecks remain. We have identified seven universal brain tumour research priorities and three cross-cutting themes, which span the research spectrum from bench to bedside and back again. We discuss the status, challenges and recommendations for each one, specific to the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Gerard Thompson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Petra Hamerlik
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Kathreena M Kurian
- Bristol Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Juanita S Lopez
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | - Lucy F Stead
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wheelwright SJ, Russ S, Mold F, Armes J, Harder H. Symptomatic presentation of cancer in primary care: a scoping review of patients' experiences and needs during the cancer diagnostic pathway. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076527. [PMID: 38508614 PMCID: PMC10961516 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to map the experiences and needs of patients presenting with symptoms of suspected cancer in the primary care interval (from when they first present to primary care to their first appointment or referral to a secondary or tertiary level healthcare facility). DESIGN This was a scoping review. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies or reports written in English which included primary data on the primary care interval experiences and/or needs of adult patients presenting with new symptoms of suspected cancer were eligible. Studies which only included patients with secondary or recurring cancer, conference abstracts and reviews were excluded. No date limits were applied. METHODS The Joanna Briggs Institute method for Scoping Reviews guided screening, report selection and data extraction. At least two independent reviewers contributed to each stage. Medline, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Embase and Web of Science were searched and several grey literature resources. Relevant quantitative findings were qualitised and integrated with qualitative findings. A thematic analysis was carried out. RESULTS Of the 4855 records identified in the database search, 18 were included in the review, along with 13 identified from other sources. The 31 included studies were published between 2002 and 2023 and most (n=17) were conducted in the UK. Twenty subthemes across four themes (patient experience, interpersonal, healthcare professional (HCP) skills, organisational) were identified. No studies included patient-reported outcome measures. Patients wanted (1) to feel heard and understood by HCPs, (2) a plan to establish what was causing their symptoms, and (3) information about the next stages of the diagnostic process. CONCLUSIONS Scoping review findings can contribute to service planning as the cancer diagnostic pathway for symptomatic presentation of cancer evolves. The effectiveness of this pathway should be evaluated not only in terms of clinical outcomes, but also patient-reported outcomes and experience, along with the perspectives of primary care HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie Russ
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Freda Mold
- Department of Health Care Management & Policy, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Jo Armes
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Helena Harder
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Agatsuma N, Utsumi T, Nishikawa Y, Horimatsu T, Seta T, Yamashita Y, Tanaka Y, Inoue T, Nakanishi Y, Shimizu T, Ohno M, Fukushima A, Nakayama T, Seno H. Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route: Who should be screened? World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1368-1376. [PMID: 38596494 PMCID: PMC11000077 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health concern, with advanced-stage diagnoses contributing to poor prognoses. The efficacy of CRC screening has been well-established; nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients remain unscreened, with > 70% of cases diagnosed outside screening. Although identifying specific subgroups for whom CRC screening should be particularly recommended is crucial owing to limited resources, the association between the diagnostic routes and identification of these subgroups has been less appreciated. In the Japanese cancer registry, the diagnostic routes for groups discovered outside of screening are primarily categorized into those with comorbidities found during hospital visits and those with CRC-related symptoms. AIM To clarify the stage at CRC diagnosis based on diagnostic routes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study using a cancer registry of patients with CRC between January 2016 and December 2019 at two hospitals. The diagnostic routes were primarily classified into three groups: Cancer screening, follow-up, and symptomatic. The early-stage was defined as Stages 0 or I. Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were exploited to determine the odds of early-stage diagnosis in the symptomatic and cancer screening groups, referencing the follow-up group. The adjusted covariates were age, sex, and tumor location. RESULTS Of the 2083 patients, 715 (34.4%), 1064 (51.1%), and 304 (14.6%) belonged to the follow-up, symptomatic, and cancer screening groups, respectively. Among the 2083 patients, CRCs diagnosed at an early stage were 57.3% (410 of 715), 23.9% (254 of 1064), and 59.5% (181 of 304) in the follow-up, symptomatic, and cancer screening groups, respectively. The symptomatic group exhibited a lower likelihood of early-stage diagnosis than the follow-up group [P < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.23; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.19-0.29]. The likelihood of diagnosis at an early stage was similar between the follow-up and cancer screening groups (P = 0.493, aOR for early-stage diagnosis in the cancer screening group vs follow-up group = 1.11; 95%CI = 0.82-1.49). CONCLUSION CRCs detected during hospital visits for comorbidities were diagnosed earlier, similar to cancer screening. CRC screening should be recommended, particularly for patients without periodical hospital visits for comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobukazu Agatsuma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan
| | - Takahiro Utsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nishikawa
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Takahiro Horimatsu
- Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takeshi Seta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan
| | - Yukitaka Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama 640-8558, Japan
| | - Yukari Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakanishi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takahiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Mikako Ohno
- Medical Support Section, Medical Affairs Division, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Akane Fukushima
- Medical Support Section, Medical Affairs Division, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Seno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Huntley C, Loong L, Mallinson C, Bethell R, Rahman T, Alhaddad N, Tulloch O, Zhou X, Lee J, Eves P, McRonald F, Torr B, Burn J, Shaw A, Morris EJ, Monahan K, Hardy S, Turnbull C. The comprehensive English National Lynch Syndrome Registry: development and description of a new genomics data resource. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 69:102465. [PMID: 38356732 PMCID: PMC10864212 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lynch Syndrome (LS) is a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by constitutional pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. To date, fragmentation of clinical and genomic data has restricted understanding of national LS ascertainment and outcomes, and precluded evaluation of NICE guidance on testing and management. To address this, via collaboration between researchers, the National Disease Registration Service (NDRS), NHS Genomic Medicine Service Alliances (GMSAs), and NHS Regional Clinical Genetics Services, a comprehensive registry of LS carriers in England has been established. Methods For comprehensive ascertainment of retrospectively identified MMR pathogenic variant (PV) carriers (diagnosed prior to January 1, 2023), information was retrieved from all clinical genetics services across England, then restructured, amalgamated, and validated via a team of trained experts in NDRS. An online submission portal was established for prospective ascertainment from January 1, 2023. The resulting data, stored in a secure database in NDRS, were used to investigate the demographic and genetic characteristics of the cohort, censored at July 25, 2023. Cancer outcomes were investigated via linkage to the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD). Findings A total of 11,722 retrospective and 570 prospective data submissions were received, resulting in a comprehensive English National Lynch Syndrome Registry (ENLSR) comprising 9030 unique individuals. The most frequently identified pathogenic MMR genes were MSH2 and MLH1 at 37.2% (n = 3362) and 29.1% (n = 2624), respectively. 35.9% (n = 3239) of the ENLSR cohort received their LS diagnosis before their first cancer diagnosis (presumptive predictive germline test). Of these, 6.3% (n = 204) developed colorectal cancer, at a median age of initial diagnosis of 51 (IQR 40-62), compared to 73 years (IQR 64-80) in the general population (p < 0.0001). Interpretation The ENLSR represents the first comprehensive national registry of PV carriers in England and one of the largest cohorts of MMR PV carriers worldwide. The establishment of a secure, centralised infrastructure and mechanism for routine registration of newly identified carriers ensures sustainability of the data resource. Funding This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK and Bowel Cancer UK. The funder of this study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Huntley
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Lucy Loong
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | | | - Rachel Bethell
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Tameera Rahman
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neelam Alhaddad
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Oliver Tulloch
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Xue Zhou
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Jason Lee
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Paul Eves
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Fiona McRonald
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - John Burn
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Adam Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Eva J.A. Morris
- Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kevin Monahan
- The Lynch Syndrome and Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Steven Hardy
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pickwell-Smith B, Greenley S, Lind M, Macleod U. Where are the inequalities in ovarian cancer care in a country with universal healthcare? A systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Cancer Policy 2024; 39:100458. [PMID: 38013132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from more deprived areas may face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. We evaluated the literature for any association between socioeconomic group, treatments received and hospital delay among patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the United Kingdom, a country with universal healthcare. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCIE, AMED, PsycINFO and HMIC from inception to January 2023. Forward and backward citation searches were conducted. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. UK-based studies were included if they reported socioeconomic measures and an association with either treatments received or hospital delay. The inclusion of studies from one country ensured greater comparability. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The review is reported to PRISMA 2020 and registered with PROSPERO [CRD42022332071]. RESULTS Out of 2876 references screened, ten were included. Eight studies evaluated treatments received, and two evaluated hospital delays. We consistently observed socioeconomic inequalities in the likelihood of surgery (range of odds ratios 0.24-0.99) and chemotherapy (range of odds ratios 0.70-0.99) among patients from the most, compared with the least, deprived areas. There were no associations between socioeconomic groups and hospital delay. POLICY SUMMARY Ovarian cancer treatments differed between socioeconomic groups despite the availability of universal healthcare. Further research is needed to understand why, though suggested reasons include patient choice, health literacy, and financial and employment factors. Qualitative research would provide a rich understanding of the complex factors that drive these inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Pickwell-Smith
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom; Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, United Kingdom.
| | - Sarah Greenley
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Lind
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom; Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Una Macleod
- Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tataru D, Khan SA, Hill R, Morement H, Wong K, Paley L, Toledano MB. Cholangiocarcinoma across England: Temporal changes in incidence, survival and routes to diagnosis by region and level of socioeconomic deprivation. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:100983. [PMID: 38357420 PMCID: PMC10865079 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims While cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) incidence and mortality rates are increasing globally, whether there are regional/temporal variations in these rates for different biliary tract cancer (BTC) subtypes, or whether they differ by sex, socioeconomic status, or route to diagnosis (RtD) remains unknown. In this work, we aimed to perform an in-depth analysis of data on the incidence, mortality, survival and RtD of CCA and other BTCs. Methods Data on all BTCs diagnosed in England between 2001 and 2018 were extracted from NHS Digital's National Cancer Registration Dataset. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASRs), mortality rates (ASMRs) and net survival rates were calculated, and Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates and RtD trends were analysed. Analyses were stratified by sex, socioeconomic deprivation, tumour subtype and region. Results The ASR for CCA rose from 2.9 in 2001-2003 to 4.6 in 2016-2018 and from 1.0 to 1.8 for gallbladder cancers (GBCs). ASMR trends mirror those of incidence, with most deaths due to iCCA. Over 20% of patients with CCA were under 65 years old. The ASRs and ASMRs were consistently higher in the most socioeconomically deprived group for CCA and GBC. The most common RtD was the emergency route (CCA 49.6%, GBC 46.2% and ampulla of Vater cancer 43.0%). The least deprived patients with CCA and ampulla of Vater cancer had better overall survival (p <0.001). Net survival rates rose for all BTCs, with 3-year net survival for CCA increasing from 9.2% in 2001 to 12.6% in 2016-2018. There was notable geographical variation in ASRs, ASMRs and net survival for all BTCs. Conclusions BTC incidence and mortality rates are increasing, with differences observed between tumour types, socioeconomic deprivation groups, RtDs and geographical regions. This highlights the need for targeted interventions, earlier diagnosis and better awareness of this condition amongst the public and healthcare professionals. Impact and implications Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) incidence and mortality rates are rising globally, particularly for intrahepatic CCA. However, it has not previously been reported if, within a single country, there are temporal and regional differences in incidence, mortality and survival rates for different biliary tract subtypes, and whether these differ by sex, socioeconomic status, or route of diagnosis. In this study we show that mortality rates for patients with CCA continue to rise and are almost 40% higher in the most socioeconomically deprived compared to the least; additionally, we observed regional variation within England in incidence, mortality and survival. This study is relevant to researchers and policy makers as it highlights regional variation and inequality, as well as emphasising the need for earlier diagnosis and better awareness of this condition amongst the public and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tataru
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, UK
| | - Shahid A. Khan
- Liver Unit, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Roger Hill
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, UK
| | | | - Kwok Wong
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, UK
| | - Lizz Paley
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, UK
| | - Mireille B. Toledano
- Mohn Centre for Children’s Health and Wellbeing, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Koo MM, Mounce LTA, Rafiq M, Callister MEJ, Singh H, Abel GA, Lyratzopoulos G. Guideline concordance for timely chest imaging after new presentations of dyspnoea or haemoptysis in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Thorax 2024; 79:236-244. [PMID: 37620048 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend urgent chest X-ray for newly presenting dyspnoea or haemoptysis but there is little evidence about their implementation. METHODS We analysed linked primary care and hospital imaging data for patients aged 30+ years newly presenting with dyspnoea or haemoptysis in primary care during April 2012 to March 2017. We examined guideline-concordant management, defined as General Practitioner-ordered chest X-ray/CT carried out within 2 weeks of symptomatic presentation, and variation by sociodemographic characteristic and relevant medical history using logistic regression. Additionally, among patients diagnosed with cancer we described time to diagnosis, diagnostic route and stage at diagnosis by guideline-concordant status. RESULTS In total, 22 560/162 161 (13.9%) patients with dyspnoea and 4022/8120 (49.5%) patients with haemoptysis received guideline-concordant imaging within the recommended 2-week period. Patients with recent chest imaging pre-presentation were much less likely to receive imaging (adjusted OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.14-0.18 for dyspnoea, and adjusted OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.06-0.11 for haemoptysis). History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma was also associated with lower odds of guideline concordance (dyspnoea: OR 0.234, 95% CI 0.225-0.242 and haemoptysis: 0.88, 0.79-0.97). Guideline-concordant imaging was lower among dyspnoea presenters with prior heart failure; current or ex-smokers; and those in more socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.The likelihood of lung cancer diagnosis within 12 months was greater among the guideline-concordant imaging group (dyspnoea: 1.1% vs 0.6%; haemoptysis: 3.5% vs 2.7%). CONCLUSION The likelihood of receiving urgent imaging concords with the risk of subsequent cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, large proportions of dyspnoea and haemoptysis presenters do not receive prompt chest imaging despite being eligible, indicating opportunities for earlier lung cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minjoung Monica Koo
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, UK
| | - Luke T A Mounce
- Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Meena Rafiq
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Health Services Research Section, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gary A Abel
- Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care (IEHC), UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hussain MI, Piozzi GN, Sakib N, Duhoky R, Carannante F, Khan JS. Laparoscopic versus Open Emergency Surgery for Right Colon Cancers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:407. [PMID: 38396446 PMCID: PMC10888455 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A laparoscopic approach to right colectomies for emergency right colon cancers is under investigation. This study compares perioperative and oncological long-term outcomes of right colon cancers undergoing laparoscopic or open emergency resections and identifies risk factors for survival. METHODS Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database between 2009 and 2019. Demographics, clinicopathological features, recurrence, and survival were investigated. Cox regression analysis was performed for risk factor analysis. RESULTS A total of 202 right colectomies (114 open and 88 laparoscopic) were included. ASA III-IV was higher in the open group. The conversion rate was 14.8%. Laparoscopic surgery was significantly longer (156 vs. 203 min, p < 0.001); pTNM staging did not differ. Laparoscopy was associated with higher lymph node yield, and showed better resection clearance (R0, 78.9 vs. 87.5%, p = 0.049) and shorter postoperative stay (12.5 vs. 8.0 days, p < 0.001). Complication rates and grade were similar. The median length of follow-up was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (20.5 vs. 33.5 months, p < 0.001). Recurrences were similar (34.2 vs. 36.4%). Open surgery had lower five-year overall survival (OS, 27.1 vs. 51.7%, p = 0.001). Five-year disease-free survival was similar (DFS, 55.8 vs. 56.5%). Surgical approach, pN, pM, retrieved LNs, R stage, and complication severity were risk factors for OS upon multivariate analysis. Pathological N stage and R stage were risk factors for DFS upon multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS A laparoscopic approach to right colon cancers in an emergency setting is safe in terms of perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. Randomized control trials are required to further investigate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (M.I.H.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (M.I.H.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Najmu Sakib
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (M.I.H.); (G.N.P.)
| | - Rauand Duhoky
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (M.I.H.); (G.N.P.)
- University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
| | - Filippo Carannante
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Jim S. Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; (M.I.H.); (G.N.P.)
- University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zakkak N, Barclay ME, Swann R, McPhail S, Rubin G, Abel GA, Lyratzopoulos G. The presenting symptom signatures of incident cancer: evidence from the English 2018 National Cancer Diagnosis Audit. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:297-307. [PMID: 38057397 PMCID: PMC10803766 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02507-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding relationships between presenting symptoms and subsequently diagnosed cancers can inform symptom awareness campaigns and investigation strategies. METHODS We used English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit 2018 data for 55,122 newly diagnosed patients, and examined the relative frequency of presenting symptoms by cancer site, and of cancer sites by presenting symptom. RESULTS Among 38 cancer sites (16 cancer groups), three classes were apparent: cancers with a dominant single presenting symptom (e.g. melanoma); cancers with diverse presenting symptoms (e.g. pancreatic); and cancers that are often asymptomatically detected (e.g. chronic lymphocytic leukaemia). Among 83 symptoms (13 symptom groups), two classes were apparent: symptoms chiefly relating to cancers of the same body system (e.g. certain respiratory symptoms mostly relating to respiratory cancers); and symptoms with a diverse cancer site case-mix (e.g. fatigue). The cancer site case-mix of certain symptoms varied by sex. CONCLUSION We detailed associations between presenting symptoms and cancer sites in a large, representative population-based sample of cancer patients. The findings can guide choice of symptoms for inclusion in awareness campaigns, and diagnostic investigation strategies post-presentation when cancer is suspected. They can inform the updating of clinical practice recommendations for specialist referral encompassing a broader range of cancer sites per symptom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Zakkak
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
| | - M E Barclay
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Swann
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
- Cancer Intelligence, Cancer Research UK, London, UK
| | - S McPhail
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, UK
| | - G Rubin
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - G A Abel
- Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, London, UK
| | - G Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare and Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Khalaf N, Ali B, Liu Y, Kramer JR, El-Serag H, Kanwal F, Singh H. Emergency Presentations Predict Worse Outcomes Among Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:603-614. [PMID: 38103105 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08207-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency presentation (EP) of cancer, a new cancer diagnosis made following an emergency department (ED) visit, is associated with worse patient outcomes and greater organizational stress on healthcare systems. Pancreatic cancer has the highest rate of EPs among European studies but remains understudied in the U.S. AIMS To evaluate the association between pancreatic cancer EPs and cancer stage, treatment, and survival. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2007 to 2019 at a tertiary-care Veterans Affairs medical center. Electronic health records were reviewed to identify EP cases, defined as a new pancreatic cancer diagnosis made within 30 days of an ED visit where cancer was suspected. We used multivariate logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards models to examine the associations between EPs and cancer stage, treatment, and survival. RESULTS Of 243 pancreatic cancer patients, 66.7% had EPs. There was no difference in stage by EP status. However, patients diagnosed through EPs were 72% less likely to receive cancer treatment compared to non-emergency presenters (adjusted OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.57). Patients with EPs also had a 73% higher mortality risk (adjusted HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.29-2.34). This difference in mortality remained statistically significant after adjusting for cancer stage and receipt of cancer treatment (adjusted HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09-1.99). CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic cancer EPs are common and independently associated with lower treatment rates and survival. Enhanced understanding of process breakdowns that lead to EPs can help identify care gaps and inform future quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Khalaf
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. MS:111-D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Basim Ali
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. MS:111-D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer R Kramer
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. MS:111-D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hashem El-Serag
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. MS:111-D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd. MS:111-D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Claridge H, Price CA, Ali R, Cooke EA, de Lusignan S, Harvey-Sullivan A, Hodges C, Khalaf N, O'Callaghan D, Stunt A, Thomas SA, Thomson J, Lemanska A. Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079863. [PMID: 38262635 PMCID: PMC10806670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. Early diagnosis may improve survival by enabling curative treatment. Statistical and machine learning diagnostic prediction models using risk factors such as patient demographics and blood tests are being developed for clinical use to improve early diagnosis. One example is the Enriching New-onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (ENDPAC) model, which employs patients' age, blood glucose and weight changes to provide pancreatic cancer risk scores. These values are routinely collected in primary care in the UK. Primary care's central role in cancer diagnosis makes it an ideal setting to implement ENDPAC but it has yet to be used in clinical settings. This study aims to determine the feasibility of applying ENDPAC to data held by UK primary care practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This will be a multicentre observational study with a cohort design, determining the feasibility of applying ENDPAC in UK primary care. We will develop software to search, extract and process anonymised data from 20 primary care providers' electronic patient record management systems on participants aged 50+ years, with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test result of ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) and no previous abnormal HbA1c results. Software to calculate ENDPAC scores will be developed, and descriptive statistics used to summarise the cohort's demographics and assess data quality. Findings will inform the development of a future UK clinical trial to test ENDPAC's effectiveness for the early detection of pancreatic cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project has been reviewed by the University of Surrey University Ethics Committee and received a favourable ethical opinion (FHMS 22-23151 EGA). Study findings will be presented at scientific meetings and published in international peer-reviewed journals. Participating primary care practices, clinical leads and policy makers will be provided with summaries of the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh Claridge
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Claire A Price
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Rofique Ali
- Tower Hamlets Network 1 Primary Care Network, London, UK
| | | | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adam Harvey-Sullivan
- Tower Hamlets Network 1 Primary Care Network, London, UK
- Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Natalia Khalaf
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ali Stunt
- Pancreatic Cancer Action, Oakhanger, Hampshire, UK
| | | | | | - Agnieszka Lemanska
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ling S, Luque Fernandez MA, Quaresma M, Belot A, Rachet B. Inequalities in treatment among patients with colon and rectal cancer: a multistate survival model using data from England national cancer registry 2012-2016. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:88-98. [PMID: 37741899 PMCID: PMC10781675 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02440-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual and tumour factors only explain part of observed inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in England. This study aims to investigate inequalities in treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in England between 2012 and 2016 were followed up from the date of diagnosis (state 1), to treatment (state 2), death (state 3) or censored at 1 year after the diagnosis. A multistate approach with flexible parametric model was used to investigate the effect of income deprivation on the probability of remaining alive and treated in colorectal cancer. RESULTS Compared to the least deprived quintile, the most deprived with stage I-IV colorectal cancer had a lower probability of being alive and treated at all the time during follow-up, and a higher probability of being untreated and of dying. The probability differences (most vs. least deprived) of being alive and treated at 6 months ranged between -2.4% (95% CI: -4.3, -1.1) and -7.4% (-9.4, -5.3) for colon; between -2.0% (-3.5, -0.4) and -6.2% (-8.9, -3.5) for rectal cancer. CONCLUSION Persistent inequalities in treatment were observed in patients with colorectal cancer at every stage, due to delayed access to treatment and premature death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suping Ling
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Miguel-Angel Luque Fernandez
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manuela Quaresma
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aurelien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee A, McCarthy D, Bergin RJ, Drosdowsky A, Martinez Gutierrez J, Kearney C, Philip S, Rafiq M, Venning B, Wawryk O, Zhang J, Emery J. Data Resource Profile: Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Data Connect. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:e292-e300. [PMID: 37889594 PMCID: PMC10749758 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Lee
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Damien McCarthy
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Bergin
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Javiera Martinez Gutierrez
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Chris Kearney
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sally Philip
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Meena Rafiq
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Epidemiology of Cancer and Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Group, UCL, London, UK
| | - Brent Venning
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia Wawryk
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jianrong Zhang
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jose S, Zalin-Miller A, Knott C, Paley L, Tataru D, Morement H, Toledano MB, Khan SA. Cohort study to assess geographical variation in cholangiocarcinoma treatment in England. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:2077-2092. [PMID: 38173436 PMCID: PMC10758644 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i12.2077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are extremely poor owing to the complexities in diagnosing and managing a rare disease with heterogenous sub-types. Beyond curative surgery, which is only an option for a minority of patients diagnosed at an early stage, few systemic therapy options are currently recommended to relieve symptoms and prolong life. Stent insertion to manage disease complications requires highly specialised expertise. Evidence is lacking as to how CCA patients are managed in a real-world setting and whether there is any variation in treatments received by CCA patients. AIM To assess geographic variation in treatments received amongst CCA patients in England. METHODS Data used in this cohort study were drawn from the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD), Hospital Episode Statistics and the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Dataset. A cohort of 8853 CCA patients diagnosed between 2014-2017 in the National Health Service in England was identified from the NCRD. Potentially curative surgery for all patients and systemic therapy and stent insertion for 7751 individuals who did not receive surgery were identified as three end-points of interest. Linear probability models assessed variation in each of the three treatment modalities according to Cancer Alliance of residence at diagnosis, and for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics at diagnosis. RESULTS Of 8853 CCA patients, 1102 (12.4%) received potentially curative surgery. The mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] percentage-point difference from the population average ranged from -3.96 (-6.34 to -1.59)% to 3.77 (0.54 to 6.99)% across Cancer Alliances in England after adjustment for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, showing statistically significant variation. Amongst 7751 who did not receive surgery, 1542 (19.9%) received systemic therapy, with mean [95%CI] percentage-point difference from the population average between -3.84 (-8.04 to 0.35)% to 9.28 (1.76 to 16.80)% across Cancer Alliances after adjustment, again showing the presence of statistically significant variation for some regions. Stent insertion was received by 2156 (27.8%), with mean [95%CI] percentage-point difference from the population average between -10.54 (-12.88 to -8.20)% to 13.64 (9.22 to 18.06)% across Cancer Alliances after adjustment, showing wide and statistically significant variation from the population average. Half of 8853 patients (n = 4468) received no treatment with either surgery, systemic therapy or stent insertion. CONCLUSION Substantial regional variation in treatments received by CCA patients was observed in England. Such variation could be due to differences in case-mix, clinical practice or access to specialist expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Jose
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Zalin-Miller
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Knott
- Health Data Analysis, Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge CB21 5XE, United Kingdom
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Lizz Paley
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Tataru
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Morement
- Department of Executive, AMMF-The Cholangiocarcinoma Charity, Essex CM24 1QW, United Kingdom
| | - Mireille B Toledano
- MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
- Mohn Centre for Children's Health and Wellbeing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
| | - Shahid A Khan
- Liver Unit, Division of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ginsburg O, Vanderpuye V, Beddoe AM, Bhoo-Pathy N, Bray F, Caduff C, Florez N, Fadhil I, Hammad N, Heidari S, Kataria I, Kumar S, Liebermann E, Moodley J, Mutebi M, Mukherji D, Nugent R, So WKW, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Unger-Saldaña K, Allman G, Bhimani J, Bourlon MT, Eala MAB, Hovmand PS, Kong YC, Menon S, Taylor CD, Soerjomataram I. Women, power, and cancer: a Lancet Commission. Lancet 2023; 402:2113-2166. [PMID: 37774725 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01701-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Centre for Global Health, US National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Carlo Caduff
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Narjust Florez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Oncology, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Shirin Heidari
- GENDRO, Geneva, Switzerland; Gender Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ishu Kataria
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, New Delhi, India
| | - Somesh Kumar
- Jhpiego India, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Liebermann
- University of Rhode Island College of Nursing, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer Moodley
- Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, and SAMRC Gynaecology Cancer Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Clemenceau Medical Center Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rachel Nugent
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Winnie K W So
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Gavin Allman
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jenna Bhimani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - María T Bourlon
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Michelle A B Eala
- College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yek-Ching Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sonia Menon
- Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
González-Esquerré J, Karlsberg S, Winters S, Paling S. Faster Diagnosis and Treatment for Cancer: Assessing Patient Pathways Using a Panel Regression Analysis of the English National Cancer Registration Data. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1730-1737. [PMID: 37741449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Timely treatment is crucial for patients with cancer, affecting both their experience and outcomes. This study examined events that shorten or extend cancer pathways. METHODS A cohort of breast, lower gastrointestinal, lung, and prostate cancers diagnosed between 2015 and 2016 in England were identified using cancer registration data. This was linked to Hospital Episode Statistic data, Cancer Waiting Times data, and specialized treatment data sets to highlight key events and dates in the pathways of 236 205 patients. Our fixed-effects panel regression included straight-to-test first appointments, multiple tests on the same day, number of multidisciplinary team meetings, appointment cancellations, trust fixed effects, and patient factors, including sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivations, age, comorbidities, stage, and route to diagnosis. RESULTS Patients with straight-to-test, multiple tests on the same day, and who were discussed in a single multidisciplinary team meeting waited a shorter time for treatment (-5, -4, and -7 days, respectively). Cancelled appointments and attending multiple providers were associated with longer pathways (+11 and +9 days). CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight specific areas in which redesigning cancer pathways and transfers between hospitals could potentially lead to less waiting time for treatment, and suggest that policies aimed at reducing cancellations, by patients or hospitals, have the potential to improve waiting times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Karlsberg
- Economics & Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, England, UK
| | - Sam Winters
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS England, London, England, UK
| | - Steven Paling
- Economics & Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barclay M, Renzi C, Antoniou A, Denaxas S, Harrison H, Ip S, Pashayan N, Torralbo A, Usher-Smith J, Wood A, Lyratzopoulos G. Phenotypes and rates of cancer-relevant symptoms and tests in the year before cancer diagnosis in UK Biobank and CPRD Gold. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2023; 2:e0000383. [PMID: 38100737 PMCID: PMC10723831 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Early diagnosis of cancer relies on accurate assessment of cancer risk in patients presenting with symptoms, when screening is not appropriate. But recorded symptoms in cancer patients pre-diagnosis may vary between different sources of electronic health records (EHRs), either genuinely or due to differential completeness of symptom recording. To assess possible differences, we analysed primary care EHRs in the year pre-diagnosis of cancer in UK Biobank and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) populations linked to cancer registry data. We developed harmonised phenotypes in Read v2 and CTV3 coding systems for 21 symptoms and eight blood tests relevant to cancer diagnosis. Among 22,601 CPRD and 11,594 UK Biobank cancer patients, 54% and 36%, respectively, had at least one consultation for possible cancer symptoms recorded in the year before their diagnosis. Adjusted comparisons between datasets were made using multivariable Poisson models, comparing rates of symptoms/tests in CPRD against expected rates if cancer site-age-sex-deprivation associations were the same as in UK Biobank. UK Biobank cancer patients compared with those in CPRD had lower rates of consultation for possible cancer symptoms [RR: 0.61 (0.59-0.63)], and lower rates for any primary care consultation [RR: 0.86 (95%CI 0.85-0.87)]. Differences were larger for 'non-alarm' symptoms [RR: 0.54 (0.52-0.56)], and smaller for 'alarm' symptoms [RR: 0.80 (0.76-0.84)] and blood tests [RR: 0.93 (0.90-0.95)]. In the CPRD cohort, approximately representative of the UK population, half of cancer patients had recorded symptoms in the year before diagnosis. The frequency of non-specific presenting symptoms recorded in the year pre-diagnosis of cancer was substantially lower among UK Biobank participants. The degree to which results based on highly selected biobank cohorts are generalisable needs to be examined in disease-specific contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Barclay
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina Renzi
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonis Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Harrison
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Ip
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Torralbo
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet Usher-Smith
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Wood
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Donor Health and Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Health Data Research UK Cambridge, Wellcome Genome Campus and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Najid S, Miailhe G, Mimoun C, Haddad B, Lecarpentier E, Dabi Y. Management of gynecological cancers in the emergency department: Impact of precariousness and prognostic factors. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102686. [PMID: 37884225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to determine the profile of patients consulting in an emergency department and diagnosed with a pelvic cancer. Our secondary objective was to assess the potential impact on this diagnostic trajectory on survival. METHOD A single-center retrospective study including patients managed for a pelvic cancer between January 2018 and November 2020 in the center Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil was conducted. Patients' characteristics were compared based on their diagnostic trajectory (emergency or referred to consultation). Precariousness was assessed using Pascal's tool based on 4 characteristics: being a beneficiary of the former Couverture Maladie Universelle (CMU) or Aide Medicale d'Etat (AME), not having complementary health insurance, being job seeking for more than 6 months and being beneficiary of allowances. A patient was defined as precarious if the Pascal tool was 'TRUE', i.e., at least one positive item. The main socio-demographic and cancer associated factors were analyzed as prognostic factors. RESULTS Over the inclusion period, among the 283 eligible patients, 37.3 % (87/233) had a diagnosis of cancer following an emergency department visit. There was a significant association between precariousness, rupture of gynecological follow-up, lack of participation in national screening campaigns and the risk of being diagnosed through the emergency pathway for all cancers studied (p = 0.001). There was no difference in terms of stage at diagnostic, management (according to current guidelines), prognostic and overall survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION Patients in a situation of precariousness are more likely to be diagnosed with cancer in an emergency department. Our study underlines the importance of precariousness as a factor determining the type of diagnostic management of gynecological cancer. Efforts should be made toward improving frail patients to primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Najid
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Créteil, France
| | | | - Camille Mimoun
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris France
| | - Bassam Haddad
- University Paris-Est Créteil - Department of Obstétrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Créteil, France
| | - Edouard Lecarpentier
- University Paris-Est Créteil - Department of Obstétrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, Créteil, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Sorbonne University - Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive medicine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vijjhalwar R, Song K, Shrestha R, Bowcock S, Sanchez-Santos MT, Ramasamy K, Javaid MK. Patient-reported symptoms and diagnostic journey in Multiple Myeloma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1282569. [PMID: 38098501 PMCID: PMC10720586 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1282569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Late presentation of multiple myeloma (MM) heightens the risk of complication risks, including end-organ damage. This study aimed to: 1) detail the diagnostic journey of MM patients, encompassing symptoms, initial diagnoses, and healthcare professionals met; 2) establish the median duration from symptom onset to MM diagnosis; and 3) examine factors linked to timely MM diagnosis within 12 weeks. Methods A total of 300 adults self-reporting MM were analysed from the Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases cohort Study (RUDY). The RUDY study is a web-based platform, where participants provide dynamic consent and self-report their MM diagnosis and information about their diagnostic journey. This includes the estimated date of initial potential first symptoms, descriptions of these symptoms, the healthcare professionals they consulted, and other diagnoses received before the MM diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, combinatorial analyses and logistic regression analyses were used to describe and examine the diagnostic journey of individuals with MM. Results Overall, 52% of the participants reported other diagnoses before MM diagnosis, with musculoskeletal disorders (47.8%), such as osteoporosis, costochondritis, or muscle strains, being the most common. The most prevalent initial reported symptom was back pain/vertebral fractures (47%), followed by chest/shoulder pain, including rib pain and fractures (20%), and fatigue/tiredness (19.7%). 40% of participants were diagnosed by direct referral from primary care to haematology without seeing other healthcare professionals whilst 60% consulted additional specialists before diagnosis. The median time from symptom onset to MM diagnosis was 4 months (IQR 2-10 months, range 0-172). Seeing an Allied Healthcare Professional such as a physiotherapist, chiropractor or an osteopath (OR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.12, 0.47], p <0.001), experiencing infection symptoms (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.13, 0.76], p = 0.013), and having chest or shoulder pain (OR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.23, 0.86], p = 0.020) were associated with a lower likelihood of being diagnosed with MM within 12 weeks. Older age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.02, 1.07], p = 0.001) was associated with a higher likelihood of diagnosis within 12 weeks. Discussion Developing resources for allied health professionals may improve early recognition of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Vijjhalwar
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kaiyang Song
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Roshi Shrestha
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stella Bowcock
- Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria T. Sanchez-Santos
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Kassim Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mills S, Donnan P, Buchanan D, Smith BH. Age and cancer type: associations with increased odds of receiving a late diagnosis in people with advanced cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1174. [PMID: 38036975 PMCID: PMC10691149 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11652-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to deliver appropriate and timely care planning and minimise avoidable late diagnoses, clinicians need to be aware of which patients are at higher risk of receiving a late cancer diagnosis. We aimed to determine which demographic and clinical factors are associated with receiving a 'late' cancer diagnosis (within the last 12 weeks of life). METHOD Retrospective cohort study of 2,443 people who died from cancer ('cancer decedents') in 2013-2015. Demographic and cancer registry datasets linked using patient-identifying Community Health Index numbers. Analysis used binary logistic regression, with univariate and adjusted odds ratios (SPSS v25). RESULTS One third (n = 831,34.0%) received a late diagnosis. Age and cancer type were significantly associated with late cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Other demographic factors were not associated with receiving a late diagnosis. Cancer decedents with lung cancer (Odds Ratios presented in abstract are the inverse of those presented in the main text, where lung cancer is the reference category. Presented as 1/(OR multivariate)) were more likely to have late diagnosis than those with bowel (95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] Odds Ratio (OR)1.52 (OR1.12 to 2.04)), breast or ovarian (95%CI OR3.33 (OR2.27 to 5.0) or prostate (95%CI OR9.09 (OR4.0 to 20.0)) cancers. Cancer decedents aged > 85 years had higher odds of late diagnosis (95%CI OR3.45 (OR2.63 to 4.55)), compared to those aged < 65 years. CONCLUSIONS Cancer decedents who were older and those with lung cancer were significantly more likely to receive late cancer diagnoses than those who were younger or who had other cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Mills
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9T, Scotland.
- Population Health and Genomics Division, University of Dundee Medical School Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland.
| | - Peter Donnan
- Population Health and Genomics Division, University of Dundee Medical School Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland
| | - Deans Buchanan
- NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, South Block, Level 7, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland
| | - Blair H Smith
- Population Health and Genomics Division, University of Dundee Medical School Mackenzie Building, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Li X, Liu C, Zhu H, Wang K, Ren X, Ma L, Zhang X, Liu M, Zhu B. Recent advances in small-molecule fluorescent probes with the function of targeting cancer receptors. ANALYTICAL METHODS : ADVANCING METHODS AND APPLICATIONS 2023; 15:5947-5977. [PMID: 37909733 DOI: 10.1039/d3ay01387a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is "the sword of Damocles" that threatens human life and health. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have been receiving much attention. Many overexpressed receptors on the surface of cancer cells provide us with an effective way to specifically identify the cancer cells, and receptor targeting strategies are becoming one of the hot ideas to enhance the ability of fluorescent probes to target tumors. Fluorescent probes connected to ligands are targeted at cancer cell surfaces through receptor-mediated endocytosis. Receptor-targeting probes can image and track cancer cells, determine tumor boundaries, monitor deep lesions, and play a role in clinical medicine, such as fluorescent imaging-guided surgery. In this review, based on the perspective of small molecule fluorescent probes, we reviewed the design ideas, photophysical properties, and applications of receptor-targeting probes for detecting biomarkers in imaging and tracing cancer cells and prospected the future developmental direction of such probes. We hope that this review will provide more ideas for the design and development of active targeting probes for receptors and lead to more applications in the medical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinke Li
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Caiyun Liu
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Hanchuang Zhu
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Kun Wang
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Xiaohua Ren
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Lixue Ma
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Xiaohui Zhang
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Mengyuan Liu
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| | - Baocun Zhu
- School of Water Conservancy and Environment, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chong YP, Lim SM, Loh TP, Mollee P, Wijeratne N, Choy KW. Screening for and diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy. J Clin Pathol 2023; 76:727-733. [PMID: 37604683 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy is a spectrum of disorders characterised by clonal proliferation of plasma cells or lymphocytes, which produce abnormal immunoglobulin or its components (monoclonal proteins). Monoclonal gammopathies are often categorised as low-tumour-burden diseases (eg, amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis), premalignant disorders (such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma), and malignancies (eg, multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia). Such diversity of concentration and structure makes monoclonal protein a challenging clonal marker. This article provides an overview on initial laboratory testing of monoclonal gammopathy to guide clinicians and laboratory professionals in the selection and interpretation of appropriate investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuh Ping Chong
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Say Min Lim
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Teluk Intan, Teluk Intan, Malaysia
| | - Tze Ping Loh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Peter Mollee
- Pathology Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nilika Wijeratne
- Dorevitch Pathology, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Department of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health Pathology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kay Weng Choy
- Department of Pathology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Golder AM, Conlan O, McMillan DC, Mansouri D, Horgan PG, Roxburgh CS. Adverse Tumour and Host Biology May Explain the Poorer Outcomes Seen in Emergency Presentations of Colon Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1018-e1025. [PMID: 37036099 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between tumor/host factors (including the systemic inflammatory response), mode of presentation, and short/long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative resectional surgery for TNM I to III colon cancer. BACKGROUND Emergency presentations of colon cancer are associated with worse long-term outcomes than elective presentations despite adjustment for TNM stage. A number of differences in tumor and host factors have been identified between elective and emergency presentations and it may be these factors that are associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS Patients undergoing curative surgery for TNM I to III colon cancer in the West of Scotland from 2011 to 2014 were identified. Tumor/host factors independently associated with the emergency presentation were identified and entered into a subsequent survival model to determine those that were independently associated with overall survival/cancer-specific survival (OS/CSS). RESULTS A total of 2705 patients were identified. The emergency presentation was associated with a worse 3-year OS and CSS compared with elective presentations (70% vs 86% and 91% vs 75%). T stage, age, systemic inflammatory grade, anemia (all P < 0.001), N stage ( P = 0.077), extramural venous invasion ( P = 0.003), body mass index ( P = 0.001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification classification ( P = 0.021) were independently associated with emergency presentation. Of these, body mass index [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82], American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (HR, 1.45), anemia (HR, 1.29), systemic inflammatory grade (HR. 1.11), T stage (HR, 1.57), N stage (HR, 1.80), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.47) were independently associated with OS. Similar results were observed for CSS. CONCLUSIONS Within patients undergoing curative surgery for colon cancer, the emergency presentation was not independently associated with worse OS/CSS. Rather, a combination of tumor and host factors account for the worse outcomes observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan M Golder
- Academic Unit of Surgery-Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Conroy S, Catto JWF, Bex A, Brown JE, Cartledge J, Fielding A, Jones RJ, Khoo V, Nicol D, Stewart GD, Sullivan M, Tran MGB, Woodward R, Cumberbatch MG. Diagnosis, treatment, and survival from kidney cancer: real-world National Health Service England data between 2013 and 2019. BJU Int 2023; 132:541-553. [PMID: 37436368 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the NHS Digital (NHSD) data for patients diagnosed with kidney cancer (KC) in England. We explore the incidence, route to diagnosis (RTD), treatment, and survival patterns from 2013 to 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was extracted from the Cancer Data NHSD portal for International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition coded KC; this included Cancer Registry data, Hospital Episode Statistics, and cancer waiting times data. RESULTS Registrations included 66 696 individuals with KC. Incidence of new KC diagnoses increased (8998 in 2013, to 10 232 in 2019), but the age-standardised rates were stable (18.7-19.4/100 000 population). Almost half of patients (30 340 [45.5%]) were aged 0-70 years and the cohort were most frequently diagnosed with Stage 1-2 KC (n = 26 297 [39.4%]). Most patients were diagnosed through non-urgent general practitioner referrals (n = 16 814 [30.4%]), followed by 2-week-wait (n = 15 472 [28.0%]) and emergency routes (n = 11 796 [21.3%]), with older patients (aged ≥70 years), Stage 4 KCs, and patients with non-specified renal cell carcinoma being significantly more likely to present through the emergency route (all P < 0.001). Invasive treatment (surgery or ablation), radiotherapy, or systemic anti-cancer therapy use varied with disease stage, patient factors, and treatment network (Cancer Alliance). Survival outcomes differed by Stage, histological subtype, and social deprivation class (P < 0.001). Age-standardised mortality rates did not change over the study duration, although immunotherapy usage is likely not captured in this study timeline. CONCLUSION The NHSD resource provides useful insight about the incidence, diagnostic pathways, treatment, and survival of patients with KC in England and a useful benchmark for the upcoming commissioned National Kidney Cancer Audit. The RTD data may be limited by incidental diagnoses, which could confound the high proportion of 'emergency' diagnoses. Importantly, survival outcomes remained relatively unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Conroy
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Unit of Urology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - James W F Catto
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Unit of Urology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Axel Bex
- Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Janet E Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Alison Fielding
- Bladder and Renal Cancer Clinical Studies Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Rob J Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Sullivan
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maxine G B Tran
- Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rose Woodward
- Action Kidney Cancer, Manchester, UK
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, UK
| | - Marcus G Cumberbatch
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Unit of Urology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Whitfield E, White B, Denaxas S, Barclay ME, Renzi C, Lyratzopoulos G. A taxonomy of early diagnosis research to guide study design and funding prioritisation. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1527-1534. [PMID: 37794179 PMCID: PMC10645731 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02450-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Researchers and research funders aiming to improve diagnosis seek to identify if, when, where, and how earlier diagnosis is possible. This has led to the propagation of research studies using a wide range of methodologies and data sources to explore diagnostic processes. Many such studies use electronic health record data and focus on cancer diagnosis. Based on this literature, we propose a taxonomy to guide the design and support the synthesis of early diagnosis research, focusing on five key questions: Do healthcare use patterns suggest earlier diagnosis could be possible? How does the diagnostic process begin? How do patients progress from presentation to diagnosis? How long does the diagnostic process take? Could anything have been done differently to reach the correct diagnosis sooner? We define families of diagnostic research study designs addressing each of these questions and appraise their unique or complementary contributions and limitations. We identify three further questions on relationships between the families and their relevance for examining patient group inequalities, supported with examples from the cancer literature. Although exemplified through cancer as a disease model, we recognise the framework is also applicable to non-neoplastic disease. The proposed framework can guide future study design and research funding prioritisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Whitfield
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
- Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.
| | - Becky White
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Matthew E Barclay
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Cristina Renzi
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- ECHO (Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes), Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL (University College London), 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kulkarni S, Knight T, Cooksley T, Marshall E, Patel N, Selvaratnam R, Atkin C. Provision of acute oncology services in the UK: data from the Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit 2022 (SAMBA22). Clin Med (Lond) 2023; 23:571-581. [PMID: 38065597 PMCID: PMC11046619 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Acute oncology services (AOS) manage acute cancer-related presentations alongside acute medical teams. This study assessed AOS provision against national peer review measures and the burden of acute cancer-related admissions. The 2022 Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit surveyed UK hospitals, collecting hospital-level and patient-level data for all medical admissions over a 24-h period. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify differences in patient outcomes for cancer-related admissions. Most hospitals (n=120 or 91.6%) reported having an AOS. There was heterogeneity in AOS provision, with many failing to meet peer-review measures. Of the 7,116 patients, 542 (7.6%) were cancer-related admissions. Cancer-related admissions had greater clinical acuity (p<0.05), length of stay (p<0.001) and 14-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.41-5.22, p<0.001) compared with other medical admissions. Increasing availability of AOS with integration of ambulatory pathways are vital next steps to improving care for acute cancer-related admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanat Kulkarni
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Thomas Knight
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Tim Cooksley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ernie Marshall
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, UK
| | - Neil Patel
- Ashford and St Peter's NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vallome G, Cafaro I, Bottini A, Dellepiane C, Rossi G, Bennicelli E, Parisi F, Zullo L, Tagliamento M, Ballestrero A, Barisione E, Grazia Piroddi IM, Montecucco F, Carbone F, Pronzato P, Lambertini M, Spagnolo F, Barletta G, Barcellini L, Ferrante M, Nardin S, Coco S, Marconi S, Zinoli L, Moscatelli P, Arboscello E, Del Mastro L, Bellodi A, Genova C. Diagnosis of lung cancer following emergency admission: Examining care pathways, clinical outcomes, and advanced NSCLC treatment in an Italian cancer Center. Heliyon 2023; 9:e21177. [PMID: 37928020 PMCID: PMC10623281 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lung cancer patients diagnosed following emergency admission often present with advanced disease and poor performance status, leading to suboptimal treatment options and outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics, treatment initiation, and survival outcomes of these patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 124 patients diagnosed with lung cancer following emergency admission at a single institution. Clinical characteristics, results of molecular analyses for therapeutic purpose, systemic treatment initiation, and survival outcomes were assessed. Correlations between patients' characteristics and treatment initiation were analyzed. Results Median age at admission was 73 years, and 79.0 % had at least one comorbidity. Most patients (87.1 %) were admitted due to cancer-related symptoms. Molecular analyses were performed in 89.5 % of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. In this subgroup, two-thirds (66.2 %) received first-line therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 3.9 months for the entire cohort, and 2.9 months for patients with metastatic lung cancer. Among patients with advanced NSCLC, OS was significantly longer for those with actionable oncogenic drivers and those who received first-line therapy. Improvement of performance status during hospitalization resulted in increased probability of receiving first-line systemic therapy. Discussion Patients diagnosed with lung cancer following emergency admission demonstrated poor survival outcomes. Treatment initiation, particularly for patients with actionable oncogenic drivers, was associated with longer OS. These findings highlight the need for proactive medical approaches, including improving access to molecular diagnostics and targeted treatments, to optimize outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Vallome
- U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Padre Antero Micone, ASL3, Genoa, Italy
| | - Iacopo Cafaro
- U.O. Clinica di Medicina Interna a Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Annarita Bottini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Dellepiane
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Bennicelli
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Parisi
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lodovica Zullo
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Ballestrero
- U.O. Clinica di Medicina Interna a Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Emanuela Barisione
- U.O. Pneumologia a Indirizzo Interventistico, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Montecucco
- First Clinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italian Cardiovascular Network, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Carbone
- First Clinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italian Cardiovascular Network, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Pronzato
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Spagnolo
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Plastic Surgery Division, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giulia Barletta
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Barcellini
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Ferrante
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Nardin
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simona Coco
- UO Tumori Polmonari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Marconi
- UO Tumori Polmonari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Linda Zinoli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Moscatelli
- UO Medicina Interna, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eleonora Arboscello
- Dipartimento di Emergenza Urgenza e Accettazione (DEA), IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Bellodi
- U.O. Clinica di Medicina Interna a Indirizzo Oncologico, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Otty Z, Brown A, Larkins S, Evans R, Sabesan S. Patient and carer experiences of lung cancer referral pathway in a regional health service: a qualitative study. Intern Med J 2023; 53:2016-2027. [PMID: 36710377 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer referral pathways aim to reduce delays and improve referral patterns of people with suspected lung cancer. AIM As part of implementing a lung cancer referral pathway at a regional Australian hospital, this study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of people with lung cancer and their carers. METHODS In-depth interviews were used to elicit data for thematic analysis in this cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer and their carers at a regional academic cancer centre were invited to participate in interviews. Five interviews were conducted face-to-face, and 14 interviews were conducted by telephone (as per interviewee preference). Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed. Descriptive phrases were used to generate initial inductive codes and themes. RESULTS Nineteen participants approached agreed to take part in the study. Factors that positively impacted the care experience were good communication, timeliness and patient advocacy and support. Improper communication, long waiting times for investigations and appointments, uncertainty about the process and inconsistent advice from providers negatively impacted the care experience. Participants preferred face-to-face or video-linked consultations over telephone consultations. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the experiences of rural and regional patients and carers with the lung cancer referral pathway is important to improve quality of care. Implementing changes to the referral pathway to improve patient and carer experiences needs to be an ongoing quality improvement exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zulfiquer Otty
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
| | - Amy Brown
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
| | - Sarah Larkins
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
| | - Rebecca Evans
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
| | - Sabe Sabesan
- Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Townsville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brigden T, Mitchell C, Redrup Hill E, Hall A. Ethical and legal implications of implementing risk algorithms for early detection and screening for oesophageal cancer, now and in the future. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293576. [PMID: 37903120 PMCID: PMC10615292 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer has significant morbidity and mortality but late diagnosis is common since early signs of disease are frequently misinterpreted. Project DELTA aims to enable earlier detection and treatment through targeted screening using a novel risk prediction algorithm for oesophageal cancer (incorporating risk factors of Barrett's oesophagus including prescriptions for acid-reducing medications (CanPredict)), together with a non-invasive, low-cost sampling device (CytospongeTM). However, there are many barriers to implementation, and this paper identifies key ethical and legal challenges to implementing these personalised prevention strategies for Barrett's oesophagus/oesophageal cancer. METHODS To identify ethical and legal issues relevant to the deployment of a risk prediction tool for oesophageal cancer into primary care, we adopted an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating targeted informal literature reviews, interviews with expert collaborators, a multidisciplinary workshop and ethical and legal analysis. RESULTS Successful implementation raises many issues including ensuring transparency and effective risk communication; addressing bias and inequity; managing resources appropriately and avoiding exceptionalism. Clinicians will need support and training to use cancer risk prediction algorithms, ensuring that they understand how risk algorithms supplement rather than replace medical decision-making. Workshop participants had concerns about liability for harms arising from risk algorithms, including from potential bias and inequitable implementation. Determining strategies for risk communication enabling transparency but avoiding exceptionalist approaches are a significant challenge. Future challenges include using artificial intelligence to bolster risk assessment, incorporating genomics into risk tools, and deployment by non-health professional users. However, these strategies could improve detection and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Novel pathways incorporating risk prediction algorithms hold considerable promise, especially when combined with low-cost sampling. However immediate priorities should be to develop risk communication strategies that take account of using validated risk algorithms, and to ensure equitable implementation. Resolving questions about liability for harms arising should be a longer-term objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Brigden
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Mitchell
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alison Hall
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wickramasinghe B, Renzi C, Barclay M, Callister MEJ, Rafiq M, Lyratzopoulos G. Pre-diagnostic prescribing patterns in dyspnoea patients with as-yet-undiagnosed lung cancer: A longitudinal study of linked primary care and cancer registry data. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 86:102429. [PMID: 37473578 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with as-yet undiagnosed lung cancer (LC) can present to primary care with non-specific symptoms such as dyspnoea, often in the context of pre-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Related medication prescriptions pre-diagnosis might represent opportunities for earlier diagnosis, but UK evidence is limited. Consequently, we explored prescribing patterns of relevant medications in patients who presented with dyspnoea in primary care and were subsequently diagnosed with LC. METHOD Linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and National Cancer Registry data were used to identify 5434 patients with incident LC within a year of a dyspnoea presentation in primary care between 2006 and 2016. Primary care prescriptions relevant to dyspnoea management were examined: antibiotics, inhaled medications, oral steroids, and opioid analgesics. Poisson regression models estimated monthly prescribing rates during the year pre-diagnosis. Variation by COPD status (52 % pre-existing, 36 % COPD-free, 12 % new-onset) was examined. Inflection points were identified indicating when prescribing rates changed from the background rate. RESULTS 63 % of patients received 1 or more relevant prescriptions 1-12 months pre-diagnosis. Pre-existing COPD patients were most prescribed inhaled medications. COPD-free and new-onset COPD patients were most prescribed antibiotics. Most patients received 2 or more relevant prescriptions. Monthly prescribing rates of all medications increased towards time of diagnosis in all patient groups and were highest in pre-existing COPD patients. Increases in prescribing activity were observed earliest in pre-existing COPD patients 5 months pre-diagnosis for inhaled medications, antibiotics, and steroids, CONCLUSION: Results indicate that a diagnostic window of appreciable length exists for potential earlier LC diagnosis in some patients. Lung cancer diagnosis may be delayed if early symptoms are misattributed to COPD or other benign conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Wickramasinghe
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Cristina Renzi
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Barclay
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew E J Callister
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Meena Rafiq
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, Dept. of Behavioural Science & Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Torné-Cachot J, Simonetti AF, Lorenzo-Carrasco V, Gálvez-Barrón C. Utility of a quick diagnostic unit during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for the diagnosis of cancer. Rev Clin Esp 2023; 223:470-478. [PMID: 37451541 DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyse changes in health care activity, time of referral and diagnosis intervals and the incidence of cancer during the first two years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a quick diagnosis unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was carried out during the prepandemic year (March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020) and the first two years of the pandemic (March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022). Demographic and clinical variables, the first visit interval, the diagnosis interval and the first visit-diagnosis interval were evaluated and compared. RESULTS During the first pandemic wave, there was a reduction in referrals (-32.6%), which then increased 8.1% and 17.7% from the second wave until the end of the first pandemic year and the second pandemic year, respectively. An increase in referrals to primary care and a decrease in emergencies were identified. The increase in cancer diagnoses of 2.7% and 15.7% in the two years of the pandemic was proportional to the increase in referrals. No changes were observed in benign processes or in cancer locations and stages. The first visit interval was higher for benign diseases (p<0.0001). A prolongation of the diagnosis interval was observed in cancer patients, although during the three years of the study the median was <15 days. CONCLUSIONS The impact of the pandemic affected the length of intervals and the origins of referrals. The quick diagnosis units constitutes and urgent complementary cancer diagnostic route with a high diagnosis yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Torné-Cachot
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Sant Camil. Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès-Garraf. Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A F Simonetti
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Sant Camil. Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès-Garraf. Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Lorenzo-Carrasco
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Sant Camil. Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès-Garraf. Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Gálvez-Barrón
- Área de Investigación, Consorci Sanitari Alt Penedès-Garraf. San Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hamilton W, Bailey SER. Colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: How to improve the diagnostic pathway. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 66:101842. [PMID: 37852715 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Even in countries with national screening programmes for colorectal cancer, most cancers are identified after the patient has developed symptoms. The patients present these symptoms usually to primary care, or in some countries to specialist care. In either healthcare setting, the clinician has to consider cancer to be a possibility, then to perform triage investigations, followed by definitive investigation, usually by colonoscopy. This apparently simple pathway is not simple: most symptoms of colorectal cancer are more likely to represent benign disease than cancer, and each of these stages represents selection of patients into a higher-risk pool. This article summarises a symptom-based approach to selection and initial investigation of such patients in primary care. Some special groups need particular attention, including the younger patient, those with an inherited predisposition to cancer, and those with co-morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Hamilton
- University of Exeter, College House, St. Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 1SR, UK.
| | - Sarah E R Bailey
- University of Exeter, College House, St. Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 1SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Conley HL, Lea CS, Delgado RV, Vos P, Harris EE, Ju A, Rathbun KM. Reduced Survival Outcome After Receiving a New Cancer Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: Findings from a Hospital Network in Rural Eastern North Carolina. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:2434-2443. [PMID: 36216978 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients whose cancer was found during an Emergency Department (ED) visit often present at later stages when survival outcomes are worse. Limited research has characterized the survival experience of cancer patients who receive their diagnosis through the ED versus those who do not. METHODS A retrospective cohort study identified all patients presenting to the ED between 2014 and 2015 in a rural, regional hospital system with a visit or resulting admission associated with an oncologic ICD-9 code. The chart was abstracted to determine a new cancer diagnosis versus an existing case. Cox proportional hazards (HR) estimated survival time. Patient and cancer characteristics were compared between those who were newly diagnosed through the ED and patients who were not. FINDINGS Thirty-nine percent of patients in our sample received their new cancer diagnosis as a result of an ED visit. The median survival was lower in cancer cases diagnosed through the ED (13 vs. 39 months, P < .001), men (20 vs. 32 months, P < .001), and patients aged ≥ 65 (22 months vs. 32 months, P < .001). Factors associated with lower survival were having a type of cancer location other than breast (HR = 1.96; P < .001), followed by being newly diagnosed with cancer through the ED (HR = 1.71; P < .001), and stage IV at diagnosis (HR = 1.70; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who received a new cancer diagnosis through the ED and required subsequent hospitalization had shorter overall survival and presented with advanced disease. Future research should address socioeconomic factors that may influence these patterns of cancer presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L Conley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - C Suzanne Lea
- Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Raven V Delgado
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Paul Vos
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Eleanor E Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Ju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Blvd, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
| | - Kimberly M Rathbun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kang S, McLeod SL, Walsh C, Grewal K. Patient outcomes associated with cancer diagnosis through the emergency department: A systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:955-962. [PMID: 36692950 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many patients are initially diagnosed with a new suspected cancer through the emergency department (ED). The objective of this systematic review was to compare stage of cancer and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer through the ED to patients diagnosed elsewhere. METHODS Electronic searches of Medline and EMBASE were conducted and reference lists were hand-searched. Studies comparing adult patients diagnosed with any type of cancer through the ED (ED diagnosis) to patients diagnosed elsewhere (non-ED diagnosis) were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed quality of the studies, and extracted data. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data pertaining to patient outcomes were summarized and pooled using random-effects models and reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), where applicable. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included. There was an increased risk of more advanced/later stage cancer (Stage III/IV or late-stage vs. earlier stage) among patients with an ED diagnosis of cancer compared to a non-ED diagnosis of cancer (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.39-1.58). Survival was lower for patients with an ED diagnosis of cancer compared to those diagnosed elsewhere (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75). CONCLUSIONS Patients with an ED diagnosis of cancer had more advanced/late stage of cancer at diagnosis and worse survival compared to patients diagnosed elsewhere. Future research examining patients diagnosed with cancer through the ED is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Kang
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelley L McLeod
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Walsh
- Library Services, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Keerat Grewal
- Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Green SM, Lloyd KE, Smith SG. Awareness of symptoms, anticipated barriers and delays to help-seeking among women at higher risk of breast cancer: A UK multicentre study. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102220. [PMID: 37200677 PMCID: PMC10186484 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Women with a family history of breast cancer have an increased lifetime risk of the disease. Delay in symptom presentation can lead to poorer outcomes. Low awareness of breast cancer symptoms and help-seeking barriers have been associated with delay in presentation in the general population. Symptom awareness and help-seeking barriers among women at increased risk of breast cancer are unknown. We conducted analysis of survey data which included women with moderate and high risk of breast cancer from 20 secondary and tertiary care clinics in England (n = 408). Women completed a validated survey assessing breast cancer symptom awareness, barriers to help-seeking and anticipated delay in help-seeking. Women recognised an average of 9.1/11 breast cancer symptoms (SD = 2.1). Nipple rash was the least recognised symptom (51.0%). Women educated to at least degree level had higher awareness than those with lower education (β = 0.14, 95% CI 0.13, 0.99, p = 0.011). Women at lower socioeconomic status (SES) had lower awareness than those at higher SES (β = -0.13, 95% CI -1.09, -0.07, p = 0.027). Women reported several anticipated help-seeking barriers (mean = 4.0/11, SD = 2.8). Waiting to see if a symptom will pass was the most commonly reported barrier to help-seeking (71.5%). Most women (376/408; 92.2%) reported that they would seek medical help within 2 weeks of discovering a breast cancer symptom. Interventions to increase awareness of non-lump breast cancer symptoms and reduce help-seeking barriers are needed, with considerations of appropriate reading levels and modalities for women with lower education and SES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuel G. Smith
- Corresponding author at: Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|