A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury

Microcirculation properties of 20 % albumin in sepsis; a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with microcirculatory dysfunction, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 20 % albumin bolus on microcirculation compared to crystalloid resuscitation in fluid-responsive patients (ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT05357339).

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial, enrolling 103 patients (Albumin n = 52, Control n = 51). Fluid responsiveness was assessed, and fluid was administered in boluses of 100 ml to clinical effect. Microcirculation was measured using the Side stream Dark Field camera and AVA 4.3 software. Baseline characteristics, macrohaemodynamics, and microcirculation parameters were recorded. Three patients were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 100 patients, 35 (35 %) females with a mean age of 58 years (range: 18-86). The mean APACHE score was 28 (range: 7-45), and the mean SOFA score was 9.4 (range: 1-17). No significant differences in APACHE (26.24 vs. 29.4, p = 0.069) or SOFA (9.08 vs. 9.78, p = 0.32) scores were found for albumin and control group respectively. The albumin group had worse microcirculation at baseline but demonstrated significant improvements in microvascular density and activity at 15 min and 60 min (p < 0.005), while the control group exhibited no significant changes. Additionally, both groups were fluid responsive, with a mean pulse pressure variability of 17 % at admission. There were no significant differences in overall fluid balances, vasopressor days, length of ICU stay, or mortality between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that a 20 % albumin bolus significantly enhances microcirculation in fluid-responsive patients with septic shock. These findings underscore the potential benefits of targeted microcirculation therapy in critically ill patients.

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2025 clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients: part 2-the volume of resuscitation fluids

OBJECTIVE

This European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the volume of early resuscitation fluid for adult critically ill patients.

METHODS

An international panel of experts developed the guideline, focusing on fluid resuscitation volume in adult critically ill patients with circulatory failure. Using the PICO format, questions were formulated, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

In adults with sepsis or septic shock, the guideline suggests administering up to 30 ml/kg of intravenous crystalloids in the initial phase, with adjustments based on clinical context and frequent reassessments (very low certainty of evidence). We suggest using an individualized approach in the optimization phase (very low certainty of evidence). No recommendation could be made for or against restrictive or liberal fluid strategies in the optimization phase (moderate certainty of no effect). For hemorrhagic shock, a restrictive fluid strategy is suggested after blunt trauma (moderate certainty) and penetrating trauma (low certainty), with fluid administration for non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock guided by hemodynamic and biochemical parameters (ungraded best practice). For circulatory failure due to left-sided cardiogenic shock, fluid resuscitation as the primary treatment is not recommended. Fluids should be administered cautiously for cardiac tamponade until definitive treatment and guided by surrogate markers of right heart congestion in acute pulmonary embolism (ungraded best practice). No recommendation could be made for circulatory failure associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel made four conditional recommendations and four ungraded best practice statements. No recommendations were made for two questions. Knowledge gaps were identified, and suggestions for future research were provided.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Fluid Management: Finding the Perfect Balance

ARDS is a challenging syndrome in which the hallmark is alveolar epithelium damage, with the consequent extravasation of fluids into the interstitium and alveolar space. Patients with severe ARDS almost always require mechanical ventilation and aggressive fluid resuscitation, at least in the initial phases. The increased intrathoracic pressure during positive pressure ventilation reduces cardiac output, worsening the circulatory status of these patients even more. In this pathological context, fluid therapies serve as a means to restore intravascular volume but can simultaneously play a detrimental role, increasing the amount of liquid in the lungs and worsening gas exchange and lung mechanics. Indeed, clinical research suggests that fluid overload leads to worsening outcomes, mostly in terms of gas exchange, days of mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay duration. For these reasons, this review aims to provide basic information about ARDS pathophysiology and heart-lung interactions, the understanding of which is essential to guide fluid therapy, together with the close monitoring of hemodynamics and fluid responsiveness.

Hypoalbuminaemia and heart failure: A practical review of current evidence

Hypoalbuminaemia (serum albumin levels ≤3.5 g/dl) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with heart failure (HF). This narrative review includes original articles and reviews published over the past 20 years and retrieved from PubMed using the following search terms (or their combination): 'heart failure', 'hypoalbuminaemia', 'heart failure with reduced ejection fraction', 'heart failure with preserved ejection fraction', 'all-cause mortality', 'in-hospital mortality', 'hospitalization', 'prognosis'. The aims of this review are to provide an overview on the prevalence of hypoalbuminaemia in HF, its impact on clinical outcomes, and potential mechanisms that may suggest future therapeutic strategies. Hypoalbuminaemia is frequent in HF patients, especially among the elderly. However, data about the exact epidemiology of hypoalbuminaemia are scant due to different definitions, and prevalence is estimated between 5% and 70% across the whole spectrum of ejection fraction. Current evidence points to hypoalbuminaemia as a marker of poor outcomes in HF, irrespective of the ejection fraction, and in other cardiovascular diseases. Among patients who suffered from acute coronary syndrome, those with hypoalbuminaemia had an increased risk of new-onset HF and in-hospital mortality. Albumin, however, might also play a role in the natural history of such diseases due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antithrombotic properties. Whether albumin supplementation or nutritional support in general would be beneficial in improving clinical outcomes in HF is not completely clear and should be evaluated in adequately designed studies.

Co-administration of albumin and loop diuretic may be associated with reduced mortality in septic shock patients: A retrospective study with PSM analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of administering albumin and loop diuretics together on in-hospital mortality in septic shock patients.

METHODS

Data from the MIMIC-IV database was used for a retrospective cohort study analyzing 3,298 adult septic shock patients. The Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were utilized to assess the relationship between loop diuretic administration and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The study found that septic shock patients who received albumin in combination with loop diuretic had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to those who received albumin alone (19.4 % vs 33.1 %, p < 0.001). Administering diuretics after albumin infusion was associated with lower mortality rates. Optimal furosemide dosages of 10 to 40 mg daily were linked to the lowest mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Co-administering albumin and loop diuretics in septic shock patients receiving high-dose crystalloids may be associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. Further investigation through a prospective randomized controlled trial is recommended to validate these findings.

Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use

PURPOSE

Nowadays, it is largely accepted that albumin should not be used in hypoalbuminemia or for nutritional purpose. The most discussed indication of albumin at present is the resuscitation in shock states, especially distributive shocks such as septic shock. The main evidence-based indication is also liver disease. In this review, we provided updated evidence-based instruction for definite and potential indications of albumin administration in clinical practice, with appropriate dosing and duration.

METHODS

Data collection was carried out until November 2023 by search of electronic databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. GRADE system has been used to determine the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for each albumin indication.

RESULTS

A total of 165 relevant studies were included in this review. Fluid replacement in plasmapheresis and liver diseases, including hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and large-volume paracentesis, have a moderate to high quality of evidence and a strong recommendation for administering albumin. Moreover, albumin is used as a second-line and adjunctive to crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in hypovolemic shock, sepsis and septic shock, severe burns, toxic epidermal necrolysis, intradialytic hypotension, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, major surgery, non-traumatic brain injury, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and severe and refractory edema with hypoalbuminemia has a low to moderate quality of evidence and weak recommendation to use. Also, in modest volume paracentesis, severe hyponatremia in cirrhosis has a low to moderate quality of evidence and a weak recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Albumin administration is most indicated in management of cirrhosis complications. Fluid resuscitation or treatment of severe and refractory edema, especially in patients with hypoalbuminemia and not responding to other treatments, is another rational use for albumin. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in hospitals can be an effective measure to reduce inappropriate uses of albumin.

Integrating ensemble and machine learning models for early prediction of pneumonia mortality using laboratory tests

Background

The recent use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical research is noteworthy. However, most research has focused on medical imaging. Although the importance of laboratory tests in the clinical field is acknowledged by clinicians, they are undervalued in medical AI research. Our study aims to develop an early prediction AI model for pneumonia mortality, primarily using laboratory test results.

Materials and methods

We developed a mortality prediction model using initial laboratory results and basic clinical information of patients with pneumonia. Several machine learning (ML) models and a deep learning method-multilayer perceptron (MLP)-were selected for model development. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and F1-score were optimized to improve model performance. In addition, an ensemble model was developed by blending several models to improve the prediction performance. We used 80,940 data instances for model development.

Results

Among the ML models, XGBoost exhibited the best performance (AUROC = 0.8989, accuracy = 0.88, F1-score = 0.80). MLP achieved an AUROC of 0.8498, accuracy of 0.86, and F1-score of 0.75. The performance of the ensemble model was the best among the developed models, with an AUROC of 0.9006, accuracy of 0.90, and F1-score of 0.81. Several laboratory tests were conducted to identify risk factors that affect pneumonia mortality using the "Feature importance" technique and SHapley Additive exPlanations. We identified several laboratory results, including systolic blood pressure, serum glucose level, age, aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, as significant predictors of mortality in patients with pneumonia.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the ensemble model, incorporating XGBoost, CatBoost, and LGBM techniques, outperforms individual ML and deep learning models in predicting pneumonia mortality. Our findings emphasize the importance of integrating AI techniques to leverage laboratory test data effectively, offering a promising direction for advancing AI applications in medical research and clinical decision-making.

Fluid accumulation syndrome in sepsis and septic shock: pathophysiology, relevance and treatment-a comprehensive review

In this review, we aimed to comprehensively summarize current literature on pathophysiology, relevance, diagnosis and treatment of fluid accumulation in patients with sepsis/septic shock. Fluid accumulation syndrome (FAS) is defined as fluid accumulation (any degree, expressed as percentage from baseline body weight) with new onset organ-failure. Over the years, many studies have described the negative impact of FAS on clinically relevant outcomes. While the relationship between FAS and ICU outcomes is well described, uncertainty exists regarding its diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. A stepwise approach is suggested to prevent and treat FAS in patients with septic shock, including minimizing fluid intake (e.g., by limiting intravenous fluid administration and employing de-escalation whenever possible), limiting sodium and chloride administration, and maximizing fluid output (e.g., with diuretics, or renal replacement therapy). Current literature implies the need for a multi-tier, multi-modal approach to de-resuscitation, combining a restrictive fluid management regime with a standardized early active de-resuscitation, maintenance fluid reduction (avoiding fluid creep) and potentially using physical measures such as compression stockings.Trial registration: Not applicable.

Fluid Management in Acute Respiratory Failure

Fluid management in acute respiratory failure is an area of uncertainty requiring a delicate balance of resuscitation and fluid removal to manage hypoperfusion and avoidance of hypoxemia. Overall, a restrictive fluid strategy (minimizing fluid administration) and careful attention to overall fluid balance may be beneficial after initial resuscitation and does not have major side effects. Further studies are needed to improve our understanding of patients who will benefit from a restrictive or liberal fluid management strategy.

Furosemide in pediatric intensive care: a retrospective cohort analysis

Introduction

Furosemide is the most commonly used medication in pediatric intensive care. Growing data indicates improved hemodynamic stability and efficacy of furosemide infusions compared to intermittent injections, thereby suggesting furosemide infusions might be considered as first line therapy in critically ill, paediatric patients. The objective of this study is to examine furosemide treatment as either continuous infusions or intermittent injections and subsequent patient outcomes.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) over a nine year period (July 31st 2006 and July 31, 2015). Eligible patients were admitted to either the general pediatric or cardiac specific ICU for a duration of at least 6 hours and who received intravenous furosemide treatment.

Results

A total of 7,478 patients were identified who received a total of 118,438 furosemide administrations for a total of 113,951 (96%) intermittent doses and 4,487 (4%) infusions running for a total of 1,588,750 hours. A total of 5,996 (80%) patients received exclusively furosemide injections and 1,482 (20%) patients received at least one furosemide infusion. A total of 193 patients died during ICU admission, amounting to 87 (6%) of the 1,482 patients who received an infusion and 106 (2%) of the 5,996 who received intermittent injections. Multivariable regression analysis showed no statistically significant decrease in adjusted mortality for patients who received furosemide injections compared to furosemide infusions (aOR 1.20, CI 0.76-1.89).

Discussion

This retrospective study observed similar mortality for patients who received furosemide infusions compared to furosemide injections. More research on furosemide in the ICU could provide insights on fluid management, drug effectiveness, and pharmacologic stewardship for critically ill children.

The Case for Albumin as Volume Expander and beyond

This chapter discusses the importance of endogenous albumin, the most abundant plasma protein in the body. Albumin has diverse functions such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory activities, intravascular buffering, drug metabolism, transport, distribution, and restoration of vascular endothelial integrity. It is also crucial for maintaining the endothelial glycocalyx layer in blood vessels. Critically ill patients may experience hypoalbuminemia, defined as serum albumin <35 g/L, due to reduced synthesis, malnutrition, increased loss, or increased catabolism. Observational studies show hypoalbuminemia as an independent predictor of worse outcomes, with a 10 g/L decrease in serum albumin linked to a higher risk of mortality, morbidity, longer ICU/hospital stays, and increased resource utilisation. Administering exogenous albumin targeting serum albumin >30 g/L may reduce complications, but further trials are needed. Exogenous albumin is used in the ICU for various indications, including resuscitation and deresuscitation. Evidence on its use as a plasma expander is inconclusive. Both high- (20%) and low-concentration (4 and 5%) albumin can be used for resuscitation if patients require additional fluid, despite receiving crystalloids. Albumin is safe and effective for plasma expansion in patients with sepsis and septic shock but should be avoided in traumatic brain injury. Judicious and vigilant use of albumin is recommended due to its cost and potential risks. Albumin administration should be based on clinical indications, and monitoring fluid balance and clinical parameters is critical to prevent fluid accumulation and oedema formation.

Intraoperative Factors Modifying the Risk of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The relationship between intraoperative anesthetic management and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after liver transplantation is not fully understood. We aimed to determine the intraoperative contributors to PPC.

METHODS

The retrospectively collected cohort included 605 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. PPCs comprised respiratory failure, respiratory infection, pulmonary edema, atelectasis (at least moderate degree), pneumothorax, and pleural effusion (at least moderate degree). The presence and type of PPC were evaluated by 2 pulmonary physicians. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between perioperative variables and PPC risk.

RESULTS

Of the 605 patients, 318 patients (52.6%) developed 486 PPCs. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PPC risk decreased with low tidal volume ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 0.62 [0.41-0.94], P  = 0.023) and increased with greater driving pressure at the end of surgery (OR 1.08 [1.01-1.14], P  = 0.018), prolonged hypotension (OR 1.85 [1.27-2.70], P  = 0.001), and blood albumin level ≤3.0 g/dL at the end of surgery (OR 2.43 [1.51-3.92], P  < 0.001). Survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 mo after transplantation was 91.2%, 89.6%, and 86.5%, respectively, in patients with PPCs and 98.3%, 96.5%, and 93.4%, respectively, in patients without PPCs (hazard ratio 2.2 [1.3-3.6], P  = 0.004). Graft survival probability at 3, 6, and 12 mo after transplantation was 89.3%, 87.1%, and 84.3%, respectively, in patients with PPCs and 97.6%, 95.8%, and 92.7%, respectively, in patients without PPCs (hazard ratio 2.3 [1.4-3.7], P  = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that tidal volume, driving pressure, hypotension, and albumin level during living donor liver transplantation were significantly associated with PPC risk. These data may help determine patients at risk of PPC or develop an intraoperative lung-protective strategy for liver transplant recipients.

The association between early fluid strategy and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A post hoc study of CHARDS

We aimed to assess general fluid management in China and evaluate the association between fluid balance and survival outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. A retrospective, multicenter study including ARDS patients was conducted. We described the fluid management of ARDS patients in China. Furthermore, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients subdivided by cumulative fluid balance were also analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with hospital mortality as the outcome. From June 2016 to February 2018, 527 ARDS patients were included in our study. The mean cumulative fluid balance was 1669 (-1101 to 4351) mL in the first 7 day after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients were divided into four groups based on cumulative fluid balance of the first 7 day after ICU admission: Group I (≤0 L), Group II (>0 L, ≤3 L), Group III (>3 L, ≤5 L), and Group IV (>5 L). Significantly lower hospital mortality was observed in patients with a lower cumulative fluid balance on day 7 of ICU admission (20.5% in Group I vs. 32.8% in Group II, 38.5% in Group III, and 50% in Group IV, p < 0.001). A lower fluid balance is associated with lower hospital mortality in patients with ARDS. However, a large-scale and well-designed randomized controlled trial is needed in the future.

Optimizing Fluid Management Guided by Volumetric Parameters in Patients with Sepsis and ARDS

We compared two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS. Sixty patients with sepsis and ARDS were randomized to receive de-escalation fluid therapy, guided either by the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, n = 30) or the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, n = 30). In cases of GEDVI > 650 mL/m² or EVLWI > 10 mL/kg, diuretics and/or controlled ultrafiltration were administered to achieve the cumulative 48-h fluid balance in the range of 0 to -3000 mL. During 48 h of goal-directed de-escalation therapy, we observed a decrease in the SOFA score (p < 0.05). Extravascular lung water decreased only in the EVLWI-oriented group (p < 0.001). In parallel, PaO₂/FiO₂ increased by 30% in the EVLWI group and by 15% in the GEDVI group (p < 0.05). The patients with direct ARDS demonstrated better responses to dehydration therapy concerning arterial oxygenation and lung fluid balance. In sepsis-induced ARDS, both fluid management strategies, based either on GEDVI or EVLWI, improved arterial oxygenation and attenuated organ dysfunction. The de-escalation therapy was more efficient for direct ARDS.

Use or Misuse of Albumin in Critical Ill Patients

Since 1940 albumin has been used worldwide and is widely available commercially since this time. However, a meta-analysis in 1998 challenged the use of albumin and identified a trend toward higher mortality in critically ill patients who had received albumin. Since then, many studies including multicenter randomized controlled trials have been carried out investigating the safety and efficacy of albumin treatment in different patient cohorts. In this context, patient cohorts that benefit from albumin were identified. However, particularly in non-liver patients, the use of albumin remains controversial. In our comprehensive review, we would like to highlight the most important studies in the recent 20 years and therefore offer an evidence-based outlook for the use of albumin for patients treated in the ICU.

Active fluid de-resuscitation in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of active fluid de-resuscitation on mortality in critically ill patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Trials investigating active fluid de-resuscitation and reporting data on mortality in patients with septic shock were eligible. The primary objective was the impact of active de-resuscitation in patients with septic shock on short-term mortality. Secondary outcomes were whether de-resuscitation lead to a fluid separation, and the impact of de-resuscitation on patient-centred outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials (8,030 patients) were included in the systematic review, whereof 5 randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. None of the RCTs showed a reduction in mortality with active de-resuscitation measures (relative risk (RR) 1.12 [95%-CI 0.84 - 1.48]). Fluid separation was achieved by two RCTs. Evidence from non-randomised trials suggests a mortality benefit with de-resuscitation strategies and indicates a trend towards a more negative fluid balance. Patient-centred outcomes were not influenced in the RCTs, and only one non-randomised trial revealed an impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation and renal replacement requirement (RRT).

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence for superiority of active fluid de-resuscitation compared to usual care regarding mortality, fluid balance or patient-centred outcomes in patients with septic shock. Current evidence is limited by the lack of high-quality RCTs in patients with septic shock, the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity of the applied de-resuscitation techniques. In addition, validity of the majority of RCTs is compromised by their inability to achieve fluid separation.

Co-Administration of Albumin and Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure with Diuretics Resistance

Acute heart failure is a frequent cause of hospital admission in Portugal, and has an increasing tendency given the aging population. Although most admissions for acute heart failure are caused by congestive conditions, not all patients have a congestive phenotype, reflecting the complexity of a process with multiple pathophysiological pathways. The use of diuretics, usually loop diuretics, is the mainstay of treatment for congestion. However, many patients develop resistance, thus constituting a challenge with no consensual solution to date, despite extensive debate over the years. Despite its frequent use in clinical practice, the co-administration of albumin and furosemide remains controversial in the management of patients with acute heart failure, hypoalbuminemia, and diuretic resistance. This review addresses the pathophysiological mechanisms of congestion in patients with acute heart failure and explores the theoretical basis that supports the co-administration of albumin and furosemide in this clinical context. It is intended to clarify the potential benefit of the combined approach in this specific population and identify possible gaps in the literature that could be the subject of future studies.

Fluid balance control in critically ill patients: results from POINCARE-2 stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients, positive fluid balance is associated with excessive mortality. The POINCARE-2 trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of a fluid balance control strategy on mortality in critically ill patients.

METHODS

POINCARE-2 was a stepped wedge cluster open-label randomized controlled trial. We recruited critically ill patients in twelve volunteering intensive care units from nine French hospitals. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, under mechanical ventilation, admitted to one of the 12 recruiting units for > 48 and ≤ 72 h, and had an expected length of stay after inclusion > 24 h. Recruitment started on May 2016 and ended on May 2019. Of 10,272 patients screened, 1361 met the inclusion criteria and 1353 completed follow-up. The POINCARE-2 strategy consisted of a daily weight-driven restriction of fluid intake, diuretics administration, and ultrafiltration in case of renal replacement therapy between Day 2 and Day 14 after admission. The primary outcome was 60-day all-cause mortality. We considered intention-to-treat analyses in cluster-randomized analyses (CRA) and in randomized before-and-after analyses (RBAA).

RESULTS

A total of 433 (643) patients in the strategy group and 472 (718) in the control group were included in the CRA (RBAA). In the CRA, mean (SD) age was 63.7 (14.1) versus 65.7 (14.3) years, and mean (SD) weight at admission was 78.5 (20.0) versus 79.4 (23.5) kg. A total of 129 (160) patients died in the strategy (control) group. Sixty-day mortality did not differ between groups [30.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.2-34.8 vs. 33.9%, 95% CI 29.6-38.2, p = 0.26]. Among safety outcomes, only hypernatremia was more frequent in the strategy group (5.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.01). The RBAA led to similar results.

CONCLUSION

The POINCARE-2 conservative strategy did not reduce mortality in critically ill patients. However, due to open-label and stepped wedge design, intention-to-treat analyses might not reflect actual exposure to this strategy, and further analyses might be required before completely discarding it. Trial registration POINCARE-2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02765009). Registered 29 April 2016.

Association between albumin infusion and septic patients with coronary heart disease: A retrospective study based on medical information mart for intensive care III database

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common comorbidity in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, particularly in the elderly. This particular population may have worse conditions during sepsis, and it presents an overwhelming challenge for clinical practice. Previous studies suggested that patients with CHD have an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and low albumin concentration worsens the prognosis of patients with stable CHD. Hypoalbuminemia in patients with sepsis is common due to nutritional disorders, excessive consumption, and leakage. Albumin is a fluid often used for resuscitation in patients with sepsis. However, albumin infusion in patients with sepsis and CHD has rarely been studied. The effects and safety of albumin infusion in patients with sepsis and CHD remain unclear. Therefore, we collected medical information from Mimic-III (Mimic-III) and compared the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality at 28- or 90-day between the albumin and non-albumin groups in septic patients with CHD. A total of 2,027 patients with sepsis and CHD were included in our study, with 405 in the albumin group and 1,622 in the non-albumin group. After propensity score matching (PSM), 350 pairs were included in our study. Improved survival benefits were found in the albumin group at the 28-day all-cause mortality compared with the non-albumin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38–0.78; p = 0.0009). However, no difference was detected in the 90-day survival benefits (HR, 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60–1.06, p = 0.1207). Albumin infusion did not reverse cardiovascular mortality neither at 28th day nor at 90th day (cardiovascular mortality: 28 days, HR, 0.52, 95% CI: 0.23–1.19, p = 0.1218; 90 days, HR, 0.66, 95% CI: 0.33–1.33, p = 0.2420).

Efficacy of albumin with diuretics in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoalbuminemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypoalbuminemia is associated with fluid overload, the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality. The co-administration of albumin and diuretics for the treatment of patients with hypoalbuminemia is expected to increase urine output, without hemodynamic instability, and improve pulmonary function; however, these effects have not been systematically investigated. Here, we aimed to clarify the benefits of the co-administration of albumin and diuretics in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

We searched for randomized, placebo-controlled trials that investigated the effects of the co-administration of albumin and diuretics compared with placebo and diuretics, in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoalbuminemia. We searched these trials in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Primary outcomes were hypotensive events after the intervention, all-cause mortality, and the length of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were improvement in the ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio) at 24 hours, total urine output (mL/d), and the clinical requirement of renal replacement therapy (RRT).

RESULTS

From the 1574 records identified, we selected 3 studies for quantitative analysis. The results of albumin administration were as follows: hypotensive events (risk ratio [RR] -1.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.15-0.81]), all-cause mortality (RR 1.0 [95% CI: 0.45-2.23]), the length of mechanical ventilation in days (mean difference -1.05 [95% CI: -3.35 to 1.26]), and improvement in P/F ratio (RR 2.83 [95% CI: 1.42-5.67]). None of the randomized controlled trials reported the total urine output, and one reported that no participants required RRT. Adverse events were not reported during the trials. The certainty of evidence was low (in the hypotensive events after the intervention and all-cause mortality) to moderate (in the length of mechanical ventilation in days, improvement of P/F ratio, clinical requirement of RRT, and adverse events).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this treatment combination reduced the number of days for which mechanical ventilation was required, it did not reduce the all-cause mortality at 30 days. In conclusion, the co-administration of albumin and diuretics may reduce hypotensive events and improve the P/F ratio at 24 hours.

ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021

BACKGROUND

The joint committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Japanese Respiratory Society/Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine on ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline has created and released the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021.

METHODS

The 2016 edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline covered clinical questions (CQs) that targeted only adults, but the present guideline includes 15 CQs for children in addition to 46 CQs for adults. As with the previous edition, we used a systematic review method with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system as well as a degree of recommendation determination method. We also conducted systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy and network meta-analyses as a new method.

RESULTS

Recommendations for adult patients with ARDS are described: we suggest against using serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to identify bacterial pneumonia as the underlying disease (GRADE 2D); we recommend limiting tidal volume to 4-8 mL/kg for mechanical ventilation (GRADE 1D); we recommend against managements targeting an excessively low SpO2 (PaO2) (GRADE 2D); we suggest against using transpulmonary pressure as a routine basis in positive end-expiratory pressure settings (GRADE 2B); we suggest implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for those with severe ARDS (GRADE 2B); we suggest against using high-dose steroids (GRADE 2C); and we recommend using low-dose steroids (GRADE 1B). The recommendations for pediatric patients with ARDS are as follows: we suggest against using non-invasive respiratory support (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) (GRADE 2D), we suggest placing pediatric patients with moderate ARDS in the prone position (GRADE 2D), we suggest against routinely implementing NO inhalation therapy (GRADE 2C), and we suggest against implementing daily sedation interruption for pediatric patients with respiratory failure (GRADE 2D).

CONCLUSIONS

This article is a translated summary of the full version of the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 published in Japanese (URL: https://www.jsicm.org/publication/guideline.html ). The original text, which was written for Japanese healthcare professionals, may include different perspectives from healthcare professionals of other countries.

In-hospital mortality of critically Ill patients with interactions of acute kidney injury and acute respiratory failure in the resource-limited settings: Results from SEA-AKI study

PURPOSE

Our goal was to describe clinical outcomes and explore the physiological interactions between acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute respiratory failure (ARF) in critically ill patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrieved from the SEA-AKI study, a multinational multicenter database of adult ICUs from Thailand, Laos, and Indonesia. AKI was defined using KDIGO criteria stage 2-3. ARF was defined by being mechanically ventilated. Patients were assigned into 6 patterns based on AKI and ARF sequence: "no AKI/ARF", "ARF alone", "AKI alone", "ARF first", "AKI first", and "Concurrent AKI-ARF". The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality of each pattern.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 5468 patients were eligible for the analysis. The "Concurrent AKI-ARF" had the highest in-hospital mortality of 69.6%. The "AKI first" and the "ARF first" had in-hospital mortality of 54.4% and 53%, respectively. Among patients with single organ failure, in-hospital mortality was 14.6% and 31.5% in the "AKI alone" and the "ARF alone", accordingly. In-hospital mortality was 12.4% in patients without AKI and ARF.

CONCLUSION

Critically ill patients with ARF and AKI are at higher risk of in-hospital death. Different patterns of AKI and ARF interaction result in unique clinical outcomes as well as risk factors.

ARDS clinical practice guideline 2021

BACKGROUND

The joint committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Japanese Respiratory Society/Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine on ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline has created and released the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021.

METHODS

The 2016 edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline covered clinical questions (CQs) that targeted only adults, but the present guideline includes 15 CQs for children in addition to 46 CQs for adults. As with the previous edition, we used a systematic review method with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system as well as a degree of recommendation determination method. We also conducted systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy and network meta-analyses as a new method.

RESULTS

Recommendations for adult patients with ARDS are described: we suggest against using serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to identify bacterial pneumonia as the underlying disease (GRADE 2D); we recommend limiting tidal volume to 4-8 mL/kg for mechanical ventilation (GRADE 1D); we recommend against managements targeting an excessively low SpO₂ (PaO₂) (GRADE 2D); we suggest against using transpulmonary pressure as a routine basis in positive end-expiratory pressure settings (GRADE 2B); we suggest implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for those with severe ARDS (GRADE 2B); we suggest against using high-dose steroids (GRADE 2C); and we recommend using low-dose steroids (GRADE 1B). The recommendations for pediatric patients with ARDS are as follows: we suggest against using non-invasive respiratory support (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) (GRADE 2D); we suggest placing pediatric patients with moderate ARDS in the prone position (GRADE 2D); we suggest against routinely implementing NO inhalation therapy (GRADE 2C); and we suggest against implementing daily sedation interruption for pediatric patients with respiratory failure (GRADE 2D).

CONCLUSIONS

This article is a translated summary of the full version of the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 published in Japanese (URL: https://www.jrs.or.jp/publication/jrs_guidelines/). The original text, which was written for Japanese healthcare professionals, may include different perspectives from healthcare professionals of other countries.

Impact of albumin infusion on prognosis of intensive care unit patients with congestive heart failure-hypoalbuminemia overlap: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Hypoalbuminemia is common in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Serum albumin is associated with the prognosis of CHF patients. Impact of albumin infusion on prognosis of patients with CHF-hypoalbuminemia overlap remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated the impact of albumin infusion on prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with CHF-hypoalbuminemia overlap.

Methods

We enrolled all patients whose diagnosis included CHF [ICD-9 (international classification of diseases 9) code =428.0] at first ICU admission from the MIMIC III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III) database, and excluded those with missing serum albumin values, with serum albumin >3.4 g/dL or <18 years old. According to the exposure of albumin infusion during hospitalization, patients were stratified into non-albumin and albumin groups. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed (1:1 ratio) to control for baseline confounding. Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality as well as length of stay in the ICU (ICU LOS) and the hospital (hospital LOS).

Results

There were 3,190 eligible patients in the initial search. Patients with albumin infusion had markedly higher in-hospital mortality (36.42% vs. 21.81%, P<0.001), longer ICU LOS [median 6.93 (3.39–14.82) vs. 3.84 (1.96–8.00) days, P<0.001], and longer hospital LOS [median 17.46 (11.45–28.33) vs. 10.92 (6.81–18.00) days, P<0.001] than those without albumin infusion. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that albumin infusion [odds ratio (OR), 1.509; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.164–1.957; P=0.002] was significantly associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. After PSM, a cohort of 429 pairs of patients was included in the final analysis. Patients with albumin infusion had markedly higher in-hospital mortality (34.97% vs. 27.27%, P=0.015), longer ICU LOS [median 8.43 (4.33–16.28) vs. 6.43 (3.07–13.66) days, P<0.001], and longer hospital LOS [median 16.92 (11.27–28.06) vs. 13.33 (8.00–21.10) days, P<0.001] than those without albumin infusion. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that albumin infusion (OR, 1.594; 95% CI, 1.143–2.223; P=0.006) was significantly associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Albumin infusion increased in-hospital mortality, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS in ICU patients with CHF-hypoalbuminemia overlap.

The Impact of Sample Size Misestimations on the Interpretation of ARDS Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Indeterminate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in ARDS may arise from sample size misspecification, leading to abandonment of efficacious therapies.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

If evidence exists for sample size misspecification in ARDS RCTs, has this led to rejection of potentially beneficial therapies? Does evidence exist for prognostic enrichment in RCTs using mortality as a primary outcome?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified 150 ARDS RCTs commencing recruitment after the 1994 American European Consensus Conference ARDS definition and published before October 31, 2020. We examined predicted-observed sample size, predicted-observed control event rate (CER), predicted-observed average treatment effect (ATE), and the relationship between observed CER and observed ATE for RCTs with mortality and nonmortality primary outcome measures. To quantify the strength of evidence, we used Bayesian-averaged meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and Bayes factors.

RESULTS

Only 84 of 150 RCTs (56.0%) reported sample size estimations. In RCTs with mortality as the primary outcome, CER was overestimated in 16 of 28 RCTs (57.1%). To achieve predicted ATE, interventions needed to prevent 40.8% of all deaths, compared with the original prediction of 29.3%. Absolute reduction in mortality ≥ 10% was observed in 5 of 28 RCTs (17.9%), but predicted in 21 of 28 RCTs (75%). For RCTs with mortality as the primary outcome, no association was found between observed CER and observed ATE (pooled OR: β = -0.04; 95% credible interval, -0.18 to 0.09). We identified three interventions that are not currently standard of care with a Bayesian-averaged effect size of > 0.20 and moderate strength of existing evidence: corticosteroids, airway pressure release ventilation, and noninvasive ventilation.

INTERPRETATION

Reporting of sample size estimations was inconsistent in ARDS RCTs, and misspecification of CER and ATE was common. Prognostic enrichment strategies in ARDS RCTs based on all-cause mortality are unlikely to be successful. Bayesian methods can be used to prioritize interventions for future effectiveness RCTs.

[Use of albumin : State of the art]

The Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation (SAFE) study has demonstrated that the use of albumin as an infusion solution in volume therapy can be regarded as safe. An exception is hypo-oncotic albumin in traumatic brain injury. While clear indications of albumin exist for some patients with liver cirrhosis, large studies that demonstrate a clinically relevant advantage beyond hemodynamic effects and would therefore justify wider use in many other areas are still lacking. In large-volume paracentesis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, but also in hepatorenal syndrome, use of albumin is recommended and established due to clinical benefit in randomized controlled trials. In septic shock, use of albumin may be considered, with two large studies addressing this issue in Germany and Italy being still in the recruitment phase. For volume therapy, albumin can be used primarily when other measures for hemodynamic stabilization have been exhausted. This applies to volume resuscitation in hypovolemia as well as in conservative fluid management in the so-called "de-resuscitation" phase. The extent to which the correction of severe hypoalbuminemia with exogenous albumin can improve the impaired outcome of these patients is also part of ongoing studies. On the way to a more individualized medicine, hypoalbuminemia may serve as a parameter in future decision making for or against the use of albumin in volume therapy.

Impact of differences in acute respiratory distress syndrome randomised controlled trial inclusion and exclusion criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Control-arm mortality varies between acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) RCTs.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed ARDS RCTs that commenced recruitment after publication of the American-European Consensus (AECC) definition (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials; January 1994 to October 2020). We assessed concordance of RCT inclusion criteria to ARDS consensus definitions and whether exclusion criteria are strongly or poorly justified. We estimated the proportion of between-trial difference in control-arm 28-day mortality explained by the inclusion criteria and RCT design characteristics using meta-regression.

RESULTS

A literature search identified 43 709 records. One hundred and fifty ARDS RCTs were included; 146/150 (97.3%) RCTs defined ARDS inclusion criteria using AECC/Berlin definitions. Deviations from consensus definitions, primarily aimed at improving ARDS diagnostic certainty, frequently related to duration of hypoxaemia (117/146; 80.1%). Exclusion criteria could be grouped by rationale for selection into strongly or poorly justified criteria. Common poorly justified exclusions included pregnancy related, age, and comorbidities (infectious/immunosuppression, hepatic, renal, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). Control-arm 28-day mortality varied between ARDS RCTs (mean: 29.8% [95% confidence interval: 27.0-32.7%; I2=88.8%; τ2=0.02; P<0.01]), and differed significantly between RCTs with different Pao2:FiO2 ratio inclusion thresholds (26.6-39.9 kPa vs <26.6 kPa; P<0.01). In a meta-regression model, inclusion criteria and RCT design characteristics accounted for 30.6% of between-trial difference (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In most ARDS RCTs, consensus definitions are modified to use as inclusion criteria. Between-RCT mortality differences are mostly explained by the Pao2:FiO2 ratio threshold within the consensus definitions. An exclusion criteria framework can be applied when designing and reporting exclusion criteria in future ARDS RCTs.

Redox signaling and antioxidant therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: No pharmacologic treatment that targets the pathophysiologic alterations of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has proven effective. Previous studies have revealed overactive oxidative stress as a potential therapeutic target. Thus we conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacyof antioxidant therapy on the clinical outcomes of ARDS patients.Methods: We retrieved clinical trials from electronic databases. Articles and conference abstracts about antioxidant therapies for patients with ARDS were identified in which the overall effect of each antioxidant therapy on the mortality of ARDS patients was summarized.Results: We identified 18 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria, including 899 patients in the experimental group and 870 patients in the control group. The pooled results indicated that most antioxidant therapies could not improve all-cause mortality and might even be harmful in ARDS patients at low risk of death.Conclusion: Unclassified patients could not benefit from the antioxidant therapies, and thus discretion must be exercised when using these therapies.Abbreviations ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU: Intensive care unit; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; RNS: Reactive nitrogen species; RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval; OTC: L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid; EPA: Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: Docosahexaenoic acid; GLA: Gamma-linolenic acid; NA: Not applicable; PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio: The ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen; ALI: Acute lung injury.

Low Serum Albumin Predicts Severe Outcomes in COVID-19 Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause serious complications such as multiorgan failure and death which are difficult to predict. We conducted this retrospective case-control observational study with the hypothesis that low serum albumin at presentation can predict serious outcomes in COVID-19 infection.

Methods

We included severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed, hospitalized patients from March to July 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in the USA. Patients were followed for 21 days for the development of the primary endpoint defined as the composite outcome which included acute encephalopathy, acute kidney injury, the requirement of new renal replacement therapy, acute hypercoagulability, acute circulatory failure, new-onset heart failure, acute cardiac injury, acute arrhythmia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), high flow oxygen support, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mechanical ventilation or death; and the secondary endpoint of death only. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the effect of albumin level and outcomes.

Results

The mean age was 56.76 years vs. 55.67 years (P = 0.68) in the normal albumin vs. the low albumin group. We noticed an inverse relationship between serum albumin at presentation and serious outcomes. The low albumin group had a higher composite outcome (93.88% vs. 6.12%, P < 0.05) and higher mortality (13.87% vs. 2.38%, P < 0.05) in comparison to the normal albumin group. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed higher odds of having composite outcomes with lower albumin group (odds ratio (OR) 10.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.74 - 24.97, P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed higher odds of having composite outcomes with the very low albumin group (OR 7.94, 95% CI 1.70 - 37.14, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Low serum albumin on presentation in COVID-19 infection is associated with serious outcomes not limited to mortality. The therapeutic option of albumin infusion should be investigated.

Phases of fluid management and the roles of human albumin solution in perioperative and critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

Positive fluid balance is common among critically ill patients and leads to worse outcomes, particularly in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney injury. Restrictive fluid infusion and active removal of accumulated fluid are being studied as approaches to prevent and treat fluid overload. Use of human albumin solutions has been investigated in different phases of restrictive fluid resuscitation, and this narrative literature review was undertaken to evaluate hypoalbuminemia and the roles of human serum albumin with respect to hypovolemia and its management.

METHODS

PubMed/EMBASE search terms were: "resuscitation," "fluids," "fluid therapy," "fluid balance," "plasma volume," "colloids," "crystalloids," "albumin," "hypoalbuminemia," "starch," "saline," "balanced salt solution," "gelatin," "goal-directed therapy" (English-language, pre-January 2020). Additional papers were identified by manual searching of reference lists.

RESULTS

Restrictive fluid administration, plus early vasopressor use, may reduce fluid balance, but in some cases fluid overload cannot be entirely avoided. Deresuscitation, with fluid actively removed through diuretics or ultrafiltration, reduces duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay. Combining hyperoncotic human albumin solution with diuretics increases hemodynamic stability and diuresis. Hyperoncotic albumin corrects hypoalbuminemia and raises colloid osmotic pressure, limiting edema formation and potentially improving endothelial function. Serum levels of albumin relative to C-reactive protein and lactate may predict which patients will benefit most from albumin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperoncotic human albumin solution facilitates restrictive fluid therapy and the effectiveness of deresuscitative measures. Current evidence is mostly from observational studies, and more randomized trials are needed to better establish a personalized approach to fluid management.

Fluid administration and monitoring in ARDS: which management?

Modalities of fluid management in patients sustaining the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are challenging and controversial. Optimal fluid management should provide adequate oxygen delivery to the body, while avoiding inadvertent increase in lung edema which further impairs gas exchange. In ARDS patients, positive fluid balance has been associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer ICU and hospital stay, and higher mortality. Accordingly, a restrictive strategy has been compared to a more liberal approach in randomized controlled trials conducted in various clinical settings. Restrictive strategies included fluid restriction guided by the monitoring of extravascular lung water, pulmonary capillary wedge or central venous pressure, and furosemide targeted to diuresis and/or albumin replacement in hypoproteinemic patients. Overall, restrictive strategies improved oxygenation significantly and reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, but had no significant effect on mortality. Fluid management may require different approaches depending on the time course of ARDS (i.e., early vs. late period). The effects of fluid strategy management according to ARDS phenotypes remain to be evaluated. Since ARDS is frequently associated with sepsis-induced acute circulatory failure, the prediction of fluid responsiveness is crucial in these patients to avoid hemodynamically inefficient—hence respiratory detrimental—fluid administration. Specific hemodynamic indices of fluid responsiveness or mini-fluid challenges should be preferably used. Since the positive airway pressure contributes to positive fluid balance in ventilated ARDS patients, it should be kept as low as possible. As soon as the hemodynamic status is stabilized, correction of cumulated fluid retention may rely on diuretics administration or renal replacement therapy.

Human albumin solutions in intensive care: A review

Albumin plays a key role in the critically ill patient acting as a prognostic marker and as a therapy in the form of human albumin solutions. However, the use of human albumin solution has varied over time with notable differences between health systems. Whilst its use is widely accepted for some clinical indications, its role has not always been clear in the critically ill and has been found to be harmful in some cohorts. Numerous studies have showed conflicting results and critical care clinicians have not always been guided by robust evidence. Nonetheless, at present the use of human albumin solution appears to be increasing again in the United Kingdom. Below, we discuss the latest evidence base for its use in critically ill patients.

Albumin as a drug: its biological effects beyond volume expansion

Albumin is the most abundant and perhaps most important protein in human blood. Research has identified many of albumin's possible roles in modulating acid-base balance, modifying inflammation, maintaining vascular endothelial integrity, and binding endogenous and exogenous compounds. Albumin plays a key role in the homeostasis of vascular endothelium, offering protection from inflammation and damage to the glycocalyx. Albumin binds a diverse range of compounds. It transports, delivers and clears drugs, plus it helps with uptake, storage and disposal of potentially harmful biological products. The biological effects of albumin in critical illness are incompletely understood, but may enhance its clinical role beyond use as an intravenous fluid. In this article, we summarise the evidence surrounding albumin's biological and physiological effects beyond its use for plasma volume expansion, and explore potential mechanistic effects of albumin as a disease modifier in patients with critical illness.

Furosemide: Would it help to improve the lungs as evaluated by sonography and compliance during aortic coarctation surgery

Background

We evaluated furosemide on attenuating lung injury and/or edema during coarctation repair surgery. We evaluated dynamic lung compliance. We measured the degree of lung edema by means of lung ultrasound (LUS). We recorded the (PaO₂/FiO₂ratio) as an indicator for oxygenation.

Materials and Methods

A study was conducted on 56 patients. Patients were divided into two groups: control group (Group C) which did not receive furosemide and furosemide group (Group F) at a dose of 1 mg/kg at induction of anesthesia. Dynamic lung compliance was calculated at induction (Cdyn 1) and at the end of the surgery (Cdyn 2). The (PaO₂/FiO₂ratio) was calculated at start and end of surgery as (PF 1) and (PF 2), respectively. LUS was performed after induction (LUS 1) and at the end of the surgery. LUS 2 using the 12 regions method plotting the results on scale from 0 to 36. Mechanical ventilation days were recorded.

Results

Administering furosemide attenuated the lung injury/edema and other pulmonary complications. Furosemide administration improved the dynamic lung compliance in the F Group compared to the C Group. Furthermore, it increased the (PaO₂/FiO₂ratio) in the F Group compared to the C Group. LUS scale values were lower in the F Group compared to the C Group. There was also less postoperative mechanical ventilation days.

Conclusions

The use of furosemide was accompanied by improved lung injury/edema profile as indicated by a much less drop in dynamic lung compliance, better oxygenation, a more favorable LUS scale with less parenchymal lung affection.

Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference

In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published a guideline on the classification and management of acute kidney injury (AKI). The guideline was derived from evidence available through February 2011. Since then, new evidence has emerged that has important implications for clinical practice in diagnosing and managing AKI. In April of 2019, KDIGO held a controversies conference entitled Acute Kidney Injury with the following goals: determine best practices and areas of uncertainty in treating AKI; review key relevant literature published since the 2012 KDIGO AKI guideline; address ongoing controversial issues; identify new topics or issues to be revisited for the next iteration of the KDIGO AKI guideline; and outline research needed to improve AKI management. Here, we present the findings of this conference and describe key areas that future guidelines may address.

Elastic Bandage vs Hypertonic Albumin for Diuretic-Resistant Volume-Overloaded Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Propensity-Match Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare elastic bandage (EB) vs hypertonic albumin solution administration to increase fluid removal by enhancing loop diuretic efficiency (DE) in patients with volume overload and diuretic resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this historic cohort study with propensity matching, we included diuretic-resistant adult (≥18 years) patients with volume overload after fluid resuscitation admitted in the intensive care unit from January 1, 2006, through June 30, 2017. Regression models and propensity matching were used to assess the associations of these interventions with changes in DE and other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1147 patients (median age, 66; interquartile range [IQR], 56-76 years; 51% [n=590] men), 384 (33%) received EB and 763 (67%) received hypertonic albumin solution. In adjusted models, EB was significantly associated with higher DE compared with hypertonic albumin solution (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.81; P=.004). After propensity matching of 345 pairs, DE remained significantly different between the 2 groups (median, 2111; IQR, 1092 to 4665 mL for EB vs median, 1829; IQR, 1032 to 3436 mL for hypertonic albumin solution; P=.02). EB, male sex, lower baseline serum urea nitrogen level, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and higher baseline left ventricular ejection fraction were DE determinants. The lowest DE quartile (<1073 mL/40-mg furosemide equivalent) following adjustment for known predictors of mortality remained independently associated with higher 90-day death rate (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.36; P=.009).

CONCLUSION

EB use is associated with greater DE than hypertonic albumin solution during the deescalation phase of sepsis resuscitation. Prospective clinical trials would validate the findings of this hypothesis-generating study.

Efficacy of furosemide-albumin compared with furosemide in critically ill hypoalbuminemia patients admitted to intensive care unit: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Some physicians co-administer albumin with loop diuretics to overcome diuretic resistance in critically ill hypoalbuminemia patients, though previous studies have reported conflicting results on this matter.

OBJECTIVE

The effects of adding albumin to furosemide to enhance its efficacy in critically ill hypoalbuminemia patients are evaluated.

METHODS

This was a non-blinded randomized trial. 49 adult critically ill patients with hypoalbuminemia and generalized edema who received randomly furosemide and furosemide/albumin complex were enrolled. The patients' urine was collected at intervals of 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after initiation of the furosemide treatment, and the urine output and urinary excretion of furosemide and sodium were measured. The urinary excretion of furosemide was considered an indicator of drug efficacy.

RESULTS

The amount of sodium and furosemide excreted in urine showed no significant differences between the two groups; however, the mean of the urinary excretion of furosemide in the first 2 h after drug infusion was significantly higher (p = 0.03) in the furosemide/albumin group. No significant correlation between APACHE II scores and serum albumin levels and the urinary excretion of furosemide was seen.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that there is not statistically significant differences between groups with furosemide alone and combined with albumin in urinary furosemide excretion. It seems that adding albumin for furosemide pharmacotherapy regime is not recommended as an intervention to increase furosemide efficacy in critically ill hypoalbuminemia patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT with the registration number IRCT201412132582N12 in 23 February 2015; https://en.irct.ir/trial/2356 Graphical abstract.

Lung-kidney interactions in critically ill patients: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 21 Workgroup

BACKGROUND

Multi-organ dysfunction in critical illness is common and frequently involves the lungs and kidneys, often requiring organ support such as invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), renal replacement therapy (RRT) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS

A consensus conference on the spectrum of lung-kidney interactions in critical illness was held under the auspices of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) in Innsbruck, Austria, in June 2018. Through review and critical appraisal of the available evidence, the current state of research, and both clinical and research recommendations were described on the following topics: epidemiology, pathophysiology and strategies to mitigate pulmonary dysfunction among patients with acute kidney injury and/or kidney dysfunction among patients with acute respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Furthermore, emphasis was put on patients receiving organ support (RRT, IMV and/or ECMO) and its impact on lung and kidney function.

CONCLUSION

The ADQI 21 conference found significant knowledge gaps about organ crosstalk between lung and kidney and its relevance for critically ill patients. Lung protective ventilation, conservative fluid management and early recognition and treatment of pulmonary infections were the only clinical recommendations with higher quality of evidence. Recommendations for research were formulated, targeting lung-kidney interactions to improve care processes and outcomes in critical illness.

Current Pharmacological Approach to ARDS: The Place of Bosentan

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by dyspnea at presentation, tachypnea on physical examination, findings of bilateral infiltration in chest radiography, refractory hypoxia, and high mortality. Although the main treatment approach is to address the underlying disease, there are also pharmacological and nonpharmacological options for supportive treatment. There is currently no pharmacological agent with proven efficacy in this syndrome, and many drugs are being studied for this purpose. One of these is the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan.

Fluid intake-related association between urine output and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a complex response to various insults, has a high mortality rate. As pulmonary edema resulting from increased vascular permeability is a hallmark of ARDS, management of the fluid status, including the urine output (UO) and fluid intake (FI), is essential. However, the relationships between UO, FI, and mortality in ARDS remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the interactive associations among UO, FI, and mortality in ARDS.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial performed at 10 centers within the ARDS Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute research network. The total UO and FI volumes within the 24-h period preceding the trial, the UO to FI ratio (UO/FI), demographic data, biochemical measurements, and other variables from 835 patients with ARDS, 539 survivors, and 296 non-survivors, were analyzed. The associations among UO, FI, the UO/FI, and mortality were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression.

Results

In all 835 patients, an increased UO was significantly associated with decreased mortality when used as a continuous variable (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–0.99, P = 0.002) and as a quartile variable (OR of Q2 to Q4: 0.69–0.46, with Q1 as reference). To explore the interaction between UO and FI, the UO/FI was calculated, and a cut-off value of 0.5 was detected for the association with mortality. For patients with a UO/FI ≤0.5, an increased UO/FI was significantly associated with decreased mortality (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03–0.253, P <  0.001); this association was not significant for patients with UO/FI ratios > 0.5 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.96–1.14, P = 0.281). A significant interaction was observed between UO and the UO/FI. The association between UO and mortality was significant in the subgroup with a UO/FI ≤0.5 (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99, P = 0.006), but not in the subgroup with a UO/FI > 0.5.

Conclusions

The association between UO and mortality was mediated by the UO/FI status, as only patients with low UO/FI ratios benefitted from a higher UO.

Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Post-Cesarean Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Preeclampsia: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether a restrictive compared to a liberal fluid therapy will increase postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with severe preeclampsia.

METHODS

A total of 46 patients (mean age, 32 years; standard deviation, 6.8 years) with severe preeclampsia were randomized to liberal (1500 ml of lactated Ringer's, n=23) or restrictive (250 ml of lactated Ringer's, n=23) intravenous fluid regimen during cesarean section. The primary outcome was the development of a postoperative renal dysfunction defined by AKI Network stage ≥1. Serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were evaluated at postoperative days 1 and 2. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02214186.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative AKI was 43.5% in the liberal fluid group and 43.5% in the restrictive fluid group (p=1.0). Intraoperative urine output was higher in the liberal (116 ml/h, IQR 69-191) than in the restrictive fluid group (80 ml/h, IQR 37-110, p<0.05). In both groups, serum cystatin C did not change from postoperative day 1 compared to the preoperative period and significantly decreased on postoperative day 2 compared to postoperative day 1 (p<0.05). In the restrictive fluid group, NGAL levels increased on postoperative day 1 compared to the preoperative period (p<0.05) and decreased on postoperative day 2 compared to postoperative day 1 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with severe preeclampsia, a restrictive fluid regimen during cesarean section was not associated with increased postoperative AKI.

Association Between Furosemide Exposure and Clinical Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort of Critically Ill Children

Furosemide is commonly prescribed in critically ill patients to increase the urine output and prevent fluid overload (FO) and acute kidney injury (AKI), but not supported by conclusive evidence. There remain conflicting findings on whether furosemide associates with AKI and adverse outcomes. Information on the impact of furosemide on adverse outcomes in a general population of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is limited. The aim of the cohort study was to investigate the associations of furosemide with AKI and clinical outcomes in critically ill children. Study Design: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 456 critically ill children consecutively admitted to PICU from January to December 2016. The exposure of interest was the use of furosemide in the first week after admission. FO was defined as ≥5% of daily fluid accumulation, and mean FO was considered significant when mean daily fluid accumulation during the first week was ≥5%. The primary outcomes were AKI in the first week after admission and mortality during PICU stay. AKI diagnosis was based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria with both serum creatinine and urine output. Results: Furosemide exposure occurred in 43.4% of all patients (n = 456) and 49.3% of those who developed FO (n = 150) in the first week after admission. Patients who were exposed to furosemide had significantly less degree of mean daily fluid accumulation than those who were not (1.10 [-0.33 to 2.61%] vs. 2.00 [0.54-3.70%], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the occurrence of AKI between patients who did and did not receive furosemide (22 of 198 [11.1%] vs. 36 of 258 [14.0%], P = 0.397). The mortality rate was 15.4% (70 of 456), and death occurred more frequently among patients who received furosemide than among those who did not (21.7 vs. 10.5%, P = 0.002). Furosemide exposure was associated with increased odds for mortality in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for body weight, gender, illness severity assessed by PRISM III score, the presence of mean FO, and AKI stage [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.95; 95%CI, 1.08-3.52; P = 0.026]. Conclusion: Exposure to furosemide might be associated with increased risk for mortality, but not AKI, in critically ill children.