51
|
Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:363-385. [PMID: 31184787 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2895] [Impact Index Per Article: 579.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of cancer survivors continues to increase in the United States because of the growth and aging of the population as well as advances in early detection and treatment. To assist the public health community in better serving these individuals, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute collaborate every 3 years to estimate cancer prevalence in the United States using incidence and survival data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries; vital statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics; and population projections from the US Census Bureau. Current treatment patterns based on information in the National Cancer Data Base are presented for the most prevalent cancer types. Cancer-related and treatment-related short-term, long-term, and late health effects are also briefly described. More than 16.9 million Americans (8.1 million males and 8.8 million females) with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2019; this number is projected to reach more than 22.1 million by January 1, 2030 based on the growth and aging of the population alone. The 3 most prevalent cancers in 2019 are prostate (3,650,030), colon and rectum (776,120), and melanoma of the skin (684,470) among males, and breast (3,861,520), uterine corpus (807,860), and colon and rectum (768,650) among females. More than one-half (56%) of survivors were diagnosed within the past 10 years, and almost two-thirds (64%) are aged 65 years or older. People with a history of cancer have unique medical and psychosocial needs that require proactive assessment and management by follow-up care providers. Although there are growing numbers of tools that can assist patients, caregivers, and clinicians in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship, further evidence-based resources are needed to optimize care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leticia Nogueira
- Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Angela B Mariotto
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - K Robin Yabroff
- Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
- Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Joan L Kramer
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Lightfoot N, MacEwan L, Tufford L, Holness DL, Mayer C, Kramer DM. Who cares? The impact on caregivers of suspected mining-related lung cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:e494-e502. [PMID: 31548817 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background In the present study, we investigated the emotional, physical, financial, occupational, practical, and quality-of-life impacts on caregivers of patients with mining-related lung cancer. Methods This concurrent, embedded, mixed-methods study used individual in-depth qualitative interviews and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (version 2: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.) quality-of-life measure with 8 caregivers of patients with suspected mining-related lung cancer who had worked in Sudbury or Elliot Lake (or both), and sometimes elsewhere. Individuals who assist workers in filing compensation claims were also interviewed in Sudbury and Elliot Lake. Interviews (n = 11) were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results Caregiver themes focused on the long time to, and the shock of, diagnosis and dealing with lung cancer; not much of a life for caregivers; strong views about potential cancer causes; concerns about financial impacts; compensation experiences and long time to compensation; and suggestions for additional support. Quality-of-life scores were below the norm for most measures. Individuals who assist workers in preparing claims were passionate about challenges in the compensation journey; the requirement for more and better family support; the need to focus on compensation compared with cost control; the need for better exposure monitoring, controls, resources, and research; and job challenges, barriers, and satisfaction. Conclusions Caregivers expressed a need for more education about the compensation process and for greater support. Worker representatives required persistence, additional workplace monitoring and controls, additional research, and a focus on compensation compared with cost control. They also emphasized the need for more family support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Lightfoot
- School of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON
| | - L MacEwan
- School of Social Work, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON
| | - L Tufford
- School of Social Work, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON
| | - D L Holness
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Division of Occupational Medicine and Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - C Mayer
- Supportive Care Oncology Research Unit, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON
| | - D M Kramer
- School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Kajiwara K, Kako J, Miyashita M. Response to: “Caring for the person with cancer and the role of digital technology in supporting carers”. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:961. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04994-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
54
|
Nightingale CL, Steffen LE, Tooze JA, Petty W, Danhauer SC, Badr H, Weaver KE. Lung Cancer Patient and Caregiver Health Vulnerabilities and Interest in Health Promotion Interventions: An Exploratory Study. Glob Adv Health Med 2019; 8:2164956119865160. [PMID: 31360617 PMCID: PMC6637827 DOI: 10.1177/2164956119865160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung cancer patients and their caregivers are at risk for negative health behaviors and poor psychosocial functioning, but few interventions exist that target this population. To inform intervention development, we explored potential targets and interest and concordance in health promotion interventions among lung cancer patients and their caregivers. Methods Lung cancer patients (n = 18) with a smoking history and their caregivers (n = 15) participated in a cross-sectional, observational survey study (an average of 1 month postdiagnosis) to assess health behaviors, psychosocial functioning, and interest in health promotion interventions. Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests examined factors associated with intervention interest. McNemar’s test examined concordance in interest. Results Many caregivers (40%) reported providing care at least 4 days per week, and over half (53.3%) reported a smoking history. Patients reported high cancer self-blame (mean = 3.1, standard deviation = 0.9, range = 1–4). Patients (55.6%) and caregivers (60%) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. There was high interest and concordance in interest in cancer education (patients, 77.8%; caregivers, 86.7%) and diet and exercise (patients, 66.7%; caregivers, 80%) interventions. Significantly more caregivers were interested in stress reduction (patients, 53.3%; caregivers, 73.3%; P = .05) and yoga (patients, 16.7%; caregivers, 50%; P = .03) than patients. Caregivers interested in stress reduction interventions had higher levels of distress than those not interested. Discussion Health promotion interventions are needed and of interest to lung cancer patients and caregivers. Shared interests in interventions suggest dyadic interventions may be appropriate, yet interventions should also address distinct patient and caregiver needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandylen L Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Laurie E Steffen
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet A Tooze
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - William Petty
- Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Suzanne C Danhauer
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Hoda Badr
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Irwin MM, Dudley W, Northouse L, Berry DL, Mallory GA. Oncology Nurses' Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice in Addressing Caregiver Strain and Burden. Oncol Nurs Forum 2019; 45:187-196. [PMID: 29466346 DOI: 10.1188/18.onf.187-196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe nurses' practices, confidence, and knowledge of evidence-based interventions for cancer caregiver strain and burden and to identify factors that contribute to these aspects.
. SAMPLE & SETTING 2,055 Oncology Nursing Society members completed an emailed survey.
. METHODS & VARIABLES Pooled analysis of survey results. Variables included the baseline nursing assessment, intervention, confidence, knowledge, strategies used, and barriers encountered.
. RESULTS Nurses tend to overestimate the strength of evidence for interventions not shown to be effective and have moderate confidence in assessing and intervening with caregivers. Having been an informal caregiver and having received care from an informal caregiver were associated with higher reported practice and confidence. Major strategies used were referral to social workers and others. Barriers reported were financial, caregiver emotional responses, and distance.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING An opportunity exists to increase nurses' knowledge and confidence in assessment and intervention with caregivers. Greater use of technology may help nurses overcome some barriers to working with caregivers. Findings can be used to plan continuing education, develop clinical processes, and identify resources nurses need to address strain and burden among informal caregivers.
Collapse
|
56
|
Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, Coleman H, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD009912. [PMID: 31204791 PMCID: PMC6573123 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, cancer is recognised as a chronic condition with a growing population of informal caregivers providing care for cancer patients. Informal caregiving can negatively affect the health and well-being of caregivers. We need a synthesised account of best evidence to aid decision-making about effective ways to support caregivers for individuals 'living with cancer'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to improve the quality of life (QoL), physical health and well-being of informal caregivers of people living with cancer compared with usual care. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Open SIGLE, Web of Science from inception up to January 2018, trial registries and citation lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychosocial interventions delivered to adult informal caregivers of adults affected by cancer on a group or individual basis with usual care. Psychosocial interventions included non-pharmacological interventions that involved an interpersonal relationship between caregivers and healthcare professionals. We included interventions delivered also to caregiver-patient dyads. Interventions delivered to caregivers of individuals receiving palliative or inpatient care were excluded. Our primary outcome was caregiver QoL. Secondary outcomes included patient QoL, caregiver and patient depression, anxiety, psychological distress, physical health status and intervention satisfaction and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and conducted 'Risk of bias' assessments. We synthesised findings using meta-analysis, where possible, and reported remaining results in a narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS Nineteen trials (n = 3, 725) were included in the review. All trials were reported in English and were undertaken in high-income countries. Trials targeted caregivers of patients affected by a number of cancers spanning newly diagnosed patients, patients awaiting treatment, patients who were being treated currently and individuals post-treatment. Most trials delivered interventions to caregiver-patient dyads (predominantly spousal dyads) and there was variation in intervention delivery to groups or individual participants. There was much heterogeneity across interventions though the majority were defined as psycho-educational. All trials were rated as being at 'high risk of bias'.Compared to usual care, psychosocial interventions may improve slightly caregiver QoL immediately post intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.53; studies = 2, 265 participants) and may have little to no effect on caregiver QoL at 12 months (SMD 0.14, 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.40; studies = 2, 239 participants) post-intervention (both low-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on caregiver depression immediately to one-month post-intervention (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.15; studies = 9, 702 participants) (moderate-quality evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver anxiety immediately post-intervention (SMD -0.12, 95 % CI -0.33 to 0.10; studies = 5, 329 participants), depression three-to-six months (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.38; studies = 5. 379 participants) post-intervention and patient QoL six to 12 months (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.26; studies = 3, 294 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence). There was uncertainty whether psychosocial interventions improve patient QoL immediately (SMD -0.03, 95 %CI -0.50 to 0.44; studies = 2, 292 participants) or caregiver anxiety three-to-six months (SMD-0.25, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.13; studies = 4, 272 participants) post-intervention (both very low-quality evidence). Two studies which could not be pooled in a meta-analysis for caregiver physical health status found little to no effect immediately post-intervention and a small intervention effect 12 months post-intervention. Caregiver or patient satisfaction or cost-effectiveness of interventions were not assessed in any studies. Interventions demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability.Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on patient physical health status immediately post-intervention (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI -0.07 to 0.41; studies = 4, 461 participants) and patient depression three to six months post-intervention (SMD-0.11, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.12; studies = 6, 534 participants) (both moderate-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver psychological distress immediately to one-month (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.26; studies = 3, 134 participants), and seven to 12 months (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.58; studies = 2, 62 participants) post-intervention; patient depression immediately (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.07; studies = 9, 852 participants); anxiety immediately (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15;studies = 4, 422 participants), and three to six months (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.02; studies = 4, 370 participants); psychological distress immediately (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.44; studies = 2, 74 participants) and seven to 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.24; studies = 2, 61 participants); and physical health status six to 12 months (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.30; studies = 2, 275 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence).Three trials reported adverse effects associated with the interventions, compared with usual care, including higher distress, sexual function-related distress and lower relationship satisfaction levels for caregivers, higher distress levels for patients, and that some content was perceived as insensitive to some participants.Trials not able to be pooled in a meta-analysis did not tend to report effect size and it was difficult to discern intervention effectiveness. Variable intervention effects were reported for patient and caregiver outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity across studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for this population. There is an immediate need for rigorous trials with process evaluations and clearer, detailed intervention descriptions. Cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted alongside future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Treanor
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Olinda Santin
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Gillian Prue
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Helen Coleman
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Peter O'Halloran
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Blackstone E, Lipson AR, Douglas SL. Closer: A videoconference intervention for distance caregivers of cancer patients. Res Nurs Health 2019; 42:256-263. [PMID: 31119765 DOI: 10.1002/nur.21952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Distance caregivers (DCGs) represent a growing demographic. The emotional burden of caregiving for a family member with cancer is amplified by the logistical challenges of providing support from afar. DCGs feel higher levels of distress, anxiety, and depression compared with local caregivers. Videoconference technology may alleviate both the emotional and practical burdens faced by DCGs. This is an ongoing randomized controlled trial in 32 outpatient ambulatory clinics at a large, urban, comprehensive cancer center. To date, 332 patient-DCG dyads have been enrolled. DCGs must have internet access and have been identified by the patient as a source of support. The intervention period is 4 months. DCGs are randomized to one of three arms: DCGs in Arm 1 receive four coaching sessions with an advanced practice nurse or social worker and four videoconference appointments during the oncologist-patient office visit. DCGs in Arm 2 participate in four videoconference appointments with the oncologist and patient, and Arm 3 is the control group, which receives access to information through a website. Primary outcome variables are DCG distress, anxiety, depression, burden, self-efficacy, and emotional support. These data are collected electronically at baseline, 4 months, and 6 months. Patient distress, anxiety, and depression are also assessed at these same intervals using brief in-person interviews. The change in each of the DCG outcomes over time will be examined by a repeated measures analysis of covariance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Blackstone
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy R Lipson
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sara L Douglas
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Carr AL, Jones J, Mikulich Gilbertson S, Laudenslager ML, Kutner JS, Kilbourn K, Sannes TS, Brewer BW, Kolva E, Joshi T, Amoyal Pensak N. Impact of a Mobilized Stress Management Program (Pep-Pal) for Caregivers of Oncology Patients: Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Cancer 2019; 5:e11406. [PMID: 31066678 PMCID: PMC6524452 DOI: 10.2196/11406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregivers of patients with advanced diseases are known to have high levels of distress, including depression and anxiety. Recent research has focused on recognizing caregivers in need of psychosocial support to help them manage their distress. Evidenced-based technological interventions have the potential to aid caregivers in managing distress. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe caregiver perceptions of the usability and acceptability, and their suggestions for future adaptations, of a mobilized psychoeducation and skills-based intervention. METHODS This study was a part of a larger trial of a mobilized psychoeducation and skills-based intervention (Psychoeducation and Skills-Based Mobilized Intervention [Pep-Pal]) for caregivers of patients with advanced illness. This substudy used a mixed-methods analysis of quantitative data from all 26 intervention participants and qualitative data from 14 intervention caregivers who completed the Pep-Pal intervention. The qualitative semistructured individual interviews, which we conducted within the first 4 weeks after participants completed the intervention, assessed the acceptability and usability of Pep-Pal. Additionally, the qualitative interviews provided contextual evidence of how the intervention was helpful to interviewees in unanticipated ways. We conducted applied thematic analysis via independent review of transcripts to extract salient themes. RESULTS Overall, caregivers of patients with advanced cancer deemed Pep-Pal to be acceptable in all Web-based sessions except for Improving Intimacy. Caregivers perceived the program to be of use across the areas they needed and in others that they had not anticipated. Caregiver recommendations of key changes for the program were to include more variety in caregiver actors in sessions, change the title of Improving Intimacy to Improving Relationships, provide an audio-only option in addition to video, and change the format of the mobilized website program to a stand-alone mobile app. CONCLUSIONS The valuable feedback in key areas from individual interviews will be integrated into the final version of Pep-Pal that will be tested in a fully powered randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03002896; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03002896 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76eThwaei).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaina L Carr
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Jacqueline Jones
- College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | | | - Mark L Laudenslager
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jean S Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Timothy S Sannes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Benjamin W Brewer
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Elissa Kolva
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Tanisha Joshi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Nicole Amoyal Pensak
- Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, United States.,Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Ugalde A, Gaskin CJ, Rankin NM, Schofield P, Boltong A, Aranda S, Chambers S, Krishnasamy M, Livingston PM. A systematic review of cancer caregiver interventions: Appraising the potential for implementation of evidence into practice. Psychooncology 2019; 28:687-701. [PMID: 30716183 PMCID: PMC6594143 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE nformal caregivers provide substantial support for people living with cancer. Previous systematic reviews report on the efficacy of cancer caregiver interventions but not their potential to be implemented. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the potential for cancer caregiver interventions to be implemented into practice. METHODS We searched three electronic databases to identify cancer caregiver interventions on 5 January 2018. We operationalised six implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, and costs) into a tool to guide data extraction. RESULTS The search yielded 33 papers (27 papers from electronic databases and six papers from other sources) reporting on 26 studies that met review criteria. Fewer than half the studies (46%) contained evidence about the acceptability of interventions from caregivers' perspectives; only two studies (8%) included interventions developed with input from caregivers. Two studies (8%) addressed potential adoption of interventions, and no studies discussed intentions, agreement, or action to implement interventions into practice. All studies reported on intervention appropriateness by providing a rationale for the interventions. For feasibility, on average less than one-third of caregivers who were eligible to be involved consented to participate. On fidelity, whether interventions were conducted as intended was reported in 62% of studies. Cost data were reported in terms of intervention delivery, requiring a median time commitment of staff of 180 minutes to be delivered. CONCLUSIONS Caregiver intervention studies lack components of study design and reporting that could bridge the gap between research and practice. There is enormous potential for improvements in cancer caregiver intervention study design to plan for future implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ugalde
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Nicole M. Rankin
- Cancer Research DivisionCancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of PsychologySwinburne UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Cancer Experiences ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Anna Boltong
- Strategy and Support DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer CentreParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Suzanne Chambers
- Faculty of HealthUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Cancer Council QLDBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Meinir Krishnasamy
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer CentreParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Patricia M. Livingston
- School of Nursing and MidwiferyDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
- Faculty of HealthDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Juraskova I. Recognising and managing the psychosocial needs of family carers: It's time for change. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:401-403. [PMID: 30878133 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Ploeg J, Ali MU, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Bartholomew A, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, McAiney C, Sherifali D. Caregiver-Focused, Web-Based Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 2). J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e11247. [PMID: 30368439 PMCID: PMC6229518 DOI: 10.2196/11247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Approaches to support the health and well-being of family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions are increasingly important given the key roles caregivers play in helping family members to live in the community. Web-based interventions to support caregivers have the potential to lessen the negative health impacts associated with caregiving and result in improved health outcomes. Objective The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of caregiver-focused, Web-based interventions, compared with no or minimal Web-based interventions, on caregiver outcomes. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of different types of Web-based interventions (eg, education, peer and professional psychosocial support, and electronic monitoring of the care recipient), compared with no or minimal Web-based interventions, on caregiver outcomes. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CIHAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, and AgeLine were searched from January 1995 to April 2017 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that compared caregiver-focused, Web-based intervention programs with no or minimal Web-based interventions for caregivers of adults with at least one chronic condition. Studies were included if they involved: adult family or friend caregivers (aged ≥18 years) of adults living in the community with a chronic condition; a caregiver-focused, Web-based intervention of education or psychosocial support or electronic monitoring of the care recipient; and general caregiver outcomes (ie, burden, life satisfaction, self-efficacy or mastery, reaction to problem behavior, self-esteem, strain, and social support). Title and abstract as well as full-text screening were completed in duplicate. Data were extracted by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer, and risk of bias assessments were completed accordingly. Where possible, data for these caregiver outcomes were meta-analyzed. Results The search yielded 7927 unique citations, of which 294 studies were screened at full text. Of those, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria; 12 were RCTs and 1 study was a CCT. One study used an RCT design in 1 country and a CCT design in 2 other countries. The beneficial effects of any Web-based intervention program, compared with no or minimal Web-based intervention, resulted in a mean increase of 0.85 points (95% CI 0.12 to 1.57) for caregiver self-esteem, a mean increase of 0.36 points (95% CI 0.11 to 0.62) for caregiver self-efficacy or mastery, and a mean decrease of 0.32 points (95% CI −0.54 to −0.09) for caregiver strain. However, the results are based on poor-quality studies. Conclusions The review found evidence for the positive effects of Web-based intervention programs on self-efficacy, self-esteem, and strain of caregivers of adults living with a chronic condition. Further high-quality research is needed to inform the effectiveness of specific types of Web-based interventions on caregiver outcomes. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42018091715; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=91715 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/738zAa5F5)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Muhammad Usman Ali
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruta Valaitis
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Health Human Resources, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Bartholomew
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Program for Interpersonal Practice, Education and Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Diana Sherifali
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Diabetes Care and Research Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Predictors of Caregiver Distress in the Community Setting Using the Home Care Version of the Resident Assessment Instrument. Prof Case Manag 2018; 23:60-69. [PMID: 29381670 DOI: 10.1097/ncm.0000000000000245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study was to identify factors predictive of new onset and improved caregiver distress among informal caregivers providing assistance for clients receiving home care. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS Home care. METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE The sample included 323,409 clients receiving home care from a Community Care Access Centre between March 2002 and March 2015 for whom data were available from two subsequent Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessments. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were created for onset of and improvement in caregiver distress. RESULTS Variables that increase the odds in onset of caregiver distress included primary caregiver is not satisfied with support received from family and friends; client lives with primary caregiver; 65 years and older; has Alzheimer and other related dementia; has condition or disease that makes cognition, activities of daily living, mood, or behavior patterns unstable; took sedatives in the last 7 days; Method for Assigning Priority Levels (MAPLe) score 4 or more; demonstrates persistent anger; has difficulty using the telephone; is married; requires 20 hr or more of informal help weekly; and Clinical Risk Scale score 4 or more. Variables that increased the odds of improved caregiver distress include client now lives with other persons (as compared with 90 days ago); demonstrates good prospects for recovery; treatment changes in last 30 days; surgical wound; female; one or more hospital visits in last 90 days; greater number of months between RAI-HC assessments; and two or more hours of physical activities in the last 3 days. Variables that decreased the odds of improved caregiver distress (i.e., persistent distress) include MAPLe score 4 or more; persistent anger; difficulty using telephone; Alzheimer, related dementia; requires interpreter; and lives with primary caregiver. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Informal caregivers provide essential support for home care clients. Factors predictive of new onset and improved caregiver distress can be used by case managers for comprehensive care planning that addresses the collective needs of the client-caregiver dyad.
Collapse
|
63
|
Impact of a health information technology tool addressing information needs of caregivers of adult and pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:2103-2112. [PMID: 30232587 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4450-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed BMT Roadmap, a health information technology (HIT) application on a tablet, to address caregivers' unmet needs with patient-specific information from the electronic health record. We conducted a preliminary feasibility study of BMT Roadmap in caregivers of adult and pediatric HSCT patients. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161665; NCT02409121). METHODS BMT Roadmap was delivered to 39 caregivers of adult and pediatric patients undergoing first-time HSCT at a single study site. We assessed person-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at baseline (hospital admission), discharge, and day 100: usefulness of BMT Roadmap (Perceived Usefulness); activation (Patient Activation Measure-Caregiver version [PAM-C]); mental health ([POMS-2®]: depression, distress, vigor, and fatigue); anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory); and quality of life (Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer [CQOLC]). To identify determinants of caregiver activation and quality of life, we used linear mixed models. RESULTS BMT Roadmap was perceived useful and activation increased from baseline to discharge (p = 0.001). Further, burden decreased through discharge (p = 0.007). Overall, a pattern of increasing vigor and decreasing depression, distress, fatigue, and anxiety was apparent from baseline to discharge. However, overall quality of life lowered at discharge after accounting for BMT Roadmap use, depression, anxiety, and fatigue (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS BMT Roadmap was a feasible HIT intervention to implement in HSCT caregivers. BMT Roadmap was associated with increased activation and decreased burden, but quality of life lowered across hospitalization. Findings support the need to further develop caregiver-specific self-directed resources and provide them both inpatient and outpatient across the HSCT trajectory.
Collapse
|
64
|
Taylor JO, Hartzler AL, Osterhage KP, Demiris G, Turner AM. Monitoring for change: the role of family and friends in helping older adults manage personal health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25:989-999. [PMID: 29726993 PMCID: PMC7646862 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Although family and friends (FF) often play a significant support role in the health of older adults (OA), we know little about their role in personal health information management (PHIM). To address this gap and inform the design of PHIM tools, we describe the work, needs, and barriers of FF in the context of PHIM for OAs. Methods We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 52 FF identified by OA as being important in their health and PHIM. We analyzed interview transcripts for themes about FF information work, barriers, and support needs. Results FF play a supportive role in OA health maintenance, medical encounters, decision making, and daily activities. Monitoring, the ongoing process of seeking information related to the OA status, emerged as a key activity comprised of 3 phases: detection, interpretation, and action. Barriers to monitoring included OA choices and constraints, FF constraints, and difficulty with technological tools, resources, health information exchange between providers, social network dynamics, and physical distance. Conclusions FF frequently monitor for change in OA well-being, seeking up-to-date information to facilitate support of OA PHIM. Health information technology tools designed for FF can support all phases of monitoring by providing: (1) timely and granular levels of access to OA health information as the OA ages; (2) tailored health education for FF that is based on OA clinical data; and (3) networking platforms that integrate delegation, volunteering, and relevant resources, along with tools to facilitate support of OA appointment calendars and medication management. Such tools could reduce the burden of PHIM for OA and their loved ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean O Taylor
- Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea L Hartzler
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katie P Osterhage
- Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George Demiris
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anne M Turner
- Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Sherifali D, Ali MU, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Bartholomew A, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, McAiney C. Impact of Internet-Based Interventions on Caregiver Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e10668. [PMID: 29970358 PMCID: PMC6053616 DOI: 10.2196/10668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health of informal caregivers of adults with chronic conditions is increasingly vital since caregivers comprise a large proportion of supportive care to family members living in the community. Due to efficiency and reach, internet-based interventions for informal caregivers have the potential to mitigate the negative mental health outcomes associated with caregiving. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the impact of internet-based interventions on caregiver mental health outcomes and the impact of different types of internet-based intervention programs. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and AgeLine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials published from January 1995 to April 2017 that compared internet-based intervention programs with no or minimal internet-based interventions for caregivers of adults with at least 1 chronic condition. The inclusion criteria were studies that included (1) adult informal caregivers (aged 18 years or older) of adults living in the community with a chronic condition; (2) an internet-based intervention program to deliver education, support, or monitoring to informal caregivers; and (3) outcomes of mental health. Title and abstract and full-text screening were completed in duplicate. Data were extracted by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer, and risk of bias assessments were completed accordingly. Where possible, data for mental health outcomes were meta-analyzed. RESULTS The search yielded 7923 unique citations of which 290 studies were screened at full-text. Of those, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria; 11 were randomized controlled trials, 1 study was a controlled clinical trial, and 1 study comprised both study designs. Beneficial effects of any internet-based intervention program resulted in a mean decrease of 0.48 points (95% CI -0.75 to -0.22) for stress and distress and a mean decrease of 0.40 points (95% CI -0.58 to -0.22) for anxiety among caregivers. For studies that examined internet-based information and education plus professional psychosocial support, the meta-analysis results showed small to medium beneficial effect sizes of the intervention for the mental health outcomes of depression (-0.34; 95% CI -0.63 to -0.05) and anxiety (-0.36; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.07). Some suggestion of a beneficial effect on overall health for the use of information and education plus combined peer and professional support was also shown (1.25; 95% CI 0.24 to 2.25). Overall, many studies were of poor quality and were rated at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The review found evidence for the benefit of internet-based intervention programs on mental health for caregivers of adults living with a chronic condition, particularly for the outcomes of caregiver depression, stress and distress, and anxiety. The types of interventions that predominated as efficacious included information and education with or without professional psychological support, and, to a lesser extent, with combined peer and psychological support. Further high-quality research is needed to inform the effectiveness of interactive, dynamic, and multicomponent internet-based interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42017075436; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=75436 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/709M3tDvn).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Sherifali
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Diabetes Care and Research Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Muhammad Usman Ali
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health, Aging and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Person-Centred Interventions for Older Adults with Multimorbidity and their Caregivers, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruta Valaitis
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Health Human Resources, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Bartholomew
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Program for Interprofessional Practice, Education and Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Marzorati C, Renzi C, Russell-Edu SW, Pravettoni G. Telemedicine Use Among Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e223. [PMID: 29914858 PMCID: PMC6028768 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of published studies and systematic reviews examining different telehealth interventions targeting patients and their effects on patients' well-being and quality of life have grown in recent decades. However, the use of telemedicine tools aimed at the family members and caregivers of adult cancer patients is less defined. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a systematic review to provide a more complete picture regarding telemedicine tools for informal caregivers (usually family members or close friends) implemented in all phases of cancer care. More specifically, the review aimed to better describe the study samples' characteristics, to analyze measured outcomes and the specific questionnaires used to assess them, and to describe in depth the implemented interventions and their formats. Finally, we examined the role of telehealth, and usability and feasibility trends in supporting patients' caregivers. METHODS We systematically searched the literature in the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were being written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, describing a telehealth-implemented intervention, and focusing on caregivers of adult cancer patients at any stage of the disease. We selected studies published up to November 2017. We critically appraised included articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and graded the quality of evidence by outcome using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework. RESULTS We included 24 studies in the final selection. In 21 of the 24 studies, the patient-caregiver dyad was analyzed, and the study population dealt with different types of cancer at different stages. Included studies considered the caregiver's condition from both an individual and a relational point of view. Along with psychosocial variables, some studies monitored engagement and user satisfaction regarding Web-based platforms or telehealth interventions. All studies reported significant improvements in some of the investigated areas, but they often showed small effect sizes. Two types of telehealth intervention formats were used: Web-based platforms and telephone calls. Some of the included studies referred to the same project, but on study samples with different cancer diagnoses or with new versions of previously developed interventions. CONCLUSIONS Reported outcomes seem to suggest that we are in an exploratory phase. More detailed and targeted research hypotheses are still needed. Clarifying caregivers' needs related to telehealth tools and better defining outcome measures may yield more significant results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marzorati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Shin JY, Kang TI, Noll RB, Choi SW. Supporting Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Summary of Technology-Mediated Interventions and Future Directions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:838-849. [PMID: 30231412 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_201397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper aims to review literature published on the support of cancer caregivers with health technology. Eighteen articles were reviewed to better understand cancer caregiving and categorized into four different themes: (1) design guidelines, (2) information facilitation, (3) social support, and (4) multicomponent interventions. Analysis of the current articles revealed that there are substantial gaps in knowledge regarding a range of health technologies that facilitate family caregiver support and its distribution to health institutions. Further research is needed in this area, as family caregivers are primary providers of essential elements of care to patients. Future studies should unpack existing barriers that interfere with the development of health technology interventions in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Youn Shin
- From the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tammy I Kang
- From the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robert B Noll
- From the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sung Won Choi
- From the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Heynsbergh N, Botti M, Heckel L, Livingston PM. Caring for the person with cancer: Information and support needs and the role of technology. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1650-1655. [PMID: 29624783 PMCID: PMC6001456 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Informal carers experience a variety of information and support needs when providing care to someone with cancer. It is unclear when carers seek information and what resources they access to support themselves throughout the cancer trajectory. METHODS A sample of 45 carers and 15 oncology nurses were recruited to participate in either focus groups or phone interviews. RESULTS Carers in the study were more likely to be women (60%), caring for a spouse or partner (64.4%), living with the patient (86.7%), and hold a university degree (46.7%). The majority of oncology nurses were females (66.6%). Findings showed that carers had limited access to adequate information as needs arose. Supports used to address information needs included information booklets, the Internet, and communication with healthcare professionals or with other carers. Barriers in communication between nurses and carers impacted on the adequacy of information received. Participants reported that technology, such as smartphone applications, might be appropriate for improving information and support needs. CONCLUSIONS Caring for someone with cancer is multifaceted. Carers need access to timely information to help them effectively manage patients' needs. Future studies should assess the role of contemporary approaches, such as digital technology, as a solution to the delivery of information and support for carers of people with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Heynsbergh
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mari Botti
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leila Heckel
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Heynsbergh N, Heckel L, Botti M, Livingston PM. Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:244. [PMID: 29499663 PMCID: PMC5834845 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carers looking after someone with cancer often experience negative impacts on their own health. M-health interventions have been designed to provide information and support to patients and their carers. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for carers is less well understood. The objectives were to assess the feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions among carers of people living with cancer. METHODS A systematic search of the CINAHL, MEDLINE and PSYCINFO databases was performed using terms related to web-based interventions and smartphone applications, carers and cancer. Studies were included if a randomised controlled trial or pilot study was conducted, focused on adult carers looking after another adult with cancer and were published between January 2007-June 2017. Articles were excluded if they reported qualitative results only or were evaluating existing websites and applications. Feasibility was measured by attrition, recruitment rates and frequency of intervention use; useability was measured by the ease of intervention use and the role of features to minimise errors in use. Acceptability was measured by carers' perception of the appropriateness of the content and their ability to incorporate the intervention into their daily routines. RESULTS Of the 729 articles, six articles met the inclusion criteria. Attrition ranged from 14% - 77%, recruitment rates from 20% - 66% and intervention useability varied across studies. Half of the studies implemented measures to improve useability. Overall, carers rated the content of the interventions as appropriate and reported improved knowledge and communication. Acceptability was further demonstrated as carers preferred the flexibility available with web-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS Technology-based interventions are suitable for use among carers of people with cancer. Further research is required to fully assess the impact of technology as an information and support mechanism for carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Heynsbergh
- Geelong, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia.
| | - Leila Heckel
- Geelong, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
| | - Mari Botti
- Geelong, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery and Epworth HealthCare, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
LeRoy AS, Shields A, Chen MA, Brown RL, Fagundes CP. Improving Breast Cancer Survivors' Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life: Alternatives to Traditional Psychotherapy. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2018; 10:28-34. [PMID: 32153724 DOI: 10.1007/s12609-018-0266-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience psychological problems and lowered quality of life (QOL). While helpful, psychotherapy is often costly and inaccessible. This review aims to provide practitioners with the latest information on empirically tested interventions among BCS that may be used in lieu of, or in addition to, traditional psychotherapy. Recent Findings Recent developments in cancer-related psychological interventions include a focus on facilitating emotional disclosure (e.g., expressive writing), enhancing close relationships (e.g., couples-based interventions), and increasing feasibility and accessibility via online and computer-based intervention programs. These alternatives to psychotherapy offer a number of benefits including cost-effectiveness, personalized adaptability, and ease of implementation. Summary Utilizing these interventions as alternatives or supplements to traditional psychotherapy may offer BCS an opportunity to increase their QOL, improve psychosocial outcomes, and find meaning in their cancer experience. Choosing the appropriate intervention requires understanding the unique circumstances for each survivor and their family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie S LeRoy
- Department of Psychology, The University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd. Rm 126, Houston, TX 77204, USA
- Department of Psychology, Rice University, Bioscience Research Collaborative, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Allison Shields
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Michelle A Chen
- Department of Psychology, Rice University, Bioscience Research Collaborative, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan L Brown
- Department of Psychology, Rice University, Bioscience Research Collaborative, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Fagundes
- Department of Psychology, Rice University, Bioscience Research Collaborative, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Ellington L, Clayton MF, Reblin M, Donaldson G, Latimer S. Communication among cancer patients, caregivers, and hospice nurses: Content, process and change over time. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:414-421. [PMID: 28964559 PMCID: PMC5857410 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE First, to describe communication of home hospice nurse visits to cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Second, to assess change in communication related to domains of care over the course of visits. METHODS Multi-site prospective observational longitudinal study of audio-recorded home hospice visits (N=537 visits; 101 patient-caregiver dyads; 58 nurses). Communication was coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System to describe content and process. Conversation representing three care domains (physical, psychosocial/daily life, and emotional) was calculated from RIAS categories across speakers and analyzed to assess change in communication over time. RESULTS On average, nurses spoke 54% of total utterances, caregivers 29%, and patients 17%. For all participants, the predominant conversational focus was on physical care. Linear mixed effects models indicated that combined participant emotional talk showed a small systematic decrease over time; however, the results for all domains indicated variability unexplained by time or speaker effects. CONCLUSIONS Home hospice conversations are predominantly focused on physical care. Systematic change in communication versus responsiveness to the dynamic effects of patient death and family response over time are discussed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Communication strategies already in use by hospice nurses could be leveraged and expanded upon to better facilitate family competence and confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - Maija Reblin
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
| | - Gary Donaldson
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Seth Latimer
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Bergström AL, Hanson E. An integrative review of information and communication technology based support interventions for carers of home dwelling older people. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [PMID: 29527109 PMCID: PMC5814658 DOI: 10.3233/tad-160158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing number of studies of informal carers of older people reveal positive results concerning support via Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Systematic examination of factors that have a potential impact on carer outcomes are needed to inform future research. OBJECTIVE To explore studies concerning ICT support of adult carers of older people and to identify study characteristics that have a potential impact on carer outcomes. METHODS This integrative review includes 123 studies published since 2005. Fundamental questions for designing sensitive support interventions; 'who, what, and how' were applied to a synthesis of the results. RESULTS Identified characteristics from the studies responding to the who question included variables of the carers, such as their relationship with the care recipient or their ethnicity. Characteristics related to the what question related to the types of interventions, and the how question concerned the different services or programs offered, the idiosyncratic needs of the carers, and the types of technologies used. CONCLUSION Results are discussed according to micro, meso and macro levels of analysis. This extensive review can inform future studies and highlight the evidence in the area for decision makers, practitioners and/or NGOs working with innovative forms of support for carers of older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Hanson
- Swedish Family Care Competence Centre, Professor Health Care Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Sin J, Henderson C, Spain D, Cornelius V, Chen T, Gillard S. eHealth interventions for family carers of people with long term illness: A promising approach? Clin Psychol Rev 2018; 60:109-125. [PMID: 29429856 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Family carers of people who have long term illness often experience physical and mental health morbidities, and burden. While there is good evidence to suggest that carers benefit from psychosocial interventions, these have primarily been delivered via face-to-face individual or group-formats. eHealth interventions offer a novel, accessible and self-paced approach to care delivery. Whether these are effective for carers' wellbeing has been little explored. This paper reports the first comprehensive systematic review in this area. A total of 78 studies, describing 62 discrete interventions, were identified. Interventions commonly aimed to promote carers' knowledge, self-efficacy, caregiving appraisal, and reduce global health morbidities. Interventions were offered to carers of people with a wide range of long term illness; dementia has been the most researched area, as reported in 40% of studies. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity in interventions precluded meta-analyses, and so data were analysed narratively. The most popular approach has comprised psychoeducational interventions delivered via an enriched online environment with supplementary modes of communication, such as network support with professionals and peers. Overall, carers appreciate the flexibility and self-paced nature of eHealth interventions, with high rates of satisfaction and acceptability. More studies using robust designs are needed to extend the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Sin
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England, UK; School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AL, England, UK.
| | - Claire Henderson
- Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, England, UK.
| | - Debbie Spain
- MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, England, UK.
| | - Victoria Cornelius
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, England, UK.
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, England, UK.
| | - Steve Gillard
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Applebaum AJ, Buda KL, Schofield E, Farberov M, Teitelbaum ND, Evans K, Cowens-Alvarado R, Cannady RS. Exploring the cancer caregiver's journey through web-based Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy. Psychooncology 2017; 27:847-856. [PMID: 29136682 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosocial interventions are historically underutilized by cancer caregivers, but support programs delivered flexibly over the Internet address multiple barriers to care. We adapted Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for cancer caregivers, an in-person psychotherapeutic intervention intended to augment caregivers' sense of meaning and purpose and ameliorate burden, for delivery in a self-administered web-based program, the Care for the Cancer Caregiver (CCC) Workshop. The present study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of this program. METHODS Eighty-four caregivers were randomized to the CCC Workshop or waitlist control arm. Quantitative assessments of meaning, burden, anxiety, depression, benefit finding, and spiritual well-being were conducted preintervention (T1), within 2-weeks postintervention (T2), and 2- to 3-month follow-up (T3). In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants. RESULTS Forty-two caregivers were randomized to the CCC Workshop. Attrition was moderate at T2 and T3, with caregiver burden and bereavement as key causes of drop-out. At T2 and T3, some observed mean change scores and effect sizes were consistent with hypothesized trends (eg, meaning in caregiving, benefit finding, and depressive symptomatology), though no pre-post significant differences emerged between groups. However, a longitudinal mixed-effects model found significant differential increases in benefit finding in favor of the CCC arm. CONCLUSIONS The CCC Workshop was feasible and acceptable. Based on effect sizes reported here, a larger study will likely establish the efficacy of the CCC Workshop, which has the potential to address unmet needs of caregivers who underutilize in-person supportive care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Applebaum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - K L Buda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - E Schofield
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Farberov
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - N D Teitelbaum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Evans
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
SurvivorCHESS to increase physical activity in colon cancer survivors: can we get them moving? J Cancer Surviv 2017; 12:82-94. [PMID: 28994035 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0647-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of SurvivorCHESS, an eHealth intervention, on physical activity in colon cancer survivors and to explore the impact of SurvivorCHESS on quality of life and distress. METHODS This was a two-arm single-blinded multi-site randomized controlled trial comparing a control group to an intervention group receiving a smartphone with the SurvivorCHESS program. RESULTS Participants using SurvivorCHESS (n = 144) increased their moderate to vigorous physical activities from 19.4 min at baseline to 50 min compared to the control group (n = 140) increasing from 15.5 to 40.3 min at 6 months (p = .083) but was not sustained 3 months after the study ended. No significant differences were found between groups over time for quality of life or distress items. Reports of physical symptoms were greater than other categories for distress items. Patients who had a higher body mass index and number of comorbid conditions were less likely to increase their physical activity. Self-determination theory including autonomous motivation and relatedness was not associated with the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Physical activity did increase over time in both groups and was not significantly different with the use of the eHealth intervention, SurvivorCHESS, compared to the control group. The amount of SurvivorCHESS use was not associated with physical activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Increasing physical activity in colon cancer survivors has the potential to improve quality of life and reduce recurrences. Using smartphone-tracking devices may be useful in helping to change this health behavior.
Collapse
|
76
|
Guay C, Auger C, Demers L, Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Gélinas-Bronsard D, Ahmed S. Components and Outcomes of Internet-Based Interventions for Caregivers of Older Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e313. [PMID: 28928109 PMCID: PMC5627044 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background When trying to access interventions to improve their well-being and quality of life, family caregivers face many challenges. Internet-based interventions provide new and accessible opportunities to remotely support them and can contribute to reducing their burden. However, little is known about the link existing between the components, the use of behavior change techniques, and the outcomes of these Internet-based interventions. Objective This study aimed to provide an update on the best available evidence about the efficacy of Internet-based interventions for caregivers of older adults. Specifically, the components and the use of behavior change techniques and how they impact on the efficacy of the intervention were sought. Methods A systematic review searched primary source studies published between 2000 and 2015. Included studies were scored with a high level of evidence by independent raters using the GRADE criteria and reported caregiver-specific outcomes about interventions delivered through the Internet for caregivers of people aged 50 years and older. A narrative synthesis identified intervention components (eg, content, multimedia use, interactive online activities, and provision of support), behavior change techniques, and caregiver outcomes (eg, effects on stressors, mediators, and psychological health). The risk of bias within the included studies was assessed. Results A total of 2338 articles were screened and 12 studies describing 10 Internet-based interventions were identified. Seven of these interventions led to statistically significant improvements in caregiver outcomes (eg, reducing depression or anxiety, n=4). These efficacious interventions used interactive components, such as online exercises and homework (n=4) or questionnaires on health status (n=2) and five of them incorporated remote human support, either by professionals or peers. The most frequently used behavior change techniques included in efficacious interventions were provision of social support (n=6) and combinations of instructions to guide behavior change and barrier identification (n=5). The design and aim of the included studies did not permit determining exactly which component and/or behavior change technique was more efficacious in producing positive outcomes in caregivers. The risk for selection bias was low for all the studies, and low to high for performance, detection, and attrition biases. Conclusions In sum, Internet-based interventions that incorporate professional and social support, and provide instructions to change behavior and problem solve in an interactive manner appear to lead to positive outcomes in caregivers. Studies isolating the specific effect of components are needed to improve our understanding of the underlying mechanism of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassioppée Guay
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudine Auger
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Louise Demers
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - W Ben Mortenson
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William C Miller
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dominique Gélinas-Bronsard
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Shen J, Naeim A. Telehealth in older adults with cancer in the United States: The emerging use of wearable sensors. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:437-442. [PMID: 28888556 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
As the aging and cancer populations in the world continue to increase, the need for complements to traditional geriatric assessments and the logical incorporation of fast and reliable telehealth tools have become interlinked. In the United States, studies examining the use of telehealth for chronic disease management have shown promising results in small groups. The implementation of health technology on a broader scale requires older adults to both accept and adapt such innovation into routine medical care. Though the commercial and recreational use of new technology has increased in older individuals, the transition into creating a smart and connected home that can interface with both patients and healthcare professionals is in its early phases. Current limitations include an inherent digital divide, as well as concerns regarding privacy, data volume, rapid change, cost and reimbursement. The emergence of low-cost, high-fidelity wearable sensors with a spectrum of clinical utility may be the key to increased use and adaptation by older adults. An opportunity to utilize wearable sensors for objective and real-time assessment of older patients with cancer for baseline functional status and treatment toxicity may be on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Shen
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
| | - Arash Naeim
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Parker Oliver D, Patil S, Benson JJ, Gage A, Washington K, Kruse RL, Demiris G. The Effect of Internet Group Support for Caregivers on Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Caregiver Burden: A Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23:621-629. [DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Parker Oliver
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Sonal Patil
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jacquelyn J. Benson
- Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Ashley Gage
- Department of Communication Disorders and Social Work, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, Missouri
| | - Karla Washington
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Robin L. Kruse
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - George Demiris
- Bio-behavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing & Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Staccini P, Fernandez-Luque L. Health Social Media and Patient-Centered Care: Buzz or Evidence? Findings from the Section "Education and Consumer Health Informatics" of the 2015 Edition of the IMIA Yearbook. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 10:160-3. [PMID: 26293862 DOI: 10.15265/iy-2015-032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the 2014 state of the art in the areas related to consumer health informatics and social media. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of articles published in 2014 in PubMed with a predefined set of queries. We identified 439 articles relevant for the review. The two section editors independently screened those papers taking into account their relevance to the topics covered by the section. In a second step, they jointly selected the 20 most representative papers as candidate best papers. Candidate best papers were then submitted for full review and scoring by external reviewers. Based on the scoring, section editors together with the IMIA Yearbook editorial board selected the four best papers published in 2014 in consumer health informatics. RESULTS Helping patients acquire a healthier lifestyle is a crucial part of patient empowerment. In this line of work, new studies are exploring the efficacy of online health interventions for patient behavioral change. The special case of smoking cessation for consumers with low socio-economic status is particularly noticeable. Another study has explored how an online intervention can reduce the anxiety of women who experience an abnormal mammography. The team of PatientsLikeMe has studied how online support groups could play a role in the quality of life of organ transplant recipients. The patient perspective of online forums' users is also analyzed in the domain of anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSIONS Online health interventions, many of them using social media, have confirmed their potential to impact consumer behavioral change. However, there are still many methodological issues that need to be addressed in order to prove cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Staccini
- Pr Pascal Staccini, 1INSERM UMR 912 SESSTIM, IRIS Dept, UFR Médecine,, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 28 avenue de Valombrose, 06107 Nice cedex 2, France, E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, McAiney C, Duggleby W, Bartholomew A, Sherifali D. Web-Based Interventions to Improve Mental Health, General Caregiving Outcomes, and General Health for Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Conditions Living in the Community: Rapid Evidence Review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e263. [PMID: 28754652 PMCID: PMC5554353 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most adults with chronic conditions live at home and rely on informal caregivers to provide support. Caregiving can result in negative impacts such as poor mental and physical health. eHealth interventions may offer effective and accessible ways to provide education and support to informal caregivers. However, we know little about the impact of Web-based interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling adults with chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this rapid evidence review was to assess the impact of Web-based interventions on mental health, general caregiving outcomes, and general health for informal caregivers of persons with chronic conditions living in the community. METHODS A rapid evidence review of the current literature was employed to address the study purpose. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Ageline were searched covering all studies published from January 1995 to July 2016. Papers were included if they (1) included a Web-based modality to deliver an intervention; (2) included informal, unpaid adult caregivers of community-living adults with a chronic condition; (3) were either a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or controlled clinical trial (CCT); and (4) reported on any caregiver outcome as a result of use or exposure to the intervention. RESULTS A total of 20 papers (17 studies) were included in this review. Study findings were mixed with both statistically significant and nonsignificant findings on various caregiver outcomes. Of the 17 included studies, 10 had at least one significant outcome. The most commonly assessed outcome was mental health, which included depressive symptoms, stress or distress, and anxiety. Twelve papers examined the impact of interventions on the outcome of depressive symptoms; 4 found a significant decrease in depressive symptoms. Eight studies examined the outcome of stress or distress; 4 of these found a significant reduction in stress or distress as a result of the intervention. Three studies examined the outcome of anxiety; 2 of these found significant reductions in anxiety. Other significant results of the interventions were seen in the outcomes of caregiver gain (ie, positive aspects of caregiving), knowledge, bonding, reduction of anger-hostility, and negative mood. Based on this review, it is not possible to determine which interventions were most effective since studies differed in their design, sample, and intervention. Study results suggest that Web-based interventions may result in reduced depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress or distress among informal caregivers of adults with chronic conditions in the community. CONCLUSIONS This is the first review assessing the impact of Web-based technologies on mental health, general caregiving outcomes, and general health for caregivers of adults with chronic conditions living in the community. Further rigorous research is needed that includes adequately powered studies examining the critical components of the intervention and the dosage needed to have an effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruta Valaitis
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,WHO Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Health Human Resources, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Program for Interprofessional Practice, Education and Research (PIPER), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy Duggleby
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Innovations in Seniors' Care Research Unit, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Amy Bartholomew
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Diana Sherifali
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Douglas SL, Daly BJ, Lipson AR. Relationship Between Physical and Psychological Status of Cancer Patients and Caregivers. West J Nurs Res 2017; 38:858-73. [PMID: 27231088 DOI: 10.1177/0193945916632531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between patient physical and emotional status and caregiver mood state for patients with advanced cancer. Data were collected from 299 cancer patients and their caregivers from a cancer center. We used a longitudinal design and collected data through interviews. The relationships between patient and caregiver emotional states over time were moderate and statistically significant at all three points in time (p values = .012-.0001). Patient physical and emotional status predicted caregiver mood state at all points in time (βs = -.22 to -.25) and caregiver mood state at baseline predicted patient emotional status at 3 months (β = -.16, p = .013). Relationships between patient emotional status and caregiver mood state were moderately strong. Addressing the emotional needs of both patients and caregivers has the potential to yield improved emotional outcomes for both over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy R Lipson
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Abstract
This article contains a review of literature published from 2010 to 2016 on family caregiving in oncology. An analysis of 810 citations resulted in 50 randomized trials. These trials describe the need to prepare family caregivers for the complex role they play in cancer care. Several studies have demonstrated improved quality of life for family caregivers and improved emotional support from interventions. Several studies addressed communication and relational intimacy, which are key concerns. An additional focus of these trials was in the area of caregiving tasks and ways to diminish the burden of caregiving and preparedness for this role. Further research is needed in this area given the shift to outpatient care and as family caregivers become the primary providers of care. Future research should include expanding tested models of family caregiver support in clinical practice and in diverse populations. CA Cancer J Clin 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:318-325. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Ferrell
- Director, Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Elaine Wittenberg
- Associate Professor, Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Smith AB, Basch E. Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postsurgical Monitoring in Oncology. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:535-538. [PMID: 28682667 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.023838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angela B Smith
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ethan Basch
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Gunn CM, Parker VA, Bak SM, Ko N, Nelson KP, Battaglia TA. Social Network Structures of Breast Cancer Patients and the Contributing Role of Patient Navigators. Oncologist 2017; 22:918-924. [PMID: 28559408 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minority women in the U.S. continue to experience inferior breast cancer outcomes compared with white women, in part due to delays in care delivery. Emerging cancer care delivery models like patient navigation focus on social barriers, but evidence demonstrating how these models increase social capital is lacking. This pilot study describes the social networks of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and explores the contributing role of patient navigators. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-five women completed a one hour interview about their social networks related to cancer care support. Network metrics identified important structural attributes and influential individuals. Bivariate associations between network metrics, type of network, and whether the network included a navigator were measured. Secondary analyses explored associations between network structures and clinical outcomes. RESULTS We identified three types of networks: kin-based, role and/or affect-based, or heterogeneous. Network metrics did not vary significantly by network type. There was a low prevalence of navigators included in the support networks (25%). Network density scores were significantly higher in those networks without a navigator. Network metrics were not predictive of clinical outcomes in multivariate models. CONCLUSION Patient navigators were not frequently included in support networks, but provided distinctive types of support. If navigators can identify patients with poorly integrated (less dense) social networks, or who have unmet tangible support needs, the intensity of navigation services could be tailored. Services and systems that address gaps and variations in patient social networks should be explored for their potential to reduce cancer health disparities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study used a new method to identify the breadth and strength of social support following a diagnosis of breast cancer, especially examining the role of patient navigators in providing support. While navigators were only included in one quarter of patient support networks, they did provide essential supports to some individuals. Health care providers and systems need to better understand the contributions of social supports both within and outside of health care to design and tailor interventions that seek to reduce health care disparities and improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Gunn
- Evans Department of Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Victoria A Parker
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sharon M Bak
- Women's Health Unit Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Naomi Ko
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kerrie P Nelson
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tracy A Battaglia
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Fu F, Zhao H, Tong F, Chi I. A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Interventions to Cancer Caregivers. Front Psychol 2017; 8:834. [PMID: 28596746 PMCID: PMC5443149 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the effect of psychosocial interventions on improving QoL, depression and anxiety of cancer caregivers. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of psychosocial interventions among adult cancer caregivers published from 2011 to 2016. PsycINFO, PubMed, Proquest, Cochrane Library, Embase, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and EBSCO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WANFANG were searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trails (RCTs); psychosocial intervention to cancer caregivers; psychosocial health indicators including quality of life, depression or anxiety. Results: 21 studies out of 4,666 identified abstracts met inclusion criteria, including 19 RCTs. The intervention modes fell into the following nine categories: family connect intervention, self-determination theory-based intervention (SDT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), emotion-focused therapy (EFT), comprehensive health enhancement support system (CHESS), FOCUS programme, existential behavioral therapy (EBT), telephone interpersonal counseling (TIP-C), problem-solving intervention (COPE). Conclusion: paired-intervention targeting self-care and interpersonal connections of caregivers and symptom management of patients is effective in improving quality of life and alleviating depression of cancer caregivers while music therapy is helpful for reducing anxiety of cancer caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Fu
- Department of Social Work, Fudan UniversityShanghai, China
| | | | - Feng Tong
- Sichuan International Studies UniversityChongqing, China
| | - Iris Chi
- University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Wasilewski MB, Stinson JN, Cameron JI. Web-based health interventions for family caregivers of elderly individuals: A Scoping Review. Int J Med Inform 2017; 103:109-138. [PMID: 28550996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Revised: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the growing proportion of elders globally, aging-related illnesses are primary causes of morbidity causing reliance on family members for support in the community. Family caregivers experience poorer physical and mental health than their non-caregiving counterparts. Web-based interventions can provide accessible support to family caregivers to offset declines in their health and well-being. Existing reviews focused on web-based interventions for caregivers have been limited to single illness populations and have mostly focused on the efficacy of the interventions. We therefore have limited insight into how web-based interventions for family caregiver have been developed, implemented and evaluated across aging-related illness. OBJECTIVES To describe: a) theoretical underpinnings of the literature; b) development, content and delivery of web-based interventions; c) caregiver usage of web-based interventions; d) caregiver experience with web-based interventions and e) impact of web-based interventions on caregivers' health outcomes. METHODS We followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews which entails setting research questions, selecting relevant studies, charting the data and synthesizing the results in a report. RESULTS Fifty-three publications representing 32 unique web-based interventions were included. Over half of the interventions were targeted at dementia caregivers, with the rest targeting caregivers to the stroke, cancer, diabetes and general frailty populations. Studies used theory across the intervention trajectory. Interventions aimed to improve a range of health outcomes for caregivers through static and interactive delivery methods Caregivers were satisfied with the usability and accessibility of the websites but usage was generally low and declined over time. Depression and caregiver burden were the most common outcomes evaluated. The interventions ranged in their impact on health and social outcomes but reductions in perception of caregiver burden were consistently observed. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers value interactive interventions that are tailored to their unique needs and the illness context. However, usage of the interventions was sporadic and declined over time, indicating that future interventions should address stage-specific needs across the caregiving trajectory. A systematic review has the potential to be conducted given the consistency in caregiver burden and depression as outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jill I Cameron
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Frambes D, Given B, Lehto R, Sikorskii A, Wyatt G. Informal Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Review of Interventions, Care Activities, and Outcomes. West J Nurs Res 2017; 40:1069-1097. [PMID: 28381113 DOI: 10.1177/0193945917699364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Family and friends are important resources for patients during cancer treatment and warrant an expanded review of not only what they contribute to patient care but also the support they need and the personal consequences of caregiving. A review of 14 randomized controlled trials published between 2009 and 2016 was completed utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The results of this review expand the scope of what is known regarding relationships among supportive interventions for caregivers, activities performed to care for cancer patients, caregiver characteristics, and health outcomes of caregivers. Specific results include (a) updated synthesis of literature associated with variables important to caregiving, (b) attention to interventions designed to support caregivers,
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Frambes
- 1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.,2 Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gwen Wyatt
- 1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Singh S, Cortez D, Maynard D, Cleary JF, DuBenske L, Campbell TC. Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:e231-e239. [PMID: 28095172 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.014621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with incurable cancer have poor prognostic awareness. We present a detailed analysis of the dialogue between oncologists and patients in conversations with prognostic implications. METHODS A total of 128 audio-recorded encounters from a large multisite trial were obtained, and 64 involved scan results. We used conversation analysis, a qualitative method for studying human interaction, to analyze typical patterns and conversational devices. RESULTS Four components consistently occurred in sequential order: symptom-talk, scan-talk, treatment-talk, and logistic-talk. Six of the encounters (19%) were identified as good news, 15 (45%) as stable news, and 12 (36%) as bad news. The visit duration varied by the type of news: good, 15 minutes (07:00-29:00); stable, 17 minutes (07:00-41:00); and bad, 20 minutes (07:00-28:00). Conversational devices were common, appearing in half of recordings. Treatment-talk occupied 50% of bad-news encounters, 31% of good-news encounters, and 19% of stable-news encounters. Scan-talk occupied less than 10% of all conversations. There were only four instances of frank prognosis discussion. CONCLUSION Oncologists and patients are complicit in constructing the typical encounter. Oncologists spend little time discussing scan results and the prognostic implications in favor of treatment-related talk. Conversational devices routinely help transition from scan-talk to detailed discussions about treatment options. We observed an opportunity to create prognosis-talk after scan-talk with a new conversational device, the question "Would you like to talk about what this means?" as the oncologist seeks permission to disclose prognostic information while ceding control to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarguni Singh
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Dagoberto Cortez
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Douglas Maynard
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - James F Cleary
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Lori DuBenske
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Toby C Campbell
- University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Diaz LJR, Cruz DDALMD, Silva RDCGE. CONTENT VALIDATION OF NURSING OUTCOMES IN RELATION TO FAMILY CAREGIVERS: CONTENT VALIDATION BY BRAZILIAN AND COLOMBIAN EXPERTS. TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM 2017. [DOI: 10.1590/0104-07072017004820015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: this study's aim was to estimate the content validity of nursing outcomes in relation to family caregivers. Method: eleven Brazilian and Colombian experts participated in the study. None of the 61 indicators of the four nursing outcomes were considered irrelevant; 42 (68.9%) were considered primary and 19 (31.1%) were considered secondary. Results: the indicators with higher validity scores were: family share care responsibilities for Caregiver well-being (CVI=0.85); disruption of family dynamics to Caregiver lifestyle disruption (CVI=0.85); perceived spiritual well-being and anger for Caregiver emotional health (CVI=0.79) and perceived general health to Caregiver physical health (CVI=0.79). Conclusion: the nursing outcomes studied had adequate content validity. It is recommended that content validation followed by clinical and construct validation of the nursing-sensitive outcomes be given in different cultures and care settings.
Collapse
|
90
|
Frisbee KL. Variations in the Use of mHealth Tools: The VA Mobile Health Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; 4:e89. [PMID: 27436165 PMCID: PMC4971391 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.3726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2014] [Revised: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile health (mHealth) technologies exhibit promise for offering patients and their caregivers point-of-need tools for health self-management. This research study involved the dissemination of iPads containing a suite of mHealth apps to family caregivers of veterans who receive care from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Administration and have serious physical or mental injuries. Objective The goal of the study was to identify factors and characteristics of veterans and their family caregivers that predict the use of mHealth apps. Methods Veteran/family caregiver dyads (N=882) enrolled in VA’s Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers program were recruited to participate in an mHealth pilot program. Veterans and caregivers who participated and received an iPad agreed to have their use of the apps monitored and were asked to complete a survey assessing Caregiver Preparedness, Caregiver Traits, and Caregiver Zarit Burden Inventory baseline surveys. Results Of the 882 dyads, 94.9% (837/882) of caregivers were women and 95.7% (844/882) of veteran recipients were men. Mean caregiver age was 40 (SD 10.2) years and mean veteran age was 39 (SD 9.15) years, and 39.8% (351/882) lived in rural locations. Most (89%, 788/882) of the caregivers were spouses. Overall, the most frequently used app was Summary of Care, followed by RX Refill, then Journal, Care4Caregivers, VA Pain Coach, and last, VA PTSD Coach. App use was significantly predicted by the caregiver being a spouse, increased caregiver computer skills, a rural living location, lower levels of caregiver preparedness, veteran mental health diagnosis (other than posttraumatic stress disorder), and veteran age. Conclusions This mHealth Family Caregiver pilot project effectively establishes the VA’s first patient-facing mHealth apps that are integrated within the VA data system. Use varied considerably, and apps that were most used were those that assisted them in their caregiving responsibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen L Frisbee
- Connected Health, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
A tailored Web-based psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 2016; 37:321-30. [PMID: 24945270 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most programs addressing psychosocial concerns of cancer survivors are in-person programs that are expensive to deliver, have limited availability, and seldom deal with caregivers' concerns. OBJECTIVE This study examined the feasibility of translating an efficacious nurse-delivered program (FOCUS Program) for patients and their caregivers to a tailored, dyadic Web-based format. Specific aims were to (1) test the preliminary effects of the Web-based intervention on patient and caregiver outcomes, (2) examine participants' program satisfaction, and (3) determine the feasibility of using a Web-based delivery format. METHODS A phase 2 feasibility study was conducted with cancer patients (lung, breast, colorectal, prostate) and their family caregivers (N = 38 dyads). The Web-based intervention provided information and support tailored to the unique characteristics of each patient, caregiver, and their dyadic relationship. Primary outcomes were emotional distress and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were benefits of illness/caregiving, communication, support, and self-efficacy. Analyses included descriptive statistics and repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS Dyads had a significant decrease in emotional distress, increase in quality of life, and perceived more benefits of illness/caregiving. Caregivers also had significant improvement in self-efficacy. There were no changes in communication. Participants were satisfied with program usability, but recommended additional content. CONCLUSIONS It was possible to translate a clinician-delivered program to a Web-based format that was easy to use and had positive effects on dyadic outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The Web-based program is a promising way to provide psychosocial care to more patients and caregivers using fewer personnel. It needs further testing in a larger randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
|
92
|
Farquhar M, Penfold C, Walter FM, Kuhn I, Benson J. What Are the Key Elements of Educational Interventions for Lay Carers of Patients With Advanced Disease? A Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Review of Structural Components, Processes and Modes of Delivery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 52:117-130.e27. [PMID: 27112309 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Educating carers about symptom management may help meet patient and carer needs in relation to distressing symptoms in advanced disease. Reviews of the effectiveness of carer interventions exist, but few have focused on educational interventions and none on the key elements that comprise them but which could inform evidence-based design. OBJECTIVES To identify the key elements (structural components, processes, and delivery modes) of educational interventions for carers of patients with advanced disease. METHODS We systematically searched seven databases, applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, conducted quality appraisal, extracted data, and performed a narrative analysis. RESULTS We included 62 articles related to 49 interventions. Two main delivery modes were identified: personnel-delivered interventions and stand-alone resources. Personnel-delivered interventions targeted individuals or groups, the former conducted at single or multiple time points, and the latter delivered as series. Just more than half targeted carers rather than patient-carer dyads. Most were developed for cancer; few focused purely on symptom management. Stand-alone resources were rare. Methods to evaluate interventions ranged from postintervention evaluations to fully powered randomized controlled trials but of variable quality. CONCLUSION Published evaluations of educational interventions for carers in advanced disease are limited, particularly for non-cancer conditions. Key elements for consideration in developing such interventions were identified; however, lack of reporting of reasons for nonparticipation or dropout from interventions limits understanding of the contribution of these elements to interventions' effectiveness. When developing personnel-delivered interventions for carers in advanced disease, consideration of the disease (and, therefore, caring) trajectory, intervention accessibility (timing, location, and transport), and respite provision may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morag Farquhar
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Clarissa Penfold
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; General Practice & Primary Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Isla Kuhn
- Medical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John Benson
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, Litzelman K, Chou WYS, Shelburne N, Timura C, O'Mara A, Huss K. Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer 2016; 122:1987-95. [PMID: 26991807 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 357] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Informal/family caregivers are a fundamental source of care for cancer patients in the United States, yet the population of caregivers and their tasks, psychosocial needs, and health outcomes are not well understood. Changes in the nature of cancer care and its delivery, along with the growing population of survivors and their caregivers, warrant increased attention to the roles and demands of caregiving. This article reviews current evidence presented at a 2-day meeting examining the state of the science of informal cancer caregiving that was convened by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research. The meeting sought to define who is an informal cancer caregiver, summarize the state of the science in informal cancer caregiving, and describe both the kinds of interventions developed to address caregiving challenges and the various outcomes used to evaluate their impact. This article offers recommendations for moving science forward in 4 areas: 1) improving the estimation of the prevalence and burden of informal cancer caregiving; 2) advancing the development of interventions designed to improve outcomes for cancer patients, caregivers, and patient-caregiver dyads; 3) generating and testing strategies for integrating caregivers into formal health care settings; and 4) promoting the use of technology to support informal cancer caregivers. Cancer 2016;122:1987-95. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Kent
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julia H Rowland
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Kristin Litzelman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nonniekaye Shelburne
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Catherine Timura
- Division of Science Policy and Public Liaison, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ann O'Mara
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Karen Huss
- Division of Extramural Science Programs, Office of Extramural Programs, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the changing dynamics of patient-provider communication with proposals for optimizing this important relationship. DATA SOURCES Current research, national programs and guidelines from the National Cancer Institute, the Commission on Cancer, the Institute of Medicine, and the Oncology Nursing Society. CONCLUSION There are important opportunities to apply evidence-based strategies to optimize patient-provider communication that will result in improved health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Oncology nurses across all areas of practice, including clinical care, research, and education, can play a significant role in achieving the goal of positive health outcomes by addressing challenges that inhibit effective patient-provider communication.
Collapse
|
95
|
Gustafson DH, Maus A, Judkins J, Dinauer S, Isham A, Johnson R, Landucci G, Atwood AK. Using the NIATx Model to Implement User-Centered Design of Technology for Older Adults. JMIR Hum Factors 2016; 3:e2. [PMID: 27025985 PMCID: PMC4797701 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.4853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
What models can effectively guide the creation of eHealth and mHealth technologies? This paper describes the use of the NIATx model as a framework for the user-centered design of a new technology for older adults. The NIATx model is a simple framework of process improvement based on the following principles derived from an analysis of decades of research from various industries about why some projects fail and others succeed: (1) Understand and involve the customer; (2) fix key problems; (3) pick an influential change leader; (4) get ideas from outside the field; (5) use rapid-cycle testing. This paper describes the use of these principles in technology development, the strengths and challenges of using this approach in this context, and lessons learned from the process. Overall, the NIATx model enabled us to produce a user-focused technology that the anecdotal evidence available so far suggests is engaging and useful to older adults. The first and fourth principles were especially important in developing the technology; the fourth proved the most challenging to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Lee KC, Yiin JJ, Chao YF. Effect of integrated caregiver support on caregiver burden for people taking care of people with cancer at the end of life: A cohort and quasi-experimental clinical trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 56:17-26. [PMID: 26794928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown small-to-medium effects of support on reducing the caregiver burden for advanced cancer patients. A dearth of studies utilized longitudinal design to examine and evaluate the effect of support for the caregiving burden till the patient's death. OBJECTIVES To test the ability of an integrative intervention program for caregivers of advanced cancer patients to lower caregiving burden as death approaches. DESIGN A two-group comparative design with repeated measures. SETTING Two cancer wards of a single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS Advanced cancer patients (N=81) and their caregivers were allocated into two groups: an experimental group (N=40) receiving coping strategies, assistance, recourses, and education intervention and a control group (N=41) receiving standard care. METHODS Caregivers received training in the caregiver support intervention at least 3 times every 2 weeks to help them reduce their caregiving burden. Subjective (Caregiver Reaction Assessment) and objective (Heart Rate Variability) measures of caregiver burden were evaluated for caregivers of patients approaching death. Only data within 3 months before the patients' death were analyzed. RESULTS Caregiver self-efficacy significantly increased and the subjective caregiving burden significantly decreased in the experimental group as patients' death approached. Heart Rate Variability also indicated a calming effect of the intervention, helping caregivers face patients' death. CONCLUSIONS The caregiver support intervention can increase caregiver self-efficacy and reduce the subjective caregiving burden. Heart Rate Variability parameters have the potential to be useful for monitoring caregiver burden in facing patients' death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwo-Chen Lee
- Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402 Taiwan.
| | - Jia-Jean Yiin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, No. 1650, Taiwan Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
| | - Yann-Fen Chao
- Department of Nursing, Mackay Medical College, No. 46, Sec. 3, Jhong-Jheng Rd, Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City 252, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Kaltenbaugh DJ, Klem ML, Hu L, Turi E, Haines AJ, Hagerty Lingler J. Using Web-based interventions to support caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015; 42:156-64. [PMID: 25806882 DOI: 10.1188/15.onf.156-164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To explore the literature to examine the physical, social, psychological, financial, usability, and feasibility outcomes of Web-based interventions on caregivers of people with cancer and to identify potential trends in this body of evidence. DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL®, PsycINFO®, and Inspec. DATA SYNTHESIS Six articles met inclusion criteria. Across studies, most caregivers were middle-aged female spouses with some college attendance who felt "somewhat comfortable" using the Internet. Caregiver interventions used single- and multicomponent services and reduced negative mood. CONCLUSIONS Web-based caregiver interventions can be beneficial in offering information and support and may positively influence the social and psychological outcomes in this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Many studies described caregiver Internet usage and interventional perceptions and needs, but few have examined the impact of web-based interventions on caregivers. More research is needed to produce high-quality evidence in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Lou Klem
- Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lu Hu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Alice J Haines
- Department of Acute/Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
98
|
Wang J, Yao N, Wang Y, Zhou F, Liu Y, Geng Z, Yuan C. Developing "Care Assistant": A smartphone application to support caregivers of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. J Telemed Telecare 2015; 22:163-71. [PMID: 26271029 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x15594753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy. Caring for children with ALL is an uncommon experience for parents without medical training. They urgently need professional assistance when their children are recovering at home. This paper documents the process of developing an Android application (app) "Care Assistant" for family caregivers of children with ALL. Key informant interviews and focus group studies were used before programming the app. The key informants and focus group members included: caregivers of children with ALL, cancer care physicians and nurses, and software engineers. We found several major challenges faced by caregivers: limited access to evidence-based clinic information, lack of financial and social assistance, deficient communications with doctors or nurses, lack of disease-related knowledge, and inconvenience of tracking treatments and testing results. This feedback was used to develop "Care Assistant". This app has eight modules: personal information, treatment tracking, family care, financial and social assistance, knowledge centre, self-assessment questionnaires, interactive platform, and reminders. We have also developed a web-based administration portal to manage the app. The usability and effectiveness of "Care Assistant" will be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingting Wang
- School of Nursing, Second Military Medical University, China
| | - Nengliang Yao
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Yuanyuan Wang
- School of Nursing, Second Military Medical University, China
| | - Fen Zhou
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Children’s Medical Centre, China
| | - Yanyan Liu
- School of Nursing, Second Military Medical University, China
| | - Zhaohui Geng
- School of Nursing, Second Military Medical University, China
| | - Changrong Yuan
- School of Nursing, Second Military Medical University, China
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Hall LK, Kunz BF, Davis EV, Dawson RI, Powers RS. The cancer experience map: an approach to including the patient voice in supportive care solutions. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17:e132. [PMID: 26022846 PMCID: PMC4468569 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2014] [Revised: 11/11/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The perspective of the patient, also called the "patient voice", is an essential element in materials created for cancer supportive care. Identifying that voice, however, can be a challenge for researchers and developers. A multidisciplinary team at a health information company tasked with addressing this issue created a representational model they call the "cancer experience map". This map, designed as a tool for content developers, offers a window into the complex perspectives inside the cancer experience. Informed by actual patient quotes, the map shows common overall themes for cancer patients, concerns at key treatment points, strategies for patient engagement, and targeted behavioral goals. In this article, the team members share the process by which they created the map as well as its first use as a resource for cancer support videos. The article also addresses the broader policy implications of including the patient voice in supportive cancer content, particularly with regard to mHealth apps.
Collapse
|
100
|
Gustafson DH, McTavish F, Gustafson DH, Mahoney JE, Johnson RA, Lee JD, Quanbeck A, Atwood AK, Isham A, Veeramani R, Clemson L, Shah D. The effect of an information and communication technology (ICT) on older adults' quality of life: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials 2015; 16:191. [PMID: 25909465 PMCID: PMC4417513 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0713-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the use of an information and communication technology (Elder Tree) designed for older adults and their informal caregivers to improve older adult quality of life and address challenges older adults face in maintaining their independence (for example, loneliness and isolation, falling, managing medications, driving and transportation). METHODS/DESIGN This study, an unblinded randomized controlled trial, will evaluate the effectiveness and cost of Elder Tree. Older adults who are at risk for losing their independence - along with their informal caregivers, if they name them - are randomized to two groups. The intervention group has access to their usual sources of information and communication as well as to Elder Tree for 18 months while the control group uses only their usual sources of information and communication. The primary outcome of the study is older adult quality of life. Secondary outcomes are cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year and the impact of the technology on independence, loneliness, falls, medication management, driving and transportation, and caregiver appraisal and mastery. We will also examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory. We will evaluate the effectiveness of Elder Tree by comparing intervention- and control-group participants at baseline and months 6, 12, and 18. We will use mixed-effect models to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes, where pretest score functions as a covariate, treatment condition is a between-subjects factor, and the multivariate outcome reflects scores for a given assessment at the three time points. Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome. Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year will be compared between the intervention and control groups. Additional analyses will examine the mediating effect of self-determination theory on each outcome. DISCUSSION Elder Tree is a multifaceted intervention, making it a challenge to assess which services or combinations of services account for outcomes in which subsets of older adults. If Elder Tree can improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs among older adults, it could suggest a promising way to ease the burden that advancing age can place on older adults, their families, and the healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02128789 . Registered on 26 March 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Fiona McTavish
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - David H Gustafson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Jane E Mahoney
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and Executive Director, Wisconsin Institute for Health Aging, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
| | - Roberta A Johnson
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - John D Lee
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
| | - Andrew Quanbeck
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Amy K Atwood
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Andrew Isham
- Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Raj Veeramani
- College of Engineering and School of Business and Executive Director, University of Wisconsin E-Business Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| | - Lindy Clemson
- Aging, Work & Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Dhavan Shah
- Mass Communication Research Center, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| |
Collapse
|