Identification and molecular characterization of m3 muscarinic receptor dimers

Distinct Structural Changes in a G Protein-coupled Receptor Caused by Different Classes of Agonist Ligands

The activity of G protein-coupled receptors can be modulated by different classes of ligands, including agonists that promote receptor signaling and inverse agonists that reduce basal receptor activity. The conformational changes in receptor structure induced by different agonist ligands are not well understood at present. In this study, we employed an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy to monitor ligand-induced conformational changes in a series of cysteine-substituted mutant M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. The observed disulfide cross-linking patterns indicated that muscarinic agonists trigger a separation of the N-terminal segment of the cytoplasmic tail (helix 8) from the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain I. In contrast, inverse muscarinic agonists were found to increase the proximity between these two receptor regions. These findings provide a structural basis for the opposing biological effects of muscarinic agonists and inverse agonists. This study also provides the first piece of direct structural information as to how the conformations induced by these two functionally different classes of ligands differ at the molecular level. Given the high degree of structural homology found among most G protein-coupled receptors, our findings should be of broad general relevance.

Dissociation and trafficking of rat GABAB receptor heterodimer upon chronic capsaicin stimulation

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors (GABAB) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate GABAergic inhibition in the brain. Their functional expression is dependent upon the formation of heterodimers between GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits, a process that occurs within the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the mechanisms that regulate GABAB receptor oligomerization at the plasma membrane remain largely unknown. We first characterized the functional cytoarchitecture of an organotypic co-culture model of rat dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. Subsequently, we studied the interactions between GABAB subunits after chronic stimulation of sensory fibres with capsaicin. Surface labelling of recombinant proteins showed a decrease in subunit co-localization and GABAB2 labelling, after capsaicin treatment. In these conditions, fluorescence lifetime imaging measurements further demonstrated a loss of interactions between green fluorescent protein-GABAB1b and t-dimer discosoma sp red fluorescent protein-GABAB2 subunits. Finally, we established that the GABAB receptor undergoes clathrin-dependent internalization and rapid recycling to the plasma membrane following activation with baclofen, a GABAB agonist. However, in cultures chronically stimulated with capsaicin, the agonist-induced endocytosis was decreased, reflecting changes in the dimeric state of the receptor. Taken together, our results indicate that the chronic stimulation of sensory fibres can dissociate the GABAB heterodimer and alters its responsiveness to the endogenous ligand. Chronic stimulation thus modulates receptor oligomerization, providing additional levels of control of signalling.

Two transmembrane Cys residues are involved in 5-HT4 receptor dimerization

The 5-HT(4) receptor (5-HT(4)R) belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and is of considerable interest for the development of new drugs to treat gastrointestinal diseases and memory disorders. The 5-HT(4)R exists as a constitutive dimer but its molecular determinants are still unknown. Using co-immunoprecipitation and Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) techniques, we show here that 5-HT(4)R homodimerization but not 5-HT(4)R-beta(2) adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) heterodimerization is largely decreased under reducing conditions suggesting the participation of disulfide bonds in 5-HT(4)R dimerization. Molecular modeling and protein docking experiments identified four cysteine (Cys) residues potentially involved in the dimer interface through intramolecular or intermolecular disulfide bonds. We show that disulfide bridges between Cys112 and Cys145 located within TM3 and TM4, respectively, are of critical importance for 5-HT(4)R dimer formation. Our data suggest that two disulfide bridges between two transmembrane Cys residues are involved in the dimerization interface of a GPCR.

Molecular dynamics of a biophysical model for β2-adrenergic and G protein-coupled receptor activation

This study analyzes 16 molecular dynamic simulations of a biophysical model for beta(2)-adrenergic (B2AR) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation. In this model, a highly conserved cysteine residue, C106 (C3.25 or CysIII:01), provides a free sulfhydryl or thiol group in an acid-base equilibrium between uncharged (RSH) and charged (RS(-)) states that functions as an electrostatic molecular switch for receptor activation. The transition of C106 in the B2AR between acid and base states significantly changes the helical/transmembrane (TM) domain interactions and the electrostatic interaction energy differences (DeltaDeltaE(EL)). The DeltaDeltaE(EL) changes correlate well with the experimentally observed ligand efficacies. The TM interaction energies display patterns compatible with those previously recognized as responsible for GPCR activation. Key differences between the agonist, epinephrine, and the antagonist, pindolol, are seen for the TM3 x 6, TM3 x 4, TM6 x 7 and TM1 x 7 interaction energies. Pindolol also produces a weaker DeltaDeltaE(EL) interaction and less TM interaction energy changes, which are important differences between the agonist and antagonist ligands. The D115E mutant with pindolol displays a greater DeltaDeltaE(EL) and TM interactions than for the wild-type B2AR with pindolol. This explains the higher activity of pindolol in the D115E mutant. The constitutively active D130A mutant displays TM interaction patterns similar to those for the activating ligands implying a common pattern for receptor activation. These findings support the broad concept of protean agonism and demonstrate the potential for allosteric modulation. They also demonstrate that this two-state model agrees with many previous experimental and theoretical observations of GPCRs.

Mutational disruption of a conserved disulfide bond in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors attenuates positive homotropic cooperativity between multiple allosteric sites and has subtype-dependent effects on the affinities of muscarinic allosteric ligands

The 2nd outer loop (o2) of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) contains a highly conserved cysteine residue that is believed to participate in a disulfide bond and is flanked on either side by epitopes that are critical to the binding of many muscarinic allosteric modulators. We determined the allosteric binding parameters of the modulators gallamine, W84, and tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA) at M2 and M3 mAChRs in which these cysteine residues had been mutated to alanines. THA is known to bind to mAChRs with a strong positive homotropic cooperativity (a Hill slope of approximately 2) that implies that it must interact with multiple allosteric sites. The disulfide cysteine mutations in M2 receptors reduced the allosteric potencies of the tested modulators as if the critical adjacent residue (Tyr177) itself had been mutated. However, in M3 receptors, the disulfide cysteine mutations had no effect on the potencies of gallamine or W84 and even increased the potency of THA. It was most interesting that the strong, positive, homotropic interactions of THA at both M2 and M3 receptors were markedly reduced by the cysteine mutations. In addition, gallamine also displayed positive homotropic cooperativity in its interactions with M3 receptors (but not M2 receptors), and this cooperativity was not evident in the cysteine mutants. Thus, it seems that these cysteine residues play a role in linking cooperating allosteric sites, although it is not currently possible to say whether these multiple sites lie within one receptor or on two linked receptors of a dimer or higher order oligomer.

RGS3 and RGS4 Differentially Associate with G Protein-coupled Receptor-Kir3 Channel Signaling Complexes Revealing Two Modes of RGS Modulation

RGS3 and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins expressed in the brain and heart that accelerate the termination of G(i/o)- and G(q)-mediated signaling. We report here the determinants mediating selective association of RGS4 with several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that form macromolecular complexes with neuronal G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir3 or GIRK) channels. Kir3 channels are instrumental in regulating neuronal firing in the central and peripheral nervous system and pacemaker activity in the heart. By using an epitope-tagged degradation-resistant RGS4 mutant, RGS4(C2V), immunoprecipitation of several hemagglutinin-tagged G(i/o)-coupled and G(q)-coupled receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells readily co-precipitated both Kir3.1/Kir3.2a channels and RGS4(C2V). In contrast to RGS4(C2V), the closely related and functionally active RGS3 "short" isoform (RGS3s) did not interact with any of the GPCR-Kir3 channel complexes examined. Deletion and chimeric RGS constructs indicate both the N-terminal domain and the RGS domain of RGS4(C2V) are necessary for association with m2 receptor-Kir3.1/Kir3.2a channel complexes, where the GPCR was found to be the major target for RGS4(C2V) interaction. The functional impact of RGS4(C2V) "precoupling" to the GPCR-Kir3 channel complex versus RGS3s "collision coupling" was a 100-fold greater potency in the acceleration of G protein-dependent Kir3 channel-gating kinetics with no attenuation in current amplitude. These findings demonstrate that RGS4, a highly regulated modulator and susceptibility gene for schizophrenia, can directly associate with multiple GPCR-Kir3 channel complexes and may affect a wide range of neurotransmitter-mediated inhibitory and excitatory events in the nervous and cardiovascular systems.

Kinetic and molecular evidences that human cardiac muscle express non-M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes that are able to interact themselves

In heart tissue five isoforms of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) have been identified, designated m1-m5, of which only M1, M2 and M3 have functional evidences for their role in cardiac physiology. The present study was designed to explore the diversity of mAChR subtypes in human hearts and determine whether these subtypes are able to interact themselves. Expression of mRNAs encoding all five subtypes was readily detected by RT-PCR reaction in both atrial (A) and ventricle (V) samples. Immunoblotting, MABA and ELISA with subtype-specific antibodies confirmed the presence of M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 proteins in membrane preparations from both A and V. Kinetic characterization using [(3)H]-QNB shown: (1) atrium had greater B(max) than did the ventricle, (2) [(3)H]-QNB behave as an allosteric modulator, inducing cooperativity at high and disclosing heterogeneity at low concentrations, (3) heterogenity was observed in pirenzepine, biperiden and tropicamide competition curves, being the high affinity sites compatible with M1 and M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes and (4) methoctramine competition curves in presence of selective muscarinic receptor subtypes antagonist displayed heterogeneity profile still maintaining cooperativity (n(H)>1), indicating muscarinic receptors subtypes are able to form homo- and hetero-oligomers. In conclusion, our results provide molecular and kinetic evidence for the presence of multiple subtypes of mAChR in human hearts, which are able to undergo discrete transitions from a non-cooperative kinetics of non-interacting monomers to a cooperative kinetics of interacting oligomers.

The proto-oncogene SET interacts with muscarinic receptors and attenuates receptor signaling

G protein-coupled receptors mediate cell responses to extracellular stimuli and likely function in the context of a larger signal transduction complex. Utilizing the third intracellular loop of a G protein-coupled receptor in glutathione S-transferase pulldown assays from rat brain lysates coupled with high sensitivity detection methods and subsequent functional studies, we report the identification of SET as a regulator of muscarinic receptor signaling. SET is a putative oncogene reported to inhibit protein phosphatase 2A and regulate gene transcription. SET binds the carboxyl region of the M3-muscarinic receptor i3 loop, and endogenous SET co-immunoprecipitates with intact M3 muscarinic receptor expressed in cells. Small interfering RNA knockdown of endogenous SET in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the M3 muscarinic receptor augmented receptor-mediated mobilization of intracellular calcium by approximately 35% with no change in agonist EC(50), indicating that interaction of SET with the M3 muscarinic receptor reduces its signaling capacity. SET knockdown had no effect on the mobilization of intracellular calcium by the P2-purinergic receptor, ionomycin, or a direct activator of phospholipase C, indicating a specific regulation of M3 muscarinic receptor signaling. These data provide expanded functionality for SET and a previously unrecognized mechanism for regulation of GPCR signaling capacity.

Oligomeric structure of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor: comparisons with rhodopsin

The structural basis of the quaternary organization of rhodopsin has recently been explored and modeled. Because information obtained from studying rhodopsin has frequently been directly applicable to other G protein-coupled receptors we wished to ascertain if dimeric and/or oligomeric forms of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor could be observed and if so whether rhodopsin might provide insights into the quaternary structure of this receptor. Co-immunoprecipitation and both conventional and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrated quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and, in concert with the reconstitution of fragments of this receptor, provided information on the molecular basis of these interactions. Development of three color fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) allowed the imaging of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor oligomers in single living cells. Mutation of hydrophobic residues in transmembrane domains I and IV of the receptor resulted in marked reduction in three color FRET suggesting an alteration in oligomeric organization and potential similarities with rhodopsin. The mutated alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor was unable to reach the cell surface, did not become terminally N-glycosylated and was unable to signal.

Calmodulin binding to peptides derived from the i3 loop of muscarinic receptors

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to identify and characterize the structural requirements of a calmodulin-binding motif identified in the third intracellular (i3) loop of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1-M5), a region important for G protein coupling.

METHODS

GST fusion proteins and synthetic peptides derived from the hM1 i3 loop were tested for binding to CaM using a cross-linking gel shift assay and a dansyl-CaM fluorescence assay. Mutagenesis studies further characterized the structural requirements for the interaction and identified critical residues.

RESULTS

28-Mer peptides from the C terminus of i3, representing the putative calmodulin domains of M1, M2, and M3, were found capable of interacting with CaM. In addition, smaller peptides defined a 5-amino-acid sequence essential for calmodulin binding. Studies performed with M1 peptides derived from GST fusion proteins, representing larger portions of the i3 C terminus, suggested the presence of a second adjacent CaM binding site. Mutagenesis studies identified two mutants that are unable to bind CaM: a point mutation, E360A, and a deletion mutant, delta232-358.

CONCLUSION

Calmodulin can bind to an M1 region implicated in G protein coupling. This indicates an important role for CaM in the regulation of muscarinic signal transduction.

Evidence for a Domain-Swapped CD4 Dimer as the Coreceptor for Binding to Class II MHC

CD4 is a coreceptor for binding of T cells to APC and the primary receptor for HIV. The disulfide bond in the second extracellular domain (D2) of CD4 is reduced on the cell surface, which leads to formation of disulfide-linked homodimers. A large conformational change must take place in D2 to allow for formation of the disulfide-linked dimer. Domain swapping of D2 is the most likely candidate for the conformational change leading to formation of two disulfide-bonds between Cys130 in one monomer and Cys159 in the other one. Mild reduction of the extracellular part of CD4 resulted in formation of disulfide-linked dimers, which supports the domain-swapped model. The functional significance of dimer formation for coreceptor function was tested using cells expressing wild-type or disulfide-bond mutant CD4. Eliminating the D2 disulfide bond markedly impaired CD4's coreceptor function. Modeling of the complex of the TCR and domain-swapped CD4 dimer bound to class II MHC and Ag supports the domain-swapped dimer as the immune coreceptor. The known involvement of D4 residues Lys318 and Gln344 in dimer formation is also accommodated by this model. These findings imply that disulfide-linked dimeric CD4 is the preferred coreceptor for binding to APC.

Constitutive activity of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

We review the literature describing constitutive activity of the five muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in native and recombinant systems and discuss the effect of constitutive activity on muscarinic pharmacology in the context of modern models of receptor activation. We include a summary of mutations found to cause constitutive activity and discuss the implications of these data for the structure, function, and activation mechanism of muscarinic receptors. Finally, we discuss the possible physiological significance of constitutive activity of muscarinic receptors, incorporating information provided by targeted deletion of each of the muscarinic subtypes.

Function-specific blockage of M(1) and M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors by VX and echothiophate

Certain organophosphate (OP) cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are also known to bind to the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). The functional consequences of such binding were investigated here using the following OP compounds: VX, echothiophate, sarin, and soman. VX (charged at physiological pH) and echothiophate (formally charged) inhibited a specific signal transduction pathway in CHO cells expressing either the M(1) or M(3) mAChR. Hence, they blocked carbamylcholine (CCh)-induced cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) synthesis (muM) and had almost no effect on CCh-induced phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis. These substances were inactive on forskolin-induced cAMP inhibition signaling in CHO cells expressing M(2) mAChR. In binding studies, using [(3)H]-N-methyl scopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) as the competitor ligand, the ChEIs, VX and echothiophate exhibited binding to rat cortical mAChR with K(i) values in the muM range. The non-charged compounds, sarin and soman, were inert in modulating both cAMP metabolism and PI hydrolysis in CHO cells expressing M(1), M(2), and M(3) mAChRs, and no binding was observed in presence of [(3)H]NMS. These data suggest that VX and echothiophate act as function-specific blockers via a non-classical path of antagonistic activity, implying the involvement of allosteric/ectopic-binding site in M(1) and M(3) mAChRs. The functionally selective antagonistic behavior of echothiophate and VX makes them potential tools for dissecting the interactions of the mAChR with different G proteins.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the rat seminal vesicle

The aim of the present study was to identify the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) mRNA subtypes in the rat seminal vesicle. Furthermore, the mAChR subtypes involved in the contraction of the seminal vesicle were also explored. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed and five PCR products corresponding to M1-M5 mAChR mRNA subtypes were detected in this tissue. Functional pharmacological studies indicated that the rank order of mAChR antagonists in blocking the contractile effects of carbachol was p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol (pF-HHSiD) >> tropicamide > methoctramine = pirenzepine. This antagonist profile indicates that M3 mAChR subtype is predominantly involved in the seminal vesicle contraction. Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies confirmed the presence of the M3 mAChR subtype in the smooth muscle layers. M2 mAChR subtype was also immunolocalized in smooth muscle cells and may be involved in the contraction of this tissue. The presence of M2 and M3 mAChR subtypes in the epithelial cells suggests that these receptors could be involved in the protein secretion. Taken together, the cholinergic neurotransmitter may be a factor controlling contractility and protein secretion in this tissue.

Dimerization of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 is not coupled to ligand binding

As described previously, receptor dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors may influence signaling, trafficking, and regulation in vivo. Up to now, most studies aiming at the possible role of receptor dimerization in receptor activation and signal transduction are focused on class A GPCRs. In the present work, the dimerization behavior of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF1R), which belongs to class B of GPCRs and plays an important role in coordination of the immune response, stress, and learning behavior, was investigated by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). For this purpose, we generated fusion proteins of CRF1R tagged at their C-terminus to a cyan or yellow fluorescent protein, which can be used as a FRET pair. Binding studies verified that the receptor constructs were able to bind their natural ligands in a manner comparable with the wild-type receptor, whereas cAMP accumulation proved the functionality of the constructs. In microscopic studies, a dimerization of the CRF1R was observed, but the addition of either CRF-related agonists or antagonists did not show any dose-related increase of the observed FRET signal, indicating that the dimer-monomer ratio is not changed on addition of ligand.

Quantitative Analysis of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Homo- and Heterodimerization in Live Cells

Although previous pharmacological and biochemical data support the notion that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) form homo- and heterodimers, the existence of mAChR oligomers in live cells is still a matter of controversy. Here we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate that M(1), M(2), and M(3) mAChR can form constitutive homo- and heterodimers in living HEK 293 cells. Quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis has revealed that the cell receptor population in cells expressing a single subtype of M(1), M(2), or M(3) mAChR is predominantly composed of high affinity homodimers. Saturation curve analysis of cells expressing two receptor subtypes demonstrates the existence of high affinity M(1)/M(2), M(2)/M(3), and M(1)/M(3) mAChR heterodimers, although the relative affinity values were slightly lower than those for mAChR homodimers. Short term agonist treatment did not modify the oligomeric status of homo- and heterodimers. When expressed in JEG-3 cells, the M(2) receptor exhibits much higher susceptibility than the M(3) receptor to agonist-induced down-regulation. Coexpression of M(3) mAChR with increasing amounts of the M(2) subtype in JEG-3 cells resulted in an increased agonist-induced down-regulation of M(3), suggesting a novel role of heterodimerization in the mechanism of mAChR long term regulation.

Rhodopsin self-associates in asolectin liposomes

We show that the photoreceptor rhodopsin (Rh) can exist in the membrane as a dimer or multimer using luminescence resonance energy transfer and FRET methods. Our approach looked for interactions between Rh molecules reconstituted into asolectin liposomes. The low receptor density used in the measurements ensured minimal receptor crowding and artifactual association. The fluorescently labeled Rh molecules were fully functional, as measured by their ability to activate the G protein transducin. The luminescence resonance energy transfer measurements revealed a distance of 47-50 Angstroms between Rh molecules. The measured efficiency of FRET between receptors was close to the theoretical maximum possible, indicating nearly quantitative Rh-Rh association. Together, these results provide compelling evidence that Rh spontaneously self-associates in membranes.

Dimerization of the melanocortin 4 receptor: a study using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer

The melanocortin 4 receptor is important in the regulation of satiety. In this study we have investigated the propensity of the MC4 receptor to homodimerize. MC4 receptors with either a modified green fluorescent protein (GFP(2)) or Renilla luciferase (RLuc) at their C-terminus were constructed. These receptors showed equivalent binding and functional properties to the wild-type MC4 receptor. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer readings indicated that the MC4 receptor exists as a constitutive homodimer, which was not regulated by peptide interaction. The efficiency of MC4 receptor to form homodimers was greatly enhanced compared to its ability to heterodimerize with the kappa opioid receptor.

Oligomerization of the alpha and beta isoforms of the thromboxane A2 receptor: relevance to receptor signaling and endocytosis

Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) is a potent mediator of inflammation, vasoconstriction and oxidative stress. The TXA(2) receptor (TP) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is expressed as two alternatively spliced isoforms, alpha (343 residues) and beta (407 residues) that share the first 328 residues. For many years GPCRs were assumed to exist and function as monomeric species, but increasing evidence suggests that a dimer is the minimal functional unit of GPCRs. In the present report, using co-immunoprecipitation of differentially tagged TP expressed in HEK293 cells, we demonstrate that TPalpha and TPbeta form homo- and hetero-oligomers. Immunoblotting of lysates from human platelets with an anti-TP specific antibody revealed the presence of endogenously expressed TP oligomers. We show that TP oligomerization is an agonist-independent process highly affected by the reducing agent dithiothreitol suggesting the involvement of disulfide bonds in TP oligomerization. Over-expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins did not modulate the extent of receptor dimerization/oligomerization. Co-expression of two TP signaling-deficient mutants, R60L and E2402R, resulted in rescuing of receptor signal transduction suggesting that dimers/oligomers constitute the functional units of this receptor. Interestingly, TPalpha which does not undergo constitutive or agonist-induced endocytosis on its own was subjected to both types of endocytosis when co-expressed with TPbeta, indicating that TPalpha can display intracellular trafficking when complexed through hetero-oligomerization with TPbeta.

The G protein-coupled receptors: pharmacogenetics and disease

Genetic variation in G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is associated with a wide spectrum of disease phenotypes and predispositions that are of special significance because they are the targets of therapeutic agents. Each variant provides an opportunity to understand receptor function that complements a plethora of available in vitro data elucidating the pharmacology of the GPCRs. For example, discrete portions of the proximal tail of the dopamine D1 receptor have been discovered, in vitro, that may be involved in desensitization, recycling and trafficking. Similar in vitro strategies have been used to elucidate naturally occurring GPCR mutations. Inactive, over-active or constitutively active receptors have been identified by changes in ligand binding, G-protein coupling, receptor desensitization and receptor recycling. Selected examples reviewed include those disorders resulting from mutations in rhodopsin, thyrotropin, luteinizing hormone, vasopressin and angiotensin receptors. By comparison, the recurrent pharmacogenetic variants are more likely to result in an altered predisposition to complex disease in the population. These common variants may affect receptor sequence without intrinsic phenotype change or spontaneous induction of disease and yet result in significant alteration in drug efficacy. These pharmacogenetic phenomena will be reviewed with respect to a limited sampling of GPCR systems including the orexin/hypocretin system, the beta2 adrenergic receptors, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors and the calcium-sensing receptor. These developments will be discussed with respect to strategies for drug discovery that take into account the potential for the development of drugs targeted at mutated and wild-type proteins.

Thromboxane A2 induces airway constriction through an M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-dependent mechanism

Thromboxane A2 (TXA2) is a potent lipid mediator released by platelets and inflammatory cells and is capable of inducing vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction. In the airways, it has been postulated that TXA2 causes airway constriction by direct activation of thromboxane prostanoid (TP) receptors on airway smooth muscle cells. Here we demonstrate that although TXA2 can mediate a dramatic increase in airway smooth muscle constriction and lung resistance, this response is largely dependent on vagal innervation of the airways and is highly sensitive to muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonists. Further analyses employing pharmacological and genetic strategies demonstrate that TP-dependent changes in lung resistance and airway smooth muscle tension require expression of the M2 mAChR subtype. These results raise the possibility that some of the beneficial actions of anticholinergic agents used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease result from limiting physiological changes mediated through the TP receptor. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate a unique pathway for TP regulation of homeostatic mechanisms in the airway and suggest a paradigm for the role of TXA2 in other organ systems.

Entropy and oligomerization in GPCRs

Evolutionary trace (ET) and entropy are two related methods for analyzing a multiple sequence alignment to determine functionally important residues in proteins. In this article, these methods have been enhanced with a view to reinvestigate the issue ofGPCR dimerization and oligomerization. In particular, cluster analysis has replaced the subjective visual analysis element of the original ET method. Previous applications of the ET method predicted two dimerization interfaces on the external transmembrane lipid-facing region of GPCRs; these were discussed in terms of dimerization and linear oligomers. Removing the subjective element of the ET method gives rise to the prediction of functionally important residues on the external face of each transmembrane helix for a large number of class A GPCRs. These results are consistent with a growing body of experimental information that, taken over many receptor subtypes, has implicated each transmembrane helix in dimeric interactions. In this application, entropy gave superior results to those obtained from the ET method in that its use gives rise to higher z-scores and fewer instances of z-scores below 3.

Expression and localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in rat efferent ductules and epididymis

The expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes (M(1)-M(5)) was studied in the rat efferent ductules and epididymis at the mRNA and protein levels. The relative abundance of each mAChR transcript subtype differed depending on the tissue and the epididymal region analyzed. The M(1) mAChR mRNA level was more abundant in the efferent ductules than in the caput and cauda of the epididymis. The M(2) mAChR mRNA level was similar between the efferent ductules and caput of the epididymis and higher in the cauda region. The M(3) mAChR mRNA level was low in the efferent ductules and caput of the epididymis, but high levels were detected in the cauda region. mRNAs for M(4) and M(5) mAChRs were not detected in these tissues. Our studies indicated a variable degree of immunostaining for each mAChR subtype in a cell-type and tissue-specific pattern. M(1) mAChR was detected over the efferent ductule epithelium. M(2) and M(3) mAChRs were observed in the apical region of the ciliated cells. Apical and narrow cells of the initial segment showed distinct staining by M(1) antibody, whereas a supranuclear reaction was noted in the principal cells of the caput of the epididymis. In addition, staining for M(1) and M(2) mAChRs was visible in the apical membrane of some epithelial cells of the cauda region. M(3) mAChR was detected in the peritubular smooth muscle of the efferent ductules and epididymis. Functional studies suggested the involvement of this subtype in epididymal tubule contraction. Thus, the cell-specific expression of the various mAChR subtypes in the efferent ductules and epididymis suggests that these receptors play a role in the modulation of luminal fluid composition and smooth muscle contraction.

Regulation of CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocyte differentiation by a cholinergic pathway

In this report, we provide evidence that muscarinic receptors play a role in the generation of CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes. Analysis of mice with targeted deletions of each of the known muscarinic receptors (M1-M5) showed that CD8+ T cells from M1 receptor-deficient mice had a defect in the ability to differentiate into cytolytic T lymphocytes. Additional pharmacological experiments support the role of muscarinic receptors in wild type mice and suggest that acetylcholine may be involved. Together, these findings suggest that the M1 muscarinic receptor is involved in CTL development, thus providing novel insights into CD8+ T cell biology and the potential role of cholinergic signaling in immune regulation.

Identification of an agonist-induced conformational change occurring adjacent to the ligand-binding pocket of the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

To study the conformational changes that convert G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from their resting to their active state, we used the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, a prototypical class A GPCR, as a model system. Specifically, we employed a recently developed in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy that allows the formation of disulfide bonds in Cys-substituted mutant M(3) muscarinic receptors present in their native membrane environment. At present, little is known about the conformational changes that GPCR ligands induce in the immediate vicinity of the ligand-binding pocket. To address this issue, we generated 11 Cys-substituted mutant M(3) muscarinic receptors and characterized these receptors in transfected COS-7 cells. All analyzed mutant receptors contained an endogenous Cys residue (Cys-532(7.42)) located within the exofacial segment of transmembrane domain (TM) VII, close to the agonist-binding site. In addition, all mutant receptors harbored a second Cys residue that was introduced into the exofacial segment of TM III, within the sequence Leu-142(3.27)-Asn-152(3.37). Disulfide cross-linking studies showed that muscarinic agonists, but not antagonists, promoted the formation of a disulfide bond between S151(3.36)C and Cys-532. A three-dimensional model of the inactive state of the M(3) muscarinic receptor indicated that Cys-532 and Ser-151 face each other in the center of the TM receptor core. Our cross-linking data therefore support the concept that agonist activation pulls the exofacial segments of TMs VII and III closer to each other. This structural change may represent one of the early conformational events triggering the more pronounced structural reorganization of the intracellular receptor surface. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first direct demonstration of a conformational change occurring in the immediate vicinity of the binding site of a GPCR activated by a diffusible ligand.

Signal transduction networks: topology, response and biochemical processes

Conventionally, biological signal transduction networks are analysed using experimental and theoretical methods to describe specific protein components, interactions, and biochemical processes and to model network behavior under various conditions. While these studies provide crucial information on specific networks, this information is not easily converted to a broader understanding of signal transduction systems. Here, using a specific model of protein interaction we analyse small network topologies to understand their response and general properties. In particular, we catalogue the response for all possible topologies of a given network size to generate a response distribution, analyse the effects of specific biochemical processes on this distribution, and analyse the robustness and diversity of responses with respect to internal fluctuations or mutations in the network. The results show that even three- and four-protein networks are capable of creating diverse and biologically relevant responses, that the distribution of response types changes drastically as a function of biochemical processes at protein level, and that certain topologies strongly pre-dispose a specific response type while others allow for diverse types of responses. This study sheds light on the response types and properties that could be expected from signal transduction networks, provides possible explanations for the role of certain biochemical processes in signal transduction and suggests novel approaches to interfere with signaling pathways at the molecular level. Furthermore it shows that network topology plays a key role on determining response type and properties and that proper representation of network topology is crucial to discover and understand so-called building blocks of large networks.

Interaction of Bivalent Ligand KDN21 with Heterodimeric δ-κ Opioid Receptors in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells

KDN21 is a bivalent ligand that contains delta and kappa opioid antagonist pharmacophores linked through a 21-atom spacer. It has been reported that KDN21 bridges delta and kappa receptors that are organized as heterodimers. We have shown previously that when using [(3)H]diprenorphine as radioligand, KDN21 displayed greatly enhanced affinity in this series for coexpressed delta and kappa opioid receptors (CDK). The present study used in vitro expression systems to investigate interactions of members of the KDN series with delta-kappa heterodimers through competition binding using selective ligands and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) assay. In this regard, the use of the selective radioligands [(3)H]naltrindole and [(3)H]norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI) in competition binding studies revealed that KDN21 has much higher affinity than other KDN members for CDK and bound to CDK more selectively relative to mixed delta and kappa opioid receptors or singly expressed delta and kappa opioid receptors. Other experiments revealed that the binding of naltrindole to delta opioid receptors could increase the binding of nor-BNI to kappa opioid receptors and vice versa, suggesting reciprocal allosteric modulation of receptors in the heterodimer. Regarding the selectivity of KDN21 for phenotypic delta and kappa opioid receptors, we investigated the effect of KDN21 on the activation of MAPKs [extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2)] by delta- or kappa-selective agonists. KDN21 inhibited the activation of ERK1/2 by [D-Pen(2),D-Pen(5)]-enkephalin (delta(1)) and bremazocine (kappa(2)) but had no effect on the activation by deltorphin II (delta(2)) and (+)-(5alpha,7alpha,8beta)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide (U69593, kappa(1)). 7-Benzylidenenaltrexone (delta(1)) and bremazocine (kappa(2)) significantly reduced the binding of KDN21 to CDK, whereas naltriben (delta(2)) and U69593 produced no such change. Taken together, these data support the idea that the organization of delta and kappa receptors as heterodimers gives rise to delta(1) and kappa(2) phenotypes.

Pronounced Conformational Changes following Agonist Activation of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

The conformational changes that convert G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activated by diffusible ligands from their resting into their active states are not well understood at present. To address this issue, we used the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, a prototypical class A GPCR, as a model system, employing a recently developed disulfide cross-linking strategy that allows the formation of disulfide bonds using Cys-substituted mutant M(3) muscarinic receptors present in their native membrane environment. In the present study, we generated and analyzed 30 double Cys mutant M(3) receptors, all of which contained one Cys substitution within the C-terminal portion of transmembrane domain (TM) VII (Val-541 to Ser-546) and another one within the C-terminal segment of TM I (Val-88 to Phe-92). Following their transient expression in COS-7 cells, all mutant receptors were initially characterized in radioligand binding and second messenger assays (carbachol-induced stimulation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis). This analysis showed that all 30 double Cys mutant M(3) receptors were able to bind muscarinic ligands with high affinity and retained the ability to stimulate G proteins with high efficacy. In situ disulfide cross-linking experiments revealed that the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, promoted the formation of cross-links between specific Cys pairs. The observed pattern of disulfide cross-links, together with receptor modeling studies, strongly suggested that M(3) receptor activation induces a major rotational movement of the C-terminal portion of TM VII and increases the proximity of the cytoplasmic ends of TM I and VII. These findings should be of relevance for other family A GPCRs.

Dimerization of chemokine receptors and its functional consequences

It became clear over the recent years that most, if not all, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are able to form dimers or higher order oligomers. Chemokine receptors make no exception to this new rule and both homo- and heterodimerization were demonstrated for CC and CXC receptors. Functional analyses demonstrated negative binding cooperativity between the two subunits of a dimer. The consequence is that only one chemokine can bind with high affinity onto a receptor dimer. In the context of receptor activation, this implies that the motions of helical domains triggered by the binding of agonists induce correlated changes in the other protomer. The impact of the chemokine dimerization process in terms of co-receptor function and drug development is discussed.

Cell-surface targeting of alpha2-adrenergic receptors -- inhibition by a transport deficient mutant through dimerization

We previously demonstrated that the alpha2B-adrenergic receptor mutant, in which the F(x)6IL motif in the membrane-proximal carboxyl terminus were mutated to alanines (alpha2B-ARm), is deficient in export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In this report, we determined if alpha2B-ARm could modulate transport from the ER to the cell surface and signaling of its wild-type counterpart. Transient expression of alpha2B-ARm in HEK293T cells markedly inhibited cell-surface expression of wild-type alpha2B-AR, as measured by radioligand binding. Subcellular localization demonstrated that alpha2B-ARm trapped alpha2B-AR in the ER. The alpha2B-AR was shown to form homodimers and heterodimers with alpha2B-ARm as measured by co-immunoprecipitation of the receptors tagged with green fluorescent protein and hemagglutinin epitopes. In addition to alpha2B-AR, the transport of alpha2A-AR and alpha2C-AR to the cell surface was also inhibited by alpha2B-ARm. Furthermore, transient expression of alpha2B-ARm significantly reduced cell-surface expression of endogenous alpha2-AR in NG108-15 and HT29 cells. Consistent with its effect on alpha2-AR cell-surface expression, alpha2B-ARm attenuated alpha2A-AR- and alpha2B-AR-mediated ERK1/2 activation. These data demonstrated that the ER-retained mutant alpha2B-ARm conferred a dominant negative effect on the cell-surface expression of wild-type alpha2-AR, which is likely mediated through heterodimerization. These data indicate a crucial role of ER export in the regulation of cell-surface targeting and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors.

Organization of rhodopsin molecules in native membranes of rod cells–an old theoretical model compared to new experimental data

It has been shown that rhodopsin forms an oligomer in the shape of long double rows of monomers. Because of the importance of rhodopsin as a template for all G protein-coupled receptors, its dimeric, tetrameric and higher-oligomeric structures also provide a useful pattern for similar structures in GPCRs. New experimental data published recently are discussed in the context of a proposed model of the rhodopsin oligomer 1N3M deposited in the protein data bank. The new rhodopsin structure at 2.2 A resolution with all residues resolved as well as an electron cryomicroscopy structure from 2D crystals of rhodopsin are in agreement with the 1N3M model. Accommodation of movement of transmembrane helix VI, regarded as a major event during the activation of rhodopsin, in a steady structure of the oligomer is also discussed. [Figure: see text]. Superimposition of the 1U19 (red wire), 1GZM (purple wire) and 1N3M (blue wire) rhodopsin structures. Size of the wires is proportional to thermal factors of backbone C(alpha) atoms, view parallel to the membrane.

Constitutively Active Homo-oligomeric Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Induces Cell Signaling Independent of Receptor Conformation and Ligand Stimulation

Members of the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily (GPCRs) undergo homo- and/or hetero-oligomerization to induce cell signaling. Although some of these show constitutive activation, it is not clear how such GPCRs undergo homo-oligomerization with transmembrane helix movement. We previously reported that angiotensin II (Ang II) type 2 (AT(2)) receptor, a GPCR, showed constitutive activation and induced apoptosis independent of its ligand, Ang II. In the present study, we analyzed the translocation and oligomerization of the AT(2) receptor with transmembrane movement when the receptor induces cell signaling. Constitutively active homo-oligomerization, which was due to disulfide bonding between Cys(35) in one AT(2) receptor and Cys(290) in another AT(2) receptor, was localized in the cell membrane without Ang II stimulation and induced apoptosis without changes in receptor conformation. These results provide the direct evidence that the constitutively active homo-oligomeric GPCRs by intermolecular interaction in two extracellular loops is translocated to the cell membrane and induces cell signaling independent of receptor conformation and ligand stimulation.

A constitutively active GPCR retains its G protein specificity and the ability to form dimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface proteins which help to regulate the physiology of all the major organ systems within higher eukaryotes. They are stimulated by multiple ligands and activate a range of effector molecules to bring about changes in cell behaviour. The use of constitutively active mutants (CAMs) of GPCRs has enabled a better understanding of receptor activation as CAMs exhibit ligand-independent signalling negating the use of ligands. Here we introduce the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a host for producing CAMs, by describing the isolation and characterization of constitutive mutants of the P-factor receptor (Mam2). One mutant Mam2[P261L] contained a single-amino-acid substitution (Pro261 to Leu) within a region of high homology in GPCRs. Substitution of this proline leads to an 18-fold increase in ligand-independent signalling. We utilized Mam2[P261L] to investigate CAM activity by demonstrating that Mam2[P261L] is efficiently trafficked to the cell surface where it can form fully functional oligomeric complexes with the native receptor. Mam2[P261L] also retains the G protein specificity (RG-profile) of the native receptor and only induces constitutive signalling in the same G proteins. Finally, evidence is provided to indicate that CAM activity results from a reduction in the kinetics of G protein binding. This is the first time that S. pombe has been utilized for isolating and characterizing CAMs and the techniques employed will complement the current systems available for studying these important receptors.

Paired activation of two components within muscarinic M3 receptor dimers is required for recruitment of beta-arrestin-1 to the plasma membrane

beta-Arrestins regulate the functioning of G protein-coupled receptors in a variety of cellular processes including receptor-mediated endocytosis and activation of signaling molecules such as ERK. A key event in these processes is the G protein-coupled receptor-mediated recruitment of beta-arrestins to the plasma membrane. However, despite extensive knowledge in this field, it is still disputable whether activation of signaling pathways via beta-arrestin recruitment entails paired activation of receptor dimers. To address this question, we investigated the ability of different muscarinic receptor dimers to recruit beta-arrestin-1 using both co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence microscopy in COS-7 cells. Experimentally, we first made use of a mutated muscarinic M(3) receptor, which is deleted in most of the third intracellular loop (M(3)-short). Although still capable of activating phospholipase C, this receptor loses almost completely the ability to recruit beta-arrestin-1 following carbachol stimulation in COS-7 cells. Subsequently, M(3)-short was co-expressed with the M(3) receptor. Under these conditions, the M(3)/M(3)-short heterodimer could not recruit beta-arrestin-1 to the plasma membrane, even though the control M(3)/M(3) homodimer could. We next tested the ability of chimeric adrenergic muscarinic alpha(2)/M(3) and M(3)/alpha(2) heterodimeric receptors to co-immunoprecipitate with beta-arrestin-1 following stimulation with adrenergic and muscarinic agonists. beta-Arrestin-1 co-immunoprecipitation could be induced only when carbachol or clonidine were given together and not when the two agonists were supplied separately. Finally, we tested the reciprocal influence that each receptor may exert on the M(2)/M(3) heterodimer to recruit beta-arrestin-1. Remarkably, we observed that M(2)/M(3) heterodimers recruit significantly greater amounts of beta-arrestin-1 than their respective M(3)/M(3) or M(2)/M(2) homodimers. Altogether, these findings provide strong evidence in favor of the view that binding of beta-arrestin-1 to muscarinic M(3) receptors requires paired stimulation of two receptor components within the same receptor dimer.

Heterodimerization of μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors Occurs at the Cell Surface Only and Requires Receptor-G Protein Interactions

Homo- and heterodimerization of the opioid receptors with functional consequences were reported previously. However, the exact nature of these putative dimers has not been identified. In current studies, the nature of the heterodimers was investigated by producing the phenotypes of the 1:1 heterodimers formed between the constitutively expressed mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and the ponasterone A-induced expression of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) in EcR293 cells. By examining the trafficking of the cell surface-located MOR and DOR, we determined that these two receptors endocytosed independently. Using cell surface expression-deficient mutants of MOR and DOR, we observed that the corresponding wild types of these receptors could not rescue the cell surface expression of the mutants, whereas the antagonist naloxone could. Furthermore, studies with constitutive or agonist-induced receptor internalization also indicated that MOR and DOR endocytosed independently and could not "drag in" the corresponding wild types or endocytosis-deficient mutants. Additionally, the heterodimer phenotypes could be eliminated by the pretreatment of the EcR293 cells with pertussis toxin and could be modulated by the deletion of the RRITR sequence in the third intracellular loop that is involved in the receptor-G protein interaction and activation. These data suggest that MOR and DOR heterodimerize only at the cell surface and that the oligomers of opioid receptors and heterotrimeric G protein are the bases for the observed MOR-DOR heterodimer phenotypes.

Emerging role of homo- and heterodimerization in G-protein-coupled receptor biosynthesis and maturation

The idea that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can function as dimers is now generally accepted. Although an increasing amount of data suggests that dimers represent the basic signaling unit for most, if not all, members of this receptor family, GPCR dimerization might also be necessary to pass quality-control checkpoints of the biosynthetic pathway of GPCRs. To date, this hypothesis has been demonstrated unambiguously only for a small number of receptors that must form heterodimers to be exported properly to the plasma membrane (referred to as obligatory heterodimers). However, increasing evidence suggests that homodimerization might have a similar role in the receptor maturation process for many GPCRs.

Concurrent Stimulation of Cannabinoid CB1 and Dopamine D2 Receptors Enhances Heterodimer Formation: A Mechanism for Receptor Cross-Talk?

Dopamine and endogenous cannabinoids display complex interactions in the basal ganglia. One possible level of interaction is between CB1 cannabinoid and D2 dopamine receptors. Here, we demonstrate that a regulated association of CB1 and D2 receptors profoundly alters CB1 signaling. This provides the first evidence that CB1/D2 receptor complexes exist, are dynamic, and are agonist-regulated with highest complex levels detected when both receptors are stimulated with subsaturating concentrations of agonist. The consequence of this interaction is a differential preference for signaling through a "nonpreferred" G protein. In this case, D2 receptor activation, simultaneously with CB1 receptor stimulation, results in the receptor complex coupling to G alpha s protein in preference to the expected G alpha i/o proteins. The result of this interaction is an increase in the second messenger cAMP, reversing an initial synergistic inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity seen at subthreshold concentrations of cannabinoid agonist. Additionally, a pertussis toxin insensitive component in the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 kinases by the cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 [(1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol] is revealed in cells stably expressing both CB1 and D2 receptors. Thus, concurrent receptor stimulation promotes a heterooligomeric receptor complex and an apparent shift of CB1 signaling from a pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibition to a partly pertussis toxin-insensitive stimulation of adenylyl cyclase and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation.

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors: past, present, and future

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal transduction has been studied for more than a century. Despite the intense focus on this class of proteins, a molecular understanding of what constitutes the functional form of the receptor is still uncertain. GPCRs have traditionally been conceptualized as monomeric proteins, and this view has changed little over the years until relatively recently. Recent biochemical and biophysical studies have challenged this traditional concept, and point instead to a mechanistic view of signal transduction wherein the receptor functions as an oligomer. Cooperative interactions within such an oligomeric array may be critical for the propagation of an external signal across the cell membrane and to the G protein, and may therefore underlie the mechanistic basis of signaling.

Role of extracellular cysteine residues in dimerization/oligomerization of the human prostacyclin receptor

Prostacyclin activation of prostanoid IP receptors may result in pain sensation, inflammatory responses, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and vasodilation in vascular tissue. The prostanoid IP receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor. In the present study, we investigated the determinants responsible, at least in part, for the prostacyclin receptor (IP) dimerization/oligomerization. Using co-immunoprecipitation of differentially tagged IP expressed in COS-7 cells, we demonstrate that IP can form dimers and oligomers. Treatment of IP-expressing cells with the stable agonist carbaprostacyclin failed to alter the ratios of oligomeric/dimeric/monomeric forms of the receptor, suggesting that IP dimerization/oligomerization is an agonist-independent process. The reducing agents dithiothreitol and 2-mercaptoethanol were highly efficient in converting the receptor from its oligomeric form to the monomeric state, indicating the involvement of disulfide bonds in IP oligomerization. Immunoblotting of the osteoblastic MG-63 cell line lysates with an anti-IP specific antibody revealed the presence of endogenous IP oligomers which were converted to dimers and monomers upon treatment with dithiothreitol. Individual substitutions of the four extracellular IP Cys residues (Cys(5), Cys(92), Cys(165) and Cys(170)) for Ser resulted in greatly decreased receptor protein expression in COS-7 cells. The C92-170S double mutant showed receptor protein expression level similar to the individual mutants. However, expression of the C92-165S and C165-170S mutants was drastically reduced, suggesting that there was formation of disulfide bonds between Cys(5) and Cys(165), and between Cys(92) and Cys(170). The Cys receptor mutants showed altered oligomer/dimer/monomer ratios. Dimerization/oligomerization likely occurs intracellularly since these Cys receptor mutants could still form dimers/oligomers despite their lack of expression at the cell surface.

Functional consequences of 7TM receptor dimerization

7TM receptors work as signaling platforms that activate multiple signalling systems at the intracellular face of the plasma membrane. It is an emerging concept that 7TM receptors form homo- and hetero-dimers or -oligomers in vitro and in vivo. Numerous studies suggest dimerization is important for receptor function including agonist/antagonist affinity, efficacy, trafficking, and specificity of signal transduction, yet it remains unknown whether dimerization is a prerequisite for 7TM receptor signaling. The current review provides an overview of the biochemical support for 7TM homodimerization, followed by a discussion of the characteristics of homodimerization, with focus on dimer organization, and the functional consequences of dimerization. Heterodimerization will not generally be discussed in this review although we have included a few examples to illustrate specific points, and a table that summarises the current literature on this subject.

Random mutagenesis of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in yeast: identification of second-site mutations that restore function to a coupling-deficient mutant M3 receptor

The M(3) muscarinic receptor is a prototypical member of the class A family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To gain insight into the structural mechanisms governing agonist-mediated M(3) receptor activation, we recently developed a genetically modified yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) which allows the efficient screening of large libraries of mutant M(3) receptors to identify mutant receptors with altered/novel functional properties. Class A GPCRs contain a highly conserved Asp residue located in transmembrane domain II (TM II; corresponding to Asp-113 in the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor) which is of fundamental importance for receptor activation. As observed previously with other GPCRs analyzed in mammalian expression systems, the D113N point mutation abolished agonist-induced receptor/G protein coupling in yeast. We then subjected the D113N mutant M(3) receptor to PCR-based random mutagenesis followed by a yeast genetic screen to recover point mutations that can restore G protein coupling to the D113N mutant receptor. A large scale screening effort led to the identification of three such second-site suppressor mutations, R165W, R165M, and Y250D. When expressed in the wild-type receptor background, these three point mutations did not lead to an increase in basal activity and reduced the efficiency of receptor/G protein coupling. Similar results were obtained when the various mutant receptors were expressed and analyzed in transfected mammalian cells (COS-7 cells). Interestingly, like Asp-113, Arg-165 and Tyr-250, which are located at the cytoplasmic ends of TM III and TM V, respectively, are also highly conserved among class A GPCRs. Our data suggest a conformational link between the highly conserved Asp-113, Arg-165, and Tyr-250 residues which is critical for receptor activation.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

An algebra of dimerization and its implications for G-protein coupled receptor signaling

Many species of receptors form dimers, but how can we use this information to make predictions about signal transduction? This problem is particularly difficult when receptors dimerize with many different species, leading to a combinatoric increase in the possible number of dimer pairs. As an example system, we focus on receptors in the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. GPCRs have been shown to reversibly form dimers, but this dimerization does not directly affect signal transduction. Here we present a new theoretical framework called a dimerization algebra. This algebra provides a systematic and rational way to represent, manipulate, and in some cases simplify large and often complicated networks of dimerization interactions. To compliment this algebra, Monte Carlo simulations are used to predict dimerization's effect on receptor organization on the membrane, signal transduction, and internalization. These simulation results are directly comparable to various experimental measures such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and as such provide a link between the dimerization algebra and experimental data. As an example, we show how the algebra and computational results can be used to predict the effects of dimerization on the dopamine D2 and somatastatin SSTR1 receptors. When these predictions were compared to experimental findings from the literature, good agreement was found, demonstrating the utility of our approach. Applications of this work to the development of a novel class of dimerization-modulating drugs are also discussed.

Homo- or hetero-dimerization of muscarinic receptor subtypes is not mediated by direct protein-protein interaction through intracellular and extracellular regions

The oligomerization of G-proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs) has been shown to occur by various mechanisms, such as via disulfide covalent linkages, noncovalent (ionic, hydrophobic) interactions of the N-terminal, and/or transmembrane and/or intracellular domains. Interactions between GPCRs could involve an association between identical proteins (homomers) or non-identical proteins (heteromers), or between two monomers (to form dimers) or multiple monomers (to form oligomers). It is believed that muscarinic receptors may also be arranged into dimeric or oigomeric complexes, but no systematic experimental evidence exists concerning the direct physical interaction between receptor proteins as its mechanism. We undertook this study to determine whether muscarinic receptors form homomers or a heteromers by direct protein-protein interaction within the same or within different subtypes using a yeast two-hybrid system. Intracellular loops (i1, i2 and i3) and the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails (C) of human muscarinic (Hm) receptor subtypes, Hm1, Hm2 and Hm3, were cloned into the vectors (pB42AD and pLexA) of a two-hybrid system and examined for heteromeric or homodimeric interactions between the cytoplasmic domains. No physical interaction was observed between the intracellular domains of any of the Hm/Hm receptor sets tested. The results of our study suggest that the Hm1, Hm2 and Hm3 receptors do not form dimers or oligomers by interacting directly through either the hydrophilic intracellular domains or the C-terminal tail domains. To further investigate extracellular domain interactions, the N-terminus (N) and extracellular loops (o1 and o2) were also cloned into the two-hybrid vectors. Interactions of Hm2N with Hm2N, Hm2o1, Hm2o2, Hm3N, Hm3o1 or Hm3o2 were examined. The N-terminal domain of Hm2 was found to have no direct interaction with any extracellular domain. From our results, we excluded the possibility of a direct interaction between the muscarinic receptor subtypes (Hm1, Hm2 and Hm3) as a mechanism for homo- or hetero-meric dimerization/oligomerization. On the other hand, it remains a possibility that interaction may occur indirectly or require proper conformation or subunit formation or hydrophobic region involvement.

Oligomerization of Wild Type and Nonfunctional Mutant Angiotensin II Type I Receptors Inhibits Gαq Protein Signaling but Not ERK Activation

The 7-transmembrane or G protein-coupled receptors relay signals from hormones and sensory stimuli to multiple signaling systems at the intracellular face of the plasma membrane including heterotrimeric G proteins, ERK1/2, and arrestins. It is an emerging concept that 7-transmembrane receptors form oligomers; however, it is not well understood which roles oligomerization plays in receptor activation of different signaling systems. To begin to address this question, we used the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor, a key regulator of blood pressure and fluid homeostasis that in specific context has been described to activate ERKs without activating G proteins. By using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we demonstrate that AT(1) receptors exist as oligomers in transfected COS-7 cells. AT(1) oligomerization was both constitutive and receptor-specific as neither agonist, antagonist, nor co-expression with three other receptors affected the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer 2 signal. Furthermore, the oligomerization occurs early in biosynthesis before surface expression, because we could control AT(1) receptor export from the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi by using regulated secretion/aggregation technology (RPD trade mark ). Co-expression studies of wild type AT(1) and AT(1) receptor mutants, defective in either ligand binding or G protein and ERK activation, yielded an interesting result. The mutant receptors specifically exerted a dominant negative effect on Galpha(q) activation, whereas ERK activation was preserved. These data suggest that distinctly active conformations of AT(1) oligomers can couple to each of these signaling systems and imply that oligomerization plays an active role in supporting these distinctly active conformations of AT(1) receptors.

Domain swapping in the human histamine H1 receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of receptors involved in transmembrane signaling. Although these receptors were generally believed to be monomeric entities, accumulating evidence supports the presence of GPCRs in multimeric forms. Here, using immunoprecipitation as well as time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer to assess protein-protein interactions in living cells, we unambiguously demonstrate the occurrence of dimerization of the human histamine H(1) receptor. We also show the presence of domain-swapped H(1) receptor dimers in which there is the reciprocal exchange of transmembrane domain TM domains 6 and 7 between the receptors present in the dimer. Mutation of aspartate(107) in transmembrane (TM) 3 or phenylalanine(432) in TM6 to alanine results in two radioligand-binding-deficient mutant H(1) receptors. Coexpression of H(1)D(107) A and H(1)F(432)A, however, results in a reconstituted radioligand binding site that exhibits a pharmacological profile that corresponds to the wild-type H(1) receptor. Interestingly, the H(1) receptor radioligands [(3)H]mepyramine and [(3)H]-(-)-trans-1-phenyl-3-N,N-dimethylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene show differential saturation binding values (B(max)) for wild-type H(1) receptors but not for the radioligand binding site that is formed upon coexpression of H(1) D(107)A and H(1) F(432)A receptors, suggesting the presence of different H(1) receptor populations.

Human lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 functions as a dimer in living cells

Lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) is a unique scavenger receptor that plays important roles in atherogenesis and has been thought to function as a monomer. Using coimmunoprecipitation studies, we demonstrate that human LOX-1 (hLOX-1) forms constitutive homo-interactions in vivo. Western blot analysis of cell lysates under nonreducing or reducing conditions revealed one clear immunoreactive species corresponding to the size of a putative receptor dimer or a monomer, respectively, consistent with the presence of disulfide-linked hLOX-1 complexes. Site-directed mutagenesis studies indicated that cysteine 140 has a key role in the formation of these disulfide-linked hLOX-1 dimers. Eliminating this intermolecular disulfide bond markedly impairs the recognition of Escherichia coli by hLOX-1. Furthermore, these dimers can act as a "structural unit" to form noncovalently associated oligomers, as demonstrated by a membrane-impermeant crosslinker, which resulted in immunoreactive species corresponding to the sizes of putative tetramers and hexamers. These results provide the first evidence for the existence of hLOX-1 dimers/oligomers.

Regulation of CXCR4 receptor dimerization by the chemokine SDF-1alpha and the HIV-1 coat protein gp120: a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) study

Both the chemokine SDF-1alpha and the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) coat protein gp120 can bind to CXCR4 chemokine receptors but with different signaling consequences. To understand the molecular basis for these differences, we tagged the rat CXCR4 receptor with enhanced cyan (ECFP) and yellow (EYFP) derivatives of the green fluorescent protein and investigated CXCR4 receptor dimerization in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-tsA201 cells using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Elevated FRET was detected under basal conditions from EYFP-CXCR4 and ECFP-CXCR4 receptor-transfected cells indicating a high level of CXCR4 receptor dimerization. In comparison, EYFP-CXCR4 and ECFP-mu-opioid receptor-cotransfected cells displayed a much lower FRET signal. The FRET signal resulting from EYFP-CXCR4- and ECFP-CXCR4-expressing cells could be attenuated by coexpressing nontagged CXCR4 receptors suggesting competition with fluorophore-tagged receptors in the membrane. Nontagged mu-opioid, kappa-opioid, and muscarinic receptors also decreased the FRET between the tagged CXCR4 receptor pairs but to a lesser extent. Application of the CXCR4 receptor agonist SDF-1alpha (50 nM) further increased the FRET signal from tagged CXCR4 receptors, an effect that was inhibited by the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. SDF-1alpha had no effect when EYFP-CXCR4 and ECFP-mu-opioid receptors were coexpressed. The effect of gp120IIIB on CXCR4 FRET was dependent on the coexpression of human CD4 (hCD4) when it increased the FRET signal, and this was decreased by AMD3100 pretreatment. FRET analysis of tagged hCD4 constructs demonstrated that there was significant association of hCD4 and CXCR4, as well as hCD4 dimerization. These data suggest that CXCR4 dimerization is involved in SDF-1alpha- and gp120-induced signaling events.

Dimerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: roles in signal transduction

Recently, many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been demonstrated to form constitutive dimers consisting of identical or distinct monomeric subunits. The discovery of GPCR dimerization has revealed a new level of molecular cross-talk between signalling molecules and may define a general mechanism that modulates the function of GPCRs under both physiological and pathological conditions. The heterodimerization between distinct GPCRs could be responsible for the generation of pharmacologically defined receptors for which no gene has been identified so far. Elucidating the role of dimerization in the activation processes of GPCRs will lead us to develop novel pharmaceutical agents that allosterically promote activation or inhibition of GPCR signalling.