51
|
Fuzzell LN, Perkins RB, Christy SM, Lake PW, Vadaparampil ST. Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups. Prev Med 2021; 144:106400. [PMID: 33388330 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States are generally high, yet certain groups demonstrate disparities in screening and surveillance. Individuals at greatest risk for cervical cancer are often from marginalized or underserved groups who do not participate in regular screening for a variety of reasons. Using the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR) Trans-Organ Conceptual Model, including concepts of individual-, provider-, facility-, system-, or policy-level factors, we provide a commentary to highlight reasons for low screening participation among subgroups in the U.S. These include racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents, sexual and gender minorities, those with limited English proficiency, those with particular religious beliefs, and various health conditions. We describe barriers and offer potential solutions for each group. In addition, we discuss cross-cutting barriers to screening including difficulty interacting with the healthcare system (limited knowledge and health literacy, lack of provider recommendation/contact), financial (cost, lack of insurance), and logistical barriers (e.g., lack of usual source of care, competing demands, scheduling issues). Solutions to address these barriers are needed to improve screening rates across all underscreened groups. Changes at state and national policy levels are needed to address health insurance coverage. Mobile screening, ensuring that interpreters are available for all visits, and targeted in reach at non-gynecological visits can further overcome barriers. Employing community outreach workers can increase community demand for screening, and patient navigators can improve adherence to both screening and follow-up diagnostic evaluation. HPV self-sampling can address multiple barriers to cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay N Fuzzell
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Boston University School of Medicine, 85 E. Concord St., Boston, MA 02118, United States of America
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Paige W Lake
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
What Do Parents Need to Know About Concussion? Developing Consensus Using the Delphi Method. Clin J Sport Med 2021; 31:139-144. [PMID: 30475245 DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many schools and sports leagues provide preseason concussion education to parents/guardians, and in some jurisdictions, it is required for interscholastic sports participation. However, directives about content are absent or vague. The purpose of this study was to obtain expert consensus about what parents/guardians need to know to about concussion. DESIGN A modified Delphi process with nationally recognized expert panel members was used to obtain consensus about parent/guardian behaviors relevant to concussion prevention, identification, and management and knowledge domains relevant to performance of those behaviors. RESULTS Sixteen parent/guardian behaviors and 24 knowledge domains were identified. However, consensus was not achieved regarding whether it is realistic to expect parents/guardians to perform approximately one-third of the behaviors that experts agreed mattered. This variability may reflect underlying uncertainty about the capacities of some parents/guardians to put knowledge into action or the belief that there are other barriers to action. Furthermore, for most knowledge domains, there was a lack of agreement about whether or not there could be a "correct" answer on the basis of current scientific knowledge. CONCLUSIONS These findings raise practical and ethical questions: how can we expect parents/guardians to help prevent, identify, or manage concussion if they cannot have all the information required to engage in these behaviors due to lack of scientific consensus? This issue is not unique to concussion. Best practices for risk communication and shared decision-making can inform how we think about educating parents/guardians about concussion inside and outside of the health care setting.
Collapse
|
53
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, Trevena L, McCaffery KJ. Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:521-524. [PMID: 32472490 PMCID: PMC7878628 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Research into health literacy and shared decision-making has largely developed along parallel, but distinct lines over the past two decades. There is little evidence that the concepts and related practice have intersected except in the most functional way, for example, to simplify shared decision-making tools by improving readability scores of decision aids. This paper presents an integrated model to strengthen and sustain patient engagement in health care by drawing on the strengths of both concepts. This includes addressing patients' skills and capacities, alongside modifications to written and verbal information. We propose an expanded model of shared decision-making which incorporates health literacy concepts and promotes two-tiered intervention methods to improve the targeting and personalization of communication and support the development of transferable health literacy skills among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Dodd RH, Cvejic E, Bell K, Black K, Bateson D, Smith MA, Mac OA, McCaffery KJ. Active surveillance as a management option for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2: An online experimental study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:179-187. [PMID: 33516531 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate framing of active surveillance as a management option for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 in women of childbearing age. METHODS We conducted a between-subjects factorial (2 × 2) randomised experiment. Women aged 25-40 living in Australia were presented with the same hypothetical pathway of testing human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive, high-grade cytology and a diagnosis of CIN2, through an online survey. They were randomised to one of four groups to evaluate the effects of (i) framing (method of explaining resolution of abnormal cells) and (ii) inclusion of an overtreatment statement (included versus not). Primary outcome was management choice following the scenario: active surveillance or surgery. RESULTS 1638 women were randomised. Overall, preference for active surveillance was high (78.9%; n = 1293/1638). There was no effect of framing or providing overtreatment information, or their interaction, on management choice. After adjusting for intervention received, age, education, and other model covariates, participants were more likely to choose active surveillance over surgery if they had not already had children, had plans for children in the future, had no family history of cancer, had no history of endometriosis, had adequate health literacy, and more trust in their GP. Participants were less likely to choose active surveillance over surgery if they were more predisposed to seek health care for minor problems. CONCLUSIONS Although we found no framing effect across the four conditions, we found a high level of preference for active surveillance with associations of increased preference that accord with the desire to minimise potential risks of CIN2 treatment on obstetric outcomes. These are valuable data for future clinical trials of active surveillance for management of CIN2 in younger women of childbearing age. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618002043213, 20/12/2018, prior to participant enrolment).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Katy Bell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten Black
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney 2050, Australia
| | - Deborah Bateson
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Family Planning New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2131, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney 2011, Australia
| | - Olivia A Mac
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Peipert JD, Lad T, Khosla PG, Garcia SF, Hahn EA. A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211036783. [PMID: 34565193 PMCID: PMC8481731 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211036783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We tested whether a low-literacy-friendly, multimedia information and assessment system used in daily clinical practice enhanced patient-centered care and improved patient outcomes. This was a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 2 arms, CancerHelp-Talking Touchscreen (CancerHelp-TT) versus control, among adults with Stage I-III breast or colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in safety net settings. Each patient was assessed for outcomes at 4 timepoints: after starting treatment (baseline), during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up assessment. The primary outcomes were health beliefs, cancer knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with communication about cancer and its treatments. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was a secondary outcome. A total of 129 patients participated in the study (65 intervention and 64 control), and approximately 50% of these completed the study. Patients randomized to receive the CancerHelp-TT program had a significantly larger increase in their cancer knowledge in comparison to those randomized to the control arm (effect size = .48, P = .05). While effect sizes for differences between randomized groups in self-efficacy, health beliefs, HRQOL, and satisfaction with communication were small (.10-.48), there was a consistent trend that participants in the intervention group showed larger increases over time in all outcomes compared to the control group. The CancerHelp-TT software was favorably rated by intervention participants. The CancerHelp-TT program showed promise to increase vulnerable cancer patients' cancer knowledge and adaptive health beliefs and attitudes. However, vulnerable patients may need additional interventional support in settings outside cancer clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Lad
- John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Hahn
- Department of Medical Social Sciences and Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Wehkamp K, Kiefer FB, Geiger F, Scheibler F, Rueffer JU, Donner-Banzhoff N, Betsch C. Enhancing Specific Health Literacy with a Digital Evidence-Based Patient Decision Aid for Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1269-1279. [PMID: 34163144 PMCID: PMC8214525 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s311470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health literacy is an important competency to make informed, shared decisions in line with patient's preferences. On the other hand, lower health literacy is associated with poorer health outcomes. Evidence-based patient decision aids (EbPDA) are validated instruments to support informed medical decisions and empower patients for relevant involvement in their care. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a digital EbPDA for hypertension on health literacy. METHODS In a randomized controlled trial, 124 participants were presented with a web-based scenario related to a newly diagnosed condition of arterial hypertension. The intervention group was provided with an online decision aid, while the control group was prompted to search for related information without support. Specific health literacy for hypertension was operationalized based on the European survey for health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47). RESULTS The intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in subjectively perceived overall specific health literacy regarding hypertension (p=0.02, Cohen's d=0.44). The effect was also statistically significant for the subcategories understanding, appraising, and applying health-related information (all p<0.05). At least equal results could be shown for participants with a lower level of education compared to participants with a high level. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that digital EbPDAs can be an effective and easily scalable instrument to improve populations' specific health literacy. A possible advantage of the measure could be that patients are addressed concerning important and pressing personal decisions, fostering awareness of the individual's need for health literacy to reflect one's options and preferences. EbPDAs may also be a promising approach to target vulnerable populations, as the investigated EbPDA seems to perform equally in less versus more educated individuals. For future research, it may be interesting to investigate whether EbPDAs have effects on general health literacy that go beyond the disease specifically addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Wehkamp
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Medical Management, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Correspondence: Kai Wehkamp Department of Internal Medicine I, Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, GermanyTel +49 (0)431-500-0 Email
| | - Felicia Beatrice Kiefer
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Geiger
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fueloep Scheibler
- Department of Pediatrics/Project SHARE TO CARE, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | | | - Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Betsch
- Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Watach AJ, Hwang D, Sawyer AM. Personalized and Patient-Centered Strategies to Improve Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:1557-1570. [PMID: 34285474 PMCID: PMC8286071 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s264927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a common sleep disorder characterized by repeated pauses in breathing during sleep, is effectively treated with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The magnitude of improvements in daily functioning and reduced negative health risks are dependent on maintaining PAP adherence, which is a significant challenge. Evidence-based interventions to improve PAP use are not easily translated to clinical practice because they are labor-intensive and require specialty expertise. Further, to date, individualized care, inclusive of personalized medicine and patient- and person-centered care have been marginally incorporated in the field's understanding of OSA and PAP adherence. This integrative review describes current PAP adherence assessment processes, interventions to improve adherence, and outlines future opportunities to advance the field, particularly as it relates to individualizing care and the use of implementation science to apply evidence to practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa J Watach
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Correspondence: Alexa J Watach University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Claire Fagin Hall, Rm 349, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USATel +1-717-599-9908 Email
| | - Dennis Hwang
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Sleep Medicine and Department of Research and Evaluation, Fontana, CA, USA
| | - Amy M Sawyer
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Tong WT, Lee YK, Ng CJ, Lee PY. Factors influencing implementation of an insulin patient decision aid at public health clinics in Malaysia: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244645. [PMID: 33378349 PMCID: PMC7773191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patient decision aids (PDAs) are developed in academic settings by academic researchers. Academic settings are different from public health clinics where the focus is on clinical work. Thus, research on implementation in public health settings will provide insights to effective implementation of PDA in real-world settings. This study explores perceived factors influencing implementation of an insulin PDA in five public health clinics. METHODS This study adopted a comparative case study design with a qualitative focus to identify similarities and differences of the potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the insulin PDA across different sites. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare providers and 15 patients from five public health clinics under the Ministry of Health in Malaysia. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic approach. RESULTS Five themes emerged which were: 1) time constraint; 2) PDA costs; 3) tailoring PDA use to patient profile; 4) patient decisional role; and 5) leadership and staff motivation. Based on the interviews and drawing on observations and interview reflection notes, time constraint emerged as the common prominent factor that cut across all the clinics, however, tailoring PDA use to patient profile; patient decisional role; leadership and staff motivation varied due to the distinct challenges faced by specific clinics. Among clinics from semi-urban areas with more patients from limited education and lower socio-economic status, patients' ability to comprehend the insulin PDA and their tendency to rely on their doctors and family to make health decisions were felt to be a prominent barrier to the insulin PDA implementation. Staff motivation appeared to be stronger in most of the clinics where specific time was allocated to diabetes team to attend to diabetes patients and this was felt could be a potential facilitator, however, a lack of leadership might affect the insulin PDA implementation even though a diabetes team is present. CONCLUSIONS This study found time constraint as a major potential barrier for PDA implementation and effective implementation of the insulin PDA across different public health clinics would depend on leadership and staff motivation and, the need to tailor PDA use to patient profile. To ensure successful implementation, implementers should avoid a 'one size fits all' approach when implementing health innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Ting Tong
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- * E-mail:
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ping Yein Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Burgoon ML, Miller PA, Hoover-Hankerson B, Strand N, Ross H. Patient Attitudes Toward Spoken Surveys in a Low-Income Urban Surgical Clinic. Am Surg 2020; 87:999-1004. [PMID: 33295190 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820960054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Diverse groups in urban settings demonstrate poor participation in health care and low levels of literacy. It is possible the method of health information delivery (eg, spoken vs. written) in these settings could impact health care related communication and understanding, though little is known on this topic. The objective of this study was to uncover the advantages and disadvantages of spoken survey administration in a low-income urban setting. The data for this study were collected via spoken survey with eighty patients in 9 surgery clinics at Temple University Hospital (TUH) in North Philadelphia. Survey responses were coded into various groups until categories and relationships among them emerged to produce themes relevant in demonstrating the advantages and disadvantages of spoken survey. 69% (55) of respondents preferred a spoken survey format. Of the 55 patients who preferred the spoken format, 33% (18) possessed some level of college education and 47% (26) had finished high school. Of the 23 patients who primarily spoke Spanish or another language at home, 78% (18) preferred a spoken interview format. Overall, 53% (42) of patients experienced at least 1 instance of poor understanding throughout the survey. Patients were better able to understand questions in a spoken survey compared to written ones that they had completed in the past due to the opportunity for surveyors to explain questions when needed. It is possible that question explanation is necessary in low-income urban settings due to low-literacy levels or improved feelings of survey intimacy and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montgomry L Burgoon
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 12314Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Parker A Miller
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 12314Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Nicolle Strand
- Department of Urban Bioethics, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, 12314Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Howard Ross
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, 25139Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Maschke A, Paasche-Orlow MK, Kressin NR, Schonberg MA, Battaglia TA, Gunn CM. Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?". JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:951-961. [PMID: 33455518 PMCID: PMC8062298 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Starting breast cancer screening at age 40 versus 50 may increase potential harms frequency with a small mortality benefit. Younger women's screening decisions, therefore, may be complex. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for women under 50 and may support women under 55 for whom guidelines vary. How women with limited health literacy (LHL) approach breast cancer screening decision-making is less understood, and most SDM tools are not designed with their input. This phenomenological study sought to characterize mammography counseling experiences among women with LHL and primary care providers (PCPs). Women ages 40-54 with LHL who had no history of breast cancer or mammogram within 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a safety-net hospital. PCPs at this site were invited to participate. Qualitative interviews explored mammography counseling experiences. Patients also reviewed sample information materials. A constant comparison technique generated four themes salient to 25 patients and 20 PCPs: addressing family history versus comprehensive risk assessment; potential mammography harms discussions; information delivery preferences; and integrating pre-visit information tools. Findings suggest that current counseling techniques may not be responsive to patient-identified needs. Opportunities exist to improve how mammography information is shared and increase accessibility across the health literacy spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Maschke
- Women's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy R Kressin
- Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tracy A Battaglia
- Women's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine M Gunn
- Women's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e1032-e1041. [PMID: 32925380 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process by which the physician and the patient collaborate to arrive at the evidence-based treatment that best aligns with the patient's individual goals of care. The implementation of SDM practices is especially important when an invasive surgical procedure is among the treatment options. Ideally, the variation in the patient treatment choice would mirror the variability in patient goals rather than variation in a physician's ability to communicate effectively. Potentially aiding in these communication efforts, decision aids are tools gaining popularity for their ability to help physicians facilitate the SDM process with patients. This article is intended to give the practicing orthopaedic surgeon an understanding of the concept of SDM and how it can improve physician-patient communication. We will explore the key elements of SDM, attendant benefits, indications, and barriers to implementation and propose steps to begin the incorporation of SDM into practice.
Collapse
|
62
|
Siyam T, Shivji A, Ross S, Eurich DT, Lavasanifar A, Yuksel N. Developing and evaluating a patient decision aid for hormone therapy to manage symptoms of surgical menopause: the story behind the "SheEmpowers" patient decision aid. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 28:157-166. [PMID: 33235034 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and evaluate an evidence-based patient decision aid (PDA) that can support women making decisions on hormone therapy (HT) for the management of early surgical menopause. METHODS The PDA development was guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and involved three phases: an exploratory phase to identify women's decisional needs; a development phase to identify evidence related to treatment options and draft initial prototype; and an evaluation phase to evaluate the prototype and elicit views on acceptability in women (N = 12). All phases were driven by a multidisciplinary group of researchers, clinicians, and patient stakeholders to ensure women's priorities were met. RESULTS A prototype PDA was drafted based on needs identified from the exploratory phase. The PDA has five domains: information on surgical menopause and HT; HT outcome probabilities; patient stories; values clarification; and guidance in deliberation. Participants in the evaluation phase perceived the tool as acceptable and offered suggestions for modifications. CONCLUSION Through our adopted, systematic approach the SheEmpowers PDA was developed to help women overcome deterrents to decision-making related to lack of knowledge, decision-making skills, and involvement in therapy decisions. The decisional effectiveness of the tool is to be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alisha Shivji
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sue Ross
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dean T Eurich
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Afsaneh Lavasanifar
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nesé Yuksel
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Durand MA, Yen RW, O'Malley AJ, Schubbe D, Politi MC, Saunders CH, Dhage S, Rosenkranz K, Margenthaler J, Tosteson ANA, Crayton E, Jackson S, Bradley A, Walling L, Marx CM, Volk RJ, Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Percac-Lima S, Bergin E, Goodwin C, Miller C, Harris C, Barth RJ, Aft R, Feldman S, Cyr AE, Angeles CV, Jiang S, Elwyn G. What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata. Cancer 2020; 127:422-436. [PMID: 33170506 PMCID: PMC7983934 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early‐stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician‐patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. Methods We conducted a 3‐arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon‐level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence‐based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre‐consultation) to T5 (1‐year after surgery. Results Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self‐reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. Conclusions Paper‐based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. Lay Summary The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text‐only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.
A paper‐based pictorial conversation aid (pictures plus text) is beneficial to all patients with early‐stage breast cancer and particularly to disadvantaged patients. Between‐surgeon variation suggests that the maximal impact of such interventions requires standardized physician training combined with these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne Durand
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,UMR 1027 Team EQUITY, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Renata W Yen
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - A James O'Malley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Danielle Schubbe
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Mary C Politi
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Shubhada Dhage
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Julie Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Eloise Crayton
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sherrill Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Bradley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Linda Walling
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Christine M Marx
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert J Volk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elissa Ozanne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea HealthCare Center, Chelsea, Massachusetts
| | | | - Courtney Goodwin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Camille Harris
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Rebecca Aft
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Amy E Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Yu L, Li P, Yang S, Guo P, Zhang X, Liu N, Wang J, Zhang W. Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:985-1002. [PMID: 33025800 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer among women. Because guidelines on screening for breast cancer for certain ages are controversial, many experts advocate the use of shared decision making (SDM) using validated decision aids (DAs). Recent studies have concluded that DAs are beneficial; however, the results have great heterogeneity. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve understanding of these tools. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of using web-based DAs in women aged 50 years and below facing the decision to be screened for breast cancer in comparison with usual care. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to February 2020 for studies assessing web-based DAs for women making a breast cancer screening decision and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. Using a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model, meta-analyses were conducted pooling results using mean differences (MD), standardized mean differences (SMD) and relative risks (RR). Results: Of 1097 unique citations, three randomized controlled trials and two before-after studies met the study eligibility criteria. Compared with usual care, web-based DAs increased knowledge (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.80; p < 0.00001), reduced decision conflict and increased the proportion of women who made an informed choice (RR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.38 to 2.50; p < 0.0001), but did not change the intention of women deciding to be screened or affect decision regret. Conclusion: This analysis showed the positive effect of web-based DAs on patient-centered outcomes in breast cancer screening. In the future, more internet devices and free or larger discount WI-FI should be established to ensure more women can benefit from this effective tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Developmental Pediatrics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Shu Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Pingping Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xuehui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Na Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Kamran R, Dal Cin A. Designing a Mission statement Mobile app for palliative care: an innovation project utilizing design-thinking methodology. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:151. [PMID: 33023545 PMCID: PMC7542118 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00659-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eliciting individual values and preferences of patients is essential to delivering high quality palliative care and ensuring patient-centered advance care planning. Despite advance care planning conserving healthcare costs by up to 36%, reducing psychological distress of patients and caregivers, and ensuring palliative care delivery in line with patient wishes, less than 33% of adults engage in it. We aimed to develop a mobile application intervention to address the challenges related to advance care planning and improve the delivery of palliative care. METHODS Design-thinking methodology was used to develop a mobile application, in response to issues prominently identified in current palliative care literature. RESULTS Issues surrounding communication of patient values from both the patient and provider side is identified as a main issue in palliative care. We designed a mobile application intervention prototype to address this. CONCLUSIONS Our "Mission Statement" mobile application will allow patients to create a mission statement identifying what they want their care team to know about them, as well as space to identify important values and preferences. Patients will be able to evolve their mission statement and values and preferences over the course of their palliative care journey through the application. Design-thinking methodology is an effective tool to drive healthcare innovation and bridge the gap between research findings and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, MDCL 3114, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada.
| | - Arianna Dal Cin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Duffy S, Barlow C, Underwood M, Day E. Updated GMC guidance on decision-making and consent: implications for urologists. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415820945539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We summarise the updated General Medical Council guidance on consent and decision-making. We explore the emphasis on enabling supported decision-making and the implications this has in day to day urological practice. In particular, we address some of the issues encountered in one-stop clinics, on pooled elective lists and with pre-written consent forms. The new guidance will emphasise the importance of sharing information relevant to your patient in light of the Montgomery ruling. Every decision is unique. We must appreciate the importance of the process of decision-making and understand our role as the clinician. Here we suggest some practical considerations to address the updated General Medical Council guidance. Level of evidence: Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan Duffy
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK
| | - Catriona Barlow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK
| | - Mark Underwood
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK
| | - Elizabeth Day
- Department of Urology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Hoffman AS, Bateman DR, Ganoe C, Punjasthitkul S, Das AK, Hoffman DB, Housten AJ, Peirce HA, Dreyer L, Tang C, Bennett A, Bartels SJ. Development and Field Testing of a Long-Term Care Decision Aid Website for Older Adults: Engaging Patients and Caregivers in User-Centered Design. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2020; 60:935-946. [PMID: 31773140 PMCID: PMC7456976 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Decisions about long-term care and financing can be difficult to comprehend, consider, and communicate. In a previous needs assessment, families in rural areas requested a patient-facing website; however, questions arose about the acceptability of an online tool for older adults. This study engaged older adults and family caregivers in (a) designing and refining an interactive, tailored decision aid website, and (b) field testing its utility, feasibility, and acceptability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Based on formative work, the research team engaged families in designing and iteratively revising paper drafts, then programmed a tailored website. The field test used the ThinkAloud approach and pre-/postquestionnaires to assess participants' knowledge, decisional conflict, usage, and acceptability ratings. RESULTS Forty-five older adults, family members, and stakeholders codesigned and tested the decision aid, yielding four decision-making steps: Get the Facts, What Matters Most, Consider Your Resources, and Make an Action Plan. User-based design and iterative storyboarding enhanced the content, personal decision-making activities, and user-generated resources. Field-testing participants scored 83.3% correct on knowledge items and reported moderate/low decisional conflict. All (100%) were able to use the website, spent an average of 26.3 min, and provided an average 87.5% acceptability rating. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS A decision aid website can educate and support older adults and their family members in beginning a long-term care plan. Codesign and in-depth interviews improved usability, and lessons learned may guide the development of other aging decision aid websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aubri S Hoffman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Daniel R Bateman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Craig Ganoe
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Sukdith Punjasthitkul
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Amar K Das
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Derek B Hoffman
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Ashley J Housten
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hillary A Peirce
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Larissa Dreyer
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Chen Tang
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Alina Bennett
- Department of Regional Ethics, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Regional, Oakland, California
| | - Stephen J Bartels
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Langford AT, Scherer LD, Ubel PA, Holmes-Rovner M, Scherr KA, Fagerlin A. Racial differences in veterans' response to a standard vs. patient-centered decision aid for prostate cancer: Implications for decision making in African American and White men. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:S0738-3991(20)30322-0. [PMID: 32591257 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether racial differences exist in patient preferences for prostate cancer treatment after being informed about options using a patient-centered vs. a standard decision aid (DA). METHODS This article reports secondary analyses of a large study of men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men were recruited from 4 VA Health Systems and randomized to receive a patient-centered or standard DA about prostate cancer treatment options. Data were collected at 1) baseline, 2) after reading the DA but prior to diagnosis, and 3) after receiving a cancer diagnosis and meeting with a urologist. RESULTS White patients who received the patient-centered DA written at a 7th grade reading level were more likely to prefer active surveillance and less likely to prefer radiation compared to those who received the standard DA written at >9th grade reading level. African American patients' treatment preferences did not differ as a function of DA. CONCLUSIONS When informed about prostate cancer treatment options through a patient-centered DA, White patients changed their treatment preferences but African American patients did not. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS As DAs are increasingly being used in clinical practice, more research is needed regarding the efficacy, relevance, and receptivity of DAs for African Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha T Langford
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Laura D Scherer
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; Colorado Program for Patient Centered Decisions at ACCORDS, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Holmes-Rovner
- Center for Ethics and Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Karen A Scherr
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Salt Lake City VA Informatics Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center for Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Langford AT, Hawley ST, Stableford S, Studts JL, Byrne MM. Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:454-461. [PMID: 30739270 PMCID: PMC9575516 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite the promise of clinical trials for improving cancer care, less than 5% of all cancer patients participate. Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). To address this gap, we developed a plain language, web-based decision support tool (CHOICES DST) in English and Spanish to support decision-making about CCTs among Blacks and Hispanics. In phase 1 (information collection), we conducted qualitative interviews with 45 cancer patients, completed a thorough literature review, and reviewed results from a telephone survey of 1100 cancer patients. In phase 2 (content generation), we created the first iteration of the CHOICES DST. In phase 3 (usability testing), we gathered user experience and acceptability data from a small sample of cancer survivors (n = 9). The Knowledge, Empowerment, and Values Clarification (KEV) model of decision-making was developed based on data from phase 1. The KEV model and other phase 1 data allowed us to create the CHOICES DST platform. Usability testing of the CHOICES DST showed highly favorable responses from users, satisfaction with content, ease of navigation, and a desire to use the tool. Qualitative results identified addressable points that would benefit from content and navigation-related alterations. The final version of the CHOICES DST was well received and understood by Black and Hispanic participants, and adheres to the mandates for plain language communication. This research provides preliminary data that CHOICES DST holds promise for improving knowledge of CCTs and potentially improving informed decision-making about participation in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha T Langford
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, Room 645, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Ann Arbor VA Center of Excellence in Health Services Research & Development, University of Michigan Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC Building 16, 4th Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sue Stableford
- Health Literacy, Plain Language, & Clear Health Communication Consultant, Brunswick, ME, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 127 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0086, USA
| | - Margaret M Byrne
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 4117 E Fowler St., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Hild S, Johanet M, Valenza A, Thabaud M, Laforest F, Ferrat E, Rat C. Quality of decision aids developed for women at average risk of breast cancer eligible for mammographic screening: Systematic review and assessment according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument. Cancer 2020; 126:2765-2774. [PMID: 32267546 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Mammographic screening contributes to a reduction in specific mortality, but it has disadvantages. Decision aids are tools designed to support people's decisions. Because these aids influence patient choice, their quality is crucial. The objective of the current study was to conduct a systematic review of decision aids developed for women eligible for mammographic screening who have an average breast cancer risk and to assess the quality of these aids. The systematic review included articles published between January 1, 1997, and August 1, 2019, in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycInfo databases. The studies were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers. Any study containing a decision aid for women eligible for mammographic screening with an average breast cancer risk was included. Two double-blind reviewers assessed the quality of the selected decision aids using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument, version 3 (IPDASi). Twenty-three decision aids were extracted. Classification of decision aid quality using the IPDASi demonstrated large variations among the decision aids (maximum IPDASi score, 188; mean ± SD score, 132.6 ± 23.8; range, 85-172). Three decision aids had high overall scores. The 3 best-rated dimensions were disclosure (maximum score, 8; mean score, 6.8), focusing on transparency; information (maximum score, 32; mean score, 26.1), focusing on the provision of sufficient details; and probabilities (maximum score, 32; mean score 25), focusing on the presentation of probabilities. The 3 lowest-rated dimensions were decision support technology evaluation (maximum score, 8; mean score, 4.3), focusing on the effectiveness of the decision aid; development (maximum score, 24; mean score, 12.6), evaluating the development process; and plain language (maximum score, 4; mean score, 1.9), assessing appropriateness for patients with low literacy. The results of this review identified 3 high-quality decision aids for breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine Hild
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marion Johanet
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Anna Valenza
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maïna Thabaud
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Flore Laforest
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Emilie Ferrat
- Primary Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris-East Creteil, Creteil, France.,Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, University of Paris-Est Creteil, Creteil, France
| | - Cédric Rat
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
71
|
Damman OC, Jani A, de Jong BA, Becker A, Metz MJ, de Bruijne MC, Timmermans DR, Cornel MC, Ubbink DT, van der Steen M, Gray M, van El C. The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:524-540. [PMID: 31840346 PMCID: PMC7155090 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent emphasis on value-based health care (VBHC) is thought to provide new opportunities for shared decision-making (SDM) in the Netherlands, especially when using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine medical encounters. It is still largely unclear about how PROMs could be linked to SDM and what we expect from clinicians in this respect. AIM To describe approaches and lessons learned in the fields of SDM and VBHC implementation that converge in using PROMs in medical encounters. APPROACH Based on input from three Dutch forerunner case examples and available evidence about SDM and VBHC, we describe barriers and facilitators regarding the use of PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. Barriers and facilitators were structured according to a conversational model that included monitoring and managing, team talk, option talk, choice talk, and decision talk. Key lessons learned and recommendations were synthesized. RESULTS The use of individual, N = 1 PROMs scores in the medical encounter has been largely achieved in the forerunner projects. Conversation on monitoring and managing is relatively well implemented, and option talk to some extent, unlike team talk, and decision talk. Aggregated PROMs information describing outcomes of treatment options seemed to be scarcely used. Experienced barriers largely corresponded to what is known from the literature, eg, perceived lack of time and lack of tools summarizing the options. Some concerns were identified about increasing health care consumption as a result of using PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. CONCLUSION Successful implementation of SDM within VBHC initiatives may not be self-evident, even though individual, N = 1 PROMs scores are being used in the medical encounter. Education and staff resources on meso and macro levels may facilitate the more time-consuming SDM aspects. It seems fruitful to especially target team talk and choice talk in redesigning clinical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anant Jani
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Brigit A de Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Becker
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot J Metz
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, GGz Breburg and Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Martine C de Bruijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R Timmermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije van der Steen
- Department of Strategy and Policy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Muir Gray
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carla van El
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Hadden KB, McLemore H, White W, Marks MH, Gan JM, Seupaul RA. Implementation of a health-literate patient decision aid for chest pain in the emergency department. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:864-869. [PMID: 31761525 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of a new health-literacy-tested patient decision aid for chest pain in Emergency Department (ED) patients. Outcomes included disposition, knowledge, decisional conflict and satisfaction prior to discharge. Patient health literacy was explored as a factor that may explain disparities in sub-group analysis of all outcomes. METHODS A health-literacy adapted tool was deployed using a pre/post intervention design. Patients enrolled during the intervention period were given the adapted chest pain decision aid that was used in conversation with their emergency medicine physician to decide on their course of action prior to being discharged. RESULTS A total of 169 participants were surveyed and used in the final analysis. Patients in the usual care group were 2.6 times more likely to be admitted for chest pain than patients in the intervention group. Knowledge scores were higher in the intervention group, while no significant differences were observed in decisional conflict and patient satisfaction, or by patient health literacy level. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Using the adapted chest pain decision tool in emergency medicine may improve knowledge and reduce admissions, while addressing known barriers to understanding related to patient health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie B Hadden
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Center for Health Literacy, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| | - Heather McLemore
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| | - Wesley White
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| | - Matthew H Marks
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| | - Jennifer M Gan
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Center for Health Literacy, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| | - Rawle A Seupaul
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Peinado S, Paquin RS, Rini C, Roche M, Butterfield RM, Berg JS, Powell CM, Bailey DB, Lewis MA. Values clarification and parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing. Health Psychol 2020; 39:335-344. [PMID: 31886693 PMCID: PMC7078054 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using an online decision aid developed to support parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing, we tested whether adding a values clarification exercise to educational content would improve decision making outcomes and influence intention to pursue genomic sequencing. We also examined whether the effect of values clarification varied depending on one's health literacy level. METHOD In an online experiment, women and men aged 18 to 44 who were either pregnant or had a pregnant partner, were currently trying to get pregnant, or were preparing for a pregnancy within the next 2 years were randomly assigned to complete either a decision aid with educational information about newborn genomic sequencing or a decision aid with the same educational information and a values clarification exercise. RESULTS Of the 1,000 participants who completed the decision aid, those who completed the values clarification exercise reported less decision regret, F(1, 995) = 6.19, p = .01, and were clearer about their personal values, F(1, 995) = 6.39, p = .01. Moderation analyses revealed that the benefit of values clarification on decisional conflict was particularly evident among participants with lower health literacy, B = -3.94, SE = 1.67, t = -2.36, p = .018. There was not a significant moderation effect of health literacy and decision aid condition on decision regret. CONCLUSIONS Adding a values clarification exercise to decision aids for parents making decisions about genomic sequencing may improve the decision-making experience and provide some benefit to individuals with lower health literacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Peinado
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Ryan S. Paquin
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Christine Rini
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical
Center, Hackensack, NJ and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington,
DC
| | - Myra Roche
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rita M. Butterfield
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cynthia M. Powell
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Donald B. Bailey
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability
Studies, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Megan A. Lewis
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Pons-Rodríguez A, Martínez-Alonso M, Perestelo-Pérez L, Garcia M, Sala M, Rué M. [Informed choice in breast cancer screening: the role of education]. GACETA SANITARIA 2020; 35:243-249. [PMID: 32173050 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in informed choice, according to educational level. METHOD Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled study, in four screening programs, in Catalonia and the Canary Islands (Spain). We analyzed 400 women who were going to be invited to participate for the first time. The intervention group received a decision aid that showed the benefits and harms of screening. The control group received a standard brochure that recommended participating in the screening program. Educational level was grouped into two categories, low and high. The primary outcome was informed choice defined as adequate knowledge and consistency between attitudes and intentions. RESULTS The intervention produced a greater increase in knowledge in women with a high educational level compared to those with a lower educational level. Among women who received the intervention, informed choice was almost three times higher in those with a high educational level (27% versus 11%). No differences were observed between educational levels in decisional conflict, confidence in the decision, anxiety and worry about breast cancer, in the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS A decision aid for breast cancer screening had much more impact on informed choice among women with a high educational level. In women with low educational level, the attitude towards screening improved and there was an increase in the intention to be screened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
- Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida - Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Anàlisi Estadística i Econòmica en Salut (GRAEES), España
| | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España; Unidad de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Tenerife, España
| | - Montse Garcia
- Programa de Prevenció i Control del Càncer, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Maria Sala
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España; Servei d'Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar Institut d'Investigació Mèdica, Barcelona, España
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida - Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Anàlisi Estadística i Econòmica en Salut (GRAEES), España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
Pickles K, Kazda L, Barratt A, McGeechan K, Hersch J, McCaffery K. Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227304. [PMID: 31940376 PMCID: PMC6961909 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australian clinicians are advised to 'offer evidence-based decisional support to men considering whether or not to have a PSA test'. This randomised trial compared the performance and acceptability of two new decision aids (DAs) to aid men in making informed choices about PSA screening. METHODS ~3000 Australian men 45-60 years with varying educational attainment were recruited via an online panel and randomised to view one of two online decision aids (one full length, one abbreviated) and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was informed choice about PSA screening. FINDINGS Significantly more men in the long DA group (38%) made an informed choice than men who received the shorter DA (33%) (95% CI 1.1% to 8.2%; p = 0.008). On knowledge, the long DA group scored, on average, 0.45 points higher than the short DA group (95% CI 0.14 to 0.76; p = 0.004) and 5% more of the participants achieved an adequate knowledge score (95% CI 1.9% to 8.8%; p = 0.002). Men allocated the long DA were less likely to intend to have a PSA test in the future (53%) than men in the short DA group (59%). Both DAs rated highly on acceptability. CONCLUSIONS Both DAs were useful and acceptable to men regardless of education level and both supported informed decision making. The long version resulted in higher knowledge, and a higher proportion of men able to make an informed choice, but the differences were small. Long DAs may be useful for men whose informational needs are not satisfied by a short DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Pickles
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luise Kazda
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Woudstra AJ, Smets EMA, Verdam MGE, Fransen MP. The Role of Health Literacy in Explaining the Relation between Educational Level and Decision Making about Colorectal Cancer Screening. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16234644. [PMID: 31766603 PMCID: PMC6926788 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about why educational inequalities exist in informed decision making in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Insight into the role and impact of health literacy is essential for intervention development. This study investigates associations between health literacy and informed decision making in CRC screening and explores to what extent health literacy mediates the association between education and informed decision making in CRC screening. In total, 696 individuals eligible for CRC screening (55–75 years of age) were recruited from online panels and filled in an online questionnaire at T0 (n = 696), T1 (n = 407) and T2 (n = 327). A hypothetical mediation model was tested using structural equation modelling. Outcomes included CRC knowledge, CRC screening knowledge, attitude, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, risk perception, self-efficacy, decisional conflict and decisional certainty. Health literacy domains included Comprehension, Application, Numeracy and Communication. Comprehension, Application and Numeracy, were found to mediate the association between education and knowledge about CRC and CRC screening, injunctive norm, descriptive norm, decisional conflict and decisional certainty. In light of these findings, targeting multiple health literacy domains in decision-support interventions is essential for facilitating informed decision making in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke J. Woudstra
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.M.A.S.); (M.G.E.V.)
| | - Mathilde G. E. Verdam
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (E.M.A.S.); (M.G.E.V.)
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P. Fransen
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Schonberg MA, Jacobson AR, Aliberti GM, Hayes M, Hackman A, Karamourtopolous M, Kistler C. Primary Care-Based Staff Ideas for Implementing a Mammography Decision Aid for Women 75+: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:2414-2420. [PMID: 31485969 PMCID: PMC6848349 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05239-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously developed a pamphlet decision aid (DA) on mammography screening for women ≥ 75 years. However, implementing DAs in primary care may be challenging and may require support from non-physician healthcare team members. OBJECTIVE To learn from primary care administrators, nurses, and staff their thoughts on how best to implement a mammography DA for women ≥ 75 years in practice. DESIGN Qualitative study entailing in-person individual interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-two non-physician healthcare team members (69.6% of those approached) participated from 8 different primary care practices (community and academic) in the Boston area or in Chapel Hill, NC. APPROACH Participants were asked to provide feedback on the DA, their thoughts on ways to make the DA available to older women, and factors that would make it easier and/or harder to implement. KEY RESULTS Participants felt the DA was clear, balanced, and understandable, but felt that it needed to be shorter for women with low health literacy. Most participants felt that as long as use of the DA was approved and supported by clinicians that women ≥ 75 years should receive the DA before a visit from staff (usually medical assistants) so that patients could ask their clinicians questions during the visit. Facilitators of DA use included its perceived helpfulness with decision-making, its format, and that existing systems (panel management, electronic medical record alerts) could be accessed to get the DA to patients especially at Medicare Annual Wellness visits. Participants perceived a need for training, albeit minimal, to provide the DA to patients. Barriers of DA use included competing demands on clinician and staff time. CONCLUSIONS Participants felt that as long as use of the mammography DA for women ≥ 75 years was supported by clinicians, it would be feasible to implement with minimal refinements to existing healthcare system processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara A Schonberg
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | - Michelle Hayes
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Christine Kistler
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Ousseine YM, Durand MA, Bouhnik AD, Smith AʻB, Mancini J. Multiple health literacy dimensions are associated with physicians' efforts to achieve shared decision-making. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1949-1956. [PMID: 31130338 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Shared decision-making (SDM) in health care is widely encouraged. However, for SDM to occur patients need to be able to obtain, understand and apply medical information. Our aim was to assess the relationship between health literacy (HL), numeracy and SDM (using French translations of validated measures). METHODS A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered online questionnaire was proposed to all members of the Seintinelles association. Several scales were used to measure HL (FCCHL and 3HLQ/SILS), numeracy (SNS-3), the SDM process (CollaboRATE) and explore their inter-relationships. RESULTS Data from 2 299 respondents (96.7% women, 46.1% with a history of cancer) were analysed. All measurement scales showed adequate psychometric properties. Functional HL, communicative HL and numeracy were positively associated with SDM while no significant relation was observed between critical HL and SDM. Furthermore, perceived difficulties in asking physicians' questions and deprivation were negatively associated with SDM. CONCLUSION Patient support to reach SDM requires high levels of HL, particularly in the functional and communicative domains. Efforts must be made to improve access and understanding of health information. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Brief self-reported measures could be used to screen for low levels of health literacy, tailor information accordingly and improve patient involvement in healthcare decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssoufa M Ousseine
- "Cancer, Biomedicine & Society" group, SESSTIM, INSERM, IRD, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Anne-Déborah Bouhnik
- "Cancer, Biomedicine & Society" group, SESSTIM, INSERM, IRD, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Allan ʻBen' Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research & South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Julien Mancini
- "Cancer, Biomedicine & Society" group, SESSTIM, BIOSTIC, APHM, INSERM, IRD, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Speller B, Metcalfe K, Kennedy ED, Facey M, Greenblatt E, Scheer AS, Warner E, Joy AA, Wright FC, Baxter NN. The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:203. [PMID: 31660965 PMCID: PMC6819618 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0912-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Premenopausal breast cancer patients are at risk of treatment-related infertility. Many patients do not receive sufficient fertility information before treatment. As such, our team developed and alpha tested the Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks, and Expectations decision aid (BEFORE DA). METHODS The BEFORE DA development process was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Our team used integrated knowledge translation by collaborating with multiple stakeholders throughout the development process including breast cancer survivors, multi-disciplinary health care providers (HCPs), advocates, and cancer organization representatives. Based on previously conducted literature reviews and a needs assessment by our team - we developed a paper prototype. The paper prototype was finalized at an engagement meeting with stakeholders and created into a graphically designed paper and mirrored online decision aid. Alpha testing was conducted with new and previously engaged stakeholders through a questionnaire, telephone interviews, or focus group. Iterative reviews followed each step in the development process to ensure a wide range of stakeholder input. RESULTS Our team developed an 18-page paper prototype containing information deemed valuable by stakeholders for fertility decision-making. The engagement meeting brought together 28 stakeholders to finalize the prototype. Alpha testing of the paper and online BEFORE DA occurred with 17 participants. Participants found the BEFORE DA usable, acceptable, and most provided enthusiastic support for its use with premenopausal breast cancer patients facing a fertility decision. Participants also identified areas for improvement including clarifying content/messages and modifying the design/photos. The final BEFORE DA is a 32-page paper and mirrored online decision aid ( https://fertilityaid.rethinkbreastcancer.com ). The BEFORE DA includes information on fertility, fertility options before/after treatment, values clarification, question list, next steps, glossary and reference list, and tailored information on the cost of fertility preservation and additional resources by geographic location. CONCLUSION The BEFORE DA, designed in collaboration with stakeholders, is a new tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients and HCPs to assist with fertility discussions and decision-making. The BEFORE DA helps to fill the information gap as it is a tool that HCPs can refer patients to for supplementary information surrounding fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Speller
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erin D Kennedy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcia Facey
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ellen Greenblatt
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena S Scheer
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anil Abraham Joy
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frances C Wright
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 040-16 Cardinal Carter Wing, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
McAlpine K, Lewis KB, Trevena LJ, Stacey D. What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019; 2:1-13. [PMID: 30652610 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids when used with patients who face cancer-related decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two reviewers independently screened the 105 trials in the original 2017 Cochrane review to identify eligible trials of patient decision aids across the cancer continuum. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice and decision-making process. Secondary outcomes were patient behavior and health system effects. A meta-analysis was conducted for similar outcome measures. RESULTS Forty-six trials evaluated patient decision aids for cancer care, including 27 on screening decisions (59%), 12 on treatments (26%), four on genetic testing (9%), and three on prevention (6%). Common decisions were aboutprostate cancer screening (30%), colorectal cancer screening (22%), breast cancer treatment (13%), and prostate cancer treatment (9%). Compared with the control groups (usual care or alternative interventions), the patient decision aid group improved the match between the chosen option and the features that mattered most to the patient as demonstrated by improved knowledge (weighted mean difference, 12.88 of 100; 95% CI, 9.87 to 15.89; 24 trials), accurate risk perception (risk ratio [RR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.56; six trials), and value-choice agreement (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.57 to 4.84; nine trials). Compared with controls, the patient decision aid group improved the decision-making process with decreased decisional conflict (weighted mean difference, -9.56 of 100; 95% CI, -13.90 to -5.23; 12 trials), reduced clinician-controlled decision making (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79; eight trials), and fewer patients being indecisive (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.78; nine trials). CONCLUSION Patient decision aids improve the attributes of the choice made and decision-making process for patients who face cancer-related decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen McAlpine
- Kristen McAlpine, Krystina B. Lewis, and Dawn Stacey, University of Ottawa; Dawn Stacey, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Lyndal J. Trevena, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Krystina B Lewis
- Kristen McAlpine, Krystina B. Lewis, and Dawn Stacey, University of Ottawa; Dawn Stacey, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Lyndal J. Trevena, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lyndal J Trevena
- Kristen McAlpine, Krystina B. Lewis, and Dawn Stacey, University of Ottawa; Dawn Stacey, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Lyndal J. Trevena, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Kristen McAlpine, Krystina B. Lewis, and Dawn Stacey, University of Ottawa; Dawn Stacey, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Lyndal J. Trevena, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Bonner C, Fajardo MA, Doust J, McCaffery K, Trevena L. Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility. Implement Sci 2019; 14:86. [PMID: 31466526 PMCID: PMC6716813 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0927-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines based on absolute risk assessment is poor around the world, including Australia. Behavioural barriers amongst GPs and patients include capability (e.g. difficulty communicating/understanding risk) and motivation (e.g. attitudes towards guidelines/medication). This paper outlines the theory-based development of a website for GP guidelines, and piloting of a new risk calculator/decision aid. METHODS Stage 1 involved identifying evidence-based solutions using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework, informed by previous research involving 400 GPs and 600 patients/consumers. Stage 2 co-developed website content with GPs. Stage 3 piloted a prototype website at a national GP conference. Stage 4 iteratively improved the website based on "think aloud" interviews with GPs and patients. Stage 5 was a feasibility study to evaluate potential efficacy (guidelines-based recommendations for each risk category), acceptability (intended use) and demand (actual use over 1 month) amongst GPs (n = 98). RESULTS Stage 1 identified GPs as the target for behaviour change; the need for a new risk calculator/decision aid linked to existing audit and feedback training; and online guidelines as a delivery format. Stage 2-4 iteratively improved content and format based on qualitative feedback from GP and patient user testing over three rounds of website development. Stage 5 suggested potential efficacy with improved identification of hypothetical high risk patients (from 26 to 76%) and recommended medication (from 57 to 86%) after viewing the website (n = 42), but prescribing to low risk patients remained similar (from 19 to 22%; n = 37). Most GPs (89%) indicated they would use the website in the next month, and 72% reported using it again after one month (n = 98). Open feedback identified implementation barriers including a need for integration with medical software, low health literacy resources and pre-consultation assessment. CONCLUSIONS Following a theory-based development process and user co-design, the resulting intervention was acceptable to GPs with high intentions for use, improved identification of patient risk categories and more guidelines-based prescribing intentions for high risk but not low risk patients. The effectiveness of linking the intervention to clinical practice more closely to address implementation barriers will be evaluated in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Bonner
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, ASK-GP Centre of Research Excellence, Rm 128 Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Michael Anthony Fajardo
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, ASK-GP Centre of Research Excellence, Rm 128 Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Bond University, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, ASK-GP Centre of Research Excellence, Robina, QLD Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, ASK-GP Centre of Research Excellence, Rm 128 Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, ASK-GP Centre of Research Excellence, Rm 128 Edward Ford Building (A27), Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Garcia-Codina O, Juvinyà-Canal D, Amil-Bujan P, Bertran-Noguer C, González-Mestre MA, Masachs-Fatjo E, Santaeugènia SJ, Magrinyà-Rull P, Saltó-Cerezuela E. Determinants of health literacy in the general population: results of the Catalan health survey. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1122. [PMID: 31420029 PMCID: PMC6698033 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7381-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health Literacy (HL) is the knowledge and competence to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information for health judgment. We analyze for the first time HL level of Catalonia’s population. Our objective was to assess HL of population in our area and to identify social determinants of HL in order to improve the strategies of the Healthcare Plan, aimed at establishing a person-centered system and reducing social inequalities in health. Methods This was a cross-sectional study based on the Health Survey for Catalonia (ESCA, Enquesta de Salut de Catalunya), which included the 16 items of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16). The statements in the questionnaire cover three different health literacy domains: Health Care, Disease Prevention, and Health Promotion. HL was categorized in three levels: Sufficient, Problematic and Inadequate. Chi-square tests were performed to compare the percentages of subjects with adequate or inadequate HL across sociodemographic and health-related variables. Variables showing significant differences were included in a stepwise logistic regression to predict inadequate HL level. Results The questionnaire was administered to 2433 subjects aged between 15 and 98 years old (mean of 45.9 years, SD 18.0). Overall, 2059 subjects (84.6%) showed sufficient HL, 250 (10.3%) inadequate HL, and 124 (5.1%) problematic HL, with no significant differences between men and women (p = 0.070). A logistic regression analysis showed that low health literacy is associated with a lower level of education (OR 2.08, CI 95% 1.32–3.28, p = 0.002), low socioeconomic status (OR 2.11, CI 95% 1.42–3.15, p < 0.001) and a physical limitation to perform everyday activities (OR 2.50, CI 95% 1.34–4.66, p = 0.004). We also found a more modest association with low physical activity, having a self-perceived chronic disorder and performing preventive activities. Conclusions Catalonia has a high percentage of subjects with sufficient HL. Education level, socioeconomic status and physical limitations were the factors with the strongest contribution to inadequate or problematic health literacy. Although these results are likely to be country-specific, the factors identified will allow policymakers of areas with similar socioeconomic profiles to identify groups with high risk of problematic or inadequate HL, which is essential for a successful patient-centered model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Garcia-Codina
- Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolors Juvinyà-Canal
- Research Group Health and Health Care, University of Girona, Plaça de Sant Domènec, 3, 17004, Girona, Spain.
| | - Paloma Amil-Bujan
- Chronicity Prevention and Care Programme, Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Bertran-Noguer
- Research Group Health and Health Care, University of Girona, Plaça de Sant Domènec, 3, 17004, Girona, Spain
| | - María Asunción González-Mestre
- Chronicity Prevention and Care Programme, Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eulàlia Masachs-Fatjo
- Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sebastià J Santaeugènia
- Central Catalonia Chronicity Research Group (C3RG), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic - University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain.,Chronic Care Program, Ministry of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Pilar Magrinyà-Rull
- Health Planning General Directorate, Ministry of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
83
|
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1726-1734. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Does the use of an online decision aid (DA) about fertility preservation (FP), in addition to standard counselling by a specialist in reproductive medicine, reduce decisional conflict compared to standard counselling alone?
Summary answer
Female cancer patients who could make use of the online DA had a significantly lower short-term decisional conflict score.
What is known already
Nowadays, female cancer patients have several options for preserving fertility, but having to decide whether to opt for FP within a short time frame after cancer diagnosis and before the start of treatment is challenging. According to previous studies focussing mainly on breast cancer patients, decisional conflict among these women is high, and they have expressed the need for additional support.
Study design, size, duration
The study was a randomized controlled trial including female cancer patients who were referred by their treating oncologist to a specialist in reproductive medicine for fertility counselling. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group (counselling only) or to the intervention group (counselling and additional use of the online DA immediately after counselling). Recruitment was ongoing from July 2016 to December 2017 at eight fertility centres in Switzerland and Germany.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
The online DA was developed by an interdisciplinary team of specialists in reproductive medicine, gynaecologists, oncologists and psychologists. Of 79 recruited participants, 59 completed the first assessment and could therefore be enrolled in the study. They were asked to complete an online questionnaire at three time points: at T1, after counselling (control group, n = 27) or after counselling and the additional use of the DA (intervention group, n = 24); at T2, 1 month later (N = 41: control group, n = 23; intervention group, n = 18); and at T3, 12 months later (N = 37: control group, n = 20; intervention group, n = 17). The survey comprised questions about fertility-related knowledge, attitude towards FP, willingness to undergo FP and socio-demographic data, as well as the decisional conflict and decisional regret scales.
Main results and the role of chance
All participants showed low decisional conflict scores. Women who used the online DA in addition to counselling (intervention group) showed a significantly lower total score on the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) compared to the control group at T1 (P = 0.008; M = 12.15, SD = 4.38; 95% CI, 3.35–20.95) and at T2 (P = 0.043; M = 9.35, SD = 4.48; 95% CI, 0.31–18.38). At T3, the mean total score of the DCS was still lower in the intervention group compared to the control group; however, this group difference was no longer significant (P = 0.199, M = 6.86, SD = 5.24; 95% CI, −3.78 to 17.51). The majority of participants had already made a decision regarding FP (yes or no) at T1 (72.5%): 91.7% in the intervention group compared to 55.6% in the control group (P = 0.014). Those who had decided already at T1 showed significantly lower decisional conflict (P = 0.007; M = 13.69, SD = 4.89; 95% CI, 3.86–23.52). The average number of DA sessions per user was 2.23, and 80.8% of the participants completed the DA’s value clarification exercises. Participants in the intervention group were satisfied with the DA and would recommend it to other patients.
Limitations, reasons for caution
The recruitment of participants was challenging because of the emotionally difficult situation patients were in. This led to the limited sample size for final analysis. Education levels were high in two-thirds of the participants. It is difficult to say whether the DA would be equally effective in women with a lower educational background.
Wider implications of the findings
There is evidence that the DA served as a helpful complement to the decision-making process for young female cancer patients qualifying for FP. This is, to our knowledge, the first randomized controlled trial evaluating a DA targeted at patients with several cancer types and in a language other than English (i.e. German). This study contributes to extending the range of the still limited number of DAs in the context of FP.
Study funding/competing interest(s)
The study was supported by a research grant of the Swiss Cancer Research. The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Trial registration number
Clinicaltrials.gov, trial no. NCT02404883.
Trial registration date
19 March 2015
Date of first patient’s enrolment
4 July 2016
Collapse
|
84
|
Case BC, Qamer SZ, Gates EM, Srichai MB. Shared Decision Making in Cardiovascular Disease in the Outpatient Setting. JACC Case Rep 2019; 1:261-270. [PMID: 34316804 PMCID: PMC8301252 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The authors developed a patient decision aid (PDA) to educate patients regarding CAD. Patients were randomized to standard of care or a PDA. PDA group had increased medical knowledge of CAD and decreased decisional conflict. Patients presenting in an outpatient setting with symptoms may benefit from the use of a PDA. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C. Case
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Syed Z. Qamer
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Emily M. Gates
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Monvadi B. Srichai
- Division of Cardiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Kugbey N, Meyer-Weitz A, Oppong Asante K. Access to health information, health literacy and health-related quality of life among women living with breast cancer: Depression and anxiety as mediators. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1357-1363. [PMID: 30772116 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined the direct and indirect influences of health literacy and access to health information on the quality of life among 205 women living with breast cancer in Ghana. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was employed. The interviewer-administered instrument included the health literacy scale, questions on access and satisfaction with healthcare information, depression and anxiety scale, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer. RESULTS Access to health information and health literacy had significant indirect effects on quality of life through depression and anxiety. Whereas health literacy had direct influence on quality of life after controlling for other factors, access to information had no direct influence on quality of life. CONCLUSION Health literacy and access to health information improve quality of life in women living with breast cancer by reducing the levels of depression and anxiety. Depression and anxiety serve as possible mechanisms for the positive impacts of access to health information and health literacy on improved quality of life among breast cancer patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health care providers need to ensure that the information needs of patients are met in oncology practice to reduce their negative emotional states which would lead to improved health and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuworza Kugbey
- Discipline of Psychology, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Department of Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe-Campus, Volta Region, Ghana.
| | - Anna Meyer-Weitz
- Discipline of Psychology, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Kwaku Oppong Asante
- Discipline of Psychology, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Donnelly KZ, Elwyn G, Theiler R, Thompson R. Promoting or Undermining Quality Decision Making? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Patient Decision Aids Comparing Surgical and Medication Abortion. Womens Health Issues 2019; 29:414-423. [PMID: 31266679 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand, describe, and compare the content of patient decision aids on surgical and medication abortion, including 1) attributes used to describe each method, 2) approaches to clarify patients' values, 3) language used to describe each method, and 4) language used to frame women's decision-making role. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed 49 decision aids identified through a previous systematic review and environmental scan. We used summative content analysis for objectives 1 and 2 and directed content analysis for objectives 3 and 4. RESULTS We identified 37 method attributes. Overall, the attributes privileged medical over practical and emotional information. One decision aid included an explicit values clarification approach, and others included implicit approaches, which varied in length, information consistency, and organization. We identified four themes-information consistency, subjective claims, emotive or ambiguous descriptions, and medication abortion as not a real abortion-related to the methods' descriptions. We identified three themes-agency in choice, unclear emphasis on women's preferences, and endorsement of clinic services-related to women's decision-making role. Of the nine tools that listed factors influencing women's decision making, patient preferences was often listed last. CONCLUSIONS Early abortion method decision aids presented a broad range of information and typically framed the method choice as the woman's. However, their emphasis on medical attributes, use of inconsistent information, and, at times, biased presentation of methods may undermine quality decision making. We recommend adapting an existing decision aid or designing a novel tool based on the content and language that women find most acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyla Z Donnelly
- The Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Regan Theiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Pack AP, Golin CE, Hill LM, Carda-Auten J, Wallace DD, Cherkur S, Farel CE, Rosen EP, Gandhi M, Asher Prince HM, Kashuba ADM. Patient and clinician perspectives on optimizing graphical displays of longitudinal medication adherence data. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1090-1097. [PMID: 30626550 PMCID: PMC6525638 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New pharmacological measures assessing medication adherence, including longitudinal drug levels in hair, are emerging. Little is known, however, about how best to present results from such measures to patients and clinicians in comprehensive, easy-to-understand, acceptable formats. We, therefore, developed three graphical display prototypes of hypothetical daily drug concentrations measured in hair, and assessed their acceptability among participants. METHODS We interviewed 30 HIV-positive patients and 29 clinicians to examine perceived acceptability for each graphical display prototype. RESULTS Patients and clinicians generally found the prototypes acceptable for facilitating understanding of patient adherence; however, areas for optimization were identified. For patients with lower health literacy, prototypes did not provide sufficient understanding of the link between medication-taking and drug concentrations in hair. These patients also preferred pictographs over bar or line graphs. Clinicians largely preferred daily drug concentration data in bar graphs with information included about the measure's accuracy. Participants questioned the utility of showing drug concentrations above a therapeutic range, though they found color-coding results acceptable. CONCLUSIONS Assessing prototype versions of graphical displays of hypothetical longitudinal adherence data indicated ways to optimize their acceptability. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Acceptable prototype-tested graphical displays of longitudinal patient-specific drug concentrations may enhance adherence monitoring in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison P Pack
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
| | - Carol E Golin
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States; School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States; Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Lauren M Hill
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States; Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Jessica Carda-Auten
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Deshira D Wallace
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Sruthi Cherkur
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Claire E Farel
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Elias P Rosen
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Monica Gandhi
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | | | - Angela D M Kashuba
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Abstract
Decision aids, sometimes known as decision-support tools, are increasingly used to help patients to understand treatment options and to reach an informed decision consistent with their own values, yet methods for their economic evaluation have received limited attention. This is at odds with the increasingly rigorous methods being applied to assess the cost effectiveness of other health technologies. This paper reviews current approaches to evaluating decision aids and proposes a new method for assessing their benefits relative to other interventions in a resource-constrained health system that seeks to improve health, equity and patient satisfaction. Current evaluation frameworks are found to be unsuitable for the economic evaluation of decision aids since their objectives are broader than health maximisation. Decision aids may generate significant non-health benefits such as improved patient knowledge and satisfaction, which cannot be assessed using cost-utility analysis. A stated-preference consultation time trade-off (CTTO) is proposed in which a proportion of hypothetical physician consultation is traded for use of the decision aid. A decision aid provides information for a patient to make an informed choice and therefore may be considered to be a substitute for physician time. The CTTO can be reported in consultation minutes or converted to monetary units using the cost of physician time. These values may be used, alongside the implementation cost, for economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Butt
- National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.
- Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Guillén Ú, Mackley A, Laventhal N, Kukora S, Christ L, Derrick M, Batza J, Ghavam S, Kirpalani H. Evaluating the Use of a Decision Aid for Parents Facing Extremely Premature Delivery: A Randomized Trial. J Pediatr 2019; 209:52-60.e1. [PMID: 30952510 PMCID: PMC6625526 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess decisional conflict and knowledge about prematurity among mothers facing extreme premature delivery when the counseling clinicians were randomized to counsel using a validated decision aid compared with usual counseling. STUDY DESIGN In this randomized trial, clinicians at 5 level III neonatal intensive care units in the US were randomized to supplement counseling using the decision aid or to counsel mothers in their usual manner. We enrolled mothers with threatened premature delivery at 220/7 to 256/7 weeks of gestation within 7 days of their counseling. The primary outcome was the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) score. One hundred mothers per group were enrolled to detect a clinically relevant effect size of 0.4 in the Decisional Conflict Scale. Secondary outcomes included knowledge about prematurity; scores on the Preparedness for Decision Making scale; and acceptability. RESULTS Ninety-two clinicians were randomized and 316 mothers were counseled. Of these, 201 (64%) mothers were enrolled. The median gestational age was 24.1 weeks (IQR 23.7-24.9). In both groups, DCS scores were low (16.3 ± 18.2 vs 16.8 ± 17, P = .97) and Preparedness for Decision Making scores were high (73.4 ± 28.3 vs 70.5 ± 31.1, P = .33). There was a significantly greater knowledge score in the decision aid group (66.2 ± 18.5 vs 57.2 ± 18.8, P = .005). Most clinicians and parents found the decision aid useful. CONCLUSIONS For parents facing extremely premature delivery, use of a decision aid did not impact maternal decisional conflict, but it significantly improved knowledge of complex information. A structured decision aid may improve comprehension of complex information. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01713894.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Úrsula Guillén
- Division of Neonatology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
| | - Amy Mackley
- Division of Neonatology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE
| | - Naomi Laventhal
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Stephanie Kukora
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lori Christ
- Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew Derrick
- Division of Neonatology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Jennifer Batza
- Division of Neonatology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Sarvin Ghavam
- Division of Neonatology, Virtua Voorhees Hospital, Voorhees Township, NJ
| | - Haresh Kirpalani
- Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Bilodeau G, Witteman H, Légaré F, Lafontaine-Bruneau J, Voyer P, Kröger E, Tremblay MC, Giguere AMC. Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027727. [PMID: 31072861 PMCID: PMC6528048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patient decision aids' features to limit their complexity for older adults with dementia and their family caregivers. DESIGN Mixed method, multiple case study within a user-centred design (UCD) approach. SETTING Community-based healthcare in the province of Quebec in Canada. PARTICIPANTS 23 older persons (aged 65+ years) with dementia and their 27 family caregivers. RESULTS During three UCD evaluation-modification rounds, participants identified strengths and weaknesses of the patient decision aids' content and visual design that influenced their complexity. Weaknesses of content included a lack of understanding of the decision aids' purpose and target audience, missing information, irrelevant content and issues with terminology and sentence structure. Weaknesses of visual design included critics about the decision aids' general layout (density, length, navigation) and their lack of pictures. In response, the design team implemented a series of practical features and design strategies, comprising: a clear expression of the patient decision aids' purpose through simple text, picture and personal stories; systematic and frequent use of pictograms illustrating key points and helping structure patient decision aids' general layout; a glossary; removal of scientific references from the main document; personal stories to clarify more difficult concepts; a contact section to facilitate implementation of the selected option; GRADE ratings to convey the quality of the evidence; a values clarification exercise formatted as a checklist and presented at the beginning of the document to streamline navigation; involvement of a panel of patient/caregiver partners to guide expression of patient priorities; editing of the text to a sixth grade reading level; UCD process to optimise comprehensiveness and relevance of content and training of patients/caregivers in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The revised template for patient decision aids is designed to meet the needs of adults living with dementia and their caregivers better, which may translate into fewer evaluation-modification rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bilodeau
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Laval University, Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Center of Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CRCHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Voyer
- Faculte des Sciences Infirmieres de l'Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Noordman J, van Vliet L, Kaunang M, van den Muijsenbergh M, Boland G, van Dulmen S. Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18:37. [PMID: 30979368 PMCID: PMC6461806 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0421-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred palliative care poses high demands on professionals and patients regarding appropriate and effective communication and informed decision-making. This is even more so for patients with limited health literacy, as they lack the necessary skills to find, understand and apply information about their health and healthcare. Recognizing patients with limited health literacy and adapting the communication, information provision and decision-making process to their skills and needs is essential to achieve desired person-centred palliative care. The aim of this study is to summarize available strategies and tools for healthcare providers towards successful communication, information provision and/or shared decision-making in supporting patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries. METHODS A scoping review was conducted. First, databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched. Next, grey literature was examined using several online databases and by contacting national experts. In addition, all references of included studies were checked. RESULTS Five studies were included that showed that there are face-to-face, written as well as online strategies available for healthcare providers to support communication, information provision and, to a lesser extent, (shared) decision-making in palliative care for patients with limited health literacy. Strategies that were mentioned several times were: teach-back method, jargon-free communication and developing and testing materials with patients with limited health literacy, among others. Two supporting tools were found: patient decision aids and question prompt lists. CONCLUSIONS To guarantee high quality person-centred palliative care, the role of health literacy should be considered. Although there are several strategies available for healthcare providers to facilitate such communication, only few tools are offered. Moreover, the strategies and tools appear not specific for the setting of palliative care, but seem helpful for providers to support the communication, information provision and decision making with patients with limited health literacy in general. Future research should focus on which strategies or tools are (most) effective in supporting patients with limited health literacy in palliative care, and the implementation of these strategies and tools in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Noordman
- Nivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth van Vliet
- Nivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Menno Kaunang
- Nivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gudule Boland
- Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel, Netherlands institute for health services research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Macalalad-Josue AA, Palileo-Villanueva LA, Sandoval MA, Panuda JP. Development of a Patient Decision Aid on the Choice of Diabetes Medication for Filipino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc 2019; 34:44-55. [PMID: 33442136 PMCID: PMC7784104 DOI: 10.15605/jafes.034.01.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a locally adapted patient decision aid (PtDA) on treatment intensification among Filipino patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and to test the feasibility of using PtDAs in a low middle-income country. METHODOLOGY A qualitative approach and an iterative process of development of a PtDA were employed for this study. We describe the process of developing a Filipino version of the Diabetes Medication Decision Aid. This PtDA was designed to help the patient choose the appropriate treatment intensification based on his own values and preferences, in consultation with his physician. The process involved decisional needs assessment through focus group discussions and key informant interviews, systematic literature review, iterative process of the development of a PtDA with clinical encounters (pilot testing), and preliminary field testing. RESULTS Decisional needs assessment revealed that Filipino patients are open to participate in shared decision-making if given the opportunity, including those with low socioeconomic status who likely have low health literacy. Physicians prefer to have visual aid tools to help them support their patient's decision-making. A PtDA prototype of a set of flash cards in Filipino was created and revised in an iterative method. We developed a more visually appealing tool after inputs from the expert panel and patient advisory group. Its use during clinical encounters provided additional insights from patients and clinicians on how to improve the PtDA. Preliminary field testing showed that its use is feasible in the target patient population. CONCLUSION Filipino patients, clinicians, and diabetes nurse educators have contributed to the creation of the first Filipino PtDA for diabetes treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Angelica Macalalad-Josue
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| | | | - Mark Anthony Sandoval
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| | - Jose Paolo Panuda
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
|
94
|
Reder M, Soellner R, Kolip P. Do Women With High eHealth Literacy Profit More From a Decision Aid on Mammography Screening? Testing the Moderation Effect of the eHEALS in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Public Health 2019; 7:46. [PMID: 30931291 PMCID: PMC6424024 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Our decision aid on mammography screening developed according to the criteria of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Collaboration increases knowledge compared to usual care. However, it remains unclear whether this decision aid is more effective in women with higher eHealth literacy. Our objective was to test whether the positive effect of the decision aid on knowledge is moderated by eHealth literacy. Methods: A total of 1,206 women aged 50 from Westphalia-Lippe, Germany, participated (response rate of 16.3%) in our study and were randomized to usual care (i.e., the standard information brochure sent with the programme's invitation letter) or the decision aid. eHealth literacy was assessed at baseline with the Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS); knowledge was assessed at baseline and post-intervention. First, we compared the 2-factor model of the German eHEALS (information-seeking and information-appraisal) found in previous research and the 3-factor model we hypothesized for decision aid use to the originally proposed 1-factor model. Second, we modeled the measurement model according to the superior factor model found in step one and tested whether the eHEALS moderated the effect of the decision aid on knowledge. Results: The 3-factor model of the eHEALS had a better model fit than the 1-factor or 2-factor model. Both information-seeking, information-appraisal, and information-use had no effect on knowledge post-intervention. All three interactions of the decision aid with information-seeking, information-appraisal, and information-use were not significant. Equally, neither education nor its interaction with the decision aid had an effect on knowledge post-intervention. Conclusion: The decision aid developed in this project increases knowledge irrespective of level of eHealth literacy. This means that not only women with high eHealth literacy profit from the decision aid but that the decision aid has been successfully conceptualized as a comprehensible information tool that can be used by women of varying eHealth literacy levels. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005176 (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00005176).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maren Reder
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Institute for Psychology, Department of Education and Social Sciences, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Renate Soellner
- Institute for Psychology, Department of Education and Social Sciences, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Petra Kolip
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Bilkey GA, Burns BL, Coles EP, Bowman FL, Beilby JP, Pachter NS, Baynam G, J. S. Dawkins H, Nowak KJ, Weeramanthri TS. Genomic Testing for Human Health and Disease Across the Life Cycle: Applications and Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges. Front Public Health 2019; 7:40. [PMID: 30915323 PMCID: PMC6421958 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The expanding use of genomic technologies encompasses all phases of life, from the embryo to the elderly, and even the posthumous phase. In this paper, we present the spectrum of genomic healthcare applications, and describe their scope and challenges at different stages of the life cycle. The integration of genomic technology into healthcare presents unique ethical issues that challenge traditional aspects of healthcare delivery. These challenges include the different definitions of utility as applied to genomic information; the particular characteristics of genetic data that influence how it might be protected, used and shared; and the difficulties applying existing models of informed consent, and how new consent models might be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma A. Bilkey
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
- Office of the Chief Health Officer, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Belinda L. Burns
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Emily P. Coles
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Faye L. Bowman
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - John P. Beilby
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Nicholas S. Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Gareth Baynam
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia and Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Hugh J. S. Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Sir Walter Murdoch School of Policy and International Affairs, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
- School of Public Health, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Kristen J. Nowak
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Tarun S. Weeramanthri
- Office of the Chief Health Officer, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, East Perth, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Abstract
Extensive literature suggests that a solution to the current problems of healthcare sustainability is the active involvement of patients in health management through the empowerment of their abilities. Latest marketing frameworks suggest that patients are important resources for co-creating health value together with operators. This research aims to analyze the effects of patient empowerment on patients’ value co-creation behaviors. An empirical survey was conducted on 250 patients with chronic diseases in Italy. The results, analyzed using the structural equation modeling, showed that their empowerment enhanced value co-creation behaviors. Patients apply their health competencies and resources in their co-creation of health service with operators. It is, therefore, important to empower patients in their transformation from passive to active stakeholders, working with providers for the most optimal health outcomes. This research provides practitioners with suggestions for patient involvement which utilizes their knowledge, capabilities and responsibility to improving healthcare services.
Collapse
|
97
|
Mangla M, Bedair H, Dwyer M, Freiberg A, Sepucha K. Pilot Study Examining Feasibility and Comparing the Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4:2381468319827278. [PMID: 30801033 PMCID: PMC6378444 DOI: 10.1177/2381468319827278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. There are many patient decision aids (DAs) available, yet there is limited evidence on comparative effectiveness of different tools. Objective. To examine feasibility of a study protocol and gather preliminary data on comparative effectiveness. Methods. Adult patients seeing a surgeon to discuss treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis were randomized to hip and knee DAs from two vendors. Pre-visit survey included Hip/Knee Decision Quality Instrument, DA usage, health literacy, and quality of life (EQ-5D). Surgical status was ascertained 6 months post-visit. We examined response rates, eligibility, and compared the two DAs on amount of use, knowledge scores, and receipt of preferred treatment. Results. Overall response rate was 58/74 (78%) and did not differ by study arm. More patients in DA-A group reported reviewing all the DAs (64.5% DA-A v. 24.0% DA-B, P = 0.003). Knowledge scores were similar across arms (55.2% DA-A v. 48.8% DA-B, P = 0.4). For DA-B, knowledge scores were higher for those who reviewed all the DAs compared with those who did not (80% knowledge v. 39% knowledge, respectively, P = 0.004), while scores for DA-A did not vary by usage (62% knowledge v. 53% knowledge, respectively, P = 0.3). A similar percentage of each group received their preferred treatment (77% v. 73%, P = 0.8). Patients who were unsure about preferred treatment at baseline were more likely to have surgery in the DA-A arm compared with the DA-B arm (55% v. 20%, P = 0.1). Limitations. Small sample; patients were only surveyed pre-visit. Conclusion. Despite having different content and formats, the two DAs had similar overall effectiveness. Patients were more likely to review all of DA-A; however, patients who reviewed all of DA-B had the highest knowledge scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahima Mangla
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Hany Bedair
- Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | - Andrew Freiberg
- Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Mangla M, Bedair H, Chang Y, Daggett S, Dwyer MK, Freiberg AA, Mwangi S, Talmo C, Vo H, Sepucha K. Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024906. [PMID: 30804032 PMCID: PMC6443066 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on the quality of treatment decisions for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). TRIAL DESIGN A 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING One academic medical centre, one community hospital and one orthopaedic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS The enrolment targets were 8 surgeons and 1120 patients diagnosed with hip or knee OA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different decision aids (DAs) stratified by site. The DAs varied in length, content and the level of detail regarding treatment options. Both DAs were available by paper or online.Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive a report detailing patients' goals and treatment preferences at the time of the visit or not. Eligible patients received their assigned DA before their visit and completed three surveys: before the visit (timepoint (T)1), 1-week postvisit (T2) and 6 months from either the visit date or surgery date for patients who underwent surgery (T3). Study staff and participating surgeons were not blinded, but the statistician conducting the analyses was blinded to the arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS The primary study outcome was decision quality, the percentage of patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment. Secondary outcomes included involvement in decision making, surgical rates, health outcomes, decision regret and satisfaction. A logistic regression model with the generalised estimating equations approach was used to compare rates of decision quality between the groups and account for the clustering of patients within providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained through the institutional review board at the main site. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02729831; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahima Mangla
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hany Bedair
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susannah Daggett
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maureen K Dwyer
- Kaplan Joint Center, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew A Freiberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sheila Mwangi
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carl Talmo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ha Vo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Speller B, Sissons A, Daly C, Facey M, Kennedy E, Metcalfe K, Baxter NN. An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:101. [PMID: 30728004 PMCID: PMC6366104 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3901-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients of reproductive age are at risk of infertility as a result of their treatment. Oncofertility decision support resources can assist patients with fertility decision-making before treatment yet available oncofertility resources contain varying levels of detail and different fertility options. The key information/sections needed in oncofertility resources remain unclear. To explore the information needs for oncofertility decision-making before cancer treatment, we aimed to evaluate existing oncofertility decision support resources with breast cancer patients and providers. METHODS We conducted 30 to 90-min interviews that included a survey questionnaire and open-ended questions with patients and providers between March and June 2016. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Analysis involved descriptive statistics for survey responses and thematic analysis of qualitative data. RESULTS A total of 16 participants completed interviews. Key information perceived by most participants as necessary for fertility decision-making included tailored post-treatment pregnancy rates, cost ranges and financial assistance for the fertility options based on patients' situation. However, patient and provider participants expressed differing opinions on the inclusion of all before and after treatment fertility options and the amount of fertility information required at diagnosis. CONCLUSION The evaluation identified fertility information needs among patients in addition to providers' views on patient needs. While existing oncofertility resources contain information perceived as necessary for decision-making there is an opportunity to use these findings to create or enhance resources to better meet the needs of patients. Additionally, patients and providers differing views on information needs highlight the opportunity for provider training to ensure better communication using resources in clinic to understand specific patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Speller
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amanda Sissons
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Corinne Daly
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcia Facey
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Brenner AT. Beginning with high value care in mind: A scoping review and toolkit to support the content, delivery, measurement, and sustainment of high value care. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:238-252. [PMID: 30553576 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create a shared vision for the content, delivery, measurement, and sustainment of patient-centered high value care. METHODS We performed a scoping review and translated findings into toolkit for system leaders. For our scoping review, we searched Medline, 2005-November 2015, for literature on patient-centered care (PCC) and its relationship to a high value care change model. We supplemented searches with key author, Google Scholar, and key website searches. One author reviewed all titles, abstracts, and articles for inclusion; another reviewed a random 20%. To develop our toolkit, we translated evidence into simple, actionable briefs on key topics and added resources. We then iteratively circulated briefs and the overall toolkit to potential users, making updates as needed. RESULTS In our scoping review, we found multiple interventions and measures to support the components of PCC and our change model. We found little on the overall effects of PCC or how PCC creates value. Potential users reported our toolkit was simple, understandable, thorough, timely, and likely to be globally useful. CONCLUSIONS Considerable evidence supports patient-centered high value care and a toolkit garnered enthusiasm. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The toolkit is ready for use, but needs comparison to other approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katrina E Donahue
- Reaching for High Value Care Team, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Reaching for High Value Care Team, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|