51
|
Nelson LA, Roddy MK, Bergner EM, Gonzalez J, Gentry C, LeStourgeon LM, Kripalani S, Hull PC, Mayberry LS. Exploring determinants and strategies for implementing self-management support text messaging interventions in safety net clinics. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e126. [PMID: 36590364 PMCID: PMC9794969 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Text message-delivered interventions for chronic disease self-management have potential to reduce health disparities, yet limited research has explored implementing these interventions into clinical care. We partnered with safety net clinics to evaluate a texting intervention for type 2 diabetes called REACH (Rapid Encouragement/Education And Communications for Health) in a randomized controlled trial. Following evaluation, we explored potential implementation determinants and recommended implementation strategies. Methods We interviewed clinic staff (n = 14) and a subset of intervention participants (n = 36) to ask about REACH's implementation potential. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an organizing framework, we coded transcripts and used thematic analysis to derive implementation barriers and facilitators. We integrated the CFIR-ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) Matching Tool, interview feedback, and the literature to recommend implementation strategies. Results Implementation facilitators included low complexity, strong evidence and quality, available clinic resources, the need for a program to support diabetes self-management, and strong fit between REACH and both the clinics' existing workflows and patients' needs and resources. The barriers included REACH only being available in English, a lack of interoperability with electronic health record systems, patients' concerns about diabetes stigma, limited funding, and high staff turnover. Categories of recommended implementation strategies included training and education, offering flexibility and adaptation, evaluating key processes, and securing funding. Conclusion Text message-delivered interventions have strong potential for integration in low-resource settings as a supplement to care. Pursuing implementation can ensure patients benefit from these innovations and help close the research to practice gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay A. Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - McKenzie K. Roddy
- Quality Scholars Program, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, US Department of Veteran Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin M. Bergner
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jesus Gonzalez
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chad Gentry
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Lipscomb University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Sunil Kripalani
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pamela C. Hull
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Lindsay S. Mayberry
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Valente JY, Galvão PPDO, Gusmoes JDSP, Sanchez ZM. Revisão sistemática sobre o efeito do programa escolar de prevenção ao uso de drogas Keepin’ it REAL: traduzido e implementado no Brasil pelo PROERD. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2022; 27:4175-4189. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320222711.07162022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo O Programa Educacional de Resistência às Drogas (PROERD) é o programa escolar de prevenção mais disseminado no Brasil, seu atual currículo é baseado no programa norte-americano Keepin’it REAL (kiR). Não há na literatura evidência de efetividade do PROERD na prevenção ao uso de drogas, sendo necessários estudos complementares que auxiliem a compreensão desses achados. O objetivo do presente estudo é realizar uma síntese das evidências do efeito do currículo que deu origem ao PROERD: o kiR. Através de revisão sistemática encontrou-se 17 estudos que reportaram resultados de efeito de diferentes versões do kiR no uso de drogas e/ou violência. Com exceção do estudo brasileiro, não foram encontrados estudos que avaliassem o efeito no uso de drogas da versão aplicada por policiais (DARE-kiR), a mesma implementada pelo PROERD. Foram encontradas evidências favoráveis do kiR na prevenção ao uso de drogas para o currículo do 7º ano, que contrariam os resultados de efeito nulo do PROERD. Não foram encontradas evidências internacionais do efeito do kiR no currículo do 5º ano, assim como o estudo do PROERD. Sugere-se que revisões no currículo do 7º ano do PROERD para que ele possa refletir os resultados internacionais e que o currículo do 5º ano posso ser repensado considerando as evidências negativas internacionais.
Collapse
|
53
|
Valente JY, Galvão PPDO, Gusmoes JDSP, Sanchez ZM. A systematic review of the effect of the school-based drug prevention program Keepin’ it REAL: translated and implemented in Brazil by PROERD. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320222711.07162022en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract The Drug Resistance Educational Program (PROERD) is Brazil’s most widespread school-based prevention program; its current curriculum is based on the North American Keepin’ it REAL (kiR) program. There is no evidence of the effectiveness of PROERD in preventing drug use, pointing to the need for further studies to understand these findings. The aim of the study was to synthesis the evidence of the effect of the kiR curriculum (PROERD) through a systematic review. We found 17 studies that reported the effects of different versions of kiR on drug use and/or violence. Except for the Brazilian study, no studies were found that assessed the effect on drug use of the version applied by police officers (DARE-kiR), the same one implemented by PROERD. Favorable evidence of kiR in drug use prevention was found for the 7th-grade curriculum, which contradicts the PROERD’s null-effect results. No international evidence of the effect of kiR was found in the 5th-grade curriculum, in the same line as the PROERD’s study. It is suggested that PROERD’s 7th-grade curriculum should be revised to reflect international results and that the 5th-grade curriculum should be reconsidered in light of the negative international evidence.
Collapse
|
54
|
Escoffery C, Foster M, Fernández ME, Haardörfer R, Mullen PD. Are Training and Experience Adapting Evidence-Based Interventions Associated With Self-Efficacy and Attitudes? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Students and Practitioners With Varying Levels of Adaptation Experience. Health Promot Pract 2022; 23:1105-1115. [PMID: 33906509 PMCID: PMC10804319 DOI: 10.1177/15248399211006490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Increasing use of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in local settings will help reduce the research-practice gap and improve health equity. Because adaptation to new settings and populations is essential to effective EBI use, frameworks to guide practice are receiving more attention; most, however, only provide broad guidelines without instructions for making adaptations in practice. Therefore, practitioners may need additional training or technical assistance (TA) to implement and adapt EBIs. This study explores whether practitioners' and students' general EBI training or TA and level of adaptation experience are associated with self-efficacy in adapting EBIs and with attitudes toward EBI use. We analyzed baseline survey data of participants in an evaluation of IM-Adapt Online, a newly developed decision support tool. We asked about previous training on EBIs, general and specific adaptation behaviors, and attitudes toward EBIs and found an association between previous training or TA in using EBIs with higher self-efficacy for using and adapting EBIs. Respondents with prior EBI training were significantly more likely to have higher self-efficacy in EBI behaviors across subdomains and in total than those without training. Respondents reported lowest self-efficacy for planning adaptations (M = 3.35) and assessing fit of EBIs to their local context (M = 3.41). This study suggests the importance of EBI adaptation training and TA to increase adoption and adaptation of EBIs, subsequently. More adaptation-specific training is warranted to assist students, practitioners, and researchers undertaking the adaptation process and implement EBIs. Future training on EBI adaptation can help practitioners tailor EBIs to meet the specific needs of their populations.
Collapse
|
55
|
Copeland L, Littlecott HJ, Couturiaux D, Hoddinott P, Segrott J, Murphy S, Moore G, Evans RE. Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066451. [PMID: 36288840 PMCID: PMC9615984 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Research on the adaptation of population health interventions for implementation in new contexts is rapidly expanding. This has been accompanied by a recent increase in the number of frameworks and guidance to support adaptation processes. Nevertheless, there remains limited exploration of the real-world experiences of undertaking intervention adaptation, notably the challenges encountered by different groups of stakeholders, and how these are managed. Understanding experiences is imperative in ensuring that guidance to support adaptation has practical utility. This qualitative study examines researcher and stakeholder experiences of funding, conducting and reporting adaptation research. SETTING Adaptation studies. PARTICIPANTS Participants/cases were purposefully sampled to represent a range of adapted interventions, types of evaluations, expertise and countries. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of researchers (n=23), representatives from research funding panels (n=6), journal editors (n=5) and practitioners (n=3). MEASURES A case study research design was used. Data were analysed using the framework approach. Overarching themes were discussed within the study team, with further iterative refinement of subthemes. RESULTS The results generated four central themes. The first three relate to the experience of intervention adaptation (1) involving stakeholders throughout the adaptation process and how to integrate the evidence base with experience; (2) selecting the intervention and negotiating the mismatch between the original and the new context; and (3) the complexity and uncertainty when deciding the re-evaluation process. The final theme (4) reflects on participants' experiences of using adaptation frameworks in practice, considering recommendations for future guidance development and refinement. CONCLUSION This study highlights the range of complexities and challenges experienced in funding, conducting and reporting research on intervention adaptation. Moving forward, guidance can be helpful in systematising processes, provided that it remains responsive to local contexts and encourage innovative practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Copeland
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hannah J Littlecott
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health (PSPH), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Danielle Couturiaux
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Pat Hoddinott
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Simon Murphy
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Graham Moore
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rhiannon E Evans
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Lange BCL, Nelson A, Lang JM, Stirman SW. Adaptations of evidence-based trauma-focused interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:108. [PMID: 36209138 PMCID: PMC9548160 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and other forms of adversity among children are high globally, resulting in the development of a number of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to address the adverse outcomes stemming from these experiences. Though EBIs are intended to be delivered according to set parameters, these EBIs are frequently adapted. However, little is known about existing adaptations of EBIs for children who experienced PTEs or other adversities. As such, this review aimed to determine: (1) why existing EBIs designed to address PTEs and other adversities experienced by children are adapted, (2) what processes are used to determine what elements should be adapted, and (3) what components of the intervention are adapted. METHODS Nine academic databases and publicly available search engines were used to identify academic and grey literature. Initial screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality determinations were completed by two members of the research team. Data were synthesized narratively for each adapted EBI by research question. RESULTS Forty-two studies examining the adaptations of nine different EBIs were located, with Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools being the most commonly adapted EBIs. Most frequently, EBIs were adapted to improve fit with a new population and to address cultural factors. Most commonly, researchers in combination with others made decisions about adapting interventions, though frequently who was involved in these decisions was not described. Common content adaptations included the addition of intervention elements and the tailoring/tweaking/refining of intervention materials. Common contextual adaptations included changes to the intended population, changes to the channel of treatment delivery, and changes to who administered the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Most published studies of EBI adaptions have been developed to improve fit and address cultural factors, but little research is available about adaptations made by clinicians in day-to-day practice. Efforts should be made to evaluate the various types of adaptations and especially whether adaptations improve access to services or improve child outcomes in order to ensure that all children exposed to trauma can access effective treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol for this systematic review was published with PROSPERO (CRD42020149536).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany C. L. Lange
- grid.475976.eChild Health and Development Institute of Connecticut, Inc., Farmington, USA
| | - Ashley Nelson
- grid.475976.eChild Health and Development Institute of Connecticut, Inc., Farmington, USA
| | - Jason M. Lang
- grid.475976.eChild Health and Development Institute of Connecticut, Inc., Farmington, USA ,grid.208078.50000000419370394Department of Psychiatry, UCONN Health, Farmington, USA ,grid.47100.320000000419368710Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- grid.429666.90000 0004 0374 5948National Center for PTSD, Washington, D.C., USA ,grid.168010.e0000000419368956Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Decker MJ, Price M, Unti L, Firpo-Triplett R, Atyam T, Spitzer J, Coyle K. Monitoring unplanned sexual health curricula adaptations: Using results to improve fidelity and support implementation. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2022; 94:102126. [PMID: 35820289 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining fidelity to an evidence-based curriculum is important, yet educators may need to adapt to unexpected situations or particular contexts. The purpose of this study is to identify the reasons for unplanned adaptations during implementation of an evidence-based sexual health education program in California. Evaluators reviewed fidelity checklists from the implementation of 571 cohorts for activities with reported unplanned adaptations. Reasons were qualitatively coded and compared across two phases of implementation and by setting. Educators reported 319 unplanned adaptations, affecting 21.5% of the 571 cohorts and 2.9% of 13,782 activities. The most common reasons for unplanned adaptations were due to time management issues, site logistic issues, and to increase participant engagement. Over time, health educators reported fewer unplanned adaptations, particularly those due to time management, resulting in a decrease in the cohorts and activities affected. Adaptations to evidence-based curricula are necessary and often occur during implementation to fit local conditions and populations. Ongoing review of adaptation data provides an opportunity to refine training and technical assistance efforts. Guidance about the types of permitted adaptations and how to anticipate and plan for adaptations for future implementation can ensure fidelity to the core curriculum components and responsiveness to youth participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha J Decker
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 490 Illinois St, Floor 7, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, Floor 2, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Melisa Price
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, 490 Illinois St, Floor 7, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
| | - Lisa Unti
- ETR, 5619 Scotts Valley Dr, Suite 140, Scotts Valley, CA 95066, USA.
| | | | - Tara Atyam
- California Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Division, PO Box 997377, MS 0500, Sacramento, CA 95899-7377, USA.
| | - Jason Spitzer
- California Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Division, PO Box 997377, MS 0500, Sacramento, CA 95899-7377, USA.
| | - Karin Coyle
- ETR, 5619 Scotts Valley Dr, Suite 140, Scotts Valley, CA 95066, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Szlamka Z, Hanlon C, Tekola B, Pacione L, Salomone E, Servili C, Hoekstra RA. Exploring contextual adaptations in caregiver interventions for families raising children with developmental disabilities. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272077. [PMID: 36170237 PMCID: PMC9518887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There are increasing efforts to scale up services globally for families raising children with developmental disabilities (DDs). Existing interventions, often developed in high income, Western settings, need substantial adaptation before they can be implemented in different contexts. The aim of this study was to explore perspectives on the role that context plays in the adaptation and implementation of interventions targeting caregivers of children with DDs across settings. The study question was applied to the Caregiver Skills Training (CST) programme of the World Health Organization specifically, as well as to stakeholder experiences with caregiver interventions more broadly. Two focus group discussions (FGDs; n = 15 participants) and 25 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants were caregivers of children with DDs and professionals involved in adapting or implementing the CST across five continents and different income settings. Data were analysed thematically. Four main themes were developed: 1) Setting the scene for adaptations; 2) Integrating an intervention into local public services; 3) Understanding the reality of caregivers; 4) Challenges of sustaining an intervention. Informants thought that contextual adaptations were key for the intervention to fit in locally, even more so than cultural factors. The socio-economic context of caregivers, including poverty, was highlighted as heavily affecting service access and engagement with the intervention. Competing health priorities other than DDs, financial constraints, and management of long-term collaborations were identified as barriers. This study validates the notion that attention to contextual factors is an essential part of the adaptation of caregiver interventions for children with DDs, by providing perspectives from different geographical regions. We recommend a stronger policy and research focus on contextual adaptations of interventions and addressing unmet socio-economic needs of caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsofia Szlamka
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Bethlehem Tekola
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Pacione
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Youth Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erica Salomone
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - WHO CST Team
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Servili
- Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rosa A. Hoekstra
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Salloum RG, Wagner TH, Midboe AM, Daniels SI, Quanbeck A, Chambers DA. The economics of adaptations to evidence-based practices. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:100. [PMID: 36153575 PMCID: PMC9509646 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00345-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently adapted in response to the dynamic contexts in which they are implemented. Adaptation is defined as the degree to which an EBP is altered to fit the setting or to improve fit to local context and can be planned or unplanned. Although adaptations are common and necessary to maximizing the marginal impact of EBPs, little attention has been given to the economic consequences and how adaptations affect marginal costs. Discussion In assessing the economic consequences of adaptation, one should consider its impact on core components, the planned adaptive periphery, and the unplanned adaptive periphery. Guided by implementation science frameworks, we examine how various economic evaluation approaches accommodate the influence of adaptations and discuss the pros and cons of these approaches. Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), mixed methods can elucidate the economic reasons driving the adaptations. Micro-costing approaches are applied in research that integrates the adaptation of EBPs at the planning stage using innovative, adaptive study designs. In contrast, evaluation of unplanned adaptation is subject to confounding and requires sensitivity analysis to address unobservable measures and other uncertainties. A case study is presented using the RE-AIM framework to illustrate the costing of adaptations. In addition to empirical approaches to evaluating adaptation, simulation modeling approaches can be used to overcome limited follow-up in implementation studies. Conclusions As implementation science evolves to improve our understanding of the mechanisms and implications of adaptations, it is increasingly important to understand the economic implications of such adaptations, in addition to their impact on clinical effectiveness. Therefore, explicit consideration is warranted of how costs can be evaluated as outcomes of adaptations to the delivery of EBPs.
Collapse
|
60
|
Farah Saliba L, Allen P, Mazzucca SL, Rodriguez Weno E, Moreland-Russell S, Padek M, Brownson RC. Program adaptation by health departments. Front Public Health 2022; 10:892258. [PMID: 36172214 PMCID: PMC9512313 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The dissemination of evidence-based interventions (i.e., programs, practices, and policies) is a core function of US state health departments (SHDs). However, interventions are originally designed and tested with a specific population and context. Hence, adapting the intervention to meet the real-world circumstances and population's needs can increase the likelihood of achieving the expected health outcomes for the target population from the implemented intervention. This study identified how SHD employees decide to adapt public health programs and what influences decisions on how to adapt them. Materials and methods SHD employees (n = 45) were interviewed using a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were consensus-coded and themes were identified using thematic analysis. Several themes aligned with the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact. Results Data, outcomes, and health department evaluations influenced decisions to adapt a program (pre-adaptation), and reasons to adapt a program included organizational and sociopolitical contextual factors. SHD middle-level managers, program managers and staff, and local agencies were involved in the decisions to adapt the programs. Finally, the goals for adapting a program included enhancing effectiveness/outcomes, reach and satisfaction with the program; funding; and partner engagement. After SHD employees decided to adapt a program, data and evidence guided the changes. Program staff and evaluators were engaged in the adaptation process. Program managers consulted partners to gather ideas on how best to adapt a program based on partners' experiences implementing the program and obtaining community input. Lastly, program managers also received input on adapting content and context from coalition meetings and periodic technical assistance calls. Discussion The findings related to decisions to adapt public health programs provide practitioners with considerations for adapting them. Findings reaffirm the importance of promoting public health competencies in program evaluation and adaptation, as well as systematically documenting and evaluating the adaptation processes. In addition, the themes could be studied in future research as mechanisms, mediators, and moderators to implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Farah Saliba
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Peg Allen
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Stephanie L. Mazzucca
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Emily Rodriguez Weno
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sarah Moreland-Russell
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Margaret Padek
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Konrad LM, Ribeiro CG, Maciel EC, Tomicki C, Brito FA, Almeida FA, Benedetti TRB. Evaluating the implementation of the active life improving health behavior change program "BCP-VAMOS" in primary health care: Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks. Front Public Health 2022; 10:726021. [PMID: 36172209 PMCID: PMC9511219 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.726021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The effective translation of evidence-based interventions has contributed to implementing actions that impact public policies and the population's health. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the factors associated with the successful implementation of these interventions. The Active Life Improving Health Behavior Change Program (BCP-VAMOS) uses behavioral strategies to promote an active and healthy lifestyle in the community. Characterized as a health innovation, it also provides health professionals with online training to implement the program in Primary Health Care (PHC). Our study describes a pragmatic trial that aims to evaluate the implementation of BCP-VAMOS, version 3.0, in PHC in southern Brazil. Methods and analysis A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT) of two arms comparing a group of PHC professionals who will participate in a traditional didactic approach (control group) vs. a group that will receive ongoing support (intervention group) for the implementation of BCP-VAMOS. The intervention will be available to adults (≥18 years old) registered at PHC. Program recipient's will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention (9 months after) to measure markers of physical activity and eating behavior (primary outcomes). Program's implementation process will be monitored for 12 months and will be evaluated using the RE-AIM and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks. Discussions The survey findings can be used widely throughout Brazil, guiding the work of health professionals, service planners and policy-makers. Also, the results may help to inform the national health promotion policy to plan interventions and improve the implementation of programs in PHC. This research results will provide practical guidance for researchers to develop similar protocols to implement and adapt public health interventions. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil, under no. 1394492. Results will be published in full as open access in the UFSC library and main trial results and associated papers in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number RBR-2vw77q-Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisandra Maria Konrad
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Cezar Grontowski Ribeiro
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Department of Physical Education, Federal Institute of Parana, Palmas, Parana, Brazil
| | - Elaine Cristina Maciel
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Camila Tomicki
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Almeida Brito
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Fabio Araujo Almeida
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Tânia Rosane Bertoldo Benedetti
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Eisman AB, Palinkas LA, Koffkey C, Herrenkohl TI, Abbasi U, Fridline J, Lundahl L, Kilbourne AM. Michigan Model for Health TM Learning to Enhance and Adapt for Prevention (Mi-LEAP): protocol of a pilot randomized trial comparing Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs versus standard implementation to deliver an evidence-based drug use prevention curriculum. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:204. [PMID: 36088351 PMCID: PMC9463731 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01145-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND School-based drug use prevention programs have demonstrated notable potential to reduce the onset and escalation of drug use, including among youth at risk of poor outcomes such as those exposed to trauma. Researchers have found a robust relationship between intervention fidelity and participant (i.e., student) outcomes. Effective implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as the Michigan Model for HealthTM (MMH), is critical to achieving desired public health objectives. Yet, a persistent gap remains in what we know works and how to effectively translate these findings into routine practice. The objective of this study is to design and test a multi-component implementation strategy to tailor MMH to meet population needs (i.e., students exposed to trauma), and improve the population-context fit to enhance fidelity and effectiveness. METHODS Using a 2-group, mixed-method randomized controlled trial design, this study will compare standard implementation versus Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs (REP) to deliver MMH. REP is a theoretically based implementation strategy that promotes evidence-based intervention (EBI) fidelity through a combination of EBI curriculum packaging, training, and as-needed technical assistance and is consistent with standard MMH implementation. Enhanced REP will tailor the intervention and training to integrate trauma-informed approaches and deploy customized implementation support (i.e., facilitation). The research will address the following specific aims: (1) design and test an implementation strategy (Enhanced REP) to deliver the MMH versus standard implementation and evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness using mixed methods, (2) estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of Enhanced REP to deliver MMH versus standard implementation. DISCUSSION This research will design and test a multi-component implementation strategy focused on enhancing the fit between the intervention and population needs while maintaining fidelity to MMH core functions. We focus on the feasibility of deploying the implementation strategy bundle and costing methods and preliminary information on cost input distributions. The substantive focus on youth at heightened risk of drug use and its consequences due to trauma exposure is significant because of the public health impact of prevention. Pilot studies of implementation strategies are underutilized and can provide vital information on designing and testing effective strategies by addressing potential design and methods uncertainties and the effects of the implementation strategy on implementation and student outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04752189-registered on 8 February 2021 on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andria B Eisman
- Community Health, Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies, College of Education, Wayne State University, 2153 Faculty/Administration Building, 656 West Kirby, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
- Center for Health and Community Impact, College of Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| | - Lawrence A Palinkas
- Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Christine Koffkey
- Community Health, Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies, College of Education, Wayne State University, 2153 Faculty/Administration Building, 656 West Kirby, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Todd I Herrenkohl
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Umaima Abbasi
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Judy Fridline
- Genesee Intermediate School District, Flint, MI, 48507, USA
| | - Leslie Lundahl
- School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Amy M Kilbourne
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C., USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Maafs-Rodríguez A, Otis B, Mattei J. Cultural Adaptation and Social Media Promotion of Healthy Eating Guides for Spanish Speakers. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR 2022; 54:863-871. [PMID: 35750617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The internet is a primary source of nutrition information in the US. Minorities and non-English speakers face a digital divide when accessing such information. We aimed to report on the reach of social media dissemination of the cultural adaptation of the evidence-based Kid's Healthy Eating Plate to Spanish-speaking Latinos and of previous versions. METHODS The adaptation was based on the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded and was disseminated through social media platforms (116 days). Outcomes were impressions, shares, website link clicks, number of viewers, and access country. RESULTS The kids' culturally adapted version had 288,773 impressions and 1,227 shares on social media; the website was linked 9,763 times, predominantly through Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc). User engagement and pageviews were mostly from Spain, Latin American countries, and the US. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The cultural adaptation of healthy eating guidelines for Spanish-speaking children was accessed in the US and worldwide. Promotion through social media had a significant impact on its reach. Cultural adaptation and paid dissemination of evidence-based materials may help close the digital divide and promote health literacy in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Maafs-Rodríguez
- Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Brett Otis
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Josiemer Mattei
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Eisman AB, Kim B, Salloum RG, Shuman CJ, Glasgow RE. Advancing rapid adaptation for urgent public health crises: Using implementation science to facilitate effective and efficient responses. Front Public Health 2022; 10:959567. [PMID: 36091566 PMCID: PMC9448975 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Responding rapidly to emerging public health crises is vital to reducing their escalation, spread, and impact on population health. These responses, however, are challenging and disparate processes for researchers and practitioners. Researchers often develop new interventions that take significant time and resources, with little exportability. In contrast, community-serving systems are often poorly equipped to properly adopt new interventions or adapt existing ones in a data-driven way during crises' onset and escalation. This results in significant delays in deploying evidence-based interventions (EBIs) with notable public health consequences. This prolonged timeline for EBI development and implementation results in significant morbidity and mortality that is costly and preventable. As public health emergencies have demonstrated (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic), the negative consequences often exacerbate existing health disparities. Implementation science has the potential to bridge the extant gap between research and practice, and enhance equity in rapid public health responses, but is underutilized. For the field to have a greater "real-world" impact, it needs to be more rapid, iterative, participatory, and work within the timeframes of community-serving systems. This paper focuses on rapid adaptation as a developing implementation science area to facilitate system responses during public health crises. We highlight frameworks to guide rapid adaptation for optimizing existing EBIs when responding to urgent public health issues. We also explore the economic implications of rapid adaptation. Resource limitations are frequently a central reason for implementation failure; thus, we consider the economic impacts of rapid adaptation. Finally, we provide examples and propose directions for future research and application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andria B. Eisman
- Community Health, Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies, College of Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- Center for Health and Community Impact (CHCI), Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Bo Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ramzi G. Salloum
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Clayton J. Shuman
- Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- Dissemination and Implementation Science Program of ACCORDS (Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Community Settings and Primary Health Care: A Pre-Implementation Contextual Analysis Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19148467. [PMID: 35886317 PMCID: PMC9323996 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the world’s leading cause of mortality, with a high burden especially among vulnerable populations. Interventions for primary prevention need to be further implemented in community and primary health care settings. Context is critically important to understand potential implementation determinants. Therefore, we explored stakeholders’ views on the evidence-based SPICES program (EBSP); a multicomponent intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, to inform its implementation. In this qualitative study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with 24 key stakeholders, 10 general practitioners, 9 practice nurses, and 13 lay community partners. We used adaptive framework analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided our data collection, analysis, and reporting. The EBSP was valued as an opportunity to improve risk awareness and health behavior, especially in vulnerable populations. Its relative advantage, evidence-based design, adaptability to the needs and resources of target communities, and the alignment with policy evolutions and local mission and vision, were seen as important facilitators for its implementation. Concerns remain around legal and structural characteristics and intervention complexity. Our results highlight context dimensions that need to be considered and tailored to primary care and community needs and capacities when planning EBSP implementation in real life settings.
Collapse
|
66
|
Tran HV, Nong HTT, Tran TTT, Filipowicz TR, Landrum KR, Pence BW, Le GM, Nguyen MX, Chibanda D, Verhey R, Go VF, Ho HT, Gaynes BN. Adaptation of a Problem-solving Program (Friendship Bench) to Treat Common Mental Disorders Among People Living With HIV and AIDS and on Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Vietnam: Formative Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37211. [PMID: 35802402 PMCID: PMC9308082 DOI: 10.2196/37211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) among people living with HIV and people who inject drugs is high worldwide and in Vietnam. However, few evidence-informed CMD programs for people living with HIV who inject drugs have been adapted for use in Vietnam. We adapted the Friendship Bench (FB), a problem-solving therapy (PST)-based program that was successfully implemented among patients with CMDs in primary health settings in Zimbabwe and Malawi for use among people living with HIV on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) with CMDs in Hanoi, Vietnam. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the adaptation process with a detailed presentation of 4 phases from the third (adaptation) to the sixth (integration) of the Assessment-Decision-Adaptation-Production-Topical Experts-Integration-Training-Testing (ADAPT-ITT) framework. METHODS The adaptation phase followed a qualitative study design to explore symptoms of CMDs, facilitators, and barriers to conducting FB for people living with HIV on MMT in Vietnam, and patient, provider, and caretaker concerns about FB. In the production phase, we revised the original program manual and developed illustrated PST cases. In the topical expert and integration phases, 2 investigators (BNG and BWP) and 3 subject matter experts (RV, DC, and GML) reviewed the manual, with reviewer comments incorporated in the final, revised manual to be used in the training. The draft program will be used in the training and testing phases. RESULTS The study was methodologically aligned with the ADAPT-ITT goals as we chose a proven, effective program for adaptation. Insights from the adaptation phase addressed the who, where, when, and how of FB program implementation in the MMT clinics. The ADAPT-ITT framework guided the appropriate adaptation of the program manual while maintaining the core components of the PST of the original program throughout counseling techniques in all program sessions. The deliverable of this study was an adapted FB manual to be used for training and piloting to make a final program manual. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully illustrated the process of operationalizing the ADAPT-ITT framework to adapt a mental health program in Vietnam. This study selected and culturally adapted an evidence-informed PST program to improve CMDs among people living with HIV on MMT in Vietnam. This adapted program has the potential to effectively address CMDs among people living with HIV on MMT in Vietnam. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04790201; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04790201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha V Tran
- The University of North Carolina, Vietnam Office, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Ha T T Nong
- The University of North Carolina, Vietnam Office, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Thuy T T Tran
- Faculty of Environmental and Occupational Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Teresa R Filipowicz
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kelsey R Landrum
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Giang M Le
- Center for Research and Training in HIV/AIDS, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Minh X Nguyen
- Faculty of Epidemiology Department, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Dixon Chibanda
- Department of Community Medicine & Research Support Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Verhey
- Department of Community Medicine & Research Support Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Vivian F Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings, School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Hien T Ho
- Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Bradley N Gaynes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Walker TJ, Foster M, Szeszulski J, Craig DW, Mullen PD, Fernández ME. Evidence-Based Intervention (EBI) Mapping: a systematic approach to understanding the components and logic of EBIs. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1300. [PMID: 35794615 PMCID: PMC9261043 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the development of numerous evidence-based interventions (EBIs), many go unused in practice. Hesitations to use existing EBIs may be due to a lack of understanding about EBI components and what it would take to adapt it or implement it as designed. To improve the use of EBIs, program planners need to understand their goals, core components, and mechanisms of action. This paper presents EBI Mapping, a systematic approach based on Intervention Mapping, that can be used to understand and clearly describe EBIs, and help planners put them into practice. METHODS We describe EBI Mapping tasks and provide an example of the process. EBI Mapping uses principles from Intervention Mapping, a systematic framework for planning multilevel health promotion interventions. EBI Mapping applies the Intervention Mapping steps retrospectively to help planners understand an existing EBI (rather than plan a new one). We explain each EBI Mapping task and demonstrate the process using the VERB Summer Scorecard (VSS), a multi-level community-based intervention to improve youth physical activity. RESULTS EBI Mapping tasks are: 1) document EBI materials and activities, and their audiences, 2) identify the EBI goals, content, and mechanisms of action, 3) identify the theoretical change methods and practical applications of those methods, 4) describe design features and delivery channels, and 5) describe the implementers and their tasks, implementation strategies, and needed resources. By applying the EBI Mapping tasks, we created a logic model for the VSS intervention. The VSS logic model specifies the links between behavior change methods, practical applications, and determinants for both the at-risk population and environmental change agents. The logic model also links the respective determinants to the desired outcomes including the health behavior and environmental conditions to improve the health outcome in the at-risk population. CONCLUSIONS EBI Mapping helps program planners understand the components and logic of an EBI. This information is important for selecting, adapting, and scaling-up EBIs. Accelerating and improving the use of existing EBIs can reduce the research-to-practice gap and improve population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Walker
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, 7000 Fannin St., TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Maya Foster
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, 7000 Fannin St., TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jacob Szeszulski
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Derek W Craig
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, 7000 Fannin St., TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patricia Dolan Mullen
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, 7000 Fannin St., TX, 77030, USA
| | - Maria E Fernández
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, 7000 Fannin St., TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Applying a User Centred Design Approach to Optimise a Workplace Initiative for Wide-Scale Implementation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19138096. [PMID: 35805755 PMCID: PMC9265782 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Translation of an effective research intervention into a program able to be implemented in practice typically requires adaptations to ensure the outcomes can be achieved within the applied setting. User centred design (UCD) methodologies can support these iterative adaptations, with this approach being particularly well suited to peer-led interventions, due to a focus on usability. We describe and reflect on the UCD approach that was applied to optimise an online, peer-led workplace health promotion initiative (BeUpstanding: ACTRN12617000682347) to be suitable for wide-scale implementation and evaluation. Optimisation was aligned against the indicators of the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework, with UCD methodologies (discovery interviews, persona and scenario mapping, facilitated workshops, surveys and prototyping) employed to enhance the program according to all RE-AIM dimensions. The core team (content experts, implementation scientist, interaction designer, software developer, business developer) worked closely with policy and practice partners and end users (workplace champions, management and staff) to iteratively develop and test across the RE-AIM indicators. This description and reflection of the process of applying UCD and the RE-AIM framework to the optimisation of BeUpstanding is intended to provide guidance for other behaviour change research adaptations into practice.
Collapse
|
69
|
Manikowski A, Williamson Lewis R, Bennett T, Miller H, Mertens A, Wasilewski-Masker K, Escoffery C, Gilleland Marchak J. Implementation of Electronic Psychosocial Screening Among Caregivers in Pediatric Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1198-e1208. [DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the reach and implementation of an electronic psychosocial screening program among caregivers of pediatric oncology patients, as well as characterize caregiver distress. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,013) included caregivers of patients age 0-17.99 years presenting across 9,280 outpatient oncology visits (median = 2; range = 1-52) from September 2018 to June 2019. At check-ins, caregivers electronically completed the pediatric distress thermometer via a patient-facing electronic health record (EHR) application. Caregiver distress ratings ≥ 8 triggered electronic alerts to medical teams to refer for social work support at point of care. Patient clinical and demographic differences in reach and fidelity were evaluated using univariate chi-square and t-tests. Caregivers reporting high distress were compared with caregivers without reports of high distress using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The e-screening program was able to reach a caregiver for nearly all children seen during the study period, with 95.5% (1,923/2,013) of patients having a caregiver-completed pediatric distress thermometer. On screeners where caregivers reported high distress, medical teams made appropriate referrals to social work 95.5% (471/493) of the time. Overall, 16.9% (325/1,923) of caregivers ever indicated high distress (score ≥ 8), with caregivers of newly diagnosed (odds ratio = 3.16; 95% CI, 2.12 to 4.71) and on-therapy (odds ratio = 2.81; 95% CI, 2.11 to 3.76) patients being more likely to report high distress, compared with those who were off-treatment for the entire study. CONCLUSION: Leveraging EHR technology to provide evidence-based psychosocial screening can aid in successfully reaching a significant proportion of caregivers of pediatric oncology patients to identify and respond to ongoing psychosocial distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Manikowski
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Tonya Bennett
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Ann Mertens
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Karen Wasilewski-Masker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jordan Gilleland Marchak
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Parascandola M, Neta G, Bloch M, Gopal S. Colliding Epidemics: Research Gaps and Implementation Science Opportunities for Tobacco Use and HIV/AIDS in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Smok Cessat 2022; 2022:6835146. [PMID: 35821759 PMCID: PMC9232349 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6835146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tobacco use is a leading cause of cancer death among people living with HIV (PLWH) worldwide, and smoking prevalence tends to be higher among PLWH. The burden of both HIV/AIDS and tobacco use is increasingly concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where resources to address these challenges are often limited. However, there has been limited effort to date to integrate tobacco cessation into HIV programs in LMICs. Methods We searched the literature (searching was conducted between October 1 and December 31, 2020) using PubMed including search terms "tobacco" and "HIV" and "cessation" over the past ten years (searching for articles published between December 1, 2010, and December 1, 2020) to identify original research studies on tobacco cessation interventions conducted in LMICs for PLWH. We also conducted an analysis of NCI-funded research grants on tobacco cessation and HIV awarded during fiscal years 2010 to 2020. Results and Discussion. Existing evidence suggests that conventional tobacco cessation treatments may be less effective among PLWH. Moreover, while substantial evidence exists to support a range of cessation interventions, most of this evidence comes from HICs and is only partly applicable to the evolving social, economic, and cultural climate of many LMICs. There is an urgent need to develop, adapt, and implement effective tobacco control and cessation interventions targeted to PLWH in LMICs, as well as to generate evidence from these settings. Implementation science provides tools develop and test strategies to overcome barriers and to integrate and scale up cessation services within existing HIV treatment settings. Conclusion There is a unique opportunity to address HIV and tobacco use in a coordinated way in LMICs by integrating evidence-based tobacco cessation into HIV programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Parascandola
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Gila Neta
- Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michele Bloch
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Satish Gopal
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Daw P, Harrison A, Doherty PJ, van Zanten JJCSV, Dalal HM, Taylor RS, van Beurden SB, McDonagh STJ, Greaves CJ. A pragmatic effectiveness-implementation study comparing trial evidence with routinely collected outcome data for patients receiving the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:270. [PMID: 35710336 PMCID: PMC9202968 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure continues to be greatly underused worldwide despite being a Class I recommendation in international clinical guidelines and uptake is low in women and patients with mental health comorbidities. METHODS Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) programme was implemented in four UK National Health Service early adopter sites ('Beacon Sites') between June 2019 and June 2020. Implementation and patient-reported outcome data were collected across sites as part of the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. The change in key outcomes before and after the supervised period of REACH-HF intervention across the Beacon Sites was assessed and compared to those of the intervention arm of the REACH-HF multicentre trial. RESULTS Compared to the REACH-HF multicentre trial, patients treated at the Beacon Site were more likely to be female (33.8% vs 22.9%), older (75.6 vs 70.1), had a more severe classification of heart failure (26.5% vs 17.7%), had poorer baseline health-related quality of life (MLHFQ score 36.1 vs 31.4), were more depressed (HADS score 6.4 vs 4.1) and anxious (HADS score 7.2 vs 4.7), and had lower exercise capacity (ISWT distance 190 m vs 274.7 m). There appeared to be a substantial heterogeneity in the implementation process across the four Beacon Sites as evidenced by the variation in levels of patient recruitment, operationalisation of the REACH-HF intervention and patient outcomes. Overall lower improvements in patient-reported outcomes at the Beacon Sites compared to the trial may reflect differences in the population studied (having higher morbidity at baseline) as well as the marked challenges in intervention delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION The results of this study illustrate the challenges in consistently implementing an intervention (shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective in a multicentre trial) into real-world practice, especially in the midst of a global pandemic. Further research is needed to establish the real-world effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention in different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| | - Alexander Harrison
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Patrick J. Doherty
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Hasnain M. Dalal
- grid.416116.50000 0004 0391 2873University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Samantha B. van Beurden
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sinéad T. J. McDonagh
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Xu Y, Chen F, Mirza M, Magaña S. Culturally adapting a parent psychoeducational intervention for Chinese immigrant families of young children with autism spectrum disorder. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xu
- Department of Health Sciences Education University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford Illinois USA
| | - Feifei Chen
- Illinois Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental Disorder Fellow Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Mansha Mirza
- Department of Disability and Human Development University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Sandy Magaña
- Steve Hicks School of Social work University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Gordon EJ, Uriarte JJ, Anderson N, Romo E, Caicedo JC, Shumate M. Implementation and modification of an organizational-level intervention: a prospective analysis. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:59. [PMID: 35659156 PMCID: PMC9164326 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00296-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Modifications to interventions can jeopardize intervention outcomes. Pre-existing perceived barriers and facilitators to the intervention arising in the implementation preparation phase may help explain why modifications to the intervention may occur during the implementation phase. This two-site comparative case study describes modifications made to a complex organizational-level intervention and examines how known implementation science factors may have enabled such changes to occur. Methods Northwestern Medicine’sTM Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program (HKTP) is a culturally competent transplant center-based intervention designed to reduce disparities in living donor kidney transplantation among Hispanics. In-depth qualitative interviews and discussions were longitudinally conducted with transplant stakeholders (i.e., physicians, administrators, clinicians) at two kidney transplant programs with large Hispanic populations during implementation preparation and implementation phases. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided interview design and qualitative analysis, and Stirman’s Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) guided modification classification. Results Across sites, 57 stakeholders participated in an interview, group discussion, and/or learning collaborative discussion. Site-B made more modifications than Site-A (n = 29 versus n = 18). Sites differed in the proportions of delaying/skipping (Site-A 50% versus Site-B 28%) and adding (Site-A 11% versus Site-B 28%) but had comparable substituting (Site-A 17% versus Site-B 17%) and tweaking (Site-A 17% versus Site-B 14%) modification types. Across sites, the transplant team consistently initiated the most modifications (Site-A 66%; Site-B 62%). While individuals initiated slightly more modifications at Site-B (21% versus Site-A 17%), institutions instigated proportionately slightly more modifications at Site-A (17% versus Site-B 10%). CFIR inner setting factors (i.e., structural characteristics, culture, available resources, implementation climate) that prominently emerged during the implementation preparation phase explained similarities and differences in sites’ modification numbers, types, and agents in the implementation phase. Conclusion Organizations implementing a culturally competent care intervention made modifications. CFIR inner setting factors emerging in the implementation preparation phase largely explained similarities and differences in study sites’ modifications. Identifying factors contributing to modifications may help institutions become better prepared to implement an intervention by addressing known factors in advance, which may foster greater fidelity leading to desired outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT03276390. We registered the study retrospectively on 9-7-17. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00296-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery - Division of Transplantation, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Jefferson J Uriarte
- Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Naomi Anderson
- School of Education and Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Elida Romo
- Department of Neurology - Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Juan Carlos Caicedo
- Department of Surgery - Division of Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michelle Shumate
- Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Evans TS, Hawkes RE, Keyworth C, Newson L, Radley D, Hill AJ, Matu J, Ells LJ. How is the NHS Low-Calorie Diet Programme expected to produce behavioural change to support diabetes remission: An examination of underpinning theory. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DIABETES 2022; 22:20-29. [PMID: 36045887 PMCID: PMC7613468 DOI: 10.15277/bjd.2022.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background In 2020, the National Health Service Low-Calorie Diet Programme (NHS-LCD) was launched, piloting a total diet (TDR) replacement intervention with behaviour change support for people living with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and excess weight. Four independent service providers were commissioned to design and deliver theoretically grounded programmes in localities across England. Aims 1) to develop a logic model detailing how the NHS-LCD programme is expected to produce changes in health behaviour, and (2) to analyse and evaluate the use of behaviour change theory in providers' NHS-LCD Programme designs. Methods A documentary review was conducted. Information was extracted from the NHS-LCD service specification documents on how the programme expected to produce outcomes. The Theory Coding Scheme (TCS) was used to analyse theory use in providers' programme design documents. Results The NHS-LCD logic model included techniques aimed at enhancing positive outcome expectations of programme participation and beliefs about social approval of behaviour change, to facilitate programme uptake and behaviour change intentions. This was followed by techniques aimed at shaping knowledge and enhancing the ability of participants to self-regulate their health behaviours, alongside a supportive social environment and person-centred approach.Application and type of behaviour change theory within service providers' programme designs varied. One provider explicitly linked theory to programme content; two providers linked 63% and 70% of intervention techniques to theory; and there was limited underpinning theory identified in the programme design documents for one of the providers. Conclusion The nature and extent of theory use underpinning the NHS-LCD varied greatly amongst service providers, with some but not all intervention techniques explicitly linked to theory. How this relates to outcomes across providers should be evaluated. It is recommended that explicit theory use in programme design and evidence of its implementation becomes a requirement of future NHS commissioning processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamla S Evans
- Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Rhiannon E Hawkes
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Keyworth
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lisa Newson
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Duncan Radley
- Obesity Institute and Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew J Hill
- Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jamie Matu
- Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Louisa J Ells
- Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Matjasko JL, Herbst JH, Estefan LF. Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences: The Role of Etiological, Evaluation, and Implementation Research. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:S6-S15. [PMID: 35597583 PMCID: PMC9215220 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Research on adverse childhood experiences is a vital part of the data-to-action link and the development of evidence-based public health and violence prevention practice. Etiological research helps to elucidate the key risk and protective factors for adverse childhood experiences and outcome research examines the consequences of exposure to them. Evaluation research is critical to building the evidence base for strategies that are likely to have a significant impact on preventing and reducing adverse experiences during childhood. Implementation research efforts inform the movement and scale-up of evidence-based findings to public health practice. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Violence Prevention located in the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control is investing in a number of research initiatives that are designed to advance what is known about the causes and consequences of adverse childhood experiences (i.e., etiological research), the strategies that are effective at reducing and preventing them (i.e., evaluation research), and how to best adapt and scale effective strategies (i.e., implementation research). This article complements the other articles in this Special Supplement by briefly providing a review of reviews for each of these areas and highlighting recent research investments and strategic directions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the area of child abuse and neglect and adverse childhood experience prevention. Research investments are critical to advancing the evidence base on the prevention of adverse childhood experiences and to ensure safe, stable, and nurturing relationships and environments so that all children can live to their fullest potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Matjasko
- Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Jeffrey H Herbst
- Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lianne Fuino Estefan
- Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Smit DJM, van Oostrom SH, Engels JA, van der Beek AJ, Proper KI. A study protocol of the adaptation and evaluation by means of a cluster-RCT of an integrated workplace health promotion program based on a European good practice. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1028. [PMID: 35597983 PMCID: PMC9123680 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13352-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An integrated workplace health promotion program (WHPP) which targets multiple lifestyle factors at different levels (individual and organizational) is potentially more effective than a single component WHPP. The aim of this study is to describe the protocol of a study to tailor a European good practice of such an integral approach to the Dutch context and to evaluate its effectiveness and implementation. Methods This study consists of two components. First, the five steps of the Map of Adaptation Process (MAP) will be followed to tailor the Lombardy WHP to the Dutch context. Both the employers and employees will be actively involved in this process. Second, the effectiveness of the integrated Dutch WHPP will be evaluated in a clustered randomized controlled trial (C-RCT) with measurements at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Clusters will be composed based on working locations or units - dependent on the organization’s structure and randomization within each organization takes place after baseline measurements. Primary outcome will be a combined lifestyle score. Secondary outcomes will be the separate lifestyle behaviors targeted, stress, work-life balance, need for recovery, general health, and well-being. Simultaneously, a process evaluation will be conducted. The study population will consist of employees from multiple organizations in different industry sectors. Organizations in the intervention condition will receive the integrated Dutch WHPP during 12 months, consisting of an implementation plan and a catalogue with activities for multiple lifestyle themes on various domains: 1) screening and support; 2) information and education; 3) adjustments in the social, digital or physical environment; and 4) policy. Discussion The MAP approach provides an appropriate framework to systematically adapt an existing WHPP to the Dutch context, involving both employers and employees and retaining the core elements, i.e. the catalogue with evidence-based activities on multiple lifestyle themes and domains enabling an integrated approach. The following process and effect evaluation will contribute to further insight in the actual implementation and effectiveness of the integrated WHP approach. Trial registration NTR (trialregister.nl), NL9526. Registered on 3 June 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13352-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise J M Smit
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 3721 MA, The Netherlands. .,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra H van Oostrom
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 3721 MA, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine A Engels
- Occupation & Health Research Group, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, the Netherlands
| | - Allard J van der Beek
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands
| | - Karin I Proper
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 3721 MA, The Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Goodyear MJ, Allchin B, Burn M, von Doussa H, Reupert A, Tchernegovski P, Sheen J, Cuff R, Obradovic A, Solantaus T, Maybery D. Promoting Self-Determination in Parents With Mental Illness in Adult Mental Health Settings. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2022; 28:129-141. [PMID: 35094587 DOI: 10.1177/10748407211067308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This article reports a strengths-based intervention to support parents with mental illness and their children in adult mental health settings: "Let's Talk About Children" (LTC) intervention. A qualitative methodology was adopted with parent participants receiving LTC in adult mental health and family services. The benefits for parents receiving LTC were described through in-depth interviews with 25 parents following the delivery of the program. Interview data identified an impact on parental self-regulation-mainly through a change in a sense of agency as a parent-and skill building, once a clearer picture of their child's everyday life was understood. This study outlines the benefits of talking with parents about the strengths and vulnerabilities of their children during routine mental health treatment. The role for self-determination of parents in preventive interventions for children is an important consideration for mental health recovery, and it also helps to break the cycle of transgenerational mental illness within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda J Goodyear
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Emerging Minds, Hilton, South Australia, Australia
| | - Becca Allchin
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Henry von Doussa
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Jade Sheen
- Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rose Cuff
- Satellite Foundation, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Obradovic
- Northern Area Mental Health Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tytti Solantaus
- Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
O’Leary MC, Hassmiller Lich K, Frerichs L, Leeman J, Reuland DS, Wheeler SB. Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science. Implement Sci 2022; 17:27. [PMID: 35428260 PMCID: PMC9013084 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01192-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Economic evaluations of the implementation of health-related evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are conducted infrequently and, when performed, often use a limited set of quantitative methods to estimate the cost and effectiveness of EBIs. These studies often underestimate the resources required to implement and sustain EBIs in diverse populations and settings, in part due to inadequate scoping of EBI boundaries and underutilization of methods designed to understand the local context. We call for increased use of diverse methods, especially the integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches, for conducting and better using economic evaluations and related insights across all phases of implementation. Main body We describe methodological opportunities by implementation phase to develop more comprehensive and context-specific estimates of implementation costs and downstream impacts of EBI implementation, using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. We focus specifically on the implementation of complex interventions, which are often multi-level, resource-intensive, multicomponent, heterogeneous across sites and populations, involve many stakeholders and implementation agents, and change over time with respect to costs and outcomes. Using colorectal cancer (CRC) screening EBIs as examples, we outline several approaches to specifying the “boundaries” of EBI implementation and analyzing implementation costs by phase of implementation. We describe how systems mapping and stakeholder engagement methods can be used to clarify EBI implementation costs and guide data collection—particularly important when EBIs are complex. In addition, we discuss the use of simulation modeling with sensitivity/uncertainty analyses within implementation studies for projecting the health and economic impacts of investment in EBIs. Finally, we describe how these results, enhanced by careful data visualization, can inform selection, adoption, adaptation, and sustainment of EBIs. Conclusion Health economists and implementation scientists alike should draw from a larger menu of methods for estimating the costs and outcomes associated with complex EBI implementation and employ these methods across the EPIS phases. Our prior experiences using qualitative and systems approaches in addition to traditional quantitative methods provided rich data for informing decision-making about the value of investing in CRC screening EBIs and long-term planning for these health programs. Future work should consider additional opportunities for mixed-method approaches to economic evaluations.
Collapse
|
79
|
Brownson RC, Shelton RC, Geng EH, Glasgow RE. Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science. Implement Sci 2022; 17:26. [PMID: 35413917 PMCID: PMC9004065 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01201-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence, in multiple forms, is a foundation of implementation science. For public health and clinical practice, evidence includes the following: type 1 evidence on etiology and burden; type 2 evidence on effectiveness of interventions; and type 3: evidence on dissemination and implementation (D&I) within context. To support a vision for development and use of evidence in D&I science that is more comprehensive and equitable (particularly for type 3 evidence), this article aims to clarify concepts of evidence, summarize ongoing debates about evidence, and provide a set of recommendations and tools/resources for addressing the "how-to" in filling evidence gaps most critical to advancing implementation science. MAIN TEXT Because current conceptualizations of evidence have been relatively narrow and insufficiently characterized in our opinion, we identify and discuss challenges and debates about the uses, usefulness, and gaps in evidence for implementation science. A set of questions is proposed to assist in determining when evidence is sufficient for dissemination and implementation. Intersecting gaps include the need to (1) reconsider how the evidence base is determined, (2) improve understanding of contextual effects on implementation, (3) sharpen the focus on health equity in how we approach and build the evidence-base, (4) conduct more policy implementation research and evaluation, and (5) learn from audience and stakeholder perspectives. We offer 15 recommendations to assist in filling these gaps and describe a set of tools for enhancing the evidence most needed in implementation science. CONCLUSIONS To address our recommendations, we see capacity as a necessary ingredient to shift the field's approach to evidence. Capacity includes the "push" for implementation science where researchers are trained to develop and evaluate evidence which should be useful and feasible for implementers and reflect community or stakeholder priorities. Equally important, there has been inadequate training and too little emphasis on the "pull" for implementation science (e.g., training implementers, practice-based research). We suggest that funders and reviewers of research should adopt and support a more robust definition of evidence. By critically examining the evolving nature of evidence, implementation science can better fulfill its vision of facilitating widespread and equitable adoption, delivery, and sustainment of scientific advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus, Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Elvin H. Geng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and Center for Dissemination and Implementation in the Institute for Public Health, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Pedersen BS, Kirk JW, Olesen MK, Grønfeldt BM, Stefánsdóttir NT, Brødsgaard R, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Nilsen P, Andersen O, Bandholm T, Pedersen MM. Feasibility and implementation fidelity of a co-designed intervention to promote in-hospital mobility among older medical patients-the WALK-Copenhagen project (WALK-Cph). Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:80. [PMID: 35397574 PMCID: PMC8994315 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01033-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobility interventions can prevent functional decline among older patients, but implementation of such interventions may be complicated by barriers in the clinical setting. The WALK-Copenhagen project (WALK-Cph) is aimed at promoting a 24-h mobility among older medical patients during hospitalization. The WALK-Cph intervention was co-designed by researchers and stakeholders to tailor the intervention to the clinical context. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and implementation fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention before evaluating clinical effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825497). METHODS The WALK-Cph intervention consisted of six components: a welcome folder explaining the importance of in-hospital activity, a WALK-plan prescribing up to three daily walking sessions during and after hospitalization, a WALK-path in the hallway that patients were motivated to use daily, exercise posters in the hallways and bedrooms, self-service on beverages and clothes, and discharge with a WALK-plan. The present study reports on phase 2 of WALK-Cph and consists of a feasibility and a fidelity component. The study was conducted at the two WALK-Cph intervention departments after the initiation of the WALK-Cph intervention. A cohort of older medical patients (+65) was recruited for the feasibility study to assess recruitment and data collection procedures and the method for assessment of activity. Simultaneously, implementation fidelity was assessed by observing clinical practice and intervention delivery at the intervention departments. RESULTS A feasibility cohort of 48 patients was included. Inclusion was considered feasible with recruitment rates between 62% and 70% of all eligible patients. Also, data collection was conducted without obstacles, and all patients accepted to wear activity monitors. The fidelity observations showed that three of the six intervention components were partially implemented as planned whereas three components were not implemented as planned. CONCLUSION The WALK-Cph intervention was found feasible, and although the intervention was not implemented with fidelity, the level of fidelity was considered sufficient to continue with further testing of the WALK-Cph intervention in a large-scale trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03825497 (retrospectively registered). Protocol PubMed ID (PMID): 29523569.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt Stævnsbo Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maren Kathrine Olesen
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Birk Mygind Grønfeldt
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Brødsgaard
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bandholm
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mette Merete Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Afifi RA, Parker EA, Dino G, Hall DM, Ulin B. Reimagining Rural: Shifting Paradigms About Health and Well-Being in the Rural United States. Annu Rev Public Health 2022; 43:135-154. [PMID: 34910581 PMCID: PMC11295601 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-123413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Rural health disparities have attracted increased national attention, compelling an expanded focus on rural health research. In this article, we deconstruct the definitions and narratives of "rural" communities and suggest that a paradigm shift is needed that centers the complexity and strength of rural places. We discuss the relevance of health equity frameworks, implementation science, and community-engaged approaches to promote rural well-being. Focusing on rural in its own right will lead to intervention innovations and reinvention with implications beyond rural areas. We conclude with suggestions for research and practice to inspire renewed interest in partnering with rural communities to promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Afifi
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, and Prevention Research Center for Rural Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States; ,
| | - E A Parker
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, and Prevention Research Center for Rural Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States; ,
| | - G Dino
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, and West Virginia Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States;
| | - D M Hall
- Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States;
| | - B Ulin
- Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Kwan BM, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE, Morrato EH, Luke DA. Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health. Annu Rev Public Health 2022; 43:331-353. [PMID: 34982585 PMCID: PMC9260852 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052220-112457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Designing for dissemination and sustainability (D4DS) refers to principles and methods for enhancing the fit between a health program, policy, or practice and the context in which it is intended to be adopted. In this article we first summarize the historical context of D4DS and justify the need to shift traditional health research and dissemination practices. We present a diverse literature according to a D4DS organizing schema and describe a variety of dissemination products, design processes and outcomes, and approaches to messaging, packaging, and distribution. D4DS design processes include stakeholder engagement, participatory codesign, and context and situation analysis, and leverage methods and frameworks from dissemination and implementation science, marketing and business, communications and visualarts, and systems science. Finally, we present eight recommendations to adopt a D4DS paradigm, reflecting shifts in ways of thinking, skills and approaches, and infrastructure and systems for training and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany M Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA;
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA;
| | - Elaine H Morrato
- Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health and Institute for Translational Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Anderson DM, Gupta AK, Birken SA, Sakas Z, Freeman MC. Adaptation in rural water, sanitation, and hygiene programs: A qualitative study in Nepal. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2022; 240:113919. [PMID: 35033992 PMCID: PMC8821331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Adaptations are modifications made to programming to improve effectiveness or contextual fit, and are important for program improvement. However, adaptations can be detrimental if they do not preserve an intervention's underlying theory of change. We present a case study of 45 adaptations made to rural WaSH programming in Nepal, identified through qualitative interviews with implementers conducted in June through August 2019. For each adaptation, we characterized its target outcomes and implementers' motivations for making the adaptation, and we assessed the adaptation's intended and unintended effects on program quality. Participants described adaptations to both interventions (e.g., changes to hygiene promotion messages) and implementation strategies (e.g., sanctions to enforce toilet construction, such as denying work permits to households without a toilet). Adoption was the most common target outcome, specifically increasing toilet construction. Other target outcomes included feasibility of program delivery, acceptability of messages or WaSH products, reach of program activities in the community, and sustainability. Implementers were commonly motivated by intense pressure to meet national open defecation free targets. Most adaptations achieved their target outcomes. However, sanctions adaptations had substantial unintended negative effects. Implementers reported that sanctions were unpopular with communities and had poor sustainability. In contrast, non-sanctions adaptations that targeted outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability had few unintended negative consequences. Our findings suggest that adaptations to promote rapid adoption of toilet construction do not consistently achieve sustained behavior change. Furthermore, adaptations to improve feasibility of program delivery or cost and acceptability of WaSH products can indirectly improve adoption even when it is not an explicit target outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darcy M Anderson
- The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Ankush Kumar Gupta
- Nepal Health Research Council, Ramshah Path, Kathmandu, P.O.Box 7626, Nepal
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 475 Vine Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA; Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Zoe Sakas
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Matthew C Freeman
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Nicholson J, English K, Heyman M. The ParentingWell Learning Collaborative Feasibility Study: Training Adult Mental Health Service Practitioners in a Family-Focused Practice Approach. Community Ment Health J 2022; 58:261-276. [PMID: 33813723 PMCID: PMC8019525 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00818-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This study investigates the feasibility and impact of the ParentingWell Learning Collaborative (PWLC) model in supporting mental health practitioners in implementing the family-focused ParentingWell practice approach with adults with mental illness. An exploratory design and qualitative methods were employed. Practitioners (n = 29) participated in in-person orientation, training and debriefing sessions; virtual coaching sessions; and via an interactive online hub. Researchers obtained data on participant engagement and satisfaction, and participants' reports of use, helpfulness, intention to use and impact. Participants were engaged in and highly satisfied with the PWLC. They deployed PWLC skills, tools and resources with parents. Evidence of impact was provided at the personal, practice and organizational levels. This study provides preliminary support for the feasibility and impact of the PWLC. Clear specification of a theoretically-based training model for practitioners is an essential step in adapting, implementing and testing interventions in new contexts .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Nicholson
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| | - Kelly English
- Children’s Behavioral Health Knowledge Center, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, 25 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Miriam Heyman
- The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453 USA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Implementation of the Wolverine Mental Health Program, Part 2: Implementation Phase. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2022; 29:227-243. [PMID: 35310456 PMCID: PMC8932458 DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
To enhance mental health care for youth in a midwestern residential treatment facility, Wolverine Human Services partnered with the Beck Institute (an intermediary) and an implementation research team to implement cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT has strong evidence supporting effectiveness for treating youth internalizing and externalizing problems, but it is a complex psychosocial intervention that demands a thoughtful implementation approach. This study outlines the implementation phase (2.5 years) of a 5-year collaborative effort. The implementation phase focused on (a) adapting CBT to fit the complex youth needs and the roles of the multidisciplinary team members resulting in a new comprehensive and coordinated care model, and (b) the strategies utilized to support its competent integration by all team members. Six blended implementation strategies were deployed in this phase: forging implementation teams, installing progress monitoring, adapting CBT, training, providing supervision and consultation, and training the trainers. A components-based approach to CBT yielded six core skills: active listening, problem solving, mood monitoring and intervention mapping, activity scheduling, distress tolerance, and cognitive restructuring. By the end of this phase, all staff had robust exposure to and experience with the adapted form of CBT. The work of our academic-community partnership has both research and clinical implications, with respect to integrating an adapted version of CBT for residential environments (CBT-RE).
Collapse
|
86
|
Mazzucca S, Saliba LF, Smith R, Weno ER, Allen P, Padek M, Brownson RC. "It's good to feel like you're doing something": a qualitative study examining state health department employees' views on why ineffective programs continue to be implemented in the USA. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:4. [PMID: 35033206 PMCID: PMC8760784 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00252-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mis-implementation, the inappropriate continuation of programs or policies that are not evidence-based or the inappropriate termination of evidence-based programs and policies, can lead to the inefficient use of scarce resources in public health agencies and decrease the ability of these agencies to deliver effective programs and improve population health. Little is known about why mis-implementation occurs, which is needed to understand how to address it. This study sought to understand the state health department practitioners’ perspectives about what makes programs ineffective and the reasons why ineffective programs continue. Methods Eight state health departments (SHDs) were selected to participate in telephone-administered qualitative interviews about decision-making around ending or continuing programs. States were selected based on geographic representation and on their level of mis-implementation (low and high) categorized from our previous national survey. Forty-four SHD chronic disease staff participated in interviews, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were consensus coded, and themes were identified and summarized. This paper presents two sets of themes, related to (1) what makes a program ineffective and (2) why ineffective programs continue to be implemented according to SHD staff. Results Participants considered programs ineffective if they were not evidence-based or if they did not fit well within the population; could not be implemented well due to program restraints or a lack of staff time and resources; did not reach those who could most benefit from the program; or did not show the expected program outcomes through evaluation. Practitioners described several reasons why ineffective programs continued to be implemented, including concerns about damaging the relationships with partner organizations, the presence of program champions, agency capacity, and funding restrictions. Conclusions The continued implementation of ineffective programs occurs due to a number of interrelated organizational, relational, human resources, and economic factors. Efforts should focus on preventing mis-implementation since it limits public health agencies’ ability to conduct evidence-based public health, implement evidence-based programs effectively, and reduce the high burden of chronic diseases. The use of evidence-based decision-making in public health agencies and supporting adaptation of programs to improve their fit may prevent mis-implementation. Future work should identify effective strategies to reduce mis-implementation, which can optimize public health practice and improve population health. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00252-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Mazzucca
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
| | | | - Romario Smith
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.,Heluna Health, City of Industry, CA, 91756, USA
| | - Emily Rodriguez Weno
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.,Bayer Strategy and Business Consulting, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - Peg Allen
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Margaret Padek
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Tongsiri S, Levkoff S, Gallagher-Thompson D, Teri L, Hinton L, Wisetpholchai B, Chuengsatiansup K, Sihapark S, Fritz S, Chen H. Cultural Adaptation of the Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (RDAD) Protocol for an Intervention to Reduce Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Thailand. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 87:1603-1614. [PMID: 35491775 PMCID: PMC10588817 DOI: 10.3233/jad-215253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (RDAD) program is an evidence-based intervention found to be feasible for implementation in community settings in the United States, and effective in reducing depression, one of the major behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). OBJECTIVE The goal of the study is to culturally adapt the RDAD for persons with dementia living in community settings of Thailand. METHODS Key adaptation steps included: 1) assess the community, 2) understand/select the intervention, 3) consult with experts/stakeholders, 4) decide what needs to be adapted, 5) adapt the original program, 6) train staff, and 7) pilot test the adapted materials. RESULTS Modifications to the original RDAD protocol included changes in number of sessions, mode of delivery, and the specific pleasant activities targeted. The pilot test demonstrated the feasibility and acceptance of the adapted RDAD intervention protocol. Implementers were able to comprehend and implement the core components of the intervention, while family members demonstrated ability to follow instructions, gain knowledge about dementia, and improve skills for setting up realistic goals. CONCLUSION Following the key adaptation steps outlined above, we were able to successfully modify the RDAD for the Thai cultural context, maintaining core components of the original protocol. Program implementers demonstrated their ability to supervise family caregivers and help them gain the knowledge and skills needed to provide care for older adults with dementia. Findings from the pilot studies were incorporated into final training and intervention protocols currently being implemented and evaluated in a randomized implementation trial in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirinart Tongsiri
- Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand
| | - Sue Levkoff
- College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dolores Gallagher-Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Linda Teri
- Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ladson Hinton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Stacy Fritz
- Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Hongtu Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Pacione L. Telehealth-delivered caregiver training for autism: Recent innovations. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:916532. [PMID: 36620655 PMCID: PMC9811175 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.916532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Providing treatment to children with autism is a global health priority, and research demonstrates that caregivers can be trained in techniques to promote their child's social interaction, communication, play, positive behavior and skills. These caregiver-mediated interventions have been shown to promote a number of positive outcomes in children with autism, as well as their caregivers. When provided by telehealth, data indicate that caregiver training is acceptable and feasible, and associated with similar positive outcomes as live face-to-face training. Telehealth innovations, which have accelerated during the COVID-19 era, have demonstrated advantages over in-person delivery of services in terms of cost effectiveness and increased accessibility, however, more research is needed on feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness for different populations in different contexts. This brief review will highlight recent caregiver skills training interventions for autism that have been successfully adapted or designed for telehealth delivery. Telehealth interventions that are scalable, adaptable, caregiver-mediated, open-access, and delivered as part of a stepped care model, have the potential to address the global treatment gap for families of children with autism and other neurodevelopmental disabilities. Considerations relevant to the global scale-up of caregiver-mediated interventions will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pacione
- Division of Child and Youth Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Valenta S, Ribaut J, Leppla L, Mielke J, Teynor A, Koehly K, Gerull S, Grossmann F, Witzig-Brändli V, De Geest S. Context-specific adaptation of an eHealth-facilitated, integrated care model and tailoring its implementation strategies-A mixed-methods study as a part of the SMILe implementation science project. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:977564. [PMID: 36925799 PMCID: PMC10012712 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.977564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Contextually adapting complex interventions and tailoring their implementation strategies is key to a successful and sustainable implementation. While reporting guidelines for adaptations and tailoring exist, less is known about how to conduct context-specific adaptations of complex health care interventions. Aims To describe in methodological terms how the merging of contextual analysis results (step 1) with stakeholder involvement, and considering overarching regulations (step 2) informed our adaptation of an Integrated Care Model (ICM) for SteM cell transplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth (SMILe) and the tailoring of its implementation strategies (step 3). Methods Step 1: We used a mixed-methods design at University Hospital Basel, guided by the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA). Step 2: Adaptations of the SMILe-ICM and tailoring of implementation strategies were discussed with an interdisciplinary team (n = 28) by considering setting specific and higher-level regulatory scenarios. Usability tests were conducted with patients (n = 5) and clinicians (n = 4). Step 3: Adaptations were conducted by merging our results from steps 1 and 2 using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME). We tailored implementation strategies according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. Results Step 1: Current clinical practice was mostly acute-care-driven. Patients and clinicians valued eHealth-facilitated ICMs to support trustful patient-clinician relationships and the fitting of eHealth components to context-specific needs. Step 2: Based on information from project group meetings, adaptations were necessary on the organizational level (e.g., delivery of self-management information). Regulations informed the tailoring of SMILe-ICM`s visit timepoints and content; data protection management was adapted following Swiss regulations; and steering group meetings supported infrastructure access. The usability tests informed further adaptation of technology components. Step 3: Following FRAME and ERIC, SMILe-ICM and its implementation strategies were contextually adapted and tailored to setting-specific needs. Discussion This study provides a context-driven methodological approach on how to conduct intervention adaptation including the tailoring of its implementation strategies. The revealed meso-, and macro-level differences of the contextual analysis suggest a more targeted approach to enable an in-depth adaptation process. A theory-guided adaptation phase is an important first step and should be sufficiently incorporated and budgeted in implementation science projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Valenta
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Janette Ribaut
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lynn Leppla
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Juliane Mielke
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Teynor
- Faculty of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Koehly
- Department of Acute Medicine, Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Gerull
- Department of Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Florian Grossmann
- Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Verena Witzig-Brändli
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinic for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
90
|
Step UP! To Stamp Out Stigma: adapting and testing a bystander intervention to reduce HIV-related stigma. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-020-01284-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
91
|
Anderson DM, Birken SA, Bartram JK, Freeman MC. Adaptation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions: A Model and Scoping Review of Key Concepts and Tools. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:896234. [PMID: 36925880 PMCID: PMC10012759 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.896234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) is important for health, livelihoods, and economic development, but WaSH programs have often underdelivered on expected health benefits. Underperformance has been attributed partly to poor ability to retain effectiveness following adaptation to facilitate WaSH programs' implementation in diverse contexts. Adaptation of WaSH interventions is common but often not done systematically, leading to poor outcomes. Models and frameworks from the adaptation literature have potential to improve WaSH adaptation to facilitate implementation and retain effectiveness. However, these models and frameworks were designed in a healthcare context, and WaSH interventions are typically implemented outside traditional health system channels. The purpose of our work was to develop an adaptation model tailored specifically to the context of WaSH interventions. Methods We conducted a scoping review to identify key adaptation steps and identify tools to support systematic adaptation. To identify relevant literature, we conducted a citation search based on three recently published reviews on adaptation. We also conducted a systematic database search for examples of WaSH adaptation. We developed a preliminary model based on steps commonly identified across models in adaptation literature, and then tailored the model to the WaSH context using studies yielded by our systematic search. We compiled a list of tools to support systematic data collection and decision-making throughout adaptation from all included studies. Results and Conclusions Our model presents adaptation steps in five phases: intervention selection, assessment, preparation, implementation, and sustainment. Phases for assessment through sustainment are depicted as iterative, reflecting that once an intervention is selected, adaptation is a continual process. Our model reflects the specific context of WaSH by including steps to engage non-health and lay implementers and to build consensus among diverse stakeholders with potentially competing priorities. We build on prior adaptation literature by compiling tools to support systematic data collection and decision-making, and we describe how they can be used throughout adaptation steps. Our model is intended to improve program outcomes by systematizing adaptation processes and provides an example of how systematic adaptation can occur for interventions with health goals but that are implemented outside conventional health system channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darcy M Anderson
- Public Health and Environment, The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Jamie K Bartram
- Public Health and Environment, The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew C Freeman
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Hills HA, Lengnick-Hall R, Johnson KA, Vermeer W, Hendricks Brown C, McGovern M. Rapid adaptation during the COVID crisis: Challenges experienced in delivering service to those with Opioid Use Disorders. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2022; 3:26334895221096295. [PMID: 37091103 PMCID: PMC9924287 DOI: 10.1177/26334895221096295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adaptation is an accepted part of implementing evidence-based practices. COVID-19 presented a unique opportunity to examine adaptation in evolving contexts. Delivering service to people with opioid use disorder during the pandemic required significant adaptation due to revised regulations and limited service access. This report evaluated changes to addiction medication services caused by the pandemic, challenges encountered in rapidly adapting service delivery, and initial impressions of which changes might be sustainable over time. Methods Qualitatively-evaluated structured interviews (N = 20) were conducted in late 2020 with key informants in Pinellas County (FL) to assess the pandemic's impact. Interviewees represented a cross-section of the professional groups including direct SUD/HIV service providers, and sheriff's office, Department of Health, and regional clinical program administrative staff. The interview questions examined significant changes necessitated by the pandemic, challenges encountered in adapting to this evolving context, and considerations for sustained change. Results The most significant changes to service delivery identified were rapid adaptation to a telehealth format, and modifying service consistent with SAMHSA guidance, to allow for 'take-home' doses of methadone. Limitations imposed by access to technology, and the retraining of staff and patients to give and receive service differently were the most common themes identified as challenging adaptation efforts. Respondents saw shifts towards telehealth as most likely to being sustained. Conclusions COVID-19 provided an unprecedented opportunity to examine adaptation in a fast-paced, dynamic, and evolving context. Adaptations identified will only be sustained through multisystem collaboration and validation. Results suggest that additional components could be added to implementation frameworks to assess rapid adaptation during unplanned events, such as access to additional resources or local decision-making that impacts service delivery. Findings will also be integrated with quantitative data to help inform local policy decisions. Plain Language Summary Adaptation is an accepted part of implementing evidencebased practices. COVID-19 presented a unique opportunity to examine rapid adaptation necessitated within evolving contexts. Delivering services to people with opioid use disorder required significant adaptation due to changing regulations and limited access to lifesaving services. This study examined changes in service delivery due to the pandemic, challenges encountered in rapid adaptation, and initial impressions of which changes might be sustainable over time. Qualitatively-evaluated structured interviews were conducted with a cross-section of professional groups (direct substance use disorder (SUD) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) service providers, and sheriff's office, Department of Health, and clinical program administrative staff) in Pinellas County (FL). The most significant changes to service delivery were rapid adaptation to a telehealth format and increased allowance for 'takehome' doses of methadone medication. Limitations imposed by access to technology, as well as the education of and staff and patients were the most common themes identified as challenges. Respondents saw shifts towards telehealth as most likely to be sustained. COVID-19 provided an unprecedented opportunity to examine adaptation in a fast-paced, dynamic, and evolving context. Adaptations will only be sustained through multisystem collaboration and validation. Findings suggest that additional components could be added to implementation frameworks to assess rapid adaptation during unplanned events, such as access to additional resources or local decision-making that impacts service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly A. Hills
- Department of Mental Health Law and Policy (MHC 2636), College of
Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Kimberly A. Johnson
- Department of Mental Health Law and Policy (MHC 2636), College of
Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Wouter Vermeer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of
Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - C. Hendricks Brown
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of
Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark McGovern
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of
Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of
Medicine, Stanford University School of
Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Gelius PC, Jansen M, King AC. Cooperative planning and its utilization in German physical activity promotion: a brief introduction. Health Promot Int 2021; 36:ii1-ii7. [PMID: 34905606 PMCID: PMC8670624 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daab170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Gelius
- Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maria Jansen
- Department of Health Services Research, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Abby C King
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Shin HD, Cassidy C, Weeks LE, Campbell LA, Drake EK, Wong H, Donnelly L, Dorey R, Kang H, Curran JA. Interventions to change clinicians' behavior related to suicide-prevention care in the emergency department: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 20:788-846. [PMID: 34907133 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review was to explore, characterize, and map the literature on interventions and intervention components implemented to change emergency department clinicians' behavior related to suicide prevention using the Behaviour Change Wheel as a guiding theoretical framework. INTRODUCTION An emergency department is a critical place for suicide prevention, yet patients are often discharged without proper suicide risk assessments and/or referrals. In response, we must support emergency department clinicians' behavior change to follow evidence-based suicide prevention strategies. However, reviews to date have yet to systematically and theoretically examine interventions' functional characteristics and how they can influence emergency department clinicians' behaviors related to suicide-prevention care. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review considered interventions that targeted emergency department clinicians' behavior change related to suicide prevention. Behavior change referred to observable practice changes as well as proxy measures of behavior change, including changes in knowledge and attitude. METHODS This review followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches included PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and gray literature, including targeted Google searches for relevant organizations/websites, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Scopus conference papers (using a specific filter). This review did not apply any date limits, but our search was limited to the English language. Data extraction was undertaken using a charting table developed specifically for the review objective. Narrative descriptions of interventions were coded using the Behavior Change Wheel's intervention functions. Reported outcome measures were categorized. Findings are tabulated and synthesized narratively. RESULTS Forty-one studies were included from the database searches, representing a mixture of experimental (n = 2), quasi-experimental (n = 24), non-experimental (n = 12), qualitative (n = 1), and mixed methods (n = 2) approaches. An additional 29 citations were included from gray literature searches. One was a pilot mixed methods study, and the rest were interventions. In summary, this review included a total of 70 citations, describing 66 different interventions. Identified interventions comprised a wide range of Behaviour Change Wheel intervention functions to change clinicians' behavior: education (n = 48), training (n = 40), enablement (n = 36), persuasion (n = 21), environmental restructuring (n = 18), modeling (n = 7), and incentivisation (n = 2). Based on the Behaviour Change Wheel analysis, many interventions targeted more than one determinant of behavior change, often employing education and training to improve clinicians' knowledge and skills simultaneously. Among the 42 studies that reported outcome measures, effectiveness was measured at clinician (n = 38), patient (n = 4), and/or organization levels (n = 6). Few studies reported implementation outcomes, such as measures of reach (n = 4), adoption (n = 5), or fidelity (n = 1). There were no evaluation data reported on the interventions identified through Google searches. CONCLUSIONS Interventions included in this review were diverse and leveraged a range of mechanisms to change emergency department clinicians' behavior. However, most interventions relied solely on education and/or training to improve clinicians' knowledge and/or skills. Future research should consider diverse intervention functions to target both individual- and/or organization-level barriers for a given context. Secondly, the ultimate goal for changing emergency department clinicians' behavior is to improve patient health outcomes related to suicide-related thoughts and behaviors, but current research has most commonly evaluated clinicians' behavior in isolation of patient outcomes. Future studies should consider reporting patient-level outcomes alongside clinician-level outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwayeon Danielle Shin
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada Aligning Health Needs and Evidence for Transformative Change (AH-NET-C): A JBI Centre of Excellence, Halifax, NS, Canada Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
95
|
Mclaughlin M, Campbell E, Sutherland R, McKenzie T, Davies L, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L. Extent, Type and Reasons for Adaptation and Modification When Scaling-Up an Effective Physical Activity Program: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1). FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2021; 1:719194. [PMID: 37007208 PMCID: PMC10062321 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2021.719194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: Few studies have described the extent, type and reasons for making changes to a program prior to and during its delivery using a consistent taxonomy. Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) is a secondary school physical activity program that was scaled-up for delivery to a greater number of schools. We aimed to describe the extent, type and reasons for changes to the PA4E1 program (the evidence-based physical activity practices, implementation support strategies and evaluation methods) made before its delivery at scale (adaptations) and during its delivery in a scale-up trial (modifications). Methods: The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) was used to describe adaptations (planned and made prior to the scale-up trial) and modifications (made during the conduct of the trial). A list of adaptations was generated from a comparison of the efficacy and scale-up trials via published PA4E1 protocols, trial registrations and information provided by trial investigators. Monthly trial team meetings tracked and coded modifications in "real-time" during the conduct of the scale-up trial. The extent, type and reasons for both adaptations and modifications were summarized descriptively. Results: In total, 20 adaptations and 20 modifications were identified, these were to physical activity practices (n = 8; n = 3), implementation support strategies (n = 6; n = 16) and evaluation methods (n = 6, n = 1), respectively. Few adaptations were "fidelity inconsistent" (n = 2), made "unsystematically" (n = 1) and proposed to have a "negative" impact on the effectiveness of the program (n = 1). Reasons for the adaptations varied. Of the 20 modifications, all were "fidelity consistent" and the majority were made "proactively" (n = 12), though most were "unsystematic" (n = 18). Fifteen of the modifications were thought to have a "positive" impact on program effectiveness. The main reason for modification was the "available resources" (n = 14) of the PA4E1 Implementation Team. Conclusions: Adaptations and modifications to public health programs are common. Modifications have the potential to impact the implementation and effectiveness of programs. Our findings underscore the importance of comprehensive reporting of the extent, type and reasons for modifications as part of process evaluations, as this data may be important to the interpretation of trial findings. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870, Identifier ACTRN12617000681358.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mclaughlin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Campbell
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Tom McKenzie
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Lynda Davies
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Hontelez JAC, Bulstra CA, Yakusik A, Lamontagne E, Bärnighausen TW, Atun R. Evidence-based policymaking when evidence is incomplete: The case of HIV programme integration. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003835. [PMID: 34752470 PMCID: PMC8577724 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Jan Hontelez and co-authors discuss the use of different types of evidence to inform HIV program integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan A. C. Hontelez
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline A. Bulstra
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Yakusik
- The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Erik Lamontagne
- The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland
- Aix-Marseille School of Economics, CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Les Milles, France
| | - Till W. Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI), Mtubatuba, South Africa
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Rifat Atun
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Rajan P, Hiller C, Lin J, Refshauge K, Lincoln M, Leaver A. Community-based interventions for chronic musculoskeletal health conditions in rural and remote populations: A systematic review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2021; 29:1621-1631. [PMID: 33368791 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Chronic musculoskeletal health conditions are highly prevalent in rural and remote areas, globally. It is unknown, however, whether interventions shown to be effective for urban populations are also effective for rural and remote populations. The purpose of the review was to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based interventions for management of chronic musculoskeletal health conditions in rural and remote populations. A systematic review was undertaken of the major databases: Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Rural and Remote Health, Embase and PEDro to April 2020 with no restrictions on language or publication date. Odds Ratios were calculated to report differences between intervention and control groups. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was not conducted, given the high heterogeneity among studies. From a total of 3,219 articles identified from the title search, five studies were eligible, with a total of 2,831 participants. Interventions evaluated included education alone, exercise with education and ergonomic modifications. Community-based education and exercise led to significantly reduced chronic musculoskeletal pain [OR = 1.85 (95% CI 1.22, 2.82)] compared with controls. Ergonomic stove installation significantly reduced average prevalence of back pain (0.25% reduction in pain prevalence; p < .05); however, no significant effect [OR = 1.02 (0.63, 1.65)] was found when transformed to Odds Ratio. There were divergent findings for education programmes alone: one study reported a positive effect [OR = 1.78 (1.27, 2.49)], while another reported no significant effect [delivered either in home [OR: 1.21 (0.78, 1.86)] or in small groups [OR = 0.95 (0.60, 1.51)]. A significant improvement in knowledge was found with community-based education delivered in participants' homes [SMD: 1.27 (1.01, 1.54)], in small groups [SMD: 0.79 (0.53, 1.06)], using traditional puppetry [SMD: 4.79 (4.51, 5.06)], and with education and exercise [SMD: 0.29 (0.06, 0.52)]. There is low quality evidence that education and/or exercise improves knowledge of arthritis, and the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions on pain was unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavithra Rajan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire Hiller
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jianhua Lin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathryn Refshauge
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michelle Lincoln
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Healy GN, Winkler EAH, Goode AD. A RE-AIM evaluation in early adopters to iteratively improve the online BeUpstanding™ program supporting workers to sit less and move more. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1916. [PMID: 34674676 PMCID: PMC8532381 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11993-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The web-based BeUpstanding program supports desk workers to sit less and move more. Successfully translated from a research-delivered intervention, BeUpstanding has gone through iterative development and evaluation phases in preparation for wide-scale implementation. In the third planned “early-adopters” phase (01/09/2017–11/06/2019), the program was made freely-available online. An integrated delivery and evaluation platform was also developed to enable workplace champions to run and evaluate the intervention within their work team independent of researcher support. Using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, this study reports on the extent to which the program and processes were “fit-for-purpose” for a national implementation trial across the indicators of uptake (reach and adoption), implementation and engagement, and effectiveness for behaviour change. Methods Data were collected via the online surveys embedded in the program and through program access analytics. Descriptive data (with linearized variance for the clustered staff-level data) and results from mixed models (repeated data and clustering for pre-post changes) are reported. Results Despite purposeful limited promotion, uptake was good, with 182 Australian users initially registering (208 total) and 135 (from 113 organisations) then completing the sign-up process. Recruitment reached users across Australia and in 16 of 19 Australian industries. Implementation was inconsistent and limited, with signed-up users completing 0 to 14 of the program’s 14 steps and only 7 (5.2%) completing all seven core steps. Many champions (n = 69, 51.1%) had low engagement (1 day toolkit usage) and few (n = 30, 22%) were highly engaged (> 1 day toolkit usage and surveyed staff). Although only 18 users (7 organisations) performed the pre- and post-program staff evaluations (337 and 167 staff, respectively), pre-post changes showed the program effectively reduced workplace sitting by − 9.0% (95% CI -12.0, − 5.9%). Discussion The program had uptake across industries and across Australia, but implementation and engagement varied widely. Few workplaces completed the evaluation components. In those that did, the program was effective for the primary outcome (workplace sitting). Conducting a planned early adopters phase and a comprehensive evaluation according to RE-AIM helped highlight necessary program improvements to make it more suitable for wide-scale implementation and evaluation. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinic Trials Registry ACTRN12617000682347. Date registered: 12/05/2017. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11993-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve N Healy
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, 288 Herston Rd, HERSTON QLD, Brisbane, 4006, Australia. .,Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Elisabeth A H Winkler
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, 288 Herston Rd, HERSTON QLD, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| | - Ana D Goode
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, 288 Herston Rd, HERSTON QLD, Brisbane, 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Kirk JW, Nilsen P, Andersen O, Stefánsdóttir NT, Grønfeldt B, Brødsgaard R, Pedersen BS, Bandholm T, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Pedersen MM. Adaptations and modifications to a co-designed intervention and its clinical implementation: a qualitative study in Denmark. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1108. [PMID: 34656126 PMCID: PMC8520628 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07142-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a long-standing debate in implementation research on whether adaptations to evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are desirable in health care. If an intervention is adapted and not delivered as conceived and planned, it is said to have low fidelity. The WALK-Cph project was developed based on the assumption that involving stakeholders in co-design processes would facilitate the fidelity of an intervention to increase the mobility of acutely admitted older medical patients and its implementation in two hospitals in Denmark. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse adaptations and modifications that were made to the co-designed WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation. METHODS This study used a qualitative design. An ethnographic field study was performed using participant observations, workshops and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed twice using the Framework Method. The first analysis was based on the frameworks from Stirman, Moore and Proctor. The second analysis, a retrospective modifications analysis, was based on the Adaptation-Impact Framework. RESULTS Many different types of adaptations and modifications were made to the WALK-Cph intervention and its implementation plan. Most of the modifications were made on the contents of the intervention. In total, 44 adaptations and modifications were made, of which 21 were planned (adaptations) and 23 were made haphazardly (modifications). Most of the content and context adaptations and modifications made on the intervention had a mixed result regarding enhanced fidelity. The retrospective modifications analysis showed that modifications were ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped. CONCLUSIONS Although an extensive co-design process was carried out to facilitate the fidelity of the WALK-Cph intervention, this study showed that many adaptations and modifications were still made to both the intervention and its implementation plan. It could indicate that the co-design process had a small effect or that adaptations and modifications are ongoing and both situationally and contextually shaped, which challenge the assumption and the desire to be able to plan and control changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark. .,Department of Public Health, Nursing, Aarhus University, Nordre Ringgade 1, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medical and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sandbäcksgatan 7, 582 25, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Birk Grønfeldt
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Rasmus Brødsgaard
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark
| | - Britt Stævnsbo Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bandholm
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, and Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen (PMR-C), Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- Department of Health and Social Context, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Mette Merete Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Danmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E, Petticrew M, Rycroft-Malone J, White M, Moore L. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021; 374:n2061. [PMID: 34593508 PMCID: PMC8482308 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1635] [Impact Index Per Article: 545.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Skivington
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lynsay Matthews
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sharon Anne Simpson
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Craig
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Janis Baird
- Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Medical Research Council ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research and Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathleen Anne Boyd
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma McIntosh
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Martin White
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laurence Moore
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|