Bezafibrate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hyperlipidaemia

Correlation of pharmacological properties of a group of hypolipaemic drugs by molecular topology

This investigation was undertaken to test the ability of the molecular connectivity model to predict the percentage of plasma protein binding, the percentage of total cholesterol reduction and oral LD50 in rats of a group of hypolipaemic drugs using multi-variable regression equations with multiple correlation coefficients, standard error of estimate, degrees of freedom, F-Snedecor function values, Mallow's CP and Student's t-test as criteria of fit. Regression analyses showed that the molecular connectivity model predicts these properties. Corresponding stability (cross validation) studies were made on the selected prediction models which confirmed their goodness of fit. The results also demonstrated that the presence of substituents and molecular volume, determine the value of these properties in hypolipaemic drugs.

Randomised double blind comparison of terbinafine and itraconazole for treatment of toenail tinea infection. Seventh Lamisil German Onychomycosis Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine and itraconazole in the treatment of toenail tinea unguium.

DESIGN

Multicentre, double blind, parallel group study.

SETTING

17 university hospitals, one army hospital, and five dermatology practices.

PATIENTS

195 patients with clinically suspected toenail tinea and growth of dermatophytes in baseline culture; data on 86 patients in the terbinafine group and 84 patients in the itraconazole group were fully evaluated for efficacy.

INTERVENTIONS

Daily dose of 250 mg terbinafine or 200 mg itraconazole for 12 weeks, with follow up for a further 40 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mycological cure (negative results on microscopy and culture) and clinical improvement (length and area of unaffected nail) at week 52 or at discontinuation of treatment.

RESULTS

At the end of the study mycological cure rates were 81% (70 out of 86) for terbinafine and 63% (53 out of 84) for itraconazole (2P < 0.01). Negative culture was achieved in 92% (79 out of 86) in the terbinafine group and 67% (56 out of 84) in the itraconazole group (2P < 0.0001). Length of unaffected nail was 9.44 mm in the terbinafine group and 7.85 mm in the itraconazole group (2P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Terbinafine is more effective than itraconazole in the treatment of toenail tinea infection.

Effects of different phenotypes of hyperlipoproteinemia and of treatment with fibric acid derivatives on the rates of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylation in humans

Little is known about the relationships between hyperlipidemia and bile acid metabolism. However, hypolipidemic treatment with fibric acid derivatives has been shown to increase biliary cholesterol secretion, presumably by reducing bile acid synthesis. To clarify such relationships, we investigated the effects of different hyperlipoproteinemic conditions and of treatment with fibric acid derivatives on the rates of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylation (the limiting step of bile acid synthesis) in humans. We studied 10 patients (aged 36 to 68 years) with lipoprotein phenotype IIa and with a clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, a condition of reduced activity of LDL receptors, and 11 patients (aged 48 to 70 years) with lipoprotein phenotype IIb or IV and clinical diagnosis of familial combined hyperlipidemia, a condition probably related to increased hepatic lipoprotein synthesis. Cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylation rates were assayed in vivo by tritium release assay after an intravenous injection of [7 alpha-3H]cholesterol. The results were compared by ANOVA to the values obtained in a group of 28 normolipidemic patients (aged 34 to 83 years), with age as the covariate. Six patients were also studied after treatment with gemfibrozil (900 to 1200 mg/d for 6 to 8 weeks) and 5 patients were studied after treatment with bezafibrate (400 mg/d for 6 to 8 weeks). Hydroxylation rates were 0.82 +/- 0.22 mmol/d in the familial hypercholesterolemia group and 1.30 +/- 0.47 mmol/d in the familial combined hyperlipidemia group (P < .05 between the two groups and between patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and control subjects; P = NS between patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and control subjects, as determined by ANOVA).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term safety of statin-fibrate combination treatment in the management of hypercholesterolaemia in patients with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety profile of treatment with a statin-fibrate combination in a cohort of patients with documented coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analytical study.

SETTING

District general hospital.

PATIENTS

102 (81 male and 21 female) hypercholesterolaemic (total cholesterol concentration > 6.5 mmol/l) patients with documented coronary artery disease and who had been treated with a statin-fibrate combination for over 1 year. Coronary artery disease was confirmed by angiography in 93 patients and by a positive (Bruce protocol) exercise test in the remainder. Fifty eight patients had a history of previous coronary bypass graft surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Twice daily lipid lowering treatment was given, with the fibrate administered in the morning (either bezafibrate 400 mg (n = 101) or fenofibrate 200 mg (n = 1)) and the statin in the evening (either simvastatin 10 mg (n = 23), 20 mg (n = 72), or 40 mg (n = 2) or pravastatin 10 mg (n = 1) or 20 mg (n = 4)). Treatment continued for 1 (n = 9), 2 (n = 58), or 3 (n = 35) years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Selected laboratory variables (total cholesterol concentration and liver (aspartate transaminase (AST)) and muscle enzyme (creatine kinase (CK)) activities) and documented symptomatology.

RESULTS

A mean (SD) total cholesterol concentration of 5.2 (0.8) mmol/l was achieved after combined treatment for 1 year which was maintained at annual follow up. Over a maximum 3 year follow up no patient reported myalgic symptoms and none had a measured CK activity > 10 times above nomal. Four men on a simvastatin-bezafibrate combination had a CK activity rise to less than three times normal. Fourteen patients with a negative history of alcohol excess (consumption < 21 units/week) had borderline raised AST values.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin-fibrate combination treatment for up to 3 years in a cohort of patients with coronary artery disease was not associated with serious disturbances in biochemical markers of muscle or liver function.

Biliary lipids, lithogenic index and biliary drug concentrations during etofibrate and bezafibrate treatment

Hypolipidemic drugs like etofibrate and bezafibrate may induce lithogenic bile and increase the risk of gallstone formation. In this study, biliary lipids, lithogenic index and biliary drug concentrations were investigated in 6 hyperlipidemic patients after cholecystectomy. Patients were treated once daily for 5 days with either 500 mg/day etofibrate or 400 mg/day bezafibrate. Hepatic bile was collected for 6 days via T-drainage in 4 hourly aliquots. In the patients treated with etofibrate, the range of the lithogenic index remained stable with 0.89-1.69 before and 0.78-1.51 after 5 day drug therapy. In the bezafibrate group, the range of the lithogenic index rose from 0.81-1.40 to 1.26-1.66 mainly as a result of an increase of biliary cholesterol concentrations. Biliary drug concentrations were substantially higher under bezafibrate treatment than under etofibrate treatment. In conclusion, the fibrate drugs, etofibrate and bezafibrate, are different with regard to lithogenicity of bile and extent of biliary excretion. The safety profile of etofibrate may be preferably compared to other fibrate drugs.

Lifibrol: a novel lipid-lowering drug for the therapy of hypercholesterolemia. Lifibrol Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of lifibrol on serum lipids in adult patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

These were two double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled studies. Each patient in each study had an 8-week dietary lead-in period on the American Heart Association Step I diet before administration of lifibrol or placebo. The first study consisted of active dosing of 4 weeks, and the second study had 12 weeks of active dosing. The setting for the study involved outpatients in private or university hospitals in the United States. All patients had primary hypercholesterolemia with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of > 160 mg/dl after the dietary lead-in period. There were 155 patients in the 4-week study and 336 patients in the 12-week study. In the first study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 150, 300, 450, 600, or 900 mg lifibrol as a single daily dose for 4 weeks. In the second study, patients were randomized to receive either 150, 300, or 600 mg lifibrol for 12 weeks. Efficacy was determined by serial measurements of serum lipids either on a weekly or biweekly basis during each study.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, lifibrol reduced LDL cholesterol (> 40%, p < 0.0001) and apolipoprotein B (approximately 40%, p < 0.0001) by 4 weeks in both studies. After 6 weeks, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased in the placebo and 150 and 300 mg lifibrol groups. In the 600 mg lifibrol group, triglycerides (approximately 25%, p < 0.001), lipoprotein (a) (approximately 30%, p < 0.001), and HDL cholesterol (approximately 5%, p < 0.002) decreased. Lifibrol reduced key sterol intermediates (e.g., lanosterol, lathosterol, beta-sitosterol, and campesterol) and increased serum bile acids, but it had no effect on urinary mevalonic acid excretion. The pharmacokinetics of lifibrol are independent of dose and are similar in men and women. Lifibrol was well tolerated. The most frequent medical event in both studies was skin rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Lifibrol is a potent lipid-lowering drug in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

The effects of fibrates on lipoprotein and hemostatic coronary risk factors

The effects of fibrates on lipoprotein profiles and lipoprotein physiology, as well as on selected coagulation and fibrinolytic factors are reviewed. It is concluded that the action of fibrates on these systems is such as to render the fibrates beneficial in atherosclerosis prevention.

Dual bezafibrate-simvastatin therapy for combined hyperlipidaemia

Statins and fibrates are both effective in the treatment of hyperlipidaemias but are not recommended in combination because episodes of rhabdomyolysis have followed combined lovastatin-gemfibrozil therapy. We assessed treatment with dual bezafibrate-simvastatin therapy in routine clinical practice. In 22 patients, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides fell by 20.1% (P < 0.0001), 35.1% (P < 0.001) and 31% (P < 0.05) respectively, and HDL-cholesterol rose by 18.4% (P < 0.05) on combination therapy. The reduction in cholesterol followed the introduction of simvastatin, while the decrease in triglycerides followed treatment with bezafibrate. No patient developed myopathy. We conclude that dual simvastatin-bezafibrate therapy is well tolerated and may reduce triglyceride concentrations, but offers no advantage in cholesterol reduction over treatment with simvastatin alone.

Treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: fluvastatin versus bezafibrate

The effects of fluvastatin and bezafibrate on lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins (apo) were investigated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. After 8 weeks of strictly controlled (computer-based assessment) dietary stabilization, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > or = 160 mg/dL; triglycerides < or = 300 mg/dL) were enrolled into a 6-week placebo phase. Altogether, 131 patients were randomized to receive either fluvastatin at 40 mg once daily (n = 64; mean age 53 years) or bezafibrate at 400 mg once daily (n = 67; mean age 52 years) for 12 weeks. Compliance with the diet was monitored (3-day food records) after 6 and 12 weeks. Fluvastatin led to significant reductions in LDL-C (-23%), total cholesterol (-17%), LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (-24%) and apo B (-19%). Fluvastatin significantly increased LpA-I (+8%) and apo E (+20%). Bezafibrate produced significant reductions in LDL-C (-17%), total cholesterol (-13%), LDL-C/HDL-C (-24%), triglycerides (-28%), apo B (-15%), and LpA-I (-10%) and significantly increased HDL-C (+12%), apo A-I (+9%), apo A-II (+30%), apo E (+14%), and Lp(a) (+3%). No clinically notable increases in levels of liver enzymes or creatine phosphokinase were observed with either treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. There was a low incidence of adverse events that tended to be mild and included headache, muscular pain, angina, and dyspepsia. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups, and no significant differences in dietary behavior were observed. In conclusion, fluvastatin is a well tolerated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. Effects of fluvastatin on LpA-I occur irrespective of changes in HDL-C.

Drug treatment of dyslipoproteinemia

This article has focused on the appropriate indications for lipid-lowering drugs in adult patients with different lipoprotein disorders, which we have divided into primary hypercholesterolemia, combined hyperlipidemia,and hypertriglyceridemia. The mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile of the major drugs have been reviewed, and based on this information, we have presented our views on the appropriate drugs of first choice and appropriate second-choice agents for treatment of adult patients with different dyslipidemias. The rationale for the use of hypolipidemic drugs is strongest in patients with hyperlipidemia who concurrently have evidence for coronary or peripheral vascular disease, in whom the goal of secondary prevention is to retard further progression of atherosclerosis and potentially induce some regression, whereas in selected high-risk patients without evidence of atherosclerosis, the goals of therapy are to prevent the premature development of CAD or, in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, prevent the adverse sequelae of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and potentially pancreatitis. We have focused on the use of hypolipidemic drugs in adult patients, and the guidelines discussed are not appropriate for use in children with hyperlipidemia, in whom drug therapy should be undertaken selectively and in consultation with a lipid specialist. Many areas of controversy in the use of lipid-lowering drugs remain to be addressed by future studies; these include the use of lipid-lowering drugs in patients with secondary causes of hyperlipidemia (e.g., the nephrotic syndrome), the use of lipid-lowering drugs in women, and recommendations for drug therapy in older patients.

The effect of bezafibrate treatment on serum alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme activities

A reduction in serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity is a well-documented side effect of treatment with bezafibrate and other fibric acid derivatives. To evaluate the effect of bezafibrate treatment on individual ALP isoenzyme activities, 10 patients were studied on two separate occasions, first, after a 6-week period on no drug treatment, and second, after 6 weeks of bezafibrate therapy. On each occasion, serum total ALP and ALP isoenzyme activities and serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) activity were measured both after fasting and following the ingestion of a standardized high-fat meal rich in long-chain fatty acid triglycerides, as intestinal ALP activity is known to be influenced by dietary fat intake. Plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were measured on fasting samples. In the fasting state, bezafibrate treatment resulted in a 25% reduction (P < .01) in serum total ALP activity; liver ALP activity was reduced by 40% (P < .01), and biliary ALP activity was reduced in those patients in whom it was initially detectable, while bone and intestinal ALP activities were unchanged. There was also a 15% reduction (P < .05) in serum GGT activity, but no change in plasma AST or ALT activities. Serum intestinal ALP activity increased significantly (P < .01) by 1 hour following ingestion of the high-fat meal, but treatment with bezafibrate did not change the magnitude of this response. There was no change in the activity of any other ALP isoenzyme following fat ingestion. This study demonstrates that the effect of bezafibrate on serum ALP activity is confined to the liver and biliary isoenzymes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rationale and design of a secondary prevention trial of increasing serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and reducing triglycerides in patients with clinically manifest atherosclerotic heart disease (the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Trial)

Controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of reducing the blood levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in reducing the incidence of coronary artery disease in hypercholesterolemic middle-aged men. However, a similar reversibility of the risk of coronary artery disease has not been demonstrated for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation and triglyceride reduction. Therefore, the effect of administering 400 mg of bezafibrate retard daily versus placebo (double blind) to patients with myocardial infarction preceding randomization by 6 months to 5 years, or a clinically manifest anginal syndrome documented by objective evidence of dynamic myocardial ischemia, or both, is being investigated. Three thousand subjects (aged 45 to 74 years) are being enrolled from 19 cardiac departments in Israel, with total serum cholesterol between 180 and 250 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol < or = 45 mg/dl and triglycerides < or = 300 mg/dl. In addition, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations are required to be < or = 180 mg/dl (< or = 160 mg/dl for patients aged < 50 years). Patients needing lipid-modifying therapy, exhibiting > or = 1 prespecified exclusion criterion or not giving informed consent, or a combination, are not randomized. The primary end points for evaluating efficacy are the incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and sudden death. The hypothesized effect of bezafibrate administration under the aforementioned protocol is to reduce an estimated cumulative end point event incidence of > or = 15% by 20 to 25% over an average follow-up period of 6.25 years, through early 1998, when the last patient recruited will have completed 5 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bezafibrate lowers plasma lipids, fibrinogen and platelet aggregability in hypertriglyceridaemia

The effects of bezafibrate 400 mg/day (slow release formulation) on plasma lipids/lipoproteins and on selected haemostatic parameters were evaluated in a double blind cross-over study in patients with Type IIb and IV hyperlipoproteinaemia. Placebo treatment did not influence any of those parameters, but the drug significantly reduced plasma triglycerides (-45%) and VLDL cholesterol, as well as causing a 12% fall in total cholesterol and a 20% increase in HDL cholesterol. Apo AI levels were significantly increased following bezafibrate and Apo B was reduced by about 20%. In addition to changes in the plasma lipid profile, bezafibrate reduced the sensitivity of platelets to the aggregatory effect of collagen, with no effect on TXB2 production. Fibrinogen levels after bezafibrate treatment were significantly lowered, the effect being more marked in patients with hyperfibrinogenaemia. Bezafibrate did not influence the plasma fibrinolytic profile. It is concluded that bezafibrate, besides its beneficial effects on the plasma lipoprotein profile, can exert beneficial changes on specific haemostatic parameters.

Effects of combined bezafibrate-simvastatin appraised in healthy subjects

The occurrence of clinical and biochemical side effects of bezafibrate (400 mg daily) or simvastatin (20 mg daily) alone or combined was appraised in 13 healthy male normolipidemic subjects according to a single blind design. Each period of 2 weeks of treatment with bezafibrate or simvastatin or bezafibrate plus simvastatin was followed by a period of placebo (1 week). No subjects experienced myalgia or muscle weakness. Plasma creatine kinase (CK) elevations, particularly skeletal muscle CK (CK-MM), were observed in 6 subjects: 11 times during different placebo periods, 5 times on bezafibrate, 4 times on simvastatin, and 4 times on combined bezafibrate-simvastatin, but never reached 1,600 IU/L. Only a trend to an increase of CK mean values on combined bezafibrate-simvastatin was shown. The hepatic transaminase and gamma-glutamyltransferase activities remained unmodified throughout the trial, unlike alkaline phosphatase activity, which fell on bezafibrate and on bezafibrate plus simvastatin. The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was more reduced with simvastatin than with bezafibrate. The addition of bezafibrate to simvastatin did not decrease it further. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity expressed as fractional esterification rate was enhanced only on simvastatin and bezafibrate-simvastatin.

Effects of slow release bezafibrate on the lipid pattern and on blood glucose of type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidaemia

Ninety-eight type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidaemia in stable metabolic control with diet alone (41) or diet plus hypoglycaemic agents (57) were divided into two groups: group 1 was put on treatment with slow release bezafibrate 400 mg a day, while group 2 was considered as control. In group 1, after 1 month of bezafibrate, serum triglycerides fell by 47% and cholesterol by 13%. HDL cholesterol showed a non-significant trend toward an increase. Fasting blood glucose significantly decreased by 6%, fructosamine and glycated haemoglobin by 5%. During OGTT, the area under the curve of both serum C-peptide and blood glucose showed a trend toward a decrease after bezafibrate. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Thirty-six patients continued the treatment with the drug for 4 months and 23 for 8 months, without further changes of the lipid pattern and glycaemic control. In the control group no significant variation of the lipid levels occurred and diabetic control slightly worsened during the study. Bezafibrate has been proved to be effective in the treatment of hyperlipidaemia in type 2 diabetic patients. The drug seems moreover to improve glycaemic control. The mechanism by which bezafibrate produces this latter effect remains to be elucidated, though an increase of peripheral insulin sensitivity might be suggested.

Bezafibrate induced rhabdomyolysis

The case is presented of a 70 year old woman with mild hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension who was readmitted to hospital six months after a previous admission for angina pectoris. The patient was treated with verapamil, nifedipine, and aspirin, and had been receiving bezafibrate (400 mg every 12 hours) for the previous 40 days. Twenty four hours after admission she developed podagra, which was treated with indomethacin (100 mg daily). Eight days after admission myocardial infarction was suspected, and the next day she presented with symptoms of rhabdomyolysis, which was confirmed by laboratory tests. Bezafibrate was withdrawn and the patient became asymptomatic after seven days. It is recommended that doctors should be aware of the possibility of patients, especially those with impaired renal function, developing rhabdomyolysis while being treated with bezafibrate.

Double-blind comparison of bezafibrate versus placebo in male volunteers with hyperlipoproteinemia

The efficacy and safety of bezafibrate were evaluated in 83 patients with type IIa, IIb, or IV hyperlipoproteinemia. Following a 12- to 14-week placebo period on a coronary-prudent diet (Period 1), patients were assigned randomly to receive either bezafibrate 600 mg/day or placebo, plus diet in a double-blind, 12-week treatment period (Period 2). The return of lipid and lipoprotein levels toward baseline was evaluated in a subsequent 8-week period on placebo plus diet (Period 3). In patients with type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia, bezafibrate significantly lowered total (14.6%, P less than 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (16.4%, P less than 0.001) and total (29.9%, P less than 0.001) and VLDL-triglyceride (44.0%, P less than 0.001) and significantly increased HDL cholesterol (9.5%, P less than 0.001). In patients with type IIb, bezafibrate had a qualitatively similar effect to that seen in type IIa on each of these lipoproteins, but the sample size was too small for statistical evaluation. In patients with type IV, bezafibrate lowered total (48.3%, P less than 0.01) and VLDL-triglyceride (57.7%, P less than 0.001) and VLDL-cholesterol (56.8%, P less than 0.001) and increased HDL-cholesterol (16.6%, P less than 0.05). All values returned toward baseline during Period 3. Only two bezafibrate patients experienced adverse events that were considered definitely treatment related; one was dropped from the study because of elevations in SGOT and SGPT, 1.5- and 4-times the upper limit of normal, respectively. For other laboratory parameters, trends upward or downward were small and of doubtful clinical significance. Bezafibrate appears to be effective and safe for modifying lipid and lipoprotein levels in patients with types IIa, IIb and IV hyperlipoproteinemia.

[Lipid status and basal steroid hormone level following 16 weeks of lovastatin therapy in primary hypercholesterolemia]

We examined the effect of a 16 week therapy with the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin in 29 patients (mean age 43 years) with primary hypercholesterolemia. All patients had cholesterol levels above 250 mg/dl (mean 348 +/- 96 mg/dl) inspite of a lipid lowering diet and a therapy with conventional lipid lowering drugs during a three month screening period. After 4 weeks on placebo 20 mg lovastatin was given orally for 4 weeks. If total cholesterol exceeded 200 mg/dl the dose of lovastatin was increased monthly by 20 mg up to the maximal dose of 80 mg/day. After 16 weeks lipid values changed compared with the placebo period: total-cholesterol -25%, triglycerides -8.6%, LDL-cholesterol -31%, APO B -25%, HDL-cholesterol +5.8%, APO AI +0.8%, total-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol -25%. There was a significant improvement of lipid parameters after lovastatin therapy compared with conventional lipid lowering drugs at the end of the screening period. Lovastatin was well tolerated. A small and reversible rise of transaminases and/or creatinine kinase was observed in 6 patients. Basal levels of ACTH in the morning increased significantly during lovastatin therapy within the normal range. This observation was more frequent in females (10/12) than in males (10/17).

Effects of gemfibrozil and other fibric acid derivatives on blood lipids and lipoproteins

Fibric acid derivatives (FADs) are a class of drugs that have been shown to reduce the production of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) while enhancing VLDL clearance due to the stimulation of lipoprotein lipase activity. The drugs can reduce plasma triglyceride levels while raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Their effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are less marked and more variable. There is evidence that oral gemfibrozil (Lopid, Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) can reduce the risk of serious coronary events, specifically in those patients who had elevations of both LDL cholesterol levels and total plasma triglyceride levels with lower HDL cholesterol levels. Newer FADs (bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, fenofibrate) have been shown to have greater efficacy in reducing LDL cholesterol than gemfibrozil but, in general, these drugs are not as effective as the other primary drugs used to lower LDL levels. The FADs are also used to treat adult patients with very high levels of triglycerides who have pancreatitis and whose disease cannot be managed with dietary therapy. The FADs are well tolerated, with dyspepsia and abdominal pain the most common adverse effects. A small risk of cholelithiasis exists with these drugs, and caution should be used when combining these drugs with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors because the combination increases the incidence of hyperlipidemic myositis and rhabdomyolysis.

Comparative studies on the influence of different fibrates on serum lipoproteins in endogenous hyperlipoproteinaemia

Two trials have been performed in the same patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types IIb (12 cases), III (6 cases) and IV (11 cases). In the first study the lipid-lowering properties of bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate were compared and in a separate trial the influence of combined treatment with gemfibrozil plus colestipol and bezafibrate plus probucol on lipoproteins were investigated. The mean percentage lipid-lowering effect of each fibrate on serum and VLDL fraction was significant in the Types IIb, III and IV patients, but there were significant differences between the fibrates. In general, gemfibrozil and bezafibrate decreased plasma lipid levels more than etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate in Type IIb patients. In Type IV cases gemfibrozil and bezafibrate were significantly potent in reducing the triglyceride level than fenofibrate, etofibrate or etofylline clofibrate. All the fibrates produced an increase in HDL cholesterol, but there were significant differences between them were in the Type IV patients. The influence of fibrates on the LDL fraction was much more variable. In hyperlipoproteinaemia Type IIb, a decrease in both LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B was observed. In Type III and IV patients, however, an increase in LDL concentration occurred. The addition of colestipol to gemfibrozil therapy led to a further decrease in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B in Type IIb patients. In patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types III and IV colestipol prevented the increase in LDL concentration after treatment with gemfibrozil alone. The effect of probucol on LDL cholesterol was comparable to that of colestipol. Combined treatment with gemfibrozil and colestipol caused an increase in HDL cholesterol concentration in contrast to combined treatment with bezafibrate and probucol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of bezafibrate on blood lipids, lipoproteins, and fibrinogen in hyperlipidaemic type 1 diabetes mellitus

The effects of bezafibrate 400 mg day-1 or placebo administered for 3 months, were compared in 36 patients with stable Type 1 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. Baseline characteristics of the 17 bezafibrate- and 19 placebo-treated patients were comparable in most respects with the exception of concentrations of fasting serum triglycerides and blood glucose which were lower (NS) and plasma fibrinogen which were higher (p less than 0.05), in those later treated with bezafibrate. Serum cholesterol concentrations decreased after 3 months bezafibrate treatment (from 7.1(0.2) (SE) to 6.3 (0.3) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05), predominantly due to a reduction in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (from 4.8(0.3) to 4.2(0.3) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05). Over the same period bezafibrate reduced serum triglycerides from 1.78 (95% Cl 1.23-2.57) to 1.26(1.02-2.09) mmol l-1 (p less than 0.05), and plasma fibrinogen from 4.1(0.2) to 2.9(0.2) g l-1, p less than 0.001. Serum apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein (a) showed no statistically significant changes. Overall there was no change in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, in patients who were initially hypertriglyceridaemic there was significant increase in the cholesterol content of HDL and the HDL2-cholesterol subfraction (both p less than 0.05). After 3 months treatment with bezafibrate, fasting blood glucose levels were reduced from 8.5(1.1) to 6.4(0.7) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05, without any change in glycosylated haemoglobin (9.2(0.4) to 9.1(0.5)%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The growth hormone clamp technique: inhibition of growth hormone release by growth hormone occurs independently of free fatty acids

It has been suggested that growth hormone (GH) can inhibit its own release: in fact it has repeatedly been shown that an acute methionyl-GH (met-GH) infusion blocks the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). However, met-GH infusions are accompanied by a significant increase of free fatty acids (FFA), which can block GH release. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inhibition of GH response to GHRH also occurs when lipolysis is pharmacologically blocked. Therefore, six normal subjects received GHRH, 50 micrograms intravenously (IV), after a 4-hour saline infusion and a 4-hour met-GH infusion (80 ng/kg/min, yielding a constant GH level of 33.6 +/- 4.63 micrograms/L), and GH release was evaluated during the following 2 hours. To prevent lipolysis, all subjects received on both occasions acipimox, an antilipolytic agent, 500 mg during the 6 hours before IV GHRH. GHRH induced a clear GH release during saline infusion (46.6 +/- 2.70 micrograms/L) and a scanty GH release during met-GH infusion (9.3 +/- 1.52 micrograms/L; P less than .01). Plasma levels of FFA, somatostatin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and glucagon and serum insulin levels were unaffected, while blood glucose levels slightly decreased during saline infusion, but not during GH infusion. These data confirm that met-GH inhibits GHRH-induced GH release, and demonstrate that this inhibition is not mediated by FFA levels.

Inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis by bezafibrate in different rat cells

Bezafibrate is one of the main drugs used in the treatment of human hyperlipemic diseases. Its action on the biosynthesis of fatty acids has been studied and the following conclusions have been drawn: (1) Lipogenesis from glucose is inhibited in hepatocytes and adipocytes isolated from "refed" rats previously treated with bezafibrate. (2) Lipogenesis from glucose is inhibited by bezafibrate in hepatocytes and adipocytes isolated from "refed" rats. (3) Lipogenesis from glucose is also inhibited by bezafibrate in acini isolated from lactating rats. These results show that bezafibrate is an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis.