Clozapine and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Lasting 1.1-12.5 Years

Clozapine-associated secondary antibody deficiency

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clozapine has recently been described as a novel cause of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD), associated with long-term therapy. Here we critically review the evidence linking clozapine use to an increased infection risk, describe immunological alterations, and discuss potential mechanisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Individuals with schizophrenia are at two to five times more likely to develop pneumonia than the general population, in particular, when receiving clozapine. Delayed-onset distinguishes clozapine-associated hypogammaglobulinaemia from agranulocytosis or neutropenia that occur at lesser frequency. Biomarker searches in treatment-resistant schizophrenia highlight an immune signature associated with long-term clozapine use. This includes reduction in class-switched memory B cells, echoing common variable immunodeficiency. Recent identification of a role for dopamine in T follicular helper-B cell interactions may inform future clinical studies.

SUMMARY

The detrimental impact of the increased infection risk associated with clozapine necessitates a re-evaluation of the current monitoring strategies as well as further studies to better understand the underlying mechanisms of SAD in this setting. On the basis of available evidence, we suggest simple modifications to clozapine monitoring including integration of routine vaccination, smoking cessation, and assessment of humoral immunity. Further studies are required to understand the role of clozapine in neuroinflammation as well as other potentially autoantibody-mediated diseases.

Antipsychotic medication exposure, clozapine, and pneumonia: results from a self-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

By using a self-controlled design, we investigated whether antipsychotic medication exposure was associated with increased pneumonia risk and whether patients receiving clozapine were more likely to develop pneumonia than patients receiving other antipsychotic medications.

METHODS

Through nationwide health registers, we identified all out-patients with schizophrenia initiating antipsychotic treatment. First, we estimated whether antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia increased their risk of pneumonia after initiation of either a first- or second-generation antipsychotic medication using a one-year mirror-image model. Afterward, similar analyses were made for individual second-generation antipsychotics. Lastly, the rate of pneumonia for patients initiated on clozapine was compared to patients commenced on other second-generation antipsychotics.

RESULTS

In total, 8355 antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia were initiated on a first-generation antipsychotic medication; 0.95% of the patients had developed pneumonia before exposure, compared to 0.68% after exposure (P = 0.057). Similar findings were made for the 8001 antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia initiated on second-generation antipsychotic medications, with 0.56% developing pneumonia before exposure compared to 0.55% after exposure (P = 1.00). Second-generation antipsychotic medications did not increase the pneumonia risk, except for risperidone (increased by 0.32%; P = 0.007) and clozapine, which gave the largest absolute increase in pneumonia risk although not significant (increased by 0.64%; P = 0.10). The rate of pneumonia was higher after initiation of clozapine than for other second-generation antipsychotic medications.

CONCLUSION

Most antipsychotic medications were not found to increase the risk of pneumonia. Clozapine exposure might be associated with increased risk of developing pneumonia.

The interface of psychiatry and COVID-19: Challenges for management of psychiatric patients

COVID-19 is a viral infection that has multisystemic physical and psychological complications. The following paper looks at the various challenges seen while treating psychiatric patients during the COVID pandemic. There is a need for physician to be aware of the drug interactions between psychiatric medications and the medications used routinely in the management of COVID. There is also the concern of psychiatric side effects of medications used to manage COVID and medical complications caused by some side effects of psychiatric drugs. The telepsychiatry and telemedicine paradigm has made it mandatory for physicians to be vigilant of the same.

Undetectable or subtherapeutic serum levels of antipsychotic drugs preceding switch to clozapine

Adequate antipsychotic treatment intensity is required for defining treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and justifying clozapine treatment. We investigated the occurrence of undetectable or subtherapeutic serum levels of oral antipsychotics preceding switch to clozapine as an endpoint of TRS. For patients starting clozapine, 12-month retrospective reviews of antipsychotic serum concentration measurements were performed in a Norwegian therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database from 2005 to 2017. Undetectable levels in high-sensitive analytical assays defined ‘no drug use’, while levels <50% of the lower reference range defined ‘subtherapeutic use’. Similar data were collected for patients switching to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, as a reference of ‘no or subtherapeutic drug use’. Nineteen of 353 patients initiating clozapine (5.4%) had a recent history of undetectable antipsychotic drug levels compared to 91 of 1048 (8.7%) initiating LAI. Another 19 patients starting clozapine (5.4%) had recent events of subtherapeutic levels. In conclusion, the present retrospective study may indicate that every 10th patient starting clozapine has a recent history of undetectable or subtherapeutic serum levels of oral antipsychotics. The clinical implications of the present study for the assessment of TRS should be investigated prospectively in further studies.

The report of the joint WPA/CINP workgroup on the use and usefulness of antipsychotic medication in the treatment of schizophrenia

This is a report of a joint World Psychiatric Association/International College of Neuropsychopharmacology (WPA/CINP) workgroup concerning the risk/benefit ratio of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. It utilized a selective but, within topic, comprehensive review of the literature, taking into consideration all the recently discussed arguments on the matter and avoiding taking sides when the results in the literature were equivocal. The workgroup's conclusions suggested that antipsychotics are efficacious both during the acute and the maintenance phase, and that the current data do not support the existence of a supersensitivity rebound psychosis. Long-term treated patients have better overall outcome and lower mortality than those not taking antipsychotics. Longer duration of untreated psychosis and relapses are modestly related to worse outcome. Loss of brain volume is evident already at first episode and concerns loss of neuropil volume rather than cell loss. Progression of volume loss probably happens in a subgroup of patients with worse prognosis. In humans, antipsychotic treatment neither causes nor worsens volume loss, while there are some data in favor for a protective effect. Schizophrenia manifests 2 to 3 times higher mortality vs the general population, and treatment with antipsychotics includes a number of dangers, including tardive dyskinesia and metabolic syndrome; however, antipsychotic treatment is related to lower mortality, including cardiovascular mortality. In conclusion, the literature strongly supports the use of antipsychotics both during the acute and the maintenance phase without suggesting that it is wise to discontinue antipsychotics after a certain period of time. Antipsychotic treatment improves long-term outcomes and lowers overall and specific-cause mortality.

A simple mechanistic terminology of psychoactive drugs: a proposal

Antidepressants, antiepileptics, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics are extremely broadly used psychoactive drugs. These drug terms are universally used in the literature. However, the indications of these drugs have broadened substantially and overlap. The mismatch between drug classification and clinical uses causes a lot of confusion in communication and renders literature searches increasingly difficult. Therefore, we propose to drop the above terms altogether and replace them by simple mechanistic terms. Antidepressants are re-named as norepinephrine/serotonin (NE/5-HT) enhancers, antiepileptics comprising drugs with different mechanisms become neuronal inhibitors with pleiotropic effects (NIPEs), and antipsychotics become antagonists at multiple G protein-coupled receptors (mGPCR antagonists). Alkali metal ions, comprising lithium, are integrated into NIPEs. The terms "typical/first-generation/conventional" and "atypical/second-generation/non-conventional" antipsychotics should be dropped, because the original criterion for distinction, i.e., the presence and absence of extrapyramidal motor effects, respectively, is not valid anymore. The suggested changes in drug nomenclature have already been implemented into a recent textbook (Seifert R, Basic Knowledge of Pharmacology). The revised nomenclature ensures consistency with other fields of pharmacology and assignment of drug classes to indications without causing confusion. The authors acknowledge that the change in drug nomenclature is a cultural process that will take time and openly discuss the problems associated with the proposal. Ultimately, international learned societies will have to agree on a new nomenclature.

Clozapine prescription pattern in patients with schizophrenia in Asia: The REAP survey (2016)

Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic medication for treatment resistant schizophrenia and is widely used in Asian countries. This study investigated clozapine prescription patterns and their associated factors in Asian countries and territories based on the database of the Research on Asian Psychotropic prescription study (REAP) conducted in 2016. Demographic and clinical information of 3744 schizophrenia patients in 15 Asian countries and territories was collected with a standardized data collection form. In total, 18.4% of the sample received clozapine, ranging from 2.6% in Japan to 32.3% in Hong Kong. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that higher antipsychotic dose (OR = 1.002, P < 0.001), less frequent first admission in the sample (OR = 0.6, P < 0.001), more severe negative symptoms (OR = 1.4, P = 0.001) and less first generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (OR = 0.2, P < 0.001) were independently and significantly associated with clozapine prescription. Clozapine is frequently and increasingly prescribed for schizophrenia in Asia, with large variation across countries and territories. Given the diverse prescription patterns of clozapine found in Asian countries/territories, the clinical rationale of clozapine prescription needs careful consideration in Asia with more local input.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of rates of clozapine-associated myocarditis and cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment refractory schizophrenia, but is associated with cardiac adverse drug reactions. Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy are the most serious cardiac adverse drug reactions although reported rates of these conditions vary in the literature. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the event rates, the absolute death rates and case fatality rates of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy associated with clozapine.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for studies that reported on the incidence of cardiomyopathy or myocarditis in people exposed to clozapine. Data were meta-analysed using a random effects model, with subgroup analysis on study size, time frame, region, quality, retrospective vs prospective, and diagnostic criteria of myocarditis or cardiomyopathy.

RESULTS

28 studies of 258,961 people exposed to clozapine were included. The event rate of myocarditis was 0.007 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.003, 0.016]), absolute death rate was 0.0004 (95% CI = [0.0002, 0.0009]) and case fatality rate was 0.127 (95% CI = [0.034, 0.377]). The cardiomyopathy event rate was 0.006 (95% CI = [0.002, 0.023]), absolute death rate was 0.0003 (95% CI = [0.0001, 0.0012]) and case fatality rate was 0.078 (95% CI = [0.018, 0.285]). Few included studies provided information on criteria for diagnosis of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Event rates of cardiomyopathy and myocarditis were higher in Australia.

CONCLUSION

Clarity of diagnostic criteria for myocarditis remains a challenge. Observation bias may, in part, influence higher reported rates in Australia. Monitoring for myocarditis is warranted in the first 4 weeks, and treatment of comorbid metabolic syndrome and diabetes may reduce the risk of cardiomyopathy. The risks of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy are low and should not present a barrier to people with treatment refractory schizophrenia being offered a monitored trial of clozapine.

Clozapine is strongly associated with the risk of pneumonia and inflammation

Clinicians need to remember that (1) systemic inflammations can increase clozapine level; (2) clozapine, by itself, can cause inflammation, particularly during titration that is too rapid for that patient; (3) clozapine may increase the risk of infection; and (4) more specifically, clozapine may be particularly strongly associated with the risk of pneumonia. Pneumonia appears to be associated with high mortality in clozapine patients around the world. Clinicians who are alert to the risk of pneumonia in clozapine patients may significantly decrease mortality in clozapine patients. There is no data on COVID-19 infections in clozapine patients, but based on what we know about clozapine pharmacology, we can hypothesise that clozapine, possibly by impairing immunological mechanisms, may increase the risk of pneumonia in infected patients. More importantly, once fever and/or pneumonia develops, the clozapine dose should be cut in half to decrease the risk of clozapine intoxication. If there is any doubt that in spite of halving the dose there are still signs of clozapine intoxication, completely stopping clozapine may be indicated. Once the signs of inflammation and fever have disappeared, the clozapine dose can be increased to the prior dosage level.

A Rational Use of Clozapine Based on Adverse Drug Reactions, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Pharmacopsychology

Using Richardson and Davidson's model and the sciences of pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacopsychology, this article reviewed the: (1) poor life expectancy associated with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which may be improved in patients who adhere to clozapine; (2) findings that clozapine is the best treatment for TRS (according to efficacy, effectiveness and well-being); and (3) potential for clozapine to cause vulnerabilities, including potentially lethal adverse drug reactions such as agranulocytosis, pneumonia, and myocarditis. Rational use requires: (1) modification of the clozapine package insert worldwide to include lower doses for Asians and to avoid the lethality associated with pneumonia, (2) the use of clozapine levels for personalizing dosing, and (3) the use of slow and personalized titration. This may make clozapine as safe as possible and contribute to increased life expectancy and well-being. In the absence of data on COVID-19 in clozapine patients, clozapine possibly impairs immunological mechanisms and may increase pneumonia risk in infected patients. Psychiatrists should call their clozapine patients and families and explain to them that if the patient develops fever or flu-like symptoms, the psychiatrist should be called and should consider halving the clozapine dose. If the patient is hospitalized with pneumonia, the treating physician needs to assess for symptoms of clozapine intoxication since halving the dose may not be enough for all patients; consider decreasing it to one-third or even stopping it. Once the signs of inflammation and fever have disappeared, the clozapine dose can be slowly increased to the prior dosage level.

Heterogeneity and efficacy of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia with or without treatment resistance: a meta-analysis

Two important clinical questions are whether there is a subtype of schizophrenia which responds differently to clozapine relative to other antipsychotics, and whether greater efficacy of clozapine is dependent on the degree of treatment-resistance. The authors address this by examining both variability and magnitude of response in patients treated with clozapine and other antipsychotics for both treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and non-resistant schizophrenia. Double-blind randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with other antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia were identified using five databases. Standard deviations and means of change in total, positive, and negative symptoms were extracted. Variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR) were used to quantify relative variability in symptom change. Hedges' g was used to quantify mean differences. Ten TRS studies (n = 822) and 29 non-TRS studies (n = 2566) were meta-analysed. Relative variability in change of total symptoms did not differ significantly between clozapine and other antipsychotics in TRS studies (VR = 1.84; 95%CI, 0.85-4.02). These findings were similar with CVR, and for positive and negative symptoms. Clozapine was superior to other antipsychotics in improving total symptoms in both TRS (g = 0.34; 95%CI, 0.13-0.56) and non-TRS (g = 0.20; 95%CI, 0.08-0.32) studies. Furthermore, clozapine was superior in improving positive symptoms in both study groups, but not for negative symptoms. Pooled effect sizes showed no significant difference between TRS and non-TRS studies. These findings do not support a subtype of schizophrenia which responds specifically to clozapine. Clozapine is more effective than other antipsychotics irrespective of treatment-resistance, arguing for its use more generally in schizophrenia. PROSPERO CRD42018086507.

Electrocardiogram Characteristics and Their Association With Psychotropic Drugs Among Patients With Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics and their association with psychotropic drugs in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, we included Danish primary care patients with first-time digital ECGs from 2001 to 2015. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia before ECG recording were matched 1:5 on age, sex, and ECG recording year to controls without psychiatric disease. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 4486 patients with schizophrenia matched with 22 430 controls (median age, 47 years; male, 55%). Between groups, the prevalence of abnormal ECGs was similar (54%, P = .536), but patients with schizophrenia demonstrated higher median heart rate (79 vs 69 beats per minute, P < .001) and Fridericia-corrected QT (QTc) interval (416 vs 412 ms, P < .001) than controls. QTc prolongation was also more prevalent among patients with schizophrenia (3.4% vs 1.1%, P < .001), and so were pathological Q waves (5.3% vs 3.9%, P < .001). Patients with schizophrenia less frequently demonstrated left ventricular hypertrophy (6.1% vs 9.6%, P < .001) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (0.7% vs 1.4%, P < .001). Among patients with schizophrenia only, particularly antipsychotics were associated with abnormal ECGs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with schizophrenia demonstrate a different cardiovascular risk profile than matched controls without psychiatric disease, with higher prevalence of elevated heart rate, QTc prolongation, and pathological Q waves, and lower prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and atrial fibrillation or flutter. Particularly antipsychotics were associated with abnormal ECGs. This underscores an integrated care approach when ECG abnormalities are detected in this group.

20-year follow-up study of physical morbidity and mortality in relationship to antipsychotic treatment in a nationwide cohort of 62,250 patients with schizophrenia (FIN20)

Antipsychotics are effective in preventing relapses of schizophrenia, but it is generally believed that their long-term use is harmful for patients' physical well-being. However, there are no long-term studies which have verified this view. This nationwide, register-based cohort study aimed to assess the risk of hospitalization due to physical health problems, as a marker for severe physical morbidity, and the risk of all-cause mortality, as well as of cardiovascular and suicidal death, associated with antipsychotic use in all patients treated for schizophrenia in inpatient care between 1972 and 2014 in Finland (N=62,250), with up to 20 years of follow-up (median: 14.1 years). The use of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., use of any antipsychotic compared with non-use) and the use of specific antipsychotics were investigated, and outcomes were somatic and cardiovascular hospitalization, and all-cause, cardiovascular and suicide death. Hospitalization-based outcomes were analyzed by a within-individual design to eliminate selection bias, comparing use and non-use periods in the same individual by stratified Cox model. Mortality outcomes were assessed by traditional between-individual Cox multivariate models. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for any somatic hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.03) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.92-1.07) during use of any antipsychotic compared to non-exposure periods within the same individual. The aHRs were 0.48 (95% CI: 0.46-0.51) for all-cause mortality, 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.67) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.43-0.62) for suicide mortality during use vs. non-use of any antipsychotic. The most beneficial mortality outcome was associated with use of clozapine in terms of all-cause (aHR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.36-0.43), cardiovascular (aHR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.47-0.64) and suicide mortality (aHR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.15-0.29). The cumulative mortality rates during maximum follow-up of 20 years were 46.2% for no antipsychotic use, 25.7% for any antipsychotic use, and 15.6% for clozapine use. These data suggest that long-term antipsychotic use does not increase severe physical morbidity leading to hospitalization, and is associated with substantially decreased mortality, especially among patients treated with clozapine.

Comfort Level and Barriers to the Appropriate Use of Clozapine: a Preliminary Survey of US Psychiatric Residents

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Prior surveys of mental health providers have identified multiple causes for underutilization of clozapine; however, no previous survey has been conducted to assess US psychiatry residents' level of comfort in prescribing clozapine.

METHODS

A survey was sent via email to program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-affiliated psychiatry residency programs requesting the survey to be distributed to current residents. The survey included questions regarding demographics, clozapine-prescribing practices, comfort levels with prescription, and perceived barriers to prescription.

RESULTS

A total of 164 psychiatric residents completed the survey, 37% PGY-1 and 2 residents and 63% PGY-3 or higher. One-third of the respondents had a clozapine clinic in their program. Only 18% of the residents felt "very" comfortable in initiating clozapine and 41% felt "somewhat" comfortable. Two main reasons for not starting clozapine were (1) side effect profile (41%) and (2) limited experience and inadequate training in clozapine use (38%). More than 4/5ths of the residents (83%) responded that they would feel more comfortable in prescribing clozapine if they were trained in a clozapine clinic. Major limitation of this study has been the small sample size, lack of representativeness, and generalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-one percent of the respondents did not feel comfortable with clozapine prescription. Major concerns cited included the side effect profile as well as lack of experience and training. The majority of the respondents felt that they would be more comfortable prescribing clozapine if they had the opportunity to train in a clozapine clinic.

Clozapine Use in Patients with Early-Stage Schizophrenia in a Chinese Psychiatric Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies suggest that clozapine is commonly underutilized and that its initiation is delayed in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Knowledge regarding clozapine use among Chinese patients with early-stage schizophrenia is limited. The aim of the present study was to investigate the point prevalence of and patterns and factors associated with clozapine use in patients with early-stage schizophrenia discharged from a psychiatric hospital in China.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the prescriptions of 867 consecutive patients with early-stage schizophrenia who were admitted to the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between Jan 1, 2011 and Dec 31, 2016.

RESULTS

At discharge from the hospital, 114 (13.1%) patients were prescribed clozapine. Among the patients taking clozapine, 93 patients (81.6%) were prescribed clozapine polypharmacy, and only 21 patients (18.4%) were prescribed clozapine monotherapy. None of the patients were prescribed an overdose of clozapine. The mean daily dosage of clozapine was 160.97 mg, 149.05 mg and 213.69 mg among all patients taking clozapine, patients taking clozapine polypharmacy and patients taking clozapine monotherapy, respectively. The antipsychotic most frequently combined with clozapine was risperidone. Logistic regression suggested that the length of hospital stay, high school education, lower benzodiazepine use and antipsychotic polypharmacy were independently and significantly associated with clozapine use (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although clozapine has been commonly used in China in recent years, the present study found that clozapine was not commonly used in patients with early-stage schizophrenia. An underutilization and delayed initiation of clozapine may exist in a portion of patients with early-stage schizophrenia. Given the unfavorable outcomes of underutilized and delayed clozapine use, future studies may be needed to assess and increase clozapine use in this population.

Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward

Suicide is a leading cause of death. A substantial proportion of the people who die by suicide come into contact with the health care system in the year before their death. This observation has resulted in the development of numerous suicide prediction tools to help target patients for preventive interventions. However, low sensitivity and low positive predictive value have led critics to argue that these tools have no clinical value. We review these tools and critiques here. We conclude that existing tools are suboptimal and that improvements, if they can be made, will require developers to work with more comprehensive predictor sets, staged screening designs, and advanced statistical analysis methods. We also conclude that although existing suicide prediction tools currently have little clinical value, and in some cases might do more harm than good, an even-handed assessment of the potential value of refined tools of this sort cannot currently be made because such an assessment would depend on evidence that currently does not exist about the effectiveness of preventive interventions. We argue that the only way to resolve this uncertainty is to link future efforts to develop or evaluate suicide prediction tools with concrete questions about specific clinical decisions aimed at reducing suicides and to evaluate the clinical value of these tools in terms of net benefit rather than sensitivity or positive predictive value. We also argue for a focus on the development of individualized treatment rules to help select the right suicide-focused treatments for the right patients at the right times. Challenges will exist in doing this because of the rarity of suicide even among patients considered high-risk, but we offer practical suggestions for how these challenges can be addressed.

Use of cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs before and after starting with clozapine versus other antipsychotic drugs: a Dutch database study

Reports of decreased mortality among patients with schizophrenia who use clozapine may be biased if clozapine is prescribed to relatively healthy patients and if intensive monitoring during its use prevents (under-treatment of) somatic disorder. We aimed to assess whether there is a difference in: (1) somatic comorbidity between patients who start with clozapine and those who start with other antipsychotics and (2) prescribed somatic medication, between patients using clozapine and those using olanzapine. Cohort study based on insurance claims (2010-2015). After selecting new users of antipsychotics and those who subsequently switched to clozapine (N = 158), aripiprazole (N = 295), olanzapine (N = 204) or first-generation antipsychotics (N = 295), we compared the clozapine starters to others on cardiovascular or diabetic comorbidity. Those using clozapine and olanzapine were compared on new prescriptions for cardiovascular or antidiabetic drugs. The ORadj of cardiovascular or diabetic comorbidity among other starters compared with clozapine starters was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-1.39], that is, a nonsignificantly increased prevalence associated with clozapine was found. Users of clozapine received significantly more new prescriptions for cardiovascular or antidiabetic medication (ORadj: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.43-5.08). Starters with clozapine were not cardiovascular/metabolic healthier than starters with other antipsychotics. During its use, they received more somatic treatment.

Long-Acting Injections in Schizophrenia: a 3-Year Update on Randomized Controlled Trials Published January 2016-March 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study was conducted in order to review randomized controlled trial (RCT) data published January 2016-March 2019 on long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) for schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-one RCTs (primary studies = 7; post hoc analyses = 24; n = 4738) compared LAIs vs. placebo (studies = 11, n = 1875), LAIs vs. oral antipsychotics (OAPs) (studies = 7, n = 658), and LAI vs. LAI (studies = 13, n = 2205). LAIs included two new formulations, aripiprazole lauroxil nanocrystal dispersion and subcutaneously injectable risperidone Perseris, as well as aripiprazole lauroxil, aripiprazole once-monthly, paliperidone once-monthly, paliperidone 3-monthly, and risperidone-LAI. Regarding prevention of relapse and hospitalization, LAIs consistently outperformed placebo, being partly superior to OAPs, without relevant LAI-LAI differences. LAIs were comparable to OAPs regarding all-cause discontinuation, functioning, quality of life, and tolerability, being associated with higher patient satisfaction and service engagement. Recent meta-analyses yielded mixed results, but never favoring OAPs over LAIs. In RCTs, LAIs are superior to placebo, but only in some aspects, superior to OAPs. Comparative effectiveness of LAIs vs. OAPs requires further study, ideally in generalizable/real-world samples.

Functioning and cognitive characteristics of clozapine users referred to psychosocial rehabilitation centers: A REHABase cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether clozapine users have specific rehabilitation needs compared to users of other antipsychotics.

METHODS

The study was performed using the REHABase collecting data on persons referred to a French network of psychosocial rehabilitation centers. It was restricted to persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder using antipsychotics. Multivariate analyses were used to compare baseline functioning and cognitive characteristics in clozapine users vs. users of other antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Of the 675 patients identified in the REHABase, one out of ten (n = 70) used clozapine. Compared to users of other antipsychotics, clozapine users had been more frequently hospitalized in psychiatry and presented less frequently with psychoactive substance use. Functional measures did not significantly differ between the two groups. Clozapine users had poorer short-term verbal memory performance than users of other antipsychotics and did not differ on executive performance.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine users may reach a recovery level comparable to that obtained in persons without treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In order to reduce the negative impact of memory deficits on the recovery process of clozapine users, it is necessary to optimize their psychotropic treatment and to promote their access to cognitive remediation programs addressing their specific needs.

Suicide and suicide risk

Although recent years have seen large decreases in the overall global rate of suicide fatalities, this trend is not reflected everywhere. Suicide and suicidal behaviour continue to present key challenges for public policy and health services, with increasing suicide deaths in some countries such as the USA. The development of suicide risk is complex, involving contributions from biological (including genetics), psychological (such as certain personality traits), clinical (such as comorbid psychiatric illness), social and environmental factors. The involvement of multiple risk factors in conveying risk of suicide means that determining an individual's risk of suicide is challenging. Improving risk assessment, for example, by using computer testing and genetic screening, is an area of ongoing research. Prevention is key to reduce the number of suicide deaths and prevention efforts include universal, selective and indicated interventions, although these interventions are often delivered in combination. These interventions, combined with psychological (such as cognitive behavioural therapy, caring contacts and safety planning) and pharmacological treatments (for example, clozapine and ketamine) along with coordinated social and public health initiatives, should continue to improve the management of individuals who are suicidal and decrease suicide-associated morbidity.

Association With Hospitalization and All-Cause Discontinuation Among Patients With Schizophrenia on Clozapine vs Other Oral Second-Generation Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies

IMPORTANCE

Recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing clozapine with nonclozapine second-generation antipsychotics (NC-SGAs) in schizophrenia have challenged clozapine's superiority in treatment-resistant patients. However, patients in RCTs are not necessarily generalizable to those in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare various outcomes of clozapine vs oral NC-SGAs in cohort studies.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL without language restriction from database inception until December 17, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Nonrandomized cohort studies reporting effectiveness and/or safety outcomes comparing clozapine with NC-SGAs in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Independent investigators assessed studies and extracted data. Using a random-effects model, the study calculated risk ratio (RR) unadjusted for covariates and follow-up duration, number needed to treat/number needed to harm (NNT/NNH) for dichotomous data, and standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) for continuous data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Coprimary outcomes were hospitalization and all-cause discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included all effectiveness and safety outcomes reported in at least 3 analyzable studies.

RESULTS

Of 8446 hits, 68 articles from 63 individual cohort studies (n = 109 341) (60.3% male; mean [SD] age of 38.8 [6.5] years, illness duration of 11.0 [5.1] years, and study duration of 19.1 [23.3] months) were meta-analyzed. Compared with NC-SGAs, despite greater illness severity (17 studies [n = 38 766]; Hedges g, 0.222; 95% CI, 0.013-0.430; P = .04), clozapine was significantly associated with lower hospitalization risk (19 studies [n = 49 453]; RR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.725-0.920; P = .001; NNT, 18; 95% CI, 12-40) and all-cause discontinuation (16 studies [n = 56 368]; RR, 0.732; 95% CI, 0.639-0.838; P < .001; NNT, 8; 95% CI, 6-12). Associations were statistically significant for comparisons with quetiapine fumarate and aripiprazole regarding hospitalization and all NC-SGAs, except aripiprazole, for all-cause discontinuation. Clozapine was also significantly associated with better outcomes regarding overall symptoms (SMD, -0.302; 95% CI, -0.572 to -0.032; P = .03) and Clinical Global Impressions scale severity (SMD, -1.182; 95% CI, -2.243 to -0.122; P = .03). Clozapine was significantly associated with increases in body weight (MD, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.31-3.08 kg; P = .02), body mass index (MD, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.24-1.68; P = .009), and type 2 diabetes (RR, 1.777; 95% CI, 1.229-2.570; P = .002; NNH, 27; 95% CI, 13-90).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In cohort studies, despite more severely ill patients being treated with clozapine, use of clozapine was associated with better key efficacy outcomes and higher cardiometabolic-related risk outcomes vs NC-SGAs.

Causes of premature mortality in schizophrenia: a review of literature published in 2018

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review examines the recent literature on the causes of premature mortality in schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

People with schizophrenia have higher premature mortality rates compared with the general population. Suicides and accidents account for a nontrivial part of the excess mortality, but the largest part is attributable to natural causes of death. Five major causes have been identified: first, adverse effects of medication; second, suboptimal lifestyle; third, somatic comorbidity; fourth, suboptimal treatment of somatic disorders; and fifth, accelerated ageing/genetic explanations. The positive aspect is that people with schizophrenia have increasing life expectancy, at least in high-income countries, and this development seems to largely follow the increase in the general population. Especially mortality rates from unnatural causes appear to have a positive impact. Nevertheless, despite more than 100 years of research and progress, the excess mortality in persons with schizophrenia remains unacceptably high, with no prospects of reaching the level in the general population.

SUMMARY

The excess mortality in schizophrenia has received much focus. Future studies should explore the reasons for the high rates of natural causes of death, while aiming to disentangle the complex interplay between medication, lifestyle, comorbidity, treatment of somatic disorders, and genetic effects.

Cardiovascular effects of psychotic illnesses and antipsychotic therapy

Mortality from cardiovascular disease is increased in people with mental health disorders in general and schizophrenia in particular. The causes are multifactorial, but it is known that antipsychotic medication can cause cardiac side-effects beyond the traditional coronary risk factors. Schizophrenia itself is a contributor to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality via cardiac autonomic dysfunction and a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome, both contributing to a reduced life expectancy. The pro-arrhythmic impact of traditional antipsychotics, especially via the hERG-potassium channel, has been known for several years. Newer antipsychotics have a reduced pro-arrhythmic profile but might contribute to higher cardiac death rates by worsening the metabolic profile. Clozapine-induced cardiomyopathy, which is dose independent, is a further concern and continuous monitoring of these patients is required. Prophylaxis with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is currently under review. Overall, management of cardiovascular risk within this population group must be multifaceted and nuanced to allow the most effective treatment of serious mental illness to be conducted within acceptable parameters of cardiovascular risk; some practical measures are presented for the clinical cardiologist.

Identification of the gene signature reflecting schizophrenia's etiology by constructing artificial intelligence-based method of enhanced reproducibility

Aims

As one of the most fundamental questions in modern science, “what causes schizophrenia (SZ)” remains a profound mystery due to the absence of objective gene markers. The reproducibility of the gene signatures identified by independent studies is found to be extremely low due to the incapability of available feature selection methods and the lack of measurement on validating signatures’ robustness. These irreproducible results have significantly limited our understanding of the etiology of SZ.

Methods

In this study, a new feature selection strategy was developed, and a comprehensive analysis was then conducted to ensure a reliable signature discovery. Particularly, the new strategy (a) combined multiple randomized sampling with consensus scoring and (b) assessed gene ranking consistency among different datasets, and a comprehensive analysis among nine independent studies was conducted.

Results

Based on a first‐ever evaluation of methods’ reproducibility that was cross‐validated by nine independent studies, the newly developed strategy was found to be superior to the traditional ones. As a result, 33 genes were consistently identified from multiple datasets by the new strategy as differentially expressed, which might facilitate our understanding of the mechanism underlying the etiology of SZ.

Conclusion

A new strategy capable of enhancing the reproducibility of feature selection in current SZ research was successfully constructed and validated. A group of candidate genes identified in this study should be considered as great potential for revealing the etiology of SZ.

Clozapine augmentation strategies - a systematic meta-review of available evidence. Treatment options for clozapine resistance

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for clozapine resistance are diverse whereas, in contrast, the evidence for augmentation or combination strategies is sparse.

AIMS

We aimed to extract levels of evidence from available data and extrapolate recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed/MEDLINE database and in the Cochrane database. Included meta-analyses were assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria, with symptom improvement as the endpoint, in order to develop a recommendation grade for each clinical strategy identified.

RESULTS

Our search identified 21 meta-analyses of clozapine combination or augmentation strategies. No strategies met Grade A criteria. Strategies meeting Grade B included combinations with first- or second-generation antipsychotics, augmentation with electroconvulsive therapy for persistent positive symptoms, and combination with certain antidepressants (fluoxetine, duloxetine, citalopram) for persistent negative symptoms. Augmentation strategies with mood-stabilisers, anticonvulsants, glutamatergics, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation or cognitive behavioural therapy met Grades C-D criteria only.

CONCLUSION

More high-quality clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of add-on treatments for symptom improvement in patients with clozapine resistance. Applying definitions of clozapine resistance would improve the reporting of future clinical trials. Augmentation with second-generation antipsychotics and first-generation antipsychotics can be beneficial, but the supporting evidence is from low-quality studies. Electroconvulsive therapy may be effective for clozapine-resistant positive symptoms.

Clozapine and all-cause mortality in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a historical cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Large-scale epidemiological studies have demonstrated a protective effect of clozapine on mortality in people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is reserved for use in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but evidence of clozapine's effect on mortality exclusively within TRS samples is inconclusive. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effect of clozapine use on all-cause mortality in TRS patients.

METHODS

A historical patient cohort sample of 2837 patients, who met criteria for TRS between 1 Jan 2008 and 1 Jan 2016, were selected from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) electronic health records (EHR). The national Zaponex Treatment Access System (ZTAS) mandatory monitoring system linked to the SLAM EHR was used to distinguish which patients were initiated on clozapine (n = 1025). Cox proportional hazard models were used, adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical monitoring, mental and physical illness severity and functional status.

RESULTS

After controlling for potential confounders, the protective effect of clozapine on all-cause mortality was significant (adjusted hazard ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.97; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine reduces the risk of mortality in patients who meet criteria for TRS. We provide further evidence that improving access to clozapine in TRS is likely to reduce the mortality gap in schizophrenia.

One-year follow-up on liraglutide treatment for prediabetes and overweight/obesity in clozapine- or olanzapine-treated patients

OBJECTIVE

Treatment with most antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of weight gain and metabolic disturbances. In a randomized trial, we previously demonstrated that 16 weeks of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide treatment vs. placebo significantly reduced glucometabolic disturbances and body weight in prediabetic, overweight/obese schizophrenia-spectrum disorder patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the beneficial effects of the 16-week intervention were sustained beyond the intervention period.

METHOD

One year after completion of the intervention, we investigated changes in body weight, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, and lipids comparing 1-year follow-up levels to end of treatment (week 16) and baseline (week 0) levels.

RESULTS

From end of treatment to the 1-year follow-up, body weight had increased in the liraglutide-treated group. However, compared to baseline levels, the placebo-subtracted body weight loss remained significantly reduced (-3.8 kg, 95% CI: -7.3 to -0.2, P = 0.04). Fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin, C-peptide, and lipids had each returned to baseline levels 1 year after stopping liraglutide.

CONCLUSION

The body weight reduction during 16 weeks of liraglutide treatment was partially sustained 1 year after the intervention was completed. However, the improvements in other metabolic parameters returned to baseline levels.

Treatment resistant schizophrenia - review and a call to action

Recovery rates in schizophrenia remain suboptimal with up to one-third resistant to standard treatments, a population prevalence of 0.2%. Clozapine is the only evidenced-based treatment for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), yet there are significant delays in its use or it may not be trialled, potentially impacting the chance of recovery. Better outcomes with earlier use of clozapine may be possible. There is emerging evidence that early treatment resistance is not uncommon from the earliest stages of psychosis. In this review, we provide an update on TRS, its epidemiology and its management, with a specific focus on the optimal use and timing of clozapine and augmentation strategies for the one-third of patients who do not respond to clozapine.