151
|
Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 62:103529. [PMID: 30165243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
With the development of next generation sequencing, beyond identifying the cause of manifestations that justified prescription of the test, other information with potential interest for patients and their families, defined as secondary findings (SF), can be provided once patients have given informed consent, in particular when therapeutic and preventive options are available. The disclosure of such findings has caused much debate. The aim of this work was to summarize all opinion-based studies focusing on SF, so as to shed light on the concerns that this question generate. A review of the literature was performed, focusing on all PubMed articles reporting qualitative, quantitative or mixed studies that interviewed healthcare providers, participants, or society regarding this subject. The methodology was carefully analysed, in particular whether or not studies made the distinction between actionable and non-actionable SF, in a clinical or research context. From 2010 to 2016, 39 articles were compiled. A total of 14,868 people were interviewed (1259 participants, 6104 healthcare providers, 7505 representatives of society). When actionable and non-actionable SF were distinguished (20 articles), 92% of respondents were keen to have results regarding actionable SF (participants: 88%, healthcare providers: 86%, society: 97%), against 70% (participants: 83%, healthcare providers: 62%, society: 73%) for non-actionable SF. These percentages were slightly lower in the specific situation of children probands. For respondents, the notion of the «patient's choice» is crucial. For healthcare providers, the importance of defining policies for SF among diagnostic lab, learning societies and/or countries is outlined, in particular regarding the content and extension of the list of actionable genes to propose, the modalities of information, and the access to information about adult-onset diseases in minors. However, the existing literature should be taken with caution, since most articles lack a clear definition of SF and actionability, and referred to hypothetical scenarios with limited information to respondents. Studies conducted by multidisciplinary teams involving patients with access to results are sadly lacking, in particular in the medium term after the results have been given. Such studies would feed the debate and make it possible to measure the impact of such findings and their benefit-risk ratio.
Collapse
|
152
|
Silva PJ, Ramos KS. Academic Medical Centers as Innovation Ecosystems: Evolution of Industry Partnership Models Beyond the Bayh-Dole Act. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2018; 93:1135-1141. [PMID: 29668523 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Innovation ecosystems tied to academic medical centers (AMCs) are inextricably linked to policy, practices, and infrastructure resulting from the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980. Bayh-Dole smoothed the way to patenting and licensing new drugs and, to some degree, medical devices and diagnostic reagents. Property rights under Bayh-Dole provided significant incentive for industry investments in clinical trials, clinical validation, and industrial scale-up of products that advanced health care. Bayh-Dole amplified private investment in biotechnology drug development and, from the authors' perspective, did not significantly interfere with the ability of AMCs to produce excellent peer-reviewed science. In today's policy environment, it is increasingly difficult to patent and license products based on the laws of nature-as the scope of patentability has been narrowed by case law and development of a suitable clinical and business case for the technology is increasingly a gating consideration for licensees. Consequently, fewer academic patents are commercially valuable. The role of technology transfer organizations in engaging industry partners has thus become increasingly complex. The partnering toolbox and organizational mandate for commercialization must evolve toward novel collaborative models that exploit opportunities for future patent creation (early drug discovery), data exchange (precision medicine using big data), cohort assembly (clinical trials), and decision rule validation (clinical trials). These inputs contribute to intellectual property rights, and their clinical exploitation manifests the commercialization of translational science. New collaboration models between AMCs and industry must be established to leverage the assets within AMCs that industry partners deem valuable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Silva
- P.J. Silva is executive director, Biomedical Corporate Alliances, Office of the Senior Vice President for Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. K.S. Ramos is professor of medicine, associate vice president for precision health sciences, director, Center for Applied Genetics and Genomic Medicine, and director, MD-PhD Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
153
|
Williams JL, Chung WK, Fedotov A, Kiryluk K, Weng C, Connolly JJ, Harr M, Hakonarson H, Leppig KA, Larson EB, Jarvik GP, Veenstra DL, Hoell C, Smith ME, Holm IA, Peterson JF, Williams MS. Harmonizing Outcomes for Genomic Medicine: Comparison of eMERGE Outcomes to ClinGen Outcome/Intervention Pairs. Healthcare (Basel) 2018; 6:healthcare6030083. [PMID: 30011878 PMCID: PMC6164315 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6030083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is moving from research to the clinic. There is a lack of evidence about the impact of genomic medicine interventions on health outcomes. This is due in part to a lack of standardized outcome measures that can be used across different programs to evaluate the impact of interventions targeted to specific genetic conditions. The eMERGE Outcomes working group (OWG) developed measures to collect information on outcomes following the return of genomic results to participants for several genetic disorders. These outcomes were compared to outcome intervention pairs for genetic disorders developed independently by the ClinGen Actionability working group (AWG). In general, there was concordance between the defined outcomes between the two groups. The ClinGen outcomes tended to be from a higher level and the AWG scored outcomes represented a subset of outcomes referenced in the accompanying AWG evidence review. eMERGE OWG outcomes were more detailed and discrete, facilitating a collection of relevant information from the health records. This paper demonstrates that common outcomes for genomic medicine interventions can be identified. Further work is needed to standardize outcomes across genomic medicine implementation projects and to make these publicly available to enhance dissemination and assist in making precision public health a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA.
| | - Alex Fedotov
- Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA.
| | - Krzysztof Kiryluk
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA.
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA.
| | - John J Connolly
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Margaret Harr
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Kathleen A Leppig
- Genetic Services, Kaiser Permanente of Washington, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Christin Hoell
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Dong AN, Tan BH, Pan Y, Ong CE. Cytochrome P450 genotype-guided drug therapies: An update on current states. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2018; 45:991-1001. [PMID: 29858511 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, knowledge of the role and clinical value of pharmacogenetic markers has expanded so that individualized pre-emptive therapy based on genetic background of patients could be within reach for clinical implementation. This is evidenced from the frequent updating of drug labels that incorporates pharmacogenetic information (where compelling data become available) by the regulatory agencies (such as the US FDA), and the periodical publication of guidelines of specific therapeutic recommendations based on the results of pharmacogenetic tests by the pharmacogenetics working groups or consortiums of professional bodies. Clinical relevance of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) polymorphism related to dose, effectiveness and/or toxicity of key drugs are presented in this review, including that of warfarin, clopidogrel, tricyclic antidepressants, and proton pump inhibitors. Prospect for routine clinical application of CYP genotyping before prescribing drugs is still currently unclear due to challenges and barriers associated with availability of well-defined and validated pharmacogenetic studies, the interpretation, result reporting and potential error of genotype testing, involvement of non-genetic factors, and other patient's demographic and disease conditions. Further studies to provide additional supporting clinical data and acceleration of pharmacogenetic testing standards and techniques should help improve the evidence base needed for clinical utility and hence move the implementation of genotype-guided therapy in clinical practice a step closer to reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Nathania Dong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Boon Hooi Tan
- Division of Applied Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yan Pan
- Department of Biomedical Science, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Chin Eng Ong
- School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Persky S, Goldring MR, Cohen RW. Genomics-informed weight management in primary care: anticipated public interest. Per Med 2018; 15:271-278. [DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Aim: An exploratory survey assessed the influence of current and potential future genomic applications for weight management on individuals’ desires to address weight management within primary care. Materials & methods: A convenience sample of 714 US adults aged 18–70 completed an online survey that presented three scenarios: no genomic information; current genomic capabilities; and potential future applications of genomics for weight management. Results: Participants had increased interest in weight management assistance through primary care when considering genomic applications in weight management, p (1,1.68) = 24.66, p < 0.001; this increase was more robust among individuals who felt their weight was important for their health, p (1,1.68) = 20.85, p < 0.001. Conclusion: Primary care systems may need to accommodate a rise in the volume of patients seeking weight management assistance as genomic approaches come to fruition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Persky
- Social & Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Megan R Goldring
- Social & Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rachel W Cohen
- Social & Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Generation and Implementation of a Patient-Centered and Patient-Facing Genomic Test Report in the EHR. EGEMS 2018; 6:14. [PMID: 30094286 PMCID: PMC6078113 DOI: 10.5334/egems.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Context Communication of genetic laboratory results to patients and providers is impeded by the complexity of results and reports. This can lead to misinterpretation of results, causing inappropriate care. Patients often do not receive a copy of the report leading to possible miscommunication. To address these problems, we conducted patient-centered research to inform design of interpretive reports. Here we describe the development and deployment of a specific patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) tool, a multi-use patient-centered genomic test report (PGR) that interfaces with an electronic health record (EHR). Implementation Process A PGR with a companion provider report was configured for implementation within the EHR using locally developed software (COMPASS™) to manage secure data exchange and access. Findings We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and clinicians that showed they sought clear information addressing findings, family implications, resources, prognosis and next steps relative to the genomic result. Providers requested access to applicable, available clinical guidelines. Initial results indicated patients and providers found the PGR contained helpful, valuable information and would provide a basis for result-related conversation between patients, providers and family. Major Themes Direct patient involvement in the design and development of a PGR identified format and presentation preferences, and delivery of relevant information to patients and providers, prompting the creation of a CDS tool. Conclusions Research and development of patient-centered CDS tools designed to support improved patient outcomes, are enhanced by early and substantial engagement of patients in contributing to all phases of tool design and development.
Collapse
|
157
|
Persky S, Kistler WD, Klein WMP, Ferrer RA. Internet Versus Virtual Reality Settings for Genomics Information Provision. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING 2018; 22:7-14. [PMID: 29932735 DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Current models of genomic information provision will be unable to handle large-scale clinical integration of genomic information, as may occur in primary care settings. Therefore, adoption of digital tools for genetic and genomic information provision is anticipated, primarily using Internet-based, distributed approaches. The emerging consumer communication platform of virtual reality (VR) is another potential intermediate approach between face-to-face and distributed Internet platforms to engage in genomics education and information provision. This exploratory study assessed whether provision of genomics information about body weight in a simulated, VR-based consultation (relative to a distributed, Internet platform) would be associated with differences in health behavior-related attitudes and beliefs, and interpersonal reactions to the avatar-physician. We also assessed whether outcomes differed depending upon whether genomic versus lifestyle-oriented information was conveyed. There were significant differences between communication platforms for all health behavior-oriented outcomes. Following communication in the VR setting, participants reported greater self-efficacy, dietary behavioral intentions, and exercise behavioral intentions than in the Internet-based setting. There were no differences in trust of the physician by setting, and no interaction between setting effects and the content of the information. This study was a first attempt to examine the potential capabilities of a VR-based communication setting for conveying genomic content in the context of weight management. There may be benefits to use of VR settings for communication about genomics, as well as more traditional health information, when it comes to influencing the attitudes and beliefs that underlie healthy lifestyle behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Persky
- 1 Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William D Kistler
- 1 Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William M P Klein
- 2 Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rebecca A Ferrer
- 3 Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Physician Knowledge of Human Genetic Variation, Beliefs About Race and Genetics, and Use of Race in Clinical Decision-making. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2018; 6:110-116. [PMID: 29926440 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-018-0505-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Race in the USA has an enduring connection to health and well-being. It is often used as a proxy for ancestry and genetic variation, although self-identified race does not establish genetic risk of disease for an individual patient. How physicians reconcile these seemingly paradoxical facts as they make clinical decisions is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine physicians' genetic knowledge and beliefs about race with their use of race in clinical decision-making DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a national sample of clinically active general internists RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-seven physicians completed the survey. Regression models indicate that genetic knowledge was not significantly associated with use of race. However, physicians who agreed with notions of race as a biological phenomenon and those who agreed that race has clinical importance were more likely to report using race in their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Genomic and precision medicine holds considerable promise for narrowing the gap in health among racial groups in the USA. For this promise to be realized, our findings suggest that future research and education efforts related to race, genomics, and health must go beyond educating health care providers about common genetic conditions to delving into assumptions about race and genetics.
Collapse
|
159
|
Pharmacogenetic testing in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): policy recommendations from the VHA Clinical Pharmacogenetics Subcommittee. Genet Med 2018; 21:382-390. [PMID: 29858578 PMCID: PMC6274593 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0057-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Clinical Pharmacogenetics Subcommittee is charged with making recommendations about whether specific pharmacogenetic tests should be used in healthcare at VHA facilities. We describe a process to inform VHA pharmacogenetic testing policy. Methods: After developing consensus definitions of clinical validity and utility, the Subcommittee identified salient drug-gene pairs with potential clinical application in VHA. Members met monthly to discuss each drug-gene pair, the evidence of clinical utility for the associated pharmacogenetic test, and any VHA-specific testing considerations. The Subcommittee classified each test as strongly recommended, recommended, or not routinely recommended before drug initiation. Results: Of 30 drug-gene pair tests reviewed, the Subcommittee classified 4 (13%) as strongly recommended, including HLA-B*15:02 for carbamazepine-associated Stevens-Johnston syndrome and G6PD for rasburicase-associated hemolytic anemia; 12 (40%) as recommended, including CYP2D6 for codeine toxicity; and 14 (47%) as not routinely recommened, such as CYP2C19 for clopidogrel dosing. Conclusion: Only half of drug-gene pairs with high clinical validity received Subcommittee support for policy promoting their widespread use across VHA. The Subcommittee generally found insufficient evidence of clinical utility or available, effective alternative strategies for the remainders. Continual evidence review and rigorous outcomes research will help promote the translation of pharmacogenetic discovery to healthcare.
Collapse
|
160
|
Williams MS, Kern MS, Lerch VR, Billet J, Williams JL, Moore GJ. Implementation of a patient-facing genomic test report in the electronic health record using a web-application interface. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:32. [PMID: 29843696 PMCID: PMC5975475 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0614-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic medicine is emerging into clinical care. Communication of genetic laboratory results to patients and providers is hampered by the complex technical nature of the laboratory reports. This can lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the results resulting in inappropriate care. Patients usually do not receive a copy of the report leading to further opportunities for miscommunication. To address these problems, interpretive reports were created using input from the intended end users, patients and providers. This paper describes the technical development and deployment of the first patient-facing genomic test report (PGR) within an electronic health record (EHR) ecosystem using a locally developed standards-based web-application interface. Methods A patient-facing genomic test report with a companion provider report was configured for implementation within the EHR using a locally developed software platform, COMPASS™. COMPASS™ is designed to manage secure data exchange, as well as patient and provider access to patient reported data capture and clinical display tools. COMPASS™ is built using a Software as a Service (SaaS) approach which exposes an API that apps can interact with. Results An authoring tool was developed that allowed creation of patient-specific PGRs and the accompanying provider reports. These were converted to a format that allowed them to be presented in the patient portal and EHR respectively using the existing COMPASS™ interface thus allowing patients, caregivers and providers access to individual reports designed for the intended end user. Conclusions The PGR as developed was shown to enhance patient and provider communication around genomic results. It is built on current standards but is designed to support integration with other tools and be compatible with emerging opportunities such as SMART on FHIR. This approach could be used to support genomic return of results as the tool is scalable and generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - Melissa S Kern
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Virginia R Lerch
- Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Billet
- Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Janet L Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Gregory J Moore
- Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Elliott AM, du Souich C, Adam S, Dragojlovic N, van Karnebeek C, Nelson TN, Lehman A, Lynd LD, Friedman JM. The Genomic Consultation Service: A clinical service designed to improve patient selection for genome-wide sequencing in British Columbia. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018; 6:592-600. [PMID: 29851296 PMCID: PMC6081221 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to clinical diagnostic genome-wide sequencing (GWS; exome or whole genome sequencing) is limited in British Columbia. The establishment of a translational research initiative (CAUSES) to provide diagnostic genome-wide sequencing for 500 children necessitated the development of a genomic consultation service, a clinical service established to provide consultation for physicians considering GWS for their pediatric patients throughout British Columbia. The Genomic Consultation Service provides patient-specific genomic advice that may include: GWS, multi-gene panel, single gene test, referral to medical genetics for clinical evaluation, or no genetic testing. Here, we describe and evaluate this service. METHODS We analyzed referral patterns, patient demographics, clinical indications, and genomic advice provided during the first year of this service. Comparison of outcomes from the first 6 months versus the last 6 months was performed. RESULTS A total of 407 referrals (238 males and 169 females [p = .0006]) were processed in the first year. Only children were eligible for referral and average patient age was 8 years. Medical genetics was the most frequent referring discipline, followed by biochemical disease and pediatric neurology, respectively. Most patients (68%) had syndromic intellectual disability. There was a significant difference in the frequency of referrals not appropriate for GWS in the first versus the second 6 months of the service (75/220 vs. 42/187; p = .01) suggesting increasing awareness of testing criteria by referring physicians. CONCLUSION This triage service is utilized throughout the province and appears to be an important factor in the high diagnostic rate (>40%) achieved in our GWS program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison M. Elliott
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- BC Children's Hospital Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Christèle du Souich
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- BC Children's Hospital Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE)Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Clara van Karnebeek
- Department of PediatricsCentre for Molecular Medicine and TherapeuticsVancouverBCCanada
- Department of PediatricsDepartment of Clinical GeneticsAcademic Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Tanya N. Nelson
- BC Children's Hospital Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Children's HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Anna Lehman
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- BC Children's Hospital Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Larry D. Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE)Department of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- CHEOS – Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes SciencesProvidence Health Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- BC Children's Hospital Research InstituteVancouverBCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Smith HS, Swint JM, Lalani SR, Yamal JM, de Oliveira Otto MC, Castellanos S, Taylor A, Lee BH, Russell HV. Clinical Application of Genome and Exome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool for Pediatric Patients: a Scoping Review of the Literature. Genet Med 2018; 21:3-16. [PMID: 29760485 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0024-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Availability of clinical genomic sequencing (CGS) has generated questions about the value of genome and exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool. Analysis of reported CGS application can inform uptake and direct further research. This scoping literature review aims to synthesize evidence on the clinical and economic impact of CGS. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2017 on diagnostic CGS for infant and pediatric patients. Articles were classified according to sample size and whether economic evaluation was a primary research objective. Data on patient characteristics, clinical setting, and outcomes were extracted and narratively synthesized. RESULTS Of 171 included articles, 131 were case reports, 40 were aggregate analyses, and 4 had a primary economic evaluation aim. Diagnostic yield was the only consistently reported outcome. Median diagnostic yield in aggregate analyses was 33.2% but varied by broad clinical categories and test type. CONCLUSION Reported CGS use has rapidly increased and spans diverse clinical settings and patient phenotypes. Economic evaluations support the cost-saving potential of diagnostic CGS. Multidisciplinary implementation research, including more robust outcome measurement and economic evaluation, is needed to demonstrate clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of CGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Baylor College of Medicine, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Michael Swint
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, The Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Seema R Lalani
- Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Genetics Laboratory, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose-Miguel Yamal
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Amy Taylor
- Texas Medical Center Library, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Heidi V Russell
- Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Mills RA, Eichmeyer JN, Williams LM, Muskett JA, Schmidlen TJ, Maloney KA, Lemke AA. Patient Care Situations Benefiting from Pharmacogenomic Testing. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-018-0136-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
164
|
Ji Y, Si Y, McMillin GA, Lyon E. Clinical pharmacogenomics testing in the era of next generation sequencing: challenges and opportunities for precision medicine. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:411-421. [PMID: 29634383 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1461561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The rapid development and dramatic decrease in cost of sequencing techniques have ushered the implementation of genomic testing in patient care. Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) techniques have been used increasingly in clinical laboratories to scan the whole or part of the human genome in order to facilitate diagnosis and/or prognostics of genetic disease. Despite many hurdles and debates, pharmacogenomics (PGx) is believed to be an area of genomic medicine where precision medicine could have immediate impact in the near future. Areas covered: This review focuses on lessons learned through early attempts of clinically implementing PGx testing; the challenges and opportunities that PGx testing brings to precision medicine in the era of NGS. Expert commentary: Replacing targeted analysis approach with NGS for PGx testing is neither technically feasible nor necessary currently due to several technical limitations and uncertainty involved in interpreting variants of uncertain significance for PGx variants. However, reporting PGx variants out of clinical whole exome or whole genome sequencing (WES/WGS) might represent additional benefits for patients who are tested by WES/WGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Ji
- a ARUP Laboratories and Department of Pathology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Yue Si
- a ARUP Laboratories and Department of Pathology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Gwendolyn A McMillin
- a ARUP Laboratories and Department of Pathology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Elaine Lyon
- a ARUP Laboratories and Department of Pathology , University of Utah School of Medicine , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Minari J, Brothers KB, Morrison M. Tensions in ethics and policy created by National Precision Medicine Programs. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:22. [PMID: 29665847 PMCID: PMC5904987 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0151-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine promises to use genomics and other data-intensive approaches to improve diagnosis and develop new treatments for major diseases, but also raises a range of ethical and governance challenges. Implementation of precision medicine in “real world” healthcare systems blurs the boundary between research and care. This has implications for the meaning and validity of consent, and increased potential for discrimination, among other challenges. Increased sharing of personal information raises concerns about privacy, commercialization, and public trust. This paper considers national precision medicine schemes from the USA, the UK, and Japan, comparing how these challenges manifest in each national context and examining the range of approaches deployed to mitigate the potential undesirable social consequences. There is rarely a “one size” fits all solution to these complex problems, but the most viable approaches are those which take account of cultural preferences and attitudes, available resources, and the wider political landscape in which national healthcare systems are embedded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
| | - Michael Morrison
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Tremblay I, Janvier A, Laberge AM. Paediatricians underuse recommended genetic tests in children with global developmental delay. Paediatr Child Health 2018; 23:e156-e162. [PMID: 30842697 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxy033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess paediatricians' use of genetic testing for children with global developmental delay (GDD). Study Design We developed and piloted a questionnaire assessing the use of genetic tests in children with GDD and awareness of relevant guidelines. All practicing Quebec paediatricians were contacted. Paediatricians who did not evaluate children with GDD in their practice were excluded. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed with SPSS. Results Of the 651 paediatricians, 225 answered (34.5%) and 141 were eligible. Only 31.9% were familiar with at least one guideline about genetic tests for the investigation of children with GDD, but 93.6% had ordered genetic testing for children with GDD (Fragile X testing [92.9%], karyotype [87.2%] and chromosomal microarray [63.8%]). Based on vignettes, 20.6% of participants would order genetic tests for isolated GDD and 95.0% for GDD with dysmorphic features and microcephaly. Only 56.7% ordered Fragile X testing for a girl with GDD and a known family history of Fragile X syndrome. Use of tests for isolated GDD was increased in presence of maternal pregnancy, compared with absence of pregnancy (44.7% and 27.7%, respectively). More participants would order genetic tests for a child with GDD and fetal exposure to alcohol (69.5%) than isolated GDD (20.6%). Conclusions Even though paediatricians often order genetic testing for children with GDD, practices and knowledge regarding testing are not optimal. As new and more complex genetic tests are developed, up-to-date training about the use of genetic tests for children with GDD needs to be integrated into paediatrics residency programs and continuous medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Tremblay
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Division of Psychology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec.,Unité d'éthique Clinique, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Annie Janvier
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Unité d'éthique Clinique, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec.,Division of Neonatology, Unité de soins palliatifs, Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec.,Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec.,Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec.,Division of Medical Genetics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Borry P, Bentzen HB, Budin-Ljøsne I, Cornel MC, Howard HC, Feeney O, Jackson L, Mascalzoni D, Mendes Á, Peterlin B, Riso B, Shabani M, Skirton H, Sterckx S, Vears D, Wjst M, Felzmann H. The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper. J Community Genet 2018; 9:103-116. [PMID: 28952070 PMCID: PMC5849701 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0331-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid advances in microarray and sequencing technologies are making genotyping and genome sequencing more affordable and readily available. There is an expectation that genomic sequencing technologies improve personalized diagnosis and personalized drug therapy. Concurrently, provision of direct-to-consumer genetic testing by commercial providers has enabled individuals' direct access to their genomic data. The expanded availability of genomic data is perceived as influencing the relationship between the various parties involved including healthcare professionals, researchers, patients, individuals, families, industry, and government. This results in a need to revisit their roles and responsibilities. In a 1-day agenda-setting meeting organized by the COST Action IS1303 "Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives," participants discussed the main challenges associated with the expanded availability of genomic information, with a specific focus on public-private partnerships, and provided an outline from which to discuss in detail the identified challenges. This paper summarizes the points raised at this meeting in five main parts and highlights the key cross-cutting themes. In light of the increasing availability of genomic information, it is expected that this paper will provide timely direction for future research and policy making in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Heidi Beate Bentzen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1130, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
- Cohort Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heidi Carmen Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Oliver Feeney
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Leigh Jackson
- RILD Building, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Álvaro Mendes
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC-UnIGENe and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Brigida Riso
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIES-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heather Skirton
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Sigrid Sterckx
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danya Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Wjst
- Helmholtz Center Munich, National Research Centre for Environmental Health, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heike Felzmann
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Volpi S, Bult CJ, Chisholm RL, Deverka PA, Ginsburg GS, Jacob HJ, Kasapi M, McLeod HL, Roden DM, Williams MS, Green ED, Rodriguez LL, Aronson S, Cavallari LH, Denny JC, Dressler LG, Johnson JA, Klein TE, Leeder JS, Piquette-Miller M, Perera M, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Rehm HL, Ritchie MD, Skaar TC, Wagle N, Weinshilboum R, Weitzel KW, Wildin R, Wilson J, Manolio TA, Relling MV. Research Directions in the Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics: An Overview of US Programs and Projects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 103:778-786. [PMID: 29460415 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Response to a drug often differs widely among individual patients. This variability is frequently observed not only with respect to effective responses but also with adverse drug reactions. Matching patients to the drugs that are most likely to be effective and least likely to cause harm is the goal of effective therapeutics. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds the promise of precision medicine through elucidating the genetic determinants responsible for pharmacological outcomes and using them to guide drug selection and dosing. Here we survey the US landscape of research programs in PGx implementation, review current advances and clinical applications of PGx, summarize the obstacles that have hindered PGx implementation, and identify the critical knowledge gaps and possible studies needed to help to address them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Volpi
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Carol J Bult
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA
| | - Rex L Chisholm
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Duke Center for Applied Genomic and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Howard J Jacob
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
| | - Melpomeni Kasapi
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Howard L McLeod
- DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dan M Roden
- Department of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric D Green
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Laura Lyman Rodriguez
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Larisa H Cavallari
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Joshua C Denny
- Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Lynn G Dressler
- Mission Health, Personalized Medicine Program, Asheville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Julie A Johnson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Teri E Klein
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - J Steven Leeder
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Minoli Perera
- Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marylyn D Ritchie
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Todd C Skaar
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard Weinshilboum
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kristin W Weitzel
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Wildin
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Pediatrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | | | - Teri A Manolio
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary V Relling
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care. Genet Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
170
|
Lemke AA, Hulick PJ, Wake DT, Wang C, Sereika AW, Yu KD, Glaser NS, Dunnenberger HM. Patient perspectives following pharmacogenomics results disclosure in an integrated health system. Pharmacogenomics 2018; 19:321-331. [DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess patient perceptions and utilization of pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing in an integrated community health system. Methods: Fifty-seven patients completed an online survey assessing their experiences with PGx testing offered through two methods: a designated PGx clinic or direct access in-home testing. Results: The majority of participants perceived PGx testing as helpful in their healthcare and reported understanding their results. Some had concerns about privacy and discrimination; most lacked familiarity with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. There were no significant differences in views between participants tested through either model. Conclusion: Participants reported value in both methods of PGx testing. Patient experiences, understanding and result utilization will play an important role in informing future development and implementation of PGx programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Lemke
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Dyson T Wake
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Chi Wang
- Biostatistics & Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 146, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Annette W Sereika
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Kristen Dilzell Yu
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Nicole S Glaser
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Henry M Dunnenberger
- Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 1001 University Place, Suite 160, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Smith DM, Weitzel KW, Cavallari LH, Elsey AR, Schmidt SO. Clinical application of pharmacogenetics in pain management. Per Med 2018; 15:117-126. [PMID: 29714124 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
There is growing experience translating genomic data into clinical practice, as seen with the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network. A primary example is the influence of CYP2D6 genotype on the beneficial and adverse effects of some opioids. Clinical recommendations exist to guide drug therapy based on CYP2D6 genotype for codeine, tramadol, oxycodone and hydrocodone, although the level of supporting evidence differs by drug. Limited evidence also supports the use of genetic data to guide other medications in chronic pain therapy, including tricyclic antidepressants and celecoxib. Pragmatic clinical trial data are needed in this area to better understand the impact of diverse populations, therapeutic interventions and clinical care environments on genotype-guided drug therapy for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Max Smith
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA
| | - Kristin W Weitzel
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA
| | - Larisa H Cavallari
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA
| | - Amanda R Elsey
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA
| | - Siegfried Of Schmidt
- Department of Community Health & Family Medicine, College of Medicine University of Florida, 200 SW 62nd Blvd Suite D Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Ramsey AT, Chen LS, Hartz SM, Saccone NL, Fisher SL, Proctor EK, Bierut LJ. Toward the implementation of genomic applications for smoking cessation and smoking-related diseases. Transl Behav Med 2018; 8:7-17. [PMID: 29385591 PMCID: PMC6065540 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The incorporation of genomic information into routine care settings is a burgeoning area for investigation in behavioral medicine. The past decade has witnessed rapid advancements in knowledge of genetic biomarkers associated with smoking behaviors and tobacco-related morbidity and mortality, providing the basis for promising genomic applications in clinical and community settings. We assessed the current state of readiness for implementing genomic applications involving variation in the α5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor subunit gene CHRNA5 and smoking outcomes (behaviors and related diseases) using a process that could be translatable to a wide range of genomic applications in behavioral medicine. We reviewed the scientific literature involving CHRNA5 genetic variation and smoking cessation, and then summarized and synthesized a chain of evidence according to analytic validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, and ethical, legal, and social implications (ACCE), a well-established set of criteria used to evaluate genomic applications. Our review identified at least three specific genomic applications for which implementation may be considered, including the use of CHRNA5 genetic test results for informing disease risk, optimizing smoking cessation treatment, and motivating smoking behavior change. For these genomic applications, we rated analytic validity as convincing, clinical validity as adequate, and clinical utility and ethical, legal, and social implications as inadequate. For clinical genomic applications involving CHRNA5 variation and smoking outcomes, research efforts now need to focus on establishing clinical utility. This approach is compatible with pre-implementation research, which is also needed to accelerate translation, improve innovation design, and understand and refine system processes involved in implementation. This study informs the readiness to incorporate smoking-related genomic applications in real-world settings and facilitates cross-disciplinary collaboration to accelerate the integration of evidence-based genomics in behavioral medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T Ramsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Li-Shiun Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sarah M Hartz
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nancy L Saccone
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sherri L Fisher
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Enola K Proctor
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Laura J Bierut
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Fossey R, Kochan D, Winkler E, Pacyna JE, Olson J, Thibodeau S, Connolly JJ, Harr M, Behr MA, Prows CA, Cobb B, Myers MF, Leslie ND, Namjou-Khales B, Milo Rasouly H, Wynn J, Fedotov A, Chung WK, Gharavi A, Williams JL, Pais L, Holm I, Aufox S, Smith ME, Scrol A, Leppig K, Jarvik GP, Wiesner GL, Li R, Stroud M, Smoller JW, Sharp RR, Kullo IJ. Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience. J Pers Med 2018; 8:jpm8010002. [PMID: 29301385 PMCID: PMC5872076 DOI: 10.3390/jpm8010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, for proposed electronic health record-based genomic medicine studies, to identify common questions and concerns. Sequencing of 109 disease related genes and genotyping of 14 actionable variants is being performed in ~28,100 participants from the 9 sites. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in actionable genes are being returned to study participants. We examined each site’s research protocols, informed-consent materials, and interactions with IRB staff. Research staff at each site completed questionnaires regarding their IRB interactions. The time to prepare protocols for IRB submission, number of revisions and time to approval ranged from 10–261 days, 0–11, and 11–90 days, respectively. IRB recommendations related to the readability of informed consent materials, specifying the full range of potential risks, providing options for receiving limited results or withdrawal, sharing of information with family members, and establishing the mechanisms to answer participant questions. IRBs reviewing studies that involve the return of results from genomic sequencing have a diverse array of concerns, and anticipating these concerns can help investigators to more effectively engage IRBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Fossey
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - David Kochan
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Erin Winkler
- Center for Individualized Medicine and Department of Medical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Joel E Pacyna
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Janet Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Stephen Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - John J Connolly
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Margaret Harr
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Meckenzie A Behr
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Beth Cobb
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Nancy D Leslie
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | | | - Hila Milo Rasouly
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Alexander Fedotov
- Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Ali Gharavi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | | | - Lynn Pais
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Ingrid Holm
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Sharon Aufox
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | | | | | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
| | - Rongling Li
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Mary Stroud
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Hayeems RZ, Bhawra J, Tsiplova K, Meyn MS, Monfared N, Bowdin S, Stavropoulos DJ, Marshall CR, Basran R, Shuman C, Ito S, Cohn I, Hum C, Girdea M, Brudno M, Cohn RD, Scherer SW, Ungar WJ. Care and cost consequences of pediatric whole genome sequencing compared to chromosome microarray. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:1303-1312. [PMID: 29158552 PMCID: PMC5865210 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0020-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is expected to alter pediatric medical management. The study aimed to describe the type and cost of healthcare activities following pediatric WGS compared to chromosome microarray (CMA). Healthcare activities prompted by WGS and CMA were ascertained for 101 children with developmental delay over 1 year. Activities following receipt of non-diagnostic CMA were compared to WGS diagnostic and non-diagnostic results. Activities were costed in 2016 Canadian dollars (CDN). Ongoing care accounted for 88.6% of post-test activities. The mean number of lab tests was greater following CMA than WGS (0.55 vs. 0.09; p = 0.007). The mean number of specialist visits was greater following WGS than CMA (0.41 vs. 0; p = 0.016). WGS results (diagnostic vs. non-diagnostic) modified the effect of test type on mean number of activities (p < 0.001). The cost of activities prompted by diagnostic WGS exceeded $557CDN for 10% of cases. In complex pediatric care, CMA prompted additional diagnostic investigations while WGS prompted tailored care guided by genotypic variants. Costs for prompted activities were low for the majority and constitute a small proportion of total test costs. Optimal use of WGS depends on robust evaluation of downstream care and cost consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jasmin Bhawra
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Kate Tsiplova
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Stephen Meyn
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nasim Monfared
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah Bowdin
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D James Stavropoulos
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christian R Marshall
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raveen Basran
- Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shinya Ito
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Cohn
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Courtney Hum
- Prenatal Diagnosis and Medical Genetics Program, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marta Girdea
- Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Brudno
- Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ronald D Cohn
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephen W Scherer
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- McLaughlin Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
O’Donnell PH, Wadhwa N, Danahey K, Borden BA, Lee SM, Hall JP, Klammer C, Hussain S, Siegler M, Sorrentino MJ, Davis AM, Sacro YA, Nanda R, Polonsky TS, Koyner JL, Burnet DL, Lipstreuer K, Rubin DT, Mulcahy C, Strek ME, Harper W, Cifu AS, Polite B, Patrick-Miller L, Yeo KTJ, Leung EKY, Volchenboum SL, Altman RB, Olopade OI, Stadler WM, Meltzer DO, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenomics-Based Point-of-Care Clinical Decision Support Significantly Alters Drug Prescribing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 102:859-869. [PMID: 28398598 PMCID: PMC5636653 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Changes in behavior are necessary to apply genomic discoveries to practice. We prospectively studied medication changes made by providers representing eight different medicine specialty clinics whose patients had submitted to preemptive pharmacogenomic genotyping. An institutional clinical decision support (CDS) system provided pharmacogenomic results using traffic light alerts: green = genomically favorable, yellow = genomic caution, red = high risk. The influence of pharmacogenomic alerts on prescribing behaviors was the primary endpoint. In all, 2,279 outpatient encounters were analyzed. Independent of other potential prescribing mediators, medications with high pharmacogenomic risk were changed significantly more often than prescription drugs lacking pharmacogenomic information (odds ratio (OR) = 26.2 (9.0-75.3), P < 0.0001). Medications with cautionary pharmacogenomic information were also changed more frequently (OR = 2.4 (1.7-3.5), P < 0.0001). No pharmacogenomically high-risk medications were prescribed during the entire study when physicians consulted the CDS tool. Pharmacogenomic information improved prescribing in patterns aimed at reducing patient risk, demonstrating that enhanced prescription decision-making is achievable through clinical integration of genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter H. O’Donnell
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Nisha Wadhwa
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Research Informatics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Brittany A. Borden
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Sang Mee Lee
- Department of Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Julianne P. Hall
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Catherine Klammer
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Sheena Hussain
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Mark Siegler
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Matthew J. Sorrentino
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Andrew M. Davis
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Yasmin A. Sacro
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Tamar S. Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Jay L. Koyner
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Deborah L. Burnet
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Kristen Lipstreuer
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - David T. Rubin
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Cathleen Mulcahy
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Mary E. Strek
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - William Harper
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Adam S. Cifu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Blase Polite
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Linda Patrick-Miller
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Kiang-Teck J. Yeo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | | | | | - Russ B. Altman
- Departments of Bioengineering, Genetics, and Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A
| | | | - Walter M. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - David O. Meltzer
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Health and the Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| | - Mark J. Ratain
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
- Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
The current state of funded NIH grants in implementation science in genomic medicine: a portfolio analysis. Genet Med 2017; 21:1218-1223. [PMID: 31048814 PMCID: PMC5920776 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Implementation science offers methods to evaluate the translation of genomic medicine research into practice. The extent in which the NIH human genomics grant portfolio includes implementation science is unknown. This brief report’s objective is to describe recently funded implementation science studies in genomic medicine in the NIH grant portfolio, and identify remaining gaps. Methods We identified investigator-initiated NIH research grants on implementation science in genomic medicine (funding initiated 2012–2016). A codebook was adapted from the literature, three authors coded grants, and descriptive statistics were calculated for each code. Results 42 grants fit the inclusion criteria (~1.75% of investigator-initiated genomics grants). The majority of included grants proposed qualitative and/or quantitative methods with cross sectional study designs, and described clinical settings and primarily white, non-Hispanic study populations. Most grants were in oncology and examined genetic testing for risk assessment. Finally, grants lacked the use of implementation science frameworks, and most examined uptake of genomic medicine and/or assessed patient centeredness. Conclusion We identified large gaps in implementation science studies in genomic medicine in the funded NIH portfolio over the past five years. To move the genomics field forward, investigator-initiated research grants should employ rigorous implementation science methods within diverse settings and populations.
Collapse
|
177
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pharmacogenetics is an important component of precision medicine. Even within the genomic era, several challenges lie ahead in the road towards clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in the clinic. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge regarding pharmacogenetics of cardiovascular drugs, focusing on those with the most evidence supporting clinical implementation- clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin. RECENT FINDINGS There is limited translation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice primarily due to the absence of outcomes data from prospective, randomized, genotype-directed clinical trials. There are several ongoing randomized controlled trials that will provide some answers as to the clinical utility of genotype-directed strategies. Several academic medical centers have pushed towards clinical implementation where the clinical validity data are strong. Their experiences will inform operational requirements of a clinical pharmacogenetics testing including the timing of testing, incorporation of test results into the electronic health record, reimbursement and ethical issues. SUMMARY Pharmacogenetics of clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin are three examples where pharmacogenetics testing may provide added clinical value. Continued accumulation of evidence surrounding clinical utility of pharmacogenetics markers is imperative as this will inform reimbursement policy and drive adoption of pharamcogenetics into routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sony Tuteja
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Nita Limdi
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Hugh Kaul Personalized Medicine Institute
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Abstract
The overall goal of radiogenomics is the identification of genomic markers that are predictive for the development of adverse effects resulting from cancer treatment with radiation. The principal rationale for a focus on toxicity in radiogenomics is that for many patients treated with radiation, especially individuals diagnosed with early-stage cancers, the survival rates are high, and therefore a substantial number of people will live for a significant period of time beyond treatment. However, many of these patients could suffer from debilitating complications resulting from radiotherapy. Work in radiogenomics has greatly benefited from creation of the Radiogenomics Consortium (RGC) that includes investigators at multiple institutions located in a variety of countries. The common goal of the RGC membership is to share biospecimens and data so as to achieve large-scale studies with increased statistical power to enable identification of relevant genomic markers. A major aim of research in radiogenomics is the development of a predictive instrument to enable identification of people who are at greatest risk for adverse effects resulting from cancer treatment using radiation. It is anticipated that creation of a predictive assay characterized by a high level of sensitivity and specificity will improve precision radiotherapy and assist patients and their physicians to select the optimal treatment for each individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry S Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Danahey K, Borden BA, Furner B, Yukman P, Hussain S, Saner D, Volchenboum SL, Ratain MJ, O'Donnell PH. Simplifying the use of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice: Building the genomic prescribing system. J Biomed Inform 2017; 75:110-121. [PMID: 28963061 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A barrier to the use of genomic information during prescribing is the limited number of software solutions that combine a user-friendly interface with complex medical data. We built and designed an online, secure, electronic custom interface termed the Genomic Prescribing System (GPS). METHODS Actionable pharmacogenomic (PGx) information was reviewed, collected, and stored in the back-end of GPS to enable creation of customized drug- and variant-specific clinical decision support (CDS) summaries. The database architecture utilized the star schema to store information. Patient raw genomic data underwent transformation via custom-designed algorithms to enable gene and phenotype-level associations. Multiple external data sets (PubMed, The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED), National Drug File - Reference Terminology (ND-FRT), and a publically-available PGx knowledgebase) were integrated to facilitate the delivery of patient, drug, disease, and genomic information. Institutional security infrastructure was leveraged to securely store patient genomic and clinical data on a HIPAA-compliant server farm. RESULTS As of May 17, 2016, the GPS back-end housed 257 CDS encompassing 112 genetic variants, 42 genes, and 46 PGx-actionable drugs. The GPS user interface presented patient-specific CDS alongside a recognizable traffic light symbol (green/yellow/red), denoting PGx risk for each genomic result. The number of traffic lights per visit increased with the corresponding increase in the number of available PGx-annotated drugs over time. An integrated drug and disease search functionality, links to primary literature sources, and potential alternative PGx drugs were indicated. The system, which was initially used as stand-alone CDS software within our clinical environment, was then integrated with the institutional electronic medical record for enhanced usability. There have been nearly 2000 logins in 43months since inception, with usage exceeding 56 logins per month and system up-times of 99.99%. For all patient-provider visits encompassing >3years of implementation, unique alert click-through rates corresponded to genomic risk: red lights clicked 100%, yellow lights 79%, green lights 43%. CONCLUSIONS Successful deployment of GPS by combining complex data and recognizable iconography led to a tool that enabled point-of-care genomic delivery with high usability. Continued scalability and incorporation of additional clinical elements to be considered alongside PGx information could expand future impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brittany A Borden
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Furner
- Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patrick Yukman
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sheena Hussain
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Donald Saner
- Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Samuel L Volchenboum
- Center for Research Informatics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter H O'Donnell
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Orlando LA, Sperber NR, Voils C, Nichols M, Myers RA, Wu RR, Rakhra-Burris T, Levy KD, Levy M, Pollin TI, Guan Y, Horowitz CR, Ramos M, Kimmel SE, McDonough CW, Madden EB, Damschroder LJ. Developing a common framework for evaluating the implementation of genomic medicine interventions in clinical care: the IGNITE Network's Common Measures Working Group. Genet Med 2017; 20:655-663. [PMID: 28914267 PMCID: PMC5851794 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Implementation research provides a structure for evaluating the clinical integration of genomic medicine interventions. This paper describes the Implementing GeNomics In PracTicE (IGNITE) Network’s efforts to promote: 1) a broader understanding of genomic medicine implementation research; and 2) the sharing of knowledge generated in the network. Methods To facilitate this goal the IGNITE Network Common Measures Working Group (CMG) members adopted the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide their approach to: identifying constructs and measures relevant to evaluating genomic medicine as a whole, standardizing data collection across projects, and combining data in a centralized resource for cross network analyses. Results CMG identified ten high-priority CFIR constructs as important for genomic medicine. Of those, eight didn’t have standardized measurement instruments. Therefore, we developed four survey tools to address this gap. In addition, we identified seven high-priority constructs related to patients, families, and communities that did not map to CFIR constructs. Both sets of constructs were combined to create a draft genomic medicine implementation model. Conclusion We developed processes to identify constructs deemed valuable for genomic medicine implementation and codified them in a model. These resources are freely available to facilitate knowledge generation and sharing across the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori A Orlando
- Department of Medicine and The Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Corrine Voils
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marshall Nichols
- Department of Medicine and The Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rachel A Myers
- Department of Medicine and The Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - R Ryanne Wu
- Department of Medicine and The Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tejinder Rakhra-Burris
- Department of Medicine and The Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kenneth D Levy
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mia Levy
- Department of Medicine and the Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Toni I Pollin
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yue Guan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy and The Center for Health Equity and Community Engaged Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michelle Ramos
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy and The Center for Health Equity and Community Engaged Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephen E Kimmel
- Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Caitrin W McDonough
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ebony B Madden
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Laura J Damschroder
- Implementation Pathways, LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Belbin GM, Odgis J, Sorokin EP, Yee MC, Kohli S, Glicksberg BS, Gignoux CR, Wojcik GL, Van Vleck T, Jeff JM, Linderman M, Schurmann C, Ruderfer D, Cai X, Merkelson A, Justice AE, Young KL, Graff M, North KE, Peters U, James R, Hindorff L, Kornreich R, Edelmann L, Gottesman O, Stahl EE, Cho JH, Loos RJ, Bottinger EP, Nadkarni GN, Abul-Husn NS, Kenny EE. Genetic identification of a common collagen disease in puerto ricans via identity-by-descent mapping in a health system. eLife 2017; 6:25060. [PMID: 28895531 PMCID: PMC5595434 DOI: 10.7554/elife.25060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Achieving confidence in the causality of a disease locus is a complex task that often requires supporting data from both statistical genetics and clinical genomics. Here we describe a combined approach to identify and characterize a genetic disorder that leverages distantly related patients in a health system and population-scale mapping. We utilize genomic data to uncover components of distant pedigrees, in the absence of recorded pedigree information, in the multi-ethnic BioMe biobank in New York City. By linking to medical records, we discover a locus associated with both elevated genetic relatedness and extreme short stature. We link the gene, COL27A1, with a little-known genetic disease, previously thought to be rare and recessive. We demonstrate that disease manifests in both heterozygotes and homozygotes, indicating a common collagen disorder impacting up to 2% of individuals of Puerto Rican ancestry, leading to a better understanding of the continuum of complex and Mendelian disease. Diseases often run in families. These disease are frequently linked to changes in DNA that are passed down through generations. Close family members may share these disease-causing mutations; so may distant relatives who inherited the same mutation from a common ancestor long ago. Geneticists use a method called linkage mapping to trace a disease found in multiple members of a family over generations to genetic changes in a shared ancestor. This allows scientists to pinpoint the exact place in the genome the disease-causing mutation occurred. Using computer algorithms, scientists can apply the same technique to identify mutations that distant relatives inherited from a common ancestor. Belbin et al. used this computational technique to identify a mutation that may cause unusually short stature or bone and joint problems in up to 2% of people of Puerto Rican descent. In the experiments, the genomes of about 32,000 New Yorkers who have volunteered to participate in the BioMe Biobank and their health records were used to search for genetic changes linked to extremely short stature. The search revealed that people who inherited two copies of this mutation from their parents were likely to be extremely short or to have bone and joint problems. People who inherited one copy had an increased likelihood of joint or bone problems. This mutation affects a gene responsible for making a form of protein called collagen that is important for bone growth. The analysis suggests the mutation first arose in a Native American ancestor living in Puerto Rico around the time that European colonization began. The mutation had previously been linked to a disorder called Steel syndrome that was thought to be rare. Belbin et al. showed this condition is actually fairly common in people whose ancestors recently came from Puerto Rico, but may often go undiagnosed by their physicians. The experiments emphasize the importance of including diverse populations in genetic studies, as studies of people of predominantly European descent would likely have missed the link between this disease and mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Morven Belbin
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Jacqueline Odgis
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Elena P Sorokin
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Muh-Ching Yee
- Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, United States
| | - Sumita Kohli
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Benjamin S Glicksberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Harris Center for Precision Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Christopher R Gignoux
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Genevieve L Wojcik
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
| | - Tielman Van Vleck
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Janina M Jeff
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Michael Linderman
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Claudia Schurmann
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Douglas Ruderfer
- Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States.,Division of Psychiatric Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, United States.,Center for Statistical Genetics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Xiaoqiang Cai
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Amanda Merkelson
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Anne E Justice
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Kristin L Young
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Misa Graff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Kari E North
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, United States
| | - Regina James
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Lucia Hindorff
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Ruth Kornreich
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Lisa Edelmann
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Omri Gottesman
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Eli Ea Stahl
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Harris Center for Precision Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, United States.,Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States
| | - Judy H Cho
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Ruth Jf Loos
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Erwin P Bottinger
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Girish N Nadkarni
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,The Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.,Center for Statistical Genetics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Luzum JA, Pakyz RE, Elsey AR, Haidar CE, Peterson JF, Whirl-Carrillo M, Handelman SK, Palmer K, Pulley JM, Beller M, Schildcrout JS, Field JR, Weitzel KW, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Cavallari LH, O’Donnell PH, Altman RB, Pereira N, Ratain MJ, Roden DM, Embi PJ, Sadee W, Klein TE, Johnson JA, Relling MV, Wang L, Weinshilboum RM, Shuldiner AR, Freimuth RR. The Pharmacogenomics Research Network Translational Pharmacogenetics Program: Outcomes and Metrics of Pharmacogenetic Implementations Across Diverse Healthcare Systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 102:502-510. [PMID: 28090649 PMCID: PMC5511786 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Numerous pharmacogenetic clinical guidelines and recommendations have been published, but barriers have hindered the clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics. The Translational Pharmacogenetics Program (TPP) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Pharmacogenomics Research Network was established in 2011 to catalog and contribute to the development of pharmacogenetic implementations at eight US healthcare systems, with the goal to disseminate real-world solutions for the barriers to clinical pharmacogenetic implementation. The TPP collected and normalized pharmacogenetic implementation metrics through June 2015, including gene-drug pairs implemented, interpretations of alleles and diplotypes, numbers of tests performed and actionable results, and workflow diagrams. TPP participant institutions developed diverse solutions to overcome many barriers, but the use of Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines provided some consistency among the institutions. The TPP also collected some pharmacogenetic implementation outcomes (scientific, educational, financial, and informatics), which may inform healthcare systems seeking to implement their own pharmacogenetic testing programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine A. Luzum
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Pharmacogenomics, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ruth E. Pakyz
- Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda R. Elsey
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Cyrine E. Haidar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Josh F. Peterson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Samuel K. Handelman
- Center for Pharmacogenomics, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kathleen Palmer
- Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jill M. Pulley
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marc Beller
- Office of Research Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Schildcrout
- Department of Statistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Julie R. Field
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kristin W. Weitzel
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Larisa H. Cavallari
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter H. O’Donnell
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Russ B. Altman
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Naveen Pereira
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark J. Ratain
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dan M. Roden
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Peter J. Embi
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Wolfgang Sadee
- Center for Pharmacogenomics, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Teri E. Klein
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Julie A. Johnson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mary V. Relling
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard M. Weinshilboum
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan R. Shuldiner
- Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
183
|
Panagiotou OA. SHIGEYUKI MATSUI, MARC BUYSE, RICHARD SIMON, EDS. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials for Predictive Medicine. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Biometrics 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/biom.12760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis A. Panagiotou
- Department of Health Services Policy & Practice; Brown University School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Torkamani A, Andersen KG, Steinhubl SR, Topol EJ. High-Definition Medicine. Cell 2017; 170:828-843. [PMID: 28841416 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The foundation for a new era of data-driven medicine has been set by recent technological advances that enable the assessment and management of human health at an unprecedented level of resolution-what we refer to as high-definition medicine. Our ability to assess human health in high definition is enabled, in part, by advances in DNA sequencing, physiological and environmental monitoring, advanced imaging, and behavioral tracking. Our ability to understand and act upon these observations at equally high precision is driven by advances in genome editing, cellular reprogramming, tissue engineering, and information technologies, especially artificial intelligence. In this review, we will examine the core disciplines that enable high-definition medicine and project how these technologies will alter the future of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Torkamani
- The Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| | - Kristian G Andersen
- The Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Steven R Steinhubl
- The Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Eric J Topol
- The Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Klein ME, Parvez MM, Shin JG. Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenomics for Personalized Precision Medicine: Barriers and Solutions. J Pharm Sci 2017; 106:2368-2379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
186
|
Wolf SM, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Chung WK, Clayton EW, Green RC, Harris-Wai J, Henderson GE, Jarvik GP, Koenig BA, Lehmann LS, McGuire AL, O'Rourke P, Somkin C, Wilfond BS, Burke W. Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med 2017; 20:545-553. [PMID: 28858330 PMCID: PMC5832495 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium encompasses nine National Institutes of Health–funded U-award projects investigating translation of genomic sequencing into clinical care. Previous literature has distinguished norms and rules governing research versus clinical care. This is the first study to explore how genomics investigators describe and navigate the research–clinical interface. Methods A CSER working group developed a 22-item survey. All nine U-award projects participated. Descriptive data were tabulated and qualitative analysis of text responses identified themes and characterizations of the research–clinical interface. Results Survey responses described how studies approached the research–clinical interface, including in consent practices, recording results, and using a research versus clinical laboratory. Responses revealed four characterizations of the interface: clear separation between research and clinical care, interdigitation of the two with steps to maintain separation, a dynamic interface, and merging of the two. All survey respondents utilized at least two different characterizations. Although research has traditionally been differentiated from clinical care, respondents pointed to factors blurring the distinction and strategies to differentiate the domains. Conclusion These results illustrate the difficulty in applying the traditional bifurcation of research versus clinical care to translational models of clinical research, including in genomics. Our results suggest new directions for ethics and oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Law School; Medical School; Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Departments of Genetics and Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Broad Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julie Harris-Wai
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California-San Francisco; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gail E Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
- Veterans Administration National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.,Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pearl O'Rourke
- Human Research Affairs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carol Somkin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Wylie Burke
- Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Bergman MW, Goodson P, Goltz HH. Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students. Front Public Health 2017; 5:229. [PMID: 28900615 PMCID: PMC5581811 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Misconceptions concerning numerical genetic risk exist even within educated populations. To more fully characterize and understand the extent of these risk misunderstandings, which have large potential impact on clinical care, we analyzed the responses from 2,576 students enrolled at 2 Southwestern universities using the PGRID tool, a 138-item web-based survey comprising measures of understanding of genetics, genetic disease, and genetic risk. The primary purpose of this study was to characterize the intersection of risk perception and knowledge, termed genetic numeracy (GN). Additionally, we identify sociodemographic factors that might shape varying levels of GN skills within the study sample and explore the impact of GN on genetic testing intentions using both the Marascuilo procedure and logistic regression analysis. Despite having some college coursework or at least one college degree, most respondents lacked high-level aptitude in understanding genetic inheritance risk, especially with respect to recessive disorders. Prior education about genetics and biology, as well as exposure to biomedical models of genetics, was associated with higher GN levels; exposure to popular media models of genetics was inversely associated with higher GN levels. Differing GN levels affects genetic testing intentions. GN will become more relevant as genetic testing is increasingly incorporated into general clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo W Bergman
- Milgard School of Business, University of Washington - Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, United States
| | - Patricia Goodson
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Heather Honoré Goltz
- University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States.,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Krier JB, Kalia SS, Green RC. Genomic sequencing in clinical practice: applications, challenges, and opportunities. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2017. [PMID: 27757064 PMCID: PMC5067147 DOI: 10.31887/dcns.2016.18.3/jkrier] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The development of massively parallel sequencing (or next-generation sequencing) has facilitated a rapid implementation of genomic sequencing in clinical medicine. Genomic sequencing (GS) is now an essential tool for evaluating rare disorders, identifying therapeutic targets in neoplasms, and screening for prenatal aneuploidy. Emerging applications, such as GS for preconception carrier screening and predisposition screening in healthy individuals, are being explored in research settings and utilized by members of the public eager to incorporate genomic information into their health management. The rapid pace of adoption has created challenges for all stakeholders in clinical GS, from standardizing variant interpretation approaches in clinical molecular laboratories to ensuring that nongeneticist clinicians are prepared for new types of clinical information. Clinical GS faces a pivotal moment, as the vast potential of new quantities and types of data enable further clinical innovation and complicated implementation questions continue to be resolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel B Krier
- Genomes2People Research Program, Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Robert C Green
- Genomes2People Research Program, Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
|
190
|
Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Schonman EF, Blout CL, Robinson JO, Krier JB, Diamond PM, Lebo M, Machini K, Azzariti DR, Dukhovny D, Bates DW, MacRae CA, Murray MF, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC. The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167:159-169. [PMID: 28654958 PMCID: PMC5856654 DOI: 10.7326/m17-0188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in asymptomatic adults might prevent disease but increase health care use without clinical value. Objective To describe the effect on clinical care and outcomes of adding WGS to standardized family history assessment in primary care. Design Pilot randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01736566). Setting Academic primary care practices. Participants 9 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 100 generally healthy patients recruited at ages 40 to 65 years. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive a family history report alone (FH group) or in combination with an interpreted WGS report (FH + WGS group), which included monogenic disease risk (MDR) results (associated with Mendelian disorders), carrier variants, pharmacogenomic associations, and polygenic risk estimates for cardiometabolic traits. Each patient met with his or her PCP to discuss the report. Measurements Clinical outcomes and health care use through 6 months were obtained from medical records and audio-recorded discussions between PCPs and patients. Patients' health behavior changes were surveyed 6 months after receiving results. A panel of clinician-geneticists rated the appropriateness of how PCPs managed MDR results. Results Mean age was 55 years; 58% of patients were female. Eleven FH + WGS patients (22% [95% CI, 12% to 36%]) had new MDR results. Only 2 (4% [CI, 0.01% to 15%]) had evidence of the phenotypes predicted by an MDR result (fundus albipunctatus due to RDH5 and variegate porphyria due to PPOX). Primary care physicians recommended new clinical actions for 16% (CI, 8% to 30%) of FH patients and 34% (CI, 22% to 49%) of FH + WGS patients. Thirty percent (CI, 17% to 45%) and 41% (CI, 27% to 56%) of FH and FH + WGS patients, respectively, reported making a health behavior change after 6 months. Geneticists rated PCP management of 8 MDR results (73% [CI, 39% to 99%]) as appropriate and 2 results (18% [CI, 3% to 52%]) as inappropriate. Limitation Limited sample size and ancestral and socioeconomic diversity. Conclusion Adding WGS to primary care reveals new molecular findings of uncertain clinical utility. Nongeneticist providers may be able to manage WGS results appropriately, but WGS may prompt additional clinical actions of unclear value. Primary Funding Source National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L. Vassy
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel B. Krier
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pamela M. Diamond
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew Lebo
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Kalotina Machini
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - David W. Bates
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Calum A. MacRae
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Heidi L. Rehm
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | | - Robert C. Green
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
191
|
Roberts MC, Kennedy AE, Chambers DA, Khoury MJ. The current state of implementation science in genomic medicine: opportunities for improvement. Genet Med 2017; 19:858-863. [PMID: 28079898 PMCID: PMC6312663 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to identify trends and gaps in the field of implementation science in genomic medicine. METHODS We conducted a literature review using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Genomics Knowledge Base to examine the current literature in the field of implementation science in genomic medicine. We selected original research articles based on specific inclusion criteria and then abstracted information about study design, genomic medicine, and implementation outcomes. Data were aggregated, and trends and gaps in the literature were discussed. RESULTS Our final review encompassed 283 articles published in 2014, the majority of which described uptake (35.7%, n = 101) and preferences (36.4%, n = 103) regarding genomic technologies, particularly oncology (35%, n = 99). Key study design elements, such as racial/ethnic composition of study populations, were underreported in studies. Few studies incorporated implementation science theoretical frameworks, sustainability measures, or capacity building. CONCLUSION Although genomic discovery provides the potential for population health benefit, the current knowledge base around implementation to turn this promise into a reality is severely limited. Current gaps in the literature demonstrate a need to apply implementation science principles to genomic medicine in order to deliver on the promise of precision medicine.Genet Med advance online publication 12 January 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C. Roberts
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy E. Kennedy
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - David A. Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Muin J. Khoury
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Heale BSE, Khalifa A, Stone BL, Nelson S, Del Fiol G. Physicians' pharmacogenomics information needs and seeking behavior: a study with case vignettes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:113. [PMID: 28764766 PMCID: PMC5540399 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0510-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genetic testing, especially in pharmacogenomics, can have a major impact on patient care. However, most physicians do not feel that they have sufficient knowledge to apply pharmacogenomics to patient care. Online information resources can help address this gap. We investigated physicians’ pharmacogenomics information needs and information-seeking behavior, in order to guide the design of pharmacogenomics information resources that effectively meet clinical information needs. Methods We performed a formative, mixed-method assessment of physicians’ information-seeking process in three pharmacogenomics case vignettes. Interactions of 6 physicians’ with online pharmacogenomics resources were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for prominent themes. Quantitative data included information-seeking duration, page navigations, and number of searches entered. Results We found that participants searched an average of 8 min per case vignette, spent less than 30 s reviewing specific content, and rarely refined search terms. Participants’ information needs included a need for clinically meaningful descriptions of test interpretations, a molecular basis for the clinical effect of drug variation, information on the logistics of carrying out a genetic test (including questions related to cost, availability, test turn-around time, insurance coverage, and accessibility of expert support).Also, participants sought alternative therapies that would not require genetic testing. Conclusion This study of pharmacogenomics information-seeking behavior indicates that content to support their information needs is dispersed and hard to find. Our results reveal a set of themes that information resources can use to help physicians find and apply pharmacogenomics information to the care of their patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0510-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bret S E Heale
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.,Intermountain Healthcare, West Valley, UT, USA
| | - Aly Khalifa
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Bryan L Stone
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Scott Nelson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Taber JM, Klein WMP, Lewis KL, Johnston JJ, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Reactions to clinical reinterpretation of a gene variant by participants in a sequencing study. Genet Med 2017; 20:337-345. [PMID: 28771245 PMCID: PMC6611163 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeAs genome science advances, people receiving personalized genetic information may receive reinterpretations of pathogenicity. Little is known about responses to adjusted results. We examined how reinterpretations might affect attitudes about genetic testing and intentions to share results with family.MethodsData were collected from high-socioeconomic-status participants (n = 58) in a genome sequencing study. Twenty-nine originally learned they were carriers of Duarte variant galactosemia, based on a variant that was reclassified as benign. Positive testers (n = 19) had a newly identified causative variant and remained carriers. Negative testers (n = 10) learned they were no longer carriers. Twenty-nine controls were carriers for a disease of comparable severity with no reclassification. Participants completed baseline, immediate, and 3-month follow-up surveys.ResultsApproximately 80% of participants demonstrated complete or partially accurate recall of their results and reported positive or neutral reactions to their result and about genetic information more generally. Positive testers reported lower intentions to share the change in their result with family. Controls reported the lowest intentions to learn future results. There were no significant group differences or changes over time in perceived ambiguity or negative emotions.ConclusionThe results suggest that high-socioeconomic-status participants understand reinterpretations conferring a neutral change or a change from carrier to noncarrier status. Participants' responses to changes in carrier results for a low-risk condition indicated minimal adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Taber
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
| | - William M P Klein
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Katie L Lewis
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
194
|
Uhlig HH, Muise AM. Clinical Genomics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Trends Genet 2017; 33:629-641. [PMID: 28755896 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Genomic technologies inform the complex genetic basis of polygenic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as Mendelian disease-associated IBD. Aiming to diagnose patients that present with extreme phenotypes due to monogenic forms of IBD, genomics has progressed from 'orphan disease' research towards an integrated standard of clinical care. Advances in diagnostic clinical genomics are increasingly complemented by pathway-specific therapies that aim to correct the consequences of genetic defects. This highlights the exceptional potential for personalized precision medicine. IBD is nevertheless a challenging example for genomic medicine because the overall fraction of patients with Mendelian defects is low, the number of potential candidate genes is high, and interventional evidence is still emerging. We discuss requirements and prospects of explanatory and predictive clinical genomics in IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holm H Uhlig
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Aleixo M Muise
- Program in Cell Biology, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Dyke SOM, Knoppers BM, Hamosh A, Firth HV, Hurles M, Brudno M, Boycott KM, Philippakis AA, Rehm HL. "Matching" consent to purpose: The example of the Matchmaker Exchange. Hum Mutat 2017; 38:1281-1285. [PMID: 28699299 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The Matchmaker Exchange (MME) connects rare disease clinicians and researchers to facilitate the sharing of data from undiagnosed patients for the purpose of novel gene discovery. Such sharing raises the odds that two or more similar patients with candidate genes in common may be found, thereby allowing their condition to be more readily studied and understood. Consent considerations for data sharing in MME included both the ethical and legal differences between clinical and research settings and the level of privacy risk involved in sharing varying amounts of rare disease patient data to enable patient matches. In this commentary, we discuss these consent considerations and the resulting MME Consent Policy as they may be relevant to other international data sharing initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie O M Dyke
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bartha M Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ada Hamosh
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Helen V Firth
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Hurles
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Brudno
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Computational Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kym M Boycott
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Heidi L Rehm
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Alkanderi S, Yates LM, Johnson SA, Sayer JA. Lessons learned from a multidisciplinary renal genetics clinic. QJM 2017; 110:453-457. [PMID: 28177086 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherited renal disorders comprise a significant proportion of cases in both paediatric and adult nephrology services. Genetic advances have advanced rapidly while clinical models of care delivery have remained static. AIM To describe a cohort of patients attending a multidisciplinary renal genetics clinic and the insights gained from this experience. DESIGN AND METHODS A retrospective review of clinic cases and their molecular genetic diagnosis over a 5-year period. RESULTS We report details of 244 individuals including 80 probands who attended the clinic. The commonest reasons for referral was familial haematuria which accounted for 37.5% of cases and cystic kidney disease, accounting for 31% of cases. Eighteen probands had a known molecular genetic diagnosis and were referred for genetic counselling and screening of at risk relatives and management plans. About 62 probands and their families were referred for a precise molecular diagnosis and this was achieved in 26 cases (42%). The most frequent new genetic diagnoses were COL4A5 mutations underlying familial haematuria and familial end stage renal disease. The clinic also allowed for patients with rare renal syndromes to be reviewed, such as ciliopathy syndromes, allowing detailed phenotyping and often a precise molecular genetic diagnosis to be provided. CONCLUSIONS The integration of modern day genetics and genomics into multidisciplinary clinics often allows a precise diagnosis which benefits patients, their relatives and the clinicians providing care and future management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Alkanderi
- Newcastle University, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - L M Yates
- Newcastle University, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
- Northern Genetics Service, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - S A Johnson
- Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - J A Sayer
- Newcastle University, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK
- Renal Services, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Rohrer Vitek CR, Abul-Husn NS, Connolly JJ, Hartzler AL, Kitchner T, Peterson JF, Rasmussen LV, Smith ME, Stallings S, Williams MS, Wolf WA, Prows CA. Healthcare provider education to support integration of pharmacogenomics in practice: the eMERGE Network experience. Pharmacogenomics 2017; 18:1013-1025. [PMID: 28639489 PMCID: PMC5941709 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Ten organizations within the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network developed programs to implement pharmacogenomic sequencing and clinical decision support into clinical settings. Recognizing the importance of informed prescribers, a variety of strategies were used to incorporate provider education to support implementation. Education experiences with pharmacogenomics are described within the context of each organization's prior involvement, including the scope and scale of implementation specific to their Electronic Medical Records and Genomics projects. We describe common and distinct education strategies, provide exemplars and share challenges. Lessons learned inform future perspectives. Future pharmacogenomics clinical implementation initiatives need to include funding toward implementing provider education and evaluating outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Andrea L Hartzler
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Terrie Kitchner
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | - Luke V Rasmussen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Health & Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | | | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Wendy A Wolf
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Genetics & Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Departments of Pediatrics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Hylind R, Smith M, Rasmussen-Torvik L, Aufox S. Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results. J Community Genet 2017; 9:19-26. [PMID: 28656483 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of secondary findings is a challenge to health-care providers relaying clinical genomic-sequencing results to patients. Understanding patients' expectations from non-diagnostic genomic sequencing could help guide this management. This study interviewed 14 individuals enrolled in the eMERGE (Electronic Medical Records and Genomics) study. Participants in eMERGE consent to undergo non-diagnostic genomic sequencing, receive results, and have results returned to their physicians. The interviews assessed expectations and intended use of results. The majority of interviewees were male (64%) and 43% identified as non-Caucasian. A unique theme identified was that many participants expressed uncertainty about the type of diseases they expected to receive results on, what results they wanted to learn about, and how they intended to use results. Participant uncertainty highlights the complex nature of deciding to undergo genomic testing and a deficiency in genomic knowledge. These results could help improve how genomic sequencing and secondary findings are discussed with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Hylind
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Maureen Smith
- Department of Center of Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sharon Aufox
- Department of Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Breen G, Li Q, Roth BL, O'Donnell P, Didriksen M, Dolmetsch R, O'Reilly PF, Gaspar HA, Manji H, Huebel C, Kelsoe JR, Malhotra D, Bertolino A, Posthuma D, Sklar P, Kapur S, Sullivan PF, Collier DA, Edenberg HJ. Translating genome-wide association findings into new therapeutics for psychiatry. Nat Neurosci 2017; 19:1392-1396. [PMID: 27786187 DOI: 10.1038/nn.4411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in psychiatry, once they reach sufficient sample size and power, have been enormously successful. The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) aims for mega-analyses with sample sizes that will grow to >1 million individuals in the next 5 years. This should lead to hundreds of new findings for common genetic variants across nine psychiatric disorders studied by the PGC. The new targets discovered by GWAS have the potential to restart largely stalled psychiatric drug development pipelines, and the translation of GWAS findings into the clinic is a key aim of the recently funded phase 3 of the PGC. This is not without considerable technical challenges. These approaches complement the other main aim of GWAS studies, risk prediction approaches for improving detection, differential diagnosis, and clinical trial design. This paper outlines the motivations, technical and analytical issues, and the plans for translating PGC phase 3 findings into new therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerome Breen
- MRC Social, Genetic &Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - Qingqin Li
- Neuroscience Therapeutic Area, Janssen Research &Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Bryan L Roth
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,National Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH PDSP), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Michael Didriksen
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Synaptic Transmission, Neuroscience Research DK, Valby, Denmark
| | - Ricardo Dolmetsch
- Department of Neuroscience, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul F O'Reilly
- MRC Social, Genetic &Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Héléna A Gaspar
- MRC Social, Genetic &Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - Husseini Manji
- Neuroscience Therapeutic Area, Janssen Research &Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Christopher Huebel
- MRC Social, Genetic &Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| | - John R Kelsoe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, and Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Dheeraj Malhotra
- Neuroscience Discovery and Translational Area, Pharma Research &Early Development, F. Hoffmann - La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Bertolino
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - Danielle Posthuma
- Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research/VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pamela Sklar
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shitij Kapur
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Patrick F Sullivan
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - David A Collier
- MRC Social, Genetic &Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK.,Discovery Neuroscience Research, Eli Lilly and Company Ltd, Windlesham, Surrey, UK
| | - Howard J Edenberg
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Seo J, Ivanovich J, Goodman MS, Biesecker BB, Kaphingst KA. Information Topics of Greatest Interest for Return of Genome Sequencing Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:511-521. [PMID: 27542972 PMCID: PMC5318287 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0006-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We investigated what information women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age would want to learn when genome sequencing results are returned. We conducted 60 semi-structured interviews with women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. We examined what specific information participants would want to learn across result types and for each type of result, as well as how much information they would want. Genome sequencing was not offered to participants as part of the study. Two coders independently coded interview transcripts; analysis was conducted using NVivo10. Across result types, participants wanted to learn about health implications, risk and prevalence in quantitative terms, causes of variants, and causes of diseases. Participants wanted to learn actionable information for variants affecting risk of preventable or treatable disease, medication response, and carrier status. The amount of desired information differed for variants affecting risk of unpreventable or untreatable disease, with uncertain significance, and not health-related. Women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age recognize the value of genome sequencing results in identifying potential causes and effective treatments and expressed interest in using the information to help relatives and to further understand their other health risks. Our findings can inform the development of effective feedback strategies for genome sequencing that meet patients' information needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joann Seo
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|