A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia

Pharmacogenetic testing in the clinical management of schizophrenia: a decision-analytic model

Clinical application of pharmacogenetic testing has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes in psychiatry. The identification of a putative genetic test for better clozapine response in schizophrenia offers an opportunity to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such testing. The authors performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of a genetic test that may identify individuals with greater likelihood of responding to clozapine treatment. We modeled a target population of schizophrenia patients in an acute psychotic episode, using a lifetime time horizon and societal perspective. Outcome measures included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness. Effects of variations in testing parameters were also examined. For a 30-year-old with schizophrenia, applying the pharmacogenetic test and treating those predicted to respond to clozapine with clozapine-first cost US $47,705 per additional quality-adjusted life-year, compared with treating all patients with conventional agents and reserving clozapine for treatment-resistant patients. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, test sensitivity and cost had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness. We conclude that pharmacogenetic tests may achieve utility in clinical psychiatry, although their cost-effectiveness depends on several clinical parameters. More consistent reporting of test parameters such as sensitivity and specificity would greatly facilitate assessment of future pharmacogenetic studies.

Antipsychotic medications and drug-induced movement disorders other than parkinsonism: a population-based cohort study in older adults

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between initiating therapy with an antipsychotic medication and a subsequent new diagnosis of a drug-induced movement disorder other than parkinsonism in older adults with dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Ontario residents aged 66 and older with a diagnosis of dementia newly started on treatment with typical or atypical antipsychotic therapy.

MEASUREMENT

Estimated relative risk of developing a drug-induced movement other than parkinsonism in the 1-year follow-up period after starting therapy with an antipsychotic medication.

RESULTS

From April 1, 1997, to March 31, 2001, 21, 835 older adults with dementia who were newly started on antipsychotic medications were identified. Nine thousand seven hundred ninety subjects were started on atypical antipsychotics and 12,045 subjects started on typical antipsychotics. Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. There were 5.24 cases of tardive dyskinesia (TD) or other drug-induced movement disorder per 100 person-years on therapy with a typical antipsychotic and 5.19 cases per 100 person-years on therapy with an atypical antipsychotic. The risk of developing drug-induced movement disorder while being treated with an atypical agent was not statistically different from that with a typical antipsychotic (relative risk=0.99, 95% confidence interval=0.86-1.15; P<.93).

CONCLUSION

Older adults with dementia who are treated with typical or atypical antipsychotic therapy are at risk for developing TD and other drug-induced movement disorders.

Bromocriptine and clozapine regulate dopamine 2 receptor gene expression in the mouse striatum

In a previous study, we showed that the psychoactive drug caffeine alters the expression of the dopamine 2 receptor (D2R) gene in vitro and in vivo. Here, we report that acute administration of antipsychotic and anti-parkinsonian drugs also regulate D2R gene expression in PC12 cells and in the mouse striatum. Treatment of PC12 cells with the atypical antipsychotic and specific 5-HT antagonist clozapine (60 microM) reduced D2R/luciferase reporter expression by 46% after 24 h. However, male and female mice treated with a clinical dose of clozapine (10 mg/kg) showed no changes in striatal D2R mRNA expression when assayed by quantitative RT-PCR. Treatment of PC12 cells with the specific D2R agonist anti-parkinsonian drug, bromocriptine mesylate (BCM; 5 microM) also resulted in decreased D2R/luciferase reporter activity (27%). In contrast to clozapine, a clinical dose of BCM (16 mg/kg) led to a 21% decrease and a 45% increase in striatal D2R mRNA expression in male and female mice, respectively, after 24 h. Coadministration of clozapine and BCM in PC12 cells resulted in a synergistic decrease in D2R/luciferase reporter expression (68%), and coadministration of these drugs in vivo led to decreases in striatal D2R mRNA expression in both male and female mice (45% and 22%, respectively). Collectively, these results indicate that clozapine, BCM, or a combination of these drugs have differential effects on dopamine receptor gene expression and might also affect striatal physiology in a sexually dimorphic manner.

Likelihood methods for treatment noncompliance and subsequent nonresponse in randomized trials

While several new methods that account for noncompliance or missing data in randomized trials have been proposed, the dual effects of noncompliance and nonresponse are rarely dealt with simultaneously. We construct a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the causal effect of treatment assignment for a two-armed randomized trial assuming all-or-none treatment noncompliance and allowing for subsequent nonresponse. The EM algorithm is used for parameter estimation. Our likelihood procedure relies on a latent compliance state covariate that describes the behavior of a subject under all possible treatment assignments and characterizes the missing data mechanism as in Frangakis and Rubin (1999, Biometrika 86, 365-379). Using simulated data, we show that the MLE for normal outcomes compares favorably to the method-of-moments (MOM) and the standard intention-to-treat (ITT) estimators under (1) both normal and non-normal data, and (2) departures from the latent ignorability and compound exclusion restriction assumptions. We illustrate methods using data from a trial to compare the efficacy of two antipsychotics for adults with refractory schizophrenia.

Application of a disease-specific mapping function to estimate utility gains with effective treatment of schizophrenia

Background

Most tools for estimating utilities use clinical trial data from general health status models, such as the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). A disease-specific model may be more appropriate. The objective of this study was to apply a disease-specific utility mapping function for schizophrenia to data from a large, 1-year, open-label study of long-acting risperidone and to compare its performance with an SF-36-based utility mapping function.

Methods

Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder by DSM-IV criteria received 25, 50, or 75 mg long-acting risperidone every 2 weeks for 12 months. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and SF-36 were used to assess efficacy and health-related quality of life. Movement disorder severity was measured using the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS); data concerning other common adverse effects (orthostatic hypotension, weight gain) were collected. Transforms were applied to estimate utilities.

Results

A total of 474 patients completed the study. Long-acting risperidone treatment was associated with a utility gain of 0.051 using the disease-specific function. The estimated gain using an SF-36-based mapping function was smaller: 0.0285. Estimates of gains were only weakly correlated (r = 0.2). Because of differences in scaling and variance, the requisite sample size for a randomized trial to confirm observed effects is much smaller for the disease-specific mapping function (156 versus 672 total subjects).

Conclusion

Application of a disease-specific mapping function was feasible. Differences in scaling and precision suggest the clinically based mapping function has greater power than the SF-36-based measure to detect differences in utility.

The growth of psychopharmacology in the 1990s: evidence-based practice or irrational exuberance

The rapid growth in sales of psychotropic medications during the late 1980s and 1990s, eventually reaching $20 billion/year, reflected the increased use of seritonin reuptake inhibitors for depression and atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Recently, however, some of the therapeutic claims for these medications have been challenged, and under-appreciated risks have turned out to be significant liabilities. Drug manufacturers increasingly dominate clinical trials research and evidence suggests that study designs and data presentations have been slanted to show products in a favorable light while unfavorable data were suppressed. At the same time, during the 1990s, potentially independent voices did not effectively or consistently present countervailing views. The extensive financial ties between the pharmaceutical industry and academic researchers, professional associations, and consumer groups may also have discouraged expression of critical views. Additionally, the narrow legal mandate of the FDA to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new drugs only in comparison to placebo (rather than in comparison to other treatments) probably limited its contribution. In the absence of reliable, impartial research on the risk and benefits of psychotropic medications, both before and after they are brought to market, pharmacy benefits management cannot achieve its goal of maximizing health care benefits per dollar spent. Further institutional support is needed for independent research, either conducted or funded by the federal government.

Does clozapine work by blocking spikes and sparing bursts?

Clozapine works better and produces fewer side effects than other antipsychotics. Existing hypotheses fail to explain why. A new hypothesis, single spike suppression, supposes that psychotic symptoms are mediated by the single spikes of neurons at the D2 receptor. All antipsychotics block these spikes. Clozapine, according to the hypothesis, blocks these spikes but, unlike other antipsychotics, spares the spike bursts that mediate movement, cognition and affect. This study explores the mathematical feasibility of single spike suppression. Could an antipsychotic with the right receptor kinetics selectively block single spikes? Could this selectivity have clinical consequences? To develop the hypothesis, the author made a mathematical model of the receptor occupancy of a synapse, and performed five simulations, varying input data within the range established by research. The effects of hypothetical antipsychotics on single spikes and bursts were compared. The author confirmed that a drug with the right dissociation rate constant (k off) would dissociate slowly enough to block single spikes, but rapidly enough to spare longer bursts. If the hypothesis is correct, this spike-selective, burst-sparing drug would work at relatively low D2 occupancies, and cause minimal D2-related side effects. Single spike suppression may explain the superior properties of clozapine better than competing hypotheses. If so, it would provide a better model for a new generation of safe, effective antipsychotics.

Synthesis and binding affinity of novel 3-aminoethyl-1-tetralones, potential atypical antipsychotics

A series of 3-aminoethyl-1-tetralones, conformationally constrained higher homologues of haloperidol (standard for typical antipsychotic profile), have been obtained by a four-step route from valerolactone. Their binding affinities at dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors were determined, showing in some cases an atypical antipsychotic profile.

The effects of race and criminal justice involvement on access to atypical antipsychotic medications among persons with schizophrenia

This study examined the impact of race and arrest history on the likelihood of being prescribed, and maintaining an atypical antipsychotic prescription for 90 or more days among patients with schizophrenia in the community. Participants were 224 adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders receiving services in public-sector mental health systems in North Carolina. The data used for this report were from a subsample of a larger group of participants being followed in an observational study and consisted of individuals who were prescribed either an atypical or conventional antipsychotic medication for 90 or more days. The purpose of the analyses presented here was to investigate differences in the likelihood of being prescribed an atypical antipsychotic by demographic and other characteristics. Logistic regression analysis indicated that African American patients were significantly less likely to receive atypical antipsychotics than their white counterparts, even when controlling for key clinical and demographic variables. However, white patients with a history of arrest were no more likely than black patients to receive atypical antipsychotics; that is, minority racial status and criminal involvement each functioned to limit patients' access to the novel medications. Implications for equal access to mental health services, in this case, effective psychopharmacologic treatment, are discussed.

Effectiveness of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has been shown to be superior to chlorpromazine in improving the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. However, technical experience with clozapine in Indian patients has not been documented.

AIM

To assess the improvement in psychopathology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia with clozapine therapy and to study the relationship between sociodemographic and various psychopathology variables among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia, Calgary Depression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). These scales were used to determine the level of psychopathology, depression, overall functioning and severity of abnormal involuntary movements in the patients. The patients were admitted to the hospital for a short time to initiate clozapine therapy. At discharge, patients were stabilized on 300-400 mg/day of clozapine. The patients were re-evaluated after 20 months.

RESULTS

The study group showed better global functioning after clozapine therapy. The therapy was well-tolerated though moderate side-effects were seen. Suicidal thoughts declined with clozapine therapy. There was a significant reduction in the negative symptom and general psychopathology scores of PANSS.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine has therapeutic efficacy in some but not all treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia.

[Leponex, 10 years after -- a clinical review]

Clozapine was one of the major advances in the treatment of schizophrenia since the introduction of the classic antipsychotic agent chlorpromazine in the 1950s. Over the past 10 years, clozapine has become the reference compound for the development of new antipsychotics, and new drugs have been developed which have also claimed atypical status. The indications of clozapine were recently extended to Psychosis in Parkinson's disease and harmonized in the European Union. This provides the opportunity to update the data on clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this article we review current clinical evidence in schizophrenia to address the following issues: 1) Efficacy in refractory/positive symptoms: a systematic and critical analysis of 14 double-blind clinical trials in comparison with both standard and novel antipsychotics show consistent findings in favour of clozapine, with all but three of the reports demonstrating superiority. The review of studies allow us to say little about the predictors of treatment response, time to clozapine response and about the impact of clozapine on the quality of patients'life and longer-term outcome. Treatment options for clozapine non-responders are reviewed. 2) Risk of EPS: clozapine is considered to have a minimal risk of EPS and in all studies where a valid methodology was used, a clear superiority over the other neuroleptics is demonstrated. It is pointed out that, if the prevalence and incidence of EPS with clozapine is low, it is not zero. All the studies assessing clozapine treatment for TD have major methodological limitations, so no final conclusion can be drawn. 3) Efficacy for primary and secondary negative symptoms and neurocognitive effects: the data of clinical studies where negative symptoms scales were used favour clozapine in terms of improvement. However most of the studies were carried out in populations with predominantly positive symptoms. With regard to the need to distinguish primary and secondary symptoms, data are conflicting regarding the benefit of clozapine. Due to the lack of studies with a valid methodology, no definitive conclusion can be drawn about the efficacy on clozapine on the deficit syndrome and on neurocognitive disorders. 4) Impact on suicide risk: 4 out of 6 retrospective studies provide evidence for the ability of clozapine therapy to reduce suicidal behaviour. The results of a recent randomized, parallel-group study designed to compare clozapine versus olanzapine in preventing suicide attempts seems to confirm this hypothesis. We also address the tolerability and safety data, especially haematologic, comitial, cardiovascular and metabolic side-effects. The effectiveness of blood monitoring for the management of neutropenia and agranulocytosis demands that the recommendations are strictly followed. The use of clozapine at doses higher than 600 mg daily should follow published recommendations, in order to minimize the risk of seizures; these include anticonvulsant regimens based on blood levels. With regard to the cardiovascular mortality, if clozapine therapy has negligible effects on QT interval, its association with potential fatal myocarditis cannot be excluded in young patients who should be investigated if they develop cardiac symptoms in the first weeks of treatment. Available data support the notion that the frequency of bodyweight gain is high with several new antipsychotics, including clozapine. Potential long term effects of bodyweight gain on mortality and morbidity have to be taken into consideration. The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the "unique clozapine profile" is discussed. Clozapine remains the only antipsychotic with efficacy at relatively low D2 receptor occupancy. The pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic aspects are also reviewed. Finally, the place of clozapine in the current treatment of schizophrenia is highlighted to inform the development of guidelines for clinical management.

Pharmacogenetic studies of response to risperidone and other newer atypical antipsychotics

Risperidone and other newer atypical antipsychotics are becoming the mainstay for schizophrenia treatment. Recent studies suggest that the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2A (5-HT2A) gene (HTR2A) T102C and G-1438A polymorphisms may influence treatment response of risperidone or olanzapine for schizophrenia's negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect and social withdrawal). In addition, the HTR6 T267C polymorphism has been linked to risperidone response for positive symptoms (delusions and hallucinations). The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) Ser311Cys polymorphism may also play a role in determining risperidone efficacy for positive, negative and cognitive symptoms, the DRD2 Ins-A2/Del-A1 diplotype may predict better risperidone response, and the DRD3 Ser311Cys variant may affect general treatment response of several atypical agents. Although investigators have started to explore genetic effects on cognitions of schizophrenia patients receiving antipsychotics, future larger sized pharmacogenetic studies on both psychotic symptoms and cognitive functions are warranted.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: 6-month results of the Pan-European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

OBJECTIVE

To present the 6-month outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment of patients participating in the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study.

METHOD

SOHO is a 3-year, prospective, observational study of the health outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment in 10 European countries. The study included over 10,000 out-patients who were initiating or changing their antipsychotic medication.

RESULTS

Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-severity and quality of life (QOL) scores improved in all treatment cohorts. There was a higher response in the CGI-overall symptoms and in the CGI-schizophrenia positive, negative, cognitive and depressive symptom scales in the olanzapine (Olz) and clozapine (Cloz) cohorts compared with other treatment cohorts. Changes were associated with an improvement in QOL.

CONCLUSION

Patients starting Olz and Cloz tend to have better outcomes at 6 months than patients who start other antipsychotics in actual out-patient clinical practice. The results should be interpreted conservatively because of the non-randomized study design.

Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a long-term disabling illness that affects approximately 1% of the population. Its course is generally chronic with acute psychotic exacerbations that may require frequent hospitalisations. The clinical picture includes a range of symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, agitation, suspiciousness, hostility, conceptual disorganisation, blunted affect, emotional and social withdrawal, lack of spontaneity, poverty of speech and a wide range of neurocognitive deficits. Over the past 50 years, antipsychotic medications have emerged as the cornerstone of management in concert with other important interventions, such as psychosocial and economic support and rehabilitation efforts. However, the unrivalled role of conventional antipsychotic medications has been continuously challenged by the wide range of adverse effects of these medications and their lack of usefulness in the treatment of neurocognitive deficits as well as deficit and negative symptoms. In addition, the lack of subjective tolerability of these agents and their negative impact on quality of life have complicated management for a large number of patients. Over the last 15 years, several new atypical antipsychotic medications have been introduced, including amisulpride, remoxipride, risperidone, sertindole, olanzapine, zotepine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. In general, the new antipsychotics have shown themselves to be at least comparable in efficacy to conventional antipsychotics but with superior subjective tolerability and a more favourable adverse effect profile. The majority of quality of life studies involving new antipsychotic agents have evaluated the benefits of risperidone, olanzapine and clozapine; only a few studies have examined the effects of other new antipsychotics. While most of these studies have methodological and design limitations, the weight of evidence from them nevertheless points to a trend towards a more positive impact on quality of life with atypical agents. A number of recommendations can be made. First, more independent well designed and controlled studies are urgently needed to evaluate the effects of antipsychotic therapy on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. New comparative studies should explore not only the differences between new and old antipsychotics but also identify any potential differences between individual new agents. The role of cost-effectiveness studies such as cost utility approaches in schizophrenia needs to be revisited, notwithstanding the fact that these types of studies have been reported to be feasible in schizophrenia. Finally, quality-of-life-based pharmacoeconomic studies of antipsychotic agents should not concentrate solely on cost reduction or containment, as it is likely that in order to maximise the benefits of new antipsychotic medications, greater expenditure on rehabilitation programmes and other support services will be necessary in the short-term at least.

Starting clozapine in the community: a UK perspective

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic available for the treatment of schizophrenia that has proved resistant to other medications and the only antipsychotic licensed for this indication. Although the drug is increasingly being used more widely in patients with schizophrenia and with other psychiatric and neurological disorders, it is still underused. The main reasons for this are that it can cause adverse effects such as weight gain and sedation, and the need for regular blood test monitoring because of the risk of agranulocytosis. While these hurdles are unavoidable, another problem in the UK has been the historical practice of admitting patients to hospital to initiate treatment with clozapine. However, protocols have now been developed for both home and day-hospital initiation. The experience of one assertive community treatment team of starting clozapine in patients' own homes has been positive, with no major adverse events reported. This approach is, however, extremely demanding of staff resources and for many services the use of day-hospitals to initiate treatment with clozapine is more appropriate. Research into staff and patients' views about community initiation of clozapine, and its economic costs, would be welcome.

Cognitive improvement in schizophrenic patients does not require a serotonergic mechanism: randomized controlled trial of olanzapine vs amisulpride

Combined serotonin-2A (5-HT(2A)) and dopamine-2 (D2) receptor blockade has been proposed as a candidate mechanism by which second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) improve both cognition and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients, in contrast to antipsychotics of the first generation. The SGA amisulpride, however, only binds to D2/D3 receptors, which makes it an interesting tool to test this assumption. In a randomized controlled trial, 52 schizophrenic patients were allocated to treatment with either olanzapine (10-20 mg/day) or amisulpride (400-800 mg/day). A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and clinical ratings were used to assess participants at inclusion and after 4 and 8 weeks. Cognitive improvements of moderate size were observed, with effect sizes similar to those obtained in previous studies on the cognitive effects of SGAs. Importantly, amisulpride was not inferior to olanzapine for any cognitive domain. Combined 5-HT(2A)/D2 receptor blockade is probably not necessary for cognitive improvement by SGAs.

Randomized double blind comparison of olanzapine vs. clozapine on subjective well-being and clinical outcome in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

This randomized double-blind multicenter trial evaluated the effects of olanzapine vs. clozapine on subjective well-being, quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome.

METHOD

The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of olanzapine, mean dosage 16.2 +/- 4.8 (5-25 mg/day) vs. clozapine, mean dosage 209 +/- 91 (100-400 mg/day) regarding improvement on the 'Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment' (SWN) Scale after 26 treatment weeks in 114 patients with schizophrenia. Secondary outcome parameters included: Munich QOL Dimension List (MLDL), Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI).

RESULTS

SWN scores improved significantly in both groups, olanzapine was non-inferior to clozapine (group difference 3.2 points in favor of olanzapine; 95% CI: 4.2;10.5). MLDL-satisfaction, PANSS and CGI-S improved similarly, olanzapine yielded a higher CGI Therapeutic Index. Individual SWN and PANSS changes correlated only moderately (r = -0.45).

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine was non-inferior to clozapine. The lack of a marked correlation between PANSS and SWN improvements indicates that patients and psychiatrists perceive treatment differently.

Assessing cost-effectiveness of drug interventions for schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To assess from a health sector perspective the incremental cost-effectiveness of eight drug treatment scenarios for established schizophrenia.

METHOD

Using a standardized methodology, costs and outcomes are modelled over the lifetime of prevalent cases of schizophrenia in Australia in 2000. A two-stage approach to assessment of health benefit is used. The first stage involves a quantitative analysis based on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, using best available evidence. The robustness of results is tested using probabilistic uncertainty analysis. The second stage involves application of 'second filter' criteria (equity, strength of evidence, feasibility and acceptability) to allow broader concepts of benefit to be considered.

RESULTS

Replacing oral typicals with risperidone or olanzapine has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 48,000 Australian dollars and 92,000 Australian dollars/DALY respectively. Switching from low-dose typicals to risperidone has an ICER of 80,000 Australian dollars. Giving risperidone to people experiencing side-effects on typicals is more cost-effective at 20,000 Australian dollars. Giving clozapine to people taking typicals, with the worst course of the disorder and either little or clear deterioration, is cost-effective at 42,000 Australian dollars or 23,000 Australian dollars/DALY respectively. The least cost-effective intervention is to replace risperidone with olanzapine at 160,000 Australian dollars/DALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an 50,000 Australian dollars/DALY threshold, low-dose typical neuroleptics are indicated as the treatment of choice for established schizophrenia, with risperidone being reserved for those experiencing moderate to severe side-effects on typicals. The more expensive olanzapine should only be prescribed when risperidone is not clinically indicated. The high cost of risperidone and olanzapine relative to modest health gains underlie this conclusion. Earlier introduction of clozapine however, would be cost-effective. This work is limited by weaknesses in trials (lack of long-term efficacy data, quality of life and consumer satisfaction evidence) and the translation of effect size into a DALY change. Some stakeholders, including SANE Australia, argue the modest health gains reported in the literature do not adequately reflect perceptions by patients, clinicians and carers, of improved quality of life with these atypicals.

Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs

The pace of innovation in psychotropic drugs has been rapid over the past 15 years. There also have been unprecedented increases in spending on prescription drugs generally and psychotropic medications specifically. Psychotropic medications are playing a more central role in treatment. They also are receiving close scrutiny from health insurers, state budget makers, and ordinary citizens. Public policy actions regarding prescription drugs have the potential to significantly affect clinical care for mental disorders, the costs of this care to individuals and society at large, and the prospects for future scientific advances. This article outlines the policy issues related to psychotropic drugs with respect to their role in determining access to mental health treatment and the cost and quality of mental health care.

An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The effect of funding source on the outcome of randomized controlled trials has been investigated in several medical disciplines; however, psychiatry has been largely excluded from such analyses. In this article, randomized controlled trials of second generation antipsychotics in schizophrenia are reviewed and analyzed with respect to funding source (industry vs. non-industry funding).

METHOD

A literature search was conducted for randomized, double-blind trials in which at least one of the tested treatments was a second generation antipsychotic. In each study, design quality and study outcome were assessed quantitatively according to rating scales. Mean quality and outcome scores were compared in the industry-funded studies and non-industry-funded studies. An analysis of the primary author's affiliation with industry was similarly performed.

RESULTS

Results of industry-funded studies significantly favored second generation over first generation antipsychotics when compared to non-industry-funded studies. Non-industry-funded studies showed a trend toward higher quality than industry-funded studies; however, the difference between the two was not significant. Also, within the industry-funded studies, outcomes of trials involving first authors employed by industry sponsors demonstrated a trend toward second generation over first generation antipsychotics to a greater degree than did trials involving first authors employed outside the industry (p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While the retrospective design of the study limits the strength of the findings, the data suggest that industry bias may occur in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. There appears to be several sources by which bias may enter clinical research, including trial design, control of data analysis and multiplicity/redundancy of trials.

Quality of life outcomes of risperidone, olanzapine, and typical antipsychotics among schizophrenia patients treated in routine clinical practice: a naturalistic comparative study

Findings in previous studies investigating the beneficial effect of risperidone and olanzapine versus typical antipsychotics on quality of life (QOL) are controversial since they did not adjust for various factors contributing to QOL. To test this assumption in a naturalistic cross-sectional design, we evaluated general and domain-specific QOL scores for baseline data of schizophrenia outpatients stabilized on atypical (N = 78, risperidone or olanzapine) and typical (N = 55) agents. Self-report and observer-rated QOL outcomes of both risperidone and olanzapine with typical antipsychotic therapy were compared across demographic, illness-related, and treatment-related factors using analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of variance, and correlation analysis. No significant differences were found in QOL outcomes of risperidone-treated and olanzapine-treated patients. Both self-report and rater-observed QOL measures indicated superiority of atypical over typical antipsychotic agents after adjusting for daily doses, duration of treatment, subjective tolerability, and adjuvant antidepressants. Lower daily doses and longer antipsychotic treatment were associated with better QOL. Self-report and observer-rated QOL scores correlated positively (r = 0.64, P < 0.001). Gender, marital status, age, education, living arrangement and employment status, age of onset, illness duration, symptom severity, emotional distress, subtypes of schizophrenia, and side effects did not affect QOL outcomes in either group. Risperidone and olanzapine revealed an advantage over typical agents in terms of QOL. Findings suggest that when calculating the beneficial effects of atypical antipsychotic therapy on QOL outcomes, daily doses, duration of treatment, and subjective tolerability may be intervening variables and should be adjusted accordingly to clearly appreciate benefits of atypical antipsychotics.

Effective dosing and dose equivalency of second-generation antipsychotic medications

Dosing patterns with second-generation antipsychotic medications (SGAs) are dynamic, with some SGAs surpassing current recommendations while others are declining in dose since their initial regulatory guidelines. Pertinent recent studies and available pharmacoepidemiologic reports, information, and expert consenses are reviewed herein to illuminate current thinking on the topic of dosing with SGAs. There is a need for fixed-dose studies of each SGA. Additionally, dosing should be a primary consideration when designing and subsequently interpreting comparative studies between SGAs.

Quetiapine in hospitalized patients with schizophrenia refractory to treatment with first-generation antipsychotics: a 4-week, flexible-dose, single-blind, exploratory, pilot trial

This short-term, single-blind, pilot trial was initiated to investigate the usefulness of quetiapine therapy in the treatment of schizophrenic patients refractory to first-generation antipsychotics. Following a neuroleptic-free period prior to study entry (at least 1 week for oral formulations and 6 weeks for depot formulations), quetiapine was started at 50 mg/day and titrated up to 500 mg/day by Day 6. This 500 mg daily dose was then maintained or increased up to a maximum of 750 mg/day, at the discretion of the treating physician, who was aware of the antipsychotic prescribed. Efficacy measures were represented by changes in total and component PANSS score from baseline to different intervals. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring the spontaneously referred moderate-to-severe adverse events, changes from baseline in SAS, BARS, and AIMS scores, supplementary use of flurazepam, lorazepam, and benztropine, clinically relevant physical changes, abnormalities in vital signs, blood chemistry, and hematology, and modifications in QTc interval and body weight. Rating scale assessments, categorization of adverse events, determination of physical examination, vital signs, and body weight were performed by a qualified physician blind to the particular antipsychotic under investigation and the aims of the study. All 12 patients completed the 4-week quetiapine treatment course. Mean total PANSS scores were significantly reduced between baseline and study endpoint (p=0.006). Five out of six PANSS subcomponent scores also showed significant decreases (p < 0.05). Six patients showed a reduction of > or = 20% in PANSS total score by the final day of quetiapine treatment, so were classified as responders. There were responders in all schizophrenia diagnostic subgroups (undifferentiated, paranoid, and disorganized). Two patients reported moderate adverse events. One patient received 3 days of benztropine therapy for EPS and five received flurazepam for insomnia. Weight change was minimal and mean SAS, BARS, and AIMS scores all showed nonsignificant decreases between baseline and endpoint. The 50% quetiapine response rate reported here in refractory patients is comparable with those previously reported for other atypical antipsychotics in populations of both refractory and intolerant patients.

New antipsychotics, compliance, quality of life, and subjective tolerability--are patients better off?

OBJECTIVES

This overview reviews the impact of second-generation antipsychotics on less frequently researched outcomes such as medication-adherence behaviour, quality of life, and subjective tolerability in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

We selectively reviewed recent literature and considered our own research and experiences in the field.

RESULTS

Most published studies about second-generation antipsychotics have dealt with issues related to efficacy and safety. So far, not many studies have focused on effectiveness in terms of such important outcomes as medication-adherence behaviour, quality of life, subjective tolerability, and overall satisfaction with treatment. Although most studies are inconclusive and their results are inconsistent--which has to do with several design and methodological limitations--there seems, on balance, to be a trend indicating superiority of second-generation, compared with first-generation, antipsychotics in improving medication-adherence behaviour and quality of life. The trend toward more favourable subjective tolerability and less frequent neuroleptic dysphoria seems to be relatively stronger.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, the state of the art can only indicate a more favourable trend for second-generation antipsychotics in regard to improving medication adherence behaviour, quality of life, and subjective tolerability. It is surprising that such important outcomes, which are likely the defining factors in the superiority of second-generation antipsychotics, have not received adequate research attention. Well-designed, controlled, and adequately powered studies are urgently needed before any firm conclusions can be reached.

Comparison of risperidone and olanzapine as used under "real-world" conditions in a state psychiatric hospital

As a follow-up to our previous study of clozapine, medical records of a state psychiatric hospital were reviewed for patients who were prescribed an atypical antipsychotic. From that sample, demographic and clinical data were obtained for individuals with an initial score of 35 or greater on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and at least two additional successive monthly BPRS ratings. A total of 100 patients met the criteria. Most received either olanzapine (46%) or risperidone (36%), with few administered quetiapine (11%) or clozapine (7%). Most also received adjunctive medications, including conventional antipsychotics, anticonvulsants/mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and antiparkinsonian agents. The number of patients whose BPRS total scores decreased by 20% or more from baseline was significantly greater for those who received olanzapine than those who received risperidone. However, there was no difference between the two antipsychotics in the number of patients who maintained that degree of improvement, in the average latency to achieve that decrease (1.67 and 1.47 months, respectively), or the average length of stay (LOS; 332 and 376 days, respectively). These results indicate a modest therapeutic advantage of olanzapine compared to risperidone, and a substantial degree of polypharmacy in the use of atypical antipsychotics. This uncontrolled "real-world" evaluation supports data from controlled clinical trials, showing that either risperidone or olanzapine would be a reasonable first choice in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, with the decision based on the least adverse side effect profile and economic constraints. When compared to our previous clozapine study, we confirm a slight advantage for the effectiveness of clozapine in the treatment of this refractory population.

Discrete state analysis for interpretation of data from clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate a multivariate health state approach to analyzing complex disease data that allows projection of long-term outcomes using clustering, Markov modeling, and preference weights.

SUBJECTS

We studied patients hospitalized 30 to 364 days with refractory schizophrenia at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic, and haloperidol, a conventional antipsychotic.

METHODS

Health status instruments measuring disease-related symptoms and drug side effects were administered in face-to-face interviews at baseline, 6 weeks, and quarterly follow-up intervals for 1 year. Cost data were derived from Veterans Affairs records supplemented by interviews. K-means clustering was used to identify a small number of health states for each instrument. Markov modeling was used to estimate long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Multivariate models with 7 and 6 states, respectively, were required to describe patterns of psychiatric symptoms and side effects (movement disorders). Clozapine increased the proportion of clients in states characterized by mild psychiatric symptoms and decreased the proportion with severe positive symptoms but showed no long-term benefit for negative symptoms. Clozapine dramatically increased the proportion of patients with no movement side effects and decreased incidences of mild akathisia. Effects on extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia were far less pronounced and slower to develop. Markov modeling confirms the consistency of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing complex disease data using multivariate health state models allows a richer understanding of trial effects and projection of long-term outcomes. Although clozapine generates substantially fewer side effects than haloperidol, its impact on psychiatric aspects of schizophrenia is less robust and primarily involves positive symptoms.

CALCYON gene variation, schizophrenia, and cocaine dependence

Calcyon is a brain-specific D1 dopamine receptor-interacting protein, with a potential role in D1-mediated physiological processes, including motor control, reward mechanisms, and cognitive processes. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between polymorphism of the CALCYON gene and (1) schizophrenia and (2) cocaine dependence in African-American (AA) and European-American (EA) subjects. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the CALCYON locus were genotyped in 70 AA and 206 EA individuals with schizophrenia and 90 AA and 118 EA individuals with cocaine dependence. The control group was comprised of 46 AA and 207 EA subjects screened to exclude those with psychiatric or substance use disorders. The specific polymorphisms studied were markers +295214G/A and +297151T/G. Comparisons of allele and haplotype frequencies between cases and controls were performed with the Fisher's Exact Test. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between these two SNPs was calculated with the 3LOCUS program. No alleles or haplotypes were found to be associated with schizophrenia or cocaine dependence either in AA or EA subjects. The markers +295214G/A and +297151T/G are in the same haplotype block in all subgroups. Allele and haplotype frequencies differed significantly between EA and AA subjects. These results suggest that these two genetic variants in the CALCYON gene do not play a major role in predisposition to either schizophrenia or cocaine dependence in AA or EA subjects. Furthermore, these findings begin to establish a haplotype map for this gene in the AA and EA populations.

Chemoenzymatic synthesis and binding affinity of novel (R)- and (S)-3-aminomethyl-1-tetralones, potential atypical antipsychotics

A series of (R)- and (S)-3-aminomethyl-1-tetralones, conformationally constrained analogues of haloperidol, have been obtained by enzymatic resolution of the corresponding racemic 3-hydroxymethyl-1-tetralones using Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase. Their binding affinities at dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors were determined showing in some cases an atypical antipsychotic profile with Meltzer's ratio higher than 1.30.

NOTCH4 gene haplotype is associated with schizophrenia in African Americans

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between the NOTCH4 gene and schizophrenia in African American (AA) and European American (EA) subjects.

METHODS

Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the NOTCH4 locus were genotyped in 123 AA schizophrenia patients, 223 EA schizophrenia patients, 85 AA healthy control subjects, and 211 EA healthy control subjects. The specific markers studied were -1725T/G and -25T/C. Comparisons of allele and haplotype frequencies between patients and control subjects were performed with the chi-square test, the Fisher's Exact Test, and CLUMP software. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between these two SNPs was calculated with the 3LOCUS program.

RESULTS

The haplotype -1725G/-25T associates to schizophrenia in AA subjects (p =.0008), but not in EA subjects. Alleles -1725G and allele -25T are in positive LD both in AAs and EAs. Allele and haplotype frequencies differ significantly between AAs and EAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The haplotype -1725G/-25T at the NOTCH4 locus, which results from SNPs of NOTCH4 that are in LD, may increase susceptibility to schizophrenia in AAs. Any effect of this locus on risk for schizophrenia is population-specific.

Clozapine but not haloperidol Re-establishes normal task-activated rCBF patterns in schizophrenia within the anterior cingulate cortex

Our previous work has identified that unmedicated volunteers with schizophrenia have regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) activation patterns inappropriately related to the cognitive demand of a task in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Using positron emission tomography (PET) with (15)O water, we compared task-induced rCBF patterns induced by haloperidol or clozapine in individuals with schizophrenia. We hypothesized that clozapine, given its superior clinical action, would tend to normalize the abnormal task-activated response in ACC more than haloperidol. Schizophrenia volunteers (SVs) (n=6) and normal volunteers (NVs) (n=12) were trained to perform a tone discrimination task with 70-80% accuracy. They were then scanned during three task conditions: (1). Rest, (2). sensory motor control (SMC) task, and (3). decision task (DEC). SVs were initially scanned after withdrawal of all psychotropic medication and again after treatment with therapeutic doses of haloperidol (n=5) and/or clozapine (n=5). rCBF values, sampled in the grown maxima of the task-activated ACC cluster, were analyzed between groups and task conditions. Task performance was similar across the unmedicated, haloperidol- and clozapine-medicated SV groups. There was a reduction in accuracy in the haloperidol SV group compared to the NVs. Group and task conditions affected rCBF in the ACC. Clozapine, but not haloperidol, reversed the abnormal ACC rCBF pattern in unmedicated SV to normal. The clozapine-treated SV group showed a rCBF pattern similar to the NV group in that ACC activation was not observed during the control task but occurred during the decision condition. The pattern seen in the haloperidol-treated SV group was similar to the unmedicated SV group in that ACC activation was seen during the control task and no further activation was seen during the DEC. We report that clozapine, but not haloperidol, normalizes anterior cingulate rCBF patterns in schizophrenia during a cognitive task. Based on these preliminary data, we propose that this pattern may account for the superior therapeutic effect of clozapine and represents a surrogate marker of this action.

Assessing the value of antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia: the importance of evaluating and interpreting the clinical significance of individual service costs

Schizophrenia is a serious and complex disorder, with treatment requiring a large number and wide range of health and social service resources. This paper addresses one challenge for assessing the direct costs of antipsychotic treatments - that of interpreting both cost and effectiveness implications of specific components of service use. Information collected on direct component costs has frequently been analysed and reported only in total. Results of several published studies provide evidence that the total direct medical costs associated with atypical antipsychotics appear to be at least equivalent to, and in some cases lower than, those associated with conventional agents. An important implication of this cost-equivalency finding is that treatment involving higher medication costs have led to offsets in certain medical service costs. Results from several studies demonstrate a shift of cost components, primarily from more expensive inpatient to less expensive outpatient care. Although the common inpatient versus outpatient dichotomy is useful, the complexities of schizophrenia and the heterogeneity of outpatient service provision are likely to warrant greater specificity. Published schizophrenia treatment guidelines can assist researchers to more fully understand and meaningfully interpret the possible relationship of antipsychotic effectiveness to the use of particular outpatient services. Because the disease requires comprehensive and continuous care, outpatient treatment costs may be better conceptualised as baseline or expectable costs necessary in the maintenance phase of treatment. Lack of expectable costs may represent poor patient outcomes and increased intangible costs. In contrast, reductions in acute outpatient service costs may provide important markers of treatment effectiveness. A small number of studies have examined the use of crisis services, but additional work is needed to differentiate treatments vis-à-vis the need for intensive (acute) interventions. The assessment and clinical interpretation of individual cost components may offer an important opportunity to build upon initial results focusing on total costs and tailor analyses to the complexities of the disorder and the treatment process. Research able to incorporate clinical acumen into cost analyses will enhance the ability of healthcare policy makers to make informed decisions regarding the value of different antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Effect of second-generation antipsychotics on employment and productivity in individuals with schizophrenia: an economic perspective

Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that imposes a considerable burden not only on those who are ill, but also on their families, neighbours and the wider society. Costs associated with treating people with schizophrenia are those derived from the use of a wide range of services provided by public psychiatric facilities and/or by voluntary and private agencies. In addition, a large part of the economic impact of schizophrenia is related to the difficulties that patients encounter in finding and keeping paid employment. The introduction of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also defined as atypicals, has increased the therapeutic options available for individuals with schizophrenia. Potential benefits of these agents include a more favourable profile in terms of positive and negative symptoms, less adverse effects and better cognitive functioning than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs). As a consequence, SGAs might favourably affect the capacity, seriously impaired in schizophrenia, of finding and keeping paid employment. To date, only 13 published studies have investigated the effect of SGA agents on employment and work productivity. Clozapine was studied in eight studies, while both olanzapine and risperidone were studied in three. Clozapine emerged as the SGA with at least some effect on work status. However, all but one clozapine study enrolled only a few individuals and did not adopt an experimental design, making it very difficult to judge the validity and generalisability of findings. Taken together, studies found little benefit, in terms of employment and work productivity, for the use of SGAs compared with FGAs. The evidence available suggests that until data demonstrate a robust effect of newer agents on employment, it remains mandatory for mental health professionals to use the most effective drug treatment together with non-pharmacological interventions, such as vocational rehabilitative programmes nested into models of community psychiatric care, which have proven effect on the capacity of finding and keeping paid employment. This will ensure that the economic impact of schizophrenia is most effectively contained.

Dropout rates with olanzapine or risperidone: a multi-centre observational study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with schizophrenia, risperidone and olanzapine are the two most commonly used atypical anti-psychotics. A recent meta-analysis based on randomized trials suggests that, in the long term, olanzapine can have a lower frequency of treatment discontinuation (or dropout) in comparison with risperidone. To better test this hypothesis, our observational study was aimed at assessing whether or not this advantage of olanzapine versus risperidone could be confirmed in a patient series examined in an observational setting.

METHODS

Our study was based on a retrospective multi-centre observational design. We collected the following information from each patient: demographic characteristics; current anti-psychotic treatment (olanzapine or risperidone, under the condition of a stable therapy over months -1 to -4); cumulative dose of the drug; previous anti-psychotic treatment (during months -5, -6, -7 and/or, when available, also before month -7); daily dose and treatment duration. Our primary analysis traced back the patient's history from the date of enrollment retrospectively up to month -7. The secondary analysis followed-up the patient's history prior to month -7, thus extending this retrospective recording as long as possible (depending on what information was actually available for individual patients).

RESULTS

The patients were enrolled from 31 institutions. In our primary analysis (months -1 to -7), a total of 144 patients were included; in this subgroup treated with olanzapine or risperidone as initial drug ( n=94), we observed 4 of 54 switches from olanzapine to risperidone and 11 of 40 switches from risperidone to olanzapine ( P=0.01). A total of 454 patients were enrolled in our secondary analysis (from month -1 up to month -73); the same comparison showed 9 of 236 switches from olanzapine to risperidone and 17 of 150 switches from risperidone to olanzapine ( P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirms the results of a recent meta-analysis and shows that olanzapine might imply a lower risk of dropout than risperidone.

A systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of mental health consultation-liaison interventions in general hospitals

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of mental health consultation-liaison interventions in general hospitals was conducted. Few studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of consultation-liaison interventions, and only two articles met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The comparable variable was length of the hospital stay. It could not be concluded that psychiatric consultation had an effect on the duration of hospital stays. In one of the studies, the group that received psychiatric consultation showed improvement in depressive symptoms. Additional studies would have been relevant to this review if they had replicated clinical practice by using a naturalistic research design.

Evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia

Taken together, the research on what treatments help people with schizophrenia point to the value of treatment programs that combine medications with a range of psychosocial services. Provision of such packages of services likely reduces the need for crisis-oriented care hospitalizations and emergency room visits and enables greater recovery. For most people with schizophrenia, the combination of psychopharmacological and psychosocial interventions improves outcomes. Several psychosocial treatments have demonstrated efficacy. These include family intervention, supported employment, assertive community treatment, skills training, and CBT. In the same way that psychopharmacologic management must be tailored individually to the needs and preferences of the patient, so too should the selection of psychosocial treatments. At the very least, all people with schizophrenia should be provided with education about their illness. Beyond illness education, all of the recommended psychosocial interventions would be used rarely during any one phase of illness for an individual. Some psychosocial treatments share treatment components, and patients have different clinical and social needs at different points in their illness course. Knowledge regarding how best to combine treatments to optimize outcomes is scarce.

Refining pharmacogenetic research in schizophrenia: Control for patient‐related variables

There is strong evidence to suggest that genetic variation plays an important role in inter‐individual differences in medication response and toxicity. Most of the previous pharmacogenetic studies, however, cannot be reconfirmed. Of note, drug efficacy or side effects depend not only on genetic factors but also on nongenetic factors, such as illness duration, past treatment history, and drug dosage or blood concentration. However, most pharmacogeneticists did not consider or control the possible impact of the nongenetic factors. Schizophrenia is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder with a polygenic mode of inheritance that is also governed by nongenetic factors. Schizophrenia's symptoms are principally subdivided into two subtypes, positive and negative. The positive symptoms include delusions and hallucinations; the negative symptoms, blunted affect and social withdrawal. Atypical antipsychotics are usually superior in the treatment of negative symptoms than typical agents. Although atypical agents are becoming the mainstay for schizophrenia treatment, what makes an antipsychotic “atypical” remains unclear. One of our recent studies have simultaneously evaluated the effects of genetic and nongenetic determinants on the efficacy of risperidone (a widely used atypical antipsychotic agent). We found that 5‐HT2A receptor 102‐T/C polymorphism could predict clinical response (mainly for negative symptoms rather than positive symptoms) in schizophrenia. Among nongenetic factors, fewer previous hospitalizations and higher risperidone dosage also predicted better treatment response after control for the 102‐T/C polymorphism and other confounders. It is hoped that this novel study model could revolutionize future research in pharmacogenetics or other fields of genetics. Drug Dev. Res. 60:164–171, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The effects of atypical antipsychotic medications on psychosocial outcomes

This review examines the question--Do atypical antipsychotic medications improve psychosocial outcomes?--by examining studies that compared the effects of atypicals to conventional antipsychotics or to other atypical medications. The authors reviewed randomized clinical trials of atypical antipsychotic medication that included psychosocial variables as outcomes. Findings from 31 published studies on more than 12,000 individuals generally showed that atypical medications led to significant improvements in negative symptoms compared to conventional antipsychotics. Effects on global assessment of psychosocial functioning and on the quality of life were mixed with only about half the studies reporting significant improvements. Olanzapine yielded the best results on psychosocial functioning; remoxipride was found to yield few significant changes on these variables. This review provides evidence that some atypical antipsychotics may have direct effects on some of the psychosocial disabilities that result from serious mental illness.

NMDA receptor antagonist effects, cortical glutamatergic function, and schizophrenia: toward a paradigm shift in medication development

There is an urgent need to improve the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia despite the introduction of important new medications. New treatment insights may come from appreciating the therapeutic implications of model psychoses. In particular, basic and clinical studies have employed the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist, ketamine, as a probe of NMDA receptor contributions to cognition and behavior. These studies illustrate a translational neuroscience approach for probing mechanistic hypotheses related to the neurobiology and treatment of schizophrenia and other disorders. Two particular pathophysiologic themes associated with schizophrenia, the disturbance of cortical connectivity and the disinhibition of glutamatergic activity may be modeled by the administration of NMDA receptor antagonists. The purpose of this review is to consider the possibility that agents that attenuate these two components of NMDA receptor antagonist response may play complementary roles in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Acute and maintenance ECT with flupenthixol in refractory schizophrenia: sustained improvements in psychopathology, quality of life, and social outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of ECT combined with antipsychotic medication therapy on psychopathology, quality of life, and social functioning in patients with refractory schizophrenia.

METHOD

An open acute (Phase I) and maintenance (Phase II) study of the combination of ECT and flupenthixol in the treatment of 46 schizophrenic patients who were nonresponsive to antipsychotic medication from at least two different classes. Scales used: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE). The duration of Phase II was 1 year.

RESULTS

In Phase I, there were marked reductions in the BPRS scores, and substantial increases in the QLS, SOFAS, GAF, and MMSE scores. During Phase II, the BPRS negative symptoms worsened but remained improved from baseline. Changes in other outcome measures were negligible.

CONCLUSION

ECT and MECT combined with flupenthixol were effective in improving psychopathology in patients refractory to antipsychotic medication alone. Ratings of psychopathology, quality of life, and social functioning all improved in Phase I and were generally sustained during Phase II in patients who had remitted.

Clozapine v. conventional antipsychotic drugs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a re-examination

BACKGROUND

Although there is a consensus that clozapine is more effective than conventional antipsychotic drugs for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, there is great heterogeneity among results of relevant trials.

AIMS

To re-evaluate the evidence comparing clozapine with conventional antipsychotics and to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

METHOD

Individual studies were inspected with assessment of clinical relevance of results. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Ten trials were examined. Recent large-scale studies have not found a substantial advantage for clozapine, especially in terms of a clinically relevant effect. Meta-regression showed that shorter study duration, financial support from a drug company and higher baseline symptom score consistently predicted greater advantage of clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be inappropriate to combine studies in meta-analysis, given the degree of heterogeneity between their findings. The benefits of clozapine compared with conventional treatment may not be substantial.

Central muscarinic acetylcholine receptor availability in patients treated with clozapine

Clozapine is the prototypical atypical antipsychotic. In vitro, clozapine antagonizes a broad range of receptors, including dopamine, serotonin and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. In vivo, receptor occupancy studies have shown moderate dopamine D(2) receptor blockade as well as high serotonin 5HT(2) receptor blockade for clozapine. Using [I-123]IQNB SPECT, we explored the influence of clozapine on muscarinic receptors in vivo. Eight schizophrenia patients underwent a total of 12 [I-123]IQNB SPECT scans after treatment with low to moderate doses of clozapine (mean 210 mg/day, range 50-450 mg/day). Muscarinic receptor availability was determined for basal ganglia, cortex, thalamus, and pons. A group of 12 age- and sex-matched unmedicated schizophrenia patients was used for comparison. Compared to unmedicated patients, [I-123]IQNB binding was lower in all regions in subjects treated with clozapine and decreased with increasing dose. In patients treated with a daily clozapine dose of at least 200 mg (mean 275+/-88 mg/day), these differences were highly significant (p <0.003) with mean reductions of muscarinic receptor availability of 45% for basal ganglia, 58% for cortex, 66% for pons, and 79% for thalamus. These preliminary data indicate that reduction of muscarinic receptor availability by clozapine can be measured in vivo and that moderate daily doses are associated with moderate to high reductions of muscarinic receptor availability. These results may explain, at least in part, the lack of extrapyramidal side effects as well as some side effects seen with clozapine.

Gabapentin in antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia: results of 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, improvement of antipsychotic-induced blefarospasm and involuntary oral-mandibulo movements were observed with the use of the anticonvulsant drug gabapentin among affectively ill patients who had been exposed to maintenance neuroleptics. The results reported in the present paper represent the sequel to the previous study.

METHODS

The purported efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia has been assessed in an open design 1-year follow-up study, in which 30 schizoaffective, bipolar I and schizophrenic patients from seven Italian centres were evaluated by means of AIMS. The results showed a statistically significant time-related decrease in AIMS scores. The mean percentage of improvement at AIMS was 47.5+/-18.2%. An improvement of more than 35% after 1 year in 76% of the subjects who completed the trial (n=25) and in 63.3% of the entire sample admitted to the study was revealed.

LIMITATION

Open trial.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of new antipsychotic drugs has probably already limited the problems related to tardive dyskinesia. However, this type of side-effect is also observed during the course of treatment with atypical neuroleptics albeit with a lesser frequency. The fact that gabapentin treatment may have further improved clinical conditions of patients in whom therapeutic protocols had already been modified, appears to suggest exertion of a possible synergic action by the new neuroleptics on tardive dyskinesia.

A program to convert patients from trade-name to generic clozapine

In spring 2000, the Missouri Department of Mental Health mandated that its psychiatric inpatient facilities convert patients from trade-name to generic clozapine. The pharmacy department at our facility was encouraged to develop a conversion program to oversee and assess the efficacy and tolerability of the change. A protocol to monitor the conversion of patients to generic clozapine hospitalwide was developed. The primary objective was to determine whether therapeutic response and level of tolerability were the same with generic versus trade-name clozapine. The secondary objective was to determine whether changes in monitoring white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts were necessary after conversion. Our results showed that most patients did not experience changes greater than a mean of 5 points in their scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). However, a statistically significant difference was seen in 22 patients who had a mean reduction or an increase of less than 5 points (p=0.0139) in BPRS scores compared with two patients who had a mean increase greater than 5 points. Assessment of percentage change in BPRS scores indicated that 14 (58%) converted patients had a 1-50% decrease in mean BPRS scores, and 10 (42%) had a 1-40% increase. However, of those with a mean BPRS increase, five (50%) had an increase of 10% or less. Our clozapine conversion program resulted in the successful conversion of all 24 patients.

Treatment of schizophrenia: preventing the progression of disease

Atypical antipsychotic drugs offer a number of advantages compared with typical antipsychotic drugs during the acute treatment of psychotic episodes and maintenance treatment to prevent psychotic relapses in patients with schizophrenia. These advantages include superior efficacy, especially for negative symptoms and reduced extrapyramidal adverse effects. Clinicians, however, need to be vigilant regarding new adverse effects that may be more strongly associated with atypical than typical drugs, especially those related to weight gain. Despite increased pill costs for atypical antipsychotic drugs, the overall costs of providing care to patients with schizophrenia using these drugs do not appear to be substantially higher.

Modelling the impact of clozapine on suicide in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia in the UK

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a major cause of suicide, and symptoms characteristic of treatment-resistant disease are strong risk factors. Clozapine reduces symptoms in 60% of such patients and significantly decreases the risk of suicide.

AIMS

To model the impact of increased clozapine prescribing on lives saved and resource utilisation.

METHOD

A model was built to compare current levels of clozapine prescribing with a scenario in which all suitable patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia received clozapine.

RESULTS

It was estimated that an average of 53 lives could be saved in the UK each year. If clozapine is cost-neutral, the cost per life-year saved is pound 5108. If clozapine achieves a 10% reduction in annual support costs, the net saving is pound 8.7 million per annum. An average of 167 acute beds would be freed each year.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia saves lives, frees resources and is cost-effective.

Pharmacotherapy for refractory schizophrenia patients

Most schizophrenic patients experience morbidity over the course of their illness, as the illness runs a chronic course and full remissions are infrequent. Therefore, defining treatment resistance among schizophrenia is problematic. Not all patients respond to antipsychotic medication treatment and an estimated 30-50% are considered resistant to treatment. Treatment resistance normally occurs along a continuum and most patients manifest varying degrees of resistance to antipsychotic medications. Essock and colleagues discovered that more than 60% of the patients in state hospitals met the criteria for clozapine therapy and, therefore, they may qualify for treatment resistance.