151
|
Kluge S, Strauß R, Kochanek M, Weigand MA, Rohde H, Lahmer T. Aspergillosis: Emerging risk groups in critically ill patients. Med Mycol 2021; 60:6408468. [PMID: 34677613 DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myab064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Information on invasive aspergillosis (IA) and other invasive filamentous fungal infections is limited in non-neutropenic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and presenting with no classic IA risk factors. This review is based on the critical appraisal of relevant literature, on the authors' own experience and on discussions that took place at a consensus conference. It aims to review risk factors favoring aspergillosis in ICU patients, with a special emphasis on often overlooked or neglected conditions. In the ICU patients, corticosteroid use to treat underlying conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sepsis, or severe COVID-19, represents a cardinal risk factor for IA. Important additional host risk factors are COPD, decompensated cirrhosis, liver failure, and severe viral pneumonia (influenza, COVID-19). Clinical observations indicate that patients admitted to the ICU because of sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome are more likely to develop probable or proven IA, suggesting that sepsis could also be a possible direct risk factor for IA, as could small molecule inhibitors used in oncology. There are no recommendations for prophylaxis in ICU patients; posaconazole mold-active primary prophylaxis is used in some centers according to guidelines for other patient populations and IA treatment in critically ill patients is basically the same as in other patient populations. A combined evaluation of clinical signs and imaging, classical biomarkers such as the GM assay, and fungal cultures examination, remain the best option to assess response to treatment. LAY SUMMARY The use of corticosteroids and the presence of co-morbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute or chronic advanced liver disease, or severe viral pneumonia caused by influenza or Covid-19, may increase the risk of invasive aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, D-20246, Germany
| | - Richard Strauß
- Department of Medicine 1, Medizinische Klinik 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, D-91054, Germany
| | - Matthias Kochanek
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, D-50937, Germany
| | - Markus A Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Holger Rohde
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, D-20246, Germany
| | - Tobias Lahmer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität Munich, Munich, D-81675, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Homeostatic Regulation of Glucocorticoid Receptor Activity by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1: From Physiology to Clinic. Cells 2021; 10:cells10123441. [PMID: 34943949 PMCID: PMC8699886 DOI: 10.3390/cells10123441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) represent a well-known class of lipophilic steroid hormones biosynthesised, with a circadian rhythm, by the adrenal glands in humans and by the inter-renal tissue in teleost fish (e.g., zebrafish). GCs play a key role in the regulation of numerous physiological processes, including inflammation, glucose, lipid, protein metabolism and stress response. This is achieved through binding to their cognate receptor, GR, which functions as a ligand-activated transcription factor. Due to their potent anti-inflammatory and immune-suppressive action, synthetic GCs are broadly used for treating pathological disorders that are very often linked to hypoxia (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory, allergic, infectious, and autoimmune diseases, among others) as well as to prevent graft rejections and against immune system malignancies. However, due to the presence of adverse effects and GC resistance their therapeutic benefits are limited in patients chronically treated with steroids. For this reason, understanding how to fine-tune GR activity is crucial in the search for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing GC-related side effects and effectively restoring homeostasis. Recent research has uncovered novel mechanisms that inhibit GR function, thereby causing glucocorticoid resistance, and has produced some surprising new findings. In this review we analyse these mechanisms and focus on the crosstalk between GR and HIF signalling. Indeed, its comprehension may provide new routes to develop novel therapeutic targets for effectively treating immune and inflammatory response and to simultaneously facilitate the development of innovative GCs with a better benefits-risk ratio.
Collapse
|
153
|
Nasa P, Chaudhry D, Govil D, Daga MK, Jain R, Chhallani AA, Krishna A, Jagiasi BG, Juneja D, Barthakur HS, Jha H, Gurjar M, Rangappa P, Aladakatti R, Mishra RC, Shetty RM, Yadav R, Garg S, Nandakumar SM, Samavedam S, Ray S, Hadda V, Javeri Y, Munjal M. Expert Consensus Statements on the Use of Corticosteroids in Non-severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021. [PMID: 34866826 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23923.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is strong evidence for the use of corticosteroid in the management of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, there is still uncertainty about the timing of corticosteroids. We undertook a modified Delphi study to develop expert consensus statements on the early identification of a subset of patients from non-severe COVID-19 who may benefit from using corticosteroids. Methods A modified Delphi was conducted with two anonymous surveys between April 30, 2021, and May 3, 2021. An expert panel of 35 experts was selected and invited to participate through e-mail. The consensus was defined as >70% votes in multiple-choice questions (MCQ) on Likert-scale type statements, while strong consensus as >90% votes in MCQ or >50% votes for "very important" on Likert-scale questions in the final round. Results Twenty experts completed two rounds of the survey. There was strong consensus for the increased work of breathing (95%), a positive six-minute walk test (90%), thorax computed tomography severity score of >14/25 (85%), new-onset organ dysfunction (using clinical or biochemical criteria) (80%), and C-reactive protein >5 times the upper limit of normal (70%) as the criteria for patients' selection. The experts recommended using oral or intravenous (IV) low-dose corticosteroids (the equivalent of 6 mg/day dexamethasone) for 5-10 days and monitoring of oxygen saturation, body temperature, clinical scoring system, blood sugar, and inflammatory markers for any "red-flag" signs. Conclusion The experts recommended against indiscriminate use of corticosteroids in mild to moderate COVID-19 without the signs of clinical worsening. Oral or IV low-dose corticosteroids (the equivalent of 6 mg/day dexamethasone) for 5-10 days are recommended for patients with features of disease progression based on clinical, biochemical, or radiological criteria after 5 days from symptom onset under close monitoring. How to cite this article How to cite this article: Nasa P, Chaudhry D, Govil D, Daga MK, Jain R, Chhallani AA, et al. Expert Consensus Statements on the Use of Corticosteroids in Non-severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(11):1280-1285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Nasa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Dhruva Chaudhry
- Professor and Head, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Govil
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Mradul K Daga
- Department of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - Ravi Jain
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Apoorv Krishna
- Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Hospital Regency Health, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Bharat G Jagiasi
- Department of Critical Care, Reliance Hospital, Navimumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deven Juneja
- Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | | | - Hrishikesh Jha
- Incharge, ICU, MRPSH, Near RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Mohan Gurjar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Pradeep Rangappa
- Consultant Intensive Care Physician, Columbia Asia Referral Hospitals, Yeshwantpur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Raghunath Aladakatti
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Gopalagowda Shathaveri Memorial Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajesh C Mishra
- Department of MICU, Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Rajesh M Shetty
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospital Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rohit Yadav
- Consultant Critical Care Medicine, Bansal Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Sandeep Garg
- Department of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sivakumar M Nandakumar
- Department of Critical Care, Royalcare Superspeciality Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Srinivas Samavedam
- Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Sumit Ray
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Holy Family Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Hadda
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Yash Javeri
- Department of Critical Care, Anesthesia and Emergency Medicine, Regency Health, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Manish Munjal
- Medical Director, Mangalam Medicity Hospital, Jaipur, Chairman Jigyasa Foundation, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Aslan A, Aslan C, Zolbanin NM, Jafari R. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19: possible mechanisms and therapeutic management. Pneumonia (Nathan) 2021; 13:14. [PMID: 34872623 PMCID: PMC8647516 DOI: 10.1186/s41479-021-00092-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic is a serious concern in the new era. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and lung failure are the main lung diseases in COVID-19 patients. Even though COVID-19 vaccinations are available now, there is still an urgent need to find potential treatments to ease the effects of COVID-19 on already sick patients. Multiple experimental drugs have been approved by the FDA with unknown efficacy and possible adverse effects. Probably the increasing number of studies worldwide examining the potential COVID-19 related therapies will help to identification of effective ARDS treatment. In this review article, we first provide a summary on immunopathology of ARDS next we will give an overview of management of patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit (ICU), while focusing on the current treatment strategies being evaluated in the clinical trials in COVID-19-induced ARDS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anolin Aslan
- Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Cynthia Aslan
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Naime Majidi Zolbanin
- Experimental and Applied Pharmaceutical Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Reza Jafari
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Shafa St., Ershad Blvd., P.O. Box: 1138, Urmia, 57147, Iran. .,Hematology, Immune Cell Therapy, and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Koushki K, Salemi M, Miri SM, Arjeini Y, Keshavarz M, Ghaemi A. Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in viral respiratory infections; Hints for discovering therapeutic targets for COVID-19. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 144:112346. [PMID: 34678727 PMCID: PMC8516725 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), known as heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells, is enhanced during several pathological conditions such as inflammatory or viral respiratory infections. It seems that the way MDSCs behave in infection depends on the type and the virulence mechanisms of the invader pathogen, the disease stage, and the infection-related pathology. Increasing evidence showing that in correlation with the severity of the disease, MDSCs are accumulated in COVID-19 patients, in particular in those at severe stages of the disease or ICU patients, contributing to pathogenesis of SARS-CoV2 infection. Based on the involved subsets, MDSCs delay the clearance of the virus through inhibiting T-cell proliferation and responses by employing various mechanisms such as inducing the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-mediated hampering of IFN-γ production, or forcing arginine shortage. While the immunosuppressive characteristic of MDSCs may help to preserve the tissue homeostasis and prevent hyperinflammation at early stages of the infection, hampering of efficient immune responses proved to exert significant pathogenic effects on severe forms of COVID-19, suggesting the targeting of MDSCs as a potential intervention to reactivate T-cell immunity and thereby prevent the infection from developing into severe stages of the disease. This review tried to compile evidence on the roles of different subsets of MDSCs during viral respiratory infections, which is far from being totally understood, and introduce the promising potential of MDSCs for developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, especially against COVID-19 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadijeh Koushki
- Hepatitis Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Maryam Salemi
- Department of Medical Virology, The Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohammad Miri
- Department of Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Yaser Arjeini
- Department of Research and Development, Production and Research Complex, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Keshavarz
- Department of Medical Virology, The Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
| | - Amir Ghaemi
- Department of Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Masterson JM, Bui C, Zhang Y, Yuan X, Huynh C, Jawanda H, Hasan W, Tourtellotte W, Luthringer D, Garcia MM. Feminising hormone therapy reduces testicular ACE-2 receptor expression: Implications for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 infection in men. Andrologia 2021; 53:e14186. [PMID: 34514615 PMCID: PMC8646357 DOI: 10.1111/and.14186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been proposed that men hospitalised with COVID-19 be treated with oestrogen or progesterone to improve COVID-19 outcomes. Transgender women (male-to-female) are routinely treated with oestrogen or oestrogen +progesterone for feminisation which provides a model for the effect of feminising hormones on testicular tissue. Our goal was to analyse differences in ACE-2 expression in testicles of trans-women taking oestrogen or oestrogen +progesterone. Orchiectomy specimens were collected from trans-women undergoing gender-affirming surgery, who were taking oestrogen or oestrogen+progesterone preoperatively. For controls, we used benign orchiectomy specimens from cis-gender men. All specimens were stained with H&E, Trichrome (fibrosis), insulin-like 3 antibody (Leydig cell) and ACE-2 IHC. Cells per high-powered field were counted by cell type (Leydig, Sertoli and Germ). Stain intensity was rated on a 0-2 scale. On immunohistochemistry staining for Leydig cells and ACE-2 staining, the oestrogen+progesterone cohort had fewer Leydig cells compared with controls. The oestrogen+progesterone cohort also had greater degree of tissue fibrosis compared with controls and the oestrogen cohort. This work supports the hopeful possibility that a short course of progesterone (or oestrogen+progesterone) could downregulate ACE-2 to protect men from COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Masterson
- Department of SurgeryDivision of UrologyCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chau Bui
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Xiaopen Yuan
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Carissa Huynh
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Harneet Jawanda
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Wohaib Hasan
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Warren Tourtellotte
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Biobank and Translational Research, Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Daniel Luthringer
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maurice M. Garcia
- Department of SurgeryDivision of UrologyCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Callejas Rubio JL, Aomar Millan I, Moreno-Higueras M, Martín Ripoll L, Yuste Osorio E, Ríos-Fernández R. [Caution with the use of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 in its initial phases]. Rev Clin Esp 2021; 221:592-595. [PMID: 33716310 PMCID: PMC7936543 DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of dexamethasone in the initial phase of infection by SARS-CoV-2 and its influence on COVID-19 is not well defined. We describe clinical-radiological characteristics, the cytokine storm parameters, and the clinical evolution of a series of patients treated with dexamethasone in the disease's initial phase. METHOD A study of 8 patients who received dexamethasone before the development of COVID-19. We evaluate clinical variables, imaging tests, cytokine release parameters, treatment used and patient evolution. RESULTS All patients received a 6 mg/day dose with a mean duration of 4.5 days before admission. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) revealed that most of them presented a severe extension; most patients had a slightly elevated level of cytokine release parameters. Three patients required high-flow oxygen therapy due to respiratory failure; none required orotracheal intubation or died. CONCLUSION Dexamethasone in the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to be associated with severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Callejas Rubio
- Unidad de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - I Aomar Millan
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - M Moreno-Higueras
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - L Martín Ripoll
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - E Yuste Osorio
- Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - R Ríos-Fernández
- Unidad de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Mushtaq MZ, Mahmood SBZ, Almas A, Ather Wasti S, Ahsan Ali S. Tocilizumab in critically ill COVID-19 patients: An observational study. Int Immunopharmacol 2021; 102:108384. [PMID: 34838490 PMCID: PMC8604692 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Tocilizumab decreases inflammatory response in the cytokine storm which is one of the mechanisms behind the development of ARDS in COVID-19 patients. The objective of our study was to determine response of tocilizumab in patients suffering from COVID-19 by analyzing clinical parameters and inflammatory markers. A single-arm observational retrospective study was conducted from March 15, 2020 to March 15, 2021. Clinical outcomes in terms of mortality, weaning from mechanical ventilator, improvement in laboratory parameters including inflammatory cytokines, and length of hospital stay were documented. Reduction in values of inflammatory markers, and patients discharged home in stable condition were defined as an improvement after tocilizumab administration. A total of 514 patients received tocilizumab, majority of whom were critically sick 333 (64.8%). Out of the total sample 363 (70.6%) patients were discharged home in stable condition. Overall mean length of stay was 11.50 ± 8.4 days. There was significant difference in length of stay of patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation as compared to those who were kept only on supplemental oxygen (p < 0.05). Patients who were discharged home showed significant improvement in inflammatory markers and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as compared to those who expired (p < 0.05). A total of 21 (4.1%) patients had positive blood culture while 57 (11.1%) had positive culture of tracheal aspirate. Hence, tocilizumab is found to be a reasonable therapeutic option for worsening COVID-19 pneumonia by decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation. However, it is associated with adverse events including bacterial and fungal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Z Mushtaq
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Saad B Z Mahmood
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Aysha Almas
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Syed Ather Wasti
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Syed Ahsan Ali
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Moreno G, Carbonell R, Martin-Loeches I, Solé-Violán J, Correig I Fraga E, Gómez J, Ruiz-Botella M, Trefler S, Bodí M, Murcia Paya J, Díaz E, Vidal-Cortes P, Papiol E, Albaya Moreno A, Sancho Chinesta S, Socias Crespi L, Lorente MDC, Loza Vázquez A, Vara Arlanzon R, Recio MT, Ballesteros JC, Ferrer R, Fernandez Rey E, Restrepo MI, Estella Á, Margarit Ribas A, Guasch N, Reyes LF, Marín-Corral J, Rodríguez A. Corticosteroid treatment and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a multicentre cohort study. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:159. [PMID: 34825976 PMCID: PMC8617372 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00951-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some unanswered questions persist regarding the effectiveness of corticosteroids for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of corticosteroids on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality among mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. METHODS This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data conducted in 70 ICUs (68 Spanish, one Andorran, one Irish), including mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients admitted between February 6 and September 20, 2020. Individuals who received corticosteroids for refractory shock were excluded. Patients exposed to corticosteroids at admission were matched with patients without corticosteroids through propensity score matching. Primary outcome was all-cause ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were to compare in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days at 28 days, respiratory superinfection and length of stay between patients with corticosteroids and those without corticosteroids. We performed survival analysis accounting for competing risks and subgroup sensitivity analysis. RESULTS We included 1835 mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS, of whom 1117 (60.9%) received corticosteroids. After propensity score matching, ICU mortality did not differ between patients treated with corticosteroids and untreated patients (33.8% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.28). In survival analysis, corticosteroid treatment at ICU admission was associated with short-term survival benefit (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.39-0.72), although beyond the 17th day of admission, this effect switched and there was an increased ICU mortality (long-term HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.16-2.45). The sensitivity analysis reinforced the results. Subgroups of age < 60 years, severe ARDS and corticosteroids plus tocilizumab could have greatest benefit from corticosteroids as short-term decreased ICU mortality without long-term negative effects were observed. Larger length of stay was observed with corticosteroids among non-survivors both in the ICU and in hospital. There were no significant differences for the remaining secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that corticosteroid treatment for mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS had a biphasic time-dependent effect on ICU mortality. Specific subgroups showed clear effect on improving survival with corticosteroid use. Therefore, further research is required to identify treatment-responsive subgroups among the mechanically ventilated COVID-19-associated ARDS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard Moreno
- Critical Care Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Joan XXIII University Hospital, C/ Dr Mallafrè Guasch, 4, 43005, Tarragona, Spain.
| | - Raquel Carbonell
- Critical Care Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Joan XXIII University Hospital, C/ Dr Mallafrè Guasch, 4, 43005, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jordi Solé-Violán
- Critical Care Department, Doctor Negrín University Hospital, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Josep Gómez
- Critical Care Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Joan XXIII University Hospital, C/ Dr Mallafrè Guasch, 4, 43005, Tarragona, Spain
- Tarragona Health Data Research Working Group (THeDaR), Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Manuel Ruiz-Botella
- Critical Care Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Joan XXIII University Hospital, C/ Dr Mallafrè Guasch, 4, 43005, Tarragona, Spain
- Tarragona Health Data Research Working Group (THeDaR), Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Sandra Trefler
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| | - María Bodí
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Josefa Murcia Paya
- Critical Care Department, Santa Lucía General University Hospital, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Emili Díaz
- Critical Care Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Parc Taulí Hospital, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | - Elisabeth Papiol
- Critical Care Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Ana Loza Vázquez
- Critical Care Department, Virgen de Valme University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - María Teresa Recio
- Critical Care Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Ricard Ferrer
- Critical Care Department, Investigation Group SODIR-VIHR, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marcos I Restrepo
- Department of Medicine, South Texas Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Ángel Estella
- Critical Care Department, Jerez University Hospital, Jerez, Spain
| | - Antonio Margarit Ribas
- Critical Care Department, Nostra Senyora de Meritxell Hospital, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | - Neus Guasch
- Critical Care Department, Nostra Senyora de Meritxell Hospital, Escaldes-Engordany, Andorra
| | - Luis F Reyes
- Infectious Diseases Department, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia
| | - Judith Marín-Corral
- Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB) - Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez
- Critical Care Department, URV/IISPV/CIBERES, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Oladunjoye O, Gallagher M, Wasser T, Oladunjoye A, Paladugu S, Donato A. Mortality due to COVID-19 infection: A comparison of first and second waves. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2021; 11:747-752. [PMID: 34804384 PMCID: PMC8604511 DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1978154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The USA suffered an initial wave of COVID-19 cases from March to July in 2020. Cases again surged in August 2020 as business restrictions were lifted. We aimed to describe demographic, treatment, and mortality differences between both waves. Methods We identified all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection in one US six-hospital health system between 1 March 2020 and 31 January 2021. We compared data obtained on patient demographics, treatment received, and mortality between first and second waves of the pandemic. Results A total of 4434 hospitalized COVID patients were identified, including 1313 patients in the first wave and 3121 patients in the second wave. Mortality was significantly higher in the first wave as compared to the second wave (23.2% vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Age and sex were similar in each wave. In the first wave, there were significantly more Non-Hispanic Black patients (28.8 vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (26.6% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001) as compared to the second wave. There was a higher mortality rate in the first wave as compared to the second, which persisted after multivariable adjustment for sex, age, ethnicity, laboratory results at admission, treatment received, high flow use and mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.83–3.87, p < 0.001). Conclusion Mortality in the second wave was lower than the first wave with significantly higher utilization of steroids, remdesivir and convalescent plasma in second wave.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olubunmi Oladunjoye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, PA, USA
| | - Molly Gallagher
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tom Wasser
- Senior Scientist, Consult-Stat, Wernersville, PA, USA
| | - Adeolu Oladunjoye
- Division of Medical Critical Care, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susmita Paladugu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, PA, USA
| | - Anthony Donato
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Vargas M, Marra A, Buonanno P, Coviello A, Iacovazzo C, Servillo G. Fragility Index and Fragility Quotient in Randomized Controlled Trials on Corticosteroids in ARDS Due to COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Etiology. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225287. [PMID: 34830569 PMCID: PMC8624335 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of corticosteroids in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19 still remains uncertain. Since ARDS is due to a hyperinflammatory response to a direct injury, we decided to perform a meta-analysis and an evaluation of robustness of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of corticosteroids on mortality in ARDS in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. We conducted a systematic search of the literature from inception up to 30 October 2020, using the MEDLINE database and the PubMed interface. We evaluated the fragility index (FI) of the included RCTs using a two-by-two contingency table and the p-value produced by the Fisher exact test; the fragility quotient (FQ) was calculated by dividing the FI score by the total sample size of the trial. Results: Thirteen RCTs were included in the analysis; five of them were conducted in COVID-19 ARDS, including 7692 patients, while 8 RCTS were performed in non-COVID ARDS with 1091 patients evaluated. Three out of eight RCTs in ARDS had a FI > 0 while 2 RCTs out of five in COVID-19 had FI > 0. The median of FI for ARDS was 0.625 (0.47) while the median of FQ was 0.03 (0.014). The median of FI for COVID-19 was 6 (2) while the median of FQ was 0.059 (0.055). In this systematic review, we found that FI and FQ of RCTs evaluating the use of corticosteroids in ARDS and COVID-19 were low.
Collapse
|
162
|
Caronna E, Pozo-Rosich P. Headache as a Symptom of COVID-19: Narrative Review of 1-Year Research. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2021; 25:73. [PMID: 34766205 PMCID: PMC8583579 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-021-00987-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headache is a common symptom of COVID-19 with emerging literature being published on the subject. Although it may seem unspecific, scientific evidence has allowed a better definition of this headache type, revealing relevant associations with other COVID-19 symptoms and prognoses. We therefore sought to highlight the most remarkable findings concerning headache secondary to COVID-19, specifically focusing on epidemiology, characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatments. RECENT FINDINGS The real prevalence of headache as a symptom of COVID-19 is still unclear ranging from 10 to 70%. Headache mainly has a tension-type-like phenotype, although 25% of individuals present with migraine-like features that also occur in patients without personal migraine history. This finding suggests that a likely pathophysiological mechanism is the activation of the trigeminovascular system. SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism can occur by trans-synaptic invasion through the olfactory route from the nasal cavity, leading to anosmia which has been associated with headache. SARS-CoV-2 protein has been found not only in olfactory mucosa and bulbs but also in trigeminal branches and the trigeminal ganglion, supporting this hypothesis. However, other mechanisms such as brain vessels inflammation due to SARS-CoV-2 damage to the endothelium or systemic inflammation in the context of cytokine storm cannot be ruled out. Interestingly, headache has been associated with lower COVID-19 mortality. No specific treatment for COVID-19 headache is available at present. Studies show that investigating COVID-19 headache represents an opportunity not only to better understand COVID-19 in general but also to advance in the knowledge of both secondary and primary headaches. Future research is therefore warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Estella Á, Vidal-Cortés P, Rodríguez A, Andaluz Ojeda D, Martín-Loeches I, Díaz E, Suberviola B, Gracia Arnillas MP, Catalán González M, Álvarez-Lerma F, Ramírez P, Nuvials X, Borges M, Zaragoza R. Management of infectious complications associated with coronavirus infection in severe patients admitted to ICU. Med Intensiva 2021; 45:485-500. [PMID: 34475008 PMCID: PMC8382590 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2021.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Infections have become one of the main complications of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted in ICU. Poor immune status, frequent development of organic failure requiring invasive supportive treatments, and prolonged ICU length of stay in saturated structural areas of patients are risk factors for infection development. The Working Group on Infectious Diseases and Sepsis GTEIS of the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Units SEMICYUC emphasizes the importance of infection prevention measures related to health care, the detection and early treatment of major infections in the patient with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Bacterial co-infection, respiratory infections related to mechanical ventilation, catheter-related bacteremia, device-associated urinary tract infection and opportunistic infections are review in the document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Á Estella
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina de Cádiz, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain.
| | - P Vidal-Cortés
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - A Rodríguez
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain
| | - D Andaluz Ojeda
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Sanchinarro de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Martín-Loeches
- PhD JFICMI Consultant in Intensive Care Medicine, CLOD Dublin Midlands Group, St James's University Hospital, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, HRB-Welcome Trust St James's Hospital, Dublin, EIRE, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Díaz
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain
| | - B Suberviola
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - M P Gracia Arnillas
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Catalán González
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Álvarez-Lerma
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - X Nuvials
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Borges
- Unidad Multidisciplinar de Sepsis, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Son Llatzer, IDISBA, Enfermedades Infecciosas UIB, Palma de Mallorca, Área de Sepsis e Infecciosas, Federación Ibérica y Panamericana de Medicina Intensiva (FEPIMCTI), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - R Zaragoza
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Li H, Yan B, Gao R, Ren J, Yang J. Effectiveness of corticosteroids to treat severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Immunopharmacol 2021. [PMID: 34492533 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.08121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of corticosteroid therapy for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We comprehensively searched articles published in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases from January 1, 2019, to March 20, 2021. RESULTS A total of 6771 patients from eight prospective studies were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that corticosteroid therapy was associated with lower mortality in severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54-0.92, P = 0.009; I2 = 54.5%). Since the proportion of the RECOVERY (Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) trial included in the meta-analysis was as high as 71.88%, we removed it and recalculated the pooled OR. The results of the remaining seven studies still suggested such a survival benefit (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.44-0.96, P = 0.030; I2 = 59.8%). Furthermore, subgroup analysis suggested that the pooled OR of three studies using corticosteroids in the early stages of treatment was much lower (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.25-0.57, P < 0.001; I2 = 47.8%). However, after excluding the RECOVERY trial, the pooled OR of the remaining four studies with unspecific administration timing of corticosteroid therapy no longer supported this result (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.69-1.17, P = 0.415; I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis, evidence based on seven randomized controlled trials and one prospective cohort study indicates that corticosteroid therapy was associated with a reduction in the mortality of severe COVID-19, especially when administered at an earlier time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
| | - Bingdi Yan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Rong Gao
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jin Ren
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Junling Yang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Nasa P, Chaudhry D, Govil D, Daga MK, Jain R, Chhallani AA, Krishna A, Jagiasi BG, Juneja D, Barthakur HS, Jha H, Gurjar M, Rangappa P, Aladakatti R, Mishra RC, Shetty RM, Yadav R, Garg S, Nandakumar SM, Samavedam S, Ray S, Hadda V, Javeri Y, Munjal M. Expert Consensus Statements on the Use of Corticosteroids in Non-severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:1280-1285. [PMID: 34866826 PMCID: PMC8608626 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is strong evidence for the use of corticosteroid in the management of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, there is still uncertainty about the timing of corticosteroids. We undertook a modified Delphi study to develop expert consensus statements on the early identification of a subset of patients from non-severe COVID-19 who may benefit from using corticosteroids. METHODS A modified Delphi was conducted with two anonymous surveys between April 30, 2021, and May 3, 2021. An expert panel of 35 experts was selected and invited to participate through e-mail. The consensus was defined as >70% votes in multiple-choice questions (MCQ) on Likert-scale type statements, while strong consensus as >90% votes in MCQ or >50% votes for "very important" on Likert-scale questions in the final round. RESULTS Twenty experts completed two rounds of the survey. There was strong consensus for the increased work of breathing (95%), a positive six-minute walk test (90%), thorax computed tomography severity score of >14/25 (85%), new-onset organ dysfunction (using clinical or biochemical criteria) (80%), and C-reactive protein >5 times the upper limit of normal (70%) as the criteria for patients' selection. The experts recommended using oral or intravenous (IV) low-dose corticosteroids (the equivalent of 6 mg/day dexamethasone) for 5-10 days and monitoring of oxygen saturation, body temperature, clinical scoring system, blood sugar, and inflammatory markers for any "red-flag" signs. CONCLUSION The experts recommended against indiscriminate use of corticosteroids in mild to moderate COVID-19 without the signs of clinical worsening. Oral or IV low-dose corticosteroids (the equivalent of 6 mg/day dexamethasone) for 5-10 days are recommended for patients with features of disease progression based on clinical, biochemical, or radiological criteria after 5 days from symptom onset under close monitoring. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE How to cite this article: Nasa P, Chaudhry D, Govil D, Daga MK, Jain R, Chhallani AA, et al. Expert Consensus Statements on the Use of Corticosteroids in Non-severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(11):1280-1285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Nasa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Prashant Nasa, Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Phone: +971501425022, e-mail:
| | - Dhruva Chaudhry
- Professor and Head, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Govil
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Mradul K Daga
- Department of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - Ravi Jain
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Apoorv Krishna
- Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Hospital Regency Health, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Bharat G Jagiasi
- Department of Critical Care, Reliance Hospital, Navimumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deven Juneja
- Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | | | - Hrishikesh Jha
- Incharge, ICU, MRPSH, Near RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Mohan Gurjar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Pradeep Rangappa
- Consultant Intensive Care Physician, Columbia Asia Referral Hospitals, Yeshwantpur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Raghunath Aladakatti
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Gopalagowda Shathaveri Memorial Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajesh C Mishra
- Department of MICU, Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Rajesh M Shetty
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospital Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rohit Yadav
- Consultant Critical Care Medicine, Bansal Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Sandeep Garg
- Department of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sivakumar M Nandakumar
- Department of Critical Care, Royalcare Superspeciality Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Srinivas Samavedam
- Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Sumit Ray
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Holy Family Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Hadda
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Yash Javeri
- Department of Critical Care, Anesthesia and Emergency Medicine, Regency Health, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Manish Munjal
- Medical Director, Mangalam Medicity Hospital, Jaipur, Chairman Jigyasa Foundation, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Rathore SS, Rojas GA, Sondhi M, Pothuru S, Pydi R, Kancherla N, Singh R, Ahmed NK, Shah J, Tousif S, Baloch UT, Wen Q. Myocarditis associated with Covid-19 disease: A systematic review of published case reports and case series. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14470. [PMID: 34235815 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Covid-19 is an extremely contagious illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The cardiac involvement in such a public health emergency disease has not been well studied and a conflicting evidence exists on this issue. OBJECTIVE This systematic review article aimed to compile and illustrate clinical characteristics, diagnostic findings, management, and outcomes manifesting in myocarditis linked with Covid-19. METHODS A literature search was accomplished for published eligible articles with MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases. All eligible case reports and case series were included from around the world without any language restrictions. For this review, inclusion criteria were laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cases reporting a diagnosis of acute myocarditis. RESULTS Data from 41 studies describing myocarditis in 42 Covid-19 patients was obtained. The median age of these patients was 43.4 years, with 71.4% of them being men. Fever was the most prevalent presenting symptoms seen in 57% of patients. Hypertension was the most pervasive comorbidity accompanying these patients. Cardiac biomarkers troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were raised in almost 90% and 87% of patients, respectively. Electrocardiogram findings were nonspecific and included ST-segment and T-wave changes. Echocardiogram commonly showed left ventricular systolic dysfunction with increased heart size. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) exhibited myocardial edema and injury. The most prevalent histopathological feature appreciated was diffuse lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates. Antivirals and corticosteroids were the most frequently used medications. About 38% of patients also needed vasopressor assistance. Out of 42 patients, 67% recovered, and eight died. CONCLUSION Because of the risk of a sudden worsening of patients conditions and myocarditis association with considerable mortality and morbidity, a knowledge of this cardiac complication of Covid-19 disease is crucial for healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianpier Alonzo Rojas
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
- Scientific society of medical students, Lima, Perú
| | - Manush Sondhi
- Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India
| | | | - Reshma Pydi
- Internal Medicine, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, India
| | | | - Romil Singh
- Department of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jill Shah
- Internal Medicine, Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Tambov, Russia
| | - Sohaib Tousif
- Internal Medicine, Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Qingqing Wen
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Estella Á, Vidal-Cortés P, Rodríguez A, Andaluz Ojeda D, Martín-Loeches I, Díaz E, Suberviola B, Gracia Arnillas MP, Catalán González M, Álvarez-Lerma F, Ramírez P, Nuvials X, Borges M, Zaragoza R. [Management of infectious complications associated with coronavirus infection in severe patients admitted to ICU]. Med Intensiva 2021; 45:485-500. [PMID: 33994616 PMCID: PMC8086823 DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Infections have become one of the main complications of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted in ICU. Poor immune status, frequent development of organic failure requiring invasive supportive treatments, and prolonged ICU length of stay in saturated structural areas of patients are risk factors for infection development. The Working Group on Infectious Diseases and Sepsis GTEIS of the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine and Coronary Units SEMICYUC emphasizes the importance of infection prevention measures related to health care, the detection and early treatment of major infections in the patient with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Bacterial co-infection, respiratory infections related to mechanical ventilation, catheter-related bacteremia, device-associated urinary tract infection and opportunistic infections are review in the document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Á Estella
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina de Cádiz, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, España
| | - P Vidal-Cortés
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, España
| | - A Rodríguez
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Tarragona, España
| | - D Andaluz Ojeda
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Sanchinarro de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - I Martín-Loeches
- PhD JFICMI Consultant in Intensive Care Medicine, CLOD Dublin Midlands group, St James's University Hospital, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, HRB-Welcome Trust St James's Hospital, Dublín, EIRE, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - E Díaz
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, España
| | - B Suberviola
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. Santander, España
| | - M P Gracia Arnillas
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - M Catalán González
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - F Álvarez-Lerma
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - P Ramírez
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - X Nuvials
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, España
| | - M Borges
- Unidad Multidisciplinar de Sepsis, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Son Llatzer, IDISBA, Enfermedades Infecciosas UIB, Palma de Mallorca, Área de Sepsis e Infecciosas, Federación Ibérica y Panamericana de Medicina Intensiva (FEPIMCTI), Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - R Zaragoza
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Bretagne S, Sitbon K, Botterel F, Dellière S, Letscher-Bru V, Chouaki T, Bellanger AP, Bonnal C, Fekkar A, Persat F, Costa D, Bourgeois N, Dalle F, Lussac-Sorton F, Paugam A, Cassaing S, Hasseine L, Huguenin A, Guennouni N, Mazars E, Le Gal S, Sasso M, Brun S, Cadot L, Cassagne C, Cateau E, Gangneux JP, Moniot M, Roux AL, Tournus C, Desbois-Nogard N, Le Coustumier A, Moquet O, Alanio A, Dromer F. COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Fungemia, and Pneumocystosis in the Intensive Care Unit: a Retrospective Multicenter Observational Cohort during the First French Pandemic Wave. Microbiol Spectr 2021; 9:e0113821. [PMID: 34668768 PMCID: PMC8528108 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01138-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic means, host factors, delay of occurrence, and outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and fungal coinfections in the intensive care unit (ICU). From 1 February to 31 May 2020, we anonymously recorded COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), fungemia (CA-fungemia), and pneumocystosis (CA-PCP) from 36 centers, including results on fungal biomarkers in respiratory specimens and serum. We collected data from 154 episodes of CAPA, 81 of CA-fungemia, 17 of CA-PCP, and 5 of other mold infections from 244 patients (male/female [M/F] ratio = 3.5; mean age, 64.7 ± 10.8 years). CA-PCP occurred first after ICU admission (median, 1 day; interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 3 days), followed by CAPA (9 days; IQR, 5 to 13 days), and then CA-fungemia (16 days; IQR, 12 to 23 days) (P < 10-4). For CAPA, the presence of several mycological criteria was associated with death (P < 10-4). Serum galactomannan was rarely positive (<20%). The mortality rates were 76.7% (23/30) in patients with host factors for invasive fungal disease, 45.2% (14/31) in those with a preexisting pulmonary condition, and 36.6% (34/93) in the remaining patients (P = 0.001). Antimold treatment did not alter prognosis (P = 0.370). Candida albicans was responsible for 59.3% of CA-fungemias, with a global mortality of 45.7%. For CA-PCP, 58.8% of the episodes occurred in patients with known host factors of PCP, and the mortality rate was 29.5%. CAPA may be in part hospital acquired and could benefit from antifungal prescription at the first positive biomarker result. CA-fungemia appeared linked to ICU stay without COVID-19 specificity, while CA-PCP may not really be a concern in the ICU. Improved diagnostic strategy for fungal markers in ICU patients with COVID-19 should support these hypotheses. IMPORTANCE To diagnose fungal coinfections in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit, it is necessary to implement the correct treatment and to prevent them if possible. For COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), respiratory specimens remain the best approach since serum biomarkers are rarely positive. Timing of occurrence suggests that CAPA could be hospital acquired. The associated mortality varies from 36.6% to 76.7% when no host factors or host factors of invasive fungal diseases are present, respectively. Fungemias occurred after 2 weeks in ICUs and are associated with a mortality rate of 45.7%. Candida albicans is the first yeast species recovered, with no specificity linked to COVID-19. Pneumocystosis was mainly found in patients with known immunodepression. The diagnosis occurred at the entry in ICUs and not afterwards, suggesting that if Pneumocystis jirovecii plays a role, it is upstream of the hospitalization in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Bretagne
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre national de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Karine Sitbon
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre national de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France
| | - Françoise Botterel
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, Créteil, France
| | - Sarah Dellière
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre national de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Letscher-Bru
- Service de Parasitologie et de Mycologie Médicale, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Taieb Chouaki
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | | | - Christine Bonnal
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Universitaire Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Arnault Fekkar
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Parasitologie Mycologie, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, Centre d’Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI), Paris, France
| | - Florence Persat
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Parasitologie et Mycologie Médicale, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon–Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Damien Costa
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Charles-Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - Nathalie Bourgeois
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Frédéric Dalle
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon—Hôpital François Mitterrand, Dijon, France
| | | | - André Paugam
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Cassaing
- Service de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Purpan Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Lilia Hasseine
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie Mycologie CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Antoine Huguenin
- Parasitologie Mycologie-Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Pôle de Biopathologie, CHU de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Nadia Guennouni
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Service de Bactériologie, Virologie, Parasitologie et Hygiène, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, IHU Imagine, Paris, France
| | - Edith Mazars
- CH de Valenciennes, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Valenciennes, France
| | - Solène Le Gal
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Hôpital de La Cavale Blanche, CHU de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Milène Sasso
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie Mycologie CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France
| | - Sophie Brun
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Laboratoire de Parasitologie Mycologie Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France
| | - Lucile Cadot
- Département d'Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Carole Cassagne
- IHU Marseille—Institut Hospitalier Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
| | - Estelle Cateau
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Gangneux
- CHU de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (IRSET), Rennes, France
| | - Maxime Moniot
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anne-Laure Roux
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Raymond Poincaré Garches, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Céline Tournus
- Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Nicole Desbois-Nogard
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, La Martinique, France
| | | | - Olivier Moquet
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais, Beauvais, France
| | - Alexandre Alanio
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre national de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux De Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Françoise Dromer
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Centre national de Référence Mycoses Invasives et Antifongiques, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Ng BH, Ban AYL, Nik Abeed NN, Faisal M. Organising pneumonia manifesting as a late-phase complication of COVID-19. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e246119. [PMID: 34716149 PMCID: PMC8559103 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute COVID-19 usually lasts 4 weeks from the onset of symptoms. We report two cases of COVID-19-associated organising pneumonia (OP) occurring beyond 4 weeks from the acute onset of symptoms. Both tested positive for SARS reverse transcription-PCR 2 months before presentation with a resolution of respiratory symptoms. The first case presented with residual fatigue and worsening exertional dyspnoea. Chest CT revealed an OP pattern. The second case presented with worsening cough and new-onset pleuritic chest pain with persistent radiological consolidation. A transbronchial lung biopsy confirmed OP. Both patients responded well to 12 weeks of steroid therapy. This case illustrates the rare presentation of OP as a late sequela of COVID-19 and the good response to steroid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boon Hau Ng
- Respiratory Unit, Department of Medicine, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Andrea Yu-Lin Ban
- Respiratory Unit, Department of Medicine, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nik Nuratiqah Nik Abeed
- Respiratory Unit, Department of Medicine, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mohamed Faisal
- Respiratory Unit, Department of Medicine, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Khalid I, Imran M, Imran M, Khan S, Akhtar MA, Amanullah K, Khalid TJ. Telemedicine monitoring of high-risk coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients by family medicine service after discharge from the emergency department. J Family Community Med 2021; 28:210-216. [PMID: 34703382 PMCID: PMC8496702 DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_184_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Up to 25% of the total coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admissions comprise patients with comorbidities who present to the emergency department (ED) with only mild-to-moderate disease. It is unclear whether as an alternative to hospitalization, telemedicine can be used to monitor these “high-risk” comorbid patients. The aim of our study was to answer this question by comparing the outcome of such patients discharged under a family medicine service (FMS) telemonitoring program and those admitted to hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with three or more risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19 disease were designated as “high-risk” in our study. In the absence of acute indication for hospitalization, these high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate disease were discharged home under the supervision of FMS led telemonitoring between October 2020 and February 2021 and were labelled as “Telemedicine group.” They were compared to similar patients who were admitted to hospital between March-August 2020 before the implementation of telemedicine service (TMS) and were taken as “Control group.” Outcome measures included intubation, number of inpatient days, 28-day mortality and cost analysis for the two groups. RESULTS: Out of 572 COVID-19 patients who presented to the ED, 70 met the inclusion criteria for the “Telemedicine Group” and 35 were included in the “Control Group”. In the Telemedicine group, 21 (30.0%) patients were brought back to ED for re-evaluation and 16 (22.9%) were eventually admitted to the hospital. There was no difference in terms of oxygen requirements, intubation, and intensive care unit admission (P > 0.74) between the groups, and none of the study patients died. The Family Medicine-led TMS saved 77% inpatient admissions and on average 4.4 hospital days and $3400 per patient (P < . 0001). CONCLUSION: Family medicine-led telemonitoring of high-risk COVID-19 patients presenting to the ED with mild-to-moderate disease is a feasible and cost-effective alternative to hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Khalid
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.,John D Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Saifullah Khan
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad A Akhtar
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khadijah Amanullah
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tabindeh J Khalid
- Department of Family Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Loinaz-Segurola C, Marcacuzco-Quinto A, Fernández-Ruiz M. Coronavirus disease 2019 in liver transplant patients: Clinical and therapeutic aspects. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1299-1315. [PMID: 34786167 PMCID: PMC8568575 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly impacted liver transplant (LT) activity across the world, with notable decreases in the number of donations and procedures in most Western countries, in particular throughout the first wave. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in LT recipients (with estimates ranging from 0.34% to 1.56%) appears to be at least comparable to that observed for the general population. Clinical and radiological features at presentation are also similar to non-transplant patients. The risk of death among LT recipients requiring hospital admission is high (from 12% to 19%), although some authors have suggested that overall mortality may be actually lower compared to the general non-transplant population. It is likely that these poor outcomes may be mainly influenced by the older age and higher comorbidity burden of LT recipients, rather than by the transplant status itself. In fact, it has been hypothesized that post-transplant immunosuppression would exert a protective role, with special focus on tacrolimus-containing regimens. There is scarce evidence to guide the optimal management of post-transplant COVID-19 and the use of antiviral or immunomodulatory therapies, although both clinical practice and guidelines support the dose reduction or withdrawal of anti-proliferative agents such as mofetil mycophenolate. Preliminary reports suggest that the antibody response to messenger RNA vaccines is significantly impaired as compared to non-immunocompromised individuals, in line with other transplant populations. Finally, it is foreseeable that the future will be conditioned by the emerging variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with increased transmissibility among LT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Loinaz-Segurola
- HBP and Transplant Surgery Unit. Department of General Surgery, Digestive Tract and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28041, Spain.
| | - Alberto Marcacuzco-Quinto
- HBP and Transplant Surgery Unit. Department of General Surgery, Digestive Tract and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28041, Spain
| | - Mario Fernández-Ruiz
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28041, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Rutter M, Lanyon PC, Grainge MJ, Hubbard R, Peach E, Bythell M, Stilwell P, Aston J, Stevens S, Pearce FA. COVID-19 Infection, Admission and Death Amongst People with Rare Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease in England. Results from the RECORDER Project. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3161-3171. [PMID: 34698821 PMCID: PMC8586729 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To calculate the rates of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19-related death among people with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RAIRD) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in England compared with the general population. Methods We used Hospital Episode Statistics to identify all people alive 01 March 2020 with ICD-10 codes for RAIRD from the whole population of England. We used linked national health records (demographic, death certificate, admissions and PCR testing data) to calculate rates of COVID-19 infection and death up to 31 July 2020. Our primary definition of COVID-19-related death was mention of COVID-19 on the death certificate. General population data from Public Health England and the Office for National Statistics were used for comparison. We also describe COVID-19-related hospital admissions and all-cause deaths. Results We identified a cohort of 168 680 people with RAIRD, of whom 1874 (1.11%) had a positive COVID-19 PCR test. The age-standardised infection rate was 1.54 (95% CI 1.50–1.59) times higher than in the general population. 713 (0.42%) people with RAIRD died with COVID-19 on their death certificate and the age-sex-standardised mortality rate for COVID-19-related death was 2.41 (2.30–2.53) times higher than in the general population. There was no evidence of an increase in deaths from other causes in the RAIRD population. Conclusions During the first wave of COVID-19 in England, people with RAIRD had a 54% increased risk of COVID-19 infection and more than twice the risk of COVID-19-related death compared with the general population. These increases were seen despite shielding policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Rutter
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter C Lanyon
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.,National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Grainge
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Richard Hubbard
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emily Peach
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mary Bythell
- National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK
| | - Peter Stilwell
- National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK
| | - Jeanette Aston
- National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK
| | - Sarah Stevens
- National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK
| | - Fiona A Pearce
- Department of Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.,National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service, National Disease Registration Service, Public Health England, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
George LJ, Philip AM, John KJ, George AA, Nayar J, Mishra AK, Lal A. A review of the presentation and outcome of sarcoidosis in coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Transl Res 2021; 7:657-665. [PMID: 34778596 PMCID: PMC8580525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the setting of the current pandemic, concerns have arisen regarding the multisystemic involvement of sarcoidosis and the possible exacerbations in response to the exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. AIM This study aims to compare the differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between patients with sarcoidosis and those in the general population. METHODS A literature search was conducted by reviewing original research articles such as case reports, case series, observational studies, and questionnaire-based surveys published in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Google scholar. Data from individual patients in case series and case reports have been pooled to create a data set that was compared with larger such cohorts obtained from several other observational studies. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were identified from 14 original articles. No significant differences were found in the clinical manifestations of patients with sarcoidosis presenting with COVID-19 as compared to the general population. The rate of hospitalization in our study was found to be 48.1%. The overall mortality in our study was 7.4%, which is higher than the global average of 2.1%. CONCLUSION Our observations have reinforced the hypothesis that the presence of additional medical comorbidities is associated with a higher risk of intensive care unit admission. Furthermore, the presence of moderate to a severe limitation in pulmonary functions is an additional risk factor associated with increased hospital admissions and mortality in sarcoidosis. However, neither the diagnosis of sarcoidosis nor ongoing treatment with steroids, methotrexate, or other immunosuppressants was associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with sarcoidosis. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS Patients with sarcoidosis must take added precautions to mitigate the risk of acquiring COVID-19 infection in view of the COVID-19-related mortality rate in this group of patients. Specifically, immunocompromised patients (on immunomodulator drugs and high dose steroids) have been found to have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. Overall impact on prognostication and outcome in cases requiring hospitalization remains yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina James George
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, DR KM Cherian Institute of Medical Sciences, Kallissery, Kerala, India
| | - Anil Mathew Philip
- Department of Medicine, St. Thomas Mission Hospital, Kattanam, Kerala, India
| | - Kevin John John
- Department of Critical Care, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
| | - Anu Anna George
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jemimah Nayar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ajay Kumar Mishra
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Amos Lal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Pérez de Llano LA, Golpe R, Pérez-Ortiz D, Menéndez R, España Yandiola PP, Artaraz A, Zalacain R, Cilloniz C, Torres A. [Early initiation of corticosteroids might be harmful in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia: A multicenter propensity score analysis.]. Arch Bronconeumol 2021; 58:281-283. [PMID: 34720332 PMCID: PMC8541830 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luis A Pérez de Llano
- Pneumology Service, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo. C039 Biodiscovery Research Group HULA-USC, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Spain
| | - Rafael Golpe
- Pneumology Service, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo. C039 Biodiscovery Research Group HULA-USC, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Spain.
| | - Diego Pérez-Ortiz
- Pneumology Service, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo. C039 Biodiscovery Research Group HULA-USC, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Spain
| | - Rosario Menéndez
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Research Center Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Amaia Artaraz
- Pneumology Service, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Rafael Zalacain
- Pneumology Service, Cruces University Hospital, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Catia Cilloniz
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Center Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Antoni Torres
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Biomedical Research Center Network for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
YAKAR MN, ERGAN B, ERGÜN B, KÜÇÜK M, CANTÜRK A, ERGON MC, GEZER NS, YAKA E, CÖMERT B, GÖKMEN AN. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51:2285-2295. [PMID: 34461684 PMCID: PMC8742492 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2104-356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused more than 2.6 million deaths all around the world. Risk factors for mortality remain unclear. The primary aim was to determine the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. Materials and methods In this retrospective cohort study, critically ill patients (≥ 18 years) who were admitted to the intensive care unit due to COVID-19 were included. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, radiologic findings, treatments, and complications were analyzed in the study. Results A total of 249 patients (median age 71, 69.1% male) were included in the study. 28-day mortality was 67.9% (n = 169). The median age of deceased patients was 75 (66–81). Of them, 68.6% were male. Cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were significantly higher in the deceased group. In the multivariate analysis, sepsis/septic shock (OR, 15.16, 95% CI, 3.96–58.11, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 4.73, 95% CI, 1.55–14.46, p = 0.006), acute cardiac injury (OR, 9.76, 95% CI, 1.84–51.83, p = 0.007), and chest CT score higher than 15 (OR, 4.49, 95% CI, 1.51-13.38, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. Conclusion Early detection of the risk factors and the use of chest CT score might improve the outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Nuri YAKAR
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Begüm ERGAN
- Department of Chest Diseases, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Bişar ERGÜN
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Murat KÜÇÜK
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Ali CANTÜRK
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Mahmut Cem ERGON
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Naciye Sinem GEZER
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Erdem YAKA
- Department of Neurology, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Bilgin CÖMERT
- Department of Internal Medicine and Critical Care, Medicana International Hospital, İzmirTurkey
| | - Ali Necati GÖKMEN
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Hanna G, Bankler S, Schandl A, Roël M, Hedman A, Andersson Franko M, Lyngå P, Geborek A, Joelsson-Alm E, Söderberg M, Darlington P. The role of ventilatory support for long-term outcomes after critical infection with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study. CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL 2021; 16:63-71. [PMID: 34665518 PMCID: PMC8652938 DOI: 10.1111/crj.13453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The full range of long‐term health consequences in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors with COVID‐19 is unclear. This study aims to investigate the role of ventilatory support for long‐term pulmonary impairment in critically ill patients and further to identify risk factors for prolonged radiological recovery. Methods A prospective observational study from a single general hospital, including all with COVID‐19 admitted to ICU between March and August 2020, investigating the association between ventilatory support and the extent of residual parenchymal changes on chest computed tomography (CT) scan and measurement of lung volumes at follow‐up comparing high‐flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non‐invasive ventilation (NIV) with invasive ventilation. A semi‐quantitative score (CT involvement score) based on lobar involvement and a total score for all five lobes was used to estimate residual parenchymal changes. The association was calculated with logistic regression and adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and severity of illness. Results Among the 187 eligible, 86 had a chest CT scan and 76 a pulmonary function test at the follow‐up with a median time of 6 months after ICU discharge. Residual lung changes were seen in 74%. The extent of pulmonary changes was similar regardless of ventilatory support, but patients with invasive ventilation had a lower total lung capacity 84% versus 92% of predicted (p < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of ICU‐treated patients with COVID‐19 had residual lung changes at 6 months of follow‐up regardless of ventilator support or not, but the total lung capacity was lower in those treated with invasive ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Hanna
- Department of Radiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Bankler
- Department of Radiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Schandl
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mari Roël
- Department of Internal Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Hedman
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Andersson Franko
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrik Lyngå
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Geborek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Joelsson-Alm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mårten Söderberg
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Darlington
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Thakur M, Datusalia AK, Kumar A. Use of steroids in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 2021; 914:174579. [PMID: 34678244 PMCID: PMC8525014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Emerging reports have shown the benefits of steroids in hospitalized COVID-19 patients as life-saving drugs. However, the use of steroids in COVID-19 patients is confusing among many physicians. Aim The aim of the current study was to find out the exact association of steroids in the deaths of COVID-19 patients. Methods The relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Google scholar, and Clinical trials registries till May 25, 2021 and sorted out based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of studies was assessed using a standard scale. The pooled odds ratio was calculated with a 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity and sub-group analyses were also done. The publication bias was assessed qualitatively. The Rev Man 5 was used for all analyses with a random-effect model. Results The quantitative analysis was done with 9922 patients (6265-male and 3657-females) from 21 relevant studies. The pooled estimate results i.e. 0.52 [0.34, 0.80] have shown a significant reduction in deaths of COVID-19 patients in the steroidal group as compared to the non-steroidal group. The sensitivity analyses did not alter our conclusions. In subgroup analysis, methylprednisolone has shown a significant reduction in deaths of COVID-19 patients as compared to the non-steroidal group, however, more clinical evidence is required for dexamethasone and hydrocortisone. Conclusion The use of steroids in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is useful to reduce deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Thakur
- Department of Regulatory Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Raebareli, 226002, India
| | - Ashok Kumar Datusalia
- Department of Regulatory Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Raebareli, 226002, India; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Raebareli, 226002, India
| | - Anoop Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), New Delhi, 110017, India.
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Abstract
Pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induced COVID-19 implied the presence of excessive proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in patients causing significant morbidity and mortality. To diminish systemic hyper inflammation, a few physicians and researchers have utilized corticosteroids. Corticosteroid implementation has increased after the publication of interim guidelines regarding corticosteroid use in COVID-19 patients by WHO, despite the remaining controversies regarding long-term side effects and disease progression capability of corticosteroids. In different studies, the implementation of corticosteroids on COVID-19 patients revealed controversial results, which require further intensive research. This review will present the current outcomes and possibilities of using corticosteroids to treat COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
|
179
|
Zolnikova OY, Maslennikov RV, Ivashkin VT, Dzhakhaya NL, Kiseleva OY, Potskhverashvili ND, Shorokhova SA. Dexamethasone in Treatment of Comorbid SARS-CoV-2 Patients Aged over 50 Years with Lung Injury over 50 %. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, HEPATOLOGY, COLOPROCTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-3-43-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Aim. An efficacy assessment of steroid therapy in SARS-CoV-2 patients aged over 50 years with lung damage over 50 % (grade 3–4).Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 158 SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalised in April—June 2020 was conducted under the inclusion criteria: age over 50 years, chest computed tomography (CT) for COVID-19-asso-ciated pneumonia, C-reactive protein (CRP) >50 mg/L, anticoagulant therapy, no contraindications to steroids, no biologic therapy. Cohort 1 patients (n = 96) received dexamethasone 4–12 mg/day, cohort 2 (n = 62) — a standard non-dexamethasone therapy.Results. Dexamethasone treatment associated with a significant alleviation of COVID-19-associated pneumonia in CT score (p = 0.001), reduced fibrinogen (p = 0.001), a trend to CRP reduction by day 8–10 and lower demand for oxygen therapy, including ventilatory support (p = 0.001). Mortality rate was 19.8 and 75.8 % in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.001).Conclusion. Dexamethasone therapy 4–12 mg/day in SARS-CoV-2 patients aged 50+ years with grade 3–4 CT changes receiving LMWH from start of hospitalisation significantly improved CT scores and reduced mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Yu. Zolnikova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - R. V. Maslennikov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - V. T. Ivashkin
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - N. L. Dzhakhaya
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - O. Yu. Kiseleva
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - S. A. Shorokhova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Yu GQ, Jiang ZH, Yang ZB, Jiang SQ, Quan XQ. The effect of glucocorticoids on mortality in severe COVID-19 patients: Evidence from 13 studies involving 6612 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27373. [PMID: 34622840 PMCID: PMC8500595 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an urgent need for effective therapies for patients with COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of glucocorticoids in severe COVID-19. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to June 26, 2021). The literature investigated the outcomes of interest were mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation. RESULTS The search identified 13 studies with 6612 confirmed severe COVID-19 patients. Our meta-analysis found that using glucocorticoids could significantly decrease COVID-19 mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.79, P < .001), relative to non-use of glucocorticoids. Meanwhile, using glucocorticoids also could significantly decrease the risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19 patients (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, P < .001). Compared with using dexamethasone (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92, P = .012), methylprednisolone use had a better therapeutic effect for reducing the mortality of patients (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.64, P = .001). CONCLUSION The result of this meta-analysis showed that using glucocorticoids could reduce mortality and risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang-Qing Yu
- Department of Microbiological Laboratory, Bao’an District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhong-Hui Jiang
- Department of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Zhong-Bin Yang
- Department of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Shi-Qin Jiang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiao-Qing Quan
- Department of General Pratice, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, The Affiliated Central Hospital of Shenzhen Longhua District, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Hasan LK, Deadwiler B, Haratian A, Bolia IK, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA. Effects of COVID-19 on the Musculoskeletal System: Clinician's Guide. Orthop Res Rev 2021; 13:141-150. [PMID: 34584465 PMCID: PMC8464590 DOI: 10.2147/orr.s321884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, continues to impact all facets of daily life. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 commonly include musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgias, arthralgias, and neuropathies/myopathies. The inflammatory response and its impact on the respiratory system have been the focus of most studies. However, the literature is more limited regarding the inflammatory response and its implications for other organ systems, specifically the musculoskeletal system. Previous studies have described how systemic inflammation may play a role in bone and joint pathology. Furthermore, it is important to understand the effects current therapeutics used in the treatment of COVID-19 may have on the musculoskeletal system. In this study, we will review the current understanding of the effect COVID-19 has on the musculoskeletal system, provide an overview of musculoskeletal symptoms of patients infected with the virus, and address key issues for clinicians to address during the care of COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laith K Hasan
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brittney Deadwiler
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aryan Haratian
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ioanna K Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander E Weber
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frank A Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Callejas Rubio JL, Aomar Millan I, Moreno-Higueras M, Martín Ripoll L, Yuste Osorio E, Ríos-Fernández R. Caution with the use of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 in its initial phases. Rev Clin Esp 2021; 221:592-595. [PMID: 34563488 PMCID: PMC8445806 DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The effect of dexamethasone in the initial phase of infection by SARS-CoV-2 and its influence on COVID-19 is not well defined. We describe clinical-radiological characteristics, the cytokine storm parameters, and the clinical evolution of a series of patients treated with dexamethasone in the disease's initial phase. Method A study of 8 patients who received dexamethasone before the development of COVID-19. We evaluate clinical variables, imaging tests, cytokine release parameters, treatment used and patient evolution. Results All patients received a 6 mg/day dose with a mean duration of 4.5 days before admission. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) revealed that most of them presented a severe extension; most patients had a slightly elevated level of cytokine release parameters. Three patients required high-flow oxygen therapy due to respiratory failure; none required orotracheal intubation or died. Conclusion Dexamethasone in the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to be associated with severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Callejas Rubio
- Unidad de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
| | - I Aomar Millan
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - M Moreno-Higueras
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - L Martín Ripoll
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - E Yuste Osorio
- Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| | - R Ríos-Fernández
- Unidad de Enfermedades Autoinmunes Sistémicas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Farmani AR, Mahdavinezhad F, Scagnolari C, Kouhestani M, Mohammadi S, Ai J, Shoormeij MH, Rezaei N. An overview on tumor treating fields (TTFields) technology as a new potential subsidiary biophysical treatment for COVID-19. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2021; 12:1605-1615. [PMID: 34542840 PMCID: PMC8451390 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-021-01067-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic situation has affected millions of people with tens of thousands of deaths worldwide. Despite all efforts for finding drugs or vaccines, the key role for the survival of patients is still related to the immune system. Therefore, improving the efficacy and the functionality of the immune system of COVID-19 patients is very crucial. The potential new, non-invasive, FDA-approved biophysical technology that could be considered in this regard is tumor treating fields (TTFields) based on an alternating electric field has great biological effects. TTFields have significant effects in improving the functionality of dendritic cell, and cytotoxic T-cells, and these cells have a major role in defense against viral infection. Hence, applying TTFields could help COVID-19 patients against infection. Additionally, TTFields can reduce viral genomic replication, by reducing the expressions of some of the vital members of DNA replication complex genes from the minichromosome maintenance family (MCMs). These genes not only are involved in DNA replication but it has also been proven that they have a crucial role in viral replication. Also, TTFields suppress the formation of the network of tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) which is knows as filamentous (F)-actin-rich tubular structures. TNTs have a critical role in promoting the spread of viruses through improving viral entry and acting as a protective agent for viral components from immune cells and even pharmaceuticals. Moreover, TTFields enhance autophagy which leads to apoptosis of virally infected cells. Thus, it can be speculated that using TTFields may prove to be a promising approach as a subsidiary treatment of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Reza Farmani
- Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Tissue Engineering Department-School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
- Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Forough Mahdavinezhad
- Anatomy Department-School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Carolina Scagnolari
- Laboratory of Virology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia, Viale Di Porta Tiburtina, 28, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Mahsa Kouhestani
- Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sadegh Mohammadi
- Department of Plastic Engineering, Faculty of Polymer Processing, Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jafar Ai
- Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hasan Shoormeij
- Emergency Medicine Department, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children’s Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Primorac D, Čemerin M, Matišić V, Molnar V, Strbad M, Girandon L, Zenić L, Knežević M, Minger S, Polančec D. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Potential Option for COVID-19 Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13091481. [PMID: 34575557 PMCID: PMC8469913 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the way of life worldwide and continues to bring high mortality rates to at-risk groups. Patients who develop severe COVID-19 pneumonia, often complicated with ARDS, are left with limited treatment options with no targeted therapy currently available. One of the features of COVID-19 is an overaggressive immune reaction that leads to multiorgan failure. Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) treatment has been in development for various clinical indications for over a decade, with a safe side effect profile and promising results in preclinical and clinical trials. Therefore, the use of MSCs in COVID-19-induced respiratory failure and ARDS was a logical step in order to find a potential treatment option for the most severe patients. In this review, the main characteristics of MSCs, their proposed mechanism of action in COVID-19 treatment and the effect of this therapy in published case reports and clinical trials are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragan Primorac
- St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.M.); (V.M.)
- Eberly College of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA 16802, USA
- The Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
- Medical School, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
- Medical School REGIOMED, 96450 Coburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin Čemerin
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Vid Matišić
- St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Vilim Molnar
- St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.M.); (V.M.)
| | - Marko Strbad
- Educell Ltd., 1236 Trzin, Slovenia; (M.S.); (L.G.); (M.K.)
- Biobanka Ltd., 1236 Trzin, Slovenia
| | | | - Lucija Zenić
- Srebrnjak Children’s Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (L.Z.); (D.P.)
| | | | - Stephen Minger
- National Institute of Biology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Denis Polančec
- Srebrnjak Children’s Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (L.Z.); (D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Kinetics of Nucleocapsid, Spike and Neutralizing Antibodies, and Viral Load in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Treated with Convalescent Plasma. Viruses 2021; 13:v13091844. [PMID: 34578426 PMCID: PMC8473255 DOI: 10.3390/v13091844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic with high morbidity and mortality. Despite meticulous research, only dexamethasone has shown consistent mortality reduction. Convalescent plasma (CP) infusion might also develop into a safe and effective treatment modality on the basis of recent studies and meta-analyses; however, little is known regarding the kinetics of antibodies in CP recipients. To evaluate the kinetics, we followed 31 CP recipients longitudinally enrolled at a median of 3 days post symptom onset for changes in binding and neutralizing antibody titers and viral loads. Antibodies against the complete trimeric Spike protein and the receptor-binding domain (Spike-RBD), as well as against the complete Nucleocapsid protein and the RNA binding domain (N-RBD) were determined at baseline and weekly following CP infusion. Neutralizing antibody (pseudotype NAb) titers were determined at the same time points. Viral loads were determined semi-quantitatively by SARS-CoV-2 PCR. Patients with low humoral responses at entry showed a robust increase of antibodies to all SARS-CoV-2 proteins and Nab, reaching peak levels within 2 weeks. The rapid increase in binding and neutralizing antibodies was paralleled by a concomitant clearance of the virus within the same timeframe. Patients with high humoral responses at entry demonstrated low or no further increases; however, virus clearance followed the same trajectory as in patients with low antibody response at baseline. Together, the sequential immunological and virological analysis of this well-defined cohort of patients early in infection shows the presence of high levels of binding and neutralizing antibodies and potent clearance of the virus.
Collapse
|
186
|
Rana R, Tripathi A, Kumar N, Ganguly NK. A Comprehensive Overview on COVID-19: Future Perspectives. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:744903. [PMID: 34595136 PMCID: PMC8476999 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.744903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of COVID-19 has proven to be an unprecedented disaster for the whole world. The virus has inflicted billion of lives across the globe in all aspects-physically, psychologically, as well as socially. Compared to the previous strains of β-CoV genera- MERS and SARS, SARS-CoV-2 has significantly higher transmissibility and worst post-recovery implications. A frequent mutation in the initial SARS-CoV-2 strain has been a major cause of mortalities (approx. 3 million deaths) and uncontrolled virulence (approx. 1 billion positive cases). As far as clinical manifestations are concerned, this particular virus has exhibited deleterious impacts on systems other than the respiratory system (primary target organ), such as the brain, hematological system, liver, kidneys, endocrine system, etc. with no promising curatives to date. Lack of emergency treatments and shortage of life-saving drugs has promoted the repurposing of existing therapeutics along with the emergence of vaccines with the combined efforts of scientists and industrial experts in this short span. This review summarizes every detail on COVID-19 and emphasizes undermining the future approaches to minimize its prevalence to the remaining lives.
Collapse
|
187
|
Song WM, Zhao JY, Zhang QY, Liu SQ, Zhu XH, An QQ, Xu TT, Li SJ, Liu JY, Tao NN, Liu Y, Li YF, Li HC. COVID-19 and Tuberculosis Coinfection: An Overview of Case Reports/Case Series and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:657006. [PMID: 34504847 PMCID: PMC8421570 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.657006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and tuberculosis (TB) are two major infectious diseases posing significant public health threats, and their coinfection (aptly abbreviated COVID-TB) makes the situation worse. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of COVID-TB cases. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies published through December 18, 2020. An overview of COVID-TB case reports/case series was prepared that described their clinical characteristics and differences between survivors and deceased patients. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death or severe COVID-19 were calculated. The quality of outcomes was assessed using GRADEpro. Results: Thirty-six studies were included. Of 89 COVID-TB patients, 19 (23.46%) died, and 72 (80.90%) were male. The median age of non-survivors (53.95 ± 19.78 years) was greater than that of survivors (37.76 ± 15.54 years) (p < 0.001). Non-survivors were more likely to have hypertension (47.06 vs. 17.95%) or symptoms of dyspnea (72.73% vs. 30%) or bilateral lesions (73.68 vs. 47.14%), infiltrates (57.89 vs. 24.29%), tree in bud (10.53% vs. 0%), or a higher leucocyte count (12.9 [10.5–16.73] vs. 8.015 [4.8–8.97] × 109/L) than survivors (p < 0.05). In terms of treatment, 88.52% received anti-TB therapy, 50.82% received antibiotics, 22.95% received antiviral therapy, 26.23% received hydroxychloroquine, and 11.48% received corticosteroids. The pooled ORs of death or severe disease in the COVID-TB group and the non-TB group were 2.21 (95% CI: 1.80, 2.70) and 2.77 (95% CI: 1.33, 5.74) (P < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion: In summary, there appear to be some predictors of worse prognosis among COVID-TB cases. A moderate level of evidence suggests that COVID-TB patients are more likely to suffer severe disease or death than COVID-19 patients. Finally, routine screening for TB may be recommended among suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 in countries with high TB burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Mei Song
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jing-Yu Zhao
- Department of Geriatrics, People Hospital of Dongying District, Dongying, China
| | - Qian-Yun Zhang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Si-Qi Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xue-Han Zhu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Qi-Qi An
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ting-Ting Xu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Shi-Jin Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jin-Yue Liu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Ning-Ning Tao
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yao Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Geriatrics, People Hospital of Dongying District, Dongying, China
| | - Yi-Fan Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Huai-Chen Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.,First College of Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Effectiveness of corticosteroids to treat severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Immunopharmacol 2021; 100:108121. [PMID: 34492533 PMCID: PMC8413363 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the effects of corticosteroid therapy for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We comprehensively searched articles published in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases from January 1, 2019, to March 20, 2021. Results A total of 6771 patients from eight prospective studies were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that corticosteroid therapy was associated with lower mortality in severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.54–0.92, P = 0.009; I2 = 54.5%). Since the proportion of the RECOVERY (Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) trial included in the meta-analysis was as high as 71.88%, we removed it and recalculated the pooled OR. The results of the remaining seven studies still suggested such a survival benefit (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.44–0.96, P = 0.030; I2 = 59.8%). Furthermore, subgroup analysis suggested that the pooled OR of three studies using corticosteroids in the early stages of treatment was much lower (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.25–0.57, P < 0.001; I2 = 47.8%). However, after excluding the RECOVERY trial, the pooled OR of the remaining four studies with unspecific administration timing of corticosteroid therapy no longer supported this result (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.69–1.17, P = 0.415; I2 = 0.0%). Conclusions In this meta-analysis, evidence based on seven randomized controlled trials and one prospective cohort study indicates that corticosteroid therapy was associated with a reduction in the mortality of severe COVID-19, especially when administered at an earlier time.
Collapse
|
189
|
Fiorino S, Tateo F, Biase DD, Gallo CG, Orlandi PE, Corazza I, Budriesi R, Micucci M, Visani M, Loggi E, Hong W, Pica R, Lari F, Zippi M. SARS-CoV-2: lessons from both the history of medicine and from the biological behavior of other well-known viruses. Future Microbiol 2021; 16:1105-1133. [PMID: 34468163 PMCID: PMC8412036 DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2021-0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of the current pandemic worldwide and its associated disease COVID-19. In this review, we have analyzed SARS-CoV-2 characteristics and those ones of other well-known RNA viruses viz. HIV, HCV and Influenza viruses, collecting their historical data, clinical manifestations and pathogenetic mechanisms. The aim of the work is obtaining useful insights and lessons for a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2. These pathogens present a distinct mode of transmission, as SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza viruses are airborne, whereas HIV and HCV are bloodborne. However, these viruses exhibit some potential similar clinical manifestations and pathogenetic mechanisms and their understanding may contribute to establishing preventive measures and new therapies against SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirio Fiorino
- Internal Medicine Unit, Budrio Hospital, Budrio (Bologna), Azienda USL, Bologna, 40054, Italy
| | - Fabio Tateo
- Institute of Geosciences & Earth Resources, CNR, c/o Department of Geosciences, Padova University, 35127, Italy
| | - Dario De Biase
- Department of Pharmacy & Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Claudio G Gallo
- Fisiolaserterapico Emiliano, Castel San Pietro Terme, Bologna, 40024, Italy
| | | | - Ivan Corazza
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic & Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Roberta Budriesi
- Department of Pharmacy & Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Matteo Micucci
- Department of Pharmacy & Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Michela Visani
- Department of Pharmacy & Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Loggi
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
| | - Wandong Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang, 325035, PR China
| | - Roberta Pica
- Unit of Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, 00157, Italy
| | - Federico Lari
- Internal Medicine Unit, Budrio Hospital, Budrio (Bologna), Azienda USL, Bologna, 40054, Italy
| | - Maddalena Zippi
- Unit of Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, 00157, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Mehta Y, Dixit SB, Zirpe K, Sud R, Gopal PB, Koul PA, Mishra VK, Ansari AS, Chamle VS. Therapeutic Approaches in Modulating the Inflammatory and Immunological Response in Patients With Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Pancreatitis: An Expert Opinion Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e18393. [PMID: 34692364 PMCID: PMC8526068 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunomodulation has long been an adjunct approach in treating critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute pancreatitis (AP). Hyperactive immune response with immunopathogenesis leads to organ dysfunction and alters the clinical outcomes in critically ill. Though the immune response in the critically ill might have been overlooked, it has gathered greater attention during this novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Modulating hyperactive immune response, the cytokine storm, especially with steroids, has shown to improve the outcomes in COVID-19 patients. In this review, we find that immune response pathogenesis in critically ill patients with sepsis, ARDS, and AP is nearly similar. The use of immunomodulators such as steroids, broad-spectrum serine protease inhibitors such as ulinastatin, thymosin alpha, intravenous immunoglobulins, and therapies such as CytoSorb and therapeutic plasma exchange may help in improving the clinical outcomes in these conditions. As the experience of the majority of physicians in using such therapeutics may be limited, we provide our expert comments regarding immunomodulation to optimize outcomes in patients with sepsis/septic shock, ARDS, and AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yatin Mehta
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, IND
| | | | - Kapil Zirpe
- Neurocritical Care, Grant Medical Foundation, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, IND
| | - Randhir Sud
- Institute of Digestive & Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, IND
| | - Palepu B Gopal
- Department of Critical Care, Continental Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND
| | - Parvaiz A Koul
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, IND
| | - Vijay K Mishra
- Medica Institute of Critical Care, Bhagwan Mahavir Medica Superspecialty Hospital, Ranchi, IND
| | - Abdul S Ansari
- Department of Critical Care Services, Nanavati Super Specialty Hospital, Mumbai, IND
| | | |
Collapse
|
191
|
Madhu D, Sharma S, Agarwal A, Saraya A. Special Considerations in the Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis in COVID-19 Hotspots: A Review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2021; 9:568-575. [PMID: 34447687 PMCID: PMC8369025 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2021.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated special considerations in the management of diseases. The way presence of pre-existing diseases or treatment for it predisposes to, alters course of, and changes the management of COVID-19, is of relevance and is being extensively studied. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is unique in that it is an autoimmune disease mandating treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, as well as a liver disease with potential for varying degrees of underlying fibrosis. The use of immunosuppressive drugs could alter the risk of acquiring COVID-19, the clinical course and severity of COVID-19 and the degree of underlying liver fibrosis could alter the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. In this review, we try to summarize key areas relevant in understanding and improving the clinical care of patients with AIH in the current pandemic. Special considerations required in the management of patients with AIH in COVID-19 hotspots have been outlined based on the current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Madhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aster MIMS Calicut, Kerala, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, Kerala, India
| | - Sanchit Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Agarwal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Anoop Saraya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
- Correspondence to: Anoop Saraya, Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar; New Delhi 110029, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3921-6752. Tel: +91-9868397203, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Hanna J, Tipparaju P, Mulherkar T, Lin E, Mischley V, Kulkarni R, Bolton A, Byrareddy SN, Jain P. Risk Factors Associated with the Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 and Its Variants in the Context of Cytokine Storm and Therapeutics/Vaccine Development Challenges. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:938. [PMID: 34452063 PMCID: PMC8402745 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent appearance of SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and has brought to light the importance of understanding this highly pathogenic agent to prevent future pandemics. This virus is from the same single-stranded positive-sense RNA family, Coronaviridae, as two other epidemic-causing viruses, SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. During this pandemic, one crucial focus highlighted by WHO has been to understand the risk factors that may contribute to disease severity and predict COVID-19 outcomes. In doing so, it is imperative to understand the virology of SARS-CoV-2 and the immunological response eliciting the clinical manifestation and progression of COVID-19. In this review, we provide clinical data-based analyses of how multiple risk factors (such as sex, race, HLA genotypes, blood groups, vitamin D deficiency, obesity, smoking, and asthma) contribute to the inflammatory overactivation and cytokine storm (frequently seen in COVID-19 patients) with a focus on the IL-6 pathway. We also draw comparisons to the virulence and pathophysiology of SARS and MERS to establish parallels in immune response and discuss the potential for therapeutic approaches that may limit disease progression in patients with higher risk profiles than others. Moreover, we cover the latest information on approved or upcoming COVID-19 vaccines. This paper also provides perspective on emerging variants and associated opportunistic infections such as black molds and fungus that have added to mortality in some parts of the world, such as India. This compilation of existing COVID-19 studies and data will provide an excellent referencing tool for the research, clinical, and public health communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Hanna
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Padmavathi Tipparaju
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Tania Mulherkar
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Edward Lin
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Victoria Mischley
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Ratuja Kulkarni
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Aliyah Bolton
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| | - Siddappa N. Byrareddy
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Neuroscience, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA;
| | - Pooja Jain
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA; (J.H.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (E.L.); (V.M.); (R.K.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Mukherji R, Marshall JL. Lessons Learned in Managing Patients with Colorectal Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:93. [PMID: 34424418 PMCID: PMC8381863 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00888-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The COVID-19 pandemic forced us to rapidly and dramatically shift our medical priorities and decision making. With little literature or experience to rely on, the initial priority was to minimize patient exposure to the hospital and to others. It remains unclear whether cancer patients are at higher risk of infection or serious complications, or if it is our traditional therapies that place them to be at higher risk. By far, the greatest negative impact was on screening. Routine colonoscopies were considered elective, and as a result, delays in diagnosis will be felt for years to come. The most positive changes were the incorporation of tele-visits, increased use of oral therapies, alterations in treatment schedules of both chemotherapy and radiation, and an increased emphasis on neoadjuvant therapy. These too will be felt for years to come. The colorectal cancer medical community has responded collaboratively and effectively to maintain treatment and to optimize outcomes for our patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Mukherji
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
| | - John L Marshall
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Abu Baker A, Aljarrah Q, Eyadeh MA, Al-Muqbel K, Allouh MZ. A Periaortitis Patient Who Succumbed to COVID-19 While Undergoing Systemic Steroid Therapy: A Case Report and Literature Review. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2021; 22:e932733. [PMID: 34415896 PMCID: PMC8409459 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.932733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periaortitis is an inflammatory condition that typically involves the infrarenal portion of the abdominal aorta. It is a rare disease usually occurring in middle-aged men. Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The published literature on the management of steroid therapy in patients with periaortitis and infected with SARS-CoV-2 is lacking. The balance between the indispensable anti-inflammatory properties of steroids and their adverse immunosuppressive characteristics remains unclear in the current COVID-19 scenario, and most of the current practices in managing potentially autoimmune aortic conditions are extrapolated from patients with rheumatological disorders contracting COVID19 while undergoing maintenance steroid therapy. CASE REPORT This report describes the case of a 62-year-old man who presented with nonspecific lower abdominal pain, unremarkable clinical exam, significantly elevated CRP level, and positive antinuclear antibody test. A CT scan showed mild aortic aneurysmal dilatation with periaortic soft tissue thickening, and a PET scan confirmed the finding, showing active abdominal periaortitis. Accordingly, he was diagnosed with autoimmune periaortitis and was maintained on a high dose of systemic corticosteroids (35 mg prednisolone/d). Eight weeks later, he was readmitted to the intensive care unit with worsening respiratory symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR test, and unfortunately died 44 days later due to COVID-19-induced respiratory failure and sepsis. CONCLUSIONS The lack of an international consensus on the management of SARS-CoV-2-positive, steroid-dependent patients with serious inflammatory aortic conditions mandates further investigations and thoughtful review of the guidelines for the management of steroid-dependent patients contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis of the outcomes of these patients is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar Abu Baker
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Qusai Aljarrah
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mohammad Asim Eyadeh
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Kusai Al-Muqbel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Mohammed Z Allouh
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Wagner C, Griesel M, Mikolajewska A, Mueller A, Nothacker M, Kley K, Metzendorf MI, Fischer AL, Kopp M, Stegemann M, Skoetz N, Fichtner F. Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 8:CD014963. [PMID: 34396514 PMCID: PMC8406706 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic corticosteroids are used to treat people with COVID-19 because they counter hyper-inflammation. Existing evidence syntheses suggest a slight benefit on mortality. So far, systemic corticosteroids are one of the few treatment options for COVID-19. Nonetheless, size of effect, certainty of the evidence, optimal therapy regimen, and selection of patients who are likely to benefit most are factors that remain to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES To assess whether systemic corticosteroids are effective and safe in the treatment of people with COVID-19, and to keep up to date with the evolving evidence base using a living systematic review approach. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which includes PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and medRxiv), Web of Science (Science Citation Index, Emerging Citation Index), and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies to 16 April 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated systemic corticosteroids for people with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, participant age, gender or ethnicity. We included any type or dose of systemic corticosteroids. We included the following comparisons: systemic corticosteroids plus standard care versus standard care (plus/minus placebo), dose comparisons, timing comparisons (early versus late), different types of corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids versus other active substances. We excluded studies that included populations with other coronavirus diseases (severe acute respiratory syndrome or Middle East respiratory syndrome), corticosteroids in combination with other active substances versus standard care, topical or inhaled corticosteroids, and corticosteroids for long-COVID treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess the risk of bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' 2 tool for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, ventilator-free days, new need for invasive mechanical ventilation, quality of life, serious adverse events, adverse events, and hospital-acquired infections. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 RCTs in 8075 participants, of whom 7041 (87%) originated from high-income countries. A total of 3072 participants were randomised to corticosteroid arms and the majority received dexamethasone (n = 2322). We also identified 42 ongoing studies and 16 studies reported as being completed or terminated in a study registry, but without results yet. Hospitalised individuals with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 Systemic corticosteroids plus standard care versus standard care plus/minus placebo We included 10 RCTs (7989 participants), one of which did not report any of our pre-specified outcomes and thus our analysis included outcome data from nine studies. All-cause mortality (at longest follow-up available): systemic corticosteroids plus standard care probably reduce all-cause mortality slightly in people with COVID-19 compared to standard care alone (median 28 days: risk difference of 30 in 1000 participants fewer than the control group rate of 275 in 1000 participants; risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.00; 9 RCTs, 7930 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Ventilator-free days: corticosteroids may increase ventilator-free days (MD 2.6 days more than control group rate of 4 days, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.53; 1 RCT, 299 participants; low-certainty evidence). Ventilator-free days have inherent limitations as a composite endpoint and should be interpreted with caution. New need for invasive ventilation: the evidence is of very low certainty. Because of high risk of bias arising from deaths that occurred before ventilation we are uncertain about the size and direction of the effects. Consequently, we did not perform analysis beyond the presentation of descriptive statistics. Quality of life/neurological outcome: no data were available. Serious adverse events: we included data on two RCTs (678 participants) that evaluated systemic corticosteroids compared to standard care (plus/minus placebo); for adverse events and hospital-acquired infections, we included data on five RCTs (660 participants). Because of high risk of bias, heterogeneous definitions, and underreporting we are uncertain about the size and direction of the effects. Consequently, we did not perform analysis beyond the presentation of descriptive statistics (very low-certainty evidence). Different types, dosages or timing of systemic corticosteroids We identified one study that compared methylprednisolone with dexamethasone. The evidence for mortality and new need for invasive mechanical ventilation is very low certainty due to the small number of participants (n = 86). No data were available for the other outcomes. We did not identify comparisons of different dosages or timing. Outpatients with asymptomatic or mild disease Currently, there are no studies published in populations with asymptomatic infection or mild disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Moderate-certainty evidence shows that systemic corticosteroids probably slightly reduce all-cause mortality in people hospitalised because of symptomatic COVID-19. Low-certainty evidence suggests that there may also be a reduction in ventilator-free days. Since we are unable to adjust for the impact of early death on subsequent endpoints, the findings for ventilation outcomes and harms have limited applicability to inform treatment decisions. Currently, there is no evidence for asymptomatic or mild disease (non-hospitalised participants). There is an urgent need for good-quality evidence for specific subgroups of disease severity, for which we propose level of respiratory support at randomisation. This applies to the comparison or subgroups of different types and doses of corticosteroids, too. Outcomes apart from mortality should be measured and analysed appropriately taking into account confounding through death if applicable. We identified 42 ongoing and 16 completed but not published RCTs in trials registries suggesting possible changes of effect estimates and certainty of the evidence in the future. Most ongoing studies target people who need respiratory support at baseline. With the living approach of this review, we will continue to update our search and include eligible trials and published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Wagner
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mirko Griesel
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Agata Mikolajewska
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anika Mueller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karoline Kley
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maria-Inti Metzendorf
- Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marco Kopp
- Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Miriam Stegemann
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Cochrane Cancer, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Falk Fichtner
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Use in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10:2447-2463. [PMID: 34389970 PMCID: PMC8363240 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We conducted a comprehensive literature review to synthesize evidence for the relationship between corticosteroid use and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods The PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 13, 2021. We searched and analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) that examined corticosteroid use in patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) and serious adverse events. Results A total of 11 RCTs and 44 OSs involving 7893 and 41,164 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study. Corticosteroid use was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality in RCTs, but was not statistically significant (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77–1.07; I2 = 63.4%). The subgroup analysis of pulse dose corticosteroid showed survival benefit statistically (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15–0.56). Moreover, the corticosteroid use may reduce the need for MV (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51–0.90; I2 = 7.5%) with no significant increase in serious adverse reactions (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.30–2.37; I2 = 33.3%). In addition, the included OSs showed that the pulse dose (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.95; I2 = 30.8%) might lower the mortality in patients with COVID-19. The pulse dose of methylprednisolone (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.80; I2 = 0%) had a beneficial effect on survival. It was especially significant when the duration of pulse methylprednisolone use was less than 7 days (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.80; I2 = 0%). Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated that corticosteroid use might cause a slight reduction in COVID-19 mortality. However, it could significantly reduce the MV requirement in patients with COVID-19 and restrict serious adverse events. Additionally, the pulse dose of methylprednisolone for less than 7 days may be a good treatment choice for patients with COVID-19. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00518-3.
Collapse
|
197
|
Hassan AE. An observational cohort study to assess N-acetylglucosamine for COVID-19 treatment in the inpatient setting. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 68:102574. [PMID: 34306677 PMCID: PMC8282940 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected millions globally, with a continued need for effective treatments. N-acetylglucosamine has anti-inflammatory activities and modulates immune response. This study evaluated whether N-acetylglucosamine administered orally improves clinical outcomes for patients admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center, prospective, observational cohort study used a retrospective control group for comparison. Multivariate analyses evaluated whether N-acetylglucosamine was an independent predictor of primary outcomes (rate of intubation, hospital length-of-stay, and mortality) and select secondary outcomes (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ICU length-of-stay, supplemental oxygen use duration, hospice initiation, and poor clinical outcome [defined as combined hospice initiation/death]). RESULTS Of the 50 patients enrolled in the N-acetylglucosamine treatment group, 48 patients had follow-up data (50.0% [24/48] male; median age 63 years, range: 29-88). Multivariate analysis showed the treatment group had improved hospital length-of-stay (β: 4.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.67; -2.85], p < 0.001), ICU admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.32 [95% CI 0.10; 0.96], p = 0.049), and poor clinical outcome (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.09; 0.86], p = 0.034). Mortality was significantly lower for treatment versus control on univariate analysis (12.5% vs. 28.0%, respectively; p = 0.039) and approached significance on multivariate analysis (p = 0.081). CONCLUSIONS N-acetylglucosamine administration was associated with reduced hospital length-of-stay, ICU admission rates, and death/hospice rates in adults with COVID-19 compared to those who received standard care alone. An upcoming trial will further investigate N-acetylglucosamine's effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04706416.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameer E. Hassan
- Valley Baptist Medical Center, 2101 Pease St, Harlingen, TX, 78550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Županić S, Perić Šitum M, Majdak M, Karakaš M, Bašić S, Sporiš D. Case series of COVID-19 in patients with myasthenia gravis: a single institution experience. Acta Neurol Belg 2021; 121:1039-1044. [PMID: 33797054 PMCID: PMC8016150 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-021-01662-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the late 2019 outbreak of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), causes a respiratory disease which could put myasthenia gravis patients at a greater risk of developing severe disease course. This paper presents a single-institution case series of hospitalized myasthenia gravis patients with COVID 19. We identified eight patients previously diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, four of whom presented with clear signs of myasthenia gravis symptom worsening on admission. No form of respiratory support was needed during the complete duration of stay for three patients, oxygen therapy was administered to two patients, while the remaining three patients required mechanical ventilation. Treatment was successful for seven patients, six of whom were discharged without any myasthenia gravis symptoms. One patient died after eleven days of intensive care unit treatment. Although treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis and COVID-19 patients is challenging, case series of myasthenia gravis patients with COVID-19 treated in our institution demonstrates relatively favorable treatment outcome. Our data seem to support the notion that immunosuppressive medication does not seem to result in worse outcomes. Our data also support the notion that intravenous immunoglobulin treatment is safe and should be administered to patients with myasthenia gravis and COVID-19 in case of myasthenia gravis worsening since benefits seem to greatly outweigh the risks.
Collapse
|
199
|
Guo H, Zhou L, Ma Z, Tian Z, Zhou F. Promising Immunotherapies against COVID-19. ADVANCED THERAPEUTICS 2021; 4:2100044. [PMID: 34179345 PMCID: PMC8212093 DOI: 10.1002/adtp.202100044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a severe pandemic and deeply affected the livelihood of people worldwide. In response to the pandemic, researchers have been rapidly studying different aspects of COVID-19, such as virus detection, vaccinations, and epidemiological aspects of the disease. It has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 can induce uncontrolled inflammation and cause a lack of antiviral response, thereby aggravating the disease. Therefore, recovery of immune functions is key to COVID-19 treatment. Many clinical trials are exploring suitable therapies, and some progress has been made. Early administration of interferons may prevent COVID-19 exacerbation and/or promotes recovery from the diseases. Inhibitors of inflammation can prevent cytokine storms and multi-organ damage. Convalescent plasma containing neutralizing antibodies has played an important role in therapeutic options at the beginning of the pandemic owing to the lack of other effective methods. To aid the development of treatment options for COVID-19, this review focuses on immunotherapies, including treatment with interferons, inhibition of pro-inflammatory mechanisms, and the use of convalescent plasma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haodong Guo
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Infection and ImmunityInstitutes of Biology and Medical SciencesSoochow UniversitySuzhouJiangsu215123China
| | - Lili Zhou
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Infection and ImmunityInstitutes of Biology and Medical SciencesSoochow UniversitySuzhouJiangsu215123China
| | - Zhenyu Ma
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Infection and ImmunityInstitutes of Biology and Medical SciencesSoochow UniversitySuzhouJiangsu215123China
| | - Zhixin Tian
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Infection and ImmunityInstitutes of Biology and Medical SciencesSoochow UniversitySuzhouJiangsu215123China
| | - Fangfang Zhou
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Infection and ImmunityInstitutes of Biology and Medical SciencesSoochow UniversitySuzhouJiangsu215123China
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Piniella-Ruiz E, Bellver-Álvarez MT, Mestre-Gómez B, Escolano-Fernández B, Vinat-Prado S, Cabezas-Olea R, Acedo-Gutiérrez MS, Akasbi-Montalvo M, Ryan-Murua P, Bustamante-Fermosel A, Muñoz-Rivas N, Santamaría-García C, Pardo-Guimerá V, Ulla-Anés M, Franco-Moreno A, Torres-Macho J. Impact of Systemic Corticosteroids on Mortality in Older Adults With Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 76:e127-e132. [PMID: 33711156 PMCID: PMC7989632 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The most susceptible population group to critical and fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is older adults. In SARS-CoV-2 infection, the host immune response is thought to play a key role in the pathophysiological effects of lung damage. Therefore, corticosteroid therapy could modulate inflammation-mediated pulmonary injury and thereby reduce progression to severe respiratory failure and death. The aim of this study was to analyse the safety and clinical efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in older adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Method We reviewed the clinical records of confirmed COVID-19 patients aged 75 years or older admitted to our hospital over a three months period (March 1, to May 31, 2020). A total of 143 patients were included in the study cohort. From 2 April, 2020, in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance on COVID-19, our hospital protocol added corticosteroid for COVID-19 treatment. We compared in-hospital mortality among patients with critical COVID-19 who received corticosteroids therapy and those who did not. Results 88 patients (61.5%) were treated with corticosteroids, and 55 patients (38.4%) were not. Both groups were similar in baseline characteristics. The median age was 85 years (IQR, 82–89), and 61.5% (88/143) were male. In-hospital mortality was lower in the corticosteroid group (68.2%) compared with patients in the non-corticosteroid group (81.8%). Treatment with corticosteroids was an independent survival factor (HR=0.61; 95% CI, 0.41–0.93; P=0.006). Conclusions In critically ill older adults with COVID-19 pneumonia, the use of corticosteroid treatment resulted in lower mortality without severe adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Piniella-Ruiz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Beatriz Mestre-Gómez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Belén Escolano-Fernández
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Vinat-Prado
- Emergency Department, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rita Cabezas-Olea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mirian Akasbi-Montalvo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Ryan-Murua
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Bustamante-Fermosel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Muñoz-Rivas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Pardo-Guimerá
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariano Ulla-Anés
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anabel Franco-Moreno
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Torres-Macho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infanta Leonor-Virgen de la Torre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|