151
|
Blanchette V, Patry J, Brousseau-Foley M. Adequacy Between Canadian Clinical Guidelines and Recommendations Compared With International Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Can J Diabetes 2021; 45:761-767.e12. [PMID: 34052133 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although quality of care in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) has improved with the use of comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, disparities between national and international guidelines have been demonstrated in one study conducted in Western Pacific regions. Although there are challenges of systematic implementation of evidence-based care in some clinical settings, their applications have demonstrated positive outcomes on DFU-associated burdens in many countries. The aim of this study was to review and evaluate 3 Canadian clinical practice guidelines and recommendations (CPGRs) in comparison with the 2019 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines. METHODS Extraction of all 85 recommendations from the IWGDF guidelines was performed and 3 independent investigators used a rating recommendations adequacy method with descriptive statistics. The Appraisal of Guidelines REsearch & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used for quality appraisal and reliability scores were noted using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS The Wounds Canada CPGR had the higher adequacy with the IWGDF guidelines. However, its development method was poor to fair. The Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario CPGR was superior for its development and implementation strategies, but major gaps were found in all chapters. The Diabetes Canada CPGR obtained a good quality appraisal evaluation, but was not dedicated exclusively to DFU and some important recommendations were absent. Reliability scores of AGREE II were good between investigators (p<0.0001). Some disparities were noted between Canadian and international recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Some disparities were noted, future orientations for development should include various health-care professionals involved in the team approach, patient-oriented research, recommendations published along with their level of evidence and strength of recommendations (such as with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system) and implementation strategies to enhance evidence-based practice in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Blanchette
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada.
| | - Jérôme Patry
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine Department, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Magali Brousseau-Foley
- Department of Physical Activity Sciences and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec affiliated with Université de Montréal, Trois-Rivières Family Medicine University Clinic, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Bowser DM, Henry BF, McCollister KE. Cost analysis in implementation studies of evidence-based practices for mental health and substance use disorders: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2021; 16:26. [PMID: 33706780 PMCID: PMC7953634 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01094-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study is a systematic literature review of cost analyses conducted within implementation studies on behavioral health services. Cost analysis of implementing evidence-based practices (EBP) has become important within implementation science and is critical for bridging the research to practice gap to improve access to quality healthcare services. Costing studies in this area are rare but necessary since cost can be a barrier to implementation and sustainment of EBP. Methods We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and applied the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Key search terms included: (1) economics, (2) implementation, (3) EBP, and (4) behavioral health. Terms were searched within article title and abstracts in: EconLit, SocINDEX, Medline, and PsychINFO. A total of 464 abstracts were screened independently by two authors and reduced to 37 articles using inclusion and exclusion criteria. After a full-text review, 18 articles were included. Results Findings were used to classify costs into direct implementation, direct services, and indirect implementation. While all studies included phases of implementation as part of their design, only five studies examined resources across multiple phases of an implementation framework. Most studies reported direct service costs associated with adopting a new practice, usually summarized as total EBP cost, cost per client, cost per clinician, and/or cost per agency. For studies with detailed analysis, there were eleven direct cost categories represented. For five studies that reported costs per child served, direct implementation costs varied from $886 to $9470 per child, while indirect implementation costs ranged from $897 to $3805 per child. Conclusions This is the first systematic literature review to examine costs of implementing EBP in behavioral healthcare settings. Since 2000, 18 studies were identified that included a cost analysis. Given a wide variation in the study designs and economic methods, comparison across studies was challenging, which is a major limitation in the field, as it becomes difficult to replicate studies or to estimate future costs to inform policy decisions related to budgeting. We recommend future economic implementation studies to consider standard economic costing methods capturing costs across implementation framework phases to support comparisons and replicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Bowser
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South St, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Brandy F Henry
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South St, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. .,School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
| | - Kathryn E McCollister
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St., CRB 1019, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Madani Larijani M, Dumba C, Thiessen H, Palen A, Carr T, Vanstone JR, Fourney DR, Hartness C, Parker R, Groot G. Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations about Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18052786. [PMID: 33803431 PMCID: PMC7967489 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: despite the efforts of multiple stakeholders to promote appropriate care throughout the healthcare system, studies show that two out of three lower back pain (LBP) patients expect to receive imaging. We used the Choosing Wisely Canada patient-oriented framework, prioritizing patient engagement, to develop an intervention that addresses lower back pain imaging overuse. Methods: to develop this intervention, we collaborated with a multidisciplinary advisory team, including two patient partners with lower back pain, researchers, clinicians, healthcare administrators, and the Choosing Wisely Canada lead for Saskatchewan. For this qualitative study, data were collected through two advisory team meetings, two individual interviews with lower back pain patient partners, and three focus groups with lower back pain patient participants. A lower back pain prescription pad was developed as an outcome of these consultations. Results: participants reported a lack of interactive and informative communication was a significant barrier to receiving appropriate care. The most cited content information for inclusion in this intervention was treatments known to work, including physical activity, useful equipment, and reliable sources of educational material. Participants also suggested it was important that benefits and risks of imaging were explained on the pad. Three key themes derived from the data were also used to guide development of the intervention: (a) the role of imaging in LBP diagnosis; (b) the impact of the patient-physician relationship on LBP diagnosis and treatment; and (c) the lack of patient awareness of Choosing Wisely Canada and their recommendations. Conclusions: the lower back pain patient-developed prescription pad may help patients and clinicians engage in informed conversations and shared decision making that could support reduce unnecessary lower back pain imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Madani Larijani
- Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; (M.M.L.); (T.C.)
| | - Cindy Dumba
- Patient and Public Partner of Choosing Wisely Canada, Regina, SK S4S 4V4, Canada;
| | - Heather Thiessen
- Saskatchewan Patient & Family Leadership Council, Saskatoon, SK S7K 7P8, Canada;
| | - Angie Palen
- Choosing Wisely Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7K 1P3, Canada;
| | - Tracey Carr
- Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; (M.M.L.); (T.C.)
| | - Jason R. Vanstone
- Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada; (J.R.V.); (C.H.); (R.P.)
| | - Daryl R. Fourney
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada;
| | - Collin Hartness
- Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada; (J.R.V.); (C.H.); (R.P.)
| | - Robert Parker
- Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, SK S4P 0W5, Canada; (J.R.V.); (C.H.); (R.P.)
| | - Gary Groot
- Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; (M.M.L.); (T.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(306)-966-1670
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Mazanec MT, Lu E, Sajatovic M, Jobst BC. A systematic literature review of recommendations for referral to specialty care for patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 116:107748. [PMID: 33508748 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In epilepsy, patients who receive appropriate care receive treatment that differs substantially from those that do not. Given the need for a more detailed assessment of the role of specialty referral in the care of patients with epilepsy, this systematic literature review identified epilepsy care guidelines and recommendations that specifically address when and why people with epilepsy should be referred to specialty care. METHODS This study identified recent (in the last 10 years) publications that made best-practice recommendations for referring people with epilepsy to a neurologist or epileptologist. We searched six databases in December 2018: MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Web of Science, CINAHL (Ebsco), Scopus (Elsevier). Search terms included "Epilepsy" OR "Seizures," "Guideline" OR "Practice Parameter," and "Referral." RESULTS The 15 full-text articles identified included formal guidelines, summaries of these guidelines, or professional commentary that builds upon existing guidelines. Most of these publications came from the U.K and its National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Overall, the included recommendations for referral varied considerably both for new-onset and refractory epilepsy. Although these recommendations were not consistent, it is reasonable to refer patients following the failure of 2 anti-seizure medication (ASM) trials. SIGNIFICANCE Guidelines and informal recommendations are not consistent regarding best practices for specialty care referral for patients with epilepsy. These guidelines and recommendations should consider the context of care in real-world settings and suggest pragmatic approaches that optimize seizure control and functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan T Mazanec
- Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Elaine Lu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- Department of Psychiatry & of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Barbara C Jobst
- Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Silverberg ND, Otamendi T, Panenka WJ, Archambault P, Babul S, MacLellan A, Li LC. De-implementing Prolonged Rest Advice for Concussion in Primary Care Settings: A Pilot Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2021; 36:79-86. [PMID: 32898029 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a de-implementation intervention to support return-to-activity guideline use after concussion. SETTING Community. PARTICIPANTS Family physicians in community practice (n = 21 at 5 clinics). DESIGN Pilot stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with qualitative interviews. Training on new guidelines for return to activity after concussion was provided in education outreach visits. MAIN MEASURES The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, and postencounter form completion (physicians prospectively recorded what they did for each new patient with concussion). Efficacy indicators included a knowledge test and guideline compliance based on postencounter form data. Qualitative interviews covered Theoretical Domains Framework elements. RESULTS Recruitment, retention, and postencounter form completion rates all fell below feasibility benchmarks. Family physicians demonstrated increased knowledge about the return-to-activity guideline (M = 8.8 true-false items correct out of 10 after vs 6.3 before) and improved guideline adherence (86% after vs 25% before) after the training. Qualitative interviews revealed important barriers (eg, beliefs about contraindications) and facilitators (eg, patient handouts) to behavior change. CONCLUSIONS Education outreach visits might facilitate de-implementation of prolonged rest advice after concussion, but methodological changes will be necessary to improve the feasibility of a larger trial. The qualitative findings highlight opportunities for refining the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah D Silverberg
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (Dr Silverberg), Rehabilitation Sciences (Ms Otamendi), and Departments of Psychiatry (Dr Panenka), Pediatrics (Dr Babul), and Physical Therapy (Dr Li), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Silverberg and Ms MacLellan); BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Panenka); British Columbia Provincial Neuropsychiatry Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Panenka); Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada (Dr Archambault); Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Ste-Marie, Ontario, Canada (Dr Archambault); Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Lévis, Quebec, Canada (Dr Archambault); Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada (Dr Archambault); Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada (Dr Archambault); BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Babul); and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Li); on behalf of the Canadian TBI Research Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
156
|
Törmä J, Pingel R, Cederholm T, Saletti A, Winblad U. Is it possible to influence ability, willingness and understanding among nursing home care staff to implement nutritional guidelines? A comparison of a facilitated and an educational strategy. Int J Older People Nurs 2021; 16:e12367. [PMID: 33624452 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translating nutrition knowledge into care practice is challenging since multiple factors can affect the implementation process. This study examined the impact of two implementation strategies, that is external facilitation (EF) and educational outreach visits (EOVs), on the organisational context and individual factors when implementing nutritional guidelines in a nursing home (NH) setting. METHODS The EF strategy was a one-year, multifaceted (including support, guidance, a practice audit and feedback) intervention given to four NH units. The EOV strategy was a three-hour lecture about the nutritional guidelines given to four other NH units. Both strategies were directed at selected NH teams, consisting of a unit manager, a nurse and 5-10 care staff. A questionnaire was distributed, before and after the interventions, to evaluate the prerequisites for the staff to use the guidelines. Three conditions were used to examine the organisational context and the individual factors: the staff's ability and willingness to implement the nutritional guidelines and their understanding of them. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models were used for the data analysis. RESULTS The results indicated that on average, there was a significant increase in the staff's ability to implement the nutritional guidelines in the EF group. The staff exposed to the EF strategy experienced better resources to implement the guidelines in terms of time, tools and support from leadership and a clearer assignment of responsibility regarding nutrition procedures. There was no change in staff's willingness and understanding of the guidelines in the EF group. On average, no significant changes were observed for the staff's ability, willingness or understanding in the EOV group. CONCLUSIONS A long-term, active and flexible implementation strategy (i.e. EF) affected the care staff's ability to implement the nutritional guidelines in an NH setting. No such impact was observed for the more passive, educational approach (i.e. EOV).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Törmä
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ronnie Pingel
- Department of Statistics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tommy Cederholm
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anja Saletti
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Winblad
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Lightfoot CJ, Coole C, Sehat K, Brewin C, Drummond A. Clinicians' experiences of discontinuing routine hip precautions following total hip replacement surgery: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4227-4232. [PMID: 33587864 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1884759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hip precautions are routinely provided in the UK, despite evidence suggesting that they are no longer needed. A change in practice was introduced into an orthopaedic service whereby the provision of routine hip precautions was discontinued for selected individuals receiving a primary total hip replacement. The change involved implementing a new regime of "no precautions" which was facilitated using a number of key strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of clinicians associated with the change in practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians who had experience of delivering both hip precautions and no hip precaution regimes. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Ten orthopaedic staff (two senior occupational therapists, one occupational therapy support worker, three senior physiotherapists, two surgeons, and two senior nurses) were interviewed. Three main themes were identified: changes experienced, perceptions of the new regime, and challenges experienced. CONCLUSION Several barriers and facilitators to the successful changeover were identified. Successful strategies in changing practice included assigning "Hip Champions", staff education and targeted training. It is proposed that holding multidisciplinary education and training would be the ideal model.Implications for rehabilitationKey strategies for changing practice were educating staff and providing targeted training.Multidisciplinary training might prevent discrepancies in the advice given to patients.Appointing "Hip Champions" provided clear role models and enabled new clinical behaviours to be enforced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney J Lightfoot
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carol Coole
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kos Sehat
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine Brewin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Avril Drummond
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
Winchester DE, Merritt J, Waheed N, Norton H, Manja V, Shah NR, Helfrich CD. Implementation of appropriate use criteria for cardiology tests and procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2021; 7:34-41. [PMID: 32232436 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The American College of Cardiology appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide clinicians with evidence-informed recommendations for cardiac care. Adopting AUC into clinical workflows may present challenges, and there may be specific implementation strategies that are effective in promoting effective use of AUC. We sought to assess the effect of implementing AUC in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a meta-analysis of studies found through a systematic search of the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, or CINAHL databases. Peer-reviewed manuscripts published after 2005 that reported on the implementation of AUC for a cardiovascular test or procedure were included. The main outcome was to determine if AUC implementation was associated with a reduction in inappropriate/rarely appropriate care. Of the 18 included studies, the majority used pre/post-cohort designs; few (n = 3) were randomized trials. Most studies used multiple strategies (n = 12, 66.7%). Education was the most common individual intervention strategy (n = 13, 72.2%), followed by audit and feedback (n = 8, 44.4%) and computerized physician order entry (n = 6, 33.3%). No studies reported on formal use of stakeholder engagement or 'nudges'. In meta-analysis, AUC implementation was associated with a reduction in inappropriate/rarely appropriate care (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.78). Funnel plot suggests the possibility of publication bias. CONCLUSION We found most published efforts to implement AUC observed reductions in inappropriate/rarely appropriate care. Studies rarely explored how or why the implementation strategy was effective. Because interventions were infrequently tested in isolation, it is difficult to make observations about their effectiveness as stand-alone strategies. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018091602. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018091602.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Winchester
- Cardiology Section, Malcom Randall VAMC, 1601 SW Archer Rd 111-D, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Justin Merritt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Nida Waheed
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Hannah Norton
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Health Science Center Library, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Veena Manja
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.,VA Northern California Health Care System, 10535 Hospital Way, Mather, CA 95655, USA
| | - Nishant R Shah
- Department of Medicine, Providence VA Medical Center, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, 830 Chalkstone Ave, Providence, RI 02908, USA.,Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Christian D Helfrich
- Seattle-Denver Center for Innovation in Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, 1660 S. Columbian Way Mailstop S-152 Seattle, WA 98108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Kosiek K, Depta A, Staniec I, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, Kowalczyk A. The Perception of Patient Safety Strategies by Primary Health Professionals. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:1063. [PMID: 33504107 PMCID: PMC7908218 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Almost all European citizens rank patient safety as very or fairly important in their country. However, few patient safety initiatives have been undertaken or implemented in Poland. The aim was to identify patient safety strategies perceived as important in Poland and compare them with those identified in an earlier Dutch study. A web-based survey was conducted among primary healthcare providers in Poland. The findings were compared with those obtained from eight other countries. The strategies regarded as most important in Poland included the use of integrated medical records for communication with specialists and others, patient-held medical records, acceptable workload in general practice, and availability of information technology. However, despite being seen as important, these strategies have not been widely implemented in Poland. This is the first study to identify strategies considered by primary care physicians in Poland to be important for improving patient safety. These strategies differed significantly from those indicated in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Depta
- Department of Medical Insurance and Health Care Financing, Medical University of Lodz, Lindleya 6, 90-131 Lodz, Poland;
| | - Iwona Staniec
- Department of Management, Lodz University of Technology, Piotrkowska 266, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Maciej Godycki-Cwirko
- Centre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego 20, 90-153 Lodz, Poland; (M.G.-C.); (A.K.)
| | - Anna Kowalczyk
- Centre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego 20, 90-153 Lodz, Poland; (M.G.-C.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Tukacs M, Cato KD. Extubation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: An international qualitative study on experts' opinions. Heart Lung 2021; 50:299-306. [PMID: 33482432 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults (adult-ECMO), a modification of cardiopulmonary bypass is increasingly used. Liberation from mechanical ventilation, or extubation, during adult-ECMO remains a challenge. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to understand expert perceptions of the reasonableness of extubation during adult-ECMO and the usefulness of an extubation clinical practice guideline (ECPG). METHODS Homogeneous purposive sampling, focus groups, and interviews with a discussion guide, and direct content, thematic analysis were used. RESULTS Fourteen volunteers participated with different educational levels (79% Doctor of Medicine, 14% Registered Nurse, 7% Nurse Practitioner), from high-volume ECMO centers of various annual ECMO runs (50% 30-49 ECMO/year, 36% 50-99 ECMO/year, 14% >100 ECMO/year) worldwide (64% North America, 21% South America, 7% Europe, 7% Asia). Seven themes were identified: paucity of evidence, mindsets towards using an ECPG, barriers, criteria and benefits of extubation, culture towards extubation and vision of the future. Participants recommended aiming for extubation based on patient selection, and a standardized extubation approach with an ECPG or team decision-making. CONCLUSION Application of adult-ECMO is expanding, during which extubation remains difficult. Experts recommend two methods of a standardized extubation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Tukacs
- Department of Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Nursing, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| | - Kenrick D Cato
- Department of Nursing Administration, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032, United States; Faculty, Columbia University School of Nursing, 560W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Hassan S, Chan V, Stevens J, Stupans I. Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2021; 10:29. [PMID: 33453730 PMCID: PMC7811740 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01577-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the extensive research that has been conducted to date, practice often differs from established guidelines and will vary between individuals and organisations. It has been noted that the global uptake of local and international surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines is poor with limited research investigating factors that affect guideline adherence. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reported barriers and enablers to the adherence of SAP guidelines. METHODS A search of the literature was performed using four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS) for articles published in the English language from January 1998 to December 2018. Articles were included if they were solely related to SAP and discussed the barriers or enablers to SAP guideline adherence. Articles that assessed the adherence to a range of infection control measures or discussed adherence to antibiotic treatment guidelines rather than SAP guidelines were excluded from this review. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS A total of 1489 papers were originally retrieved, with 48 papers meeting the eligibility criteria. Barriers and enablers were mapped to 11 out of 14 TDF domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion and behavioural regulation. Barriers were further categorised into personal or organisational barriers, while enablers were arranged under commonly trialled interventions. CONCLUSIONS There are numerous factors that can determine the uptake of SAP guidelines. An identification and understanding of these factors at a local level is required to develop tailored interventions to enhance guideline adherence. Interventions, when used in combination, can be considered as a means of improving guideline use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hassan
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Vincent Chan
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Stevens
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ieva Stupans
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Translating Evidence Into Practice Through Knowledge Implementation. REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
163
|
Kumpf O, Nothacker M, Dubb R, Kaltwasser A, Brinkmann A, Greim CA, Wildenauer R. [Quality Assurance in Intensive Care Medicine: Peer Reviews and Quality Indicators]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2021; 56:12-27. [PMID: 33412600 DOI: 10.1055/a-1130-4950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Goal-oriented quality management in health care is an essential tool to provide good medical practice and treatment. It aims at a patient-centred case management with high transparency of structural and clinical process aspects, as well as patient outcome. An objective and comprehensive description of clinical care includes the use of quality indicators. However, the appliance of those indicators falls short, when the evaluation of quality is not followed by recommendations for improvement.As a highly specified area in health care provided in hospitals, intensive care medicine is characterized by complex interprofessional and multidisciplinary approaches. In addition, critical care units are an expensive resource. In order to provide an economic and yet high quality patient care, treatments should be evidence-based, and cost-drivers must be analysed for their effectiveness on patient-outcome.Various methods of quality assurance allow for a formative evaluation of intensive care units by peer reviews, including the use of quality indicators. This article focuses on peer review systems currently applied in German hospitals, and particularly describes quality indicators that have been established by DIVI (German Interdisciplinary Society of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine). It also addresses the need for a professional dialogue between equal partners. This has to accompany each peer review that aims at an improvement in quality of critical patient care.
Collapse
|
164
|
Barreto JOM, Bortoli MC, Luquine CD, Oliveira CF, Toma TS, Ribeiro AAV, Tesser TR, Rattner D, Vidal A, Mendes Y, Carvalho V, Neri MA, Chapman E. Implementation of national childbirth guidelines in Brazil: barriers and strategies. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2020; 44:e170. [PMID: 33417646 PMCID: PMC7778467 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2020.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The present report describes the process and results obtained with a knowledge translation project developed in three stages to identify barriers to the Implementation of the National Guidelines for Normal Childbirth in Brazil, as well strategies for effective implementation. The Improving Programme Implementation through Embedded Research (iPIER) model and the Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools provided the methodological framework for the project. In the first stage, the quality of the Guidelines was evaluated and the barriers preventing implementation of the recommendations were identified through review of the global evidence and analysis of contributions obtained in a public consultation process. In the second stage, an evidence synthesis was used as the basis for a deliberative dialogue aimed at prioritizing the barriers identified. Finally, a second evidence synthesis was presented in a new deliberative dialogue to discuss six options to address the prioritized barriers: 1) promote the use of multifaceted interventions; 2) promote educational interventions for the adoption of guidelines; 3) perform audits and provide feedback to adjust professional practice; 4) use reminders to mediate the interaction between workers and service users; 5) enable patient-mediated interventions; and 6) engage opinion leaders to promote use of the Guidelines. The processes and results associated with each stage were documented and formulated to inform a review and update of the Guidelines and the development of an implementation plan for the recommendations. Effective implementation of the Guidelines is important for improving the care provided during labor and childbirth in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)Brasília, DFBrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
| | - Maritsa C. Bortoli
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Cézar D. Luquine
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Cintia F. Oliveira
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Tereza S. Toma
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Aline A. V. Ribeiro
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Taís R. Tesser
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Daphne Rattner
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Avila Vidal
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Yluska Mendes
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Viviane Carvalho
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Mônica Almeida Neri
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde ColetivaSalvador (BA)BrazilUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador (BA), Brazil.
| | - Evelina Chapman
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)Brasília, DFBrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Barreto JOM, Bortoli MC, Luquine Jr CD, Oliveira CF, Toma TS, Ribeiro AAV, Tesser TR, Rattner D, Vidal A, Mendes Y, Carvalho V, Neri MA, Chapman E. [Implementation of the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil: barriers and trategiesObstáculos y estrategias para la aplicación de las Directrices Nacionales para el Parto Normal en el Brasil]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2020; 44:e120. [PMID: 33346245 PMCID: PMC7745726 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2020.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The present report describes the process and results obtained with a knowledge translation project developed in three stages to identify barriers to the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil as well strategies for effective implementation. The Improving Programme Implementation through Embedded Research (iPIER) model and the Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools provided the methodological framework for the project. In the first stage, the quality of the Guidelines was evaluated and the barriers preventing implementation of the recommendations were identified through review of the global evidence and analysis of contributions obtained in a public consultation process. In the second stage, an evidence synthesis was used as basis for a deliberative dialogue aimed at prioritizing the barriers identified. Finally, a second evidence synthesis was presented in a new deliberative dialogue to discuss six options to address the prioritized barriers: 1) promote the use of multifaceted interventions; 2) promote educational interventions for the adoption of guidelines; 3) perform audits and provide feedback to adjust professional practice; 4) use reminders to mediate the interaction between workers and service users; 5) enable patient-mediated interventions; and 6) engage opinion leaders to promote the use of guidelines. The processes and results associated with each stage were documented and formulated to inform a review and update of the Guidelines and the development of an implementation plan for the recommendations. An effective implementation of the Guidelines is relevant to improve the care provided during labor and childbirth in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), BrasíliaDFBrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| | - Maritsa C. Bortoli
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Cézar D. Luquine Jr
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Cintia F. Oliveira
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Tereza S. Toma
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Aline A. V. Ribeiro
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Taís R. Tesser
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Daphne Rattner
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Avila Vidal
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Yluska Mendes
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Viviane Carvalho
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Mônica Almeida Neri
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde ColetivaSalvador (BA)BrasilUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
| | - Evelina Chapman
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), BrasíliaDFBrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Wang Y, Zhu LY, Deng HB, Yang X, Wang L, Xu Y, Wang XJ, Pang D, Sun JH, Cao J, Liu G, Liu Y, Ma YF, Wu XJ. Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040686. [PMID: 33303451 PMCID: PMC7733196 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 40%-80% of patients after hip and knee arthroplasty. Clinical decision-making aided by guidelines is the most effective strategy to reduce the burden of VTE. However, the quality of guidelines is dependent on the strength of their evidence base. The objective of this article is to critically evaluate the quality of VTE prevention guidelines and the strength of their recommendations in VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS Relevant literature up to 16 March 2020 was systematically searched. We searched databases such as Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang and nine guidelines repositories. The identified guidelines were appraised by two reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II and appraised the strength of their recommendations independently. Following quality assessment, a predesigned data collection form was used to extract the characteristics of the included guideline. RESULTS We finally included 15 guidelines. Ten of the included guidelines were rated as 'recommended' or 'recommended with modifications'. The standardised scores were relatively high in the domains of Clarity of Presentation, and Scope and Purpose. The lowest average standardised scores were observed in the domains of Applicability and Stakeholder Involvement. In reference to the domains of Rigour of Development and Editorial Independence, the standardised scores varied greatly between the guidelines. The agreement between the two appraisers is almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficients higher than 0.80). A considerable proportion of the recommendations is based on low-quality or very-low-quality evidence or is even based on working group expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the majority of the recommendations are based on low-quality evidence, and further confirmation is needed. Furthermore, guideline developers should pay more attention to methodological quality, especially in the Stakeholder Involvement domain and the Applicability domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Yun Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Bo Deng
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Jie Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Pang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Evidence-Based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Peking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Hua Sun
- Intensive Care Unit, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Cao
- Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ge Liu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Fen Ma
- Outpatient Department, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Juan Wu
- Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Purcell C, Daw P, Kerr C, Cleland J, Cowie A, Dalal HM, Ibbotson T, Murphy C, Taylor R. Protocol for an implementation study of an evidence-based home cardiac rehabilitation programme for people with heart failure and their caregivers in Scotland (SCOT:REACH-HF). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040771. [PMID: 33277287 PMCID: PMC7722379 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite evidence that cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an essential component of care for people with heart failure, uptake is low. A centre-based format is a known barrier, suggesting that home-based programmes might improve accessibility. The aim of SCOT: Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is to assess the implementation of the REACH-HF home-based CR intervention in the context of the National Health Service (NHS) in Scotland.This paper presents the design and protocol for this observational implementation study. Specific objectives of SCOT:REACH-HF are to: (1) assess service-level facilitators and barriers to the implementation of REACH-HF; (2) compare real-world patient and caregiver outcomes to those seen in a prior clinical trial; and (3) estimate the economic (health and social) impact of implementing REACH-HF in Scotland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The REACH-HF intervention will be delivered in partnership with four 'Beacon sites' across six NHS Scotland Health Boards, covering rural and urban areas. Health professionals from each site will be trained to facilitate delivery of the 12-week programme to 140 people with heart failure and their caregivers. Patient and caregiver outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Assessments include the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), five-dimension EuroQol 5L, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Caregiver Burden Questionnaire. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with up to 20 health professionals involved in programme delivery (eg, cardiac nurses, physiotherapists). 65 facilitator-patient consultations will be audio recorded and assessed for fidelity. Integrative analysis will address key research questions on fidelity, context and CR participant-related outcomes. The SCOT:REACH-HF findings will inform the future potential roll-out of REACH-HF in Scotland. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been given ethical approval by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (reference 20/WS/0038, approved 25 March 2020). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is listed on the ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN53784122. The research team will ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with both General Data Protection Regulations and the University of Glasgow's Research Governance Framework. Findings will be reported to the funder and shared with Beacon Sites, to facilitate service evaluation, planning and good practice. To broaden interest in, and understanding of REACH-HF, we will seek to publish in peer-reviewed scientific journals and present at stakeholder events, national and international conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claire Kerr
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Cleland
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aynsley Cowie
- Cardiac Rehabilitation, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Hasnain M Dalal
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tracy Ibbotson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Clare Murphy
- Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rod Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Mulder RL, van Kalsbeek RJ, Hudson MM, Skinner R, Kremer LCM. The Critical Role of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Indicators in High-Quality Survivorship After Childhood Cancer. Pediatr Clin North Am 2020; 67:1069-1081. [PMID: 33131535 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Childhood cancer survivors are at significant risk for late cancer treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Physicians involved in the care of childhood cancer survivors should be aware of these specific health problems and provide high-quality, long-term follow-up care to preserve and improve survivors' health. The steps required to achieve high-quality care include synthesizing evidence (systematic reviews are helpful in this regard), developing clinical policy from evidence into evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, disseminating and implementing clinical practice guidelines, and evaluating their impact on quality of care and survivor health outcomes with quality indicators. This article describes these cornerstones of evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
169
|
Alharbi NS, Alanazi MA. Perceptions of health care professionals towards clinical practice guidelines: The case of Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Prim Care Diabetes 2020; 14:605-609. [PMID: 32057724 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines are developed by healthcare policy makers and disseminated to practitioners in order to minimize practice variations and to improve the quality of care. Problems arise when there is a sole reliance on passive dissemination strategies such as mailing or publishing the guidelines, as these approaches do not usually lead to the adoption. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the perspectives of the health care professionals toward the Saudi National Diabetes Guidelines in terms of awareness, adherence and their preferred dissemination and implementation strategies of the guideline. METHOD A cross-sectional survey was conducted among physicians and nurses working in twenty primary health care centers in the city of Riyadh between February and March 2019. RESULTS Nearly half of the total 179 respondents reported that they were unaware of the guidelines (49.1%), and 92% of the remaining 91 participants who were aware of the guideline reported that they had first heard about it through their official mail. The mean scores ranked according to the most preferred methods for disseminating and implementing the diabetes guidelines were as follows: via reminder systems 4.35±0.74, financial incentives 4.33±0.65, and audit and feedback 4.27±0.58. On the other hand, the least favorable strategies were traditional education 3.79±0.96 and the distribution of the guideline by mail 3.13±0.95. CONCLUSION The level of awareness of the diabetes guidelines among the primary health care professionals was suboptimal. This was more likely due to the Ministry of Health's reliance on passive implementation strategies. In order to have the guidelines translated into clinical practice, active and targeted implementation strategies such as reminder systems, audit and feedback must be considered by the Saudi health policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nouf Sahal Alharbi
- Department of Health Sciences, Collage of Applied Studies and Community Service, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Musaad Alnashmi Alanazi
- Department of hospital and health administration, Collage of Business Administration, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Zgierska AE, Robinson JM, Lennon RP, Smith PD, Nisbet K, Ales MW, Boss D, Tuan WJ, Vidaver RM, Hahn DL. Increasing system-wide implementation of opioid prescribing guidelines in primary care: findings from a non-randomized stepped-wedge quality improvement project. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:245. [PMID: 33248458 PMCID: PMC7700706 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01320-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinician utilization of practice guidelines can reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing and harm in chronic non-cancer pain; yet, implementation of “opioid guidelines” is subpar. We hypothesized that a multi-component quality improvement (QI) augmentation of “routine” system-level implementation efforts would increase clinician adherence to the opioid guideline-driven policy recommendations. Methods Opioid policy was implemented system-wide in 26 primary care clinics. A convenience sample of 9 clinics received the QI augmentation (one-hour academic detailing; 2 online educational modules; 4–6 monthly one-hour practice facilitation sessions) in this non-randomized stepped-wedge QI project. The QI participants were volunteer clinic staff. The target patient population was adults with chronic non-cancer pain treated with long-term opioids. The outcomes included the clinic-level percentage of target patients with a current treatment agreement (primary outcome), rates of opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescribing, urine drug testing, depression and opioid misuse risk screening, and prescription drug monitoring database check; additional measures included daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED), and the percentages of all target patients and patients prescribed ≥90 mg/day MED. T-test, mixed-regression and stepped-wedge-based analyses evaluated the QI impact, with significance and effect size assessed with two-tailed p < 0.05, 95% confidence intervals and/or Cohen’s d. Results Two-hundred-fifteen QI participants, a subset of clinical staff, received at least one QI component; 1255 patients in the QI and 1632 patients in the 17 comparison clinics were prescribed long-term opioids. At baseline, more QI than comparison clinic patients were screened for depression (8.1% vs 1.1%, p = 0.019) and prescribed ≥90 mg/day MED (23.0% vs 15.5%, p = 0.038). The stepped-wedge analysis did not show statistically significant changes in outcomes in the QI clinics, when accounting for the comparison clinics’ trends. The Cohen’s d values favored the QI clinics in all outcomes except opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescribing. Subgroup analysis showed that patients prescribed ≥90 mg/day MED in the QI compared to comparison clinics improved urine drug screening rates (38.8% vs 19.1%, p = 0.02), but not other outcomes (p ≥ 0.05). Conclusions Augmenting routine policy implementation with targeted QI intervention, delivered to volunteer clinic staff, did not additionally improve clinic-level, opioid guideline-concordant care metrics. However, the observed effect sizes suggested this approach may be effective, especially in higher-risk patients, if broadly implemented. Trial registration Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra E Zgierska
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Public Health Sciences, and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, PA, 17033, Hershey, USA.
| | - James M Robinson
- Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1109C WARF Building, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI, 53726, USA
| | - Robert P Lennon
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| | - Paul D Smith
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI, 53715, USA
| | - Kate Nisbet
- Interstate Postgraduate Medical Association, P.O. Box 5474, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Mary W Ales
- Interstate Postgraduate Medical Association, P.O. Box 5474, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Deanne Boss
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI, 53715, USA
| | - Wen-Jan Tuan
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI, 53715, USA
| | - Regina M Vidaver
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI, 53715, USA
| | - David L Hahn
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Court, Madison, WI, 53715, USA
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Forcadell Drago E, Dalmau Llorca MR, Aguilar Martín C, Ferreira-González I, Hernández Rojas Z, Gonçalves AQ, López-Pablo C. Impact of Implementing a Dyslipidemia Management Guideline on Cholesterol Control for Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease in Primary Care. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E8590. [PMID: 33228008 PMCID: PMC7699273 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of death worldwide. The control of CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, reduces their mortality rate. Nonetheless, fewer than 50% of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) have good cholesterol control. Our objective is to assess whether the level of participation of general practitioners (GPs) in activities to implement a dyslipidemia management guideline, and the characteristics of the patient and physician are associated with cholesterol control in IHD patients. We undertook a quasi-experimental, uncontrolled, before-and-after study of 1151 patients. The intervention was carried out during 2010 and 2011, and consisted of a face-to-face training and online course phase (Phase 1), and another of face-to-face feedback (Phase 2). The main outcome variable was the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control, whereby values of <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) were set as a good level of control, according to the recommendations of the guidelines in force in 2009. After Phase 1, 6.7% more patients demonstrated good cholesterol control. With respect to patient characteristics, being female and being older were found to be risk factors of poor control. Being diabetic and having suffered a stroke were protective factors. Of the GPs' characteristics, being tutor in a teaching center for GP residents and having completed the online course were found to be protective factors. We concluded that cholesterol control in IHD patients was influenced by the type of training activity undertook by physicians during the implementation of the GPC, and patient and physician characteristics. We highlight that if we apply the recent targets of the European guideline, which establish a lower level of LDL-C control, the percentage of good control could be worse than the observed in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Forcadell Drago
- Equip d’Atenció Primària Tortosa Oest, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain;
- Programa de Doctorat en Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l’Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; (Z.H.R.); (A.Q.G.)
- GAVINA Research Group, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Maria Rosa Dalmau Llorca
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l’Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; (Z.H.R.); (A.Q.G.)
- GAVINA Research Group, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Equip d’Atenció Primària Tortosa Est, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Programa de Doctorat de Biomedicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
| | - Carina Aguilar Martín
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l’Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; (Z.H.R.); (A.Q.G.)
- GAVINA Research Group, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Unitat d’Avaluació, Direcció d’Atenció Primària Terres de l’Ebre, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Ferreira-González
- Programa de Doctorat en Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Departament de Cardiologia, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Zojaina Hernández Rojas
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l’Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; (Z.H.R.); (A.Q.G.)
- GAVINA Research Group, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Equip d’Atenció Primària Tortosa Est, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Programa de Doctorat de Biomedicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
| | - Alessandra Queiroga Gonçalves
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Terres de l’Ebre, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain; (Z.H.R.); (A.Q.G.)
- GAVINA Research Group, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Unitat Docent de Medicina de Família i Comunitària Tortosa-Terres de L’Ebre, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Carlos López-Pablo
- Departament de Patologia, Hospital de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta, Institut Català de la Salut, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain;
- Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
- Departament d’Infermeria, Campus Terres de l’Ebre, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43500 Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Patton MP, Moore L, Farhat I, Tardif PA, Gonthier C, Belcaid A, Lauzier F, Turgeon A, Clément J. Inter-hospital variation in surgical intensity for trauma admissions: A multicentre cohort study. Int J Clin Pract 2020; 74:e13613. [PMID: 32683730 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for injury care are increasingly moving away from surgical management towards less invasive procedures but there is a knowledge gap on how these recommendations are influencing practice. We aimed to assess inter-hospital variation in surgical intensity for injury admissions and evaluate the correlation between hospital surgical intensity and mortality/complications. METHODS We included adults admitted for major trauma between 2006 and 2016 in a Canadian provincial trauma system. Analyses were stratified for orthopaedic (n = 16 887), neurological (n = 12 888) and torso injuries (n = 9816). Surgical intensity was quantified with the number of surgical procedures <72 hours. Inter-hospital variation was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We assessed the correlation between the risk-adjusted mean number of surgical procedures and risk-adjusted incidence of mortality and complications using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). RESULTS Moderate inter-hospital variation was observed for orthopaedic surgery (ICC = 14.0%) whereas variation was low for torso surgery (ICC = 2.7%) and neurosurgery (ICC = 0.8%). Surgical intensity was negatively correlated with hospital mortality for torso injury (r = -.32, P = .02) and neurotrauma (r = -.65, P = .08). A strong positive correlation was observed with hospital complications for orthopaedic injuries (r = .36, P = .006) whereas the opposite was observed for neurotrauma (r = -.71, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS Results should be interpreted with caution as they may be a result of residual confounding. However, they may suggest that there are opportunities for quality improvement in surgical care for injury admissions, particularly for orthopaedic injuries. Moving forward, we should aim to prospectively evaluate adherence to guidelines on non-operative management and their impact on mortality and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pier Patton
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Lynne Moore
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Imen Farhat
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Pier-Alexandre Tardif
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Gonthier
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Amina Belcaid
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - François Lauzier
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Departement of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Alexis Turgeon
- Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit), Traumatologie - Urgence - Soins intensifs (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Julien Clément
- Departement of Surgery, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Aboubaker S, Evers ES, Kobeissi L, Francis L, Najjemba R, Miller NP, Wall S, Martinez D, Vargas J, Ashorn P. The availability of global guidance for the promotion of women's, newborns', children's and adolescents' health and nutrition in conflicts. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002060. [PMID: 33223502 PMCID: PMC7684670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant global gains in sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition (SRMNCAH&N) will be difficult unless conflict settings are adequately addressed. We aimed to determine the amount, scope and quality of publically available guidance documents, to characterise the process by which agencies develop their guidance and to identify gaps in guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts. METHODS We identified guidance documents published between 2008 and 2018 through English-language Internet sites of humanitarian response organisations, reviewed them for their scope and assessed their quality with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II) tool. Additionally, we interviewed 22 key informants on guidance development, dissemination processes, perceived guidance gaps and applicability. FINDINGS We identified 105 conflict-relevant guidance documents from 75 organisations. Of these, nine were specific to conflicts, others were applicable also to other humanitarian settings. Fifteen documents were technical normative guidelines, others were operational guides (67), descriptive documents (21) or advice on legal, human rights or ethics questions (2). Nutrition was the most addressed health topic, followed by communicable diseases and violence. The documents rated high quality in their 'scope and purpose' and 'clarity of presentation' and low for 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. Key informants reported end user need as the primary driver for guideline development and WHO technical guidelines as their main evidence base. Insufficient local contextualisation, lack of inter-agency coordination and lack of systematic implementation were considered problems in guideline development. Several guidance gaps were noted, including abortion care, newborn care, early child development, mental health, adolescent health beyond sexual and reproductive health and non-communicable diseases. INTERPRETATION Organisations are motivated and actively producing guidance for SRMNCAH&N promotion in humanitarian settings, but few documents address conflicts specifically and there are important guidance gaps. Improved inter-organisation collaboration for guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts and other humanitarian settings is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Egmond Samir Evers
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loulou Kobeissi
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lauren Francis
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Steve Wall
- Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Per Ashorn
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Healey A, Hartwick M, Downar J, Keenan S, Lalani J, Mohr J, Appleby A, Spring J, Delaney JW, Wilson LC, Shemie S. Improving quality of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in organ donation: a framework and implementation toolkit. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67:1549-1556. [PMID: 32918249 PMCID: PMC7546981 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01774-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) is responsible for the largest increase in deceased donation over the past decade. When the Canadian DCD guideline was published in 2006, it included recommendations to create standard policies and procedures for withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) as well as quality assurance frameworks for this practice. In 2016, the Canadian Critical Care Society produced a guideline for WLSM that requires modifications to facilitate implementation when DCD is part of the end-of-life care plan. METHODS A pan-Canadian multidisciplinary collaborative was convened to examine the existing guideline framework and to create tools to put the existing guideline into practice in centres that practice DCD. RESULTS A set of guiding principles for implementation of the guideline in DCD practice were produced using an iterative, consensus-based approach followed by development of four implementation tools and three quality assurance and audit tools. CONCLUSIONS The tools developed will aid DCD centres in fulsomely adapting the Canadian Critical Care Society Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Healey
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Trillium Gift of Life Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Michael Hartwick
- Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - James Downar
- Department of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sean Keenan
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Donation Services, BC Transplant, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehan Lalani
- Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jim Mohr
- Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Amber Appleby
- Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jenna Spring
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jesse W Delaney
- Departments of Critical Care and Medicine, Scarborough Health Network, Scarborough, ON, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindsay C Wilson
- Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sam Shemie
- Donation and Transplantation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Montréal Children's Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Purtle J, Marzalik JS, Halfond RW, Bufka LF, Teachman BA, Aarons GA. Toward the data-driven dissemination of findings from psychological science. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 2020; 75:1052-1066. [PMID: 33252944 PMCID: PMC8182894 DOI: 10.1037/amp0000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The public health impact of psychological science is maximized when it is disseminated clearly and compellingly to audiences who can act on it. Dissemination research can generate knowledge to help achieve this, but dissemination is understudied in the field of implementation science. As a consequence, the designs of dissemination strategies are typically driven by anecdote, not evidence, and are often ineffective. We address this issue by synthesizing key theory and findings from consumer psychology and detailing a novel research approach for "data-driven dissemination." The approach has 3 parts: (a) formative audience research, which characterizes an audience's awareness about, adoption of, and attitudes toward an intervention, as well as preferences for receiving information about it; (b) audience segmentation research, which identifies meaningful subgroups within an audience to inform the tailoring of dissemination strategies; and (c) dissemination effectiveness research, which determines the strategies that are most effective. This approach is then illustrated using the dissemination of the American Psychological Association's (APA, 2017) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults as a case study. Data are presented from a 2018-2019 survey of licensed APA-member psychologists who treat adults with PTSD (n = 407, response rate = 29.8%). We present survey findings on awareness about, attitudes toward, and adoption of the guideline and find significant differences across these domains between psychologists who do and do not regularly use clinical practice guidelines. We conclude by discussing future directions to advance dissemination research and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob S. Marzalik
- American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Raquel W. Halfond
- American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Lynn F. Bufka
- American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
176
|
Quittner AL, Abbott J, Hussain S, Ong T, Uluer A, Hempstead S, Lomas P, Smith B. Integration of mental health screening and treatment into cystic fibrosis clinics: Evaluation of initial implementation in 84 programs across the United States. Pediatr Pulmonol 2020; 55:2995-3004. [PMID: 32649006 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large-scale epidemiological study of 6088 individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) and 4102 caregivers in nine countries documented elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety, leading to international guidelines for annual screening and follow-up. To facilitate national implementation, 84 CF programs funded a mental health coordinators (MHC). Implementation was evaluated after 1 year using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to identify facilitators and barriers. METHODS A 45-item internet survey was developed to assess relevant CFIR implementation steps. Surveys were completed in 2016. It assessed five domains tailored to study aims: (a) Intervention characteristics, (b) outer setting, (c) inner setting, (d) characteristics of individuals, and (e) process of implementation. RESULTS Response rate was 88%, with pediatric and adult programs equally represented. A majority of MHCs were social workers (54.1%) and psychologists (41.9%); 41% had joined the team in the past year. Facilitators across the five domains included universal uptake of screening tools, greater awareness and detection of psychological symptoms, reduced stigma, and positive feedback from patients and families. Barriers included limited staff time, space, and logistics. DISCUSSION This is the largest systematic effort to integrate mental health screening and treatment into the care of individuals with a serious, chronic illness and their caregivers. MHCs implementing screening, interpretation and follow-up reported positive results, and significant barriers. This national implementation effort demonstrated that depression and anxiety can be efficiently evaluated and treated in a complex, chronic disease. Future efforts include recommending the addition of screening scores to national CF Registries and examining their effects on health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janice Abbott
- School Psychology, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Saida Hussain
- Research Institute, Nicklaus Children's Research Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Thida Ong
- Pediatric Pulmonology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ahmet Uluer
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Hempstead
- Clinical Affairs, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paula Lomas
- Clinical Affairs, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Beth Smith
- Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Bishay K, Causada-Calo N, Scaffidi MA, Walsh CM, Anderson JT, Rostom A, Dube C, Keswani RN, Heitman SJ, Hilsden RJ, Shorr R, Grover SC, Forbes N. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:1030-1040.e9. [PMID: 32330506 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colonoscopy quality indicators such as adenoma detection rate (ADR) are surrogates for the effectiveness of screening-related colonoscopy. It is unclear whether endoscopist feedback on these indicators improves performance. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether associations exist between endoscopist feedback and colonoscopy performance. METHODS We conducted a search through May 2019 for studies reporting on endoscopist feedback and associations with ADR or other colonoscopy quality indicators. Pooled rate ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to assess for potential methodological or clinical factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS From 1326 initial studies, 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis for ADR, representing 33,184 colonoscopies. Endoscopist feedback was associated with an improvement in ADR (RR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.34). Low performers derived a greater benefit from feedback (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18-2.23) compared with moderate performers (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.29), whereas high performers did not derive a significant benefit (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.13). Feedback was not associated with increases in withdrawal time (weighted mean difference, +0.43 minutes; 95% CI, -0.50 to +1.36 minutes) or improvements in cecal intubation rate (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01). CONCLUSION Endoscopist feedback is associated with modest improvements in ADR. The implementation of routine endoscopist audit and feedback should be considered alongside other quality improvement interventions in institutions dedicated to the provision of high-quality screening-related colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirles Bishay
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | | | - Catharine M Walsh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Learning Institute, and Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario; The Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John T Anderson
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London; Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHSFT, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Catherine Dube
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Robert J Hilsden
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Risa Shorr
- Learning Services, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Samir C Grover
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Wagner TH, Yoon J, Jacobs JC, So A, Kilbourne AM, Yu W, Goodrich DE. Estimating Costs of an Implementation Intervention. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:959-967. [PMID: 33078681 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20960455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Health care systems frequently have to decide whether to implement interventions designed to reduce gaps in the quality of care. A lack of information on the cost of these interventions is often cited as a barrier to implementation. In this article, we describe methods for estimating the cost of implementing a complex intervention. We review methods related to the direct measurement of labor, supplies and space, information technology, and research costs. We also discuss several issues that affect cost estimates in implementation studies, including factor prices, fidelity, efficiency and scale of production, distribution, and sunk costs. We examine case studies for stroke and depression, where evidence-based treatments exist and yet gaps in the quality of care remain. Understanding the costs for implementing strategies to reduce these gaps and measuring them consistently will better inform decision makers about an intervention's likely effect on their budget and the expected costs to implement new interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Wagner
- Health Economics Resource Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jean Yoon
- Health Economics Resource Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Josephine C Jacobs
- Health Economics Resource Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Angela So
- Health Economics Resource Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Amy M Kilbourne
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Washington, DC, USA.,University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Learning Health Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Wei Yu
- Health Economics Resource Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - David E Goodrich
- Center for Evaluation and Implementation Resources, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Center for Clinical Management Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Performance Measure Development, Use, and Measurement of Effectiveness Using the Guideline on Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 16:1463-1472. [PMID: 31774323 PMCID: PMC6956829 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201909-665st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Guideline implementation tools are designed to improve uptake of guideline recommendations in clinical settings but do not uniformly accompany the clinical practice guideline documents. Performance measures are a type of guideline implementation tool with the potential to catalyze behavior change and greater adherence to clinical practice guidelines. However, many performance measures suffer from serious flaws in their design and application, prompting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) to define its own performance measure development standards in a previous workshop in 2012. This report summarizes the proceedings of a follow-up workshop convened to advance the ATS’s work in performance measure development and guideline implementation. To illustrate the application of the ATS’s performance measure development framework, we used the example of a low–tidal volume ventilation performance measure created de novo from the 2017 ATS/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome clinical practice guideline. We include a detailed explanation of the rationale for the specifications chosen, identification of areas in need of further validity testing, and a preliminary strategy for pilot testing of the performance measure. Pending additional resources and broader performance measure expertise, issuing “preliminary performance measures” and their specifications alongside an ATS clinical practice guideline offers a first step to further the ATS’s guideline implementation agenda. We recommend selectively proceeding with full performance measure development for those measures with positive early user feedback and the greatest potential impact in accordance with ATS leadership guidance.
Collapse
|
180
|
Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:920. [PMID: 33028324 PMCID: PMC7542898 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs. METHODS We searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS We included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5 years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty). CONCLUSIONS Our review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO ( CRD42018092884 ).
Collapse
|
181
|
Egerton T, Hinman RS, Hunter DJ, Bowden JL, Nicolson PJA, Atkins L, Pirotta M, Bennell KL. PARTNER: a service delivery model to implement optimal primary care management of people with knee osteoarthritis: description of development. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040423. [PMID: 33033032 PMCID: PMC7542957 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Implementation strategies, such as new models of service delivery, are needed to address evidence practice gaps. This paper describes the process of developing and operationalising a new model of service delivery to implement recommended care for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a primary care setting. METHODS Three development stages occurred concurrently and iteratively. Each stage considered the healthcare context and was informed by stakeholder input. Stage 1 involved the design of a new model of service delivery (PARTNER). Stage 2 developed a behavioural change intervention targeting general practitioners (GPs) using the behavioural change wheel framework. In stage 3, the 'Care Support Team' component of the service delivery model was operationalised. RESULTS The focus of PARTNER is to provide patients with education, exercise and/or weight loss advice, and facilitate effective self-management through behavioural change support. Stage 1 model design: based on clinical practice guidelines, known evidence practice gaps in current care, chronic disease management frameworks, input from stakeholders and the opportunities and constraints afforded by the Australian primary care context, we developed the PARTNER service-delivery model. The key components are: (1) an effective GP consultation and (2) follow-up and ongoing care provided remotely (telephone/email/online resources) by a 'Care Support Team'. Stage 2 GP behavioural change intervention: a multimodal behavioural change intervention was developed comprising a self-audit/feedback activity, online professional development and desktop software to provide decision support, patient information resources and a referral mechanism to the 'Care Support Team'. Stage 3 operationalising the 'care support team'-staff recruited and trained in evidence-based knee OA management and behavioural change methodology. CONCLUSION The PARTNER model is the result of a comprehensive implementation strategy development process using evidence, behavioural change theory and intervention development guidelines. Technologies for scalable delivery were harnessed and new primary evidence was generated as part of the process.Trial registration number ACTRN12617001595303 (UTN U1111-1197-4809).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorlene Egerton
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jocelyn L Bowden
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philippa J A Nicolson
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lou Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, UCL, London, UK
| | - Marie Pirotta
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Centre for Health Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Iranzo A, Serralheiro P, Schuller JC, Schlit AF, Bentz JWG. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Risk Minimization Measures of Sodium Oxybate in the European Union. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2020; 7:307-315. [PMID: 32989679 PMCID: PMC7581670 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-020-00212-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®), approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for narcolepsy with cataplexy, is only available through risk mitigation programs due to potential adverse effects including respiratory and central nervous system depression, neuropsychiatric events, and misuse. OBJECTIVE We report findings from a survey evaluating effectiveness of the European Union Xyrem® Risk Management Plan (RMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional, online, multiple-choice survey was distributed to randomly selected healthcare professionals (HCPs) from six European countries (April 2016-May 2018). Eligibility criteria: current/potential Xyrem® prescriber and/or sleep disorder specialist; contact information available; on the Xyrem® RMP educational materials mailing list. PRIMARY OUTCOME proportion of respondents answering each question correctly (< 50% responses correct = unsatisfactory comprehension, 50% to < 70% = satisfactory, ≥ 70% = excellent), with precision assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Of the 709 HCPs contacted, 601 did not agree to take part, 108 were screened with 35/108 eligible for inclusion; 31 HCPs completed the survey. Of the 31 respondents, 29 (93.5%; 95% CI 84.4-100.0) reported receiving Xyrem® safety information, commonly from a sales representative, EMA Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), or educational meeting; only 9/31 (31.0%; 14.3-50.0) recalled receiving mailed educational materials. The number of HCPs answering dosing-related questions correctly ranged from 24/31 to 31/31. All Xyrem® contraindications were correctly identified by 26/31 (83.9%; 70.0-96.7) respondents. All respondents 'always' or 'sometimes' completed SmPC recommended activities upon treatment initiation. The majority indicated signs of abuses/misuse/diversion (23/31; 74.2%; 58.6-88.0) and criminal use (23/31; 74.2%; 59.4-89.3) should be monitored at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate the importance of providing a range of educational materials. However, the low sample size limits interpretation; increased HCP engagement would improve understanding of how best to develop educational materials. EUROPEAN POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDY (PAS) REGISTER NUMBER EUPAS15024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Iranzo
- Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
183
|
Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, Goldberg H, Diaz-Martinez JP, Tomlinson G, Grimshaw JM, Shojania KG. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370:m3216. [PMID: 32943437 PMCID: PMC7495041 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the improvements achieved with clinical decision support systems and examine the heterogeneity from pooling effects across diverse clinical settings and intervention targets. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline up to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES AND METHODS Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials reporting absolute improvements in the percentage of patients receiving care recommended by clinical decision support systems. Multilevel meta-analysis accounted for within study clustering. Meta-regression was used to assess the degree to which the features of clinical decision support systems and study characteristics reduced heterogeneity in effect sizes. Where reported, clinical endpoints were also captured. RESULTS In 108 studies (94 randomised, 14 quasi-randomised), reporting 122 trials that provided analysable data from 1 203 053 patients and 10 790 providers, clinical decision support systems increased the proportion of patients receiving desired care by 5.8% (95% confidence interval 4.0% to 7.6%). This pooled effect exhibited substantial heterogeneity (I2=76%), with the top quartile of reported improvements ranging from 10% to 62%. In 30 trials reporting clinical endpoints, clinical decision support systems increased the proportion of patients achieving guideline based targets (eg, blood pressure or lipid control) by a median of 0.3% (interquartile range -0.7% to 1.9%). Two study characteristics (low baseline adherence and paediatric settings) were associated with significantly larger effects. Inclusion of these covariates in the multivariable meta-regression, however, did not reduce heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Most interventions with clinical decision support systems appear to achieve small to moderate improvements in targeted processes of care, a finding confirmed by the small changes in clinical endpoints found in studies that reported them. A minority of studies achieved substantial increases in the delivery of recommended care, but predictors of these more meaningful improvements remain undefined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice L Kwan
- Sinai Health System, Department of Medicine, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisha Lo
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacob Ferguson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hanna Goldberg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juan Pablo Diaz-Martinez
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kaveh G Shojania
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Denno DM, Plesons M, Chandra-Mouli V. Effective strategies to improve health worker performance in delivering adolescent-friendly sexual and reproductive health services. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2020; 33:269-297. [PMID: 32887182 DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2019-0245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite recognition of the important role of health workers in providing adolescent-friendly sexual and reproductive health services (AFSRHS), evidence on strategies for improving performance is limited. This review sought to address: (1) which interventions are used to improve health worker performance in delivering AFSRHS? and (2) how effective are these interventions in improving AFSRHS health worker performance and client outcomes? Methods Building on a 2015 review, a search for literature on 18 previously identified programs was conducted to identify updated literature and data relevant to this review. Data was systematically extracted and analyzed. Results Due to the parent review's eligibility criteria, all programs included health worker training. Otherwise, supervision was the most frequently reported intervention used (n=10). Components and methods related to quality of trainings and supervision varied considerably in program reports. Nearly half of programs described employing processes to ensure availability of basic medicines and supplies (n=7). Other interventions (policies, standards, and job descriptions [n=5]; refresher trainings [n=5]; job aids or other reference material [n=3]) were less commonly reported to have been employed. No discernible patterns emerged in the relationship between interventions and outcomes of interest. Conclusions Multi-faceted complementary strategies are recommended to improve health worker performance to deliver AFSRHS; however, this was uncommonly reported in the programs that we reviewed. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions and intervention packages are needed to guide efficient use of limited resources to enhance health worker capacity to deliver AFSRHS. In the interim, programs should be developed and implemented based on available existing evidence on improving health worker performance within and outside adolescent health. Implications and contribution This review is the first to examine the interventions commonly used to improve health worker performance in delivering AFSRHS. The findings indicate a need for additional effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evaluations of such interventions. In the meantime, existing evidence on improving health worker performance within and outside adolescent health must be integrated more thoughtfully into program planning and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Denno
- Department of Pediatrics and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marina Plesons
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization and the Human Reproduction Programme, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva1211,Switzerland
| | - Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization and the Human Reproduction Programme, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva1211,Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Meisters R, Putrik P, Ramiro S, Hifinger M, Keszei AP, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Woolf AD, Smolen JS, Stamm TA, Stoffer-Marx M, Uhlig T, Moe RH, de Wit M, Tafaj A, Mukuchyan V, Studenic P, Verschueren P, Shumnalieva R, Charalambous P, Vencovský J, Varvouni M, Kull M, Puolakka K, Gossec L, Gobejishvili N, Detert J, Sidiropoulos P, Péntek M, Kane D, Scirè CA, Arad U, Andersone D, van de Laar M, van der Helm-van Mil A, Głuszko P, Cunha-Miranda L, Berghea F, Damjanov NS, Tomšič M, Carmona L, Turesson C, Ciurea A, Shukurova S, Inanc N, Verstappen SMM, Boonen A. EULAR/eumusc.net standards of care for rheumatoid arthritis: cross-sectional analyses of importance, level of implementation and care gaps experienced by patients and rheumatologists across 35 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:1423-1431. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveAs part of European League against Rheumatism (EULAR)/European Musculoskeletal Conditions Surveillance and Information Network, 20 user-focused standards of care (SoCs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) addressing 16 domains of care were developed. This study aimed to explore gaps in implementation of these SoCs across Europe.MethodsTwo cross-sectional surveys on the importance, level of and barriers (patients only) to implementation of each SoC (0–10, 10 highest) were designed to be conducted among patients and rheumatologists in 50 European countries. Care gaps were calculated as the difference between the actual and maximum possible score for implementation (ie, 10) multiplied by the care importance score, resulting in care gaps (0–100, maximal gap). Factors associated with the problematic care gaps (ie, gap≥30 and importance≥6 and implementation<6) and strong barriers (≥6) were further analysed in multilevel logistic regression models.ResultsOverall, 26 and 31 countries provided data from 1873 patients and 1131 rheumatologists, respectively. 19 out of 20 SoCs were problematic from the perspectives of more than 20% of patients, while this was true for only 10 SoCs for rheumatologists. Rheumatologists in countries with lower gross domestic product and non-European Union countries were more likely to report problematic gaps in 15 of 20 SoCs, while virtually no differences were observed among patients. Lack of relevance of some SoCs (71%) and limited time of professionals (66%) were the most frequent implementation barriers identified by patients.ConclusionsMany problematic gaps were reported across several essential aspects of RA care. More efforts need to be devoted to implementation of EULAR SoCs.
Collapse
|
186
|
Robinson L, Poole M, McLellan E, Lee R, Amador S, Bhattarai N, Bryant A, Coe D, Corbett A, Exley C, Goodman C, Gotts Z, Harrison-Dening K, Hill S, Howel D, Hrisos S, Hughes J, Kernohan A, Macdonald A, Mason H, Massey C, Neves S, Paes P, Rennie K, Rice S, Robinson T, Sampson E, Tucker S, Tzelis D, Vale L, Bamford C. Supporting good quality, community-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia: the SEED research programme including feasibility RCT. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar08080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
In the UK, most people with dementia die in the community and they often receive poorer end-of-life care than people with cancer.
Objective
The overall aim of this programme was to support professionals to deliver good-quality, community-based care towards, and at, the end of life for people living with dementia and their families.
Design
The Supporting Excellence in End-of-life care in Dementia (SEED) programme comprised six interlinked workstreams. Workstream 1 examined existing guidance and outcome measures using systematic reviews, identified good practice through a national e-survey and explored outcomes of end-of-life care valued by people with dementia and family carers (n = 57) using a Q-sort study. Workstream 2 explored good-quality end-of-life care in dementia from the perspectives of a range of stakeholders using qualitative methods (119 interviews, 12 focus groups and 256 observation hours). Using data from workstreams 1 and 2, workstream 3 used co-design methods with key stakeholders to develop the SEED intervention. Worksteam 4 was a pilot study of the SEED intervention with an embedded process evaluation. Using a cluster design, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of recruitment and retention, outcome measures and our intervention. Four general practices were recruited in North East England: two were allocated to the intervention and two provided usual care. Patient recruitment was via general practitioner dementia registers. Outcome data were collected at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months. Workstream 5 involved economic modelling studies that assessed the potential value of the SEED intervention using a contingent valuation survey of the general public (n = 1002). These data informed an economic decision model to explore how the SEED intervention might influence care. Results of the model were presented in terms of the costs and consequences (e.g. hospitalisations) and, using the contingent valuation data, a cost–benefit analysis. Workstream 6 examined commissioning of end-of-life care in dementia through a narrative review of policy and practice literature, combined with indepth interviews with a national sample of service commissioners (n = 20).
Setting
The workstream 1 survey and workstream 2 included services throughout England. The workstream 1 Q-sort study and workstream 4 pilot trial took place in North East England. For workstream 4, four general practices were recruited; two received the intervention and two provided usual care.
Results
Currently, dementia care and end-of-life care are commissioned separately, with commissioners receiving little formal guidance and training. Examples of good practice rely on non-recurrent funding and leadership from an interested clinician. Seven key components are required for good end-of-life care in dementia: timely planning discussions, recognising end of life and providing supportive care, co-ordinating care, effective working with primary care, managing hospitalisation, continuing care after death, and valuing staff and ongoing learning. Using co-design methods and the theory of change, the seven components were operationalised as a primary care-based, dementia nurse specialist intervention, with a care resource kit to help the dementia nurse specialist improve the knowledge of family and professional carers. The SEED intervention proved feasible and acceptable to all stakeholders, and being located in the general practice was considered beneficial. None of the outcome measures was suitable as the primary outcome for a future trial. The contingent valuation showed that the SEED intervention was valued, with a wider package of care valued more than selected features in isolation. The SEED intervention is unlikely to reduce costs, but this may be offset by the value placed on the SEED intervention by the general public.
Limitations
The biggest challenge to the successful delivery and completion of this research programme was translating the ‘theoretical’ complex intervention into practice in an ever-changing policy and service landscape at national and local levels. A major limitation for a future trial is the lack of a valid and relevant primary outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that influences outcomes for both individuals and systems.
Conclusions
Although the dementia nurse specialist intervention was acceptable, feasible and integrated well with existing care, it is unlikely to reduce costs of care; however, it was highly valued by all stakeholders (professionals, people with dementia and their families) and has the potential to influence outcomes at both an individual and a systems level.
Future work
There is no plan to progress to a full randomised controlled trial of the SEED intervention in its current form. In view of new National Institute for Health and Care Excellence dementia guidance, which now recommends a care co-ordinator for all people with dementia, the feasibility of providing the SEED intervention throughout the illness trajectory should be explored. Appropriate outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of such a complex intervention are needed urgently.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21390601.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research, Vol. 8, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marie Poole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emma McLellan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard Lee
- Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sarah Amador
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nawaraj Bhattarai
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dorothy Coe
- North East and North Cumbria Local Clinical Research Network, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anne Corbett
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Catherine Exley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Zoe Gotts
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Sarah Hill
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Susan Hrisos
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Helen Mason
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Massey
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Paul Paes
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katherine Rennie
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Professional Services, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Rice
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elizabeth Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Dimitrios Tzelis
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Bamford
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Hovlid E, Braut GS, Hannisdal E, Walshe K, Bukve O, Flottorp S, Stensland P, Frich JC. Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038850. [PMID: 32868366 PMCID: PMC7462249 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. METHODS We performed a literature search (1980-January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. RESULTS We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation's current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. CONCLUSIONS External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einar Hovlid
- Institute of Social Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Geir Sverre Braut
- Institute of Social Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Haugesund, Norway
| | - Einar Hannisdal
- Department of health, County Governor in Oslo and Akershus, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kieran Walshe
- The University of Manchester Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Oddbjørn Bukve
- Institute of Social Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway
| | | | - Per Stensland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan C Frich
- Institute of Health and Society, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Brantnell A, Woodford J, Baraldi E, van Achterberg T, von Essen L. Views of Implementers and Nonimplementers of Internet-Administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: Survey of Primary Care Decision Makers in Sweden. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18033. [PMID: 32784186 PMCID: PMC7450364 DOI: 10.2196/18033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-administered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) has been demonstrated to be an effective intervention for adults with depression and/or anxiety and is recommended in national guidelines for provision within Swedish primary care. However, the number and type of organizations that have implemented ICBT within primary care in Sweden is currently unclear. Further, there is a lack of knowledge concerning barriers and facilitators to ICBT implementation. OBJECTIVE The two primary objectives were to identify and describe primary care organizations providing ICBT in Sweden and compare decision makers' (ie, directors of primary care organizations) views on barriers and facilitators to implementation of ICBT among ICBT implementers (ie, organizations that offered ICBT) and nonimplementers (ie, organizations that did not offer ICBT). METHODS An online survey based on a checklist for identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation was developed and made accessible to decision makers from all primary care organizations in Sweden. The survey consisted of background questions (eg, provision of ICBT and number of persons working with ICBT) and barriers and facilitators relating to the following categories: users, therapists, ICBT programs, organizations, and wider society. RESULTS The participation rate was 35.75% (404/1130). The majority (250/404, 61.8%) of participants were health care center directors and had backgrounds in nursing. Altogether, 89.8% (363/404) of the participating organizations provided CBT. A minority (83/404, 20.5%) of organizations offered ICBT. Most professionals delivering ICBT were psychologists (67/83, 80%) and social workers (31/83, 37%). The majority (61/83, 73%) of organizations had 1 to 2 persons delivering ICBT interventions. The number of patients treated with ICBT during the last 12 months was 1 to 10 in 65% (54/83) of the organizations, ranging between 1 and 400 treated patients across the whole sample. There were 9 significant (P<.05) differences out of 37 possible between implementers and nonimplementers. For example, more implementers (48/51, 94%) than nonimplementers (107/139, 76.9%) perceived few technical problems (P<.001), and more implementers (53/77, 68%) than nonimplementers (103/215, 47.9%) considered that their organization has resources to offer ICBT programs (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite research demonstrating the effectiveness of ICBT for depression and anxiety and national guidelines recommending its use, ICBT is implemented in few primary care organizations in Sweden. Several interesting differences between implementers and nonimplementers were identified, which may help inform interventions focusing on facilitating the implementation of ICBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Brantnell
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Division of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joanne Woodford
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Enrico Baraldi
- Division of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Theo van Achterberg
- KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Louise von Essen
- Clinical Psychology in Healthcare, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Goo B, Seo BK. Strategies to revise the Korean Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc—A web based approach. Eur J Integr Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
190
|
Kim JO, Hanumanthappa N, Chung YT, Beck J, Koul R, Bashir B, Cooke A, Dubey A, Butler J, Nashed M, Hunter W, Ong A. Does dissemination of guidelines alone increase the use of palliative single-fraction radiotherapy? Initial report of a longitudinal change management campaign at a provincial cancer program. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:190-197. [PMID: 32905177 PMCID: PMC7467795 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite level 1 evidence demonstrating the equivalence of single-fraction radiotherapy (sfrt) and multiple-fraction radiotherapy (mfrt) for the palliation of painful bone metastases, sfrt remains underused. In 2015, to encourage the sustainable use of palliative radiation oncology resources, CancerCare Manitoba disseminated, to each radiation oncologist in Manitoba, guidelines from Choosing Wisely Canada (cwc) that recommend sfrt. We assessed whether dissemination of the guidelines influenced sfrt use in Manitoba in 2016, and we identified factors associated with mfrt. Methods All patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis in Manitoba from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 were identified from the provincial radiotherapy database. Patient, treatment, and disease characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record and tabulated by fractionation schedule. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with mfrt. Results In 2016, 807 patients (mean age: 70 years; range: 35-96 years) received palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis, with 69% of the patients having uncomplicated bone metastasis. The most common primary malignancies were prostate (27.1%), lung (20.6%), and breast cancer (15.9%). In 62% of cases, mfrt was used-a proportion that was unchanged from 2015. On multivariable analysis, a gastrointestinal [odds ratio (or): 5.3] or lung primary (or: 3.3), complicated bone metastasis (or: 4.3), and treatment at a subsidiary site (or: 4.4) increased the odds of mfrt use. Conclusions Dissemination of cwc recommendations alone did not increase sfrt use by radiation oncologists in 2016. A more comprehensive knowledge translation effort is therefore warranted and is now underway to encourage increased uptake of sfrt in Manitoba.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J O Kim
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | | | - Y T Chung
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - J Beck
- Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - R Koul
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - B Bashir
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - A Cooke
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - A Dubey
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - J Butler
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - M Nashed
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| | - W Hunter
- Radiation Oncology, Western Manitoba Cancer Centre, Brandon, MB
| | - A Ong
- Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Tahvonen P, Oikarinen H, Tervonen O. The effect of interventions on appropriate use of lumbar spine radiograph and CT examinations in young adults and children: a three-year follow-up. Acta Radiol 2020; 61:1042-1049. [PMID: 31865752 DOI: 10.1177/0284185119893091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to international guidelines, radiological examinations of the lumbar spine are of limited value and do not improve clinical outcome unless there are clinical red flags present suggesting serious pathology. Nevertheless, the utilization of lumbar spine imaging remains high. PURPOSE To follow up the effects of active referral guideline implementation and education on the number and appropriateness of lumbar spine radiographs and computed tomography (CT) examinations in young patients and to evaluate whether the appropriate radiographs have more significant findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS Referral guidelines for spine examinations and info pocket cards on radiation protection were distributed to referring practitioners. Educational lectures were provided annually. The number of lumbar spine radiographs and CT examinations on patients aged <35 years was analyzed before and three years after the interventions. Appropriateness and findings of 313 radiographs and appropriateness of 117 CT scans of the lumbar spine were assessed. RESULTS The number of lumbar spine radiographs and CT scans decreased significantly after the interventions and the level remained unchanged during the follow-up (-33% and -72%, respectively, P < 0.001). Appropriateness improved significantly in radiographs from 2005 to 2009 (65% vs. 85%) and in CT scans already from 2005 to 2007 (23% vs. 63%). Radiographs that were in accordance with the guidelines had more significant findings compared to radiographs that were not; in young adults, this was 56% versus 21% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION A combination of interventions can achieve a sustained reduction in the number of lumbar spine examinations and improve appropriateness. Inappropriate lumbar spine radiographs do not seem to contain significant findings that would affect patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pirita Tahvonen
- Department of Radiology, Lapland Central Hospital, Rovaniemi, Finland
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Heljä Oikarinen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Osmo Tervonen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Giguère A, Zomahoun HTV, Carmichael PH, Uwizeye CB, Légaré F, Grimshaw JM, Gagnon MP, Auguste DU, Massougbodji J. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD004398. [PMID: 32748975 PMCID: PMC8475791 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004398.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Printed educational materials are widely used dissemination strategies to improve the quality of healthcare professionals' practice and patient health outcomes. Traditionally they are presented in paper formats such as monographs, publication in peer-reviewed journals and clinical guidelines. This is the fourth update of the review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of printed educational materials (PEMs) on the practice of healthcare professionals and patient health outcomes. To explore the influence of some of the characteristics of the printed educational materials (e.g. source, content, format) on their effect on healthcare professionals' practice and patient health outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), HealthStar, CINAHL, ERIC, CAB Abstracts, Global Health, and EPOC Register from their inception to 6 February 2019. We checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised trials (RTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series studies (ITSs) that evaluated the impact of PEMs on healthcare professionals' practice or patient health outcomes. We included three types of comparisons: (1) PEM versus no intervention, (2) PEM versus single intervention, (3) multifaceted intervention where PEM is included versus multifaceted intervention without PEM. Any objective measure of professional practice (e.g. prescriptions for a particular drug), or patient health outcomes (e.g. blood pressure) were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers undertook data extraction independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. For analyses, we grouped the included studies according to study design, type of outcome and type of comparison. For controlled trials, we reported the median effect size for each outcome within each study, the median effect size across outcomes for each study and the median of these effect sizes across studies. Where data were available, we re-analysed the ITS studies by converting all data to a monthly basis and estimating the effect size from the change in the slope of the regression line between before and after implementation of the PEM. We reported median changes in slope for each outcome, for each study, and then across studies. We standardised all changes in slopes by their standard error, allowing comparisons and combination of different outcomes. We categorised each PEM according to potential effects modifiers related to the source of the PEMs, the channel used for their delivery, their content, and their format. We assessed the risks of bias of all the included studies. MAIN RESULTS We included 84 studies: 32 RTs, two CBAs and 50 ITS studies. Of the 32 RTs, 19 were cluster RTs that used various units of randomisation, such as practices, health centres, towns, or areas. The majority of the included studies (82/84) compared the effectiveness of PEMs to no intervention. Based on the RTs that provided moderate-certainty evidence, we found that PEMs distributed to healthcare professionals probably improve their practice, as measured with dichotomous variables, compared to no intervention (median absolute risk difference (ARD): 0.04; interquartile range (IQR): 0.01 to 0.09; 3,963 healthcare professionals randomised within 3073 units). We could not confirm this finding using the evidence gathered from continuous variables (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.11; IQR: -0.16 to 0.52; 1631 healthcare professionals randomised within 1373 units ), from the ITS studies (standardised median change in slope = 0.69; 35 studies), or from the CBA study because the certainty of this evidence was very low. We also found, based on RTs that provided moderate-certainty evidence, that PEMs distributed to healthcare professionals probably make little or no difference to patient health as measured using dichotomous variables, compared to no intervention (ARD: 0.02; IQR: -0.005 to 0.09; 935,015 patients randomised within 959 units). The evidence gathered from continuous variables (SMD: 0.05; IQR: -0.12 to 0.09; 6,737 patients randomised within 594 units) or from ITS study results (standardised median change in slope = 1.12; 8 studies) do not strengthen these findings because the certainty of this evidence was very low. Two studies (a randomised trial and a CBA) compared a paper-based version to a computerised version of the same PEM. From the RT that provided evidence of low certainty, we found that PEM in computerised versions may make little or no difference to professionals' practice compared to PEM in printed versions (ARD: -0.02; IQR: -0.03 to 0.00; 139 healthcare professionals randomised individually). This finding was not strengthened by the CBA study that provided very low certainty evidence (SMD: 0.44; 32 healthcare professionals). The data gathered did not allow us to conclude which PEM characteristics influenced their effectiveness. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable. Half of the included RTs were at risk of selection bias. Most of the ITS studies were conducted retrospectively, without prespecifying the expected effect of the intervention, or acknowledging the presence of a secular trend. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The results of this review suggest that, when used alone and compared to no intervention, PEMs may slightly improve healthcare professionals' practice outcomes and patient health outcomes. The effectiveness of PEMs compared to other interventions, or of PEMs as part of a multifaceted intervention, is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik Giguère
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada
- VITAM Research center on Sustainable Health, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the SPOR-SUPPORT Unit of Québec, Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne - Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Claude Bernard Uwizeye
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Health Care and Services (CERSSPL-UL), Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
| | - David U Auguste
- Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - José Massougbodji
- Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the SPOR-SUPPORT Unit of Québec, Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
|
194
|
Avent ML, Cosgrove SE, Price-Haywood EG, van Driel ML. Antimicrobial stewardship in the primary care setting: from dream to reality? BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:134. [PMID: 32641063 PMCID: PMC7346425 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01191-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians who work in primary care are potentially the most influential healthcare professionals to address the problem of antibiotic resistance because this is where most antibiotics are prescribed. Despite a number of evidence based interventions targeting the management of community infections, the inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates remain high. DISCUSSION The question is how can appropriate prescribing of antibiotics through the use of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) programs be successfully implemented in primary care. We discuss that a top-down approach utilising a combination of strategies to ensure the sustainable implementation and uptake of AMS interventions in the community is necessary to support clinicians and ensure a robust implementation of AMS in primary care. Specifically, we recommend a national accreditation standard linked to the framework of Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship, supported by resources to fund the implementation of AMS interventions that are connected to quality improvement initiatives. This article debates how this can be achieved. The paper highlights that in order to support the sustainable uptake of AMS programs in primary care, an approach similar to the hospital and post-acute care settings needs to be adopted, utilising a combination of behavioural and regulatory processes supported by sustainable funding. Without these strategies the problem of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing will not be adequately addressed in the community and the successful implementation and uptake of AMS programs will remain a dream.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Avent
- Statewide Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - S E Cosgrove
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - E G Price-Haywood
- Ochsner Health System, Center for Outcomes and Health Services Research, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Ochnser Clinical School, The University of Queensland, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - M L van Driel
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Kelleher KJ, Rubin D, Hoagwood K. Policy and Practice Innovations to Improve Prescribing of Psychoactive Medications for Children. Psychiatr Serv 2020; 71:706-712. [PMID: 32188362 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Psychoactive medications are the most expensive and fastest-growing class of pharmaceutical agents for children. The cost, side effects, and unprecedented growth rate at which these drugs are prescribed have raised alarms from health care clinicians, patient advocates, and agencies about the appropriateness of how these drugs are distributed to parents and their children. This article examines current prescribing of three classes of psychoactive drugs-stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics-and efforts to improve pediatric prescribing of these agents. Federal policy efforts to curb questionable prescribing of psychoactive medications to children have focused particularly on oversight of antipsychotic use among foster care children. The article reviews system-level interventions, including delivery system enhancements, which increase availability of alternatives to medication treatments, employ electronic medical record reminders, and increase cross-sector care coordination; clinician prescribing enhancements, which disseminate best-practice guidelines, create quality and learning collaboratives, and offer "second opinion" psychiatric consultations; and prescriber monitoring programs, which include retrospective review and prospective monitoring of physicians' prescribing to identify patterns suggestive of inappropriate prescribing. Potential interventions to deter inappropriate pediatric prescribing are briefly described, such as transparency in drug prices and incentives among insurers, public agencies, and pharmacy benefit managers; value-based purchasing, specifically value-based payment for medications; and preventive interventions, such as parent training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly J Kelleher
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Kelleher); PolicyLab at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia (Rubin); Department of Pediatrics, New York University Langone Health, New York (Hoagwood)
| | - David Rubin
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Kelleher); PolicyLab at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia (Rubin); Department of Pediatrics, New York University Langone Health, New York (Hoagwood)
| | - Kimberly Hoagwood
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Kelleher); PolicyLab at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia (Rubin); Department of Pediatrics, New York University Langone Health, New York (Hoagwood)
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Slaughter SE, Eliasziw M, Ickert C, Jones CA, Estabrooks CA, Wagg AS. Effectiveness of reminders to sustain practice change among direct care providers in residential care facilities: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2020; 15:51. [PMID: 32611451 PMCID: PMC7329498 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01012-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to compare the effectiveness of monthly or quarterly peer reminder knowledge translation interventions, with monthly or quarterly paper-based reminders, to sustain a mobility innovation, the sit-to-stand activity. METHOD A cluster RCT using a stratified 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted in 24 Canadian residential care facilities with 416 residents and 54 peer reminder care aides. The 1-year intervention included two intensities of reminders (high: socially based peer reminders delivered by volunteer care aides to other care aides; low: paper-based reminders posted in residents' rooms), at two frequencies (monthly; every 3 months). Intervention fidelity was assessed using questionnaires and observations. Monthly sustainability rate of the sit-to-stand activity was calculated as the percentage of opportunities that residents successfully completed the activity in 30 days. Residents' sustainability rates were analyzed using a linear mixed model that mirrored the clustered repeated-measures factorial trial design. The model included a random intercept to account for clustering within sites. An unstructured covariance structure characterized the interdependence of repeated measures over time. RESULTS Twenty-four sites were randomized. One site was excluded because of falsifying data, leaving 23 sites and 349 residents for intention-to-treat analysis. Paper reminders were implemented with high fidelity across all arms (91.5% per protocol), while the peer reminders were implemented with moderate fidelity in the monthly group (81.0% per protocol) and poor fidelity in the quarterly group (51.7% per protocol). At month 1, mean sustainability ranged from 40.7 to 47.2 per 100 opportunities, across the four intervention arms (p = 0.43). Mean rate of sustainability in the high intensity, high frequency group diverged after randomization, yielding statistically significant differences among the groups at 4 months which persisted for the remainder of the trial. After 12 months, the mean sustainability in the high intensity, high frequency group was approximately twice that of the other three groups combined (64.1 versus 37.8 per 100 opportunities, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A monthly peer reminder intervention was more effective than a quarterly peer reminder intervention, a monthly paper-based reminder intervention, and a quarterly paper-based reminder intervention, in supporting care aides to sustain a mobility innovation in residential care facilities over 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01746459. Registered 11 December 2012: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01746459 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Slaughter
- Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| | - Misha Eliasziw
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, USA
| | - Carla Ickert
- Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - C Allyson Jones
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Adrian S Wagg
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Mariappan P. Propensity for Quality: No Longer a Tenuous Proposition in Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2020; 78:60-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
198
|
Daw P, van Beurden SB, Greaves C, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Harrison A, Dalal H, McDonagh STJ, Doherty PJ, Taylor RS. Getting evidence into clinical practice: protocol for evaluation of the implementation of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036137. [PMID: 32565467 PMCID: PMC7307528 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves health-related quality of life and reduces hospital admissions. However, patients with heart failure (HF) often fail to attend centre-based CR programmes. Novel ways of delivering healthcare, such as home-based CR programmes, may improve uptake of CR. Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a new, effective and cost-effective home-based CR programme for people with HF. The aim of this prospective mixed-method implementation evaluation study is to assess the implementation of the REACH-HF CR programme in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The specific objectives are to (1) explore NHS staff perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of REACH-HF, (2) assess the quality of delivery of the programme in real-life clinical settings, (3) consider the nature of any adaptation(s) made and how they might impact on intervention effectiveness and (4) compare real-world patient outcomes to those seen in a prior clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS REACH-HF will be rolled out in four NHS CR centres across the UK. Three healthcare professionals from each site will be trained to deliver the 12-week programme. In-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups will be conducted with approximately 24 NHS professionals involved in delivering or commissioning the programme. Consultations for 48 patients (12 per site) will be audio recorded and scored using an intervention fidelity checklist. Outcomes routinely recorded in the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation will be analysed and compared with outcomes from a recent randomised controlled trial: the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire and exercise capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test). Qualitative research findings will be mapped onto the Normalisation Process Theory framework and presented in the form of a narrative synthesis. Results of the study will inform national roll-out of REACH-HF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study (IRAS 261723) has received ethics approval from the South Central (Hampshire B) Research Ethics Committee (19/SC/0304). Written informed consent will be obtained from all health professionals and patients participating in the study. The research team will ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Data Protection Act 2018, General Data Protection Regulations and in accordance with the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2005). Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings to publicise and explain the research methods and findings to key audiences to facilitate the further uptake of the REACH-HF intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN86234930.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha B van Beurden
- Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Hasnain Dalal
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Cornwall, UK
| | | | | | - Rod S Taylor
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Patiño-Lugo DF, Pastor Durango MDP, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Posada Borrero AM, Ciro Correa V, Plata Contreras JA, Vera Giraldo CY, Aguirre-Acevedo DC. Implementation of the clinical practice guideline for individuals with amputations in Colombia: a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:538. [PMID: 32539755 PMCID: PMC7296745 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05406-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The issue of lower extremity amputation has been in the Colombian political agenda for its relationship with the armed conflict and antipersonnel mines. In 2015 the Colombian Ministry of Health published a national clinical practice guideline (CPG) for amputee patients. However, there is a need to design implementation strategies that target end-users and the context in which the CPG will be used. This study aims to identify users’ perceptions about the barriers and facilitators for implementing the guideline for the care of amputee patients in a middle-income country such as Colombia. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 users, including patients, health workers, and administrative staff of institutions of the health system in Colombia. Individuals were purposively selected to ensure different perspectives, allowing a balance of individual positions. Results According to participants’ perceptions, barriers to implementation are classified as individual barriers (characteristics of the amputee patient and professionals), health system barriers (resource availability, timely care, information systems, service costs, and regulatory changes), and barriers related to clinical practice guidelines (utility, methodological rigour, implementation flexibility, and characteristics of the group developing the guidelines). Conclusions Our study advances knowledge on the perceived individual and health system barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the CPG for amputee patients in Colombia. Importantly, the governance, financial, and service delivery arrangements of the Colombian health system are determining factors in implementing CPGs. For example, the financial arrangements between the insurance companies and the health care provider institutions were identified as barriers for the implementation of recommendations related to the continuity and opportunity of care of patients with amputations. The design of implementation strategies that successfully address the individual behaviours and the contextual health systems arrangements may significantly impact the health care process for amputee patients in Colombia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Patiño-Lugo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - María Del Pilar Pastor Durango
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Ana María Posada Borrero
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Verónica Ciro Correa
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jesús Alberto Plata Contreras
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Claudia Yaneth Vera Giraldo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Werfalli M, Raubenheimer PJ, Engel M, Musekiwa A, Bobrow K, Peer N, Hoegfeldt C, Kalula S, Kengne AP, Levitt NS. The effectiveness of peer and community health worker-led self-management support programs for improving diabetes health-related outcomes in adults in low- and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2020; 9:133. [PMID: 32505214 PMCID: PMC7275531 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01377-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Community-based peer and community health worker-led diabetes self-management programs (COMP-DSMP) can benefit diabetes care, but the supporting evidence has been inadequately assessed. This systematic review explores the nature of COMP-DSMP in low- and middle-income countries' (LMIC) primary care settings and evaluates implementation strategies and diabetes-related health outcomes. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed-MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL PsycINFO Database, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR), and HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) for studies that evaluated a COMP-DSMP in adults with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes in World Bank-defined LMIC from January 2000 to December 2019. Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials with at least 3 months follow-up and reporting on a behavioural, a primary psychological, and/or a clinical outcome were included. Implementation strategies were analysed using the standardised implementation framework by Proctor et al. Heterogeneity in study designs, outcomes, the scale of measurements, and measurement times precluded meta-analysis; thus, a narrative description of studies is provided. RESULTS Of the 702 records identified, eleven studies with 6090 participants were included. COMP-DSMPs were inconsistently associated with improvements in clinical, behavioural, and psychological outcomes. Many of the included studies were evaluated as being of low quality, most had a substantial risk of bias, and there was a significant heterogeneity of the intervention characteristics (for example, peer definition, selection, recruitment, training and type, dose, and duration of delivered intervention), such that generalisation was not possible. CONCLUSIONS The level of evidence of this systematic review was considered low according to the GRADE criteria. The existing evidence however does show some improvements in outcomes. We recommend ongoing, but well-designed studies using a framework such as the MRC framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions to inform the evidence base on the contribution of COMP-DSMP in LMIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Werfalli
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
| | - Peter J. Raubenheimer
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
| | - Mark Engel
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
| | - Alfred Musekiwa
- Chronic Diseases of Lifestyle Research Unit, Durban, Durban, South Africa
| | - Kirsten Bobrow
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
| | - Nasheeta Peer
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
- Chronic Diseases of Lifestyle Research Unit, Durban, Durban, South Africa
| | | | - Sebastiana Kalula
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Andre Pascal Kengne
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
- South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Naomi S. Levitt
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape 7935 South Africa
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Chronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, J 47 Room 86, Old Groote Schuur Hospital Building, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|