201
|
汪 夏, 朱 晓, 吴 茜. [Current Status of and Barriers to the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in 77 Tertiary Hospitals]. SICHUAN DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION 2023; 54:1000-1005. [PMID: 37866959 PMCID: PMC10579079 DOI: 10.12182/20230960601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the status of and obstacles to the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in tertiary-care general hospitals in China. Methods Questionnaire on the Current Status of and Barriers to the Implementation of ERAS in Tertiary-Care Hospitals, a self-developed questionnaire, was used to conduct a survey of 77 tertiary hospitals from 21 provinces across China between May 2022 and June 2022. The participating hospitals were selected by convenience sampling. The questionnaire on the current implementation status of ERAS was mainly focused on the departments involved and the ERAS programs implemented, incorporating a total of 25 items of three dimensions, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. The answer to each question consisted of 5 options from "never" to "always", which corresponded to 1 to 5 points on the scoring scale, with the higher scores indicating better implementation of the program concerned. In the questionnaire on barriers to ERAS implementation and recommendations, 10 items of two dimensions, including hospital management, and patient and caregiver, were concerned with the barriers to implementation. The answer to each question consisted of 5 options from "disagree" to "strongly agree", which corresponded to 1 to 5 points on the scoring scale, with the higher scores indicating the greater importance of the barriers. Results ERAS programs were implemented in 73 (94.8%) hospitals. The best-implemented items were preoperative education (4.73±0.51), prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (4.55±0.71), and postoperative follow-up (4.40±0.81). The items of poor implementation status were preoperative prehabilitation (2.71±1.40), preoperative oral carbohydrate drinks (3.03±1.49), and early ambulation after surgeries (3.04±1.22). The main obstacles to ERAS implementation included a lack of effective incentive systems, poor motivation among the medical and nursing staffs (3.21±0.93), a lack of disease-specific clinical implementation pathways (3.16±1.06), and a lack of experience in multidisciplinary teamwork (2.98±1.17). Conclusion There is a high rate of ERAS implementation in tertiary general hospitals in China, but clinical implementation and dissemination are still confronted with many obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 夏云 汪
- 江西科技学院 (南昌 330000)Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330000, China
| | - 晓萍 朱
- 江西科技学院 (南昌 330000)Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330000, China
| | - 茜 吴
- 江西科技学院 (南昌 330000)Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330000, China
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Porserud A, Aly M, Nygren-Bonnier M, Hagströmer M. Association between early mobilisation after abdominal cancer surgery and postoperative complications. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106943. [PMID: 37296020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative complications and readmission to hospital after major cancer surgery are common. Early mobilisation in hospital is thought to reduce complications, and patients are recommended to mobilise for at least 2 h on the day of surgery, and thereafter at least 6 h per day. Evidence for early mobilisation is limited and therefore also how early mobilisation may influence the development of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between early mobilisation after abdominal cancer surgery and readmission to hospital due to postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult patients who had abdominal cancer surgery due to ovarian, colorectal, or urinary bladder cancer between January 2017 and May 2018 were included in the study. Exposure was set to the mean number of steps taken over the first three postoperative days, measured with an activity monitor. Primary outcome was readmission to hospital within 30 days after discharge, and secondary outcome was severity of complications. Data were obtained from medical records. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between exposure and outcomes. RESULTS Of 133 patients included in the study, 25 were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after discharge. The analysis showed no association between early mobilisation and readmission or severity of complications. CONCLUSION Early mobilisation does not seem to increase the odds of readmission, nor the severity of complications. This study contributes to the limited research on the association between early mobilisation and postoperative complications after abdominal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Porserud
- Karolinska Institutet, Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 23100, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden; Karolinska University Hospital, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Markus Aly
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska University Hospital, Patient Area Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Malin Nygren-Bonnier
- Karolinska Institutet, Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 23100, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden; Karolinska University Hospital, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Maria Hagströmer
- Karolinska Institutet, Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 23100, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden; Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, 113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Sophiahemmet University, Department of Health Promoting Science, 114 28, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Baamer RM, Humes DJ, Toh LS, Knaggs RD, Lobo DN. Predictors of persistent postoperative opioid use following colectomy: a population-based cohort study from England. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:1081-1092. [PMID: 37265223 PMCID: PMC10953341 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study on adults undergoing colectomy from 2010 to 2019 used linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data to determine the prevalence of persistent postoperative opioid use following colectomy, stratified by pre-admission opioid exposure, and identify associated predictors. Based on pre-admission opioid exposure, patients were categorised as opioid-naïve, currently exposed (opioid prescription 0-6 months before admission) and previously exposed (opioid prescription within 7-12 months before admission). Persistent postoperative opioid use was defined as requiring an opioid prescription within 90 days of discharge, along with one or more opioid prescriptions 91-180 days after hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to obtain odds ratios for predictors of persistent postoperative opioid use. Among the 93,262 patients, 15,081 (16.2%) were issued at least one opioid prescription within 90 days of discharge. Of these, 6791 (45.0%) were opioid-naïve, 7528 (49.9%) were currently exposed and 762 (5.0%) were previously exposed. From the whole cohort, 7540 (8.1%) developed persistent postoperative opioid use. Patients with pre-operative opioid exposure had the highest persistent use: 5317 (40.4%) from the currently exposed group; 305 (9.8%) from the previously exposed group; and 1918 (2.5%) from the opioid-naïve group. The odds of developing persistent opioid use were higher among individuals who used long-acting opioid formulations in the 180 days before colectomy than those who used short-acting formulations (odds ratio 3.41 (95%CI 3.07-3.77)). Predictors of persistent opioid use included: previous opioid exposure; high deprivation index; multiple comorbidities; use of long-acting opioids; white race; and open surgery. Minimally invasive surgical approaches were associated with lower odds of persistent opioid use and may represent a modifiable risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. M. Baamer
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of PharmacyKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
| | - D. J. Humes
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - L. S. Toh
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - R. D. Knaggs
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Pain Centre Versus ArthritisUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - D. N. Lobo
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
- David Greenfield Metabolic Physiology Unit, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing ResearchSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
Hootsmans N, Parmiter S, Connors K, Badve SB, Snyder E, Turcotte JJ, Jayaraman SS, Zahiri HR. Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program to limit perioperative opioid use in outpatient minimally invasive GI and hernia surgeries. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7192-7198. [PMID: 37353653 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10217-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative pain management is important for patient satisfaction while returning to homeostasis in the safest way possible. Studies show that patients don't require as much opioids as once thought. The benefits of ERAS pathways extend beyond enhancement of patients' perioperative experience, and include reducing opioid prescriptions in the face of the ongoing nationwide opioid crisis and evidence of prescription opioids as a contributor. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing same day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures for GI and hernia disease using a minimal-opioid ERAS protocol at two community hospitals between January 2020 and May 2022. We included elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis without perforation, and minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) inguinal and ventral hernia repair or abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Primary outcome was postoperative opioid use. RESULTS A total of 509 patients were included, undergoing procedures of MIS hernia repair (52.5%), LC (43.6%), and LA (7.9%). Only 9.4% of patients received opioid prescriptions at discharge, with no difference between groups. Among the patients receiving a prescription at discharge, there was a significant difference in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed (25.0 ± 0.0 in the LA group, 65.0 ± 41.4 in the LC group, 100.6 ± 46.2 in the MIS hernia/AWR group; P = 0.015). Nine percent of patients called with pain management concerns postoperatively. ASA score ≥ 3 was associated with increased odds for postoperative opioid prescription (OR 2.084; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that an opioid-sparing ERAS program effectively manages pain for patients undergoing multiple outpatient MIS GI/hernia procedures, and suggests generalizability across a diverse range of operations. Therefore, the use of ERAS may safely and effectively expand beyond inpatient MIS and open surgeries that target reduced length of stay to also minimize opioids for outpatient procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Hootsmans
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA.
| | - Sara Parmiter
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Connors
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Shivani B Badve
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Elise Snyder
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Justin J Turcotte
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | | | - H Reza Zahiri
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
- Luminis Health Doctors Community Medical Center, Lanham, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Abdelnaby A, Alcabes A. Can Colorectal Surgery Be Performed as an Outpatient Surgery? Adv Surg 2023; 57:279-285. [PMID: 37536859 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
The potential to discharge patients safely within the same day after colorectal surgery has developed over time with concurrent advances in concepts of enhanced recovery pathways, along with minimally invasive techniques available to surgeons. The advent of planned same-day discharges after elective colectomy is made possible by research establishing improved length of stay with minimal morbidity in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery and especially minimally invasive surgery in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. In tracing the timeline of research and development of knowledge in this setting, the safety of outpatient colorectal surgery can be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abier Abdelnaby
- Colon and Rectal Surgical Services, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| | - Analena Alcabes
- Department of Surgery, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Bergamaschi L, Chiaravalli S, Signoroni S, Di Bartolomeo M, Ferrari A. Management and pharmacotherapy of pediatric colorectal carcinoma: a review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1527-1535. [PMID: 37358925 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2230123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most common tumors in adult, but is extremely rare in children. In childhood, CRC often presents unfavorable aggressive histotypes, advanced clinical stage at onset and a worse prognosis. Pediatric CRC series are limited and include few patients, therefore information about treatment strategy and pharmacotherapy is scarce. For this reason, management of these patients represents a real challenge for pediatric oncologists. AREAS COVERED The authors provide an overview of the general features and management strategies of pediatric CRC with specific attention to systemic treatment. Literature data regarding pharmacotherapy in published pediatric series are summarized and analyzed in detail, according to adult treatment standards. EXPERT OPINION In the absence of specific recommendations for pediatric CRC, the general therapeutic strategy should follow the same principles as for adults and should be the result of a multidisciplinary discussion. Patient access to optimal treatment is difficult due to the lack of new drugs approved for the pediatric age group and non-availability of clinical trials. Collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists is considered crucial in order to overcome these issues and find solutions to increase knowledge and improve the outcome of such a rare disease in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bergamaschi
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Chiaravalli
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Signoroni
- Unit of Hereditary Digestive Tract Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Abhinav K, Jadhav D, Andar UB, Karmarkar V, Agrawal R, Agrawal A. Management of Post-craniotomy Pain in Elective Cases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus 2023; 15:e46189. [PMID: 37905293 PMCID: PMC10613341 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Craniotomy is associated with significant postoperative discomfort. Standardized pain management and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol could improve patient-reported outcomes and lower medical expenses. AIM The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the effectiveness of an ERAS protocol for neurosurgery in the treatment of postoperative pain following elective craniotomies. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 128 patients were assigned to the ERAS group and received care in accordance with the neurosurgical ERAS regulations, while 130 other participants were assigned to the control group and received traditional postoperative assistance. The participants' postoperative pain ratings using the numerical rating scale (NRS) were this study's main outcome of interest. The verbal NRS uses the numbers 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no sensation of pain and 10 indicating the most severe pain. On postoperative day (POD) 1, the patients' postoperative pain level at the surgical site was evaluated using the NRS. This was repeated every day until the patient either reported feeling no sensation of pain or was discharged home. RESULTS The mean value of pain on the day of surgery was 4.43 ± 0.43 and 4.72 ± 0.68 for patients in the ERAS and control groups, respectively. The pain values were higher in the control group compared to the ERAS group. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.478). The mean value of pain on POD1 was 3.13 ± 0.21 and 4.45 ± 0.95 for patients in the ERAS and control groups, respectively. These pain values were higher in the control group compared to the ERAS group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.011). The mean value of pain on POD2 was 2.86 ± 0.3 and 4.33 ± 0.37 for patients in the ERAS and control groups, respectively. The values of pain were higher in the control group compared to the ERAS group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.003). The mean value of pain on POD3 was 2.33 ± 0.52 and 4.04 ± 0.15 for patients in the ERAS and control groups, respectively. The pain values were higher in the control group compared to the ERAS group. The difference was meaningful statistically (p < 0.001). The mean value of pain on POD4 was 2.26 ± 0.9 and 2.84 ± 0.13 for the ERAS and control groups, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.274). The ERAS group had a significantly higher proportion of participants rating their pain between 1 and 3 (68.9%) and a lower proportion rating their pain between 4 and 7 (28.2%), compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Differences in the highest pain ratings (8-10) between the groups were not statistically significant. The duration of hospital stay, beginning from surgery to discharge, was lesser among study participants in the ERAS group, and this finding was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The findings of this study imply that the ERAS protocol may aid pain management following elective craniotomies. Additionally, the ERAS protocol decreased the overall expense of medical care and the cumulative/postoperative length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumar Abhinav
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, IND
| | - Dikpal Jadhav
- Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Mumbai, IND
| | - Uday B Andar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, IND
| | - Vikram Karmarkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND
| | - Rama Agrawal
- Department of Physiology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND
| | - Ankita Agrawal
- Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Patna, IND
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Cukierman DS, Cata JP, Gan TJ. Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2023; 37:285-303. [PMID: 37938077 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23 h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Cukierman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tong Joo Gan
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Buzzi G, Antonello M, Scognamiglio F, De Simoni O, Spolverato G, Pilati P, Pucciarelli S, Angriman I, Scarpa M, Castagliuolo I. Predictors of urinary tract infection after lower gastrointestinal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:342. [PMID: 37642738 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03064-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections (UTIs) cause postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal (GI) surgery that can prolong postoperative hospital stays. In patients with a fever of unknown origin (FUO), clinicians ignore what to do while waiting for the results of the urine culture test. This study aimed to develop a nomogram predicting UTI in the case of postoperative FUO. METHODS This observational, retrospective study included all consecutive patients from 1 November 2020 to 1 November 2021 undergoing lower-GI surgery at the Chirurgia Generale 3, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. A nomogram was created and externally validated in 90 consecutive patients undergoing urine culture tests for FUO at the Chirurgia Oncologica Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology. RESULTS In the development cohort, 109 (N = 109) patients performed a urine culture test for FUO, and 39 were diagnosed with UTI. In a multivariate analysis of patients who underwent urine culture tests for FUO, UTI was associated with female sex, older age, and duration of catheterization at the date of the urine culture test. We developed a nomogram to predict UTI in surgical patients with a C-index of 0.76. In the validation cohort, 90 consecutive patients, who had lower-GI surgery, underwent a urine culture test for FUO and were tested with this nomogram. In the validation cohort, the C-index of the nomogram for predicting a positive urine culture test was 0.71. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE UTIs are a common problem in patients undergoing lower-GI surgery. A nomogram including the major risk factors may help to reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics during the period awaiting the result of the urine culture test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Buzzi
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Maria Antonello
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua and Microbiology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Scognamiglio
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Ottavia De Simoni
- Chirurgia Oncologica Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Castelfranco Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Pilati
- Chirurgia Oncologica Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Castelfranco Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Imerio Angriman
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Scarpa
- Chirurgia Generale 3, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
| | - Ignazio Castagliuolo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua and Microbiology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Karlsson P, Nygren-Bonnier M, Henningsohn L, Rydwik E, Hagströmer M. The feasibility of using a digital tool to enhance mobilisation following abdominal cancer surgery-a non-randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:147. [PMID: 37612761 PMCID: PMC10463628 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01377-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early mobilisation is strongly recommended following abdominal cancer surgery, but evidence on how to structure early mobilisation to improve outcomes and support patient adherence is lacking. Pedatim® (Phystec) is a novel digital tool designed to support mobilisation in hospital settings using prescribed activities and goals on a tablet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the Pedatim tablet to enhance mobilisation following abdominal cancer surgery. METHODS In a non-randomised feasibility trial design, participants were recruited between January and May 2022 at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Participants used a Pedatim tablet from postoperative day 1 (POD 1) until hospital discharge. The primary objective was to evaluate process feasibility, regarding recruitment, compliance, and acceptability. Recruitment was measured by percentage of available patients included, eligibility criteria sufficiency, and number of dropouts. Compliance was measured by number of patients using versus not using the board. Acceptability was measured using the System Usability Scale. The secondary objective was to evaluate scientific feasibility, defined as an indication of treatment effects where physical activity was assessed using an activPAL accelerometer. Unforeseen events relating to the tablet were also registered. RESULTS Based on predetermined feasibility criteria, the overall study design was determined to be feasible regarding recruitment as 69% accepted participation (n = 20), compliance was 95%, and the acceptability mean score was high (77/100). Eligibility criteria were not feasible as 79% (n = 108) of available patients were excluded. The intervention was determined to be scientifically feasible, mean steps per day increased from 623 (SD 766) to 1823 (SD 1446), and mean sit-to-stand transitions per day increased from 11 (SD 8) to 29 (SD 12) POD 1-4. Technical issues emerged, highlighting the need for available technical support and "user champions" among healthcare professionals on the ward. CONCLUSIONS Using the Pedatim tablet to enhance mobilisation following abdominal cancer surgery was deemed feasible, but a randomised controlled trial is needed to determine the tool's effectiveness. The study process was determined to be feasible with revisions of the eligibility criteria needed before a future trial. Involving healthcare professionals and providing available technical support are important for future implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrik Karlsson
- Department of Neurobiology, Division of Physiotherapy, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy & Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Malin Nygren-Bonnier
- Department of Neurobiology, Division of Physiotherapy, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy & Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Henningsohn
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Rydwik
- Department of Neurobiology, Division of Physiotherapy, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Hagströmer
- Department of Neurobiology, Division of Physiotherapy, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy & Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Wu EB, Li YY, Hung KC, Illias AM, Tsai YF, Yang YL, Chin JC, Wu SC. The Impact of Rocuronium and Sugammadex on Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Open Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:959. [PMID: 37627844 PMCID: PMC10451676 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), an all-encompassing perioperative care approach, has been demonstrated to enhance surgical results, mitigate postoperative issues, and decrease the length of hospital stay (LOS) in diverse surgical specialties. In this retrospective study, our objective was to examine the influence of muscle relaxant selection on LOS and perioperative results in adult patients undergoing open spine surgery. Specifically, we compared 201 patients who received cisatracurium and neostigmine with 201 patients who received rocuronium and sugammadex, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The utilization of the rocuronium and sugammadex combination in anesthesia for open spinal surgery did not lead to a reduction in the LOS but was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative chest radiographic abnormalities, including infiltration, consolidation, atelectasis, or pneumonia (p = 0.027). In our secondary analysis, multivariate analysis revealed multiple determinants influencing the prolonged LOS (>7 days) during open spine surgery. Bispectral index-guided anesthesia emerged as a protective factor, while variables such as excessive intraoperative blood loss and fluid administration as well as postoperative chest radiographic abnormalities independently contributed to prolonged LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- En-Bo Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (Y.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.Y.)
| | - Yan-Yi Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (Y.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.Y.)
| | - Kuo-Chuan Hung
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan;
| | - Amina M. Illias
- Department of Anesthesiology, Linko Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (A.M.I.); (Y.-F.T.)
| | - Yung-Fong Tsai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Linko Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (A.M.I.); (Y.-F.T.)
| | - Ya-Ling Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (Y.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.Y.)
| | - Jo-Chi Chin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Park One International Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan;
| | - Shao-Chun Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (Y.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.Y.)
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan;
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Fischer A, Veraar C, Worf I, Tarantino S, Kiss N, Schuh C, Hiesmayr M. More Nutritional Support on the Wards after a Previous Intensive Care Unit Stay: A nutritionDay Analysis in 136,667 Patients. Nutrients 2023; 15:3545. [PMID: 37630737 PMCID: PMC10459371 DOI: 10.3390/nu15163545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
ICU (intensive care unit) patients are exposed to nutritional risks such as swallowing problems and delayed gastric emptying. A previous ICU stay may affect nutritional support upon transfer to the ward. The aim was to study the use of enteral (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN), and oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in ward patients with and without a previous ICU stay, also referred to as post- and non-ICU patients. In total, 136,667 adult patients from the nutritionDay audit 2010-2019 were included. A previous ICU stay was defined as an ICU stay during the current hospitalisation before nutritionDay. About 10% of all patients were post-ICU patients. Post-ICU patients were more frequently exposed to risk factors such as a BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, weight loss, decreased mobility, fair or poor health status, less eating and a longer hospital length of stay before nDay. Two main results were shown. First, both post- and non-ICU patients were inadequately fed: About two thirds of patients eating less than half a meal did not receive EN, PN, or ONS. Second, post-ICU patients had a 1.3 to 2.0 higher chance to receive EN, PN, or ONS compared to non-ICU patients in multivariable models, accounting for sex, age, BMI, weight change, mobility, health status, amount eaten on nutritionDay, hospital length of stay, and surgical status. Based on these results, two future goals are suggested to improve nutritional support on the ward: first, insufficient eating should trigger nutritional therapy in both post- and non-ICU patients; second, medical caregivers should not neglect nutritional support in non-ICU patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arabella Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Cecilia Veraar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Isabella Worf
- Center for Medical Data Science (CeDAS), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (I.W.); (S.T.); (M.H.)
- nutritionDay Worldwide, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Tarantino
- Center for Medical Data Science (CeDAS), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (I.W.); (S.T.); (M.H.)
- nutritionDay Worldwide, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Noemi Kiss
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Christian Schuh
- IT-Systems and Communications (ITSC), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Michael Hiesmayr
- Center for Medical Data Science (CeDAS), Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (I.W.); (S.T.); (M.H.)
- nutritionDay Worldwide, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Smith BP, Jones BA, Cofer KD, Hollis RH, Shao C, Gleason L, Waldrop MG, Katta MH, Wood L, McLeod MC, Morris MS, Chu DI. Racial disparities in postoperative outcomes persist for patients with inflammatory bowel disease under a colorectal enhanced recovery program. Am J Surg 2023; 226:227-232. [PMID: 37120415 PMCID: PMC10524897 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) reduce racial disparities in surgical outcomes for general colorectal surgery populations. It is unclear, however, if disparities in IBD populations are impacted by ERPs. METHODS Retrospective study comparing IBD patients undergoing major elective colorectal operations before (2006-2014) and after (2015-2021) ERP implementation using ACS-NSQIP data. The primary outcome of length of stay (LOS) was analyzed by negative binomial regression, and secondary outcomes (complications and readmissions) by logistic regression. RESULTS Of 466 IBD patients, 47% were pre-ERP and 53% were ERP patients. In multivariable analysis stratified by ERP period, Black race was associated with increased odds of complications in the pre-ERP (OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.3) and ERP groups (OR 3.1 95%CI 1.3-7.6). Race was not a predictor of LOS or readmission in either group. High social vulnerability was associated with increased odds of readmission pre-ERP (OR 15.1, 95%CI 2.1-136.3), but this disparity was mitigated under ERPs (OR 1.4, 95%CI 0.4-5.6). CONCLUSION While ERPs mitigated some disparities by social vulnerability, racial disparities persist in IBD populations even under ERPs. Further work is needed to achieve surgical equity for IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burkely P Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Bayley A Jones
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Kevin D Cofer
- The Ohio State University, Department of Emergency Medicine, 750 Prior Hall, 376 W 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Robert H Hollis
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Connie Shao
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Lauren Gleason
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Mary G Waldrop
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Meghna H Katta
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Lauren Wood
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - M Chandler McLeod
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Melanie S Morris
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Daniel I Chu
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Fukuoka H, Tourlousse DM, Ohashi A, Suzuki S, Nakagawa K, Ozawa M, Ishibe A, Endo I, Sekiguchi Y. Elucidating colorectal cancer-associated bacteria through profiling of minimally perturbed tissue-associated microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1216024. [PMID: 37593761 PMCID: PMC10432157 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1216024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Sequencing-based interrogation of gut microbiota is a valuable approach for detecting microbes associated with colorectal cancer (CRC); however, such studies are often confounded by the effect of bowel preparation. In this study, we evaluated the viability of identifying CRC-associated mucosal bacteria through centimeter-scale profiling of the microbiota in tumors and adjacent noncancerous tissue from eleven patients who underwent colonic resection without preoperative bowel preparation. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed that differences between on- and off-tumor microbiota varied considerably among patients. For some patients, phylotypes affiliated with genera previously implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis, as well as genera with less well-understood roles in CRC, were enriched in tumor tissue, whereas for other patients, on- and off-tumor microbiota were very similar. Notably, the enrichment of phylotypes in tumor-associated mucosa was highly localized and no longer apparent even a few centimeters away from the tumor. Through short-term liquid culturing and metagenomics, we further generated more than one-hundred metagenome-assembled genomes, several representing bacteria that were enriched in on-tumor samples. This is one of the first studies to analyze largely unperturbed mucosal microbiota in tissue samples from the resected colons of unprepped CRC patients. Future studies with larger cohorts are expected to clarify the causes and consequences of the observed variability in the emergence of tumor-localized microbiota among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironori Fukuoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Dieter M. Tourlousse
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Akiko Ohashi
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Suzuki
- Department of Surgery, Fujisawa Shonandai Hospital, Fujisawa, Japan
| | - Kazuya Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Mayumi Ozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ishibe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yuji Sekiguchi
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
Scott MJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, Anderson ID, Balfour A, Foss NB, Cooper Z, Dhesi JK, French WB, Grant MC, Hammarqvist F, Hare SP, Havens JM, Holena DN, Hübner M, Johnston C, Kim JS, Lees NP, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Mohseni S, Ordoñez CA, Quiney N, Sharoky C, Urman RD, Wick E, Wu CL, Young-Fadok T, Peden CJ. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ®) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care. World J Surg 2023; 47:1850-1880. [PMID: 37277507 PMCID: PMC10241558 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07020-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care. METHODS Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL. RESULTS Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- University College London, London, UK
| | - Geeta Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey UK
| | - Robert J. Aitken
- Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009 Australia
| | - Iain D. Anderson
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott La, Salford, M6 8HD UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Angie Balfour
- Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU Scotland
| | | | - Zara Cooper
- Harvard Medical School, Kessler Director, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Division of Trauma, Burns, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120 USA
| | - Jugdeep K. Dhesi
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - W. Brenton French
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
| | - Michael C. Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| | - Folke Hammarqvist
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Hälsovägen 3. B85, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah P. Hare
- Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY UK
| | - Joaquim M. Havens
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carolyn Johnston
- Department of Anesthesia, St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London, UK
| | - Jeniffer S. Kim
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, Pasadena, CA 9110 USA
| | - Nicholas P. Lees
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Scott La, Salford, M6 8HD UK
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Dileep N. Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 701 85 Orebro, Sweden
| | - Carlos A. Ordoñez
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 No. 18 – 49, 760032 Cali, Colombia
- Sección de Cirugía de Trauma y Emergencias, Universidad del Valle – Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cl 5 No. 36-08, 760032 Cali, Colombia
| | - Nial Quiney
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU5 7XX UK
| | - Catherine Sharoky
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Richard D. Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University and Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10Th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Elizabeth Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave HSW1601, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Christopher L. Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine-Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Anesthesiology-Weill Cornell Medicine, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Tonia Young-Fadok
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 e. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Carol J. Peden
- Department of Anesthesiology Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue IRD 322, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Sinz S, Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Steffen T. Gum Chewing and Coffee Consumption but not Caffeine Intake Improve Bowel Function after Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1730-1745. [PMID: 37277676 PMCID: PMC10412511 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05702-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus is common after gastrointestinal surgery. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of gum chewing and coffee and caffeine intake on ileus-related outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing noninvasive treatments for ileus after gastrointestinal surgery. The main analyses included random effects network meta-analyses using frequentist methods with simultaneous direct and indirect comparisons of time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and length of stay. Bayesian network meta-analysis using Markov chains was also used. RESULTS A total of 32 RCTs comparing 4999 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Time to flatus was reduced by gum chewing (mean difference compared to control (MD): -11 h, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) - 16 to - 5 h, P < 0.001). Time to defecation was reduced by gum chewing and coffee, with MDs of -18 h (95% CI - 23 to - 13 h, P < 0.001) and -13 h (95% CI - 24 to - 1 h, P < 0.001), respectively. Length of stay was reduced by coffee and gum chewing with MDs of - 1.5 days (95% CI: - 2.5 to - 0.6 days, P < 0.001) and - 0.9 days (95% CI: - 1.3 to - 0.4 days, P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION Coffee and gum chewing were proven to be effective noninvasive approaches for shortening the postoperative length of hospital stay and time to first defecation, especially in open gastrointestinal surgery; thus these actions should be recommended after gastrointestinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Sinz
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
| | - René Warschkow
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ignazio Tarantino
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Thompson HM, Williams H, Omer DM, Yuval JB, Verheij FS, Fiasconaro M, Widmar M, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Shahrokni A, Garcia-Aguilar J. Comparison of short-term outcomes and survival between minimally invasive colectomy and open colectomy in patients 80 years of age and older. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1857-1865. [PMID: 37022559 PMCID: PMC10527224 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01575-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
We investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older with colon cancer who underwent robotic colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy. Data for patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center between January 2006 and November 2018 were collected retrospectively. Outcomes from minimally invasive laparoscopic or robotic colectomy were compared. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with significance evaluated by the log-rank test. The laparoscopic (n = 104) and the robotic (n = 75) colectomy groups did not differ across baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent a robotic colectomy had a shorter median length of hospital stay (5 versus 6 days; p < 0.001) and underwent fewer conversions to open surgery (3% versus 17%; p = 0.002) compared to the laparoscopic cohort. The groups did not differ in postoperative complication rates, overall survival or disease-free survival. Elderly patients undergoing robotic colectomy for colon cancer have a shorter hospital stay and lower rates of conversion without compromise to oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Thompson
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah Williams
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dana M Omer
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Floris S Verheij
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris H Wei
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Service, Jersey Shore Medical Center, Neptune Township, NJ, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Orbay Yaşli S, Günay Canpolat D, Doğruel F, Demirbaş AE. Efficacy of Tenoxicam, Paracetamol, and Their Combination in Postoperative Pain After Double-Jaw Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e44195. [PMID: 37641729 PMCID: PMC10460537 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Orthognathic surgical procedures include a series of surgical operations in which interventions are applied to the maxilla, mandible, or both for occlusal or aesthetic concerns due to facial skeletal development deformities. Double-jaw surgeries have the highest pain scores, in which both maxilla and mandible bones are intervened. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of individual applications of paracetamol and tenoxicam with their combined application on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery. Methods In this randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients undergoing double-jaw surgery were allocated into three groups, with each having 20 patients: the paracetamol group, the tenoxicam group, and the paracetamol-tenoxicam combination group. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at intervals of 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and again at the 24th postoperative hour. Additionally, the consumption of opioids and other rescue analgesics was documented over the 24-hour postoperative period. Results The VAS values at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 24 hours were lower in the paracetamol-tenoxicam group compared to the other groups (p<0.001). The need for a rescue analgesic drug in the first 24 hours was not observed in the tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam groups. Conclusion It was concluded that both tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam combinations, especially the tenoxicam-paracetamol combination, were good options for postoperative analgesia in patients with double-jaw surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seher Orbay Yaşli
- Anesthesiology in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, TUR
| | - Dilek Günay Canpolat
- Anesthesiology in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, TUR
| | - Fatma Doğruel
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, TUR
| | - Ahmet E Demirbaş
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, TUR
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Schott N, Chamu J, Ahmed N, Ahmed BH. Perioperative truncal peripheral nerve blocks for bariatric surgery: an opioid reduction strategy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:851-857. [PMID: 36854643 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgical patients are vulnerable to cardiopulmonary depressant effects of opioids. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to improve postoperative morbidity recommends regional anesthesia for postoperative pain management. However, there is limited evidence that peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have added benefit. OBJECTIVE Study the effect of PNB on postoperative pain and opioid use following bariatric surgery. SETTING Academic medical center, United States. METHODS We conducted a cohort study of patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. A total of 44 patients received the control ERAS protocol with preoperative oral extended-release morphine sulfate (MS), while 45 patients underwent a PNB with either intrathecal morphine (IM) or oral MS per local ERAS protocol. The PNB group either underwent preoperative bilateral T7 paravertebral (PVT) PNBs (27 patients) with IM or postoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) PNBs (18 patients) with oral MS. The primary outcome compared total opioid consumption between the ERAS control group and the PNB group up to 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included comparison by block type and postoperative pain scores. RESULTS PVT or TAP PNB patients had a reduction in mean postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) requirements compared with the ERAS protocol cohort at 24 hours (93.9 versus 42.8 mg), P < .0001; at 48 hours (72.6 versus 40.5 mg); and in pain scores at 24 hours (5.64/10 versus 4.46/10), P = .02. OME and pain scores were higher in the SG cohort. CONCLUSION Addition of truncal PNB to standard ERAS protocol for bariatric surgical patients reduces postoperative total opioid consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Schott
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jauhleene Chamu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Noor Ahmed
- North Allegheny Senior High School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bestoun H Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Popeskou SG, Bernardi L, Christoforidis D. Intracorporeal IPAA After Fully Laparoscopic Total Proctocolectomy With Transanal Specimen Extraction. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:e843-e845. [PMID: 37134218 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sotirios-Georgios Popeskou
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Bernardi
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Dimitrios Christoforidis
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Hou YT, Pan YY, Wan L, Zhao WS, Luo Y, Yan Q, Zhang Y, Zhang WX, Mo YC, Huang LP, Dai QX, Jia DY, Yang AM, An HY, Wu AS, Tian M, Fang JQ, Wang JL, Feng Y. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in adult patients receiving gastrectomy/colorectal resection: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1474-1484. [PMID: 37555116 PMCID: PMC10405110 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acupuncture promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function and provides analgesia after major abdominal surgery. The effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) remain unclear. AIM To explore the potential effects of TEAS on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gastrectomy and colorectal resection. METHODS Patients scheduled for gastrectomy or colorectal resection were randomized at a 2:3:3:2 ratio to receive: (1) TEAS at maximum tolerable current for 30 min immediately prior to anesthesia induction and for the entire duration of surgery, plus two 30-min daily sessions for 3 consecutive days after surgery (perioperative TEAS group); (2) Preoperative and intraoperative TEAS only; (3) Preoperative and postoperative TEAS only; or (4) Sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the time from the end of surgery to the first bowel sound. RESULTS In total, 441 patients were randomized; 405 patients (58.4 ± 10.2 years of age; 247 males) received the planned surgery. The time to the first bowel sounds did not differ among the four groups (P = 0.90; log-rank test). On postoperative day 1, the rest pain scores differed significantly among the four groups (P = 0.04; Kruskal-Wallis test). Post hoc comparison using the Bonferroni test showed lower pain scores in the perioperative TEAS group (1.4 ± 1.2) than in the sham stimulation group (1.7 ± 1.1; P = 0.04). Surgical complications did not differ among the four groups. CONCLUSION TEAS provided analgesic effects in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, and it can be added to clinical practice as a means of accelerating postoperative rehabilitation of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Tao Hou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lei Wan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Wen-Sheng Zhao
- Department of Pain Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ying Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Qi Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Wei-Xin Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Yun-Chang Mo
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lu-Ping Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qin-Xue Dai
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dan-Yun Jia
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ai-Ming Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hai-Yan An
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - An-Shi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Ming Tian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Jian-Qiao Fang
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture and Neurology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jun-Lu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yi Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
- Department of Pain Medicine, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
- Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education/National Health Commission of China, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Frassini S, Cobianchi L, Fugazzola P, Biffl WL, Coccolini F, Damaskos D, Moore EE, Kluger Y, Ceresoli M, Coimbra R, Davies J, Kirkpatrick A, Di Carlo I, Hardcastle TC, Isik A, Chiarugi M, Gurusamy K, Maier RV, Segovia Lohse HA, Jeekel H, Boermeester MA, Abu-Zidan F, Inaba K, Weber DG, Augustin G, Bonavina L, Velmahos G, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Ten Broek RPG, Granieri S, Dal Mas F, Farè CN, Peverada J, Zanghì S, Viganò J, Tomasoni M, Dominioni T, Cicuttin E, Hecker A, Tebala GD, Galante JM, Wani I, Khokha V, Sugrue M, Scalea TM, Tan E, Malangoni MA, Pararas N, Podda M, De Simone B, Ivatury R, Cui Y, Kashuk J, Peitzman A, Kim F, Pikoulis E, Sganga G, Chiara O, Kelly MD, Marzi I, Picetti E, Agnoletti V, De'Angelis N, Campanelli G, de Moya M, Litvin A, Martínez-Pérez A, Sall I, Rizoli S, Tomadze G, Sakakushev B, Stahel PF, Civil I, Shelat V, Costa D, Chichom-Mefire A, Latifi R, Chirica M, Amico F, Pardhan A, Seenarain V, Boyapati N, Hatz B, Ackermann T, Abeyasundara S, Fenton L, Plani F, Sarvepalli R, Rouhbakhshfar O, Caleo P, Ho-Ching Yau V, Clement K, Christou E, Castillo AMG, Gosal PKS, Balasubramaniam S, Hsu J, Banphawatanarak K, Pisano M, Adriana T, Michele A, Cioffi SPB, Spota A, Catena F, Ansaloni L. ECLAPTE: Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency-2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:42. [PMID: 37496068 PMCID: PMC10373269 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00511-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparotomy incisions provide easy and rapid access to the peritoneal cavity in case of emergency surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) is a late manifestation of the failure of abdominal wall closure and represents frequent complication of any abdominal incision: IHs can cause pain and discomfort to the patients but also clinical serious sequelae like bowel obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, and necessity of reoperation. Previous guidelines and indications in the literature consider elective settings and evidence about laparotomy closure in emergency settings is lacking. This paper aims to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) project called ECLAPTE (Effective Closure of LAParoTomy in Emergency): the final manuscript includes guidelines on the closure of emergency laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Frassini
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dimitrios Damaskos
- General and Emergency Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General Surgery, Monza University Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC, Claremont, CA, USA
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Timothy C Hardcastle
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa
- Trauma and Burns Services, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Mayville, 4058, South Africa
| | - Arda Isik
- Division of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Helmut A Segovia Lohse
- II Cátedra de Clínica Quirúrgica, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - Hans Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Kenji Inaba
- Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, 2051 Marengo Street, Room C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Dieter G Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Goran Augustin
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - George Velmahos
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Vimercate, Via Santi Cosma E Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari, Dorsoduro 3246, 30123, Venezia, Italy
| | - Camilla Nikita Farè
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Jacopo Peverada
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simone Zanghì
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Jacopo Viganò
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Matteo Tomasoni
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Tommaso Dominioni
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Giovanni D Tebala
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, S. Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Trauma Department, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Thomas M Scalea
- Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A Malangoni
- Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, 15772, Athens, Greece
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Rao Ivatury
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew Peitzman
- Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Fernando Kim
- Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- Trauma Center and Emergency Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael D Kelly
- Department of General Surgery, Albury Hospital, Albury, Australia
| | - Ingo Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale M Bufalini, Cesena, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | - Giampiero Campanelli
- Division of General Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Marc de Moya
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrey Litvin
- AI Medica Hospital Center / Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencian International University (VIU), Valencia, Spain
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- Department of General Surgery, Military Teaching Hospital, Hôpital Principal Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Gia Tomadze
- Department of Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Philip F Stahel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Ian Civil
- Trauma Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - David Costa
- Department of General y Digestive Surgery, "Dr. Balmis" Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Rifat Latifi
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Francesco Amico
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Vidya Seenarain
- Acute Surgical Unit, Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Nikitha Boyapati
- Acute Surgical Unit, Department of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Basil Hatz
- State Major Trauma Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street, Perth, Australia
| | - Travis Ackermann
- General Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sandun Abeyasundara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, QLD, Australia
| | - Linda Fenton
- Maitland Private Hospital, East Maitland, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Frank Plani
- Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto, South Africa
| | - Rohit Sarvepalli
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Omid Rouhbakhshfar
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Pamela Caleo
- Nambour Selangor Private Hospital, Sunshine Coast University Private Hospital, Birtinya, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Kristenne Clement
- Department of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Erasmia Christou
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Preet K S Gosal
- Department of General Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sunder Balasubramaniam
- Department of Trauma, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy Hsu
- Department of Trauma, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Toro Adriana
- General Surgery, Augusta Hospital, Augusta, Italy
| | - Altomare Michele
- Trauma Center and Emergency Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano P B Cioffi
- Trauma Center and Emergency Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Spota
- Trauma Center and Emergency Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Acute Care Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery and Trauma, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Park JW, Kim EK, Park S, Han WK, Lee J, Lee JH, Nahm FS. Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for reducing opioid requirement and facilitating early ambulation: a double-blind, randomized trial. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12056. [PMID: 37491384 PMCID: PMC10368743 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39265-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Various techniques have been formulated to reduce pain and ensure early recovery after surgery, as these are major concerns among surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patients. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), the injection of local anesthetic into the fascial plane, is a simple and novel analgesia technique widely used due to its minimal risk of complications. ESPB has been tried in various surgeries; however, no study has reported its use in colorectal surgery. This study investigated whether ESPB could promote early recovery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) by reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity. After randomization into the ESPB or control groups, an ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed at the thoracic 10th-11th level with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or normal saline. The ESPB group used less fentanyl during the initial 24 h after surgery (P = 0.004) and experienced less pain (P < 0.05 at all-time points) than the control group. The time to the first ambulation and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the ESPB group than in the control group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.008, respectively). In conclusion, ESPB could promote early recovery by reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity in patients receiving LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Woo Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eun-Kyoung Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seongjoo Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Jiyoun Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ji Hyeon Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Francis Sahngun Nahm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Obafemi T, Mullis D, Bajaj S, Krishna P, Boyd J. Results following implementation of a cardiac surgery ERAS protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0277868. [PMID: 37450443 PMCID: PMC10348550 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate peri-operative care is essential to ensuring a satisfactory outcome in cardiac surgery. In this study, we look at the impact of evidence-based protocols implemented at Stanford Hospital. METHODS This study is a single-center, retrospective analysis. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were implemented for CABG/Valve and open Aortic operations on 11/1/2017 and 6/1/2018, respectively. Propensity-score matched analysis was used to compare 30-day mortality and morbidity of patients from the pre- and post-implementation cohorts. Secondary endpoints included the following: total hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, time until extubation, and time until urinary catheter removal. RESULTS After the implementation of the ERAS protocols for CABG/Valve operations, the median post-op LOS decreased from 7.0 days to 6.1 days (p<0.001), and median ICU LOS decreased from 69.9 hours to 54.0 (p = 0.098). There was no significant decrease in 30-day mortality (4% to 3.3%, p = 0.47). However, the incidence of post-op ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) decreased from 5.0% to 2.1% (p = 0.003) and post-op urinary tract infections (UTIs) from 8.3% to 3.6% (p<0.001). Patients who underwent open aortic procedures experienced an improvement in 30-day mortality (7% to 3.5%, p = 0.012), decrease in median ICU LOS (91.7 hours to 69.6 hours, p<0.001), and a decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation (79.3 hours to 46.3 hours, p = 0.003). There was a decrease in post-op LOS, post-op VAP, and post-op UTI, although statistical significance was not attained. CONCLUSION At Stanford Hospital, ERAS pathways have led to decreased morbidity and LOS while simultaneously improving mortality amongst our critically ill patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomi Obafemi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Danielle Mullis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Simar Bajaj
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Purnima Krishna
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Jack Boyd
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Ren Q, Wu M, Li HY, Li J, Zeng ZH. Failure of enhanced recovery after surgery in liver surgery: a systematic review and meta analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1159960. [PMID: 37497275 PMCID: PMC10366385 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify and summarize the existing evidence regarding ERAS failure and related risk factors after hepatic surgery. The objective was to provide physicians with a better understanding of these factors so that they can take appropriate action to minimize ERAS failure and improve patient outcomes. Method A literature search of the PubMed MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. The search strategy involved terms related to ERAS, failure, and hepatectomy. Result A meta-analysis was conducted on four studies encompassing a total of 1,535 patients, resulting in the identification of 20 risk factors associated with ERAS failure after hepatic surgery. Four of these risk factors were selected for pooling, including major resection, ASA classification of ≥3, advanced age, and male gender. Major resection and ASA ≥ 3 were identified as statistically significant factors of ERAS failure. Conclusion The comprehensive literature review results indicated that the frequently identified risk factors for ERAS failure after hepatic surgery are linked to operative and anesthesia factors, including substantial resection and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher. These insights will assist healthcare practitioners in taking prompt remedial measures. Nevertheless, there is a requirement for future high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized evaluation frameworks for ERAS programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuping Ren
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Medical Center, Sichuan Medical University, Chengdu, China
| | - Menghang Wu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hong Yu Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiafei Li
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zi Hang Zeng
- West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Hrdy O, Duba M, Dolezelova A, Roskova I, Hlavaty M, Traj R, Bönisch V, Smrcka M, Gal R. Effects of goal-directed fluid management guided by a non-invasive device on the incidence of postoperative complications in neurosurgery: a pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trial. Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12:32. [PMID: 37408018 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00321-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The positive effects of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) on patient-orientated outcomes have been demonstrated in various clinical scenarios; however, the effects of fluid management in neurosurgery remain unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the safety and feasibility of GDHT using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in elective neurosurgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared between GDHT and control groups. METHODS We conducted a single-center randomized pilot study with an enrollment target of 34 adult patients scheduled for elective neurosurgery. We randomly assigned the patients equally into control and GDHT groups. The control group received standard therapy during surgery and postoperatively, whereas the GDHT group received therapy guided by an algorithm based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In the GDHT group, we aimed to achieve and sustain an optimal cardiac index by using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and bolus administration of colloids and vasoactive drugs. The number of patients with adverse events, feasibility criteria, perioperative parameters, and incidence of postoperative complications was compared between groups. RESULTS We successfully achieved all feasibility criteria. The GDHT protocol was safe, because no patients in either group had unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation after surgery or brain edema requiring therapy during surgery or 24 h after surgery. Major complications occurred in two (11.8%) patients in the GDHT group and six (35.3%) patients in the control group (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggested that a large randomized trial evaluating the effects of GDHT on the incidence of postoperative complications in elective neurosurgery should be safe and feasible. The rate of postoperative complications was comparable between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration: ClininalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04754295, date of registration: February 15, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Hrdy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milos Duba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Andrea Dolezelova
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Roskova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Hlavaty
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Rudolf Traj
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vit Bönisch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Gal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
228
|
Owada Y, Murata Y, Hamaguchi Y, Yamada K, Inomata S, Ogawa K, Ohara Y, Akashi Y, Enomoto T, Maruo K, Tanaka M, Oda T. Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Asian J Endosc Surg 2023; 16:423-431. [PMID: 36958287 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program, abdominal wall blocks are strongly recommended as postoperative multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot rectus sheath block (RSB) with that of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as a method of multimodal analgesia in patients receiving conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgery. METHODS A noninferiority comparison was performed. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: TEA and RSB. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score upon coughing as of 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS In total, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEA (n = 42) or RSB (n = 38). Three patients were excluded from the TEA group after randomization. The NRS score on coughing as of 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group (least square mean: 3.59 vs 6.39; 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1.87 to 3.74, P < .001). The NRS scores upon coughing and at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group as of 4, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the TEA group. Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION This is the first report of comparing RSB with TEA in laparoscopic surgery. TEA may be recommended as a multimodal analgesia protocol for laparoscopic gastric and colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Owada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yuya Murata
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Yuto Hamaguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kumiko Yamada
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Shinichi Inomata
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institution of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Koichi Ogawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ohara
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yosihimasa Akashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Enomoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Makoto Tanaka
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institution of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Oda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Lynch CA. Are Patients Requiring Hartmann's Procedure Being Adequately Optimised for Surgery: An Audit Cycle. Cureus 2023; 15:e41589. [PMID: 37559850 PMCID: PMC10407682 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hartmann's procedures are common surgical operations indicated in a wide variety of presentations including colon malignancy, diverticular disease, volvulus, and colovesical and colovaginal fistulas. The procedure is a major undertaking for the patient and those presenting in the emergency setting are often clinically unwell with deranged laboratory investigations. Numerous studies have demonstrated that pre-operative anaemia contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Applying the conclusions of one study recommending a minimum haemoglobin >12 g/dL level pre-operatively, this audit assessed patient optimisation prior to Hartmann's procedure. Materials and methods Patients undergoing Hartmann's procedures between May 2016 and February 2020 were identified. Data was collected retrospectively to analyse American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade and pre-operative haemoglobin level. Pre-operative haemoglobin and group and save blood test values were identified pre-and post-intervention. Results Pre-intervention, 15 (21%) of 70 patients had a haemoglobin level <12 g/dL and 63 patients (90%) had a group and save blood test completed on admission. Post-intervention data was collected from 45 patients, with figures improving to five (11%) and 44 (97%) patients, respectively. Conclusion Our flowchart poster distribution and addition to the surgical proforma led to increased patient optimisation prior to Hartmann's procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron A Lynch
- General Surgery, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
230
|
Mac Curtain BM, O'Mahony A, Temperley HC, Ng ZQ. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and emergency surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:1780-1786. [PMID: 37282791 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to assess the modified protocols used and patient outcomes when enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are utilized in an emergency setting. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched until 13 March 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess for bias, along with funnel plot asymmetry. We present log risk ratios for dichotomous variables and raw mean differences for continuous variables. RESULTS Seven randomized trials were included, comprising 573 patients. Results of the primary outcomes when comparing ERAS to standard care are as follows; withdrawal of nasogastric tube (raw mean difference -1.87 CI: -2.386 to -1.359), time to first liquid diet (raw mean difference -2.56 CI: -3.435 to -1.669), time to first solid diet (raw mean difference -2.35 CI: -2.933 to -1.76), time to first flatus (raw mean difference -2.73 CI: -5.726 to 0.257), time to first stool passed (raw mean difference -1.83 CI: -2.307 to -1.349), time to removal of drains (raw mean difference -3.23 CI: -3.609 to -2.852), time to removal of urinary catheter (raw mean difference -1.57 CI: -3.472 to 0.334), mean pain score (raw mean difference -1.79 CI: -2.222 to -1.351) and length of hospital stay (raw mean difference -3.16 CI: -3.688 to -2.63). CONCLUSIONS The adoption of ERAS protocols in an emergency surgery setting was observed to enhance patient recovery, while not indicating any statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Mac Curtain
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aaron O'Mahony
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hugo C Temperley
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Zi Qin Ng
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Laou E, Papagiannakis N, Ntalarizou N, Choratta T, Angelopoulou Z, Annousis K, Sakellakis M, Kyriakaki A, Ragias D, Michou A, Chalkias A. The Relation of Calculated Plasma Volume Status to Sublingual Microcirculatory Blood Flow and Organ Injury. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1085. [PMID: 37511698 PMCID: PMC10381119 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The calculated plasma volume status (cPVS) was validated as a surrogate of intravascular filling. The aim of this study is to assess the cPVS in relation to sublingual perfusion and organ injury. METHODS Pre- and postoperative cPVS were obtained by determining the actual and ideal plasma volume levels in surgical patients. The sublingual microcirculation was assessed using SDF imaging, and we determined the De Backer score, the Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (Consensus PPV), and the Consensus PPV (small). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the distribution of cPVS and its association with intraoperative sublingual microcirculation and postoperative complications. RESULTS The median pre- and postoperative cPVS were -7.25% (IQR -14.29--1.88) and -0.4% (IQR -5.43-6.06), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean intraoperative administered fluid volume was 2.5 ± 2.5 L (1.14 L h-1). No statistically significant correlation was observed between the pre- or postoperative cPVS and sublingual microcirculation variables. Higher preoperative (OR = 1.04, p = 0.098) and postoperative cPVS (OR = 1.057, p = 0.029) were associated with postoperative organ injury and complications (sepsis (30%), anemia (24%), respiratory failure (13%), acute kidney injury (6%), hypotension (6%), stroke (3%)). CONCLUSIONS The calculated PVS was associated with an increased risk of organ injury and complications in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Laou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Agia Sophia Children's Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Papagiannakis
- First Department of Neurology, Eginition University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Nicoletta Ntalarizou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Theodora Choratta
- First Department of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 18537 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Zacharoula Angelopoulou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | | | - Minas Sakellakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, 10461 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Kyriakaki
- High Dependency Unit, General Hospital of Syros Vardakeio and Proio, 84100 Syros, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Ragias
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Anastasia Michou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Chalkias
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece
- Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Ioannidis O, Ramirez JM, Ubieto JM, Feo CV, Arroyo A, Kocián P, Sánchez-Guillén L, Bellosta AP, Whitley A, Enguita AB, Teresa M, Anestiadou E. The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol for Bowel Obstruction: Recommendations for Perioperative Care. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4185. [PMID: 37445224 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanical bowel obstruction is a common symptom for admission to emergency services, diagnosed annually in more than 300,000 patients in the States, from whom 51% will undergo emergency laparotomy. This condition is associated with serious morbidity and mortality, but it also causes a high financial burden due to long hospital stay. The EUPEMEN project aims to incorporate the expertise and clinical experience of national clinical specialists into development of perioperative rehabilitation protocols. Providing special recommendations for all aspects of patient perioperative care and the participation of diverse specialists, the EUPEMEN protocol for bowel obstruction, as presented in the current paper, aims to provide faster postoperative recovery and reduce length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis Ioannidis
- Fourth Department of Surgery, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jose M Ramirez
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Martínez Ubieto
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlo V Feo
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara-University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Antonio Arroyo
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche, Hospital General Universitario Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain
| | - Petr Kocián
- Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luis Sánchez-Guillén
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Miguel Hernández Elche, Hospital General Universitario Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain
| | - Ana Pascual Bellosta
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Adam Whitley
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 100 34 Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Marta Teresa
- Institute for Health Research Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Elissavet Anestiadou
- Fourth Department of Surgery, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Zhang Y, Tao K, Yu J, Chen C, Zheng Q, Lei S, Zhong X, Liu L, Wang W, Wang Q, Li E, Luo Y, Zhang G, Feng X, Li Y, Wang J. Evaluation of early liquid drinking after radical gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a Chinese multicenter propensity score matching analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goad029. [PMID: 37304556 PMCID: PMC10250079 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after surgery is used in gastrointestinal surgery. This study aimed to access the effects of early liquid drinking (ELD) on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent radical gastrectomy, as high-quality evidence on the outcomes of ELD after gastrectomy is currently lacking. Methods Clinicopathological data of patients with GC from 11 centers were retrospectively analysed. Clinical outcomes were investigated in 555 patients, including 225 who started drinking liquid within 48 h (ELD group) of surgery and 330 who started drinking liquid after flatus resumption (traditional liquid drinking [TLD] group). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed using a match ratio of 1:1 and 201 patients were selected from each group for the analysis. Primary outcome was time to first passage of flatus. Secondary outcomes included time to first defecation, post-operative hospitalization days, occurrence of short-term post-operative complications, and hospitalization costs. Results After PSM, baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The time to first flatus (2.72 ± 1.08 vs 3.36 ± 1.39 days), first defecation (4.34 ± 1.85 vs 4.77 ± 1.61 days), and post-operative hospital stay (8.27 ± 4.02 vs 12.94 ± 4.43 days) were shorter in the ELD group than in the TLD group (all P < 0.05). The ELD group had lower hospitalization costs than the TLD group ([7.83 ± 2.44 vs 8.78 ± 3.41] × 104 RMB, P = 0.041). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of post-operative complications. Conclusions Compared with TLD, post-operative ELD could promote rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduce hospitalization costs; moreover, ELD does not increase the risk of post-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Chao Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Quan Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Sanlin Lei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P. R. China
| | - Xiaogang Zhong
- Department of Surgical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Hernia and Fistula, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, P. R. China
| | - Lixin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - En Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yuwen Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Guanrong Zhang
- lnformation and Statistics Center, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xingyu Feng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Junjiang Wang
- Corresponding author. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 106 Zhongshan Second Street, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, P. R. China. Tel: +86-20-83827812;
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Kim IK, Lee CS, Bae JH, Han SR, Lee DS, Lee IK, Lee YS. Immediate urinary catheter removal after colorectal surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:162. [PMID: 37284881 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04460-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for colorectal surgery recommends early urinary catheter (UC) removal after surgery. However, the optimal timing remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the safety of immediate UC removal and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS From November 2019 and April 2022, patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were collected retrospectively. A UC was inserted in the operating room after general anesthesia and removed in the operating room immediately after surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of POUR following immediate UC removal after surgery, and the secondary outcomes were the identification of POUR-related risk factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS Among 737 patients, 81 (10%) had POUR immediately after UC removal. No patient had urinary tract infection. The incidence of POUR was significantly higher in male and in those with a history of urinary disease. However, there were no significant differences in tumor location, surgical procedure, or approach. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the POUR group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for POUR were male, a history of urinary disease, and intrathecal morphine injection. CONCLUSIONS Immediate removal of UC immediately after colorectal surgery is safe and feasible in the trend of ERAS. Male, a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and intrathecal morphine injection were risk factors for POUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Kyeong Kim
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul Seung Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Bae
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Rim Han
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Sang Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Suk Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Lee KY, Lee J, Oh ST, Lee CS, Kim NS, Song JM, Yoo RN, Choi BJ. Postoperative effects of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal: A multicenter propensity score matched study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286562. [PMID: 37267375 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the advantages of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal (LHR) compared to open Hartmann reversal (OHR) have been reported in the literature, the number of multicenter studies with good matching investigating this topic is rare. In the present study, we aimed to confirm the advantages of LHR in terms of short-term outcomes through propensity score matching of LHR and OHR groups, using data collected from multiple institutions. METHODS Patients who underwent Hartmann reversal at six institutions under the Catholic Medical Center of the Catholic University of Korea between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021, were included. The patients were divided into the LHR and OHR groups based on the technique used. The two groups were matched using propensity score matching (1:1 ratio, logistic regression with the nearest-neighbor method). The primary outcome was postoperative ileus (POI) frequency, and secondary outcomes were time to solid diet (days) and length of stay (days). RESULTS Among 337 patients, propensity score matching was performed on 322, after excluding 15 who had undergone open conversion. Of these, 63 patients were assigned to each group through propensity score matching. There was no difference in the frequency of adhesiolysis (77.8% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.503) or the operation time. (210 (IQR 159-290) vs. 233 (IQR 160-280), p = 0.718) between the two groups. As the primary outcome, the LHR group showed significantly lower POI frequency than the OHR group. (4.8% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0041) Regarding the secondary outcomes, the LHR group showed a shorter period to solid diet than the OHR group. The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the LHR group (4 vs. 6, p < 0.0001; 9 vs. 12, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION LHR is an effective method to ensure faster recovery of patients after surgery compared to OHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kil-Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeim Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Taek Oh
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul Seung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Suk Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Myung Song
- Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ri-Na Yoo
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Jo Choi
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Molenaar CJL, Minnella EM, Coca-Martinez M, ten Cate DWG, Regis M, Awasthi R, Martínez-Palli G, López-Baamonde M, Sebio-Garcia R, Feo CV, van Rooijen SJ, Schreinemakers JMJ, Bojesen RD, Gögenur I, van den Heuvel ER, Carli F, Slooter GD. Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Reducing Postoperative Complications and Enhancing Functional Capacity Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The PREHAB Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:572-581. [PMID: 36988937 PMCID: PMC10061316 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Importance Colorectal surgery is associated with substantial morbidity rates and a lowered functional capacity. Optimization of the patient's condition in the weeks prior to surgery may attenuate these unfavorable sequelae. Objective To determine whether multimodal prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery can reduce postoperative complications and enhance functional recovery. Design, Setting, and Participants The PREHAB randomized clinical trial was an international, multicenter trial conducted in teaching hospitals with implemented enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Adult patients with nonmetastasized colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility and randomized to either prehabilitation or standard care. Both arms received standard perioperative care. Patients were enrolled from June 2017 to December 2020, and follow-up was completed in December 2021. However, this trial was prematurely stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions The 4-week in-hospital supervised multimodal prehabilitation program consisted of a high-intensity exercise program 3 times per week, a nutritional intervention, psychological support, and a smoking cessation program when needed. Main Outcomes and Measures Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, number of patients with CCI score more than 20, and improved walking capacity expressed as the 6-minute walking distance 4 weeks postoperatively. Results In the intention-to-treat population of 251 participants (median [IQR] age, 69 [60-76] years; 138 [55%] male), 206 (82%) had tumors located in the colon and 234 (93%) underwent laparoscopic- or robotic-assisted surgery. The number of severe complications (CCI score >20) was significantly lower favoring prehabilitation compared with standard care (21 of 123 [17.1%] vs 38 of 128 [29.7%]; odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26-0.87]; P = .02). Participants in prehabilitation encountered fewer medical complications (eg, respiratory) compared with participants receiving standard care (19 of 123 [15.4%] vs 35 of 128 [27.3%]; odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.26-0.89]; P = .02). Four weeks after surgery, 6-minute walking distance did not differ significantly between groups when compared with baseline (mean difference prehabilitation vs standard care 15.6 m [95% CI, -1.4 to 32.6]; P = .07). Secondary parameters of functional capacity in the postoperative period generally favored prehabilitation compared with standard care. Conclusions and Relevance This PREHAB trial demonstrates the benefit of a multimodal prehabilitation program before colorectal cancer surgery as reflected by fewer severe and medical complications postoperatively and an optimized postoperative recovery compared with standard care. Trial Registration trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR5947.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enrico Maria Minnella
- Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Miquel Coca-Martinez
- Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Regis
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Rashami Awasthi
- Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Raquel Sebio-Garcia
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlo Vittorio Feo
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Unit of Provincial General Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | | | | | - Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Edwin R. van den Heuvel
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
237
|
Hong J, de Roulet A, Foglia C, Saldinger P, Chao SY. Outcomes of a Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Modified for a Diverse and Urban Community. J Surg Res 2023; 286:74-84. [PMID: 36774706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) colorectal programs have been shown to improve the length of stay (LOS) without increasing hospital resource utilization at academic centers worldwide. A multidisciplinary ERAS protocol that includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management guidelines was recently implemented at our urban, racially diverse, and academically affiliated community hospital. A delivery option was provided to reduce barriers to care. Given our unique patient population, the objective of our study was to determine if improvements in outcomes were reproducible in our hospital. METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing elective colectomy at New York-Presbyterian Queens Hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patient outcomes were compared between surgeries performed under standard practice (all colectomies prior to April 2017) and those performed after the implementation of the ERAS protocol. Demographic and perioperative data were abstracted from a prospectively derived database used to submit data to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Additional data were obtained from chart review. RESULTS Six hundred five elective colectomies were performed by 12 surgeons (range 1-228 cases) during the study period. Of these, 22 were performed open (41% followed ERAS), 467 were performed laparoscopically (57% followed ERAS), and 116 were performed robotically (74% followed ERAS). The average patient age was 64 y. Of which, 55% were male; 34% were Asian, 27% were non-Hispanic Caucasian, 27% were Hispanic, and 11% were Black or African American (all P-values > 0.05 for ERAS versus non-ERAS). Average duration of procedure was longer in the ERAS group (262 min versus 243 min, P = 0.04), although when stratified by procedure type, this relationship held true only for laparoscopic procedures. Hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (4.3 versus 5.4 d, P < 0.001) and this relationship held true for procedures performed both laparoscopically (4.2 versus 5.3 d, P = 0.01) and robotically (4.1 versus 5.1 d, P = 0.04). Of the ERAS group, patients who opted for delivery of ERAS components (n = 205) had the shortest LOS when compared to patients who picked up components (n = 91) or opted out of ERAS (n = 309) (4.1 versus 4.4 versus 5.2 d, P = 0.003). No significant differences were found for 30-d mortality, 30-d readmission, wound infection, or other postoperative complications (all P-values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an ERAS protocol in an urban, diverse, academically affiliated community hospital is associated with reductions in LOS for colectomies performed both laparoscopically and robotically. Facilitating ERAS compliance with a delivery option was also associated with improvements in hospital LOS. Preoperative nutrition supplementation was not associated with outcomes. No differences in mortality, readmission rates, or rates of postoperative complications were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Hong
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Queens, Flushing, New York.
| | - Amory de Roulet
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Queens, Flushing, New York
| | - Christopher Foglia
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Pierre Saldinger
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Steven Y Chao
- Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Queens, Flushing, New York; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
238
|
Meißner C, Meyer F, Ridwelski K. Prehabilitation in elective surgical interventions - what must the general and abdominal surgeon know. Innov Surg Sci 2023; 8:93-101. [PMID: 38058772 PMCID: PMC10696941 DOI: 10.1515/iss-2023-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives For years, many efforts have been invested to prepare patients, in particular, those with reduced physical and psychic status, much better to provide and finally achieve better outocme if there is time available to provide several beneficial measures. Methods Therefore, the objective was to illustrate the concept and various single elements of a complex prehabilitation concept based on (i) selective references from the medical literature and (ii) own clinical experiences from clinical practice in general and abdominal surgery. Results Prehabiliation can be considered the solution of the efforts to improve preoperative status for patients in a disadvantageous status for almost all types of surgery and all other operative and/or interventional procedures. It is the targeted process to improve individual functionality and organ function before a planned (elective) surgical intervention; P. comprises basically nutritional, physical and psychological measures; P. focusses especially onto the elderly, frail and malnourished patients before a planned surgical intervention; the overall aim is to significantly improve final outcome characterized by shorter length of stay, lower complication rate and mortality as well as cost efficiency; P. is especially important in cancer surgery, in which the beneficial effects can be particularly implemented; P. programs and/or "Standard Operating Protocols" (SOP) may help to establish and materialize its single aspects and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). There is still further potential to reliably establish and to utilize the options of prehabilitation measures as listed above. Conclusions Prehabiliation is an indispensable aspect in today's preparation for elective surgery, which needs to become obligatory part of the preparation measures to planned surgical interventions, which can further contribute to a better final outcome and ERAS as well as, in addtion, needs to be further developed and accomplished.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Meißner
- MVZ “Im Altstadtquartier”, General Surgery, Magdeburg, Germany
- Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Frank Meyer
- Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg with University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Ridwelski
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Municipal Hospital (“Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH”), Magdeburg, Germany
- Otto-von-Guericke University at Magdeburg, Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Somashekhar SP, Deo S, Thammineedi SR, Chaturvedi H, Mandakukutur Subramanya G, Joshi R, Kothari J, Srinivasan A, Rohit KC, Ray M, Prajapati B, Guddahatty Nanjappa H, Ramalingam R, Fernandes A, Ashwin KR. Enhanced recovery after surgery in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: national survey of peri-operative practice by Indian society of peritoneal surface malignancies. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:91-99. [PMID: 37304161 PMCID: PMC10249752 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is designed to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing stress response following surgery. A two part ERAS guidelines specific for Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was recently published with intent of extending the benefit to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This survey was performed to examine clinicians' knowledge, practice and obstacles about ERAS implementation in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Methods Requests to participate in survey of ERAS practices were sent to 238 members of Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface malignancies (ISPSM) via email. They were requested to answer a 37-item questionnaire on elements of preoperative (n=7), intraoperative (n=10) and postoperative (n=11) practices. It also queried demographic information and individual attitudes to ERAS. Results Data from 164 respondents were analysed. 27.4 % were aware of the formal ERAS protocol for CRS and HIPEC. 88.4 % of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices for CRS and HIPEC either, completely (20.7 %) or partially (67.7 %). The adherence to the protocol among the respondents were as follows: pre operative (55.5-97.6 %), intra operative (32.6-84.8 %) and post operative (25.6-89 %). While most respondents considered implementation of ERAS for CRS and HIPEC in the present format, 34.1 % felt certain aspects of perioperative practice have potential for improvement. The main barriers to implementation were difficulty in adhering to all elements (65.2 %), insufficient evidence to apply in clinical practice (32.4 %), safety concerns (50.6 %) and administrative issues (47.6 %). Conclusions Majority agreed the implementation of ERAS guidelines is beneficial but are followed by HIPEC centres partially. Efforts are required to overcome barriers like improving certain aspects of perioperative practice to increase the adherence, confirming the benefit and safety of protocol with level I evidence and solving administrative issues by setting up dedicated multi-disciplinary ERAS teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suryanarayana Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - Rama Joshi
- Gynaecological Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Kumar C. Rohit
- Aster International Institute of Oncology,Aster hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Rajagopalan Ramalingam
- Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Aaron Fernandes
- Aster International Institute of Oncology,Aster hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
240
|
Xie J, Luo C, Du Q, Zou W, Li X, Ma Z, Wu X, Zhang M. Factors associated with early mobilization among colorectal cancer patients after surgery: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 64:102317. [PMID: 37187102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyue Xie
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Chuqing Luo
- Health Management Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University / West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Qianqian Du
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wenjie Zou
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xinxin Li
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ziyan Ma
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiaodan Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China; Unit of Psychiatry, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, China.
| | - Meifen Zhang
- School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74, Zhongshan Rd.2, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
Falcone F, Laganà AS, Casarin J, Chiofalo B, Barra F, Garzon S, Ghezzi F, Vizza E, Malzoni M. Evaluation of Peri-Operative Management in Women with Deep Endometriosis Who are Candidates for Bowel Surgery: A Survey from the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:462-472. [PMID: 36754274 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE There is great consensus that the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is beneficial for surgical patients, but there is a paucity of data concerning its application in women with deep endometriosis (DE) who are candidates for bowel surgery. The survey described herein was aimed at gathering detailed information on perioperative management of DE patients who were undergoing sigmoid/rectal (discoid or segmental) resection within the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (SEGI) group. DESIGN Baseline survey. SETTING National survey conducted within the main Italian cooperative group in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (SEGI). PATIENTS The study did not involve patients. INTERVENTIONS A 63-item questionnaire covering ERAS items for gynecologic/elective colorectal surgery was sent to SEGI centers. Only questionnaires from centers that reported performing ≥10 sigmoid/rectal resections per year were considered for this analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Thirty-three of 38 (86.8%) of the questionnaires were analyzed. The rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were 40.4%, 64.4%, and 62.6% for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative items, respectively. The proportion of overall agreement was 56.6%. Preoperative diet, fasting and bowel preparation, correction of anemia, avoidance of peritoneal drains, postoperative feeding, and early mobilization were the most controversial items. Comparative analysis revealed that the referred rates of complete disease removal and conversion to open surgery were significantly different depending on case volume (p = .044 and p = .003, respectively) and gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .042 and p = .022, respectively), with higher chances of obtaining a complete laparoscopic/robotic excision of endometriosis in centers that reported ≥30 DE surgeries performed per year and/or ≥90% of bowel resections performed by a gynecologist/general surgeon specifically dedicated to DE management. In contrast, the rates of concordance with the ERAS guidelines were not significantly different according to case volume (p = .081) or gynecologist's/surgeon's experience (p = .294). CONCLUSION This is the first study on DE conducted on a national scale. The current survey results revealed suboptimal compliance with the ERAS recommendations and underline the need to improve the quality of perioperative care in DE patients undergoing sigmoid/rectal resection. This study is a first step toward building a consistent, structured reporting platform for the SEGI units and facilitating wide implementation and standardization of the ERAS protocol for DE patients in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Falcone
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy (Dr. Falcone and Dr. Malzoni).
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli," University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Dr. Laganà)
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy (Dr. Casarin and Dr. Ghezzi)
| | - Benito Chiofalo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (Dr. Chiofalo and Dr. Vizza)
| | - Fabio Barra
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.O. "Ospedale del Tigullio"-ASL4, Metropolitan Area of Genoa, Genoa, Italy (Dr. Barra); Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy (Dr. Barra)
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (Dr. Garzon)
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy (Dr. Casarin and Dr. Ghezzi)
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (Dr. Chiofalo and Dr. Vizza)
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy (Dr. Falcone and Dr. Malzoni)
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
Deshler BJ, Rockenbach E, Patel T, Monahan BV, Poggio JL. Current update on multimodal analgesia and nonopiate surgical pain management. Curr Probl Surg 2023; 60:101332. [PMID: 37302814 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bailee J Deshler
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily Rockenbach
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Takshaka Patel
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Resident Physician, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brian V Monahan
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Resident Physician, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Juan Lucas Poggio
- Division and System Chief, Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Professor of Surgery, Temple University Health System, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Smith BP, Hollis RH, Shao CC, Gleason L, Wood L, McLeod MC, Kay DI, Oates GR, Pisu M, Chu DI. The association of social vulnerability with colorectal enhanced recovery program failure. Surg Open Sci 2023; 13:1-8. [PMID: 37012979 PMCID: PMC10066546 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) improve outcomes, but over 20 % of patients fail ERP and the contribution of social vulnerability is unknown. This study aimed to characterize the association between social vulnerability and ERP adherence and failure. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of colorectal surgery patients between 2015 and 2020 utilizing ACS-NSQIP data. Patients who failed ERP (LOS > 6 days) were compared to patients not failing ERP. The CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) was used to assess social vulnerability. Result 273 of 1191 patients (22.9 %) failed ERP. SVI was a significant predictor of ERP failure (OR 4.6, 95 % CI 1.3-16.8) among those with >70 % ERP component adherence. SVI scores were significantly higher among patients non-adherent with 3 key ERP components: preoperative block (0.58 vs. 0.51, p < 0.01), early diet (0.57 vs. 0.52, p = 0.04) and early foley removal (0.55 vs. 0.50, p < 0.01). Conclusions Higher social vulnerability was associated with non-adherence to 3 key ERP components as well as ERP failure among those who were adherent with >70 % of ERP components. Social vulnerability needs to be recognized, addressed, and included in efforts to further improve ERPs. Key message Social vulnerability is associated with non-adherence to enhanced recovery components and ERP failure among those with high ERP adherence. Social vulnerability needs to be addressed in efforts to improve ERPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burkely P. Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Robert H. Hollis
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Connie C. Shao
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Lauren Gleason
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Lauren Wood
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Marshall C. McLeod
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Danielle I. Kay
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| | - Gabriela R. Oates
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pediatrics, 1600 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States of America
| | - Maria Pisu
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Preventive Medicine and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1808 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States of America
| | - Daniel I. Chu
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
Antunes M, Baumgärtel A, Gjessing PF, Ytrebø LM. Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation. J Pain Res 2023; 16:1855-1865. [PMID: 37284327 PMCID: PMC10239760 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s410019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trial Registration Trial registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05406765).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Antunes
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of North Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Acute and Critical Care Research Group, UiT – the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Aleksander Baumgärtel
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Acute and Critical Care Research group, UiT – the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Petter Fosse Gjessing
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Gastro Surgery Research group, UiT – the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Lars Marius Ytrebø
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of North Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Acute and Critical Care Research Group, UiT – the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
245
|
Yapa AKDS, Humes DJ, Crooks CJ, Lewis-Lloyd CA. Venous thromboembolism following colectomy for diverticular disease: an English population-based cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:203. [PMID: 37212868 PMCID: PMC10203000 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02920-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
AIM This study reports venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates following colectomy for diverticular disease to explore the magnitude of postoperative VTE risk in this population and identify high risk subgroups of interest. METHOD English national cohort study of colectomy patients between 2000 and 2019 using linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data. Stratified by admission type, absolute incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) were calculated for 30- and 90-day post-colectomy VTE. RESULTS Of 24,394 patients who underwent colectomy for diverticular disease, over half (57.39%) were emergency procedures with the highest VTE rate seen in patients ≥70-years-old (IR 142.27 per 1000 person-years, 95%CI 118.32-171.08) at 30 days post colectomy. Emergency resections (IR 135.18 per 1000 person-years, 95%CI 115.72-157.91) had double the risk (aIRR 2.07, 95%CI 1.47-2.90) of developing a VTE at 30 days following colectomy compared to elective resections (IR 51.14 per 1000 person-years, 95%CI 38.30-68.27). Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was shown to be associated with a 64% reduction in VTE risk (aIRR 0.36 95%CI 0.20-0.65) compared to open colectomies at 30 days post-op. At 90 days following emergency resections, VTE risks remained raised compared to elective colectomies. CONCLUSION Following emergency colectomy for diverticular disease, the VTE risk is approximately double compared to elective resections at 30 days while MIS was found to be associated with a reduced risk of VTE. This suggests advancements in postoperative VTE prevention in diverticular disease patients should focus on those undergoing emergency colectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali K D S Yapa
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
| | - David J Humes
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Colin J Crooks
- Gastrointestinal & Liver Theme, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christopher A Lewis-Lloyd
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Yang W, Yuan T, Cai Z, Ma Q, Liu X, Zhou H, Qiu S, Yang L. Laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis protocol. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1080327. [PMID: 37284204 PMCID: PMC10240957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1080327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is now commonly administered for postoperative pain control and reduced opioid consumption in patients undergoing major colorectal surgeries, such as colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, and inflammatory bowel disease resection. However, there remain several controversies about the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic TAPB compared to ultrasound-guided TAPB. Therefore, the aim of this study is to integrate both direct and indirect comparisons to identify a more effective and safer TAPB approach. Materials and methods Systematic electronic literature surveillance will be performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for eligible studies through July 31, 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools will be applied to scrutinize the methodological quality of the selected studies. The primary outcomes will include (1) opioid consumption at 24 hours postoperatively and (2) pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively both at rest and at coughing and movement according to the numerical rating scale (NRS). Additionally, the probability of TAPB-related adverse events, overall postoperative 30-day complications, postoperative 30-day ileus, postoperative 30-day surgical site infection, postoperative 7-day nausea and vomiting, and length of stay will be analyzed as secondary outcome measures. The findings will be assessed for robustness through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Data analyses will be performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 17.0. P value of less than 0.05 will be defined as statistically significant. The certainty of evidence will be examined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group approach. Ethics and dissemination Owing to the nature of the secondary analysis of existing data, no ethical approval will be required. Our meta-analysis will summarize all the available evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TAPB approaches for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. High-quality peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international conferences will facilitate disseminating the results of this study, which are expected to inform future clinical trials and help anesthesiologists and surgeons determine the optimal tailored clinical practice for perioperative pain management. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281720, identifier (CRD42021281720).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Yang
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhaolun Cai
- Gastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qin Ma
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xueting Liu
- Department of Medical Discipline Construction, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hang Zhou
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siyuan Qiu
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lie Yang
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
247
|
Macías-Valle A, Rodríguez-López C, González-Senac NM, Mayordomo-Cava J, Vidán MT, Cruz-Arnés ML, Jiménez-Gómez LM, Dujovne-Lindenbaum P, Pérez-Menéndez ME, Ortiz-Alonso J, Valenzuela PL, Rodríguez-Romo G, Serra-Rexach JA. Exercise effects on functional capacity and quality of life in older patients with colorectal cancer: study protocol for the ECOOL randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:314. [PMID: 37211611 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery and treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the elderly patient increase the risk of developing post-operative complications, losing functional independence, and worsening health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials evaluating the potential benefit of exercise as a countermeasure. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based multicomponent exercise program for improving HRQoL and functional capacity in older adults undergoing CRC surgery and treatment. METHODS This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, single-center trial aims to randomize 250 patients (>74 years) to either an intervention or a control group (i.e., usual care). The intervention group will perform an individualized home-based multicomponent exercise program with weekly telephone supervision from diagnosis until three months post-surgery. The primary outcomes will be HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30; CR29; and ELD14) and functional capacity (Barthel Index and Short Physical Performance Battery), which will be assessed at diagnosis, at discharge, and one, three, and six months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be frailty, physical fitness, physical activity, inspiratory muscle function, sarcopenia and cachexia, anxiety and depression, ambulation ability, surgical complications, and hospital length of stay, readmission and mortality. DISCUSSION This study will examine the effects of an exercise program in older patients with CRC across a range of health-related outcomes. Expected findings are improvement in HRQoL and physical functioning. If proven effective, this simple exercise program may be applied in clinical practice to improve CRC care in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05448846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Macías-Valle
- Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences (INEF), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Rodríguez-López
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Nicolas María González-Senac
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer Mayordomo-Cava
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Teresa Vidán
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Luisa Cruz-Arnés
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Miguel Jiménez-Gómez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit - General Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paula Dujovne-Lindenbaum
- Colorectal Surgery Unit - General Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Elena Pérez-Menéndez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit - General Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Ortiz-Alonso
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro L Valenzuela
- Physical Activity and Health Research Group (PaHerg), Research Institute of the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre ("Imas12"), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriel Rodríguez-Romo
- Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences (INEF), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Antonio Serra-Rexach
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Health Research Institute Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Dr.Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Perets M, Yellinek S, Carmel O, Boaz E, Dagan A, Horesh N, Reissman P, Freund MR. The effect of mechanical bowel preparation on postoperative complications in laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective propensity score matching analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:133. [PMID: 37193834 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04409-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether full bowel preparation affects 30-day surgical outcomes in laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all elective laparoscopic right colectomies performed for colonic adenocarcinoma between Jan 2011 and Dec 2021. The cohort was divided into two groups-no bowel preparation (NP) group and patients who received full bowel preparation (FP), including oral and mechanical cathartic bowel preparation. All anastomoses were extracorporeal stapled side-to-side. The two groups were compared at baseline and then were matched using propensity score based on demographic and clinical parameters. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate, mainly anastomotic leak (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rate. RESULTS The original cohort included 238 patients with a median age of 68 (SD 13) and equal M:F ratio. Following propensity score matching, 93 matched patients were included in each group. Analysis of the matched cohort showed a significantly higher overall complication rate in the FP group (28 vs 11.8%, p = 0.005) which was mostly due to minor type II complications. There were no differences in major complication rates, SSI, ileus, or AL rate. Although operative time was significantly longer in the FP group (119 vs 100 min, p ≤ 0.001), length of stay was significantly shorter in the FP group (5 vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Aside from a shorter hospital stay, full mechanical bowel preparation for laparoscopic right colectomy does not seem to have any benefit and may be associated with a higher overall complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Perets
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Shlomo Yellinek
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ofra Carmel
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Elad Boaz
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amir Dagan
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nir Horesh
- Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Petachia Reissman
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michael R Freund
- Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Molenaar CJ, van Rooijen SJ, Fokkenrood HJ, Roumen RM, Janssen L, Slooter GD. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5:CD013259. [PMID: 37162250 PMCID: PMC10171468 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the cornerstone in curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, surgery itself can adversely affect patient health. 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' programmes, which include multimodal interventions, have improved patient outcomes substantially. However, these are mainly applied peri- and postoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation includes multiple preoperative interventions to prepare patients for surgery with the aim of increasing resilience, thereby improving postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of multimodal prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity, postoperative complications, and quality of life in adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in January 2021. We also searched trial registries up to March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for surgery, comparing multimodal prehabilitation programmes (defined as comprising at least two preoperative interventions) with no prehabilitation. We focused on the following outcomes: functional capacity (i.e. 6-minute walk test, VO2peak, handgrip strength), postoperative outcomes (i.e. complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, re-admissions), health-related quality of life, compliance, safety of prehabilitation, and return to normal activities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Any disagreements were solved with discussion and consensus. We pooled data to perform meta-analyses, where possible. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs that enrolled 250 participants with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for elective (mainly laparoscopic) surgery. Included trials were conducted in tertiary care centres and recruited patients during periods ranging from 17 months to 45 months. A total of 130 participants enrolled in a preoperative four-week trimodal prehabilitation programme consisting of exercise, nutritional intervention, and anxiety reduction techniques. Outcomes of these participants were compared to those of 120 participants who started an identical but postoperative programme. Postoperatively, prehabilitation may improve functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test at four and eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 26.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.81 to 65.85; 2 studies; n = 131; and MD 26.58, 95% CI -8.88 to 62.04; 2 studies; n = 140); however, the certainty of evidence is low and very low, respectively, due to serious risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. After prehabilitation, the functional capacity before surgery improved, with a clinically relevant mean difference of 24.91 metres (95% CI 11.24 to 38.57; 3 studies; n = 225). The certainty of evidence was moderate due to downgrading for serious risk of bias. The effects of prehabilitation on the number of complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; 3 studies; n = 250), emergency department visits (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; 3 studies; n = 250) and re-admissions (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.65; 3 studies; n = 250) were small or even trivial. The certainty of evidence was low due to downgrading for serious risk of bias and imprecision. The effects on VO2peak, handgrip strength, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, health-related quality of life, return to normal activities, safety of the programme, and compliance rate could not be analysed quantitatively due to missing or insufficient data. The included studies did not report a difference between groups for health-related quality of life and length of hospital stay. Data on remaining outcomes were not reported or were reported inadequately in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation may result in an improved functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test both preoperatively and postoperatively. A solid effect on the number of omplications, postoperative emergency department visits and re-admissions could not be established. The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low, due to downgrading for serious risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. In addition, only three heterogeneous studies were included in this review. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Numerous relevant RCTs are ongoing and will be included in a future update of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rudi Mh Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
250
|
Molenaar CJL, Reudink M, Sabajo CR, Janssen L, Roumen RMH, Klaase JM, Slooter GD. Prehabilitation for patients with colorectal cancer: a snapshot of current daily practice in Dutch hospitals. Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12:15. [PMID: 37158927 PMCID: PMC10165784 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00299-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal prehabilitation programmes are increasingly being imbedded in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathways to enhance the patient's recovery after surgery. However, there is no (inter)national consensus on the content or design of such a programme. This study aimed to evaluate the current practice and opinion regarding preoperative screening and prehabilitation for patients undergoing surgery for CRC throughout the Netherlands. METHODS All regular Dutch hospitals offering colorectal cancer surgery were included. An online survey was sent to one representative colorectal surgeon per hospital. Descriptive statistics were used for analyses. RESULTS Response rate was 100% (n = 69). Routine preoperative screening of patients with CRC for frailty, diminished nutritional status and anaemia was the standard of care in nearly all Dutch hospitals (97%, 93% and 94%, respectively). Some form of prehabilitation was provided in 46 hospitals (67%) of which more than 80% addressed nutritional status, frailty, physical status and anaemia. All but two of the remaining hospitals were willing to adopt prehabilitation. The majority of the hospitals offered prehabilitation to specific subgroups of patients with CRC, such as the elderly (41%), the frail (71%) or high-risk patients (57%). There was high variability in the setting, design and content of the prehabilitation programmes. CONCLUSIONS Whereas preoperative screening is sufficiently incorporated in Dutch hospitals, standardised enhancement of the patient's condition in the context of multimodal prehabilitation seems to be challenging. This study presents an overview of current clinical practice in the Netherlands. Uniform clinical prehabilitation guidelines are vital to diminish heterogeneity in programmes and to produce useful data to enable a nationwide implementation of an evidence-based prehabilitation programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muriël Reudink
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Charissa R Sabajo
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Rudi M H Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|