Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma

Comprehensive characterization of neddylation related genes in cutaneous melanoma identified a novel prognostic signature for treatment outcomes, immune landscape

Neddylation, as a post-translational modification, has garnered significant attention in various tumor types recently. Few studies have investigated the involvement of neddylation-related genes (NRGs) in cutaneous melanoma (CM). Our study aims to identify prognostic NRGs and investigate their potential roles in CM. The RNA-sequencing data and corresponding clinical data of CM patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, while the expression profiles of 812 normal skin specimens were obtained from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database. The neddylation-related genes (NRGs) were extracted from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). We identified differentially expressed NRGs in CM and determined neddylation-related prognostic genes through univariate Cox regression analysis. We constructed a novel NRGs signature using LASSO-COX. The accuracy and utility of the NRGs signature were evaluated via a variety of statistical methods. Bioinformatics tools were employed to investigate the differential biological functions and signaling pathways among distinct risk groups. The expression levels of NRGs were analyzed through RT-qPCR experiments conducted in vitro. Finally, we identified an 8-NRGs signature in CM. Our prognostic model exhibited a high predictive capability for outcomes. The differences in the proportions of immune cells among subgroups were statistically significant. The in vitro experiments indicated significant differences in the expression of our NRGs. The 8-NRGs signature serves as a prognostic model for CM. Importantly, the novel biological prognostic model holds potential for personalized therapy in CM patients.

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 in cancer immunotherapy: function, prognostic biomarker and therapeutic potentials

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) has emerged as a key immune checkpoint regulating immune responses in the context of cancer. The inhibitory effect of LAG-3-expressing T cells contributes to suppressing anti-tumor immunity and promoting tumor progression. This review discusses the function of LAG-3 in immune suppression, its interactions with ligands, and its potential as a prognostic biomarker for cancers. We also explore therapeutic strategies targeting LAG-3, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, and CAR T cells. This review summarizes the current preclinical and clinical studies on LAG-3, highlighting the potential of therapeutic regimens targeting LAG-3 to enhance antitumor immunity and improve patients' outcomes. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanism of action of LAG-3 and optimize its application in tumor therapy.

Comparing neoantigen cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint therapy unveils an effective vaccine and anti-TREM2 macrophage-targeting dual therapy

The goal of therapeutic cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) is to promote T cells with anti-tumor capabilities. Here, we compared mutant neoantigen (neoAg) peptide-based vaccines with ICT in preclinical models. NeoAg vaccines induce the most robust expansion of proliferating and stem-like PD-1+TCF-1+ neoAg-specific CD8 T cells in tumors. Anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1 ICT promotes intratumoral TCF-1- neoAg-specific CD8 T cells, although their phenotype depends in part on the specific ICT used. Anti-CTLA-4 also prompts substantial changes to CD4 T cells, including induction of ICOS+Bhlhe40+ T helper 1 (Th1)-like cells. Although neoAg vaccines or ICTs expand iNOS+ macrophages, neoAg vaccines maintain CX3CR1+CD206+ macrophages expressing the TREM2 receptor, unlike ICT, which suppresses them. TREM2 blockade enhances neoAg vaccine efficacy and is associated with fewer CX3CR1+CD206+ macrophages and induction of neoAg-specific CD8 T cells. Our findings highlight different mechanisms underlying neoAg vaccines and different forms of ICT and identify combinatorial therapies to enhance neoAg vaccine efficacy.

In vivo gene editing of T-cells in lymph nodes for enhanced cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, while promising for cancer treatment, faces challenges like unexpected side effects and limited objective responses. Here, we develop an in vivo gene-editing strategy for improving ICB cancer therapy in a lastingly effective manner. The approach uses a conductive hydrogel-based electroporation system to enable nucleofection of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) targeted CRISPR-Cas9 DNAs into T-cells directly within the lymph nodes, and subsequently produces PD1-deficient T-cells to combat tumor growth, metastasis and recurrence in different melanoma models in mice. Following in vivo gene editing, animals show enhanced cellular and humoral immune responses along with multi-fold increases of effector T-cells infiltration to the solid tumors, preventing tumor recurrence and prolonging their survival. These findings provide a proof-of-concept for direct in vivo T-cell engineering via localized gene-editing for enhanced cancer immunotherapy, and also unlock the possibilities of using this method to treat more complex human diseases.

Evaluating the Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Combination Therapies in the Management of Brain Metastases: A Comprehensive Review

Brain metastases (BM) are a frequent and severe complication in patients with lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a crucial treatment option for BM, whether used alone or in combination with chemotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect multiple organ systems, complicating their use in BM patients. This review examines the mechanisms of irAEs and their effects on different organs and evaluates the safety of ICIs across various treatment strategies for BM. Our analysis indicates that ICIs significantly improve survival and disease control in BM patients, but their use increases the risk of irAEs, including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, and neurologic toxicities. Neurotoxic events, particularly treatment-associated brain necrosis (TABN) and encephalitis, are more common in BM patients. While the overall incidence of irAEs is similar between patients with and without BM, the neurotoxicity risk is higher in the BM population. Combining ICIs with chemotherapy and SRS enhances efficacy but also heightens the risk of adverse events across organ systems. ICIs offer substantial benefits for BM patients but require careful management to mitigate the risks of irAEs. Close patient monitoring, individualized treatment protocols, and prompt intervention are essential for optimizing the outcomes. Future research should focus on refining combination strategies and improving the management of irAEs, particularly neurotoxicity, to maximize therapeutic benefits for BM patients.

[Atypical and/or systemic dermatologic disorders related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: A review]

Immunological checkpoint inhibitors are now part of the oncological therapeutic arsenal in many solid cancers and malignant blood diseases, at the cost of immuno-mediated toxicities, of which dermatological disorders are among the most frequent. The most common, following treatment with anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4, are maculopapular erythema, pruritus, vitiligo, or lichenoid lesions, but other more atypical conditions may lead to the internist being called upon. Here, we present a case series of these less common dermatological manifestations including fasciitis, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, granulomatosis and immune-induced vasculitis. Some manifestations appear similar to the primary forms or seem to correspond to paraneoplastic syndromes, but some diagnostic and therapeutic particularities are specific to ICI toxicity that the internist must be aware of.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab Versus Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using RELATIVITY-047 and CheckMate 067 Trial Data

PURPOSE

Nivolumab plus relatlimab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have been approved for advanced melanoma on the basis of the phase II/III RELATIVITY-047 and phase III CheckMate 067 trials, respectively. As no head-to-head trial comparing these regimens exists, an indirect treatment comparison was conducted using patient-level data from each trial.

METHODS

Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for baseline characteristic differences. Minimum follow-ups (RELATIVITY-047, 33 months; CheckMate 067, 36 months) were selected to best align assessments. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed objective response rate (cORR), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) per investigator; overall survival (OS); and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A Cox regression model compared PFS, OS, and MSS. A logistic regression model compared cORRs. Subgroup analyses were exploratory.

RESULTS

After IPTW, key baseline characteristics were balanced for nivolumab plus relatlimab (n = 339) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 297). Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated similar PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.33]), cORR (odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14]), OS (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.19]), and MSS (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.12]) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Subgroup comparisons showed larger numerical differences favoring nivolumab plus ipilimumab with acral melanoma, BRAF-mutant melanoma, and lactate dehydrogenase >2 × upper limit of normal, but were limited by small samples. Nivolumab plus relatlimab was associated with fewer grade 3-4 TRAEs (23% v 61%) and any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation (17% v 41%).

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated similar efficacy to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in the overall population, including most-but not all-subgroups, and improved safety in patients with untreated advanced melanoma. Results should be interpreted with caution.

Natural killer cells are required for the recruitment of CD8+ T cells and the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma brain metastases

Background Brain metastases (BrM) affect up to 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma and are associated with poor prognosis. While combined immune checkpoint blockade of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) demonstrates intracranial efficacy in a proportion of patients with melanoma, the responses are rarely durable, particularly in patients with symptomatic BrM. The brain is an immune-specialized organ and immune responses are regulated differently to the periphery.Methods Using our previously established two-site model of melanoma BrM with concomitant intracranial and extracranial tumors, in which clinically observed efficacy of the combined PD-1/CTLA-4 (PC) blockade can be reproduced, we here explored the role of natural killer (NK) cells in BrM, using functional studies, immunophenotyping and molecular profiling.Results We demonstrate that NK cells are required for the intracranial efficacy of PC blockade. While both perforin and interferon gamma were necessary for the PC blockade-dependent control of intracranial tumor growth, NK cells isolated from intracranial tumors demonstrated only a limited cancer cell killing ability, and PC blockade did not alter the abundance of NK cells within tumors. However, the depletion of NK cells in PC blockade-treated mice led to tumor molecular profiles reminiscent of those observed in intracranial tumors that failed to respond to therapy. Furthermore, the depletion of NK cells resulted in a strikingly reduced abundance of CD8+ T cells within intracranial tumors, while the abundance of other immune cell populations including CD4+ T cells, macrophages and microglia remained unaltered. Adoptive T cell transfer experiments demonstrated that PC blockade-induced trafficking of CD8+ T cells to intracranial tumors was chemokine-dependent. In line with this, PC blockade enhanced intratumoral expression of several T cell-attracting chemokines and we observed high expression levels of cognate chemokine receptors on BrM-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in mice, as well as in human BrM. Importantly, the depletion of NK cells strikingly reduced the intratumoral expression levels of T cell attracting chemokines and vascular T cell entry receptors that were upregulated following PC blockade.Conclusion Our data demonstrate that NK cells underpin the efficacy of PC blockade in BrM by orchestrating the "responder" molecular profile in tumors, and by controlling the intratumoral abundance of CD8+ T cells through regulation of multiple key molecular mediators of T cell trafficking.

Resistance Management for Cancer: Lessons from Farmers

One of the main reasons we have not been able to cure cancers is that treatments select for drug-resistant cells. Pest managers face similar challenges with pesticides selecting for pesticide-resistant insects, resulting in similar mechanisms of resistance. Pest managers have developed 10 principles that could be translated to controlling cancers: (i) prevent onset, (ii) monitor continuously, (iii) identify thresholds below which there will be no intervention, (iv) change interventions in response to burden, (v) preferentially select nonchemical control methods, (vi) use target-specific drugs, (vii) use the lowest effective dose, (viii) reduce cross-resistance, (ix) evaluate success based on long-term management, and (x) forecast growth and response. These principles are general to all cancers and cancer drugs and so could be employed broadly to improve oncology. Here, we review the parallel difficulties in controlling drug resistance in pests and cancer cells. We show how the principles of resistance management in pests might be applied to cancer. Integrated pest management inspired the development of adaptive therapy in oncology to increase progression-free survival and quality of life in patients with cancers where cures are unlikely. These pest management principles have the potential to inform clinical trial design.

TMED inhibition suppresses cell surface PD-1 expression and overcomes T cell dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Blockade of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint (ICB) is revolutionizing cancer therapy, but little is known about the mechanisms governing its expression on CD8 T cells. Because PD-1 is induced during activation of T cells, we set out to uncover regulators whose inhibition suppresses PD-1 abundance without adversely impacting on T cell activation.

METHODS

To identify PD-1 regulators in an unbiased fashion, we performed a whole-genome, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based CRISPR-Cas9 screen in primary murine CD8 T cells. A dual-readout design using the activation marker CD137 allowed us to uncouple genes involved in PD-1 regulation from those governing general T cell activation.

RESULTS

We found that the inactivation of one of several members of the TMED/EMP24/GP25L/p24 family of transport proteins, most prominently TMED10, reduced PD-1 cell surface abundance, thereby augmenting T cell activity. Another client protein was cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), which was also suppressed by TMED inactivation. Treatment with TMED inhibitor AGN192403 led to lysosomal degradation of the TMED-PD-1 complex and reduced PD-1 abundance in tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells (TIL) in mice, thus reversing T cell dysfunction. Clinically corroborating these findings, single-cell RNA analyses revealed a positive correlation between TMED expression in CD8 TIL, and both a T cell dysfunction signature and lack of ICB response. Similarly, patients receiving a TIL product with high TMED expression had a shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results uncover a novel mechanism of PD-1 regulation, and identify a pharmacologically tractable target whose inhibition suppresses PD-1 abundance and T cell dysfunction.

Axl and EGFR Dual-Specific Binding Affibody for Targeted Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a tumor of the head and neck, with a higher incidence in southern China and Southeast Asia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the main treatments; however, metastasis and recurrence remain the main causes of treatment failure. Further, the majority of patients are diagnosed in the late stage due to lack of tumor-specific biomarker for early diagnosis. Therefore, an effective treatment and early detection can improve the outcome of patient with NPC. Axl and EGFR are co-expressed in NPC tissues and play key roles in tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion, which are often correlated with poor prognosis and therapy resistance. In this study, we generated a novel bispecific affibody (Z239-1907) for the dual targeting and inhibition of Axl and EGFR expression in NPC-positive cells both in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro experiments demonstrated that Z239-1907 had more pronounced antitumor effects than either modality alone (ZAXL239 or ZEGFR1907) in NPC-positive cells. Further, mice bearing NPC-positive tumors showed significant inhibition in tumor growth after treatment with Z239-1907 compared to ZAXL239 and ZEGFR1907. The in vivo tumor targeting ability and imaging also showed that Z239-1907 specifically and selectively targeted NPC xenograft mice models and accumulate at tumor site as early as 30 min and disappeared within 24 h post-injection. Collectively, these results suggest that Z239-1907 dual-target affibody is a promising therapeutic agent and a molecular imaging probe for early diagnosis in NPC.

Delayed and Concurrent Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Immunotherapy-Naïve Melanoma Brain Metastases

Melanoma remains a formidable challenge in oncology, causing the majority of skin cancer deaths in the United States, with brain metastases contributing substantially to this mortality. This paper reviews the current therapeutic strategies for melanoma brain metastases, with a focus on delayed and concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). While surgery and traditional chemotherapy offer limited efficacy, recent advances in immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have played a major role in the advancement and improved efficacy of the treatment of cancers, including brain metastases. Recent studies indicate that monotherapy with ICIs may lead to a higher median overall survival compared to historical benchmarks, potentially allowing patients to delay radiosurgery. Other studies have found that combining SRS with ICIs demonstrates promise, with results indicating improved intracranial control. Ongoing clinical trials explore novel combinations of immunotherapies and radiotherapies, aiming to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse effects. As treatment options expand, future studies will be necessary to understand the interplay between therapies and their optimal sequencing to improve patient outcomes.

Impact on Survival with Immunotherapy and Evaluation of Biomarkers in Peruvian Patients with Advanced Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Advanced malignant melanoma is a very aggressive disease, historically with poor prognosis before the new advances with immunotherapy and targeted therapies that have changed the standard of care, especially in cutaneous melanoma. Peru has aggressive features such as higher rates of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) subtype with historically shorter survival.

METHODS

This study describes Peruvian patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy (nivolumab) in two oncological institutions (public and private), including the discussion of the impact on overall survival (OS) divided by subtype (with incidence in ALM histology) and potential biomarkers that could be related to prognosis.

RESULTS

We found that immunotherapy is safe, and improves progression-free survival (PFS), OS and objective response rate (ORR) in our patients, with lower benefit in ALM histology. No prognostic blood inflammatory biomarkers were detected.

DISCUSSION

There is very limited data of Peruvian patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy, especially the outcomes in ALM histology. Our goal is to share an example of the impact of immunotherapy in a Latin American (LATAM) population considered as an unsatisfied group with an enormous need of novel treatments and biomarkers.

Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other treatment modalities in patients with advanced mucosal melanomas: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Background

Mucosal melanomas (MM) are an aggressive subtype of melanoma. Given the rarity of this disease, the conduct of clinical trials is challenging and has been limited. Current treatment options have been extrapolated from the more common cutaneous melanoma even though MM is distinct in pathogenesis, etiology and prognosis. This is the first meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4) and other treatment modalities (targeted therapy such as KIT inhibitors and VEGF inhibitors, as well as radiotherapy) on survival outcomes in MM to develop clinical guidelines for evidence-based management.

Methods

The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023411195). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched from inception until 25 July 2024, for all cohort and observational studies. Eligible studies included those with five or more participants with locally advanced or metastatic MM treated with anti-PD1, anti-CTLA4, VEGF inhibitors and/or KIT inhibitors. Titles and abstracts of potential articles were screened and full texts of all potentially eligible studies were retrieved and reviewed by two independent reviewers. Individual patient data (IPD) from published Kaplan-Meier curves were reconstructed using a graphical reconstruction method and pooled as a one-stage meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis using a two-stage meta-analysis approach was conducted. Extracted outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). For each treatment arm, median survival time and 12-month survival proportion were estimated. Data from double-arm trials was pooled to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), ratios of restricted mean time lost (RMTL) and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Findings

From a total of 7402 studies, 35 eligible studies comprising a total of 2833 participants were included. Combined anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 therapy had the highest 12-month OS and 12-month PFS at 71.8% (95% CI: 67.6%, 76.2%, n = 476) and 35.1% (95% CI: 30.5%, 40.4%, n = 401) respectively, followed by anti-PD1 therapy alone (OS: 64.0% (95% CI: 61.4%, 66.7%, n = 1399); PFS: was 28.3% (95% CI: 25.8%, 31.2%, n = 1142), anti-PD1 and VEGF inhibitor combination therapy (OS: 57.1% (95% CI: 51.0%, 63.9%)), KIT inhibitors (OS: 48.2% (95% CI: 37.6%, 61.8%); PFS: 8.3% (95% CI: 3.7%, 18.7%)) and anti-CTLA4 therapy alone (OS: 33.3% (95% CI: 28.4%, 39.1%); PFS: 9.8% (95% CI: 5.9%, 16.5%)). In the double-arm studies, combination therapy with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 had similar OS and PFS with anti-PD1 alone (OS: HR 0.856 (95% CI: 0.704, 1.04); RMTL ratio 0.932 (95% CI: 0.832, 1.044, P = 0.225); RMST ratio 1.102 (95% CI: 0.948, 1.281, P = 0.204); PFS: HR 0.919 (95% CI: 0.788, 1.07); RMTL ratio 0.936 (95% CI: 0.866, 1.013, P = 0.100); RMST ratio 1.21 (95% CI: 0.979, 1.496, P = 0.078)), however, anti-PD1 therapy alone had significantly better PFS than anti-CTLA4 alone (HR 0.548 (95% CI: 0.376, 0.799); RMTL ratio 0.715 (95% CI: 0.606, 0.844, P < 0.001); RMST ratio 1.659 (95% CI: 1.316, 2.092, P < 0.001)). Anti-PD1 therapy with radiotherapy versus anti-PD1 alone showed no significant difference (OS: HR 0.854 (95% CI: 0.567, 1.29); RMTL ratio 0.855 (95% CI: 0.675, 1.083, P = 0.193); RMST ratio 1.194 (95% CI: 0.928, 1.536, P = 0.168; PFS: HR 0.994 (95% CI: 0.710, 1.39); RMTL ratio 1.006 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.162, P = 0.939); RMST ratio 0.984 (95% CI: 0.658, 1.472, P = 0.939)).

Interpretation

For the systemic treatment of MM, anti-PD1 is the best monotherapy. While combining anti-PD1 with other treatment options such as anti-CTLA4, VEGF inhibitors or radiotherapy might achieve better outcomes, these improvements did not reach statistical significance when evaluated by HR, RMTL and RMST ratios.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Medical Research Council Transition Award (TA20nov-0020), SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Programme (08/FY2020/EX/67-A143 and 08/FY2021/EX/17-A47), the Khoo Pilot Collaborative Award (Duke-NUS-KP(Coll)/2022/0020A), the National Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant-New Investigator Grant (CNIGnov-0025), the Terry Fox Grant (I1056) and the Khoo Bridge Funding Award (Duke-NUS-KBrFA/2024/0083I).

Approach to Patients with Cancer Going to Surgery

The preoperative care of patients with cancer plays a pivotal role in ensuring optimal outcomes and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals undergoing surgical interventions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the key considerations, challenges, and strategies involved in the preoperative management of oncology patients. We delve into the multidisciplinary approach required to address the unique needs of this patient population, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among surgeons, oncologists, anesthesiologists, primary care physicians, hospitalists, and other health care professionals.

The roles of migrasomes in immunity, barriers, and diseases

Migrasomes are recently identified extracellular vesicles and organelles formed in conjunction with cell migration. They are situated at the rear of migrating cells, exhibit a circular or elliptical membrane-enclosed structure, and function as a new organelle. Migrasomes selectively sort intercellular components, mediating a cell migration-dependent release mechanism known as migracytosis and modulating cell-cell communication. Accumulated evidence clarifies migrasome formation processes and indicates their diverse functional roles. Migrasomes may also be potentially correlated with the occurrence, progression, and prognosis of certain diseases. Migrasomes' involvement in physiological and pathological processes highlights their potential for expanding our understanding of biological procedures and as a target in clinical therapy. However, the precise mechanisms and full extent of their involvement in immunity, barriers, and diseases remain unclear. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the roles of migrasomes in human immunity and barriers, in addition to providing insights into their impact on human diseases. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Migrasomes, newly identified extracellular vesicles and organelles, form during cell migration and are located at the rear of migrating cells. These circular or elliptical structures mediate migracytosis, selectively sorting intercellular components and modulating cell-cell communication. Evidence suggests diverse functional roles for migrasomes, including potential links to disease occurrence, progression, and prognosis. Their involvement in physiological and pathological processes highlights their significance in understanding biological procedures and potential clinical therapies. However, their exact mechanisms in immunity, barriers, and diseases remain unclear. This review provides an overview of migrasomes' roles in human immunity and barriers, and their impact on diseases.

PSF-lncRNA interaction as a target for novel targeted anticancer therapies

The Polypyrimidine Tract-Binding Protein-Associated Splicing Factor (PSF), a component of the Drosophila Behavior/Human Splicing (DBHS) complex, plays a pivotal role in cancer pathogenesis. The epigenetic regulation mediated by PSF and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), along with PSF's alternative splicing activity, has been implicated in promoting cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance in various human cancers. Recent research highlights the therapeutic promise of targeting the PSF-lncRNA interaction to combat aggressive malignancies, making it a compelling target for cancer therapy. This review offers a detailed synthesis of the current understanding of PSF's role in oncogenic pathways and recent progress in identifying inhibitors of PSF-lncRNA interactions. Furthermore, it discusses the potential of using these inhibitors in cancer treatment strategies, especially as adjuncts to immune checkpoint blockade therapies to improve the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). By outlining the interaction patterns of existing PSF-lncRNA inhibitors, this article aims to guide the development and refinement of future pharmacological interventions.

A study on the efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody

Tumors constitute a significant health concern for humans, and PD-1 and CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies have been proven effective in cancer treatment. Some researchers have identified that the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 dual blockade demonstrates superior therapeutic efficacy. However, the development of PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibodies faces challenges in terms of both safety and efficacy. The present study discloses a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody, designated as SH010. Experimental validation through surface plasmon resonance (SPR) confirmed that SH010 exhibits favorable binding activity with both PD-1 and CTLA-4. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated stable binding of SH010 antibody to CHOK1 cells overexpressing human or cynomolgus monkey PD-1 protein and to 293F cells overexpressing human or cynomolgus monkey CTLA-4 protein. Moreover, it exhibited excellent blocking capabilities in protein binding between human PD-1 and PD-L1, as well as human CTLA-4 and CD80/CD86. Simultaneously, in vitro experiments indicate that SH010 exerts a significant activating effect on hPBMCs. In murine transplant models of human prostate cancer (22RV1) and small cell lung cancer (NCI-H69), administration of varying concentrations of the bispecific antibody significantly inhibits tumor growth. MSD analysis revealed that stimulation of hPBMCs from three different donors with SH010 did not induce the production of cytokine release syndrome. Furthermore, Single or repeated intravenous administrations of SH010 in cynomolgus monkeys show favorable systemic exposure without noticeable drug accumulation or apparent toxicity. In conclusion, SH010 represents a novel cancer therapeutic drug poised to enter clinical trials and obtain market approval.

Corticosteroids for Immune-Related Adverse Events and Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

Retrospective studies suggest that immunosuppressive treatment of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impairs survival in patients with melanoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we study this association across tumor types using data from six international phase II/III registrational trials.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was performed on individual patient data from the anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) + anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (anti-CTLA-4) treatment arms of six clinical trials (CheckMate-067, -142, -214, -648, -743, and -9LA). Among patients who received systemic immunosuppression for treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), associations of peak and cumulative corticosteroid dose, and use of second-line immunosuppression with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using multilevel Cox regression with adjustment for age and sex.

RESULTS

Of the 1,959 patients who received anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 therapy, 834 patients who were treated with immunosuppression for trAEs were included. Eight hundred and thirty-two patients (100%) received corticosteroids and 81 patients (10%) received second-line immunosuppressants. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS: adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.29) for 1 versus 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone and HRadj, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.96) for 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg. Similar effects were observed for OS: HRadj, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.39) and HRadj, 1.66 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.37) for 1 and 2 versus 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Cumulative corticosteroid dose was not associated with survival. HRadj of use of second-line immunosuppression was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.68) for PFS and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.77) for OS.

CONCLUSION

Higher corticosteroid peak dose for trAEs is associated with worse survival across tumor types, while cumulative dose is not. Too few patients received second-line immunosuppressants to confirm or reject an association with survival. These data argue for a reconsideration of irAE management approaches, starting with lower corticosteroid dose whenever feasible.

Erythroid progenitor cell modulates cancer immunity: Insights and implications

The emergence of immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has markedly enhanced cancer treatment outcomes for numerous patients. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of immunotherapy demonstrates substantial variation across different cancer types and individual patients. The immunosuppressive characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a crucial role in contributing to this variation. Typically, people focus on cells with immunosuppressive functions in the TME, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), but research on TAMs alone cannot fully explain the complex structure and composition of the TME. Recent studies have reported that tumors can induce erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) to exert immunosuppressive functions, not only acting within the TME but also secreting artemin in the spleen to promote tumor progression. In this review, we summarize the recent research on EPCs and tumors in recent years. We elucidate the mechanisms by which EPCs exert immunosuppressive functions in tumor-bearing conditions. In this review, we further propose potential therapeutic strategies targeting EPCs and emphasize the importance of in-depth exploration of the mechanisms by which EPCs regulate tumors and the immune system, as well as the significant clinical value of developing corresponding drugs.

Evaluating the Impact of Adjunctive Partial Cryoablation on Dual Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Response in a Murine Model

Purpose To evaluate the impact of adjunctive partial cryoablation on checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy response. Materials and Methods One hundred fifty-six mice (equal number of male and female animals) with dual-implanted tumor models were treated with dual CPI or a vehicle and randomized to treatment of a single tumor with partial cryoablation. Tumors were followed for 60 days following cryoablation for response assessment. In additional groups, the tumor microenvironment was characterized via flow cytometry, cytokine analysis, and immunohistochemistry. Statistical comparison was made between the different treatment groups regarding T-cell infiltration and activation characteristics within the noncryoablated tumor and cytokine levels within the partially ablated tumor. Additionally, qualitative assessment of T-cell activation within the cryoablated and noncryoablated tumors at immunofluorescence was carried out. Results At 60 days following treatment, CPI and adjunctive cryoablation-treated MC-38 mice had a significantly increased survival rate (79%) compared with mice treated with CPI alone (61%; P < .001). CT-26 mice also had an increased survival rate (57% vs 35%, respectively; P = .04). Following cryoablation, increases in inflammatory cytokines and chemokines within the treated tumors were observed. Flow cytometry of noncryoablated tumor showed increased CD8 T-cell activation. Immunofluorescence and histologic evaluation following cryoablation further demonstrated a robust CD8 T-cell and myeloid infiltrate. Conclusion Adjunctive cryoablation significantly increased the response to dual CPI in multiple cancer models at both partially ablated and distant (nonablated) tumor sites. Immune analysis suggests cryoablation promotes a vigorous immune response within the partially cryoablated tumor that increases activation of the adaptive immune system within distant tumor sites. Keywords: Cancer, Cryoablation, Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy, Tumor Response Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

A Phase Ib Study of Selinexor in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially advanced the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma. However, improving therapeutic efficacy requires identifying drug combinations that elicit durable responses without inducing intolerable toxicity. Within that context, selinexor emerges as a possible combination option that has been shown in preclinical studies to enhance the efficacy of ICI therapy. Methods: In this phase 1b study, we investigated selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in 25 patients with advanced non-uveal melanoma. Patients received selinexor at a dosage of 60 mg taken orally twice weekly, and pembrolizumab intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks. Results: Despite the high incidence of adverse events (96%), most treatment-related toxicities were manageable with supportive care and dose reductions. The most common adverse events of any grade were nausea (n = 20; 80%), decreased white blood cell count (n = 15; 60%), vomiting (n = 14; 56%), anemia (n = 12; 48%), fatigue (n = 12; 48%), and decreased platelet count (n = 12; 48%). The 10 patients with treatment-naïve evaluable disease had an objective response rate (ORR) of 70% (n = 7, including three patients with complete response), which was significantly higher than that of the 14 patients with prior anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy, whose ORR was 7% (n = 1; p = 0.002). Stable disease was observed in two patients (20%) with treatment-naïve disease and seven patients (50%) with prior anti-PD-1 therapy. Conclusion: Selinexor combined with pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic melanoma. The toxicity profile of the combination was consistent with that reported for individual agents, with no additional safety concerns.

Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) programs for monitoring symptoms among patients treated with immunotherapy: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Monitoring toxicities among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is relatively recent. This scoping review aims to guide decision making in the development of PROMs programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Data on PROM programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg, PROMs used, frequency) were extracted. Two authors with established interrater reliability screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A narrative synthesis identified patterns in the data.

RESULTS

A total of 22 articles described 16 unique multicomponent, electronic PROM programs for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, mainly developed for remote monitoring of toxicities between appointments. Patients typically completed 18-26 items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) weekly, with high adherence and satisfaction. Commonly monitored symptoms were diarrhea, fatigue, shortness of breath, cough, nausea, decreased appetite, rash, joint pain, pain, and mood. Other features of PROMs programs included clinician alerts, with some programs only flagging symptoms that had an impact on treatment. Some programs also or only sent alerts to patients to contact their clinicians and gave access to symptom management information. In terms of efficacy, the only consistent finding was an increase in quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this scoping review provide some indication as to which components of a PROM program are promising. However, as the evidence base for using PROMs among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is growing, many questions remain, including which symptoms to monitor, using which PROM, and at what frequency. More trials are needed to answer these questions and to determine how best to implement PROMs among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor in clinical practice.

Inhibition of Notch enhances efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in triple-negative breast cancer

Aberrant Notch, which is a defining feature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, regulates intercellular communication in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). This includes tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) recruitment through Notch-dependent cytokine secretion, contributing to an immunosuppressive TIME. Despite the low response rate of TNBC to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), here, we report that inhibition of Notch-driven cytokine-mediated programs reduces TAMs and induces responsiveness to sequentially delivered ICB. This is characterized by the emergence of GrB+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in the primary tumor. A more impressive effect of sequential treatment is observed in the lung where TAM depletion and increased CTLs are accompanied by near-complete abolition of metastases. This is due to (i) therapeutic reduction in Notch-dependent, prometastatic circulating factors released by the primary tumor, and (ii) elevated PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) in lung metastases, rendering them profoundly sensitive to ICB. These findings highlight the potential of combination cytokine inhibition and ICB as an immunotherapeutic strategy in TNBC.

Cell Identity and Spatial Distribution of PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Responders

The programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis inhibits T cell activity, impairing anti-tumor immunity. Blocking this axis with therapeutic antibodies is one of the most promising anti-tumor immunotherapies. It has long been recognized that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade reinvigorates exhausted T (TEX) cells already present in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, recent advancements in high-throughput gene sequencing and bioinformatic tools have provided researchers with a more granular and dynamic insight into PD-1/PD-L1 blockade-responding cells, extending beyond the TME and TEX populations. This review provides an update on the cell identity, spatial distribution, and treatment-induced spatiotemporal dynamics of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade responders. It also provides a synopsis of preliminary reports of potential PD-1/PD-L1 blockade responders other than T cells to depict a panoramic picture. Important questions to answer in further studies and the translational and clinical potential of the evolving understandings are also discussed.

A systematic review of cardiovascular toxicities induced by cancer immune therapies: Underlying mechanisms, clinical manifestations and therapeutic approaches

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of various types of cancers, even those previously deemed untreatable. Nonetheless, these medications have been associated with inflammation and damage across various organs. These challenges are exemplified by the adverse cardiovascular impacts of cancer immunotherapy, which need comprehensive understanding, clarification, and management integrated into the overall care of cancer patients. Numerous anticancer immunotherapies have been linked to the prevalence and severity of cardiovascular toxicity. These challenges emphasize the importance of conducting fundamental and applied research to elucidate disease causes, discover prognostic indicators, enhance diagnostic methods, and create successful therapies. Despite the acknowledged importance of T cells, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the inciting antigens, the reasons for their recognition, and the mechanisms of how they contribute to cardiac cell injury. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanism, epidemiology, diagnosis, pathophysiology and corresponding treatment of cardiovascular toxicity induced by immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell therapies (ACT), and bi-specific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) among others. By elucidating these aspects, we aim to provide a better understanding of immunotherapies in cancer treatment and offer guidance for their clinical application.

Nature and management of melanoma recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 50 % of resected stage II-IV melanoma patients develop recurrent disease by 5 years despite adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy. Data to define best management of recurrences is lacking.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study. Patients with resected stage II-IV melanoma who commenced adjuvant anti-PD-1-based therapy before January 2022 and later recurred were identified. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, recurrence patterns, management and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

711 patients from 17 sites were included. Median age was 60 [range 16-92], 64 % were male, 2 % stage II, 91 % were stage III, 7 % stage IV. Median time to recurrence was 6.2 months (0-68.5) and median follow up time from recurrence was 19.8 months (range 0.2-73.1). 63 % recurred on anti-PD-1 therapy, 36 % off therapy [3 % < 6 months, 33 % > 6 months]. Initial recurrences were locoregional (LR) alone in 44 %, distant alone (DR) in 43 %, and 11 % in both sites. LR recurrences were managed with local therapy, alone (62 %) or with "second adjuvant" anti-PD-1 (14 %) or BRAF/MEK therapy (23 %); 12 m RFS2 was 25 %, 29 % and 69 % respectively (p = 0.0045). Definitive systemic therapy at first recurrence was given in 16 % LR and 86 % DR, with best outcomes for anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD-1 and trial combinations (24 m PFS 63 % and 69 %, respectively). The 24 m OS for the entire cohort was 65 %.

CONCLUSION

Most recurrences following adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy occur early and while still on drug. Outcomes are poor, regardless of site, timing of recurrence, and subsequent treatment.

Comparison of efficacy between anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy as first-line immunotherapy for advanced mucosal melanoma in Japanese patients: A single-center, retrospective cohort study

Mucosal malignant melanoma (MMM) is a rare subtype of malignant melanoma with a more aggressive biological behavior than cutaneous melanoma (CM). Owing to its rarity, it is necessary to accumulate information on treatments, especially in Asians, in whom MMM occurs more frequently than in Caucasians. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy (NIVO+IPI) versus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (PD-1) in Japanese patients with MMM. We reviewed patients with advanced or recurrent MMM who received ICIs as first-line systematic therapy between February 2012 and February 2024 at the Shizuoka Cancer Center. We enrolled a total of 57 patients: 10 (17.5%) were treated with NIVO+IPI, and 47 (82.5%) were treated with PD-1 as first-line systemic therapy. Objective response rates (ORR) did not differ significantly between the NIVO+IPI and PD-1 groups (40.0% vs 27.7%; p = 0.176). There was also no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS time: 4.3 months vs 9.9 months, log-rank test, p = 0.578) or overall survival (OS) (median OS time: 33.1 months vs. 22.8 months, log-rank test, p = 0.697) between the two groups. However, regarding AEs, grade ≥3 AEs leading to discontinuation of first-line treatment occurred in 80% of patients in the NIVO+IPI group and in 22.6% of patients in the PD-1 group (p = 0.002). No difference was found in the efficacy of NIVO+IPI therapy and anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy as the first-line treatment for MMM in Japanese patients, but an increase in AEs was observed with combination therapy. This study suggests that patients with MMM may receive less benefit from NIVO+IPI than from PD-1.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and neurotoxicity: a focus on diagnosis and management for a multidisciplinary approach

INTRODUCTION

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, the consequential over activation of the immune system is often complicated by adverse events that can affect several organs and systems, including the nervous system. The precise pathophysiology underlying neurological irAEs (n-irAEs) is not completely known. Around 3.8% of patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 agents, 6.1% of patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1, and 12% of patients receiving combination therapies have n-irAEs. Most n-irAEs are low-grade, while severe toxicities have rarely been reported. in this article, we performed an updated literature search on immuno-related neurotoxicity on main medical research database, from February 2017 to December 2023.

AREAS COVERED

We have also compared the latest national and international guidelines on n-irAEs management with each other in order to better define patient management.

EXPERT OPINION

A multidisciplinary approach appears necessary in the management of oncological patients during immunotherapy. Therefore, in order to better manage these toxicities, we believe that it is essential to collaborate with neurologists specialized in the diagnosis and treatment of n-irAEs, and that a global neurological assessment, both central and peripheral, is necessary before starting immunotherapy, with regular reassessment during treatment.

T lymphocyte‑related immune response and immunotherapy in gastric cancer (Review)

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a global healthcare challenge because of its high incidence and poor prognosis. The efficacy of current chemotherapy regimens for advanced GC is limited. T cells, which have been implicated in the progression of GC, have a significant impact in the tumor microenvironment. With a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying the cancer immunoediting process, immunotherapy may become a promising treatment option for patients with GC. Several clinical trials are currently investigating different mechanisms targeting the tumor immune response. The present review summarized T cell-involved immune responses and various immunotherapy strategies for GC.

Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus: Optimisation Strategies for Anti-Cancer Therapies

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent a targeted anti-cancer therapy approach due to their ability not only to selectively infect and destroy malignant cells but also to induce an immune response. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) offers a promising platform due to its low prevalence and pathogenicity in humans, lack of pre-existing immunity, easily manipulated genome, rapid growth to high titers in a broad range of cell lines, and inability to integrate into the host genome. However, despite its many advantages, many unresolved problems remain: problematic production based on the reverse genetics system, oncological selectivity, and the overall effectiveness of VSV monotherapy. This review will discuss various attempts at viral genome modifications aimed at improving the oncolytic properties of VSV. These strategies include inhibition of viral genes, modification of genes responsible for targeting cancer cells over healthy ones, insertion of foreign genes for boosting immune response, and changing the order of viral and inserted foreign genes. In addition, possible ways to improve VSV-based anti-tumor therapy and achieve higher efficiency will be considered by evaluating the effectiveness of various delivery methods as well as discussing treatment options by combining VSV with other groups of anticancer drugs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephritis-treatment standard

Over the last 13 years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has grown remarkably, owing to their unprecedented anti-tumor efficacy in certain tumor groups. With increased use of ICIs, we are seeing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) more frequently. Renal irAEs, such as ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), are reported in 2%-5% of patients treated with ICIs, with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) as the most common histopathologic lesion, though various forms of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Modifiable risk factors for ICI-AKI include concurrent use of ATIN-associated drugs, like proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, and dual ICI therapy with both Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and its ligand (PD1/PDL-1) blockade. Kidney biopsies remain the diagnostic modality of choice, though several promising non-invasive biomarkers, which have not yet been broadly clinically validated have emerged. The treatment of ICI-AKI involves holding ICIs, discontinuation of ATIN-associated drugs and initiation of immunosuppression with corticosteroids as first-line therapy. With prompt treatment initiation, most patients achieve full or partial renal recovery, allowing for re-challenge with ICI. However, a subset of patients will require additional steroid-sparing therapies for corticosteroid-dependent or refractory ICI-AKI. Here we review developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-AKI, the approach to diagnosis (with a focus on the emergence of novel diagnostic tools), prognostic factors and the current evidence for establishing treatment standards for ICI-AKI. As the evidence base remains largely retrospective, we identify questions that would benefit from future prospective studies in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of ICI-AKI.

Caerin 1.1 and 1.9 peptides halt B16 melanoma metastatic tumours via expanding cDC1 and reprogramming tumour macrophages

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) such as anti-PD-1 antibodies, has revolutionised cancer treatment, although response rates vary among patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that caerin 1.1 and 1.9, host-defence peptides from the Australian tree frog, enhance the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and therapeutic vaccines in a murine TC-1 model by activating tumour-associated macrophages intratumorally.

METHODS

We employed a murine B16 melanoma model to investigate the therapeutic potential of caerin 1.1 and 1.9 in combination with anti-CD47 and a therapeutic vaccine (triple therapy, TT). Tumour growth of caerin-injected primary tumours and distant metastatic tumours was assessed, and survival analysis conducted. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of CD45+ cells isolated from distant tumours was performed to elucidate changes in the tumour microenvironment induced by TT.

RESULTS

The TT treatment significantly reduced tumour volumes on the treated side compared to untreated and control groups, with notable effects observed by Day 21. Survival analysis indicated extended survival in mice receiving TT, both on the treated and distant sides. scRNAseq revealed a notable expansion of conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) and CD4+CD8+ T cells in the TT group. Tumour-associated macrophages in the TT group shifted toward a more immune-responsive M1 phenotype, with enhanced communication observed between cDC1s and CD8+ and CD4+CD25+ T cells. Additionally, TT downregulated M2-like macrophage marker genes, particularly in MHCIIhi and tissue-resident macrophages, suppressing Cd68 and Arg1 expression across all macrophage types. Differential gene expression analysis highlighted pathway alterations, including upregulation of oxidative phosphorylation and MYC target V1 in Arg1hi macrophages, and activation of pro-inflammatory pathways in MHCIIhi and tissue-resident macrophages.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that caerin 1.1 and 1.9, combined with immunotherapy, effectively modulate the tumour microenvironment in primary and secondary tumours, leading to reduced tumour growth and enhanced systemic immunity. Further investigation into these mechanisms could pave the way for improved combination therapies in advanced melanoma treatment.

Impact of race, ethnicity, and social determinants on outcomes following immune checkpoint therapy

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies are one of the greatest advances in the history of cancer care and are now commonly used in the management of many different malignancies. However, much remains unknown about the factors that affect the efficacy and side effect profile of these agents. This review delves into the published literature that evaluates the intricate interplay between race, age, gender, and social determinants in shaping outcomes following ICB across solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. We examine the pivotal phase 2 and 3 trials to evaluate the demographics of participants and outcomes based on these variables, if reported. Most, but not all, trials reported some basic demographic information like age, sex, race, ethnicity, and/or geographic area for enrollment. Clinically relevant biological markers that could affect ICB outcomes such as obesity or markers of social determinants of health were largely not reported. Trials were generally representative for men and women based on expected prevalence for a given malignancy, but often under-represented non-white participants and rarely enrolled patients from the global south. Subgroup analyses were conducted in many ICB trials for solid malignancies, but rarely conducted for hematologic malignancies. These analyses largely showed similar qualitative benefit across subgroups, but adverse events were rarely reported by subgroup. This review adds to our understanding of the populations that these clinical trials have studied and highlight the urgent need to redouble our efforts at increasing the diversity of the population in future ICB trials.

Programmable bionanomaterials for revolutionizing cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy involves a cutting-edge method that utilizes the immune system to detect and eliminate cancer cells. It has shown substantial effectiveness in treating different types of cancer. As a result, its growing importance is due to its distinct benefits and potential for sustained recovery. However, the general deployment of this treatment is hindered by ongoing issues in maintaining minimal toxicity, high specificity, and prolonged effectiveness. Nanotechnology offers promising solutions to these challenges due to its notable attributes, including expansive precise surface areas, accurate ability to deliver drugs and controlled surface chemistry. This review explores the current advancements in the application of nanomaterials in cancer immunotherapy, focusing on three primary areas: monoclonal antibodies, therapeutic cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell treatment. In adoptive cell therapy, nanomaterials enhance the expansion and targeting capabilities of immune cells, such as T cells, thereby improving their ability to locate and destroy cancer cells. For therapeutic cancer vaccines, nanoparticles serve as delivery vehicles that protect antigens from degradation and enhance their uptake by antigen-presenting cells, boosting the immune response against cancer. Monoclonal antibodies benefit from nanotechnology through improved delivery mechanisms and reduced off-target effects, which increase their specificity and effectiveness. By highlighting the intersection of nanotechnology and immunotherapy, we aim to underscore the transformative potential of nanomaterials in enhancing the effectiveness and safety of cancer immunotherapies. Nanoparticles' ability to deliver drugs and biomolecules precisely to tumor sites reduces systemic toxicity and enhances therapeutic outcomes.

PD-L1 restrains PD-1+Nrp1lo Treg cells to suppress inflammation-driven colorectal tumorigenesis

T cells function not only as an essential component of host cancer immunosurveillance but also as a regulator of colonic inflammation, a process that promotes colorectal cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a T cell-negative regulator, but its role in regulation of T cell functions in the context of colorectal cancer is unknown. We report that global deletion of Cd274 results in increased colonic inflammation, PD-1+ T cells, and inflammation-driven colorectal tumorigenesis in mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis revealed that PD-L1 suppresses subpopulations of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+Nrp1lo regulatory T (Treg) cells and interleukin (IL) 6+ neutrophils in colorectal tumor. Treg cells produce transforming growth factor (TGF) β to recruit IL6+ neutrophils. Neutrophils produce IL6 to inhibit activation of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and primary CTLs. Accordingly, IL6 blockade immunotherapy increases CTL activation and suppresses colon tumor growth in vivo. Our findings determine that PD-L1 restrains PD-1+Nrp1loTGFβ+ Treg cells to suppress IL6+ neutrophil tumor recruitment to sustain CTL activation to control inflammation-driven colorectal tumorigenesis.

Cold and hot tumors: from molecular mechanisms to targeted therapy

Immunotherapy has made significant strides in cancer treatment, particularly through immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which has shown notable clinical benefits across various tumor types. Despite the transformative impact of ICB treatment in cancer therapy, only a minority of patients exhibit a positive response to it. In patients with solid tumors, those who respond well to ICB treatment typically demonstrate an active immune profile referred to as the "hot" (immune-inflamed) phenotype. On the other hand, non-responsive patients may exhibit a distinct "cold" (immune-desert) phenotype, differing from the features of "hot" tumors. Additionally, there is a more nuanced "excluded" immune phenotype, positioned between the "cold" and "hot" categories, known as the immune "excluded" type. Effective differentiation between "cold" and "hot" tumors, and understanding tumor intrinsic factors, immune characteristics, TME, and external factors are critical for predicting tumor response and treatment results. It is widely accepted that ICB therapy exerts a more profound effect on "hot" tumors, with limited efficacy against "cold" or "altered" tumors, necessitating combinations with other therapeutic modalities to enhance immune cell infiltration into tumor tissue and convert "cold" or "altered" tumors into "hot" ones. Therefore, aligning with the traits of "cold" and "hot" tumors, this review systematically delineates the respective immune characteristics, influencing factors, and extensively discusses varied treatment approaches and drug targets based on "cold" and "hot" tumors to assess clinical efficacy.

Managing Select Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across cancer programs has created the need for standardized monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Delayed recognition without appropriate treatment can have serious and life-threatening consequences. The management of irAEs presents a unique set of challenges that must be addressed at a multidisciplinary level. Although various national and international guidelines and working groups provide high-level recommendations for the management of irAEs, practical guidance is lacking. Furthermore, timely collaboration between specialists requires institutional protocols that enable the early recognition, assessment, and treatment of irAEs. Such protocols should be developed by institution specialists and include algorithms for all healthcare providers involved in the care of patients treated with ICIs. At William Osler Health System in Brampton, Ontario, practical step-by-step multidisciplinary treatment approaches with recommendations for the management of irAEs were developed in collaboration with experts across Canada. Here, we provide an in-depth description of the approaches, outlining baseline investigations prior to the initiation of ICIs, as well as the monitoring and management of irAEs based on symptoms, severity, and involved organ systems. We encourage other centres to adapt and modify our approaches according to their specific needs and requirements.

A phase II multicentre study of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibitor (TM5614) plus nivolumab for treating anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody-refractory malignant melanoma: TM5614-MM trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies (PD-1 Abs) are widely used for advanced melanoma, but information on the efficacy of anti-PD-1 Abs is limited in the Asian population. There remains an unmet need to improve the therapeutic effects of anti-PD-1 Ab-treatment, particularly in patients with melanoma who are refractory to anti-PD-1 Abs. The aim of this study was to evaluate anti-PD-1 Ab-treatment in combination with TM5614 (a plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibitor) in patients with unresectable melanoma.

METHODS

The TM5614-MM study was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with TM5614 in patients with advanced, unresectable malignant melanoma recruited at seven Japanese institutes between 13 September 2021 and 31 March 2023. Patients with metastatic or unresectable melanoma previously treated with anti-PD-1 Abs were enrolled. Nivolumab 480 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks for 8 weeks, while TM5614 was administered orally at a dose of 120 mg (0-4 weeks) and 180 mg once daily (5-8 weeks). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate after 8 weeks of concomitant use of TM5614.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, and 34 patients were included in the anti-PD-1 Ab-refractory cohort. The overall response rate at 8 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval 12.9-44.9%, P = 0.027) in 27 patients who were anti-PD-1 Ab-refractory based on investigator assessment in the protocol per set cohort. Seven patients discontinued treatment owing to progressive disease or adverse events. Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 3 of 39 patients (7.7%) in the intention-to-treat cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

TM5614 in combination with nivolumab is well tolerated and effective in anti-PD-1 Ab-refractory unresectable melanoma.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients - A Review of Potential Complications and Management Strategies

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has enabled a paradigm shift in Oncology, with the treatment of metastatic cancer in certain tumor types becoming akin to the treatment of chronic disease. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of developing cancer compared to the general population. Historically, KTR were excluded from ICI clinical trials due to concern for allograft rejection and decreased anti-tumor efficacy. While early post-marketing data revealed an allograft rejection risk of 40%-50%, 2 recent small prospective trials have demonstrated lower rates of rejection of 0%-12%, suggesting that maintenance immunosuppression modification prior to ICI start modulates rejection risk. Moreover, objective response rates induced by ICI for the treatment of advanced or metastatic skin cancer, the most common malignancy in KTR, have been comparable to those achieved by immune intact patients. Non-invasive biomarkers may have a role in risk-stratifying patients before starting ICI, and monitoring for rejection, though allograft biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis. This clinically focused review summarizes current knowledge on complications of ICI use in KTR, including their mechanism, risk mitigation strategies, non-invasive biomarker use, approaches to treatment of rejection, and suggestions for future directions in research.

Establish a novel immune-related gene prognostic risk index (IRGPRI) associated with CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background

The aim of this study is to create an index called IRGPRI (immune-related gene prognostic risk index) that can be utilized for predicting the prognosis and assessing the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Distinguishing gene expression patterns (DEGs) were detected in CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) compared to other cellular types such as CD4 T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and CD8 Tex using the advanced technology of Single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-seq). The construction of IRGPRI was accomplished by employing LASSO Cox regression analysis. We conducted a comparative analysis on clinical characteristics and molecular features, such as pathway enrichment and gene mutation, among the distinct subgroups of IRGPRI. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between immunological characteristics and IRGPRI subgroups to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of ICIs in NSCLC patients.

Results

A total of 109 genes were identified by intersecting immune-related genes with DEGs obtained from single-cell RNA sequencing data (GSE131907), specifically comparing CTLs to other cell types. From these, we selected 7 prognosis-related genes, namely TRBC1, HLA-DMA, CTSH, RAC1, CTSL, ANXA2, and CEBPB. These genes were used to construct the IRGPRI. The prognosis of patients diagnosed with NSCLC was found to be significantly better in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group, as demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis. This observation was further confirmed through the utilization of data from the GEO cohort. The low-risk group demonstrated an increase in pathways linked with immune response, whereas the high-risk group exhibited a higher prevalence of pathways related to cancer. Furthermore, it was noted in the TCGA cohort that there existed a significant rise in the mutation frequency of every gene within the high-risk group as opposed to the low-risk group. Missense variation emerged as the most prevalent form of mutation. According to the analysis of immune cell infiltration and function, the comprehensive findings suggest that the group with a low risk is characterized by an increased presence of plasma cells, CTLs, T cells follicular helper, Tregs, and Dendritic cell resting. Additionally, they exhibit a higher score in terms of immune function for B cells, CD8+ T cells, checkpoint activity, T cell inhibition and stimulation. Moreover, this low-risk group demonstrates greater efficacy when treated with ICIs therapy compared to the high-risk group.

Conclusions

Our research effectively developed and verified a unique IRGPRI, showcasing its association with immune-related characteristics. As a result, the potential of IRGPRI as a valuable biomarker for predicting prognosis and evaluating the effectiveness of ICIs treatment in cancer is evident.

The Recent Research Progress of the Tumor mRNA Vaccine

Tumors have long posed a significant threat to human life and health, and the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine is seen as an attractive approach for cancer immunotherapy due to its developmental simplicity, rapid manufacture, and increased immune safety and efficiency. In this review, we have summarized details of the developmental history of mRNA vaccines, discussed the basic molecular structure and the effect on the stable and translation level of mRNA, analyzed the underlying immune efficiency and mechanisms on tumors, and assessed the current status of clinical research. We explored the treatment and application prospects of mRNA vaccines, aiming to provide perspectives on the future of mRNA tumor vaccines for ongoing clinical research.

Pembrolizumab-induced thyroid storm

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel treatment modalities that have revolutionized the field of oncology. Their widespread use in various cancers and prolonged survival of patients led to the identification of a wide range of side effects associated with the therapy, known as immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). IrAEs are presumed to arise from immunologic enhancement and frequently result in endocrine disorders. Thyroid dysfunction is not uncommon during therapy with pembrolizumab and affects up to 13% to 14% of patients. Thyroid storm associated with ICIs is extremely rare. We present a case of a 34-year-old woman with metastatic ovarian carcinoma who developed thyroid storm shortly after an addition of pembrolizumab.

Balancing Tumor Immunotherapy and Immune-Related Adverse Events: Unveiling the Key Regulators

Tumor immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in cancer treatment in recent years, offering vast potential. This method primarily involves targeting and inhibiting the suppressive checkpoints present in different immune cells to enhance their activation, ultimately leading to tumor regression. However, tumor cells exploit the surrounding immune cells and tissues to establish a tumor microenvironment (TME) that supports their survival and growth. Within the TME, the efficacy of effector immune cells is compromised, as tumor cells exploit inhibitory immune cells to suppress their function. Furthermore, certain immune cells can be co-opted by tumor cells to facilitate tumor growth. While significantly enhancing the body's tumor immunity can lead to tumor regression, it can also result in severe toxic side effects and an inflammatory factor storm. As a consequence, patients often discontinue treatment due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or, in extreme cases, succumb to toxic side effects before experiencing tumor regression. In this analysis, we examined several remission regimens for irAEs, each with its own drawbacks, including toxic side effects or suppression of tumor immunotherapy, which is undesirable. A recent research study, specifically aimed at downregulating intestinal epithelial barrier permeability, has shown promising results in reducing the severity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) while preserving immune function. This approach effectively reduces the severity of IBD without compromising the levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ, which are crucial for maintaining the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy. Based on the substantial similarities between IBD and ICI colitis (combo immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced colitis), this review proposes that targeting epithelial cells represents a crucial research direction for mitigating irAEs in the future.

Phase I/II study of BMS-986156 with ipilimumab or nivolumab with or without stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid malignancies

BACKGROUND

BMS-986156 is an agonist of the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-related protein (GITR) and promotes increased effector T-cell activation. Combined anti-GITR, anti-programmed death-1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies and radiotherapy improve tumor control in preclinical studies. Herein we describe the results of the safety and efficacy of BMS-986156+ipilimumab or nivolumab with/without stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with advanced solid cancers (NCT04021043).

METHODS

This open-label, multigroup, single-center phase I/II study enrolled patients with histologically-confirmed stage IV solid cancers resistant to standard treatments. Group 1 (G1, n=20) received four cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus BMS-986156 (30 mg as dose level 1 (L1) or 100 mg as dose level 2 (L2)), every 3 weeks (Q3W). Group 2 (G2, n=10) received four cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus BMS-986156 (dose as determined in G1, Q3W) with SABR (50 Gy/4 fx or 60-70 Gy/10 fx to liver/lung lesions. Group 3 (G3, n=20) received four cycles of nivolumab (480 mg) plus BMS-986156 (30 mg), every 4 weeks with SABR. Maintenance nivolumab could be given up to 2 years. Tumor responses were assessed every 1-3 months until progression, using immune-related response criteria.

RESULTS

50 patients were enrolled between 10/2019 and 12/2021. Patients received a median of 3 (IQR 2-4.25) initial treatment cycles. 100 mg BMS-986156 with ipilimumab was tolerated well. Five discontinued BMS-986156 with ipilimumab due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with three in G1/L1, one in G1/L2 and one in G2, respectively. 22 patients (44%) experienced Grade 1-3 TRAEs (6, 4, 5, 7 patients for G1/L1, G1/L2, G2, G3). Six (12%) had Grade 3 TRAEs (2, 2, 1, 1 for G1/L1, G1/L2, G2, G3), with elevated alanine aminotransferase (n=3, in G1/L2, G2 and G3) and aspartate aminotransferase (n=2, in G2 and G3) being the most common. There was no Grade 4-5 TRAEs. Overall, 19/39 (48.7%) patients eligible for efficacy analysis had stable disease and 3 (7.7%) achieved a partial response. Out-of-field (abscopal) disease control rate (ACR) and out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ARR) were 38.5% and 7.7%, respectively, with the highest ACR (50%, 9/18) and ARR (11.1%, 2/18) in G3.

CONCLUSIONS

BMS-986156 was well-tolerated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, with or without SABR. Outcomes were encouraging in this population, as more than half of patients had stable disease/partial response.

Dual PD-L1/SOX10 Immunohistochemistry Combined With Digital Imaging Enhances Stratification Accuracy of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated an overall survival benefit in patients with advanced melanoma. Though the significance of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on melanoma cells as a predictive biomarker of response remains inconclusive, some reports indicate that a PD-L1 expression of <1% of tumor cells may be associated with better outcomes with dual immunotherapy. Adequate patient selection for combination therapy is critical given the higher frequency of adverse effects compared with monotherapy. Immunohistochemical (IHC) PD-L1 interpretation in tumor cells is challenging when inflammatory cells are present and cutoffs are low. We studied 36 metastatic melanoma biopsies from Immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive patients, previously stained and scored for PD-L1 IHC using the tumor proportion score (TPS). Cases were classified into 3 groups: <1%, 1% to 5%, and >5%. After de-coverslipping, SRY-related HMG-box-10 (SOX10) IHC was performed on PD-L1 IHC slides with a red chromogen, and subsequently scanned and scored by ≥2 dermatopathologists. This assessment determined that 25% of cases (9/36) had a TPS ≥ 1%, in contrast to the single IHC assay (63.8%). The majority of the 1-5% group (11/13, 84.6%) underwent a change of category to <1% TPS. In the >5% group, 60% of cases (6/10) were downgraded to <1% and 1% to 5% (4 and 2 cases, respectively). Our study suggests that PD-L1 IHC evaluation could benefit from dual PD-L1/SOX10 IHC. Dual IHC is expected to decrease the interference caused by PD-L1 expression on inflammatory cells, and digital imaging proves useful for the preservation and analysis of stains. Refining PD-L1 evaluation in metastatic melanoma may improve clinical decisions between single and combination immunotherapy, with potentially profound consequences in response and quality of life.

Toripalimab in combination with HBM4003, an anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, in advanced melanoma and other solid tumors: an open-label phase I trial

BACKGROUND

HBM4003 is a novel anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain-only antibody, designed to enhance Treg ablation and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity while ensuring a manageable safety profile. This phase I trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of HBM4003 plus with anti-PD-1 antibody toripalimab in patients with advanced solid tumors, especially focusing on melanoma.

METHODS

The multicenter, open-label phase I trial was divided into two parts: dose-escalation phase (part 1) and dose-expansion phase (part 2). In part 1, HBM4003 was administered at doses of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg in combination with toripalimab with fixed dosage of 240 mg every 3 weeks. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was used in the expansion phase. Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D in part 1 and objective response rate (ORR) in part 2. Biomarkers based on cytokines and multiplex immunofluorescence staining were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients received study treatment, including 36 patients treated with RP2D of HBM4003 0.3 mg/kg plus toripalimab 240 mg every 3 week. 36 participants (90.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), of which 10 (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs and 5 (12.5%) experienced immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) with maximum severity of grade 3. No grade 4 or 5 irAEs occurred. Efficacy analysis set included 32 melanoma patients treated with RP2D and with available post-baseline imaging data. The ORRs of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-naïve subgroup and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-failed subgroup were 33.3% and 5.9%, respectively. In mucosal melanoma, the ORR of the two subgroups were 40.0% and 10.0%, respectively. Baseline high Treg/CD4+ratio in the tumor serves as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBM4003 0.3 mg/kg plus toripalimab 240 mg every 3 week demonstrated manageable safety in solid tumors and no new safety signal. Limited data demonstrated promising antitumor activity, especially in PD-1 treatment-naïve mucosal melanoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04727164.

Construction and validation of an immune-related gene signature predictive of survival and response to immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor with the second incidence rate and the third mortality rate worldwide. In this study, we identified and validated an immune-related gene signature, explored the clinical and molecular characteristics of the signature-defined risk groups, and assessed its ability in predicting prognosis, immune cell infiltration and immunotherapy responses. The Cancer Genome Atlas database was used as the training set while GSE39582 database as the validation set. Immune-related hub genes were selected by the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-penalized Cox regression model, and the signature was then constructed by the selected genes and their relevant coefficients. Prognostic performance of the signature and the signature-base nomogram models were assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots in both training and validation cohorts. Clinical and mutation-related data were downloaded and analyzed to explore their associations with signature-defined risk groups. Proportions of infiltrated immune cells was estimated via CIBERSORT algorithm and immunotherapy response was evaluated by immunophenoscore and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion scores. Seven among 790 immune-related differentially-expressed genes were selected and use to construct the signature. The signature and signature-base nomograms showed promising prognostic performance in both training and validation cohorts. Signature-defined high-risk group was associated with advanced disease, poor pathological prognostic factors and less active immune infiltration microenvironment. Besides, the response to immunotherapy of high-risk group was predicted to be poorer by immunophenoscore and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion scores. Our signature proved its efficacy in predicting prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment and responses to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Preclinical comparison of prolgolimab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab

Prolgolimab is a recombinant IgG1-based anti-PD-1 antibody, whose properties were improved by the introduction of the LALA mutation, and which has demonstrated high efficacy in patients with metastatic melanoma. This paper presents the results of comparative preclinical studies of antigen-binding and effector functions involving prolgolimab and conventional IgG4 antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab. None of the studied antibodies had undesirable antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity. Prolgolimab has shown higher PD-1 receptor occupancy and T-cell activation, but lower propensity to activate antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as compared to nivolumab and pembrolizumab. An in vivo study in mice inoculated with CT26.wt cancer cells showed that tumor growth inhibition was 16% for pembrolizumab and 56% for prolgolimab. This study warrants clinical comparison of IgG1- and IgG4-based anti-PD-1 antibodies.