251
|
Kim J, Seki E. Inflammation and Immunity in Liver Neoplasms: Implications for Future Therapeutic Strategies. Mol Cancer Ther 2025; 24:188-199. [PMID: 39365846 PMCID: PMC11794036 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, the "hallmarks of cancer" have revolutionized cancer research and highlighted the crucial roles of inflammation and immunity. Protumorigenic inflammation promotes cancer development along with inhibition of antitumor immunity, shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME) toward a tumor-permissive state and further enhancing the malignant potential of cancer cells. This immunosuppressive TME allows tumors to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, understanding the complex interplay between tumors and the immune system within the TME has become pivotal, especially with the advent of immunotherapy. Although immunotherapy has achieved notable success in many malignancies, primary liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, presents unique challenges. The hepatic immunosuppressive environment poses obstacles to the effectiveness of immunotherapy, along with high mortality rates and limited treatment options for patients with liver cancer. In this review, we discuss current understanding of the complex immune-mediated mechanisms underlying liver neoplasms, focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. We describe the molecular and cellular heterogeneity within the TME, highlighting how this presents unique challenges and opportunities for immunotherapy in liver cancers. By unraveling the immune landscape of liver neoplasms, this review aims to contribute to the development of more effective therapeutic interventions, ultimately improving clinical outcomes for patients with liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieun Kim
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Ekihiro Seki
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
252
|
Budkowska M, Ostrycharz-Jasek E, Cecerska-Heryć E, Dołęgowska K, Siennicka A, Nazarewski Ł, Rykowski P, Dołęgowska B. The Impact of Human Liver Transplantation on the Concentration of Fibroblast Growth Factors: FGF19 and FGF21. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:1299. [PMID: 39941067 PMCID: PMC11818808 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
The multitude of processes in which the liver participates makes it vulnerable to many serious diseases, which can lead to chronic organ failure. Modern medicine bases the treatment of end-stage liver failure on liver transplantation. To ensure the proper functioning of the transplanted liver, a balance of cellular and immunological processes and appropriate concentrations of many different factors are necessary, including, among others, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). Over the last several years, studies have focused on some FGF growth factors, i.e., FGF19 and FGF21. These two growth factors belong to the FGF19 subfamily, and we concentrate on these two factors in our work. These factors diffuse away from the site of secretion into the blood, acting as hormones. FGF19 is a growth factor with a high therapeutic potential, involved in the homeostasis of bile acids necessary to maintain the proper function of the transplanted liver. FGF21, in turn, plays an important role in regulating lipid and glucose homeostasis. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the concentration of growth factors FGF19 and FGF21 in the plasma of 84 patients before, 24 h, and 2 weeks after liver transplantation (ELISA test was used). Additionally, the correlations of the basic laboratory parameters-alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin and hemoglobin (Hb)-with FGF19 and FGF21 were determined. Our studies noted statistically significant changes in FGF19 and FGF21 concentrations before, 24 h, and 2 weeks after liver transplantation. The highest values for FGF19 before liver transplantation and the lowest values 24 h after this surgery were observed for FGF21; the highest concentrations were observed the day after liver transplantation, and the lowest were observed immediately before surgery. Observations of increases and decreases in the concentration of the examined factors at individual time points (before and after transplantation) allow us to suspect that FGF19 has an adaptive and protective function toward the transplanted liver. At the same time, FGF21 may affect the regenerative mechanisms of the damaged organ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Budkowska
- Department of Medical Analytics, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Ewa Ostrycharz-Jasek
- Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland;
- Doctoral School, University of Szczecin, 70-383 Szczecin, Poland
- Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Center, University of Szczecin, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Cecerska-Heryć
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (E.C.-H.); (B.D.)
| | - Katarzyna Dołęgowska
- Department of Immunology Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstanców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Aldona Siennicka
- Department of Medical Analytics, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Łukasz Nazarewski
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, ul Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (Ł.N.); (P.R.)
| | - Paweł Rykowski
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, ul Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (Ł.N.); (P.R.)
| | - Barbara Dołęgowska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland; (E.C.-H.); (B.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
253
|
Wu J, Lu F, Li Z, Dai Y, Wang Y, Zheng L, Bao R, Rao Y, Wang H. Caring Readiness Among Parents of Children Who Have Undergone Liver Transplantation and Are Transitioning From the Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Nurs 2025. [PMID: 39901577 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/05/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the status and influencing factors of caring readiness among parents of children undergoing liver transplantation transitioning from the intensive care unit, and to explore the associations between caring readiness and other variables. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. METHODS A total of 126 parents of children who underwent liver transplantation at a tertiary hospital in China took a questionnaire survey via convenience sampling. Independent t-test, ANOVA and correlation analysis were conducted to analyse the data. Multivariable stepwise linear regression was used to analyse the influencing factors of caring readiness. The PROCESS macro (Model 4) was used to verify the mediating effect of caregiver burden between social support and caring readiness. REPORTING METHOD The STROBE checklist was used as a guideline in this study. RESULTS The mean score of caring readiness among parents of children who had undergone liver transplantation and were transitioning from the intensive care unit was 23.62 ± 5.34. Multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis indicated that experience with caregiving, intensive care unit length of stay, social support and caregiver burden were the factors associated with caring readiness, explaining 18.6% of the variance in caring readiness among parents. Caregiver burden partially moderated the relationship between social support and caring readiness (20.93%). CONCLUSION The study shows caring readiness was moderate among parents of children who have undergone liver transplantation and are transitioning from the intensive care unit. It reveals that lack of caregiving experience and children's short intensive care unit length of stay should be emphasised, preventing inadequate readiness of parents. Furthermore, enhancing social support interventions and burden-reduction strategies are important for improving parents' caring readiness. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE The findings demonstrate that health care professionals should provide timely and appropriate intervention strategies to enhance parents' caring readiness, which could potentially be achieved by increasing social support and reducing caregiver burden. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Parents of children who underwent liver transplantation participated in this study via a questionnaire survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyun Wu
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fangyan Lu
- Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhiru Li
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanhong Dai
- Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li Zheng
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ruijie Bao
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuxin Rao
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huafen Wang
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
254
|
Kokudo T, Kokudo N. Evolving Indications for Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following the Milan Criteria. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:507. [PMID: 39941874 PMCID: PMC11815920 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 01/30/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Since their introduction in the 1990s, the Milan criteria have been the gold standard of indication for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, several institutions have reported wider indication criteria for LT with comparable survival outcomes. Methods: This paper summarizes the recent indications for LT for HCC through a literature review. Results: There are several criteria expanding the Milan criteria, which can be subdivided into the "based on tumor number and size only", "based on tumor number and size plus tumor markers", and "based on tumor differentiation" groups, with the outcomes being comparable to those of patients included within the Milan criteria. Besides the tumor size and number, which are included in the Milan criteria, recent criteria included biomarkers and tumor differentiation. Several retrospective studies have reported microvascular invasion (MVI) as a significant risk factor for postoperative recurrence, highlighting the importance of preoperatively predicting MVI. Several studies attempted to identify preoperative predictive factors for MVI using tumor markers or preoperative imaging findings. Patients with HCC who are LT candidates are often treated while on the waiting list to prevent the progression of HCC or to reduce the measurable disease burden of HCC. The expanding repertoire of chemotherapeutic regiments suitable for patients with HCC should be further investigated. Conclusions: There are several criteria expanding Milan criteria, with the outcomes being comparable to those of patients included within the Milan criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan;
| | | |
Collapse
|
255
|
Andrade R, Perez-Rojas J, da Silva SG, Miskinyte M, Quaresma MC, Frazão LP, Peixoto C, Cubells A, Montalvá EM, Figueiredo A, Cipriano A, Gonçalves-Reis M, Proença D, Folgado A, Pereira-Leal JB, Oliveira RC, Pinto-Marques H, Tralhão JG, Berenguer M, Cardoso J. HepatoPredict Accurately Selects Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation Regardless of Tumor Heterogeneity. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:500. [PMID: 39941867 PMCID: PMC11816190 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/19/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths rising worldwide. This is leading to an increased demand for liver transplantation (LT), the most effective treatment for HCC in its initial stages. However, current patient selection criteria are limited in predicting recurrence and raise ethical concerns about equitable access to care. This study aims to enhance patient selection by refining the HepatoPredict (HP) tool, a machine learning-based model that combines molecular and clinical data to forecast LT outcomes. METHODS The updated HP algorithm was trained on a two-center dataset and assessed against standard clinical criteria. Its prognostic performance was evaluated through accuracy metrics, with additional analyses considering tumor heterogeneity and potential sampling bias. RESULTS HP outperformed all clinical criteria, particularly regarding negative predictive value, addressing critical limitations in existing selection strategies. It also demonstrated improved differentiation of recurrence-free and overall survival outcomes. Importantly, the prognostic accuracy of HP remained largely unaffected by intra-nodule and intra-patient heterogeneity, indicating its robustness even when biopsies were taken from smaller or non-dominant nodules. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the usage of HP as a valuable tool for optimizing LT candidate selection, promoting fair organ allocation and enhancing patient outcomes through integrated analysis of molecular and clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Andrade
- Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; (R.A.); (J.G.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Judith Perez-Rojas
- Pathology Service, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (A.C.); (E.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ISS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Sílvia Gomes da Silva
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Hospital Curry Cabral, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, 1069-166 Lisbon, Portugal; (S.G.d.S.)
- NOVA Medical School, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Migla Miskinyte
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Margarida C. Quaresma
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Laura P. Frazão
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Carolina Peixoto
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Almudena Cubells
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (A.C.); (E.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ISS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Eva M. Montalvá
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (A.C.); (E.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ISS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Liver Transplantation and Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - António Figueiredo
- Pathology Service, Hospital Curry Cabral, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, 1069-166 Lisbon, Portugal;
| | - Augusta Cipriano
- Pathology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal;
| | - Maria Gonçalves-Reis
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Daniela Proença
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - André Folgado
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - José B. Pereira-Leal
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| | - Rui Caetano Oliveira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal;
- Pathology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal;
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação em Meio Ambiente, Genética e Oncobiologia (CIMAGO), 3001-301 Coimbra, Portugal
- Centro Académico e Clínico (CAC), 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Hugo Pinto-Marques
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Centre, Hospital Curry Cabral, Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, 1069-166 Lisbon, Portugal; (S.G.d.S.)
- NOVA Medical School, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - José Guilherme Tralhão
- Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; (R.A.); (J.G.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal;
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação em Meio Ambiente, Genética e Oncobiologia (CIMAGO), 3001-301 Coimbra, Portugal
- Centro Académico e Clínico (CAC), 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (A.C.); (E.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ISS La Fe), 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Hepatology Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Joana Cardoso
- Ophiomics Precision Medicine, 1600-514 Lisbon, Portugal; (M.M.); (M.C.Q.); (L.P.F.); (C.P.); (M.G.-R.); (D.P.); (A.F.); (J.B.P.-L.)
| |
Collapse
|
256
|
Cheah YL, Yang HY, Simon CJ, Akoad ME, Connor AA, Daskalaki D, Han DH, Brombosz EW, Kim JK, Tellier MA, Ghobrial RM, Gaber AO, Choi GH. The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in 2 specialized centers. Liver Transpl 2025; 31:190-200. [PMID: 39441028 PMCID: PMC11732260 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Robotic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive option for living donor hepatectomy. Currently, there are no studies on the learning curve of robotic donor hepatectomy. Thus, we evaluated the learning curve for robotic donor right hepatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive living donors who underwent robotic hepatectomy at 2 specialized centers between 2016 and 2022. We estimated the number of cases required to achieve stable operating times for robotic donor right hepatectomy using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The complication rates were similar between the 2 centers (22.8% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.74). Most complications were graded as minor (70.4%). Analysis of the total operative time demonstrated that the learning curves reached a peak at the 17th case in center 1 and the 9th case in center 2. The average operation times for cases 1-17 versus 18-99 in center 1 were 603 versus 438 minutes ( p < 0.001), and cases 1-9 versus 10-15 in center 2 were 532 versus 418 minutes ( p = 0.002). Complication rates were lower after the learning curves were achieved, although this did not reach statistical significance. A comparison of outcomes between centers suggests that a standardized approach to this complex operation can be successfully transferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yee L. Cheah
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hye Yeon Yang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Caroline J. Simon
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed E. Akoad
- Department of Surgery, Roger L. Jenkins Transplantation Institute, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ashton A. Connor
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Despoina Daskalaki
- Department of Surgery, Roger L. Jenkins Transplantation Institute, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Elizabeth W. Brombosz
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jae K. Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Maureen A. Tellier
- Department of Surgery, Roger L. Jenkins Transplantation Institute, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - R. Mark Ghobrial
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, JC Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
257
|
Choudhury A, Kulkarni AV, Arora V, Soin AS, Dokmeci AK, Chowdhury A, Koshy A, Duseja A, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Patwa AK, Sood A, Roy A, Shukla A, Chan A, Krag A, Mukund A, Mandot A, Goel A, Butt AS, Sahney A, Shrestha A, Cárdenas A, Di Giorgio A, Arora A, Anand AC, Dhawan A, Jindal A, Saraya A, Srivastava A, Kumar A, Kaewdech A, Pande A, Rastogi A, Valsan A, Goel A, Kumar A, Singal AK, Tanaka A, Coilly A, Singh A, Meena BL, Jagadisan B, Sharma BC, Lal BB, Eapen CE, Yaghi C, Kedarisetty CK, Kim CW, Panackel C, Yu C, Kalal CR, Bihari C, Huang CH, Vasishtha C, Jansen C, Strassburg C, Lin CY, Karvellas CJ, Lesmana CRA, Philips CA, Shawcross D, Kapoor D, Agrawal D, Payawal DA, Praharaj DL, Jothimani D, Song DS, Kim DJ, Kim DS, Zhongping D, Karim F, Durand F, Shiha GE, D’Amico G, Lau GK, Pati GK, Narro GEC, Lee GH, Adali G, Dhakal GP, Szabo G, Lin HC, Li H, Nair HK, Devarbhavi H, Tevethia H, Ghazinian H, Ilango H, Yu HL, Hasan I, Fernandez J, George J, Behari J, Fung J, Bajaj J, Benjamin J, Lai JC, Jia J, Hu JH, et alChoudhury A, Kulkarni AV, Arora V, Soin AS, Dokmeci AK, Chowdhury A, Koshy A, Duseja A, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Patwa AK, Sood A, Roy A, Shukla A, Chan A, Krag A, Mukund A, Mandot A, Goel A, Butt AS, Sahney A, Shrestha A, Cárdenas A, Di Giorgio A, Arora A, Anand AC, Dhawan A, Jindal A, Saraya A, Srivastava A, Kumar A, Kaewdech A, Pande A, Rastogi A, Valsan A, Goel A, Kumar A, Singal AK, Tanaka A, Coilly A, Singh A, Meena BL, Jagadisan B, Sharma BC, Lal BB, Eapen CE, Yaghi C, Kedarisetty CK, Kim CW, Panackel C, Yu C, Kalal CR, Bihari C, Huang CH, Vasishtha C, Jansen C, Strassburg C, Lin CY, Karvellas CJ, Lesmana CRA, Philips CA, Shawcross D, Kapoor D, Agrawal D, Payawal DA, Praharaj DL, Jothimani D, Song DS, Kim DJ, Kim DS, Zhongping D, Karim F, Durand F, Shiha GE, D’Amico G, Lau GK, Pati GK, Narro GEC, Lee GH, Adali G, Dhakal GP, Szabo G, Lin HC, Li H, Nair HK, Devarbhavi H, Tevethia H, Ghazinian H, Ilango H, Yu HL, Hasan I, Fernandez J, George J, Behari J, Fung J, Bajaj J, Benjamin J, Lai JC, Jia J, Hu JH, Chen JJ, Hou JL, Yang JM, Chang J, Trebicka J, Kalf JC, Sollano JD, Varghese J, Arab JP, Li J, Reddy KR, Raja K, Panda K, Kajal K, Kumar K, Madan K, Kalista KF, Thanapirom K, Win KM, Suk KT, Devadas K, Lesmana LA, Kamani L, Premkumar M, Niriella MA, Al Mahtab M, Yuen MF, Sayed MHE, Alla M, Wadhawan M, Sharma MK, Sahu M, Prasad M, Muthiah MD, Schulz M, Bajpai M, Reddy MS, Praktiknjo M, Yu ML, Prasad M, Sharma M, Elbasiony M, Eslam M, Azam MG, Rela M, Desai MS, Vij M, Mahmud N, Choudhary NS, Marannan NK, Ormeci N, Saraf N, Verma N, Nakayama N, Kawada N, Oidov Baatarkhuu, Goyal O, Yokosuka O, Rao PN, Angeli P, Parikh P, Kamath PS, Thuluvath PJ, Lingohr P, Ranjan P, Bhangui P, Rathi P, Sakhuja P, Puri P, Ning Q, Dhiman RK, Kumar R, Vijayaraghavan R, Khanna R, Maiwall R, Mohanka R, Moreau R, Gani RA, Loomba R, Mehtani R, Rajaram RB, Hamid SS, Palnitkar S, Lal S, Biswas S, Chirapongsathorn S, Agarwal S, Sachdeva S, Saigal S, Kumar SE, Violeta S, Singh SP, Mochida S, Mukewar S, Alam S, Lim SG, Alam S, Shalimar, Venishetty S, Sundaram SS, Shetty S, Bhatia S, Singh SA, Kottilil S, Strasser S, Shasthry SM, Maung ST, Tan SS, Treeprasertsuk S, Asthana S, Manekeller S, Gupta S, Acharya SK, K.C. S, Maharshi S, Asrani S, Dadhich S, Taneja S, Giri S, Singh S, Chen T, Gupta T, Kanda T, Tanwandee T, Piratvishuth T, Spengler U, Prasad VGM, Midha V, Rakhmetova V, Arroyo V, Sood V, BR VK, Wong VWS, Pamecha V, Singh V, Dayal VM, Saraswat VA, Kim WR, Jafri W, Gu W, Jun WY, Qi X, Chawla YK, Kim YJ, Shi Y, Abbas Z, Kumar G, Shiina S, Wei L, Omata M, Sarin SK, APASL-ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) for APASL-ACLF working party. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): the ‘Kyoto Consensus’—steps from Asia. Hepatol Int 2025; 19:1-69. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10773-4] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a condition associated with high mortality in the absence of liver transplantation. There have been various definitions proposed worldwide. The first consensus report of the working party of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set in 2004 on ACLF was published in 2009, and the “APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC)” was formed in 2012. The AARC database has prospectively collected nearly 10,500 cases of ACLF from various countries in the Asia–Pacific region. This database has been instrumental in developing the AARC score and grade of ACLF, the concept of the ‘Golden Therapeutic Window’, the ‘transplant window’, and plasmapheresis as a treatment modality. Also, the data has been key to identifying pediatric ACLF. The European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL CLIF) and the North American Association for the Study of the End Stage Liver Disease (NACSELD) from the West added the concepts of organ failure and infection as precipitants for the development of ACLF and CLIF-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and NACSELD scores for prognostication. The Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH) added COSSH-ACLF criteria to manage hepatitis b virus-ACLF with and without cirrhosis. The literature supports these definitions to be equally effective in their respective cohorts in identifying patients with high mortality. To overcome the differences and to develop a global consensus, APASL took the initiative and invited the global stakeholders, including opinion leaders from Asia, EASL and AASLD, and other researchers in the field of ACLF to identify the key issues and develop an evidence-based consensus document. The consensus document was presented in a hybrid format at the APASL annual meeting in Kyoto in March 2024. The ‘Kyoto APASL Consensus’ presented below carries the final recommendations along with the relevant background information and areas requiring future studies.
Collapse
|
258
|
Costaguta AC, Costaguta GA, Rumbo C, Gondolesi G, D'Agostino D, Pallitto MB, Bottasso O, Álvarez F. Lack of differences in outcomes between 3 immunosuppression protocols in the first year after pediatric liver transplantation: A multicenter study. Liver Transpl 2025; 31:201-210. [PMID: 38949782 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Advances in immunosuppression have extended patient and graft survival rates after solid organ transplantation; however, this is not free of side effects. Balancing safety and efficacy is of paramount importance, particularly in the pediatric setting. Current literature comparing different protocols is scarce, and decisions are mostly guided by physician preference. We aimed to compare 3 different protocols from 4 different centers to identify differences in outcomes after 1 year of follow-up. A retrospective analysis of the databases of the participating centers was performed. Consecutive patients aged <18 years with a first liver-only transplant and no other underlying congenital or acquired immunodeficiency were included. Patients were classified according to the immunosuppression protocol as follows: group A (prednisone + tacrolimus + basiliximab), group B (prednisone + tacrolimus + basiliximab + antithymocyte globulin), and group C (prednisone + tacrolimus). Differences in survival, frequency of rejection, infections, and other complications were analyzed in the entire group (n = 97) and the group with biliary atresia (n = 48). After 1 year of follow-up, no differences in patient or graft survival were observed when comparing either the entire group (n = 97) or patients with biliary atresia only (n = 48). The frequencies of rejection and episodes of infection were similar. Renal function showed no differences either before or after transplantation or between the groups. Immunosuppression protocols used in this study appeared to be equally safe and effective. This could offer the opportunity to tailor them to the patient's individual characteristics without compromising the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro C Costaguta
- Liver Transplantation Unit of the Sanatorio de Niños de Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Guillermo A Costaguta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition of CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carolina Rumbo
- Department Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriel Gondolesi
- Department Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Fundación Favaloro, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel D'Agostino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Italiano, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Belén Pallitto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Italiano, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Oscar Bottasso
- Immunology Department, IDICER-CONICET, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Fernando Álvarez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition of CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Montreal's University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
259
|
Larson EL, Ciftci Y, Jenkins RT, Zhou AL, Ruck JM, Philosophe B. Outcomes of Liver Transplant for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma. Clin Transplant 2025; 39:e70087. [PMID: 39869081 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2025] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare indication of liver transplant with limited evidence. METHODS Adult recipients undergoing first-time liver-only transplant from 2002 to 2021 in the United States were identified using the UNOS/OPTN database. We compared post-transplant outcomes of recipients receiving liver transplant for HEH versus other diagnoses. Survival was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Propensity score matching for recipient age, sex, and MELD was performed, with baseline characteristics and survival compared between groups. RESULTS Of 111 558 liver transplant recipients identified, 121 (0.1%) underwent transplant for HEH. Donors to HEH recipients were more often living donors. Recipients with HEH were younger, more likely to be female, and had lower BMI. Recipients with HEH had higher albumin, lower bilirubin, lower INR, and lower serum creatinine, as well as lower MELD scores and rates of ascites and encephalopathy. Similar post-transplant survival was observed for recipients with HEH (16.6 [lower 95% CI 14.9] years) and non-HEH diagnoses (13.8 [95% CI 13.6-13.9] years, log-rank p = 0.28), even after adjusting for baseline donor and recipient characteristics (aHR 1.28 [95% CI 0.94-1.74], p = 0.12). The propensity score matched cohort also had similar post-LT survival. CONCLUSIONS This national study represents the largest known report on liver transplant for HEH. The survival of recipients with HEH was similar to other etiologies, supporting the use of liver transplantation (LT) in advanced HEH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L Larson
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yusuf Ciftci
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Reed T Jenkins
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alice L Zhou
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jessica M Ruck
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Benjamin Philosophe
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
260
|
Han EJ, Ahn JS, Choi YJ, Kim DH, Choi JS, Chung HJ. Exploring the gut microbiome: A potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2025; 1880:189251. [PMID: 39719176 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/26/2024]
Abstract
The gut microbiome, a complex community of trillions of microorganisms in the intestines, is crucial in maintaining human health. Recent advancements in microbiome research have unveiled a compelling link between the gut microbiome and cancer development and progression. Alterations in the composition and function of the gut microbiome, known as dysbiosis, have been implicated in various types of cancer, including, esophageal, liver, colon, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal. However, the specific gut microbial strains associated with the development or progression of cancers in various tissues remain largely unclear. Here, we summarize current research findings on the gut microbiome of multiple cancers. This review aims to identify key gut microbial targets that closely influence cancer development based on current research findings. To accurately evaluate the effectiveness of the gut microbiome as a clinical tool for cancer, further research is needed to explore its potential as a biomarker and therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui-Jeong Han
- Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju 61751, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Seon Ahn
- Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju 61751, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu-Jin Choi
- Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju 61751, Republic of Korea
| | - Da-Hye Kim
- Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju 61751, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Soon Choi
- Research Center for Materials Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Daejeon 34133, Republic of Korea; College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
| | - Hea-Jong Chung
- Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju 61751, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
261
|
Akabane M, Bekki Y, Inaba Y, Imaoka Y, Esquivel CO, Kwong A, Kim WR, Sasaki K. Survival benefit of liver transplantation utilizing marginal donor organ according to ABO blood type. Liver Transpl 2025; 31:161-169. [PMID: 39287561 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
The current liver transplantation (LT) allocation policy focuses on the MELD scores, often overlooking factors like blood type and survival benefits. Understanding blood types' impact on survival benefits is crucial for optimizing the MELD 3.0 classification. This study used the United Network for Organ Sharing national registry database (2003-2020) to identify LT characteristics per ABO blood type and to determine the optimal MELD 3.0 scores for each blood type, based on survival benefits. The study included candidates of LT aged 18 years or older listed for LT (total N=150,815; A: 56,546, AB: 5841, B: 18,500, O: 69,928). Among these, 87,409 individuals (58.0%) underwent LT (A:32,156, AB: 4,362, B: 11,786, O: 39,105). Higher transplantation rates were observed in AB and B groups, with lower median MELD 3.0 scores at transplantation (AB: 21, B: 24 vs. A/O: 26, p <0.01) and shorter waiting times (AB: 101 d, B:172 d vs. A: 211 d, O: 201 d, p <0.01). A preference for donation after cardiac death (DCD) was seen in A and O recipients. Survival benefit analysis indicated that B blood type required higher MELD 3.0 scores for transplantation than A and O (donation after brain death transplantation: ≥15 in B vs. ≥11 in A/O; DCD transplantation: ≥21 in B vs. ≥11 in A, ≥15 in O). The study suggests revising the allocation policy to consider blood type for improved post-LT survival. This calls for personalized LT policies, recommending higher MELD 3.0 thresholds, particularly for individuals with type B blood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho Akabane
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yuki Bekki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inaba
- Clinical Research Promotion Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Imaoka
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Carlos O Esquivel
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Allison Kwong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - W Ray Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kazunari Sasaki
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
262
|
Nigam A, Bloomfield GC, Boumezrag M, Ali SM, Kwon D, Jha RC, Fishbein TM, Radkani P, Winslow ER. Impact of prior cholecystectomy on diagnosis and outcomes of choledochal cyst resection in adults. Am J Surg 2025; 240:116088. [PMID: 39577120 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The diagnosis of choledochal cysts in the adult population is complicated by the expected physiologic dilation of the common bile duct after cholecystectomy. We aimed to compare patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection based on cholecystectomy status. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent choledochal cyst resection between 1/1/1998-12/31/2021. Patients were categorized based on whether they had undergone cholecystectomy prior to choledochal cyst diagnosis. Preoperative imaging characteristics, pathology findings, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Amongst 119 patients who underwent excision, 58 (46 %) had and 69 (54 %) had not undergone prior cholecystectomy. Preoperative imaging demonstrated no difference in biliary tract diameter although a greater proportion of patients with a gallbladder in place had an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (55 % v 33 %, p < 0.05). Biliary malignancy was observed in a greater proportion of patients with prior cholecystectomy although this was not statistically significant (5 % v 3 %; p = 0.9). Rates of post-operative complications were statistically similar between patient cohorts. DISCUSSION Radiographic and clinical features were similar among patients who had and had not undergone cholecystectomy. Choledochal cyst patients should be managed uniformly regardless of cholecystectomy status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Maryam Boumezrag
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Salima Mansoor Ali
- Department of Clinical and Laboratory Pathology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - DongHyang Kwon
- Department of Clinical and Laboratory Pathology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Reena C Jha
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Pejman Radkani
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily R Winslow
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
263
|
Chen ICY, Dungca LBP, Yong CC, Chen CL. Sequential living donor liver transplantation after liver resection optimizes outcomes for patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2025; 24:50-56. [PMID: 39510903 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While liver transplantation (LT) provides the best long-term survival, it is constrained by organ scarcity and strict criteria. Liver resection (LR) is often the initial treatment for patients with solitary tumors and preserved liver function. The high recurrence rates associated with LR has prompted the exploration of sequential living donor liver transplantation (seqLDLT) after LR as a strategy for HCC patients with high-risk of recurrence. METHODS We analyzed data from 27 adult patients who underwent seqLDLT after LR for HCC at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (KCGMH) between June 1994 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on high-risk histopathological features post-LR or as part of downstaging strategy. Outcomes measured included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Among 765 HCC patients who underwent LDLT, 204 received LR before LDLT, and 27 underwent seqLDLT. Five patients (19%) underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) following LR as a downstaging strategy while the rest received seqLDLT as a preemptive strategy. The median age was 53.5 years with 85% males. Chronic hepatitis B was the predominant underlying disease (74%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DFS rates were 100%, 96.0%, 96.0% and 100%, 96.2%, 96.2%, respectively, with two patients experiencing HCC recurrence. One patient died from HCC recurrence. High-risk histopathological features included microvascular invasion (52%), satellite nodules (15%), multiple tumors (26%), tumors > 5 cm (19%), and a total tumor diameter > 10 cm (7%). CONCLUSIONS SeqLDLT offers a promising, tailored approach for managing HCC with adverse histopathologic features. Combining seqLDLT, downstaging strategies, and multidisciplinary treatments can achieve satisfactory OS and DFS in carefully selected patients, highlighting the need for refined criteria to identify the best candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itsuko Chih-Yi Chen
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Leona Bettina P Dungca
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
| | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
264
|
Bonomi AM, Overdevest AG, Fritzsche JA, Busch OR, Daams F, Kazemier G, Swijnenburg RJ, Beuers U, Zonderhuis BM, van Wanrooij RLJ, Erdmann JI, Voermans RP, Besselink MG. Outcome of a 'step-up approach' for recurrent cholangitis in patients with a non-stenotic hepaticojejunostomy after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: single center series. HPB (Oxford) 2025; 27:177-185. [PMID: 39567296 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent non-stenotic cholangitis (NSC) is a challenging and poorly understood complication of a surgical hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). Optimal treatment remains unclear. METHODS A retrospective single center series including patients with recurrent cholangitis with a non-stenotic HJ after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery was conducted (2015-2022). Primary outcome was resolution of NSC (i.e. free of NSC during six months). Secondary outcomes included reduction of NSC monthly episode frequency and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. RESULTS Overall, 50 of 1179 (4.2%) patients with HJ developed NSC. Treatment included a 'step-up approach' with short-course antibiotics (n = 50, 100 %), prolonged antibiotics (n = 26, 52%), and revisional surgery (n = 7, 14 %). Resolution of NSC was achieved in 15 patients (30%) and reduction of NSC frequency in an additional 21 patients (42%). Concomitant ursodeoxycholic acid use and discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors was the only predictor for resolution (OR 4.229, p = 0.035). Secondary sclerosing cholangitis occurred in 12 patients (24%) and was associated with the number of NSC episodes (OR 1.2, p = 0.050). CONCLUSION A 'step-up approach' to recurrent NSC after HJ resulted in 30 % resolution and further 42 % reduced frequency of NSC although still a quarter of patients developed secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Future prospective studies should assess whether a protocolized approach could improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro M Bonomi
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands.
| | - Anouk G Overdevest
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeska A Fritzsche
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich Beuers
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Babs M Zonderhuis
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
265
|
Clymo J, Dean M, Lambert C, Rollin M. Developing a tool for assessing and communicating the expected difficulty of performing a tracheostomy. J Intensive Care Soc 2025; 26:105-107. [PMID: 39554688 PMCID: PMC11562241 DOI: 10.1177/17511437241270261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
There are no guidelines for assessing and communicating the expected difficulty of a tracheostomy, leading to difficulties planning a percutaneous approach in intensive care or referring onwards to surgical teams. A Delphi process was used to develop a tool containing metrics which are relevant for either specialty and can be universally assessed by both. Palpable tracheal rings, prior surgery or radiotherapy to the anterior neck, uncorrectable clotting or platelet dysfunction, ability to extend the neck freely, and overlying vessels visible, palpable or on imaging were all found to be relevant. It is hoped this tool will aid communication between specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon Clymo
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mike Dean
- Department of Anaesthetics, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Lambert
- Critical Care Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Rollin
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
266
|
Xiao YS, He YF, Huang XW, Tang ZY, Fan J, Zhou J. Liver transplantation using an otherwise-wasted partial liver resection graft. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2025; 24:29-34. [PMID: 39414400 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation represents a complex surgical procedure and serves as a curative treatment for patients presenting an acute or chronic end-stage liver disease, or carefully selected liver malignancy. A significant gap still exists between the number of available donor organs and potential recipients. The use of an otherwise-wasted resected liver lobe from patients with benign liver tumors is a new, albeit small, option to alleviate the allograft shortage. This review provides evidence that resected liver lobes may be used successfully in liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Sheng Xiao
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yi-Feng He
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiao-Wu Huang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zhao-You Tang
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
267
|
Tabrizian P, Marino R, Bhoori S, Zeitlhoefler M, Mehta N, Banz V, Gruttadauria S, Iavarone M, Mazzarelli C, Simonotti N, Yao F, Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab prior liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2025; 7:101246. [PMID: 39911942 PMCID: PMC11794155 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab offers a novel approach to immunomodulation, showing efficacy as a primary treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Concerns about graft safety and rejection have limited its exploration in the neoadjuvant setting of liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we investigate the clinical efficacy and the safety profile of pre-transplant administration of atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC. Methods Herein, we performed a prospective assessment of 17 patients with HCC treated with neoadjuvant preoperative atezolizumab and bevacizumab prior to LT for HCC, obtained from December 2020 and December 2023 at seven Western transplant centers. Results Among the 17 patients with HCC included in the study, 16 (94.1%) had a tumor burden outside of Milan criteria. Neoadjuvant locoregional therapies along with the administration of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (median: 5 months; discontinued at least 4 weeks prior to LT) led to an objective response rate of 94% (complete response: 59%), downstaging to within Milan criteria (82%) and a pathological response at explant examination of 88%. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events accounted for 17.6% of cases and were manageable. During the 25-month median follow-up period, two cases of mild (rejection activity index ≤4), biopsy-proven rejection were reported but no instances of severe allograft rejection or graft loss were reported. The 1-year and 3-year post-LT survival rates were 94.2% and 88.2%, respectively. Conclusions This study highlights the favorable oncological and survival outcomes associated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment in the pre-LT setting. This immune-based combination was safe in terms of treatment-related adverse events, and absence of severe post-transplant rejection or graft loss. These preliminary results could pave the way for expanding transplant eligibility criteria in patients at more advanced HCC stages. Impact and Implications Studies on the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma have been limited, despite its potential to enhance anti-tumor responses and downstaging, owing to concerns about its safety profile. Among 17 patients who underwent successful liver transplantation following neoadjuvant atezolizumab/bevacizumab, 82% achieved downstaging to within Milan criteria, 94% radiological objective response and 88% pathology response, without drop-outs due to treatment-related adverse events or graft loss. The neoadjuvant combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma shows an encouraging safety profile and stands out as a promising pre-transplant optimization treatment, leading to improved oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parissa Tabrizian
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, RMTI and Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Marino
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, RMTI and Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherrie Bhoori
- Division of HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcus Zeitlhoefler
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, RMTI and Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Vanessa Banz
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department Abdominal Center UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Palermo, and Department of Surgery and Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, CRC "A. M. and A. Migliavacca" Centre for Liver Disease, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nicolò Simonotti
- Division of HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francis Yao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Division of HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Josep M. Llovet
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, RMTI and Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
268
|
Avolio AW, Antonelli M, Caccamo L, Frongillo F, Del Prete L, Ferrarese A, Iavarone M, Burra P. We need evidence-based futility thresholds to transplant grade-3 acute on chronic liver failure patients with poor respiratory, haemodynamic, and metabolic parameters. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2025; 49:101194. [PMID: 39850340 PMCID: PMC11754689 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 12/07/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso W. Avolio
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche - Unità di Chirurgia Generale e del Trapianto di Fegato, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Antonelli
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione - Unità di Anestesia, Rianimazione, Terapia Intensiva e Tossicologia Clinica, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucio Caccamo
- Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Frongillo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche - Unità di Chirurgia Generale e del Trapianto di Fegato, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Del Prete
- Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Ferrarese
- Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Unità Trapianto Multiviscerale, Gastroenterologia, Padua, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Unità Trapianto Multiviscerale, Gastroenterologia, Padua, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
269
|
Pierrard J, Foguenne M, Baldin P, Bonaccorsi-Riani E, Coubeau L, Ciccarelli O, Dahlqvist G, Delire B, Van Ooteghem G. Does prior radiotherapy impact the acute cellular liver graft rejection? Cancer Radiother 2025; 29:104590. [PMID: 40043526 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy can be used as a bridge therapy prior to liver transplantation. Radiotherapy generates immune reactions involving T cells, which are the main effectors of acute cellular rejection after transplantation. Here, we investigated the impact of radiotherapy on acute cellular rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of oncological patients who benefited from liver transplantation. Patients who received radiotherapy prior to liver transplantation ("RT cohort", n=17) were compared to a matched cohort ("NoRTmatched cohort", n=17) obtained through propensity score-matching analysis of the total non-irradiated cohort ("NoRTall" cohort, n=136). The acute cellular rejection was evaluated using the Banff score for rejection (mild:<5, moderate: 5-6, and severe: 7-9) obtained on an early post-transplantation biopsy. Overall and disease-free survival were reported for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS Median Banff scores was significantly lower for the RT cohort compared to the NoRTall cohort (2.5 versus 5, respectively, P=0.043) but this statistical difference was eliminated after comparison with the NoRTmatched cohort (median: 4, P=0.62). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 62 % and 69 %, respectively, for hepatocellular carcinoma patients of the RT cohort (n=14) and did not differ from the 5-year overall (83 %, P=0.15) and disease-free survival rates (90 %, P=0.05) of those of the NoRTmatched cohort (n=16). CONCLUSION Radiotherapy given prior to liver transplantation did not impact the rate or severity of acute cellular rejection. Furthermore, overall and disease-free survival rates were not impacted by radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Pierrard
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique (Irec), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Maxime Foguenne
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pamela Baldin
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique (Irec), Morphology Lab (MORF), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pathology, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent Coubeau
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Géraldine Dahlqvist
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bénédicte Delire
- Department of Abdominal Transplantation, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geneviève Van Ooteghem
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique (Irec), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
270
|
Mukherjee S, Chopra A, Karmakar S, Bhat SG. Periodontitis increases the risk of gastrointestinal dysfunction: an update on the plausible pathogenic molecular mechanisms. Crit Rev Microbiol 2025; 51:187-217. [PMID: 38602474 DOI: 10.1080/1040841x.2024.2339260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Periodontitis is an immuno-inflammatory disease of the soft tissues surrounding the teeth. Periodontitis is linked to many communicable and non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancers. The oral-systemic link between periodontal disease and systemic diseases is attributed to the spread of inflammation, microbial products and microbes to distant organ systems. Oral bacteria reach the gut via swallowed saliva, whereby they induce gut dysbiosis and gastrointestinal dysfunctions. Some periodontal pathogens like Porphyromonas. gingivalis, Klebsiella, Helicobacter. Pylori, Streptococcus, Veillonella, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Peptostreptococcus, Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter actinomycetomcommitans and Streptococcus mutans can withstand the unfavorable acidic, survive in the gut and result in gut dysbiosis. Gut dysbiosis increases gut inflammation, and induce dysplastic changes that lead to gut dysfunction. Various studies have linked oral bacteria, and oral-gut axis to various GIT disorders like inflammatory bowel disease, liver diseases, hepatocellular and pancreatic ductal carcinoma, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. Although the correlation between periodontitis and GIT disorders is well established, the intricate molecular mechanisms by which oral microflora induce these changes have not been discussed extensively. This review comprehensively discusses the intricate and unique molecular and immunological mechanisms by which periodontal pathogens can induce gut dysbiosis and dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantan Mukherjee
- Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Aditi Chopra
- Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shaswata Karmakar
- Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Subraya Giliyar Bhat
- Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Periodontology, College of Dental Surgery, Iman Abdulrahman Bin Faizal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
271
|
Sha M, Wang J, Cao J, Zou ZH, Qu XY, Xi ZF, Shen C, Tong Y, Zhang JJ, Jeong S, Xia Q. Criteria and prognostic models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation. Clin Mol Hepatol 2025; 31:S285-S300. [PMID: 39159949 PMCID: PMC11925443 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 08/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated death globally. Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a key treatment for patients with HCC, and the Milan criteria have been adopted as the cornerstone of the selection policy. To allow more patients to benefit from LT, a number of expanded criteria have been proposed, many of which use radiologic morphological characteristics with larger and more tumors as surrogates to predict outcomes. Other groups developed indices incorporating biological variables and dynamic markers of response to locoregional treatment. These expanded selection criteria achieved satisfactory results with limited liver supplies. In addition, a number of prognostic models have been developed using clinicopathological characteristics, imaging radiomics features, genetic data, and advanced techniques such as artificial intelligence. These models could improve prognostic estimation, establish surveillance strategies, and bolster long-term outcomes in patients with HCC. In this study, we reviewed the latest findings and achievements regarding the selection criteria and post-transplant prognostic models for LT in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Sha
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Cao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Hui Zou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-ye Qu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-feng Xi
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuan Shen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Tong
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-jun Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Seogsong Jeong
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Qiang Xia
- Department of Liver Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
272
|
Mabrut JY, Muller X, Mohkam K. Robotic living donor left lateral sectionectomy for liver transplantation (with video). J Visc Surg 2025; 162:58-60. [PMID: 39304436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon, France; Lyon Hepatology Institute, Inserm U1052, Lyon, France.
| | - Xavier Muller
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon, France; Lyon Hepatology Institute, Inserm U1052, Lyon, France
| | - Kayvan Mohkam
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317 Lyon, France; Lyon Hepatology Institute, Inserm U1052, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
273
|
Jeddou H, Tzedakis S, Chaouch MA, Sulpice L, Samson M, Boudjema K. Viability Assessment During Normothermic Machine Liver Perfusion: A Literature Review. Liver Int 2025; 45:e16244. [PMID: 39821671 PMCID: PMC11740183 DOI: 10.1111/liv.16244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2024] [Revised: 12/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The discrepancy between donor organ availability and demand leads to a significant waiting-list dropout rate and mortality. Although quantitative tools such as the Donor Risk Index (DRI) help assess organ suitability, many potentially viable organs are still discarded due to the lack of universally accepted markers to predict post-transplant outcomes. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) offers a platform to assess viability before transplantation. Thus, livers considered unsuitable for transplantation based on the DRI can be evaluated and potentially transplanted. During NMP, various viability criteria have been proposed. These criteria are neither homogeneous nor consensual. In this review, we aimed to describe the viability criteria during NMP and evaluate their ability to predict hepatic graft function following transplantation. We conducted a PubMed search using the terms 'liver transplantation', 'normothermic machine perfusion' and 'assessment', including only English publications up to February 2024. Viability assessment during NMP includes multiple hepatocellular and cholangiocellular criteria. Lactate clearance and bile production are commonly used indicators, but their ability to predict post-transplant outcomes varies significantly. The predictive value of cholangiocellular criteria such as bile pH, bicarbonate and glucose levels remains under investigation. Novel markers, such as microRNAs and proteomic profiles, offer the potential to enhance graft evaluation accuracy and provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying liver viability. Combining perfusion parameters with biomarkers may improve the prediction of long-term graft survival. Future research should focus on standardising viability assessment protocols and exploring real-time biomarker evaluations, which could enhance transplantation outcomes and expand the donor pool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heithem Jeddou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive SurgeryUniversity Hospital, Rennes 1 UniversityRennesFrance
- Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)‐UMR_S 1085, Université de RennesRennesFrance
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary, Digestive and Endocrine SurgeryCochin Hospital, APHPParisFrance
- Université Paris CitéParisFrance
| | - Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive SurgeryMonastir University HospitalMonastirTunisia
| | - Laurent Sulpice
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive SurgeryUniversity Hospital, Rennes 1 UniversityRennesFrance
- INSERM OSS U1242, University Hospital, Rennes 1 UniversityRennesFrance
| | - Michel Samson
- Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)‐UMR_S 1085, Université de RennesRennesFrance
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive SurgeryUniversity Hospital, Rennes 1 UniversityRennesFrance
- Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)‐UMR_S 1085, Université de RennesRennesFrance
| |
Collapse
|
274
|
De-Armas-Conde N, González-Rico FJ, Jaén-Torrejimeno I, Merino JM, López-Guerra D, Ordiales-Talavero A, Rojas-Holguín A, Marín-Díaz B, Ramón-Rodríguez J, Ordóñez-Mata L, Fernández-Salguero PM, Blanco-Fernández G. Involvement of β-catenin expression in hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis in a cohort of patients undergoing curative treatment. Surgery 2025; 178:108885. [PMID: 39448327 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma is a tumor of epithelial origin that arises from the action of different carcinogens on the hepatocytes and has a high worldwide incidence. The prognostic markers of this disease have not been completely established. Mutations in the gene encoding β-catenin are overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma. The objective of our study was to correlate the molecular expression of β-catenin in hepatocellular carcinoma with the already known prognostic markers. METHODS We conducted an observational and prospective cohort study on adult patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma from whom samples of nontumor and tumor liver parenchyma were taken intraoperatively to correlate the molecular expression of β-catenin in hepatocellular carcinoma with the known prognostic markers. RESULTS A total of 81 samples were collected, of which 48 met the inclusion criteria. The final sample was divided into patients with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on a cirrhotic liver, corresponding to 31 patients (64.6%), and patients with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on a noncirrhotic liver, corresponding to 17 patients (35.4%). We found that overexpression of β-catenin and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio are independently related to disease-free survival, and both overexpression and molecular repression of β-catenin are independently related. CONCLUSION Molecular overexpression of β-catenin in hepatocellular carcinoma compared with nontumor tissue is associated with worse disease-free survival, and its combination with a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio worsens this prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia De-Armas-Conde
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier González-Rico
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Isabel Jaén-Torrejimeno
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Jaime M Merino
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Diego López-Guerra
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Ana Ordiales-Talavero
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Adela Rojas-Holguín
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Beatriz Marín-Díaz
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Julen Ramón-Rodríguez
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Laura Ordóñez-Mata
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Pedro M Fernández-Salguero
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Genética, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Gerardo Blanco-Fernández
- Department of Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura (INUBE), Campus de Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain; Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Badajoz, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
275
|
Groß S, Bitzer M, Albert J, Blödt S, Boda-Heggemann J, Borucki K, Brunner T, Caspari R, Dombrowski F, Evert M, Follmann M, Freudenberger P, Gani C, Gebert J, Geier A, Gkika E, Götz M, Helmberger T, Hoffmann RT, Huppert P, Krug D, Fougère CL, Lang H, Langer T, Lenz P, Lüdde T, Mahnken A, Nadalin S, Nguyen HHP, Nothacker M, Ockenga J, Oldhafer K, Ott J, Paprottka P, Pereira P, Persigehl T, Plentz R, Pohl J, Recken H, Reimer P, Riemer J, Ringe K, Roeb E, Rüssel J, Schellhaas B, Schirmacher P, Schlitt HJ, Schmid I, Schütte K, Schuler A, Seehofer D, Sinn M, Stengel A, Steubesand N, Stoll C, Tannapfel A, Taubert A, Trojan J, van Thiel I, Utzig M, Vogel A, Vogl T, Wacker F, Waidmann O, Wedemeyer H, Wege H, Wenzel G, Wildner D, Wörns MA, Galle P, Malek N. [Not Available]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2025; 63:e82-e158. [PMID: 39919781 DOI: 10.1055/a-2460-6347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Groß
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Jörg Albert
- Katharinenhospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart
| | - Susanne Blödt
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | | | - Katrin Borucki
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
| | - Reiner Caspari
- Klinik Niederrhein Erkrankungen des Stoffwechsels der Verdauungsorgane und Tumorerkrankungen, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
| | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | | | - Cihan Gani
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
| | - Jamila Gebert
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Andreas Geier
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
| | - Martin Götz
- Medizinische Klinik IV - Gastroenterologie/Onkologie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und minimal invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden
| | - Peter Huppert
- Radiologisches Zentrum, Max Grundig Klinik, Bühlerhöhe
| | - David Krug
- Strahlentherapie Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuklearmedizin und Klinische Molekulare Bildgebung, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Zentrale Einrichtung Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - Tom Lüdde
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - Andreas Mahnken
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen
| | - Karl Oldhafer
- Klinik für Leber-, Gallenwegs- und Pankreaschirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
| | - Julia Ott
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Sektion für Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - Philippe Pereira
- Zentrum für Radiologie, Minimal-invasive Therapien und Nuklearmedizin, SLK-Klinken Heilbronn
| | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
| | - Ruben Plentz
- Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Gastroenterology, University of Kentucky
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Asklepios Klinik Altona
| | | | - Peter Reimer
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
| | | | - Kristina Ringe
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Elke Roeb
- Medizinische Klinik II Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
| | - Jörn Rüssel
- Medizinische Klinik IV Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
| | - Barbara Schellhaas
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroenterologie, Pneumologie und Endokrinologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Allgemeine Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | | | - Irene Schmid
- Kinderklinik und Kinderpoliklinik im Dr. von Haunerschen Kinderspital, LMU München
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital Osnabrück
| | - Andreas Schuler
- Medizinische Klinik, Gastroenterologie, Alb-Fils-Kliniken, Geislingen an der Steige
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
| | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Knochenmarktransplantation mit Abteilung für Pneumologie), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Innere Medizin VI - Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| | | | | | | | - Anne Taubert
- Klinische Sozialarbeit, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Medizinische Klinik 1: Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Pneumologie und Allergologie, Endokrinologie und Diabetologie sowie Ernährungsmedizin, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | | | - Martin Utzig
- Abteilung Zertifizierung, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - Henning Wege
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Onkologie/Hämatologie, Gastroenterologie und Infektiologie, Klinikum Esslingen
| | - Gregor Wenzel
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V., Berlin
| | - Dane Wildner
- Innere Medizin, Krankenhäuser Nürnberger Land GmbH, Standort Lauf
| | - Marcus-Alexander Wörns
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Klinikum Dortmund
| | - Peter Galle
- 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Infektiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz
| | - Nisar Malek
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
276
|
Angelico R, Bonaccorsi Riani E, De Martin E, Parente A, Foguenne M, Sensi B, Rodríguez-Perálvarez ML. Immunosuppression protocols for emerging oncological indications in liver transplantation: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Liver Transpl 2025; 31:181-189. [PMID: 39347698 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
The evolving field of liver transplant (LT) oncology calls for tailored immunosuppression protocols to minimize the risk of tumor recurrence. We systematically reviewed the available evidence from inception to May 2023 regarding immunosuppression protocols used in patients undergoing LT for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma, and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to identify common practices and to evaluate their association with oncological outcomes. Studies not involving humans, case reports, and short case series (ie, n < 10) were excluded. Among 3374 screened references, we included 117 studies involving 6797 patients distributed as follows: cholangiocarcinoma (58.1%), NETs (18.8%), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma (7.7%), CRLM (6.8%), mixed neoplasms (6.8%), or others (1.7%). Only 41% of the studies disclosed details of the immunosuppression protocol, and 20.8% of studies provided drug trough concentrations during follow-up. The immunosuppression protocols described were heterogeneous and broadly mirrored routine practices for nontumoral indications. The only exception was CRLM, where tacrolimus minimization-or even withdrawal-in combination with inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) were consistently reported. None of the studies evaluated the relationship between the immunosuppression protocol and oncological outcomes. In conclusion, based on low-quality and indirect scientific evidence, patients with tumoral indications for LT should receive the lowest tacrolimus level tolerated under close surveillance. The combination with mTORi titrated to achieve the top therapeutic range of trough concentrations could allow complete tacrolimus withdrawal. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and CRLM, in whom tumor recurrence is the main cause of death. We propose a tool for reporting immunosuppression protocols, which could be implemented in future transplant oncology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgical Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eliano Bonaccorsi Riani
- Pole of Experimental Surgery and Transplantation - CHEX, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eleonora De Martin
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, INSERM Unit, FHU Hepatinov, Villejuif, France
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Maxime Foguenne
- Pole of Experimental Surgery and Transplantation - CHEX, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, HPB and Transplant Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel L Rodríguez-Perálvarez
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, IMIBIC, CIBERehd, University of Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
277
|
Sievers CK, Eng C. Moving towards more personalized approaches in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 22:90-91. [PMID: 39609570 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-01025-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsie K Sievers
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
278
|
Manzia TM, Trapani S, Nardi A, Ricci A, Lenci I, Sensi B, Angelico R, De Feo TM, Agnes S, Andorno E, Baccarani U, Carraro A, Cescon M, Cillo U, Colledan M, Pinelli D, De Carlis L, De Simone P, Ghinolfi D, Benedetto FD, Ettorre GM, Gruttadauria S, Lupo LG, Tandoi F, Mazzaferro V, Romagnoli R, Rossi G, Caccamo L, Rossi M, Spada M, Vennarecci G, Vivarelli M, Zamboni F, Tisone G, Cardillo M, Angelico M. Fairness and pitfalls of the Italian waiting list for elective liver transplantation: The ECALITA registry study. Dig Liver Dis 2025; 57:408-416. [PMID: 39237429 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The challenge of transplant waiting-lists is to provide organs for all candidates while maintaining efficiency and equity. AIMS We investigated the probability of being transplanted or of waiting-list dropout in Italy. METHODS Data from 12,749 adult patients waitlisted for primary liver-transplantation from January 2012 to December 2022 were collected from the National Transplant-Registry.The cohort was divided into Eras:1 (2012-2014);2 (2015-2018);and 3 (2019-2022). RESULTS The one-year probability of undergoing transplant increased (67.6 % in Era 1vs73.8 % in Era 3,p < 0001) with a complementary 46 % decrease in waiting-list failures. Patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma were transplanted more often than cirrhotics[at model for end-stage liver-disease (MELD)-15:HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.21-1.35;at MELD-25:HR = 1.04,95 %CI:0.92-1.19) and those with other indications (at MELD-15:HR = 1.27,95 %CI:1.11-1.46) across all eras. Candidates with Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV)related disease had a greater probability of transplant than those with Hepatitis-C virus-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.07-1.20), alcohol-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.05-1.21), and metabolic-related (HR = 1.18,95 %CI:1.09-1.28)disease. Waiting-list failures increased by 27 % every 5 MELD-points and by 14 % for every 5-year increase in recipient-age and decreased by 10 % with each 10-cm increase in stature. Blood-group O patients showed the highest probability of waiting-list failure (HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.15-1.43). CONCLUSIONS Liver-transplantation waiting-list success-rates have significantly improved in Italy, with patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma and/or HBV-related diseases being favored. High MELD-score, old-age, short-stature, and blood-group O were significant risk-factors for waiting-list failure. Efforts to improve organ-allocation and prioritization-policies are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Maria Manzia
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Silvia Trapani
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Alessandra Nardi
- Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ricci
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology and Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital Foundation], 00133
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133.
| | - Tullia Maria De Feo
- North Italy Transplant program (NITp). Transplant Coordination Unit, Fondazione IRCSS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico [Cà Granda General Research Hospital], Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Salvatore Agnes
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Service, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Foundation A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy, 00136
| | - Enzo Andorno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit. A.O.U. S. Martino [S. Martino University Hospital], Genoa, Italy, 16132
| | - Umberto Baccarani
- Department of Medicine, Università Degli Studi Di Udine [University of Udine], Udine, Italy, 33100
| | - Amedeo Carraro
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University and Hospital Trust of Verona. Azienda Ospedaliera Verona, Verona, Italy, 37129
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, AOU Sant'Orsola IRCCS [Sant'Orsola University Research Hospital], Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy, 40138
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 35135
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII [Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital] Bergamo, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 24127
| | - Domenico Pinelli
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII [Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital] Bergamo, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 24127
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of General Surgery & Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda [Niguarda Metropolitan Hospital], University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 20161
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AOU Pisana [Pisana University Hospital], Pisa, Italy, 56124
| | - Davide Ghinolfi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AOU Pisana [Pisana University Hospital], Pisa, Italy, 56124
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico [General Hospital], University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, 41125
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation. Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini [San Camillo Forlanini Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00152
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneoper i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione [Research Hospital - Highly-specialized Mediterranean Institute for Transplants and Therapies]), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Palermo, Italy; Department of Surgery and Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy, 90127
| | - Luigi Giovanni Lupo
- General Surgery and Liver transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy, 70121
| | - Francesco Tandoi
- General Surgery and Liver transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy, 70121
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Milan and Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS [Research Hospital Foundation], Istituto Nazionale Tumori [National Cancer Institute], IRCCS, Milan, 20133, Italy
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- Liver Transplant Center, General Surgery 2 U, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy, 10126
| | - Giorgio Rossi
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Lucio Caccamo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 20122
| | - Massimo Rossi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy, 00185
| | - Marco Spada
- Department of Specialized Surgery, Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and of Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS [Research Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00165
| | - Giovanni Vennarecci
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy, 80131
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti [Joint Hospitals], Ancona, Italy, 60126
| | - Fausto Zamboni
- Department of Surgery, General and Hepatic Transplantation Surgery Unit, A.O.B. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy, 09047
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Hepatobiliary and Transplantation Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital], Rome, Italy, 00133
| | - Massimo Cardillo
- Italian National Transplant Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy, 00161
| | - Mario Angelico
- Hepatology and Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata [Tor Vergata General Hospital Foundation], 00133
| |
Collapse
|
279
|
Ho K, Chan A. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status in Hong Kong, China. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2025; 24:45-49. [PMID: 39307663 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
With the advances in transplant oncology in recent years, the role of liver transplantation has expanded to make curative treatment a possibility for a wider patient population. We highlight strategies in Hong Kong, China that have enabled preoperative prognostication for judicious patient selection, downstaging therapy to definitive treatment, and postoperative therapies that have provided a growing role for liver transplantation in patients with more advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Ho
- Liver Transplant Center, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Albert Chan
- Liver Transplant Center, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
280
|
Sangro B, Argemi J, Ronot M, Paradis V, Meyer T, Mazzaferro V, Jepsen P, Golfieri R, Galle P, Dawson L, Reig M. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2025; 82:315-374. [PMID: 39690085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.
Collapse
|
281
|
Huang YF, Zhu ZJ. "No-donor" liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2025; 24:23-28. [PMID: 39547885 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is hindered by organ shortage. The potential way to relieve this issue is to expand the donor pool via extending the donor criteria and make full use of all available grafts. The concept of "no-donor" liver transplantation allows grafts to be recovered from other liver recipients. This review summarizes the current clinical practice of "no-donor" liver transplantation, focusing on the experiences of Chinese transplant teams. Domino liver transplantation was introduced by Furtado in 1995 and implemented later in 2013 in China, and novel donor indications including some essential-to-treat inherited metabolic liver-based diseases have emerged. The concept of cross-auxiliary domino liver transplantation brings a further expansion of the domino liver graft pool, and the first pair of liver transplantation performed "rigorously without donation" was accomplished in our center in 2018. Our experience with this original transplantation procedure is hereby reviewed. In order to further promote and make successful "no-donor" liver transplantation, close co-operation between researchers, surgeons, physicians, organ procurement organizations, as well as ethical committees is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Fa Huang
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, China.
| |
Collapse
|
282
|
Saravanan N, Demetris A, Fiel MI, Harrington C, Khurram NA, Schiano TD, Levitsky J. Serum and tissue biomarkers of plasma cell-rich rejection in liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2025; 25:259-268. [PMID: 39393458 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
The distinction between autoimmune and alloimmune reactions in liver transplant recipients can be challenging. Plasma cell-rich rejection (PCRR), previously known as de novo autoimmune hepatitis or plasma cell hepatitis, is an atypical and underrecognized form of allograft rejection observed post-liver transplantation, often in conjunction with features of T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection. If PCRR is not recognized and treated with prompt immunosuppressive augmentation, patients can develop advanced hepatic fibrosis, necroinflammation, and allograft failure. Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with PCRR, there exists a need to develop noninvasive biomarkers which can be used in screening, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring of PCRR. This study is a literature review of candidate serum-based and tissue-based biomarkers in adult and pediatric liver transplant PCRR. We also discuss biomarkers from plasma cell-rich processes observed in other disease states and other organ transplant recipients that might be tested in liver transplant PCRR. We conclude with proposed future directions in which biomarker implementation into clinical practice could lead to advances in personalized management of PCRR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivetha Saravanan
- Division of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anthony Demetris
- Division of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire Harrington
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nigar Anjuman Khurram
- Division of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas D Schiano
- Division of Liver Diseases and Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Josh Levitsky
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
283
|
Abdulla M, Abdulla M, Al-Hashimi H, Isa HM, Dunne K, Blackwell J. Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography for Monitoring Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Review of Recent Advances. Pediatr Transplant 2025; 29:e70010. [PMID: 39729533 DOI: 10.1111/petr.70010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/29/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver disease. However, post-transplant monitoring, particularly the diagnosis and prognosis of complications such as allograft fibrosis, remains challenging. Traditionally, liver biopsy has been the gold standard for assessing allograft fibrosis, despite its invasive nature and inherent procedural risks. Recently, shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) has seen increasing use as a noninvasive method to provide real-time, quantitative measurements of liver stiffness as a proxy for fibrosis. In this review, the latest developments in the use of SWE as a method to assess allograft fibrosis post-PLT are presented, including the current technical challenges associated with its clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abdulla
- School of Medicine, RCSI Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain
| | - Maryam Abdulla
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hasan M Isa
- Pediatric Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain
- Pediatric Department, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Kevin Dunne
- School of Medicine, RCSI Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain
| | - James Blackwell
- School of Medicine, RCSI Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Bahrain
| |
Collapse
|
284
|
van der Lei S, Puijk RS, Dijkstra M, Schulz HH, Vos DJW, De Vries JJJ, Scheffer HJ, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Aldrighetti L, Arntz M, Barentsz MW, Besselink MG, Bracke B, Bruijnen RCG, Buffart TE, Burgmans MC, Chapelle T, Coolsen MME, de Boer SW, de Cobelli F, de Jong K, de Wilt JHW, Diederik AL, Dooper AMC, Draaisma WA, Eker HH, Erdmann JI, Futterer JJ, Geboers B, Groot GMC, Hagendoorn J, Hartgrink HH, Horsthuis K, Hurks R, Jenniskens SFM, Kater M, Kazemier G, Kist JW, Klaase JM, Knapen RRMM, Kruimer JWH, Lamers ABGN, Leclercq WKG, Liefers GJ, Manusama ER, Meier MAJ, Melenhorst MCAM, Mieog JSD, Molenaar QI, Nielsen K, Nijkamp MW, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Nota IMGC, Op de Beeck B, Overduin CG, Patijn GA, Potters FH, Ratti F, Rietema FJ, Ruiter SJS, Schouten EAC, Schreurs WH, Serafino G, Sietses C, Slooter GD, Smits MLJ, Soykan EA, Spaargaren GJ, Stommel MWJ, Timmer FEF, van Baardewijk LJ, van Dam RM, van Delden OM, van den Bemd BAT, van den Bergh JE, van den Boezem PB, van der Leij C, van der Meer RW, van der Meijs BBM, van der Ploeg APT, van der Reijden JJ, van Duijvendijk P, van Erkel AR, van Geel AM, Van Heek NT, van Manen CJ, van Rijswijk CSP, van Waesberghe JHTM, Versteeg KS, Vink T, Zijlstra IAJ, Zonderhuis BM, Swijnenburg RJ, van den Tol MP, Meijerink MR. Thermal ablation versus surgical resection of small-size colorectal liver metastases (COLLISION): an international, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2025; 26:187-199. [PMID: 39848272 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00660-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with small-size colorectal liver metastases, growing evidence suggests thermal ablation to be associated with fewer adverse events and faster recovery than resection while also challenging resection in terms of local control and overall survival. This study assessed the potential non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared with surgical resection in patients with small-size resectable colorectal liver metastases. METHODS Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) from 14 centres in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy with ten or fewer small-size (≤3 cm) colorectal liver metastases, no extrahepatic metastases, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were stratified per centre, and according to their disease burden, into low, intermediate, and high disease burden subgroups and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either thermal ablation (experimental group) or surgical resection (control group) of all target colorectal liver metastases using the web-based module Castor electronic data capture with variable block sizes of 4, 6, and 8. Although at the operator's discretion, a minimally invasive approach in both treatment groups was recommended. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A hazard ratio (HR) of 1·30 was considered the upper limit of non-inferiority for the primary endpoint. A preplanned interim analysis with predefined stopping rules for futility (conditional power to prove the null hypothesis <20%) and early benefit (conditional power >90%, superior safety outcomes for the experimental group, and no difference or superiority regarding local control for the experimental group) was done 12 months after enrolment of 50% of the planned sample size. Safety was assessed per treatment group. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088150. FINDINGS Between Aug 7, 2017, and Feb 14, 2024, 300 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=148, 100 male [68%] and 48 female [32%]; median age 67·9 years [IQR 29·2-85·7]) or to the control group (n=148, 107 male [72%] and 41 female [28%]; median age 65·1 [IQR 31·4-87·4]); four patients (two in each treatment group) were excluded after randomisation because they were found to have other disease pathology. Median follow-up at the prespecified interim analysis was 28·9 months (IQR 0·3-77·8). The trial was stopped early for meeting the predefined stopping rules: (1) a conditional likelihood to prove non-inferiority for overall survival of 90·5% (median overall survival not reached in both groups; HR 1·05; 95% CI 0·69-1·58; p=0·83), (2) a non-inferior local control (median local control not reached in both groups; HR 0·13, 95% CI 0·02-1·06; p=0·057), and (3) a superior safety profile for the experimental group. Patients in the experimental group had fewer adverse events than those in the control group (28 [19%] vs 67 [46%]; p<0·0001). Serious adverse events occurred in 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the experimental group and 29 (20%) of 146 in the control group, mostly periprocedural haemorrhage requiring intervention (one [1%] vs eight [5%]), and infectious complications requiring intervention (six [4%] vs 11 [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths in the experimental group and three treatment-related deaths (2%) in the control group (two due to postoperative cardiac complications and one due to sepsis and liver failure). INTERPRETATION The assumption that thermal ablation should be reserved for unresectable colorectal liver metastases requires re-evaluation and the preferred treatment should be individualised and based on clinical characteristics and available expertise. FUNDING Medtronic-Covidien.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Robbert S Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hannah H Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Danielle J W Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Arntz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bart Bracke
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Thierry Chapelle
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sanne W de Boer
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Koert de Jong
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen L Diederik
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Anniek M C Dooper
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Hasan H Eker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Bart Geboers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gerie M C Groot
- Department of Radiology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, Netherlands
| | | | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rob Hurks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd F M Jenniskens
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Kater
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jakob W Kist
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robrecht R M M Knapen
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Armand B G N Lamers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Gerrit-Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Mark A J Meier
- Department of Radiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | | | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Karin Nielsen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Irene M G C Nota
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bart Op de Beeck
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christiaan G Overduin
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - Fons H Potters
- Department of Radiology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Rietema
- Department of Radiology, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Evelien A C Schouten
- Department of Scientific Administration, National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Gianpiero Serafino
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Ezgi A Soykan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Florentine E F Timmer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bente A T van den Bemd
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Bram B M van der Meijs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Geel
- Department of Radiology, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ted Vink
- Department of Radiology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Ijsbrand A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Barbara M Zonderhuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
285
|
Hassanain H, Connor AA, Brombosz EW, Patel K, Elaileh A, Basra T, Kodali S, Victor DW, Simon CJ, Cheah YL, Hobeika MJ, Mobley CM, Saharia A, Dhingra S, Schwartz M, Maqsood A, Heyne K, Kaseb AO, Vauthey JN, Gaber AO, Abdelrahim M, Ghobrial RM. Sorafenib as Adjuvant Therapy Post-Liver Transplant: A Single-center Experience. Transplant Direct 2025; 11:e1746. [PMID: 39866680 PMCID: PMC11759322 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a rising incidence and mortality in North America. Liver transplantation (LT) with adjunctive therapies offers excellent outcomes. However, HCC recurrences are associated with high mortality. We investigate whether adjuvant systemic therapy can reduce recurrence, as shown with other malignancies. Methods Medical records of patients undergoing LT for HCC at a single center between January 2016 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) recipients of adjuvant sorafenib, (2) nonrecipients at high recurrence risk, and (3) nonrecipients at low risk by explant pathology features. The outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were also propensity score matched 1:2 to nonadjuvant recipients based on recurrence risk features. Results During the study period, 273 patients with HCC underwent LT and 16 (5.9%) received adjuvant sorafenib therapy. Adjuvant sorafenib recipients were demographically similar to nonrecipients and, on explant pathology, had greater tumor burden, lymphovascular invasion, and poorer differentiation (all P < 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 12 adjuvant sorafenib recipients (75%). OS was similar among the 3 groups (P = 0.2), and adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-3.78; P = 0.62). RFS was significantly lower in sorafenib patients (hazard ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-23.05; P = 0.001). Following propensity matching, adjuvant sorafenib use was not associated with either OS (P = 0.24) or RFS rates (P = 0.65). Conclusions In this single-center analysis, adjuvant sorafenib was not associated with OS. Recipients were observed to have shorter RFS, likely due to the increased prevalence of high-risk features, and sorafenib use was associated with high frequencies of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Hassanain
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashton A. Connor
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Khush Patel
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed Elaileh
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tamneet Basra
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sudha Kodali
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David W. Victor
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Yee Lee Cheah
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark J. Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ashish Saharia
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sadhna Dhingra
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Schwartz
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anaum Maqsood
- Dr. Mary and Ron Neal Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Kirk Heyne
- Dr. Mary and Ron Neal Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ahmed O. Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maen Abdelrahim
- Dr. Mary and Ron Neal Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - R. Mark Ghobrial
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
286
|
Zhao J, Sun R, Zhi L, Guo D, Ling S, Liang X, Li J, Jia C. METTL4 and METTL5 as biomarkers for recurrence-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Future Oncol 2025; 21:331-340. [PMID: 39706798 PMCID: PMC11792863 DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2442296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with high rates of postoperative recurrence. Identifying reliable biomarkers for predicting recurrence is critical for improving patient outcomes. This study investigates the predictive value of m6A methylation-related genes, METTL4 and METTL5, on HCC recurrence after surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed METTL4 and METTL5 expression in HCC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues using the TCGA database and evaluated their levels in surgical samples from 67 hCC patients. A recurrence risk model was developed and validated in an external cohort of 65 patients. RESULTS METTL4 and METTL5 were significantly overexpressed in HCC tissues. High expression correlated with shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS). The model stratified patients into high, medium, and low-risk groups with 3-year RFS rates of 18.75%, 69.70%, and 93.75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS METTL4 and METTL5 expression levels are strong predictors of HCC recurrence. The risk model offers a novel approach for postoperative management of HCC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery
- Liver Neoplasms/mortality
- Liver Neoplasms/genetics
- Liver Neoplasms/pathology
- Liver Neoplasms/surgery
- Methyltransferases/genetics
- Methyltransferases/metabolism
- Female
- Male
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Prognosis
- Aged
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialing Zhao
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqi Sun
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liang Zhi
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Danjing Guo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sunbin Ling
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiangnan Liang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jianhui Li
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Artificial Organs and Computational Medicine in Zhejiang Province, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Shulan International Medical College, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Changku Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
287
|
Ji K, Niu J, Zhang C, Shi Y, Liang Z, Wang Z, Xu T, Cao S, Zhou G, Cao Y, Zheng Y, Zhu J, Li Z, Ai J, Chen F, Jing L. Systemic Inflammation-Based Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Multicenter Study. Acad Radiol 2025; 32:776-786. [PMID: 39191565 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The optimal prognostic assessment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains unclear. This study aimed to propose a novel staging system in comparison with the current staging systems for HCC following DEB-TACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS From four centers, patients with HCC undergoing DEB-TACE as the initial therapy were retrospectively included and classified into training and validation sets. Multivariable regression was used to determine the independent prognostic factors in the training set. A novel staging system incorporating the independent factors was proposed and externally validated in terms of discrimination and calibration compared to other staging systems in both sets. RESULTS The training and validation sets included 335 and 99 patients, respectively. Multivariable regression revealed independent factors including alpha-fetoprotein level, aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte count ratio index, maximum tumor diameter, Child-Pugh class, and portal vein invasion. The novel prognostic staging system, named PADCA, was proposed and outperformed other staging systems with the highest C-index, area under the curve, Wald test value, clinical benefit, and the lowest Akaike information criterion in the training and validation sets. CONCLUSION The PADCA staging system has a superior prognostic predictive ability compared to the current staging systems. PADCA can assist clinicians in screening out the patients most likely to derive benefit from DEB-TACE and guiding the formulation of therapy and follow-up strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Ji
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jiahua Niu
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Cong Zhang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yang Shi
- Center of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Kashi Area, Kashi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Zhiying Liang
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Kashi Area, Kashi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Zilin Wang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Tiantian Xu
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Shoujin Cao
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Guanhui Zhou
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yunbo Cao
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yan Zheng
- Department of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jinghua Zhu
- Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Kashi Area, Kashi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Jing Ai
- Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li Jing
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
288
|
Patel S, Gutmann C, Loveridge R, Pirani T, Willars C, Vercueil A, Angelova-Chee M, Aluvihare V, Heneghan M, Menon K, Heaton N, Bernal W, McPhail M, Gelandt E, Morgan L, Whitehorne M, Wendon J, Auzinger G. Perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in liver transplantation-bridge to transplantation, intraoperative salvage, and postoperative support: outcomes and predictors for survival in a large-volume liver transplant center. Am J Transplant 2025; 25:396-405. [PMID: 39182613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
Data on perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in liver transplantation (LT) are scarce. ECMO has been used preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively for a variety of indications at our center. This retrospective, single-center study of ECMO use peri-LT aimed to describe predictors for successful outcome in this highly select cohort of patients. Demographics, support method, and indication for LT were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Twenty-nine patients received venovenous (V-V; n = 20), venoarterial (V-A; n = 8), and venoarteriovenous (n = 1) ECMO. Twelve (41.4%) patients were bridged to emergency LT for acute liver failure, and emergency redo LT. Four (13.3%) patients required intraoperative V-A ECMO salvage, 2 necessitating extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Thirteen (43.3%) patients required ECMO support after LT: V-V ECMO (n = 9); V-A ECMO (n = 1); and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 3) between postoperative days 2 to 30. Overall, 19 patients (65.5%) were successfully weaned off ECMO; 15 (51.7%) survived to intensive care unit discharge. All patients who underwent intraoperative salvage ECMO and all who were bridged to emergency redo LT died. Peri-LT ECMO is feasible. Post-LT ECMO outcomes are encouraging, in particular for V-V ECMO. Intraoperative ECMO salvage, uncontrolled sepsis, and graft failure are associated with poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Patel
- Liver Intensive Care, General Intensive Care & ECMO, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Clemens Gutmann
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom; Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Loveridge
- Liver Intensive Care, General Intensive Care & ECMO, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Tasneem Pirani
- Liver Intensive Care, General Intensive Care & ECMO, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Willars
- Liver Intensive Care, General Intensive Care & ECMO, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andre Vercueil
- Critical Care & ECMO, Department of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Milena Angelova-Chee
- Critical Care & ECMO, Department of Critical Care, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Varuna Aluvihare
- Transplant Hepatology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Heneghan
- Transplant Hepatology, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Krishna Menon
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - William Bernal
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom; Liver Intensive Care, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark McPhail
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom; Liver Intensive Care, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elton Gelandt
- Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Morgan
- Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Julia Wendon
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom; Liver Intensive Care, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Georg Auzinger
- Liver Intensive Care, General Intensive Care & ECMO, Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Critical Care, Anesthesia & Pain Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
289
|
Choudhury A, Kulkarni AV, Arora V, Soin AS, Dokmeci AK, Chowdhury A, Koshy A, Duseja A, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Patwa AK, Sood A, Roy A, Shukla A, Chan A, Krag A, Mukund A, Mandot A, Goel A, Butt AS, Sahney A, Shrestha A, Cárdenas A, Di Giorgio A, Arora A, Anand AC, Dhawan A, Jindal A, Saraya A, Srivastava A, Kumar A, Kaewdech A, Pande A, Rastogi A, Valsan A, Goel A, Kumar A, Singal AK, Tanaka A, Coilly A, Singh A, Meena BL, Jagadisan B, Sharma BC, Lal BB, Eapen CE, Yaghi C, Kedarisetty CK, Kim CW, Panackel C, Yu C, Kalal CR, Bihari C, Huang CH, Vasishtha C, Jansen C, Strassburg C, Lin CY, Karvellas CJ, Lesmana CRA, Philips CA, Shawcross D, Kapoor D, Agrawal D, Payawal DA, Praharaj DL, Jothimani D, Song DS, Kim DJ, Kim DS, Zhongping D, Karim F, Durand F, Shiha GE, D'Amico G, Lau GK, Pati GK, Narro GEC, Lee GH, Adali G, Dhakal GP, Szabo G, Lin HC, Li H, Nair HK, Devarbhavi H, Tevethia H, Ghazinian H, Ilango H, Yu HL, Hasan I, Fernandez J, George J, Behari J, Fung J, Bajaj J, Benjamin J, Lai JC, Jia J, Hu JH, et alChoudhury A, Kulkarni AV, Arora V, Soin AS, Dokmeci AK, Chowdhury A, Koshy A, Duseja A, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Patwa AK, Sood A, Roy A, Shukla A, Chan A, Krag A, Mukund A, Mandot A, Goel A, Butt AS, Sahney A, Shrestha A, Cárdenas A, Di Giorgio A, Arora A, Anand AC, Dhawan A, Jindal A, Saraya A, Srivastava A, Kumar A, Kaewdech A, Pande A, Rastogi A, Valsan A, Goel A, Kumar A, Singal AK, Tanaka A, Coilly A, Singh A, Meena BL, Jagadisan B, Sharma BC, Lal BB, Eapen CE, Yaghi C, Kedarisetty CK, Kim CW, Panackel C, Yu C, Kalal CR, Bihari C, Huang CH, Vasishtha C, Jansen C, Strassburg C, Lin CY, Karvellas CJ, Lesmana CRA, Philips CA, Shawcross D, Kapoor D, Agrawal D, Payawal DA, Praharaj DL, Jothimani D, Song DS, Kim DJ, Kim DS, Zhongping D, Karim F, Durand F, Shiha GE, D'Amico G, Lau GK, Pati GK, Narro GEC, Lee GH, Adali G, Dhakal GP, Szabo G, Lin HC, Li H, Nair HK, Devarbhavi H, Tevethia H, Ghazinian H, Ilango H, Yu HL, Hasan I, Fernandez J, George J, Behari J, Fung J, Bajaj J, Benjamin J, Lai JC, Jia J, Hu JH, Chen JJ, Hou JL, Yang JM, Chang J, Trebicka J, Kalf JC, Sollano JD, Varghese J, Arab JP, Li J, Reddy KR, Raja K, Panda K, Kajal K, Kumar K, Madan K, Kalista KF, Thanapirom K, Win KM, Suk KT, Devadas K, Lesmana LA, Kamani L, Premkumar M, Niriella MA, Al Mahtab M, Yuen MF, Sayed MHE, Alla M, Wadhawan M, Sharma MK, Sahu M, Prasad M, Muthiah MD, Schulz M, Bajpai M, Reddy MS, Praktiknjo M, Yu ML, Prasad M, Sharma M, Elbasiony M, Eslam M, Azam MG, Rela M, Desai MS, Vij M, Mahmud N, Choudhary NS, Marannan NK, Ormeci N, Saraf N, Verma N, Nakayama N, Kawada N, Oidov Baatarkhuu, Goyal O, Yokosuka O, Rao PN, Angeli P, Parikh P, Kamath PS, Thuluvath PJ, Lingohr P, Ranjan P, Bhangui P, Rathi P, Sakhuja P, Puri P, Ning Q, Dhiman RK, Kumar R, Vijayaraghavan R, Khanna R, Maiwall R, Mohanka R, Moreau R, Gani RA, Loomba R, Mehtani R, Rajaram RB, Hamid SS, Palnitkar S, Lal S, Biswas S, Chirapongsathorn S, Agarwal S, Sachdeva S, Saigal S, Kumar SE, Violeta S, Singh SP, Mochida S, Mukewar S, Alam S, Lim SG, Alam S, Shalimar, Venishetty S, Sundaram SS, Shetty S, Bhatia S, Singh SA, Kottilil S, Strasser S, Shasthry SM, Maung ST, Tan SS, Treeprasertsuk S, Asthana S, Manekeller S, Gupta S, Acharya SK, K C S, Maharshi S, Asrani S, Dadhich S, Taneja S, Giri S, Singh S, Chen T, Gupta T, Kanda T, Tanwandee T, Piratvishuth T, Spengler U, Prasad VGM, Midha V, Rakhmetova V, Arroyo V, Sood V, Br VK, Wong VWS, Pamecha V, Singh V, Dayal VM, Saraswat VA, Kim WR, Jafri W, Gu W, Jun WY, Qi X, Chawla YK, Kim YJ, Shi Y, Abbas Z, Kumar G, Shiina S, Wei L, Omata M, Sarin SK. Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): the 'Kyoto Consensus'-steps from Asia. Hepatol Int 2025; 19:1-69. [PMID: 39961976 PMCID: PMC11846769 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10773-4] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2025]
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a condition associated with high mortality in the absence of liver transplantation. There have been various definitions proposed worldwide. The first consensus report of the working party of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set in 2004 on ACLF was published in 2009, and the "APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC)" was formed in 2012. The AARC database has prospectively collected nearly 10,500 cases of ACLF from various countries in the Asia-Pacific region. This database has been instrumental in developing the AARC score and grade of ACLF, the concept of the 'Golden Therapeutic Window', the 'transplant window', and plasmapheresis as a treatment modality. Also, the data has been key to identifying pediatric ACLF. The European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL CLIF) and the North American Association for the Study of the End Stage Liver Disease (NACSELD) from the West added the concepts of organ failure and infection as precipitants for the development of ACLF and CLIF-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and NACSELD scores for prognostication. The Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH) added COSSH-ACLF criteria to manage hepatitis b virus-ACLF with and without cirrhosis. The literature supports these definitions to be equally effective in their respective cohorts in identifying patients with high mortality. To overcome the differences and to develop a global consensus, APASL took the initiative and invited the global stakeholders, including opinion leaders from Asia, EASL and AASLD, and other researchers in the field of ACLF to identify the key issues and develop an evidence-based consensus document. The consensus document was presented in a hybrid format at the APASL annual meeting in Kyoto in March 2024. The 'Kyoto APASL Consensus' presented below carries the final recommendations along with the relevant background information and areas requiring future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Choudhury
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Vinod Arora
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - A S Soin
- Medanta-The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | | | - Abhijeet Chowdhury
- Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Abraham Koshy
- VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Center Ltd, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Kumar Mishra
- Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Ajit Sood
- Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| | - Akash Roy
- Apollo Multispeciality Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Akash Shukla
- Seth G S Medical College and K E M Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Girgaon, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Albert Chan
- Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Amar Mukund
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Amit Goel
- Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | | | | | - Andrés Cárdenas
- Univerity of Barcelona Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi-Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anil Arora
- Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajender Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil Chandra Anand
- Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, India
| | | | - Ankur Jindal
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Anoop Saraya
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Anshu Srivastava
- Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anupam Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Apurva Pande
- Fortis Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Archana Rastogi
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Arun Valsan
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Ashish Goel
- Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajender Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashwani K Singal
- University of Louisville School of Medicine, Trager Transplant Center and Jewish Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - Audrey Coilly
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul Brousse Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ayaskanta Singh
- IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Babu Lal Meena
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | | | - Bikrant Bihari Lal
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - C E Eapen
- Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, India
| | - Cesar Yaghi
- Saint Joseph University, Hôtel-Dieu de France University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | - Chen Yu
- Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chetan R Kalal
- Nanavati Max Super Specialty Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Chhagan Bihari
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Chitranshu Vasishtha
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Christian Jansen
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Chun Yen Lin
- Linkou Medical Centre, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | | | - Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana
- Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Medistra Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dong-Sik Kim
- Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Fazal Karim
- Sir Salimullah Medical College, Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Francois Durand
- Université de Paris, AP-HP, C, DMU DIGEST, Centre de Référence Des Maladies Vasculaires du Foie, FILFOIE, ERN RARE-LIVER, Centre de Recherche Sur L'inflammation, Inserm, Paris, France
| | | | - Gennaro D'Amico
- Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Clinica La Maddalena, Palermo, Italy
| | - George K Lau
- Humanity and Health Medical Center, Hongkong, SAR, China
| | | | - Graciela Elia Castro Narro
- Hospital Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubiran",, Mexico City, Mexico
- Latin-American Association for the Study of the Liver (ALEH), Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Guan-Huei Lee
- National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gupse Adali
- University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Gyongyi Szabo
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - H C Lin
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hai Li
- School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hari Kumar Nair
- Ernakulam Medical Center (EMC), Kinder Multispeciality Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | - Harshvardhan Tevethia
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | | | | | - Irsan Hasan
- Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - J Fernandez
- University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS and CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jacob George
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jaideep Behari
- Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James Fung
- Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Jaya Benjamin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Jennifer C Lai
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jidong Jia
- Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Hua Hu
- The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Jun Chen
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jin Lin Hou
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jin Mo Yang
- The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Johannes Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jonel Trebicka
- Medizinische Klinik B, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jörg C Kalf
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jose D Sollano
- Department of Medicine, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, Manila, Philippines
| | - Joy Varghese
- Gleneagles Global Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Juan Pablo Arab
- Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jun Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Kaiser Raja
- King's College Hospital London, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kalpana Panda
- IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Kamal Kajal
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Karan Kumar
- Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Kaushal Madan
- Max Super Specialty Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Kemal Fariz Kalista
- Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | - Khin Maung Win
- University of Medicine, Yangon Ministry of Health, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Ki Tae Suk
- Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Lubna Kamani
- Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Madhumita Premkumar
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Mamun Al Mahtab
- Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Man Fung Yuen
- Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Manasa Alla
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Manoj Kumar Sharma
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Manoj Sahu
- IMS and SUM Hospital, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Manya Prasad
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Martin Schulz
- Goethe University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Meenu Bajpai
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | | | - Ming Lung Yu
- Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Sun Yet-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | - Mithun Sharma
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Mohammed Eslam
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mohd Golam Azam
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorder (BIRDEM) Shahbad, Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Mohd Rela
- Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Moreshwar S Desai
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mukul Vij
- Dr. Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Nadim Mahmud
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Necati Ormeci
- İstanbul Health and Technology University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Neeraj Saraf
- Medanta-The Medicity Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Nipun Verma
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Norifumi Kawada
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Oidov Baatarkhuu
- Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | | | - Osamu Yokosuka
- Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - P N Rao
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Philipp Lingohr
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Piyush Ranjan
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Pravin Rathi
- Topi Wala National (TN) Medical College and BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Puneet Puri
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Qin Ning
- Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - R K Dhiman
- Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rahul Kumar
- Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rajan Vijayaraghavan
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Rajeev Khanna
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Rakhi Maiwall
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Ravi Mohanka
- Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Girgaon, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Richard Moreau
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), Barcelona, Spain
- Centre de Recherche Sur L'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM and Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Beaujon, Service d'Hépatologie, Clichy, France
| | - Rino Alvani Gani
- Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Rohit Loomba
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rohit Mehtani
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India
| | | | - S S Hamid
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Sadhna Lal
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Sagnik Biswas
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Samagra Agarwal
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Max Super Specialty Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Satender Pal Singh
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Saurabh Mukewar
- Midas Multispeciality Hospital Pvt. Ltd, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Seema Alam
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Seng Gee Lim
- National University Hospital, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shahinul Alam
- Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Shalimar
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Shiran Shetty
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shobna Bhatia
- National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, India
| | | | - Shyam Kottilil
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - S M Shasthry
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Soek Siam Tan
- Selayang Hospital, University of Malaysia, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | - Subhash Gupta
- Max Super Specialty Hospital Saket, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sudhamshu K C
- Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sudhir Maharshi
- Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Sumeet Asrani
- Baylor Simmons Transplant Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sunil Dadhich
- Dr Sampuranand Medical College (SNMC), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Sunil Taneja
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Suprabhat Giri
- Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, India
| | - Surender Singh
- Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Tao Chen
- Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tarana Gupta
- Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Tatsuo Kanda
- Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | | | - Ulrich Spengler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - V G Mohan Prasad
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Vicente Arroyo
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vikrant Sood
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Vinay Kumar Br
- Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Viniyendra Pamecha
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Virendra Singh
- Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India
| | - Vishwa Mohan Dayal
- Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, (IGIMS), Bely Road Patna, Bihar, India
| | | | - WRay Kim
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wasim Jafri
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wenyi Gu
- Goethe University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Wong Yu Jun
- Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiaolong Qi
- Medical School, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yogesh K Chawla
- Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, India
| | - Yoon Jun Kim
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu Shi
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Ziauddin University Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Guresh Kumar
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | | | - Lai Wei
- Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Masao Omata
- Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, 110070, India.
| |
Collapse
|
290
|
Yang Z, Liu JP, Chen JL, Zheng SS. China Liver Transplant Registry plays an important role in liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2025; 24:14-17. [PMID: 39632155 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
In China, liver transplantation is an important discipline in the field of organ transplantation. China Liver Transplant Registry (CLTR) is a scientific project that has been set up to advance surgical techniques and procedures and to improve both short- and long-term post-transplant follow-up and outcome of the liver recipients. CLTR also serves as a robust data support platform for the National Liver Transplant Quality Control Center in the quest to upscale its quality control protocols. The mission of CLTR is to register all liver transplantation activities in the mainland of China and to conduct scientific analyses of the collected data. The huge number of compiled cases and the scientific research conducted over the past decade based on this database drastically revolutionized the clinical practice in the country. All CLTR activities and projects will be a guarantee to foster progresses of liver transplantation in China in a more scientific way, to standardize the systematic care in the field of liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jian-Peng Liu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jun-Li Chen
- National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Liver Transplant, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310003, China; Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Liver Transplant, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
291
|
Law JH, Kow AWC. Prediction and management of small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation. Clin Mol Hepatol 2025; 31:S301-S326. [PMID: 39657750 PMCID: PMC11925445 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 11/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) remains a critical challenge in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), characterized by graft insufficiency due to inadequate liver volume, leading to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. As the global adoption of LDLT increases, the ability to predict and manage SFSS has become paramount in optimizing recipient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the pathophysiology, risk factors, and strategies for managing SFSS across the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. The pathophysiology of SFSS has evolved from being solely volume-based to incorporating portal hemodynamics, now recognized as small-for-flow syndrome. Key risk factors include donor-related parameters like age and graft volume, recipient-related factors such as MELD score and portal hypertension, and intraoperative factors related to venous outflow and portal inflow modulation. Current strategies to mitigate SFSS include careful graft selection based on graft-to-recipient weight ratio and liver volumetry, surgical techniques to optimize portal hemodynamics, and novel interventions such as splenic artery ligation and hemiportocaval shunts. Pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin have also shown promise in modulating portal pressure. Advances in 3D imaging and artificial intelligence-based volumetry further aid in preoperative planning. This review emphasizes the importance of a multifaceted approach to prevent and manage SFSS, advocating for standardized definitions and grading systems. Through an integrated approach to surgical techniques, hemodynamic monitoring, and perioperative management, significant strides can be made in improving the outcomes of LDLT recipients. Further research is necessary to refine these strategies and expand the application of LDLT, especially in challenging cases involving small-for-size grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-hao Law
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei-Chieh Kow
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Center for Organ Transplantation (NUCOT), National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
292
|
Ecker BL, Maki RG, Cavnar MJ, DeMatteo RP. Surgical Management of Sarcoma Metastatic to Liver. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2025; 39:55-65. [PMID: 39510677 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors with a propensity for hematogenous metastasis. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common histologic subtype and the most common source of hepatic metastases. In the case of metastatic GIST, neoadjuvant imatinib can be used as a selection tool for the judicious application of surgery, where treatment-responsive patients who undergo resection to prevent the development of treatment-resistant clones have associated 10-year actuarial survival of 40%. Further advances for many of the non-GIST sarcoma subtypes will depend on the development of improved systemic therapies and evaluation of their activity in subtype or molecularly defined trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett L Ecker
- Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center 94 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 1172, Livingston, NJ 07039.
| | - Robert G Maki
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce st, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael J Cavnar
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St First Floor, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center 94 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 1172, Livingston, NJ 07039
| |
Collapse
|
293
|
Malik AK, Davidson BR, Manas DM. Surgical management, including the role of transplantation, for intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:108248. [PMID: 38467524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening disease with poor outcomes despite optimal treatment currently available (5-year overall survival following resection 20-35%, and <10% cured at 10-years post resection). The insidious onset makes diagnosis difficult, the majority do not have a resection option and the high recurrence rate post-resection suggests that occult metastatic disease is frequently present. Advances in perioperative management, such as ipsilateral portal vein (and hepatic vein) embolisation methods to increase the future liver remnant volume, genomic profiling, and (neo)adjuvant therapies demonstrate great potential in improving outcomes. However multiple areas of controversy exist. Surgical resection rate and outcomes vary between centres with no global consensus on how 'resectable' disease is defined - molecular profiling and genomic analysis could potentially identify patients unlikely to benefit from resection or likely to benefit from targeted therapies. FDG-PET scanning has also improved the ability to detect metastatic disease preoperatively and avoid futile resection. However tumours frequently invade major vasculo-biliary structures, with resection and reconstruction associated with significant morbidity and mortality even in specialist centres. Liver transplantation has been investigated for very selected patients for the last decade and yet the selection algorithm, surgical approach and both value of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies remain to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the contemporary management of intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
294
|
Briant AR, Morello R, Sérée O, Vigneron N, Wilson S, Besch C, Houssel-Debry P, Pageaux GP, Coilly A, Dumortier J, Altieri M. Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study. Clin Transplant 2025; 39:e70109. [PMID: 39945212 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM De novo cancers after liver transplantation (LT) are major causes of complications and mortality after LT. No report was found in the literature on several successive cancers (SSC). The aim of this study was to see if the survival of one or more cancers was different and to study the survival prognostic factors of patients with one cancer or SSC after LT. METHODS Using data from the French national database, 114 French patients who underwent LT between 1993 and 2012 were followed up until their death or until June 2016. The Cox model performed to analyze potential risk factors (cancer characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy (IT), smoking, and alcohol use). RESULTS After an average follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.1 years, 52 patients developed 1 cancer, 49 had 2 cancers, and 13 had 3 cancers. The reduction in survival time was significantly and independently associated with the metastatic stage (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = [1.45-10.93], p < 0.001), ENT (otolaryngology), and respiratory cancer versus genitourinary (HR = 8.28, 95% CI = [3.12-22.02], p < 0.001), and SSC (HR = 2.54, 95% CI = [1.39-4.65], p = 0.014). CONCLUSION The patients with ENT, respiratory cancers have a shorter survival. The stage of cancer and SSC reduces median survival at 10 years. The earliness of the first cancer should be taken as a warning signal of risk of SSC and impaired survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaïs R Briant
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Research and Innovation Department and Methodology Platform, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Units, Caen, France
- OncoNormandie, DSRC, Caen, France
| | - Rémy Morello
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Research and Innovation Department and Methodology Platform, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Units, Caen, France
| | | | - Nicolas Vigneron
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Research and Innovation Department and Methodology Platform, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Units, Caen, France
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, Calvados General Tumor Registry, Caen, France
- UFR Santé Caen France: U1086 INSERM- "ANTICIPE", Caen, France
| | - Sarah Wilson
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Research and Innovation Department and Methodology Platform, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Units, Caen, France
- UFR Santé Caen France: U1086 INSERM- "ANTICIPE", Caen, France
| | - Camille Besch
- Service de chirurgie hépato-bilio-pancréatique et transplantation hépatique, CHRU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pauline Houssel-Debry
- Hôpital Universitaire de Pontchaillou, Service d'Hépatologie et Transplantation hépatique, Rennes, France
| | | | - Audrey Coilly
- AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM, Unité 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jérôme Dumortier
- Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Unité de transplantation hépatique, et Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Mario Altieri
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Research and Innovation Department and Methodology Platform, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Units, Caen, France
- UFR Santé Caen France: U1086 INSERM- "ANTICIPE", Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
295
|
Sallustio BC. Alternate Sampling Matrices for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressants. Ther Drug Monit 2025; 47:105-117. [PMID: 39592182 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressant (IS) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) relies on measuring mostly pharmacologically inactive erythrocyte-bound and/or plasma protein-bound drug levels. Variations in hematocrit and plasma protein levels complicate interpretation of blood calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and inhibitors of the molecular target of rapamycin (mTORi) concentrations. Variable binding of mycophenolic acid (MPA) to albumin similarly complicates its TDM in plasma. A different matrix may improve IS concentration-response relationships and better reflect exposures at sites of action. METHODS This review explores the evidence for IS TDM using peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC), graft tissue, and total or unbound plasma concentrations. RESULTS Tandem mass spectrometry provides the sensitivity for assessing these matrices. But several challenges must be addressed, including minimizing hemolysis during blood collection, preventing IS efflux during PBMC preparation, and determining the need for further purification of the PBMC fraction. Assessing and reducing nonspecific binding during separation of unbound IS are also necessary, especially for lipophilic CNIs/mTORi. Although TDM using PBMC or unbound plasma concentrations may not be feasible due to increased costs, plasma CNI/mTORi levels may be more easily integrated into routine TDM. However, no validated TDM targets currently exist, and published models to adjust blood CNI/mTORi concentrations for hematocrit or to predict PBMC, and total and unbound plasma IS concentrations have yet to be validated in terms of measured concentrations or prediction of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Even if CNI/mTORi measurements in novel matrices do not become routine, they may help refine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and improve mathematical models for TDM using whole blood. Notably, there is evidence to support measuring unbound MPA in patients with severe renal dysfunction, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperbilirubinemia, with some proposed TDM targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetta C Sallustio
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, SA, Australia ; and
- Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
296
|
Lin X, Yu Z, Liu Y, Li C, Hu H, Hu J, Liu M, Yang Q, Gu P, Li J, Nandakumar KS, Hu G, Zhang Q, Chen X, Ma H, Huang W, Wang G, Wang Y, Huang L, Wu W, Liu N, Zhang C, Liu X, Zheng L, Chen P. Gut-X axis. IMETA 2025; 4:e270. [PMID: 40027477 PMCID: PMC11865426 DOI: 10.1002/imt2.270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Revised: 01/02/2025] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Abstract
Recent advances in understanding the modulatory functions of gut and gut microbiota on human diseases facilitated our focused attention on the contribution of the gut to the pathophysiological alterations of many extraintestinal organs, including the liver, heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, bone, skin, reproductive, and endocrine systems. In this review, we applied the "gut-X axis" concept to describe the linkages between the gut and other organs and discussed the latest findings related to the "gut-X axis," including the underlying modulatory mechanisms and potential clinical intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Lin
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismShunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde)Foshan City528308China
| | - Zuxiang Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research, Health Science Center, The Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Institute of Systems BiomedicinePeking UniversityBeijing100191China
| | - Yang Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offsprings Health, Center for Global HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjing211166China
| | - Changzhou Li
- Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Hui Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghai200123China
| | - Jia‐Chun Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural MedicinesInstitute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijing100050China
| | - Mian Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Qin Yang
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, School of Basic Medical SciencesSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Peng Gu
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, School of Basic Medical SciencesSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, School of Basic Medical SciencesSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Kutty Selva Nandakumar
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and BiophysicsKarolinska InstituteStockholm17177Sweden
| | - Gaofei Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research, Health Science Center, The Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Institute of Systems BiomedicinePeking UniversityBeijing100191China
| | - Qi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research, Health Science Center, The Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Institute of Systems BiomedicinePeking UniversityBeijing100191China
| | - Xinyu Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offsprings Health, Center for Global HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjing211166China
| | - Huihui Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offsprings Health, Center for Global HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjing211166China
| | - Wenye Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offsprings Health, Center for Global HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjing211166China
| | - Gaofeng Wang
- Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Yan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural MedicinesInstitute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijing100050China
| | - Liping Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| | - Wenjuan Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai East HospitalTongji University School of MedicineShanghai200123China
| | - Ning‐Ning Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Center for Single‐Cell Omics, School of Public HealthShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghai200025China
| | - Chenhong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and BiotechnologyShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghai200240China
| | - Xingyin Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offsprings Health, Center for Global HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjing211166China
- School of MedicineSouthern University of Science and TechnologyShenzhenChina
| | - Leming Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research, Health Science Center, The Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Institute of Systems BiomedicinePeking UniversityBeijing100191China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, School of Basic Medical SciencesSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhou510515China
| |
Collapse
|
297
|
Singh RR, Gopakumar H, Dhillon S. Do Patients With NASH-related Cirrhosis Have Better Overall Survival Compared With Other Etiologies of Cirrhosis? A Population-based Study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2025; 59:177-182. [PMID: 38847908 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
GOALS AND BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading cause of cirrhosis. We aim to explore the clinical outcomes of NASH cirrhosis compared with other etiologies of cirrhosis. METHODS We utilized an EHR-based database (TriNetX) to study the outcomes of NASH cirrhosis. Patients diagnosed with NAFLD or NASH and cirrhosis between January 2016 and December 2019 were identified utilizing appropriate ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes were decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation. The Control group was patients with other etiologies of cirrhosis than NASH. Study and control groups were matched for demographic characters and comorbidities using propensity score matching. RESULTS We identified 45,063 patients with NASH cirrhosis. The NASH cirrhosis cohort comprised older (61 vs. 59 y) White (78% vs. 64%) women (58% vs. 38%) with more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, obesity, ischemic heart disease, history of cancer, chronic kidney disease). After propensity score matching, patients with NASH cirrhosis had a better 3-year survival (78% vs. 74%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) compared with patients with non-NASH cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed less commonly in patients with NASH cirrhosis (6.7% vs. 10.6%, P <0.001), and liver transplantation was performed more often for NASH cirrhosis compared with non-NASH cirrhosis [Risk ratio 1.13 (1.08-1.18)]. CONCLUSIONS Patients with NASH cirrhosis probably have better 3-year overall survival than other etiologies of cirrhosis. This is an interesting finding, as patients with NASH are older and have more comorbidities. Improved survival can be partly explained by a higher probability of liver transplantation and improvements in cardiovascular outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu R Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, IL
- Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harishankar Gopakumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, IL
| | - Sonu Dhillon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, IL
| |
Collapse
|
298
|
Veeramachaneni H, Dbouk N, Subramanian R. PRO: Is the management of ACLF better in a liver-dedicated ICU? Liver Transpl 2025; 31:242-246. [PMID: 39297744 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hima Veeramachaneni
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nader Dbouk
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ram Subramanian
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
299
|
Bredin P, Galvin Z, O'Kane GM. Role of immunotherapy in managing cancers prior to liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2025; 30:3-11. [PMID: 39620576 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increasingly are being evaluated in earlier stage disease. Herein we explore the role of ICIs pre-liver transplant for liver cancers. RECENT FINDINGS Given the high response rates with combination approaches including locoregional treatments, more patients with liver confined disease, without vascular invasion, who have received ICIs are now being rendered eligible for potential liver transplant. This opportunity to expand the population who may benefit from liver transplant has also come with challenges recognizing the global shortage of organs. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression potentially competes with the immune-stimulating effects of ICIs and graft rejection has been a concern. ICIs may provide an opportunity to maintain patients on the waiting list but an understanding of who is likely to benefit is needed, to circumvent possible toxicities. In addition, ICIs are now considered standard of care, in combination with chemotherapy, for advanced cholangiocarcinoma, where the role of liver transplant is evolving. SUMMARY As the eligibility criteria globally for liver transplant in the setting of malignancy continues to expand, the integration of ICIs becomes increasingly important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zita Galvin
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park
- University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Grainne M O'Kane
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park
- University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
300
|
Rajendran L, Sapisochin G, Cattral M. The role of living donor liver transplantation in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2025; 30:12-20. [PMID: 39607024 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite technical and therapeutic advances, only 20-40% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have resectable disease. Historically, the remaining patients with unresectable, liver-only CRLM would receive palliative chemotherapy, with a median survival of 8 months. RECENT FINDINGS Liver transplantation has emerged as a viable option for selected patients with CRLM. This advancement stems from improved understanding of tumour genomics and biology and better patient selection criteria. The results of recent prospective clinical trials have further ignited enthusiasm for liver transplantation as a viable therapeutic option. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers several advantages over deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for this disease, including reduced wait-time and optimized timing and coordination of oncologic therapy. On-going LDLT clinical trials have demonstrated favourable outcomes as compared with other liver transplantation indications. However, there is no established consensus or standardization in the implementation of LDLT for CRLM, beyond trials and centre-specific protocols. SUMMARY LDLT is an excellent therapeutic option in highly selected patients with CRLM. Refining prognostic factors and selection criteria will help to further optimize the utility and broaden the acceptance and implementation of LDLT for patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luckshi Rajendran
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Cattral
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|