Hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine or efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy: role of hepatitis C and B infections

Effects of hepatic function and hepatitis C virus on the nervous system assessment of advanced-stage HIV-infected individuals

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of liver function and hepatitis C virus (HCV) serostatus on neurological, neuropsychological, and psychiatric abnormalities in an advanced-stage HIV-infected cohort.

DESIGN

A correlational analysis of baseline data accumulated on 137 participants in the Manhattan HIV Brain Bank, a longitudinal study of HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

Patients underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests, a semi-structured psychiatric interview, and a neurological examination. The resulting diagnostic data were correlated with biochemical indices of hepatic function and HCV serostatus.

RESULTS

Biochemical indices of liver function correlated with motor dysfunction determined by neurological evaluation, but not with neuropsychological or psychiatric disorders. Discrete neurological diagnostic entities showed no relationship with biochemical indices, with one exception: patients with cryptococcal leptomeningitis had worse liver function than those without. HCV had no relationship with any neurological disorder or symptom complex. In contrast, HCV serostatus was related to neuropsychological and psychiatric abnormalities, and indices of liver function were not. HCV-seropositive patients were more likely to have histories of opiate, cocaine or stimulant dependency, to have greater impairment in executive functioning, and to meet diagnostic criteria for AIDS dementia, compared with HCV-negative individuals of similar immunological and virological status.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV and biochemical indices of liver function associate differentially with nervous system abnormalities in this HIV-infected population. Neurological abnormalities correlate with biochemical indices of liver function, whereas neuropsychological and psychiatric dysfunction are linked to HCV infection. We postulate that multifactorial impacts of HCV and liver disease on HIV-related nervous system disorders may originate in different anatomical and cellular compartments.

Management and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected adults: recommendations from the Veterans Affairs Hepatitis C Resource Center Program and National Hepatitis C Program Office

Nearly 40% of human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV-) infected veterans on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the United States are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). With the increased survival due to declining opportunistic infections as a result of HAART, HCV-associated liver disease has become a leading cause of death in HIV-infected individuals. HCV infection has been shown to lead to rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease in HIV infection. Results from recent clinical trials in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients show improved response rates using pegylated formulations of interferon plus ribavirin when compared to standard interferon plus ribavirin. However, the treatment of HCV in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients can be complicated by the hepatotoxic and myelosuppressive effects of HIV therapy and HIV infection itself. Prior to initiating HCV therapy, HIV therapy should be optimized by improving immune suppression and avoiding specific antiretroviral drugs that may cause hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression. In the event of treatment-related neutropenia or anemia during HCV therapy, the use of growth factors should be considered to maximize sustained virologic response to HCV therapy. In HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with end-stage liver disease, liver transplantation is being investigated and shows promise as a potential therapeutic option. With the recent advances in the treatment of HCV in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals, all HIV/HCV-coinfected patients eligible for HCV treatment should be evaluated for HCV combination therapy with careful consideration of their HIV disease.

Hepatitis C virus infection in HIV type 1-infected individuals does not accelerate a decrease in the CD4+ cell count but does increase the likelihood of AIDS-defining events

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) appears to adversely affect hepatitis C, but whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a reciprocal effect on HIV-1 infection remains a point of controversy. In a multivariate analysis of a cohort of 5832 individuals, we found that individuals coinfected with HCV and HIV-1 (prevalence of coinfection, 5.8%) had a CD4+ cell count that decreased at a rate similar to that for individuals infected with HIV-1 alone. However, coinfection was associated with a statistically significant increased likelihood of onset of an acquired immunodeficiency syndromedefining illness or developing a CD4+ cell count of <200 cells/mm3, compared with infection with HIV-1 alone (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.072.17). Patients who were naive to highly active antiretroviral therapy were significantly less likely to progress to either end point, because of their higher CD4+ cell counts. In conclusion, there was an increased number of adverse events in coinfected individuals, compared with individuals infected with HIV-1 alone.

Management of gastrointestinal disorders in children with HIV infection

A double scenario characterizes the epidemiology of HIV infection in children. In countries where highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is available, the pattern of HIV infection is evolving into that of a chronic disease, for which control strictly depends on patients' adherence to treatment. In developing countries with no or limited access to HAART, AIDS is rapidly expanding and is loaded with a high fatality ratio, due to the combined effects of malnutrition and opportunistic infections. The digestive tract is a target of the disease in both settings. Opportunistic infections play a major role in children with severe immune impairment, with Cryptosporidium parvum being the leading agent of severe diarrhea. Several therapeutic approaches are effective in reducing fecal output, but the eradication of the parasite is rarely obtained. Other opportunistic infections may induce severe and protracted diarrhea, including atypical mycobacteria and cytomegalovirus. Diagnosis of diarrhea should be individually tailored based on presenting symptoms and risk factors. A stepwise approach is effective in limiting patient discomfort and minimizing the costs of investigations, starting with microbiologic investigation and proceeding with endoscopy and histology. Aggressive treatment of infectious diarrhea is required in severely immunocompromised children. However, antiretroviral therapy prevents the development of severe cryptosporidiosis. The liver and pancreas are also target organs in HIV infection, although functional failure is rare. The digestive-absorptive functions are impaired, with steatorrhea, nutrient malabsorption, and increased permeability occurring in 20-70% of children. Intestinal dysfunction contributes to growth failure and further immune derangement, leading to wasting, the terminal stage of AIDS. Nutritional management is crucial in HIV-infected children and is based on aggressive nutritional rehabilitation through enteral or parenteral routes and micronutrient supplementation.HIV may play a direct enteropathogenic role and is implicated in both diarrhea and intestinal dysfunction. This explains the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in inducing remission of diarrhea and restoring intestinal function. Gastrointestinal side effects of antiretroviral drugs are increasingly observed; they are often mild and transient. Severe reactions are rare but require the withdrawal of drugs. In conclusion, severe enteric infections and intestinal dysfunction characterize the intestinal involvement of HIV infection. This is more common in, but not limited to, children who do not receive effective antiretroviral therapy. Diagnostic approaches include microbiologic and morphologic examinations and assessment of digestive processes, but immunologic and virologic data should be also carefully considered. Treatment is based upon specific anti-infectious drugs, antiretroviral therapy, and nutritional rehabilitation.

Therapeutic Interventions for HIV Infection and Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Combination antiretroviral therapy reduces overall and liver-specific morbidity and mortality in coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and represents the most beneficial pharmaceutical treatment intervention for most coinfected patients. Antiviral therapy for HCV infection is potentially organ- and life-saving but, in general, should be reserved for patients who achieve suppression of HIV RNA and immune restoration from combination antiretroviral therapy or for patients with nadir CD4+ T lymphocyte levels of >350 cells/microL. Safe and virologically active treatment of coinfection with HIV and hepatitis B virus can be concurrently achieved by the use of combination antiretroviral therapy regimens containing lamivudine and/or tenofovir.

Coinfection with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus in Injection Drug Users and Minority Populations

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common. In the United States, it has been estimated that 25% of persons infected with HIV are also infected with HCV. The prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV is highest among those infected via percutaneous routes. In fact, in urban areas in the United States, 50%-90% of persons infected with HIV via injection drug use are coinfected with HCV. In addition, limited data from drug treatment centers in these urban areas suggest that the prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV may be highest among African Americans and Hispanics. Little information is available with regard to the epidemiology of coinfection with HIV and HCV among injection drug users (IDUs) or minority populations. Likewise, although there is a growing body of data on the potential complexities of treating HCV among IDUs and the poor response to current anti-HCV treatment among African Americans, few data address the therapy of coinfection with HIV and HCV among IDUs and minority populations.

Update on Hepatitis B and C Coinfection in HIV

Coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common in patients with HIV infection. HIV infection and immunosuppression alter the natural history of chronic viral hepatitis, and some patients experience accelerated progression to clinically significant liver disease. Therapies used in the treatment of HBV or HCV monoinfection have been applied to the treatment of HIV-coinfected patients. However, development of viral resistance and lack of virologic response remain significant areas of concern. Timely diagnosis and clinical staging of chronic hepatitis infection are critical in the management of HIV-coinfected patients.

Changes in nevirapine plasma concentrations over time and its relationship with liver enzyme elevations

Liver enzyme elevations are frequently seen in patients treated with nevirapine (NVP). Both elevated NVP plasma levels and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection seem to favor the development of NVP-related liver toxicity. We have examined variation on NVP C(trough) over time, as well as the impact of NVP C(trough) concentrations and the role of chronic hepatitis C on the incidence of liver enzyme elevations over a 48-week study period in HIV-infected patients on NVP therapy. Thirty-seven patients who initiated a triple regimen of NVP (200 mg bid) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) were analyzed. A significant increase in serum transaminase levels occurred progressively over time. However, no significant variations in NVP plasma C(trough) were noticed in 48 weeks. In total population, maximum fold increase (MFI) in serum AST, ALT, and GGT was correlated with 24 week NVP C(trough). In HCV+ subjects, 12-week NVP C(trough) was closely correlated with maximum transaminase elevations, whereas in HCV- patients, 24-week concentrations were correlated with maximum transaminase increase. However, no differences in either NVP plasma C(trough) or in MFI in transaminase levels could be determined when comparing patients with and without hepatitis C at any time point.

Antiretroviral treatment change among HIV, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus co-infected patients in the Australian HIV Observational Database

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on rates of change of antiretroviral treatment among patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the Australian HIV Observational Database (AHOD).

METHODS

Analysis was based on 805 of the 2218 patients recruited to the AHOD by March 2003, who had commenced HAART after 1 January 1997, who had recorded test results for HBV surface antigen and anti-HCV antibody, and who had follow-up of more than 3 months. The effect of hepatitis co-infection on the rate of antiretroviral treatment change after commencing HAART was assessed using a random-effect Poisson regression model.

RESULTS

Among those included in the analyses, the prevalences of HBV and HCV were 4.8% and 12.8%, respectively. The overall rate of combination antiretroviral treatment change was 0.74 combinations per year. Factors independently associated with an increased rate of change of combination antiretroviral treatment were: prior AIDS-defining illness; prior exposure to double combination antiretroviral therapy; and antiretroviral treatment class. Co-infection with HBV and/or HCV was not found to be significantly associated with the rate of combination antiretroviral treatment change.

CONCLUSIONS

While both HBV and HCV co-infections are relatively common in the AHOD, they do not appear to be serious impediments to the treatment of HIV-infected patients.

Therapies for HIV and viral hepatitis coinfection

The natural history of chronic viral hepatitis is altered by HIV coinfection. Liver fibrosis rates and clinical features of liver disease develop more rapidly. Although HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfected subjects may progress more rapidly to AIDS, this is probably explained by comorbid illness, substance abuse and socioeconomic circumstances. Safe and virologically active treatment of HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfection can be concurrently achieved by the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens containing lamivudine and/or tenofovir. In most cases, highly active antiretroviral therapy represents the most beneficial initial pharmaceutical intervention for HIV-hepatitisC virus coinfection. HepatitisC virus antiviral therapy should, in most cases, be reserved for those achieving HIV RNA suppression and immune restoration from highly active antiretroviral therapy or with nadir CD4 T-lymphocytes above 350 cells/microl.

Hyperbilirubinemia in the setting of antiviral therapy

Hyperbilirubinemia is a common side effect of antiviral medications. The mechanisms underlying its development are multiple and unique to each therapy. During administration of antiviral medications, the hyperbilirubinemia observed in the absence of liver injury is most frequently manifested by isolated increases in the indirect-reacting fraction. Relevant mechanisms leading to indirect hyperbilirubinemia in this setting include hemolysis, decreased hepatic bilirubin clearance as a result of impairment of bilirubin conjugation, or circumstances in which both processes occur simultaneously. Underlying genetic susceptibilities may potentiate these side effects of antiviral therapy. Conjugated (direct-reacting) hyperbilirubinemia can be a consequence of generalized hepatocellular injury, selective cholestatic defects, biliary obstruction, or, rarely, genetic disorders of bilirubin transport. In the specific setting of antiviral therapy, preexisting liver disease or antiviral hepatotoxicity, such as is encountered with the use of the nucleoside and non-nucleoside human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase inhibitors, are the most frequent causes of direct-reacting or mixed direct- and indirect-reacting hyperbilirubinemia. Modification in antiviral drug choice or dose may be required in cases of liver injury or of brisk hemolysis leading to significant anemia. The mild indirect hyperbilirubinemia associated with impairment in conjugation tends to be well tolerated and of little consequence. The decision to continue or discontinue antiviral therapy in the face of hyperbilirubinemia should be made after an assessment of the cause of the elevated bilirubin level and a thorough assessment of the risks and benefits of antiviral therapy.

Management of Hepatitis C in HIV-infected Patients

As the survival of HIV-infected patients has been lengthening over the past 10 years as a consequence of effective antiretroviral therapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. HCV/HIV coinfection is associated with accelerated progression of liver disease, untoward effects on the immunologic and virologic response to antiretroviral medications, and possibly with a more aggressive course of HIV disease. The results of major trials of combination therapy for HCV in coinfected patients have clearly established the combination of pegylated interferon-alpha with ribavirin as the treatment of choice in this population. However, the effectiveness and tolerability of this regimen remains suboptimal, particularly in patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. This paper reviews the impact of HCV coinfection in HIV-infected patients, outlines current concepts on management and antiviral treatment, and discusses some of the newer agents, currently in the therapeutic pipeline, that are directed against novel molecular targets.

Hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a call for further investigation

A growing body of evidence indicates that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals are more likely to be infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) than HIV-negative individuals, possibly as a result of shared risk factors. There is also evidence that HIV-positive individuals who are subsequently infected with HBV are more likely to become HBV chronic carriers, have a high HBV replication rate, and remain hepatitis Be antigen positive for a much longer period. In addition, it is evident that immunosuppression brought about by HIV infection may cause reactivation or reinfection in those previously exposed to HBV. Furthermore, HIV infection exacerbates liver disease in HBV co-infected individuals, and there is an even greater risk of liver disease when HIV and HBV co-infected patients are treated with highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). Complicating matters further, there have been several reports linking HIV infection to 'sero-silent' HBV infections, which presents serious problems for diagnosis, prevention, and control. In sub-Saharan Africa, where both HIV and HBV are endemic, little is known about the burden of co-infection and the interaction between these two viruses. This paper reviews studies that have investigated HIV and HBV co-infection in sub-Saharan Africa, against a backdrop of what is currently known about the interactions between these two viruses.

Progression of liver fibrosis in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus undergoing antiretroviral therapy

As the immunosuppression caused by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) accelerates the progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver fibrosis, the immune reconstitution associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may have the opposite effect. However, hepatotoxicity related to HAART could enhance the progression of liver fibrosis. Some retrospective studies have shown that therapy with the protease inhibitors may be associated with less severe liver fibrosis, whereas nevirapine use seems to correlate with faster progression. Low-grade liver toxicity associated with nevirapine could account for this effect. However, other studies have not confirmed these findings. Long-term prospective studies are needed to analyse the impact of antiretroviral drugs on the progression of HCV-related liver disease. Meanwhile, no specific recommendations can be made on the use of individual drugs or drug classes in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Most importantly however, the inherent benefits of HAART largely outweigh the risk of enhancing fibrosis progression. Additionally, in coinfected patients, other factors that promote fibrogenesis, such as alcohol consumption, should be avoided. Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C could also reduce the risk of liver damage associated with HAART.

Hepatitis B and HIV: prevalence, AIDS progression, response to highly active antiretroviral therapy and increased mortality in the EuroSIDA cohort

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatitis B (HBV) coinfection affects outcome in HIV-1-infected patients remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of HBV (assessed as HBsAg) coinfection and its possible impact on progression to AIDS, all-cause deaths, liver-related deaths and response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the EuroSIDA cohort.

METHODS

Data on 9802 patients in 72 European HIV centres were analysed. Incidence rates of AIDS, global mortality and liver-related mortality, time to 25% CD4 cell count increase and time to viral load < 400 copies/ml after starting HAART were calculated and compared between HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients.

RESULTS

HBsAg was found in 498 (8.7%) patients. The incidence of new AIDS diagnosis was similar in HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients (3.3 and 3.4/100 person-years, respectively) even after adjustment for potential confounders: the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-1.19; P = 0.61]. The incidences of all-cause and liver-related mortalities were significantly higher in HBsAg-positive subjects (3.7 and 0.7/100 person-years, respectively) compared with HBsAg-negative subjects (2.6 and 0.2/100 person-years, respectively). The adjusted IRR values were 1.53 for global (95% CI, 1.23-1.90; P = 0.0001) and 3.58 for liver-related (95% CI, 2.09-6.16; P < 0.0001) mortality. HBsAg status did not influence viral or immunological responses among the 1679 patients starting HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HBV coinfection was 9% in the EuroSIDA cohort. Chronic HBV infection significantly increased liver-related mortality in HIV-1-infected patients but did not impact on progression to AIDS or on viral and immunological responses to HAART.

High prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among tuberculosis patients with and without HIV in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

To determine the prevalence and exposure factors associated with hepatitis B infection in tuberculosis patients with and without HIV type 1 coinfection, the presence of hepatitis B virus serological markers was investigated in a retrospective study. The seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus in patients with tuberculosis only was 14.6%, and in tuberculosis patients coinfected with HIV it increased to 35.8%. In patients with HIV and tuberculosis coinfection, homosexuality constituted the principal exposure factor, while in tuberculosis patients without HIV, a gradual increase in hepatitis B virus seroprevalence was noted along with increasing age. The results demonstrate that hepatitis B infection is highly prevalent in tuberculosis patients in Brazil and suggest that a vaccination program for the general population should be considered in order to prevent further hepatitis B infections.

Initial antiretroviral therapy in chronically-infected HIV-positive adults

Currently, there are 20 individual antiretroviral drugs and two co-formulation products that are approved by the FDA for the treatment of HIV-infected individuals. It is widely accepted that the selection of an appropriate first-line regimen is critical in assuring durable treatment response. This article reviews the factors that should be considered in the selection of an initial antiretroviral regimen and present the currently available evidence regarding the status of individual antiretroviral agents and treatment strategies relative to these factors.

Hepatitis C coinfection increases the risk of fulminant hepatic failure in patients with HIV in the HAART era

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is uncertain if patients coinfected with hepatitis C and HIV are more likely to suffer fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) when compared to patients with HIV-only.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using national administrative databases from the Department of Veterans Affairs in patients hospitalized for the first time with HIV and/or hepatitis C between 10/1991 and 9/2000. Fulminant hepatic failure was defined as occurring after the index hospitalization through 9/2001 in the absence of pre-existing liver disease. We calculated incidence rates, Kaplan Meier cumulative incidence curves, and Cox proportional hazards ratios while adjusting for demographics and other potential confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 11,678 patients with HIV-only and 4761 patients with coinfection. There were 92 cases of fulminant hepatic failure yielding an incidence rate of 1.1/1000 person-years and 2.5/1000 person-years in the HIV-only and coinfected groups. The cumulative incidence of fulminant hepatic failure in the coinfected group was higher than in the HIV-only group (P<0.0001). The risk of fulminant hepatic failure in patients with coinfection compared to HIV-only during the HAART era was several folds higher than that during the pre-HAART era.

CONCLUSIONS

HAART and hepatitis C coinfection appeared to act synergistically in HIV-infected patients to increase the risk of fulminant hepatic failure, a rare but often fatal disease.

Hepatitis B and C viral load changes following initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in patients with advanced HIV infection

Chronic infection with either hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is frequently present in patients seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) because of shared routes of transmission. With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens capable of controlling HIV replication and dramatically prolonging the survival of HIV-infected patients, the impact of co-morbid infections such as HBV and HCV has come into focus. Several studies have monitored HBV or HCV viral loads following initiation of HAART, with disparate results. The effects of HAART on hepatitis B and C plasma viral loads (n = 9 and 32, respectively) and on liver enzyme levels were studied in a large cohort of prospectively studied subjects with advanced stage HIV disease. Comparing the mean pre- and post-HAART levels, there was an estimated increase of (a) 1.40 log(10) from 4.83 to 6.24 log(10) for HBV plasma viral load (P = 0.07), (b) 0.74 log(10) from 6.38 to 7.12 log(10) for HCV plasma viral load (P = 0.001), and (c) 19.4 U/L from 37.4 to 56.8 U/L for serum alanine aminotransferase (P < 0.001). While the number of subjects co-infected with HIV and HBV was limited, these data collected in a population of advanced stage HIV-infected patients raises questions regarding the interactions of these viruses with each other and the host immune system and has implications regarding the order in which antiviral therapies are initiated.

Open, Randomized, Multicentre Italian Trial on Peg-Ifn plus Ribavirin versus Peg-Ifn Monotherapy for Chronic Hepatitis C in HIV-Coinfected Patients on Haart

Background

Chronic hepatitis C is common and aggressive in HIV-positive patients, so the development of a well-tolerated HCV therapy is a priority. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α2b (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) versus PEG-IFN monotherapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and analysed the predictive factors of response.

Methods

An Italian, multicentre, open-label trial including 135 coinfected patients, randomized to PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg/week plus RBV 400 mg twice daily ( n=69, arm A) or PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg/week ( n=66, arm B) for 48 weeks. We assessed the predictive values of early virological response (EVR) at week 8 (HCV-RNA drop >2 log10 compared with baseline or undetectable levels) on sustained virological response (SVR).

Results

Fifty-five patients (28 from arm A and 27 from arm B) completed 48 weeks of therapy. At the end of treatment, 20/28 patients in arm A and 11/27 in arm B had HCV-RNA <50 IU/ml. In a per-protocol analysis, SVR was reached by 54% of patients in arm A (genotype 2–3, 11/16; genotype 1–4, 4/12) and 22% in arm B (genotype 2–3, 3/15; genotype 1–4, 3/12). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR was 22% in arm A (genotype 2–3, 11/32; genotype 1–4, 4/37) versus 9% in arm B (genotype 2–3, 3/32; genotype 1–4, 3/34). The best predictors of SVR were the use of combination therapy, infection with HCV genotype 3 versus genotype 1, and EVR at week 8. Thirty patients (15 from arm A and 15 from arm B) dropped out of the trial prematurely due to side effects. The positive predictive value of EVR at week 8 was 65%, the negative predictive value was 86%.

Conclusions

PEG-IFN plus RBV can be considered a solid option for the treatment of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. The key to successfully improving efficacy is strong compliance through strict overall patient monitoring, in order to best manage drug toxicity. EVR assessment at week 8 may become a useful stategy in the management of therapy.

Influence of liver fibrosis on highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated hepatotoxicity in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection

BACKGROUND

Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a known risk factor for hepatotoxicity in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of HCV-related liver fibrosis in HAART-associated hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

In a prospective study involving 107 patients who underwent liver biopsy, fibrosis was graded according 5 stages, from F0 (no fibrosis) to F4 (cirrhosis). Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase to >5 times the upper limit of normal, or a >3.5-fold increase if baseline levels were abnormal. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was compared with liver fibrosis stage and with time and composition of HAART.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 patients (25%) had hepatotoxic events (5.1 events/100 person-years of therapy). The incidence was greater for patients with stage F3 or F4 fibrosis (38%) than for those with stage F1 or F2 fibrosis (15%; 7.6 vs. 3 events/100 person-years; relative risk, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.97; P=.013). Duration of HCV infection, duration of HAART, diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HCV load, HCV genotype, and nadir CD4(+) cell count did not affect the risk of hepatotoxicity. Of the 86 patients who received nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 11 (13%) developed liver toxicity. In these patients, fibrosis stages F1 and F2 were associated with similar rates of toxicity (3 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, 3.3 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz, and 3.4 events/100 person-years for those who received non-NNRTIs). There was a greater incidence among patients with F3 or F4 fibrosis who received NNRTIs (11.7 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, and 8.6 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz), compared with those who received non-NNRTIs (4 events/100 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

HAART-associated hepatotoxicity correlates with liver histological stage in patients coinfected with HIV and HCV. There was no difference in hepatotoxicity risk for different antiretroviral therapies in patients with mild-to-moderate fibrosis.

Role of growth factors in the treatment of patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C (HCV) contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and those with recurrent hepatitis C after successful liver transplantation. Treatment of hepatitis C in these patient populations, while crucial, can be quite challenging. Baseline cytopenias, in particular, may limit dosing of interferon and/or ribavirin or preclude therapy entirely when standard guidelines are followed. Concomitant medications, opportunistic infections, and other bone marrow insults account for the anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia frequently encountered in these patients. Sustained virologic response rates in published series for HIV/HCV and post-transplantation HCV have not reached those seen in treatment of HCV alone, despite the highly selected patient populations chosen for these studies. Hematopoietic growth factors such as erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors may be used to improve the anemia and neutropenia seen during treatment of HCV. Reported experience with these growth factors is limited in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, but studies are underway to determine if growth factors improve adherence to therapy and perhaps virologic response rates. Post-transplantation studies of HCV therapy have reported more liberal use of growth factors; however, discontinuation rates have been high and virologic response rates have been disappointing. Further study of growth factors as a means to increase sustained virologic response rates and maintain adequate dosing and duration of interferon and ribavirin therapy in these patient populations is needed.

Hepatitis C infection is not associated with systemic HIV-associated non-hodgkin's lymphoma: A cohort study

Immunosuppression induced by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increases the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). As the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implicated in the development of B cell lymphomas, we compared the incidence of systemic NHL during HIV infection compared to HIV and HCV co-infection. Of 5,832 individuals studied during the era of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), 102 patients were diagnosed with systemic NHL. The incidence of systemic NHL was 6.9 of 10(4) patient years during HIV infection compared to 7.1 of 10(4) patient years during HIV alone (p = 0.9). In this immunocompromised patient population, there was no association between HCV infection and an increased risk of lymphoma.

Hepatotoxicity of Antiretrovirals

Hepatotoxicity is a relevant adverse effect derived from the use of antiretrovirals that may increase the morbidity and mortality among treated HIV-infected patients and challenges the treatment of HIV infection. Although several antiretrovirals have been reported to cause fatal acute hepatitis, they most often cause an asymptomatic elevation of transaminase levels. In addition to ruling out a variety of processes not related to the use of antiretrovirals or to the HIV infection, for appropriate management of the complication it is necessary to deduce the possible pathogenic mechanisms of the hepatotoxicity. Among these mechanisms, direct drug toxicity, immune reconstitution in the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infections, hypersensitivity reactions with liver involvement and mitochondrial toxicity play a major role, although several other pathogenic pathways may be involved. Liver toxicity is more frequent among subjects with chronic HCV and/or HCB co-infections and alcohol users. Complex immune changes that alter the response against hepatitis virus antigens might be involved in the elevation of transaminase levels after suppression of the HIV replication by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in patients co-infected with HCV/HBV. The contribution of each particular drug to the development of hepatotoxicity in a HAART regimen is difficult to determine. The incidence of liver toxicity is not well known for most of the antiretrovirals. Although it is most often mild, fatal cases of acute hepatitis linked to the use of HAART have been reported across all families of antiretrovirals. Acute hepatitis is related to hypersensitivity reactions in the case of non-nucleosides and to mitochondrial toxicity in the case of nucleoside analogues. Alcohol intake and use of other drugs are other co-factors that increase the incidence of transaminase level elevation among HIV-infected patients. The management of liver toxicity is based mainly on its clinical impact, severity and pathogenic mechanism. Although low-grade HAART-related hepatotoxicity most often spontaneously resolves, severe grades may require discontinuation of the antiretrovirals, for example when there is liver decompensation, hypersensitivity reaction or lactic acidosis.

Antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics in hepatitis with hepatic dysfunction

Chronic viral hepatitis is common among persons with HIV-1 infection, because of shared modes of transmission, and coinfection results in accelerated liver damage, compared with persons with chronic viral hepatitis alone. The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a significant decrease in the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV-1 infection. A number of the medications that are commonly used in HAART regimens are metabolized by the hepatic CYP enzymes, which raises the possibility of significant interactions between antiretroviral medications and hepatic impairment induced by chronic viral hepatitis. Although the data are still very scant, the pharmacokinetics of several antiretroviral medications have been shown to be significantly altered in the presence of liver disease. In the present report, we review the available data and consider potential options, such as dose adjustment and therapeutic drug monitoring, for the administration of antiretroviral therapy to patients with significant hepatic impairment.

Special considerations in the initiation and management of antiretroviral therapy in individuals coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Although hepatitis C (HCV) treatment efficacy has improved in recent years, the majority of HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals may not enjoy the full benefits of these treatments and appropriate HIV management is crucial. Evidence is accumulating regarding the impact of HIV/HCV coinfection on the response to, and safety and tolerability of, antiretroviral therapy (ART) in this population.

METHODS

Computerized, English-language literature searches of MEDLINE and PubMed databases (January 1985 to May 2004) for studies of HIV and HCV infection in humans to examine critically (a) the impact of HCV on the HIV virologic and immunologic response to ART; (b) the safety and tolerability of ART in coinfected individuals; and (c) the relationship between immune suppression and immune restoration on hepatic injury.

RESULTS

Three key messages emerged regarding the use of ART in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals: (a) although HCV appeared to have no impact on HIV virologic response, the data are equivocal regarding immunologic response; (b) morbidities associated with HCV infection, such as insulin resistance, diabetes, mitochondrial dysfunction, and liver inflammation, are also associated toxicities of ART, and (c) both immune suppression and restoration can contribute to the onset and acceleration of HCV-related liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The CD4 cell count threshold for initiating ART in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients may be higher because of the impact of immune suppression and restoration on the onset of HCV-associated liver disease and the possibility of a blunted immune response to ART at lower CD4 cell counts. Further, overlapping morbidity between HCV-related mitochondrial and metabolic disease manifestations and ART toxicities warrant careful attention by clinicians.

Hepatotoxicity associated with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens with or without concurrent ritonavir

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of significant liver enzyme elevations following the initiation of protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with or without pharmacokinetic boosting with ritonavir (RTV), and to define the role of chronic viral hepatitis in its development.

DESIGN

Prospective, cohort analysis of 1161 PI-naive, HIV-infected patients receiving RTV-boosted (lopinavir, indinavir and saquinavir) and unboosted PI-based ART (indinavir, nelfinavir) that had at least one liver enzyme measurement before and during therapy.

METHODS

The incidence of grade 3 and 4 liver enzyme elevations among persons with and without hepatitis B and/or C co-infection treated with PI-based ART were compared. Severe hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum liver enzyme >/= 5-times the upper limit of the normal range or 3.5-times an elevated baseline level.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade 3 or 4 elevations among PI-naive patients was: nelfinavir, 11%; lopinavir/RTV (200 mg/day), 9%; indinavir, 13%; indinavir/RTV (200-400 mg/day), 12.8%; and saquinavir/RTV (800 mg/day), 17.2%. The risk was significantly greater among persons with chronic viral hepatitis (63% of cases); however, the majority of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients treated with nelfinavir (84%), saquinavir/RTV (74%), indinavir, 86%, indinavir/RTV (90%) or lopinavir/RTV (87%) did not develop hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the lopinavir/RTV is not associated with a significantly increased risk of hepatotoxity among HCV-infected and uninfected patients compared with an alternative PI-based regimen, nelfinavir. Accordingly, other medication-related factors (e.g, efficacy and non-hepatic toxicity) should guide individual treatment decisions.

Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection Increases Mortality in HIV-Infected Patients in the Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Era: Data from the HIV Atlanta VA Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

We compared survival among patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) with that among patients infected solely with HIV.

METHODS

Descriptive, bivariate, and survival analyses were conducted using data for all HIV-positive patients who were seen during the period of January 1997 through May 2001 in the HIV Atlanta VA Cohort Study (HAVACS) and who had been tested for HCV antibody since 1992 (n=970).

RESULTS

The prevalence of HCV coinfection was 31.6%, and coinfected patients were significantly more likely to be older, black, and injection drug users. In multivariate analysis, the duration of survival from the time of diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was significantly shortened for HIV-HCV-coinfected patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-3.10), as was time from HIV diagnosis to death (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.26-4.82). Recovery of CD4+ cell count from the time of initiation of HAART did not differ significantly by coinfection status.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV coinfection is common in this HIV-infected population and negatively affects survival from the time of both HIV and AIDS diagnoses, although this is apparently not associated with a difference in CD4+ cell recovery while receiving HAART. These findings differ from those of a previous study that was conducted in this cohort in the pre-HAART era, which found no association between HIV-HCV coinfection and HIV disease progression.

Efavirenz for HIV-1 infection in adults: an overview

Efavirenz (Sustiva), Bristol-Myers Squibb) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has been used successfully since the late 1990s to treat HIV-1 infection, and has since become a cornerstone of antiretroviral therapy. The efficacy and potency of efavirenz has been established in many clinical trials and cohort studies, where it has been compared with unboosted or ritonavir (Norvir, Abbott Laboratories Ltd)-boosted protease inhibitors, nevirapine (Viramune, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd); and three nucleoside analog-based regimens. Pharmacokinetics allowing for a convenient once-daily administration make efavirenz one of the first agents to be included in once-daily regimens. Tolerability of efavirenz is satisfactory, although CNS-related toxicity can occur, and is still poorly understood. New insights into the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz could help to manage this unwanted toxicity. This drug profile will examine the principal data concerning the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety that have made efavirenz a standard of care in HIV-1 therapy, and will comment on new data that could change the way efavirenz is used in the near future.

The management of chronic viral hepatitis: A Canadian consensus conference 2004

Several government and nongovernment organizations held a consensus conference on the management of acute and chronic viral hepatitis to update previous management recommendations. The conference became necessary because of the introduction of new forms of therapy for both hepatitis B and hepatitis C. The conference issued recommendations on the investigation and management of chronic hepatitis B, including the use of lamivudine, adefovir and interferon. The treatment of hepatitis B in several special situations was also discussed. There were also recommendations on the investigation and treatment of chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis C-HIV coinfection. In addition, the document makes some recommendations about the provision of services by provincial governments to facilitate the delivery of care to patients with hepatitis virus infection. The present document is meant to be used by practitioners and other health care providers, including public health staff and others not directly involved in patient care.

Outcomes of liver transplantation in HIV-infected individuals: the impact of HCV and HBV infection

Liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals is considered to be an experimental therapy with limited reported worldwide experience, and little long-term survival data. Published data suggest that the short-term outcome is encouraging in selected patients. Here, we report our experience in 14 HIV-infected liver allograft recipients, and compare outcomes between those coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the non-HCV group. A total of 14 HIV-infected patients (12 male, 2 female, age range 26-59 years) underwent LT between January 1995 and April 2003. Indications for LT were HCV (n = 7), hepatitis B virus (HBV; n = 4), alcohol-induced liver disease (n = 2), and seronegative hepatitis (n = 1); 3 patients presented with acute liver failure. At LT, CD4 cell counts (T-helper cells that are targets for HIV) ranged from 124 to 500 cells/microL (mean 264), and HIV viral loads from <50 to 197,000 copies/mL. Nine of 12 patients were exposed to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) before LT. In the non-HCV group (n = 7), all patients are alive, all surviving more than 365 days (range 668-2,661 days). No patient has experienced HBV recurrence, and graft function is normal in all 7 patients. However, 5 of 7 HCV-infected patients died after LT at 95-784 days (median 161 days). A total of 4 patients died of complications due to recurrent HCV infection and sepsis, despite antiviral therapy in 3 of them. A total of 3 patients experienced complications relating to HAART therapy. In conclusion, outcome of LT in HIV-infected patients with HBV or other causes of chronic liver disease indicates that LT is an acceptable therapeutic option in selected patients. However, longer follow-up in larger series is required before a conclusive directive can be provided for HCV / HIV coinfected patients requiring LT.

Long‐Term Efficacy and Safety of Protease Inhibitor Switching to Nevirapine in HIV‐Infected Patients with Undetectable Virus Load

BACKGROUND

Simplified highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens are becoming widely used, particularly as a result of the side effects of and difficult compliance with protease inhibitor (PI) therapy. However, the long-term efficacy of HAART has not been properly assessed.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 110 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with undetectable virus load who discontinued PI therapy and initiated therapy with nevirapine without changing nucleoside analogues. Reasons for switching were treatment simplification (45%), lipodystrophy (24%), renal problems (23%), and dyslipidemia (8%). HIV-1 load, CD4 cell count, and fasting biochemistry profiles were performed at the time of switching (baseline) and every 3-4 months thereafter. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of this combination.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (61.8%) had a duration of follow-up of 3 years. The mean increase in the CD4 cell count after 3 years was 90 cells/microL (13.8% from baseline). Virus loads remained undetectable in all patients but 9 (8.2%). Triglyceride levels dramatically improved at 12 months (a 75% decrease; P<.02) and remained statistically significant over time (P<.04). The same occurred with serum cholesterol levels: there was an initial reduction of 25% (P<.02) and at the end of the follow-up period (P<.015). However, at the long-term evaluation, complete normalization of mean serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels could not be achieved. Sixteen patients (14.5%) had to stop therapy as a result of nevirapine-associated side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The switching of a PI to nevirapine is a safe and well-tolerated option for maintaining long-term virological suppression and immunological control. Three years after starting nevirapine therapy, rates of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia improved, although normal cholesterol and triglyceride values were not achieved.

Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in HIV antiretroviral-experienced patients: evaluation of risk factors for liver enzyme elevation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk factors for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-related liver enzyme elevation (LEE) in HIV antiretroviral-experienced patients.

METHODS

An open prospective observational study was carried out to analyse the incidence and time of LEE development during LPV/r treatment, and to determine whether LEE development was correlated with epidemiological, clinical and biochemical data, immune and virological profiles, concomitant hepatic diseases, antiretroviral therapy, or histological and ultrasonography liver examination results. A diagnosis of LEE was considered when LEE symptoms occurred after LPV/r introduction and was confirmed by a second control within 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 782 HIV-positive outpatients have been enrolled in six different Infectious Diseases Departments in Northern Italy since August 2000. Of these patients, 71 (9.1%) developed LEE within 115+/-85 days (mean+/-standard deviation); 13 of these subjects discontinued LPV/r and four were hospitalized. Of the patients with LEE, 74.6% and 25.4% had grade 2 and > or =3 toxicity, respectively. No correlation between LEE and sex, baseline CD4 cell count, viral load, HIV stage, triglyceride values, histological and ultrasonography liver examination results, nevirapine use, or increase in CD4 cell count was observed. Higher baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) values (P < 0.0001 and P=0.004, respectively), younger age (P=0.008), previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (P=0.012), efavirenz use (P=0.04), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or HBV coinfection (P < 0.0001, relative risk 4.78) were significantly related to LEE. No correlations between LEE and the same risk factors as investigated in the whole study population were found in subgroups of patients with HCV and/or HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV and HBV testing and measurement of baseline ALT values are essential for screening subjects at risk of LEE before starting LPV/r. Strict monitoring of clinical and biochemical parameters should be performed in these patients.

Treatment of the hepatitis C virus in patients coinfected with HIV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common among individuals with HIV, and the progression of liver disease is accelerated in coinfected individuals compared with those with HCV alone. HCV coinfection also can decrease tolerability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, the presence of HCV appears to increase morbidity and mortality in these individuals, and as such the management of both HCV and HIV in coinfected individuals requires careful consideration. Although coinfected patients should be considered for HCV therapy, the limited information to date indicates a lower rate of virologic response with current HCV therapies. Moreover, interactions between HCV and HIV antiviral medications may occur and potentially affect treatment efficacy. Thus, the decision to undertake HCV treatment must be individualized.

The Problems Faced When Assessing the Prevalence and Incidence of Antiretroviral-Related Toxicities

Although the dramatic effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in reducing morbidity and mortality must not be underestimated, it is also important to consider the incidence and prevalence of HAART-related toxicities. Although several studies have investigated HAART-related toxicities, there has been great variety between them in the reported incidence and prevalence rates of these toxicities. Various factors, including whether the study type was a clinical trial or an observational study, the definition of the toxicity endpoints, the demographic characteristics of the study populations and the effect of calendar year on analyses, may all influence the rates observed. We investigated the possible explanations for the differences in the incidence and prevalence rates of HAART-related toxicities between studies, focussing on metabolic and hepatotoxic disorders.

Longitudinal effect of antiretroviral therapy on markers of hepatic toxicity: impact of hepatitis C coinfection

To characterize longitudinal hepatic toxicity of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected women with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, we measured alanine and aspartate aminotransferase values among women initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). For 312 HIV/HCV coinfected women who received HAART for a mean of 1.8 years, the prevalence of elevated aminotransferase levels >3 times and >5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) was low (<12% and <4%, respectively), and the prevalence of elevated aminotransferase levels declined over time. When we analyzed trends in aminotransferase levels according to type of HAART received among HCV-infected and uninfected women, we found that mean aminotransferase levels declined among 539 women receiving therapy with protease inhibitors (decreases of 5.34%-4.23% of the ULN per year; P values for trend of.007-.06), but mean values among 128 women receiving therapy with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors remained stable (from decreases of 1.65% to increases of 7.57% of the ULN per year; P values of.19-.71). Our findings lend support to assertions that antiretroviral therapy is safe for women with HCV infection.

The relationship between nevirapine plasma concentrations and abnormal liver function tests

Abnormal liver function tests are frequently observed in HIV-infected individuals receiving nevirapine (NVP). Here we investigate the relationship between total and unbound plasma concentrations of NVP and the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT). HIV-infected individuals [n = 85, 22 female, 34 hepatitis C or B virus (HCV or HBV(+))] receiving NVP (200 mg bd; median duration 66 weeks, range 3-189) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) were enrolled into this study. Blood samples were taken at C(trough) (12 hr postdose) for measurement of NVP and liver function tests (ALT and gammaGT). Plasma protein bound and unbound drug was separated using ultrafiltration and NVP concentrations quantified using HPLC-MS/MS. A linear relationship was observed between total and unbound NVP C(trough) (r(2) = 0.77, p < 0.0001). Patients with elevated ALT (>37 IU/liter; n = 31) had higher NVP unbound C(trough) than those with ALT within the normal range (median 2268 vs. 1694 ng/ml, p = 0.04) but there was no difference in total C(trough). Logistic regression revealed no association between higher NVP C(trough) and ALT elevations. Significantly higher NVP total and unbound C(trough) were observed in patients with increased gammaGT (>40 IU/liter; n = 63; total 6747 vs. 4530 ng/ml, p = 0.001; unbound 2113 vs. 1557 ng/ml, p = 0.03). Significantly higher unbound NVP C(trough) was observed in HCV/HBV(+) (median 2275 vs. 1726 ng/ml, p = 0.02) and on bivariate analysis, higher NVP C(trough) was associated with HCV/HBV coinfection (chi(2) = 4.228; p = 0.04). Overall we found no strong association between NVP concentrations and hepatotoxicity. Although in this study NVP was well tolerated in HCV/HBV coinfected patients, higher plasma concentrations were observed.

Directly Observed Therapy for the Management of HIV-Infected Patients in a Methadone Program

The objective of this prospective, observational clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily and twice-daily directly observed therapy (DOT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients undergoing methadone treatment. Methadone and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were dispensed daily as DOT, with patients in the twice-daily HAART group self-administering the second dose. Clinical and laboratory end points were monitored, along with the impact of ongoing cocaine use. We studied 54 patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. At baseline, the median virus load was 111,000 copies/mL, and the median CD4+ cell count was 165 cells/mm3. After a median of 24 months, 17 of 29 patients in the once-daily HAART group and 18 of 25 in the twice-daily HAART group had virus loads of <400 copies/mL, regardless of ongoing cocaine use. Thirty-two patients required methadone dose adjustment, which was managed without modification of HAART. Treatment-limiting hepatic toxicity was rare. A DOT program of coadministered methadone and HAART can be implemented with good results, even for patients who continue to use cocaine.

Studies on the allostimulatory function of dendritic cells from HCV-HIV-1 co-infected patients

There is increasing recognition of the potential morbidity and mortality associated with HIV-1 and hepatitis C (HCV) co-infection. HIV appears to adversely affect HCV disease while the reciprocal effect of HCV on HIV remains controversial. We therefore studied the effect of co-infection on dendritic cell function versus HIV infection alone, as previous work has shown that HCV impairs dendritic cell (DC) function. HIV-1 positive individuals with HCV were matched for CD4 count, HIV-1 RNA viral load and therapy, to HIV-1 positive patients without HCV. Monocyte-derived DC were generated and mixed leukocyte reactions were performed. We assessed allostimulatory capacity with and without administration of exogenous Th1 cytokines, using thymidine uptake and cell division analyses with the vital dye CFSE. We found that monocyte-derived DC from co-infected individuals showed no significant differences in allostimulatory capacity to ex vivo generated DC from HIV-1 infected individuals without HCV. Unlike the situation with HCV infection alone, this impairment was not reversed by increasing concentrations of either interleukin-2 or -12. Monocyte-derived DC from HIV-1 and HCV co-infected individuals have a similar allostimulatory capacity to DC from matched patients with HIV-1 alone. These findings are compatible with results of prior clinical studies that found no evidence that HCV co-infection altered HIV disease progression and has implications for immunotherapeutic approaches in co-infected individuals.

Changes in hepatitis C viral response after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy and control of HIV viremia in chronically co-infected individuals

BACKGROUND

HIV seropositive individuals co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have an increased risk for liver cirrhosis. We examined the long-term effect of controlling HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on HCV viremia among co-infected patients.

METHOD

HIV/HCV co-infected patients who initiated HAART and were able to control HIV viremia to <500 copies/mL were evaluated. HIV and HCV viremia were measured at each time point from frozen plasma samples by using bDNA methodology. Liver function tests and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts of all patients were obtained at each time point.

RESULTS

Seventeen co-infected patients met criteria for study from a cohort of 156 patients. Median time to achieve an HIV viral load (VL) <500 copies/mL after initiation of HAART was 28 weeks (range, 5-225 weeks). Thirteen of 17 patients had increases in HCV VL. Slope analysis of HCV VL vs. HIV VL was -0.14 (p=.0496), demonstrating a 0.14 log increase in HCV VL concomitant with control of HIV viremia. HCV viremia returned toward baseline levels in the 16 patients who maintained HIV suppression for 6 months. None cleared HCV after initiation of HAART during this time. Alkaline phosphatase, ALT, and AST levels were not significantly changed from baseline nor correlated with change in HCV VL (p>.05).

CONCLUSION

Control of HIV viremia may result in an early increase in HCV viremia. In this study, for every 1 log decrease of HIV VL there was a 0.14 log increase of HCV VL. The exact mechanism of this flare seen with control of HIV viremia is unknown. However, HAART alone was not able to eliminate or significantly reduce the HCV viremia in this cohort of co-infected patients.

Mitochondrial toxicity associated with HAART following liver transplantation in an HIV-infected recipient

Antiretroviral therapy is not uncommonly associated with drug toxicities, and hepatotoxicity occurs in approximately 20% of individuals prescribed antiretroviral therapy. Mitochondrial toxicity causing lactic acidosis is a rare but fatal complication that has been described in some HIV-infected patients treated with nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In this report, we describe the course of an HIV-infected patient receiving antiretroviral therapy who developed lactic acidosis after liver transplantation for HCV-induced liver disease.

HIV and hepatitis C coinfection within the CAESAR study

The declining incidence of AIDS-related opportunistic diseases among people with HIV infection has shifted the focus of clinical management to prevention and treatment of comorbidities such as chronic liver disease. The increased risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related advanced liver disease in people with HIV infection makes early HCV diagnosis a priority. To assess HCV prevalence and predictors of HIV/HCV coinfection, we have conducted a retrospective analysis of people enrolled in the CAESAR (Canada, Australia, Europe, South Africa) study, a multinational randomized placebo-controlled study of the addition of lamivudine to background antiretroviral therapy. The impact of HCV on HIV disease progression was also examined. Anti-HCV antibody testing on 1649 CAESAR study participants demonstrated a HIV/HCV coinfection prevalence of 16.1%, which varied from 1.9% in South Africa to 48.6% in Italy. The strongest predictor of HIV/HCV coinfection was HIV exposure category (P<0.0001), with odds ratios (ORs) compared to homosexual as follows: injecting drug use (IDU), 365 [95% confidence interval (CI): 179-742]; transfusion or blood products, 32.2 (95% CI: 15.2-67.6); homosexual and IDU, 22.9 (95% CI: 8.5-62.1). The prevalence of HIV/HCV was low (3.7%) among homosexual men without reported IDU. Other predictors of HIV/HCV coinfection were alanine aminotransferase (ALT), country of residence, ethnicity and stage of HIV disease. A history of IDU or ALT > or =40 U/L at baseline had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%, sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 71% for HIV/HCV coinfection. HIV disease progression was similar in HIV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected patients. People with HIV and a history of IDU or elevated liver function tests should be targeted for HCV testing. The low prevalence of HIV/HCV coinfection among homosexual men without a history of IDU suggests low efficiency of sexual HCV transmission.

Hepatitis B virus infection: co-infection with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, and human immunodeficiency virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) shares routes of transmission, namely exchange of infected body fluids, sharing of contaminated needles, and blood transfusion, with other hepatotropic viruses, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) and with systemic retroviral infections, such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Thus, many HBV infected patients are co-infected with other viral pathogens. Co-infection appears to increase the risk of progression of liver disease and may have important ramifications on choice of antiviral medication and treatment regimen. This article reviews the current knowledge of co-infection of HBV with HCV, HDV, and HIV.