Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent Acquisition of HIV: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Staff and Providers' Perceptions of Patients' PrEP Candidacy, Acceptability, and Adherence in Methadone Clinic Settings

BACKGROUND

People who use drugs and patients in substance use treatment may be placed at high risk for HIV due to mixing sex and drugs, potential engagement in sex work, and injection drug use. However, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption among these populations remains low. Methadone clinics, a main point of contact with the healthcare system for this population, are a missed opportunity to offer biomedical HIV prevention. Understanding provider and staff perceptions of patients' PrEP-related candidacy, acceptability, and adherence is a critical first step to informing PrEP implementation in substance use treatment settings.

METHODS

Thirty semistructured interviews were conducted at 2 methadone clinics in Northern New Jersey between January and April 2019. Participants included methadone counselors, medical providers, front desk staff, intake coordinators, and other clinic staff members.

RESULTS

Three major themes were identified: (1) provider and staff's perceptions of who would benefit most from PrEP, (2) perceptions of patients' acceptability of PrEP, and (3) perceptions of patients' ability to take a pill every day. Broadly, staff perceived younger patients to be better PrEP candidates than older patients, expressed cautious optimism that PrEP would be acceptable to their patient populations, and were mixed in terms of their perceptions of patients' ability to adhere to PrEP. Notably, staff largely did not mention patients who inject drugs as potential PrEP candidates, suggesting a missed opportunity.

CONCLUSION

To promote PrEP implementation in methadone clinics, staff and providers should receive training around screening for PrEP eligibility in order to maximize the benefits of PrEP for various subpopulations, especially those who inject. Importantly, discussions around sexual behavior and injection drug use must be approached in an open, non-stigmatizing manner. These findings can be used to inform future interventions to integrate PrEP services into substance use treatment settings.

PrEP Navigator Perceptions of the Implementation of Injectable PrEP on HIV Prevention in Tennessee

Tennessee is in the southern region of the United States and has not yet fully benefitted from HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Relatively little research has focused on pivotal roles of PrEP navigators. This study examined PrEP navigator perceptions of implementing long-acting injectable (LAI) PrEP in Tennessee. Semi-structured interviews with state-funded navigators were audio-recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded using a hierarchical system. Coded transcripts were aggregated, sorted, and analyzed using an iterative inductive/deductive qualitative approach. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), institutional, individual, and modifying factors to initiating and transitioning to LAI PrEP were identified. Most navigators initially had limited training and experience with LAI PrEP. Navigators reported systemic barriers associated with accessibility to LAI PrEP such as health insurance, pharmaceutical policies, and cost policies. While navigators noted the continued support of the state health department, strategies for circumventing individual and structural barriers are needed for universally implementing injectable PrEP.

"When Somebody Comes into This Country and You Are Trans on Top of That Is Like You Got… Two Strikes on You": Intersectional Barriers to PrEP Use Among Latina Transgender Women in the Eastern and Southern United States

In the United States (U.S.), Latina transgender women (LTW) are highly burdened by HIV and are prioritized for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This study explored intersectional barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake among LTW. Between February-November 2022, in-depth interviews were conducted with 27 LTW in the LITE Study. Participants were purposively sampled from 196 LTW in the cohort based on PrEP uptake (PrEP-naïve n = 8, PrEP-eligible and not user n = 5, current PrEP user n = 6, previous PrEP user n = 8). We conducted content analysis guided by a Modified Social Ecological Model and Intersectionality Framework. The mean age of participants was 32.3 (SD = 12.9). Themes were: (1) Intrapersonal: Medical distrust, acceptability of PrEP modalities, and concerns about long-term health; (2) Interpersonal: Mistreatment in healthcare, discrimination-related healthcare avoidance, difficulty finding trans-competent providers, language barriers, and shame and stigma; and (3) Structural: PrEP in the context of limited access to gender-affirming care and widespread silicone use, immigration status, economic marginalization, lack of community outreach, transphobia and anti-transgender legislative contexts, and xenophobia. This study found multilevel intersectional barriers influence PrEP uptake and persistence. Culturally tailored HIV prevention efforts are needed to address LTW-specific barriers, provide information on programs subsidizing PrEP, and implement policy change to ensure equitable PrEP access.

Evidence-Based Periodic Health Examinations for Adults: A Practical Guide

Periodic health examinations, or annual clinical checkups, are a primary reason for seeking medical care. The objective is to identify hidden problems or diseases in their early stages and to promote behaviors that prevent or minimize the consequences of these conditions. However, the practice of conducting annual reviews with clinical, laboratory, and imaging examinations indiscriminately is not associated with outcomes that matter to the patient (such as reducing morbidity and mortality) and may result in harm, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The objective of the present work is to review and summarize the measures currently recommended and supported by scientific evidence from the main regulatory authorities of the United States (United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)) and Canada (Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC)), in order to create a practical guide for evidence-based checkups.

The Effects of MyChoices and LYNX Mobile Apps on HIV Testing and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use by Young US Sexual Minority Men: Results From a National Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Young sexual minority men have among the highest rates of HIV in the United States; yet, the use of evidence-based prevention strategies, including routine HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), remains low. Mobile apps have enormous potential to increase HIV testing and PrEP use among young sexual minority men.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the efficacy of 2 theory- and community-informed mobile apps-LYNX (APT Mobility) and MyChoices (Keymind)-to improve HIV testing and PrEP initiation among young sexual minority men.

METHODS

Between October 2019 and May 2022, we implemented a 3-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial in 9 US cities to test the efficacy of the LYNX and MyChoices apps against standard of care (SOC) among young sexual minority men (aged 15-29 years) reporting anal sex with cisgender male or transgender female in the last 12 months. Randomization was 1:1:1 and was stratified by site and participant age; there was no masking. The co-primary outcomes were self-reported HIV testing and PrEP initiation over 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 381 young sexual minority men were randomized. The mean age was 22 (SD 3.2) years. Nearly one-fifth were Black, non-Hispanic (n=67, 18%), Hispanic or Latino men (n=67, 18%), and 60% identified as gay (n=228). In total, 200 (53%) participants resided in the Southern United States. At baseline, participants self-reported the following: 29% (n=110) had never had an HIV test and 85% (n=324) had never used PrEP. Sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics did not differ by study arm. Compared to SOC (n=72, 59%), participants randomized to MyChoices (n=87, 74%; P=.01) were more likely to have received at least 1 HIV test over 6 months of follow-up; those randomized to LYNX also had a higher proportion of testing (n=80, 70%) but it did not reach the a priori threshold for statistical significance (P=.08). Participants in both MyChoices (n=23, 21%) and LYNX (n=21, 20%) arms had higher rates of starting PrEP compared to SOC (n=19, 16%), yet these differences were not statistically significant (P=.52).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to facilitating earlier treatment among those who become aware of their HIV status, given the ubiquity of mobile apps and modest resources required to scale this intervention, a 25% relative increase in HIV testing among young sexual minority men, as seen in this study, could meaningfully reduce HIV incidence in the United States.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03965221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03965221.

Achieving the state of Georgia 25% HIV incidence reduction target among men who have sex with men in Atlanta through expanded use of multimodal pre-exposure prophylaxis: A mathematical model

The US faces substantial demographic and geographic disparities in both HIV burden and access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective strategy to prevent HIV acquisition. Long-acting cabotegravir (CAB) is a novel, injectable PrEP option which demonstrated superior reduction in risk of HIV acquisition compared to daily-oral PrEP in the HPTN083 trial. We modelled the impact of increased PrEP initiations and the introduction of long-acting CAB on HIV incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Atlanta, Georgia, a population with a high burden of HIV. The Georgia Department of Public Health has set an ambitious 25% HIV incidence reduction target, which could be reached with a daily-oral PrEP coverage of 42.2%. However, the target could be achieved at lower levels of PrEP coverage (34.6%) if a mix of PrEP modalities was used, such as an equal split of long-acting CAB PrEP and daily-oral PrEP. Our results clearly demonstrate that broadening access to new PrEP options has the potential to facilitate the achievement of public health HIV incidence reduction goals at plausible levels of PrEP coverage.

Outcomes of a pilot randomized clinical trial testing brief interventions to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among rural people who inject drugs attending syringe services programs

Background

Kentucky is one of seven states with high, sustained rural HIV transmission tied to injection drug use. Expanding access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been endorsed as a key HIV prevention strategy; however, uptake among people who inject drugs (PWID) has been negligible in rural areas. Syringe services programs (SSPs) have been implemented throughout Kentucky's Appalachian region, providing an important opportunity to integrate PrEP services.

Objectives

The primary objective was to examine preliminary efficacy and effect sizes of the study interventions on PrEP initiation among HIV-negative PWID.

Design

Parallel group randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Eighty participants were enrolled from two rural SSP locations in southeastern Kentucky. Following informed consent, participants completed a baseline interview, and were randomized to the intervention comparators. The primary endpoint was PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed PrEP prescription, within the 6-month study period. Analyses employed intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol approaches.

Results

In total, 77/80 enrollees (96.2%) completed at least one session of their assigned intervention, regardless of trial arm. Seventy (87.5%) were linked to the embedded PrEP provider for the initial clinical visit; 38 (47.5%) completed a follow-up clinical visit with the provider, 22 (27.5%) were issued a prescription, and 7 (8.8%) initiated PrEP during the study period. We observed a 12.1% difference (14.6% vs 2.5%; ITT) and 12.8% difference (15.4% vs 2.6%; per protocol) in the primary outcome (PrEP initiation), in favor of the experimental intervention.

Conclusion

This pilot trial established proof of concept for integrated PrEP care within SSPs in rural areas, and demonstrated a clinically meaningful difference in PrEP initiation between interventions, which warrants examination in a larger trial. Rates of early care discontinuation indicate a need for ongoing patient engagement strategies and implementation support for community SSPs.

Trial registration

Prospective registration with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05037513 (registered August 5, 2021).

Readiness to implement contingency management to promote PrEP initiation and adherence among people who inject drugs: results from a multi-site implementation survey

BACKGROUND

Contingency management (CM), an incentive-based intervention to encourage target behaviors, effectively promotes medication adherence. However, efforts to extend CM to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have been lacking. As part of a randomized clinical trial to promote HIV Prevention among people who inject drugs (PWID), we examined the readiness of staff in community-based organizations serving PWID to implement CM for PrEP uptake and adherence in this population.

METHODS

From April to August 2022, we conducted a survey of staff from four community-based organizations providing HIV testing, harm reduction, and outreach services in the northeastern United States. We assessed knowledge and attitudes regarding PrEP for PWID on five-point Likert scales (e.g., Poor to Excellent, Not at all to Extremely). Using a modified version of the Contingency Management Beliefs Questionnaire, we assessed the degree to which attitudes about CM for HIV prevention influenced interest in its adoption on a scale from "1-No influence at all" to "5-Very strong influence". We explored endorsement patterns, along with average values of individual items and subscale scores.

RESULTS

Among 271 staff invitations, 123 (45.4%) responded. The majority (88.6%) of respondents reported prior PrEP awareness, with a mean self-rated knowledge of 2.98 out of 5 (SD = 1.1). Attitudes towards PrEP, including its relevance to and importance for clients (both means = 4.3), efficacy (mean = 4.5), and safety (mean = 4.2), were positive. Items related to practicality and confidence in providing PrEP-related care had relatively lower ratings. Respondents endorsed influential generalized (mean = 2.1) and training-related (mean = 2.5) CM implementation barriers less frequently than positive attitudes towards CM (mean = 3.6). Staff favored adding CM to existing services (mean = 3.8), and highly endorsed it as "useful for targeting HIV prevention with PrEP" (mean = 3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents generally supported the use of CM to promote HIV prevention among PWID and favored adding it to their existing services. Though respondents understood the value of both PrEP and CM to support HIV prevention activities, findings corroborate research citing relative lack of knowledge and confidence regarding PrEP management among clients, potentially detracting from implementation readiness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04738825.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV-1: An Assessment of Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Usage Patterns, First Evidence of HIV-1, and HIV-1 Risk Factors in the United States

In clinical trials, once-daily oral tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) significantly reduced HIV-1 acquisition risk; however, this was highly dependent on medication adherence and persistence. We report clinical characteristics, PrEP usage patterns, first evidence of HIV-1, and associated risk factors among adults with commercial insurance using oral PrEP in the United States using health plan claims from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2020, from individuals who newly initiated emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) or FTC/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) for daily PrEP. Overall, 25,419 individuals were included (FTC/TDF, n = 24,232; FTC/TAF, n = 1187), with generally similar characteristics reported during the 6-month baseline period across cohorts. Mean follow-up length was 504 and 77 days for FTC/TDF and FTC/TAF, respectively, corresponding with the 2019 approval of FTC/TAF for PrEP. Similarly, mean PrEP use duration was 354 and 68 days for FTC/TDF and FTC/TAF, respectively. PrEP breaks (>90-day gap) were observed in 11.1% of individuals using FTC/TDF, with a mean break duration of 249 days; 20.0% of individuals using FTC/TDF and 7.3% using FTC/TAF had ≥1 sexually transmitted infection diagnosis during follow-up. From 6 to 12 months of follow-up, mean FTC/TDF proportion of days covered (PDC; 0.74 vs. 0.67) and persistence (70.2% vs. 57.4%) decreased; real-world PDC and persistence were lower than reported in globally conducted clinical trials. First evidence of HIV-1 was infrequent among individuals using FTC/TDF (0.6%), though 60.3% had PrEP on hand when HIV-1 definition was met; high-risk sexual behavior, syphilis, and gonorrhea were the most important risk factors.

Unawareness of partner risk factors thwarts implementation of USPSTF recommendations for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in primary care

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis for persons at high risk of HIV exposure. The optimal screening strategy for at-risk individuals in primary care is not known. We evaluated the strategy of universal screening and discussed challenges to the implementation of this recommendation in primary care. Around 430 of 500 (86%) screening surveys were completed. Mutual monogamy was common but monogamous partners with recent negative HIV testing were uncommon. Likewise, among heterosexually active men and women, inconsistent condom use was common. Such individuals would be on guideline for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) if their partner was at risk for HIV exposure. None of these potentially at-risk individuals met the criteria for PrEP, but 13% lacked knowledge of their partners' sexual and behavioral risk factors, preventing a clear decision on whether PrEP should be used. Our screen identified no individuals who clearly met the guideline criteria for HIV PrEP. We conclude that universal screening for HIV PrEP in primary care is unlikely to be an efficient strategy; targeted screening is likely more appropriate. Moreover, the 2019 guidelines for heterosexually active men and women rely on information that is often unknown to the patient, which makes these guidelines difficult to implement. Future guidelines should address these problems.

Pediatrician Preferences for Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Facilitate HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

PURPOSE

Pediatric primary care clinicians are often uncertain about patients' HIV infection risk and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing guidelines. This study was conducted to help identify ways to design and deliver useful electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts for PrEP to help mitigate this issue.

METHODS

Individual interviews and focus groups with pediatricians explored provider preferences for clinical decision support around PrEP in the EHR. Key themes were identified via the immersion-crystallization qualitative analytic technique.

RESULTS

Clinicians described ideal decision support tools as succinct, helpful in identifying patients at risk of acquiring HIV, providing automated follow-up, and linking to evidence-based prescribing guidelines. Concerns emerged about alert fatigue.

DISCUSSION

This study summarizes clinicians' preferences for EHR tool development to support PrEP provision among pediatricians with limited comfort and experience with prescribing PrEP. These findings can inform the development of PrEP decision support by implementing provider-centered feedback.

HIV preexposure prophylaxis in adolescents and young adults: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an update of evidence for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), including efficacy and safety of newly available medications. It discusses barriers to care that are unique to adolescents and young adults as well as interventions that may help increase uptake, adherence, and retention in care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine and cabotegravir are both newly approved medications for the prevention of HIV and are well tolerated and effective for adolescents. These medications, along with tenofovir disoproxil-emtricitabine, offer a variety of PrEP options to choose from.

SUMMARY

Adolescents and young adults have many options when it comes to HIV prevention, but barriers persist in terms of uptake and adherence to PrEP and retention in care. Technology-based interventions, provider education, navigation support, and multiple access options are all tools to help increase PrEP use in young people.

Preventing Behavioral Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections in Adolescents and Young Adults

HIV prevention in adolescents and young adults (AYA) requires a multi-pronged strategy encompassing behavioral, biologic, and structural approaches. This article reviews the epidemiology of HIV infection in the United States and its pathogenesis and transmission. Prevention approaches are discussed in more detail, with an emphasis on how each approach is relevant to AYA populations. Information is summarized in a resource table with links to references and in-depth discussions of the topics reviewed in this article.

Consensus recommendations for use of long-acting antiretroviral medications in the treatment and prevention of HIV-1: Endorsed by the American Academy of HIV Medicine, American College of Clinical Pharmacy, Canadian HIV and Viral Hepatitis Pharmacists Network, European AIDS Clinical Society, and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Five long-acting (LA) antiretrovirals (ARVs) are currently available in a limited number of countries worldwide for HIV-1 prevention or treatment-cabotegravir, rilpivirine, lenacapavir, ibalizumab, and dapivirine. Implementing use of LA ARVs into routine clinical practice requires significant changes to the current framework of HIV-1 prevention, treatment, and service provision. Given the novelty, complexity, and interdisciplinary requirements needed to safely and optimally utilize LA ARVs, consensus recommendations on the use of LA ARVs will assist clinicians in optimizing use of these agents. The purpose of these recommendations is to provide guidance for the clinical use of LA ARVs for HIV-1 treatment and prevention. In addition, future areas of research are also identified and discussed.

Long-acting injectable ART to advance health equity: a descriptive analysis of US clinic perspectives on barriers, needed support and programme goals for implementation from applications to the ALAI UP Project

INTRODUCTION

Approval of the first long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI ART) medication heralded a new era of HIV treatment. However, the years since approval have been marked by implementation challenges. The "Accelerating Implementation of Multilevel Strategies to Advance Long-Acting Injectable for Underserved Populations (ALAI UP Project)" aims to accelerate the systematic and equitable delivery of LAI ART.

METHODS

We coded and analysed implementation barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains, desired resources and programme goals from questionnaire short-answer responses by clinics across the United States responding to ALAI UP's solicitation to participate in the project between November 2022 and January 2023.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight clinics responded to ALAI UP's solicitation. The characteristics of LAI ART as an innovation (cost, complexity of procurement, dosing interval, limited eligibility) precipitated and interacted with barriers in other CFIR domains. Barriers included obtaining coverage for the cost of medication (27/38 clinics) (outer setting); need for new workflows and staffing (12/38) and/or systems to support injection scheduling/coordination (16/38), transportation and expanded clinic hours (13/38) (inner setting); and patient (10/38) and provider (7/38) education (individuals). To support implementation, applicants sought: technical assistance to develop protocols and workflows (18/38), specifically strategies to address payor challenges (8/38); additional staff for care coordination and benefits navigation (17/38); opportunities to share experiences with other implementing clinics (12/38); patient-facing materials to educate and increase demand (7/38); and support engaging communities (6/38). Clinics' LAI ART programme goals varied. Most prioritized delivering LAI ART to their most marginalized patients struggling to achieve viral suppression on oral therapy, despite awareness that current US Food and Drug Administration approval is only for virally suppressed patients. The goal for LAI ART reach after 1 year of implementation ranged from ≤10% of patients with HIV on LAI ART (17/38) to ≥50% of patients (2/38).

CONCLUSIONS

Diverse clinic types are interested in offering LAI ART and most aspire to use LAI ART to support their most vulnerable patients sustain viral suppression. Dedicated resources centred on equity and relevant to context and population are needed to support implementation. Otherwise, the introduction of LAI ART risks exacerbating, not ameliorating, health disparities.

STI/HIV testing, STIs, and HIV PrEP use among men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) in United States, 2019-2022

BACKGROUND

Routine sexually transmitted infection and human immunodeficiency virus (STI/HIV) testing and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use are recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) at increased risk of HIV.

METHODS

Using Healthverity, a large administrative dataset in the United States, we assessed STI/HIV testing, chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity by specimen type, and HIV PrEP use among MSM and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) at their first visits (index date) for those at increased risk of HIV and STIs from 2019 through 2022.

RESULTS

Among 81,716 MSM and MSMW aged 15-64 years at their index date visit, STI testing rates were 57.9% for chlamydia, 58.1% for gonorrhea, and 52.2% for syphilis testing, respectively; 55.5%, 30.9%, and 18.1% had HIV testing, HIV PrEP use, and PrEP initiation, respectively, among the patients who did not have HIV. Of patients with chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, 48% were tested from the genital site only and 25% from three anatomic sites (rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital). Chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity was 9.8% for chlamydia rectal infection, 7.3% for gonorrhea rectal infection, and 5.3% for gonorrhea pharyngeal infection.

CONCLUSION

Our results present current medical services provided during initial clinic visits for MSM and MSMW in private outpatient settings. Our study suggests that the assessment of STI/HIV testing is periodically needed due to the high prevalence of infection, and efforts to promote HIV PrEP for MSM and MSMW in private settings are urgently needed.

PrEP facilitators and barriers in substance use bridge clinics for women who engage in sex work and who use drugs

BACKGROUND

Women who engage in sex work and use drugs (WSWUD) experience disproportionate HIV risks. Substance use treatment bridge clinics offer an opportunity to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery to WSWUD, but research on best practices is lacking. Therefore, we explored facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the PrEP care continuum in these settings.

METHODS

Bridge clinic and affiliated harm reduction health service providers and WSWUD from Boston were recruited using passive and active outreach between December 2021 and August 2022. Participants were invited to take part in semi-structured phone or in-person interviews to explore HIV prevention and PrEP care experiences overall and within bridge clinic settings. Deductive codes were developed based on HIV risk environment frameworks and the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model and inductive codes were added based on transcript review. Grounded content analysis was used to generate themes organized around the PrEP care continuum.

RESULTS

The sample included 14 providers and 25 WSWUD. Most WSWUD were aware of PrEP and more than half had initiated PrEP at some point. However, most who initiated PrEP did not report success with daily oral adherence. Providers and WSWUD described facilitators and barriers to PrEP across the steps of the care continuum: Awareness, uptake, adherence, and retention. Facilitators for WSWUD included non-stigmatizing communication with providers, rapid wraparound substance use treatment and HIV services, having a PrEP routine, and service structures to support PrEP adherence. Barriers included low HIV risk perceptions and competing drug use and survival priorities. Provider facilitators included clinical note templates prompting HIV risk assessments and training. Barriers included discomfort discussing sex work risks, competing clinical priorities, and a lack of PrEP adherence infrastructure.

CONCLUSION

WSWUD and bridge clinic providers favored integrated HIV prevention and substance use services in harm reduction and bridge clinic settings. Harm reduction and bridge clinic programs played a key role in HIV prevention and PrEP education for WSWUD. Effective behavioral and structural interventions are still needed to improve PrEP adherence for WSWUD.

Using Electronic Health Records to Improve HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Care: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains limited and inequitable, and strategies are needed to improve PrEP provision in primary care.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster randomized trial at Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support intervention guided by an electronic health record (EHR)-based HIV risk prediction model to improve PrEP provision. Primary care providers (PCPs) were randomized to usual care or intervention, with PCPs who provide care to people with HIV balanced between arms. PCPs in the intervention arm received an EHR-based staff message with prompts to discuss HIV prevention and PrEP before upcoming in-person or video visits with patients whose predicted 3-year HIV risk was above a prespecified threshold. The main study outcome was initiation of PrEP care within 90 days, defined as PrEP discussions, referrals, or prescription fills.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one PCPs had 5051 appointments with eligible patients (2580 usual care; 2471 intervention). There was a nonsignificant increase in initiation of PrEP care in the intervention arm (6.0% vs 4.5%, HR 1.32, 95% CI: 0.84 to 2.1). There was a significant interaction by HIV provider status, with an intervention HR of 2.59 (95% CI: 1.30 to 5.16) for HIV providers and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.35) for non-HIV providers (P-interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSION

An EHR-based intervention guided by an HIV risk prediction model substantially increased initiation of PrEP care among patients of PCPs who also care for people with HIV. Higher-intensity interventions may be needed to improve PrEP provision among PCPs less familiar with PrEP and HIV care.

How Would You Manage HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in This Patient With Medical Comorbidities? : Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Despite advances in treatment, HIV infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with more than 30 000 new cases diagnosed in the United States each year. There are several interventions traditionally used to prevent HIV transmission, but these vary in effectiveness and there are challenges to their implementation. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published initial guidance on the use of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent transmission of HIV infection in persons at risk based on multiple studies that showed it to be highly efficacious in various populations. It was updated in 2021 to reflect new drug options. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force also recently updated its recommendations for PrEP, which strongly support its use in persons at risk. Despite its well-established effectiveness, the implementation of PrEP in clinical practice has been variable, especially among populations underserved by the medical system and marginalized by society. Fewer than one third of persons in the United States who are eligible for PrEP currently receive it. Here, 2 physicians experienced in HIV PrEP debate how best to identify patients who might benefit from PrEP, how to decide what regimen to use, and how to monitor therapy.

PrEP Discontinuation In A US National Cohort Of Sexual And Gender Minority Populations, 2017-22

In the US, sexual and gender minority populations are disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a key prevention method, but its effectiveness relies on consistent usage. Our four-year national cohort study explored PrEP discontinuation among sexual and gender minority people who initiated PrEP. We found a high annual rate of discontinuation (35-40 percent) after PrEP initiation. Multivariable analysis with 6,410 person-years identified housing instability and prior history of PrEP discontinuation as predictors of discontinuation. Conversely, older age, clinical indication for PrEP, and having health insurance were associated with ongoing PrEP use. To promote sustained PrEP use, strategies should focus on supporting those at high risk for discontinuation, such as younger people, those without stable housing or health insurance, and prior PrEP discontinuers.

Neurosyphilis: insights into its pathogenesis, susceptibility, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

Background and aim

Invasion of the central nervous system by Treponema pallidum can occur at any stage of syphilis. In the event that T. pallidum is not cleared promptly, certain individuals may experience progression to neurosyphilis, which manifests as cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, limb paralysis, and potentially fatal outcomes. Early identification or prevention of neurosyphilis is therefore crucial. The aim of this paper is to conduct a critical and narrative review of the latest information focusing exclusively to the pathogenesis and clinical management of neurosyphilis.

Methodology

To compile this review, we have conducted electronic literature searches from the PubMed database relating to neurosyphilis. Priority was given to studies published from the past 10 years (from 2013 to 2023) and other studies if they were of significant importance (from 1985 to 2012), including whole genome sequencing results, cell structure of T. pallidum, history of genotyping, and other related topics. These studies are classic or reflect a developmental process.

Results

Neurosyphilis has garnered global attention, yet susceptibility to and the pathogenesis of this condition remain under investigation. Cerebrospinal fluid examination plays an important role in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis, but lacks the gold standard. Intravenous aqueous crystalline penicillin G continues to be the recommended therapeutic approach for neurosyphilis. Considering its sustained prominence, it is imperative to develop novel public health tactics in order to manage the resurgence of neurosyphilis.

Conclusion

This review gives an updated narrative description of neurosyphilis with special emphasis on its pathogenesis, susceptibility, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among Black/African American men who have sex with other men in Iowa: COM-B model analysis

Background

In Iowa, men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 54% of persons with HIV in 2022 and Non-Hispanic Black/African Americans were over 10 times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than Non-Hispanic white Iowans. To address this disparity in HIV incidence and prevalence, the United States (US) government ending the HIV epidemic (EHE) initiative seeks to expand pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) coverage across the United States. Recent data showed that PrEP coverage is suboptimal in Iowa (a rural state), and Black Iowans were less likely to engage with PrEP services.

Objectives

Using capability, opportunity, motivation and behavior (COM-B) model for behavior change, this study sought to identify the key barriers and facilitators to PrEP uptake among Black/African American MSM in small urban areas in Iowa.

Design

This was a phenomenological study aimed to explore subjective views of Black MSM on PrEP use.

Methods

In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 Black MSM aged 20-42 years in two small urban counties. Broad themes identified from the interview transcripts were analyzed inductively and mapped onto the COM-B constructs deductively.

Results

Results showed that barriers to PrEP uptake were closely associated with five (of six) COM-B subcomponents: physical capability, psychological capability, social opportunity, reflective motivation, and automatic motivation. The thematized barriers were (1) lack of medical insurance; (2) limited PrEP awareness; (3) PrEP stigma; (4) fear of distrust among partners; (5) anticipated side effects; and (6) doubt about PrEP effectiveness. Similarly, facilitators to PrEP uptake were aligned with four subcomponents of COM-B model: physical capability, psychological capability, social opportunity, and physical opportunity. The thematized facilitators were (1) increased PrEP awareness; (2) PrEP access without discrimination; (3) state provision of PrEP to uninsured; and (4) physicians buy-in and recommendation. No motivation-related facilitators were reported.

Conclusion

To reduce the current disparity in HIV incidence and to achieve the EHE goals of expanding PrEP coverage in Iowa, efforts should be directed toward the provision of low-cost or free PrEP services, healthcare providers' training on cultural competence, and the development of culturally appropriate strategies to deliver PrEP to the Black MSM community.

Implementing an Automated Prediction Model to Improve Prescribing of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis

Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is nearly 100% effective at decreasing HIV acquisition but is underused in priority populations. Primary care clinicians need tools to help them identify persons likely to benefit from PrEP use and prescribe it when appropriate. The researchers developed and validated an automated decision support tool with interactive alerts in the electronic health record to increase PrEP discussions and prescribing in primary care. They piloted the tool at three federally qualified health centers and assessed feasibility, acceptance by clinicians, and preliminary impact on PrEP care. Of 33,803 patients who visited the pilot clinics from July 2022 through January 2023, providers received PrEP alerts at the point of care for 2.2% of patients, demonstrating feasibility. Although numbers of PrEP prescriptions remained low, the proportion of all patients with new PrEP prescriptions was 4.5 times higher at pilot clinics compared with matched control clinics (0.09% vs. 0.02%). Implementation of the decision support tool was associated with a statistically nonsignificant 5.5% increase in HIV tests per 100 patients. In qualitative interviews, providers said the tool facilitated PrEP discussions with patients, particularly for those patients who would not have initiated discussions because of stigma. The researchers found that acceptance, use, and impact of machine-learning models for PrEP depends on collaborating with and building trust among providers, including blending a data-driven approach to identifying patients at increased risk for HIV acquisition with providers' traditional decision-making framework. These approaches could be useful for health care organizations seeking to implement automated prediction models across all areas of medicine.

Knowledge, sex, and region associated with primary care providers prescribing adolescents HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

Although HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively and safely prevents HIV among adolescents, uptake of PrEP is low. Adolescents must have primary care providers (PCPs) prescribe them PrEP, making PCPs critical actors in PrEP delivery. However, research has primarily investigated determinants of PCPs' intention to prescribe adolescents PrEP rather than the determinants of performing the behavior itself. We examined the demographic, clinical practice, and implementation determinants of PCPs previously prescribing PrEP to adolescents. PCPs were recruited from a national Qualtrics panel of licensed medical providers in the United States from July 15-August 19, 2022. The Theoretical Domains Framework informed the implementation determinants measured. A multivariable logistic regression was used. PCPs who were more knowledgeable of the CDC guidelines (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 2.16-4.10), who were assigned male at birth (aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.59), and who practiced in the Western region (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04-3.30) had greater odds of prior prescribing adolescents PrEP. Provider-based educational interventions should be designed, implemented, and tested to encourage PCPs to prescribe PrEP to eligible adolescents.