Association of Surgical Risk With Exogenous Hormone Use in Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review

Multidisciplinary management of sexual and gender minorities with bladder cancer

Bladder cancer, a common urologic malignancy, has poor morbidity and mortality in sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals, stemming from higher risk, poor access to care and lack of quality cancer care. To begin addressing this disparity, this review offers key considerations for evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of SGM individuals with bladder cancer. In addition to thorough medical and surgical history, initial evaluation should include discussion of patient goals for sexual function and organ preservation, as well as an evaluation of sexual function. Prior gender affirming surgery and patient specific sexual function goals will impact diagnosis and treatment approaches, including surgical and radiation therapy. Throughout care for SGM individuals with bladder cancer, it is critical to acknowledge the systemic discrimination that may be experienced by these individuals and approach conversations with sensitivity and humility and incorporate mental and social support as appropriate.

Peri-operative care of transgender and gender-diverse individuals: guidance for clinicians and departments

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this document is to guide best practice to ensure the safety and dignity of transgender and gender-diverse people in the peri-operative period. While transgender and gender-diverse people may have specific health needs in relation to gender dysphoria, their health requirements go beyond their gender identity. Most doctors will provide care to someone who is transgender or gender-diverse at some stage in their career. It is therefore important that all anaesthetists are educated on specific considerations when caring for these patients.

METHODS

A working party was assembled consisting of individuals with experience in direct clinical care of the relevant patient group, those who have expertise in endocrinology and gender-affirming hormones, educators on the topic of transgender and gender-diverse healthcare, and authors of both cisgender and transgender identities. After discussion among the working party, targeted searches of literature were undertaken.

RESULTS

The authors initially came up with a list of over 25 recommendations which was subsequently revised to a list of 15 recommendations after further review by the working party. These included airway assessment and management; management of hormonal therapy; relevant issues in obstetric anaesthesia; and hospital infrastructure and processes.

CONCLUSIONS

This document provides the first guidance produced to advise on best practice to ensure the safety and dignity of trans and gender-diverse individuals in the peri-operative period.

Enhanced Recovery After Gender-Affirming Surgery

The adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in multiple surgical disciplines has revolutionized perioperative care, demonstrating reduced complications and shorter hospital stays across surgical specialties. ERAS protocols have increasingly been incorporated in plastic surgery, yet a notable gap in the literature on ERAS for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) still exists. A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies on ERAS protocols in GAS. The aim of this review was to assess the current status of ERAS adoption in GAS, evaluate its impact on perioperative care, and provide recommendations for future research and clinical practice. While there is an overall scarcity of evidence-based ERAS protocols across GAS, published studies on the application of ERAS in GAS have demonstrated promising early outcomes and illustrate an area for further investigation and innovation in plastic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5

Venous Thromboembolism and Estrogen-Containing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

Gender-affirming therapy involves the use of hormones to develop the physical characteristics of the identified gender and suppressing endogenous sex hormone production. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known risk of exogenous estrogen therapy, and while evidence of VTE risk among transgender women using modern gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is still emerging, it is thought to affect up to 5% of transgender women. Historically, GAHT was associated with a high risk of VTE; however, modern preparations are less thrombogenic mainly due to significantly lower doses used as well as different preparations. This review presents the available literature regarding the following four topics: (1) risk of VTE among transgender women receiving estradiol GAHT, (2) how the route of administration of estradiol affects the VTE risk, (3) perioperative management of GAHT, (4) VTE risk among adolescents on GAHT. There is a need for large, longitudinal studies of transgender women using GAHT to further characterize VTE risk and how this is affected by factors such as patient age, duration of GAHT use, tobacco use, body mass index, and comorbidities. Future studies in these areas could inform the development of clinical guidelines to improve the care of transgender people.

Patterns of Perioperative Hormone Therapy for Gender-Affirming Surgery

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding perioperative hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for gender-affirming surgery (GAS). Common concerns for continuing perioperative HRT included risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or hematoma. However, discontinuing HRT is not risk free and may cause mood swing or increased anxiety. Our study aimed to investigate current patterns of HRT before GAS worldwide.

METHODS

The first stage of Delphi technique was implemented by sending a 27-item survey to all surgeons (total n = 150; 94 plastic surgeon, 35 urologist, and 21 gynecologists) of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health who perform GAS. Survey themes included the hormone type, duration, and usage of DVT prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Overall survey response rate was 34% (total n = 51; 8 urologists, 35 plastic surgeons, and 8 gynecologists). The majority of surgeons are US-based (n = 39, 76%). The most common HRTs are in injection form (n = 28, 55%). The majority of surgeons do not stop HRT before GAS and do provide DVT prophylaxis to all patients <1 week after GAS. The most common procedure that surgeons discontinue HRT is feminizing bottom surgery (43%). For surgeons who discontinue HRT before GAS, there is a wide variation on discontinuation schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in perioperative HRT patterns for GAS. Further research is needed to develop a data-driven consensus guideline to provide high quality of care for transgender and nonbinary patients.

Liver transplantation for people of minoritised sexual and gender identities in the USA

The number of people who report to be of minoritised sexual or gender identities in the USA, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexuality-diverse and gender-diverse identities, has been increasing in the past decade. This diverse and unique population continues to experience not only health disparities but also psychosocial, economic, and legal disparities in accessing and receiving health care, including liver transplantations. As liver transplantation is life-saving for people with end-stage liver disease, understanding the factors that can affect access to and quality of liver transplantation care in people of minoritised sexual and gender identities in the USA, including differential social supports, insurance coverage, and medical and psychiatric comorbidities, is crucial. Actions, such as collecting sexual orientation and gender identity data, implementing inclusive language, recognising implicit biases, building diverse teams, providing a safer environment, and supporting further research to understand the unique health challenges are needed to ensure equitable access to high-quality liver transplantation care for people of minoritised sexual and gender identities.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Insurance Claims Database

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence and associated risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after gender affirming vaginoplasty.

METHODS

We searched International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) Marketscan, a commercial claims database, for Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) procedure codes to identify patients who underwent gender affirming vaginoplasty from 2011-2020. We quantified deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes found within 90 days after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish association between VTE events and age, residency location, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

We identified 1588 patients who underwent gender affirming vaginoplasty. Overall, 1.1% of patients experienced a VTE within 90 days following surgery. Patients who experienced postoperative VTE were older, more likely to have had a prior VTE, less likely to be from an urban area, and more likely to have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Among patients with postoperative VTE, 47.1% had previous VTE. Among patients without a postoperative VTE, 1.3% had previous VTE.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing gender affirming vaginoplasty, the incidence of postoperative VTE was 1.1%. Older age, rurality, increased comorbidities, and prior VTE were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE. Current guidelines do not recommend cessation of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prior to vaginoplasty. Further research is needed to evaluate if certain high-risk patients would benefit from perioperative adjustment of GAHT or perioperative VTE prophylaxis.

High Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Transgender Women Undergoing Facial Feminization Procedures

Background

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a significant concern due to its impact on patient comfort, recovery time, and extended hospital stay. Previous research links higher PONV rates in women during their periovulatory phase to estrogen. This study investigates the PONV risk in transgender women after facial feminization surgery.

Methods

Retrospective chart reviews of transgender women aged older than 18 undergoing facial feminization from 2014 to 2020 were undertaken. Data included demographics, hormone use history, comorbidities, and PONV history. PONV was classified as any nausea/vomiting episode before discharge. Anesthesia records were examined, and PACU notes were analyzed for PONV indicators. A cis-gender male and female cohort undergoing rhinoplasty served as controls.

Results

Of the 282 transgender women receiving facial feminization surgery, 104 experienced PONV, marking a 37% PONV rate. Compared with the 11% PONV rate among cis-gender rhinoplasty patients, this was notably higher. Hormone therapy discontinuation showed no influence on PONV incidence.

Conclusions

Transgender women undergoing facial feminization surgery have a 38% PONV rate, surpassing the 11% rate in cis-gender rhinoplasty patients and the general 20%-30% rate for all procedures, including the 25% for oral and maxillofacial surgery. This suggests a heightened PONV risk for transgender women after facial feminization procedures.

Perioperative Care of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people endure numerous physical and mental health disparities secondary to lifelong stigma and marginalization, which are often perpetuated in medical spaces. Despite such barriers, TGD people are seeking gender-affirming care (GAC) with increased frequency. GAC facilitates the transition from the sex assigned at birth to the affirmed gender identity and is comprised of hormone therapy (HT) and gender-affirming surgery (GAS). The anesthesia professional is uniquely poised to serve as an integral support for TGD patients within the perioperative space. To provide affirmative perioperative care to TGD patients, anesthesia professionals should understand and attend to the biological, psychological, and social dimensions of health that are relevant to this population. This review outlines the biological factors that impact the perioperative care of TGD patients, such as the management of estrogen and testosterone HT, safe use of sugammadex, interpretation of laboratory values in the context of HT, pregnancy testing, drug dosing, breast binding, altered airway and urethral anatomy after prior GAS, pain management, and other GAS considerations. Psychosocial factors are reviewed, including mental health disparities, health care provider mistrust, effective patient communication, and the interplay of these factors in the postanesthesia care unit. Finally, recommendations to improve TGD perioperative care are reviewed through an organizational approach with an emphasis on TGD-focused medical education. These factors are discussed through the lens of patient affirmation and advocacy with the intent to educate the anesthesia professional on the perioperative management of TGD patients.

Sociodemographics of Patient Populations Undergoing Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Systematic Review of All Cohort Studies

Importance

Sociodemographic and health characteristics of patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) are currently unknown. Understanding these patient characteristics is vital to optimizing patient-centered care for transgender patients.

Objective

To determine sociodemographic characteristics for the transgender population undergoing GAS. Collected sociodemographic information included the following: age, race/ethnicity, body metrics, hormone replacement therapy administration and duration, substance use, psychiatric comorbidities, and medical comorbidities.

Evidence Review

A search of seven electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Gender Studies) was used to find all articles on GAS from inception through May 2019. The 15,190 articles were then subjected to two levels of screening, and articles unrelated to gender-affirming care, unavailable in English, n<5, and with no outcomes reporting were excluded. Textbook chapters and letters were also excluded.

Findings

A total of 406 studies were fully extracted, with 307 studies reporting age (n=22,727 patients), 19 reporting race/ethnicity (n=1184), 74 reporting body metrics (body mass index [BMI] n=6852, height n=416, and weight n=475), 58 reporting hormone therapies (n=5104), 56 reporting substance use (n=1146), 44 reporting psychiatric comorbidities (n=574), and 47 reporting medical comorbidities (n=573). From the 406 studies, 80 were done in the United States. Regarding U.S. studies, 59 studies reported age (n=5365), 10 reported race/ethnicity (n=709), 22 reported body metrics (BMI n=2519), 18 reported hormone therapies (n=3285), 15 reported substance use (n=478), 44 reported psychiatric comorbidities (n=394), and 47 reported medical comorbidities (n=293). Age was the most reported characteristic, reported in 75.62% of studies (73.75% of U.S. studies). Race/ethnicity was the least commonly reported data, reported in 4.68% of studies (12.50% of U.S. studies).

Conclusions and Relevance

The type of sociodemographic information reported by GAS studies is inconsistently reported. To improve patient-centered care for transgender patients, further work is needed to create a standardization of collected sociodemographic information.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy, mental health, and surgical considerations for aging transgender and gender diverse adults

As the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population ages, more transfeminine and transmasculine individuals present to clinic to initiate or continue their gender-affirming care at older ages. Currently available guidelines on gender-affirming care are excellent resources for the provision of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), primary care, surgery, and mental health care but are limited in their scope as to whether recommendations require tailoring to older TGD adults. Data that inform guideline-recommended management considerations, while informative and increasingly evidence-based, mainly come from studies of younger TGD populations. Whether results from these studies, and therefore recommendations, can or should be extrapolated to aging TGD adults remains to be determined. In this perspective review, we acknowledge the lack of data in older TGD adults and discuss considerations for evaluating cardiovascular disease, hormone-sensitive cancers, bone health and cognitive health, gender-affirming surgery, and mental health in the older TGD population on GAHT.

Transgender health and the impact of aging and menopause

Gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is used by many transgender people to reduce gender incongruence and improve psychological functioning. As GAHT shares many similarities with menopausal hormone therapy, clinicians supporting people through menopause are ideally placed to manage GAHT. This narrative review provides an overview of transgender health and discusses long-term effects of GAHT to consider when managing transgender individuals across the lifespan. Menopause is less relevant for transgender individuals who take GAHT (often given lifelong) to achieve sex steroid concentrations generally in the range of the affirmed gender. For people using feminizing hormone therapy, there is an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke and osteoporosis relative to cisgender individuals. For trans people using masculinizing hormone therapy, there is an increased risk of polycythemia, probable higher risk of myocardial infarction and pelvic pain which is poorly understood. Proactive mitigation of cardiovascular risk factors is important for all transgender people and optimization of bone health is important for those using feminizing hormones. With a lack of research to guide GAHT in older age, a shared decision-making approach is recommended for the provision of GAHT to achieve individual goals whilst minimizing potential adverse effects.

Principles and outcomes of gender-affirming vaginoplasty

Vaginoplasty is the most frequently performed gender-affirming genital surgery for gender-diverse people with genital gender incongruence. The procedure is performed to create an aesthetic and functional vulva and vaginal canal that enables receptive intercourse, erogenous clitoral sensation and a downward-directed urine stream. Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a single surgical procedure involving anatomical component rearrangement of the penis and scrotum that enables many patients to meet these anatomical goals. Other options include minimal-depth, peritoneal and intestinal vaginoplasty. Patient quality of life has been shown to improve drastically after vaginoplasty, but complication rates have been documented to be as high as 70%. Fortunately, most complications do not alter long-term postoperative clinical outcomes and can be managed without surgical intervention in the acute perioperative phase. However, major complications, such as rectal injury, rectovaginal fistula, and urethral or introital stenosis can substantially affect the patient experience. Innovations in surgical approaches and techniques have demonstrated promising early results for reducing complications and augmenting vaginal depth, but long-term data are scarce.

Perioperative Hormone Management in Gender-Affirming Mastectomy: Is Stopping Testosterone before Top Surgery Really Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming mastectomy, or "top surgery," has become one of the most frequently performed procedures for transgender and nonbinary patients. However, management of perioperative testosterone therapy remains controversial. Despite a lack of supporting evidence, many surgeons require cessation of testosterone before top surgery. This is the first study to compare complication rates in patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy with and without discontinuation of perioperative testosterone.

METHODS

This retrospective review included patients undergoing top surgery by the senior author between 2017 and 2020. Reflecting a change in the senior author's practice, before May of 2019, all patients were required to discontinue testosterone before surgery; all patients treated after this point continued their testosterone regimens throughout the perioperative period. Patients were stratified according to testosterone regimen and perioperative hormone management, with demographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes compared among groups.

RESULTS

A total of 490 patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy during the study period were included. Testosterone was held perioperatively in 175 patients and continued in 211 patients; 104 patients never received testosterone therapy. Demographic characteristics were similar among groups and there was no difference in rates of hematoma (2.9% versus 2.8% versus 2.9%, respectively; P = 0.99), seroma (1.1% versus 0% versus 1%, respectively; P = 0.31), venous thromboembolism (0% versus 0.5% versus 0%, respectively; P = 0.99), or overall complications (6.9% versus 4.3% versus 5.8%, respectively; P = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate no difference in postoperative complication rates among groups. Whereas further investigation is warranted, our data suggest that routine cessation of testosterone in the perioperative period is not necessary for patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

IDEA Group Consensus Statement on Medical Management of Adult Gender Incongruent Individuals Seeking Gender Affirmation as Male

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is the most frequent treatment offered to gender-incongruent individuals, which reduces dysphoria. The goal of therapy among gender-incongruent individuals seeking gender affirmation as male is to change their secondary sex characteristics to affect masculine physical appearances. GAHT greatly improves mental health and quality of life among gender incongruent individuals. India-specific guideline for appropriate care for gender-incongruent individuals is almost absent. This document is intended to assist endocrinologists and other healthcare professionals interested in gender incongruity for individuals seeking gender affirmation as male. A safe and effective GAHT regimen aims to effect masculinising physical features without adverse effects. In this document, we offer suggestions based on an in-depth review of national and international guidelines, recently available evidence and collegial meetings with expert Indian clinicians working in this field. Clinicians represented in our expert panel have developed expertise due to the volume of gender incongruent individuals they manage. This consensus statement provides protocols for the hormone prescribing physicians relating to diagnosis, baseline evaluation and counselling, prescription planning for masculinising hormone therapy, choice of therapy, targets for monitoring masculinising hormone therapy, clinical and biochemical monitoring, recommending sex affirmation surgery and peri-operative hormone therapy. The recommendations made in this document are not rigid guidelines, and the hormone-prescribing physicians are encouraged to modify the suggested protocol to address emerging issues.

A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of 180 Transmasculine Patients Undergoing Gender-Affirming Mastectomy While Continuing Masculinizing Hormone Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming mastectomy is a fundamental step in the transition process of transmasculine patients following the initiation of hormone replacement therapy. Its perioperative management, however, remains underreported and controversial. In this study, a large series of mastectomies in transmen maintaining hormonal therapy is presented.

METHODS

Over a 10-year study period, a consecutive series of 180 transmasculine patients undergoing chest masculinizing surgery was evaluated. Demographical and surgical data were collected and analyzed for potential factors influencing outcome.

RESULTS

The overall rate of complications was 15.5%. Patients who underwent periareolar incision mastectomy were significantly more likely to develop any type of complication than patients with a sub-mammary incision (28.6% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.045). Hematoma was the most common reason for surgical revision. It occurred significantly more often among the periareolar group (21.4% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.041). Duration and type of hormonal therapy did not differ between patients with or without complications. In a multivariate regression analysis, smoking and type of incision were identified as significant predictors of the all-cause complication rate, whereas the influence of BMI and resection weight diminished after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

There is scarcity of information concerning the influence of perioperative hormonal therapy in patients undergoing chest wall masculinization. The observed complication rates-with special regard to hematoma-were comparable to current reports; yet further research is needed to profoundly evaluate this topic and provide evidence-based recommendations for the perioperative management of HRT of transmasculine patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Transgender Medicine and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Gender dysphoria refers to psychological distress that results from an incongruence between gender identity and sex assigned at birth. Administration of sex hormones is most often used as a first step to develop and maintain physical characteristics consistent with gender identity. Gender-affirming hormone treatment is considered beneficial for the quality of life and reduction of depression. However, estrogen and androgen-lowering hormone therapies used in transwomen are in particular associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism. In this review, introduced by a clinical case, we provide an overview of the currently available medical therapies in transgender medicine, and put the associated increased risk of venous thromboembolism into perspective.

Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8

Background: Transgender healthcare is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented increase in the number and visibility of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people seeking support and gender-affirming medical treatment in parallel with a significant rise in the scientific literature in this area. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) is an international, multidisciplinary, professional association whose mission is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, public policy, and respect in transgender health. One of the main functions of WPATH is to promote the highest standards of health care for TGD people through the Standards of Care (SOC). The SOC was initially developed in 1979 and the last version (SOC-7) was published in 2012. In view of the increasing scientific evidence, WPATH commissioned a new version of the Standards of Care, the SOC-8. Aim: The overall goal of SOC-8 is to provide health care professionals (HCPs) with clinical guidance to assist TGD people in accessing safe and effective pathways to achieving lasting personal comfort with their gendered selves with the aim of optimizing their overall physical health, psychological well-being, and self-fulfillment. Methods: The SOC-8 is based on the best available science and expert professional consensus in transgender health. International professionals and stakeholders were selected to serve on the SOC-8 committee. Recommendation statements were developed based on data derived from independent systematic literature reviews, where available, background reviews and expert opinions. Grading of recommendations was based on the available evidence supporting interventions, a discussion of risks and harms, as well as the feasibility and acceptability within different contexts and country settings. Results: A total of 18 chapters were developed as part of the SOC-8. They contain recommendations for health care professionals who provide care and treatment for TGD people. Each of the recommendations is followed by explanatory text with relevant references. General areas related to transgender health are covered in the chapters Terminology, Global Applicability, Population Estimates, and Education. The chapters developed for the diverse population of TGD people include Assessment of Adults, Adolescents, Children, Nonbinary, Eunuchs, and Intersex Individuals, and people living in Institutional Environments. Finally, the chapters related to gender-affirming treatment are Hormone Therapy, Surgery and Postoperative Care, Voice and Communication, Primary Care, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, and Mental Health. Conclusions: The SOC-8 guidelines are intended to be flexible to meet the diverse health care needs of TGD people globally. While adaptable, they offer standards for promoting optimal health care and guidance for the treatment of people experiencing gender incongruence. As in all previous versions of the SOC, the criteria set forth in this document for gender-affirming medical interventions are clinical guidelines; individual health care professionals and programs may modify these in consultation with the TGD person.

Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss perineal and robotic approaches to gender-affirming vaginoplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Davydov peritoneal vaginoplasty has its origins in neovaginal reconstruction for vaginal agenesis. It has been adapted as a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure and provides an alternative to perineal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Both techniques represent variations of penile inversion vaginoplasty with successful outcomes and overall low rates of major complications reported in the literature. However, there are differing advantages and considerations to each approach. A perineal approach has been the gold standard to gender-affirming vaginoplasty for many decades. Robotic peritoneal gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) is an emerging alternative, with potential advantages including less reliance on extragenital skin grafts in individuals with minimal genital tissue, especially among patients presenting with pubertal suppression, and safer dissection in revision vaginoplasty for stenosis of the proximal neovaginal canal. Additional risks of RPGAV include those associated with robotic abdominal surgeries.

LGBTQ+ health and anaesthesia for obstetric and gynaecological procedures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People who self-identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirited and intersex (LGBTQ2SI) make up approximately 10% of the US population. Black, Native American and Latino/a/x communities are known to have a higher percentage of people who self-identify as LGBTQ2SI than white communities. Despite growing acceptance of LGBTQ2SI communities in the USA, these populations continue to experience health inequities. This review article will provide a narrative review of recent publications that discuss topics of LGBTQ2SI health and anaesthetic care during obstetric and gynaecological procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Of the articles reviewed for this study, there were four main themes that emerged: inclusion of LGBTQ2SI health topics in curriculum and provider training materials; social determinants of LGBTQ2SI reproductive and overall health; improving the quality and safety of perioperative care for LGBTQ2SI communities; and disparities in perinatal anaesthetic care for LGTBQ2SI communities.

SUMMARY

There are unique considerations when providing anaesthetic care for obstetric and gynaecological procedures to LGBTQ2SI communities. There is a limited, yet growing, body of literature exploring this aspect of perioperative and perinatal care. Researchers and clinicians must continue to pursue clinical research which seeks to improve the quality of care we provide all patients.

Surgical Implications of LGBTQ+ Health Disparities: A Review

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) patients face challenging health care disparities. However, due to restrictions in reporting and collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) demographic data, comprehensive studies of surgical disparities in the LGBTQ+ population are limited. This review aims to summarize the existing literature describing surgical disparities in LGBTQ+ patients and to identify areas of surgical care in which further studies are warranted. This review addresses the literature in infectious diseases, substance use disorders, bariatrics, cardiovascular medicine, oncology, and laryngology as relevant to surgical practice. Understanding the current landscape of knowledge in LGBTQ+ surgical disparities and the areas where gaps in research exist will help the surgeon to create a framework of practice to provide more equitable care to LGBTQ+ patients.

The Effect of Preoperative Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Use on Perioperative Adverse Events in Transmasculine Individuals Undergoing Masculinizing Chest Surgery for Gender Affirmation

BACKGROUND

Many providers require cessation of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender patients prior to undergoing masculinizing chest surgery due to concern for increased adverse events in the presence of exogenous hormones. Evidence has suggested that continuation of GAHT for certain patients may be safe for gender affirming procedures.

OBJECTIVES

To compare adverse event rates in GAHT cessation versus GAHT continuation in patients undergoing masculinizing chest surgery.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included patients at the Cleveland Clinic and MetroHealth System who underwent masculinizing chest surgery between 2016 and 2020.

RESULTS

There were 236 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 172 (72.9%) discontinued testosterone GAHT prior to surgery (T-GAHT cessation), and 64 (27.1%) patients continued testosterone GAHT prior to surgery (T-GAHT continuous). Mean (SD) age at surgery was 25 (8) years, and mean (SD) BMI was 29.5 (6.6). Average duration of testosterone therapy was 18 months (range 0-300). There was no significant difference in tobacco use (p=0.73), diabetes (p=0.54), thrombophilia (p=0.97), or history of thromboembolism (p=0.39). Most patients underwent double incision free nipple graft technique (77.9%). There was no significant difference in surgical time (p=0.12), intraoperative complications (p=0.54), or postoperative complications (p=0.34). The most common complication was postoperative bleeding/hematoma (7.2%). Other complications included seroma (2.1%), infection (1.3%), and nipple graft failure (0.4%). There were no thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative adverse events for patients who continue GAHT preoperatively versus patients who undergo GAHT cessation for masculinizing chest surgery.

Prostatic metaplasia and pilar differentiation in gender-affirming mastectomy specimens

With the increasing practice of gender-affirming mastectomy as a therapeutic procedure in the setting of gender dysphoria, there has come a profusion of literature on the pathologic findings within these specimens. Findings reported in over 1500 patients have not included either prostatic metaplasia or pilar metaplasia of breast epithelium. We encountered both of these findings in the course of routine surgical pathology practice and therefore aimed to analyze these index cases together with a retrospective cohort to determine the prevalence, anatomic distribution, pathologic features, and associated clinical findings of prostatic metaplasia and pilar metaplasia in the setting of gender-affirming mastectomy. In addition to the 2 index cases, 20 additional archival gender-affirming mastectomy specimens were studied. Before mastectomies, all but 1 patient received testosterone cypionate, 6/22 patients received norethindrone, and 21/22 practiced breast binding. Prostatic metaplasia, characterized by glandular proliferation along the basal layer of epithelium in breast ducts, and in one case, within lobules, was seen in 18/22 specimens; 4/22 showed pilar metaplasia, consisting of hair shafts located within breast ducts, associated with squamoid metaplasia resembling hair matriceal differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, prostatic metaplasia was positive for PSA in 16/20 cases and positive for NKX3.1 in 15/20 cases. Forty-three reduction mammoplasty control cases showed no pilar metaplasia and no definite prostatic metaplasia, with no PSA and NKX3.1 staining observed. We demonstrate that prostatic metaplasia and pilar metaplasia are strikingly common findings in specimens from female-assigned-at-birth transgender patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy. Awareness of these novel entities in the breast is important, to distinguish them from other breast epithelial proliferations and to facilitate accrual of follow-up data for better understanding their natural history.

Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Transplantation

Sex and gender often are used interchangeably, but are two distinct entities, with sex being the biological attribute and gender including the social, psychological, and cultural aspects of one's identity. Kidney transplantation has been proven to be the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease, improving both quality of life and life-expectancy for most patients. However, gender disparities in access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation remain despite the plethora of evidence showing the advantages of kidney transplantation to our patients. Data have shown that women are less likely to be waitlisted for a kidney transplant and to receive a deceased donor or a living donor kidney. On the other hand, women are more likely than men to become living kidney donors. Although some state the latter is the result of the female gender to nurture and care for loved ones, others believe this observation is because women often are incompatible with their spouse or child because pregnancy is a strong sensitizing event, which stems from the biological rather than the social differences between the sexes. Influence of sex and gender is not limited to access to kidney transplantation, but rather exist in other areas of transplant medicine, such as the difference observed in transplant outcomes between the sexes, variability in immunosuppression metabolism, and even in more contemporary areas such as recent data showing sex-based differences in outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease-2019, with males having an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and death.

Face Lift after Facial Feminization Surgery: Indications and Special Considerations

SUMMARY

Iatrogenic jowling can be an unintended consequence of facial feminization surgery. Reduction of the mandible and chin without overlying changes to the soft tissue can lead to a redundant and deflated soft-tissue envelope, requiring a face lift to address jowling, cervicofacial laxity, and/or lower facial rhytids. Prospective quality-of-life outcomes data support this hypothesis, as patients who underwent mandible contouring with or without angle osteotomies were significantly more likely to express interest in face lift following facial feminization surgery on univariable analysis (90.0 percent versus 10.0 percent, p = 0.038). Patients with inherent skin laxity are at particularly high risk, such as those with advancing age, extrinsic skin damage (e.g., sun exposure, cigarette smoke), and history of massive weight loss. Before facial feminization surgery, the authors recommend comprehensive patient counseling that includes a discussion of the possible future need for a face lift, preferably around 1 year after facial feminization surgery. When performing a face lift after facial feminization surgery, technical considerations include those related to sequelae of prior facial surgery, anatomical differences between cismale and cisfemale facial soft tissue, and the mechanism of jowling after facial feminization surgery versus normal facial aging. The authors believe that these considerations can set more realistic expectations for facial feminization surgery patients, improve surgeons' ability to skillfully execute this procedure, and ultimately contribute to ongoing quality-of-life improvements in facial feminization surgery patients.

Perioperative Considerations for Person-Centered Gender-Affirming Surgery

With more than 1 million people identifying as transgender in the United States alone, the likelihood of encountering a transgender patient and their family of choice in the perioperative setting is very high. A lack of data exists to equitably inform transgender-specific issues, as well as the associated morbidity during the transgender reassignment perioperative period. Anaesthesiologists should actively acquire the knowledge and skills needed to inclusively and respectfully manage these patients and be aware of their unique physiological and psychosocial needs. The pre-operative approach includes a detailed history, focusing on the patients cross-sex hormone treatment (CSHT) regimen and associated medical conditions. An in-depth understanding of commonly used hormones such as estrogen and testosterone and their effect in the perioperative periods is essential. The physical examination should be relevant to the anatomy that is currently present while taking into consideration feminising and masculinising procedures (e.g., genioplasty, thyroid cartilage augmentation), how these interventions alter the anatomy, and potential airway complications. Laboratory results should be interpreted with care – and with expert assistance if needed - as hormone therapy might affect reference values. In addition, risk assessment tools should be used with caution since they often include sex in their scoring system but do not account for the use of CSHT. Intraoperative considerations include urethral catheter placement, drug dosing, and drug interactions that are commonly encountered in the transgender patient. Special attention should be taken in transgender females who have undergone vocal feminization, as case reports have described unexpected difficult airway management. A multimodal approach, which includes regional blocks and attention to pre-existing chronic pain conditions, should be employed as part of the post-operative pain management plan. The post-operative nausea and vomiting risk has not yet been established in this population, requiring appropriate anti-emetic prophylaxis. Despite societal advances that improve transgender health, the medical community still lacks empirical evidence to effectively mitigate the distinctive challenges confronted by this at-risk population.

Transgender Surgery: Perspectives Across Levels of Training in Medical and Surgical Specialties

Purpose: Approximately 1.4 million adults identify as transgender in the United States. Transgender patients face societal, legal, and medical discrimination that can lead to health disparities. The objective of this study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of transgender health care across various levels of medical training and specialties. Methods: Between April 1, 2019 and May 1, 2019, an anonymous survey was distributed to residents and attendings, in both medical and surgical specialties, at a university-affiliated hospital. Participants were recruited into the study with survey distribution by email to residency program directors, residents, and residency-affiliated attendings. Results: There was a response rate of 29.5% (118/400). Across all respondents, 34.7%, 31.4%, and 39% knew where to refer transgender patients for hormone replacement, psychotherapy, or surgery, respectively. Only 37.9% of residents and 46.2% of attendings reported that they were confident of providing care for a transgender patient (p=0.130). In addition, less than one-third of surgical respondents reported sufficient knowledge to describe transgender surgery. The most common reasons affecting comfort level when caring for transgender patients were lack of exposure (53.4%) and lack of formal education (47.6%), with other reasons being personal, moral, and religious reasons (11%, 8.5%, and 6.8%, respectively). Conclusion: Despite literature demonstrating the effectiveness of formal didactics and education in transgender health, there remain disparities in the knowledge and comfort of residents and attendings across all specialties. To deliver competent health care to transgender patients, efforts must focus on improving the availability of system-wide resources and educational opportunities for all specialties.

Gender-Affirming Mastectomy in Transmasculine Patients: Does Obesity Increase Complications or Revisions?

BACKGROUND

Obesity can often be a barrier to gender-affirming top surgery in transmasculine patients because of concern for increased surgical site complications.

STUDY DESIGN

All adult patients (N = 948) within an integrated health care system who underwent gender-affirming mastectomy from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and surgical site complications or revisions.

RESULTS

One third of patients (n = 295) had obese body mass index (BMI), and those patients were further stratified into obesity class I (BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2, 9.4%), class II (BMI of 35-39.9 kg/m2, 8.9%), and class III (BMI of ≥40 kg/m2, 2.9%). A majority of patients across BMI categories underwent double incision surgery. There were no significant differences in complications or revisions between patients with obesity versus those with normal BMI, when BMI was treated as a categorical or continuous variable and when evaluating only patients who underwent double incision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity alone should not be considered a contraindication for gender-affirming mastectomy. Attention should be given to several modifiable risk factors identified in this study, including lesser incision surgical techniques, tobacco use, and testosterone use. Further research is needed to understand risks associated with the highest BMI (≥40 kg/m2) patients and to assess patient satisfaction with surgical outcome.

Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in Transgender Patients Undergoing Cross-Sex Hormone Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Feminizing and masculinizing hormone treatments are established components of management in transgender patients. Exogenous hormones have been associated with hemostatic effects, which are well-studied in cis-gender individuals on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Unfortunately, comprehensive understanding of their effects on venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in the transgender population is lacking.

AIM

This manuscript aims to identify the risk of VTE among transgender individuals undergoing cross-sex hormone therapy.

METHODS

A Systematic review of the literature was performed in March 2020 for studies reporting VTE rates in transgender patients undergoing hormone treatment and rates in cis-gender patients on HRT. Data regarding demographics, hormone therapy, and VTE incidence were collected and pooled for analysis.

OUTCOME

The primary outcome of interest was the development of a VTE event in association with concurrent hormone administration.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 studies were included with 11 reporting VTE rates among transgender patients, 6 in cis-female patients, and 5 in cis-male patients. Data from 9,180 transgender patients (6,068 assigned male at birth [AMAB] and 3,112 assigned female at birth [AFAB]) undergoing hormone treatment and 103,713 cis-gender patients (18,748 female and 84,965 male) undergoing HRT were pooled. The incidence of VTE was higher in AMAB patients compared to AFAB patients (42.8 vs 10.8 VTE per 10,000 patient years; P = .02). The rate of VTE incidences in AMAB patients appears similar or higher than the rate demonstrated in cis-females on HRT. VTE incidence in AFAB patients, however, is similar to the published rates in cis-males on HRT.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

AMAB patients on hormone therapy have higher VTE rates than AFAB patients. AMAB and AFAB patients may have similar VTE incidence to cis-female and cis-male patients on hormone replacement therapy, respectively.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This is the first study to aggregate and quantify the development of VTE events in association with hormone therapy in transgender patients. It places these values in the context of rates published in more widely studied populations. It is limited by its retrospective data and heterogenic data.

CONCLUSION

Surgical planning regarding perioperative and postoperative VTE prophylaxis or cessation of hormone therapy should take into account each patient's Caprini risk assessment and the nature of each intervention. Kotamarti VS, Greige N, Heiman AJ, et al. Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in Transgender Patients Undergoing Cross-Sex Hormone Treatment: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2021;18:1280-1291.

No Venous Thromboembolism Increase Among Transgender Female Patients Remaining on Estrogen for Gender-Affirming Surgery

BACKGROUND

Both surgery and exogenous estrogen use are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, it is not known whether estrogen hormone therapy (HT) exacerbates the surgery-associated risk among transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. The lack of published data has contributed to heterogeneity in perioperative protocols regarding estrogen HT administration for TGNB patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on all TGNB patients who underwent gender-affirming surgery between November 2015 and August 2019. Surgery type, preoperative HT regimen, perioperative HT regimen, VTE prophylaxis management, outcomes, and demographic data were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 919 TGNB patients underwent 1858 surgical procedures representing 1396 unique cases, of which 407 cases were transfeminine patients undergoing primary vaginoplasty. Of the latter, 190 cases were performed with estrogen suspended for 1 week prior to surgery, and 212 cases were performed with HT continued throughout. Of all cases, 1 patient presented with VTE, from the cohort of transfeminine patients whose estrogen HT was suspended prior to surgery. No VTE events were noted among those who continued HT. Mean postoperative follow-up was 285 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative VTE was not a significant risk in a large, homogenously treated cohort of TGNB patients independent of whether HT was suspended or not prior to surgery.

Venous thromboembolism in the hormonal milieu

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hormonal therapy is administered for multiple indications including contraception, alleviation of menopausal symptoms, hypogonadism, and more recently, gender-affirming care. Data suggest varying degrees of increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE).

RECENT FINDINGS

While oral progestin only methods do not appear to increase the risk of VTE, an association was seen with injection progestin contraception. Combined oral contraception with low-dose ethinyl estradiol and most types of progestin increased the risk of VTE compared with levonorgestrel-containing oral therapies. While transdermal hormonal contraception has been previously associated with increased VTE, a recently approved levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol transdermal patch reported low rates (<0.2%) in a large single-arm open-label study. Women receiving postmenopausal HRT experienced an increased risk of VTE in a dose-dependent manner when using oral hormonal therapy while nonoral methods, such as topical estrogen, did not appear to increase the risk of VTE. Some studies suggest no increased risk of VTE with testosterone therapy, however, a recent case-crossover study suggested higher VTE risk in men on testosterone, particularly men less than age 65 without hypogonadism. Route of administration had no effect on VTE rates. The estimated incidence rate of VTE risk in transgender women receiving estrogen therapy is 2.3 per 1000 person years, but may be imprecise due to heterogeneity in studies included in published meta-analyses. Surgical risk estimates are primarily indirect data drawn from cisgender patients receiving hormone therapy in the perioperative setting.

SUMMARY

Hormonal therapy affects VTE risk to varying degrees dependent on specific type of hormone, formulation, and occasionally route of delivery.

Hormonal Gender Reassignment Treatment for Gender Dysphoria

BACKGROUND

No data are available at present on the prevalence of gender dysphoria (trans-identity) in Germany. On the basis of estimates from the Netherlands, it can be calculated that approximately 15 000 to 25 000 persons in Germany are affected. Persons suffering from gender dysphoria often experience significant distress and have a strong desire for gender reassignment treatment.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database employing the searching terms "transsexualism," "transgender," "gender incongruence," "gender identity disorder," "gender-affirming hormone therapy," and "gender dysphoria."

RESULTS

In view of its far-reaching consequences, some of which are irreversible, hormonal gender reassignment treatment should only be initiated after meticulous individual consideration, with the approval of the treating psychiatrist/psychotherapist and after extensive information of the patient by an experienced endo - crinologist. Before the treatment is begun, the patient must be extensively screened for risk factors. The contraindications include severe preexisting thromboembolic diseases (mainly if untreated), hormone-sensitive tumors, and uncontrolled pre - existing chronic diseases such as arterial hypertension and epilepsy. Finding an appropriate individual solution is the main objective even if contraindications are present. Male-to-female treatment is carried out with 17β-estradiol or 17β-estradiol valerate in combination with cyproterone acetate or spironolactone as an antiandrogen, female-to-male treatment with transdermal or intramuscular testosterone preparations. The treatment must be monitored permanently with clinical and laboratory follow-up as well as with gynecological and urological early-detection screening studies. Prospective studies and a meta-analysis (based on low-level evidence) have documented an improvement in the quality of life after gender reassignment treatment. Female-to-male gender-incongruent persons often have difficulty being accepted in a gynecological practice as a male patient.

CONCLUZION

Further prospective studies for the quantification of the risks and benefits of hormonal treatment would be desirable. Potential interactions of the hormone preparations with other medications must always be considered.

Considerations for Transgender Patients Perioperatively

With a shift in the cultural, political, and social climate surrounding gender and gender identity, an increase in the acceptance and visibility of transgender individuals is expected. Anesthesiologists are thus more likely to encounter transgender and gender nonconforming patients in the perioperative setting. Anesthesiologists need to acquire an in-depth understanding of the transgender patient's medical and psychosocial needs. A thoughtful approach throughout the entirety of the perioperative period is key to the successful management of the transgender patient. This review provides anesthesiologists with a culturally relevant and evidence-based approach to transgender patients during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.

Medical transition for gender diverse patients

Purpose of review

The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of gender-affirming hormone therapy, including the various hormone regimens available, the efficacy and potential risks of these treatments, and considerations for surveillance and long-term care.

Recent findings

Recent studies reaffirm that hormone therapy has positive physical and psychological effects for many transgender individuals. The overall risks of treatment are low. Transgender women may have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and breast cancer based on recent cohort studies, but these findings have yet to be confirmed with randomized controlled trials. Important long-term considerations include metabolic, cardiovascular, and skeletal health.

Summary

High-quality, long-term studies on the effectiveness and safety of various gender-affirming hormone treatment regimens are lacking, but the currently available evidence suggests that it is overall safe and effective with appropriate oversight.

Estrogen Continuation and Venous Thromboembolism in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty

BACKGROUND

Estrogen therapy and penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) are necessary, life-saving interventions for many transfeminine patients. Patients undergoing PIV are generally at low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on Caprini Score. Estrogen therapy may increase VTE risk in surgical patients, but its cessation may be psychiatrically dysphoric for transfeminine patients.

AIM

This study examines whether perioperative estrogen cessation impacts VTE risk in patients undergoing PIV.

METHODS

This was a pre-post study of patients undergoing PIV. From 2014 through 2018, all patients stopped estrogen therapy for 2 weeks before surgery and resumed 1 week postoperatively (group 1). Starting in 2019, all patients continued estrogen therapy perioperatively, with dose reductions for those whose dose was >6 mg/day (group 2).

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was 90-day VTE rate.

RESULTS

178 patients were included in the study, with 117 in group 1 and 61 in group 2. Median Caprini Score was 4 in group 1 (interquartile range: 3-6) and 3 in group 2 (interquartile range: 3-4) (P = .011). Complications per patient were higher in group 1 (2.2 vs 0.9, P < .001), with a longer follow-up (14.1 vs 10.2 months, P < .001). Rates of 90-day VTE were not different between groups (0.0% vs 1.6%, P = .166).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patients undergoing PIV are generally at low risk for VTE, based on 2005 Caprini Scores. This study provides preliminary evidence that perioperative estrogen therapy continuation does not appear to substantially increase VTE risk in transfeminine patients undergoing PIV with low Caprini Scores, although more investigation is needed to establish true safety.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the pre-post design and single-surgeon experience, high proportion of patients with 90-day follow-up, and relatively large series to understand baseline VTE risk by Caprini Score in a PIV population. The main weakness of this study is its limited power to measure true differences in VTE risk based on estrogen continuation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that perioperative estrogen continuation may be safe for patients undergoing PIV, the overwhelming majority of whom are at low baseline VTE risk. However, clinicians should weigh the magnitude of the risks and benefits of estrogen cessation on a case-by-case basis. Nolan IT, Haley C, Morrison SD, et al. Estrogen Continuation and Venous Thromboembolism in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty. J Sex Med 2021;18:193-200.

Kidney transplantation and donation in the transgender population: A single-institution case series

The medical needs of the transgender population are increasingly recognized within the US health care system. Hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery present distinct anatomic, hormonal, infectious, and psychosocial issues among transgender kidney transplant donors and recipients. We present the first reported experience with kidney transplantation and donation in transgender patients. A single-center case series (January 2014-December 2018) comprising 4 transgender kidney transplant recipients and 2 transgender living donors was constructed and analyzed. Experts in transplant surgery, transplant psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, pharmacy, and endocrinology were consulted to discuss aspects of care for these patients. Four transgender patients identified as male-to-female and 2 as female-to-male. Three of 6 had gender-affirming surgeries prior to transplant surgery, 1 of whom had further procedures posttransplant. Additionally, 4 patients were on hormone therapy. All 6 had psychiatric comorbidities. The 4 grafts have done well, with an average serum creatinine of 1.45 mg/dL at 2 years (range 1.01-1.85 mg/dL). However, patients encountered various postoperative complications, 1 of which was attributable to modified anatomy. Thus, transgender kidney transplant patients can present novel challenges in regard to surgical considerations as well as pre- and posttransplant care. Dedicated expertise is needed to optimize outcomes for this population.

Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline dedicated to standardizing and optimizing perioperative care for women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The guideline was rigorously formulated by an American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Task Force of US and Canadian gynecologic surgeons with special interest and experience in adapting ERAS practices for patients requiring minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. It builds on the 2016 ERAS Society recommendations for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncologic surgery by serving as a more comprehensive reference for minimally invasive endoscopic and vaginal surgery for both benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. For example, the section on preoperative optimization provides more specific recommendations derived from the ambulatory surgery and anesthesia literature for the management of anemia, hyperglycemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Recommendations pertaining to multimodal analgesia account for the recent Food and Drug Administration warnings about respiratory depression from gabapentinoids. The guideline focuses on workflows important to high-value care in minimally invasive surgery, such as same-day discharge, and tackles controversial issues in minimally invasive surgery, such as thromboprophylaxis. In these ways, the guideline supports the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists and our collective mission to elevate the quality and safety of healthcare for women through excellence in clinical practice.

Transgender pediatric surgical patients-Important perioperative considerations

Transgender describes a variety of identities in which an individual's gender identity is different from expected based on the sex assigned at birth. In the United States, it is estimated that over 1 million adults and 150 000 youth identify as transgender, with increasing numbers being seen in healthcare and surgical settings. These numbers will continue to rise as visibility and acceptance grow. Current guidelines recommend transition-related surgeries be reserved for older adolescents and adults. However, this is not the only circumstance in which the pediatric anesthesiologist may find themselves caring for a transgender patient. In order to provide the safest and most affirming care, it is crucial that the pediatric anesthesiologist develop a working knowledge of this unique and vulnerable population, including the potential impacts of gender-affirming treatment on their perioperative care.

Donor Site Morbidity in Phalloplasty Reconstructions: Outcomes of the Radial Forearm Free Flap

The radial artery forearm free flap (RFFF) is the workhorse technique for phallus reconstruction. The RFFF provides good cosmesis and potential sensory recovery. However, the donor site is large in comparison to other applications of the RFFF which may increase the potential for donor site morbidity, such as nerve injury, delayed wound healing, and decreased hand strength. This study systematically reviewed the current literature to assess the donor site morbidity associated with RFFF phalloplasty (RFFFP).

A Review of Psychosocial Risk Factors Among Transgender Patients Seeking Bariatric Surgery

As nearly one third of transgender individuals in the USA are obese, more transgender patients may pursue bariatric surgery as a means of sustaining weight loss. Transgender individuals, like bariatric surgery patients, have high rates of mood pathology, substance use, abuse, and self-harm behaviors. However, there is no research on transgender bariatric surgery candidates. The aim of this review is to elucidate potential psychosocial risk factors, including sex hormone management, which may impact surgical clearance, presurgical psychosocial assessment, and treatment recommendations.

Mastectomy in Transgender and Cisgender Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes

Background:

Mastectomy is a commonly requested procedure in the transmasculine population and has been shown to improve quality of life, although there is limited research on safety. The aim of this study was to provide a nationwide assessment of epidemiology and postoperative outcomes following masculinizing mastectomy and compare them with outcomes following mastectomy for cancer prophylaxis and gynecomastia correction in cisgender patients.

Methods:

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2017 was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to create cohorts of mastectomies for 3 indications: transmasculine chest reconstruction, cancer risk-reduction (CRRM), and gynecomastia treatment (GM). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were compared between the 3 cohorts. Multivariable regression analysis was used to control for confounders.

Results:

A total of 4,170 mastectomies were identified, of which 14.8% (n = 591) were transmasculine, 17.6% (n = 701) were CRRM, and 67.6% (n = 2,692) were GM. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of transmasculine cases (85.3%), compared with the general surgeons in the CRRM (97.9%) and GM (73.7%) cohorts. All-cause complication rates in the transmasculine, CRRM, and GM cohorts were 4.7%, 10.4%, and 3.7%, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, transgender males were not at an increased risk for all-cause or wound complications. Multivariable regression identified BMI as a predictor of all-cause and wound complications.

Conclusion:

Mastectomy is a safe and efficacious procedure for treating gender dysphoria in the transgender male, with an acceptable and reassuring complication profile similar to that seen in cisgender patients who approximate either the natal sex characteristics or the new hormonal environment.