1
|
Aref HAT, Turk T, Dhanani R, Xiao A, Olson J, Paul P, Dennett L, Yacyshyn E, Sadowski CA. Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 66:152432. [PMID: 38554593 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision-making (SDM) tools are facilitators of decision-making through a collaborative process between patients/caregivers and clinicians. These tools help clinicians understand patient's perspectives and help patients in making informed decisions based on their preferences. Despite their usefulness for both patients and clinicians, SDM tools are not widely implemented in everyday practice. One barrier is the lack of clarity on the development and evaluation processes of these tools. Such processes have not been previously described in the field of rheumatology. OBJECTIVE To describe the development and evaluation processes of shared decision-making (SDM) tools used in rheumatology. METHODS Bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for relevant articles. Guidelines for the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were followed. Studies included were: addressing SDM among adults in rheumatology, focusing on development and/or evaluation of SDM tool, full texts, empirical research, and in the English language. RESULTS Of the 2030 records screened, forty-six reports addressing 36 SDM tools were included. Development basis and evaluation measures varied across the studies. The most commonly reported development basis was the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria (19/36, 53 %). Other developmental foundations reported were: The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) (6/36, 16 %), Informed Medical Decision Foundation elements (3/36, 8 %), edutainment principles (2/36, 5.5 %), and others (e.g. DISCERN and MARKOV Model) (9/31,29 %). The most commonly used evaluation measures were the Decisional Conflict Scale (18/46, 39 %), acceptability and knowledge (7/46, 15 %), and the preparation for decision-making scale (5/46,11 %). CONCLUSION For better quality and wider implementation of such tools, there is a need for detailed, transparent, systematic, and consistent reporting of development methods and evaluation measures. Using established checklists for reporting development and evaluation is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba A T Aref
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tarek Turk
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ruhee Dhanani
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Xiao
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joanne Olson
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pauline Paul
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liz Dennett
- Geoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elaine Yacyshyn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl A Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naye F, Toupin-April K, de Wit M, LeBlanc A, Dubois O, Boonen A, Barton JL, Fraenkel L, Li LC, Stacey D, March L, Barber CEH, Hazlewood GS, Guillemin F, Bartlett SJ, Berthelsen DB, Mather K, Arnaud L, Akpabio A, Adebajo A, Schultz G, Sloan VS, Gill TK, Sharma S, Scholte-Voshaar M, Caso F, Nikiphorou E, Nasef SI, Campbell W, Meara A, Christensen R, Suarez-Almazor ME, Jull JE, Alten R, Morgan EM, El-Miedany Y, Singh JA, Burt J, Jayatilleke A, Hmamouchi I, Blanco FJ, Fernandez AP, Mackie S, Jones A, Strand V, Monti S, Stones SR, Lee RR, Nielsen SM, Evans V, Srinivasalu H, Gérard T, Demers JL, Bouchard R, Stefan T, Dugas M, Bergeron F, Beaton D, Maxwell LJ, Tugwell P, Décary S. OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 65:152344. [PMID: 38232625 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Shared decision making (SDM) is a central tenet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal care. The lack of standardization regarding SDM instruments and outcomes in clinical trials threatens the comparative effectiveness of interventions. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) SDM Working Group is developing a Core Outcome Set for trials of SDM interventions in rheumatology and musculoskeletal health. The working group reached consensus on a Core Outcome Domain Set in 2020. The next step is to develop a Core Outcome Measurement Set through the OMERACT Filter 2.2. METHODS We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) to identify candidate instruments for the OMERACT Filter 2.2 We systematically reviewed five databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). An information specialist designed search strategies to identify all measurement instruments used in SDM studies in adults or children living with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others. Paired reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text articles. We extracted characteristics of all candidate instruments (e.g., measured construct, measurement properties). We classified candidate instruments and summarized evidence gaps with an adapted version of the Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table. RESULTS We found 14,464 citations, read 239 full text articles, and included 99 eligible studies. We identified 220 potential candidate instruments. The five most used measurement instruments were the Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions) (n=38), the Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument (n=20), the Decision Regret Scale (n=9), the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (n=8), and the CollaboRATE (n=8). Only 44 candidate instruments (20%) had any measurement properties reported by the included studies. Of these instruments, only 57% matched with at least one of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table. CONCLUSION We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties. The next steps for the OMERACT SDM Working Group are to match candidate instruments with Core Domains, assess feasibility and review validation studies of measurement instruments in rheumatic diseases or other conditions. Development and validation of new instruments may be required for some Core Domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Annie LeBlanc
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada; VITAM Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Olivia Dubois
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- VA Portland Health Care System, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arthritis Research Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lyn March
- Department of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Department of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Susan J Bartlett
- Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, McGill University, Canada; Research Institute - McGill University Health Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Medicine Division of Rheumatology, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dorthe B Berthelsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen & Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, Odense & Department of Rehabilitation, Municipality of Guldborgsund, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Nykoebing, Denmark
| | | | - Laurent Arnaud
- Department of Rheumatology, CRMR RESO, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Adewale Adebajo
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Victor S Sloan
- Sheng Consulting LLC, Flemington, NJ, USA; The Peace Corps, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tiffany K Gill
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Saurab Sharma
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- Patient Research Partner, Department of Pharmacy and Department of Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen
| | - Francesco Caso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College Hospital, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samah Ismail Nasef
- Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Willemina Campbell
- Patient research partner, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alexa Meara
- Division of Rheumatology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Robin Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, & Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology Research Center, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology, Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, Schlosspark-Klinik, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esi M Morgan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Division of Rheumatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Burt
- Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. Clare's Mercy Hospital, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | | | - Ihsane Hmamouchi
- Health Sciences Research Centre (CReSS), Faculty of Medicine, International University of Rabat (UIR), Rabat, Morocco
| | - Francisco J Blanco
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Anthony P Fernandez
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sara Monti
- Department of Rheumatology, Policlinico S. Matteo, IRCCS Fondazione, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simon R Stones
- Patient research partner, Envision Pharma Group, Wilmslow, UK
| | - Rebecca R Lee
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, and University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Demark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vicki Evans
- Patient Research Partner and Discipline of Optometry, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Hemalatha Srinivasalu
- Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA; GW School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
| | - Thomas Gérard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | | | - Roxanne Bouchard
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Théo Stefan
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | - Lara J Maxwell
- Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giachello M, Leporatti L, Levaggi R, Montefiori M. The illness trap: The impact of disability benefits on willingness to receive HCV treatment. ECONOMICS AND HUMAN BIOLOGY 2024; 52:101352. [PMID: 38278057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Health care is assumed to be a primary good, implying that patients should always demand or accept treatments that may enhance their life expectancy and quality of life, especially if the risks associated with the treatment are low. We argue that, especially in countries with a well-developed welfare state, treating an invalidating condition may lead to opportunity costs in terms of reduced disability allowances that may represent a barrier to treatment for low-income individuals. We test this hypothesis by applying a recursive bivariate probit approach to population data from an ad hoc administrative database for Liguria (an Italian administrative region). The dataset includes data for more than 8 thousand people affected by hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection between 2013 and 2020. After the discovery of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in 2014, HCV eradication may now be possible. However, despite the national and international efforts, several patients diagnosed with HCV choose not to undergo drug therapy despite the adverse consequences for their personal health and relevant costs to the national health system. We show that five years after the implementation of the new drugs, approximately 41 % of the diagnosed population in Liguria remains untreated. This percentage increases to 64 % within the subgroup entitled to disability benefits and characterized by lower income levels. The "illness trap" effect is more substantial for older people but also low-income patients. Moreover, we find that this effect is higher in patients with an intermediate range of comorbidities; indeed, these patients are at a higher risk of losing economic benefits if they recover from HCV. These results suggest the need for healthcare policies addressing this distorting effect when designing benefit programs and granting financial benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Giachello
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy
| | - Lucia Leporatti
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy.
| | - Rosella Levaggi
- Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, via S. Faustino 74/B, Brescia, BS 25122, Italy
| | - Marcello Montefiori
- Department of Economics (DIEC), Centro APHEC, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5, Genova, GE 16126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reyna VF, Edelson S, Hayes B, Garavito D. Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory. Med Decis Making 2022; 42:741-754. [PMID: 35735225 PMCID: PMC9283268 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221105473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
HIGHLIGHTS Fuzzy-trace theory (FTT) supports practical approaches to improving health and medicine.FTT differs in important respects from other theories of decision making, which has implications for how to help patients, providers, and health communicators.Gist mental representations emphasize categorical distinctions, reflect understanding in context, and help cue values relevant to health and patient care.Understanding the science behind theory is crucial for evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie F Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Edelson
- Human Neuroscience Institute and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Bridget Hayes
- Human Neuroscience Institute and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - David Garavito
- Human Neuroscience Institute and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Danila MI, Chen L, Ruderman EM, Owensby JK, O'Beirne R, Melnick JA, Harrold LR, Curtis D, Nowell WB, Curtis JR. Evaluation of an Intervention to Support Patient-Rheumatologist Conversations About Escalating Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Principle Study. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021; 4:279-287. [PMID: 34962093 PMCID: PMC8992469 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study’s objective was to test whether an online video intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation improves willingness to change treatment in people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted a controlled, randomized trial among patients with RA enrolled in ArthritisPower, a United States patient registry. We recruited participants by email and surveyed their assessment of disease activity (patient global), satisfaction with disease control (patient acceptable symptom state), attitudes about RA medications, decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale), and willingness to modify RA treatment (choice predisposition scale, higher scores are better) if or when recommended by their rheumatologist. Intervention groups watched educational videos relevant to a treat‐to‐target (T2T) strategy, whereas control groups viewed vaccination‐related videos as an “attention control.” We compared the between‐group difference in patients’ willingness to modify RA treatment (primary outcome) and difference in decisional conflict about changing RA treatment (secondary outcome) after watching the videos using t tests. Results Participants with self‐reported RA (n = 208) were 90% White and 90% women, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50 (11) years, and 52% reported familiarity with the RA T2T strategy. We found a significant improvement in between‐group difference in willingness to change RA treatment among intervention versus control participants (0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.09‐0.88], P = 0.02). The effect size (Glass’s delta) for the intervention was 0.48. Decisional conflict about treatment change decreased, but the between‐group difference was not significant. Conclusion This novel educational patient‐directed intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation was associated with improved willingness to change RA treatment if or when recommended by a rheumatologist. Further studies should evaluate whether this change in patients’ predisposition translates into actual treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria I Danila
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Lang Chen
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Ronan O'Beirne
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - David Curtis
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roodenrijs NMT, Hamar A, Kedves M, Nagy G, van Laar JM, van der Heijde D, Welsing PMJ. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2021; 7:e001512. [PMID: 33419871 PMCID: PMC7798678 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise, by a systematic literature review (SLR), the evidence regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA), informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of D2T RA. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to December 2019. Relevant papers were selected and appraised. RESULTS Two hundred seven (207) papers studied therapeutic strategies. Limited evidence was found on effective and safe disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with comorbidities and other contraindications that limit DMARD options (patients with obesity, hepatitis B and C, risk of venous thromboembolisms, pregnancy and lactation). In patients who previously failed biological (b-)DMARDs, all currently used b/targeted synthetic (ts-)DMARDs were found to be more effective than placebo. In patients who previously failed a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), there was a tendency of non-TNFi bDMARDs to be more effective than TNFis. Generally, effectiveness decreased in patients who previously failed a higher number of bDMARDs. Additionally, exercise, psychological, educational and self-management interventions were found to improve non-inflammatory complaints (mainly functional disability, pain, fatigue), education to improve goal setting, and self-management programmes, educational and psychological interventions to improve self-management.The identified evidence had several limitations: (1) no studies were found in patients with D2T RA specifically, (2) heterogeneous outcome criteria were used and (3) most studies had a moderate or high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS This SLR underscores the scarcity of high-quality evidence on the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of patients with D2T RA. Effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs decreased in RA patients who had failed a higher number of bDMARDs and a subsequent b/tsDMARD of a previously not targeted mechanism of action was somewhat more effective. Additionally, a beneficial effect of non-pharmacological interventions was found for improvement of non-inflammatory complaints, goal setting and self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia M T Roodenrijs
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Attila Hamar
- Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Melinda Kedves
- Rheumatology, Bacs-Kiskun Megyei Korhaz, Kecskemet, Hungary
| | - György Nagy
- Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology & Rheumatology & Clinical Rheumatology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jacob M van Laar
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aronson PL, Politi MC, Schaeffer P, Fleischer E, Shapiro ED, Niccolai LM, Alpern ER, Bernstein SL, Fraenkel L. Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old. Acad Emerg Med 2021; 28:46-59. [PMID: 32648270 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop and test a tool to engage parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days of age evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The tool was designed to improve communication for all parents and to support shared decision-making (SDM) about whether to perform a lumbar puncture (LP) for infants 29 to 60 days of age. METHODS We conducted a multiphase development and testing process: 1) individual, semistructured interviews with parents and clinicians (pediatric and general emergency medicine [EM] physicians and pediatric EM nurses) to learn their preferences for a communication and SDM tool; 2) design of a "storyboard" of the tool with design impression testing; 3) development of a software application (i.e., app) prototype, called e-Care; and 4) usability testing of e-Care, using qualitative assessment and the system usability scale (SUS). RESULTS We interviewed 27 parents and 23 clinicians. Interviews revealed several themes, including that a communication tool should augment but not replace verbal communication; a Web-based format was preferred; and information about infections and testing, including the rationales for specific tests, would be valuable. We then developed separate versions of e-Care for infants ≤ 28 days and 29 to 60 days of age, in both English and Spanish. The e-Care app includes four sections: 1) homepage; 2) why testing is done; 3) what tests are done; and 4) what happens after testing, including a table for parents of infants 29 to 60 days of age to compare the risks/benefits of LP in preparation for an SDM conversation. Parents and clinicians reported that e-Care was understandable and helpful. The mean SUS score was 90.3 (95% confidence interval = 84 to 96.6), representing "excellent" usability. CONCLUSIONS The e-Care app is a useable and understandable tool to support communication and SDM with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days of age in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L. Aronson
- From the Department of PediatricsYale School of Medicine New HavenCTUSA
- the Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CTUSA
| | - Mary C. Politi
- the Department of Surgery Division of Public Health Sciences School of Medicine Washington University St. Louis MOUSA
| | - Paula Schaeffer
- From the Department of PediatricsYale School of Medicine New HavenCTUSA
| | - Eduardo Fleischer
- From the Department of PediatricsYale School of Medicine New HavenCTUSA
| | - Eugene D. Shapiro
- From the Department of PediatricsYale School of Medicine New HavenCTUSA
- the Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases Yale School of Public Health Yale School of Public Health New Haven CTUSA
| | - Linda M. Niccolai
- the Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases Yale School of Public Health Yale School of Public Health New Haven CTUSA
| | - Elizabeth R. Alpern
- the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago ILUSA
| | - Steven L. Bernstein
- the Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CTUSA
- and the Yale Center for Implementation Science Yale School of Medicine New Haven CTUSA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- and the Department of Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Savioni L, Triberti S. Cognitive Biases in Chronic Illness and Their Impact on Patients' Commitment. Front Psychol 2020; 11:579455. [PMID: 33192894 PMCID: PMC7655771 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Savioni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Triberti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Owensby JK, Chen L, O'Beirne R, Ruderman EM, Harrold LR, Melnick JA, Safford MM, Curtis JR, Danila MI. Patient and Rheumatologist Perspectives Regarding Challenges to Achieving Optimal Disease Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:933-941. [PMID: 31008566 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and prioritize patient- and rheumatologist-perceived barriers to achieving disease control. METHODS Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologists from the Corrona registry were invited by e-mail to participate in nominal groups. Two separate lists of barriers were created, 1 from RA patient-only nominal groups and the other from rheumatologist-only nominal groups, and barriers were sorted into themes. Next, using an online survey, a random sample of RA patients from the Corrona registry were asked to rank their top 3 barriers to achieving disease control. RESULTS Four nominal groups totaling 37 RA patients identified patient barriers to achieving control of RA activity that were classified into 17 themes. Three nominal groups totaling 25 rheumatologists identified barriers that were classified into 11 themes. The financial aspects of RA care ranked first for both types of nominal groups, while medication risk aversion ranked second among the perceived barriers of the physician nominal group and third among those of the RA patient nominal group. Among the 450 RA patients surveyed, 77% considered RA a top health priority, and 51% reported being aware of the treat-to-target strategy for RA care; the 3 most important patient-perceived challenges to achieving disease control were RA prognosis uncertainty, medication risk aversion, and the financial/administrative burden associated with RA care. CONCLUSION There are common, potentially modifiable, patient- and rheumatologist-reported barriers to achieving RA disease control, including perceived medication risk aversion, suboptimal treatment adherence, and suboptimal patient-physician communication regarding the benefits of tight control of disease activity in RA. Addressing these obstacles may improve adherence to goal-directed RA care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garavito DMN, Reyna VF, DeTello JE, Landow BR, Tarpinian LM. Intentions to report concussion symptoms in nonprofessional athletes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valerie F. Reyna
- Department of Human Development Cornell University Ithaca New York USA
| | - Joseph E. DeTello
- Department of Human Development Cornell University Ithaca New York USA
| | - Bailey R. Landow
- Department of Human Development Cornell University Ithaca New York USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tucker Edmonds B, Hoffman SM, Laitano T, Bhamidipalli SS, Jeffries E, Fadel W, Kavanaugh K. Values clarification: Eliciting the values that inform and influence parents' treatment decisions for periviable birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2020; 34:556-564. [PMID: 31637742 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Values clarification can assist families facing the threat of periviable delivery in navigating the complexity of competing values related to death, disability, and quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE We piloted values clarification exercises to inform resuscitation decision making and qualitatively assess perceptions of QOL. METHODS We conducted a mixed-method study of women with threatened periviable delivery (22 0/7-24 6/7 weeks) and their important others (IOs). Participants engaged in three values clarification activities as part of a semi-structured interview-(a) Card sorting nine conditions as an acceptable/unacceptable QOL for a child; (b) Rating/ranking seven common concerns in periviable decision making (scale 0-10, not at all to extremely important); and (c) "Agreed/disagreed" with six statements regarding end-of-life treatment, disability, and QOL. Participants were also asked to define "QOL" and describe their perceptions of a good and poor QOL for their child. Analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4 and NVivo 12. RESULTS All mild disabilities were an acceptable QOL, while two-thirds of participants considered long-term mechanical ventilation unacceptable. Although pregnant women rated "Impact on Your Physical/Mental Health" (average 5.6) and IOs rated "Financial Concerns" the highest (average 6.6), both groups ranked "Financial Concerns" as the most important concern (median 5.0 and 6.0, respectively). Most participants agreed that "Any amount of life is better than no life at all" (pregnant women 62.1%; IOs 75.0%) and disagreed that resuscitation would cause "Too much suffering" for their child (pregnant women 71.4%; IOs 80.0%). Half were familiar with the phrase "QOL". Although the majority described a good QOL in terms of emotional well-being (eg "loved", "happy", "supported"), a poor QOL was described in terms of functionality (eg "dependent" and "confined"). Additionally, financial stability emerged as a distinctive theme when IOs discussed poor QOL. CONCLUSION The study offers important insights on parental perspectives in periviable decision making and potential values clarification tools for decision support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shelley M Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tatiana Laitano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Surya Sruthi Bhamidipalli
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine & Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Erin Jeffries
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - William Fadel
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine & Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Karen Kavanaugh
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.,College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blalock SJ, Solow EB, Reyna VF, Keebler M, Carpenter D, Hunt C, Hickey G, O'Neill K, Curtis JR, Chapman SB. Enhancing Patient Understanding of Medication Risks and Benefits. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 74:142-150. [PMID: 32799397 PMCID: PMC9305434 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 interventions, including the DrugFactsBox format for presenting written medication information and the SMART (Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training) program designed to enhance gist (i.e., “bottom‐line” meaning) reasoning ability. Methods We used a 2 × 2 factorial research design. A total of 286 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups, including DrugFactsBox with the SMART program, DrugFactsBox without the SMART program, other consumer medication information (CMI) with the SMART program, and other CMI without the SMART program. Data were collected via telephone interviews and online questionnaires at 4 time points, including baseline and 6‐week, 3‐month, and 6‐month time points following baseline. The primary outcome variable was informed decision‐making, which was defined as making a value‐consistent decision concerning use of disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs based on adequate knowledge. Results We found no main effects for the 2 interventions, either alone or in combination. However, there was a significant interaction between assignment to the SMART/no SMART groups and informed decision‐making at baseline. Among participants in the SMART groups who did not meet the criteria for informed decision‐making at baseline, 42.5% met the criteria at the 6‐month follow‐up, compared to 23.6% of participants in the no SMART groups (mean difference 18.9 [95% confidence interval 5.6, 32.2]; P = 0.007). This difference was driven by increased knowledge in the SMART groups. Among participants who met the criteria for informed decision‐making at baseline, the difference between the SMART and no SMART groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion Participation in a theory‐driven program to enhance gist reasoning may have a beneficial effect on informed decision‐making among patients with inadequate knowledge concerning therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Blalock
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Solow
- Division of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Molly Keebler
- Center for BrainHealth, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Delesha Carpenter
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Caprice Hunt
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Genevieve Hickey
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kimberlee O'Neill
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reyna VF, Brust‐Renck PG. How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
14
|
Pablos JL, Jover JA, Roman-Ivorra JA, Inciarte-Mundo J, Dilla T, Sacristan JA, Comellas M, Lizán L. Patient Decision Aid (PDA) for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Reduces Decisional Conflict and Improves Readiness for Treatment Decision Making. THE PATIENT 2020; 13:57-69. [PMID: 31410723 PMCID: PMC6957559 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00381-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to develop and assess the effectiveness of a patient decision aid (PDA) to support treatment decision making in Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail to achieve the therapeutic goal with the current disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment strategy. METHODS The PDA was developed in accordance with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards recommendations. A steering group led the project. Three literature reviews and two focus groups were performed to develop the PDA prototype. To check its comprehensibility, acceptability, and feasibility, alpha-testing was performed using the Decision Support Acceptability Scale (DSAS). Beta-testing was conducted to assess preliminary evidence of PDA efficacy using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) before and after PDA use. Readiness was evaluated using the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS). RESULTS The PDA included (1) a brief description of RA, (2) treatment information, and (3) a values clarification section. Alpha-testing revealed that most patients considered that the information was presented in a good or excellent way and it could help clarify their values and facilitate treatment decision making. Most rheumatologists agreed that the PDA was easy to understand, to use, and allowed them to reach a shared decision. Beta-testing showed that PDA significantly reduced overall patients' decisional conflict [33.2 (DE: 21.4) vs 24.6 (23.5); p < 0.001] and prepared the patient for decision making [PDMS: 67.5 (21.0)]. CONCLUSIONS We developed a PDA for Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe RA that reduces patients' decisional conflict and increases their readiness for decision making. The use of this PDA in routine clinical practice may improve the quality of the decision-making process and the quality of the choices made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juan Angel Jover
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luís Lizán
- Outcomes'10, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
- Medicine Department, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stamp LK, Chan SJ, Marra C, Helme C, Treharne GJ. Tapering biologic therapy for people with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: A review of patient perspectives and associated clinical evidence. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 17:161-169. [PMID: 31148375 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Biologic therapies have increased the control of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Questions remain about tapering biologics when remission is achieved in RA. The patient perspective has to be incorporated in pragmatic applications of tapering but is rarely accounted for in clinical studies of tapering. The aim of the present review was to summarize the evidence about RA patient perspectives on biologic tapering. METHODS We provided a narrative summary of the currently small body of research on patient perspectives retrieved through systematic searches with an emphasis on seeking qualitative research. In addition, we provided an update on relevant clinical research and financial considerations that frame the findings on patient perspectives. RESULTS Financial considerations around commencing/continuing on biologic therapies in RA vary internationally and have implications for patient perspectives. Recent clinical studies indicate that the benefit of tapering biologic therapy when in remission are predicted by drug concentration and aspects of disease activity, severity and duration. Three major concerns have been identified from studies of patient perspectives on biologic tapering: (a) disease relapse; (b) access to treatment in the case of disease flare when tapering; and (c) local motivation for dose reduction (i.e., driven by funding or health benefit). CONCLUSIONS More research is needed on tapering biologics, and should include studies of patient perspectives as well as health economic evaluations. Patient decision aids are a potential way of applying clinical and patient-focused evidence to help all parties come to a decision, but require developmental research and pragmatic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa K Stamp
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, Aotearoa/New Zealand
| | - Suz Jack Chan
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa/New Zealand
| | - Carlo Marra
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa/New Zealand
| | - Caitlin Helme
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa/New Zealand
| | - Gareth J Treharne
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa/New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reyna VF, Helm RK, Weldon RB, Shah PD, Turpin AG, Govindgari S. Brain activation covaries with reported criminal behaviors when making risky choices: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 2019; 147:1094-1109. [PMID: 29975093 DOI: 10.1037/xge0000434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Criminal behavior has been associated with abnormal neural activity when people experience risks and rewards or exercise inhibition. However, neural substrates of mental representations that underlie criminal and noncriminal risk-taking in adulthood have received scant attention. We take a new approach, applying fuzzy-trace theory, to examine neural substrates of risk preferences and criminality. We extend ideas about gist (simple meaning) and verbatim (precise risk-reward tradeoffs) representations used to explain adolescent risk-taking to uncover neural correlates of developmentally inappropriate adult risk-taking. We tested predictions using a risky-choice framing task completed in the MRI scanner, and examined neural covariation with self-reported criminal and noncriminal risk-taking. As predicted, risk-taking was correlated with a behavioral pattern of risk preferences called "reverse framing" (preferring sure losses over a risky option and a risky option over sure gains, the opposite of typical framing biases) that has been linked to risky behavior in adolescents and is rarely observed in nondisordered adults. Experimental manipulations confirmed processing interpretations of typical framing (gist-based) and reverse-framing (verbatim-based) risk preferences. In the brain, covariation with criminal and noncriminal risk-taking was observed predominantly when subjects made reverse-framing choices. Noncriminal risk-taking behavior was associated with emotional reactivity (amygdala) and reward motivation (striatal) areas, whereas criminal behavior was associated with greater activation in temporal and parietal cortices, their junction, and insula. When subjects made more developmentally typical framing choices, reflecting nonpreferred gist processing, activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex covaried with criminal risk-taking, which may reflect cognitive effort to process gist while inhibiting preferred verbatim processing. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
|
17
|
How to Get the Most from Methotrexate (MTX) Treatment for Your Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient?-MTX in the Treat-to-Target Strategy. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8040515. [PMID: 30991730 PMCID: PMC6518419 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) is a remarkable drug with a key role in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at every stage of its evolution. Its attributes include good overall efficacy for signs and symptoms, inhibition of structural damage and preservation of function with acceptable and manageable safety, a large dose-titratable range, options for either an oral or parenteral route of administration, and currently unrivalled cost-effectiveness. It has a place as a monotherapy and also as an anchor drug that can be safely used in combination with other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or used concomitantly with biological DMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs. MTX is not without potential issues regarding toxicity, notably hepatotoxicity and bone marrow toxicity, as well as tolerability problems for some, but not all, patients. But many of these issues can be mitigated or managed. In the face of a welcome expansion in available targeted therapies for the treatment of RA, MTX looks set to remain at the foundation of pharmacotherapy for the majority of people living with RA and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. In this article, we provide an evidence-based discussion as to how to achieve the best outcomes with this versatile drug in the context of a treat-to-target strategy for the management of RA.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wilhelms EA, Fraenkel L, Reyna VF. Effects of Probabilities, Adverse Outcomes, and Status Quo on Perceived Riskiness of Medications: Testing Explanatory Hypotheses Concerning Gist, Worry, and Numeracy. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2018; 32:714-726. [PMID: 30686857 PMCID: PMC6345391 DOI: 10.1002/acp.3448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We tested predictions of fuzzy-trace theory that qualitative health status and gist representations (ordinal and categorical) of risks contribute to willingness to start medications, beyond effects of objective risk, emotion (worry), and numeracy. Adults in two experiments were given hypothetical scenarios based on actual medications, varying health status quo (acceptable or unacceptable), adverse event (pneumonia or cancer), and four levels of quantitative risk (from 1/100,000 to 1/100) between subjects. In both experiments, cancer and higher quantitative risk elicited greater worry and risk perceptions and reduced willingness to start a new medication. Willingness to start was also influenced by health status quo. After controlling for other variables, only status quo and gist representations consistently predicted willingness to start in both experiments. Results support an integrated approach to understanding and predicting perceptions of the risks of medications that encompasses numerical cognition, emotions (such as worry), and qualitative gist representations of medical information.
Collapse
|
19
|
Phillips R, Pell B, Grant A, Bowen D, Sanders J, Taylor A, Edwards A, Choy E, Williams D. Identifying the unmet information and support needs of women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pregnancy planning, pregnancy and early parenting: mixed-methods study. BMC Rheumatol 2018; 2:21. [PMID: 30886972 PMCID: PMC6390539 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-018-0029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) such as inflammatory arthritis and Lupus, and many of the treatments for these diseases, can have a detrimental impact on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Disease activity and organ damage as a result of ARDs can affect maternal and foetal outcomes. The safety and acceptability of hormonal contraceptives can also be affected. The objective of this study was to identify the information and support needs of women with ARDs during pregnancy planning, pregnancy and early parenting. Methods This mixed methods study included a cross-sectional online survey and qualitative narrative interviews. The survey was completed by 128 women, aged 18–49 in the United Kingdom with an ARD who were thinking of getting pregnant in the next five years, who were pregnant, or had young children (< 5 years old). The survey assessed quality-of-life and information needs (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale Short Form and Educational Needs Assessment Tool), support received, what women found challenging, what was helpful, and support women would have liked. From the survey participants, a maximum variation sample of 22 women were purposively recruited for qualitative interviews. Interviews used a person-centered participatory approach facilitated by visual methods, which enabled participants to reflect on their experiences. Interviews were also carried out with seven health professionals purposively sampled from primary care, secondary care, maternity, and health visiting services. Results Survey findings indicated an unmet need for information in this population (ENAT total mean 104.85, SD 30.18). Women at the pre-conception stage reported higher needs for information on pregnancy planning, fertility, giving birth, and breastfeeding, whereas those who had children already expressed a higher need for information on pain and mobility. The need for high quality information, and more holistic, multi-disciplinary, collaborative, and integrated care consistently emerged as themes in the survey open text responses and interviews with women and health professionals. Conclusions There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate interventions to better inform, support and empower women of reproductive age who have ARDs as they navigate the complex challenges that they face during pregnancy planning, pregnancy and early parenting. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41927-018-0029-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon Phillips
- 1Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Bethan Pell
- 2Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Aimee Grant
- 2Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Bowen
- 1Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Julia Sanders
- 3School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ann Taylor
- 4Centre for Medical Education, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- 1Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ernest Choy
- 5Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Denitza Williams
- 1Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reyna V. When Irrational Biases Are Smart: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Complex Decision Making. J Intell 2018; 6:E29. [PMID: 31162456 PMCID: PMC6480760 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence6020029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
I take a decision-making approach to consider ways of addressing the "unresolved and dramatic problems in the world". Traditional approaches to good decision-making are reviewed. These approaches reduce complex decisions to tradeoffs between magnitudes of probabilities, and outcomes in which the quantity and precision of information are key to making good decisions. I discuss a contrasting framework, called "fuzzy-trace theory", which emphasizes understanding the simple gist of options and applying core social and moral values. Importantly, the tendency to rely on meaningful but simple gist increases from childhood to adulthood (or, in adulthood, as people gain experience in a domain), so that specific irrational biases grow with knowledge and experience. As predicted theoretically, these violations of rationality in the traditional sense are associated empirically with healthier and more adaptive outcomes. Thus, interventions that help decision makers understand the essential gist of their options and how it connects to core values are practical approaches to reducing "unresolved and dramatic problems in the world" one decision at a time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Reyna
- Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shaw Y, Metes ID, Michaud K, Donohue JM, Roberts MS, Levesque MC, Chang JC. Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Motivations for Accepting or Resisting Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment Regimens. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:533-541. [PMID: 28575542 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient refusal of and nonadherence to treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can adversely affect disease outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This qualitative study describes how RA patients' feelings in response to experiences and information affected their decisions to accept (agree to adopt, initiate, and implement) or resist (refuse, avoid, and discontinue) DMARD treatment regimens. METHODS A total of 48 RA patients were interviewed about their experiences making decisions about DMARDs. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes related to their internal motivations for accepting or resisting treatment regimens, using a narrative analysis approach. RESULTS In addition to feelings about the necessity and dangers of medications, patients' feelings towards their identity as an ill person, the act of taking medication, and the decision process itself were important drivers of patient's decisions. For patients' motivations to accept treatment regimens, 2 themes emerged: a desire to return to a normal life, and fear of future disability due to RA. For motivations to resist treatment regimens, 5 themes emerged: fear of medications, maintaining control over health, denial of sick identity, disappointment with treatment, and feeling overwhelmed by the cognitive burden of deciding. CONCLUSION Feelings in response to experiences and information played a major role in how patients weighed the benefits and costs of treatment options, suggesting that addressing patients' feelings may be important when rheumatologists counsel about therapeutic options. Further research is needed to learn how best to address patients' feelings throughout the treatment decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yomei Shaw
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ilinca D Metes
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, and National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Julie M Donohue
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark S Roberts
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Judy C Chang
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Can we educate decision makers to make better decisions? In the present paper, I argue that we can in at least two broad ways: (1) teaching concrete knowledge about a specific decision or decision type and (2) teaching more abstract decision-making competencies thought to lead to better decisions. Teaching knowledge can be done using decision aids and similar techniques that provide important information about a specific choice (e.g., a medical treatment option). In these cases, information presented using evidence-based techniques to improve comprehension and use of information will have greater effects on judgments and choices. Teaching more abstract decision competencies, on the other hand, involves formal schooling (with the bulk of formal education falling during childhood) or training in a specific competency important to decision processes and outcomes; I use numeracy interventions as an exemplar.
Collapse
|
23
|
Romer D, Reyna VF, Satterthwaite TD. Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2017; 27:19-34. [PMID: 28777995 PMCID: PMC5626621 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent neuroscience models of adolescent brain development attribute the morbidity and mortality of this period to structural and functional imbalances between more fully developed limbic regions that subserve reward and emotion as opposed to those that enable cognitive control. We challenge this interpretation of adolescent development by distinguishing risk-taking that peaks during adolescence (sensation seeking and impulsive action) from risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood (impulsive choice and other decisions under known risk). Sensation seeking is primarily motivated by exploration of the environment under ambiguous risk contexts, while impulsive action, which is likely to be maladaptive, is more characteristic of a subset of youth with weak control over limbic motivation. Risk taking that declines monotonically from childhood to adulthood occurs primarily under conditions of known risks and reflects increases in executive function as well as aversion to risk based on increases in gist-based reasoning. We propose an alternative Life-span Wisdom Model that highlights the importance of experience gained through exploration during adolescence. We propose, therefore, that brain models that recognize the adaptive roles that cognition and experience play during adolescence provide a more complete and helpful picture of this period of development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Romer
- Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, United States
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Klein EY, Martinez EM, May L, Saheed M, Reyna V, Broniatowski DA. Categorical Risk Perception Drives Variability in Antibiotic Prescribing in the Emergency Department: A Mixed Methods Observational Study. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32. [PMID: 28634909 PMCID: PMC5602760 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4099-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to evidence-based antibiotic therapy guidelines for treatment of upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) varies widely among clinicians. Understanding this variability is key for reducing inappropriate prescribing. OBJECTIVE To measure how emergency department (ED) clinicians' perceptions of antibiotic prescribing risks affect their decision-making. DESIGN Clinician survey based on fuzzy-trace theory, a theory of medical decision-making, combined with retrospective data on prescribing outcomes for URI/pneumonia visits in two EDs. The survey predicts the categorical meanings, or gists, that individuals derive from given information. PARTICIPANTS ED physicians, residents, and physician assistants (PAs) who completed surveys and treated patients with URI/pneumonia diagnoses between August 2014 and December 2015. MAIN MEASURES Gists derived from survey responses and their association with rates of antibiotic prescribing per visit. KEY RESULTS Of 4474 URI/pneumonia visits, 2874 (64.2%) had an antibiotic prescription. However, prescribing rates varied from 7% to 91% for the 69 clinicians surveyed (65.2% response rate). Clinicians who framed therapy-prescribing decisions as a categorical choice between continued illness and possibly beneficial treatment ("why not take a risk?" gist, which assumes antibiotic therapy is essentially harmless) had higher rates of prescribing (OR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.54]). Greater agreement with the "antibiotics may be harmful" gist was associated with lower prescribing rates (OR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that clinicians who perceive prescribing as a categorical choice between patients remaining ill or possibly improving from therapy are more likely to prescribe antibiotics. However, this strategy assumes that antibiotics are essentially harmless. Clinicians who framed decision-making as a choice between potential harms from therapy and continued patient illness (e.g., increased appreciation of potential harms) had lower prescribing rates. These results suggest that interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing should emphasize the non-negligible possibility of serious side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eili Y Klein
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5801 Smith Avenue, Suite 3220, Office 265, Davis Building, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA. .,Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, USA. .,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Elena M Martinez
- Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Larissa May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Mustapha Saheed
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5801 Smith Avenue, Suite 3220, Office 265, Davis Building, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA
| | - Valerie Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research and Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - David A Broniatowski
- Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Martin RW, Enck RD, Tellinghuisen DJ, Eggebeen AT, Birmingham JD, Head AJ. Comparison of the Effects of a Pharmaceutical Industry Decision Guide and Decision Aids on Patient Choice to Intensify Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Med Decis Making 2017; 37:577-588. [PMID: 28590834 PMCID: PMC5466141 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17696995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects a pharmaceutical industry decision guide and International Patient Decision Aids Standard (IPDAS) compliant patient decision aids (PtDA) on patient medication beliefs and choice to intensify therapy. METHODS Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, who had never taken etanercept (Enbrel), took part in a mail survey. They were presented with a hypothetical decision scenario where they were asked to consider adding etanercept to their current regimen. Each patient was randomized to review 1 of 3 forms of an etanercept-specific decision support: a long PtDA (LONG DA), a short PtDA (SHORT DA), or the manufacturer's Enbrel decision guide (Pharm Booklet). RESULTS We had 402 RA patients participate in the study (response rate, 52%). Of the patients randomized to the Pharm Booklet, 30.6% elected to initiate etanercept. Only 14.6% and 14.0% of patients who reviewed the LONG DA or SHORT DA choose to take etanercept (χ2 = 15.7; P < 0.001). Patients who reviewed the LONG DA or SHORT DA had a greater increase in knowledge about etanercept than those who reviewed the Pharm Booklet. There was no difference in decisional conflict among the groups. A logistic regression model explained 44.2% (R2 = 0.442) of patient choice to intensify therapy by initiating etanercept. The strongest predictor of choice to intensify therapy were beliefs about etanercept's ability to improve symptoms (OR = 2.56, 96%CI [1.71, 3.80]), and its use by others like the respondent (OR = 2.24, 95%CI [1.49, 3.35]). Mediation analysis confirmed the presence of a partial mediating effect of decision support on patients' intent to take etanercept (OR = 0.59, 95%CI [0.39, 0.89]). CONCLUSIONS Patients supported by the Pharm Booklet were twice as likely to choose to intensify therapy. The Pharm Booklet's effects are partially mediated through persuasive communication techniques that influence patients' beliefs that symptoms will improve, and increase social normative beliefs, rather than by increasing the relevant knowledge, clarifying patient values about positive or negative treatment outcomes, or increasing their self-efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W. Martin
- Richard W. Martin, Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA; e-mail:
| | - Ryan D. Enck
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH)
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE)
- Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (DJT)
| | - Donald J. Tellinghuisen
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH)
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE)
- Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (DJT)
| | - Aaron T. Eggebeen
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH)
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE)
- Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (DJT)
| | - James D. Birmingham
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH)
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE)
- Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (DJT)
| | - Andrew J. Head
- Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH)
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE)
- Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (DJT)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Blalock SJ, Reyna VF. Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review. Health Psychol 2017; 35:781-792. [PMID: 27505197 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fuzzy-trace theory is a dual-process model of memory, reasoning, judgment, and decision making that contrasts with traditional expectancy-value approaches. We review the literature applying fuzzy-trace theory to health with 3 aims: evaluating whether the theory's basic distinctions have been validated empirically in the domain of health; determining whether these distinctions are useful in assessing, explaining, and predicting health-related psychological processes; and determining whether the theory can be used to improve health judgments, decisions, or behaviors, especially compared to other approaches. METHOD We conducted a literature review using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science to identify empirical peer-reviewed papers that applied fuzzy-trace theory, or central constructs of the theory, to investigate health judgments, decisions, or behaviors. RESULTS Seventy nine studies (updated total is 94 studies; see Supplemental materials) were identified, over half published since 2012, spanning a wide variety of conditions and populations. Study findings supported the prediction that verbatim and gist representations are distinct constructs that can be retrieved independently using different cues. Although gist-based reasoning was usually associated with improved judgment and decision making, 4 sources of bias that can impair gist reasoning were identified. Finally, promising findings were reported from intervention studies that used fuzzy-trace theory to improve decision making and decrease unhealthy risk taking. CONCLUSIONS Despite large gaps in the literature, most studies supported all 3 aims. By focusing on basic psychological processes that underlie judgment and decision making, fuzzy-trace theory provides insights into how individuals make decisions involving health risks and suggests innovative intervention approaches to improve health outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Blalock
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nota I, Drossaert CHC, Melissant HC, Taal E, Vonkeman HE, Haagsma CJ, van de Laar MAFJ. Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:51. [PMID: 28441950 PMCID: PMC5405550 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A main element of patient-centred care, Patient Decision Aids (PtDAs) facilitate shared decision-making (SDM). A recent update of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) emphasised patient involvement during PtDA development, but omitted a methodology for doing so. This article reports on the value of user-centred design (UCD) methods for the development of a PtDA that aims to support inflammatory arthritis patients in their choice between disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods The IPDAS development process model in combination with UCD methods were applied. The process was overseen by an eight-member multidisciplinary steering group. Patients and health professionals were iteratively consulted. Qualitative in-depth interviews combined with rapid prototyping were conducted with patients to assess their needs for specific functionality, content and design of the PtDA. Group meetings with health professionals were organized to assess patients’ needs and to determine how the PtDA should be integrated into patient pathways. The current literature was reviewed to determine the clinical evidence to include in the PtDA. To evaluate usability among patients, they were observed using the PtDA while thinking aloud and then interviewed. Results The combination of patient interviews with rapid prototyping revealed that patients wanted to compare multiple DMARDs both for their clinical aspects and implications for daily life. Health professionals mainly wanted to refer patients to a reliable, easily adjustable source of information about DMARDs. A web-based PtDA was constructed consisting of four parts: 1) general information about SDM, inflammatory arthritis and DMARDs; 2) an application to compare particular DMARDs; 3) value clarification exercises; and 4) a printed summary of patients’ notes, preferences, worries and questions that they could bring to discuss with their rheumatologist. Conclusions The study demonstrated that UCD methods can be of great value for the development of PtDAs. The early, iterative involvement of patients and health professionals was helpful in developing a novel user-friendly PtDA that allowed patients to choose between DMARDs. The PtDA fits the values of all stakeholders and easily integrates with the patient pathway and daily workflow of health professionals. This collaborative designed PtDA may improve SDM and patient participation in arthritis care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Nota
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Constance H C Drossaert
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen C Melissant
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Taal
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50 000, 7500 KA, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J Haagsma
- Department of Rheumatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, PO Box 7600, 7600 SZ, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50 000, 7500 KA, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blalock SJ. Medication Risk Communication in Rheumatology: Where Are We and Where Do We Go from Here? Curr Rheumatol Rep 2017; 19:7. [PMID: 28164248 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-017-0631-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews findings from recent research examining issues related to the risk communication process within the context of rheumatologic conditions. Five specific questions are addressed. First, to what extent do patients with rheumatic disorders exhibit adequate knowledge relevant to disease and medication risks and risk management? Second, what sources do patients use when attempting to find information about disease and medication risks and risk management? Third, what types of information about disease and medication risks and risk management do rheumatologists provide during routine office visits. Fourth, what governmental regulations attempt to increase consumer access to information about medication risks and risk management? Finally, what other educational resources are available to facilitate patient-provider communication concerning disease and medication risks and risk management? The findings reported identify gaps in patient knowledge concerning medication risks and risk management, highlight areas for improvement, and identify resources that may enhance medication risk communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Blalock
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7573, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Singh JA, Shah N, Green C. Individualized patient decision-aid for immunosuppressive drugs in women with lupus nephritis: study protocol of a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:53. [PMID: 28143529 PMCID: PMC5282664 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1408-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE), also commonly referred to as lupus, is a rare, but sometimes, fatal disease, that primarily affects young women. Lupus nephritis, a common manifestation of lupus, is more common and more devastating in patients of minority race/ethnicity. Patients have negative views of immunosuppressive drugs for lupus nephritis due to a concern about side effects and under-appreciation of its benefit. We designed a study to assess the effectiveness of individualized, computerized patient decision-aid for immunosuppressive drugs for lupus nephritis compared to a standard pamphlet for patient decision-making. METHODS Adult women with lupus nephritis, with a current lupus nephritis flare or at risk of a future lupus nephritis flare will be randomized to individualized, computerized patient decision-aid for immunosuppressive drugs vs. standard pamphlet with information about lupus and its treatment including immunosuppressive drugs and outcomes. Patients will complete outcome assessments immediately after the intervention has been administered. Patients will be followed at 3-months with a brief survey, either in person or on the phone, and at 6-months with medical record review for exploratory outcomes. Co-primary outcomes are decisional conflict and informed choice regarding immunosuppressive drugs (combines values, knowledge and choice). Secondary outcomes include: (1) assessment of patient-physician communication by assessing audio-taped physician-patient communication after intervention administration; (2) concordance between patient's desired and actual role in immunosuppressive drugs decision-making using the control preference scale (CPS); and (3) patient perception of physician interaction using the interpersonal process of care- short form (IPC-SF). DISCUSSION This is one of the first studies to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention targeting minorities with lupus nephritis. This patient-centered lupus nephritis decision-aid will be available in the public domain in English and Spanish. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02319525 ; registered on November 5, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasvinder A Singh
- Rheumatology Section, Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Division of Epidemiology at the School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Nipam Shah
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Candace Green
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nota I, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Vonkeman HE, Haagsma CJ, van de Laar MAFJ. Evaluation of a patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Arthritis Res Ther 2016; 18:252. [PMID: 27793171 PMCID: PMC5086044 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1138-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to international guidelines, treatment of inflammatory arthritis should be based on a shared decision between patient and rheumatologist. Furthermore, patients with inflammatory arthritis have high need of information and want to be more actively involved in medical decision-making. To facilitate shared decision-making and support patients in choosing between disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), a web-based patient decision aid (PtDA) was developed. This study evaluated use, appreciation and effect of this PtDA. METHODS A post-test only study with a historical comparison group was conducted. In a two-year period, all patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, who were deciding whether to start a (different) DMARD were invited to participate. In the first year, patients received standard information (comparison group). In the second year, patients were referred to the PtDA (intervention group). In both groups, a questionnaire was sent four weeks after consulting the rheumatologist. Patient characteristics included sociodemographic, health-related and preference-related variables. Process measures were for use and appraisal of the PtDA (intervention group only). The primary outcome measure was patients' perceived role in medical decision-making. Secondary outcome measures comprised satisfaction with the decision-making process and the decision, beliefs about medication, adherence to medication and trust in the physician. RESULTS We received 158/232 questionnaires (68 %) from the comparison group and 123/200 (61 %) from the intervention group. The PtDA was used by 69/123 patients (57 %) in the intervention group. Patients who used the PtDA highly appreciated it and perceived it as easy to use and helpful. Relative to the comparison group, patients in the intervention group perceived a more active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients' personal preferences. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION The web-based PtDA was highly appreciated and perceived as helpful for decision-making. Implementation of the PtDA in rheumatology practice was associated with a significantly larger proportion of patients perceiving an active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients' personal preferences. The PtDA can be a valuable aid in improving patient participation in decision-making about DMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Nota
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Constance H C Drossaert
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Taal
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50 000, 7500, KA, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J Haagsma
- Department of Rheumatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, PO Box 7600, 7600, SZ, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50 000, 7500, KA, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Reyna VF, Wilhelms EA. The Gist of Delay of Gratification: Understanding and Predicting Problem Behaviors. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING 2016; 30:610-625. [PMID: 28808356 DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Delay of gratification captures elements of temptation and self-denial that characterize real-life problems with money and other problem behaviors such as unhealthy risk taking. According to fuzzy-trace theory, decision makers mentally represent social values such as delay of gratification in a coarse but meaningful form of memory called "gist." Applying this theory, we developed a gist measure of delay of gratification that does not involve quantitative trade-offs (as delay discounting does) and hypothesize that this construct explains unique variance beyond sensation seeking and inhibition in accounting for problem behaviors. Across four studies, we examine this Delay-of-gratification Gist Scale by using principal components analyses and evaluating convergent and divergent validity with other potentially related scales such as Future Orientation, Propensity to Plan, Time Perspectives Inventory, Spendthrift-Tightwad, Sensation Seeking, Cognitive Reflection, Barratt Impulsiveness, and the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (delay discounting). The new 12-item measure captured a single dimension of delay of gratification, correlated as predicted with other scales, but accounted for unique variance in predicting such outcomes as overdrawing bank accounts, substance abuse, and overall subjective well-being. Results support a theoretical distinction between reward-related approach motivation, including sensation seeking, and inhibitory faculties, including cognitive reflection. However, individuals' agreement with the qualitative gist of delay of gratification, as expressed in many cultural traditions, could not be reduced to such dualist distinctions nor to quantitative conceptions of delay discounting, shedding light on mechanisms of self-control and risk taking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie F Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Department of Human Development, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Evan A Wilhelms
- Psychology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mathews AL, Coleska A, Burns PB, Chung KC. Evolution of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Medical Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68:318-24. [PMID: 26315611 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Revised: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The migration of health care toward a consumer-driven system favors increased patient participation during the treatment decision-making process. Patient involvement in treatment decision discussions has been linked to increased treatment adherence and patient satisfaction. Previous studies have quantified decision-making styles of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, none of them have considered the evolution of patient involvement after living with RA for many years. We conducted a qualitative study to determine the decision-making model used by long-term RA patients, and to describe the changes in their involvement over time. METHODS Twenty participants were recruited from the ongoing Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis study. Semistructured interviews were conducted and data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS Nineteen out of 20 participants recalled using the paternalistic decision-making (PDM) model immediately following their diagnosis. Fourteen of the 19 participants who initially used PDM evolved to shared decision-making (SDM). Participants attributed the change in involvement to the development of a trusting relationship with their physician, as well as to becoming educated about the disease. CONCLUSION When initially diagnosed with RA, patients may let their physician decide on the best treatment course. However, over time patients may evolve to exercise a more collaborative role. Physicians should understand that even within SDM, each patient can demonstrate a varied amount of autonomy. It is up to the physician to have a discussion with each patient to determine his or her desired level of involvement.
Collapse
|
33
|
Wolfe CR, Reyna VF, Widmer CL, Cedillos-Whynott EM, Brust-Renck PG, Weil AM, Hu X. Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of the BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2016; 49:178-189. [PMID: 28008216 PMCID: PMC5166605 DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System helps women understand and make decisions about genetic testing for breast cancer risk. BRCA Gist is guided by Fuzzy-Trace Theory, (FTT) and built using AutoTutor Lite. It responds differently to participants depending on what they say. Seven tutorial dialogues requiring explanation and argumentation are guided by three FTT concepts: forming gist explanations in one's own words, emphasizing decision-relevant information, and deliberating the consequences of decision alternatives. Participants were randomly assigned to BRCA Gist, a control, or impoverished BRCA Gist conditions removing gist explanation dialogues, argumentation dialogues, or FTT images. All BRCA Gist conditions performed significantly better than controls on knowledge, comprehension, and risk assessment. Significant differences in knowledge, comprehension, and fine-grained dialogue analyses demonstrate the efficacy of gist explanation dialogues. FTT images significantly increased knowledge. Providing more elements in arguments against testing correlated with increased knowledge and comprehension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiangen Hu
- University of Memphis, Memphis, TN and Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wilhelms EA, Reyna VF, Brust-Renck P, Weldon RB, Corbin JC. Gist Representations and Communication of Risks about HIV-AIDS: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory Approach. Curr HIV Res 2016; 13:399-407. [PMID: 26149161 DOI: 10.2174/1570162x13666150511142748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Revised: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
As predicted by fuzzy-trace theory, people with a range of training—from untrained adolescents to expert physicians—are susceptible to biases and errors in judgment and perception of HIV-AIDS risk. To explain why this occurs, we introduce fuzzy-trace theory as a theoretical perspective that describes these errors to be a function of knowledge deficits, gist-based representation of risk categories, retrieval failure for risk knowledge, and processing interference (e.g., base-rate neglect) in combining risk estimates. These principles explain how people perceive HIV-AIDS risk and why they take risks with potentially lethal outcomes, often despite rote (verbatim) knowledge.For example, people inappropriately generalize the wrong gist about condoms' effectiveness against fluid-borne disease to diseases that are transferred skin-to-skin, such as HPV. We also describe how variation in processing in adolescence (e.g., more verbatim processing compared to adults) can be a route to risk-taking that explains key aspects of why many people are infected with HIV in youth, as well as how interventions that emphasize bottom-line gists communicate risks effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, B44 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Examining Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Preference Heterogeneity Using Segmentation Analysis: Treat Now or Defer? J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50:252-7. [PMID: 26166145 PMCID: PMC4811360 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve our understanding of patients' treatment preferences for chronic hepatitis C (HCV). METHODS Subjects with HCV were recruited from 2 VA medical centers. Preferences were ascertained using conjoint analysis. We used segmentation analysis to examine whether there were groups of respondents with similar preferences that were systematically different from the preferences of others. We then measured the associations between treatment preference with subjects' characteristics and their gist principles related to living with HCV and the burden of therapy. RESULTS A total of 199 subjects participated in this study. The segmentation analysis demonstrated that subjects could be classified into 2 distinct groups. The larger group [group 1, n=118 (59%)] opted for current treatment and the other [group 2, n=81 (41%)] preferred to defer. Patients with cirrhosis were less likely to belong to group 2 (prefer to defer) compared with those without cirrhosis (40.5% vs. 21.3%), whereas subjects self-identifying as African American were more likely to belong to group 2 than white subjects (51.3% vs. 30.5%). Members of group 1 had a more positive overall gist principles related to HCV compared with members of group 2 [mean (SD) score=28.63 (3.06) vs. 26.46 (2.79), P<0.0001]. These gist principles mediated the relationship between race and treatment preference (Sobel test statistic=-2.68, 2-tailed P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that there are groups of HCV patients with similar preferences that are distinct from other groups' preferences. Patients' gist principles related to the significance of having a chronic viral infection and the burdens of therapy are strongly related to their current treatment decisions. These findings help inform how best to initiate and deliver treatment for patients with HCV.
Collapse
|
36
|
Fraenkel L, Matzko CK, Webb DE, Oppermann B, Charpentier P, Peters E, Reyna V, Newman ED. Use of Decision Support for Improved Knowledge, Values Clarification, and Informed Choice in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016. [PMID: 26195173 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the potential value of a theory-based, interactive decision support tool in clinical practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are candidates for biologic agents. METHODS We conducted an 8-week, 2-arm, parallel, single-blind pilot trial in which candidates for treatment escalation with a biologic agent were randomized to receive either a link to a web-based tool or usual care. Outcomes included changes in objective knowledge, subjective knowledge, values clarification, and satisfaction with risk communication as well as the proportion of subjects defined as making an informed choice to escalate care at 2 weeks. RESULTS A total of 125 subjects were randomized. Significant between-group differences at 2 weeks favoring the intervention group were seen for changes in objective knowledge, subjective knowledge, and values clarification. No significant between-group differences were found in subjects' satisfaction with risk communication. Among those deciding to escalate care, a greater percentage met the criteria for an informed choice at 2 weeks in the intervention group compared to the control group (32% versus 13%; P = 0.02). Improvements in subjective knowledge and values clarification persisted at 8 weeks. There were no between-group differences in objective knowledge at 8 weeks. CONCLUSION In this study, use of a decision support tool at the time of decision-making resulted in improved objective and subjective knowledge, as well as values clarity, compared to usual care. Not all improvements were sustained, emphasizing the need to offer educational support should additional escalation of care be required over the course of the illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Debra E Webb
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Syrowatka A, Krömker D, Meguerditchian AN, Tamblyn R. Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e20. [PMID: 26813512 PMCID: PMC4748141 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient information and education, such as decision aids, are gradually moving toward online, computer-based environments. Considerable research has been conducted to guide content and presentation of decision aids. However, given the relatively new shift to computer-based support, little attention has been given to how multimedia and interactivity can improve upon paper-based decision aids. Objective The first objective of this review was to summarize published literature into a proposed classification of features that have been integrated into computer-based decision aids. Building on this classification, the second objective was to assess whether integration of specific features was associated with higher-quality decision making. Methods Relevant studies were located by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. The review identified studies that evaluated computer-based decision aids for adults faced with preference-sensitive medical decisions and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. A thematic synthesis was conducted to develop the classification of features. Subsequently, meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences (SMD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported knowledge or decisional conflict. Further subgroup analyses compared pooled SMDs for decision aids that incorporated a specific feature to other computer-based decision aids that did not incorporate the feature, to assess whether specific features improved quality of decision making. Results Of 3541 unique publications, 58 studies met the target criteria and were included in the thematic synthesis. The synthesis identified six features: content control, tailoring, patient narratives, explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. A subset of 26 RCTs from the thematic synthesis was used to conduct the meta-analyses. As expected, computer-based decision aids performed better than usual care or alternative aids; however, some features performed better than others. Integration of content control improved quality of decision making (SMD 0.59 vs 0.23 for knowledge; SMD 0.39 vs 0.29 for decisional conflict). In contrast, tailoring reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.40 vs 0.71 for knowledge; SMD 0.25 vs 0.52 for decisional conflict). Similarly, patient narratives also reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.43 vs 0.65 for knowledge; SMD 0.17 vs 0.46 for decisional conflict). Results were varied for different types of explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. Conclusions Integration of media rich or interactive features into computer-based decision aids can improve quality of preference-sensitive decision making. However, this is an emerging field with limited evidence to guide use. The systematic review and thematic synthesis identified features that have been integrated into available computer-based decision aids, in an effort to facilitate reporting of these features and to promote integration of such features into decision aids. The meta-analyses and associated subgroup analyses provide preliminary evidence to support integration of specific features into future decision aids. Further research can focus on clarifying independent contributions of specific features through experimental designs and refining the designs of features to improve effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Syrowatka
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:3-15. [PMID: 25969430 PMCID: PMC4717393 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 958] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. METHODS A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. RESULTS The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1-3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (≥9/10). CONCLUSIONS The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ferdinand C Breedveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Free University and Humboldt University, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, USA
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology B, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital,Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Monika Schoels
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Stoffer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jose Louis Andreu
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Martin Aringer
- Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bergman
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neil Betteridge
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Burkhardt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt, German
| | - Mario Cardiel
- Centro de Investigación Clínica de Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Bernard Combe
- Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Montpellier University, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Durez
- Pôle de Recherche en Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joao Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Department, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alan Gibofsky
- Weill Medical College, Cornell University Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Juan J Gomez-Reino
- Rheumatology Unit, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Pekka Hannonen
- Department of Medicine, Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Marios Kouloumas
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Landewe
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Nash
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrew Östör
- Rheumatology Clinical Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pam Richards
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Carter Thorne
- Division of Rheumatology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Martinus de Wit
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Desirée van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Corbin JC, Reyna VF, Weldon RB, Brainerd CJ. How Reasoning, Judgment, and Decision Making are Colored by Gist-based Intuition: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory Approach. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION 2015; 4:344-355. [PMID: 26664820 PMCID: PMC4671075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Fuzzy-trace theory distinguishes verbatim (literal, exact) from gist (meaningful) representations, predicting that reliance on gist increases with experience and expertise. Thus, many judgment-and-decision-making biases increase with development, such that cognition is colored by context in ways that violate logical coherence and probability theories. Nevertheless, this increase in gist-based intuition is adaptive: Gist is stable, less sensitive to interference, and easier to manipulate. Moreover, gist captures the functionally significant essence of information, supporting healthier and more robust decision processes. We describe how fuzzy-trace theory accounts for judgment-and-decision making phenomena, predicting the paradoxical arc of these processes with the development of experience and expertise. We present data linking gist memory processes to gist processing in decision making and provide illustrations of gist reliance in medicine, public health, and intelligence analysis.
Collapse
|
40
|
Reyna VF, Weldon RB, McCormick M. Educating Intuition: Reducing Risky Decisions Using Fuzzy-Trace Theory. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 2015; 24:392-398. [PMID: 26594099 DOI: 10.1177/0963721415588081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Risky decision-making, especially in adolescence, is a major public health problem. However, fuzzy-trace theory suggests that bad outcomes are preventable by changing thinking, and, therefore, feelings, about risks. The theory aligns with new findings and has been shown to be effective in experiments on sexual risk-taking, medication adherence, and genetic testing. Despite the vulnerabilities of the adolescent brain, decision processes can be modified by applying evidence-based theory.
Collapse
|
41
|
Zuchowski JL, Hamilton AB, Pyne JM, Clark JA, Naik AD, Smith DL, Kanwal F. Qualitative analysis of patient-centered decision attributes associated with initiating hepatitis C treatment. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15:124. [PMID: 26429337 PMCID: PMC4591706 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0356-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this era of a constantly changing landscape of antiviral treatment options for chronic viral hepatitis C (CHC), shared clinical decision-making addresses the need to engage patients in complex treatment decisions. However, little is known about the decision attributes that CHC patients consider when making treatment decisions. We identify key patient-centered decision attributes, and explore relationships among these attributes, to help inform the development of a future CHC shared decision-making aid. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews with CHC patients at four Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals, in three comparison groups: contemplating CHC treatment at the time of data collection (Group 1), recently declined CHC treatment (Group 2), or recently started CHC treatment (Group 3). Participant descriptions of decision attributes were analyzed for the entire sample as well as by patient group and by gender. RESULTS Twenty-nine Veteran patients participated (21 males, eight females): 12 were contemplating treatment, nine had recently declined treatment, and eight had recently started treatment. Patients on average described eight (range 5-13) decision attributes. The attributes most frequently reported overall were: physical side effects (83%); treatment efficacy (79%), new treatment drugs in development (55%); psychological side effects (55%); and condition of the liver (52%), with some variation based on group and gender. Personal life circumstance attributes (such as availability of family support and the burden of financial responsibilities) influencing treatment decisions were also noted by all participants. Multiple decision attributes were interrelated in highly complex ways. CONCLUSIONS Participants considered numerous attributes in their CHC treatment decisions. A better understanding of these attributes that influence patient decision-making is crucial in order to inform patient-centered clinical approaches to care (such as shared decision-making augmented with relevant decision-making aids) that respond to patients' needs, preferences, and circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Zuchowski
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, 16111 Plummer St. Bldg. 25, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA.
| | - Alison B Hamilton
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, 16111 Plummer St. Bldg. 25, North Hills, CA, 91343, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Jeffrey M Pyne
- Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA. .,Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4300 West 7th Street, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
| | - Jack A Clark
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, 200 Springs Rd, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA. .,Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St. #358w, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| | - Aanand D Naik
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness & Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Donna L Smith
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness & Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness & Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reyna VF, Hans VP, Corbin JC, Yeh R, Lin K, Royer C. The Gist of Juries: Testing a Model of Damage Award Decision Making. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 21:280-294. [PMID: 29075092 DOI: 10.1037/law0000048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Despite the importance of damage awards, juries are often at sea about the amounts that should be awarded, with widely differing awards for cases that seem comparable. We tested a new model of damage award decision making by systematically varying the size, context, and meaningfulness of numerical comparisons or anchors. As a result, we were able to elicit large differences in award amounts that replicated for 2 different cases. Although even arbitrary dollar amounts (unrelated to the cases) influenced the size of award judgments, the most consistent effects of numerical anchors were achieved when the amounts were meaningful in the sense that they conveyed the gist of numbers as small or large. Consistent with the model, the ordinal gist of the severity of plaintiff's damages and defendant's liability predicted damage awards, controlling for other factors such as motivation for the award-judgment task and perceived economic damages. Contrary to traditional dual-process approaches, numeracy and cognitive style (e.g., need for cognition and cognitive reflection) were not significant predictors of these numerical judgments, but they were associated with lower levels of variability once the gist of the judgments was taken into account. Implications for theory and policy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie F Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Department of Human Development, and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University
| | | | - Jonathan C Corbin
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Department of Human Development, and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University
| | - Ryan Yeh
- Department of Human Development, Cornell University
| | - Kelvin Lin
- Department of Human Development, Cornell University
| | - Caisa Royer
- Department of Human Development, Cornell University
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
We review decision making along the cancer continuum in the contemporary context of informed and shared decision making in which patients are encouraged to take a more active role in their health care. We discuss challenges to achieving informed and shared decision making, including cognitive limitations and emotional factors, but argue that understanding the mechanisms of decision making offers hope for improving decision support. Theoretical approaches to decision making that explain cognition, emotion, and their interaction are described, including classical psychophysical approaches, dual-process approaches that focus on conflicts between emotion versus cognition (or reason), and modern integrative approaches such as fuzzy-trace theory. In contrast to the earlier emphasis on rote use of numerical detail, modern approaches emphasize understanding the bottom-line gist of options (which encompasses emotion and other influences on meaning) and retrieving relevant social and moral values to apply to those gist representations. Finally, research on interventions to support better decision making in clinical settings is reviewed, drawing out implications for future research on decision making and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wendy L Nelson
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute
| | - Paul K Han
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center
| | - Michael P Pignone
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Setton R, Wilhelms E, Weldon B, Chick C, Reyna V. An Overview of Judgment and Decision Making Research Through the Lens of Fuzzy Trace Theory. XIN LI KE XUE JIN ZHAN 2014; 22:1837-1854. [PMID: 28725239 PMCID: PMC5512727 DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.01837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
We present the basic tenets of fuzzy trace theory, a comprehensive theory of memory, judgment, and decision making that is grounded in research on how information is stored as knowledge, mentally represented, retrieved from storage, and processed. In doing so, we highlight how it is distinguished from traditional models of decision making in that gist reasoning plays a central role. The theory also distinguishes advanced intuition from primitive impulsivity. It predicts that different sorts of errors occur with respect to each component of judgment and decision making: background knowledge, representation, retrieval, and processing. Classic errors in the judgment and decision making literature, such as risky-choice framing and the conjunction fallacy, are accounted for by fuzzy trace theory and new results generated by the theory contradict traditional approaches. We also describe how developmental changes in brain and behavior offer crucial insight into adult cognitive processing. Research investigating brain and behavior in developing and special populations supports fuzzy trace theory's predictions about reliance on gist processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Setton
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, USA
| | - Evan Wilhelms
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, USA
| | - Becky Weldon
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, USA
| | - Christina Chick
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, USA
| | - Valerie Reyna
- Departments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barton JL, Koenig CJ, Evans-Young G, Trupin L, Anderson J, Ragouzeos D, Breslin M, Morse T, Schillinger D, Montori VM, Yelin EH. The design of a low literacy decision aid about rheumatoid arthritis medications developed in three languages for use during the clinical encounter. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014; 14:104. [PMID: 25649726 PMCID: PMC4363399 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-014-0104-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care is a priority among policy makers, clinicians and patients both nationally and internationally. Demands on patients to have basic knowledge of RA, treatment options, and details of risk and benefit when making medication decisions with clinicians can be overwhelming, especially for those with limited literacy or limited English language proficiency. The objective of this study is to describe the development of a medication choice decision aid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in three languages using low literacy principles. METHODS Based on the development of a diabetes decision aid, the RA decision aid (RA Choice) was developed through a collaborative process involving patients, clinicians, designers, decision-aid and health literacy experts. A combination of evidence synthesis and direct observation of clinician-patient interactions generated content and guided an iterative process of prototype development. RESULTS Three iterations of RA Choice were developed and field-tested before completion. The final tool organized data using icons and plain language for 12 RA medications across 5 issues: frequency of administration, time to onset, cost, side effects, and special considerations. The tool successfully created a conversation between clinician and patient, and garnered high acceptability from clinicians. CONCLUSIONS The process of collaboratively developing an RA decision aid designed to promote shared decision making resulted in a graphically-enhanced, low literacy tool. The use of RA Choice in the clinical encounter has the potential to enhance communication for RA patients, including those with limited health literacy and limited English language proficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Barton
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Division of Hospital & Specialty Medicine, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | | | - Gina Evans-Young
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Laura Trupin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Dean Schillinger
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Edward H Yelin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yelin E, Tonner C, Kim SC, Katz JN, Ayanian JZ, Brookhart MA, Solomon DH. Sociodemographic, disease, health system, and contextual factors affecting the initiation of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66:980-9. [PMID: 24339352 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Accepted: 11/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of sociodemographic, disease, and health system characteristics and contextual features about the community of residence on the subsequent initiation of treatment with biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We analyzed data from the University of California, San Francisco Rheumatoid Arthritis Panel Study for the years 1999-2011. Principal data collection was by a structured annual phone survey. We estimated Kaplan-Meier curves of the time until initiation of biologic agents, stratified by age and income. We also used Cox regression to estimate the effect of individual-level sociodemographic and medical factors, contextual-level socioeconomic status measures, and density of health providers in the local community on the probability of initiating therapy with biologic agents for RA. RESULTS In total, 527 persons were included in the panel in 1999, and 229 persons (44%) had initiated therapy with biologic agents by 2011. In multivariable Cox regression models, age <70 years (hazard ratio [HR] for ages 19-54 years 1.89 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.24-2.87] and HR for ages 55-69 years 1.25 [95% CI 0.84-1.87]), Hispanic ethnicity (HR 2.02 [95% CI 1.05-3.86]), household income ≥$30,000/year (HR 1.61 [95% CI 1.12-2.32]), being married or with a partner (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.00-1.92]), and residence in rural environments (HR 1.96 [95% CI 1.28-2.99]) were associated with a higher probability of initiating biologic agents. Having no (HR 0.18 [95% CI 0.08-0.40]) or only 1-4 rheumatology visits in the year prior to interview (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.45-0.81]) and living in an area with ≥1 federally qualified health centers (HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.41-0.96]) were associated with a lower probability. CONCLUSION The probability of initiating therapy with biologic agents is affected by sociodemographic and health system characteristics as well as the nature of the community of residence, resulting in disparities in access to these medications.
Collapse
|
47
|
Fraenkel L, Seng EK, Cunningham M, Mattocks K. Understanding how patients (vs physicians) approach the decision to escalate treatment: a proposed conceptual model. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 54:278-85. [PMID: 25172936 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We performed a qualitative study to better understand how patients with RA approach risk-benefit trade-offs inherent in the choice of remaining with their current treatment vs escalating care. METHODS We used a think-aloud protocol to examine how patients with RA approach risk-benefit trade-offs inherent in the choice of remaining with their current treatment vs adding a biologic. The data emerging from the protocols were used to develop a conceptual model describing how patients approach the decision to escalate care. RESULTS Participants who were strongly impacted by their disease were not open to considering alternative options. For some patients, being highly impacted by their disease results in a strong preference to escalate care. For others, the same level of distress is reason to unconditionally refuse additional medications. In contrast, those who were moderately impacted were more open to consider treatment options. Among these participants, however, subjects' risk-benefit trade-offs were consistently modified by factors unrelated to medication, including sociodemographic characteristics, role responsibilities and the quality of the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSION The conceptual model indicates that patients approach the decision to escalate care differently from physicians. In order to improve care in RA, it is important to recognize that many patients with moderate to high disease activity are not open to alternative treatments, which is a prerequisite to engaging in decision making. Routine clinical encounters should enable health care providers to identify these patients in order to tailor education prior to recommending treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana Fraenkel
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY and Department of Research, VA Central Western Massachusetts, North Hampton, MA, USA. Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY and Department of Research, VA Central Western Massachusetts, North Hampton, MA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY and Department of Research, VA Central Western Massachusetts, North Hampton, MA, USA
| | - Meaghan Cunningham
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY and Department of Research, VA Central Western Massachusetts, North Hampton, MA, USA
| | - Kristin Mattocks
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Department of Medicine, VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY and Department of Research, VA Central Western Massachusetts, North Hampton, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reyna VF, Mills BA. Theoretically motivated interventions for reducing sexual risk taking in adolescence: a randomized controlled experiment applying fuzzy-trace theory. J Exp Psychol Gen 2014; 143:1627-1648. [PMID: 24773191 PMCID: PMC4115050 DOI: 10.1037/a0036717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Fuzzy-trace theory is a theory of memory, judgment, and decision making, and their development. We applied advances in this theory to increase the efficacy and durability of a multicomponent intervention to promote risk reduction and avoidance of premature pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Seven hundred and thirty-four adolescents from high schools and youth programs in 3 states (Arizona, Texas, and New York) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 curriculum groups: RTR (Reducing the Risk), RTR+ (a modified version of RTR using fuzzy-trace theory), and a control group. We report effects of curriculum on self-reported behaviors and behavioral intentions plus psychosocial mediators of those effects: namely, attitudes and norms, motives to have sex or get pregnant, self-efficacy and behavioral control, and gist/verbatim constructs. Among 26 outcomes, 19 showed an effect of at least 1 curriculum relative to the control group: RTR+ produced improvements for 17 outcomes and RTR produced improvements for 12 outcomes. For RTR+, 2 differences (for perceived parental norms and global benefit perception) were confined to age, gender, or racial/ethnic subgroups. Effects of RTR+ on sexual initiation emerged 6 months after the intervention, when many adolescents became sexually active. Effects of RTR+ were greater than RTR for 9 outcomes, and remained significantly greater than controls at 1-year follow-up for 12 outcomes. Consistent with fuzzy-trace theory, results suggest that by emphasizing gist representations, which are preserved over long periods and are key memories used in decision making, the enhanced intervention produced larger and more sustained effects on behavioral outcomes and psychosocial mediators of adolescent risk taking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie F Reyna
- Department of Human Development, Human Neuroscience Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C, Imboden J, Katz P, Schillinger D, Yelin EH. English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2014; 41:1290-7. [PMID: 24931952 PMCID: PMC4286372 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treat-to-target guidelines promote shared decision making (SDM) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Also, because of high cost and potential toxicity of therapies, SDM is central to patient safety. Our objective was to examine patterns of perceived communication around decision making in 2 cohorts of adults with RA. METHODS Data were derived from patients enrolled in 1 of 2 longitudinal, observational cohorts [University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) RA Cohort and RA Panel Cohort]. Subjects completed a telephone interview in their preferred language that included a measure of patient-provider communication, including items about decision making. Measures of trust in physician, education, and language proficiency were also asked. Logistic regression was performed to identify correlates of suboptimal SDM communication. Analyses were performed on each sample separately. RESULTS Of 509 patients across 2 cohorts, 30% and 32% reported suboptimal SDM communication. Low trust in physician was independently associated with suboptimal SDM communication in both cohorts. Older age and limited English proficiency were independently associated with suboptimal SDM in the UCSF RA Cohort, as was limited health literacy in the RA Panel Cohort. CONCLUSION This study of over 500 adults with RA from 2 demographically distinct cohorts found that nearly one-third of subjects report suboptimal SDM communication with their clinicians, regardless of cohort. Lower trust in physician was independently associated with suboptimal SDM communication in both cohorts, as was limited English language proficiency and older age in the UCSF RA Cohort and limited health literacy in the RA Panel Cohort. These findings underscore the need to examine the influence of SDM on health outcomes in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Dean Schillinger
- University of California, San Francisco
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wolfe CR, Reyna VF, Widmer CL, Cedillos EM, Fisher CR, Brust-Renck PG, Weil AM. Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach. Med Decis Making 2014; 35:46-59. [PMID: 24829276 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x14535983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND . Many healthy women consider genetic testing for breast cancer risk, yet BRCA testing issues are complex. OBJECTIVE . To determine whether an intelligent tutor, BRCA Gist, grounded in fuzzy-trace theory (FTT), increases gist comprehension and knowledge about genetic testing for breast cancer risk, improving decision making. DESIGN . In 2 experiments, 410 healthy undergraduate women were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: an online module using a Web-based tutoring system (BRCA Gist) that uses artificial intelligence technology, a second group read highly similar content from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Web site, and a third that completed an unrelated tutorial. INTERVENTION . BRCA Gist applied FTT and was designed to help participants develop gist comprehension of topics relevant to decisions about BRCA genetic testing, including how breast cancer spreads, inherited genetic mutations, and base rates. MEASURES . We measured content knowledge, gist comprehension of decision-relevant information, interest in testing, and genetic risk and testing judgments. RESULTS . Control knowledge scores ranged from 54% to 56%, NCI improved significantly to 65% and 70%, and BRCA Gist improved significantly more to 75% and 77%, P < 0.0001. BRCA Gist scored higher on gist comprehension than NCI and control, P < 0.0001. Control genetic risk-assessment mean was 48% correct; BRCA Gist (61%) and NCI (56%) were significantly higher, P < 0.0001. BRCA Gist participants recommended less testing for women without risk factors (not good candidates; 24% and 19%) than controls (50%, both experiments) and NCI (32%), experiment 2, P < 0.0001. BRCA Gist testing interest was lower than in controls, P < 0.0001. LIMITATIONS . BRCA Gist has not been tested with older women from diverse groups. CONCLUSIONS . Intelligent tutors, such as BRCA Gist, are scalable, cost-effective ways of helping people understand complex issues, improving decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Wolfe
- Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA (CRW, CLW, EMC, CRF, AMW)
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA (VFR, PGB-R),Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA (VFR)
| | - Colin L Widmer
- Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA (CRW, CLW, EMC, CRF, AMW)
| | - Elizabeth M Cedillos
- Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA (CRW, CLW, EMC, CRF, AMW)
| | - Christopher R Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA (CRW, CLW, EMC, CRF, AMW)
| | | | - Audrey M Weil
- Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA (CRW, CLW, EMC, CRF, AMW)
| |
Collapse
|