The fate of chronic rhinosinusitis sufferers after maximal medical therapy

Assessing the effect of absorbable steroid sinus implant: a state-of-the-art systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic sinus surgery is not a definitive treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The use of sinus stents after surgery to maintain sinus patency and deliver local steroids has gained popularity. The first steroid-eluting bioabsorbable implant (SEBI) approved for this indication, later Propel, was developed in 2011. This state-of-the-art review aims to summarize the available evidence, as well as to point out potential pitfalls and lack of specific analyses to guide future research on this new therapeutic option.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO.

REVIEW METHODS

Nine research questions were defined: Are steroid-eluting Sinus implants useful for the control of CRS symptoms after surgery? Do they improve surgical field healing after CRS surgery? Do they decrease polyp regrowth after ESS? Do they decrease the need for ESS? Are they useful in symptom control as in-office procedure? Are they better than other steroid-impregnated resorbable materials? Do they have a positive impact on olfaction? Are they safe? Are they cost-effective? Retrieved articles were reviewed by two authors.

RESULTS

Twenty nine studies were included: 3 metanalysis, 1 systematic review, 10 randomized clinical trials, 4 quasi-experimental studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, 4 cost studies, 3 case series and 2 expert consensus. The review encompassed a population of 3,012 patients treated with SEBI and 2826 controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first state-of-the-art review assessing steroid eluting bioabsorbable stent evidence. Despite the effort in recent years, still several questions remain unanswered. This review will hopefully guide future research efforts to better define the role of SEBI in the otolaryngology practice.

Association of mucus eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels with disease control status in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

Identifying the biomarkers for uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is important for directing treatment decisions. Eosinophilia has been reported to be involved in the poor disease control of CRS and mucus eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is potentially a biomarker of intense eosinophil activation. This study aimed to assess the relationship between mucus EDN levels, disease severity, and degree of CRS control.

METHODS

A total of 150 adult patients with CRS and 25 healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. The nasal mucus and tissue specimens were collected to analyze EDN levels. Disease severity was assessed by Lund-Mackay score and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score. Five CRS symptom severities during the prior month (nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea/postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, smell, sleep disturbance or fatigue), use of rescue medications in the last six months, and the presence of diseased mucosa on nasal endoscopy were obtained. Consistent with the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 CRS control criteria, uncontrolled CRS was defined as meeting at least three items.

RESULTS

40% of patients with CRS presented with uncontrolled status. Patients with uncontrolled CRS had significantly higher nasal mucus EDN levels (P = 0.010), percentage of blood eosinophil (P = 0.015), SNOT-22 score (P < 0.001), Lund-Mackay score (P = 0.008), and a more eosinophilic dominant phenotype of CRS (P < 0.001) than patients with controlled CRS. Furthermore, mucus EDN levels were positively correlated with blood eosinophils (r = 0.541, P = 0.005), SNOT-22 score (r = 0.460, P = 0.021), and Lund-Mackay score (r = 0.387, P = 0.039). Mucus EDN levels were the significant parameter related to uncontrolled CRS in multivariable analysis after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities (odds ratio = 1.323; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucus EDN levels may be a potential biomarker for identifying the CRS control status.

Patterns of Olfactory Impairment Among Patients with Uncontrolled Chronic Rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVES

Self-reported olfactory dysfunction is an assessment component criterion for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control of the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS). No studies have objectively explored olfactory function across different psychophysical olfactory domains among patients with uncontrolled CRS. We aimed to investigate the patterns of olfactory impairment in patients with uncontrolled CRS with Sniffin' Sticks test.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with CRS were prospectively recruited and assessed for disease control based on the EPOS criteria. Sniffin' Sticks test scores, olfactory cleft computed tomography (CT) scores, olfactory cleft endoscopy scale (OCES), questionnaire of olfactory disorders-negative statements (QOD-NS), and sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) were obtained. Multiple logistic regression was applied to explore risk factors of uncontrolled CRS.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of patients with CRS presented with uncontrolled status. The odor threshold (OT) (p = 0.005), odor identification (OI) (p = 0.041), and thresholds-discrimination-identification (TDI) (p = 0.029) scores were significantly lower in patients with uncontrolled CRS when compared with patients with controlled CRS. Furthermore, patients with uncontrolled CRS presented with a significantly increased percentage of anosmia (p = 0.014), olfactory cleft CT score (p = 0.038), OCES (p = 0.016), QOD-NS(p = 0.008), and SNOT-22 (p < 0.001) scores than patients with controlled CRS. After adjusting for patient demographics, as for the subdomain of olfaction, only the OT score was an independent risk factor for uncontrolled CRS (odds ratio = 0.604; p = 0.030). The OT scores less than 5.950 were the best predictor of uncontrolled CRS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with uncontrolled CRS demonstrated distinct patterns of olfactory impairment, and a reduced olfactory threshold was highly associated with uncontrolled CRS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:2341-2348, 2024.

Particulate matter exposure is associated with increased inflammatory cytokines and eosinophils in chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is thought to result from complex interactions between the host immune system, microbiota, and environmental exposures. Currently, there is limited data regarding the impact of ambient particulate matter ≤2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) in the pathogenesis of CRS, despite evidence linking PM2.5 to other respiratory diseases. We hypothesized that PM2.5 may result in differential cytokine patterns that could inform our mechanistic understanding of the effect of environmental factors on CRS.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of data prospectively collected from 308 CRS patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Cytokines were quantified in intraoperative mucus specimens using a multiplex flow cytometric bead assay. Clinical and demographic data including zip codes were extracted and used to obtain tract-level income and rurality measures. A spatiotemporal machine learning model was used to estimate daily PM2.5 levels for the year prior to each patient's surgery date. Spearman correlations and regression analysis were performed to characterize the relationship between mucus cytokines and PM2.5. RESULTS: Several inflammatory cytokines including IL-2, IL-5/IL-13, IL-12, and 21 were significantly correlated with estimated average 6, 9, and 12-month preoperative PM2.5 levels. These relationships were maintained for most cytokines after adjusting for age, income, body mass index, rurality, polyps, asthma, and allergic rhinitis (AR) (p < .05). There were also higher odds of asthma (OR = 1.5, p = .01) and AR (OR = 1.48, p = .03) with increasing 12-month PM2.5 exposure. Higher tissue eosinophil counts were associated with increasing PM2.5 levels across multiple timeframes (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic PM2.5 exposure may be an independent risk factor for development of a mixed, type-2 dominant CRS inflammatory response.

The percentage of controlled chronic rhinosinusitis after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic disease with a high recurrence rate, and the aim of treating CRS is to maintain disease control. Recently, a series of CRS control instruments have been developed to assess the control levels. We pooled existing studies to evaluate the percentage of controlled CRS after treatment in patients with CRS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies assessing CRS control. Both comprehensive assessments and self-report of CRS control were included.

RESULTS

9 studies with 1931 patients after treatment and 295 patients before treatment were included. CRS control assessments of the 2012 European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS 2012), EPOS 2020, and Sinus Control Test (SCT) were comprehensive assessments utilized in the clinic practice. The self-report assessment included patient-reported global level of CRS control. These existing disease control instruments categorized patients into three (uncontrolled, partly controlled, and controlled) or five (not at all, a little, somewhat, very, and completely) control categories. Only 8% (95% CI 0.05-0.11) of patients with CRS stayed well controlled before treatment assessed by comprehensive assessments. About 35% (95% CI 0.22-0.49) of patients achieved well controlled after treatment when assessed by the comprehensive measures. Meanwhile, 40% (95% CI 0.28-0.52) of patients reported well controlled after treatment when using self-report.

CONCLUSION

About 35-40% of patients with CRS showed well controlled after treatment, which stressed the importance of identifying these undertreated patients with CRS.

Causal analysis between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been shown to be potentially closely related, but the relationship between these conditions, particularly the possibility of a causal link, is not fully understood. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal relationship between these two disorders.

METHODS

We extracted genome-wide association study data sets for GERD and CRS from publicly available gene summaries, and used MR to conduct a causal inference analysis. The main robustness test used in this study included MR-Egger regression, a leave-one-out sensitivity test, and multivariate MR (MVMR).

RESULTS

GERD increased the risk of developing CRS by 36%, based on the inverse-variance weighted method, a statistically significant association (odds ratio [OR] 1.360, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.179-1.568, P < 0.001). Other MR assessment methods, such as weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode, similarly observed a significant increase in the risk of CRS occurrence (OR 1.434, 95% CI 1.186-1.734, P < 0.001; OR 1.927, 95% CI 1.166-3.184, P = 0.013; and OR 1.910, 95% CI 1.222-2.983, P = 0.006, respectively). No significant bias was found in the heterogeneity or pleiotropy tests (P = 0.071 and P = 0.700, respectively). Even after excluding possible mediators using MVMR, GERD appeared to significantly increase the risk of developing CRS (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.008-1.023, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new, significant evidence that GERD is genetically associated with a higher incidence rate of CRS. However, further research is needed to elucidate the potential underlying biological mechanisms of this relationship.

Z-Form Extracellular DNA in Pediatric CRS May Provide a Mechanism for Recalcitrance to Treatment

OBJECTIVES

We examined sinus mucosal samples recovered from pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients for the presence of Z-form extracellular DNA (eDNA) due to its recently elucidated role in pathogenesis of disease. Further, we immunolabeled these specimens for the presence of both members of the bacterial DNA-binding DNABII protein family, integration host factor (IHF) and histone-like protein (HU), due to their known role in converting common B-DNA to the rare Z-form.

METHODS

Sinus mucosa samples recovered from 20 patients during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) were immunolabelled for B- and Z-DNA, as well as for both bacterial DNABII proteins.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 20 samples (95%) included areas rich in eDNA, with the majority in the Z-form. Areas positive for B-DNA were restricted to the most distal regions of the mucosal specimen. Labeling for both DNABII proteins was observed on B- and Z-DNA, which aligned with the role of these proteins in the B-to-Z DNA conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Abundant Z-form eDNA in culture-positive pediatric CRS samples suggested that bacterial DNABII proteins were responsible for the conversion of eukaryotic B-DNA that had been released into the luminal space by PMNs during NETosis, to the Z-form. The presence of both DNABII proteins on B-DNA and Z-DNA supported the known role of these bacterial proteins in the B-to-Z DNA conversion. Given that Z-form DNA both stabilizes the bacterial biofilm and inactivates PMN NET-mediated killing of trapped bacteria, we hypothesize that this conversion may be contributing to the chronicity and recalcitrance of CRS to treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:1564-1571, 2024.

Heterogeneity in the definition of chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: a systematic review of the scientific literature

PURPOSE

Disease control is conceptually recognized to be an important outcome measure for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, inconsistent usage is a significant factor in disadoption of important concepts and it is presently unclear how consistently the construct of CRS 'control' is being defined/applied. The objective of this study was to determine the heterogeneity of CRS disease control definitions in the scientific literature.

METHODS

Systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception through December 31, 2022. Included studies used CRS disease control as an explicitly stated outcome measure. The definitions of CRS disease control were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified with more than half published in 2021 or later. Definitions of CRS control were variable, although 48.4% of studies used the EPOS (2012 or 2020) criteria to define control, 14 other unique definitions of CRS disease control were also implemented. Most studies included the burden CRS symptoms (80.6%), need for antibiotics or systemic corticosteroids (77.4%) or nasal endoscopy findings (61.3%) as criteria in their definitions of CRS disease control. However, the specific combination of these criteria and prior time periods over which they were assessed were highly variable.

CONCLUSION

CRS disease control is not consistently defined in the scientific literature. Although many studies conceptually treated 'control' as the goal of CRS treatment, 15 different criteria were used to define CRS disease control, representing significant heterogeneity. Scientific derivation of criteria and collaborative consensus building are needed for the development of a widely-accepted and -applied definition of CRS disease control.

Surgical management of rhinosinusitis for the allergist-immunologist

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common chronic inflammatory disease characterized by inflammation of the sinus, with or without nasal passage inflammation, occurring for more than 12 weeks at a time. CRS has historically been classified in 2 categories: CRS without nasal polyps or CRS with nasal polyps (25%-30% of cases). The mainstay of treatment for CRS with or without nasal polyps is medical management, and options may include a combination of saline irrigation, nasal steroids, allergy medications, antibiotics, oral steroids, and treatment with targeted monoclonal antibodies. Unfortunately, up to 60% of patents report symptoms refractory to maximal medical therapy. As such, a combined approach of surgery and medical therapy may be offered. Endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS is approached in a stepwise fashion, ranging from the simplest technique, such as polyp removal, to more expanded approaches that open the paranasal sinuses and allow gravity-dependent drainage. This review article provides a review and in-depth explanation of various surgical approaches for CRS, including the indications, techniques, and respective outcomes for each one.

The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The last decade has seen significant developments in the field of biologics for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Translational research borne from knowledge of the pathophysiology of type 2 inflammatory disease of the lower airways and the strong association with CRSwNP, has led to major therapeutic breakthroughs, with phase 3 trials of four biologics completed at the time of writing, and more underway. This article explores the evidence behind biologics for CRSwNP, the guidance on their use and the health economic factors influencing their position amongst the established therapeutic options for this common chronic condition.

Current understanding of disease control and its application in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Background

Disease control is a primary treatment goal for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This study aims to summarize the evaluation parameters of disease control and then identify predictors of poorly controlled CRS.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify studies relating to disease control in CRS.

Results

The concept of disease control in patients with CRS involved the longitudinal assessment of the disease state and was also an important goal of treatment. As a metric of the disease state, the disease control reflected the ability to keep disease manifestations within certain limits, the efficacy after treatment, and the impact on quality of life. Validated measurements, such as EPOS2012 criteria, EPOS2020 criteria, Sinus Control Test, and patient/physician-reported global level of CRS control, have been utilized in clinical practice. These existing disease control instruments incorporated various disease manifestations and categorized patients into two (well-controlled and poor-controlled), three (uncontrolled, partly controlled, and controlled), or five (not at all, a little, somewhat, very, and completely) control categories. Eosinophilia, high computerized tomography score, bilateral sinonasal disease, asthma, allergic rhinitis, female gender, aspirin intolerance, revision surgery, low serum amyloid A, and specific T cell subtype would predict poorly controlled CRS.

Conclusion

The concept of disease control and its application were gradually developed in patients with CRS. The existing disease control instruments demonstrated a lack of uniformity regarding the controlled criteria and included parameters.

State of the Art Medical Management of Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory disease with a treatment goal of controlling symptoms and limiting disease burden. While endoscopic sinus surgery is effective for removing polyps and aerating sinuses, proper medical management remains necessary for reducing inflammation and limiting polyp recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to summarize the literature regarding medical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, with a specific focus on developments in the past 5 years.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a literature review using PubMed to identify studies assessing medical treatment strategies for patients with CRSwNP. Articles focusing on chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis were excluded unless specifically stated. Surgical treatment and biologic therapies for CRSwNP will be covered in subsequent chapters and are therefore not included.

RESULTS

Intranasal saline irrigations and topical steroids are mainstays of CRSwNP treatment in the pre-surgical, post-surgical, and maintenance phases of the disease. Alternative steroid delivery methods and adjunctive treatments with antibiotics, anti-leukotrienes, and other topical therapies have been investigated and may benefit certain patient populations, but convincing evidence does not exist to warrant addition of these treatments to the standard of care for CRSwNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical steroid therapy is clearly effective for CRSwNP, and recent studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of high-dose nasal steroid rinses. Alternate delivery methods for local steroids may be useful for patients who are not responding to or who are noncompliant with conventional intranasal corticosteroid sprays and rinses. Future studies are needed to clarify if oral or topical antibiotics, oral anti-leukotrienes, or other novel therapies are significantly effective in decreasing symptoms and improving the quality of life in patients with CRSwNP.

A Review of the Different Intraoperative Findings of Revision Endoscopic Frontal Surgery

A revision endoscopic sinus surgery (rESS) is considered when the primary surgery fails to improve the symptoms or causes problems. The rESS is still a difficult surgical procedure, despite the use of imaging-guided surgical navigation systems, because the anatomical landmarks are removed or scarred. To determine the causes and indications of rESS observed radiologically or endoscopically in patients with frontal rhinosinusitis. This retrospective clinical study was conducted between 2010 and 2019 in the Ear, Nose, and Throat Department of King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Sixty cases were indicated for revision endoscopic surgery, and all had distorted or lost anatomical landmarks. Most landmark losses were caused by undissected uncinate processes and residual agger nasi with/without ethmoid disease. The rESS surgical procedure remains difficult, despite the use of imaging-guided surgical navigation systems, because most of the anatomical landmarks are removed or scarred. An undissected uncinate process, residual agger nasi with/without ethmoid disease, extensive mucosal disease with polyps obstructing the frontal recess, and lateralized middle turbinates are the most common conditions requiring rESS.

Effects of Fluticasone Exhalation Delivery System in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Nasal sprays with corticosteroids deliver medication to the restricted areas including anterior and inferior parts of the nasal cavity. The fluticasone exhalation delivery system (EDS-FLU) has recently been proved to improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of EDS-FLU in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

METHODOLOGY

A systematic literature review using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of EDS-FLU on outcomes in patients with CRSwNP.

RESULTS

Of the initial 108 abstracts reviewed, 4 full-text articles were included. The 22-item sinonasal outcome test scores were significantly decreased in patients with CRSwNP after receiving EDS-FLU twice a day (93, 186, or 372 μg) for 16 weeks when compared with exhalation delivery system (EDS)-placebo (all P < .001). Patients with CRSwNP reported significant improvement of smell after receiving twice daily EDS-FLU twice a day (93, or 372 μg) for 4 weeks when compared with EDS-placebo (all P < .05). The proportions of patients achieving ≥1-point improvement in total polyp grade were significantly higher in EDS-FLU group and dose dependent, with the highest rates in the 372 μg group. The proportions of patients achieving polyp elimination were significantly higher in EDS-FLU group with the highest rates in the 372 μg group.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the clinical outcomes in patients with CRSwNP treated with EDS-FLU. EDS-FLU produced significant improvements regarding the quality of life, smell, and endoscopic assessment of polyp grade.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Open, prospective, multicenter study on postoperative intranasal phototherapy in nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic effect of ultraviolet (UV) light is generally attributed to its immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects. Since chronic inflammation is the major factor in the development of nasal polyposis, we have previously used mixed ultraviolet-visible light (mUV-VIS, Rhinolight®) phototherapy for the treatment of nasal polyps.

AIMS

In the present open, multicenter study, our aim was to delineate whether mUV-VIS applied postoperatively in vivo together with intranasal steroid treatment could reduce the recurrence of nasal polyps.

METHODS

After functional endoscopic sinus surgery, one group of patients received mUV-VIS light together with standard intranasal steroid (mometason furoate 2 × 200 μg) application for a 12-week treatment period, whereas the other patient group obtained only intranasal steroid for the same duration. We recorded nasal endoscopy images and obtained demographical and clinical data, total nasal score (TNS), and nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE). We performed acoustic rhinometry and measured nasal inspiratory peak flow. Follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

We found that the recurrence of nasal polyps was significantly diminished, and based on video-endoscopic measurements, the size and grade of recurrent polyps were significantly smaller in the phototherapy-receiving group. Nasal obstruction values and NOSE were significantly better throughout the follow-up period in the mUV-VIS light-treated group than in the intranasal steroid monotreatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhinophototherapy together with standard nasal steroid application may have a supportive role in the treatment of recurrent bilateral nasal polyps.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps management in the age of biologics

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the most common medical conditions seen in the U.S. population. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in adults has predominately a type 2 inflammatory endotype that usually is treated with medical management that consists of inhaled corticosteroids, saline solution irrigation, oral corticosteroid bursts, and, at times, leukotriene antagonists and antibiotics. If medical management fails, then surgical intervention is usually recommended. Various biologics that target type 2 inflammation are now available, which have been or will be approved for use in these patients. Objective: To determine where biologics that affect the type 2 pathway fit into the algorithm of treatment for CRSwNP. Methods: A review of the literature on standard-of-care measures and surgical interventions in CRSwNP and an analysis of recent studies on the efficacy and safety of biologics in this condition. Results: Standard of care with medication and surgical interventions fail in some patients with CRSwNP. Biologics that affect the type 2 inflammatory pathway led to a decrease in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and improved quality of life both in patients who had surgery and those who had not had surgery for CRSwNP. Also, they showed efficacy and safety in patients whether or not they had comorbid asthma. These agents do not cure the patient with CRSwNP, and will be required chronically for control. Conclusion: Shared decision-making should be used in determining the use of certain medications, surgical management, and biologics in patients with CRSwNP. In patients for whom surgery has already failed and in patients with moderate-to-severe CRSwNP who have other type 2 comorbidities, e.g., asthma, a trial of biologics is a rational course.

Oral Corticosteroid Regimens in the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Oral corticosteroids are often used in the medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with and without polyps. The purpose of our study is to review the literature for studies reporting the dosage of oral corticosteroids as part of the appropriate medical management prior to, immediately before, and after surgical intervention.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature for oral corticosteroid regimens given to patients with CRS from March 2012 to September 2018. Studies that did not disclose the exact doses of the regimen were excluded from our analysis.

RESULTS

Our search resulted in 7 articles with 4 studies of Level of Evidence (LOE) 1b, 2 studies with LOE III, and 1 study with LOE IV. The daily doses varied from 15 mg to 1 mg/kg, and with total doses ranging from 150 to 352 mg. In addition, several studies gave the same regimen to both subtypes of CRS. There was no mention of side effects in most of the studies.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variation in the steroid doses given to patients with CRS and prospective or randomized controlled trials are needed to provide better improved evidence.

Should Oral Corticosteroids be Used in Medical Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis? A Risk Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) as a part of appropriate medical therapy (AMT) (formerly maximal medical therapy) in chronic rhinosinusitis remains controversial. While the risks of OCS are well known, the benefit remains unclear due the absence of a standardized prescribing regimen. Consequently, it is difficult to characterize whether the risks of OCS and its ability to avert endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are helpful in AMT. When OCS is highly effective at averting surgery, the lesser risks of OCS would be justified because it can avoid the greater risks of ESS. When OCS is poorly effective at averting ESS, the risks of OCS would not be justified because many patients will be exposed to both risks. This study seeks to identify the threshold effectiveness of OCS at averting ESS that would minimize risk exposure to patients.

METHODS

A probabilistic risks-based decision analysis was constructed from literature reported incidences and impacts of adverse events of OCS and ESS. Monte Carlo analysis was performed to identify the minimum effectiveness required to avoid further intervention (MERAFI) for chronic sinusitis without nasal polyp (CRSsNP) and chronic sinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP).

RESULTS

The analysis showed MERAFI results of 20.8% (95% CI 20.7-20.9%) for CRSsNP and 16.8% (95% CI 16.7-16.9%) for CRSwNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Given reported OCS effectiveness in the range of 34-71% in CRSsNP and 46-63% in CRSwNP, this analysis suggests that the inclusion of OCS in AMT may be the lower risk strategy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 131:473-481, 2021.

Latest advances in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps endotyping and biomarkers, and their significance for daily practice

The term chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) comprises of an assortment of diseases that share a common feature: inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa. The phenotype classification of CRS, based on the presence of polyps, has failed to offer a curative treatment for the disease, particularly in refractory cases. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remains a challenging entity. Researchers have made efforts trying to characterize subtypes of the disease according to the endotypes, which are delineated by different immunological pathways, using biomarkers. Even if the inflammatory processes controlling CRSwNP are not fully understood, data suggested that the disease associated with a type 2 inflammatory mechanisms can be also linked to the type 1 or type 3 pathomechanism, being highly heterogeneous. Biomarkers for CRSwNP are proposed, such as: eosinophil count, cytokines, metalloproteinases, bitter and sweet taste receptors, and the nasal microbiome. For endotyping to be clinically applicable and simply determined, biomarkers referring to the intrinsic biomolecular mechanism still need to be found. Precision medicine is becoming the new standard of care, but innovative therapies such as biologics may be rather challenging for the clinicians in their daily practice. This new approach to CRSwNP implies patient selection and a simple algorithm for deciding the right treatment, easy to implement and adjust. Our review points out the ongoing new research on the pathophysiology of CRSwNP, biomarkers and treatment opportunities. It allows clinicians to keep abreast of current evidence-based knowledge and to individualize the management of CRSwNP, especially in refractory cases.

Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA2 five-stage study, including a workshop

BACKGROUND

The randomised controlled trial is widely considered to be the gold standard study for comparing the effectiveness of health interventions. Central to its design is a calculation of the number of participants needed (the sample size) for the trial. The sample size is typically calculated by specifying the magnitude of the difference in the primary outcome between the intervention effects for the population of interest. This difference is called the 'target difference' and should be appropriate for the principal estimand of interest and determined by the primary aim of the study. The target difference between treatments should be considered realistic and/or important by one or more key stakeholder groups.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the report is to provide practical help on the choice of target difference used in the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial for researchers and funder representatives.

METHODS

The Difference ELicitation in TriAls2 (DELTA2) recommendations and advice were developed through a five-stage process, which included two literature reviews of existing funder guidance and recent methodological literature; a Delphi process to engage with a wider group of stakeholders; a 2-day workshop; and finalising the core document.

RESULTS

Advice is provided for definitive trials (Phase III/IV studies). Methods for choosing the target difference are reviewed. To aid those new to the topic, and to encourage better practice, 10 recommendations are made regarding choosing the target difference and undertaking a sample size calculation. Recommended reporting items for trial proposal, protocols and results papers under the conventional approach are also provided. Case studies reflecting different trial designs and covering different conditions are provided. Alternative trial designs and methods for choosing the sample size are also briefly considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing an appropriate sample size is crucial if a study is to inform clinical practice. The number of patients recruited into the trial needs to be sufficient to answer the objectives; however, the number should not be higher than necessary to avoid unnecessary burden on patients and wasting precious resources. The choice of the target difference is a key part of this process under the conventional approach to sample size calculations. This document provides advice and recommendations to improve practice and reporting regarding this aspect of trial design. Future work could extend the work to address other less common approaches to the sample size calculations, particularly in terms of appropriate reporting items.

FUNDING

Funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the MRC-National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.

What is the most appropriate treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis?

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common, treatable disease that affects approximately 11% of British adults. It places an enormous burden on patients, with significant detriment to their quality of life, and the health service as it consumes vast numbers of both primary and secondary care resources. However, there is considerable variability in treatment strategies and prescribing practices. This review summarises the key recommendations from landmark guidelines in the treatment of CRS and critically appraises the evidence for treatment.

Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Refractory to Maximal Medical Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study Under Real-World Conditions

This investigation explored the outcomes of 4 standardized treatments in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), despite recent maximal medical therapy (MMT). In a prospective observational study, we compared continued nasal steroids and irrigation (cNSI), repeated MMT (rMMT), pulsed nasal steroid inhalation (PSI), and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Between November 2015 and March 2016, patients with symptomatic CRS despite having received MMT during the year prior to symptom reoccurrence were offered 1 of 4 standardized treatments. Reflecting real-world conditions, patients selected their treatment option following physician counseling. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores were obtained before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2 months and 1 year following treatment. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) duration since last MMT was 144 (±36 days). Of the 130 patients, 52 selected cNSI, 16 PSI, 19 rMMT, and 43 ESS. Mean SNOT-22 scores before treatment did not significantly differ between treatments (P = .99). Overall, SNOT-22 scores decreased from 38 ± 2 before treatment to 20 ± 2 after 1 year (P < .001), with a higher reduction for patients having CRS with nasal polyps than for those without nasal polyps (35 ± 2 to 15 ± 2 vs 41 ± 3 to 25 ± 4, respectively; both P < .001). Overall, no difference between the 3 medical treatments was observed (all P > .2). Post-treatment scores following ESS (19 ± 2) were significantly lower than for each of the 3 medical treatments (cNSI 26 ± 2, P = .004; PSI 27 ± 3, P = .026; rMMT 28 ± 3, P = .008). At 1 year following ESS, 26 of 31 patients were asymptomatic and did not require additional systemic steroids, compared to 25 of 50 patients following medical treatment (P = .002). The investigated standardized treatments significantly improved SNOT-22 scores in patients with refractory CRS under real-world conditions. Both patients having CRS with and those without nasal polyps showed significant improvement in SNOT-22 scores, although a less profound effect was found among the latter group. Patients who selected ESS were less symptomatic during the first follow-up year than patients who selected medical treatment alone. Patients with refractory CRS did not benefit from an additional course of MMT in comparison to those who were treated only with cNSI.

Clarithromycin and endoscopic sinus surgery for adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: study protocol for the MACRO randomised controlled trial

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common source of ill health; 11% of UK adults reported CRS symptoms in a worldwide population study. Guidelines are conflicting regarding whether antibiotics should be included in primary medical management, reflecting the lack of evidence in systematic reviews. Insufficient evidence to inform the role of surgery contributes to a fivefold variation in UK intervention rates. The objective of this trial is to establish the comparative effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or a prolonged course of antibiotics (clarithromycin) in adult patients with CRS in terms of symptomatic improvement and costs to the National Health Service compared with standard medical care (intranasal medication) at 6 months.

Methods/design

A three-arm parallel-group trial will be conducted with patients who remain symptomatic after receiving appropriate medical therapy (either in primary or secondary care). They will be randomised to receive: (1) intranasal medication plus ESS, (2) intranasal medication plus clarithromycin (250 mg) or (3) intranasal medication plus a placebo. Intranasal medication (current standard medical care) is defined as a spray or drops of intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations. The primary outcome measure is the SNOT-22 questionnaire, which assesses disease-specific health-related quality of life. The study sample size is 600. Principal analyses will be according to the randomised groups irrespective of compliance. The trial will be conducted in at least 16 secondary or tertiary care centres with an internal pilot at six sites for 6 months.

Discussion

The potential cardiovascular side effects of macrolide antibiotics have been recently highlighted. The effectiveness of antibiotics will be established through this trial, which may help to reduce unnecessary usage and potential morbidity. If ESS is shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective, the trial may encourage earlier intervention. In contrast, if it is shown to be ineffective, then there should be a significant reduction in surgery rates. The trial results will feed into the other components of the MACRO research programme to establish best practice for the management of adults with CRS and design the ideal patient pathway across primary and secondary care.

Trial registration

ISRCTN36962030. Registered on 17 October 2018.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3314-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Immunological Characteristics in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Undergoing Revision Surgeries

Purpose

Despite medical and surgical treatments, some cases of nasal polyps (NP) exhibit recidivism. However, the endotype of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the immunological profile of refractory CRSwNP.

Methods

The control (n =23), primary NP group (pNP, n =70) and refractory NP group (rNP, n =86) were enrolled in this study. Patients who underwent revision surgeries due to failed maximal medical treatment after primary surgery were defined as the rNP group. A total of 18 inflammatory markers were investigated in nasal tissues using multiplex cytokine assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

The clinical characteristics of rNP included more extensive disease and worse clinical course after surgery. Additionally, rNP subjects showed higher infection rate (mucopurulence and culture-positive rate), more frequent use of antibiotics and suffered from symptomatic bacterial infection, increased asthma morbidity compared to pNP. Cytokine profile analysis showed that levels of Th17-associated mediators (myeloperoxidase, interleukin (IL)-8, IL-17A and IL-23), B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and Th1 cytokine (interferon-γ) were up-regulated in rNP compared to controls and pNP. Human neutrophil elastase-positive cells were also enhanced in rNP compared with pNP. Upregulation of Th17/Th1mediators and BAFF were observed in rNP, regardless of tissue eosinophilia or asthmatic comorbidity. Interestingly, eosinophilic markers, such as eosinophil cationic protein and C-C motif chemokine ligand 24, were up-regulated in asthmatic rNP compared to pNP and controls. Levels of anti-dsDNA immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA were up-regulated in rNP and highest in asthmatic eosinophilic rNP among subtypes of rNP.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Th17/Th1-associated mediators and BAFF may play a role and be a potential therapeutic target in refractory CRSwNP. Additionally, eosinophilic markers and autoantibodies may contribute to refractoriness in asthmatic rNP.

NAVIGATE I: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common, high-morbidity chronic inflammatory disease, and patients often experience suboptimal outcomes with current medical treatment. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) may improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with nasal polyps (NP). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion and polyp grade. Key secondary end points were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised (MOS Sleep-R). Other prespecified end points included all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and key indicators for surgical intervention.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, EDS-placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-three subjects with NP and moderate-severe congestion/obstruction, most with history of corticosteroid use (94.4%) and/or prior surgery (60.4%), were randomized to EDS-FLU 93 µg, 186 µg, or 372 µg or EDS-placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (16 double-blind + 8 single-arm extension with EDS-FLU 372 µg BID).

RESULTS

All EDS-FLU doses produced significant improvement in both coprimary end points ( P < .05) and in SNOT-22 total score ( P ≤ .005). EDS-FLU significantly improved all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP ( P < .05), including congestion/obstruction, facial pain/pressure, rhinorrhea/post-nasal drip, and hyposmia/anosmia. Approximately 80% of subjects reported improvement with EDS-FLU, with 65% reporting "much" or "very much" improvement by week 16. Adverse events were generally local in nature and similar to other intranasal steroids studied for similar durations in similar populations, with the most common being epistaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) who were symptomatic despite high rates of prior intranasal steroid use and/or surgery, EDS-FLU produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes (symptoms, SNOT-22, RSDI, SF-36, PGIC, and NP grade), including all 4 cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP.

NAVIGATE II: Randomized, double-blind trial of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is common and sometimes complicated by nasal polyps (NPs). Corticosteroid nasal sprays are often unsatisfactory because they are ineffective at delivering medication to high/deep sites of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess whether an exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) capable of high/deep drug deposition improves outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (n = 323) 18 years and older with moderate-to-severe congestion and NPs were randomized to twice-daily EDS-FLU (93, 186, or 372 μg) or exhalation delivery system (EDS)-placebo for 24 weeks (16 double-blind plus 8 open-label when all received 372 μg). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion/obstruction at 4 weeks and summed bilateral polyp grade at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included symptoms, polyp elimination, and functioning.

RESULTS

EDS-FLU was superior on both coprimary end points (P < .001 vs EDS-placebo, all doses). Mean polyp grade improved continuously through week 24 (P < .009, all comparisons), with polyps eliminated on at least 1 side in approximately 25% of patients at week 24 versus 8.7% with EDS-placebo (P ≤ .014, all comparisons). Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test scores also improved significantly versus those in patients receiving EDS-placebo (-21.1 to -21.4 vs -11.7 at week 16, P < .05 all doses). At the end of the double-blind period, EDS-FLU (all doses) significantly improved all 4 defining disease symptoms. In most patients (68%), those receiving EDS-FLU reported "much" or "very much" improvement. The number of patients eligible for surgery decreased by 62%-67%. The safety profile was similar to that reported in prior trials evaluating conventional corticosteroid nasal sprays in comparable populations.

CONCLUSION

EDS-FLU produces clinically and statistically significant improvement in all 4 diagnostically defining disease symptoms, polyp grade, and quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NPs.

Glucocorticoid receptor isoform expression in peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

In several inflammatory disorders, altered peripheral blood mononuclear leukocyte (PBML) glucocorticoid (GC) receptor isoform expression has been associated with GC resistance and disease severity. However, it is unclear if PBML GC receptor isoforms are expressed differentially and are associated with worsened disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

PBMLs were isolated from control (n = 8), CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) (n = 8), atopic CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (n = 8), non-atopic CRSwNP (n = 8), and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) (n = 8) patients. Demographics, atopic status, asthmatic status, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, Lund-Kennedy nasal endoscopy scores, Lund-Mackay sinus computed tomography (CT) scores, Kennedy Osteitis scores, and GC utilization 6 months postoperatively were collected. Intracellular immunostaining was then performed for functional GC receptor α (GCRα) and nonfunctional GC receptor β (GCRβ), followed by flow cytometry analysis of geometric mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) and the percentage of cells expressing each GC receptor isoform.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, each CRS subtype had decreased PBML GCRα and GCRα:GCRβ MFI expression, but no difference in GCRβ expression. Decreasing PBML GCRα in AFRS was associated with increasing Lund-Mackay sinus CT scores (r = -0.880, p =0.004). No significant associations were found between GC receptor isoform expression and other clinical measures.

CONCLUSION

CRS patients have reduced functional PBML GCRα expression and decreased GCRα:GCRβ compared to controls. Reductions in GCRα in AFRS are associated with worsening Lund-Mackay sinus CT scores. The clinical implications of decreased functional GC receptor expression merits further investigation.

Emerging Role of Proteases in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous upper airway disease with multiple etiologies. Clinically, CRSwNP can be classified into either eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic subtypes. The eosinophilic phenotype of CRSwNP is widely thought to be highly associated with recurrence of nasal polyps or surgical failure. Epithelial cells have a crucial role in the development of Th2-biased airway diseases. Recent studies have shown that a wide range of external stimuli such as allergens and microorganisms can elicit the release of epithelial-derived Th2-driving cytokines and chemokines. Protease activity is a feature common to these multiple environmental insults and there is growing evidence for the concept that an imbalance of proteases and protease inhibitors in the epithelial barrier leads to both the initiation and maintenance of chronic eosinophilic airway inflammation. In this review, we analyze recent work on the role of proteases in the development of the sinonasal mucosal type 2 immune response with an emphasis on the molecular pathways promoting adaptive Th2 cell immunity.

Contemporary Pharmacotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are chronic conditions causing nasal inflammation. CRS is increasingly recognized as a chronic inflammatory process rather than a chronic infection. Although the primary initiating factors in CRS remain unclear, AR is driven by IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to environmental allergens. Understanding the underlying inflammatory pathways and disease endotypes are driving innovation toward novel pharmacotherapies targeting critical mediators implicated in CRS and AR, including IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, IgE, and epithelial initiators IL-33 and TSLP. Extensive investigations are needed to determine the role, timing, predictive prognostic factors and long-term safety and efficacy of these agents.

Medical therapy, refractory chronic rhinosinusitis, and productivity costs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to address the most recent advances in the medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), define recalcitrant and refractory CRS, and discuss the productivity costs associated with CRS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies evaluating anti-IL-4 receptor α antibodies and calcium channel blockers have demonstrated promising early results during management of CRS. Recent appropriateness criteria have been developed to assist clinicians with defining which patients have 'refractory' CRS and may be considered candidates for endoscopic sinus surgery. Productivity costs appear to be associated with disease severity and can be reduced with appropriate interventions.

SUMMARY

Topical corticosteroid therapy and high volume saline irrigation continue to be the cornerstone to medical therapy, whereas use of systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics depends on CRS phenotype and presence of acute exacerbation. More research is needed before routine use of novel immunomodulatory therapies such as anti-IL5, anti-IgE, anti-IL4, and calcium channel blockers. Clinicians should apply an appropriate definition for refractory CRS when discussing role of sinus surgery. Assessing the degree of work productivity impairment can assist in treatment decision-making and may help predict treatment outcomes.

The value of frontal sinusotomy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps-A cost utility analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The number of surgical procedures performed for frontal sinusitis and the associated costs have increased dramatically over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic frontal sinusotomy (EFS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort-style Markov decision-tree economic model with a 36-year time horizon.

METHODS

Matched cohorts of CRSwNP patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with (n = 139) and without (n = 49) EFS were compared to each other and to patients (n = 139) from the Medical Expenditures Survey Panel database who underwent medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis. Multi-year health utility values were calculated from responses to the EuroQol 5-Dimension instrument. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Decision analysis showed that ESS without EFS proved more cost-effective than ESS with EFS or medical management. ESS without EFS compared to medical management yielded an ICER of $9,004/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). ESS with EFS compared to ESS without EFS yielded an ICER of $62,310/QALY. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY, ESS without EFS was more cost-effective than ESS with EFS with 52.1% certainty. These results were robust to one-way analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ESS remains a cost-effective intervention compared to medical therapy alone for patients with CRSwNP. In this study, the addition of frontal sinusotomy during ESS for patients with CRSwNP was not found to be cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY, but may be cost effective at a higher threshold of $100,000/QALY.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c. Laryngoscope, 128:43-51, 2018.

Economics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this article is to provide an updated review of the economic burden of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and discuss how both medical and surgical interventions impact direct and indirect costs related to CRS. By understanding the economics of CRS, clinicians may improve the patient-centeredness of their care and help distinguish between low and high value interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Direct costs related to CRS are primarily driven by outpatient physician visits, prescription medical therapy, and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). CRS produces large indirect costs and these costs often vary based on the severity of the patients CRS-specific QoL impairment. The overall direct cost related to CRS is estimated to range between $10 and $13 billion per year in the USA. The overall indirect cost related to CRS-related losses in work productivity is estimated to be in excess of $20 billion per year. In the appropriate patients with refractory CRS, ESS provides significant reductions in both direct and indirect costs; however, continued medical therapy alone may be a high value intervention in select patients who have lower severity in their baseline QoL and work productivity.

Allergic sensitization does not predispose to sinus inflammation in externalized paranasal sinuses

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a multifactorial etiology, with a debate about the role of inhalant allergy in the pathogenesis of CRS.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of allergy status on externalized paranasal sinuses after tumor resection to determine if a predisposition to inhalant allergy brought about additional inflammation after sinus surgery.

METHODOLOGY

A case-control study was performed on patients who had no history of CRS who underwent paranasal sinus tumor resection. Allergic sensitization was defined by a positive serum ImmunoCAP test result. Outcomes were measured at least 6 months after surgery by using the modified Lund-MacKay endoscopic score and the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome test, with rhinitis, sleep, psychological, ear and/or facial, and sinus subscores to assess the impact of allergy status on mucosal inflammation.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (53.44 ± 17.46 years; 46% women) were assessed. Of these, 61.17% were allergically sensitized at the time of surgery. Postsurgery endoscopic assessment was similar [the modified Lund-Mackay endoscopic score allergic sensitized 0.5 (1.7) versus nonallergic sensitized 0.0 (0.9); p = 0.15]. Sinonasal symptoms were also similar between the groups' 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome test scores, allergic sensitized versus allergic nonsensitized, (allergic 28.9 ± 20.8 versus nonallergic 33.5 ± 19.7; p = 0.31), rhinitis score (5.9 ± 5.5 versus 6.4 ± 4.7; p = 0.66), sleep score (6.9 ± 5.9 versus 7.7 ± 4.8; p = 0.50), ear and/or facial symptom score (3.4 ± 3.6 versus 4.3 ± 3.3; p = 0.22), psychological score (6.9 ± 6.0 versus 8.3 ± 6.7; p = 0.29), and of nasal symptom score (6.4 ± 5.2 versus 7.0 ± 5.3; p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Externalization of the sinuses in patients with inhalant allergy did not bring about significant additional inflammation in patients after tumor surgery.

Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Nasal Polyps

Biologics are novel therapeutic medications developed for the targeted therapy for a variety of inflammatory conditions. The biologics currently investigated for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps modulate specific inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of disease. Investigations have focused on the most severe form of the disease, namely, CRS with nasal polyps. It is hoped that specific targeted therapies using these biologics can significantly modulate the immune system, offering both disease control and symptomatic relief. This review summarizes those therapies that have been used to treat nasal polyps.

Vitamin D pathway regulatory genes encoding 1α-hydroxylase and 24-hydroxylase are dysregulated in sinonasal tissue during chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with many inflammatory respiratory disease states. However, serum vitamin D concentrations may not reflect tissue-specific availability. In this study we sought to assess the local expression of genes essential in vitamin D regulation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of adult patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery was performed. Patients were defined as having CRS with polyps (CRSwNP) or without polyps (CRSsNP), or normal sinus mucosa. Sinus mucosal biopsies were assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction to determine expression of genes encoding the vitamin D receptor (VDR), 25-hydroxylase (CYP2R1), 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1), and 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1). Expression levels correlated with serum 25(OH)D [sum 25(OH)D₂  and 25(OH)D₃ ], the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and Nasal Symptom Score (NSS). Separate analyses were performed for patients grouped by tissue eosinophilia.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were assessed (age 49.47 ± 18.14 years, 48.4% female), including 8 CRSsNP, 10 CRSwNP, and 13 controls. CRSsNP and CRSwNP mucosa exhibited decreased CYP27B1 compared with controls (0.0437 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.0999] vs 0.3260 [IQR 2.9384] vs 0.6557 [IQR 1.1005], p = 0.039), whereas CYP24A1 was upregulated (0.8522 [IQR 1.3170] vs 1.2239 [IQR 4.4197] vs 0.1076 [IQR 0.1791], p = 0.025). CYP24A1 was upregulated in both non-eosinophilic CRS and eosinophilic CRS (1.1337 [IQR 2.3790] vs 0.9555 [IQR 3.2811] vs 0.1076 [IQR 0.1791], p = 0.033). Significant correlations were observed between NSS and CYP2R1 (r = -0.432, p = 0.022), CYP24A1 (r = 0.420, P = 0.026), and VDR (r = 0.425, p = 0.024), although no correlations with serum 25(OH)D were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The local regulation of vitamin D in sinonasal tissue during CRS may be independent of serum 25(OH)D levels. Vitamin D may be dysregulated at multiple levels, with decreased transcription of the metabolic gene CYP27B1 and increased transcription of the catabolic gene CYP24A1 observed.

A Review of Classification Schemes for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis Endotypes

Objective

The recent development of endotypes to categorize disease variants of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) reflects an evolving understanding of the various pathophysiologic and pathogenetic mechanisms that contribute to the clinical heterogeneity of CRS manifestations. This review highlights popular endotype‐based criteria used to define different CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) subtypes and further discusses the emerging therapeutic advances for each classificatory approach.

Data Sources

PubMed literature review.

Methods

A review of the current literature was conducted to determine present‐day uses of immunologic and molecular profiles in the CRSwNP disease spectrum to identify specific endotypes.

Results

Four distinct but overlapping classification schemes have emerged to define endotypes within the CRSwNP phenotype: 1) type 2 cytokine‐based approach, 2) eosinophil‐based approach, 3) immunoglobulin (Ig)E‐based approach, and 4) cysteinyl based approach. The identification of key inflammatory biomarkers related to these CRSwNP endotypes has broadened the classification of CRS beyond common phenotypic expressions. Furthermore, CRSwNP endotypes may improve the selection of CRSwNP patients who are suitable candidates for biomarker‐specific treatment options, such as anti‐interleukin‐5; anti‐IgE; and platelet‐directed therapies.

Conclusion

Chronic rhinosinusitis endotyping with key biomarker patterns of inflammation allows for improved diagnostic and potentially therapeutic classifications of CRSwNP variants.

Is there a future for biologics in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis?

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory condition of the sinonasal mucosa consisting of poorly defined subtypes and characterized by variable clinical manifestations, responses to therapy, and underlying pathophysiologies. In the related disorder of asthma, progress has been made in defining disease subtypes on both clinical and pathophysiologic levels, facilitating the development of targeted biologic pharmacotherapy. The potential role of these drugs for the management of CRS will be reviewed. The objective of this work is to highlight the emerging therapeutic targets in CRS in light of evolving treatment options for asthma and enhanced understandings of the clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of CRS.

METHODS

This article is a review of recent studies regarding current and future advances in biomarker-directed therapies in the medical treatment of CRS.

RESULTS

Various biologic therapies used in the management of asthma have demonstrated clinical promise for CRS, particularly within the CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) phenotype. Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies increasingly support the targeting of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and interleukin (IL)-5 pathways to improve outcome measures in CRSwNP patients. The IL-4/IL-13 pathway and other type 2 inflammatory pathways have also shown potential as targets for CRSwNP, but all pathways require further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Recalcitrant CRS in the United States and Europe is most commonly associated with nasal polyposis and a type 2 cytokine skewing in the tissue, resulting in tissue infiltration of eosinophils, mast cells, and basophils. Targeting biomarkers of the associated type 2 pathways may be a practical treatment option for recalcitrant CRSwNP in the future.

Budget impact analysis of bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus implants following endoscopic sinus surgery

OBJECTIVE

Propel is a bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus implant inserted following an endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The objective of this study was to estimate the budget impact of incorporating Propel post-ESS for CRS patients from a self-insured employer or third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

An Excel-based budget impact model was developed. Estimates of the prevalence of CRS, rates of ESS, and effectiveness outcomes, along with direct and indirect costs from CRS were obtained from published literature. A total population of 1.5 million members was hypothesized for the analysis. All cost data were adjusted to October 2015 US dollars using the Medical Care Component of the Consumer Price Index. The cost and clinical/economic characteristics of Propel were compared to other treatments commonly used to minimize post-operative complications. The primary outcome was the incremental budget impact reported using per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs. Scenario-based, probabilistic, and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to gauge the robustness of the results and identify the parameters with the most influence on the results.

RESULTS

For a US self-insured employer or a commercial health plan of 1.5 million members, the incremental PMPM impact of incorporating Propel was estimated to range from -$0.003 to $0.036, respectively, for all members in the health plan. Sensitivity analyses identified the cost of Propel, probability of polyposis recurrence requiring medical intervention, probability of adhesion formation requiring surgical intervention, and the treatment costs for polyposis as the primary parameters influencing the results.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated the use of Propel following ESS procedures has a negligible impact on the budget of a US self-insured employer or payer. The upfront cost of Propel was offset by savings associated with reduced probability for polyp recurrence, adhesion formation, and their subsequent treatment.

Trichostatin A Inhibits Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition Induced by TGF-β1 in Airway Epithelium

Background and Objectives

Tissue remodeling is believed to cause recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a novel clinical therapeutic target in many chronic airway diseases related with tissue remodeling. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trichostatin A (TSA) on transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced EMT in airway epithelium and nasal tissue.

Materials and Methods

A549 cells, primary nasal epithelial cells (PNECs), or inferior nasal turbinate organ culture were exposed to TSA prior to stimulation with TGF-β1. Expression levels of E-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin, α-smooth muscle actin (SMA), histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), and HDAC4 were determined by western blotting and/or immunofluorescent staining. Hyperacetylation of histone H2 and H4 by TSA was measured by western blotting. After siHDAC transfection, the effects of HDAC2 and HDAC4 silencing on expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin, α-SMA, HDAC2, and HDAC4 in TGF-β1-induced A549 were determined by RT-PCR and/or western blotting. We assessed the change in migration capacity of A549 cells by using cell migration assay and transwell invasion assay.

Results

TGF-β1 altered mRNA and protein expression levels of EMT markers including E-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin, α-SMA, slug, and snail in A549 cells. Inhibition and silencing of HDAC2 and HDAC4 by TSA and siRNA enhanced TGF-β1-induced EMT in A549 cells. TSA blocked the effect of TGF-β1 on the migratory ability of A549 cells. In experiments using PNECs and inferior turbinate organ cultures, TSA suppressed expression of EMT markers induced by TGF-β1.

Conclusions

We showed that EMT is induced by TGF-β1 in airway epithelial cells and nasal tissue via activation of HDAC2 and HDAC4, and that inhibition of HDAC2 and HDAC4 by TSA reduces TGF-β1-induced EMT. This observation indicates that histone deacetylase inhibitors such as TSA could be potential candidates for treatment of recalcitrant CRS related with tissue remodeling.

Clinical implications of mucosal remodeling from chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Prognostic implications of mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remain unclear. Remodeling of respiratory mucosa in asthma is associated with greater medication use and decreased function. This study investigates the implications of mucosal remodeling on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with CRS.

METHODS

A case-control study of adult patients with CRS undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) was performed. Mucosal remodeling was defined by squamous metaplasia, subepithelial fibrosis, and/or basement membrane thickening. The presence of remodeling changes were assessed relative to clinical and treatment outcomes at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12 months using a Nasal Symptom Score (NSS) and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Treatment outcomes were assessed by oral corticosteroid usage (burst/continuous), topical corticosteroid irrigation frequency, and further surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (48.73 ± 14.75 years, 48.2% female) were assessed. Significant improvements where seen for the entire population, in both NSS (2.64 ± 1.06 to 1.34 ± 1.08, p < 0.001) and SNOT-22 (2.05 ± 0.96 to 1.06 ± 0.79, p < 0.001). Patients with remodeling (n = 88) were younger (47.2 ± 14.8 vs 54.7 ± 13.5 years, p = 0.03), but had similar symptom scores. Remodeling was seen in CRS with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (54.5%) and eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) (59.8%). Symptom improvement at 12 months was similar between remodeled and non-remodeled groups (NSS: Δ1.34 ± 1.20 vs Δ1.12 ± 1.31, p = 0.395; SNOT-22: Δ1.05 ± 0.91 vs Δ0.73 ± 0.95, p = 0.124); however, patients with remodeling had greater corticosteroid irrigation frequency (64.0% vs 31.6% daily use, Kendall's tau-b p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Established mucosal remodeling predicts a greater reliance on topical therapies to reach similar clinical endpoints as those without remodeling.

Altered Th17/Treg Ratio in Nasal Polyps With Distinct Cytokine Profile: Association With Patterns of Inflammation and Mucosal Remodeling

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease that can be classified as eosinophilic or noneosinophilic. Nasal polyps can exhibit different types of mucosal inflammation and responses to treatment. Imbalanced ratios of T-helper 17(Th17) and regulatory T (Treg) cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of nasal polyps.This study assessed the frequency of Th17 and Treg cells and related cytokines in patients with nasal polyps and tested for associations with mucosal remodeling.Surgical samples from 12 controls and 33 CRSwNP patients were analyzed histopathologically. The frequency of Th17 and Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and tissues were determined using flow cytometry. Th17 and Treg cells-related cytokines in plasma were measured by Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) multiplex assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).Eosinophilic CRSwNP (ECRSwNP) patients exhibited robust eosinophilia, whereas non-ECRSwNP patients were characterized by neutrophilia. Compared with non-ECRSwNP, an increased Th17/Treg ratio in ECRSwNP was associated with a less increased frequency of Th17 cells and a more striking reduction of Treg cells. An altered Th17/Treg cell ratio was positively correlated with eosinophilic and neutrophilic infiltration, submucosal basement membrane thickness, and the degree of subepithelial collagen deposition. Compared with non-ECRSwNP, ECRSwNP had higher levels of IL-17A and IL-4, and lower levels of IL-10 and TGF-β1, whereas non-ECRSwNP showed higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-6.Th17/Treg cell imbalance in nasal polyps (both in tissues and PBMCs) with distinct cytokine profile may contribute to different inflammatory patterns (eosinophilic versus neutrophilic inflammation) and corresponding features of mucosal remodeling. Effective strategies can be designed to target a Th17/Treg imbalance to restore immune homeostasis in nasal polyps.