Relationships between memory decline and the use of metformin or DPP4 inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes with normal cognition or Alzheimer's disease, and the role APOE carrier status

Repurposing antidiabetic drugs for Alzheimer's disease: A review of preclinical and clinical evidence and overcoming challenges

Repurposing antidiabetic drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. This review examines the potential of repurposing antidiabetic drugs for AD treatment, focusing on preclinical evidence, clinical trials, and observational studies. In addition, the review aims to explore challenges and opportunities in repurposing antidiabetic drugs for AD, emphasizing the importance of well-designed clinical trials that consider patient selection criteria, refined outcome measures, adverse effects, and combination therapies to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Preclinical evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, metformin, thiazolidinediones, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit neuroprotective effects in AD preclinical models. In preclinical studies, antidiabetic drugs have demonstrated neuroprotective effects by reducing amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation, and cognitive impairment. Antidiabetic drug classes, notably GLP-1 analogs and SGLT2 inhibitors, and a reduced risk of dementia in patients with diabetes mellitus. While the evidence for DPP4 inhibitors is mixed, some studies suggest a potential protective effect. On the other hand, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) and sulfonylureas may potentially increase the risk, especially in those experiencing recurrent hypoglycemic events. Repurposing antidiabetic drugs for AD is a promising therapeutic strategy, but challenges such as disease heterogeneity, limited biomarkers, and benefits versus risk evaluation need to be addressed. Ongoing clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD patients without diabetes will be crucial in determining the clinical efficacy and safety of the antidiabetic drugs, paving the way for potential treatments for AD.

Therapeutic Effects of Metformin on Central Nervous System Diseases: A Focus on Protection of Neurovascular Unit

Metformin is one of the most commonly used oral hypoglycemic drugs in clinical practice, with unique roles in neurodegeneration and vascular lesions. Neurodegeneration and vasculopathy coexist in many diseases and typically affect the neurovascular unit (NVU), a minimal structural and functional unit in the central nervous system. Its components interact with one another and are indispensable for maintaining tissue homeostasis. This review focuses on retinal (diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa) and cerebral (ischemic stroke, Alzheimer's disease) diseases to explore the effects of metformin on the NVU. Metformin has a preliminarily confirmed therapeutic effect on the retinal NUV, affecting many of its components, such as photoreceptors (cones and rods), microglia, ganglion, Müller, and vascular endothelial cells. Since it rapidly penetrates the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and accumulates in the brain, metformin also has an extensively studied neuronal protective effect in neuronal diseases. Its mechanism affects various NVU components, including pericytes, astrocytes, microglia, and vascular endothelial cells, mainly serving to protect the BBB. Regulating the inflammatory response in NVU (especially neurons and microglia) may be the main mechanism of metformin in improving central nervous system related diseases. Metformin may be a potential drug for treating diseases associated with NVU deterioration, however, more trials are needed to validate its timing, duration, dose, clinical effects, and side effects.

The neuroprotective role of celastrol on hippocampus in diabetic rats by inflammation restraint, insulin signaling adjustment, Aβ reduction and synaptic plasticity alternation

Celastrol, the primary constituent of Tripterygium wilfordii, has demonstrated neuroprotective properties in rats with dementia by reducing inflammation. A high-fat diet and streptozotocin injection were utilized to establish a diabetic rat model, which was then employed to investigate the possible protective effect of celastrol against the development of diabetes-induced learning and memory deficits. Afterwards, the experimental animals received a dose of celastrol by gavage (4 mg/kg/d). An animal study showed that celastrol enhanced insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in diabetic rats. In the Morris water maze test, rats with diabetes performed poorly in terms of spatial learning and memory; treatment with celastrol improved these outcomes. Additionally, administration of celastrol downregulated the expression of inflammatory-related proteins (NF-κB, IKKα, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and greatly reduced the generation of Aβ in the diabetic hippocampus tissue. Moreover, the insulin signaling pathway-related proteins PI3K, AKT, and GSK-3β were significantly upregulated in diabetic rats after celastrol was administered. Also, celastrol prevented damage to the brain structures and increased the synthesis of synaptic proteins like PSD-95 and SYT1. In conclusion, celastrol exerts a neuroprotective effect by modulating the insulin signaling system and reducing inflammatory responses, which helps to ameliorate the cognitive impairment associated with diabetes.

Association Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Alzheimer's Disease: Common Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Targets

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) rates are rising, mirroring the global trend of an aging population. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that those with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have an increased risk of developing dementia. These degenerative and progressive diseases share some risk factors. To a large extent, the amyloid cascade is responsible for AD development. Neurofibrillary tangles induce neurodegeneration and brain atrophy; this chain reaction begins with hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins caused by progressive amyloid beta (Aβ) accumulation. In addition to these processes, it seems that alterations in brain glucose metabolism and insulin signalling lead to cell death and reduced synaptic plasticity in AD, before the onset of symptoms, which may be years away. Due to the substantial evidence linking insulin resistance in the brain with AD, researchers have coined the name "Type 3 diabetes" to characterize the condition. We still know little about the processes involved, even though current animal models have helped illuminate the links between T2DM and AD. This brief overview discusses insulin and IGF-1 signalling disorders and the primary molecular pathways that may connect them. The presence of GSK-3β in AD is intriguing. These proteins' association with T2DM and pancreatic β-cell failure suggests they might be therapeutic targets for both disorders.

Analysis of current situation and influencing factors of cognitive dysfunction associated with type 2 diabetes and follow-up study on treatment effectiveness

Background

Many studies have explored the risk factors associated with cognitive impairment in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, research on determining the optimal threshold for these risk factors and comparative studies on the therapeutic effects of insulin and metformin is limited. This study aims to establish the optimal threshold for cognitive impairment risk factors in T2DM patients and compare the efficacy of insulin and metformin in treating mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Methods

A total of 308 patients with T2DM were included. The optimal threshold for cognitive impairment risk factors was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve and binary logistic regression models. MCI patients were divided into three groups: insulin, metformin, and insulin with metformin. The treatment effect was evaluated after a 6-month follow-up.

Results

The study identified several factors that influenced cognitive function in T2DM patients, including female gender, duration of diabetes >13.50 years, years of education >7.50 years, and serum sodium level > 141.90 mmol/L. Metformin and insulin with metformin showed superior therapeutic effects compared to insulin alone, but no difference was observed between metformin and combination therapy.

Conclusion

Special attention should be given to female and those with diabetes duration >13.50 years, as well as to individuals with educational level ≤ 7.50 years and serum sodium concentration ≤ 141.90 mmol/L. Metformin and insulin with metformin effectively improve MCI in patients with T2DM and outperform insulin monotherapy. The efficacy of metformin and combination therapy was found to be comparable.

Comparing regional brain uptake of incretin receptor agonists after intranasal delivery in CD-1 mice and the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Targeting brain insulin resistance (BIR) has become an attractive alternative to traditional therapeutic treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Incretin receptor agonists (IRAs), targeting either or both of the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors, have proven to reverse BIR and improve cognition in mouse models of AD. We previously showed that many, but not all, IRAs can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) after intravenous (IV) delivery. Here we determined if widespread brain uptake of IRAs could be achieved by circumventing the BBB using intranasal (IN) delivery, which has the added advantage of minimizing adverse gastrointestinal effects of systemically delivered IRAs. Of the 5 radiolabeled IRAs tested (exenatide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, DA4-JC, and DA5-CH) in CD-1 mice, exenatide, dulaglutide, and DA4-JC were successfully distributed throughout the brain following IN delivery. We observed significant sex differences in uptake for DA4-JC. Dulaglutide and DA4-JC exhibited high uptake by the hippocampus and multiple neocortical areas. We further tested and found the presence of AD-associated Aβ pathology minimally affected uptake of dulaglutide and DA4-JC. Of the 5 tested IRAs, dulaglutide and DA4-JC are best capable of accessing brain regions most vulnerable in AD (neocortex and hippocampus) after IN administration. Future studies will need to be performed to determine if IN IRA delivery can reduce BIR in AD or animal models of that disorder.

Unveiling the impact of aging on BBB and Alzheimer's disease: Factors and therapeutic implications

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly prevalent neurodegenerative condition that has devastating effects on individuals, often resulting in dementia. AD is primarily defined by the presence of extracellular plaques containing insoluble β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (P-tau). In addition, individuals afflicted by these age-related illnesses experience a diminished state of health, which places significant financial strain on their loved ones. Several risk factors play a significant role in the development of AD. These factors include genetics, diet, smoking, certain diseases (such as cerebrovascular diseases, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia), age, and alcohol consumption. Age-related factors are key contributors to the development of vascular-based neurodegenerative diseases such as AD. In general, the process of aging can lead to changes in the immune system's responses and can also initiate inflammation in the brain. The chronic inflammation and the inflammatory mediators found in the brain play a crucial role in the dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Furthermore, maintaining BBB integrity is of utmost importance in preventing a wide range of neurological disorders. Therefore, in this review, we discussed the role of age and its related factors in the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier and the development of AD. We also discussed the importance of different compounds, such as those with anti-aging properties, and other compounds that can help maintain the integrity of the blood-brain barrier in the prevention of AD. This review builds a strong correlation between age-related factors, degradation of the BBB, and its impact on AD.

Diabetes mellitus and risk of incident dementia in APOE ɛ4 carriers: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diabetes raises the risk of dementia, mortality, and cognitive decline in the elderly, potentially because of hereditary variables such as APOE. In this study, we aim to evaluate Diabetes mellitus and the risk of incident dementia in APOE ɛ4 carriers.

METHOD

We thoroughly searched PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for related articles up to September 2023. The titles, abstracts, and full texts of articles were reviewed; data were extracted and analyzed.

RESULT

This meta-analysis included nine cohorts and seven cross-sectional articles with a total of 42,390 population. The study found that APOE ɛ4 carriers with type 2 diabetes (T2D) had a 48% higher risk of developing dementia compared to non-diabetic carriers (Hazard Ratio;1.48, 95%CI1.36-1.60). The frequency of dementia was 3 in 10 people (frequency: 0.3; 95%CI (0.15-0.48). No significant heterogeneity was observed. Egger's test, which we performed, revealed no indication of publication bias among the included articles (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

Overall, diabetes increases the risk of dementia, but further large-scale studies are still required to support the results of current research.

Mitochondrial disorders leading to Alzheimer's disease-perspectives of diagnosis and treatment

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia globally. The pathogenesis of AD remains still unclear. The three main features of AD are extracellular deposits of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaque, accumulation of abnormal formation hyper-phosphorylated tau protein, and neuronal loss. Mitochondrial impairment plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. There are problems with decreased activity of multiple complexes, disturbed mitochondrial fusion, and fission or formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Moreover, mitochondrial transport is impaired in AD. Mouse models in many research show disruptions in anterograde and retrograde transport. Both mitochondrial transportation and network impairment have a huge impact on synapse loss and, as a result, cognitive impairment. One of the very serious problems in AD is also disruption of insulin signaling which impairs mitochondrial Aβ removal.Discovering precise mechanisms leading to AD enables us to find new treatment possibilities. Recent studies indicate the positive influence of metformin or antioxidants such as MitoQ, SS-31, SkQ, MitoApo, MitoTEMPO, and MitoVitE on mitochondrial functioning and hence prevent cognitive decline. Impairments in mitochondrial fission may be treated with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 or ceramide.

Investigating the impact of hypertension with and without diabetes on Alzheimer's disease risk: A clinico-pathological study

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension and diabetes are common cardiovascular risk factors that increase Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. However, it is unclear whether AD risk differs in hypertensive individuals with and without diabetes.

METHODS

Cognitively normal individuals (N = 11,074) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) were categorized as having (1) hypertension with diabetes (HTN+/DM+), (2) hypertension without diabetes (HTN+/DM-), or (3) neither (HTN-/DM-). AD risk in HTN+/DM+ and HTN+/DM- was compared to HTN-/DM-. This risk was then investigated in those with AD neuropathology (ADNP), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebrovascular neuropathology (CVNP), arteriolosclerosis, and atherosclerosis. Finally, AD risk in HTN-/DM+ was compared to HTN-/DM-.

RESULTS

Seven percent (N = 830) of individuals developed AD. HTN+/DM+ (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31 [1.19-1.44]) and HTN+/DM- (HR = 1.24 [1.17-1.32]) increased AD risk compared to HTN-/DM-. AD risk was greater in HTN+/DM+ with ADNP (HR = 2.10 [1.16-3.79]) and CAA (HR = 1.52 [1.09-2.12]), and in HTN+/DM- with CVNP (HR = 1.54 [1.17-2.03]). HTN-/DM+ also increased AD risk (HR = 1.88 [1.30-2.72]) compared to HTN-/DM-.

DISCUSSION

HTN+/DM+ and HTN+/DM- increased AD risk compared to HTN-/DM-, but pathological differences between groups suggest targeted therapies may be warranted based on cardiovascular risk profiles.

HIGHLIGHTS

AD risk was studied in hypertensive (HTN+) individuals with/without diabetes (DM+/-). HTN+/DM+ and HTN+/DM- both had an increased risk of AD compared to HTN-/DM-. Post mortem analysis identified neuropathological differences between HTN+/DM+ and HTN+/DM-. In HTN+/DM+, AD risk was greater in those with AD neuropathology and CAA. In HTN+/DM-, AD risk was greater in those with cerebrovascular neuropathology.

Metformin, Cognitive Function, and Changes in the Gut Microbiome

The decline in cognitive function and the prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders are among the most serious threats to health in old age. The prevalence of dementia has reached 50 million people worldwide and has become a major public health problem. The causes of age-related cognitive impairment are multiple, complex, and difficult to determine. However, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is linked to an enhanced risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Human studies have shown that patients with T2D exhibit dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. This dysbiosis may contribute to the development of insulin resistance and increased plasma lipopolysaccharide concentrations. Metformin medication mimics some of the benefits of calorie restriction and physical activity, such as greater insulin sensitivity and decreased cholesterol levels, and hence may also have a positive impact on aging in humans. According to recent human investigations, metformin might partially restore gut dysbiosis related to T2D. Likewise, some studies showed that metformin reduced the risk of dementia and improved cognition, although not all studies are concordant. Therefore, this review focused on those human studies describing the effects of metformin on the gut microbiome (specifically the changes in taxonomy, function, and circulating metabolomics), the changes in cognitive function, and their possible bidirectional implications.

Metformin ameliorates mitochondrial damage induced by C9orf72 poly(GR) via upregulating AKT phosphorylation

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are devastating neurodegenerative diseases with no effective cure. GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 is the most common genetic cause of both ALS and FTD. A key pathological feature of C9orf72 related ALS/FTD is the presence of abnormal dipeptide repeat proteins translated from GGGGCC repeat expansion, including poly Glycine-Arginine (GR). In this study, we observed that (GR)50 conferred significant mitochondria damage and cytotoxicity. Metformin, the most widely used clinical drug, successfully relieved (GR)50 induced mitochondrial damage and inhibited (GR)50 related cytotoxicity. Further research revealed metformin effectively restored mitochondrial function by upregulating AKT phosphorylation in (GR)50 expressed cells. Taken together, our results indicated restoring mitochondrial function with metformin may be a rational therapeutic strategy to reduce poly(GR) toxicity in C9orf72 ALS/FTD patients.

Metformin, age-related cognitive decline, and brain pathology

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation of metformin with change in cognition and brain pathology. During a mean of 8 years (SD = 5.5) of annual follow-up visits, 262/3029 participants were using metformin at any time during the study. Using a linear-mixed effect model adjusted for age, sex, and education, metformin users had slower decline on a score of global cognition compared to non-users (estimate = 0.017, SE = 0.007, p = 0.027). Analyses of cognitive domains showed a slower decline in episodic memory and semantic memory specifically. In sensitivity analysis, when examining any diabetes medication use vs none, no association was observed of any diabetes medication use with cognitive function. In the autopsy subset of 1584 participants, there was no difference in the level of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology or the presence of infarcts (of any size or location) between groups of metformin users vs non-users. However, in additional analyses, metformin users had higher odds of subcortical infarcts, and lower odds of atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis.

No association between metformin initiation and incident dementia in older adults newly diagnosed with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Metformin has been suggested to reduce dementia risk; however, most epidemiologic studies have been limited by immortal time bias or confounding due to disease severity.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of metformin initiation with incident dementia using strategies that mitigate these important sources of bias.

METHODS

Residents of Ontario, Canada ≥66 years newly diagnosed with diabetes from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017 entered this retrospective population-based cohort. To consider the indication for metformin monotherapy initiation, people with hemoglobin A1c of 6.5%-8.0% and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were selected. Using the landmark method to address immortal time bias, exposure was grouped into "metformin monotherapy initiation within 180 days after new diabetes diagnosis" or "no glucose-lowering medications within 180 days." To address disease latency, 1-year lag time was applied to the end of the 180-day landmark period. Incident dementia was defined using a validated algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Over mean follow-up of 6.77 years from cohort entry, metformin initiation within 180 days after new diabetes diagnosis (N = 12,331; 978 events; 65,762 person-years) showed no association with dementia risk (aHR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.96-1.15]), compared to delayed or no glucose-lowering medication initiation (N = 22,369; 1768 events; 117,415 person-years).

CONCLUSION

Early metformin initiation was not associated with incident dementia in older adults newly diagnosed with diabetes. The utility of metformin to prevent dementia was not supported.

Metformin: The Winding Path from Understanding Its Molecular Mechanisms to Proving Therapeutic Benefits in Neurodegenerative Disorders

Metformin, a widely prescribed medication for type 2 diabetes, has garnered increasing attention for its potential neuroprotective properties due to the growing demand for treatments for Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and motor neuron diseases. This review synthesizes experimental and clinical studies on metformin's mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic benefits for neurodegenerative disorders. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library, focused on key phrases such as "metformin", "neuroprotection", and "neurodegenerative diseases", with data up to September 2023. Recent research on metformin's glucoregulatory mechanisms reveals new molecular targets, including the activation of the LKB1-AMPK signaling pathway, which is crucial for chronic administration of metformin. The pleiotropic impact may involve other stress kinases that are acutely activated. The precise role of respiratory chain complexes (I and IV), of the mitochondrial targets, or of the lysosomes in metformin effects remains to be established by further research. Research on extrahepatic targets like the gut and microbiota, as well as its antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties, is crucial for understanding neurodegenerative disorders. Experimental data on animal models shows promising results, but clinical studies are inconclusive. Understanding the molecular targets and mechanisms of its effects could help design clinical trials to explore and, hopefully, prove its therapeutic effects in neurodegenerative conditions.

SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors improve Alzheimer's disease-like pathology and cognitive function through distinct mechanisms in a T2D-AD mouse model

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) share common features, including insulin resistance. Brain insulin resistance has been implicated as a key factor in the pathogenesis of AD. Recent studies have demonstrated that anti-diabetic drugs sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2-i) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4-i) improve insulin sensitivity and provide neuroprotection. However, the effects of these two inhibitors on the brain metabolism and insulin resistance remain uninvestigated. We developed a T2D-AD mouse model using a high-fat diet (HFD) for 19 weeks along with a single dose of streptozotocin (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) at the fourth week of HFD initiation. Subsequently, the animals were treated with SGLT2-i (empagliflozin, 25 mg/kg/day orally [p.o.]) and DPP4-i (sitagliptin, 100 mg/kg/day p.o.) for 7 weeks. Subsequently, behavioral tests were performed, and the expression of insulin signaling, AD-related, and other signaling pathway proteins in the brain were examined. T2D-AD mice not only showed increased blood glucose levels and body weight but also insulin resistance. SGLT2-i and DPP4-i effectively ameliorated insulin sensitivity and reduced body weight in these mice. Furthermore, SGLT2-i and DPP4-i significantly improved hippocampal-dependent learning, memory, and cognitive functions in the T2D-AD mouse model. Interestingly, SGLT2-i and DPP4-i reduced the hyperphosphorylated tau (pTau) levels and amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation and enhanced brain insulin signaling. SGLT2-i reduced pTau accumulation through the angiotensin converting enzyme-2/angiotensin (1-7)/ mitochondrial assembly receptor axis, whereas DPP4-i reduced Aβ accumulation by increasing insulin-degrading enzyme levels. These findings suggest that SGLT2-i and DPP4-i prevent AD-like pathology and cognitive dysfunction in T2D mice potentially through affecting brain insulin signaling via different mechanisms.

Anti-diabetics and the Prevention of Dementia: A Systematic Review

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide epidemic that is only increasing as the years progress, and as of 2019, affecting over 37 million. T2DM is a chronic condition caused by reduced insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance. Due to insulin not operating at optimal conditions, blood glucose rises and remains high, thus disturbing metabolic hemostasis. Many complications can arise from T2DM, such as coronary vascular disease, kidney damage, eye damage, and, quite significantly, dementia. It is theorized that dementia from T2DM stems from the fact that the brain is susceptible to hyperglycemic conditions, which are promoted by the increase in insulin resistance of target cells in the central nervous system. This directly affects cognitive processes and memory, which correlates to decreased temporal and front lobes volume. The risk of diabetic complications can be minimized with therapeutic interventions such as oral-antidiabetic (OAD) agents and insulin. Several OADs are on the market, but the first-line agent is metformin, a biguanide that decreases glucose production and increases insulin sensitivity. This paper aims to determine if currently prescribed OADs can help slow cognitive decline and reduce the risk and incidence of dementia as a complication of T2DM. Studies found that, for the most part, all OADs except sulfonylureas (SU) significantly slowed the decline of cognitive function and reduced the risk and incidence of dementia. SU's were shown to increase the risk of dementia in most studies. Of all the OADs, thiazolidinediones may be the most beneficial drug class for reducing the risk of dementia in T2DM patients. Future research should focus on whether early intervention with specific classes of OADs can not only improve glycemic control, leading to decreased hyperglycemia but also prevent the build-up of damaged brain tissue and help to reduce the risk and incidence of dementia in patients with T2DM.

Insights from insulin resistance pathways: Therapeutic approaches against Alzheimer associated diabetes mellitus

Alzheimer Associated Diabetes Mellitus, commonly known as Type 3 Diabetes Mellitus (T3DM) is a distinct subtype of diabetes with a pronounced association with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Insulin resistance serves as a pivotal link between these two conditions, leading to diminished insulin sensitivity, hyperglycemia, and impaired glucose uptake. The brain, a vital organ in AD context, is also significantly impacted by insulin resistance, resulting in energy deficits and neuronal damage, which are hallmark features of the neurodegenerative disorder. To pave the way for potential therapeutic interventions targeting the insulin resistance pathway, it is crucial to comprehend the intricate pathophysiology of T3DM and identify the overlapped features between diabetes and AD. This comprehensive review article aims to explore various pathway such as AMPK, PPARγ, cAMP and P13K/Akt pathway as potential target for management of T3DM. Through the analysis of these complex mechanisms, our goal is to reveal their interdependencies and support the discovery of innovative therapeutic strategies. The review extensively discusses several promising pharmaceutical candidates that have demonstrated dual drug action mechanisms, addressing both peripheral and cerebral insulin resistance observed in T3DM. These candidates hold significant promise for restoring insulin function and mitigating the detrimental effects of insulin resistance on the brain. The exploration of these therapeutic options contributes to the development of innovative interventions that alleviate the burden of T3DM and enhance patient care.

The Association between Metformin Use and Risk of Developing Severe Dementia among AD Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

This study explores the potential impact of metformin on the development of severe dementia in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). With an emerging interest in the role of the APOE genotype in mediating metformin's effects on cognitive decline in AD patients, we sought to investigate whether metformin usage is associated with a reduced risk of severe dementia. Using data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database (2005-2021), we identified 1306 participants with both AD and T2DM on diabetes medications. These individuals were categorized based on metformin usage, and a propensity score-matched cohort of 1042 participants was analyzed. Over an average follow-up of 3.6 years, 93 cases of severe dementia were observed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that metformin users and non-users had similar probabilities of remaining severe dementia-free (log-rank p = 0.56). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for covariates showed no significant association between metformin usage and a lower risk of severe dementia (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.46; p = 0.85). A subgroup analysis based on APOE ε4 carrier status demonstrated consistent results, with metformin use not correlating with a reduced severe dementia risk. In conclusion, our findings from a substantial cohort of AD and T2DM patients suggest that metformin usage is not significantly associated with a decreased risk of severe dementia. This observation persists across APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers, indicating a lack of genotype-mediated effect.

Association of sulfonylureas with the risk of dementia: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sulfonylureas are oral glucose-lowering medications positioned as a second-line therapy for type 2 diabetes. Evidence relating them to cognitive decline has been mixed. The objective was to determine whether sulfonylurea use was associated with a differential risk of dementia compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor use.

METHODS

Using administrative data from residents in Ontario, Canada, adults aged ≥66 years who were new users of a sulfonylurea or a DPP4 inhibitor from June 14, 2011, to March 31, 2021 entered this population-based retrospective cohort study. Dementia was ascertained using a validated algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and confidence intervals (CI) for time to incident dementia. The observation window started at 1 year after cohort entry to mitigate protopathic bias due to delayed diagnosis. The primary analysis used an intention-to-treat exposure definition. A separate propensity-score weighted analysis was conducted to explore within-class differences in dementia risk among sulfonylurea new users selected from the primary cohort.

RESULTS

Among 107,806 DPP4 inhibitor new users and 37,030 sulfonylurea new users, sulfonylureas compared with DPP4 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of dementia (18.4/1000 person-years; aHR [95% CI] = 1.09 [1.04-1.15]) over a mean follow-up of 4.82 years from cohort entry. Glyburide compared to gliclazide exhibited a higher dementia risk (aHR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.03-1.32]).

CONCLUSION

New use of a sulfonylurea especially glyburide was associated with a higher dementia risk compared with new use of a DPP4 inhibitor in older adults with diabetes.

Mitochondria and Oxidative Stress as a Link between Alzheimer's Disease and Diabetes Mellitus

This review is devoted to the problems of the common features linking metabolic disorders and type 2 diabetes with the development of Alzheimer's disease. The pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease closely intersects with the mechanisms of type 2 diabetes development, and an important risk factor for both pathologies is aging. Common pathological mechanisms include both factors in the development of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, insulin resistance, and amyloidosis, as well as impaired mitochondrial dysfunctions and increasing cell death. The currently available drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease have limited therapeutic efficacy. It is important to note that drugs used to treat Alzheimer's disease, in particular acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, show a positive therapeutic potential in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, while drugs used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes can also prevent a number of pathologies characteristic for Alzheimer's disease. A promising direction in the search for a strategy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease may be the creation of complex multi-target drugs that have neuroprotective potential and affect specific common targets for type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.

Antidiabetic agents as a novel treatment for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease

Therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative disorders have commonly targeted individual aspects of the disease pathogenesis to little success. Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), are characterized by several pathological features. In AD and PD, there is an abnormal accumulation of toxic proteins, increased inflammation, decreased synaptic function, neuronal loss, increased astrocyte activation, and perhaps a state of insulin resistance. Epidemiological evidence has revealed a link between AD/PD and type 2 diabetes mellitus, with these disorders sharing some pathological commonalities. Such a link has opened up a promising avenue for repurposing antidiabetic agents in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. A successful therapeutic strategy for AD/PD would likely require a single or several agents which target the separate pathological processes in the disease. Targeting cerebral insulin signalling produces numerous neuroprotective effects in preclinical AD/PD brain models. Clinical trials have shown the promise of approved diabetic compounds in improving motor symptoms of PD and preventing neurodegenerative decline, with numerous further phase II trials and phase III trials underway in AD and PD populations. Alongside insulin signalling, targeting incretin receptors in the brain represents one of the most promising strategies for repurposing currently available agents for the treatment of AD/PD. Most notably, glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have displayed impressive clinical potential in preclinical and early clinical studies. In AD the GLP-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, has been demonstrated to improve cerebral glucose metabolism and functional connectivity in small-scale pilot trials. Whilst in PD, the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide is effective in restoring motor function and cognition. Targeting brain incretin receptors reduces inflammation, inhibits apoptosis, prevents toxic protein aggregation, enhances long-term potentiation and autophagy as well as restores dysfunctional insulin signalling. Support is also increasing for the use of additional approved diabetic treatments, including intranasal insulin, metformin hydrochloride, peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor γ agonists, amylin analogs, and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors which are in the investigation for deployment in PD and AD treatment. As such, we provide a comprehensive review of several promising anti-diabetic agents for the treatment of AD and PD.

Crosstalk between Alzheimer's disease and diabetes: a focus on anti-diabetic drugs

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are two of the most common age-related diseases. There is accumulating evidence of an overlap in the pathophysiological mechanisms of these two diseases. Studies have demonstrated insulin pathway alternation may interact with amyloid-β protein deposition and tau protein phosphorylation, two essential factors in AD. So attention to the use of anti-diabetic drugs in AD treatment has increased in recent years. In vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies have evaluated possible neuroprotective effects of anti-diabetic different medicines in AD, with some promising results. Here we review the evidence on the therapeutic potential of insulin, metformin, Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1R), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP IV) Inhibitors, Sulfonylureas, Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and Amylin analog against AD. Given that many questions remain unanswered, further studies are required to confirm the positive effects of anti-diabetic drugs in AD treatment. So to date, no particular anti-diabetic drugs can be recommended to treat AD.

Alzheimer's Disease Treatment: The Search for a Breakthrough

As the search for modalities to cure Alzheimer's disease (AD) has made slow progress, research has now turned to innovative pathways involving neural and peripheral inflammation and neuro-regeneration. Widely used AD treatments provide only symptomatic relief without changing the disease course. The recently FDA-approved anti-amyloid drugs, aducanumab and lecanemab, have demonstrated unclear real-world efficacy with a substantial side effect profile. Interest is growing in targeting the early stages of AD before irreversible pathologic changes so that cognitive function and neuronal viability can be preserved. Neuroinflammation is a fundamental feature of AD that involves complex relationships among cerebral immune cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which could be altered pharmacologically by AD therapy. Here, we provide an overview of the manipulations attempted in pre-clinical experiments. These include inhibition of microglial receptors, attenuation of inflammation and enhancement of toxin-clearing autophagy. In addition, modulation of the microbiome-brain-gut axis, dietary changes, and increased mental and physical exercise are under evaluation as ways to optimize brain health. As the scientific and medical communities work together, new solutions may be on the horizon to slow or halt AD progression.

Non-canonical function of DPP4 promotes cognitive impairment through ERp29-associated mitochondrial calcium overload in diabetes

DPP4 has been shown to induce diabetes-associated mitochondrial dysfunction and cognitive impairment through its non-canonical function. Here, we report that enhanced DPP4 expression in diabetes contributes to IP3R2-mediated mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM) formation, mitochondria calcium overload, and cognitive impairment, and its knockdown showed opposite effects. Mechanistically, DPP4 binds to PAR2 in hippocampal neurons and activates ERK1/2/CEBPB signaling, which upregulates ERp29 expression and promotes its binding to IP3R2, thereby inhibiting IP3R2 degradation and promoting MAM formation, mitochondria calcium overload, and cognitive impairment. Meanwhile, targeting DPP4-mediated PAR2/ERK1/2/CEBPB/ERp29 signaling achieved satisfactory therapeutic effects on MAM formation, mitochondria calcium overload, and cognitive impairment. Notably, DPP4 activates this pathway in an enzymatic activity-independent manner, suggesting the non-canonical role of DPP4 in the pathogenesis of mitochondria calcium overload and cognitive impairment in diabetes. Together, these results identify DPP4-mediated PAR2/ERK1/2/CEBPB/ERp29 signaling as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes.

The role of the probiotic Akkermansia muciniphila in brain functions: insights underpinning therapeutic potential

The role of Akkermansia muciniphila, one of the most abundant microorganisms of the intestinal microbiota, has been studied extensively in metabolic diseases, such as obesity and diabetes. It is considered a next-generation probiotic microorganism. Although its mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated, accumulating evidence indicates the important role of A. muciniphila in brain functions via the gut-brain axis and its potential as a therapeutic target in various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, only a limited number of studies, particularly clinical studies, have directly assessed the therapeutic effects of A. muciniphila interventions in these disorders. This is the first review to discuss the comprehensive mechanism of A. muciniphila in the gut-brain axis via the protection of the intestinal mucosal barrier and modulation of the immune system and metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, amino acids, and amino acid derivatives. Additionally, the role of A. muciniphila and its therapeutic potential in various neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and cognitive deficit, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis, have been discussed. The review suggests the potential role of A. muciniphila in healthy brain functions.

Long-term use of metformin and Alzheimer's disease: beneficial or detrimental effects

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease characterized by extracellular deposition of amyloid beta (Aβ) leading to cognitive decline. Evidence from epidemiological studies has shown the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the development of AD. T2DM and peripheral insulin resistance (IR) augment the risk of AD with the development of brain IR with inhibition of neuronal insulin receptors. These changes impair clearance of Aβ, increase secretion of Aβ_1-42, reduce brain glucose metabolism, and abnormal deposition of Aβ plaques. Insulin-sensitizing drug metformin inhibits aggregation of Aβ by increasing the activity of the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) and neprilysin (NEP) levels. Additionally, different studies raised conflicting evidence concerning long-term metformin therapy in T2DM patients, as it may increase the risk of AD or it may prevent the progression of AD. Therefore, the objective of this review was to clarify the beneficial and detrimental effects of long-term metformin therapy in T2DM patients and risk of AD. Evidence from clinical trial studies revealed the little effect of metformin on AD. Various animal studies showed that metformin increases Aβ formation by activation of amyloid precursor protein (APP)-cleaving enzymes with the generation of insoluble tau species. Of note, the metformin effect on cognitive function relative to AD pathogenesis is mostly assessed in animal model studies. The duration of metformin therapy was short in most animal studies, this finding cannot apply to the long-term duration of metformin in humans. Therefore, large-scale prospective and comparative studies involving long-term metformin therapy in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients are required to exclude the effect of T2DM-induced AD.

Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors With Time to Dementia: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases dementia risk, but clear evidence to recommend interventions that can mitigate that risk remains lacking. This population-based retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether new use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors was associated with lower dementia risk.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ontario residents aged ≥66 years who were new users of an SGLT2 inhibitor or a DPP-4 inhibitor from 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2021 entered the cohort. Incident dementia was identified using a validated algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and CIs for time to incident dementia. To address reverse causality and disease latency, the observation window started at 1-year lag time from cohort entry. The primary analysis followed intention-to-treat exposure definition, and a secondary as-treated analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among 106,903 individuals, SGLT2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of dementia (14.2/1,000 person-years; aHR 0.80 [95% CI 0.71-0.89]) over a mean follow-up of 2.80 years from cohort entry. When stratified by different SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin exhibited the lowest risk (aHR 0.67 [95% CI 0.53-0.84]), followed by empagliflozin (aHR 0.78 [95% CI 0.69-0.89]), whereas canagliflozin showed no association (aHR 0.96 [95% CI 0.80-1.16]). The as-treated analysis observed a larger association (aHR 0.66 [95% CI 0.57-0.76]) than the intention-to-treat analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors showed an association with lower dementia risk in older people with T2D. Randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Plasma sDPP4 (Soluble Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4) and Cognitive Impairment After Noncardioembolic Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors have been proven to promote neuronal regeneration, reverse the development of cognitive deficits. However, the association of circulating soluble form (sDPP4 [soluble DPP4]) with poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between plasma sDPP4 levels and PSCI in patients with ischemic stroke.

METHODS

A total of 600 noncardioembolic stroke patients were included based on a preplanned ancillary study from the CATIS (China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke). We used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to evaluate cognitive function at 3 months follow-up after ischemic stroke. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of plasma sDPP4 levels with subsequent PSCI. We further calculated integrated discrimination improvement and category-free net reclassification improvement to investigate the incremental prognostic effect of plasma sDPP4 beyond the basic model with conventional risk factors.

RESULTS

Plasma sDPP4 was inversely associated with PSCI after ischemic stroke, and the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for the highest versus lowest quartile of sDPP4 was 0.49 (0.29-0.81; P for trend=0.011). Each 1-SD increase of logarithm-transformed plasma sDPP4 concentration was associated with 17% (odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.70-0.99]) lower risk of PSCI. Adding plasma sDPP4 to the basic model notably improved risk reclassification for PSCI, as shown by a category-free net reclassification improvement of 19.10% (95% CI, 2.52%-35.68%; P=0.03) and integrated discrimination improvement of 0.79% (95% CI, 0.13%-1.46%; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher plasma sDPP4 levels were associated with decreased risk of cognitive impairment after noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Hypoglycemic medicines in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Pathophysiological links between AD and glucose metabolism

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a global chronic disease in adults with beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposits and hyperphosphorylated tau protein as the pathologic characteristics. Although the exact etiology of AD is still not fully elucidated, aberrant metabolism including insulin signaling and mitochondria dysfunction plays an important role in the development of AD. Binding to insulin receptor substrates, insulin can transport through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), thus mediating insulin signaling pathways to regulate physiological functions. Impaired insulin signaling pathways, including PI3K/Akt/GSK3β and MAPK pathways, could cause damage to the brain in the pathogenesis of AD. Mitochondrial dysfunction and overexpression of TXNIP could also be causative links between AD and DM. Some antidiabetic medicines may have benefits in the treatment of AD. Metformin can be beneficial for cognition improvement in AD patients, although results from clinical trials were inconsistent. Exendin-4 may affect AD in animal models but there is a lack of clinical trials. Liraglutide and dulaglutide could also benefit AD patients in adequate clinical studies but not semaglutide. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (DPP4is) such as saxagliptin, vildagliptin, linagliptin, and sitagliptin could boost cognitive function in animal models. And SGLT2 inhibitors such as empagliflozin and dapagliflozin were also considerably protective against new-onset dementia in T2DM patients. Insulin therapy is a promising therapy but some studies indicated that it may increase the risk of AD. Herbal medicines are helpful for cognitive function and neuroprotection in the brain. For example, polyphenols, alkaloids, glycosides, and flavonoids have protective benefits in cognition function and glucose metabolism. Focusing on glucose metabolism, we summarized the pharmacological mechanism of hypoglycemic drugs and herbal medicines. New treatment approaches including antidiabetic synthesized drugs and herbal medicines would be provided to patients with AD. More clinical trials are needed to produce definite evidence for the effectiveness of hypoglycemic medications.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Mortality: A Latent Class Approach

Background Cardiovascular risk factors co-occur with one another, and little is known about the extent of their clustering and risk of Alzheimer disease (AD). We identify groups of cardiovascular risk factors in cognitively normal individuals and investigate between-group differences in incident AD and death. Methods and Results Cognitively normal individuals were recruited from the National Alzheimer's Coordinator Center. A latent class analysis was conducted with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart condition, stroke, smoking history, diabetes, and high body mass index. Between-group differences in the incidence of AD, mortality, and mortality-adjusted AD were investigated. This study included 12 412 cognitively normal individuals (average follow-up, 65 months). Three groups were identified: (1) low probabilities of cardiovascular risk factors (reference; N=5398 [43%]), (2) hypertension and hypercholesterolemia (vascular-dominant; N=5721 [46%]), and (3) hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and high body mass index (vascular-metabolic; N=1293 [10%]). Both vascular groups were significantly older, had more men, were slightly less educated, and were slightly more cognitively impaired than the reference group (all P<0.05). However, only the vascular-metabolic group had a significantly younger age of death compared with the reference group (84.3 versus 88.7 years, P<0.001). Only the vascular-dominant group had a greater incidence of AD (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; P<0.001) compared with the reference group. Mortality was greater in the vascular-dominant (OR, 3.26; P<0.001) and vascular-metabolic groups (OR, 1.84; P=0.02). Mortality-adjusted AD was greater in the vascular-dominant (OR, 1.54; P=0.02) and vascular-metabolic groups (OR, 1.46; P=0.04). Conclusions Three distinct cardiovascular risk factor groups were identified in cognitively normal elderly individuals. Only the vascular-dominant group was associated with a greater incidence of AD. Selective mortality may contribute to the attenuated association between the vascular-metabolic group and incident AD.

Ferroptosis: a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease

The most prevalent dementia-causing neurodegenerative condition is Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aberrant buildup of amyloid β and tau hyperphosphorylation are the two most well-known theories about the mechanisms underlying AD development. However, a significant number of pharmacological clinical studies conducted around the world based on the two aforementioned theories have not shown promising outcomes, and AD is still not effectively treated. Ferroptosis, a non-apoptotic programmed cell death defined by the buildup of deadly amounts of iron-dependent lipid peroxides, has received more attention in recent years. A wealth of data is emerging to support the role of iron in the pathophysiology of AD. Cell line and animal studies applying ferroptosis modulators to the treatment of AD have shown encouraging results. Based on these studies, we describe in this review the underlying mechanisms of ferroptosis; the role that ferroptosis plays in AD pathology; and summarise some of the research advances in the treatment of AD with ferroptosis modulators. We hope to contribute to the clinical management of AD.

Current Insights on the Use of Insulin and the Potential Use of Insulin Mimetics in Targeting Insulin Signalling in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are chronic diseases that share several pathological mechanisms, including insulin resistance and impaired insulin signalling. Their shared features have prompted the evaluation of the drugs used to manage diabetes for the treatment of AD. Insulin delivery itself has been utilized, with promising effects, in improving cognition and reducing AD related neuropathology. The most recent clinical trial involving intranasal insulin reported no slowing of cognitive decline; however, several factors may have impacted the trial outcomes. Long-acting and rapid-acting insulin analogues have also been evaluated within the context of AD with a lack of consistent outcomes. This narrative review provided insight into how targeting insulin signalling in the brain has potential as a therapeutic target for AD and provided a detailed update on the efficacy of insulin, its analogues and the outcomes of human clinical trials. We also discussed the current evidence that warrants the further investigation of the use of the mimetics of insulin for AD. These small molecules may provide a modifiable alternative to insulin, aiding in developing drugs that selectively target insulin signalling in the brain with the aim to attenuate cognitive dysfunction and AD pathologies.

RENEWAL: REpurposing study to find NEW compounds with Activity for Lewy body dementia-an international Delphi consensus

Drug repositioning and repurposing has proved useful in identifying new treatments for many diseases, which can then rapidly be brought into clinical practice. Currently, there are few effective pharmacological treatments for Lewy body dementia (which includes both dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia) apart from cholinesterase inhibitors. We reviewed several promising compounds that might potentially be disease-modifying agents for Lewy body dementia and then undertook an International Delphi consensus study to prioritise compounds. We identified ambroxol as the top ranked agent for repurposing and identified a further six agents from the classes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and angiotensin receptor blockers that were rated by the majority of our expert panel as justifying a clinical trial. It would now be timely to take forward all these compounds to Phase II or III clinical trials in Lewy body dementia.

Altered cortical thickness, degree centrality, and functional connectivity in middle-age type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the changes in brain structure and function in middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using morphometry and blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI).

METHODS

A total of 44 middle-aged patients with T2DM and 45 matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Surface-based morphometry (SBM) was used to evaluate the changes in brain morphology. Degree centrality (DC) and functional connectivity (FC) were used to evaluate the changes in brain function.

RESULTS

Compared with HCs, middle-aged patients with T2DM exhibited cortical thickness reductions in the left pars opercularis, left transverse temporal, and right superior temporal gyri. Decreased DC values were observed in the cuneus and precuneus in T2DM. Hub-based FC analysis of these regions revealed lower connectivity in the bilateral hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, left precuneus, as well as left frontal sup.

CONCLUSION

Cortical thickness, degree centrality, as well as functional connectivity were found to have significant changes in middle-aged patients with T2DM. Our observations provide potential evidence from neuroimaging for analysis to examine diabetes-related brain damage.

Actions of Metformin in the Brain: A New Perspective of Metformin Treatments in Related Neurological Disorders

Metformin is a first-line drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the world. Besides its hypoglycemic effects, metformin also can improve cognitive or mood functions in some T2DM patients; moreover, it has been reported that metformin exerts beneficial effects on many neurological disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Fragile X syndrome (FXS); however, the mechanism underlying metformin in the brain is not fully understood. Neurotransmission between neurons is fundamental for brain functions, and its defects have been implicated in many neurological disorders. Recent studies suggest that metformin appears not only to regulate synaptic transmission or plasticity in pathological conditions but also to regulate the balance of excitation and inhibition (E/I balance) in neural networks. In this review, we focused on and reviewed the roles of metformin in brain functions and related neurological disorders, which would give us a deeper understanding of the actions of metformin in the brain.

Metabolic hormones mediate cognition

Recent biochemical and behavioural evidence indicates that metabolic hormones not only regulate energy intake and nutrient content, but also modulate plasticity and cognition in the central nervous system. Disruptions in metabolic hormone signalling may provide a link between metabolic syndromes like obesity and diabetes, and cognitive impairment. For example, altered metabolic homeostasis in obesity is a strong determinant of the severity of age-related cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disease. Here we review the evidence that eating behaviours and metabolic hormones-particularly ghrelin, leptin, and insulin-are key players in the delicate regulation of neural plasticity and cognition. Caloric restriction and antidiabetic therapies, both of which affect metabolic hormone levels can restore metabolic homeostasis and enhance cognitive function. Thus, metabolic hormone pathways provide a promising target for the treatment of cognitive decline.

Association Between Metformin and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

As one of the widely used drugs for the management of type 2 diabetes mellites (T2DM), metformin is increasingly believed to delay cognitive deterioration and therapeutically for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients especially those with T2DM. However, studies of the potential neuroprotective effects of metformin in AD patients have reported contradictory results.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between metformin and the risk of developing AD.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify clinical observational studies on the relationship between AD risk and metformin use published before December 20, 2021. Two investigators independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 1,670 records, we included 10 studies involving 229,110 participants. The meta-analysis showed no significant association between AD incidence and metformin exposure (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.88-1.56, p = 0.291). However, subgroup analysis showed that among Asians, the risk of AD was significantly higher among metformin users than those who did not (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24-2.37, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The available evidence does not support the idea that metformin reduces risk of AD, and it may, in fact, increase the risk in Asians. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to understand the role played by metformin and other antidiabetic drugs in the prevention of AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Diabetes and cognitive decline

Epidemiologic studies have documented an association between diabetes and increased risk of cognitive decline in the elderly. Based on animal model studies, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain such an association, including central insulin signaling, neurodegeneration, brain amyloidosis, and neuroinflammation. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms in humans remain poorly defined. It is reasonable, however, that many pathways may be involved in these patients leading to cognitive impairment. A major aim of clinicians is identifying early onset of neurologic signs and symptoms in elderly diabetics to improve quality of life of those with cognitive impairment and reduce costs associated with long-term complications. Several biomarkers have been proposed to identify diabetics at higher risk of developing dementia and diagnose early stage dementia. Although biomarkers of brain amyloidosis, neurodegeneration and synaptic plasticity are commonly used to diagnose dementia, especially Alzheimer disease, their role in diabetes remains unclear. The aim of this review is to explore the molecular mechanisms linking diabetes with cognitive decline and present the most important findings on the clinical use of biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting early cognitive decline in diabetics.

Glucose-lowering drugs, cognition, and dementia: The clinical evidence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important risk factor for dementia. The possibility to mitigate this risk by controlling T2DM is compelling; however, different glucose-lowering drugs have different effects on the brain by virtue of their different mechanisms of action. The clinical and epidemiological data appear mixed, warranting careful critical evaluation of the human studies. Here we examine the evidence in the context of dementia prevention and treatment, both for people with and without T2DM. We discuss the evidence on this scaffold of research directions, identifying methodological complexities in the extant literature (e.g. comparator discrepancies, changes in the therapeutic landscape), and the implications of different outcome measures (e.g. neuropsychological). We consider possible implications of cerebrovascular protection vs. effects on progression of neurodegenerative proteinopathy, and we present a research roadmap for glucose-lowering drugs in cognitive neurology, including neuroimaging, and fluid biomarkers. We conclude that there is great potential to advance personalized strategies to prevent and treat dementia with glucose-lowering drugs.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated cognitive dysfunction: Advances in potential mechanisms and therapies

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its target organ injuries cause distressing impacts on personal health and put an enormous burden on the healthcare system, and increasing attention has been paid to T2D-associated cognitive dysfunction (TDACD). TDACD is characterized by cognitive dysfunction, delayed executive ability, and impeded information-processing speed. Brain imaging data suggest that extensive brain regions are affected in patients with T2D. Based on current findings, a wide spectrum of non-specific neurodegenerative mechanisms that partially overlap with the mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases is hypothesized to be associated with TDACD. However, it remains unclear whether TDACD is a consequence of T2D or a complication that co-occurs with T2D. Theoretically, anti-diabetes methods are promising neuromodulatory approaches to reduce brain injury in patients with T2D. In this review, we summarize potential mechanisms underlying TDACD and promising neurotropic effects of anti-diabetes methods and some neuroprotective natural compounds. Constructing screening or diagnostic tools and developing targeted treatment and preventive strategies would be expected to reduce the burden of TDACD.

Association Between Specific Type 2 Diabetes Therapies and Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias in Propensity-Score Matched Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Objective

We sought to determine the impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) anti-hyperglycemic medications (A-HgM) on risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) outcomes including vascular dementia, and non-AD dementia such as frontotemporal, Lewy body, and mixed etiology dementias.

Research Design and Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the US-based Mariner claims dataset. 1,815,032 T2D participants 45 years and older with records 6 months prior and at least 3 years after the diagnosis of T2D were included. Claims were surveyed for a diagnosis of AD and ADRD 12 months post T2D diagnosis. A propensity score approach was used to minimize selection bias. Analyses were conducted between January 1st and February 28th, 2021.

Results

In this cohort study A-HgM exposure was associated with decreased diagnosis of AD (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59–0.62; p < 0.001), vascular dementia (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69–0.74; p < 0.001) and non-AD dementia (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66–0.68; p < 0.001). Metformin was associated with the greatest risk reduction and insulin with the least reduction in risk compared to patients not receiving A-HgM for ADRD risk. Of interest, patients with a diagnosis of AD, while either on metformin or insulin, were older in age and predominately female, than individuals on these drugs that did not develop AD. Mean (SD) follow-up was 6.2 (1.8) years.

Conclusion

After controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities, A-HgM in patients with T2D was associated with a reduced risk of AD and ADRD. These findings provide evidence in support of T2D as a risk factor for AD and ADRD and the beneficial impact of early and effective control of hyperglycemia to mitigate risk.

Deciphering the Roles of Metformin in Alzheimer's Disease: A Snapshot

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease predominantly affecting millions of elderly people. To date, no effective therapy has been identified to reverse the progression of AD. Metformin, as a first-line medication for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), exerts multiple beneficial effects on various neurodegenerative disorders, including AD. Evidence from clinical studies has demonstrated that metformin use contributes to a lower risk of developing AD and better cognitive performance, which might be modified by interactors such as diabetic status and APOE-ε4 status. Previous mechanistic studies have gradually unveiled the effects of metformin on AD pathology and pathophysiology, including neuronal loss, neural dysfunction, amyloid-β (Aβ) depositions, tau phosphorylation, chronic neuroinflammation, insulin resistance, impaired glucose metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction. Current evidence remains ambiguous and even conflicting. Herein, we review the current state of knowledge concerning the mechanisms of metformin in AD pathology while summarizing current evidence from clinical studies.

Omarigliptin/galangin combination mitigates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in rats: Involvement of glucagon-like peptide-1, toll-like receptor-4, apoptosis and Akt/GSK-3β signaling

AIMS

The objectives of this work were to assess the possibility of administration of omarigliptin and/or galangin to combat lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation in rats and to explore the possible mechanisms that might contribute to their actions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a rat model of LPS-induced neuroinflammation, the changes in the behavioral tests, biochemical parameters, and the histopathological picture were assessed.

KEY FINDINGS

Administration of either omarigliptin or galangin to LPS-injected rats was able to significantly improve the behavioral changes with restoration of the oxidant/antioxidant balance, decrement of toll-like receptor-4 levels, and amelioration of the neuroinflammation associated with inhibition of apoptosis and restoration of glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in the cerebral tissues. In addition, omarigliptin and/or galangin significantly reduced the levels of phospho-Akt and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) and significantly increased the expression of beclin-1 in the cerebral tissues compared versus the group treated with LPS alone. As a result, these changes were positively reflected on the histopathological and the electron microscopic picture of the cerebral tissues. These beneficial effects were maximally evidenced in rats treated with omarigliptin/galangin combination relative to the use of either omarigliptin or galangin alone.

SIGNIFICANCE

Omarigliptin/galangin combination might be proposed as a promising therapeutic line for mitigation of the pathophysiologic events of LPS-induced neuroinflammation.

Exploring the dual character of metformin in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease, which results in dementia typically in the elderly. The disease is mainly characterized by the deposition of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the brain. However, only few drugs are available for AD because of its unknown pathological mechanism which limits the development of new drugs. Therefore, it is urgent to identify potential therapeutic strategies for AD. Moreover, research have showed that there is a significant association between Type 2 diabetes mellites (T2DM) and AD, suggesting that the two diseases may share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Such mechanisms include impaired insulin signaling, altered glucose metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and premature aging, which strongly affect cognitive function and increased risk of dementia. Consequently, as a widely used drug for T2DM, metformin also has therapeutic potential for AD in vivo. It has been confirmed that metformin is beneficial on the brain of AD animal models. The mechanisms underlying the effects of metformin in Alzheimer's disease are complex and multifaceted. Metformin may work through mechanisms involving homeostasis of glucose metabolism, decrease of amyloid plaque deposition, normalization of tau protein phosphorylation and enhancement of autophagy. However, in clinical trials, metformin had little effects on patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD. Pathological effects and negative clinical results of metformin on AD make the current topic quite controversial. By reviewing the latest progress of related research, this paper summarizes the possible role of metformin in AD. The purpose of this study is not only to determine the potential treatment of AD, but also other related neurodegenerative diseases.

Association of metformin use with Alzheimer's disease in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a population-based nested case-control study

Metformin reduces insulin resistance, which constitutes a pathophysiological connection of diabetes with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the evidence of metformin on AD development was still insufficient and conflicting. We investigated AD risk in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 DM treated with metformin. This retrospective, observational, nested case–control study included patients with newly diagnosed type 2 DM obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service DM cohort (2002–2017). Among 70,499 dementia-free DM patients, 1675 AD cases were matched to 8375 controls for age, sex, and DM onset and duration. The association between AD and metformin was analyzed by multivariable regression analyses, adjusted for comorbidities and cardiometabolic risk profile. Metformin use was associated with an increased odds of AD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.50; 95% CI 1.23–1.83). The risk of AD was higher in patients with a longer DM duration. Furthermore, AD risk was significantly high in DM patients with depression (AOR 2.05; 95% CI 1.02–4.12). Given the large number of patients with DM who are taking metformin worldwide, a double-blinded, prospective study is required to determine the long-term cognitive safety of metformin.

The association of antidiabetic medications and Mini-Mental State Examination scores in patients with diabetes and dementia

Background

The effect of antidiabetic medication on cognitive function is unclear. We analyzed the association between five antidiabetic drugs and change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in patients with diabetes and dementia.

Methods

Using the Swedish Dementia Registry and four supplementary Swedish registers/databases, we identified 1873 patients (4732 observations) with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (diabetes) and Alzheimer’s disease or mixed-pathology dementia who were followed up at least once after dementia diagnosis. Use of metformin, insulin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinediones (TZD), and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) was identified at baseline. Prevalent-user, incident-user, and drug-drug cohorts were sampled, and propensity-score matching was used to analyze comparable subjects. Beta coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI) from the random intercept and slope linear mixed-effects models determined the association between the use of antidiabetic medications and decline in MMSE score points between the follow-ups. Inverse-probability weighting was used to account for patient dropout.

Results

Compared to non-users, prevalent users of metformin (beta 0.89, 95% CI 0.44; 1.33) and DPP-4i (0.72, 0.06; 1.37) experienced a slower cognitive decline with time. Secondly, compared to DPP-4i, the use of insulin (−1.00, −1.95; −0.04) and sulfonylureas (−1.19; −2.33; −0.04) was associated with larger point-wise decrements in MMSE with annual intervals.

Conclusions

In this large cohort of patients with diabetes and dementia, the use of metformin and DPP-4i was associated with a slower decline in MMSE scores. Further examination of the cognitive effects of metformin and incretin-based medications is warranted.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-021-00934-0.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) Inhibitors for New-Onset Dementia: A Propensity Score-Matched Population-Based Study With Competing Risk Analysis

Introduction: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I) on new-onset cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the two novel antidiabetic agents on cognitive dysfunction by comparing the rates of dementia between SGLT2I and DPP4I users.

Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with SGLT2I and DPP4I between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 in Hong Kong. Exclusion criteria were <1-month exposure or exposure to both medication classes, or prior diagnosis of dementia or major neurological/psychiatric diseases. Primary outcomes were new-onset dementia, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's. Secondary outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular mortality.

Results: A total of 13,276 SGLT2I and 36,544 DPP4I users (total n = 51,460; median age: 66.3 years old [interquartile range (IQR): 58–76], 55.65% men) were studied (follow-up: 472 [120–792] days). After 1:2 matching (SGLT2I: n = 13,283; DPP4I: n = 26,545), SGLT2I users had lower incidences of dementia (0.19 vs. 0.78%, p < 0.0001), Alzheimer's (0.01 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.0047), Parkinson's disease (0.02 vs. 0.14%, p = 0.0006), all-cause (5.48 vs. 12.69%, p < 0.0001), cerebrovascular (0.88 vs. 3.88%, p < 0.0001), and cardiovascular mortality (0.49 vs. 3.75%, p < 0.0001). Cox regression showed that SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of dementia (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.27–0.61], P < 0.0001), Parkinson's (HR:0.28, 95% CI: [0.09–0.91], P = 0.0349), all-cause (HR:0.84, 95% CI: [0.77–0.91], P < 0.0001), cardiovascular (HR:0.64, 95% CI: [0.49–0.85], P = 0.0017), and cerebrovascular (HR:0.36, 95% CI: [0.3–0.43], P < 0.0001) mortality.

Conclusions: The use of SGLT2I is associated with lower risks of dementia, Parkinson's disease, and cerebrovascular mortality compared with DPP4I use after 1:2 ratio propensity score matching.