Clinical trial of adjunctive celecoxib treatment in patients with major depression: a double blind and placebo controlled trial

Long-term characterisation of the relationship between change in depression severity and change in inflammatory markers following inflammation-stratified treatment with vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent condition with a substantial incidence of relapse or treatment resistance. A subset of patients show evidence of low-grade inflammation, with these patients having a higher likelihood of more severe or difficult to treat courses of illness. Anti-inflammatory treatment of MDD has been investigated with mixed results, and no known studies have included assessments beyond cessation of the anti-inflammatory agent, meaning it remains unknown if any benefit from treatment persists. The objective of the present study was to investigate treatment outcomes up to 29 weeks post-cessation of celecoxib or placebo augmentation of an antidepressant, and how concentrations of selected inflammatory markers change over the same period.

METHODS

The PREDDICT parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (University of Adelaide, Australia) ran from December 2017 to April 2020. Participants with MDD were stratified into normal range or elevated inflammation strata according to screening concentrations of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants were randomised to treatment with vortioxetine and celecoxib or vortioxetine and placebo for six weeks, and vortioxetine alone for an additional 29 weeks (35 total weeks). Following a previous publication of results from the six-week RCT phase, exploratory analyses were performed on Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores, response and remission outcomes, and selected peripheral inflammatory markers across the entire study duration up to week 35.

RESULTS

Participants retained at each observation were baseline N=119, week 2 N=115, week 4 N=103, week 6 N=104, week 8 N=98, week 22 N=81, and week 35 N=60. Those in the elevated hsCRP celecoxib-augmented group had a statistically significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline to week 35 compared to all other groups, demonstrating the greatest clinical improvement long-term, despite no group or strata differences at preceding time points. Response and remission outcomes did not differ by treatment group or hsCRP strata at any time point. Changes in hsCRP between baseline and week 35 and Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) concentrations between baseline and week 6 and baseline and week 35 were statistically significantly associated with MADRS scores observed at week 6 and week 35 respectively, with reducing TNF-α concentrations associated with reducing MADRS scores and vice versa in each case. A post-hoc stratification of the participant cohort by baseline TNF-α concentrations led to significant prediction by the derived strata on clinical response at weeks 6, 8 and 35, with participants with elevated baseline TNF-α less likely to achieve clinical response.

INTERPRETATION

The present analysis suggests for the first time a possible longer-term clinical benefit of celecoxib augmentation of vortioxetine in inflammation-associated MDD treatment. However, further research is needed to confirm the finding and to ascertain the reason for such a delayed effect. Furthermore, the trial suggests that TNF-α may have a stronger relationship with anti-inflammatory MDD treatment outcomes than hsCRP, and should be investigated further for potential predictive utility.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p.

Naproxen adjunct to fluoxetine for moderate-to-severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

AIM

Current treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) encounter resistance and limiting adverse events, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of naproxen, a medication with effects on inflammation and neuronal function, on OCD.

METHODS

One hundred and four OCD outpatients with a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score of >21 were equally assigned to receive fluoxetine plus either naproxen 250 mg or matched placebo q12hr. Patients were assessed using the Y-BOCS by recording the subscale scores at baseline and weeks 5 and 10 to evaluate efficacy. They were also assessed in terms of tolerability.

RESULTS

Data from 96 patients were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. There were significant time-treatment interaction effects on the obsession subscale (η P 2  = 0.055) and total (η P 2  = 0.043) scores of Y-BOCS. Reductions in the obsession subscale and total scores of Y-BOCS were significantly greater in the fluoxetine plus naproxen group until the endpoint (Cohen's d = 0.560 and Cohen's d = 0.477, respectively). However, the difference in compulsion subscale score changes between the groups was not significant. Respondents with a reduction of ≥35% in Y-BOCS total scores were significantly more in the fluoxetine plus naproxen group (80.0% versus 47.8%). The side effect frequencies were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Naproxen, adjunct to fluoxetine, outperformed adjunctive placebo in treating obsession and total symptoms of OCD patients in a safe and tolerable manner.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered and published in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir; registration number IRCT20090117001556N139).

The inflammatory underpinning of depression: An historical perspective

Over the last thirty years, substantial evidence has accumulated in support of the hypothesis that dysregulation of inflammatory processes plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of depression. This review traces the evolution of research supporting this link, discussing key findings from several major investigative fronts: Alterations in inflammatory markers associated with depression; Mood changes following the exogenous administration of inflammatory challenges; The anti-inflammatory properties of traditional antidepressants and the promising antidepressant effects of anti-inflammatory drugs. Additionally, it explores how inflammatory processes interact with specific brain regions and neurochemical systems to drive depressive pathology. A thorough analysis of the 100 most-cited experimental studies on the topic ensures a comprehensive, transparent and unbiased collection of references. This methodological approach offers a panoramic view of the inflammation-depression nexus, shedding light on the complexity of its mechanisms and their connections to psychiatric categorizations, symptoms, demographics, and life events. Synthesizing insights from this extensive research, the review presents an integrative model of the biological foundations of inflammation-associated depression. It posits that we have reached a critical juncture where the translation of this knowledge into personalized immunomodulatory treatments for depression is not just possible, but imperative.

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in the Pathophysiology of Late Life Depression

INTRODUCTION

Late life depression (LLD) is characterized by specific clinical features including a high frequency of vascular form and frequent antidepressant treatment resistance. The expression and functions of the serine protease inhibitor, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is known to be altered by aging, vascular damage, insulin levels associated with a sedentary lifestyle, chronic stress leading to hypercortisolemia, and inflammatory changes linked to stress responses. These phenomena would be implicated in LLD like vascular depression. This article thus aims to review the existing literature regarding the association between LLD and plasmatic levels of PAI-1, a marker of hypofibrinolysis. We hypothesize that increased age would be associated with changes in PAI-1 plasma level and function which influence LLD pathogenesis and its treatment.

RESULTS

Although a large number of studies on PAI-1 changes in the elderly exist, studies about its implications in LLD are sparse. Despite heterogeneous findings regarding the direction of variation in plasmatic PAI-1 levels among elderly participants with LLD, all studies demonstrated an association between PAI-1 levels and current or remitted depressive symptoms. Moreover, disruptions in the concentrations of other biological markers influencing PAI-1 expression, such as cytokines or adipokines, were also observed, notably an increase in the levels of interleukins 6 and 8.

DISCUSSION

LLD genesis appears to be influenced by PAI-1 regulatory loops which are implicated in senescence or cell death. The resistance to antidepressant treatment appears to be linked to distinct biological profiles involving inflammatory and fibrinolytic factors. Taken together these data suggest that PAI-1 pathway may be a promising target of treatment development efforts for LLD, and depression in general.

Inflammation-stratified augmentation of vortioxetine with celecoxib: Results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorder

Low-grade inflammation is considered as a pathophysiological mechanism in a subtype of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Anti-inflammatory drugs have shown efficacy in treating MDD. However, it remains unclear how to identify suitable patients for anti-inflammatory treatment of depression. This study investigates the predictive value of pre-treatment high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) stratification on the outcome of celecoxib augmentation of vortioxetine. The PREDDICT study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week trial on augmentation of vortioxetine with celecoxib between December 2017 and April 2020 at the University of Adelaide (Australia). The present analysis focusses on the question of whether the pre-treatment hsCRP measurement and stratification of patients to depression with inflammation (hsCRP >3 mg/L) or without inflammation (hsCRP ≤3 mg/L) has an impact on the outcome of anti-inflammatory treatment with celecoxib. A total of n = 119 mostly treatment-resistant MDD patients with moderate to severe symptomatology were recruited in the trial. There was no effect of treatment group (celecoxib or placebo), pre-treatment hsCRP strata (with/without inflammation), or interaction between the two terms on treatment outcome. The results of the current analysis do not support the hypothesis that pre-treatment hsCRP level is predictive for response to anti-inflammatory treatment with celecoxib in MDD patients. Further research is needed to identify appropriate biomarkers for the prediction of anti-inflammatory treatment outcome in depression. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12617000527369p. Registered on 11 April 2017, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p.

The efficacy and safety of adding celecoxib to escitalopram for improving symptoms of major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

There is growing evidence that adding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to some psychopharmacological treatments may help to improve symptoms in patients suffering from major depressive disorder. The present study examined the therapeutic efficacy of adding celecoxib to escitalopram and the safety of doing so.

METHOD

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to either treatment with escitalopram plus celecoxib (intervention group) or escitalopram and placebo. All patients were evaluated blind to treatment group with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) before the intervention as well at 4 and 8 weeks after initiating treatment. Chi-square and paired t-test were used to examine between-group differences at those assessment times.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in depressive symptoms between intervention and placebo groups at baseline. However, at 4 and 8 weeks after the beginning of treatment, there were significant between-group differences in HDRS scores, favoring the intervention group. No between-group differences were found in treatment-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding celecoxib to escitalopram may improve symptoms of depression in patients with major depressive disorder without increasing the risk of drug-related side effects.

"Inflamed" depression: A review of the interactions between depression and inflammation and current anti-inflammatory strategies for depression

Depression is a common mental disorder, the effective treatment of which remains a challenging issue worldwide. The clinical pathogenesis of depression has been deeply explored, leading to the formulation of various pathogenic hypotheses. Among these, the monoamine neurotransmitter hypothesis holds a prominent position, yet it has significant limitations as more than one-third of patients do not respond to conventional treatments targeting monoamine transmission disturbances. Over the past few decades, a growing body of research has highlighted the link between inflammation and depression as a potential key factor in the pathophysiology of depression. In this review, we first summarize the relationship between inflammation and depression, with a focus on the pathophysiological changes mediated by inflammation in depression. The mechanisms linking inflammation to depression as well as multiple anti-inflammatory strategies are also discussed, and their efficacy and safety are assessed. This review broadens the perspective on specific aspects of using anti-inflammatory strategies for treating depression, laying the groundwork for advancing precision medicine for individuals suffering from "inflamed" depression.

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors alleviated depressive and anxious-like behaviors in mice exposed to lipopolysaccharide: Involvement of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation

Depression and anxiety disorders have their pathophysiologies linked to inflammation and oxidative stress. In this context, celecoxib (CLX) and etoricoxib (ETR) inhibit cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), an enzyme expressed by cells involved in the inflammatory process and found in the brain. Studies have been using CLX as a possible drug in the treatment of depression, although its mechanisms at the central nervous system level are not fully elucidated. In this study, the effects of CLX and ETR on behavioral, oxidative, and inflammatory changes induced by systemic exposure to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were evaluated in adult male swiss mice. For ten days, the animals received intraperitoneal injections of LPS at 0.5 mg/kg. From the sixth to the tenth day, one hour after LPS exposure, they were treated orally with CLX (15 mg/kg), ETR (10 mg/kg), or fluoxetine (FLU) (20 mg/kg). Twenty-four hours after the last oral administration, the animals underwent evaluation of locomotor activity (open field test), predictive tests for depressive-like behavior (forced swim and tail suspension tests), and anxiolytic-like effect (elevated plus maze and hole board tests). Subsequently, the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and striatum were dissected for the measurement of oxidative and nitrosative parameters (malondialdehyde, nitrite, and glutathione) and quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6). LPS induced depressive and anxious-like behavior, and treatment with CLX or ETR was able to reverse most of the behavioral changes. It was evidenced that nitrosative stress and the degree of lipid peroxidation induced by LPS were reduced in different brain areas after treatment with the drugs, as well as the endogenous defense system against free radicals was strengthened. CLX and ETR also significantly reduced LPS-induced cytokine levels. These data are expected to expand information on the role of inflammation in depression and anxiety and provide insights into possible mechanisms of COX-2 inhibitors in psychiatric disorders with a neurobiological basis in inflammation and oxidative stress.

Pentoxifylline as a Novel Add-on Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder in Adult Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence indicates an association between immune dysregulation and major depressive disorder (MDD). Pentoxifylline (PTX), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce pro-inflammatory activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in depressive symptoms and pro-inflammatory markers after administration of PTX as an adjunctive agent to citalopram in patients with MDD.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to either citalopram (20 mg/day) plus placebo (twice daily) (n=50) or citalopram (20 mg/day) plus PTX (400 mg) (twice daily) (n=50). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D-17) scores at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 and serum levels of interleukin1-β (IL-1-β), tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, IL-6, serotonin, IL-10, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at baseline and week 12 were evaluated.

RESULTS

HAM-D-17 score in the PTX group significantly reduced in comparison to the control group after weeks 4, 6, 8,10, and 12 ((LSMD): - 2.193, p=0.021; - 2.597, p=0.036; - 2.916, p=0.019; - 4.336, p=0.005; and - 4.087, p=0.008, respectively). Patients who received PTX had a better response (83%) and remission rate (79%) compared to the placebo group (49% and 40%, p=0.006 and p=0.01, respectively). Moreover, the reduction in serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory factors and increase in serotonin and BDNF in the PTX group was significantly greater than in the placebo group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the safety and efficacy of PTX as an adjunctive antidepressant agent with anti-inflammatory effects in patients with MDD.

Efficacy and acceptability of anti-inflammatory agents in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anti-inflammatory agents have emerged as a potential new therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). In this meta-analysis, our aim was to evaluate the antidepressant effect of anti-inflammatory agents and compare their efficacy.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Review, Cochrane Trial, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to identify eligible randomized clinical trials. The primary outcome measures of our meta-analysis were efficacy and acceptability, while the secondary outcome measures focused on remission rate and dropout rate due to adverse events. We used odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to present our results.

Results

A total of 48 studies were included in our analysis. In terms of efficacy, anti-inflammatory agents demonstrated a significant antidepressant effect compared to placebo (OR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.41-2.97, p = 0.0002). Subgroup analyses revealed that anti-inflammatory agents also exhibited significant antidepressant effects in the adjunctive therapy subgroup (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.39-3.37, p = 0.0006) and in MDD patients without treatment-resistant depression subgroup (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.53-3.54, p < 0.0001). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of network meta-analysis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (SUCRA value = 81.6) demonstrated the highest acceptability among the included anti-inflammatory agents.

Conclusion

In summary, our meta-analysis demonstrates that anti-inflammatory agents have significant antidepressant effects and are well-accepted. Furthermore, adjunctive therapy with anti-inflammatory agents proved effective in treating MDD. Among the evaluated anti-inflammatory agents, NSAIDs exhibited the highest acceptability, although its efficacy is comparable to placebo.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=422004), identifier CRD42023422004.

Efficacy and safety of celecoxib for treatment of mild to moderate postpartum depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

Evidence has demonstrated the roles of inflammatory processes in pathogenesis of depression. We aim to assess the effects of adjunctive celecoxib with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), an anti-inflammatory agent, in treatment of postpartum depression and on levels of Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and inflammatory cytokines.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effects of adjunctive celecoxib with CBT on postpartum depression. Fifty outpatient women with postpartum depression, participated in this study. Patients randomly received either a celecoxib capsule twice a day or a placebo capsule twice a day for 6 weeks. Patients were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the adverse event checklist at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 6.

RESULTS

Patients in the celecoxib group showed a greater decline in HDRS scores from baseline to all three study time points compared to the placebo group (p = 0.12 for week 2, p = 0.001 for week 4, p < 0.001 for week 6). Rate of response to treatment was significantly higher in the celecoxib group compared to the placebo group at week 4 (60 vs 24%, p = 0.010) and week 6 (96 vs 44%, p < 0.001). Rate of remission was significantly higher in the celecoxib group compared to the placebo group at week 4 (52 vs 20%, p = 0.018) and week 6 (96 vs 36%, p < 0.001). Levels of most inflammatory markers were significantly lower in the celecoxib group compared to the placebo group at week 6. Levels of BDNF were significantly higher in the celecoxib group compared to the placebo group at week 6 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest adjunctive celecoxib is an effective treatment for the improvement of postpartum depressive symptoms.

Evaluation of serum interleukin-12 and interleukin-4 as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder

Recently, scientists have focused on pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunological dysregulation in major depressive disorder (MDD). Some research suggests pro-inflammatory cytokines' role in MDD development, whereas anti-inflammatory studies are sparse. There is no systematic investigation of Bangladeshi MDD patients' pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. This study examines the blood levels of IL-12 and IL-4 in Bangladeshi patients and healthy controls (HCs) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these cytokines to identify MDD patients from those without MDD. A total of 110 people with MDD from the department of psychiatry of a teaching hospital in Dhaka and 107 HCs from Dhaka participated in this case-control study. Depression and illness severity were gauged using DSM-5 criteria and Ham-D scores. Commercially marketed ELISA kits were used in accordance with manufacturer guidelines to measure the levels of IL-12 and IL-4 in peripheral blood, allowing a comparison of the patient and control groups. In comparison to HCs, MDD patients (5333.00 ± 307.40 pg/ml) showed noticeably higher levels of IL-12 than in HCs (2331.00 ± 207.40 pg/ml). The increased levels were positively correlated with Ham-D scores (male: r = 0.351, p < 0.050; female: r = 0.389, p < 0.050), suggesting a possible relationship to disease progression. Additionally, compared to HCs (272.81 ± 23.94 pg/ml), MDD patients had significantly higher peripheral blood levels of IL-4 (876.35 ± 66.73 pg/ml) (p < 0.001). Also, there was a positive correlation between IL-4 serum levels and Ham-D scores (male: r = 0.361, p < 0.050; female: r = 0.398, p < 0.050). Therefore, we observed increased levels of these serum cytokines and their association with the severity of depression. The results of this study demonstrate the possibility of IL-12 and IL-4 blood levels as distinct markers capable of differentiating between MDD patients and HCs, possibly acting as markers of MDD susceptibility. To ascertain the diagnostic effectiveness of these two cytokines, more research is necessary.

Exploring the role of inflammation in major depressive disorder: beyond the monoamine hypothesis

Major depressive disorder affects approximately 8.4% of the United States population. The World Health Organization estimates that 280 million adults worldwide are suffering from depression. They have estimated that by 2030 it will be the second most serious condition. Current treatment relies on the monoamine hypothesis, however, one-third of patients with MDD do not respond to monoamine-based antidepressants. For years, it was hypothesized that the primary pathway of MDD involved serotonin as the main neurotransmitter. The monoamine hypothesis, a widely accepted theory, sought to explain the biological basis of MDD as being caused by the depletion of monoamine neurotransmitters, namely norepinephrine and serotonin. This hypothesis regarding monoamines as the pathophysiological basis of MDD led to the design and widespread use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, given that only one-third of patients improve with SSRI it is reasonable to infer that the pathway involved is more complex than once hypothesized and there are more neurotransmitters, receptors, and molecules involved. The monoamine hypothesis does not explain why there is a delay in the onset of effect and action of SSRIs. Several studies have demonstrated that chronic stress is a risk factor for the development of MDD. Thus the monoamine hypothesis alone is not enough to fully account for the pathophysiology of MDD highlighting the need for further research involving the pathways of MDD. In this paper, we review the role of inflammation and cytokines on MDD and discuss other pathways involved in the development and persistence of depressive symptoms.

Minocycline in depression not responding to first-line therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder is often resistant to first-line treatment, with around 30% failing to respond to traditional therapy. Treatment-resistant depression results in prolonged hospitalization and healthcare costs. Anti-inflammatory drugs have shown promising results in depression not responding to initial therapy. Minocycline has anti-inflammatory properties and crosses the blood-brain barrier. It has demonstrated varied results in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We assessed the efficacy of minocycline compared to placebo in depression not responding to one first-line antidepressant via a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for RCTs. We visualized the results using forest plots and drapery plots. We assessed and explored heterogeneity using I2, prediction interval, and meta-regression. Then, we rated the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

Four RCTs revealed a non-significant difference in depression severity [-3.93; 95% CI: -16.14 to 8.28], rate of response [1.15; 0.33-4.01], and rate of remission [0.94; 0.44-2.01]. However, the reduction in depression severity is significant at a trend of P < .1. The high between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 78%) for depression severity could be answered by meta-regression (P = .02) for the duration of therapy.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference with minocycline compared to placebo for depression not responding to first-line antidepressant therapy. However, the treatment response varies with treatment duration and patients' neuroinflammatory state. Thus, larger and longer RCTs, especially in diverse disease subgroups, are needed for further insight. This is needed to allow greater precision medicine in depression and avoid elevated healthcare expenditure associated with hit-and-trial regimens.

REGISTRATION

CRD42023398476 (PROSPERO).

Efficacy and safety of celecoxib monotherapy for treatment of moderate depressive symptoms following COVID-19 infection: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Celecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, was found to be an effective add-on treatment for unipolar and bipolar depression. We investigated the potential beneficial effect of celecoxib monotherapy on depressive symptoms after Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the therapeutic effects of celecoxib monotherapy in patients with moderate depressive symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomized to receive either a celecoxib capsule (100 mg) twice daily or a placebo capsule twice daily for 6 weeks. Participants were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the side effect checklist at baseline and weeks 3 and 6.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included. GLM repeated-measures showed a significant effect of time × treatment (F = 12.95, df = 1.98, p < 0.001) for celecoxib, suggesting superior improvement of depressive symptoms in celecoxib compared to placebo from baseline to the study endpoint. HDRS scores in the celecoxib group showed a greater decline from baseline to both week 3 (t = 4.12, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10) and week 6 (t = 4.76, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.27), compared to the placebo group. Rate of response to treatment (70% vs 9%, p < 0.001) and remission (67% vs 0%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in celecoxib compared to the placebo group at week 6. Adverse event frequencies were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that treatment with celecoxib significantly improved depression scores of patients with depressive symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Further trials with larger sample sizes and longer study periods should assess our findings before any suggestion for clinical use. The trial was prospectively registered at the Iranian registry of clinical trials (www.irct.ir; registration number: IRCT20090117001556N142).

Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) at Baseline Predicts Clinical Response for a Subset of Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depressed Patients

Background: in a recent double-blind, placebo controlled RCT we demonstrated that selective inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) is an effective adjunctive strategy in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBDD). To better clarify the mechanisms underlying TRBDD and treatment response, we conducted a retrospective exploratory analysis of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI = absolute neutrophils × absolute monocytes/absolute lymphocytes) in relation to other biomarkers and clinical outcomes after escitalopram (ESC), combined with the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib (CBX), versus placebo. Methods: Baseline measures of SIRI were compared between TRBDD and healthy controls (HC), and correlated with blood-based inflammatory cytokines, kynurenines, and growth factors. Post-treatment Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 (HAMD-17) total scores (clinical outcome) were modelled according to SIRI adjusting for demographics (including relevant interactions with SIRI), baseline depression, treatment arm, and treatment timepoint using multiple linear regression and robust linear mixed effects models. Results: Baseline SIRI did not distinguish TRBDD from HC groups. Baseline SIRI was significantly correlated with lower baseline MCP-1. The relationship between SIRI and HAMD-17 was significant at treatment week 8, in contrast to baseline. Finally, baseline SIRI predicted elevated post-treatment HAMD-17 scores, amongst patients with elevated depression scores at baseline. Significance: High pre-treatment SIRI may predict poorer depressive outcomes amongst TRBDD patients with baseline elevated depression.

Isoalantolactone relieves depression-like behaviors in mice after chronic social defeat stress via the gut-brain axis

RATIONALE

The management of depression continues to be challenging despite the variety of available antidepressants. Herbal medicines are used in many cultures but lack stringent testing to understand their efficacy and mechanism of action. Isoalantolactone (LAT) from Elecampane (Inula helenium) improved the chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)-induced anhedonia-like phenotype in mice comparable to fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI).

OBJECTIVES

Compare the effects of LAT and fluoxetine on depression-like behaviors in mice exposed to CSDS.

RESULT

The CSDS-induced decrease in protein expression of postsynaptic density (PSD95), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and glutamate receptor subunit-1 (GluA1) in the prefrontal cortex was restored by LAT. LAT showed robust anti-inflammatory activity and can lessen the increase in IL-6 and TNF-α caused by CSDS. CSDS altered the gut microbiota at the taxonomic level, resulting in significant changes in α- and β-diversity. LAT treatment reestablished the bacterial abundance and diversity and increased the production of butyric acid in the gut that was inhibited by CSDS. The levels of butyric acid were negatively correlated with the abundance of Bacteroidetes, and positively correlated with those of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes across all treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data suggest that, similar to fluoxetine, LAT show antidepressant-like effects in mice exposed to CSDS through the modulation of the gut-brain axis.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in C-reactive protein (CRP) predict response to adjunctive celecoxib treatment of resistant bipolar depression

Background

Affective illness has been associated with a proinflammatory state, and it is generally accepted that the immune system plays a key role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Since inflammatory biomarkers are elevated in bipolar disorder, anti-inflammatory combination therapies may enhance response and reverse treatment resistance.

Purpose

In the present study we investigated the possible impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the CRP gene on CRP blood levels, treatment response and level-of-stress perception in our cohort of treatment-resistant bipolar-depressed patients receiving escitalopram and celecoxib, or escitalopram and placebo, as previously reported (Halaris et al., 2020).

Methods

Study design, clinical findings, and CRP blood levels have been reported previously (Halaris et al., 2020; Edberg et al., 2018). In this follow-up study we extracted DNA from blood cells collected at baseline. Genome-wide genotyping was performed for all subjects using the Infinium Multi-Ethnic Global-8 v1.0 Kit. Based on reports in the literature indicating possible associations with psychiatric conditions, ten previously reported CRP gene polymorphisms were evaluated in a preliminary analysis. We focused on rs3093059 and rs3093077 were in complete LD. Carriers were defined as those possessing at least one C allele for rs3093059, or at least one G allele for rs3093077. Additionally, we determined blood levels of the medications administered.

Results

Non-carriers of rs3093059 and rs3093077 had significantly lower baseline CRP blood levels than carriers (p = 0.03). Increased rates of HAM-D17 response (p = 0.21) and remission (p = 0.13) and lower PSS-14 scores (p = 0.13) were observed in non-carriers among subjects receiving celecoxib but they did not reach statistical significance. When examining all subjects, nominally significant associations between carrier-status and remission (p = 0.04) and PSS-14 scores (p = 0.04) were observed after correcting for treatment arm. Non-carriers receiving celecoxib had the highest rates of response and remission, and the lowest stress scores.

Conclusions

Carriers of the CRP SNPs may have higher baseline CRP levels, although non-carriers appear to benefit more from celecoxib co-therapy. Determination of the carrier status in conjunction with pretreatment blood CRP level measurement may contribute to personalized psychiatric practice, but replication of the present findings is needed.

Celecoxib for Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The effects of celecoxib on a broad spectrum of mood disorders and on inflammatory parameters have not yet been comprehensively evaluated. The aim of this study was to systematically summarize the available knowledge on this topic. Data from both preclinical and clinical studies were analyzed, considering the efficacy and safety of celecoxib in the treatment of mood disorders, as well as the correlation of inflammatory parameters with the effect of celecoxib treatment. Forty-four studies were included. We found evidence supporting the antidepressant efficacy of celecoxib in a dose of 400 mg/day used for 6 weeks as an add-on treatment in major depression (SMD = -1.12 [95%Cl: -1.71,-0.52], p = 0.0002) and mania (SMD = -0.82 [95% CI:-1.62,-0.01], p = 0.05). The antidepressant efficacy of celecoxib in the above dosage used as sole treatment was also confirmed in depressed patients with somatic comorbidity (SMD = -1.35 [95% CI:-1.95,-0.75], p < 0.0001). We found no conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of celecoxib in bipolar depression. Celecoxib at a dose of 400 mg/d used for up to 12 weeks appeared to be a safe treatment in patients with mood disorders. Although an association between celecoxib response and inflammatory parameters has been found in preclinical studies, this has not been confirmed in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of celecoxib in bipolar depression, as well as long-term studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of celecoxib in recurrent mood disorders, studies involving treatment-resistant populations, and assessing the association of celecoxib treatment with inflammatory markers.

Latroeggtoxin-VI protects nerve cells and prevents depression by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway activation and excessive inflammation

Depression has a high incidence and seriously endangers human health. Accumulated evidence indicates that targeting neuroinflammation is a potential avenue for neuroprotection and thus depression prevention. Herein, the effects of latroeggtoxin-VI (LETX-VI), a bioactive protein from the eggs of spider Latrodectus tredecimguttatus, on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation and depression were systematically investigated using RAW264.7 macrophages and depression mouse model. Pretreatment with LETX-VI suppressed LPS-evoked NF-κB signaling pathway activation, inhibited LPS-induced over-production of NO, iNOS, IL-6 and TNF-α; at the same time LETX-VI mitigated the inhibitory effect of LPS on the expression of anti-inflammatory factors such as Arg-1, thereby suppressing oxidative stress and excessive inflammation. Culture of PC12 cells with the conditioned medium of RAW264.7 cells pretreated with LETX-VI demonstrated the neuroprotective effect of LETX-VI due to its anti-inflammation effect. In the LPS-induced depression mouse model, pretreatment with LETX-VI improved the LPS-induced depression-like behaviors, inhibited the activation of microglia and astrocytes, prevented the down-regulation of Nurr1 expression and alleviated the LPS-caused adverse changes in the brain tissues. Taken together, these in vitro and in vivo findings provide powerful insights into the anti-inflammation-based neuroprotective and antidepressant mechanisms of LETX-VI, which is helpful to deeply reveal the biological effects and potential applications of LETX-VI.

Anti-Inflammatory Treatment Efficacy in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses

Purpose

Immune imbalances in major depressive disorder (MDD) have been targeted by anti-inflammatory treatment approaches in clinical trials to increase responsiveness to therapy. However, even after several meta-analyses, no translation of evidence into clinical practice has taken place. We performed a systematic review to evaluate meta-analytic evidence of randomized controlled trials on the use of anti-inflammatory agents for MDD to summarize efficacy estimates and elucidate shortcomings.

Methods

Pooled effect estimates and heterogeneity indices were primary outcomes. Characteristics of the included meta-analyses were extracted. Scientific quality of meta-analyses was assessed using the Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR).

Results

N=20 meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. Study characteristics like outcome scales, composition of patient populations, and add-on or monotherapy regimen varied very little for celecoxib studies, varied little for minocycline studies, and were rather variable for omega 3 fatty acids studies. R-AMSTAR scores ranged from 26 to 39 out of 44 points indicating variable quality, where a comprehensive literature search was the strongest and the consideration of scientific quality in the conclusions was the weakest domain across all meta-analyses. For minocycline and celecoxib, superiority was demonstrated with medium to large effect size with substantial heterogeneity and with large to very large effect size with negligible heterogeneity, respectively. For omega 3 fatty acids, superiority was also demonstrated with mainly small and medium effect sizes with substantial heterogeneity. However, for minocycline and omega 3 fatty acids, non-significant meta-analyses were found also.

Conclusion

Even in our synthesized approach, no clear recommendations could be derived on the use of anti-inflammatory treatment for MDD due to several critical aspects like heterogeneity, diversity of patient populations, treatment regimen, and outcomes, and limited scientific quality. However, we observed clear inter-substance differences with meta-analytic evidence being strongest for celecoxib and weakest for omega 3 fatty acids.

Elevated Serum IL-2 Levels are Associated With Major Depressive Disorder: A Case-Control Study

Objectives

Numerous earlier studies have stated an association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and altered expression of inflammatory process. However, it still needs to determine whether the alteration of cytokines is the causative factor or a consequence of this disorder. Therefore, we attempted to evaluate the role of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-2 in the pathophysiology of depression.

Methods

We collected blood samples from 111 MDD patients and 112 healthy controls (HCs) matched by age and sex. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) score was used to assess study participants. We determined the severity of depression using the Hamilton Depression (Ham-D) rating scale. We assayed serum levels of IL-2 using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit.

Results

Elevated levels of IL-2 were detected in MDD patients than HCs (29.79 ± 6.18 and 12.77 ± 4.84 pg/ml, P < 0.05). We observed a higher level of IL-2 in female MDD patients compared to female HCs (31.98 ± 8.34 and 7.76 ± 0.36 pg/ml, P < 0.05). We witnessed a sex-specific correlation between the serum IL-2 levels and the Ham-D score and found that the females with higher Ham-D scores had higher serum IL-2 levels. Moreover, the ROC curve represented the good diagnostic performance of serum IL-2 levels as a biomarker with sensitivity and specificity values of 83.7% and 80.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

The current study findings indicate that elevated serum IL-2 levels are associated with MDD. This alteration may be the cause of triggering depression or a result of the activated inflammatory process during the depression. Therefore, we recommend further interventional research to clarify the actual reasons for these altered IL-2 levels in MDD patients.

Major depressive disorder (mdd): emerging immune targets at preclinical level

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder is a mental health disorder that is characterized by a persistently low mood and loss of interest. MDD is affecting over 3.8% of the global population as a major health problem. Its etiology is complex, and involves the interaction between a number of factors, including genetic predisposition and the presence of environmental stresses.

AREAS COVERED

The role of the immune and inflammatory systems in depression has been gaining interest, with evidence suggesting the potential involvement of pro-inflammatory molecules like TNF, interleukins, prostaglandins, and other cytokines, among others, has been put forth. Along with this, the potential of agents, from NSAIDs to antibiotics, are being evaluated in therapy for depression. The current review will discuss emerging immune targets at the preclinical level.

EXPERT OPINION

With increasing evidence to show that immune and inflammatory mediators are implicated in MDD, increasing research toward their potential as drug targets is encouraged. At the same time, agents acting on these mediators and possessing anti-inflammatory potential are also being evaluated as future therapeutic options for MDD, and increasing focus toward non-conventional drugs which can act through these mechanisms is important as regards the future prospects of the use of anti-inflammatory agents in depression.

Association of systemic inflammatory biomarkers with depression risk: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018 analyses

BACKGROUND/AIM

Depression has become a multiple disease worldwide, and is closely related to the systemic inflammatory response.

METHODS

Based on the data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), this study included 2,514 depressive and 26,487 non-depressive adults. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were used to quantify systemic inflammation. The multivariate logistic regression and inverse probability weighting methods were used to analyze the effect size of SII and SIRI on the risk of depression.

RESULTS

After adjusting for all confounders, the above associations of SII and SIRI with depression risk remained significant (SII, OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.02, p = 0.001; SIRI, OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.10, p = 0.016). Each 100-unit increase in SII was associated with a 2% increase in the risk of depression, while each one-unit increase in SIRI was associated with a 6% increase in the risk of depression.

CONCLUSION

Systemic inflammatory biomarkers (SII and SIRI) significantly affected the risk of depression. SII or SIRI can serve as a biomarker of anti-inflammation treatment for depression.

The Glutamatergic System in Treatment-Resistant Depression and Comparative Effectiveness of Ketamine and Esketamine: Role of Inflammation?

The glutamatergic system is the primary excitatory pathway within the CNS and is responsible for cognition, memory, learning, emotion, and mood. Because of its significant importance in widespread nervous system function, it is tightly regulated through multiple mechanisms, such as glutamate recycling, microglial interactions, and inflammatory pathways. Imbalance within the glutamatergic system has been implicated in a wide range of pathological conditions including neurodegenerative conditions, neuromuscular conditions, and mood disorders including depression. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most common mood disorder worldwide, has a high prevalence rate, and afflicts approximately 280 million people. While there are numerous treatments for the disease, 30-40% of patients are unresponsive to treatment and deemed treatment resistant; approximately another third experience only partial improvement (World Health Organization, Depression fact sheet [Internet], 2020). Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in 2019 and has offered new hope to patients. It is the first treatment targeting the glutamatergic system through a complex mechanism. Numerous studies have implicated imbalance in the glutamatergic system in depression and treatment resistance. Esketamine and ketamine principally work through inhibition of the NMDA receptor, though more recent studies have implicated numerous other mechanisms mediating the antidepressant efficacy of these agents. These mechanisms include increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), activation of mammalian target of the rapamycin complex (mTORC), and reduction in inflammation. Esketamine and ketamine have been shown to decrease inflammation in numerous ways principally through reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) (Loix et al., Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 62(1):47-58, 2011; Chen et al., Psychiatry Res 269:207-11, 2018; Kopra et al., J Psychopharmacol 35(8):934-45, 2021). This anti-inflammatory effect has also been shown to be involved in the antidepressive properties of both ketamine and esketamine (Chen et al., Psychiatry Res 269:207-11, 2018; Kopra et al., J Psychopharmacol 35(8):934-45, 2021).

Repurposing antimalarial artesunate for the prophylactic treatment of depression: Evidence from preclinical research

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have linked inflammation and oxidative stress with the pathogenesis of depression. Artesunate is a commonly used medication to treat malaria and has been shown to produce antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. However, its prophylactic effects on depression and depression-related brain pathology are unknown.

METHODS

In Experiment 1, using a PC12 cell line, we investigated whether artesunate can prevent hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ )-induced oxidative injury that mimics oxidative stress commonly observed in the depressed brain. Next, using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mouse model of depression, we investigated whether artesunate can prevent behavioral deficits observed in the open field test, novelty-suppressed feeding test, sucrose preference test, forced swimming test, and tail suspension procedure.

RESULTS

We found that artesunate significantly prevented a H₂ O₂ -induced reduction in PC12 cell activity, suggesting its antioxidant potential. We also found that mice pretreated with artesunate (5, 15 mg/kg) intraperitoneally (i.p.) prior to the LPS (.8 mg/kg, i.p.) treatment showed fewer and less severe depression- and anxiety-like behaviors than the LPS-treated control mice.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that artesunate produces antioxidant effect, as well as antidepressant and anxiolytic effects. Importantly, our findings first demonstrate that artesunate can prevent LPS-induced depression- and anxiety-like symptoms, strongly suggesting its prophylactic potential in the treatment of depression and, perhaps, other psychiatric disorders associated with inflammation and oxidative stress.

How does IL-6 change after combined treatment in MDD patients? A systematic review

A growing amount of research suggests that inflammatory responses have a crucial role in the complex pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), a disabling medical condition. The present review has two primary goals. Firstly, to highlight and summarize results from studies that investigated the changes of IL-6 in MDD patients before and after combined treatment. The second aim is to enlighten the need for further research on the difference in the concentration of the pro-inflammatory cytokines between MDD and Treatment-Resistant MDD. The protocol of this study was written using PRISMA, and it is registered at PROSPERO (identification: CRD42021289233). We searched the following bibliographic databases to identify potentially eligible articles without any time limit until September 2021: Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO. As they met the eligibility criteria, 14 articles were included in this systematic review. The selected studies assessed twelve different elements as an adjunction to the standard pharmacotherapy (ECT, Ketamine, CBT, NCT, Ketoprofene, Lithium, Celecoxib, Metformin tDCS, Pentoxifylline, ethyl-EPA, Zinc). Significant results were found in the studies that analyzed the impact of combined treatment with the adjunction of the following elements: ECT, Ketamine, CBT, NCT, Celecoxib, Metformin, and Pentoxifylline. Overall, this systematic review identifies several potentially beneficial combined treatments for MDD patients. Further evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy of reducing IL-6 levels in patients with Treatment-Resistant MDD.

Anti-inflammatory medications for the treatment of mental disorders: A scoping review

This scoping review assessed the effect of anti-inflammatory medications in mental disorders. A search in Medline and the Cochrane database focusing on randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews identified 53 primary research articles, conducted in major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and somatic symptom disorders and related disorders (SSRD). The findings suggest that there is scope to consider the use of anti-inflammatory agents in mental disorders, however, not as a one-size-fits-all solution. Treatment could be especially helpful in subgroups with evidence of baseline inflammation. Anti-inflammatory medications that seem mostly effective in bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder, such as Celecoxib, Pioglitazone and statins, may differ from the ones with indications of effectiveness in schizophrenia, such as Minocycline and Aspirin. This might suggest a different underlying mechanism for treatment success in those two main illness groups. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed that take levels of inflammation markers into account.

Pathophysiology and Current Drug Treatments for Post-Stroke Depression: A Review

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a biopsychosocial disorder that affects individuals who have suffered a stroke at any point. PSD has a 20 to 60 percent reported prevalence among stroke survivors. Its effects are usually adverse, can lead to disability, and may increase mortality if not managed or treated early. PSD is linked to several other medical conditions, including anxiety, hyper-locomotor activity, and poor functional recovery. Despite significant awareness of its adverse impacts, understanding the pathogenesis of PSD has proved challenging. The exact pathophysiology of PSD is unknown, yet its complexity has been definitively shown, involving mechanisms such as dysfunction of monoamine, the glutamatergic systems, the gut-brain axis, and neuroinflammation. The current effectiveness of PSD treatment is about 30-40 percent of all cases. In this review, we examined different pathophysiological mechanisms and current pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for the treatment of PSD.

Unique brain endothelial profiles activated by social stress promote cell adhesion, prostaglandin E2 signaling, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation, and anxiety

Chronic stress may precipitate psychiatric disorders including anxiety. We reported that Repeated Social Defeat (RSD) in mice increased accumulation of inflammatory monocytes within the brain vasculature, which corresponded with increased interleukin (IL)-1 Receptor 1-mediated activation of endothelia, and augmented anxiety-like behavior. One unknown, however, is the role of immune-activated endothelia in regulating the physiological and behavioral responses to social stress. Thus, we sought to determine the RNA profile of activated endothelia and delineate the pathways by which these endothelia communicate within the brain to influence key responses to social stress. First, endothelial-specific RiboTag mice were exposed to RSD and brain endothelial mRNA profiles from the whole brain and prefrontal cortex were determined using RNAseq. RSD increased expression of cell adhesion molecules (Icam1), inflammatory genes (Lrg1, Lcn2, Ackr1, Il1r1), and cyclooxygenase-2 (Ptgs2/COX-2). In studies with IL-1R1KO mice, there was clear dependence on IL-1R1 on endothelia-associated transcripts including Lrg1, Icam1, Lcn2. Moreover, prostaglandin (PG)E2 was increased in the brain after RSD and Ptgs2 was localized to endothelia, especially within the hypothalamus. Next, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, Celecoxib (CCB), was used with social stress. RSD increased PGE2 in the brain and this was abrogated by CCB. Moreover, CCB reduced RSD-induced Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis activation with attenuation of hypothalamic paraventricular neuron activation, hypothalamic Crh expression, and corticosterone in circulation. Production, release, and accumulation of inflammatory monocytes after RSD was COX-2 independent. Nonetheless, CCB blocked anxiety-like behavior in response to RSD. Collectively, social stress stimulated specific endothelia RNA profiles associated with increased cell adhesion, IL-1 and prostaglandin signaling, HPA axis activation, and anxiety.

Current Perspectives on Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Inflammatory Mechanism of Unipolar Depression

Since depression remains a major public health issue there is a constant need for new and more efficient therapeutic strategies based on the mechanisms involved in the aetiology of depression. Thus, the pathogenic link between depression and inflammation is considered to play a potential key role in the development of such therapies. This review summarizes the results of various pharmacological (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, cytokine inhibitors, corticosteroids, statins, minocycline, N-acetyl cysteine, omega-3 fatty acids and probiotics) and non-pharmacological interventions (electroconvulsive therapy, physical exercise and psychological therapy) and outlines their efficacy and discusses potential challenges. Both conventional and non-conventional anti-inflammatory drugs showed promising results according to the specific group of patients. The pre-existing pro-inflammatory status was, in most cases, a predictor for clinical efficacy and, in some cases, a correlation between clinical improvement and changes in various biomarkers was found. Some of the non-pharmacological interventions (physical exercise and electroconvulsive therapy) have also showed beneficial effects for depressive patients with elevated inflammatory markers. Treatments with anti-inflammatory action may improve clinical outcomes in depression, at least for some categories of patients, thus opening the way for a future personalised approach to patients with unipolar depression regarding the inflammation-related mechanism.

Effects of Dexamethasone and Pentoxifylline on Mania-like and Depression-like Behaviors in Rats

Several studies support the notion that inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology and treatment approaches of psychiatric illnesses, particularly mood disorders. Congruently, classic anti-inflammatory drugs were found efficacious in randomized clinical trials of patients with mood disorders. Moreover, accumulating data indicate that psychotropic drugs exhibit some anti-inflammatory effects. This study was undertaken to examine the efficacy of dexamethasone (a potent corticosteroid) and pentoxifylline (a methylxanthine drug with proven anti-tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitory activity) in behavioral models in rats, which were treated intraperitoneally with either dexamethasone or pentoxifylline for two weeks and then subjected to a battery of behavioral tests. Treatment with pentoxifylline, but not dexamethasone, was associated with antidepressant-like and anti-manic-like effects. The beneficial behavioral effects of pentoxifylline were accompanied by a prominent reduction in pro-inflammatory mediator levels in the brain. For the first time, the current work proves the efficacy of pentoxifylline against both mania-like and depressive-like behaviors. These results suggest that pentoxifylline may be a promising therapeutic intervention for patients with mood disorders. Taking into account the excellent tolerability profile of pentoxifylline in humans, it is warranted to conduct randomized clinical trials to investigate its therapeutic efficacy in patients with psychiatric disorders.

Stress, mindfulness, and systemic lupus erythematosus: An overview and directions for future research

Although the pathogenesis of autoimmunity is not fully understood, it is thought to involve genetic, hormonal, immunologic, and environmental factors. Stress has been evaluated as a potential trigger for autoimmunity and disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The physiologic changes that occur with stress involve numerous catecholamines, hormones, and cytokines that communicate intricately with the immune system. There is some evidence that these systems may be dysregulated in patients with autoimmune disease. Mindfulness-based techniques are practices aimed at mitigating stress response and have been shown to improve quality of life in general population. This review will discuss pathophysiology of chronic stress as it relates to SLE, evidence behind mindfulness-based practices in these patients, and directions for future research.

Effect of celecoxib on improving depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-inflammation drugs were uncovered to be a potential therapy for depression. Celecoxib as a selective COX2 inhibitor is also one anti-inflammation drugs. Celecoxib is widely used in the clinic, which is well known by medical workers. It is uncertain whether celecoxib has efficacy in improving depression.

AIM

To estimate the effect of celecoxib on improving depression.

METHODS

All literature was searched until 2022. The databases included PubMed, OVID database, Cochrane library, Web of Science, CNKI, Clinicaltrials.gov database and Wanfang database. The random effects model was used to estimate the standardized mean differences with 95%CIs. With determined diagnostic criteria, studies containing patients with depression in the celecoxib group and the control group were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome measures were set for depression scale scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine randomized controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis (including 847 subjects with depression and 810 control subjects). The meta-analysis showed that celecoxib had an effect of anti-depression. At the same time, heterogeneity was observed (I² = 82.1%, P = 0.00), and meta-regression was implemented to estimate the source of heterogeneity, which showed that the type of depression scale and depression type may lead to the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis with respect to depression scale and depression type suggested that depression type was the possible main source of heterogeneity. Moreover, Egger’s test, Begg’s test, funnel plot and Doi plot was implemented, and publication bias was found to be significant. Next, the trim and fill method was used to estimate the influence of publication bias on the outcome of the meta-analysis, which showed that the outcome of the meta-analysis was reliable. Sensitivity analysis was estimated by deleting a study one by one, and the outcome of the meta-analysis was significantly stable. The quality of all randomized controlled trial studies was assessed by risk of bias, which indicated the rank of evidence in the meta-analysis was high.

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib could be effective for improving depression.

The role of the immune system in posttraumatic stress disorder

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops in a subset of individuals upon exposure to traumatic stress. In addition to well-defined psychological and behavioral symptoms, some individuals with PTSD also exhibit elevated concentrations of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Moreover, PTSD is often co-morbid with immune-related conditions, such as cardiometabolic and autoimmune disorders. Numerous factors, including lifetime trauma burden, biological sex, genetic background, metabolic conditions, and gut microbiota, may contribute to inflammation in PTSD. Importantly, inflammation can influence neural circuits and neurotransmitter signaling in regions of the brain relevant to fear, anxiety, and emotion regulation. Given the link between PTSD and the immune system, current studies are underway to evaluate the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatments in those with PTSD. Understanding the complex interactions between PTSD and the immune system is essential for future discovery of diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Antidepressant Effects of NSAIDs in Rodent Models of Depression-A Systematic Review

In recent years much focus has been on neuroimmune mechanisms of depression. As a consequence, many preclinical and clinical trials have been performed examining potential antidepressant effects of several anti-inflammatory drugs. The results of such trials have been varied. With the current manuscript we wished to elucidate the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on depressive-like behaviour in rodent models of depression by performing a systematic review of the available literature. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed for rodent models of depression where NSAIDs were administered and a validated measure of depressive-like behaviour was applied. 858 studies were initially identified and screened using Covidence systematic review software. Of these 36 met the inclusion criteria and were included. The extracted articles contained data from both rat and mouse studies but primarily male animals were used. Several depression models were applied and 17 different NSAIDs were tested for antidepressant effects. Our results suggest that stress models are the best choice when examining antidepressant effects of NSAIDs. Furthermore, we found that rat models provide a more homogenous response than mouse models. Intriguingly, the use of female animals was only reported in three studies and these failed to find antidepressant effects of NSAIDs. This should be explored further. When comparing the different classes of NSAIDs, selective COX-2 inhibitors were shown to provide the most stable antidepressant effect compared to non-selective COX-inhibitors. Suggested mechanisms behind the antidepressant effects were attenuation of neuroinflammation, HPA-axis dysregulation and altered monoamine expression.

Microglial Inflammatory-Metabolic Pathways and Their Potential Therapeutic Implication in Major Depressive Disorder

Increasing evidence supports the notion that neuroinflammation plays a critical role in the etiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), at least in a subset of patients. By virtue of their capacity to transform into reactive states in response to inflammatory insults, microglia, the brain's resident immune cells, play a pivotal role in the induction of neuroinflammation. Experimental studies have demonstrated the ability of microglia to recognize pathogens or damaged cells, leading to the activation of a cytotoxic response that exacerbates damage to brain cells. However, microglia display a wide range of responses to injury and may also promote resolution stages of inflammation and tissue regeneration. MDD has been associated with chronic priming of microglia. Recent studies suggest that altered microglial morphology and function, caused either by intense inflammatory activation or by senescence, may contribute to depression and associated impairments in neuroplasticity. In this context, modifying microglia phenotype by tuning inflammatory pathways might have important translational relevance to harness neuroinflammation in MDD. Interestingly, it was recently shown that different microglial phenotypes are associated with distinct metabolic pathways and analysis of the underlying molecular mechanisms points to an instrumental role for energy metabolism in shaping microglial functions. Here, we review various canonical pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and metabolic pathways in microglia that may provide new therapeutic opportunities to control neuroinflammation in brain disorders, with a strong focus on MDD.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms and seizure related with serum cytokine in epilepsy patients

Neuroinflammation contributes to epileptogenesis and ictogenesis. Various signals of neuroinflammation lead to neuronal hyper-excitability. Since an interplay between epilepsy, psychiatric comorbidities and neuroinflammation has been suggested, we explored psychiatric symptoms in epilepsy patients, and the relationship with neuroinflammation. We screened epilepsy patients who were admitted for video-EEG monitoring between July 2019 and December 2020. Enrolled patients were asked to respond to neuropsychiatric questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q)) on admission. Serum cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IFN-γ, CCL2, and CCL5) were measured by ELISA on admission, and within 6 h after a seizure. We enrolled 134 patients, and 32 patients (23.9%) had seizures during monitoring. Cytokine levels did not change after seizures, but IL-2 and IL-6 increased in cases of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The HADS-A score was lower in Q4 of CCL5 (p-value = 0.016) and anxiety was also less common in Q4 of CCL5 (p-value = 0.042). NPI-Q question 4 (depression) severity was higher in CCL2 (p-value = 0.024). This suggested that psychiatric symptoms may also be related to inflammatory processes in epilepsy patients. Further large, standardized studies are necessary to underpin the inflammatory mechanisms in epilepsy and psychiatric symptoms.

Antidepressant psychopharmacology: is inflammation a future target?

Raised inflammatory setpoints have been associated with major depression and its detrimental consequences on brain function, as they lead to increased production of cytokines, changes in gene expression and activated brain microglia. Three main lines of evidence support immune-inflammatory mechanisms as targets for the treatment of depression. First, higher inflammation hampers response to antidepressants, and effective antidepressant treatment decreases inflammation. Second, conventional antidepressants share immune-modulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, which could affect inflammation during the depression. Third, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory treatments proved superior to placebo in randomized controlled antidepressant trials. New targets and new pharmacologic treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases have been identified and tested in several medical settings and interest is warranted for testing them as antidepressants.

Immune targets for therapeutic development in depression: towards precision medicine

Over the past two decades, compelling evidence has emerged indicating that immune mechanisms can contribute to the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and that drugs with primary immune targets can improve depressive symptoms. Patients with MDD are heterogeneous with respect to symptoms, treatment responses and biological correlates. Defining a narrower patient group based on biology could increase the treatment response rates in certain subgroups: a major advance in clinical psychiatry. For example, patients with MDD and elevated pro-inflammatory biomarkers are less likely to respond to conventional antidepressant drugs, but novel immune-based therapeutics could potentially address their unmet clinical needs. This article outlines a framework for developing drugs targeting a novel patient subtype within MDD and reviews the current state of neuroimmune drug development for mood disorders. We discuss evidence for a causal role of immune mechanisms in the pathogenesis of depression, together with targets under investigation in randomized controlled trials, biomarker evidence elucidating the link to neural mechanisms, biological and phenotypic patient selection strategies, and the unmet clinical need among patients with MDD.

Platelet Parameters, C-Reactive Protein, and Depression: An Association Study

Objective

This study aims to investigate the correlation of platelet parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) with depression.

Methods

The clinical data of 61 patients with depression and 30 healthy control subjects were collected to compare the platelet parameters, CRP levels, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores of the two groups for correlation analysis.

Results

The results revealed that the body mass index (BMI) of patients with depression was lower (P < 0.05) than that of the healthy control subjects, and that this difference was more significant in women than in men. Patients with severe depression showed an increased mean platelet volume (MPV) (P < 0.05). In the patients with depression, MPV was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with HAMD scores for work and interest, gastrointestinal symptoms, hopelessness, the anxiety/somatization factor, and the hopelessness factor. Platelet count (PLT) was negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with HAMD scores for hypochondriasis, and plateletcrit (PCT) was negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with HAMD scores for middle insomnia and hypochondriasis. Platelet distribution width (PDW) was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with HAMD scores for gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms as well as hopelessness. Higher CRP levels (P < 0.05) were found in the patients with depression than in the healthy control subjects. Furthermore, in the patients with depression, CRP levels were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with HAMD scores for guilt and the cognitive impairment factor.

Conclusion

Classical platelet parameters (PLT, MPV, PCT, PDW) and CRP were shown to be associated with specific depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment factors, including sleep, gastrointestinal symptoms, hypochondriasis, losing interest in work, and despair. These results suggest that both platelet parameters and CRP could be suitable biomarkers for predicting the occurrence and prognosis of depression, thus providing a new target for its treatment.

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels are associated with major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVES

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a distressing condition characterized by persistent low mood, loss of interest in daily activities. Researchers consider several biological, psycho-social, and genetic factors are involved in depression. The present study aimed to investigate the serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in MDD patients to explore its role in depression.

METHODS

This case-control study recruited 114 MDD patients and 106 healthy controls (HCs) matched by age and gender. A specialized psychiatrist diagnosed the cases and evaluated the controls based on the diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, 5th edition. We quantified serum MCP-1 levels using commercially available enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay kits. Also, we applied the Hamilton depression rating scale (Ham-D) to measure the severity of depression.

RESULTS

We observed the decreased levels of serum MCP-1 in MDD patients compared to HCs. Also, we obtained a significant negative correlation between serum MCP-1 levels and Ham-D scores. Moreover, female MDD patients with higher Ham-D scores exhibited lower serum MCP-1 levels. The receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the good diagnostic value of MCP-1 with the area under the curve at 0.837.

CONCLUSIONS

The depression-related alteration of serum MCP-1 may be more complicated than the current assumption and depends on the characteristics of the individual patients. Our study suggests that the serum MCP-1 levels might involve in the pathophysiology and mechanism of MDD. The present findings, along with the diagnostic evaluation, might be used to evaluate depressive patients.

Associations between Melatonin, Neuroinflammation, and Brain Alterations in Depression

Pro-inflammatory systemic conditions that can cause neuroinflammation and subsequent alterations in brain regions involved in emotional regulation have been suggested as an underlying mechanism for the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). A prominent feature of MDD is disruption of circadian rhythms, of which melatonin is considered a key moderator, and alterations in the melatonin system have been implicated in MDD. Melatonin is involved in immune system regulation and has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory conditions, through both immunological and non-immunological actions. Melatonin has been suggested as a highly cytoprotective and neuroprotective substance and shown to stimulate all stages of neuroplasticity in animal models. The ability of melatonin to suppress inflammatory responses through immunological and non-immunological actions, thus influencing neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity, along with subsequent alterations in brain regions that are implicated in depression, can be demonstrated by the antidepressant-like effects of melatonin. Further studies that investigate the associations between melatonin, immune markers, and alterations in the brain structure and function in patients with depression could identify potential MDD biomarkers.

No evidence for clinical efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib with vortioxetine in the treatment of depression: A 6-week double-blind placebo controlled randomized trial

Given the role of low-grade inflammation in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), anti-inflammatory strategies may improve treatment outcomes in some patients. However, it is controversial whether they can be used as adjunctive treatments and whether pre-treatment levels of inflammation can predict treatment outcomes. This study was conducted to measure the efficacy of anti-inflammatory augmentation of antidepressant treatment in MDD patients; and to investigate whether treatment response was dependent on baseline inflammation levels. This parallel-group randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the University of Adelaide (Australia). Participants with MDD were randomised to receive vortioxetine with celecoxib or vortioxetine with placebo for six weeks, and baseline blood high sensitivity C reactive protein levels were measured. Primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) and secondary outcomes included change in cognition (THINC-integrated tool - Codebreaker task) and functioning (Functioning Assessment Short Test) over 6 weeks. There was no evidence of superior efficacy of celecoxib augmentation over placebo on depressive symptom severity, response and remission rates, cognition and psychosocial functioning. There was also no evidence that pre-treatment inflammation levels modified the effect of celecoxib augmentation versus placebo. This observed lack of efficacy of celecoxib add-on does not support the use of celecoxib augmentation of antidepressants in the treatment of MDD in a cohort that mostly comprises treatment-resistant individuals. Additionally, C-reactive protein may not be suitable to predict treatment selection and response in MDD. The study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000527369 (www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000527369p).

Mental depression: Relation to different disease status, newer treatments and its association with COVID-19 pandemic (Review)

The present study aimed to review major depression, including its types, epidemiology, association with different diseases status and treatments, as well as its correlation with the current COVID-19 pandemic. Mental depression is a common disorder that affects most individuals at one time or another. During depression, there are changes in mood and behavior, accompanied by feelings of defeat, hopelessness, or even suicidal thoughts. Depression has a direct or indirect relation with a number of other diseases including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, epilepsy, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. In addition, antidepressant drugs have several side effects including sedation, increased weight, indigestion, sexual dysfunction, or a decrease in blood pressure. Stopping medication may cause a relapse of the symptoms of depression and pose a risk of attempted suicide. The pandemic of COVID-19 has affected the mental health of individuals, including patients, individuals contacting patients and medical staff with a number of mental disorders that may adversely affect the immune ability of their bodies. Some of the drugs currently included in the protocols for treating COVID-19 may negatively affect the mental health of patients. Evidence accumulated over the years indicates that serotonin (5HT) deficiencies and norepinephrine (NE) in the brain can lead to mental depression. Drugs that increase levels of NE and 5HT are commonly used in the treatment of depression. The common reason for mood disorders, including mania and bipolar disease are not clearly understood. It is assumed that hyperactivity in specific parts of the brain and excessive activity of neurotransmitters may be involved. Early diagnosis and developing new treatment strategies are essential for the prevention of the severe consequences of depression. In addition, extensive research should be directed towards the investigation of the mental health disturbances occurring during and/or after COVID-19 infection. This may lead to the incorporation of a suitable antidepressant into the current treatment protocols.

Evolution and Emerging Trends in Depression Research From 2004 to 2019: A Literature Visualization Analysis

Depression has become a major threat to human health, and researchers around the world are actively engaged in research on depression. In order to promote closer research, the study of the global depression knowledge map is significant. This study aims to map the knowledge map of depression research and show the current research distribution, hotspots, frontiers, and trends in the field of depression research, providing researchers with worthwhile information and ideas. Based on the Web of Science core collection of depression research from 2004 to 2019, this study systematically analyzed the country, journal, category, author, institution, cited article, and keyword aspects using bibliometric and data visualization methods. A relationship network of depression research was established, highlighting the highly influential countries, journals, categories, authors, institutions, cited articles, and keywords in this research field. The study identifies great research potential in the field of depression, provides scientific guidance for researchers to find potential collaborations through collaboration networks and coexistence networks, and systematically and accurately presents the hotspots, frontiers, and shortcomings of depression research through the knowledge map of global research on depression with the help of information analysis and fusion methods, which provides valuable information for researchers and institutions to determine meaningful research directions.