Outcomes of patients after successful left ventricular assist device explantation: a EUROMACS study

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Multimodality imaging for the evaluation and management of patients with long-term (durable) left ventricular assist devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are gaining increasing importance as therapeutic strategy in advanced heart failure (HF), not only as bridge to recovery or to transplant but also as destination therapy. Even though long-term LVADs are considered a precious resource to expand the treatment options and improve clinical outcome of these patients, these are limited by peri-operative and post-operative complications, such as device-related infections, haemocompatibility-related events, device mis-positioning, and right ventricular failure. For this reason, a precise pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative evaluation of these patients is crucial for the selection of LVAD candidates and the management LVAD recipients. The use of different imaging modalities offers important information to complete the study of patients with LVADs in each phase of their assessment, with peculiar advantages/disadvantages, ideal application, and reference parameters for each modality. This clinical consensus statement sought to guide the use of multimodality imaging for the evaluation of patients with advanced HF undergoing LVAD implantation.

Deactivation of LVAD support for myocardial recovery-surgical perspectives

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are excellent therapies for advanced heart failure patients either bridged to transplant or for lifetime use. LVADs also allow for reverse remodeling of the failing heart that is often associated with functional improvement. Indeed, growing enthusiasm exists to better understand this population of patients, whereby the LVAD is used as an adjunct to mediate myocardial recovery. When patients achieve benchmarks suggesting that they no longer need LVAD support, questions related to the discontinuation of LVAD therapy become front and center. The purpose of this review is to provide a surgical perspective on the practical and technical issues surrounding LVAD deactivation.

Myocardial Recovery in the Systemic Context: A Philosophic Shift for the Heart Failure Subspecialty to Optimize Patient Care

Heart failure poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems and society at large, mainly due to its increasing prevalence among the aging population and its association with frequent hospitalizations with high mortality rates. At its core, heart failure management seeks to emphasize myocardial recovery across the spectrum of disease, from acute cardiogenic shock to ambulatory heart failure, with care ranging from consideration of mechanical circulatory support to medication optimization. In this review, we propose a definition of "recovery" that extends beyond the restoration of normal myocardial dynamics to the entire human organism, ultimately improving functional capacity and clinical outcomes. Prioritizing this more holistic definition of "recovery" allows a broader representation of the spectrum of disease and corresponding management that falls under the "heart failure" umbrella. In so doing, a more synchronized delivery of care across settings and disciplines may be feasible for the modern patient living with heart failure.

Ventricular assist device support in paediatric patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy-clinical outcomes and haemodynamics

OBJECTIVES

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is rare and is generally associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to other cardiomyopathies. Ventricular assist device (VAD) support for these children is seldom applied and often hampered by the surgical difficulties.

METHODS

All paediatric (<19 years) patients with a restricted cardiomyopathy supported by a VAD from the EUROMACS database were included and compared to patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy (retrospective database analyses). Participating centres were retrospectively contacted to provide additional detailed echo and Swan Ganz measurements to analyse the effect of VAD support on pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular function.

RESULTS

Forty-four paediatric VAD-supported patients diagnosed with restricted cardiomyopathy were included, with a median age at implantation of 5.0 years. Twenty-six of the 44 patient with a restricted cardiomyopathy survived to transplantation (59.1%), 16 died (36.4%) and 2 are still on ongoing VAD support (4.5%) after a median duration of support of 95.5 days (interquartile range 33.3-217.8). Transplantation probability after 1 and 2 years of VAD support in patients with a restricted cardiomyopathy were comparable to patients with a dilated cardiomyopathy (52.3% vs 51.4% and 59.5% vs 60.1%, P = 0.868). However, mortality probability was higher in the restricted cardiomyopathy cohort (35.8% vs 17.0% and 35.8% vs 19.0%, P = 0.005). Adverse event rates were high (cerebrovascular accident in 31.8%, pump thrombosis in 29.5%, major bleeding 25.0%, eventual biventricular support in 59.1%). In the atrially cannulated group, cerebrovascular accident and pump thrombosis occurred in twice as much patients (21.1% vs 40.0%, P = 0.595 and 15.8% vs 40.0%, P = 0.464; probably non-significant due to the small numbers). Pulmonary arterial pressures improved after implantation of a VAD, and 6 patients who were initially labelled as ineligible due to pulmonary hypertension could eventually be transplanted.

CONCLUSIONS

VAD support in children with a restricted cardiomyopathy is rarely performed. Mortality and adverse event rates are high. On the other hand, survival to cardiac transplantation was 59.1% with all patients surviving the 1st 30 days after cardiac transplantation. Pulmonary arterial pressures improved while on support, potentially making cardiac transplantation a viable option for previously ineligible children.

The Role of Ventricular Assist Devices in Patients With Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a prevalent heart muscle disease characterized by ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction, leading to severe heart failure (HF) and often requiring heart transplantation (HTx). This systematic review aimed to synthesize information regarding the role of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in managing HF patients due to DCM. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies involving adult patients with HF due to DCM treated with VADs. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, pediatric populations, and non-peer-reviewed articles. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies demonstrated that the use of VADs in patients with DCM resulted in significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis reduction, and reverse ventricular remodeling. Studies reported enhanced survival rates, reduced symptoms, and better quality of life. VADs served as a critical bridge to HTx and, in some cases, as long-term destination therapy. However, complications such as thrombus formation, anemia, and kidney failure were noted, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring and management. Continuous advancements in VAD technology and patient management protocols were found to be essential for optimizing outcomes. We conclude that VADs play a crucial role in managing advanced HF due to DCM by providing mechanical circulatory support, improving cardiac function, and enhancing patient survival and quality of life. Despite associated complications, VADs are invaluable for patients with severe HF, offering both immediate and long-term therapeutic benefits. Future research should focus on minimizing complications and further improving VAD technology to enhance patient outcomes.

Impact of Diabetes and Glycemia on Cardiac Improvement and Adverse Events Following Mechanical Circulatory Support

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is prevalent in cardiovascular disease and contributes to excess morbidity and mortality. We sought to investigate the effect of glycemia on functional cardiac improvement, morbidity, and mortality in durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with an LVAD were prospectively evaluated (n=531). After excluding patients missing pre-LVAD glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements or having inadequate post-LVAD follow-up, 375 patients were studied. To assess functional cardiac improvement, we used absolute left ventricular ejection fraction change (ΔLVEF: LVEF post-LVAD-LVEF pre-LVAD). We quantified the association of pre-LVAD HbA1c with ΔLVEF as the primary outcome, and all-cause mortality and LVAD-related adverse event rates (ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, LVAD-related infection, device thrombosis) as secondary outcomes. Last, we assessed HbA1c differences pre- and post-LVAD. Patients with type 2 diabetes were older, more likely men suffering ischemic cardiomyopathy, and had longer heart failure duration. Pre-LVAD HbA1c was inversely associated with ΔLVEF in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy but not in those with ischemic cardiomyopathy, after adjusting for age, sex, heart failure duration, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Pre-LVAD HbA1c was not associated with all-cause mortality, but higher pre-LVAD HbA1c was shown to increase the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, LVAD-related infection, and device thrombosis by 3 years on LVAD support (P<0.05 for all). HbA1c decreased from 6.68±1.52% pre-LVAD to 6.11±1.33% post-LVAD (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes and pre-LVAD glycemia modify the potential for functional cardiac improvement and the risk for adverse events on LVAD support. The degree and duration of pre-LVAD glycemic control optimization to favorably affect these outcomes warrants further investigation.

Predictors of long-term success after successful explantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device support

OBJECTIVES

Predictors and evaluations of continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) explantation in recovered patients remain under discussion due to lack of evidence on long-term safety and efficacy. This study summarized our experiences regarding cf-LVAD explantation in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients and estimated a predictor for sufficient myocardial recovery allowing left ventricular assist device explant.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 135 adult patients with cf-LVAD therapy as bridge to heart transplant due to non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Of those, 13 patients underwent device explantation (recovery group) after myocardial recovery. Twelve (92%) of the explanted patients were evaluated using our weaning protocol and underwent surgical explantation. Meanwhile, the remaining 122 continued with cf-LVAD therapy (non-recovery group).

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed time interval between the first heart failure event and cf-LVAD implantation as an independent predictor for successful explantation. The optimal time interval cutoff value to predict cf-LVAD explantation was 7 months, with a sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 84.6%. Echocardiography in patients with successful cf-LVAD explantation showed significant improvement of left ventricular function and dimensions at 6 months postoperatively. The 13 explanted patients are currently alive at a median of 30 (interquartile range; 18-58) months after explantation. The survival rate free from rehospitalization due to heart failure following explantation was 100%. Left ventricular function and remodelling after explantation were also preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients with a short interval between the first heart failure event and cf-LVAD therapy, left ventricular myocardium may recover in an early phase after device implantation.

Patient-tailored silicone plug for HeartMate 3™ left ventricular assist device explantation

Patient-tailored silicone plug for HeartMate 3™ left ventricular assist device explantation in two successive males proceeded successfully. Given medical therapeutic advancements, FDA-approved plug systems designed by LVAD manufacturers themselves will be necessary for the near future to provide a safe and simple device explantation alternative that fulfills all regulatory standards.

Integrating molecular and clinical variables to predict myocardial recovery

Mechanical unloading and circulatory support with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) mediate significant myocardial improvement in a subset of advanced heart failure (HF) patients. The clinical and biological phenomena associated with cardiac recovery are under intensive investigation. Left ventricular (LV) apical tissue, alongside clinical data, were collected from HF patients at the time of LVAD implantation (n=208). RNA was isolated and mRNA transcripts were identified through RNA sequencing and confirmed with RT-qPCR. To our knowledge this is the first study to combine transcriptomic and clinical data to derive predictors of myocardial recovery. We used a bioinformatic approach to integrate 59 clinical variables and 22,373 mRNA transcripts at the time of LVAD implantation for the prediction of post-LVAD myocardial recovery defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% and LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) ≤5.9cm, as well as functional and structural LV improvement independently by using LVEF and LVEDD as continuous variables, respectively. To substantiate the predicted variables, we used a multi-model approach with logistic and linear regressions. Combining RNA and clinical data resulted in a gradient boosted model with 80 features achieving an AUC of 0.731±0.15 for predicting myocardial recovery. Variables associated with myocardial recovery from a clinical standpoint included HF duration, pre-LVAD LVEF, LVEDD, and HF pharmacologic therapy, and LRRN4CL (ligand binding and programmed cell death) from a biological standpoint. Our findings could have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications for advanced HF patients, and inform the care of the broader HF population.

Durable left ventricular assist device explantation following recovery in paediatric patients: Determinants and outcome after explantation

OBJECTIVES

Myocardial recovery in children supported by a durable left ventricular assist device is a rare, but highly desirable outcome because it could potentially eliminate the need for a cardiac transplant and the lifelong need for immunosuppressant therapy and the risk of complications. However, experience with this specific outcome is extremely limited.

METHODS

All patients < 19 years old supported by a durable left ventricular assist device from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support database were included. Participating centres were approached for additional follow-up data after explantation. Associated factors for explantation due to myocardial recovery were explored using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The incidence of recovery in children supported by a durable left ventricular assist device was 11.7% (52/445; median duration of support, 122.0 days). Multivariable analyses showed body surface area (hazard ratio 0.229; confidence interval 0.093-0.565; P = 0.001) and a primary diagnosis of myocarditis (hazard ratio 4.597; confidence interval 2.545-8.303; P < 0.001) to be associated with recovery. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in children with myocarditis was not associated with recovery. Follow-up after recovery was obtained for 46 patients (88.5%). Sustained myocardial recovery was reported in 33/46 (71.7%) at the end of the follow-up period (28/33; >2 year). Transplants were performed in 6/46 (11.4%) (in 5 after a ventricular assist device was reimplanted). Death occurred in 7/46 (15.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial recovery occurs in a substantial portion of paediatric patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices, and sustainable recovery is seen in around three-quarters of them. Even children with severely dilated ventricles due to myocarditis can show recovery. Clinicians should be attentive to (developing) myocardial recovery. These results can be used to develop internationally approved paediatric weaning guidelines.

Value of Invasive Hemodynamic Assessments in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). There is a significant risk of HF admissions and hemocompatibility-related adverse events that can be minimized by optimizing the LVAD support. Invasive hemodynamic assessment, which is currently underutilized, allows personalization of care for patients with LVAD, and may decrease the need for recurrent hospitalizations. It also aids in triaging patients with persistent low-flow alarms, evaluating reversal of pulmonary vasculature remodeling, and assessing right ventricular function. In addition, it can assist in determining the precipitant for residual HF symptoms and physical limitation during exercise and is the cornerstone of the assessment of myocardial recovery. This review provides a comprehensive approach to the use of invasive hemodynamic assessments in patients supported with LVADs.

Benchtop Models of Patient-Specific Intraventricular Flow During Heart Failure and LVAD Support

The characterization of intraventricular flow is critical to evaluate the efficiency of fluid transport and potential thromboembolic risk but challenging to measure directly in advanced heart failure (HF) patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. The study aims to validate an in-house mock loop (ML) by simulating specific conditions of HF patients with normal and prosthetic mitral valves (MV) and LVAD patients with small and dilated left ventricle volumes, then comparing the flow-related indices result of vortex parameters, residence time (RT), and shear-activation potential (SAP). Patient-specific inputs for the ML studies included heart rate, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, ejection fraction, aortic pressure, E/A ratio, and LVAD speed. The ML effectively replicated vortex development and circulation patterns, as well as RT, particularly for HF patient cases. The LVAD velocity fields reflected altered flow paths, in which all or most incoming blood formed a dominant stream directing flow straight from the mitral valve to the apex. RT estimation of patient and ML compared well for all conditions, but SAP was substantially higher in the LVAD cases of the ML. The benchtop system generated comparable and reproducible hemodynamics and fluid dynamics for patient-specific conditions, validating its reliability and clinical relevance. This study demonstrated that ML is a suitable platform to investigate the fluid dynamics of HF and LVAD patients and can be utilized to investigate heart-implant interactions.

Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Scientific Statement

Despite advances in medical therapy for patients with stage C heart failure (HF), survival for patients with advanced HF is <20% at 5 years. Durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) support is an important treatment option for patients with advanced HF. Innovations in dLVAD technology have reduced the risk of several adverse events, including pump thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding. Average patient survival is now similar to that of heart transplantation at 2 years, with 5-year dLVAD survival now approaching 60%. Unfortunately, greater adoption of dLVAD therapy has not been realized due to delayed referral of patients to advanced HF centers, insufficient clinician knowledge of contemporary dLVAD outcomes (including gains in quality of life), and deprioritization of patients with dLVAD support waiting for heart transplantation. Despite these challenges, novel devices are on the horizon of clinical investigation, offering smaller size, permitting less invasive surgical implantation, and eliminating the percutaneous lead for power supply.

Myocardial recovery in children supported with a durable ventricular assist device-a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

A small percentage of paediatric patients supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) can have their device explanted following myocardial recovery. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on the clinical course in these children after weaning.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on 27 May 2022 using Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar to include all literature on paediatric patients supported by a durable VAD during the last decade. Overlapping study cohorts and registry-based studies were filtered out.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles were included. Eighteen of them reported on the incidence of recovery in cohort studies, with an overall incidence rate of 8.7% (81/928). Twenty-two of the included articles reported on clinical outcomes after VAD explantation (83 patients). The aetiologies varied widely and were not limited to diseases with a natural transient course like myocarditis. Most of the patients in the included studies (70; 84.3%) were supported by a Berlin Heart EXCOR, and in 66.3% (55/83), only the left ventricle had to be supported. The longest follow-up period was 19.1 years, and multiple studies reported on long-term myocardial recovery. Fewer than half of the reported deaths had a cardiac cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial recovery during VAD support is dependent on various contributing components. The interactions among patient-, device-, time- and hospital-related factors are complex and not yet fully understood. Long-term recovery after VAD support is achievable, even after a long duration of VAD support, and even in patients with aetiologies different from myocarditis or post-cardiotomy heart failure. More research is needed on this favourable outcome after VAD support.

Mitral regurgitation severity at left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct myocardial transcriptomic signatures

OBJECTIVES

We examined for differences in pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation myocardial transcriptome signatures among patients with different degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

Between January 2018 and October 2019, we collected left ventricular (LV) cores during durable LVAD implantation (n = 72). A retrospective chart review was performed. Total RNA was isolated from LV cores and used to construct cDNA sequence libraries. The libraries were sequenced with the NovaSeq system, and data were quantified using Kallisto. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Gene Ontology analyses were performed, with a false discovery rate <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Comparing patients with preoperative mild or less MR (n = 30) and those with moderate-severe MR (n = 42), the moderate-severe MR group weighted less (P = .004) and had more tricuspid valve repairs (P = .043), without differences in demographics or comorbidities. We then compared both groups with a group of human donor hearts without heart failure (n = 8). Compared with the donor hearts, there were 3985 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for mild or less MR and 4587 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. Specifically altered genes included 448 DEGs for specific for mild or less MR and 1050 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. On GSEA, common regulated genes showed increased immune gene expression and reduced expression of contraction and energetic genes. Of the 1050 genes specific for moderate-severe MR, there were additional up-regulated genes related to inflammation and reduced expression of genes related to cellular proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation with moderate-severe MR had increased activation of genes related to inflammation and reduction of cellular proliferation genes. This may have important implications for myocardial recovery.

Myocardial recovery following left ventricular assist device implantation

Durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have consistently shown improved mortality and morbidity in patients with end-stage heart failure. Select patients with LVADs may experience significant enough myocardial recovery after device implantation to allow for explantation or decommissioning. While earlier trials suggested a high incidence of recovery, real-world clinical data have demonstrated this to be a much rarer phenomenon. Whether or not patients experience recovery, practices such as speed optimization and usage of guideline-directed medical therapy can improve patient outcomes.

Successful Explantation of Berlin Heart Excor in Two Young Children

Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation in children is widely used as bridge-to-heart transplantation. Berlin left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support as a bridge to recovery is rare. There is a scarcity of literature describing systematic evaluation in pediatric VAD explantation. Patient 1. A 3 month old boy presented with acute heart failure secondary to myocarditis. An echocardiogram demonstrated severely depressed left ventricular function. He required ECMO cannulation and was decannulated 11 days later. He continued to be hemodynamically unstable and required Berlin LVAD implantation with the intent to bridge to transplantation. Patient 2. A 3 month old boy presented initially with a heart rate of 250 beats/min and an electrocardiogram showed multifocal atrial tachycardia. An echocardiogram showed severely decreased left ventricular function. He was placed on ECMO due to unstable hemodynamics. He did not tolerate ECMO decannulation due to persistent chaotic atrial rhythm and underwent Berlin LVAD implantation with the intent to bridge to transplantation. After both patients showed evidence of myocardial recovery, they underwent a weaning protocol that includes: screening, trial-off with echocardiography, and trial-off in the catheterization suite. Our patients met the criteria and underwent successful explantation. Explantation of VAD can be successfully performed even in young children with appropriate candidate selection and a multidisciplinary and systematic approach.

Distinct Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profile Specifies Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Potential of Myocardial Recovery on Mechanical Unloading and Circulatory Support

BACKGROUND

Extensive evidence from single-center studies indicates that a subset of patients with chronic advanced heart failure (HF) undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support show significantly improved heart function and reverse structural remodeling (ie, termed "responders"). Furthermore, we recently published a multicenter prospective study, RESTAGE-HF (Remission from Stage D Heart Failure), demonstrating that LVAD support combined with standard HF medications induced remarkable cardiac structural and functional improvement, leading to high rates of LVAD weaning and excellent long-term outcomes. This intriguing phenomenon provides great translational and clinical promise, although the underlying molecular mechanisms driving this recovery are largely unknown.

METHODS

To identify changes in signaling pathways operative in the normal and failing human heart and to molecularly characterize patients who respond favorably to LVAD unloading, we performed global RNA sequencing and phosphopeptide profiling of left ventricular tissue from 93 patients with HF undergoing LVAD implantation (25 responders and 68 nonresponders) and 12 nonfailing donor hearts. Patients were prospectively monitored through echocardiography to characterize their myocardial structure and function and identify responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

These analyses identified 1341 transcripts and 288 phosphopeptides that are differentially regulated in cardiac tissue from nonfailing control samples and patients with HF. In addition, these unbiased molecular profiles identified a unique signature of 29 transcripts and 93 phosphopeptides in patients with HF that distinguished responders after LVAD unloading. Further analyses of these macromolecules highlighted differential regulation in 2 key pathways: cell cycle regulation and extracellular matrix/focal adhesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to characterize changes in the nonfailing and failing human heart by integrating multiple -omics platforms to identify molecular indices defining patients capable of myocardial recovery. These findings may guide patient selection for advanced HF therapies and identify new HF therapeutic targets.

HeartMate 3 Explantation Using Felt Plug for Ventriculotomy Occlusion

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) can be utilized for heart failure patients as a bridge to transplant, bridge to destination, or bridge to recovery. Given the lack of a universally accepted consensus for assessing myocardial recovery, techniques and strategies in LVAD explantation also vary. In addition, the incidence of LVAD explantation remains relatively low, and surgical techniques of explantation continue to be areas of interest. Our approach using a felt-plug Dacron technique is an effective way to preserve left ventricular geometry and cardiac function.

Percutaneous Decommissioning 11 Years After Initial CF-LVAD Placement

An 80-year-old man with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy status post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement 11 years prior presented for recurrent LVAD alarms from internal driveline fracture. Given his partial myocardial recovery and his preference to avoid surgical procedures, percutaneous LVAD decommissioning was performed by occlusion of the outflow graft and subsequently driveline removal. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Role of the mitral valve in left ventricular assist device pathophysiology

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of heart failure results from progressive dilatation of the left ventricle (LV) and mitral annulus. This leads to leaflet tethering with posterior displacement. Contrary to common assumptions, MR often does not resolve with LVAD decompression of the LV alone. The negative impact of significant (moderate-severe) mitral regurgitation in the LVAD setting is becoming better recognized in terms of its harmful effect on right heart function, pulmonary vascular resistance and hospital readmissions. However, controversies remain regarding the threshold for intervention and management. At present, there are no consensus indications for the repair of significant mitral regurgitation at the time of LVAD implantation due to the conflicting data regarding potential adverse effects of MR on clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of MR pathophysiology in patients supported with LVAD and potential future management strategies.

Clinical myocardial recovery in advanced heart failure with long term left ventricular assist device support

Left ventricular assist-device (LVAD) implantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). With chronic unloading and circulatory support, LVAD-supported hearts often show significant reverse remodeling at the structural, cellular and molecular level. However, translation of these changes into meaningful cardiac recovery allowing LVAD explant is lagging. Part of the reason for this discrepancy is lack of anticipation and hence promotion and evaluation for recovery post LVAD implant. There is additional uncertainty about the long-term course of HF following LVAD explant. In selected patients, however, guided by the etiology of HF, duration of disease and other clinical factors, significant functional improvement and LVAD explantation with long-term freedom from recurrent HF events has been demonstrated to be feasible in a reproducible manner. The identified predictors of myocardial recovery suggest that the elective therapeutic use of potentially less invasive VADs for reversal of HF earlier in the disease process is a future goal that warrants further investigation. Hence, it is prudent to develop and implement tools to predict HF reversibility prior to LVAD implant, optimize unloading-promoted recovery with guideline directed medical therapy and monitor for myocardial improvement. This review article summarizes the clinical aspects of myocardial recovery and together with its companion review article focused on the biological aspects of recovery, they aim to provide a useful framework for clinicians and investigators.

Myostatin/AKT/FOXO Signaling Is Altered in Human Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Disturbances in the ubiquitin proteasome system, and especially changes of the E3 ligases, are subjects of interest when searching for causes and therapies for cardiomyopathies. The aim of this study was to clarify whether the myostatin/AKT/forkhead box O (FOXO) pathway, which regulates the expression of the E3 ligases muscle atrophy F-box gene (MAFbx) and muscle ring-finger protein-1 (MuRF1), is changed in dilated cardiomyopathy of ischemic origin (IDCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy of non-ischemic origin (NIDCM). The mRNA and protein expression of myostatin, AKT, FOXO1, FOXO3, MAFbx and MuRF1 were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ELISA, respectively, in myocardial tissue from 26 IDCM and 23 NIDCM patients. Septal tissue from 17 patients undergoing Morrow resection served as a control. MAFbx and FOXO1 mRNA and protein expression (all p < 0.05), AKT mRNA (p < 0.01) and myostatin protein expression (p = 0.02) were decreased in NIDCM patients compared to the control group. Apart from decreases of AKT and MAFbx mRNA expression (both p < 0.01), no significant differences were detected in IDCM patients compared to the control group. Our results demonstrate that the myostatin/AKT/FOXO pathway is altered in NIDCM but not in IDCM patients. FOXO1 seems to be an important drug target for regulating the expression of MAFbx in NIDCM patients.

Novel Targets for a Combination of Mechanical Unloading with Pharmacotherapy in Advanced Heart Failure

LVAD therapy is an effective rescue in acute and especially chronic cardiac failure. In several scenarios, it provides a platform for regeneration and sustained myocardial recovery. While unloading seems to be a key element, pharmacotherapy may provide powerful tools to enhance effective cardiac regeneration. The synergy between LVAD support and medical agents may ensure satisfying outcomes on cardiomyocyte recovery followed by improved quality and quantity of patient life. This review summarizes the previous and contemporary strategies for combining LVAD with pharmacotherapy and proposes new therapeutic targets. Regulation of metabolic pathways, enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and function, immunomodulating treatment, and stem-cell therapies represent therapeutic areas that require further experimental and clinical studies on their effectiveness in combination with mechanical unloading.

LVAD as a Bridge to Remission from Advanced Heart Failure: Current Data and Opportunities for Improvement

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established treatment modality for advanced heart failure (HF). It has been shown that through volume and pressure unloading they can lead to significant functional and structural cardiac improvement, allowing LVAD support withdrawal in a subset of patients. In the first part of this review, we discuss the historical background, current evidence on the incidence and assessment of LVAD-mediated cardiac recovery, and out-comes including quality of life after LVAD support withdrawal. In the second part, we discuss current and future opportunities to promote LVAD-mediated reverse remodeling and improve our pathophysiological understanding of HF and recovery for the benefit of the greater HF population.

Outcome of percutaneous HeartMate3 decommissioning: A single-centre experience

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the role of percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) decommissioning as a safe procedure after myocardial recovery in patients with advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND

The HeartMate3 LVAD (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) is designed to provide circulatory support with enhanced hemocompatibility for patients with advanced heart failure. Most VADs are used as a bridge to heart transplantation; however, in certain cases, myocardial function recovers, and VADs can be explanted after the patient is weaned. Although surgical explantation remains the gold standard, minimally invasive percutaneous decommissioning has been described as a successful alternative. In this study, we present our experience, one-year outcomes, and adverse events associated with percutaneous LVAD decommissioning.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of data from six consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LVAD decommissioning.

RESULTS

Six patients were enrolled in the study. For all six patients, HM3 decommissioning was completed at least 6 months ago. No technical complications were documented. No strokes were observed within the study period, and the ejection fraction improved. The mean follow-up duration was 18 ± 8.5 months, and the survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous HeartMate3 decommissioning appears to be safe. In particular, the survival after the procedure was 100%, and no events, especially thromboembolic ones, occurred.

Protocolized screening effectively identifies myocardial recovery following destination therapy left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Myocardial recovery following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been of interest in transplant candidates with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy but is rare. Evidence suggests that a combination of left ventricular unloading and pharmacologic reverse remodeling is beneficial. Recovery in non-transplant candidates (i.e., destination therapy [DT]) patients is believed to be even rarer.

METHODS

All DT LVADs between January 1, 2017 and November 23, 2020 were reviewed. All patients were subjected to an institutional protocol consisting of combined pharmacologic remodeling and mechanical unloading with proactive screening for recovery. The primary outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of myocardial recovery. Baseline characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between recovered and non-recovered DT patients using non-parametric tests to identify predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients received DT LVADs. Nine patients were identified as myocardial recovery candidates using the protocol screening criteria. Overall, 11 patients underwent formal confirmatory testing for recovery, of which 10 were deemed recovered and underwent LVAD explant, defunctionalization, or transplantation. 37.5% of patients that had a concomitant coronary artery bypass during LVAD implantation achieved recovery. An equal proportion of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients achieved recovery. The cumulative incidence of myocardial recovery was 25.1% at 36 months. No factors were identified as being predictive of recovery.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial recovery in DT LVAD patients can be achieved at a higher rate than previously reported. Revascularization at the time of LVAD is safe and may be beneficial. LVAD therapy may not be the final destination in these patients.

Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: JACC Focus Seminar

As the prevalence of advanced heart failure continues to rise, treatment strategies for select patients include heart transplantation or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, both of which improve quality of life and extend survival. Recently, the HeartMate 3 has been incorporated into clinical practice, the United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation system was revised, and the management of LVAD-related complications has evolved. Contemporary LVAD recipients have greater preoperative illness severity, but survival is higher and adverse event rates are lower compared with prior eras. This is driven by advances in device design, patient selection, surgical techniques, and long-term management. However, bleeding, infection, neurologic events, and right ventricular failure continue to limit broader implementation of LVAD support. Ongoing efforts to optimize management of patients implanted with current devices and parallel development of next-generation devices are likely to further improve outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure.

Comparative analysis of LVAD patients in regard of ischaemic or idiopathic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score analysis of EUROMACS data

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in management of patients with advanced heart failure, mortality remains high. Aim of this study was to compare impact of different aetiology of ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy on early outcomes and long-term survival of patients after left ventricular assist device implantation.

METHODS

European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) gathers clinical data and follow-up parameters of LVAD recipients. Patients enrolled in the EUROMACS registry with primary diagnosis of either ischaemic (n = 1190) or idiopathic (n = 812) cardiomyopathy were included. Primary Endpoints were early mortality as well as long-term survival. Secondary endpoint were major postoperative adverse events, such as need for rethoracotomy. Additionally, a propensity-score matching analysis was performed for patients with ischaemic (n = 509) and idiopathic (n = 509) cardiomyopathy.

RESULTS

In terms of basic demographics and baseline parameters the two groups significantly differed as expected before propensity-score matching due to different aetiology of cardiomyopathy. Seven-day (52 (4.4%) versus 18 (2.2%); p = 0.009), 30-day (153 (12.9%) versus 73 (9.0%); p = 0.008) and in-hospital mortality (253 (19.7%) versus 123 (15.1%); p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the idiopathic cardiomyopathy group compared to the ischaemic cardiomyopathy group, whereas after propensity-score matching 30-day (p = 0.169) was comparable and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.051) was almost significant. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in regard of long-term survival after propensity-score matching (Breslow-test p = 0.161 and LogRank-test p = 0.113).

CONCLUSION

Though patients with ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy suffer from different cardiomyopathy aetiologies, 30-day-mortality and long-term survival of both groups were similar leading to the conclusion that covariates predominately influence mortality and survival of ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathies.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery: Long-term ventricular remodeling and adverse events

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) mechanically unload the heart and coupled with neurohormonal therapy can promote reverse cardiac remodeling and myocardial recovery. Minimally invasive LVAD decommissioning with the device left in place has been reported to be safe over short-term follow-up. Whether device retention reduces long-term safety, or sustainability of recovery is unknown.

METHODS

This is a dual-center retrospective analysis of patients who had achieved responder status (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF ≥40% and left ventricular internal diastolic diameter, LVIDd ≤6.0 cm) and underwent elective LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery from May 2010 to January 2020. All patients had outflow graft closure and driveline resection with the LVAD left in place. Emergent LVAD decommissioning for an infection or device thrombosis was excluded. Patients were followed with serial echocardiography for up to 3-years. The primary clinical outcome was survival free of heart failure hospitalization, LVAD reimplantation, or transplant.

RESULTS

During the study period 515 patients received an LVAD and 29 (5.6%) achieved myocardial recovery, 12 patients underwent total device explantation or urgent device decommissioning, 17 patients underwent elective LVAD decommissioning, and were included in the analysis. Median age of patients at LVAD implantation was 42 years (interquartile range, IQR: 25-54 years), all had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 5 (29%) were female. At LVAD implantation, median LVEF was 10% (IQR: 5%-15%), and LVIDd 6.6 cm (IQR: 5.8-7.1 cm). There were 11 hydrodynamically levitated centrifugal-flow (65%), and 6 axial-flow LVADs (35%). The median duration of LVAD support before decommissioning was 28.7 months (range 13.5-36.2 months). As compared to the turndown study parameters, 1-month post-decommissioning, median LVEF decreased from 55% to 48% (p = 0.03), and LVIDd increased from 4.8 cm to 5.2 cm (p = 0.10). There was gradual remodeling until 6 months, after which there was no statistical difference on follow-up through 3-years (LVEF 42%, LVIDd 5.6 cm). Recurrent infections affected 41% of patients leading to 3 deaths and 1 complete device explant. Recurrent HF occurred in 1 patient who required a transplant. Probability of survival free of HF, LVAD, or transplant was 94% at 1-year, and 78% at 3-years.

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery was associated with excellent long-term survival free from recurrent heart failure and preservation of ventricular size and function up to 3-years. Reducing the risk of recurrent infections, remains an important therapeutic goal for this management strategy.

Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition on morbidity and mortality during long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: An IMACS report

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) improves survival and reduces adverse cardiac events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the benefit is not well-defined following left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS

We analyzed the ISHLT IMACS registry for adults with a primary, continuous-flow LVAD from January 2013 to September 2017 who were alive at postoperative month 3 without a major adverse event, and categorized patients according to treatment an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Propensity score matching was performed separately for ACEI/ARB vs none (n = 4,118 each) and MRA vs none (n = 3,892 each).

RESULTS

Of 11,494 patients included, 50% were treated with ACEI/ARB and 38% with MRA. Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly better for patients receiving ACEI/ARB (p < 0.001) but not MRA (p = 0.31). In Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for known predictors of mortality following LVAD, ACEI/ARB use (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93], p < 0.0001) but not MRA use (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.88-1.21], p = 0.69) was independently associated with lower mortality. Among patients treated with an ACEI/ARB, there was a significantly lower unadjusted risk of cardiovascular death (p < 0.001), risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01), and creatinine level (p < 0.001). MRA therapy was associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01) but higher risk of hemolysis (p < 0.01). Potential limitations include residual confounding and therapy crossover.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a benefit for ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with heart failure after LVAD implantation.

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Strategies Following Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Explantation or Decommissioning: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Mechanical circulatory support using left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has transformed management of patients with end-stage heart failure with more patients on LVAD therapy surviving long enough to necessitate either device explantation or decommissioning. Usually, there is foreign material retained following these procedures that requires maintaining antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. However, there is no consensus on optimal management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy following LVAD explantation or decommissioning. We conducted a scoping review of antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies, searching EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL. A total of 15 case reports and series encompassing 38 patient cases were found that met inclusion criteria. There was a heterogeneity of LVAD types and techniques used for explantation and decommissioning. Most reports identified in our review maintained patients on a vitamin K antagonist for at least 3 months post-explantation or decommissioning with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin. However, there was no single agreed-upon optimal strategy for antiplatelet and anticoagulant use post-procedure. Factors such as the degree of foreign material retained following device explantation or decommissioning and whether there is another indication for anticoagulation or antiplatelet use must be considered. A lack of overall consensus indicates that more studies are needed in this area to establish definitive guidelines around antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy following LVAD explantation or decommissioning.

Current era left ventricular assist devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have changed the landscape of treatment options for patients with end stage heart failure. Due to the limited availability of donor hearts for transplantation, LVADs have become an important option for many of these patients. Much progress has been made in the device industry since then, and newer devices continue to improve patient outcomes. In this review, we will discuss some of the key transitions in LVADs over the years, the current LVADs used in practice today, implantation techniques, the impact of the new heart allocation system on LVAD use and future prospective LVADs.

A detailed explantation assessment protocol for patients with left ventricular assist devices with myocardial recovery

OBJECTIVES

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for end-stage heart failure patients has been on the rise, providing a reliable long-term option. For some LVAD patients, longer term LV unloading leads to recovery; hence, the need for evaluating potential myocardial recovery and weaning eligibility has emerged.

METHODS

All patients who underwent contemporary LVAD explantation at our institution between 2009 and 2020 were included in the study. Patients in New York Heart Association I, left ventricular ejection fraction >40%, a cardiac index >2.4 l/min and a peak oxygen intake >50% predicted underwent a 4-phase weaning assessment. A minimally invasive approach using a titanium plug was the surgery of choice in the most recent explants. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the survival at 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (17 HeartMate II, 9 HeartWare) underwent LVAD explantation after a median 317 days of support [IQ (212-518)], range 131-1437. Mean age at explant was 35.8 ± 12.7 years and 85% were males. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy was the underlying diagnosis in 70% of cases. Thirteen (48%) patients were on short-term mechanical circulatory support and 60% required intensive care unit admission prior to the LVAD implantation. At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 88%, whereas at 6 years, it was 77%. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 year post-explant was 44.25% ± 8.44.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a standardized weaning protocol (echocardiographic and invasive) and a minimally invasive LVAD explant technique minimizes periprocedural complications and leads to good long-term device-free survival rates.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Percutaneous Deactivation With a Watchman Device

Myocardial recovery in patients with left ventricular assist devices is a rare event. Surgical explantation remains a risky and challenging procedure. Alternative percutaneous techniques could represent an effective solution. This report describes the clinical use of a Watchman closure device (Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, MA) in deactivation of a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL).

Outcomes of patients after successful left ventricular assist device explantation: a EUROMACS study

AIMS

Sufficient myocardial recovery with the subsequent explantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) occurs in approximately 1-2% of the cases. However, follow-up data about this condition are scarcely available in the literature. This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes and clinical management following LVAD explantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An analysis of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support was performed to identify all adult patients with myocardial recovery and successful explantation. Pre-implant characteristics were retrieved and compared with the non-recovery patients. The follow-up data after explantation were collected via a questionnaire. A Kaplan-Meier analysis for freedom of the composite endpoint of death, heart transplantation, LVAD reimplantion, or heart failure (HF) relapse was conducted. A total of 45 (1.4%) cases with myocardial recovery resulting in successful LVAD explantation were identified. Compared with those who did not experience myocardial recovery, the explanted patients were younger (44 vs. 56 years, P < 0.001), had a shorter duration of cardiac disease (P < 0.001), and were less likely to have ischaemic cardiomyopathy (9% vs. 41.8%, P < 0.001). Follow-up after explantation could be acquired in 28 (62%) cases. The median age at LVAD implantation was 43 years (inter-quartile range: 29-52), and 23 (82%) were male. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 18% (inter-quartile range: 10-20%), and 60.7% of the patients had Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile 1 or 2. Aetiologies of HF were dilated cardiomyopathy in 36%, myocarditis in 32%, and ischaemic in 14% of the patients, and 18% had miscellaneous aetiologies. The devices implanted were HeartMate II in 14 (50%), HVAD in 11 (39%), HeartMate 3 in 2 (7%), and 1 unknown with a median duration of support of 410 days (range: 59-1286). The median follow-up after explantation was 26 months (range 0.3-73 months), and 82% of the patients were in New York Heart Association Class I or II. Beta-blockers were prescribed to 85%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to 71%, and loop diuretics to 50% of the patients, respectively. Freedom from the composite endpoint was 100% after 30 days and 88% after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival after LVAD explantation is excellent without the need for heart transplantation or LVAD reimplantation. Only a minority of the patients suffer from a relapse of significant HF.