Usefulness of suPAR as a biological marker in patients with systemic inflammation or infection: a systematic review

Associations between soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) concentration and psychiatric disorders - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence of an association between inflammation in the pathogenesis of mental disorders. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker of chronic inflammation, which provides a more stable index of systemic inflammation than more widely used biomarkers. This review aims to synthesise studies that measured suPAR concentrations in individuals with a psychiatric disorder, to determine if these concentrations are altered in comparison to healthy participants.

METHOD

Comprehensive literature searches from inception to October 2023 were conducted of five relevant databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, APA PsychInfo). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare the standardised mean difference of blood suPAR levels (i.e. plasma or serum) for individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls. Separate meta-analyses of suPAR levels were conducted for individuals with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder and depressive disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses included excluding studies at high risk of bias, and analyses of studies that measured suPAR concentrations either in serum or in plasma separately.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 149 records. Ten full-text studies were screened for eligibility and 9 studies were included for review. Primary analyses revealed no significant difference in suPAR levels between individuals with any psychiatric disorder compared to controls (k = 7, SMD = 0.42, 95 % CI [-0.20, 1.04]). However, those with depressive disorder had elevated suPAR levels relative to controls (k = 3, SMD = 0.61, 95 % CI [0.34, 0.87]). Similarly, secondary analyses showed no evidence of a significant difference in suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder when studies at high risk of bias were excluded (k = 6, SMD = 0.54, 95 % CI [-0.14, 1.22]), but elevated suPAR concentrations for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder were found (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]). Furthermore, studies that analysed plasma suPAR concentrations found elevated plasma suPAR levels in individuals with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls (k = 5, SMD = 0.84, 95 % CI [0.38, 1.29]), while studies measuring serum suPAR levels in any psychiatric disorder did not find a difference (k = 2, SMD = -0.61, 95 % CI [-1.27, 0.04]). For plasma, elevated suPAR concentrations were also identified for those with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder (k = 3, SMD = 0.98, 95 % CI [0.39, 1.58]).

DISCUSSION

When studies measuring either only serum or only plasma suPAR were considered, no significant difference in suPAR levels were observed between psychiatric disorder groups, although significantly elevated suPAR levels were detected in those with moderate to severe depressive disorder. However, plasma suPAR levels were significantly elevated in those with any psychiatric disorder relative to controls, while no difference in serum samples was found. A similar finding was reported for schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder. The plasma findings suggest that chronic inflammatory dysregulation may contribute to the pathology of schizophrenia and depressive disorder. Future longitudinal studies are required to fully elucidate the role of this marker in the psychopathology of these disorders.

Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health due to its high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods for identifying sepsis or its causative organisms are time-consuming and contribute to a high mortality rate. Biomarkers have been developed to overcome these limitations and are currently used for sepsis diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment response assessment. Over the past few decades, more than 250 biomarkers have been identified, a few of which have been used in clinical decision-making. Consistent with the limitations of diagnosing sepsis, there is currently no specific treatment for sepsis. Currently, the general treatment for sepsis is conservative and includes timely antibiotic use and hemodynamic support. When planning sepsis-specific treatment, it is important to select the most suitable patient, considering the heterogeneous nature of sepsis. This comprehensive review summarizes current and evolving biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for sepsis.

Prognostic role of suPAR in acute pancreatitis: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common emergency condition with high morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic impact. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a potential biomarker for AP prognosis. This study systematically reviews the literature on suPAR's prognostic roles in assessing AP severity, organ failure, mortality, and other pathological markers.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of 5 databases up to March 19, 2023, was conducted, selecting cohort studies that examined suPAR's relationship with AP outcomes. Outcome variables included AP severity, organ failure, mortality, hospital stay length, and suPAR's association with other inflammatory markers. Our paper has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42023410628).

RESULTS

Nine prospective observational studies with 1033 AP patients were included. Seven of eight studies found suPAR significantly elevated in severe acute pancreatitis (P < .05). Four studies showed suPAR effectively predicted organ failure risk, and 4 studies concluded suPAR significantly predicted mortality (P < .05). The review had no high-risk studies, enhancing credibility.

CONCLUSION

suPAR is a valuable prognostic marker in AP, significantly predicting severity, organ failure, hospital stay length, and mortality. Further large-scale studies are needed to explore suPAR's role in other clinical outcomes related to AP disease course, to establish it as a mainstay of AP prognosis.

Point-of-Care Serum Proenkephalin as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to investigate the prognostic utility of point-of-care (POC)-measured proenkephalin (PENK), a novel biomarker, in terms of predicting in-hospital mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock.

METHODS

Bedside PENK was measured in consecutive patients presenting to the ED with septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria. The association of PENK with inflammatory and routine biomarkers, and its role as a predictor of in-hospital mortality, was examined.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with septic shock [53% females, median age 83 years (IQR 71-88)] were evaluated. Median (IQR) values of creatinine, plasma lactate, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR), procalcitonin and PENK were 1.7 (1.0-2.9) mg/dL, 3.6 (2.1-6.8) mmol/L, 13.1 (10.0-21.4) ng/mL, 2.06 (0.84-3.49) ng/mL, and 205 (129-425) pmol/L, respectively. LogPENK significantly correlated with LogLactate (rho = 0.369, p = 0.004), LogCreatinine (rho = 0.537, p < 0.001), LogProcalcitonin (rho = 0.557, p < 0.001), and LogSuPAR (rho = 0.327, p = 0.011). During hospitalization, 39/61 (64%) patients died. In a multivariable logistic regression model, logPENK was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 11.9, 95% CI: 1.7-84.6, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

POC PENK levels measured upon presentation to the ED strongly correlated with metabolic, renal and inflammatory biomarkers, and may serve as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in children with obesity or type 1 diabetes as a marker of endothelial dysfunction: a cross-sectional study

Pediatric obesity and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) represent two common chronic diseases associated with chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and long-term complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the possible diagnostic and prognostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a marker of inflammation and impaired endothelial function, in children with the diseases. In this cross-sectional study, children and adolescents with T1DM (N = 41) or obesity (N = 37), aged < 18 years old, and without proteinuria were included, together with children of similar age and without evident morbidity that served as controls (N = 42). Serum samples were obtained during standard outpatient follow up and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) concentrations were measured using a commercially available sandwich ELISA kit (DUP00, R&D systems). Clinical and biochemical indices that were also assessed include body mass index (BMI) z-score, Tanner stages, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting lipid profile and serum creatinine. Mean serum suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with obesity compared to patients with T1DM and controls, while children with T1DM had similar suPAR levels to controls. Also, serum suPAR levels showed a negative correlation with age (Spearman rho -0.359, p < 0.001) and serum creatinine levels (Spearman rho -0.334, p = 0.005), and a positive correlation with BMI z-score (Spearman rho 0.354, p = 0.009) in the whole cohort.  Conclusion: Serum suPAR may be a useful predictive marker of inflammation or endothelial dysfunction for children with obesity and T1DM, as well as a promising therapeutic target. Further studies are needed in order to clarify whether the reported differences in suPAR levels could reflect a greater impairment of the inflammation status and endothelial function in children with obesity compared to children with T1DM. What is Known: • Paediatric obesity and type 1 diabetes are characterised by chronic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation. • Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been proposed as a useful biomarker for chronic inflammation and cardiovascular risk in adults. What is New: • Serum suPAR levels were increased in children and adolescents with obesity compared to those with T1DM and healthy controls; thus, obesity may affect the inflammatory status and endothelial function to a higher degree than T1DM during childhood. • Serum suPAR may serve as a diagnostic and predictive marker of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction for children and adolescents with obesity and T1DM.

suPAR in cardiovascular disease

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), the soluble counterpart of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, is found in the circulation at various levels. suPAR and its parent molecule, cell surface uPAR, exhibit similar structure and extracellular functional roles facilitating fibrinolysis, cellular adhesion, and migration. Studies have assessed the correlation between suPAR in cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is postulated that suPAR may serve as an indicator of inflammatory activation and burden during CVD progression. Increased suPAR independently predicts poorer outcomes in acute coronary syndromes, in heart failure, as well as in coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. To guide translation into clinical utization, suPAR has been assessed in numerous CVD settings for improved risk discrimination independently or in association with established traditional risk factors. Whilst the involvement of suPAR has been explored in other diseases such as kidney diseases and cancer, there is only emerging evidence of suPAR's mechanistic involvement in cardiovascular disease. In this review, we provide a background into suPAR and its potential role as a biomarker in CVD.

Advances in sepsis biomarkers

Sepsis, a dysregulated host immune response to an infectious agent, significantly increases morbidity and mortality for hospitalized patients worldwide. This chapter reviews (1) the basic principles of infectious diseases, pathophysiology and current definition of sepsis, (2) established sepsis biomarkers such lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, (3) novel, newly regulatory-cleared/approved biomarkers, such as assays that evaluate white blood cell properties and immune response molecules, and (4) emerging biomarkers and biomarker panels to highlight future directions and opportunities in the diagnosis and management of sepsis.

qSOFA combined with suPAR for early risk detection and guidance of antibiotic treatment in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sepsis guidelines suggest immediate start of resuscitation for patients with quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) 2 or 3. However, the interpretation of qSOFA 1 remains controversial. We investigated whether measurements of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) may improve risk detection when qSOFA is 1.

METHODS

The study had two parts. At the first part, the combination of suPAR with qSOFA was analyzed in a prospective cohort for early risk detection. At the second part, the double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) SUPERIOR evaluated the efficacy of the suPAR-guided medical intervention. SUPERIOR took place between November 2018 and December 2020. Multivariate stepwise Cox regression was used for the prospective cohort, while univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for the RCT. Consecutive admissions at the emergency department (ED) with suspected infection, qSOFA 1 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/mL were allocated to single infusion of placebo or meropenem. The primary endpoint was early deterioration, defined as at least one-point increase of admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score the first 24 h.

RESULTS

Most of the mortality risk was for patients with qSOFA 2 and 3. Taking the hazard ratio (HR) for death of patients with qSOFA = 1 and suPAR < 12 ng/mL as reference, the HR of qSOFA = 1 and suPAR ≥ 12 ng/mL for 28-day mortality was 2.98 (95% CI 2.11-3.96). The prospective RCT was prematurely ended due to pandemia-related ED re-allocations, with 91 patients enrolled: 47 in the placebo and 44 in the meropenem arm. The primary endpoint was met in 40.4% (n = 19) and 15.9% (n = 7), respectively (difference 24.5% [5.9-40.8]; odds ratio 0.14 [0.04-0.50]). One post hoc analysis showed significant median changes of SOFA score after 72 and 96 h equal to 0 and - 1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining qSOFA 1 with the biomarker suPAR improves its prognostic performance for unfavorable outcome and can help decision for earlier treatment. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT, 2018-001008-13) and Clinical-Trials.gov (NCT03717350). Registered 24 October 2018.

Role of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in critically ill children with hospital-acquired pneumonia: an observational study in hospital with controls

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-ventilator associated pneumonia (Non-VAP)) is still a hot issue. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is prognostic in critically ill children with sepsis regarding mortality prediction. Our aim was to evaluate suPAR levels in children with HAP.

METHODS

An observational, prospective study was conducted on 45 children diagnosed HAP (VAP and Non-VAP) and 40 healthy controls. Paediatric Sequential Organ Failure assessment Score (pSOFA) was assessed for each patient. Plasma suPAR levels were measured with ELISA on the day of diagnosis.

RESULTS

On comparison levels of plasma suPAR for the children with HAP with the healthy control group, no statistically significant difference was observed (148 pg/mL (22.4-1939.7) and 184.4 pg/mL (31.6-1311.7), respectively, (p=0.32). suPAR was significantly increased in children with elevated pSOFA score on the day of diagnosis of pneumonia (p=0.034). suPAR was significantly increased in children with shock (p=0.005). suPAR levels was negatively correlated with oxygen saturation (rs=0.31,p=0.048). suPAR was not significantly correlated with C reactive protein.

CONCLUSIONS

suPAR can be used as a predictor for severity of illness in children with HAP. We firmly know that plasma suPAR, a novel marker, could indicate the disease if carried out on larger patient groups.

Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the Holy Grail or chasing a mirage!

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. It is a complex syndrome and is characterized by physiologic, pathologic and biochemical abnormalities in response to an infection. Diagnosis of sepsis is based on history, physical examination and other investigations (including biomarkers) which may help to increase the certainty of diagnosis. Biomarkers have been evaluated in the past for many diseases and have been evaluated for sepsis as well. Biomarkers may find a possible role in diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic monitoring and anti-microbial stewardship in sepsis. Since the pathophysiology of sepsis is quite complex and is incompletely understood, a single biomarker that may be robust enough to provide all information has not been found as of yet. However, many biomarkers have been studied and some of them have applications at the bedside and guide clinical decision-making. We evaluated the PubMed database to search for sepsis biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and possible role in antibiotic escalation and de-escalation. Clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials were included. Commonly studied biomarkers such as procalcitonin, Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator (Supar), presepsin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, etc., have been described for their possible applications as biomarkers in septic patients. The sepsis biomarkers are still an area of active research with newer evidence adding to the knowledge base continuously. For patients presenting with sepsis, early diagnosis and prompt resuscitation and early administration of anti-microbials (preferably within 1 h) and source control are desired goals. Biomarkers may help us in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic monitoring of septic patients. The marker redefining our view on sepsis is yet a mirage that clinicians and researchers continue to chase.

Evaluation of plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR) levels in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR), a soluble form of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, is a biomarker produced by macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, active T cells, endothelial cells, and circulating tumor cells. SuPAR is a novel biomarker showing altered inflammation in many inflammatory diseases. This study aims to investigate the SuPAR level in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and to evaluate the SuPAR level in active, and remission patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient and healthy control SuPAR levels were analyzed by immunoassay method. SuPAR levels between UC patients and control group were compared. The difference between SuPAR levels in patients with active UC and UC in remission was analyzed. The relationship between C-reactive protein level, Total Mayo score, Mayo Endoscopic score used to predict disease activity, and amount of SuPAR were evaluated.

RESULTS

SuPAR levels were determined in the UC patient group (2170,3 ± 121,0 pg/ml), and healthy controls (2130,7 ± 164,8 pg/ml) (p = 0. 805). Median SuPAR levels were determined in moderate UC (2479 pg/ml), mild UC (1944 pg/ml), and patients in remission (1774 pg/ml) (p = 0,207). There were no significant relationships between SuPAR levels and CRP levels, Total Mayo score, disease duration in the UC group (r = 0.177, r = 0.267, and r = 0,007; respectively p > 0.05). A slightly positive correlation was found between Mayo Endoscopic Score and SuPAR level (r = 0.303; p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

SuPAR is of limited value in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and in the assessment of disease activation.

Comparative Analysis of Whole Transcriptome Profiles in Septic Cardiomyopathy: Insights from CLP- and LPS-Induced Mouse Models

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with septic cardiomyopathy being a common and severe complication. Despite its significant clinical impact, the molecular mechanisms underlying sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) remain incompletely understood. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of whole transcriptome profiles using RNA sequencing in mouse hearts in two widely used mouse models of septic cardiomyopathy. CLP-induced sepsis was achieved by surgical cecal ligation and puncture, while LPS-induced sepsis was induced using a 5 mg/kg intraperitoneal (IP) injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). For consistency, we utilized sham-operated mice as the control for septic models. Our aim was to identify key genes and pathways involved in the development of septic cardiomyopathy and to evaluate the similarities and differences between the two models. Our findings demonstrated that both the CLP and lipopolysaccharide LPS methods could induce septic heart dysfunction within 24 h. We identified common transcriptional regulatory regions in the septic hearts of both models, such as Nfkb1, Sp1, and Jun. Moreover, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in comparison to control were involved in shared pathways, including regulation of inflammatory response, regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process, and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. However, each model presented distinctive whole transcriptome expression profiles and potentially diverse pathways contributing to sepsis-induced heart failure. This extensive comparison enhances our understanding of the molecular basis of septic cardiomyopathy, providing invaluable insights. Accordingly, our study also contributes to the pursuit of effective and personalized treatment strategies for SICM, highlighting the importance of considering the specific causative factors.

Comparison of C-reactive protein with distinct hyperinflammatory biomarkers in association with COVID-19 severity, mortality and SARS-CoV-2 variants

C-reactive protein (CRP) has been one of the most investigated inflammatory-biomarkers during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemics caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The severe outcome among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is closely related to the cytokine storm and the hyperinflammation responsible for the acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. It still remains a challenge to determine which of the hyperinflammatory biomarkers and cytokines are the best predictors for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the outcome prediction efficiencies between CRP, the recently reported inflammatory modulators (suPAR, sTREM-1, HGF), and the classical biomarkers (MCP-1, IL-1β, IL-6, NLR, PLR, ESR, ferritin, fibrinogen, and LDH) in patients confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 infection at hospital admission. Notably, patients with severe disease had higher serum levels of CRP, suPAR, sTREM-1, HGF and classical biomarkers compared to the mild and moderate cases. Our data also identified CRP, among all investigated analytes, to best discriminate between severe and non-severe forms of disease, while LDH, sTREM-1 and HGF proved to be excellent mortality predictors in COVID-19 patients. Importantly, suPAR emerged as a key molecule in characterizing the Delta variant infections.

Can serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor be an effective biomarker in comparing the inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open appendectomy?

Introduction

The inflammatory response after laparoscopy and laparotomy has been compared in studies in adults, but only a few studies have compared the immune response between laparoscopy and laparotomy in children.

Aim

To compare open and laparoscopic appendectomies regarding a new biomarker, suPAR, to evaluate the inflammatory response.

Material and methods

Patients between 3 and 17 years of age who were admitted to the pediatric surgery department and scheduled for appendectomy due to appendicitis were enrolled in the investigation. The patients were randomized to receive either laparoscopic (n = 20) or conventional open appendectomy (n = 20). The primary outcome was a change in preoperative and postoperative suPAR levels. The secondary outcomes were the white blood cell count, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, C-reactive protein level, appendix diameter, symptoms, symptom duration, surgical complications, operative time, rescue analgesics, hospital stay, and family satisfaction.

Results

The mean age of the patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy was 10.55 ±2.743 (3-17) years. The mean age of the patients undergoing open appendectomy was 11.40 ±3.515 (3-17) years. A statistically significant difference was found when the postoperative suPAR values between the two groups were compared (p = 0.048). The operative time and hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than those in the open group (p = 0.001, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with a shorter operative time, a shorter hospital stay, and a smaller inflammatory response caused by surgical stress than open appendectomy. suPAR is an effective marker for comparing postoperative inflammatory stress between open and closed appendectomies.

Serum HMGB1 and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels aid diagnosis and prognosis prediction of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Objective: To study the clinical application of serum HMGB1 and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) expression in sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Clinical data of 303 septic patients with/without ARDS were documented. Levels of serum inflammatory markers and HMGB1/suPAR were measured. ARDS patients were subdivided into high and low HMGB1/suPAR expression groups and followed up. Results: Serum HMGB1 and suPAR were upregulated in ARDS patients and positively correlated with inflammatory markers. The combination of HMGB1 with suPAR surpassed HMGB1 or suPAR alone in aiding diagnosis of sepsis with ARDS. CRP, PCT, IL-6, HMGB1 and suPAR were independent risk factors for ARDS. High HMGB1/suPAR expression might be linked to poor prognosis. Conclusion: Serum HMGB1/suPAR levels might aid diagnosis and predict poor prognosis of septic patients with ARDS.

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Is a Biomarker Associated with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Elderly, Specifically in Women

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) may result in the development of heart failure, which is widespread among people of advanced age. The pathophysiology of LVH is complex and its biochemical pathways are not fully understood in this group. Elevated soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a biomarker of immune activation, including fibrosis, reflects subclinical organ damage in systematic diseases. The present study assesses the clinical role of suPAR measurement in determination of LVH-associated cardiac disorders in the elderly. The studied population consisted of 238 individuals aged 76-91 years; of these, 139 (58%) were diagnosed with LVH. Serum biomarkers measurement (suPAR, troponin T, NT-proBNP and CRP) and echocardiography were performed in all subjects. The suPAR level was significantly higher in the LVH group (4.01 vs. 3.82 ng/mL, p = 0.033) and correlated with the parameters of cardiac diastolic function. Stepwise logistic regression found suPAR level (OR = 1.55, p = 0.016), BMI (OR = 1.17, p = 0.0003) and hypertension (OR = 2.42, p = 0.046) to be independently associated with LVH in women. In men, the strongest predictors of LVH were hypertension (OR = 7.52, p = 0.014) and BMI (OR = 1.42, p = 0.032). The observations indicate suPAR as a promising marker reflecting LVH, especially in women at advanced age, independent of age-associated cardiac remodeling.

suPAR links a dysregulated immune response to tissue inflammation and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to sepsis results in poor outcomes and conventional kidney function indicators lack diagnostic value. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an innate immune-derived molecule implicated in inflammatory organ damage. We characterized the diagnostic ability of longitudinal serum suPAR levels to discriminate severity and course of sepsis-induced AKI (SI-AKI) in 200 critically ill patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. The pathophysiologic relevance of varying suPAR levels in SI-AKI was explored in a polymicrobial sepsis model in WT, (s)uPAR-knockout, and transgenic suPAR-overexpressing mice. At all time points studied, suPAR provided a robust classification of SI-AKI disease severity, with improved prediction of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality compared with established kidney biomarkers. Patients with suPAR levels of greater than 12.7 ng/mL were at highest risk for RRT or death, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.48 (95% CI, 3.00-18.63). suPAR deficiency protected mice against SI-AKI. suPAR-overexpressing mice exhibited greater kidney damage and poorer survival through inflamed kidneys, accompanied by local upregulation of potent chemoattractants and pronounced kidney T cell infiltration. Hence, suPAR allows for an innate immune-derived and kidney function-independent staging of SI-AKI and offers improved longitudinal risk stratification. suPAR promotes T cell-based kidney inflammation, while suPAR deficiency improves SI-AKI.

BIOMARKERS: CAN THEY REALLY GUIDE OUR DAILY PRACTICE?

ABSTRACT

Optimal management of septic patients requires accurate assessment of both current severity status and prognosis. Since the 1990s, substantial advances have been made in the use of circulating biomarkers for such assessments. This summary of the session on "Biomarkers: can they really use guide our daily practice?" presented at the 2021 WEB-CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SHOCK SOCIETY, 6 November 2021. These biomarkers include ultrasensitive detection of bacteremia, circulating soluble urokina-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin and procalcitonin. In addition, the potential application of novel multiwavelength optical biosensor technology allows noninvasive monitoring of multiple metabolites that can be used to assess severity and prognosis in septic patients. The application these biomarkers and improved technologies provide the potential for improved personalized management of septic patients.

Biomarkers as Prognostic Predictors and Therapeutic Guide in Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Evidence

A biomarker is a molecule that can be measured in a biological sample in an objective, systematic, and precise way, whose levels indicate whether a process is normal or pathological. Knowing the most important biomarkers and their characteristics is the key to precision medicine in intensive and perioperative care. Biomarkers can be used to diagnose, in assessment of disease severity, to stratify risk, to predict and guide clinical decisions, and to guide treatments and response to them. In this review, we will analyze what characteristics a biomarker should have and how to ensure its usefulness, and we will review the biomarkers that in our opinion can make their knowledge more useful to the reader in their clinical practice, with a future perspective. These biomarkers, in our opinion, are lactate, C-Reactive Protein, Troponins T and I, Brain Natriuretic Peptides, Procalcitonin, MR-ProAdrenomedullin and BioAdrenomedullin, Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and lymphopenia, Proenkephalin, NefroCheck, Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), Interleukin 6, Urokinase-type soluble plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), Presepsin, Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP), and Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3). Finally, we propose an approach to the perioperative evaluation of high-risk patients and critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) based on biomarkers.

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Prognostic Marker of Ugandan Children at Risk of Severe and Fatal Malaria

BACKGROUND

Current malaria diagnostic tests do not reliably identify children at risk of severe and fatal infection. Host immune and endothelial activation contribute to malaria pathogenesis. Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a marker of these pathways. We hypothesized that measuring suPAR at presentation could risk-stratify children with malaria.

METHODS

Plasma suPAR levels were determined in consecutive febrile children with malaria at presentation to hospital in Jinja, Uganda. We evaluated the accuracy of suPAR in predicting in-hospital mortality, and whether suPAR could improve a validated clinical scoring system (Lambaréné Organ Dysfunction Score [LODS]).

RESULTS

Of the 1226 children with malaria, 39 (3.2%) died. suPAR concentrations at presentation were significantly higher in children who went on to die than in those who survived (P < .0001). suPAR levels were associated with disease severity (LODS: 0 vs 1, P = .001; 1 vs 2, P < .001; 2 vs 3, 0 vs 2, 1 vs 3, and 0 vs 3, P < .0001). suPAR concentrations were excellent predictors of in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .91-.94]). The prognostic accuracy of LODS (AUROC, 0.93 [95% CI, .91-.94]) was improved when suPAR was added (AUROC, 0.97 [95% CI, .96-.98]; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring suPAR at presentation can identify children at risk of severe and fatal malaria. Adding suPAR to clinical scores could improve the recognition and triage of children at risk of death. suPAR can be detected with a point-of-care test and can now be evaluated in prospective trials.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and survival in elective cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The study investigated the prognostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and calculated a simplified biomarker score comprising suPAR, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and age.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Biomarkers were assessed in a cohort of 478 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. After a median follow-up of 4.2 years, a total of 72 (15.1%) patients died. SuPAR, NT-proBNP and age were independent prognosticators of mortality in a multivariable Cox regression model after adjustment for EuroScoreII. We then calculated a simplified biomarker score comprising age, suPAR and NT-proBNP, which had a superior prognostic value compared to EuroScoreII (Harrel's C of 0.76 vs. 0.72; P for difference = 0.02). Besides long-term mortality, the biomarker score had an excellent performance predicting one-year mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure.

CONCLUSION

The biomarker suPAR and NT-proBNP were strongly and independently associated with mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A simplified biomarker score comprising only three variables (age, suPAR and NT-proBNP) performed better than the established EuroScoreII with respect to intermediate and long-term outcome as well as hospitalization due to heart failure. As such, integration of established and upcoming biomarkers in clinical practice may provide improved decision support in cardiac surgery.

Urinary CD80 and Serum suPAR as Biomarkers of Glomerular Disease among Adults in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Urinary CD80 has been shown to have good specificity for minimal change disease (MCD) in children. However, the investigation of circulating factors such as soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) as biomarkers of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is quite controversial. The objective of this study was to determine whether urinary CD80 and serum suPAR can be used for the diagnosis of MCD and FSGS, respectively, in the adult population of Brazil. We also attempted to determine whether those biomarkers assess the response to immunosuppressive treatment.

METHODS

This was a prospective study in which urine and blood samples were collected for analysis of CD80 and suPAR, respectively, only in the moment of renal biopsy, from patients undergoing to diagnostic renal biopsy. At and six months after biopsy, we analyzed serum creatinine, serum albumin, and proteinuria in order to evaluate the use of the CD80 and suPAR collected in diagnosis as markers of response to immunosuppressive treatment. In healthy controls were collected urinary CD80 and proteinuria, serum suPAR, and creatinine.

RESULTS

The results of 70 renal biopsies were grouped, by diagnosis, as follows: FSGS (n = 18); membranous nephropathy (n = 14); MCD (n = 5); and other glomerulopathies (n = 33). There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of the urinary CD80 levels, and serum suPAR was not significantly higher in the FSGS group, as would have been expected. Urinary CD80 correlated positively with nephrotic syndrome, regardless of the type of glomerular disease. Neither biomarker correlated with proteinuria at six months after biopsy.

CONCLUSION

In adults, urinary CD80 can serve as a marker of nephrotic syndrome but is not specific for MCD, whereas serum suPAR does not appear to be useful as a diagnostic or treatment response marker.

Eosinopenia as Predictor of Poor Outcome in Hospitalized COVID-19 Adult Patients from Waves 1 and 2 of 2020 Pandemic

During SARS-CoV-2 infection, eosinopenia may reflect a hyperactive immune response. In this study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we aimed to better understand the prognostic value of severe eosinopenia (absolute eosinophil count = 0 G/L) and decipher its underlying mechanisms. We retrospectively analyzed the records of COVID-19 patients hospitalized from March to June 2020 in three university hospitals in Marseille, France. We assessed the association between severe eosinopenia and a composite poor outcome in these patients, including the need for oxygen supplementation at >6 L/min, ICU admission, and in-hospital death. Among the 551 COVID-19 patients included in this study, severe eosinopenia was found in 228 (51%) of them on admission to hospital and was associated with a composite poor outcome using multivariate analysis (OR = 2.58; CI95 [1.77−3.75]; p < 0.0001). We found a significant association between the presence of severe eosinopenia on admission and the elevation in C-reactive protein, ferritin, IP-10, and suPAR. The histological findings in a series of 37 autopsies from patients who died from severe COVID-19 and presented with severe eosinopenia showed no pulmonary eosinophil trapping. Severe eosinopenia can be a reliable biomarker associated with a composite poor outcome in hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients. It may reflect the magnitude of immune hyperactivation during severe-to-critical COVID-19.

Subacute effects of a single dose of psilocybin on biomarkers of inflammation in healthy humans: An open-label preliminary investigation

Rationale

Psilocybin is a serotonergic psychedelic that has gained prominent attention recently as a potential therapeutic for neuropsychiatric disorders including Major Depressive Disorder. Pre-clinical and initial studies in humans suggest that serotonin 2A receptor agonists, including serotonergic psychedelics, have anti-inflammatory effects. This may contribute to its therapeutic effects as previous studies indicate a link between neuropsychiatric disorders and inflammatory processes. However, the effect of psilocybin on biomarkers of inflammation has not been evaluated in humans.

Objectives

Investigate the effect of a single dose of psilocybin on peripheral biomarkers of inflammation in healthy humans.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 16 healthy participants before and one day after the administration of a single oral dose of psilocybin (mean dose: 0.22 mg/kg) and subsequently analyzed for concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor-necrosis-factor (TNF) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). Change in inflammatory markers was evaluated using a paired t-test where p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We did not observe statistically significant changes in any of the above biomarkers of inflammation (all Cohen's d ≤ 0.31; all p ≥ 0.23).

Conclusions

Our data do not support that a single dose of psilocybin reduces biomarkers of inflammation in healthy individuals one day after administration. Nevertheless, we suggest that future studies consider additional markers of inflammation, including markers of neuroinflammation, and evaluate potential anti-inflammatory effects of psilocybin therapy in clinical cohorts where more prominent effects may be observable.

Association between variables measured in the ambulance and in-hospital mortality among adult patients with and without infection: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with infection to the ambulance are common, but risk factors for poor outcome are not known. The primary aim of the current study was to study the association between variables measured in the ambulance and mortality among adult patients with and without infection. The secondary aim was to study the association between these variables and mortality in a subgroup of patients who developed sepsis within 36 h.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 553 ambulance patients with, and 318 patients without infection, performed in Stockholm during 2017-2018. The association between 21 variables (8 keywords related to medical history, 6 vital signs, 4 blood tests, and age, gender, comorbidity) and in-hospital mortality was analysed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among patients with infection, inability of the patient to answer questions relating to certain symptoms such as pain and gastrointestinal symptoms was significantly associated with mortality in univariable analysis, in addition to oxygen saturation < 94%, heart rate > 110 /min, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 15, soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) 4.0-7.9 ng/mL, suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL and a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 5. suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL remained significant in multivariable analysis (OR 25.4; 95% CI, 3.2-199.8). Among patients without infection, suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL and a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 5 were significantly associated with mortality in univariable analysis, while suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL remained significant in multivariable analysis (OR 56.1; 95% CI, 4.5-700.0). Among patients who developed sepsis, inability to answer questions relating to pain remained significant in multivariable analysis (OR 13.2; 95% CI, 2.2-78.9), in addition to suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL (OR 16.1; 95% CI, 2.0-128.6).

CONCLUSIONS

suPAR ≥ 8.0 ng/mL was associated with mortality in patients presenting to the ambulance both with and without infection and in those who developed sepsis. Furthermore, the inability of the ambulance patient with an infection to answer questions relating to specific symptoms was associated with a surprisingly high mortality. These results suggest that suPAR and medical history are valuable tools with which to identify patients at risk of poor outcome in the ambulance and could potentially signal the need of enhanced attention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03249597 .

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor improves early risk stratification in cardiogenic shock

AIMS

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker reflecting the level of immune activation. It has been shown to have prognostic value in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure as well as in critical illness. Considering the complex pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock (CS), we hypothesized suPAR might have prognostic properties in CS as well. The aim of this study was to assess the kinetics and prognostic utility of suPAR in CS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SuPAR levels were determined in serial plasma samples (0-96 h) from 161 CS patients in the prospective, observational, multicentre CardShock study. Kinetics of suPAR, its association with 90-day mortality, and additional value in risk-stratification were investigated. The median suPAR-level at baseline was 4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.2-6.6)] ng/mL. SuPAR levels above median were associated with underlying comorbidities, biomarkers reflecting renal and cardiac dysfunction, and higher 90-day mortality (49% vs. 31%; P = 0.02). Serial measurements showed that survivors had significantly lower suPAR levels at all time points compared with nonsurvivors. For risk stratification, suPAR at 12 h (suPAR12h) with a cut-off of 4.4 ng/mL was strongly associated with mortality independently of established risk factors in CS: OR 5.6 (95% CI 2.0-15.5); P = 0.001) for death by 90 days. Adding suPAR12h > 4.4 ng/mL to the CardShock risk score improved discrimination identifying high-risk patients originally categorized in the intermediate-risk category.

CONCLUSION

SuPAR associates with mortality and improves risk stratification independently of other previously known risk factors in CS patients.

The Correlation of Interleukin-6, Malnutrition Inflammation Score and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Undergoing Routine Hemodialysis

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing routine hemodialysis (HD) have a high prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and inflammation. The combination of inflammation and PEM is associated with cardiovascular disease and poor outcomes. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an inflammatory factor that runs parallel to endothelial damage and is closely related to the nutritional status of CKD HD patients. The tool to assess nutrition status is Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS) and to assess endothelial damage is Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA). It is currently unclear whether there is a correlation between inflammation, malnutrition, and endothelial dysfunction. Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the correlation between IL-6, MIS and ADMA in CKD HD patients.  Methods: A cross-sectional design with analytic observational study was conducted on end stage renal disease patient who undergo routine hemodialysis for at least 2 years with the duration of hemodialysis is 4-5 hours and at least twice per week. IL-6 was examined by kit (ELISA) and ADMA using LC-MS/MS at a certified laboratory in Manado city. History taking and physical examination were used to calculate MIS. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 22. Results: There were 30 participants consisting of 22 men (72%) and 8 women (28%). The median age of the subjects was 56.50 years. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between IL-6 and ADMA (r = 0.440, p = 0.015), MIS and ADMA (r = 0.378, p = 0.039), and IL-6 and MIS (r = 0.682, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: There was a significant correlation between IL-6, MIS and ADMA.

A perspective on molecular signalling dysfunction, its clinical relevance and therapeutics in autism spectrum disorder

Intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders that have become a primary clinical and social concern, with a prevalence of 2-3% in the population. Neuronal function and behaviour undergo significant malleability during the critical period of development that is found to be impaired in ID/ASD. Human genome sequencing studies have revealed many genetic variations associated with ASD/ID that are further verified by many approaches, including many mouse and other models. These models have facilitated the identification of fundamental mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ASD/ID, and several studies have proposed converging molecular pathways in ASD/ID. However, linking the mechanisms of the pathogenic genes and their molecular characteristics that lead to ID/ASD has progressed slowly, hampering the development of potential therapeutic strategies. This review discusses the possibility of recognising the common molecular causes for most ASD/ID based on studies from the available models that may enable a better therapeutic strategy to treat ID/ASD. We also reviewed the potential biomarkers to detect ASD/ID at early stages that may aid in diagnosis and initiating medical treatment, the concerns with drug failure in clinical trials, and developing therapeutic strategies that can be applied beyond a particular mutation associated with ASD/ID.

Biomarkers for early detection and predicting outcomes in acute kidney injury

The current diagnosis of acute kidney injury relies on the measurement of serum creatinine levels and urine output. However, both measures are subject to considerable limitations; for example, change in serum creatinine levels ideally requires a knowledge of baseline function that is often not available. Furthermore, creatinine levels are influenced by many factors including diet, drug therapy, muscle mass, gender and ethnicity, which may lead to underestimation of the extent of renal dysfunction. Similarly, urine output lacks both specificity and sensitivity as a marker of acute kidney injury given that oliguria may be an appropriate physiological response to a multitude of stressors and that output may be maintained until significant renal damage has already occurred.

Given the well-documented consequences of acute kidney injury and the considerable burden associated with its development, much attention has focused on early identification of patients at high risk to try and improve outcomes. Many studies have focused on the identification of candidate molecules that may enable the early detection of individuals at risk of developing acute kidney injury, including constitutive proteins associated with kidney damage, as well as molecules upregulated in response to injury, non-renal products that may be filtered, reabsorbed or secreted by the kidney, and markers of renal stress. Such biomarkers may also aid stratification for adverse events, such as the need for kidney replacement therapy or progression to chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease. This article discusses some of these novel biomarkers and assesses the role they may have in the understanding, management, diagnosis and prognostication of acute kidney injury.

Anti-ETAR and suPAR as markers of disease activity in renal ANCA-associated vasculitis

PURPOSE

In anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), there is a lack of reliable biomarkers of disease activity. The aim of the study was to evaluate soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and anti-endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) antibodies levels in active phase and remission of AAV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 60 patients (median age 63.0 years) with renal AAV into this study. Plasma suPAR, urine suPAR (expressed as urine suPAR/creatinine ratio) and serum anti-ETAR antibodies were assayed by ELISA. Disease activity was assessed using Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) and patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on their BVAS scores, namely: active AAV subgroup (BVAS≥1) and remission subgroup (BVAS ​= ​0). Median follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Patients with active AAV had higher levels of all candidate biomarkers in comparison to those in remission (p ​< ​0.05). C-statistics for plasma suPAR, urine suPAR/creatinine ratio and serum anti-ETAR were 0.807, 0.713 and 0.783, respectively. In multivariable analysis, no clear associations were found between serum anti-ETAR and BVAS, while both plasma suPAR and serum anti-ETAR were independently influenced by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma suPAR better discriminated between active AAV and remission in comparison to urine suPAR/creatinine ratio and serum anti-ETAR antibodies.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and functionally relevant coronary artery disease: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an emerging biomarker associated with anatomical CAD burden and cardiovascular outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI) and death. We aimed at validating previous findings of the prognostic value of suPAR and evaluated its diagnostic potential for functional relevant CAD (fCAD).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected fCAD were enrolled. Adjudication of fCAD was performed blinded to suPAR concentrations by myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography (MPI-SPECT) and coronary angiography. Prognostic outcome measures included all-cause, cardiovascular death, and incident MI during 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Among consecutive 968 patients, SuPAR concentrations were higher in patients with fCAD compared to those without (3.45ng/mL versus 3.20ng/mL, p = 0.007), without acceptable diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.56, 95%CI 0.52-0.60). SuPAR correlated with high-sensitivity cardiac-troponin (hs-cTn) T (Spearman's rho (ρ) 0.393, p < 0.001), NT-proBNP (ρ = 0.327, p < 0.001), age (ρ = 0.364, p < 0.001) and very weakly with coronary atherosclerosis (ρ = 0.123, p < 0.001). Prognostic discrimination of suPAR was moderate for cardiovascular death (AUC =0.72, 95%CI 0.62-0.81) and all-cause death (AUC =0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.79) at 2-years. SuPAR remained a significant predictor for all-cause death in the full model (HR =1.96, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SuPAR was an independent predictor of all-cause death, without diagnostic utility for fCAD.

Soluble Urokinase Receptor and Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Main problem: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an immunological risk factor for kidney disease and a prognostic marker for cardiovascular events.

Methods: We measured serum suPAR levels in a total of 1,023 kidney transplant recipients either before (cohort 1, n = 474) or at year 1 after transplantation (cohort 2, n = 549). The association of suPAR levels and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Results: The highest suPAR tertile compared to the two lower tertiles had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality in both cohorts separately (cohort 1: hazard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20–3.08, p = 0.007; cohort 2: HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.51–5.13, p = 0.001) and combined (n = 1,023, combined HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.48–3.08, p < 0.001). The association remained significant in the subgroup of patients with normal kidney function (cohort 2: HR = 5.40, 95% CI 1.42–20.5, p = 0.013). The increased mortality risk in patients with high suPAR levels was attributable mainly to an increased rate of cardiovascular death (n = 1,023, HR = 4.24, 95% CI 1.81–9.96, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A high suPAR level prior to and at 1 year after kidney transplantation was associated with an increased risk of patient death independent of kidney function, predominantly from cardiovascular cause.

[Prognostic power of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for short-term mortality in patients seen in Emergency Departments due to infections]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse and compare 30-day mortality prognostic power of several biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate and suPAR) in patients seen in emergency departments (ED) due to infections. Secondly, if these could improve the accuracy of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).

METHODS

A prospective, observational and analytical study was carried out on patients who were treated in an ED of one of the eight participating hospitals. An assessment was made of 32 independent variables that could influence mortality at 30 days. They covered epidemiological, comorbidity, functional, clinical and analytical factors.

RESULTS

The study included 347 consecutive patients, 54 (15.6%) of whom died within 30 days of visiting the ED. SUPAR has got the best biomarker area under the curve (AUC)-ROC to predict mortality at 30 days of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.765-0.907; P <.001) with a cut-off > 10 ng/mL who had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 86%. The score qSOFA ≥ 2 had AUC-ROC of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.621-0.793; P < .001) with sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 89%. The mixed model (suPAR > 10 ng/mL plus qSOFA ≥ 2) has improved the AUC-ROC to 0.853 [95% CI: 0.790-0.916; P < .001] with the best prognostic performance: sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 97% with a negative predictive value of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

suPAR showed better performance for 30-day mortality prognostic power from several biomarkers in the patients seen in ED due to infections. Score qSOFA has better performance that SRIS and the mixed model (qSOFA ≥ 2 plus suPAR > 10 ng/mL) increased the ability of qSOFA.

The Predictive Value of Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objective

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR) is a circulating protein and a novel identified promising biomarker for various renal diseases and kidney injury. However, it remains unknown on the predictive value of suPAR in contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

A total of 399 patients undergoing PCI were enrolled in the research from June 2020 to June 2021 in Zhongda Hospital. Patients were divided into CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI groups according to the preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels. Plasma suPAR level was detected through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on admission. Demographic data, hematological parameters, coronary angiography data and medications were recorded and compared between CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI groups. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed for identifying the independent risk factors of CI-AKI and assessment of the predictive value of suPAR for CI-AKI.

Results

CI-AKI occurred in 65 (16.3%) patients undergoing PCI. The level of suPAR in CI-AKI group was significantly higher than that in the non-CI-AKI group. Multivariate logistic regression indicated diabetes, lower LVEF, lower hydration rate, lower baseline eGFR, higher plasma suPAR (OR = 2.875, 95% CI = 2.038–3.672, P < 0.001) and volume of contrast media were all independent risk factors for CI-AKI after adjustment of the confounding factors. ROC analysis illustrated that the optimal area under the curve was 0.765, indicating plasma suPAR was a splendid predictor for CI-AKI. The corresponding cut-off value was 3.305 ng/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 63.1% and 82.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Increased suPAR level is independently associated with elevated risk of suffering CI-AKI, and suPAR is a strong predictor for CI-AKI in patients undergoing PCI. SuPAR might act as a novel biomarker for CI-AKI in clinical practice.

Inflammation-Related Biomarkers Are Associated with Heart Failure Severity and Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Inflammation-related biomarkers are associated with clinical outcomes in mixed-etiology chronic heart failure populations. Inflammation-related markers tend to be higher in ischemic than in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NI-DCM) patients, which might impact their prognostic performance in NI-DCM patients. Therefore, we aimed to assess the association of inflammation-related biomarkers with heart failure severity parameters and adverse cardiac events in a pure NI-DCM patient cohort. Fifty-seven patients with NI-DCM underwent endomyocardial biopsy. Biopsies were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for CD3+, CD45ro+, CD68+, CD4+, CD54+, and HLA-DR+ cells. Blood samples were tested for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and adiponectin. During a five-year follow-up, twenty-seven patients experienced at least one composite adverse cardiac event: left ventricle assist device implantation, heart transplantation or death. Interleukin-6, TNF-α and adiponectin correlated with heart failure severity parameters. Patients with higher levels of interleukin-6, TNF-α, adiponectin or hs-CRP, or a higher number of CD3+ or CD45ro+ cells, had lower survival rates. Interleukin-6, adiponectin, and CD45ro+ cells were independently associated with poor clinical outcomes. All patients who had interleukin-6, TNF-α and adiponectin concentrations above the threshold experienced an adverse cardiac event. Therefore, a combination of these cytokines can identify high-risk NI-DCM patients.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) predicts critical illness and kidney failure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker and risk factor for kidney diseases, with a potential prognostic value in critically ill patients. In this monocentric prospective study, we measured plasma suPAR levels immediately after ICU admission in unselected 237 consecutive patients using a turbidimetric assay. Primary objective was the prognostic value for ICU- and 28-day mortality. Secondary objectives were association with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, coagulation and inflammation markers, AKI-3 and differences in prespecified subgroups. Median suPAR levels were 8.0 ng/mL [25th-75th percentile 4.3-14.4], with lower levels in ICU survivors than non-survivors (6.7 vs. 11.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001). SuPAR levels were higher in COVID-19, kidney disease, moderate-to-severe liver disease, and sepsis. ICU mortality increased by an odds ratio (OR) of 4.7 in patients with the highest compared to lowest quartile suPAR. Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates at 3 months were 63% and 49%, in patients with suPAR below/above 12 ng/mL (log-rank p = 0.027). Due to an observed interaction between SOFA score and suPAR, we performed a random forest method identifying cutoffs. ICU mortality was 53%, 17% and 2% in patients with a SOFA score > 7, SOFA ≤ 7 & suPAR > 8 ng/mL, and SOFA score ≤ 7 & suPAR ≤ 8 ng/mL, respectively. suPAR was a significant predictor for AKI-3 occurrence (OR per doubling 1.89, 95% CI: 1.20-2.98; p = 0.006). suPAR levels at ICU admission may offer additional value for risk stratification especially in ICU patients with moderate organ dysfunction as reflected by a SOFA score ≤ 7.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and lactate as prognostic biomarkers in patients presenting with non-specific chief complaints in the pre-hospital setting - the PRIUS-study

BACKGROUND

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are faced daily with patients presenting with non-specific chief complaints (NSC). Patients presenting with NSCs often have normal vital signs. It has previously been established that NSCs may have a serious underlying condition that has yet to be identified. The aim of the current study was to determine if soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and lactate could be used to identify serious conditions among patients presenting with NSCs to the EMS. The secondary aim was to describe the prognostic value for mortality in the group.

METHOD

A blinded prospective observational cohort study was conducted of patients brought to the ED by ambulance after calling the national emergency number 112 and who were assessed as having NSC by the EMS. Biomarkers were measured during index EMS assessment before transportation to the ED. Patients were followed via EMS and hospital electronic health records. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were included, with a median age of 82 years. A serious condition was present in 15.2% of the patients. Elevated suPAR above 3 ng/ml had a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.17 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 17.3% as being predictive of a prevalent serious condition. Elevated suPAR above 9 ng/ml had LR+ 4.67 and a PPV of 16.7% as being predictive of 30-day mortality. Lactate was not significantly predictive.

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospital suPAR and lactate cannot differentiate serious conditions in need of urgent treatment and assessment in the ED among patients presenting with non-specific chief complaints. suPAR has shown to be predictive of 30-day mortality, which could add some value to the clinical assessment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03089359. Registered 20 March 2017, retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03089359 .

RAGE and αVβ3-integrin are essential for suPAR signaling in podocytes

The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases including primary and recurrent focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), diabetic nephropathy, and acute kidney injuries (AKI). Elevated serum suPAR concentration is a negative prognostic indicator in multiple critical clinical conditions. This study has examined the initial transduction steps used by suPAR in cultured mouse podocytes. We now report that the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) co-immunoprecipitates with αV and β3 integrin subunits, which have been previously shown to initiate suPAR signal transduction at the podocyte cell surface. siRNA knock-down of RAGE attenuated Src phosphorylation evoked by either suPAR or by glycated albumin (AGE-BSA), a prototypical RAGE agonist. suPAR effects on Src phosphorylation were also blocked by the structurally dissimilar RAGE antagonists FPS-ZM1 and azeliragon, as well as by cilengitide, an inhibitor of outside-in signaling through αV-integrins. FPS-ZM1 also blocked Src phosphorylation evoked by AGE-BSA. FPS-ZM1 blocked increases in cell surface TRPC6 abundance, cytosolic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of the small GTPase Rac1 evoked by either suPAR or AGE-BSA. In addition, FPS-ZM1 inhibited Src phosphorylation evoked by serum collected from a patient with recurrent FSGS during a relapse. The magnitude of this inhibition was indistinguishable from the effect produced by a neutralizing antibody against suPAR. These data suggest that orally bioavailable small molecule RAGE antagonists could represent a useful therapeutic strategy for a wide range of clinical conditions associated with elevated serum suPAR, including primary FSGS and AKI.

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of suPAR in Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has the potential to diagnose infectious diseases. Due to the lack of reliable biomarkers and the importance of timely diagnosis for sepsis treatment, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the value of suPAR diagnosis and prognosis for sepsis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies, which reported the value of suPAR diagnosis and/or prognosis in patients with sepsis.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies involving 6,906 patients were included. Sensitivity and specificity of suPAR for diagnosing sepsis were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.86] and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.83), respectively. The area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting mortality were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively, with AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82). In addition, AUC for differentiating sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.76) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.88), respectively.

CONCLUSION

suPAR is a feasible biomarker for timely diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Compared with effective value of procalcitonin (PCT) identified by previous meta-analysis, suPAR has similar clinical guiding value, whereas suPAR exhibits higher specificity, which can facilitate the deficiencies of PCT. suPAR also shows a diagnostic value in differentiating sepsis from SIRS. Considering the lack of biomarkers for sepsis and the similar clinical value of suPAR and PCT, suPAR should be considered as a biomarker in clinical practice for sepsis.

Fibrinolytic System and Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications

Fibrinolysis is a crucial physiological process that helps to maintain a hemostatic balance by counteracting excessive thrombosis. The components of the fibrinolytic system are well established and are associated with a wide array of physiological and pathophysiological processes. The aberrant expression of several components, especially urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its cognate receptor uPAR, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), has shown a direct correlation with increased tumor growth, invasiveness, and metastasis. As a result, targeting the fibrinolytic system has been of great interest in the field of cancer biology. Even though there is a plethora of encouraging preclinical evidence on the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting the key oncogenic components of the fibrinolytic system, none of them made it from “bench to bedside” due to a limited number of clinical trials on them. This review summarizes our existing understanding of the various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies targeting the fibrinolytic system during cancer.

Urine soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor as a potential biomarker of lupus nephritis activity

There is a lack of non-invasive biomarkers to identify lupus nephritis (LN). Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a sensitive biomarker of ongoing inflammation and a potential marker of podocyte dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess urine and plasma suPAR in LN. 14 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with newly diagnosed LN, 8 active SLE patients (SLEDAI >8) without LN and 31 healthy individuals were enrolled. Urine and plasma samples were taken before the initiation of LN induction therapy, and monthly thereafter. Global and renal disease activity were defined using the SLEDAI-2K and the SLEDAI-2K renal domain score, respectively. suPAR concentrations were measured with the suPARnostic Flex ELISA assay. Urine and plasma suPAR levels were elevated in SLE patients with active LN compared with resolved LN and healthy controls. Urine suPAR levels were comparable to healthy controls in active SLE without LN. Urine and plasma suPAR levels were higher before than after the initiation of LN induction therapy. Prospective follow-up measurements also suggested that urine suPAR levels raised again in patients with a relapse of LN according to SLEDAI-2K renal domain score, whereas plasma suPAR levels did not correlate with renal disease activity. Urine suPAR is a promising LN activity biomarker, given its isolated elevation in urine in active LN and pronounced decrease with LN improvement.

Promising Novel Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases remain the most common causes of death globally, according to the World Health Organization. In recent years, a great number of biomarkers have been investigated, whereas only some have gained value in the diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification of different cardiovascular illnesses. As numerous studies have investigated the diagnostic yield of novel biomarkers in various disease entities every year, this review aims to provide an overview of the current status of four promising representatives. In particular, this manuscript refers to soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), growth differentiation factor (GDF-15) and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). These markers are of special interest as they are thought to provide an accurate estimate of cardiovascular risk in certain patient populations, especially those with pre-existing diseases, such as obesity or diabetes mellitus. We sought to give an overview of their function, individual diagnostic and predictive value and determination in the laboratory. A review of the literature regarding the aforementioned cardiovascular biomarkers yielded manifold results with respect to their individual diagnostic and prognostic value. Yet, the clinical relevance of these findings remains unclear, warranting further studies to identify their optimal use in clinical routine.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Cardiac Disease

This review summarizes the published literature referring to the use and validity of the biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) when used for the assessment of patients with cardiac diseases. It is measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in plasma samples. In cardiology a cut-off value range of 3.5 - 4.5 ng/mL has been commonly utilized. Different cut-off values may be applied based on the measuring kit used, the patient population and the clinical setting. A PubMed/Medline search was conducted aiming to identify all publications relevant to the use of suPAR in patients with cardiac diseases. A total of 39 studies were included in this review. suPAR as a marker of inflammation has been used more extensively in recent years, alone or in combination with other biomarkers of inflammation and cardiac pathology in the assessment of patients with acute and chronic cardiac diseases. suPAR is closely related to the pathophysiology of cardiac disease, and a number of publications encourages its use as a valuable biomarker in the assessment of patients presenting to the cardiology service. It may be most valuable in the risk assessment of patients with acute coronary syndromes and congestive heart failure, as suPAR elevation may be an independent predictor of mortality in these conditions. In conclusion, among several biomarkers used for clinical entities with underlying inflammatory pathophysiology including cardiac diseases, suPAR is a novel attractive index for the prognostic risk stratification of cardiac patients. More research is warranted to confirm its diagnostic and prognostic validity, alone or combined with other cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers.

Blood biomarker discovery for autism spectrum disorder: A proteomic analysis

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by deficits in social communication and social interaction and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. Given the lack of specific pharmacological therapy for ASD and the clinical heterogeneity of the disorder, current biomarker research efforts are geared mainly toward identifying markers for determining ASD risk or for assisting with a diagnosis. A wide range of putative biological markers for ASD is currently being investigated. Proteomic analyses indicate that the levels of many proteins in plasma/serum are altered in ASD, suggesting that a panel of proteins may provide a blood biomarker for ASD. Serum samples from 76 boys with ASD and 78 typically developing (TD) boys, 18 months-8 years of age, were analyzed to identify possible early biological markers for ASD. Proteomic analysis of serum was performed using SomaLogic’s SOMAScan^TM assay 1.3K platform. A total of 1,125 proteins were analyzed. There were 86 downregulated proteins and 52 upregulated proteins in ASD (FDR < 0.05). Combining three different algorithms, we found a panel of 9 proteins that identified ASD with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.8599±0.0640, with specificity and sensitivity of 0.8217±0.1178 and 0.835±0.1176, respectively. All 9 proteins were significantly different in ASD compared with TD boys, and were significantly correlated with ASD severity as measured by ADOS total scores. Using machine learning methods, a panel of serum proteins was identified that may be useful as a blood biomarker for ASD in boys. Further verification of the protein biomarker panel with independent test sets is warranted.

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor predicts peripheral artery disease severity and outcomes

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) severity and peripheral artery disease (PAD). We hypothesize an association of PAD severity and suPAR in patients without advanced CKD and further risk stratification according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. For study purposes, suPAR was measured in 334 PAD patients (34% women, age 69 (62-78) years, eGFR 68 ± 20 mL/min/1.72 m2) by commercial ELISA. Patients were followed for 10 years to assess long-term all-cause survival by Cox regression. Higher suPAR levels were associated with lower ankle-brachial index (R = -0.215, p = 0.001) in patients with PAD without media-sclerosis (n = 236). suPAR levels inversely correlated with decreased glomerular filtration rate (R = -0.476, p < 0.001) and directly correlated with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (R = 0.207, p < 0.001). Furthermore, higher suPAR levels associated with a higher KDIGO risk score (p < 0.001). Baseline suPAR was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.40 (95% CI 1.16-1.68), p < 0.001) over 10 years. suPAR remained associated with mortality (HR 1.29 (1.03-1.61), p = 0.026) after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and eGFR. Future research may define a standard role for suPAR assessment in PAD's work-up and treatment, especially in patients with CKD.

Elevated soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor serum levels indicate poor survival following transarterial chemoembolization therapy for hepatic malignancies: An exploratory analysis

Background and Aim

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) represents a standard of care for patients with intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases. However, identification of the ideal candidates for TACE therapy remains challenging. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has recently evolved as a prognostic marker in patients with cancer; however no data on suPAR in the context of TACE exists.

Methods

Serum levels of suPAR were measured by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in n = 48 TACE patients (HCC: n = 38, liver metastases: n = 10) before intervention and 1 day after TACE, as well as in 20 healthy controls.

Results

Serum levels of suPAR were significantly elevated in patients with liver cancer compared to healthy controls. Patients with or without an objective tumor response to TACE therapy had comparable levels of circulating suPAR. Importantly, baseline suPARs above the ideal prognostic cut‐off value (5.39 ng/mL) were a significant prognostic marker for reduced overall survival (OS) following TACE. As such, patients with initial suPAR levels >5.39 ng/mL showed a significantly reduced median OS of only 256 days compared to patients with suPAR serum levels below the cut‐off value (median OS: 611 days). In line with previous data, suPAR serum concentrations correlated with those of creatinine but were independent of tumor entity, leukocyte count, and C‐reactive protein in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Baseline suPAR serum levels provide important information on the postinterventional outcome of liver cancer patients receiving TACE.

Plasma suPAR may help to distinguish between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

SuPAR (soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) is a biomarker reflecting the inflammatory state of the human body. Earlier studies suggest that urinary suPAR/creatinine ratio levels are elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP), and that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) level is elevated in pancreatic cancer (PC). Our aim was to study the levels of P-suPAR in CP in a long-term prospective follow-up setting to explore the possibility of distinguishing between PC and CP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two patient groups were compared. The first group included 83 patients who were prospectively followed up after their first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) for median 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. Twelve patients in this group developed CP during follow-up, and two patients were further excluded from the CP cohort. The second group consisted of 25 patients operated on for suspicion of pancreatic malignancy and final pathological diagnosis of PC. P-suPAR levels were measured and compared within and between these groups.

RESULTS

P-suPAR levels remained low during follow-up despite the development of CP. P-suPAR was significantly higher in PC patients [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.4) ng/mL] than in CP patients [2.6 (1.8-3.6) ng/mL]; p = .014. A cutoff value of 2.8 ng/mL resulted from a ROC curve with area under curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.97), p = .009 in differentiation between PC and CP with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88% and 70% respectively.

CONCLUSION

P-suPAR is higher in patients with PC than in patients with CP, and it could thus be used in differentiating between PC and CP.

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor, Changes of 24-Hour Blood Pressure, and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease

Background

Soluble urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is associated with cardiovascular risks and poor renal outcomes. However, whether elevated suPAR levels are associated with 24‐hour blood pressure patterns or kidney disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear.

Methods and Results

A total of 751 patients with CKD stage 1 to 5 were recruited from CMERC‐HI (Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Etiology Research Center–High Risk) cohort study (2013–2018). The relationship of serum suPAR levels to 24‐hour blood pressure parameters and CKD progression was analyzed. The median serum suPAR level was 1439.0 (interquartile range, 1026.2–2150.1) pg/mL, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 52.8±28.5 mL/min per 1.73 m² at baseline. Patients with higher suPAR levels had significantly higher levels of office, 24‐hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic blood pressure and nighttime diastolic blood pressure than those with lower suPAR levels. The highest suPAR tertile was associated with an increased risk of a reverse dipping pattern (odds ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.27–6.76; P=0.01). During a follow‐up of 43.2 (interquartile range, 27.0–55.6) months, the CKD progression occurred in 271 (36.1%) patients. The highest suPAR tertile was significantly associated with higher risk of CKD progression than the lowest tertile (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.37–3.21; P=0.001). When the relationship was reevaluated with respect to each dipping pattern (dipper, extreme dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper), this association was consistent only in reverse dippers in whom the risk of CKD progression increased (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02–2.01; P=0.03) with every 1‐unit increase in serum suPAR levels.

Conclusions

Elevated suPAR levels are independently associated with CKD progression, and this association is prominent in reverse dippers.

Metabolomics: An emerging potential approach to decipher critical illnesses

Critical illnesses contribute to the maximum morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sepsis/septic shock are the two most common acute illnesses associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Once triggered, both have an identical underlying mechanism, portrayed by inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. The diagnosis of ARDS is based on clinical findings, laboratory tests, and radiological imaging. Blood cultures remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of sepsis, with the limitation of time delay and low positive yield. A combination of biomarkers has been proposed to diagnose and prognosticate these acute disorders with strengths and limitations, but still, the gold standard has been elusive to clinicians. In this review article, we illustrate the potential of metabolomics to unravel biomarkers that can be clinically utilized as a rapid prognostic and diagnostic tool associated with specific patient populations (ARDS and sepsis/septic shock) based on the available scientific data.