Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women

Osteoporosis screening using QCT-based cutoff value of Hounsfield units in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases

PURPOSE

In patients with degenerative lumbar diseases, we aimed to establish the cutoff value of Hounsfield units (HU) for osteoporosis screening on the basis of the relationship between computed tomography (CT) HU value and volume bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT).

METHODS

A total of 136 patients aged ≥ 50 years with degenerative lumbar diseases were retrospectively included. Their QCT-BMD of L1-2 were recorded, and the CT values of L1-2 were measured with the same CT images of QCT. The degree of bone loss was evaluated with the criteria based on QCT-BMD: cutoff value of 80 mg/cm3 for osteoporosis and cutoff value of 120 mg/cm3 for osteopenia. The cutoff of CT value was acquired according to the linear regression equation between CT value and QCT-BMD.

RESULTS

The rate of osteoporosis, osteopenia, normal BMD was 33.8% (46/136), 51.5% (70/136), and 14.7% (20/136), respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients between CT value and QCT-BMD were over 0.9 (P < 0.05). The cutoff of average CT value of L1-2 was calculated and adjusted to 110HU for osteoporosis and 160HU for osteopenia according the equation: average QCT-BMD of L1-2 = 0.76 ✕ average CT value of L1-2-0.46 (R2 = 0.931, P < 0.001). Cutoff value of 110HU was 91.2% (42/46) sensitive and 88.9% (80/90) specific for identifying osteoporosis. The cutoff value of 160HU was 95.0% (19/20) sensitive and 96.6% (112/116) specific for distinguishing normal BMD from abnormal BMD (osteoporosis and osteopenia).

CONCLUSION

The CT value is effective in osteoporosis screening, and the QCT-based cutoff value is 110 HU for osteoporosis and 160 HU for osteopenia in the patients with degenerative lumbar disease.

Can we screen opportunistically for low bone mineral density using CT scans of the shoulder and artificial intelligence?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the CT attenuation of bones seen on shoulder CT scans could be used to predict low bone mineral density (BMD) (osteopenia/osteoporosis), and to compare the performance of two machine learning models to predict low BMD.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated 194 patients aged 50 years or greater (69.2 ± 9.1 years; 170 females) who underwent unenhanced shoulder CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within 1 year of each other between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. The CT attenuation of the humerus, glenoid, coracoid, acromion, clavicle, first, second, and third ribs was obtained using 3D-Slicer. Support vector machines (SVMs) and k-nearest neighbours (kNN) were used to predict low BMD. DeLong test was used to compare the areas under the curve (AUCs).

RESULTS

A CT attenuation of 195.4 Hounsfield Units of the clavicle had a sensitivity of 0.577, specificity of 0.781, and AUC of 0.701 to predict low BMD. In the test dataset, the SVM had sensitivity of 0.686, specificity of 1.00, and AUC of 0.857, while the kNN model had sensitivity of 0.966, specificity of 0.200, and AUC of 0.583. The SVM was superior to the CT attenuation of the clavicle (P = .003) but not better than the kNN model (P = .098).

CONCLUSION

The CT attenuation of the clavicle was best for predicting low BMD; however, a multivariable SVM was superior for predicting low BMD.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

SVM utilizing the CT attenuations at many sites was best for predicting low BMD.

Causal relationship between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration: a univariate and multivariable mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have suggested a possible association between bone mineral density (BMD) and intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), the causal relationship between them remains unclear. Evidence from accumulating studies indicates that they might mutually influence one another. However, observational studies may be affected by potential confounders. Meanwhile, Mendelian randomization (MR) study can overcome these confounders to assess causality.

OBJECTIVES

This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to explore the causal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) on intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD).

METHODS

Summary data from genome-wide association studies of bone mineral density (BMD) and IDD (the FinnGen biobank) have been acquired. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the primary MR analysis approach. Weighted median, MR-Egger regression, weighted mode, and simple mode were used as supplements. The Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) and MR-Egger regression were performed to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Cochran's Q test evaluated heterogeneity. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was further conducted to determine the reliability of the causal relationship. Multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses used multivariable inverse variance-weighted methods to individually and jointly adjust for four potential confounders, body mass index (BMI), Type2 diabetes, hyperthyroidism and smoking. A reverse MR analysis was conducted to assess potential reverse causation.

RESULTS

In the univariate MR analysis, femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD), heel bone mineral density (eBMD), lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD), and total body bone mineral density (TB BMD) had a direct causal effect on intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) [FNBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.17 (1.04 to 1.31), p = 0.008, eBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.06 (1.01 to 1.12), p = 0.028, LSBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.20 (1.10 to 1.31), p = 3.38E-7,TB BMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.20 (1.12 to 1.29), p = 1.0E-8]. In the MVMR analysis, it was revealed that, even after controlling for confounding factors, heel bone mineral density (eBMD), lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD), and total body bone mineral density (TB BMD) still maintained an independent and significant causal association with IDD(Adjusting for heel bone mineral density: beta = 0.073, OR95% CI = 1.08(1.02 to 1.14), P = 0.013; Adjusting for lumbar spine bone mineral density: beta = 0.11, OR(95%CI) = 1.12(1.02 to 1.23), P = 0.03; Adjusting for total body bone mineral density: beta = 0.139, OR95% CI = 1.15(1.06 to 1.24), P = 5.53E - 5). In the reverse analysis, no evidence was found to suggest that IDD has an impact on BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from our univariate and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis establish a substantial positive causal association between BMD and IDD, indicating that higher bone mineral density may be a significant risk factor for intervertebral disc degeneration. Notably, no causal effect of IDD on these four measures of bone mineral density was observed. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing this causal relationship.

Causal relationships between anthropometric traits, bone mineral density, osteoarthritis and spinal stenosis: A Mendelian randomisation investigation

OBJECTIVE

Spinal stenosis is a common condition among older individuals, with significant morbidity attached. Little is known about its risk factors but degenerative conditions, such as osteoarthritis (OA) have been identified for their mechanistic role. This study aims to explore causal relationships between anthropometric risk factors, OA, and spinal stenosis using Mendelian randomisation (MR) techniques.

DESIGN

We applied two-sample MR to investigate the causal relationships between genetic liability for select risk factors and spinal stenosis. Next, we examined the genetic relationship between OA and spinal stenosis with linkage disequilibrium score regression and Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates MR method. Finally, we used multivariable MR (MVMR) to explore whether OA and body mass index (BMI) mediate the causal pathways identified.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed strong evidence for the effect of higher BMI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.41-1.69, p-value = 2.7 × 10-21), waist (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.15-1.79, p-value = 1.5 × 10-3) and hip (OR = 1.50, 95%CI: 1.27-1.78, p-value = 3.3 × 10-6) circumference on spinal stenosis. Strong evidence of causality was also observed for higher bone mineral density (BMD): total body (OR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.12-1.29, p-value = 1.6 × 10-7), femoral neck (OR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.09-1.37, p-value = 7.5×10-7), and lumbar spine (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.25-1.52, p-value = 4.4 × 10-11). We detected high genetic correlations between spinal stenosis and OA (rg range: 0.47-0.66), with Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect estimates results supporting a causal effect of OA on spinal stenosis (ORallOA = 1.6, 95%CI: 1.41-1.79). Direct effects of BMI, BMD on spinal stenosis remained after adjusting for OA in the MVMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic susceptibility to anthropometric risk factors, particularly higher BMI and BMD can increase the risk of spinal stenosis, independent of OA status. These results may inform preventative strategies and treatments.

Preoperative Assessment of Bone Density Using MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score Modified for Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have reported the clinical application of the Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) scores for assessing bone density in operative lumbar spine patients. We aim to explore whether the method could be modified and applicable for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between September 2020 and March 2022 with non-contrast T1-weighted MRI and DEXA were included. Correlation between cervical VBQ scores and DEXA T-scores was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. Student's t test was used to present the discrepancy between the VBQ of patients with normal bone density (T ≥ -1.0) and patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis (T < -1.0). Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients (20 patients with T ≥ -1.0 vs 63 patients with T < -1.0 ) were included. Significant difference was found between the cervical VBQ between groups (2.99 ± .79 vs 3.80 ± .81, P < .001). Interclass correlation coefficient for inter-rater reliability was .82 (95% CI: .70-.93) and .91(95% CI: .84-.97) for intra-rater reliability. The area under the ROC curve was .78 (95% CI: .65-.90). The DEXA T-score of the femoral neck, total hip and the lowest DEXA T-score were found to be significantly correlated with the cervical VBQ score according to Pearson correlation analysis (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to apply the VBQ method to assess the bone density in preoperative cervical spine patients. Cervical VBQ scores were significantly correlated with DEXA T-score. With an overall accuracy of .78, the radiation-free and cost-effective method could be a potential tool for screening patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis before surgery.

Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study

INTRODUCTION

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk despite proven limitations. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is regarded as a sensitive method for diagnosis and follow-up. Pathologic fractures are classified as the main clinical manifestation of osteoporosis. The objective of the study was to compare DXA and QCT to determine their sensitivity and discriminatory power.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 50 years and older were included who had DXA of the lumbar spine and femur and additional QCT of the lumbar spine within 365 days. Fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively examined. BMD measurements were analyzed for the detection of osteoporotic fractures. Sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for calculations. As an indication for a second radiological examination was given, the results were compared with control groups receiving exclusively DXA or QCT for diagnosis or follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, BMD measurements of 404 subjects were analyzed. DXA detected 15 (13.2%) patients having pathologic fractures (n = 114) with normal bone density, 66 (57.9%) with osteopenia, and 33 (28.9%) with osteoporosis. QCT categorized no patients having pathologic fractures with healthy bone density, 14 (12.3%) with osteopenia, and 100 (87.7%) with osteoporosis. T-score DXA, trabecular BMD QCT, and cortical BMD QCT correlated weakly. Trabecular BMD QCT and cortical BMD QCT classified osteoporosis with decreased bone mineral density (AUC 0.680; 95% CI 0.618-0.743 and AUC 0.617; 95% CI 0.553-0.682, respectively). T-score DXA could not predict prevalent pathologic fractures. In control groups, each consisting of 50 patients, DXA and QCT were significant classifiers to predict prevalent pathologic fractures.

CONCLUSION

Our results support that volumetric measurements by QCT in preselected subjects represent a more sensitive method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and prediction of fractures compared to DXA.

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

Detecting whether L1 or other lumbar levels would be excluded from DXA bone mineral density analysis during opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using machine learning

PURPOSE

One or more vertebrae are sometimes excluded from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis if the bone mineral density (BMD) T-score estimates are not consistent with the other lumbar vertebrae BMD T-score estimates. The goal of this study was to build a machine learning framework to identify which vertebrae would be excluded from DXA analysis based on the computed tomography (CT) attenuation of the vertebrae.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 995 patients (69.0% female) aged 50 years or greater with CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis and DXA within 1 year of each other. Volumetric semi-automated segmentation of each vertebral body was performed using 3D-Slicer to obtain the CT attenuation of each vertebra. Radiomic features based on the CT attenuation of the lumbar vertebrae were created. The data were randomly split into training/validation (90%) and test datasets (10%). We used two multivariate machine learning models: a support vector machine (SVM) and a neural net (NN) to predict which vertebra(e) were excluded from DXA analysis.

RESULTS

L1, L2, L3, and L4 were excluded from DXA in 8.7% (87/995), 9.9% (99/995), 32.3% (321/995), and 42.6% (424/995) patients, respectively. The SVM had a higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.803) than the NN (AUC = 0.589) for predicting whether L1 would be excluded from DXA analysis (P = 0.015) in the test dataset. The SVM was better than the NN for predicting whether L2 (AUC = 0.757 compared to AUC = 0.478), L3 (AUC = 0.699 compared to AUC = 0.555), or L4 (AUC = 0.751 compared to AUC = 0.639) were excluded from DXA analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning algorithms could be used to identify which lumbar vertebrae would be excluded from DXA analysis and should not be used for opportunistic CT screening analysis. The SVM was better than the NN for identifying which lumbar vertebra should not be used for opportunistic CT screening analysis.

Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography

Osteoporosis, marked by low bone mineral density (BMD) and a high fracture risk, is a major health issue. Recent progress in medical imaging, especially CT scans, offers new ways of diagnosing and assessing osteoporosis. This review examines the use of AI analysis of CT scans to stratify BMD and diagnose osteoporosis. By summarizing the relevant studies, we aimed to assess the effectiveness, constraints, and potential impact of AI-based osteoporosis classification (severity) via CT. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 39 articles were retrieved from the databases, and the key findings were compiled and summarized, including the regions analyzed, the type of CT imaging, and their efficacy in predicting BMD compared with conventional DXA studies. Important considerations and limitations are also discussed. The overall reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI in classifying osteoporosis using CT images ranged from 61.8% to 99.4%, 41.0% to 100.0%, and 31.0% to 100.0% respectively, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.582 to 0.994. While additional research is necessary to validate the clinical efficacy and reproducibility of these AI tools before incorporating them into routine clinical practice, these studies demonstrate the promising potential of using CT to opportunistically predict and classify osteoporosis without the need for DEXA.

The association of lumbar disc degeneration with lumbar vertebral trabecular volumetric bone mineral density in an urban population of young and middle-aged community-dwelling Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and osteoporosis (OP) are age-related conditions that induce low back pain and have an impact on quality of life. The relationship between LDD and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) is, however, contentious and ever-changing. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between lumbar vertebral volumetric BMD (vBMD) and LDD in an urban population of young and middle-aged community-dwelling Chinese adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

719 participants were recruited from among the subjects enrolled in a 10-year longitudinal study of degeneration of the spine and knee being conducted at the Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. The severity of LDD was graded using the five-grade Pfirrmann classification, and lumbar vertebral vBMD was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The relationship between the grade of intervertebral disc degeneration and lumbar vertebral vBMD was analyzed, and multiple linear regression was performed to adjust for covariates.

RESULTS

The mean lumbar vBMD decreased as the grade of LDD increased (171.5 g/cm3, 147.8 g/cm3, and 124.3 g/cm3, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, a higher LDD stage was associated with a lower mean L2-L4 vBMD, although a statistically significant correlation was observed only in men (standardized coefficient β = - 0.656, P = 0.004). In men, there was a negative correlation between single-vertebra vBMD and degeneration of adjacent intervertebral discs, particularly those involving the L3 vertebra (L2-3 disc: β = - 0.333, P < 0.001, L3-4 disc: β = - 0.398, P < 0.001), as well as the mean grade of the L2-4 discs (β = - 0.448, P < 0.001). However, the L5-S1 disc had a smaller correlation with age than others, and no statistically significant associations with lumbar vBMD were observed in either men (β = - 0.024, P = 0.729) or women (β = - 0.057, P = 0.396).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that the degree of LDD was negatively associated with lumbar trabecular vBMD, although (excepting the L5-S1 disc), the relationship was statistically significant only in men.

Pulse-echo ultrasound measurement in osteoporosis screening: a pilot study in older patients

BACKGROUND

A mere 25% of patients who need treatment for osteoporosis receive appropriate therapy, partly due to the time-consuming and stressful diagnostic workup for older patients with functional decline.

AIMS

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of pulse-echo ultrasound measurement of the lower leg for the detection of osteoporosis in older patients, and evaluate the effect of a proposed diagnostic algorithm.

METHODS

Cortical thickness and the so-called density index (DI) were measured prospectively on the lower leg with a pulse-echo ultrasound (PEUS) device. The accuracy of the device was compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip. We calculated algorithms combining FRAX® scores and PEUS measures as a guide for specific treatment of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-three patients aged on average 81 years (82.1% women, 275/333) were included in the study. The sensitivity of the ultrasound device versus DXA for the detection of osteoporosis was 94.4% (84/89), and the specificity was 59% (144/247). The gender-specific sensitivity was 96.2% (75/78) for women and 81.8% (9/11) for men.

DISCUSSION

Clinical decisions for the specific treatment of osteoporosis could be based on the proposed algorithm, without additional DXA measurements, in 90.9% (303/333) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Older patients with a similar risk profile as in our study population may benefit from PEUS, as it is a non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient diagnostic tool with high accuracy in screening patients for osteoporosis and the risk of fractures.

Increased risks of vertebral fracture and reoperation in primary spinal fusion patients who test positive for osteoporosis by Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

While osteoporosis is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in spinal fusion patients, diagnosing osteoporosis reliably in this population has been challenging due to degenerative changes and spinal deformities. Addressing that challenge, biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT) is a CT-based diagnostic test for osteoporosis that measures both bone mineral density and bone strength (using finite element analysis) at the spine; CT scans taken for spinal evaluation or previous care can be repurposed for the analysis.

PURPOSE

Assess the effectiveness of BCT for preoperatively identifying spinal fusion patients with osteoporosis who are at high risk of reoperation or vertebral fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study in a multi-center integrated managed care system using existing data from patient medical records and imaging archives.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We studied a randomly sampled subset of all adult patients who had any type of primary thoracic (T4 or below) or lumbar fusion between 2005 and 2018. For inclusion, patients with accessible study data needed a preop CT scan without intravenous contrast that contained images (before any instrumentation) of the upper instrumented vertebral level.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reoperation for any reason (primary outcome) or a newly documented vertebral fracture (secondary outcome) occurring up to 5 years after the primary surgery.

METHODS

All study data were extracted using available coded information and CT scans from the medical records. BCT was performed at a centralized lab blinded to the clinical outcomes; patients could test positive for osteoporosis based on either low values of bone strength (vertebral strength ≤ 4,500 N women or 6,500 N men) and/or bone mineral density (vertebral trabecular bone mineral density ≤ 80 mg/cm³ both sexes). Cox proportional hazard ratios were adjusted by age, presence of obesity, and whether the fusion was long (four or more levels fused) or short (3 or fewer levels fused); Kaplan-Meier survival was compared by the log rank test. This project was funded by NIH (R44AR064613) and all physician co-authors and author 1 received salary support from their respective departments. Author 6 is employed by, and author 1 has equity in and consults for, the company that provides the BCT test; the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

RESULTS

For the 469 patients analyzed (298 women, 171 men), median follow-up time was 44.4 months, 11.1% had a reoperation (median time 14.5 months), and 7.7% had a vertebral fracture (median time 2.0 months). Overall, 25.8% of patients tested positive for osteoporosis and no patients under age 50 tested positive. Compared to patients without osteoporosis, those testing positive were at almost five-fold higher risk for vertebral fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval = 2.2-9.7; p<.0001 Kaplan-Meier survival). Of those positive-testing patients, those who tested positive concurrently for low values of both bone strength and bone mineral density (12.6% of patients overall) were at almost four-fold higher risk for reoperation (3.7, 1.9-7.2; Kaplan-Meier survival p<.0001); the remaining positive-testing patients (those who tested positive for low values of either bone strength or bone mineral density but not both) were not at significantly higher risk for reoperation (1.6, 0.7-3.7) but were for vertebral fracture (4.3, 1.9-10.2). For both clinical outcomes, risk remained high for patients who underwent short or long fusion.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting, BCT was effective in identifying primary spinal fusion patients aged 50 or older with osteoporosis who were at elevated risks of reoperation and vertebral fracture.

Association of volatile organic compounds co-exposure with bone health indicators and potential mediators

Limited evidence was found in the associations of volatile organic compound (VOC) exposure with bone health indicators. This study aimed to explore the associations of individual and combined metabolites of VOCs (mVOCs) in urine, a representative of the internal exposure level of VOCs, with bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis (OP) and fracture, and potential mediators. Data of the National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey 2005-2006 and 2013-2014 was used. Multiple linear and logistic regression modeling were performed to analyze the associations of individual mVOC with bone health indicators. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was adopted to select mVOCs that were more relevant to bone health indicators for further weight quantile sum (WQS) analysis used for analyzing the associations between multiple VOC co-exposure and bone health indicators. Mediation analysis was used to identify potential mediators. Seventeen mVOC members with detection rate of >50% in urine of all 3478 participants aged ≥20 years (1829 females) were involved. Levels of most mVOCs were higher in women than men. Eight mVOCs were negatively associated with BMDs, and two and four mVOCs were positively associated with OP and fracture risks, respectively. WQS regression revealed decreased femoral neck BMD (β = -0.010 g/cm², 95% CI: -0.020, -0.0001) and total spine BMD (β = -0.015 g/cm², 95% CI: -0.028, -0.002) in response to increasing mVOC mixture levels. And alkaline phosphatase (ALP), body mass index (BMI), fasting insulin (FI) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL), were mediators in the associations with proportions of mediating effect ranging from 4.6% to 10.2%. Individual and combined VOC (co-)exposure were associated with reduced BMDs in American adults. ALP, BMI, FI and HDL were demonstrated to be mediators in the association of multiple VOC co-exposure with BMD.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a common comorbidity in elderly patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and may increase perioperative complications in orthopedic surgery (e.g., component migration, periprosthetic fractures). As there is no investigation of bone mineral density (BMD) in elderly patients prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe, we investigated this issue with a particular focus on a potential treatment gap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 109 consecutive elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) scheduled for TKA. In addition to a detailed assessment of osteoporosis and osteopenia, the influence of clinical risk factors and radiological OA severity on BMD was evaluated using group comparisons and linear regression models. In addition, we analyzed differences in BMD between patients scheduled for TKA vs. total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Of the included 109 patients, 19 patients (17.4%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis and 50 (45.9%) with osteopenia. In the osteoporotic patients, a clinically relevant underdiagnosis concomitant with a serious treatment gap was observed in 95.0% of the patients. Body mass index, OA grade, and glucocorticoid use were identified as independent factors associated with BMD. No differences in BMD were found between the patients scheduled for TKA vs. THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients, DXA screening should be recommended for patients ≥ 70 years indicated for TKA.

Value of computed tomography Hounsfield units in predicting pedicle screw loosening in the thoracic spine

We evaluated the feasibility of using the Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the vertebral body to predict screw loosening in the thoracic spine. Consecutive patients who underwent thoracic spinal fusion surgery (from 2014 to 2020) were retrospectively identified. Patients with pedicle screw loosening in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on postoperative computed tomography were included in the "loosening" group. The control group comprised an equal number of age-, sex-, and UIV-matched patients without screw loosening. Preoperative HU values at the UIV and lumbar T-scores were compared between the groups; receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for HU values and T-scores to predict screw loosening, and the best cutoff values were determined. The same statistical analyses were performed for each subgroup, i.e., upper (T1-T4) and lower (T9-T12) thoracic levels. Forty-six patients each were included in the loosening and control groups. A significant between-group difference of HU values was noted for the lower thoracic UIV (loosening = 99.3, control = 126.3; p = 0.02) but not for the upper thoracic UIV (loosening = 171.8, control = 146.0, p = 0.70). T-scores did not differ between the groups for the lower (p = 0.14) and upper (p = 0.56) thoracic UIV. For the lower thoracic UIV, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.660 for HUs (p = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.541-0.766) and 0.601 (p = 0.13; 95% CI 0.480-0.713) for T-scores. The optimal cutoff value for HUs was 126.3. Using this cutoff, HU values showed a better positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy compared to T-scores in predicting screw loosening.

Therapeutic Effects of Conservative Treatment with 2-Week Bed Rest for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study

UPDATE

This article was updated on October 19, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1787, in the legend for Figure 2, the sentence that had read "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as 1 - (A/P) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images." now reads "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as (1 - [A/P]) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images." On page 1788, in the section entitled "Data Collection," the sentence that had read "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as 1 - (anterior vertebral wall height/posterior vertebral wall height) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images 9 ." now reads "The vertebral collapse rate (in %) was defined as (1 - [anterior vertebral wall height/posterior vertebral wall height]) × 100, and vertebral instability (in %) was defined as the difference in vertebral collapse rate between the loaded and non-loaded images 9 ." Finally, on page 1791, in Table IV, the footnote for the "Primary outcome" row that had read "N = 113 in the rest group and 99 in the no-rest group." now reads "N = 116 in the rest group and 108 in the no-rest group."

The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the USA and the world. It is a subclinical condition until complicated by fracture(s). These fractures place an enormous medical and personal burden on individuals who suffer from them and take a significant economic toll. Any new fracture in an adult aged 50 years or older signifies imminent elevated risk for subsequent fractures, particularly in the year following the initial fracture. What a patient perceives as an unfortunate accident may be seen as a sentinel event indicative of bone fragility and increased future fracture risk even when the result of considerable trauma. Clinical or subclinical vertebral fractures, the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a 5-fold increased risk for additional vertebral fractures and a 2- to 3-fold increased risk for fractures at other sites. Untreated osteoporosis can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fracture(s), often resulting in disability and premature death. In appropriate patients, treatment with effective antifracture medication prevents fractures and improves outcomes. Primary care providers and medical specialists are critical gatekeepers who can identify fractures and initiate proven osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporosis detection, diagnosis, and treatment should be routine practice in all adult healthcare settings. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) - formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation - first published the Clinician's Guide in 1999 to provide accurate information on osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Since that time, significant improvements have been made in diagnostic technologies and treatments for osteoporosis. Despite these advances, a disturbing gap persists in patient care. At-risk patients are often not screened to establish fracture probability and not educated about fracture prevention. Most concerning, the majority of highest risk women and men who have a fracture(s) are not diagnosed and do not receive effective, FDA-approved therapies. Even those prescribed appropriate therapy are unlikely to take the medication as prescribed. The Clinician's Guide offers concise recommendations regarding prevention, risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years and older. It includes indications for bone densitometry as well as fracture risk thresholds for pharmacologic intervention. Current medications build bone and/or decrease bone breakdown and dramatically reduce incident fractures. All antifracture therapeutics treat but do not cure the disease. Skeletal deterioration resumes sooner or later when a medication is discontinued-sooner for nonbisphosphonates and later for bisphosphonates. Even if normal BMD is achieved, osteoporosis and elevated risk for fracture are still present. The diagnosis of osteoporosis persists even if subsequent DXA T-scores are above - 2.5. Ongoing monitoring and strategic interventions will be necessary if fractures are to be avoided. In addition to pharmacotherapy, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake, weight-bearing and resistance-training exercise, and fall prevention are included in the fracture prevention armamentarium. Where possible, recommendations in this guide are based on evidence from RCTs; however, relevant published data and guidance from expert clinical experience provides the basis for recommendations in those areas where RCT evidence is currently deficient or not applicable to the many osteoporosis patients not considered for RCT participation due to age and morbidity.

Bone Turnover Marker Profiling and Fracture Risk in Older Women: Fracture Risk from Age 75 to 90

PURPOSE

A major challenge in osteoporosis is to identify individuals at high fracture risk. We investigated six bone turnover markers (BTMs) to determine association with specific fracture types; the time-frame for risk prediction and whether these are influenced by age at assessment.

METHODS

Population-based OPRA cohort (n = 1044) was assessed at ages 75, 80, 85 and fractures documented for up to 15 years. Six BTMs were analyzed at each time-point (N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, PINP; total osteocalcin, OC; bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, BALP; C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, CTX; tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, TRAcP5b; urinary osteocalcin). Hazard ratios (HR) for any, major osteoporotic, vertebral and hip fractures were calculated as short (1, 2, 3 years) and long-term risk (5, 10, 15 years).

RESULTS

At 75 year, high CTX levels were associated with an increased risk of all fractures, including major osteoporotic fractures, across most time-frames (HRs ranging: 1.28 to 2.28). PINP was not consistently associated. Urinary osteocalcin was consistently associated with elevated short-term risk (HRs ranging: 1.83-2.72). Other BTMs were directionally in accordance, though not all statistically significant. BTMs were not predictive for hip fractures. Association of all BTMs attenuated over time; at 80 year none were associated with an increased fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

CTX, urinary OC and TRAcP5b are predictive for fracture in a 1 to 3 year, perspective, whereas in the long-term or above age 80 years, BTMs appear less valuable. Resorption markers, particularly CTX, were more consistently associated with fracture risk than formation markers in the very elderly.

Preoperative MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The importance of bone status assessment in spine surgery is well recognized. The current gold standard for assessing bone mineral density is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, DEXA has been shown to overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. Consequently, alternative radiographic measurements using data routinely gathered during preoperative evaluation have been explored for the evaluation of bone quality and fracture risk. Opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and more recently, the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, have both been shown to correlate with DEXA T-scores and predict osteoporotic fractures. However, to date the direct association between VBQ and QCT has not been studied.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ and spine QCT BMD measurements and assess whether the recently described novel VBQ score can predict the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis diagnosed with QCT.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing lumbar fusion from 2014-2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation of the VBQ score with BMD measured by QCT, and association between VBQ score and presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis.

METHODS

Asynchronous QCT measurements were performed. The average L1-L2 BMD was calculated and patients were categorized as either normal BMD (>120 mg/cm³) or osteopenic/osteoporotic (≤120 mg/cm³). The VBQ score was calculated by dividing the median signal intensity of the L1-L4 vertebral bodies by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI images. Inter-observer reliability testing of the VBQ measurements was performed. Demographic data and the VBQ score were compared between the normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic group. To determine the area-under-curve (AUC) of the VBQ score as a predictor of osteopenia/osteoporosis receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. VBQ scores were compared with QCT BMD using the Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients (53% female) were included. The mean age was 62 years and the mean BMI was 28.2 kg/m². The inter-observer reliability of the VBQ measurements was excellent (ICC of 0.90). When comparing the patients with normal QCT BMD to those with osteopenia/osteoporosis, the patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis were significantly older (64.9 vs. 56.7 years, p<.0001). The osteopenic/osteoporotic group had significantly higher VBQ scores (2.6 vs. 2.2, p<.0001). The VBQ score showed a statistically significant negative correlation with QCT BMD (correlation coefficient = -0.358, 95% CI -0.473 - -0.23, p<.001). Using a VBQ score cutoff value of 2.388, the categorical VBQ score yielded a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 57.0% with an AUC of 0.7079 to differentiate patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and with normal BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the VBQ score showed moderate diagnostic ability to differentiate patients with normal BMD versus osteopenic/osteoporotic BMD based on QCT. VBQ may be an interesting adjunct to clinically performed bone density measurements in the future.

Assessment of bone health in patients with prostate cancer using cancer staging computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) values from computed tomography (CT) in cancer staging as a supplementary screening tool for bone health among prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

T-scores of bone mineral density (BMD) in each lumbar vertebra (L1-L4) and hip for newly diagnosed PCa patients (N = 139) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The degenerative changes in each lumbar vertebra were assessed, and the HU values of trabecular bone in axial CT images of each vertebral body (vertebral CT-HU value) were measured using staging CT.

RESULTS

556 vertebrae were analyzed. 326 of 556 (59%) lumbar vertebrae had degenerative changes. The vertebral CT-HU value was positively correlated with the lumbar BMD T-score, with higher correlation coefficients observed in vertebrae without degenerative changes (r = 0.655, N = 230) when compared to vertebrae with degenerative changes (r = 0.575, N = 326). The thresholds matching BMD T-scores of - 2.0 and - 1.5 set by cancer treatment-induced bone loss guidelines were 95 HU and 105 HU, respectively. Based on the intervention threshold (lumbar BMD T-score <  - 1.5), 15.1% of PCa patients required osteoporosis treatment; and, this value increased to 30.9% when L1-L4 CT-HU thresholds that corresponded to BMD T-score <  - 1.5 were used.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar BMD values from DXA may not reflect true bone health in PCa patients who often have lumbar degenerative diseases. Thresholds based on the vertebral CT-HU value can be used as a supplementary method to identify PCa patients who need anti-osteoporosis drugs.

Utility of PINP to monitor osteoporosis treatment in primary care, the POSE study (PINP and Osteoporosis in Sheffield Evaluation)

PURPOSE

In Sheffield (UK), we introduced the PINP monitoring algorithm for the management of osteoporosis treatment delivered in primary care. Our aims were to evaluate whether this algorithm was associated with better osteoporosis outcomes and was cost-effective compared to standard care.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were referral from Sheffield GPs, BMD scans performed between 2012 and 2013 and a report advising initiation of oral bisphosphonate and PINP monitoring. 906 patients were identified and retrospectively divided into Group A (intention to monitor, with baseline PINP, n = 588) and Group B (no intention to monitor, without baseline PINP, n = 318). The model described by Davis and colleagues was used to extrapolate life-time costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

No differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups (age, gender, BMI, BMD and major risk factors for fractures). More patients in Group A started oral treatment (77.4% vs 49.1%; p < 0.001), but there were no differences between groups in the presence of a gap in treatment >3 months or in treatment duration. Patients in Group A were more likely to have follow-up DXA scan at 4-6 years from baseline (46.9% vs 29.2%; p < 0.000) and had a greater increase in total hip BMD (+2.74% vs + 0.42%; p value = 0.003). Fewer new fractures occurred in Group A but this was not statistically significant, but the numbers of fractures were small. Patients in Group A were more likely to change management (p = 0.005) including switching to zoledronate (p = 0.03). The PINP measurement and increased prescribing in Group A resulted in increases in both costs (£30.19) and QALYs (0.0039) relative to Group B, giving an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £7660 in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients monitored with PINP are more likely to start oral bisphosphonate treatment, switch to zoledronate, have follow-up DXA scans and a greater increase of hip BMD. PINP monitoring has the potential to be cost-effective in a UK NHS setting given that interventions with an ICER under £20,000 are generally considered to be cost-effective.

Relationship Between the OF Classification and Radiological Outcome of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures After Kyphoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The OF classification is a new classification for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between preoperative OF subgroups and the postoperative outcome after kyphoplasty in patients with such fractures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent kyphoplasty of a single osteoporotic vertebral fracture were included and divided into groups according to the OF subgroups. Pre- and postoperative plain radiographs were analyzed in regard to the restoration of vertebral body height and local kyphotic angle (LKA). Additionally, clinical data including pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale pain scores was documented. The clinical and radiological results were compared pre- and postoperatively within groups and between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients from OF subgroups 2 to 4 were included (OF 2: n = 58; OF 3: n = 36; OF 4: n = 62). Patients from all groups experienced significant pain relief postoperatively (P < .001). Patients with OF 2 fractures showed a repositioning of the vertebral body height in the anterior and middle portions (both P < .001), but no significant improvement in LKA. For OF 3 and 4 fractures, there was a significant restoration of vertebral body height (P < .001 for both) and a significant improvement of LKA (P < .001 for both). The highest average restoration was noted in the OF 4 group.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher OF subgroup is related to a higher radiological benefit from kyphoplasty. This confirms that the OF classification is an appropriate tool for the preoperative assessment of osteoporotic fractures.

Longitudinal Changes in Bone Mineral Measurements Inside and Outside Radiation Fields Used for Cervical Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE

We compared the magnitude of changes in bone mineral density (BMD), within and outside the radiation field, among women who received pelvic radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for cervical cancer.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In this secondary analysis of a prospective study, we analyzed serial CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from 78 patients who received definitive RT or chemoradiation (CRT) for cervical cancer at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. BMD values at L1, L2, L3 and L4 were measured. We compared changes in BMD within the radiation field (i.e., at L4) with those outside the field (i.e., at L1). Linear mixed models were also used to examine the effect of RT on changes in BMD over time and covariate adjustment.

RESULTS

The median age of the 78 patients was 45.5 years (range 23-88); all received RT and 76 (97%) received concurrent CRT. Treatment was associated with significant declines in BMD in all 4 lumbar vertebral bodies over time (P<0.05), with nadir at 3 months for L4 and at 1 year for L1. Pairwise comparisons at 3 months and 2 years after treatment indicated that BMD in L4 (within the RT field) had improved (P=0.037), but BMD in L1 (outside the RT field) was no different at 3 months and 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant BMD declines were observed in all lumbar vertebral bodies immediately following RT. However, in-field vertebral bodies reached nadir BMD earlier than those located outside the RT field. Our results suggest that treatment and patient-related factors other than RT may contribute to declines in BMD after treatment for cervical cancer. Routine bone density screening and post-RT therapy with hormones may be beneficial for selected patients who receive CRT for cervical cancer.

Discordance in Bone Mineral Density between the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck Is Associated with Renal Dysfunction

PURPOSE

Bone mineral density (BMD) determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is considered a gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. Some people show discordance in BMD values measured at the femur and that at the lumbar spine (LS). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether differences in BMD T-scores between the LS and femur neck (FN) are associated with renal dysfunction in the general population of Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed national data for 17306 adults from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 2008 and 2011. BMD T-score differences between LS and FN (termed BMD offset) were calculated by subtracting FN T-scores from LS T-scores. Diminished renal function was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

RESULTS

Among those aged ≥50 years, BMD offset was negatively associated with eGFR levels. Additionally, eGFR levels decreased linearly across increasing BMD offset quartiles. Men and women with an offset of >1.5 showed a 4.79-times and 2.51-times higher risk of renal dysfunction, respectively, compared to individuals with an offset of ≤0, after adjusting for age, body mass index, educational level, current smoking, and physical activity. In contrast, there was little evidence of an association between renal dysfunction and BMD offset in subjects aged <50 years.

CONCLUSION

Discordance between LS and FN BMDs was significantly associated with renal dysfunction in subjects aged ≥50 years. When assessing bone health in older chronic kidney disease patients, physicians should consider the possibility of BMD discordance between LS and FN.

Functional Validation of Osteoporosis Genetic Findings Using Small Fish Models

The advancement of human genomics has revolutionized our understanding of the genetic architecture of many skeletal diseases, including osteoporosis. However, interpreting results from human association studies remains a challenge, since index variants often reside in non-coding regions of the genome and do not possess an obvious regulatory function. To bridge the gap between genetic association and causality, a systematic functional investigation is necessary, such as the one offered by animal models. These models enable us to identify causal mechanisms, clarify the underlying biology, and apply interventions. Over the past several decades, small teleost fishes, mostly zebrafish and medaka, have emerged as powerful systems for modeling the genetics of human diseases. Due to their amenability to genetic intervention and the highly conserved genetic and physiological features, fish have become indispensable for skeletal genomic studies. The goal of this review is to summarize the evidence supporting the utility of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) for accelerating our understanding of human skeletal genomics and outlining the remaining gaps in knowledge. We provide an overview of zebrafish skeletal morphophysiology and gene homology, shedding light on the advantages of human skeletal genomic exploration and validation. Knowledge of the biology underlying osteoporosis through animal models will lead to the translation into new, better and more effective therapeutic approaches.

Associations of Age at Menopause With Postmenopausal Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Women

CONTEXT

Menopause before age 45 is a risk factor for fractures, but menopause occurs at age ≥45 in ~90% of women.

OBJECTIVE

To determine, in women with menopause at age ≥45, whether (1) years since the final menstrual period (FMP) is more strongly associated with postmenopausal bone mineral density (BMD) than chronological age and (2) lower age at FMP is related to more fractures.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a longitudinal cohort study of the menopause transition (MT).

PARTICIPANTS

A diverse cohort of ambulatory women (pre- or early perimenopausal at baseline, with 15 near-annual follow-up assessments).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postmenopausal lumbar spine (LS) or femoral neck (FN) BMD (n = 1038) and time to fracture (n = 1554).

RESULTS

Adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette use, alcohol intake, baseline LS or FN BMD, baseline MT stage, and study site using multivariable linear regression, each additional year after the FMP was associated with 0.006 g/cm2 (P < 0.0001) and 0.004 g/cm2 (P < 0.0001) lower postmenopausal LS and FN BMD, respectively. Age was not related to FN BMD independent of years since FMP. In Cox proportional hazards regression, accounting for race/ethnicity, BMI, cigarette use, alcohol intake, prior fracture, diabetes status, exposure to bone-modifying medications/supplements, and study site, the hazard for incident fracture was 5% greater for each 1-year decrement in age at FMP (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Years since the FMP is more strongly associated with postmenopausal BMD than chronological age, and earlier menopause is associated with more fractures.

Parathyroid Hormone Disturbances in Postmenopausal Women with Distal Forearm Fracture

Background

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disorder with a wide range of adverse effects, such as osteoporosis. Many women are not diagnosed due to asymptomatic disease or vague symptoms but are still at risk of severe adverse effects. Early identification of patients with PHPT is therefore of importance. The aim of this study was to determine PHPT prevalence among postmenopausal women with a distal forearm fracture.

Methods

Recruitment was conducted in conjunction with the occurrence of a distal forearm fracture at Karolinska University Hospital. In total, 161 postmenopausal women were included in a cross-sectional study with repeated evaluations. Analyzes of serum calcium, ionized calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D were performed. Diagnosis of PHPT was based on clinical evaluations and biochemical definitions of serum calcium and PTH in coherence with previous population prevalence reports.

Results

Mean age was 64.7 (9.5) years, serum calcium 2.33 (0.10) mmol/L, ionized calcium 1.25 (0.05) mmol/L and PTH 54 (26) ng/L. PTH was elevated in 32 (20%) women. In total, 11 (6.8%) women were diagnosed with PHPT; 6 with classical PHPT and 5 with mild PHPT. The prevalence of PHPT was significantly increased compared to the population prevalence of 3.4% (p = 0.022).

Conclusion

Screening postmenopausal women in conjunction with low-energy distal forearm fracture revealed a large number of women with parathyroid disturbance. Evaluation of parathyroid hormone and calcium status in this group of patients seems beneficial.

3D assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration in zebrafish identifies changes in bone density that prime disc disease

Back pain is a common condition with a high social impact and represents a global health burden. Intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) is one of the major causes of back pain; no therapeutics are currently available to reverse this disease. The impact of bone mineral density (BMD) on IVDD has been controversial, with some studies suggesting osteoporosis as causative for IVDD and others suggesting it as protective for IVDD. Functional studies to evaluate the influence of genetic components of BMD in IVDD could highlight opportunities for drug development and repurposing. By taking a holistic 3D approach, we established an aging zebrafish model for spontaneous IVDD. Increased BMD in aging, detected by automated computational analysis, is caused by bone deformities at the endplates. However, aged zebrafish spines showed changes in bone morphology, microstructure, mineral heterogeneity, and increased fragility that resembled osteoporosis. Elements of the discs recapitulated IVDD symptoms found in humans: the intervertebral ligament (equivalent to the annulus fibrosus) showed disorganized collagen fibers and herniation, while the disc center (nucleus pulposus equivalent) showed dehydration and cellular abnormalities. We manipulated BMD in young zebrafish by mutating sp7 and cathepsin K, leading to low and high BMD, respectively. Remarkably, we detected IVDD in both groups, demonstrating that low BMD does not protect against IVDD, and we found a strong correlation between high BMD and IVDD. Deep learning was applied to high-resolution synchrotron µCT image data to analyze osteocyte 3D lacunar distribution and morphology, revealing a role of sp7 in controlling the osteocyte lacunar 3D profile. Our findings suggest potential avenues through which bone quality can be targeted to identify beneficial therapeutics for IVDD.

Effect of T12 Mislabeling as L1 on the Diagnosis of Low BMD at Lumbar Spine

Mislabeling of T12 vertebra as L1 has been shown to reduce L1-L4 bone mineral density (BMD). However, the effect of such mislabeling on the L1-L4 BMD and prevalence of osteoporosis and/or osteopenia in a clinical setting is not known. The study aimed to the effect of mislabelling of T12 as L1 on the L1-L4 BMD and diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or osteopenia. It is a retrospective study done at a tertiary health care center in South India. Database of dual X-ray absorptiometry machine at our center was reviewed and BMD data of men aged more than 50 years and postmenopausal women who underwent BMD during the last 3.5 years were included in the analysis. A total of 570 subjects had undergone BMD testing at the lumbar spine of whom images of the T12 and lower part of the T11 were available for 293 subjects. Six of these with ≤1 eligible vertebra for the calculation of L1-L4 BMD were further excluded from the analysis. The BMD data of the remaining 287 subjects were noted. Later T12 was labeled as L1 and a new set of BMD data was obtained. Using the WHO classification, BMD status was classified as normal BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis for both the analyses. L1-L4 BMD (0.916 ± 0.163 vs 0.937 ± 0.170, p < 0.0001) and T-scores of L1-L4 (-2.23 ± 1.37 vs -2.06 ± 1.43, p < 0.0001) with mislabeling were significantly lower than those measured with correct labeling. BMD status was misclassified by T12 mislabelling as L1 in a total of 30 (10.4%) individuals. Inter-rater agreement between the 2 scenarios for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal BMD was substantial (weighted Kappa: 0.87 [95%CI: 0.83-0.91]). To conclude, mislabeling of T12 as L1 significantly reduces L1-L4 BMD. However, the diagnosis of BMD status by mislabeling has a substantial agreement with that obtained with correct labeling.

Identification of Novel Pleiotropic SNPs Associated with Osteoporosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified hundreds of genetic loci for osteoporosis (OP) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), individually, however, a large proportion of the total trait heritability remains unexplained. Previous studies demonstrated that these two diseases may share some common genetic determination and risk factors, but they were generally focused on individual trait and failed to identify the common variants that play key functional roles in the etiology of these two diseases. Here, we performed a conditional false discovery rate (cFDR) analysis to identify novel pleiotropic variants shared between them by integrating two independent GWASs with summary statistics for total body bone mineral density (TB-BMD, a major risk factor for osteoporosis) (n = 66,628) and RA (n = 58,284). A fine-mapping approach was also applied to identify the most probable causal variants with biological effects on both TB-BMD and RA. As a result, we found 47 independent pleiotropic SNPs shared between TB-BMD and RA, and 40 of them were validated in heel ultrasound estimated BMD (eBMD), femoral neck BMD (FN-BMD) or lumbar spine (LS-BMD). We detected one SNP (rs13299616) was novel and not identified by previous BMD or RA-related studies. Combined with fine-mapping and GWAS-eQTL colocalization analyses, our results suggested that locus 1p13.2 (including PTPN22, MAGI3, PHTF1, and RSBN1) was an important region to regulate TB-BMD and RA simultaneously. These findings provide new insights into the shared biological mechanisms and functional genetic determinants between OP and RA, and novel potential targets for treatment development.

A comparison between femoral neck and LS-BMD with LS-TBS in T2DM patients: a case control study

Background

Despite having higher bone mineral density (BMD) values, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients are at increased risk of fracture. Trabecular bone score (TBS) obtained by evaluating bone microarchitecture might be a more accurate factor for determining bone strength in T2DM patients. In this study, we aimed at investigating the mean values of lumbar spine (LS) TBS, LS-BMD, and femoral neck BMD in T2DM patients and controls, as well as the ability of LS-TBS and BMD in distinguishing between T2DM patients and controls.

Methods

This case-control study was conducted on 150 patients with T2DM (129 women, 21 men) and 484 controls (424 women, 60 men) in Tehran, Iran. LS-TBS along with femoral neck BMD and LS-BMD was computed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images. Diagnostic accuracy and discriminative capacity of LS-TBS, femoral neck BMD, and LS-BMD between the case and control groups were assessed.

Results

T2DM patients showed significantly lower LS-TBS values compared to the control group in the total population and in women. However, in T2DM patients, femoral neck BMD and LS-BMD were found to be significantly higher in the total population and in men, respectively, compared to the control group. Based on area under the curve (AUC) and after adjusting for age and BMI, TBS, LS-BMD, and femoral neck BMD were shown to have the acceptable ability in distinguishing T2DM patients and controls.

Conclusion

Besides higher BMD and lower TBS values in T2DM patients compared to controls, a similar acceptable discriminative ability of LS-TBS, LS-BMD, and femoral neck BMD in differentiating between T2DM patients and controls was observed in the total population and in women.

Characteristics of the DXA Measurements in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Analysis of Over 1000 Patients

Purpose

To explore the characteristics and reliability of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD).

Patients and Methods

A total of 1041 patients aged ≥50 years undergoing lumbar fusion for LDD were reviewed. The BMDs and T-scores of DXA were retrospectively analysed. The diagnosis of osteoporosis was in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Based on the guidelines of International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), an abnormal lumbar segment is identified as having unreliable T-scores when there is more than a 1.0 T-score difference between two adjacent vertebrae.

Results

The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosed on DXA was 42.3%, and it was higher in women than in men (50.2% vs 31.8%, P < 0.001). Increasing age resulted in higher prevalence of osteoporosis in females. The prevalence of osteoporosis significantly declined with increasing BMI. The lowest lumbar T-score was mostly found at L1. Unreliable T-scores were mostly seen in the lower lumbar segment (L3-L4) and were the least common in L1-L2. The average amount of abnormal lumbar segments increased with age (P = 0.003) and BMI (P = 0.021). Furthermore, those with degenerative lumbar scoliosis had more abnormal segments (P < 0.001). Of the 95 patients with at least one fractured vertebra, 39 (41.1%) were not diagnosed as having osteoporosis on lumbar DXA.

Conclusion

Female, older age and low BMI are the risk factors for osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for LDD. Lower lumbar segments, such as L3-L4, are more likely to have unreliable T-scores. Patients with older age, higher BMI or degenerative scoliosis have more abnormal segments with unreliable T-scores. Lumbar DXA measurements are not sensitive enough to identify patients with vertebral fracture.

Increasing fasting glucose and fasting insulin associated with elevated bone mineral density-evidence from cross-sectional and MR studies

We performed a cross-sectional study using the National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) data and a Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using the GWAS summary statistics from European populations. The T2D-related indices (fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting insulin (FI), and insulin resistance (IR)) were found to associate with elevated bone mineral density (BMD).

INTRODUCTION

The known associations amongst FPG, FI, IR, and BMD remain inconsistent. This study aims to explore the abovementioned associations by using cross-sectional and MR designs.

METHODS

Data from adults aged ≥ 20 years (n = 7170) in four rounds of the U.S. NHANES (2005-2010 and 2013-2014) were analysed in this cross-sectional study. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used for statistical analyses. A two-sample MR study was performed using the genome-wide association study summary statistics obtained from the Meta-analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (n = 108,557) and Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis Consortium (n = 32,735) to examine the causality of the FI-BMD association.

RESULTS

Multiple linear regression revealed that FPG was positively associated with the BMDs at the hip, femur neck, and 1st lumbar spine (L1). Multiple logistic regressions revealed that FPG levels were associated with elevated BMDs at the hip and L1, and FI and IR levels were associated with elevated BMD at the hip. Patients with type 2 diabetes had higher hip BMD than those without diabetes. In the MR study, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 0.49 g/cm² (95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.97) in response to per unit increase in log-transformed FI.

CONCLUSION

Findings from our cross-sectional and MR studies revealed the associations between the studied diabetic indices and BMD measurements in the US and European adults.

Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Correlates With Prevalent Fractures, and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the added value of 1/3 radius (1/3R) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by spine and hip sites and its correlation with prevalent fractures and predicted fracture risk.

METHODS

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) with/without trabecular bone score were considered proxy for fracture risk. The contribution of 1/3R to risk prediction was depicted via linear regression models with FRAX score as the dependent variable-first only with central and then with radius T-score as an additional covariate. Significance of change in the explained variance was compared by F-test.

RESULTS

The study included 1453 patients, 86% women, aged 66 ± 10 years. A total of 32% (n = 471) were osteoporotic by spine/hip and 8% (n = 115) by radius only, constituting a 24.4% increase in the number of subjects defined as osteoporotic (n = 586, 40%). Prior fracture prevalence was similar among patients with osteoporosis by spine/hip (17.4%) and radius only (19.1%) (P = .77). FRAX prediction by a regression model using spine/hip T-score yielded explained variance of 51.8% and 49.9% for MOF and 39.8% and 36.4% for hip (with/without trabecular bone score adjustment, respectively). The contribution of 1/3R was statistically significant (P < .001) and slightly increased the explained variance to 52.3% and 50.4% for MOF and 40.9% and 37.4% for hip, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Reclassification of BMD results according to radius measurements results in higher diagnostic output. Prior fractures were equally prevalent among patients with radius-only and classic-site osteoporosis. FRAX tool performance slightly improved by incorporating radius BMD. Whether this approach may lead to a better fracture prediction warrants further prospective evaluation.

More severe phenotype of early-onset osteoporosis associated with recessive form of LRP5 and combination with DKK1 or WNT3A

Background

Early‐onset osteoporosis (EOOP) is defined by low bone mineral density (BMD), which increases the risk of fracture. Although the prevalence of osteoporosis at a young age is unknown, low BMD is highly linked to genetic background. Heterozygous pathogenic variants in low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 5 (LRP5) are associated with EOOP. This study aimed to investigate the genetic profile in patients with EOOP to better understand the variation in phenotype severity by using a targeted gene sequencing panel associated with bone fragility.

Method and Results

We used a sequencing panel with 17 genes reported to be related to bone fragility for analysis of 68 patients with EOOP. We found a high positivity rate of EOOP with LRP5 variants (14 patients, 20.6%). The remaining 79.4% of patients with EOOP but without LRP5 variants showed variable disease severity, as observed in patients with at least one variant in this gene. One patient, with multiple fractures and spine L1‐L4 BMD Z‐score −2.9, carried a novel pathogenic homozygous variant, c.2918T>C, p.(Leu973Pro), without any pseudoglioma. In addition to carrying the LRP5 variant, 2 other patients carried a heterozygous variant in Wnt signaling pathway genes: dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1 (DKK1) [NM_012242.4: c.359G>T, p.(Arg120Leu)] and Wnt family member 3A (WNT3A) [NM_033131.3: c.377G>A, p. (Arg126His)]. As compared with single‐variant LRP5 carriers, double‐variant carriers had a significantly lower BMD Z‐score (−4.1 ± 0.8) and higher mean number of fractures (6.0 ± 2.8 vs. 2.2 ± 1.9). Analysis of the family segregation suggests the inheritance of BMD trait.

Conclusion

Severe forms of EOOP may occur with carriage of 2 pathogenic variants in genes encoding regulators of the Wnt signaling pathway. Two‐variant carriers of Wnt pathway genes had severe EOOP. Moreover, DKK1 and WNT3A genes should be included in next‐generation sequence analyses of bone fragility.

Gene association may occur in the same signaling pathway and can generate a severe bone phenotype in early‐onset osteoporosis. Recessive form associated with lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 5 could be responsible for a stronger phenotype. Interestingly this recessive form is not associated with ocular problems as observed in pseudoglioma osteoporosis or vitreoretinopathy. Assessment of genetics based on an next generation sequencing panel should include WNT3A and DKK1.

Lumbar Scoliosis in Postmenopausal Women Increases with Age but is not Associated with Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

The contribution of lumbar scoliosis to osteoporosis is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to determine the prevalence and relationship of lumbar scoliosis to osteoporosis in aging women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis used dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of randomly selected groups of postmenopausal women (64-68, 74-78, and 84-88 years; N = 300 each) in a university teaching hospital from 2014 to 2019. Lumbar Cobb angle was tested for an association to femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and spine T score, age, weight, and ethnicity. Logistic regression tested an association between scoliosis (Cobb angle > 10°) and osteoporosis (T score ≤ -2.5). Available sequential DXA scans (N = 51) were analyzed for changes in Cobb angle using a linear mixed model of these longitudinal data.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis and Cobb angle both increased with age: from 22% and 4.4 (SD = 7.8) respectively in 64- to 68-year-olds to 32.9% and to 9.7 (SD = 9.2) in women age 84 to 88 years. The prevalence of clinically significant scoliosis rose from 11.5% in the youngest group, to 27.3% and 39.4% in the age 74 to 78 and 84 to 88 cohorts, respectively. Cobb angle increased 0.7° per year of follow-up. After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant association between T scores at any site (TH, FN, or spine) and Cobb angle.

CONCLUSION

Based on screening DXAs, the incidence and degree of lumbar scoliosis increases significantly in women between age 65 and 85 years. There was no association between the incidence of lumbar scoliosis and FN bone density.

Changes in bone mineral density over 10 years in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

To investigate changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 10-year period.

Methods

Consecutive patients with early RA (symptom duration <12 months) were followed according to a structured programme and examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at inclusion and after 2, 5 and 10 years. Mean Z-scores over the study period were estimated using mixed linear effect models. Changes in Z-scores between follow-up visits were analysed using paired T-tests.

Results

At inclusion, 220 patients were examined with DXA. At the femoral neck, the mean Z-score over 10 years was −0.33 (95 % CI −0.57 to −0.08) in men and −0.07 (−0.22 to 0.08) in women. Men had significantly lower BMD at the femoral neck than expected by age at inclusion (intercept Z-score value −0.35; 95 % CI −0.61 to −0.09), whereas there was no such difference in women. At the lumbar spine, the mean Z-score over the study period for men was −0.05 (−0.29 to 0.19) and for women 0.06 (−0.10 to 0.21). In paired comparisons of BMD at different follow-up visits, femoral neck Z-scores for men decreased significantly from inclusion to the 5-year follow-up. After 5 years, no further reduction was seen.

Conclusions

In this observational study of a limited sample, men with early RA had reduced femoral neck BMD at diagnosis, with a further significant but marginal decline during the first 5 years. Lumbar spine BMD Z-scores were not reduced in men or women with early RA. Data on 10-year follow-up were limited.

The Utility of Radiographic Focal Erosions of Hands or Feet in Predicting DXA-defined Osteoporosis of the Hip in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a common comorbidity in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients and can result in estimated double risk of pathological fractures. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is known to decrease with RA because of mechanisms incorporating traditional as well as disease-specific causes. With the advent of newer disease-modifying antirheumatic agents and bone protection medications, it is becoming important to identify those individuals who are at increased risk of developing osteoporosis among RA patients.

AIM

In the current study, we aim to evaluate a multitude of factors including focal erosions on radiographs of hands or feet that can predict osteoporosis in RA patients.

METHODS

After obtaining IRB approval, 26 patients (20 females & 6 males) with a median age of 62 years (95% CI: 57.4 - 66.0) were retrospectively identified from a Rheumatology clinic database with an established diagnosis of RA but not taking osteoporosis medications. A detailed assessment was accomplished including evaluating a number of disease-specific variables, hands/feet radiographs and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

The total hip BMD was lower in RA patients with radiographic erosions (0.862 g/cm2 ± 0.17) compared to those patients without erosions (1.011 g/cm2 ± 0.13). On univariate logistic regression, the presence of radiographic erosions predicted osteoporosis of the hip (p = 0.04). ROC curve demonstrated satisfactory performance of erosions in predicting WHO-defined osteoporosis or osteopenia at the hip (AUC = 0.732).

CONCLUSION

RA patients who show radiographic erosions are more likely to develop hip osteoporosis that may require further intervention.

Gene Expression and RNA Splicing Imputation Identifies Novel Candidate Genes Associated with Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Though genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with osteoporosis related traits, such as bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture, it remains a challenge to interpret their biological functions and underlying biological mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

Integrate diverse expression quantitative trait loci and splicing quantitative trait loci data with several powerful GWAS datasets to identify novel candidate genes associated with osteoporosis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Here, we conducted a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) for total body BMD (TB-BMD) (n = 66 628 for discovery and 7697 for validation) and fracture (53 184 fracture cases and 373 611 controls for discovery and 37 857 cases and 227 116 controls for validation), respectively. We also conducted multi-SNP-based summarized mendelian randomization analysis to further validate our findings.

RESULTS

In total, we detected 88 genes significantly associated with TB-BMD or fracture through expression or ribonucleic acid splicing. Summarized mendelian randomization analysis revealed that 78 of the significant genes may have potential causal effects on TB-BMD or fracture in at least 1 specific tissue. Among them, 64 genes have been reported in previous GWASs or TWASs for osteoporosis, such as ING3, CPED1, and WNT16, as well as 14 novel genes, such as DBF4B, GRN, TMUB2, and UNC93B1.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings provide novel insights into the pathogenesis mechanisms of osteoporosis and highlight the power of a TWAS to identify and prioritize potential causal genes.

Associations between dietary patterns and osteoporosis-related outcomes in older adults: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To describe the associations of baseline dietary pattern scores with falls risk, bone mineral density (BMD), and incident fractures measured over 10 years in older adults.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Dietary patterns were identified using exploratory factor analysis. Femoral neck (FN), hip, and lumbar spine (LS) BMD were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, falls risk z-score using the Physiological Profile Assessment, and incident fractures by self-report. Linear mixed-effects models and log-binomial regression were used to estimate associations between baseline dietary pattern z-scores and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1098 participants at baseline, 567 were retained over 10 years. Four dietary patterns were derived: fruit and vegetable (FV), animal protein (AP), snack, and Western. FV pattern reduced falls risk at baseline by β = 0.05-0.08/SD and the annual decreases of FN and hip BMD were less for higher Western or AP pattern scores in all populations and women. The annual increase in LS of the entire population was greater with higher scores of FV, AP, and Western patterns (all β = 0.001 g/cm²/year/SD, p < 0.05). Higher scores of FV and snack were associated with a higher risk of LS BMD increasing over 10 years (p < 0.05 for all, except snack pattern in men) and incident fracture was not associated with any dietary pattern in the overall cohort and both men and women separately.

CONCLUSIONS

An FV dietary pattern may be beneficial for reducing falls risk. The associations of dietary patterns and BMD are modest in magnitude and did not translate into an improved fracture risk. Associations between diet and LS BMD may reflect osteoarthritis rather than osteoporosis.

Opportunistic use of chest CT for screening osteoporosis and predicting the risk of incidental fracture in breast cancer patients: A retrospective longitudinal study

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of chest computed tomography (CT) for opportunistic screening and longitudinal follow-up of osteoporosis in breast cancer patients, compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The association between L1 vertebral attenuation on chest CT and incidental fracture was also evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed 414 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent both non-enhanced chest CT and DXA within a 3-month interval and had at least two DXA and two chest CT examinations over more than 1 year. The attenuation value of the L1 trabecular bone was measured on an axial CT image and compared to the corresponding DXA T-score. The diagnostic performance of L1 vertebral attenuation on CT for osteoporosis was calculated at different thresholds (90 HU, 100 HU, 110 HU), and the correlation between L1 vertebral attenuation values and DXA T-scores was statistically analyzed. Overall fracture-free survival was estimated and compared with the threshold of 90 HU on CT and -2.5 T-score on DXA. Of 414 patients (median age, 53.0 years), 88 (21.3%) had either vertebral or non-vertebral fractures. The median follow-up duration between initial and final DXA was 902.9 days. There was a moderate correlation between L1 vertebral attenuation value and DXA T-score (ρ = 0.684, CI 0.653–0.712). Fracture-free survival was significantly lower in patients with attenuation values ≤90 HU on CT and T-scores ≤-2.5 on DXA (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that attenuation values ≤90 HU on CT (P < .001), T-scores ≤-2.5 on DXA (P = .003), and age ≥65 years (P = .03) were independent significant prognostic factors associated with overall fracture-free survival. The sensitivities and specificities of L1 attenuation value were 54.9% and 85.8% at 90-HU threshold, 74.0% and78.4% at 100-HU threshold, and 83.9% and 70.1% at 110-HU threshold, respectively. In conclusion, CT can be used for predicting osteoporosis and discriminating incidental fracture risk in breast cancer patients.

Bone mineral density changes after bariatric surgery

INTRODUCTION

Although bariatric surgery is associated with multiple health benefits, decreased bone mass is a known complication of the procedure. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with significant bone loss and increased fracture risk. However, data on the effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on bone mineral changes are sparse. The impact of vitamin D and calcium levels on bone mineral density (BMD) after SG is also unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to include patients who underwent RYGB or SG from 2014 to 2016 at a single institution. Patients were included if bone densitometry was performed preoperatively and within 2 years postoperatively. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and calcium levels were collected preoperatively and at time of bone densitometry scan. BMD and T-score changes at the femoral neck, femoral trochanter, total hip, and lumbar spine were compared between RYGB and SG patients.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included. 24 (60%) of patients underwent RYGB and 16 (40%) patients underwent SG. No statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics was noted between RYGB and SG patients. All measurements, except for serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, were significantly decreased in RYGB patients, postoperatively. All measurements, except for BMD and T-score at the lumbar spine and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, were significantly decreased in SG patients, postoperatively. The extent of decrease in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was significantly associated with decreased BMD (p = 0.049) and T-score (p = 0.032) at the lumbar spine. The extent of decrease in serum calcium was significantly associated with decreased BMD (p = 0.046) at the femoral neck.

CONCLUSION

All patients were found to have decreased BMD after RYGB and SG. Surgery type was not a significant risk factor in BMD change. Despite vitamin D and calcium supplementation in all patients, a decrease in vitamin D and calcium levels were associated with a decrease in BMD. Close follow-up and treatment of vitamin D and calcium levels are warranted in all bariatric patients.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosed using quantitative CT in 296 consecutive lumbar fusion patients

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that increases the risk for fragility fractures. Screening and diagnosis can be achieved by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using quantitative CT tomography (QCT) in the lumbar spine. QCT-derived BMD measurements can be used to diagnose osteopenia or osteoporosis based on American College of Radiology (ACR) thresholds. Many reports exist regarding the disease prevalence in asymptomatic and disease-specific populations; however, osteoporosis/osteopenia prevalence rates in lumbar spine fusion patients without fracture have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to define osteoporosis and osteopenia prevalence in lumbar fusion patients using QCT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospective data was performed. All patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery who had preoperative fine-cut CT scans were eligible. QCT-derived BMD measurements were performed at L1 and L2. The L1-2 average BMD was used to classify patients as having normal findings, osteopenia, or osteoporosis based on ACR criteria. Disease prevalence was calculated. Subgroup analyses based on age, sex, ethnicity, and history of abnormal BMD were performed. Differences between categorical groups were calculated with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Overall, 296 consecutive patients (55.4% female) were studied. The mean age was 63 years (range 21-89 years). There were 248 (83.8%) patients with ages ≥ 50 years. No previous clinical history of abnormal BMD was seen in 212 (71.6%) patients. Osteopenia was present in 129 (43.6%) patients and osteoporosis in 44 (14.9%). There were no prevalence differences between sex or race. Patients ≥ 50 years of age had a significantly higher frequency of osteopenia/osteoporosis than those who were < 50 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In 296 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 14.9% and that for osteopenia was 43.6% diagnosed by QCT. This is the first report of osteoporosis disease prevalence in lumbar fusion patients without vertebral fragility fractures diagnosed by QCT.

Effect of the lumbar scoliosis on the results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

One of the most common causes of lumbar scoliosis in adults is the decreased bone mineral density (BMD). The scoliosis in the lumbar spine has a known effect over the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of the lumbar scoliosis on the results of the DXA scan of the lumbar spine. 1019 women aged ≥40 years underwent a DXA scan of the spine. Age, weight, height, total BMD, total Tscore of the lumbar spine were recorded. The angle of the lumbar scoliosis (Cobb’s angle) was measured from the DXA scan image using a DICOM software. The incidence of lumbar scoliosis in the current study accounts to 12.3%. Women with scoliosis showed significantly higher incidence of discrepancy in BMD T-scores between the adjacent vertebrae by more than 1 SD compared to women without scoliosis, (p=0.046). DXA results of subjects with scoliosis require more detailed evaluation of the T-scores of each vertebra to make a prompt decision about the final diagnosis.

Bone Health Following Bariatric Surgery: An Update

Obesity rates are increasing rapidly, and bariatric surgery is currently the most effective tool for weight loss. Recently, bariatric surgery induced bone loss has gained attention. Such detrimental effect on bone is multifactorial and causes may include nutrient deficiencies, gut and gonadal hormonal changes, mechanical unloading, loss of lean mass, increased bone marrow fat, and increased risk of fall. This review describes the available evidence on bone loss and fracture risk following bariatric surgery and summarizes the guidelines on the topic. Increased bone resorption starts early postsurgery, and bone markers peak at 1-2 yr. Across studies, the drop in areal bone mineral density is inconsistent at the lumbar spine, while a 2%-5% drop at 6 mo and a 6%-10.5% at 9-12 mo are observed at the total hip. Conversely, studies using quantitative CT showed a 6%-7% decrease in volumetric bone mineral density at the lumbar spine at 6-12 mo postsurgery. These studies also report significant bone loss at the radius and tibia, in addition to alteration in bone microarchitecture. Fracture risk increases 2 yr after surgery, more so following malabsorptive procedures. Fractures were reported at axial, weight bearing sites and at appendicular sites. The available evidence is very heterogeneous, and mostly derived from studies on Roux-en-y gastric bypass in premenopausal women. Data on restrictive procedures is scarce. Our findings suggest that the early postoperative phase represents the "golden window" to intervene and promote bone health. More research is needed to determine the effect of different bariatric procedures on bone, to identify optimal interventions to prevent bone loss and to characterize high risk individuals who should be targeted.

The impact of degenerative disc disease on regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

It has been reported that degenerative disc disease (DDD) is associated with higher spinal bone mineral density (BMD) based on previous studies that used dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, DDD is often associated with proliferative bone changes and can lead to an overestimation of BMD measured with DXA. Trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) in the vertebral body measured with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is less affected by those changes and can be a favorable alternative to DXA for patients with degenerative spinal changes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of DDD on regional trabecular vBMDs in the vertebral body measured by QCT.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Cross-sectional observational study at a single academic institution.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

Consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion between 2014 and 2017 who had a routine preoperative CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within a 90-day interval.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Regional trabecular vBMDs in the vertebral body by QCT.

METHODS

QCT measurements were conducted in L1-S1 vertebral trabecular bone. Any apparent sclerotic lesions that might affect vBMD values were excluded from the region of interest. The vBMDs of each level were defined as the average vBMD of the upper and lower vertebrae. To evaluate DDD, Pfirrmann grade, Modic grade, total end plate score, and vacuum phenomenon were documented. Univariate regression analysis and multivariate analyses with a linear mixed model adjusted with individual variability of segmental vBMDs were conducted with vBMD as the response variable.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients and 715 disc levels, 125 patients and 596 discs met our inclusion criteria. Mean vBMD (±standard deviation [SD]) of all levels was 119.0±39.6 mg/cm³. After adjusting for all covariates, Pfirrmann grade was not an independent contributor to vBMD, but the presence of any Modic change (type 1, β=6.8, p≤.001; type 2, β=6.7, p<.001; type 3, β=43.6, p<.001), high TEPS (score 10-12, β=14.2, p<.001), or vacuum phenomenon (β=9.0, p<.001) was shown to be independent contributors to vBMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that the presence of certain end plate lesions (Modic changes and high TEPS) on MRI was significantly associated with increased regional QCT-vBMDs in the vertebral body, but no significant association was observed with disc nucleus pathology, unless it was associated with a vacuum phenomenon. When end plate lesions with Modic changes and high TEPS are present at the measuring level, care must be taken to interpret vBMD values, which might be overestimations even if the trabecular area appears normal.

Assessment of bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans: a retrospective feasibility study in 50 comparing CT and DXA data

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) is a standard diagnostic tool for preoperative screening for many indications in spinal and pelvic surgery. The gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements not only at the lower lumbar, but also at the sacral spine using standard CT scans.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Main inclusion criterion for this retrospective analysis in 50 patients was the availability of both a CT scan of the lumbar and sacral spines and a DXA scan. HUs were measured in intact vertebral bodies L4, L5 and S1. Results of the HU in CT scan were compared to the T-score and bone mineral density in DXA. A group with normal bone density (T-score higher - 1, n = 26) was compared with a group with impaired bone density (T-score lower - 1, n = 24).

RESULTS

A multivariant binary logistic regression analysis showed significant results for HU measurement in L4 (p = 0.009), L5 (p = 0.005) and S1 (p = 0.046) with respect to differentiation between normal and impaired bone quality. Cutoffs between normal and impaired bone density values for trabecular region of interest attenuation for L4, L5 and S1 are presented. In L4 100% sensitivity to detect normal bone was reached when HU was higher than 161, HU higher than 157 in L5 and HU higher than 207 in S1.

CONCLUSIONS

HU measurements in CT scans have proven to be a feasible tool to additionally assess bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine with good sensitivity, when compared with the gold standard DXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Kidney function and its association to imminent, short- and long-term fracture risk-a longitudinal study in older women

Reduced kidney function is associated with an increased fracture risk, although the relationship between an age-related decline and fractures needs further investigation. We followed kidney function and fracture risk for 10 years. A mild-moderate decline in kidney function was associated with fracture, but not in advanced age.

INTRODUCTION

With age, kidney function declines. Though well known that chronic kidney disease is associated with increased fracture risk, the extent to which the typical age-related decline contributes is unclear. In the OPRA cohort, a longitudinal study of older non-selected women, we investigated the association between kidney function and fracture.

METHODS

Cystatin C-based kidney function estimates were available at age 75 (n = 981) and 80 (n = 685). Women were categorized by kidney function: normal (CKD stages 1 and 2), mild-moderate (3a), poor (3b-5), and imminent, short- and long-term fracture risk investigated. BMD measurements and kidney function for risk prediction were also evaluated; women were categorized by both reduced kidney function (stages 3-5) and osteoporosis status.

RESULTS

In the short term, 2-3 years, mild-moderate kidney dysfunction was associated with the highest risk increase: osteoporotic fractures (2 years HRadj 2.21, 95% CI 1.27-3.87) and also up to 5 years (between 75 and 80 years) (HRadj 1.51, 1.04-2.18). Hip fracture risk was similarly increased. This association was not observed from age 80 nor for women with poorest kidney function. Reduced kidney function was associated with higher risk even without osteoporosis (osteoporotic fracture; HRadj 1.66, 1.08-2.54); risk increased by having both osteoporosis and reduced function (HRadj 2.53, 1.52-4.23).

CONCLUSION

Older women with mild-moderate reduction of kidney function are at increased risk of fractures, but not those with the worst function. Our findings furthermore confirm the value of osteoporosis assessment and it is possible that in this age group, age-related decline of kidney function has limited contribution compared with BMD.

The Significant Correlation Between the Density of the Cochlea Otic Capsule and Spine in Hearing Loss Patients

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are systemic disorders that affect all bones. Osteoporosis in the ear bone and cochlea otic capsule contribute to the occurrence of conduction and sensorineural deaf. The osteoporosis prevalence in RSSA is 38%; meanwhile hearing interference in osteoporosis patients is 66.67%. The femur and spine DXA are the golden standard to calculate the bone mineral density. The temporal bone density can be measured with CT scan using the Hounsfield Unit units. There is a hypothesis that the femur bone mass density can illustrate the temporal bone density. This study aimed to analyzes the correlation between the density of the cochlea otic capsule and the ear bone towards the femur and spine density in patients with reduction in bone density. This was a cross-sectional observational type analytic retrospective study analyzing 30 samples of patients with a reduction in bone density that have HRCT Mastoid examination results during 2017 at RSSA Malang's osteoporosis polyclinic. From 30 samples, most were female with an age range of 51-60 years old. The average femur, spine, ear bone and cochlea otic capsule of the osteoporosis group was lower than the osteopenia group. The spine density was significantly correlated with the otic capsule density. There was a positive significant correlation between the spine density towards the otic capsule density. The lower the spine density, the lower the otic capsule became.

The role of bone mineral density in therapeutic decision-making using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): a sub-study of the Taiwan OsteoPorosis Survey (TOPS)

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-based intervention threshold (IT) is widely applied for treatment decision-making; however, an IT based on FRAX without the measurement of bone mass density (BMD) has not been validated. The study demonstrated that estimates of fracture risk by FRAX without BMD were higher than those by FRAX with BMD in women with old age.

INTRODUCTION

BMD is an integral component for bone strength assessment, but age-specific impacts of BMD on fracture risk assessment and therapeutic decision-making remained unclear. We aimed to investigate whether using BMD measurement changed the interpretation of the FRAX-based fracture probability assessment and treatment decision.

METHODOLOGY

The database was provided by the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association (TOA) which conducted a nationwide survey of BMD. We calculated the 10-year major and hip fracture probabilities using the FRAX for each participant, either with (FRAX + BMD) or without BMD (FRAX - BMD). Age-specific individual intervention thresholds (IITs) were established using the FRAX-based fracture risk, equivalent to a woman with a prior fracture. Participants whose FRAX scores of major fracture were greater than or equal to their IITs were deemed suitable for therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 14,007 postmenopausal women were enrolled. Compared with FRAX + BMD, FRAX - BMD predicted lower FRAX scores in major and hip fractures in subjects aged 40-60 years; however, FRAX - BMD estimated higher risks for those aged 61-90 years. The therapeutic decision using FRAX - BMD was concordant to that using FRAX + BMD in 90.5% of the subjects, especially in the younger age group (40-70 years). FRAX - BMD identified more treatment candidates (7.7-16.4%) among those aged 71-90 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The FRAX scores are influenced by age, irrespective of the consideration of BMD. FRAX - BMD is able to identify more subjects for therapeutic intervention in the elderly population. We should reconsider the role of BMD at different ages for therapeutic decision-making.