Phase 2 study of lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Current Status of Immunotherapy in Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aims to present the current landscape of immunotherapy in the management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors and identify ongoing and future targets for improved response.

RECENT FINDINGS

Somatostatin analogs and mTOR inhibitors remain cornerstones of non-surgical treatment, and applications of PRRT in SBNET are promising. Several efforts to replicate the success of immunotherapies in other solid tumors have been attempted in SBNET, with limited responses observed with current immune targets, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Epigenetic analyses have suggested a potential role for methylation and histone acetylation in SBNET tumorigenesis that warrant greater exploration. While the incidence of SBNET continues to increase, the number of effective therapies is few. Further elucidation of targetable components of the SBNET immune microenvironment with greater modulatory effects is necessary to improve outcomes in this growing patient population.

Small-molecule-based targeted therapy in liver cancer

Liver cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging criteria, clinical guidelines provide tutorials to clinical management of liver cancer at their individual stages. However, most patients diagnosed with liver cancer are at advanced stage; therefore, many researchers conduct investigations on targeted therapy, aiming to improve the overall survival of these patients. To date, small-molecule-based targeted therapies are highly recommended (first line: sorafenib and lenvatinib; second line: regorafenib and cabozantinib) by current the clinical guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Herein, we summarize the small-molecule-based targeted therapies in liver cancer, including the approved and preclinical therapies as well as the therapies under clinical trials, and introduce their history of discovery, clinical trials, indications, and molecular mechanisms. For drug resistance, the revealed mechanisms of action and the combination therapies are also discussed. In fact, the known small-molecule-based therapies still have limited clinical benefits to liver cancer patients. Therefore, we analyze the current status and give our ideas for the urgent issues and future directions in this field, suggesting clues for novel techniques in liver cancer treatment.

The impact of lenvatinib on sarcopenia in patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Lenvatinib is a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TKI are suspected of exacerbating muscle loss in patients with cancer. In this study, we analyze the role of muscle loss in patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib. This is a retrospective analysis of a real-life cohort of 25 patients with advanced HCC who were treated with lenvatinib from 2018 to March 2021 in Germany. Patients were stratified for loss of skeletal muscle area during the first three months of lenvatinib therapy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed for all patients, especially regarding loss of muscle before and during the first three months of therapy with lenvatinib. Three months after beginning of therapy with lenvatinib, a significant reduction of muscle mass was observed in 60% of patients (p = 0.035). Despite increase of loss of skeletal muscle, patients benefitted from lenvatinib in our cohort of patients in terms of OS and PFS and did not experience increased toxicity. Furthermore, muscle loss was not a negative predictor of survival in the univariate analysis (p = 0.675). Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma experience muscle loss with lenvatinib therapy. However, despite progressive muscle loss, patients benefit from a therapy with lenvatinib in terms of OS and PFS without increased toxicity. However, assessment and prophylaxis of skeletal muscle status should be recommended during a therapy with lenvatinib.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: post-marketing study

Aim: This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.Materials & methods: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and other safety and effectiveness end points were assessed in patients who initiated lenvatinib according to the approved label in republic of Korea.Results: Among 658 lenvatinib-treated patients, ADRs were reported in 57.8%; ADRs grade ≥3 in 13.5%. The most common grade ≥3 ADRs were asthenia (1.2%) and hepatic encephalopathy (1.2%). Physician-reported tumor responses (n = 511) were complete (1.0%) or partial (12.9%) response and stable (45.2%) or progressive disease (40.9%); objective response rates were higher with longer lenvatinib treatment duration (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Lenvatinib was generally well tolerated and effective in real-world clinical practice in Korea.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05225207.

Oncology Dose Selection in Subsequent Indications: What Can We Learn From FDA-approved Oncology Drugs?

PURPOSE

The modern oncology drug development landscape has shifted away from traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Following their initial approvals, many oncology drugs have been approved in subsequent indications either as monotherapy or in combination to benefit a broader patient population. To date, dose selection strategies for subsequent indications have not been systematically reviewed. This review examines how approved dosing regimens were selected in subsequent indications for FDA-approved oncology drugs.

METHODS

The Drugs@FDA database was used to identify FDA-approved new molecular entities (NMEs) between 2010 and 2023. NMEs with more than 1 approved indication were included in the analysis. In total, the dosing regimens for 67 novel oncology drugs that obtained FDA approvals for multiple indications were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Overall, in subsequent indications, 72% of NMEs used the same or clinically equivalent alternative dosing regimens to those approved in the initial indications. Amongst the 28% of NMEs that used different dosing regimens, safety/tolerability was the leading cause of a dosing regimen changes in both monotherapy and combination therapy settings. Other factors leading to changes in dosing regimens include differences in tumor biology, disease burden, pharmacokinetics, and overall benefit-risk profiles obtained from dose-finding studies.

IMPLICATIONS

Our analysis highlighted the importance of selecting a safe, tolerable, and yet efficacious dosing regimen for the initial indication as a suboptimal initially approved regimen could lead to dosing regimen changes in later indications. Preclinical and clinical data could be leveraged to understand the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic differences between indications and thus support dose selection in subsequent indications.

Evolving treatment landscape in thymic epithelial tumors: From mechanism to therapy

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum that arise from thymic epithelial cells. Although surgery is the preferred treatment for resectable TETs, the options for unresectable or recurrent advanced-stage TETs are limited beyond platinum-based chemotherapy. The evolving landscape of TET treatments is marked by significant advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, particularly with anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While monotherapies demonstrated certain efficacy, the development of combination strategies is vital for improving patient outcomes. This review consolidates progress in anti-angiogenic therapies and ICIs, emphasizing the evolution of combination therapies of TETs. Furtherly, we particularly discuss new first-line strategies based on these advancements and emphasizes exploring novel treatments like antibody-drug conjugates, immunomodulatory drugs and cytokine-based agents for TETs. Mechanistically, the molecular features of TETs integrated with clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy, and immunophenotyping of TETs along with its impact on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy are discussed. Thus, this review systemizes the development in the treatment landscape of TETs, integrating the corresponding molecular and immune mechanisms, aiming to provide new references for the treatment of TETs.

Efficacy of lenvatinib and transarterial chemoembolization combination therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma administered an insufficient dose of early lenvatinib

Recently, the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and efficacy was demonstrated for lenvatinib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a higher RDI of lenvatinib monotherapy indicating a higher efficacy. However, not every patient can tolerate a high RDI during the course of treatment; therefore, add-on combination therapy may be necessary for patients requiring a low RDI. The addition of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to lenvatinib therapy improves clinical outcomes. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus TACE (the LEN-TACE group) with those of lenvatinib alone (the LEN group) in patients with unresectable HCC with a high- or low-RDI. A total of 66 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in the present retrospective study. Eligible patients were those who initiated lenvatinib monotherapy between April 2018 and September 2020. Of these patients, 29 had an 8-week RDI of ≥60%, 6 of which received LEN-TACE. A further 37 patients had an 8-week RDI of <60%, 7 of which received LEN-TACE. In the high-RDI group, both the radiological evaluations and the overall survival (OS) time were improved in those in the low-RDI group. In addition, the median OS of patients treated with LEN-TACE was longer compared with that of patients treated with lenvatinib alone in the low-RDI group (P=0.0467). Therefore, the results of the present study revealed that early TACE should be considered instead of continuing lenvatinib only treatment in patients receiving an insufficient dose of lenvatinib, such as those with an 8-week RDI of <60%.

A real-world drug safety surveillance study of lenvatinib from the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

There is a need to determine lenvatinib-associated real-world adverse events (AEs) as its adverse effects may result in its discontinuation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Lenvatinib-associated AEs were analyzed and quantified and risk signals from the first quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were detected through data mining. Potential targets for lenvatinib-associated cholecystitis, cholangitis, and hepatic encephalopathy were identified by data mining.

RESULT

68 Preferred Terms (PTs) with an important imbalance were kept. Unexpected AEs, such as immune-mediated hepatitis, portal vein thrombosis and adrenal insufficiency were associated with the use of lenvatinib use. Lenvatinib alone was more strongly associated with adrenal insufficiency than lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination. Hepatic encephalopathy was more strongly correlated with drug use when Lenvatinib was administered to male patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Most AEs occurred during the first month after treatment, with a median onset time of 41 days. FGFR4, PDGFRA, and KIT (Lenvatinib targets) are potentially linked to cholecystitis, cholangitis, and hepatic encephalopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified Lenvatinib-associated AEs and discovered new AEs that will be useful for clinical monitoring and risk assessment.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

There is no systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Objective

To examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic ACC.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies of VEGFR inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic ACC from database inception to August 31, 2023.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were prospective clinical trials of recurrent or metastatic ACC treated with VEGFR inhibitors, reporting at least 1 outcome of interest specifically for ACC. Of 1963 identified studies, 17 (0.9%) met inclusion criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed to extract data. Data were pooled using a random-effects generalized linear mixed model with 95% CIs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy outcome was best overall response to VEGFR inhibitors, including objective response, stable disease, or progressive disease (PD). Safety and tolerability outcomes included incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, rates of exit from trial due to PD or drug-related toxic effects, and dose reduction rate (DRR).

Results

A total of 17 studies comprising 560 patients with recurrent or metastatic ACC treated with 10 VEGFR inhibitors were included. The objective response rate was 6% (95% CI, 3%-12%; I2 = 71%) and stable disease was the most frequent best overall response (82%; 95% CI, 74%-87%; I2 = 67%). The 6-month disease control (defined as objective response and stable disease) rate was 54% (95% CI, 45%-62%; I2 = 52%). The rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 53% (95% CI, 42%-64%; I2 = 81%) and of DRR was 59% (95% CI, 40%-76%). Most patients (57%; 95% CI, 44%-70%; I2 = 83%) continued therapy until PD; 21% (95% CI, 15%-28%; I2 = 62%) of patients suspended therapy for toxic effects. In subgroup analysis by specific VEGFR inhibitor, the objective response rate was 14% (95% CI, 7%-25%; I2 = 0%), stable disease rate was 76% (95% CI, 63%-85%; I2 = 0%), proportion treated until PD was 61% (95% CI, 14%-94%; I2 = 94%), and DRR was 78% (95% CI, 66%-87%; I2 = 39%) with lenvatinib. Corresponding axitinib results were objective response rate of 8% (95% CI, 4%-15%; I2 = 0%) and stable disease rate of 85% (95% CI, 72%-92%; I2 = 69%), with 73% (95% CI, 63%-82%; I2 = 0%) of patients treated until PD, and the DRR was 22% (95% CI, 12%-38%; I2 = 77%). Rivoceranib had the highest objective response rate (24%; 95% CI, 7%-57%) but high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 95%) and the lowest rate of patients who continued therapy until PD (35%; 95% CI, 20%-55%; I2 = 90%).

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that VEGFR inhibitors were associated with high rates of disease stabilization in recurrent or metastatic ACC. Of 10 included VEGFR inhibitors, lenvatinib and axitinib were associated with the best combined and consistent efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles, substantiating their inclusion in treatment guidelines.

Adverse Events as Potential Predictive Factors of Activity in Patients with Advanced HCC Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

In the context of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, the correlation between the appearance of adverse events (AEs) and reported efficacy outcomes is well-known and widely investigated. From other pathological settings, we are aware of the prognostic and predictive value of the occurrence of immune-related AEs in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective multicenter real-world study aims to investigate the potential prognostic value of AEs in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the first-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 823 patients from five countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and the Republic of Korea).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 73.3% presented at least one AE during the study period. The most common AEs were proteinuria (29.6%), arterial hypertension (27.2%), and fatigue (26.0%). In all, 17.3% of the AEs were grade (G) 3. One death due to bleeding was reported. The multivariate analysis confirmed the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 [versus G ≥ 2; hazard ratio (HR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.90; p < 0.01] and immunotoxicity G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.24-0.99; p = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.43-0.95; p = 0.01), diarrhea (yes versus no; HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85; p = 0.01), fatigue (yes versus no; HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.65-0.95; p < 0.01), arterial hypertension G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p < 0.01), and proteinuria (yes versus no; HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98; p = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated for other therapies, there is also a correlation between the occurrence of AEs and outcomes for patients with HCC for the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

GDF15: Immunomodulatory Role in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and the sixth most common cancer worldwide. Evidence shows that growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis through various mechanisms. This paper reviews the latest insights into the role of GDF15 in the development of HCC, its role in the immune microenvironment of HCC, and its molecular mechanisms in metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)-related HCC. Additionally, as a serum biomarker for HCC, diagnostic and prognostic value of GDF15 for HCC is summarized. The article elaborates on the immunological effects of GDF15, elucidating its effects on hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), liver fibrosis, as well as its role in HCC metastasis and tumor angiogenesis, and its interactions with anticancer drugs. Based on the impact of GDF15 on the immune response in HCC, future research should identify its signaling pathways, affected immune cells, and tumor microenvironment interactions. Clinical studies correlating GDF15 levels with patient outcomes can aid personalized treatment. Additionally, exploring GDF15-targeted therapies with immunotherapies could improve anti-tumor responses and patient outcomes.

Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in various solid tumors

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in various types of solid tumors.

METHOD

By searching PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang and other databases, all the literatures about the comparison of clinical efficacy of lenvatinib in the treatment of various solid tumors. According to the criteria of inclusion and exclusion of literature, two participants screened the literature, collated the data and evaluated the literature. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis of the included literatures.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included, including 5213 patients. Meta-analysis showed that, in terms of efficacy, the risk (HR) of prolonging PFS in the treatment of various solid tumors in the lenvatinib group was 1.91 times that in the control group (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.58-2.31, p < 0.00001), and the risk (HR) of prolonging OS was 1.27 times that in the single targeted drug group (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.15-1.40, p < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the risk of adverse events in the treatment of various solid tumors in the lenvatinib group was higher than that in the control group, especially in Endocrine Toxicities, Renal/Urinary Toxicities, Vascular Toxicities, Musculoskeletal/a Connective Tissue Toxicities and Metabolism/Nutrition Toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib in various solid tumors can prolong OS and disease PFS of patients, improve the clinical benefit rate and improve the quality of life of patients. At the same time, there is a certain incidence of adverse events, and symptomatic intervention should be given in clinical medication.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in systemic therapies

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is traditionally associated with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Sorafenib, a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was introduced in 2007 as a first-in-class systemic agent for advanced HCC. After sorafenib, a range of targeted therapies and immunotherapies have demonstrated survival benefits in the past 5 years, revolutionizing the treatment landscape of advanced HCC. More recently, evidence of novel combinations of systemic agents with distinct mechanisms has emerged. In particular, combination trials on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab have shown encouraging efficacy. Hence, international societies have revamped their guidelines to incorporate new recommendations for these novel systemic agents. Aside from treatment in advanced HCC, the indications for systemic therapy are expanding. For example, the combination of systemic therapeutics with locoregional therapy (trans-arterial chemoembolization or stereotactic body radiation therapy) has demonstrated promising early results in downstaging HCC. Recent trials have also explored the role of systemic therapy as neoadjuvant treatment for borderline-resectable HCC or as adjuvant treatment to reduce recurrence risk after curative resection. Despite encouraging results from clinical trials, the real-world efficacy of systemic agents in specific patient subgroups (such as patients with advanced cirrhosis, high bleeding risk, renal impairment, or cardiometabolic diseases) remains uncertain. The effect of liver disease etiology on systemic treatment efficacy warrants further research. With an increased understanding of the pathophysiological pathways and accumulation of clinical data, personalized treatment decisions will be possible, and the field of systemic treatment for HCC will continue to evolve.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

The study aims to evaluate the benefits and potential adverse effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A systematic literature search of several databases for relevant studies, published from inception up to May 2023, was performed. Clinical trials investigating TACE combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors compared with other treatment regimens for advanced HCC were included. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Trial sequential analysis was used to determine whether the study results were sufficiently conclusive. Totally thirteen cohort studies comprising 1279 patients were included. The combined use of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) compared with other treatment regimens. The incidences of all-grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Prognostic factor analysis identified treatment options, portal vein tumor thrombus, extrahepatic metastasis, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage as independent prognostic factors for OS. Extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh score, and hepatic vein invasion emerged as independent prognostic factors for PFS. TSA suggested that the available data were adequate for drawing numerical conclusions regarding ORR and DCR. An approach combining TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors appeared to offer significant improvements in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in patients with advanced HCC without significantly increasing the risk for all-grade adverse events.

Chemically engineered mTOR-nanoparticle blockers enhance antitumour efficacy

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly prevalent and deadly type of cancer, and although pharmacotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, therapeutic outcomes are often unsatisfactory. Pharmacological inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been closely associated with HCC regression.

METHODS

Herein, we covalently conjugated AZD8055, a potent mTORC1/2 blocker, with a small panel of unsaturated fatty acids via a dynamically activating linkage to enable aqueous self-assembly of prodrug conjugates to form mTOR nanoblockers. Cell-based experiments were carried out to evaluate the effects of the nanoblocker against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. The orthotopic and subcutaneous HCC mouse models were established to examine its antitumour activity.

FINDINGS

Among several fatty acids as promoieties, linoleic acid-conjugated self-assembling nanoblocker exhibited optimal size distribution and superior physiochemical properties. Compared with free agents, PEGylated AZD8055 nanoblocker (termed AZD NB) was pharmacokinetically optimized after intravenous administration. In vivo investigations confirmed that AZD NB significantly suppressed tumour outgrowth in subcutaneous HCCLM3 xenograft, Hepatoma-22, and orthotopic Hepa1-6 liver tumour models. Strikingly, treatment with AZD NB, but not free agent, increased intratumour infiltration of IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells and CD8+ memory T cells, suggesting a potential role of the mTOR nanoblocker to remodel the tumour microenvironment. Overall, a single conjugation with fatty acid transformed a hydrophobic mTOR blocker into a systemically injectable nanomedicine, representing a facile and generalizable strategy for improving the therapeutic index of mTOR inhibition-based cancer therapy.

INTERPRETATION

The mTOR inhibition by chemically engineered nanoblocker presented here had enhanced efficacy against tumours compared with the pristine drug and thus has the potential to improve the survival outcomes of patients with HCC. Additionally, this new nanosystem derived from co-assembling of small-molecule prodrug entities can serve as a delivery platform for the synergistic co-administration of distinct pharmaceutical agents.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171368,81721091), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ21H180001), the Jinan Provincial Laboratory Research Project of Microecological Biomedicine (JNL-2022039c and JNL-2022010B), State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases (zz202310), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023ZD59).

Intestinal Microbiome Associated with Efficacy of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has become the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no studies have reported on specific intestinal microbiota associated with the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. In this study, we analyzed fecal samples collected before treatment to investigate the relationship between the intestinal microbiome and the efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. A total of 37 patients with advanced HCC who were treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab were enrolled. Fecal samples were collected from the patients, and they were divided into responder (n = 28) and non-responder (n = 9) groups. We compared the intestinal microbiota of the two groups and analyzed the intestinal bacteria associated with prognosis using QIIME2. The alpha and beta diversities were not significantly different between both groups, and the proportion of microbiota was similar. The relative abundance of Bacteroides stercoris and Parabacteroides merdae was higher in the responder group than in the non-responder group. When the prognosis was analyzed by the presence or absence of those bacteria, patients without both had a significantly poorer prognosis. Differences in intestinal microbiome are involved in the therapeutic effect of atezolizumab and bevacizumab.

Prognoses of Patients Treated With Surgical Therapy Versus Continuation of Local-Plus-Systemic Therapy Following Successful Down-Staging of Intermediate-Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

The difference in the prognoses between treatment with surgical therapy and continuation of local-plus-systemic therapy following successful down-staging of intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

METHODS

Data of 405 patients with intermediate-advanced HCC treated at 30 hospitals across China from January 2017 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received local-plus-systemic therapy and were divided into the surgical (n = 100) and nonsurgical groups (n = 305) according to whether they received surgical therapy. The differences between long-term prognoses of the 2 groups were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed in 173 HCC patients who met the criteria for surgical resection following down-staging.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis of all patients showed that surgical therapy, hazard ratio (HR): 0.289, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.136-0.613) was a protective factor for overall survival (OS), but not for event-free survival (EFS). Multivariable analysis of 173 intermediate-advanced HCC patients who met the criteria for surgical resection after conversion therapy showed that surgical therapy (HR: 0.282, 95% CI, 0.121-0.655) was a protective factor for OS, but not for EFS. Similar results were obtained after propensity score matching. For patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (HR: 0.171, 95% CI, 0.039-0.751) and C (HR: 0.269, 95% CI, 0.085-0.854), surgical therapy was also a protective factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, for patients with intermediate-advanced HCC who underwent local-plus-systemic therapies, surgical therapy is a protective factor for long-term prognosis and can prolong OS, and for those who met the surgical resection criteria after conversion therapy, surgical therapy is recommended.

Cardiovascular toxicities following the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in hepatocellular cancer patients: a retrospective, pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac adverse events (AEs) are common in tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs). This study explored the cardiac AEs of TKIs through the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were utilized for data mining of the suspected cardiac AEs of TKIs, based on FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 4708 cardiac AEs reports of sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, and cabozantinib were identified. Hypertension accounts for the most reported cardiac AE. Lenvatinib appears to induce cardiac failure with the highest signals strength [ROR = 7.7 (3.46,17.17)]. Acute myocardial infarction was detected in lenvatinib [ROR = 7.91 (5.64,11.09)] and sorafenib [ROR = 2.22 (1.74, 2.84)]. Acute coronary syndrome was detected in lenvatinib [ROR = 11.57 (6.84, 19.58)] and sorafenib [ROR = 2.81 (1.87,4.24)]. Atrial fibrillation was detected in sorafenib [ROR = 1.82 (1.55,2.14)] and regorafenib [ROR = 1.36 (1.03,1.81)]. Meanwhile, aortic dissections were detected in sorafenib [ROR = 5.08 (3.31,7.8)] and regorafenib [ROR = 3.39 (1.52,7.56)]. Most patients developed hypertension and cardiac failure within 30 days of initiating TKI treatments. Patients taking lenvatinib had an increased incidence of developing acute coronary syndrome after 180 days of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of FAERS data provides a precise profile on the characteristics of cardiac AEs associated with different TKI regimens. Distinct monitoring and appropriate management are needed in the care of TKI recipients.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary liver cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated adrenal insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a rare, but potentially serious adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aims to examine the incidence, clinical features and the clinical correlation between occurrence of AI and efficacy in primary liver cancer (PLC) patients treated with ICIs; and to evaluate the significance of the continuation of ICIs treatment in PLC patients who developed AI.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and March 2022, 47 PLC patients with ICIs-associated AI (AI cohort) were screened from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan university, a general hospital in China. Between December 2019 and August 2021, 419 PLC patients who were treated with ICIs were reviewed to identify those without immune- associated adverse events (irAEs) (control cohort). Clinical features and outcomes of the PLC patients from the two cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

Totally, 47 PLC patients with AI (AI cohort) and 63 PLC patients without irAEs (control cohort) were included. The incidence of grades 3-4 of AI and all irAEs were 40.4 % and 48.9 %, respectively. The median three-year survival was significantly longer in the AI cohort than that in the control cohort (26.3 months (95 % CI: 18.9--33.5) vs.16.1 months (95 % CI:10.4--21.7); p = 0.021). Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression model showed that the development of AI remained significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.561; p = 0.033) in the adjusted regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that PLC patients undergoing ICIs therapy and developing AI after ICIs treatment had favorable survival outcomes compared to those without irAEs.

Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of a Novel Teoptinib Derivative as an Effective Anti-hepatocellular Carcinoma Agent

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a type of liver cancer known for its poor prognosis and high mortality. Teoptinib is a highly selective MET inhibitor that has been used in the treatment of liver cancer. Although good progress has been made in clinical treatment, further improvement is still needed. In this study, a series of novel Teoptinib derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as anti-cancer agents for the treatment of liver cancer, and an oral nanodrug delivery system was also explored.

METHODS

A series of novel Teoptinib derivatives were synthesized, and an oral nanodrug delivery system was also explored. HPLC, high-resolution mass spectrometer and NMR were used to determine the structure and molecular formula of the synthesized compounds. Zeta potential assay was used to access the particle size distribution and zeta potential of the nanoparticles. MTT assay, cell colony formation assay, cell apoptosis inhibition assay, cell scratch assay, and the MHCC-97H xenograft model of nude mice assay were used to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity of the synthesized compounds.

RESULTS

Compound (R)-10 showed the best antitumor activity with 0.010 μM of the IC50 value against MHCC-97H, a human liver cancer cell line with high c-Met expression. The MHCC-97H xenograft model of nude mice assay showed that nano-prodrug of compound (R)-10 exhibited good in vivo activity with 87.67% of the TGI at the dosage of 8 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

We designed and synthesized a series of c-Met inhibitors containing different side chains and chiral centers as anti-liver cancer agents. Among them, compound (R)-10 shows a promising effect as a lead molecule for further study in the treatment of liver cancer. The successful incorporation of (R)-10 into a novel oral nanodrug delivery system highlights the importance of effective drug delivery systems for enhanced therapeutic efficacy.

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of camrelizumab plus lenvatinib in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma surgery

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus different targeted drugs in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery.

Patients and methods

This retrospective cohort study included HCC patients who, after undergoing failed postoperative adjuvant lenvatinib therapy, received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (C group, n = 97), camrelizumab plus oral apatinib 250 mg daily (C+A group, n = 125), camrelizumab plus oral lenvatinib 12 mg daily (for bodyweight ≥60 kg)/lenvatinib 8 mg daily (for bodyweight <60 kg) (C+L group, n = 120), or camrelizumab plus oral sorafenib 400 mg bi-daily (C+S group, n = 114) between October 2020 and October 2021. The outcomes including the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. The median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), 6-month OS rate, 12-month OS rate, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

As of 31 May 2022 with last follow-up time, the ORR was 17.2% for the C group, 44.6% for the C+A group, 47.9% for the C+L group, and 36.3% for the C+S group. The DCR was 72.0% for the C group, 81.8% for the C+A group, 85.5% for the C+L group, and 77.9% for the C+S group. The mPFS was 11.0 months (10.1-12.8) for the C group, 14.0 months (12.7-16.5) for the C+A group, 18.0 months (16.9-20.1) for the C+L group, and 12.0 months (9.7-14.4) for the C+S group. The mOS was 13.0 months (11.6-15.3) for the C group, 17.0 months (15.8-19.4) for the C+A group, 19.0 months (17.7-20.2) for the C+L group, and 15.0 months (14.1-17.3) for the C+S group. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 patients (14.4%) for the C group, 10 patients (8.0%) for the C+A group, 5 patients (4.2%) for the C+L group, and 11 patients (9.6%) for the C+S group. The most common adverse events were fatigue and transaminitis.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib as adjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in HCC patients. It might be a potential adjuvant therapy or second-line treatment for these patients.

Role of Immunological Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Disease and Associated Pathways

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the predominant causes of cancer-related mortality across the globe. It is attributed to obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, smoking, and infection by the hepatitis virus. Early diagnosis of HCC is essential, and local treatments such as surgical excision and percutaneous ablation are effective. Palliative systemic therapy, primarily with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Sorafenib, is used in advanced cases. However, the prognosis for advanced HCC remains poor. This Review additionally describes the pathophysiological mechanisms of HCC, which include aberrant molecular signaling, genomic instability, persistent inflammation, and the paradoxical position of the immune system in promoting and suppressing HCC. The paper concludes by discussing the growing body of research on the relationship between mitochondria and HCC, suggesting that mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to the progression of HCC. This Review focuses on immunological interactions between different mechanisms of HCC progression, including obesity, viral infection, and alcohol consumption.

Prognostic Significance of C-Reactive Protein in Lenvatinib-Treated Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is an established biomarker for acute inflammation and has been identified as a prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the significance of the serum CRP level, specifically in HCC patients treated with lenvatinib, remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 HCC patients who received lenvatinib treatment at six centers. Clinical characteristics were assessed to identify clinical associations between serum CRP and HCC prognosis.

RESULTS

The median overall serum CRP level was 0.29 mg/dL. The cohort was divided into two groups: the low-CRP group with a serum CRP < 0.5 mg/dL and the high-CRP group with a serum CRP ≥ 0.5 mg/dL. The low-CRP group exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the high-CRP group (22.9 vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for progression-free survival (PFS) between the high- and low-CRP groups (9.8 vs. 8.4 months, p = 0.411), while time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was significantly longer in the low-CRP group (8.5 vs. 4.4 months, p = 0.007). The discontinuation rate due to poor performance status was significantly higher in the high-CRP group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A baseline serum CRP level exceeding 0.5 mg/dL was identified as an unfavorable prognostic factor in HCC patients receiving lenvatinib treatment.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Conversion Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 244 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib (LEN) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Atezo + Bev) to examine the characteristics, treatment courses, and prognoses. The cases of patients who could achieve HCC downstaging from Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C to A or zero indicated the need for conversion therapy. The patients' prognoses with and without conversion therapy were compared. Of the 244 patients, 12 (4.9%) underwent conversion therapy, six out of 131 (4.6%) were treated with LEN, and six out of 113 (5.3%) were treated with Atezo + Bev. Eleven patients (91.7%) with a modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) grade 1 or 2a and BCLC-B stage showed significantly higher rates of transition during conversion therapy (p < 0.05). The patients undergoing conversion therapy had a significantly longer median overall survival rate than those receiving chemotherapy alone (1208 [1064-NA] vs. 569 [466-704] days, p < 0.01). A comparison of the patients who achieved a partial response with and without conversion was evaluated using propensity score matching to reduce the confounding factors, showing a significant survival benefit in the conversion group (1208 [1064-NA] vs. 665 days, p < 0.01). Among the patients with u-HCC who were treated with LEN and Atezo + Bev, those with mALBI 1 + 2a and BCLC-B were likely to achieve conversion therapy with downstaging.

Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Lenvatinib following Immunotherapy: A Real World Evidence Study

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is an FDA-approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting. Recent trial data have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as well as tremelimumab plus durvalumab as preferred first-line treatment options for advanced HCC. The role of lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021 at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who received immunotherapy followed by lenvatinib. Median overall survival and progression-free survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and responses were determined using RECIST 1.1. Adverse events were determined using CTCAE v 4.0.

RESULTS

We identified 53 patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy. Forty five (85%) patients had a Child Pugh class A at diagnosis, while 30 (58%) patients were still Child Pugh A at time of lenvatinib initiation. Lenvatinib was administered as a second-line treatment in 85% of the patients. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-6.6), and the median OS from the time of lenvatinib initiation was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.7-19.5). In patients with Child Pugh class A, the median OS and PFS was 14 and 5.2 months, respectively. Race, gender, and Child Pugh class was associated with OS on multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

Our study, using real-world data, suggests that patients benefit from treatment with lenvatinib following progression on immunotherapy in advanced HCC. The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown, and these results need to be validated in a clinical trial.

Hot and cold tumors: Immunological features and the therapeutic strategies

The "hotness" or "coldness" of the tumors are determined by the information of the cancer cells themselves, tumor immune characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and signaling mechanisms, which are key factors affecting cancer patients' clinical efficacy. The switch mechanism of "hotness" and "coldness" and its corresponding pathological characteristics and treatment strategies are the frontier and hot spot of tumor treatment. How to distinguish the "hotness" or "coldness" effectively and clarify the causes, microenvironment state, and characteristics are very important for the tumor response and efficacy treatments. Starting from the concept of hot and cold tumor, this review systematically summarized the molecular characteristics, influencing factors, and therapeutic strategies of "hot and cold tumors," and analyzed the immunophenotypes, the tumor microenvironment, the signaling pathways, and the molecular markers that contribute to "hot and cold tumors" in details. Different therapeutic strategies for "cold and hot tumors" based on clinical efficacy were analyzed with drug targets and proteins for "cold and hot tumors." Furthermore, this review combines the therapeutic strategies of different "hot and cold tumors" with traditional medicine and modern medicine, to provide a basis and guidance for clinical decision-making of cancer treatment.

Understanding sorafenib-induced ferroptosis and resistance mechanisms: Implications for cancer therapy

Sorafenib is an important first-line treatment option for liver cancer due to its well-characterized safety profile. While novel first-line drugs may have better efficacy than Sorafenib, they also have limitations such as worse safety and cost-effectiveness. In addition to inducing apoptosis, Sorafenib can also trigger ferroptosis, which has recently been recognized as an immunogenic cell death, unleashing new possibilities for cancer treatment. However, resistance to Sorafenib-induced ferroptosis remains a major challenge. To overcome this resistance and augment the efficacy of Sorafenib, a wide range of nanomedicines has been developed to amplify its pro-ferroptotic effects. This review highlights the mechanisms underlying Sorafenib-triggered ferroptosis and its resistance, and outlines innovative strategies, particularly nanomedicines, to overcome ferroptosis resistance. Moreover, we summarize molecular biomarkers that signify resistance to Sorafenib-mediated ferroptosis, which can assist in predicting therapeutic outcomes.

Combined immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: How to maximize immune checkpoint blockade synergic anti-tumor effect

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of liver cancer and has an increasing incidence worldwide. The management of HCC still has many restrictions, despite the fact that there are now numerous treatment options, including liver transplantation/resection, locoregional treatments (LRT), and systemic medication. As a turning point in the history of cancer treatment, the discovery of the immune checkpoints and the development of their inhibitors provide new hope for HCC patients. However, limited objective response rate and insignificant overall survival improvement are still urgent problems to be solved for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Combination therapies are considered a solution for improving the effectiveness and response rate of ICIs, and several forms of combination treatments are currently being actively researched. In this review, we summarize the mainstream combination strategies, explain their theoretical basis, introduce several important and ongoing clinical trials, and suggest some potential future paths in this area at the conclusion of the review. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: Not applicable.

Donafenib and GSK-J4 Synergistically Induce Ferroptosis in Liver Cancer by Upregulating HMOX1 Expression

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Donafenib is a multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC, but its clinical effect is very limited. Here, through integrated screening of a small-molecule inhibitor library and a druggable CRISPR library, that GSK-J4 is synthetically lethal with donafenib in liver cancer is shown. This synergistic lethality is validated in multiple HCC models, including xenograft, orthotopically induced HCC, patient-derived xenograft, and organoid models. Furthermore, co-treatment with donafenib and GSK-J4 resulted in cell death mainly via ferroptosis. Mechanistically, through integrated RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) analyses, that donafenib and GSK-J4 synergistically promoted the expression of HMOX1 and increased the intracellular Fe2+ level is found, eventually leading to ferroptosis. Additionally, through cleavage under targets & tagmentation followed by sequencing (CUT&Tag-seq), it is found that the enhancer regions upstream of HMOX1 promoter significantly increased under donafenib and GSK-J4 co-treatment. A chromosome conformation capture assay confirmed that the increased expression of HMOX1 is caused by the significantly enhanced interaction between the promoter and upstream enhancer under dual-drug combination. Taken together, this study elucidates a new synergistic lethal interaction in liver cancer.

Efficacy of the Combination of Systemic Sequential Therapy and Locoregional Therapy in the Long-Term Survival of Patients with BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a combination of systemic sequential therapy and locoregional therapy on the long-term survival of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients with intrahepatic target nodules who had initially received systemic therapy (lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab) were reviewed. The clinical impact of the combined use of systemic sequential therapy and locoregional therapy was evaluated by determining overall survival (OS). The combined use of systemic sequential therapy with more than two agents and locoregional treatment was defined as multidisciplinary combination therapy (MCT), while only systemic sequential therapy and repeated locoregional-treatment was defined as a single treatment procedure (STP).

RESULTS

R0 resection, MCT, and STP resulted in significantly better OS compared with no additional treatment (median OS, not reached vs. 18.2 months and 12.6 vs. 8.1 months, respectively; p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the use of R0 resection and MCT were associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.053, p = 0.006 and 0.189, p < 0.001, respectively) compared with that for STP (HR; 0.279, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

MCT is may effective in patients with BCLC stage C HCC and intrahepatic target nodules who have previously received systemic therapy-based treatment.

Pretreatment Proteinuria Predicts the Prognosis of Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is a common adverse event in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether the presence of pretreatment proteinuria affects the clinical course is still unclear.

METHOD

From 2011 to 2022, 321 patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with systemic therapy as first-line treatment were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively analyzed the presence of pretreatment proteinuria and the treatment course of systemic therapy.

RESULTS

In the cohort, 190 patients were tested for proteinuria qualitatively within 3 months before systemic therapy; 75 were treated with sorafenib, 72 were treated with lenvatinib, and 43 were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Overall survival tended to be longer for patients treated with lenvatinib and significantly longer with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients without pretreatment proteinuria but not for those treated with sorafenib. Further analysis was performed in 111 patients treated with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab who had proteinuria measured quantitatively. Multivariate analysis including proteinuria, liver function, and HCC stage revealed that the severity of proteinuria was an independent predictor of prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment proteinuria predicts a poorer prognosis in patients with unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab but not in those treated with sorafenib.

RNF2 inhibits E-Cadherin transcription to promote hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via inducing histone mono-ubiquitination

RNF2 is a RING domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase that mediate histone H2A mono-ubiquitination to repress gene transcription, but its expression patterns and molecular function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. Herein, we extracted data from TGCA database and validated RNF2 expression in our own cohort, which revealed that RNF2 was highly expressed in HCC and was associated with malignant characteristics and poor prognosis of HCC. Moreover, RNF2 was demonstrated to promote HCC metastasis via enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, RNF2 repressed E-Cadherin transcription by increasing the deposition of H2K119ub at the E-Cadherin promoter region. In addition, RNF2-regulated crosstalk between H2AK119ub, H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 synergistically reduced E-Cadherin transcription, which promoted EMT and HCC metastasis. These results indicate that RNF2 played an oncogenic role in HCC progression via inducing EMT, and RNF2 could be a potential therapeutic target for HCC.

Significance of Physical Status and Liver Function Reserve for Outcome of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Lenvatinib Treatment

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain the primary therapeutic option for patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the selection of a suitable TKI is an issue in real-world clinical practice. Thus, this study aimed to identify patients most likely to benefit from lenvatinib treatment.

Methods

A retrospective review of 143 patients with unresectable advanced-stage HCC treated with lenvatinib between January 2020 and December 2021 was performed. Outcomes related to lenvatinib treatment were measured, and the clinical parameters affecting prognosis were analyzed.

Results

Overall, the median time of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 months and 17.7 months, respectively. Prognostic analyses found that Child-Pugh score > 5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-3.80, p = 0.001) was a significant factor affecting the PFS of HCC after lenvatinib treatment. Child-Pugh score > 5 (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.20-3.74, p = 0.009), body weight ≥ 60 kg (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.32-0.90, p = 0.020), and additional trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment (HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21-0.70, p = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors for OS. However, early α-fetoprotein reduction was not significantly correlated with patient outcomes. Additionally, patients with pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio > 4.07 showed a significant worse PFS and OS than other patients.

Conclusion

The outcome of patients with advanced-stage HCC remains poor. However, the host condition, including good physical status and better functional liver preservation, largely affected the outcome of patients receiving lenvatinib treatment. Moreover, additional locoregional therapy for intrahepatic HCC, other than TKI treatment, can be considered in certain patients to achieve a favorable outcome.

Indonesian consensus on systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly cancer with a rising incidence in the last 20 years. Most patients are diagnosed late when curative treatment is no longer feasible. With the background of chronic liver disease in most patients, the management of HCC becomes more complicated, in which well-preserved liver function is a prerequisite for locoregional or systemic therapies. In 2008, sorafenib became the first systemic agent proven to provide survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage HCC. For nearly a decade, no treatment has succeeded in providing better results than sorafenib. However, numerous advances in systemic therapies have emerged in the last 5 years to fulfill the unmet needs of effective therapeutic options. Several agents have been approved for clinical use after positive results in phase III clinical trials, including lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and lastly immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor. With various options available, knowledge on the clinical evidence of each drug, their safety profile, as well as the patient characteristics and preferences become mandatory in clinical decision making. The objective of this consensus is to help clinicians, health-care workers, and policy makers in providing best clinical care for HCC patients.

Combination carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced thymic carcinoma

Thymic carcinoma is a very rare neoplasm for which no optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has been established to date. Hence, we performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel as a first-line regimen for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. We conducted this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who had received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy between August 2013 and December 2021. Twelve patients were included in this study and were subjected to efficacy and safety analysis. Their median age was 62 years (range, 47-74 years), and all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. After a median follow-up time of 19.7 months, the overall response rate was 50%; the median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.8 months and 23.3 months, respectively. Chemotherapy-related peripheral neuropathy was observed in 2 patients (16%; each with grade 1). Other toxicities were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy regimen showed good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Lenvatinib is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, clinical outcomes of lenvatinib therapy in patients with post-liver transplantation (LT) HCC recurrence remain unclear. We investigated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with post-LT HCC recurrence.

METHODS

This multinational, multicenter, retrospective study included 45 patients with recurrent HCC after LT who received lenvatinib at six institutions in three countries (Korea, Italy, and Hong Kong) from June 2017 to October 2021.

RESULTS

At the time of lenvatinib initiation, 95.6% (n = 43) of patients had Child-Pugh A status, and 35 (77.8%) and 10 (22.2%) participants were classified as having albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades 1 and 2, respectively. The objective response rate was 20.0%. With a median follow-up duration of 12.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.2-14.7), the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 (95% CI: 5.3-9.8) months, and 14.5 (95% CI: 0.8-28.2) months, respectively. Patients with ALBI grade 1 showed significantly better OS (52.3 months, [95% CI: not assessable]) than patients with ALBI grade 2 (11.1 months [95% CI: 0.0-30.4 months], p = 0.003). The most common adverse events were hypertension (n = 25, 55.6%), fatigue (n = 17, 37.8%), and anorexia (n = 14, 31.1%).

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib showed consistent efficacy and toxicity profiles in patients with post-LT HCC recurrence that were comparable to those reported from previous studies among non-LT HCC patients. The baseline ALBI grade correlated with better OS in post-LT lenvatinib-treated patients.

Well-preserved liver function enhances the clinical impact of curative-intent subsequent treatment during lenvatinib treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical impact of curative-intent subsequent treatment on overall prognosis in lenvatinib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

Eighty-three consecutive patients with intrahepatic target nodules who received lenvatinib were reviewed. The clinical impact of curative-intent subsequent treatments was investigated through analysis of overall survival (OS) according to pathological deterioration stratified by mALBI grade.

RESULTS

In patients with mALBI grade 1 and 2a liver function, R0 resection and lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization (lenvatinib-TACE) sequential therapy resulted in significantly better OS compared with other, non-curative-intent subsequent therapy and lack of additional treatment (median OS, 37.6 vs 29.0 months and 17.1 vs 8.9 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that use of R0 resection and lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy were associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.021; P < 0.001 and 0.108; P < 0.001) compared with other, non-curative-intent subsequent treatment (HR 0.256; P = 0.010). In contrast, in patients with mALBI grade 2b liver function, multivariate analysis confirmed higher treatment efficacy for non-curative-intent subsequent treatment with respect to OS (HR 0.041; P < 0.001) compared with R0 resection and lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy (HR 0.057; P = 0.027 and 0.063; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Curative-intent subsequent treatment is more useful for HCC patients with better liver function (mALBI grade 1 and 2a) and intrahepatic target nodules who have received lenvatini b-based treatment.

Current therapeutic modalities and chemopreventive role of natural products in liver cancer: Progress and promise

Liver cancer is a severe concern for public health officials since the clinical cases are increasing each year, with an estimated 5-year survival rate of 30%–35% after diagnosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes a significant subtype of liver cancer (approximate75%) and is considered primary liver cancer. Treatment for liver cancer mainly depends on the stage of its progression, where surgery including, hepatectomy and liver transplantation, and ablation and radiotherapy are the prime choice. For advanced liver cancer, various drugs and immunotherapy are used as first-line treatment, whereas second-line treatment includes chemotherapeutic drugs from natural and synthetic origins. Sorafenib and lenvatinib are first-line therapies, while regorafenib and ramucirumab are second-line therapy. Various metabolic and signaling pathways such as Notch, JAK/ STAT, Hippo, TGF-β, and Wnt have played a critical role during HCC progression. Dysbiosis has also been implicated in liver cancer. Drug-induced toxicity is a key obstacle in the treatment of liver cancer, necessitating the development of effective and safe medications, with natural compounds such as resveratrol, curcumin, diallyl sulfide, and others emerging as promising anticancer agents. This review highlights the current status of liver cancer research, signaling pathways, therapeutic targets, current treatment strategies and the chemopreventive role of various natural products in managing liver cancer.

Influence of Lenvatinib on the Functional Reprogramming of Peripheral Myeloid Cells in the Context of Non-Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Lenvatinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of several types of cancers, including metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The intended targets include VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFRα, RET, and KIT signaling pathways, but drug resistance inevitably develops and a complete cure is very rare. Recent data has revealed that most of the TKIs have additional 'off-target' immunological effects, which might contribute to a protective antitumor immune response; however, human cellular data are lacking regarding Lenvatinib-mediated immunomodulation in DTC. Here, we investigated in ex vivo models the impact of Lenvatinib on the function of immune cells in healthy volunteers. We found that monocytes and macrophages were particularly susceptible to Lenvatinib, while neutrophiles and lymphocytes were less affected. In tumor-immune cell co-culture experiments, Lenvatinib exerted a broad inhibitory effect on the proinflammatory response in TC-induced macrophages. Interestingly, Lenvatinib-treated cells had decreased cellular M2 membrane markers, whereas they secreted a significantly higher level of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 upon LPS stimulation. In addition, prolonged exposure to Lenvatinib impaired macrophages survival and phenotypical differentiation, which was accompanied by remarkable morphological changes and suppressed cellular metabolic activity. These effects were mediated by myeloid cell-intrinsic mechanisms which are independent of Lenvatinib's on-target activity. Finally, using specific inhibitors, we argue that dual effects on p38 MAPK and Syk pathways are likely the underlying mechanism of the off-target immunological effects we observed in this study. Collectively, our data show the immunomodulatory properties of Lenvatinib on human monocytes. These insights could be harnessed for the future design of novel treatment strategies involving a combination of Lenvatinib with other immunotherapeutic agents.

Clinical study of lenvatinib in the treatment of hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and antiviral therapy

Background: Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2017. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical action of lenvatinib in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC. Methods: A continuous cohort of advanced HCC was retrospectively enrolled. And the patients were divided into HBV-related HCC and HCV-related HCC based on previous history of hepatitis virus infection. Then propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare objective response rate (ORR),disease control rate (DCR),progression-free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS) and safety between the two groups. Results: A total of 203 eligible patients were included, with 72 HBV-related HCC and 36 HCV-related HCC after PSM. Both ORR (20.8% vs. 5.6%, P = .0759) and DCR (76.4% vs. 52.8%, P = .0232) were significantly higher in the HBV-related HCC than in the HCV-related HCC. Although no statistical differences in PFS (6.1 months vs. 3.3 months, P = .17) and OS (14.9 months vs. 17.7 months, P = .96) were observed between the two groups, there was a trend of difference in the PFS survival curve. On multivariate regression analysis of PFS, both HBV infection (HR, .54; 95% CI, .31-.95; P = .0332) and antiviral time >5 years (HR, .49; 95% CI, .26-.9; P = .0219) were identified as independent favorable factors, and AFP >200 ng/mL (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.22; P = .0216) were found to be an independent adverse factor. In addition, compared with HCC who received the first dose of antiviral drugs less than 5 years, the patients who were administered those drugs over 5 years had a significantly favorable PFS (11.27 months vs. 3.87 months, P = .0011). Lenvatinib was well tolerated in all patients and the adverse events (AEs) were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: It seemed that lenvatinib benefited more in HBV-related advanced HCC in delaying disease progression, compared to those with HCV-related advanced HCC.

Safety and Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice: An Observational Post-Marketing Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib was approved for use in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in Japan in 2018. Patients with diverse clinical characteristics receive lenvatinib treatment in clinical practice. Thus, it is crucial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib in real-world clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of lenvatinib for uHCC in clinical practice in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2018 and January 2019, patients with uHCC who were administered lenvatinib for the first time were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, observational post-marketing study (NCT03663114). Patients were orally administered lenvatinib and followed up for 12 months. For safety, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated. For effectiveness, the objective response rate (ORR) was calculated to evaluate tumor response. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Data of 703 patients (median age, 73 years; 80.2% males) were analyzed. The median (range) treatment duration was 25.3 (0.3-68.9) weeks. The mean ± standard deviation initial dose was 7.37 ± 1.65 mg in patients with body weight < 60 kg and 10.43 ± 2.49 mg in those with body weight ≥ 60 kg. ADRs (any grade) were reported in 84.9% of the patients, with Grade ≥ 3 ADRs reported in 42.5% of the patients. The most common ADRs (> 10%) were decreased appetite, fatigue, hypertension, proteinuria, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypothyroidism, and diarrhea. The median OS of the 703 patients was 498.0 days. In 494 patients assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), the ORR was 39.5% (95% confidence interval: 35.1-43.9%). Patients with better liver or renal function at baseline achieved significantly higher ORR than those with worse liver or renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with uHCC in real-world clinical practice in Japan, treatment with lenvatinib was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The ORR and median OS were similar to or better than the results of the Japanese subset of the global Phase III REFLECT trial. Our results demonstrated that clinically meaningful treatment responses were achieved with lenvatinib in real-world clinical practice.

Painful Foot Lesions: A Case Report

Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a documented cutaneous adverse reaction to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) chemotherapy. Cutaneous toxicities such as HFSR can be debilitating and may result in serious complications; however, continued chemotherapy is desirable to optimize the patient's odds of survival and tumor remission. We present a case of a 66-year-old male, with a history of metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma, who was diagnosed with grade 3 HFSR triggered by axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Our patient was able to expeditiously resume chemotherapy after temporary cessation of axitinib with concurrent application of topical steroids and keratolytics. Expedient return to life-prolonging chemotherapy is of great importance for patients with advanced malignancies; therefore, accurate diagnosis and prompt identification of the offending medication are critical to the management of this entity. We aim to increase the awareness of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced HFSR and review the diagnosis and current guidelines for management.

Lenvatinib Might Induce Activation of Host Immunity in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, plus bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an approved first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors are more effective in patients with HCC when administered with anti-VEGF drugs; however, these drugs affect host immunity. Lenvatinib is an anti-VEGF agent used to treat HCC; therefore, this study evaluated the effect of treatment of HCC with lenvatinib on host immunity in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

We studied adult Japanese patients with CLD and unresectable HCC treated with lenvatinib at our hospital. Lenvatinib was administered for 4 weeks (8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg; 12 mg/day for bodyweight >60 kg). Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 4 weeks of treatment and examined for immune-related changes.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were enrolled in this study. We found a significant increase in T helper (Th) 1 cells following 4 weeks of lenvatinib treatment, although there was no significant difference in Th2 cells and regulatory T cells. We also found a significant increase in serum levels of TNF-alpha, soluble TNF-alpha receptor I, and endothelial growth factor following 4 weeks of lenvatinib treatment. Furthermore, an increase in Th1 cells and serum levels of TNF-alpha was found in patients with partial response.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib might induce Th1-dominant host immunity in patients with CLD and unresectable HCC treatment in patients who showed a partial response. These changes in host immunity may be a biomarker in HCC patients treated with lenvatinib.

Five years of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: are there any predictive and/or prognostic factors?

INTRODUCTION

Lenvatinib was the first drug approved in 2017 for first-line treatment of hepatocarcinoma (HCC) after 10 years of Sorafenib as exclusive standard of care. The therapeutic armamentarium has recently expanded following the approval of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

AREAS COVERED

Numerous studies have been conducted during the past 5 years on Lenvatinib use in real-world settings in an effort to determine prognostic and predictive factors of Lenvatinib efficacy. In order to choose the most effective therapeutic approach, it may be helpful to summarize these results in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

A subgroup that appears to benefit most from Lenvatinib therapy are patients with non-viral cirrhosis. This aspect is of great importance today considering the increase in NASH prevalence. Also, a significant proportion of BCLC B patients appear to respond well to Lenvatinib therapy. The biological heterogeneity highlighted in HCC patients, along with the growing number of therapeutic options, makes the identification of stratification tools able to define which patients are more likely to respond to a treatment rather than another one of crucial interest. Further investigation deepening the biological pathways underlying HCC carcinogenesis are of particular interest in order to pave the way for precision medicine even for HCC patients.

An overview: Management of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has constituted a significant health burden worldwide, and patients with advanced HCC, which is stage C as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, have a poor overall survival of 6-8 months. Studies have indicated the significant survival benefit of treatment based on sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab with reliable safety. In addition, the combination of two or more molecularly targeted therapies (first- plus second-line) has become a hot topic recently and is now being extensively investigated in patients with advanced HCC. In addition, a few biomarkers have been investigated and found to predict drug susceptibility and prognosis, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the clinical benefits of current therapies. In addition, many therapies other than tyrosine kinase inhibitors that might have additional survival benefits when combined with other therapeutic modalities, including immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, hepatectomy, and chemotherapy, have also been examined. This review provides an overview on the current understanding of disease management and summarizes current challenges with and future perspectives on advanced HCC.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Objective

Lenvatinib and sorafenib are first-line oral multikinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the choice of the primary therapeutic agent among these two remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for relevant research published up to June 30, 2022. After quality assessment and data extraction of the included studies, RevMan 5.3 software was used for analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.

Results

Fifteen studies containing 3908 patients were included after final scrutiny. Our meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the lenvatinib and sorafenib groups (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-1.02; p = 0.09); however, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53-0.74; p < 0.00001), complete response (CR) (OR = 5.61; 95% CI: 2.71-11.64; p < 0.00001), partial response (PR) (OR = 4.62; 95% CI: 3.06-6.98; p < 0.00001), objective response rate (ORR) (OR = 5.61; 95% CI: 3.90-8.09; p < 0.00001), and disease control rate (DCR) (OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.79-3.28; p < 0.00001) in the lenvatinib group were significantly better than those in the sorafenib group. In terms of treatment safety, lenvatinib had similar incidences of any grade adverse events (AEs) (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.47-2.09; p = 0.98) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI; 1.00-1.37; p = 0.05) compared to sorafenib. Besides, lenvatinib was significantly associated with a higher incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, decreased appetite, and weight loss, whereas sorafenib was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea and hand-foot skin reaction (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Given its potential survival benefit and good tolerability, lenvatinib is an appropriate and promising alternative to sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced HCC.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD 42022327398.

Epidemiologic, Genetic, Pathogenic, Metabolic, Epigenetic Aspects Involved in NASH-HCC: Current Therapeutic Strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is the sixth most frequent cancer in the world, being the third cause of cancer-related deaths. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by fatty infiltration, oxidative stress and necroinflammation of the liver, with or without fibrosis, which can progress to advanced liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and HCC. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and diabetes exacerbates the course of NASH, which elevate the risk of HCC. The growing prevalence of obesity are related with increasing incidence of NASH, which may play a growing role in HCC epidemiology worldwide. In addition, HCC initiation and progression is driven by reprogramming of metabolism, which indicates growing appreciation of metabolism in the pathogenesis of this disease. Although no specific preventive pharmacological treatments have recommended for NASH, dietary restriction and exercise are recommended. This review focuses on the molecular connections between HCC and NASH, including genetic and risk factors, highlighting the metabolic reprogramming and aberrant epigenetic alterations in the development of HCC in NASH. Current therapeutic aspects of NASH/HCC are also reviewed.

Expert Insights on Current Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical and Molecular Approaches and Bottlenecks to Progress

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver tumor that typically occurs in the setting of chronic liver disease/cirrhosis. Treatment modalities for HCC have evolved and given the variety of treatment options, a multi-disciplinary approach requiring input from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, hepatology, and interventional radiology is necessary. Multiple advances have been made over the last decade regarding treatment of HCC, especially advanced disease. Resection and transplantation remain as cornerstone curative-intent treatment options. For patients who are not candidates for curative-intent therapy, exciting progress has been made in molecular and cellular approaches to systemic therapy for HCC including immunotherapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although the prognosis for advanced HCC remains poor, the armamentarium of therapies has increased, and valuable years of life can be gained with these therapies. While the main therapeutic modality for early-stage disease remains resection, multimodal immunotherapy has emerged as first-line treatment for advanced disease. We herein review different clinical and molecular treatment modalities related to the treatment of HCC, as well as provide insights into future directions for HCC treatment. We highlight how research and progress are needed to move into a new era of molecular and cellular treatments.